种子处理对玉米种子萌发及幼苗期生理生化的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
以PEG、6-BA浸种及老化处理改善或降低玉米种子活力,并通过SOD、α-淀粉酶活性等多项生理生化指标的测定,对种子处理对玉米种子萌发及幼苗期生理生化的影响,对PEG、6-BA浸种及老化处理改善或降低玉米种子活力的机制等方面有了更深入的了解。主要研究结果概述如下:
     1.不同浓度6-BA对玉米种子萌发有不同影响,太低对种子萌发促进作用不明显,而超过一定浓度会抑制种子萌发。实验表明6-BA以1.0×10~(-8)mol/L浓度25℃浸种18 h处理玉米种子的效果较佳,表现发芽率高,幼苗健壮,根粗壮,叶色深,植株高,干物质积累多。PEG处理种子也能提高种子活力,但主要是提高了种子的萌发率,萌发速度和幼苗的整齐度。
     2.实验采用45℃,100%RH的处理方法对种子进行人工老化,发现老化1 d的种子活力下降不大,各项生理生化指标与对照没有明显差异;而老化2 d的种子活力下降明显,表现为种子发芽率和幼苗生长势的明显下降,生理生化指标差异明显,而且出现了畸形苗。
     3.用PEG和6-BA处理的玉米种子,其α-淀粉酶活性都较高,而人工老化1 d的种子α-淀粉酶变化不大,人工老化2 d的种子的酶活性显著降低。PEG和6-BA处理有可能促进了萌发启动物质的产生和积累,从而促进萌发。
     4.以浓度为1.0×10~(-6)和1.0×10~(-8)mol/L的6-BA处理玉米种子,其萌发的幼苗叶片叶绿素含量都较对照显著提高,人工老化2 d及自然老化的种子萌发幼苗的叶绿素含量都较对照低。尽管1.0×10~(-6) mol/L 6-BA处理对提高玉米种子活力的作用不大,但也能较明显地提高玉米幼苗叶片叶绿素含量,表明6-BA可在一定程度上提高叶片叶绿素含量,增强幼苗光合作用。
     5.对幼苗的抗逆性进行分析发现,在10℃的冷环境中,6-BA处理的玉米种子的幼苗SOD酶活性、可溶性蛋白含量都较高,而MDA含量较低。PEG处理的玉米种子的幼苗SOD酶活性和MDA含量较低,而可溶性蛋白含量较对照略高。人工老化2 d的种子幼苗叶片中SOD酶活性较对照下降明显,其可溶性蛋白含量变化幅度最大,且含量也低,MDA含量高。试验结果表明高活力种子的幼苗抗逆性较强。
     6.从发芽率、幼苗生长势、简化活力指数等一系列生理生化指标的测定和比较,发现玉米种子处理改变了种子活力,而种子活力在很大程度上决定其萌发及幼苗期生理生化特征。但同时也发现活力相同,生理生化表现也不一定相同。种子内部的生理生化是相互影响,互相作用的,单独某个生理生化指标的大小不能用来衡量种子活力的大小。
Improving and reducing maize seed vigor were obtained by PEG, 6-BA treatments and artificial ageing, and a lot of physiological and biochemical characteristics were tested, such as SOD and α-amylase activities. The results can help us to get better understanding for the effects of seed treatment on the physiology and biochemistry during seed germination and in seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.). And the mechanism of the seed vigor change by the treatments was analyzed. The main results of the present study were as follows:
    1. The concentration of 6-BA affects maize seeds vigor. Low density of 6-BA did not show effect to seed germination, and too high density inhibited seed germination. The results of present study showed that the 6-BA density of 1 .0× 10-8 mol/L was the best to improve maize seed vigor, the treated seeds by this concentration showed higher germination percentage, more vigorous seedlings, stronger root and thicker leaf color. PEG also improved seeds vigor, but it mainly accelerated seeds germination, higher germination percentage and the seedlings come out evenly.
    2. Maize seeds were artificially aged in the environment of 45 ℃ , 100% RH. One day ageing declined maize seed vigor little, but two day ageing declined the seed vigor significantly, the seed germination percentage was declined and the seedling growth were stunted, weaker seedling and deformity seedlings were appeared.
    3. The a-amylase activity of the maize seeds treated by PEG and 1.0×10-8 mol/L 6-BA was higher than the untreated seeds. The a-amylase activity of the seeds aged for 1 d changed little, and of the seeds aged for 2 d was declined significantly. PEG and 6-BA treatments might actuate to produce the material for seed germination starting.
    4. The chlorophyll content in the seedling leaves of maize seeds were treated by 1.0× 10-6 and 1.0×10-8 mol/L 6-BA was significantly higher than CK, and that of the seeds naturally aged or artificially aged for 2 d was lower. Though 1.0×10-6 mol/L 6-BA treatment did not enhance seed vigor, but it also increased the chlorophyll content of seedling leaves. It may show that 6-BA can increase leaf chlorophyll content and improve their photosynthesis.
    5. For high vigor seeds, their seedlings showed stronger resistance to adverse circumstances. For the seeds treated by 1 .0×10-8 mol/L 6-BA, when
    
    
    
    the seedlings were growing in 10℃ cold environment, their SOD activity and soluble protein content were higher and their MDA content was lower. And for the seeds treated by PEG, the SOD activity and MDA content of the seedlings were lower and their soluble protein content was higher than the CK. For the seeds aged 2 d, their seedlings showed lower SOD activity, higher MDA content, and significantly lower soluble protein content.
    6. From sorts of seeds physiological and biochemical characteristics, such as germination rate, seedlings growth, simper vigor index, we could get a conclusion that seed treatment could change seed vigor, their physiological and biochemical characteristics were mainly decided by seeds vigor. In the other hand, even with the same vigor, there were still differences for their physiological and biochemical characteristics. There were interaction among all the seed physiological and biochemical characteristics can affect each other. It is not suitable to use only one physiological and biochemical characteristic to judge seed vigor.
引文
1. Perry, D.A. and J. W. Boodley, Hort Sci, 1980, 15(2): 192~193
    2. McDonald, M. B. Vigor test subcommittee report. AOSA Newsletter, 1980, 54(1): 37~40
    3.陶嘉龄,郑光华,种子活力,科学出版社,1991
    4.刘明久,人工老化对6个玉米杂交种活力的影响,河南职技师院学报,2000,28(3):1~3
    5.陈雅君,玉米种子生活力与发芽率相关性初探[J),种子,1998(2):56~57
    6.陈贞,红花种子人工老化试验研究[J],种子,1998(1):13~15
    7. Delouche J C, Baskin C C, Accelerated aging techniques for predicting the relative storability of seeds lots[J]. Seed science and Technology, 1973, 1(2): 427~452
    8.郭克婷,棉花种子人工老化方法探讨,种子科技,1998,(3):30~31
    9.陈晓玲,卢新雄,豇豆种子耐贮性的三种人工老化方法的比较研究,中国农业科学.2001,34(2):219~222
    10.崔鸿文,王飞,黄瓜种子人工老化过程中某些生理生化规律研究,西北农业大学学报,1992,20(1):51~54
    11.唐祖君,宋明,大白菜种子人工老化及劣变的生理生化分析,园艺学报,1999,26(5):319~322
    12.巩振辉,何玉科,人工老化和PEG引发对甜椒种子活力的影响,中国农学通报,1991,7(2):31~35
    13.欧阳西荣,徐辉,李丽,种子老化对玉米幼苗生长和植株发育的影响,中国农学通报,2002,18(6):31~35
    14.刘军,黄上志,傅家瑞,不同活力玉米种子胚萌发过程中蛋白质的变化,热带亚热带植物学报,1999,7(1):65~69
    15.乔燕祥,高平平,马俊华,两个玉米自交系在种子老化过程中的生理特性和种子活力变化的研究,作物学报,2003,29(1):123~127
    16.汪晓峰,丛滋金(译),膜质变等生化变化与种子老化,种子,1993,(1):66~70
    17.朱世东,张志伟,蔬菜种子老化与膜脂过氧化作用,园艺学报,1995,22(4):394~396
    18.杨剑平,唐玉林,小麦种子衰老的生理生化分析,种子,1995,(2):8~10
    19.杨剑平,王海涛,刘春晖,玉米老化种子萌发幼苗的研究,国外农学-杂粮作物,1995,(3):55~56
    20.宁淑香,姜敏,多效唑处理对玉米植株抗旱能力的影响,辽宁农业学报,1992(2):12~14
    21.汪惠芳,S3307对玉米种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响,植物生理学通讯,
    
    2000,36(5):491
    22.张东向,H_2O_2浸种对水稻和玉米种子萌发的影响,植物生理学通讯,1996,32(2):115~117
    23.张海燕,Ca(NO_3)_2预处理对小麦和玉米幼苗抗盐性的影响,山西师大学报:自科版.1999,13(1):56~59
    24.刘思春,张一平,激光场处理玉米种子对玉米幼苗抗旱性影响,干旱地区农业研究,1995,13(2):78~81
    25.徐安起,王庆成,磁场处理玉米种子的生物学效应研究,山东农业科学,2000,(6):16~17
    26.崔钦,杨春林,EM生物制剂浸种玉米种子的增产效果,沈阳农业大学学报,1997,28(1):79~80
    27.曲力涛,白容霖,张晓波,增产菌在玉米上的应用,国外农学-杂粮作物,1998,18(6):30~31
    28.师素云,王学臣,羧甲基壳聚糖(NCMC)对玉米幼苗氮代谢有关酶活性的影响,江苏农业学报,1997,13(2):70~72
    29.刘玉涛,多功能种衣剂对早地玉米萌发生长及产量的影响,玉米科学,2000,8(4):85~86
    30.王沙生译,[美]A.A.卡恩,种子休眠和萌发的生理生化,农业出版社,1989
    31. Heydecker, W, 1977. In. A. A. Khan ed., The Physiology and Biochemistry of seed Dormancy and Germination. Elsevier /North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam. pp. 237~252
    32.熊冬金,聚乙稀醇对水稻玉米种子萌发代谢作用及生长的影响,江西农业学报,1998,10(4):91~95
    33.智慧,陈洪斌,PEG处理对提高谷子种子活力方法的研究,种子,1998(3):11~14
    34.李季平,李杰刚,聚乙二醇(PEG)处理对小麦萌发种子生理生化特性的影响,河南农业科学,2002(6):4~6
    35.洪法水,董振吉,马成仓,周谋文,Ca、PEG预处理对干旱胁迫下小麦幼苗某些酶活性的影响,作物学报,1996,22(1):101~106
    36.傅家瑞,蔡东燕,应用PEG渗调提高大豆种子活力的研究,作物学报,1986,12(2):133~137
    37.顾龚平,吴国荣,PEG处理对大豆幼苗活力及活性氧代谢的影响,中国油料作物学报,2000,22(2):26~30
    38.张燕,姚照兵,PEG和低温胁迫对烟草幼苗某些生理特性的影响,吉林农业大学学报,2002,24(6):14~19
    39.张燕,冯永新,低温胁迫下PEG对烟草幼苗膜脂过氧化作用的影响,西南农业大学学报,2001,23(6):549~552,568
    40.陈刚,王广志,不同处理对烟草种子萌发及过氧化氢酶活性的影响,烟草科技,2002(2):11~14
    
    
    41.靳万贵,蒋晓玲,PEG处理对提高一串红种子活力的研究,新疆农业科学,2002(5):24~25
    42.洪法水,王旭明,马成仓,PEG预处理提高玉米种子活力和萌发代谢的效应,安徽农业科学,1995,23(2):111~113
    43.熊冬金,李绩祥,荣先恒,PVA PEG预处理及低温胁迫下时对幼苗代谢的影响,南昌大学学报,1998,22(4):310~312
    44.乔爱民,傅家瑞,PEG渗调引发处理对菜薹老化种子DNA损伤的修复作用,园艺学报,2000
    45.李曙轩,植物生长调节剂与农业生产,科技出版社,1989
    46.李曙轩,植物生长调节剂与蔬菜生产,上海科学技术出版社,1992
    47.王三根,细胞分裂素与植物种子发育和萌发,种子,1999,(4):35~37
    48.汤日圣,刘晓忠,4PU-30延缓杂交水稻叶片衰老的效果与作用,作物学报.1998,24(2),231~236
    49.王三根,梁颍,6-BA对低温下水稻幼苗细胞膜系统保护作用的研究,中国水稻科学,1995,9(4):223~229
    50.王三根,何立人,淹水对大麦与小麦若干生理生化特性影响的比较研究,作物学报,1996,22(2):228~232
    51.朱速松,刘友良,6-苄基腺嘌呤对大麦耐盐性的调节机理,南京农业大学学报,1996,19(3):12~16
    52. Kabar K, Alleviation of salinity stress by plant growth regulators on seed germination[J], Plant Physiol, 1987, 128:179~183
    53. Kuiper D, Actual cytokinin concentration in plant tissue as an indicator for salt resistance in cereals, Plant and Soil, 1990, 123: 243~250
    54.梁颍,胡雪琴,6—BA对水分胁迫下水稻幼苗生理特性的影响,耕作与栽培,2002(4):28~29,43
    55.李双顺,林植芳,抗氧化剂和6—BA对根系渗透胁迫的玉米叶片光合膜特性的影响,植物学报,1994,36(11):871~877
    56.王三根,细胞分裂素在植物抗逆和延衰中的作用,植物学通报,2000,17(2):121~126
    57.李玲,许德成,植物生长调节剂研究和在园林植物上的应用,广东园林,2002(1):32~34,37
    58. WJ Davies, JH Zhang, Root Signals And The Regulation Of Growth And Development Of Plants In Drying Soil, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol.,Jan 1991, 42: 55~76.
    59. Smigocki A, JW Neal Jr, McCanna I, Cytokinin-mediated insect resistance in Nicotiana plants transformed in Nicotiana phants, Plant Mol Biol, Oct 1993, 23(2): 325~351
    60.周洪生,玉米种子大全,中国农业出版社,2000
    61.佟屏亚,罗振锋,矫树凯,现代玉米生产,中国农业科技出版社,1998
    62.Johnson, R. R. and L. M. Wax, Agron. J., 1981, 73: 859~862
    
    
    63. Villier, T.A., In: Crop genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow, ed. By O. H. Frankel and J. G. Hawkes, Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1975, 297~316
    64.湖南省杂交水稻科研协作组,水稻三系培育和杂种优势的研究,中国农业科学,1978,(4):1~8
    65.郭秀璞,BR处理对小麦萌发生长及α-淀粉酶活性的影响,麦类作物,1998,18(5):38~39
    66.杨德光,沈秀瑛,赵天宏,马秀芳,水分胁迫下玉米叶片光合的活性氧限制,玉米科学,2000,8(3):59~61
    67.朱广廉,钟诲文,张爱琴,植物生理学实验,北京大学出版社,1990
    68.中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编,现代植物生理学实验指南,科技出版社,1999
    69. Downes BP, Crowell DN, Cytokinin regulates the expression of a soybean beta-expansin gene by a post-transcriptional mechanism, Plant Mot Biol, 1998, 37(3): 437~444
    70. Eiki momotani, Kou auki, Hideo tsuji, Effect of 6-BA on diurnal in DNA content per chloroplast and chloroplast replication in intact bean leaves[J], Journal of Experimental botany, 1991, 42(243): 1287~1293
    71.王爱国,罗广华,邵从本,大豆种子超氧物歧化酶的研究,植物生理学报,1983,9(1):77~79
    72.武宝玕,格林.托德,小麦幼苗中过氧化物歧化酶活性与幼苗脱水忍耐力相关性的研究,植物学报,1985,27(2):152~160
    73.张玉琼,张鹤英,淹水逆境下玉米若干生理生化特征的变化,安徽农业大学学报,1998,25(4):378~381
    74. Erich, Elstner, Oxygen activation and oxygen toxicity, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 73~96
    75.王爱国,邵从本,罗广华,丙二醛作为作物脂质过氧化指标的探讨 植物生理学通讯,1986,(2):55~57
    76.张宪政主编,作物生理研究法,农业出版社,1992
    77.汤学军,王康,激动素和抗坏血酸保护受冷害苗细胞膜和促进SOD合成的效应,植物学报,增刊,1993:45~49

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700