古龙南英台地区葡萄花油层沉积体系研究
|
摘要
古龙南英台地区位于松辽盆地北部中央坳陷区齐家—古龙凹陷南部,研究的目的层段是下白垩统的葡萄花油层,即姚家组一段。前人对本研究区的地层、沉积相等方面已经做过不同程度的研究,但存在不同的见解。本文在前人研究的基础上,以层序地层学、沉积学等理论为指导,对葡萄花油层进行了更加精细的层序划分,在此基础上进行了相应的沉积体系研究,对该区的储层预测及有利油气富集区优选具有重要的指导意义。
综合地震、测井、岩心、录井等资料,重新厘定了研究区葡萄花油层所属的三级层序边界SBⅢ1和SBⅢ2,分别对应地震反射界面T1-1和T03;在此基础上,又依次识别出英台地区葡萄花油层的四级、五级、六级层序界面。进而对研究区进行了高分辨率层序地层划分,将葡萄花油层划分为1个中期旋回(PI油组)、3个短期旋回(PI上、PI中、PI下)和8个超短期旋回(PI1、PI2、PI3、PI4、PI5、PI6、PI7、PI8)。在各级次基准面旋回划分的基础上,以超短期旋回为等时地层对比单元,对研究区进行了层序地层对比,建立了英台地区葡萄花油层的层序地层格架。
在此层序格架内进行了物源分析、沉积相类型及沉积相展布研究。通过颜色、岩性、沉积构造类型、古生物标志、测井相特征等相标志的研究,结合岩心观察和电性资料,进行了详细的单井沉积相分析。在此基础上,确定了研究区的沉积相类型,认为研究区葡萄花油层发育三角洲相和湖泊相,三角洲相以三角洲前缘亚相沉积为主,主要发育水下分流河道、河口坝、席状砂、水下决口扇和水下分流间湾等微相;湖泊相主要发育滨浅湖相。通过重矿物分析、砂岩百分含量等值线图的综合判定,认为研究区主要受西部物源控制,北部物源为次要物源,母岩类型主要为酸性岩浆岩。在以上研究的基础上进行了剖面相对比,并编制了以超短期旋回为单位的8张沉积相平面展布图,揭示了该区沉积体系的时空展布规律,综合分析认为研究区葡萄花油层沉积时期整体为水体加深,砂体萎缩的退积沉积序列。
The first member of Yaojia Formation, Putaohua Reservoir of the lower cretaceous, is the study layer of Yingtai area in South Gulong Region, locating in southern part of Qijia-Gulong sag of the central depressed area of Songliao basin. Although predecessors have done much deeply research on this area, different opinions are still existing. Based on the former studies, guided by the theories of sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology, this dissertation did a more specific division and facies reserch on Putaohua Reservoir, which is very instructive to the reservoir prediction and favorable abundance zone of oil and gas.
Based on seismic, well log, core and geologic log data, third-order sequence boundaries SBⅢ1and SBⅢ2 corresponding to seismic reflection interfaces T1-1 and T03 were redelimited; extending the method turing on it and developing it into forth-order, fith-order and sixth-order sequence boundaries of Putaohua Reservoir in Yingtai area. And then, high resolution stratigraphic classification was conducted, with one mid-term cycles ( PI reservoir group), three short-term cycles ( PI upper, PI middle, PI lower ) and eight super-short-term cycles(PI1、PI2、PI3、PI4、PI5、PI6、PI7、PI8). Through the division of base level cycles and sequence stratigraphic units (super-short-term cycles), sequence stratigraphic contrast and sequence stratigraphic framework of Putaohua Reservoir of Yingtai area was accomplished.
Source analysis, sedimentary facies types and distribution of sedimentary facies were researched within sequence framework. By means of analyzing color, lithology, types of sedimentary structures, paleontological markers, electrofacies feature and so on ,combined with core and logging data, single well facies, we did a comprehensive study on single well facies, and then confirmed types of sedimentary faces in the study area which develops delta facies and lake facies in Putaohua oil layer. Delta front subfacies is the main subfacies, of which microfacies types mainly are underwater distributary channel, mouth bar, sand sheet, sub-sea crevasse channel and underwater distributary interchannels. Lake facies mainly develops shore-shallow lake microfacies. Heavy minerals data and sandstone content revealed that controlled mainly by the western provenance system and accidentally by the northern provenance system, source rock of this study area is mainly acidic magmatic rocks. On the basis of the study above, profile contrast were implemented and eight phase-plane diagrams in super-short-term cycle units were drawed, which established the time and space evolution of sedimentary system of this area. What we have achieved makes us believe that Putaohua reservoir deposits in a deepening water, sand body fading retrograding sedimentary sequence.
综合地震、测井、岩心、录井等资料,重新厘定了研究区葡萄花油层所属的三级层序边界SBⅢ1和SBⅢ2,分别对应地震反射界面T1-1和T03;在此基础上,又依次识别出英台地区葡萄花油层的四级、五级、六级层序界面。进而对研究区进行了高分辨率层序地层划分,将葡萄花油层划分为1个中期旋回(PI油组)、3个短期旋回(PI上、PI中、PI下)和8个超短期旋回(PI1、PI2、PI3、PI4、PI5、PI6、PI7、PI8)。在各级次基准面旋回划分的基础上,以超短期旋回为等时地层对比单元,对研究区进行了层序地层对比,建立了英台地区葡萄花油层的层序地层格架。
在此层序格架内进行了物源分析、沉积相类型及沉积相展布研究。通过颜色、岩性、沉积构造类型、古生物标志、测井相特征等相标志的研究,结合岩心观察和电性资料,进行了详细的单井沉积相分析。在此基础上,确定了研究区的沉积相类型,认为研究区葡萄花油层发育三角洲相和湖泊相,三角洲相以三角洲前缘亚相沉积为主,主要发育水下分流河道、河口坝、席状砂、水下决口扇和水下分流间湾等微相;湖泊相主要发育滨浅湖相。通过重矿物分析、砂岩百分含量等值线图的综合判定,认为研究区主要受西部物源控制,北部物源为次要物源,母岩类型主要为酸性岩浆岩。在以上研究的基础上进行了剖面相对比,并编制了以超短期旋回为单位的8张沉积相平面展布图,揭示了该区沉积体系的时空展布规律,综合分析认为研究区葡萄花油层沉积时期整体为水体加深,砂体萎缩的退积沉积序列。
The first member of Yaojia Formation, Putaohua Reservoir of the lower cretaceous, is the study layer of Yingtai area in South Gulong Region, locating in southern part of Qijia-Gulong sag of the central depressed area of Songliao basin. Although predecessors have done much deeply research on this area, different opinions are still existing. Based on the former studies, guided by the theories of sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology, this dissertation did a more specific division and facies reserch on Putaohua Reservoir, which is very instructive to the reservoir prediction and favorable abundance zone of oil and gas.
Based on seismic, well log, core and geologic log data, third-order sequence boundaries SBⅢ1and SBⅢ2 corresponding to seismic reflection interfaces T1-1 and T03 were redelimited; extending the method turing on it and developing it into forth-order, fith-order and sixth-order sequence boundaries of Putaohua Reservoir in Yingtai area. And then, high resolution stratigraphic classification was conducted, with one mid-term cycles ( PI reservoir group), three short-term cycles ( PI upper, PI middle, PI lower ) and eight super-short-term cycles(PI1、PI2、PI3、PI4、PI5、PI6、PI7、PI8). Through the division of base level cycles and sequence stratigraphic units (super-short-term cycles), sequence stratigraphic contrast and sequence stratigraphic framework of Putaohua Reservoir of Yingtai area was accomplished.
Source analysis, sedimentary facies types and distribution of sedimentary facies were researched within sequence framework. By means of analyzing color, lithology, types of sedimentary structures, paleontological markers, electrofacies feature and so on ,combined with core and logging data, single well facies, we did a comprehensive study on single well facies, and then confirmed types of sedimentary faces in the study area which develops delta facies and lake facies in Putaohua oil layer. Delta front subfacies is the main subfacies, of which microfacies types mainly are underwater distributary channel, mouth bar, sand sheet, sub-sea crevasse channel and underwater distributary interchannels. Lake facies mainly develops shore-shallow lake microfacies. Heavy minerals data and sandstone content revealed that controlled mainly by the western provenance system and accidentally by the northern provenance system, source rock of this study area is mainly acidic magmatic rocks. On the basis of the study above, profile contrast were implemented and eight phase-plane diagrams in super-short-term cycle units were drawed, which established the time and space evolution of sedimentary system of this area. What we have achieved makes us believe that Putaohua reservoir deposits in a deepening water, sand body fading retrograding sedimentary sequence.
引文
[1]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:147-154.
[2]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):249-255.
[3] Robert M.Carter. Two models:global sea-level change and sequence stratigraphic architecture[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1998, 122:23-36.
[4]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):315-321.
[5]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89-97.
[6]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):90-95.
[7]郑荣才,吴朝容,叶茂才.浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路[J].成都理工学院学报,2000,27(3):241-244.
[8]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369-375.
[9]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军,等.高分辨率层序地层学-原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:3-24.
[10]郑荣才,柯光明,文华国,等.高分辨率层序分析在河流相砂体等时对比中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):641-647.
[11]钟建华,孙正贵,禚元杰,等.高分辨率层序地层学的应用—以河125断层区沙三中亚段为例[J].地质找矿论丛,2009,24(3):243-248.
[12]张金亮,谢俊.储层沉积相[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:1-364.
[13] L.E.Brown and Fisher,W.L.Seismic stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems:examples form Brazilian rift and pull apart basins,In Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration(C.E.Payton,Ed) [J].AAPG Memoir26 ,1977,213-248.
[14] Fisher W.L., Mc Gowen J.H., Depositional systems in the Wilcoxgroup of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas[J].Gulf Coast Association geological Society,Transactions17,1967:105-125.
[15]孔庆莹.塔里木盆地孔雀河地区古生代海相沉积体系研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2004.
[16]王信.沙特B区块古生界层序地层格架及沉积体系研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[17]刘文.Rub’Al Khali盆地古生界沉积体系及石油地质特征[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[18]孙小霞.埕北地区古近系东营组沉积体系研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[19] Galloway W.E., Hobday D.K.. Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems[M].New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996: 219-225.
[20] Allen P.A., Allen J.R., Basin analysis,principles and application[J]. Blackwell Scientific Publication.1990.
[21]姜在兴.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:365-366.
[22]刘宝珺,等.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
[23] Pittijohn F.J., Potter P.E., Siever R.Sands and sandstones[J]. Springer-Verlag Berlin,1971.
[24] Reineck H.E.and Singh I.B., Depositional sedimentary environments with references to terrigenous clastics[J]. Springer- Verlag Berlin,1980.
[25] Pittijohn F.J., Sedimentary Rocks[J].New York:Harper & Row,1975,
[26] Friedman G.M., Sanders J.E., Principles of sedimentology[J]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1978.
[27]刘宝珺.当代沉积学研究的新进展与发展趋势[J].沉积与特提斯,2002,22(3):1-6.
[28]孙枢.中国沉积学的今后发展:若干思考与建议[J].地学前缘,2005,12(2):4-12.
[29]向树安.冀中坳陷淀南地区古近系沙河街组沙一～沙三段层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2008.
[30]关德师.松辽盆地下白垩统层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].广州:中国科学院地球化学研究所,2004.
[31]王海侨,钟建华.应用聚类判别识别英台地区低电阻率油层[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):250-252.
[32]许建红.松辽盆地英台地区姚家组一段层序地层分析及油气远景评价[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2005.
[33]舒良树,慕玉福,王伯长.松辽盆地含油气地层及其构造特征[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(4):340-347.
[34]王东坡,刘招君,刘立.松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.
[35]高瑞祺,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社1997,1-125.
[36]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002,1-7.
[37]萧德铭,迟元林,蒙启安.松辽盆地北部向斜区岩性油藏勘探认识与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.
[38]黄薇.松辽盆地古龙凹陷中段葡萄花油层精细层序划分与沉积相研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[39]于建成.松辽盆地北部中浅层含油气系统特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
[40]蔡希源,陈章明,王玉华.松辽两江地区石油地质分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[41]王东坡.松辽盆地沉积建造与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[42]杨继良.松辽盆地断陷盆地的地质结构与油气[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[43]张宗命.中国石油大地构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982.
[44]马明侠.松辽盆地北部浅层生物气形成条件及其资源潜力评价[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[45]厉玉乐.泰康—西超地区沉积相研究及隐蔽油气藏形成条件分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005.
[46]翟光明,等.中国石油地质志卷二大庆、吉林油田(上册).北京:石油工业出版社,1987.
[47]杨万里,等.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985.
[48]高瑞祺,萧德铭.松辽及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:1-229.
[49]陈昭年,陈发景.松辽盆地反转构造[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:1-62.
[50]王永春.松辽盆地南部岩性油藏的形成和分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:131-177.
[51]王贵文.松辽盆地北部肇源南地区葡萄花油层油气成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2008.
[52]连晓亮.他拉哈-常家围子地区葡萄花油层储层沉积学研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2006.
[53]高祥成.大庆油田英台地区黑帝庙油层组构造特征与油气成藏关系[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.
[54]刘立等.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域内中新生代盆地基地结构与沉积构造演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1993
[55]黄薇,张顺,梁江平,等.松辽盆地沉积地层与成藏响应[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(5):13-17.
[56]张世广.大庆长垣以西地区青山口组层序地层及油气成藏特征研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[57]李占东.肇源-太平川地区葡萄花油层储层精细预测及成藏条件研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[58]韩学彬.肇源-太平川地区葡萄花油层油气成藏特征研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[59]孙钰,钟建华,李世银,等.层序地层学在松辽盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探中应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2006,25(S1):25-33.
[60]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴,等.松辽盆地南部坳陷期层序地层研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):1-7.
[61]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1):92-100.
[62]郑荣才,彭军,彭光明,等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):654-662.
[63]叶兴树.闵桥地区阜三段高分辨率层序地层学及低阻油藏预测[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.
[64]王永凤.朝503区块扶余油层沉积特征与成藏条件[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[65]杨玉芳.松辽盆地古龙北地区青山口组沉积体系与油气富集规律研究[D].广州:中国石科学院广州地球化学研究所,2010.
[66]赵莹.头台油田茂11地区扶余油层层序格架及沉积体系研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[67]李璐璐.朝45区块扶杨油层层序特征与油气成藏研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[68]翟光明.总论(中国石油地质志,卷1).北京:石油工业出版社,1992.
[69]陈志鹏.松辽盆地齐家北地区青山口组构造特征及其对沉积的控制作用[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2009.
[70]钟建华,梁刚.沉积构造的研究现状及发展趋势[J].地质论评,2009,55(6):831-839.
[71]王海侨.英台地区萨葡高油层沉积体系及储层特征研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.
[72]杨玉芳,钟建华,司维柳,等.松辽盆地北部他拉哈-齐家地区姚一段沉积与成藏特征再认识[J].现代地质,2010,24(2):301-310.
[2]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):249-255.
[3] Robert M.Carter. Two models:global sea-level change and sequence stratigraphic architecture[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1998, 122:23-36.
[4]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):315-321.
[5]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89-97.
[6]邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):90-95.
[7]郑荣才,吴朝容,叶茂才.浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路[J].成都理工学院学报,2000,27(3):241-244.
[8]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369-375.
[9]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军,等.高分辨率层序地层学-原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:3-24.
[10]郑荣才,柯光明,文华国,等.高分辨率层序分析在河流相砂体等时对比中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):641-647.
[11]钟建华,孙正贵,禚元杰,等.高分辨率层序地层学的应用—以河125断层区沙三中亚段为例[J].地质找矿论丛,2009,24(3):243-248.
[12]张金亮,谢俊.储层沉积相[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:1-364.
[13] L.E.Brown and Fisher,W.L.Seismic stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems:examples form Brazilian rift and pull apart basins,In Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration(C.E.Payton,Ed) [J].AAPG Memoir26 ,1977,213-248.
[14] Fisher W.L., Mc Gowen J.H., Depositional systems in the Wilcoxgroup of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas[J].Gulf Coast Association geological Society,Transactions17,1967:105-125.
[15]孔庆莹.塔里木盆地孔雀河地区古生代海相沉积体系研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2004.
[16]王信.沙特B区块古生界层序地层格架及沉积体系研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[17]刘文.Rub’Al Khali盆地古生界沉积体系及石油地质特征[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[18]孙小霞.埕北地区古近系东营组沉积体系研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
[19] Galloway W.E., Hobday D.K.. Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems[M].New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996: 219-225.
[20] Allen P.A., Allen J.R., Basin analysis,principles and application[J]. Blackwell Scientific Publication.1990.
[21]姜在兴.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:365-366.
[22]刘宝珺,等.岩相古地理基础和工作方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
[23] Pittijohn F.J., Potter P.E., Siever R.Sands and sandstones[J]. Springer-Verlag Berlin,1971.
[24] Reineck H.E.and Singh I.B., Depositional sedimentary environments with references to terrigenous clastics[J]. Springer- Verlag Berlin,1980.
[25] Pittijohn F.J., Sedimentary Rocks[J].New York:Harper & Row,1975,
[26] Friedman G.M., Sanders J.E., Principles of sedimentology[J]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1978.
[27]刘宝珺.当代沉积学研究的新进展与发展趋势[J].沉积与特提斯,2002,22(3):1-6.
[28]孙枢.中国沉积学的今后发展:若干思考与建议[J].地学前缘,2005,12(2):4-12.
[29]向树安.冀中坳陷淀南地区古近系沙河街组沙一～沙三段层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2008.
[30]关德师.松辽盆地下白垩统层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].广州:中国科学院地球化学研究所,2004.
[31]王海侨,钟建华.应用聚类判别识别英台地区低电阻率油层[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(3):250-252.
[32]许建红.松辽盆地英台地区姚家组一段层序地层分析及油气远景评价[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2005.
[33]舒良树,慕玉福,王伯长.松辽盆地含油气地层及其构造特征[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(4):340-347.
[34]王东坡,刘招君,刘立.松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.
[35]高瑞祺,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社1997,1-125.
[36]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002,1-7.
[37]萧德铭,迟元林,蒙启安.松辽盆地北部向斜区岩性油藏勘探认识与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.
[38]黄薇.松辽盆地古龙凹陷中段葡萄花油层精细层序划分与沉积相研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[39]于建成.松辽盆地北部中浅层含油气系统特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
[40]蔡希源,陈章明,王玉华.松辽两江地区石油地质分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[41]王东坡.松辽盆地沉积建造与海平面升降[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[42]杨继良.松辽盆地断陷盆地的地质结构与油气[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[43]张宗命.中国石油大地构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982.
[44]马明侠.松辽盆地北部浅层生物气形成条件及其资源潜力评价[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[45]厉玉乐.泰康—西超地区沉积相研究及隐蔽油气藏形成条件分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005.
[46]翟光明,等.中国石油地质志卷二大庆、吉林油田(上册).北京:石油工业出版社,1987.
[47]杨万里,等.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985.
[48]高瑞祺,萧德铭.松辽及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:1-229.
[49]陈昭年,陈发景.松辽盆地反转构造[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:1-62.
[50]王永春.松辽盆地南部岩性油藏的形成和分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:131-177.
[51]王贵文.松辽盆地北部肇源南地区葡萄花油层油气成藏条件研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2008.
[52]连晓亮.他拉哈-常家围子地区葡萄花油层储层沉积学研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2006.
[53]高祥成.大庆油田英台地区黑帝庙油层组构造特征与油气成藏关系[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.
[54]刘立等.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域内中新生代盆地基地结构与沉积构造演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1993
[55]黄薇,张顺,梁江平,等.松辽盆地沉积地层与成藏响应[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(5):13-17.
[56]张世广.大庆长垣以西地区青山口组层序地层及油气成藏特征研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[57]李占东.肇源-太平川地区葡萄花油层储层精细预测及成藏条件研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[58]韩学彬.肇源-太平川地区葡萄花油层油气成藏特征研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[59]孙钰,钟建华,李世银,等.层序地层学在松辽盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探中应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2006,25(S1):25-33.
[60]孙钰,钟建华,姜在兴,等.松辽盆地南部坳陷期层序地层研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):1-7.
[61]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1):92-100.
[62]郑荣才,彭军,彭光明,等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):654-662.
[63]叶兴树.闵桥地区阜三段高分辨率层序地层学及低阻油藏预测[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.
[64]王永凤.朝503区块扶余油层沉积特征与成藏条件[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[65]杨玉芳.松辽盆地古龙北地区青山口组沉积体系与油气富集规律研究[D].广州:中国石科学院广州地球化学研究所,2010.
[66]赵莹.头台油田茂11地区扶余油层层序格架及沉积体系研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[67]李璐璐.朝45区块扶杨油层层序特征与油气成藏研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009.
[68]翟光明.总论(中国石油地质志,卷1).北京:石油工业出版社,1992.
[69]陈志鹏.松辽盆地齐家北地区青山口组构造特征及其对沉积的控制作用[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2009.
[70]钟建华,梁刚.沉积构造的研究现状及发展趋势[J].地质论评,2009,55(6):831-839.
[71]王海侨.英台地区萨葡高油层沉积体系及储层特征研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.
[72]杨玉芳,钟建华,司维柳,等.松辽盆地北部他拉哈-齐家地区姚一段沉积与成藏特征再认识[J].现代地质,2010,24(2):301-310.