生态农业与生态旅游业耦合机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
具备可持续发展特征的生态农业和生态旅游业是对当前我国传统农业和旅游业的升级转变。生态农业主要是通过农业机械化、土地规模化、技术创新和技术集约化的途径来提升农业生产力水平、农产品的原生态水平和农民的收入水平。而生态旅游业提倡摈弃传统旅游业无序无节制地消耗资源,提倡在旅游承载力约束下进行旅游开发,从而提升旅游产品的高品味性、环保性和经济效益。目前,大多数研究都是将这两个产业分开独立研究。虽然到目前为止,生态旅游和生态农业在单独领域已经取得了丰硕的成果,但仍然缺乏对两个产业的协同演化机制研究,缺乏连续性的、系统的动态分析。尤其是生态农业和生态旅游业的耦合机制研究领域还基本属于空白。
     论文的研究对正处在经济转型时期的三峡库区,是十分必要的。三峡库区具备实现跨越式发展的巨大的资源,但随着三峡工程完工,也出现了一系列有待解决的新农村建设问题。首先,库区具有发展生态农业得天独厚的优势。远离工业密集区,土壤、空气等很少被污染,生物多样化,种群间制衡机制完备。其次,库区也具备发展生态旅游业的区位优势,库区位于长江三峡旅游黄金线路的黄金路段上,本身就具备旅游产业的基础和品牌影响力。所以完全可以将自然资源优势和生态环境优势通过生态农业和生态旅游业的强力拉动有效地转化为商品优势和经济优势。而且,三峡工程的竣工和移民的迁建造成的生态系统脆弱化和产业结构的空心化,加之库区传统农业耕种背景下的低收入状况,也要求在没有密集工业的现实情况下必须发展生态农业和生态旅游业耦合的新型产业系统。因此,研究生态农业和生态旅游业两大产业的耦合机制,所取得的研究成果不仅为三峡库区产业结构调整、经济增长方式转型和库区社会主义新农村建设提供建议,而且也为其他区域的产业结构调整提供参考。
     论文在介绍研究背景与意义、思路与内容、特色与创新以及相关理论研究综述的基础上,对生态农业和生态旅游业耦合机制进行了研究,得到了创新性结论如下:
     ①运用大系统理论对产业耦合的过程进行机理分析,建立单一的封闭产业系统的发展模型和耦合的开放产业系统的发展模型。进行耦合过程中不同互动关系下产业发展的效应分析,模型推导结论显示,产业间的不同关系对开放产业系统的耦合有着非常重要的影响。在开放产业系统中,互补产业可以直接导致产业耦合。相互竞争的产业在某些特定的强约束下可能促进产业耦合。其中,产业的替代效应与潜在市场规模、资源容量和污染排放及控制阀值对产业的耦合起关键作用。
     ②模型刻画了封闭和开放产业耦合系统中资源的最优利用问题,对不可再生资源和可再生资源的最优配置进行分类描述。区别了资源在耦合产业系统中的竞争性消耗和合作性消耗两种开发方式,模型推导显示,相互合作比相互竞争对于资源的开发和消耗更具有可持续性。合作性产业耦合通过对基于资源生产出的产品的价格控制来延长资源的开采和使用时间,在一定程度上延缓了资源的消耗。最后构建出基于资源消耗、劳动力供给、环境压力和容量约束下的生态农业、生态旅游业耦合产业系统的最优配置模型。
     ③引入产业系统结构负熵概念,通过数理模型刻画、分析生态农业、生态旅游业的耦合产业结构负熵,选取典型地区进行实证分析,验证从封闭的传统农业、传统旅游业生产模式向开放的生态农业、生态旅游业耦合产业的升级转型中,产业发展潜力增强,产业发展规模扩大,产业结构负熵降低,产业系统趋于有序化发展。
     ④讨论两大产业系统间、政府与产业系统间的耦合博弈行为。主要包括对两个主要机制的研究。在对耦合系统产权管理决策机制的研究发现:中央政府对两大产业耦合系统的产权管理进行严格的统一管理所带来的预期收益实际将大于将两大产业耦合系统产权管理放在地方政府进行管理,中央政府仅在宏观政策上对其进行管理所带来的经济收益。并且由于该结论仅从经济角度进行判断,尚未将环境损失、社会福利损失纳入,这预示政府的实际损失实际更大。因此作为一个理性政府,可以认为政府在对生态农业和生态旅游业耦合系统产权管理模式改革中,将趋向于加强对耦合系统产权的统一管理。
     在对生态农业和生态旅游业利益分配机制研究发现,耦合产业系统内的两部门存在合作竞争关系,并且耦合系统内部存在准超额利润,耦合系统中有比较优势的主管部门需要采取激励和惩罚措施来降低比较劣势主管部门的违约诱惑。在重复性耦合过程中给予比较劣势主管部门比一次性耦合过程中更高的收益分配比例,会降低其违约诱惑。同时,应控制比较劣势主管部门在长期耦合过程中所得收益比例的增长幅度,以免增强相对优势主管部门的背约倾向。
Eco-agriculture and eco-tourism are sustainable and able to upgrade China's traditional agriculture and tourism. By means of agricultural mechanization, large land scale, technological innovation, and technical intensification, eco-agriculture promotes the level of agricultural productive forces, the original ecological level of agricultural products, and the farmer’s income level. And eco-tourism avoids the traditional tourism disorder to consume the resources intemperately and advocates developing tourism under the constraints of tourism carrying capacity so as to increase the taste of tourism products, the environmental protection, and the economic efficiency. At present, the major researches on the two fields are separate and independent. Although eco-agriculture and eco-tourism have already borne fruit in their independent domains, but there are still little continuous and dynamic analysis on the two industries and little research on the synergetic evolution mechanism, in particular, on the eco-agriculture and eco-tourism coupling mechanism.
     The research in this dissertation is very necessary for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in the process of the economic transformation. Three Gorges Reservoir Area is rich in resources needed for the great development, but with the completion of Three Gorges Project, there have also been a series of new rural reconstruction problems yet to be resolved. First of all, the reservoir area is possessed of unique advantages for developing eco-agriculture. In addition, it is away from the industry-intensive areas and has barely-polluted soil and air, biodiversity, and comprehensive inter-species balance mechanism. Secondly, the reservoir area also has location advantages for developing eco-tourism since it is located in the golden section of Yangtze River Three Gorges Tourism gold lines, and it has the tourism industrial foundation and brand influence. Therefore, it is good to convert natural strengths and ecological advantages into commercial and economic superiority by the strong pull from eco-agriculture and eco-tourism. Moreover, the fragile ecosystem and the hollow of the industrial structure caused by Three Gorges Project and the relocation of migrants, in addition to the low-income status due to the traditional farming, call for a new type of coupling industrial system of eco-agriculture and eco-tourism in the area without intensive industries. Therefore, the research on the coupling mechanism of eco-agriculture and eco-tourism do not only provide suggestions for the industrial structure adjustment, changes of economic growth mode, and the new socialist countryside construction in the reservoir area, but also make a reference for the industrial structure adjustment in other regions.
     Based on the introduction of research background and significance, ideas and the content, features and innovations, as well as relevant theoretical researches, the dissertation conducted the research on the coupling mechanism of eco-agriculture and eco-tourism. The creative researches are as follows:
     ①The dissertation analyzed the mechanism of industrial coupling by employing the large-scale system theory, and attempted to establish the development model of a single and closed industrial system and the development model of a open coupled industrial system. The effect analysis on the industrial development under the different interactive relations during the industrial coupling, and the conclusion derived from the model showed that the different relations among industries had great impacts on the coupling of open industrial system. In the open industrial system, the supplementary industries led directly to industrial coupling, and under certain strong constraints, competing industries might promote industrial coupling. Among these constraints, the industrial substitution effect, the potential market scale, the resources capacity, pollution emissions, and the threshold value play the crucial role in industrial coupling.
     ②The dissertation set up a model to depict the optimal utilization of resources, and conducted the classified description to the optimal allocation of non-renewable and renewable resources both in the closed industrial coupled system and the open industrial coupled system. It distinguished two kinds of resources development modes in the coupled industrial system, the competitive consumption and the cooperative consumption. The model indicated that cooperation was more sustainable than competition as to the resources development and consumption. The cooperative industrial coupling could extend the time of resources exploitation and use by controlling the price of resource-based products, and, to a certain extent, slow the resources consumption as well. Finally, it constructed an optimal allocation model of the coupled industrial system of eco-agriculture and ecotourism subject to constraints of resources consumption, labor force supplies, and environmental pressure and capacity.
     ③The dissertation introduced the concept of the industrial structure negentropy and analyzed the structure negentropy of the coupled system of eco-agriculture and ecotourism in terms of mathematical model. It selected a typical area to conduct a empirical analysis to verify that, during the transition from the closed traditional agriculture and tourism industry into the open coupled industry of eco-agriculture and ecotourism, industrial development potential was strengthened, the scale of industrial development was expanded, industrial structure negentropy was lowered, and industrial systems tended to develop orderly.
     ④The dissertation discussed the coupled game behavior both between the two industries, and between government and the industrial system. The study was mainly on two main mechanisms. The study on the decision mechanism of property right management in coupled system found: the expected return derived from the strict centralized management on the coupled industrial system directly by central government would be greater than economic benefits brought from the management by local government that central government only carried out management on macro policies. Moreover, since the conclusion was made from the economic angle without regard to the environmental and social welfare losses, it was indicated that government's actual loss was actually bigger. Therefore, as a rational government, it would tend to centralize its management on the coupled system of eco-agriculture and ecotourism.
     The study on the profits distribution of the two industries, eco-agriculture and ecotourism, found that there existed the cooperative and competitive relations between two sectors in the coupled industrial system. Moreover, in the coupled system, there were the quasi super profits, and the superior department needed to take the incentive and punitive measures to weaken the inferior department’s temptation to break an agreement. The higher proportion of the inferior department could be obtained from the repeated coupling instead of a single coupling, which could weaken the inferior department’s temptation to break an agreement. At the same time, the growth rate of the profits distribution proportion gained by the inferior department from the repeated coupling should be controlled in order to prevent the superior department’s tendency to break an agreement.
引文
[1]阎成.中国生态农业建设成就与发展[J].农业环境保护, 1997.16(1):32-34.
    [2] Bonnieux, F., Rainelli, P., Vermersch, D. Estimating the supply of environmental benefits by agriculture: a French case study[J]. Environ. Resour. Econ, 1998, 1:135-153.
    [3] De Koei jer, T. J., Wossink, G. A. A., Struik, P. C.,Renkema, J. A. Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency[J]. Environ. Manage, 2002, 66:9-17.
    [4] Donald, P. F, Pisano, G., Rayment, M. D., Pain, D. J. The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe' s farmland birds[J]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 2002, 89:167-182.
    [5] Antle, J. M., McGucking, T. Productivity and Environmental[M], 1993.
    [6] Carlson, G. A., Zilberman, D., Miranowski, J. A. Agricultural and Environmental Resource Economics [M], Oxford University Press, New York. 1989.
    [7] Baties and Taylor. Alternative Agriculture[J]. Ecological Economics, 1992, 4:238-242.
    [8]李祖永.生态农业支持和保护制度研究.合肥工业大学硕士论文, 2005.
    [9]吴德礼,李惠彬.基于转型经济:区域发展理论研究与规划实务[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社, 2008.
    [10]宋旭光.生态占用测度问题研究[J].统计研究, 2003.2:44-47.
    [11]催和瑞,赵黎明,薛庆林.基于耗散结构理论的区域农业可持续发展系统分析[J].系统辩证学学报, 2005.1.
    [12] V. Tellarini, F. Caporali. An input/output methodology to evaluate farms as sustainable agroecosystems: an application of indicators to farms in central Italy[J]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 2000:111-123.
    [13] Smyth A. J., Dumanski J. FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management[J]. World Soil Resources Reports, 1993, 73:1-56.
    [14] M. J. C. Gowda, K. M. Jayaramaiah. Cooperative evaluation of rice production systems for their sustainability[J]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 1998, 69:1-9.
    [15] Julic Guthman. Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower in California[J]. Agriculture and Human Yalues, 2000, 17, 3:257.
    [16] FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization). Selected Indicators of Food and Agriculture Development in Asia-Pacific Region, 1989-99[M]. RAP Publication. 2000.
    [17]李全胜.我国生态农业建设的理论基础[J].生态农业研究, 2000.4:1-4.
    [18]骆世明.我国经济起飞期的农业持续发展[J].生态科学, 1994, 1.
    [19]冯杰.中国农业高效益模式大全[M].北京:农业出版社, 1992.
    [20]卢良恕.中国立体农业模式[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 1993.
    [21]韩东峰,孟庆岩,孙鹏飞,王兆骞.我国生态农业模式研究现状及展望[J].生态经济, 2008.4:33-34.
    [22]王静慧.县域生态农业产业化理论与典型模式研究[D].中国农业大学博士论文, 2003.
    [23]周小萍,陈百明,卢燕霞,张正峰.中国几种生态农业产业化模式及其实施途径探讨[J].农业工程学报, 2004.3:296-300.
    [24]李树.关于生态农业产业化经营问题的思考[J].理论月刊, 2000. 8
    [25]徐保根.生态农业产业化经营浅析[J].中国生态农业学报, 2002.1:110-112.
    [26]张真,胡梅.山区生态脱贫的生态农业产业化建设实践——以浙江省磐安县为例[J].理论月刊, 2000.8:12-14.
    [27]张敬华.姜堰市生态农业产业化发展分区和主导产业定位研究[J].生态经济,2004.1:222-223.
    [28]焦雯裙,阂庆文.我国生态农业产业化的主要类型和需要注意的问题[J].农业环境与发展, 2007.1:4-7.
    [29] Wight,P. Ecotourism: Ethics or Eco-Self?[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 1993:3-9.
    [30] Orams, M. B. Toward a more Desirable Form of Ecotourism[J]. Tourism Management, 1995:3-8.
    [31] Ryel, R, Grasse,T. Marketing Ecotourism: Attracting the Elusive Ecotourist. In Nature Tourism:Managing for the Environment[M]. Island Press, Washington, DC. 1991.
    [32] Ziffer, Karen, A. Ecotourism the Uneasy Alliance, Conservation Internation and Ernst and Young,[M] Washington, DC. 1989.
    [33] Farrell, B. H., Runyan, D. Ecology, Tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1991, 18(1):26-40.
    [34] Pigram, J. Sustainable Tourism Development[J]. Journal of Tourism Studies, 1990, 2(3):2-9.
    [35] World Tourism Organization, Sustainable Tourism Development for Local Planner[M]. World Tourism Organization. Madrid, 1993.
    [36] Wood, K., House, S. L. The Good Tourist[M]. Mandarin. London, 1991.
    [37] Getz, D. Capacity to Absorb Tourism: Concepts and Applications for Strategic Planning[J]. Annals of Tourism Research. 1983, 10(2):239-263.
    [38] O’Reilly, A. M.Tourism Carrying Capacity[J]. Tourism Management. 1986, 7(4):254-258.
    [39] Mathieson, A., Wall, G. Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts[M]. Longman, London, 1980.
    [40] Mathieson, A , Wall, G. Tourism: Economic, Physical, and Social Impacts[M]. Longman,London, 1982
    [41] Lea, J. Tourism and development ethics in the third world[M]. Routledge. London, 1988.
    [42] Burns, P. H, Holden, A. Tourism: A New Perspective[M]. Prentice Hall International(UK) Ltd, Hemel Hempsted, 1995.
    [43] France, L. The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Tourism[M]. Earthscan Publication Ltd, 1997.
    [44] Archer, B. H., Fletcher, J. E. Multiplier Analysis in Tourism, Cahiers du Tourisme, Centre Des Hautes Etudes Touristiques[M]. Universite de Droit, D’Economie et Des Sciences, Aix en Provence, 1991.
    [45] Mieckowski, Z. Environmental Issues of Tourism and Recreation[M]. University Press of America, Inc. Lanham, 1995.
    [46] Murphy, P. N. Tourism: A Community Approach[J]. Methenm, 1985.
    [47] Thorsell, J.W. Managing Protected Areas in Eastern Africa: A Training Manual. College of African Wildlife Management[J]. Mweka Tanzania, 1984.
    [48] Brandon, C. Basic Steps Towards Encouraging Local Participation in Nature Tourism Projects[J]. The Ecotourism Society, 1993:132-168.
    [49] Horwich, R. H. Ectourism and Community Decelopment: A View From Belize[J]. The Ecotourism Society, 1993:132-168.
    [50] Grdjah Mada University. A Report on Environment and Development. In Sustainable Tourism Development: Guide for Local Planners[M]. World Tourism Organization Publication, 1990.
    [51] Myrdal, G. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions[M]. London: Duckworth, 1957.
    [52] Hirschman, A. O. The strategy of economic development[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
    [53] Perroux, F. Note sur la notion de pole de croissance[J]. Economie Appliquee, 1955, 7:307-320.
    [54] Friedman, J. Regional Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela.Cambridge[M], Mass. I. T. Press, 1966.
    [55] Raymond, Vernon. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 5:190-207.
    [56] J. G. Willianmson. Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol,ⅩⅢ.1965, 4.
    [57]罗斯托.主导部门和起飞.从起飞进入持续增长的经济学[M].成都:四川人民出版社, 1988.
    [58]赫希曼.经济发展战略[M].北京:经济科学出版社, 1991.
    [59] Krugman, P. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of political economy,1991, 99:.483-499.
    [60] Gersbach, Hans, Schmutzler, Armin. A product market theory of training and turnover of firms[R]. IZA Discussion papers, 2001(327).
    [61] J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, Peter Nijkamp. Operationalizing sustainble development: dynamic ecological economic models[J]. Ecological Economics, 1991, 4:11-33.
    [62] Common, M., Ch. Perrings. Towards and ecological economics of sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 1992, 6(1):7-34.
    [63] John C. Woodwell. A simulation model to illustrate feedbacks among resource consumption, production, and, facts of production in ecological-economic systems[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 112:131-150.
    [64] Cecilia Collados, Timothy P. Duane.Natural capital and quality of life: a model for evaluating the sustainablility of alternative regional development paths[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 30:441-460.
    [65] Rosimeiry Portela, Ida Rademacher.A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 143:115-146.
    [66] Costanza.R., Lisa Wainger, Car Folke. Modeling Complex Ecological Economic Systems[J]. BoiScoence, 1993, 43(8):545-555.
    [67] Alexey Voinov, Robert Costanza, Lisa Wainger. Patuxent landscape model: integrated wcological economic modeling of a watershed[J]. Environmental Modelling & software, 1999, 14:473-491.
    [68] Roelof M. Boumans, F. Villa, R. Costanza. Non-spatial calibrations of a general unit model for ecosystem simulations[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 146:17-32.
    [69] R. Kerry Turner, Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific intergration for management and policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 35:7-23.
    [70] Peter Eder, Michael Narodoslawsky. What environmental pressures are region’s industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input-output models[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29:359-374.
    [71] Shinichiro Nakamura. An interindustry approach to analyzing economicand environmental effects of the recycling of waste[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28:133-145.
    [72] Kaufmann, R. The environment and economic well being[M]. in Frontiers of environmental economics, Edited by Henk Folmer et al. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited , UK, 2001
    [73] Monica Grasso. Ecological-economic model for optimal mangrove trade of between forestry and forestry production: comparing a dynamic optimization and a simulation model[J].Ecological Modelling, 1998, 112:131-150.
    [74] Harbin Li, David I. Gartner, Pu Mou, Carl C. Trettin. A landscape model (LEEMATH) to evaluate effects of management impacts on timber and wildlife habitat[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2000, 27:263-292.
    [75] Christian Friis Bach, Economic incentives for sustainable management: a small optimal control model for tropical forestry[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 30: 251-265.
    [76] Marjan van den Belt, Lisa Deutsch, Asa Jansson. A consensus-based simulation model for management in the Patagonia coastal zone[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 110:79-103.
    [77] P.Zander, H. Kaehele. Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development[J]. Agricultural Systems, 1999, 59:311-325.
    [78] K. W. J. Malafant, D. P. Fordham. An integrated framework for modelling irrigation futures in southern Australia[M]. J. L. Us and C.A Brebbia.Southampton: UK WIT Press, 1999.
    [79] M.Wier, B. Hasler., J. M. Andersen. Evaluating consequences of agricultural policy measures in an integrated economic and environmental model system, in Ecosystems and sustainable Development[M]. Southampton: UK WIT Press, 1999.
    [80]赖亚兰.重庆三峡库区高效生态农业可持续发展模式与机制研究[D].西南农业大学博士毕业论文, 2001.
    [81]皮立波.现代都市农业的理论和实践研究[D].西南财经大学博士毕业论文, 2001.
    [82]张昕.黑龙江生态旅游资源合理配置[D].东北农业大学博士毕业论文, 2005.
    [83]李丰生.生态旅游环境承载力研究[D].中南林学院博士毕业论文, 2005.
    [84]黄茂祝.伊春区域生态旅游资源评价及开发对策[D].东北农业大学博士毕业论文, 2006.
    [85]刘锋.中国西部旅游发展战略研究[M].北京:中国旅游出版社, 2001
    [86]《西部开发旅游发展战略》课题组.西部开发旅游发展战略[M].北京:中国旅游出版社, 2002.
    [87]邵琪伟.发展乡村旅游[N].促进新农村建设.
    [88]任继周.系统耦合在大农业中的战略地位[J].科学. 1999. 51(6): 12-14.
    [89] H. T.奥德姆著,蓝盛芳译.能量、环境与经济——系统分析导引[M].北京:东方出版, 1992.
    [90]尼科利斯G,普利高京,徐锡申等译. I.非平衡系统的自组织[M].北京:科学出版社, 1986.
    [91]哈肯·H.郭治安译.高等协同学[M].北京:科学出版社, 1989.
    [92]托姆R.赵松年等译.结构稳定性与形态发生学[M].成都:四川教育出版社, 1992.
    [93]艾根,舒斯特尔.曾国屏,沈小峰译.超循环论[M].上海:上海译文出版社, 1990.
    [94]吴彤.自组织方法论研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2001.
    [95]沈华嵩.经济系统的自组织理论[M].北京:中国科学社会出版社, 1991.
    [96]钱学森.论系统工程[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社, 1982.
    [97]魏宏森,曾国屏.系统论[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1995.
    [98]路德维希·冯贝塔兰菲,秋同等译.一般系统论[M].北京:社会科学出版社, 1987.
    [99] Simon H. The architecture of complexity [J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 106(6):467-482.
    [100] Albert Adriaanse.《环境政策行为指数》[M].海牙, 1993.
    [101]钱学森等.《论系统工程》[M].湖南:湖南科学技术出版社, 1982.
    [102]邹锐.生态经济系统发展演化与控制的理论研究[J].生态经济, 1994. 6:16-20.
    [103]湛恳华,沈小峰.普利高津与耗散结构论[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社, 1982.
    [104]蔡绍洪,彭仕政,伍进.耗散结构与非平衡相变原理及应用[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 1998.
    [105]谷凤锋,张秀英.区域经济系统耗散结构的形成与演化机制研究[J].东北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005. 16(2): 119-124.
    [106] R. J. E. Clausius.关于热力学第二定律[J].自然科学争鸣, 1975.
    [107]普里高津.从混沌到有序[M].上海:上海译文出版社, 1987.
    [108] N. Wiener.控制论[M].北京:科学出版社, 1962.
    [109] C. E. Shannon.信息论理论基础[M].上海:上海译文出版社, 1987.
    [110]王身立.耗散结构向何处去——广义进化与负熵[M].北京:人民出版社, 1989.
    [111]赵士洞,陈华.新林业——美国林业一场潜在革命[J].世界林业研究, 1991.l.
    [112]赫尔曼·格拉夫·哈茨费尔德编,沈照仁译.生态林业理论与实践[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 1997.
    [113] Hartwick, J. M. Intergrnerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources[J]. Amercian Economic Review, 1977, 67:972-974.
    [114] Hartwick, J. M. Substitution among exhaustible resources and intergenerational equity[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1978, 45:347-354.
    [115] Solow, R. M. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, Symposium, 1974:29-46.
    [116]蒋中一.动态最优化基础[M].上海:商务印书馆,1999.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700