摘要
鸢尾属(Iris L.)是单子叶植物鸢尾科中最大的属,也是最进化的属。野生的鸢尾属植物生命力强,抗逆性强,绿色期长,观赏价值高,有大面积推广应用的前景。系统地掌握鸢尾属植物种子生物学特性及其种苗的发育过程,将为其育种、扩繁和园林应用提供理论指导与技术支持,对东北地区的城市绿化建设发挥巨大作用。基于此目的,本论文以东北野生鸢尾属中的6种典型植物为研究对象,从种子形态结构、种子各项生理指标(包括生活力、含水量、吸水性)、种子的休眠与萌发、种苗的发育过程几个方面进行研究。研究结果如下:
(1)6种鸢尾属植物的种子外观形态差异很大,肉眼即可进行区分。玉蝉花、黄菖蒲、燕子花的结构使其可以在水面漂浮较长时间,直到有满足种子萌发的环境条件出现。这三个种均为湿生植物:溪荪、北陵种皮较薄,但胚乳较为致密,为中生种类:马蔺种皮厚,胚乳硬实,紧紧包被种胚,具有旱生植物的特征。这也是其发芽困难的主要原因。
(2)6个鸢尾种类的种皮亚显微结构区别显著。其中呈网状纹饰的有玉蝉花、溪荪、北陵、黄菖蒲、燕子花5个种类。马蔺纹饰为蜂窝状。本文认为鸢尾属种皮微形态特征的网脊龙骨状、网眼较浅的是较原始特征,表面有凹点或网脊较宽、网眼较深的是较进化的特征。
(3)成熟野生鸢尾种子绝大多数具有活力,种子发芽的内在潜力很大。玉蝉花、溪荪、北陵、黄菖蒲种子生活力在不同时期变化不明显。2年的室温贮藏对马蔺种子的品质产生显著影响,生活力下降了13%。6种鸢尾属植物的种子均具有一定透水性。马蔺胚乳结构较为致密,对水分的吸收有阻碍。种皮厚而致密,也是致使种子发芽率低的原因之一。
(4)6种植物的种子萌发对温度的适应范围基本上趋于一致,即在15℃条件下和30℃条件下均不利于萌发,大部分种类的萌发最适应范围在20~25℃。30/20℃昼夜变温处理有助于种子发芽。尤其是低温层积处理与昼夜变温激素处理有利于种子发芽,但各种种子适宜的激素种类及浓度不同。马蔺种子经过切除部分胚乳的方法可以得到较高的发芽率。
(5)鸢尾属植物种苗的生长规律是:从种子3月开始发芽至6月期间生长缓慢;7月份时生长速度中等;8~10月期间生长快速,11~12月期间生长极慢。根系生长高峰比苗高生长高峰期推迟一个月。根系生长量与苗高生长量的关系不规则。叶片数目与不定根数目在种苗生长过程中存在显著的正相关性。
(6)溪荪、北陵、黄菖蒲、燕子花种苗的子叶只有基鞘,无舌状鞘。这4种鸢尾属植物属于鸭跖草型。玉蝉花种苗子叶的基鞘和舌状鞘均发达,属于蓝耳草型。马蔺幼苗只有舌状鞘而基鞘完全退化,子叶联结继续伸延和下胚轴完全贴合,形成中胚轴。属于迦通尼型。6个种类中只有舌状鞘的马蔺是最进化。其次是具有舌状鞘和基鞘的玉蝉花以及黄菖蒲和燕子花。而溪荪、北陵则是相对原始的种类。
(7)所测定的莺尾属植物中,马蔺的光补偿点、光饱和点均较高,为典型的喜光阳生植
物;溪荪光补偿点较低而光饱和点高,说明其能适应多种光照环境,为较耐阴植物:北陵的
光补偿点、光饱和点适中,为中性植物:玉蝉花光补偿点高而光饱和点较低;燕子花的光补
偿点、光饱和点均较低,为强耐阴植物。
Iris L. is the largest and most evolutional genus in Iridaceae. Both life force and resistance in wild Iris are strong at the same time they keep green for long time. So Wild Iris have favourable foreground to large-scale extending. Finding out seeds biological characters and seedlings growth process of Iris will provide theoretic instruct and technical support for breeding, propagation as well as application in garden. In the thesis, we choose six wild species in northeast of China to study the configuration, physiological characteristic, peculiarity of dormancy and bourgeon as well as seedlings growth process. The results as follows:
(1) Morphological difference of six species in Iris is obvious. The seeds can be distinguished by naked eye. The structure of I. ensata, I. pseudacorus and I. laevigata could make them floating on the water for a long time before they could germinate under a fitting condition. I.sanguinea and I. typhifolia have thin seed capsules and compact endosperms. The seed testa of I, lactea is thick and keratose. At the meantime, rigid endosperms enwrap the embryo. This is an important obstacle to germinate.
(2) The difference of seed testa ultrastructure is notable. The figures of I. ensata, I. sanguinea, I. typhifolia, I. pseudacorus and I. laevigata are all reticular but the figure of I. lactea is alveolate. The latter is more evolutive than the former.
(3) Most of mature seeds of wild Iris have activity. The activities of I. ensata, I. sanguinea, I. typhifolia and I. pseudacorus are steady in two years but the activities of/, lactea reduced by 13%. All the seeds of six plants are dank. The structures of endosperm and seed capsule of I. lactea are compact which is one reason lead to the low germination percent of seeds.
(4) The adaptive temperature range of six species at which seed can germinate is rough consistent, i.e., 15C and 30C are not adaptive to germinate and the most adaptive temperature range to most species is from 20 C to 25 C. In addition, the alternative temperature change can redound to the germination of seeds in Iris.
(5) Seedlings growth rule of Iris is as followed: Seedlings grow slowly from March (germination) to June. They have moderate vegetal speed during July. From August to October, seedlings growth speed is fast followed by a very slowly growth until december the growth stopped. Growth climax of roots lagged a month compared with the growth climax of seedlings.
(6) Cotyledons of I.sanguinea, I. typhifolia, I. pseudacorus and I. laevigata seedlings only had basal but no ligular sheath. All these four species belong to commelina type. Basal and ligular sheath of I. ensata seedlings are all perfectly existed, and they belong to cyanotis type. I. lactea seedlings only remain ligular sheath and basal completely degenerated, and neck extend downward until completely joint with hypocotyl forming mesocotyl, which belong to cartonama type.
(7) Among chosen plants species, light compensation point (LCP) and light saturation point
(LSP) of I. lactea are higher than the others. So I. lactea is a typical light favor plant. LCP of I sanguinea is lower and LSP is higher which show that I. sanguinea is a shade sustainable plant. LCP and LSP of I. typhifolia both are moderate at light point. LCP is higer but LSP of I. ensata is lower so it can bear part time shade condition. LCP and LSP of I, laevigata are lower and the shade endurance is strong.
引文
1 郭翎.鸢尾.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000,11
2 赵毓棠.中国植物志.北京:科学出版社,1985,16(1):134
3 董小东,赵毓棠,谢航.国产鸢尾属尼泊尔鸢尾亚属的研究.植物研究,1998,18(2):32~36
4 赵毓棠.国产鸢尾属的研究.植物分类学报.1980,18(1):53~61
5 赵毓棠.中国鸢尾属一新种.植物分类学报.1992,30(2):181~182
6 黄苏珍,顾姻,贺善安.鸢尾属(Iris L.)植物的杂交育种及其同工酶分析.植物资源与环境,1996,5:38~41
7 黄苏珍,韩玉林.德国鸢尾的组织培养.江苏林业科技,2000,27(增刊):21~23
8 黄苏珍.鸢尾属(Iris L.)植物的杂交育种.植物资源与环境,1998,7(1):35~39
9 高俊平,姜伟贤.中国花卉科技进展.北京:中国农业出版社,2001
10 葛传吉.马蔺染色体的核型分析.广西植物,1990,10(2):139~142
11 王冰.徐岩.射干鸢尾的核型分析.中国药学杂志,1998,33(12):716~719
12 卢继承.鸢尾的染色体核型分析.山东师大学报(自然科学版),2000,15(2):214~216
13 齐耀斌,赵毓棠.中国鸢尾属花粉形态研究.植物分类学报,1987,25(6):430~436
14 秦民坚,徐国钧.鸢尾科药用根茎类的性状鉴定研究.中草药,1998,29(10):695~697
15 杨敏.从鸢尾鲜根直接制取鸢尾酮的新工艺研究.1999年全国香料香精技术开发与应用学术交流会,1999:306~308
16 黄德林,刘仲义.RP-HPLC法测定射干和鸢尾中射干甙、鸢尾甙的含量.华西药学杂志,1997,12(2):115~116
17 唐小敏.鸢尾属(Iris)观赏植物的引种及试种研究.浙江农业科学,2001,1:16~19
18 陈德芬,杨焕婷,马钟艳.外源激素对鸢尾组织培养的影响.天津农业科学,1997,3(3):18~20
19 谢航.中国鸢尾属有关分类群的讨论及属下分类系统的修订.东北师范大学,1996,6
20 杨秀莲.鸢尾品种的综合评价及种间杂交的研究.南京林业大学,1998,5
21 杨秀莲,陈道明.花菖蒲品种主要性状的评价.江苏林业学报,1998,25(增刊):121~126
22 彭幼芬.种子生理学.湖南:中南工业大学出版社,1994:75
23 杜国桢,马锦荣.十五种野生草本植物种子在不同温度下萌发能力的研究.草业学报,1994,3(1):18~24
24 徐本美,龙雅宜,顾增辉.十三种花卉种子室内萌发初探.种子,1988,3:12~16
25 原雅玲,邢吉庆.鸢尾属植物的引种栽培.西北植物学报,1994,14(5):138~141
26 刘青林,吴涤新,田砚亭.鸢尾体细胞无性系的建立与变异.西北植物学报,1994,14(4):267~272
27 董小东,谢航,赵宏.大理鸢尾和高原鸢尾的花粉形态.云南植物研究,1999,21(1):63~64
28 江明,谢文中.香根鸢尾的组织培养和快速繁殖,园艺学报,1995,22(3):301~302
29 伍碧华,颜济,周永红.种皮对扁竹兰鸢尾(Iris confusa)及其杂种种子萌发的抑制作用.四川农业大学学报,1998,16(3):337~340
30 杨乃博.鸢尾组织培养.植物生理学通讯,1986(3):1~7
31 徐恒刚,董志勤,单敏.马蔺在城市绿化中的作用及前景.内蒙古科技与经济,2002(9):60~61
32 孔红.甘肃萱草属种子微形态及其分类学意义.西北植物学报,2001,21(2):373~376
33 陈世龙,何廷农.双蝴蝶属和蔓龙胆属(龙胆科)种子表面特征的研究.西北植物学报,2002,22(1),37~42
34 刘德福,陈世璜.马蔺的繁殖特性及生态地理分布的研究.内蒙古农牧学院学报,1998,9(1):1~6
35 张萍.玉蝉花花部形态和开花生物学研究.烟台师范学院学报(自然科学版),1999,15(4):291~293
36 田洪,于翠兰,张宝国.紫花鸢尾的栽培技术.吉林蔬果,2000,4:36~37
37 王桂芹.不同生态环境马蔺植物体解剖结构比较.内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2002,17(2):127~129
38 陈震,张丽萍.射干栽培技术.基层中药杂志,1999,13(2):28~29
39 刘长江.种子的形态鉴定.种子,1989,41(3):45~48
40 马骥,王勋陵.骆驼蓬属种子微形态及其生态学与分类学意义.武汉植物学研究,1997,15(4):323~327
41 玉兵,班汉珍,戴唯娜.马尾松、杉木种子四唑测定生活力及发芽率的实验研究.广西林业科学,1996,25(2):93~96
42 史晓华,黎念林,金玲,朱秋桂,等.秤锤树种子休眠与萌发的初步研究.浙江林学院学报,1999,18(3):228~233
43 徐本美,张治明,张会金.蔷薇种子的萌发与休眠的研究.种子,1993,(1):5~9
44 徐本美,史晓华,黎念林.大叶冬青种子的休眠与萌发初探植物引种驯化集刊(第11集).北京:科学出版社,1997:150~155
45 叶要妹,王彩云,史银莲.对节白蜡种子休眠原因的初步探讨.湖北农业大学,1999,(4):45~47
46 李青丰,易津,张力君,等.针茅种子萌发检验标准及幼苗发育特征的研究.草业科学,1995,12(4):50~52
47 傅家瑞.种子生理.科学出版社,1985
48 李近雨,胡延杰.五味子种子休眠生理及催芽技术的初步研究.河北林学院学报,1994,9(4):288~294
49 徐是雄,唐锡华,傅家瑞,等.种子生理的研究进展.广州:中山大学出版社,1987:211
50 颜启传,等译.ISTA.国际种子检验规程(1976).北京:技术标准出版社,1980:145~162
51 赖力,郑光华.红松种子休眠与种皮的关系.植物学报,1989,31(12):92
52 王九龄,杨建平.紫椴种子休眠及萌发.林业科学,1981,17(3):317
53 徐本美,龙雅宜.关于野生花卉种子萌发的研究.种子,1991,6:44~47
54 叶能干,季强彪,廖海民,等.种子植物幼苗形态学.贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2002:79~81
55 傅松玲,谬美琴.白玉兰播种苗年生长规律的研究.生物数学学报,1996,11(5):129~132
56 秦民坚,余国奠,王旭红,田中俊弘.射干生物学研究(1)分类学综合特征和居群调查.中国野生植物资源,1996,18(2):30~31
57 秦民坚,李贵英,山口茂治,田中俊弘.温度对射干种子萌发影响的实验研究.武汉植物学研究,2000,18 (2):151~156
58 白伟岚 园林植物的耐阴性.园艺学报,1999,6(1):37~40
59 裴保华,植物生理学 北京:中国林业出版社,1990
60 管康林.略述种子休眠与萌发研究中的几个问题.种子,1984,(1)
61 W. R. Dykes. To the memory of the late sir Michael Foster, 1912. 11
62 Brian Mathew. The Iris. London: B T Batsford Ltd, 1981
63 Peter Goldblatt Systematics. Phylogeny and Evolution of Dietes(Iridaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1981, 68 (1): 132~153
64 John C. Manning, Peter Goldblatt. Endotbecium in Iridaceae and its systematic implications. American Journal of Botany, 1990, 77 (4): 527~532
65 Paul Kron, Steven C. Stewart Variability in the expession of a Rhizome Architecture Model in a natural population oflris versicolor (Iridaceae). American Journal of Botany, 1994, 81 (9): 1128~1138
66 Herbert Parkes Riley. A Character Analysis of Colonies of Iris Hexagona Vat. Goganticaerulea and Natural Hybrids. American Journal of Botany, 1938, 25 (10): 712~724
67 Jyotirmay. Mitra Karyotype analysis of Bearded Iris. Botanical Gazette, 1956, 117 (4): 265~293
68 G. I. Rodionenko. The Genus Iris L. The British Iris society London, 1984
69 Arber. A. Monocotyledons, A morphological study. Cambridge: University press, 1925
70 Boyd. L. Monocotylous seeding: Morphological studies in the post seminal development of the embryo Trans. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb, 1932
71 Eames. A. J. Morphology of the Angiosperms. New York: Mcgrow-Hill Book co. Inc, 1961
72 Tillich. H. J. Keimlingsban und verwandtschaftliche Beziehunger der Araceae Gledilazhia. 1985, 13 (1): 63~73
73 Benson L. Plant taxonomy: methods and principles. New york: The Ronald Press Company, 1962
74 Heywood V H. Scanning electron microscopy in the study of plant materials. Micron, 1969, 1: 114
75 Balkwill K, Campbell-Young G. Taxonomic studies in Acanthaceae: testa microsculpturing in southern African species of Thunbergia. Bot Journ Linn Soc, 1999, 131: 301~325
76 Vosa C G. Scanning electron microscopy of seed- coat patterns in nineteen species. South African Bot, 1983, 49:251~259
77 Gutterman Y Heydecker W. Studies of the Surfaces of Desert Plant. Ann Bot, 1973, 37:1049~1050
78 Sahai K. Macro and micro morphology of seed surface of exotic pine species adapted in Indian Himalayan climate. Phytomorphology, 1994, 44 (1~2): 31~35
79 Gupta M. Pandey N, Sharma C P. Zine deficiency effect on seed coat topography of Vicia faba Linn. Phytomorphoiogy. 1994, 44 (1~2): 135~138
80 Pobert, R. J. The role of temperature in germination ecophysiology, Seeds, The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities (Ed. Michael Fenner). C. A. B International, 1992
81 Vegis. A. Plant Plant Physiol. 1964 (15): 185