东北地区城乡经济协调发展问题研究
|
摘要
城乡经济协调发展是资本、劳动力等要素在城乡之间优化组合、集聚、扩散、渗透的相互作用形态,体现为城乡之间在产业结构、收入分配、投资和市场交换等方面相互依存、相互联系、共同发展的关系。从空间维度分析是要素在城乡各个经济主体之间流动与配置的一种状态,从时间维度分析是城乡结构由不均衡向均衡结构状态转化的一种演进过程。
改革开放以来,东北地区城乡经济关系受到传统二元经济结构的制约,呈现出城乡经济发展差距不断扩大的趋势。东北地区城乡经济发展差距扩大的原因既有一般规律性特征,比如我国工业化发展的战略、长期以来对城市发展的偏向和工农业产品剪刀差、计划经济条件下形成的制度安排等因素;也具有特殊性,体现在重工业发展的历史因素以及改革开放以来东北重工业发展战略的强化,以资源型工业发展为主的产业模式,大型装备制造业高资本密集化发展方式以及农业发展长期落后等因素不断强化城乡二元结构,导致城乡产业、城乡消费与投资、城乡要素市场等出现结构性失衡,城乡经济发展差距不断扩大。因而,要实现东北城乡经济协调发展,必须对东北地区城乡关系的现状进行深入分析,认清城乡经济关系的主要矛盾,研究制约东北地区城乡经济协调发展的因素,从而以有效的途径实现东北地区城乡经济协调发展。
本论文的研究是基于新古典经济增长理论,将资本、劳动力等要素在城乡空间范围内分布、占有和变化作为研究的基本出发点,利用发展经济学的二元结构理论和区域经济学的空间结构理论及其它相关理论,阐释东北地区城乡经济关系演进过程中体现出的特殊性,从城乡经济协调发展的角度,说明城乡经济发展的非均衡特点和表现出来的非均衡阶段性特征,将发展现代农业和实现农村工业化作为破解传统城乡二元结构的内生力量,强调以中小城镇为基础的城镇化是实现城乡经济协调发展的外部推力,以此在更广泛的范围内,寻找能使农村经济增长的驱动力,使城乡两个系统能彼此协调,在相互调整方面寻求新的突破。
本论文由绪论、正文、结论等三个主要部分构成。
绪论部分主要分析本论文选题的依据、研究背景、研究的学术与实践价值,阐述论文写作的总体思路、主要研究内容、论文基本框架、主要研究方法等。
正文共分为六章。第一章是本论文的基础部分,主要对城乡经济协调发展的理论进行归类分析与评价,以及相关理论对本论文研究的启示。
第二章、第三章与第四章是本论文的核心部分。在理论研究的基础上,第二章分析了东北城乡经济关系从萌芽、形成、发展、延续的演进过程,并分析了不同阶段东北城乡经济关系的特殊性。这一章对本论文的研究起了理论与实践的铺垫作用。第三章在第二章研究的基础上,利用聚类分析法,对东北城乡协调发展进行实证分析,揭示东北地区城乡经济协调发展的区域性差异,并进行分类总结与评价。在此基础上,研究影响东北城乡经济协调发展的因素。第四章则在前三章分析的基础上,重点研究促进东北城乡经济协调发展的动力与形成机制问题。本文认为,发展现代农业和实现农村工业化是城乡经济协调发展的内在动力,以县城为核心的中小城镇发展是外在推力,只有内力与外力共同发挥作用,才能实现城乡经济协调发展。
第五章总结了国外城乡经济协调发展的成功经验和教训,以及我国发达地区城乡经济协调发展的主要成功经验,并研究了国内外经验对东北地区实现城乡经济协调发展的启示。第六章从东北城乡经济关系演变的普遍规律与特殊性出发,提出实现东北地区城乡经济协调发展的目标、原则和主要对策。
结论部分概括总结论文研究的主要观点,提出论文研究的不足之处,并展望相关研究课题的发展趋势,以使未来的研究更加完善、系统。
The coordinated development of urban and rural economy is an interaction pattern of capital, labor and other elements under the optimal combination, concentration, diffusion and infiltration. It is presented as an interdependent, interrelated, and development together relationship between industrial structure, income distribution, investment and market exchange. From the analysis in terms of spatial dimension, it is presented as a state of the factors flow and configuration between each economic entity. In terms of time dimension, it is presented as the evolved process of urban-rural structure, which is the configuration state from imbalance to balance.
Since reform and opening up, the urban and rural economic relation in the northeast is constrained by the traditional dual structure in urban and rural economy. The gap between regions is continually widening. It doesn’t only have the characteristic of general regularity, such as the strategy of heavy industry development, long-term deflection to urban development and the scissors gap between industrial product and agricultural product, the institutional arrangements under planned economy, but also have the particularity which can be found in the historical factor of heavy industry development, the strategy of enhancing heavy industry development after reform and opening up, resource-based industrial primarily development model, large equipment manufacturing industry with high capital-intensive development mode and backward development of agricultural, and all these factors continuously strengthen urban-rural dual structure, and lead the industries, consumption and investment, factor market of urban-rural become structural imbalance, and the gap of economic development between urban and rural is continuously widening. Thus, in order to achieve coordinated development between urban and rural areas in the northeast, it is required to analyses the current situation of the relation between urban and rural areas in the northeast deeply, see clearly about contradiction of urban-rural economic relations; It is a effective way to achieve the coordinate development of urban-rural economy in the northeast through studying the restraining factors.
This paper is based on the neo-classical theories of growth, taking spatial distribution, possession and change of capital and labor as the fundamental point, and taking use of the dual structure theory of developmental economics to present the particularities which reflect from the evaluation of urban-rural economic relations in the northeast;What’s more, in terms of the perspective of the coordinated development of urban and rural economy, it presents the non-balanced economic development in urban and rural areas and its non-equilibrium stages. To take the development of modern agriculture and achieve agriculture–industrialization as the internal force to break through traditional urban-rural dual structure; on the base of urbanization, emphasizing the external driving of achieving the coordinative development of urban-rural economy; then in a broader context, in search of factors that can make rural areas’economic growth, in order to coordinate the urban-rural system, and make good progress in mutual adjustment.
This paper includes three parts which are the introduction, the main body and the conclusion.
The introduction analyzes the basis of subject selection, context of research, as well as the academic and practical value of the research. It develops the general idea, main contents, basic frame and the research methods.
The main part of the paper is divided into six chapters. Chapter one comprise the basic part which is mainly on analyzing and evaluating the theory of coordinated development of urban and rural economic, as well as enlightens for this paper’s studies.
The second and third as well as the forth chapter are the core of this paper. Chapter two analyzes the process of the economic relationship between urban and rural area in the northeast from budding, formation, development, and continuation, as well as the particularity of the economic relationship between urban and rural area in the northeast at different stages.This chapter have played an important role in paving the theory and practice’s way. On the basis of chapter two, chapter three uses agglomerative method and takes an empirical analysis on the coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast, so as to reveal the regional differences of economic coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast and make the conclusion and discussion by category. According to this, the factors which influence the economic coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast are investigated. The forth chapter, based on the former chapters, focuses on the inherent driving force and the formation mechanism of the urban and rural economic coordinated development in the Northeast. Accordingly, this paper holds that the development of modern agriculture and rural industrialization is the internal driving force of coordinated development of urban and rural economy, and the the development of middle and small towns which take the county as their core is the external driving force. Only when the internal driving force coeffects with the external driving force can the urban and rural economy develop coordinately.
Chapter five summarizes the successful experiences and lessons of coordinating urbanand rural economic development both in some developed domestic regions and aboard, and gets the enlightenment to coordinated development of urban and rural area in the northeast. From the perpective of general rule and particularity of the northeast urban-rural economic relational evolution, chapter six provides the goals and principles of urban and rural areas’economic coordinated development in the northeast area as well as how to achieve the goals.
The last part concluds the key points and limitations of this research and forecast the future development of relevant researches, so as to improve and systematize the future research.
改革开放以来,东北地区城乡经济关系受到传统二元经济结构的制约,呈现出城乡经济发展差距不断扩大的趋势。东北地区城乡经济发展差距扩大的原因既有一般规律性特征,比如我国工业化发展的战略、长期以来对城市发展的偏向和工农业产品剪刀差、计划经济条件下形成的制度安排等因素;也具有特殊性,体现在重工业发展的历史因素以及改革开放以来东北重工业发展战略的强化,以资源型工业发展为主的产业模式,大型装备制造业高资本密集化发展方式以及农业发展长期落后等因素不断强化城乡二元结构,导致城乡产业、城乡消费与投资、城乡要素市场等出现结构性失衡,城乡经济发展差距不断扩大。因而,要实现东北城乡经济协调发展,必须对东北地区城乡关系的现状进行深入分析,认清城乡经济关系的主要矛盾,研究制约东北地区城乡经济协调发展的因素,从而以有效的途径实现东北地区城乡经济协调发展。
本论文的研究是基于新古典经济增长理论,将资本、劳动力等要素在城乡空间范围内分布、占有和变化作为研究的基本出发点,利用发展经济学的二元结构理论和区域经济学的空间结构理论及其它相关理论,阐释东北地区城乡经济关系演进过程中体现出的特殊性,从城乡经济协调发展的角度,说明城乡经济发展的非均衡特点和表现出来的非均衡阶段性特征,将发展现代农业和实现农村工业化作为破解传统城乡二元结构的内生力量,强调以中小城镇为基础的城镇化是实现城乡经济协调发展的外部推力,以此在更广泛的范围内,寻找能使农村经济增长的驱动力,使城乡两个系统能彼此协调,在相互调整方面寻求新的突破。
本论文由绪论、正文、结论等三个主要部分构成。
绪论部分主要分析本论文选题的依据、研究背景、研究的学术与实践价值,阐述论文写作的总体思路、主要研究内容、论文基本框架、主要研究方法等。
正文共分为六章。第一章是本论文的基础部分,主要对城乡经济协调发展的理论进行归类分析与评价,以及相关理论对本论文研究的启示。
第二章、第三章与第四章是本论文的核心部分。在理论研究的基础上,第二章分析了东北城乡经济关系从萌芽、形成、发展、延续的演进过程,并分析了不同阶段东北城乡经济关系的特殊性。这一章对本论文的研究起了理论与实践的铺垫作用。第三章在第二章研究的基础上,利用聚类分析法,对东北城乡协调发展进行实证分析,揭示东北地区城乡经济协调发展的区域性差异,并进行分类总结与评价。在此基础上,研究影响东北城乡经济协调发展的因素。第四章则在前三章分析的基础上,重点研究促进东北城乡经济协调发展的动力与形成机制问题。本文认为,发展现代农业和实现农村工业化是城乡经济协调发展的内在动力,以县城为核心的中小城镇发展是外在推力,只有内力与外力共同发挥作用,才能实现城乡经济协调发展。
第五章总结了国外城乡经济协调发展的成功经验和教训,以及我国发达地区城乡经济协调发展的主要成功经验,并研究了国内外经验对东北地区实现城乡经济协调发展的启示。第六章从东北城乡经济关系演变的普遍规律与特殊性出发,提出实现东北地区城乡经济协调发展的目标、原则和主要对策。
结论部分概括总结论文研究的主要观点,提出论文研究的不足之处,并展望相关研究课题的发展趋势,以使未来的研究更加完善、系统。
The coordinated development of urban and rural economy is an interaction pattern of capital, labor and other elements under the optimal combination, concentration, diffusion and infiltration. It is presented as an interdependent, interrelated, and development together relationship between industrial structure, income distribution, investment and market exchange. From the analysis in terms of spatial dimension, it is presented as a state of the factors flow and configuration between each economic entity. In terms of time dimension, it is presented as the evolved process of urban-rural structure, which is the configuration state from imbalance to balance.
Since reform and opening up, the urban and rural economic relation in the northeast is constrained by the traditional dual structure in urban and rural economy. The gap between regions is continually widening. It doesn’t only have the characteristic of general regularity, such as the strategy of heavy industry development, long-term deflection to urban development and the scissors gap between industrial product and agricultural product, the institutional arrangements under planned economy, but also have the particularity which can be found in the historical factor of heavy industry development, the strategy of enhancing heavy industry development after reform and opening up, resource-based industrial primarily development model, large equipment manufacturing industry with high capital-intensive development mode and backward development of agricultural, and all these factors continuously strengthen urban-rural dual structure, and lead the industries, consumption and investment, factor market of urban-rural become structural imbalance, and the gap of economic development between urban and rural is continuously widening. Thus, in order to achieve coordinated development between urban and rural areas in the northeast, it is required to analyses the current situation of the relation between urban and rural areas in the northeast deeply, see clearly about contradiction of urban-rural economic relations; It is a effective way to achieve the coordinate development of urban-rural economy in the northeast through studying the restraining factors.
This paper is based on the neo-classical theories of growth, taking spatial distribution, possession and change of capital and labor as the fundamental point, and taking use of the dual structure theory of developmental economics to present the particularities which reflect from the evaluation of urban-rural economic relations in the northeast;What’s more, in terms of the perspective of the coordinated development of urban and rural economy, it presents the non-balanced economic development in urban and rural areas and its non-equilibrium stages. To take the development of modern agriculture and achieve agriculture–industrialization as the internal force to break through traditional urban-rural dual structure; on the base of urbanization, emphasizing the external driving of achieving the coordinative development of urban-rural economy; then in a broader context, in search of factors that can make rural areas’economic growth, in order to coordinate the urban-rural system, and make good progress in mutual adjustment.
This paper includes three parts which are the introduction, the main body and the conclusion.
The introduction analyzes the basis of subject selection, context of research, as well as the academic and practical value of the research. It develops the general idea, main contents, basic frame and the research methods.
The main part of the paper is divided into six chapters. Chapter one comprise the basic part which is mainly on analyzing and evaluating the theory of coordinated development of urban and rural economic, as well as enlightens for this paper’s studies.
The second and third as well as the forth chapter are the core of this paper. Chapter two analyzes the process of the economic relationship between urban and rural area in the northeast from budding, formation, development, and continuation, as well as the particularity of the economic relationship between urban and rural area in the northeast at different stages.This chapter have played an important role in paving the theory and practice’s way. On the basis of chapter two, chapter three uses agglomerative method and takes an empirical analysis on the coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast, so as to reveal the regional differences of economic coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast and make the conclusion and discussion by category. According to this, the factors which influence the economic coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Northeast are investigated. The forth chapter, based on the former chapters, focuses on the inherent driving force and the formation mechanism of the urban and rural economic coordinated development in the Northeast. Accordingly, this paper holds that the development of modern agriculture and rural industrialization is the internal driving force of coordinated development of urban and rural economy, and the the development of middle and small towns which take the county as their core is the external driving force. Only when the internal driving force coeffects with the external driving force can the urban and rural economy develop coordinately.
Chapter five summarizes the successful experiences and lessons of coordinating urbanand rural economic development both in some developed domestic regions and aboard, and gets the enlightenment to coordinated development of urban and rural area in the northeast. From the perpective of general rule and particularity of the northeast urban-rural economic relational evolution, chapter six provides the goals and principles of urban and rural areas’economic coordinated development in the northeast area as well as how to achieve the goals.
The last part concluds the key points and limitations of this research and forecast the future development of relevant researches, so as to improve and systematize the future research.
引文
[1]姜作培.资源配置:城乡统筹发展的关键[J].福建论坛.人文社会科学版,2005(2):23-28.
[2]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.12.
[3]钱纳里.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1986.25.
[4]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.13.
[5]姜作培.资源配置:城乡统筹发展的关键[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2005(2):23-28.
[6]杨立新.城乡统筹发展的理论梳理和深入探讨[J].税务与经济,2007(3):56-60.
[7]李泉.城乡协调发展:一个多维互动过程[J].新疆社会科学,2006(6):19-23.
[8]李泉.中外城乡关系问题研究综述[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(4):58-61.
[9]龚建平.费景汉和拉妮斯对刘易斯二元经济模式的批评[J].求索,2003(3):35-36.
[10]张云峰.西方国家基于“二元”结构的农村剩余劳动力转移理论评述[J].西北师范大学学报,2006(3)111-116
[11]戴炳源.乔根森的二元经济理论[J].经济体制改革,1998(2):23-26.
[12] TODARO M P. A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed counties[J].American Economic Review,1969,59(1):138-148
[13]郝寿义.区域经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.116.
[14]郝寿义.区域经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.114.
[15] SACHES JEFFREY .XIAOKAI YANG. et al Globalization, Dual Economy, and economic development[J]. China Economic Review,2000,11
[16]郭文杰.国外学者关于二元经济理论的研究综述[J].广西商学院学报,2007(6):4-11.
[17] DOUCLASS,MIKE.A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban [J].A Agenda for Policy Reach with Reference to Indonesia .Third World Planning Review ,1998a,20(1).
[18]王华.西方城乡发展理论研究进展[J].经济地理,2006(3):463-468.
[19]王华.西方城乡发展理论研究进展[J].经济地理,2006(3):463-468.
[20] KENNETH LYNCH.Rural-urban interaction in the developing world [M].Routledge Perspective on Development,2005.
[21]郭文杰.国外学者关于二元经济理论的研究综述[J].广西商学院学报,2007(6):4-11.
[22]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.12.
[23]杨立新.城乡统筹发展的理论梳理和深入研讨[J].税务与经济,2007(3):56-60.
[24]李泉.城乡协调发展:一个多维互动过程[J].新疆社会科学,2006(6):19-23.
[25]顾朝林.论中国建制镇发展、地域差异及空间演化[J].地理科学,1995(8):208-216.
[26]潘盛洲.逐步改变城乡二元结构[J].农村工作通讯,2004(1):34.
[27]赵勇.实施城乡良性互动发展,统筹城乡经济社会发展[J].红旗文稿,2004(12):2-5.
[28]陈雯、吴楚材.中国城市化在城乡关系中的作用及其发展[J].经济地理,1995(9):25-29.
[29]蒋励.乡村城镇化与城乡经济协调发展[J].农业现代化研究,1995(3):96-99.
[30]许大明.信息化对城乡体一体化进程的影响及对策[J].经济地理,2004(3):221-225.
[31]陈家宝.城乡一体化进程中的资源整合与对策[J].中共南京市委党校南京市行政学院学报,2002(1):3-10.
[32]闫永林.城乡空间结构与经济发展[J].商业经济,2006(8):25-26.
[33]王书芳.经济空间结构优化的三种形式[J].中南财经大学学报,2001(5):44-48.
[34]战金艳.城乡关联发展评价模型系统构建[J].地理研究,2002(6):495-501.
[35]段娟,鲁齐.我国区域城乡互动发展与关联发展综合评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005(1):76-81.
[36]修春亮.东北城乡一体化的策略研究[J].东北老工业基地的改造与振兴[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2003.63-69.
[37]王凤秋.东北地区城乡经济互动发展的思考[J].东北亚论坛,2006(5):14-19.
[38]王凤秋.东北地区城乡经济互动发展的思考[J].东北亚论坛,2006(5):14-19.
[39]房艳刚.东北地区城乡结构的演变机理与统筹发展[J].人文地理,2005(4):51-56.
[40]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.32.
[41]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.32.
[42]邓伟.东北区域发展报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.11.
[43]曲晓范.近代东北城市的历史变迁[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001.4.
[44]曲晓范.近代东北城市的历史变迁[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001.4.
[45]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.35.
[46] [47] [48]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.41.
[49]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.49.
[50]中国东北经济第一卷[M].北京:中国计划出版社,1988.74-157.
[51] [52]吴玲.黑龙江省农村劳动力转移的特征、问题及提高绩效的对策[J].农业现代化研究,2007(5):330-333.
[53]王寒菊.吉林省农村剩余劳动力转移途径[J].农业与技术,2008(8):98-99.
[54]刘全红.辽宁省农村富余劳动力转移就业现状、问题及对策[J].辽宁经济,2007(8):16-17.
[55]王丹.辽宁省农村剩余劳动力转移与农民增收的相关关系[J].辽宁经济,2008(8):8.
[56]郑安安.黑龙江省农村金融有效供给机制现状及对策[J].交通科技与经济,2008(2):117-118.
[57]刘萍,我国农村金融体系调查研究及对策—以黑龙江省为案例[J].银行家,2009(3):107-109.
[58]徐萍.吉林农村金融现状与问题分析[J].长春金融高等专科学校学报,2007(2):6-8.
[59]吕振通等.SPSS统计分析与应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.192.
[60]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.62.
[61]陈才.东北老工业基地新型工业化之路[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2004.77.
[62]许经勇.我国新型城乡关系的演变[J].南通大学学报,2006(6):121-125.
[63]谭崇台.发展经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1989. 241.
[64]刘春燕.东北区域农业发展优势及特点剖析[J].科技成果纵横,2007(5):30-33.
[65]李辉.东北地区土地资源承载力与农民城市化问题研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2007(2):119-124.
[66]鲍振东.东北地区发展报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.199.
[67] [68]候锐.东北农业发展与振兴东北老工业基地[J].调研世界,2004(6):31-34.
[69]吴自聪.东北地区农业发展的区位分析与农业现代化路径选择[J].吉林省经济管理干部学院学报,2008(3).26-29.
[70]程叶青.东北地区农业可持续发展问题探索[J].经济地理,2006(2):300-303.
[71]吉林省土壤肥料总站.东北黑土问题报告[R].内部资料,2004(1):37-47.
[72] [73] [74]赫修贵.关于东北老工业基地发展现代农业的思考[M].行政论坛,2007(5):78-81.
[75] [76]鲍振东.东北地区发展报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.211-212.
[77]王景新.乡村新型合作组织崛起[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[78] [79]衣保中.东北地区农业组织的发展及其在农业产业化中的作用[J].东北亚论坛, 2006(5):41-45.
[80] [81]申茂向.中国农村工业化及其环境与趋势分析[J].中国软科学,2005(10):33-41.
[82]高伯文.改革开放以来城乡工业化协调发展的路径选择与分析[J].东南学术,2008(3):76-84.
[83]程怀儒.农村工业化是解决中国农村剩余劳动力的主渠道[J].甘肃社会科学,2008(1):182-185.
[84]陈忠卫.农村工业化与市场发育间关系的基本分析[J].财经问题研究,1999(1):8-10.
[85]施俊生.浅析建立公共财政在农民职业教育中的投入机制[J].中国农学通报,2007(1):441-444.
[86]吉林省财政厅预算处、国库处.关于吉林省县乡财政困难问题的调查报告[J].预算管理与会计,2006(12):38-40.
[87]资料来源:[EB/OL].http://tieba.baidu.com/,2007-09-29.
[88]董雪.江苏省县域经济发展对辽宁省的启示[J].现代农业科技,2008(14):281-284.
[89]王晓芳等,东北地区县域经济类型及其发展战略研究[J].东北亚论坛,2007(4):83-88.
[90] [91]吉林省财政厅预算处、国库处.关于吉林省县乡财政困难问题的调查报告[J].预算管理与会计,2006(12):38-40.
[92]孟雷.我国百强县发展经验总结及对辽宁县域经济发展的启示[J].商场现代化,2007(6):221-223.
[93]谷永芬.培育民营经济产业集群促进黑龙江省县域经济持续发展[J].商业研究,2006(16):146-148.
[94]刘俊杰.县域经济发展与小城镇建设[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005. 56.
[95]陈永国.统筹城乡发展的国际经验、教训及启示[J].生产力研究,2008(19):113-114、119.
[96]卢荣善.国外“工业下移”的实践及其对我国新农村建设的启[J].农业经济问题,2008(8):105-109.
[97]曹卫东,李秀丽.工业反哺农业的国际经验及我国的政策选择[J].学习论坛,2007(6):40-41.
[98] [99]张珂垒,蒋和平.法国构建发展现代农业的政策体系及启示[J].世界农业,2008(12):50-54.
[100]李树,陈刚.国外财政支农的经验与启示[J].今日国土,2009(3):32-33.
[101]王芳,胡永盛,李军国.外农村区域发展基本经验及启示[J].江西农业大学学报,2008(12):38-41.
[102] [103]熊坤新,陶晓辉.印度帮助落后地区的措施、成就和经验[J].科技导报,2001(9):61-63.
[104] [105]翟雪玲,赵长保.巴西工业化、城市化与农业现代化的关系[J].世界农业,2007(5):23-26.
[106]宋蓓.国外城市化发展路径评述[J].国外社会科学,2007(2):41-45.
[107] [108]苏振兴谨防城市化的消极后果[J].中国城市经济,2006(8):44-45.
[109]王军平王华妍拉美城市化教训对我国的警示[J]投资北京,2008(3):85-86.
[110] [111]张家唐.拉美的城市化与“城市病”[J].河北大学学报,2003(3):35-37.
[112]袁东振.混乱和无序:拉美城市化的教训[J].科学决策,2005(6):36-39.
[113]秦佑国.墨西哥城的教训与“拉美化”的防止[J].瞭望新闻周刊,2005(6):52-53.
[114]程洪,陈朝娟.论20世纪拉美城市化进程及其对中国的启示[J].拉丁美洲研究,2006(4):35-42.
[115]罗哲,李泉.城乡网络非均衡:欠发达区域协调城乡关系的模式选择[J].新疆社会科学,2009(2):13-16.
[116] [117]尹焕三.论统筹城乡发展的八种互动模式[J].长白学刊,2008(5):102-105.
[118]王冠国.浅谈我国统筹城乡发展中土地流转模式[J].农村经济与科技,2009(1):82-83.
[119]肖云.成都市统筹城乡发展模式的社会经济效应分析[J].成都理工大学学报,2008(3):82-86.
[120]张振芳.加强教育培训促进农民增收[J].农村天地,2004(11):33.
[121]姜建成.支持互补共赢:苏南城乡统筹发展的战略选择[J].城市发展研究, 2008(6):1-3、9.
[122]周成仓.城乡统筹与新农村建设模式研究[J].青海师范大学学报,2009(1):53-56.
[123]徐瑜青.农民贷款需求与农村金融机构多元化的挑战[J].中国农村信用合作,2009(2):30-33.
[124] [125]张长青.黑龙江省农业产业化经营组织形式探析[J].北方经贸,2008(7):30-31.
[126]孔晓军,申承均,王秀珍.发展农产品加工业促进农村工业化[J].农机化研究, 2006(4):1-3.
[127]王延明,张淑洁.吉林省农村产业结构存在的问题及对策研究[J].吉林省经济管理干部学院学报,2008(2):13-16.
[2]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.12.
[3]钱纳里.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1986.25.
[4]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.13.
[5]姜作培.资源配置:城乡统筹发展的关键[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2005(2):23-28.
[6]杨立新.城乡统筹发展的理论梳理和深入探讨[J].税务与经济,2007(3):56-60.
[7]李泉.城乡协调发展:一个多维互动过程[J].新疆社会科学,2006(6):19-23.
[8]李泉.中外城乡关系问题研究综述[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(4):58-61.
[9]龚建平.费景汉和拉妮斯对刘易斯二元经济模式的批评[J].求索,2003(3):35-36.
[10]张云峰.西方国家基于“二元”结构的农村剩余劳动力转移理论评述[J].西北师范大学学报,2006(3)111-116
[11]戴炳源.乔根森的二元经济理论[J].经济体制改革,1998(2):23-26.
[12] TODARO M P. A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed counties[J].American Economic Review,1969,59(1):138-148
[13]郝寿义.区域经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.116.
[14]郝寿义.区域经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.114.
[15] SACHES JEFFREY .XIAOKAI YANG. et al Globalization, Dual Economy, and economic development[J]. China Economic Review,2000,11
[16]郭文杰.国外学者关于二元经济理论的研究综述[J].广西商学院学报,2007(6):4-11.
[17] DOUCLASS,MIKE.A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban [J].A Agenda for Policy Reach with Reference to Indonesia .Third World Planning Review ,1998a,20(1).
[18]王华.西方城乡发展理论研究进展[J].经济地理,2006(3):463-468.
[19]王华.西方城乡发展理论研究进展[J].经济地理,2006(3):463-468.
[20] KENNETH LYNCH.Rural-urban interaction in the developing world [M].Routledge Perspective on Development,2005.
[21]郭文杰.国外学者关于二元经济理论的研究综述[J].广西商学院学报,2007(6):4-11.
[22]龚抑军.产业结构研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002.12.
[23]杨立新.城乡统筹发展的理论梳理和深入研讨[J].税务与经济,2007(3):56-60.
[24]李泉.城乡协调发展:一个多维互动过程[J].新疆社会科学,2006(6):19-23.
[25]顾朝林.论中国建制镇发展、地域差异及空间演化[J].地理科学,1995(8):208-216.
[26]潘盛洲.逐步改变城乡二元结构[J].农村工作通讯,2004(1):34.
[27]赵勇.实施城乡良性互动发展,统筹城乡经济社会发展[J].红旗文稿,2004(12):2-5.
[28]陈雯、吴楚材.中国城市化在城乡关系中的作用及其发展[J].经济地理,1995(9):25-29.
[29]蒋励.乡村城镇化与城乡经济协调发展[J].农业现代化研究,1995(3):96-99.
[30]许大明.信息化对城乡体一体化进程的影响及对策[J].经济地理,2004(3):221-225.
[31]陈家宝.城乡一体化进程中的资源整合与对策[J].中共南京市委党校南京市行政学院学报,2002(1):3-10.
[32]闫永林.城乡空间结构与经济发展[J].商业经济,2006(8):25-26.
[33]王书芳.经济空间结构优化的三种形式[J].中南财经大学学报,2001(5):44-48.
[34]战金艳.城乡关联发展评价模型系统构建[J].地理研究,2002(6):495-501.
[35]段娟,鲁齐.我国区域城乡互动发展与关联发展综合评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005(1):76-81.
[36]修春亮.东北城乡一体化的策略研究[J].东北老工业基地的改造与振兴[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2003.63-69.
[37]王凤秋.东北地区城乡经济互动发展的思考[J].东北亚论坛,2006(5):14-19.
[38]王凤秋.东北地区城乡经济互动发展的思考[J].东北亚论坛,2006(5):14-19.
[39]房艳刚.东北地区城乡结构的演变机理与统筹发展[J].人文地理,2005(4):51-56.
[40]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.32.
[41]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.32.
[42]邓伟.东北区域发展报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.11.
[43]曲晓范.近代东北城市的历史变迁[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001.4.
[44]曲晓范.近代东北城市的历史变迁[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001.4.
[45]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.35.
[46] [47] [48]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.41.
[49]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.49.
[50]中国东北经济第一卷[M].北京:中国计划出版社,1988.74-157.
[51] [52]吴玲.黑龙江省农村劳动力转移的特征、问题及提高绩效的对策[J].农业现代化研究,2007(5):330-333.
[53]王寒菊.吉林省农村剩余劳动力转移途径[J].农业与技术,2008(8):98-99.
[54]刘全红.辽宁省农村富余劳动力转移就业现状、问题及对策[J].辽宁经济,2007(8):16-17.
[55]王丹.辽宁省农村剩余劳动力转移与农民增收的相关关系[J].辽宁经济,2008(8):8.
[56]郑安安.黑龙江省农村金融有效供给机制现状及对策[J].交通科技与经济,2008(2):117-118.
[57]刘萍,我国农村金融体系调查研究及对策—以黑龙江省为案例[J].银行家,2009(3):107-109.
[58]徐萍.吉林农村金融现状与问题分析[J].长春金融高等专科学校学报,2007(2):6-8.
[59]吕振通等.SPSS统计分析与应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.192.
[60]陈玉梅.东北地区城镇化道路[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.62.
[61]陈才.东北老工业基地新型工业化之路[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2004.77.
[62]许经勇.我国新型城乡关系的演变[J].南通大学学报,2006(6):121-125.
[63]谭崇台.发展经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1989. 241.
[64]刘春燕.东北区域农业发展优势及特点剖析[J].科技成果纵横,2007(5):30-33.
[65]李辉.东北地区土地资源承载力与农民城市化问题研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2007(2):119-124.
[66]鲍振东.东北地区发展报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.199.
[67] [68]候锐.东北农业发展与振兴东北老工业基地[J].调研世界,2004(6):31-34.
[69]吴自聪.东北地区农业发展的区位分析与农业现代化路径选择[J].吉林省经济管理干部学院学报,2008(3).26-29.
[70]程叶青.东北地区农业可持续发展问题探索[J].经济地理,2006(2):300-303.
[71]吉林省土壤肥料总站.东北黑土问题报告[R].内部资料,2004(1):37-47.
[72] [73] [74]赫修贵.关于东北老工业基地发展现代农业的思考[M].行政论坛,2007(5):78-81.
[75] [76]鲍振东.东北地区发展报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.211-212.
[77]王景新.乡村新型合作组织崛起[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[78] [79]衣保中.东北地区农业组织的发展及其在农业产业化中的作用[J].东北亚论坛, 2006(5):41-45.
[80] [81]申茂向.中国农村工业化及其环境与趋势分析[J].中国软科学,2005(10):33-41.
[82]高伯文.改革开放以来城乡工业化协调发展的路径选择与分析[J].东南学术,2008(3):76-84.
[83]程怀儒.农村工业化是解决中国农村剩余劳动力的主渠道[J].甘肃社会科学,2008(1):182-185.
[84]陈忠卫.农村工业化与市场发育间关系的基本分析[J].财经问题研究,1999(1):8-10.
[85]施俊生.浅析建立公共财政在农民职业教育中的投入机制[J].中国农学通报,2007(1):441-444.
[86]吉林省财政厅预算处、国库处.关于吉林省县乡财政困难问题的调查报告[J].预算管理与会计,2006(12):38-40.
[87]资料来源:[EB/OL].http://tieba.baidu.com/,2007-09-29.
[88]董雪.江苏省县域经济发展对辽宁省的启示[J].现代农业科技,2008(14):281-284.
[89]王晓芳等,东北地区县域经济类型及其发展战略研究[J].东北亚论坛,2007(4):83-88.
[90] [91]吉林省财政厅预算处、国库处.关于吉林省县乡财政困难问题的调查报告[J].预算管理与会计,2006(12):38-40.
[92]孟雷.我国百强县发展经验总结及对辽宁县域经济发展的启示[J].商场现代化,2007(6):221-223.
[93]谷永芬.培育民营经济产业集群促进黑龙江省县域经济持续发展[J].商业研究,2006(16):146-148.
[94]刘俊杰.县域经济发展与小城镇建设[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005. 56.
[95]陈永国.统筹城乡发展的国际经验、教训及启示[J].生产力研究,2008(19):113-114、119.
[96]卢荣善.国外“工业下移”的实践及其对我国新农村建设的启[J].农业经济问题,2008(8):105-109.
[97]曹卫东,李秀丽.工业反哺农业的国际经验及我国的政策选择[J].学习论坛,2007(6):40-41.
[98] [99]张珂垒,蒋和平.法国构建发展现代农业的政策体系及启示[J].世界农业,2008(12):50-54.
[100]李树,陈刚.国外财政支农的经验与启示[J].今日国土,2009(3):32-33.
[101]王芳,胡永盛,李军国.外农村区域发展基本经验及启示[J].江西农业大学学报,2008(12):38-41.
[102] [103]熊坤新,陶晓辉.印度帮助落后地区的措施、成就和经验[J].科技导报,2001(9):61-63.
[104] [105]翟雪玲,赵长保.巴西工业化、城市化与农业现代化的关系[J].世界农业,2007(5):23-26.
[106]宋蓓.国外城市化发展路径评述[J].国外社会科学,2007(2):41-45.
[107] [108]苏振兴谨防城市化的消极后果[J].中国城市经济,2006(8):44-45.
[109]王军平王华妍拉美城市化教训对我国的警示[J]投资北京,2008(3):85-86.
[110] [111]张家唐.拉美的城市化与“城市病”[J].河北大学学报,2003(3):35-37.
[112]袁东振.混乱和无序:拉美城市化的教训[J].科学决策,2005(6):36-39.
[113]秦佑国.墨西哥城的教训与“拉美化”的防止[J].瞭望新闻周刊,2005(6):52-53.
[114]程洪,陈朝娟.论20世纪拉美城市化进程及其对中国的启示[J].拉丁美洲研究,2006(4):35-42.
[115]罗哲,李泉.城乡网络非均衡:欠发达区域协调城乡关系的模式选择[J].新疆社会科学,2009(2):13-16.
[116] [117]尹焕三.论统筹城乡发展的八种互动模式[J].长白学刊,2008(5):102-105.
[118]王冠国.浅谈我国统筹城乡发展中土地流转模式[J].农村经济与科技,2009(1):82-83.
[119]肖云.成都市统筹城乡发展模式的社会经济效应分析[J].成都理工大学学报,2008(3):82-86.
[120]张振芳.加强教育培训促进农民增收[J].农村天地,2004(11):33.
[121]姜建成.支持互补共赢:苏南城乡统筹发展的战略选择[J].城市发展研究, 2008(6):1-3、9.
[122]周成仓.城乡统筹与新农村建设模式研究[J].青海师范大学学报,2009(1):53-56.
[123]徐瑜青.农民贷款需求与农村金融机构多元化的挑战[J].中国农村信用合作,2009(2):30-33.
[124] [125]张长青.黑龙江省农业产业化经营组织形式探析[J].北方经贸,2008(7):30-31.
[126]孔晓军,申承均,王秀珍.发展农产品加工业促进农村工业化[J].农机化研究, 2006(4):1-3.
[127]王延明,张淑洁.吉林省农村产业结构存在的问题及对策研究[J].吉林省经济管理干部学院学报,2008(2):13-16.