社会资本对农业技术创新团队效能的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
20世纪80年代以来,技术创新由个人创新逐渐转向团队创新。团队集结了多学科、跨区域的人、财、物力更能适应知识经济时代的技术创新的特点和要求,已有研究表明,包含沟通、信任、领导、团队内外部非正式关系、共同愿景等因素的社会资本被认为是团队效能的重要影响因素。实践证实,在创新过程中,团队成员之间的沟通、信任、团队领导的态度等因素对团队的创新效果产生了重要的影响。由于农业技术创新团队实践起步较晚,研究有限,尤其是对社会资本与技术创新团队效能的系统、全面的研究仍然比较缺乏。本研究旨在通过社会资本对农业技术创新团队效能影响的研究,完善社会资本理论,提高其普适性,为农业技术创新团队的进一步发展提供理论指导,并为政府推进技术创新团队发展以及创新团队的自我完善提供实践指导。
     本文在全球技术创新团队化、集群化的背景下,以社会资本理论、技术创新理论以及组织社会学理论为指导,以农业技术创新团队为研究对象,在对社会资本及团队效能的概念进行界定的基础上,提出了结构维度社会资本、关系维度社会资本、认知维度社会资本、任务绩效以及周边绩效及其衡量指标,对三维度社会资本之间的关系进行分析并提出假设,构建了社会资本三维度对团队效能及其两方面影响的理论框架,并就社会资本对团队效能的影响进行了理论分析,提出了社会资本对团队效能影响的理论假设;在此基础上,结合四川省农业科技创新产业链示范工程中农业技术创新团队的实践,利用调查收集的数据进行统计分析,在对数据的信度和效度进行评价的基础上,运用验证性因子分析(CFA)的方法对社会资本和团队效能的结构进行了检验;最后,在取得农业技术创新团队层次数据的基础上,运用相关分析、多元线性回归分析以及路径分析法,就社会资本对农业技术创新团队的效能影响的理论假设进行检验,得出研究结论,并提出了有针对性的,操作性强的对策建议。本文得出的主要结论是:
     1、社会资本三维度:结构维度、关系维度、认知维度之间具有方向性的影响关系。其中,结构维度社会资本在三维度中具有基础性,结构维度社会资本对关系维度和认知维度社会资本具有正向影响,认知维度社会资本对关系维度社会资本具有正向影响。
     2、团队效能包含任务绩效和周边绩效两个方面,二者在总体结构上可以区分开来,具有各自不同的构面,但是任务绩效和周边绩效之间的相互影响系数较大,二者之间存在高度的相互影响关系。
     3、就社会资本总量而言,其对团队效能总量的影响是正向且显著的。
     4、结构维度社会资本对团队效能及其两个方面均有直接的正向影响;对任务绩效和周边绩效存在间接影响。
     5、认知维度社会资本对团队效能的影响不显著;对任务绩效具有负向影响作用,是结构维度社会资本对任务绩效产生间接影响的中介;对周边绩效存在直接影响和间接影响。
     6、关系维度社会资本对团队效能及任务绩效的影响均不显著,对周边绩效存在正向显著的直接影响,且在结构维度及认知维度社会资本对周边绩效的间接影响中扮演了桥梁角色。
     根据上述结论提出以下建议:首先,重视农业技术创新团队结构维度社会资本的培育和发展。在团队内部要加强成员之间的联系,形成以团队领导为中心的内部网络,维持团队成员相对稳定的局面,为团队内部资源和信息的交流奠定基础,注重团队外部网络的开拓,为团队获取外部资源和信息提供机会。其次,充分发挥认知维度社会资本对农业技术创新团队周边绩效的正向影响作用,抑制和避免其不良影响。一方面,在团队内部形成共同的语言和认知模式,以团队目标作为终极导向,在提升团队的创造力的同时为成员提供更多支持,提高其工作和组织满意度;另一方面,注意保护成员个人的创新精神和创新能力,从而使团队拥有不断创新的动力;再次,充分发挥关系维度社会资本在提高团队周边绩效中的直接正向影响作用和中介作用。就团队内部而言,提升团队主管的业务能力和管理水平,从而提升团队成员的心理安全度,提高其对领导的信任度和工作满意度,与此同时,促进成员之间的广泛深入交流,形成彼此信任的氛围,使其之间的互动更加自由和开放,以提升成员的工作满意度和组织认同感。在团队外部,提高成员与外部主体的相互信任水平,增大团队获取时效信息和有限资源的机率,从而提升成员对于团队发展和继续合作的预期。最后,在团队内部社会资本与外部社会资本的培育上面,应注意保持适当的比例,以平衡二者在时间和精力占用中形成的此消彼长关系。
     本文的创新之处主要体现在三个方面:(1)厘清了社会资本的内部架构及相互作用机理,揭示了社会资本的结构、关系、认知三维度之间方向性的影响关系,丰富了社会资本理论。(2)剖析了社会资本对农业技术创新团队效能的影响路径。探明了关系维度和认知维度社会资本在影响团队效能中的中介作用,指明了关系维度扮演的社会资本桥梁角色,将从整体上影响社会资本对团队效能发挥作用的程度。(3)利用熵权法获取了社会资本总量和团队效能总量数据,实证了社会资本总量对农业技术创新团队效能总量的影响方向和影响程度,弥补了现有研究当中重视结构影响分析而总量影响分析不足的局限。
Since the Nineteen eighties, technological innovation has gradually shifted from the individual innovation to team innovation. The team can adapt the characteristics and requirements of technical innovation in the era of knowledge economy, because it can assemble people, money and things from different disciplines and regions. Some of the existing research has proved that social capital including communication, trust, leadership, informal relationship in and out of the team, shared vision can influence the teams' effectiveness. The practice has proved that in the process of innovation, communication among team members, trust, the attitude of the leader can greatly influence the teams' innovation. Because the practice of agricultural technology innovation team is late, the research is also limited, especially the systemic and comprehensive research between social capital and technological innovation teams' effectiveness is still lacking. The purpose of this research is to study the influence of social capital on agricultural technology innovation teams'effectiveness, to improve the theory of social capital and improve its universality. Theoretical guidance can be provided for the further development of agricultural technology innovation teams and practical guidance can be provided both for the government to promote the development of technology innovation team and the teams'self-improvement.
     The context of this paper is the global technology innovation based on the team and becoming cluster. It is guided by the theory of social capital, technological innovation and sociology of organization. The agricultural technology innovation team is taken as the research object. Based on the definition of the concepts of social capital and team effectiveness, the concepts and indexes of structural dimension, the relational dimension, the cognitive dimension of social capital, task performance and contextual performance are proposed. The relationships among the dimensions of social capital are analysed and supposed. The theoretical framework of the influence of social capital and its dimensions on team effectiveness and its aspects is built. The theoretical analysis about the influence of social capital on team effectiveness is done. The theoretical hypotheses about the influence of social capital on teams' effectiveness are put forward. Combine with the practice of agricultural technology innovation team in the demonstration project of agricultural technology innovating industry chain of Sichuan province. Statistical analysis is performed by using the collected data in the survey. The reliability and validity of the data is evaluated. The method of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is used to examine the structure of social capital and team effectiveness. Finally, the data of team level is gotten. The methods of correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and path analysis are used to inspect the theoretical assumptions of the influence of social capital on the efficiency of agricultural technology innovation teams. The conclusions are gotten. Niche targeting and strong operation suggestions are put forward. The main conclusions of this paper are:
     1. The three dimensions of social capital:structural dimension relational dimension and cognitive dimension have directional relationship. Among them, structural dimension of social capital is fundamental, structural dimension of social capital has positive impact on the relational dimension and cognitive dimension of social capital. Cognitive dimension of social capital has positive impact on the relational dimension of social capital.
     2. The effectiveness of team includes two aspects:task performance and contextual performance, the two can be distinguished in the overall structure, each has different dimensions, but the influence coefficient between task performance and contextual performance is big, so there is high interaction between them.
     3. As to the total amount of social capital, its influence on the total amount of team effectiveness is positive and significant.
     4. Structural dimension of social capital has a direct and positive influence on team effectiveness and its two aspects. It has indirect influence on the task performance and contextual performance.
     5. The influence of cognitive dimension of social capital on team effectiveness is not significant. It has negative influence on task performance, and it is the intrmediaary of structural dimension of social capital's influence on task performance. It has direct and indirect influence on contextual performance.
     6. The influence of relational dimension of social capital on team effectiveness and task performance are not significant. It has direct and positive influence on contextual performance, and it plays the role of bridge on the indirect influence of structural dimension and cognitive dimensions of social capital on contextual performance.
     According to the above, the following suggestions can be put forward. First, pay attention to the cultivation and development of structural dimension of social capital in the agricultural technology innovation teams. Within the team, strengthen the links between members, form internal network taking team leader as the center, keep relatively stable situation of team members. This can make foundation for the exchange of resources and information in the team. Pay attention to the development of external network of the team, providing opportunity for the team to acquire external resources and information. Secondly, give full play to the positive influence of cognitive dimensions of social capital on contextual performance, restrain and avoid its adverse influence. On one hand, the common language and cognitive pattern should be formed within the team, making the team goals as the ultimate guide. Improve the creativity of the team and provide more support for members, raise their satisfaction about the work and organization; on the other hand, protect the innovation spirit and innovation ability of individual members to let the team have the power of innovation; Third, give full play to the direct positive effect and the intermediary role of relational dimension of social capital on contextual performance. Within the team, improve the business and management ability of the leader, enhance psychological safety of the members, raise their confidence about the leader and satisfaction about the work, at the same time, promote extensive and in-depth exchanges among members, forming trusting atmosphere among them. The interaction will be more open and liberal. The members' satisfaction about work and their organizational identity will be raised. In outside of the team, improve the level of mutual trust between members and the outer bodies, increase the probability to get the information and limited resources. This can enhance the expectation of the members about the development of the team and the continuing cooperation. Finally, in the cultivation of teams' internal social capital and external social capital, proper proportion should be maintained to balance the two aspects' occupation in time and effort.
     There are three innovations in this paper:(1) The structure of social capital and the interaction mechanism are clarified. The directional relations between different dimensions of social capital are gotten, making the theory of social capital become perfect;(2) The influence paths of social capital on team effectiveness are cleared. The intermediary roles of relational dimension and cognitive dimension of social capital on team performance are analysed, especially the bridge role played by relational dimension of social capital will influence the influencing extent of social capital on team effectiveness as a whole;(3) Entropy approach is adopted to get the data of the total amount of social capital and team effectiveness. The direction and extent of influence made by the total amount of social capital on the total amount of team effectiveness are also gotten, to make up the existing research in the aspect that the structure effect analysis is taken seriously but the total effect analysis is deficient.
引文
[1]Bourdieu. The Forms of Capital, in J. G Richardson(ed.)Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, NewYork:Greenwood Press 1986:.241-258.
    [2]詹姆斯·S·科尔曼著,邓方译.社会理论的基础[M].社会科学文献出版社,1999.
    [3][美]托马斯·福特·布朗,木子西编译.社会资本理论综述[J].马克思主义与现实,2000(2):4146.
    [4]Ronald Burt:Structral Hole, Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1992.
    [5][美]林南著,张磊译.社会资本——关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].世纪出版集团、上海人民出版社,2005.
    [6]普特南.使民主运转起来:现代意大利的公民传统[M].1993.
    [7]Adler S. Paul and Kwon S. Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J]. Academy of Management Review,2002(01):17-40.
    [8]Gabby S, Zuckerman E. Social capital and opportunity in corporate R&D:the contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectations [J]. Social Science Research,1998(27):189-217.
    [9]Tsai W, Ghoshal S. Social capita land value creation:The role of intrafirm networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,1998 (4):464-476.
    [10]张体勤.企业家社会资本对新创企业绩效影响研究[D].山东大学博士学位论文,2008.
    [11]赵宏.创新团队合作研发绩效的经济学分析与评价研究[D].南京理工大学硕士学位论文,2009(6):9.
    [12]张其仔.社会资本与国有企业绩效研究[J].当代财经,2000.
    [13]边燕杰、丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(02):87-99.
    [14]蔡晓陈.社会资本的经济分析[D].武汉大学博士学位论文,2007(04)
    [15][德]马克思.资本论第一卷(中文版)[M].北京:北京人民出版社,1972.
    [16][英]亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究(中文版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1979.
    [17]王英.企业的人力资本、物质资本投资与企业绩效的实证研究[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2008(03).
    [18]西奥多·W·舒尔茨.论人力资本投资[M].北京经济学院出版社,1990.
    [19]宇红,企业社会资本理论研究[D].东北财经大学博士学位论文,2005(07).
    [20]张文宏.社会资本:理论争辩与经验研究[J].社会学研究,2003(04):23-35.
    [21]张其仔.社会资本论[M].社会科学文献出版社,1997.
    [22]福山.信任——社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].李苑蓉译.呼和浩特:远方出版社,1998.
    [23]Michael Woolcock. Social Capital and Economic Development:Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework [J]. Theory and Society,1998(27):151-208.
    [24]彼得·埃文斯.跨越公私线的发展战略,社会资本与社会发展[M].李惠斌、杨雪冬主编,社会科学文献出版社,2000.
    [25]Douglass. C. North, Institution.Institutional Change and Economic Performance [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,1990.
    [26]World Bank. "What is Social Capital?" http://www world bank.org/poverty/scapital/whatsc.html, 1999.
    [27]Nahapiet, Ghoshal. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review,1998, (232):242-266.
    [28]Wayne Baker. Achieving Success Through Social Capital:tapping the hidden resources in your personal and business networks [M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,2000.
    [29]Cohen, D, Prusak, L, In Good Company. How social capital makes organizations work[M]. Boston, Ma:Harvard Business School Press.2001.
    [30]斯蒂芬·P·罗宾斯.管理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
    [31]Lawrence Hollp. Managing Teams[M].1 edition by the McGraw-Hill companys,Inc,1999.
    [32]德鲁克.未来的管理[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2000.
    [33]乔恩·R·卡曾巴赫.团队的智慧——创建绩优组织[M].北京:经济出版科学社,2000.
    [34]Hillriege D., Slocum JW., Woodman RW. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition)[M], South-Western College Publishing, USA,2001.
    [35]柯江林.企业研发团队的社会资本——测量、理论与实证[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2010.
    [36]Sundstrom. workteam:applications and effectiveness [J]. American Psychologist,1990 (02): 120-133.
    [37]高小清.企业创新团队研究.山西大学硕士学位论文[D],2008(06)
    [38]杨晨,顾晓丹.创新团队内涵探析[J].科技管理研究,2008(06):394-396.
    [39]Hellstrom T, Jacomb M, Malmquist, Guiding innovation socially and cognitively:the innovation team model at skanova networks [J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2002(05):172-180.
    [40]哈里斯.构建创新团队——培养与整合高绩效创新团队的战略及方法[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2008.
    [41]甄珍.基于知识共享视角的创新团队研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(02):127-130.
    [42]池颖.我国高校科研创新团队建设研究[D],吉林大学博士学位论文,2009(12)
    [43]Kratzer J. Managing creative team performance in virtual environments [J] Journal of technovation,2006(26):42-49.
    [44]许小东.R&D团队建设与管理的思考[J].科学管理研究,2001(01):50-58.
    [45]孙和义.实施人才强校战略建设优秀创新团队[J].中国高校师资研究,2006(2):28-29.
    [46]程勉中.论高等学校的创新团队建设[J].研究与发展管理,2005(12):116-122.
    [47]约瑟夫·阿罗斯·熊彼特著,何畏,易家祥译.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务出版社,1991.
    [48]张利群.技术创新与区域经济增长[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2010(12)
    [49]E. Mansfied. The Economics of Technological Change [M].London [etc.]:[s.n.],1969.
    [50]杨晶晶.经济开放促进技术创新的理论及实证研究[D].湖南大学博士学位论文,2010(01).
    [51]谭慧:张培刚经济论文选集(下卷)[M].长沙:湖南出版社,1992.
    [52]柳卸林.技术创新经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1993.
    [53]傅家骥:技术创新学.北京:清华大学出版社,1998.
    [54]张凤,何传启.国家创新系统[M]..中国高等教育出版社,1999.
    [55]刘洪涛,汪应洛.中国技术创新部门模式的实证研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),1999(03):13-15.
    [56]关于加强技术创新发展高科技实现产业化的决定[N].http://www.china water.net.cn/CWSNews/990820.html,1999-08-20.
    [57]许庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
    [58]阮汝祥.创新制胜[M].北京:中国宇航出版社,2007.
    [59][美]罗斯托著,国际关系研究所编译室译.北京:商务印书社,1962.
    [60]孙丽萍.我国农业科研创新能力与团队建设研究[D].中国农业科学院博士学位论文,2009(12)
    [61]褚田芬.农业科研单位科技创新团队建设研究——以某省农业科学院为例[D].上海交通大学硕士学位论文,2009(06).
    [62]井润田.科研团队领导行为及其影响团队效能的研究[D].电子科技大学博士学位论文,2008(09).
    [63]Tjosvold Dean, Margaret Poon, Zi-you Yu. Team Effectiveness in China:Cooperative Conflict for Relationship Building[J]. Human Relations,2005 (58):341-367.
    [64]Guzzo R.A., Dickson M.W. Team in organizations-Recent research on performance and effectiveness[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,1996 (47):307-338.
    [65]戚振江,王端旭.研发团队效能管理[J].科研管理,2003(3):127-1 32.
    [66]Hillriege, D, Slocum, J.W.&Woodman, R.W. Organizational behavior(ninth edition)[M].USA: South Western College Publishing,2001.
    [67]Bandura. A Self-efficacy:The exercise of control [M].New York, NY:WH Freeman & Company, 1997.
    [68]Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P.& Futrell, D. Work teams:Applications and effectiveness [J]. American Psychology,1990(02):120-133.
    [69]Alejandro Portes. Social Capital:Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1998(24):1-24.
    [70]张凤海,侯铁珊.技术创新理论述评[J].东北大学学报,2008(5):101-105.
    [71]周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003.
    [72]于显洋.组织社会学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
    [73]莫兴武.农业科研创新团队关系型社会资本对创新绩效影响研究[D].四川农业大学学位论文,2012(06)
    [74]钟涨宝,黄甲寅,万江红.社会资本理论述评[J].社会,2001(10):29-31.
    [75]张广利,陈仕中.社会资本理论发展的瓶颈:定义探讨及测量问题[J].中国社会科学,2006(02):102-106.
    [76]张方华.社会资本理论研究综述田.江苏科技大学学报,2005(12):7-14.
    [77]Coleman. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988:95-120.
    [78]Turner, Jonathan H., "The Formation of Social Capital." in Social Capital:A Multifaceted Perspective[M], (eds.) by Partha Dagupta&Ismail Serageldin, Washington, DC:The World Bank,1999.
    [79]Brown, Tomas Ford. Theoretical Summary of Social Capital, Working paper, University of Wisconsin,1999.
    [80]Uphoff Norman. Learning from Galoya:Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science [M]-London:Intermediate Technology Publications,1996.
    [81]Granovetter, M. S. Economic action and social structure:The problem of embededness [J].American Journal of sociology,1985(91):481-510.
    [82]李惠斌,杨雪冬.社会资本与社会发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
    [83]McGrath J.E, Social Psychology:A Brief introduction [J].New York:Holt Rinchart & Winston. 1964.
    [84]Nieva, V.F, Fleishman, E.A & Rieck, A. Team Dimensions:Their Identity, Their Measurement &Their Relationship[M].Washington, DC:Advanced Research Resources organizations.1978.
    [85]Jewell L.N & Reitz, H.J. Group Effectiveness in organizations[M]. Illinois:Foresman and company,1981.
    [86]Hackmaan J.R. A Normative Model of work team-effectiveness[D].CT:Yale univereity.1983.
    [87]Gladstein D L. Groups in context:A model of task group effectiveness[J].. Administrative science Quarterly,1984(29):499-517.
    [88]Salas E, Dickinson T L, converse S A & Tannenbuam S L, Toward an Understanding of Team Performance and Training[C]. In Swezey R W & Salas E.(Eds),Teams:Their Training and Performance,NJ:1992:3-29.
    [89]Taylor G L, J. Snyder L J, Dahnke K F, et al Self-directed R&D teams:what makes them effective? [J]. Research Technology Management,1995, (38):19-24.
    [90]张体勤,常宏建.高校学术创新团队绩效影响因素研究[J].山东经济,2010(1):52-59.
    [91]Cohen S G, Bailey D E. what makes teams work:Group effective research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J].. Journal of management,1997(23):239-290.
    [92]张小林,王重鸣.群体绩效和团队效能研究的新进展[J].应用心理学,1997(12):58-64.
    [93]徐芳.团队绩效测评技术与实践[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
    [94]戚振江,王端旭.研发团队效能管理[J].科研管理,2003(03):127-132.
    [95]卢向南,黄存权.有效识别项目团队绩效的影响因素[J].技术经济与管理研究,2004(05):82-83.
    [96]黄玉清.项目团队有效性模型的构建与分析[J].广东商学院学报.2006(05):39-41.
    [97]任浩,赵枫.基于商业生态系统的团队效能评价模型研究[D]同济大学学位论文,2007.
    [98]蒋日富,霍国庆,谭红军,郭传杰.科研团队知识创新绩效影响要素研究——基于我国国立科研机构的调查分析[J].科学学研究,2007(04):364-372.
    [99]Den Hartog D. N., Van Muijen J. J.& Koopman P. L. Linking transformational leadership and organizational culture [J].The Journal of Leadership Studies,1996 (03):68-83.
    [100]Bass, B.M. Does the transactional transformational leadership paradigm transcend Organizational and national boundearies? [J] American Psychology,1997(02):130-139.
    [101]Bums J M. Leadership[M].New York:Harper & Row,1978.
    [102]孟太生.科研团队领导行为及其影响团队效能的研究[D].电子科技大学博士学位论文,2008.
    [103]廖泉文,黄玉清.构建项目团队的信任[J].中国人力资源开发,2002(12):10-13.
    [104]姜永志.团队内部信任对团队效能影响的实证研究[D].内蒙古财经学院硕士学位论文,2011(06)
    [105]殷家山.团队社会资本与团队效能关系的实证研究——基于团队内外部非正式关系网络的的视角[D].华东理工大学学位论文,2010(12).
    [106]Heng-Li Yang, Jih Hsin Tang. Team structure and team performance in IS development:a social network perspective[J]. Information & Management.2004(41):335-349.
    [107]林亿明.团队导向的人力资源管理实务对团队知识分享与创新之影响——社会资本的中介效果[D].东吴大学硕士论文,2001(07).
    [108]何芳蓉.新产品开发团队之社会资本、知识分享与绩效的实证研究[D].国立高雄第一科技大学硕士论文,2003(05).
    [109]李彰明.团队社会资本、知识管理.价值管理对创新竞争力影响之研究——以不动产为例[D].国立成功大学硕士论文,2007(06).
    [110]柯江林,孙健敏,石金涛,顾琴轩.企业R&D团队之社会资本与团队效能关系的实证研究——以知识分享与知识整合为中介变量[J].管理世界,2007(03):89-101.
    [111]李光红,张娜.社会资本对大学生创新团队绩效的影响研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007(06):182-184.
    [112]张娜,陈学中.团队社会资本及对绩效的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(11):181-185.
    [113]张娜.创新团队社会资本及对团队绩效的影响研究[D].济南大学学位论文,2008(06)
    [114]陈朝旭,缪小明.研发团队内部社会资本对突破性创新的影响——以知识冲突为中介变量[J].情报杂志,2010(08):187-192.
    [115]彭灿.团队社会资本对团队创造力的影响:命题与模型[J].情报杂志,2011(05):187-192.
    [116]Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D and Researcher across organizational boundaries[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000, (01):50-65.
    [117]Granovetter, M., The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology,1973 (78):1367.
    [118]Amabile T M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta G B., Kramer S J. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity:Perceived leader support[J]. Leadership Quarterly,2004 (15):5-32.
    [119]Burt R.S.Structural holes:The social structure of competition [M]:Belknap pr,1995.
    [120]Brass D.J, Burkhardt. M E. Potential power and power use:An investigation of structure and behavior[J]..Academy of management journal,1993:441-470.
    [121]房路生.企业家社会资本与创业绩效关系研究[D].西北大学博士学位论文,2010(06).
    [122]郭贵林.社会资本、知识过程与部门效能关系实证研究-以企业R&D部门为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008(10)
    [123]Burt R S.Structure holes:The social structure of competition[M].Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
    [124]Blau. P. M. Exchange and Power in social life[M]:Transaction Pub,1986.
    [125]福朗西斯,福山.信任——杜会道德与繁荣的创造[M]. 呼和浩特:远方出版社,1998.
    [126]Adler, Paul S., Kwon, Seok-Woo. Social capital:prospects for a new concept[J].Academy of Management Review,2002(27):23-36.
    [127]Luo, Jar-Der. Particularistic Trust and general Trust-A Network Analysis in Chinese organizations[J].Management and Organizational Review,2005 (03):437-458.
    [128]Carnevale D.G, Wechsler B. Trust in the Public sector:Individual and organizational Determinants [J]. Administration&Society,1992 (04):471-494.Mayer R. C.,. Davis J. H, Schoorman F D.An integrative model of organizational trust[J].Academy of management review,1995 (03):709-734.
    [129]
    [130]Hosmer L. T. Trust:The connecting link between organizational theory and Phiosophical ethics [J].Academy of Management Review,1995 (02):379-403.
    [131]郑也夫.信任:溯源与定义[J].北京社会科学,1999(04):118-123.
    [132]黄孝武.企业间信任问题理论述评[J].经济学动态,2002(10):59-64.
    [133]Zucker L. G. Production of trust:Institutional sources of economic structure 1840-1920.[J].Research in organizational behavior,1986(08):53-111.
    [134]Ring, Peter Smith, Van De Ven, etal. Structuring Cooperative Relationships Between Organizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1992(13):483-488.
    [135]Mccauley D.P., Kuhnert K.W. A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management.[J]. Public Administration Quarterly,1992(03):265-283.
    [136]郭毅,朱熹.国外社会资本与管理学研究新进展—分析框架与应用评述[J].外国经济与管理,2003(07):2-7.
    [137]周小虎,陈传明.企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J].中国工业经济,2004(05):90-96.
    [138]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the Replication of technology[J].Organization Scienee,1992 (03):383-397.
    [139]InkPen A.C.Tsang E.W.K.Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer[J].Academy of Management Review,2005 (01):146-165.
    [140]Orton J.D, Weick K.E. Loosely coupled systems:A reconceptualization [J]. Academy of Management Review,1990 (15):203-223.
    [141]Kang S C,S S Morris and S A snell. Extending the Human Resource Architecture:Relational Archetypes and Value Creation [R].CAHRS Working Paper Series,2003 (05):3-13.
    [142]Coleman J. social capital in the creation of the Human Capital[J]. American journal of sociology, 1988 (94):95-120.
    [143]罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.
    [144]罗家德,叶勇助.中国人的信任游戏[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
    [145]Zucker, L.G Production of trust:Institutional sources of economic structure[J]. Research in organizational behavior,1986(08),53-111.
    [146]Sheppard, Blair h. and Tuchinsky, Marla. Micro-OB and the network organization. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler(eds.). Trust in organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage publications, Inc, 1992:140-165.
    [147]罗家德,郑孟育,谢智棋.实践性社群内社会资本对知识分享的影响[J].江西社会科学,2007(3):131-141.
    [148]Sim B. Sitkin and Nancy L. Roth. Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic "Remedies" for Trust/Distrust[J]. Organization Science,1993(09):367-392.
    [149]Ming-huei Chen, Yuan-Chieh Chang etal., Social CaPital and Creativity in R&D Project Teams[J].R&D Management,2008 (01):21-34.
    [150]Borman W.C., Motowidlo S.J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection In Organization[M]. San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass,1993.
    [151]罗正学、朱霞等.任务绩效、关系绩效与工作绩效的关系研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006(05):451-452.
    [152]刘亚楠,王刚,陈建成.任务绩效和关系绩效的研究综述[J].经济研究视角(下),2011(07):3-5.
    [153]Janz,.B.D., Colquitt, J.A.& Noe,.R.A., Knowledge worker team effectiveness:The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development and contextual support variables, Personnel psychology, 1997 (50):887-904.
    [154]Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D.L.& Weingart, L.R.Maximizing cross-functional new Product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence:A conflict communications Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001 (44):779-793.
    [155]Guzzo R.A., Dickson M.W.. Team in organizations---Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology,1996 (47):307-338.
    [156]Ancona, D.G. Outward bound:Strategic for team survival in an organization[J].Academy of Management Joumal,1990(33):334-365.
    [157]Ratzburg, W. Organizational behavior notes by Wilf Ratzburg:Team Effectiveness inventory [EB/OL]. http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1650/qteameffectiveness.htm,2003.
    [158]陈旭.团队领导对团队效能的影响机理研究[J].科研管理,2006(07):138-141.
    [159]严进周边绩效[J].外国经济与管理,1999(05):30-33.
    [160]罗家德,郑孟育,谢智棋.实践性社群内社会资本对知识分享的影响[J].江西社会科学,2007(03):131-141.
    [161]Kanter, R. M. When a thousand flows bloom:structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations[A].In:B. M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (eds.), Reseach in organizational behavior[C]. Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,1988.169-211.
    [162]况学文,彭迪云.社会资本与中小企业技术创新绩效的实证研究[J].商场现代化,2007(09):12-14.
    [163]Dyer J. H., Singh H. The Relational View:Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998(23):660-679.
    [164]Beugelsdijk S. Mapping the landscape of social capital-the need for a two-level approach [D]. Center dissertation series [C]. Tilburg:Tilburg University,2003.
    [165]Xueming Luo, David A. Griffith, Sandra S. Liu and Yi-Zheng Shi. The Effects of Customer Relationships and Social Capital on Firm Performance:A Chinese Business Illustration [J].Journal of International Marketing,2004,12 (4):25-45.
    [166]Williams J G. The importance of HR practices and workplaces and workplace trust in achieving superior performance:A study of public-sector organizations[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management,2003 (14):28-54.
    [167]Akcomak I S, Ter Weel B. Social capital, innovation and growth:evidence from Europe[A]. UNU-MERIT Working Paper,2006.
    [168]廖泉文,黄玉清.构建项目团队的信任[J].中国人力资源开发,2004(10):113.
    [169]徐淑芳.信任社会资本与经济绩效[J].学习与探索,2005(05):210-213.
    [170]张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释: 来自中国的跨省调查分析[EB/OL].http://www.studa.net/china/060117/14444885.html,2006-1-17.
    [171]谢洪明,王琪,葛志良.企业文化、学习与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(03):73-77.
    [172]Senge P. M. The Fifth Discipline:the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization [MJ.New York:Doubleday Dell Publishing,1990.
    [173]游浚,张斌.基于社会资本视角的创新管理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(08):29-31.
    [174]Hong-zen Wang, H. Michael Hsiao. Social Capitalor Human Capital? Professionals in Overseas Taiwanese Firms [J]. Journal of Contemporary Asia,2002,32 (03):346-362.
    [175]黎仁惠,王晓东.从社会资本视角看技术转移中隐性知识的转化[J].科技进步与对策,2009(07):130-133.
    [176]陆铭,李爽.社会资本、非正式制度与经济发展[J].管理世界,2008(09):161-179.
    [177]吴江秋.基于社会资本理论的组织管理研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2009(23):1-2.
    [178]Natalia W. A theoretical and Empirical Assessment of the social capital of Nascent Entrepreneurical Teams[D]. Purdue University,2004(06).
    [179]石军伟,付海艳.社会资本理论的历史回顾与新发展[J].财经政法资讯,2005(04):51-57.
    [180]Burt R.S. The network of social capital [C].in R.1.Sutton & B M Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.2000(22):345-423.
    [181]Ibarra, H. Homophily and differential returns:Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1992(37):422-447.
    [182]Umphress, E., Labianca, G, Brass, D.J., Kass, E. E.& Scholten L. The role of Instrumental and expressive social ties in employees'perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science, 2003(14):738-753.
    [183]任亮.社会资本理论的五个命题[J].探索,2007(03):109-113.
    [184]Nicolaou, N.,& Biriey S. Social networks in organizational emergence:The university spinout Phenomenon[Jl. Management Science,2003(49):1702-1725.
    [185]Wellman, B. Which types of ties and networks Provide What kinds of social support[C]. In E J Lawler B Markovsky C. Ridgeway & H walker(eds), Advances in group Processes, vol.9:207-235.Greenwieh, CT:JAI Press.1992.
    [186]Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effects [J]. American Sociological Review,1996(61):674-698.
    [187]Kratzer J.The social structure of leadership and creativity in engineering design teams:An empirical analysis[J].J Eng Technol.Manage,2008(25):269-286.
    [188]Krackhardt D. The ties that toture:Simmelian tie analysis in organizations [C].In S.B.Andrews & D knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations,vol.16:183-210. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press,1999.
    [189]Portes A, Sensenbrenner J. Embeddedness and immigration:Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology,1993(98):1320-1350.
    [190]Levine, D. N. Simmel and Parsons reconsidered[J].American Journal of Sociology,1991(96):1097-1116.
    [191]Seers, A. Team member exchange quality:A new construct for role making research [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1989(43):118-135.
    [192]Milliken F J & Martins L L. Searching for common threads:Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups [J]. Academy of Management Review,1996(21):402-433.
    [193]Ancona D. G Outward bound:Strategies for team survival in an organization [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1990(33):334-365.
    [194]Geletkanycz M A.&Hambrick D C.The external ties of executives:Implications for strategic choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997(42):654-681
    [195]石军伟,胡立君,付海艳.企业社会责任、社会资本与组织竞争优势:一个战略互动视角—基于中国转型期经验的实证研究[J].中国工业经济.2009(11):87-98.
    [196]Aryee S, Budhwar P S&Chen Z X. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and workout comes:test of a social exchange model [J].Journal of organizational Behavior,2002(23):267-285.
    [197]Costigan R D, Ilter S S, Berman J J. A Multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations [J]Journal of Managerial Issues,1998 (03):303-317.
    [198]Tan H H, Tan C S.F. Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization [J].Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs,2000 (02):241-260.
    [199]李晋,张体勤.员工-主管信任模型构建[J].山东社会科学,2009(02),98-100.
    [200]柯江林.基于社会资本的企业R&D团队效能形成机制研究-以知识分享与整合为中介[D].上海交通大学博士学位论文,2006.
    [201]徐碧祥.员工信任对其知识整合与共享意愿的作用机制研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007(05).
    [202]彼得,什托姆普卡著,程胜利译.信任——一种社会学理论[M].北京:中华书局,2005.
    [203]杨志蓉.团队快速信任、互动行为与团队创造力研究[D].浙江大学学位论文,2006(10).
    [204]Rousseau D M.,Sitkin S B,Burt R S, Camere C. Not so differe after all:A Cross discipline view of trust[J].Academy of Management Review,1998 (03):393-404.
    [205]Bradach J L, Eccles R G. Markets versus hierarchies:From ideal types to Plural forms [J].Annual Review of Sociology,1989(15):97-118.
    [206]Seers A, Petty M M, Cashman J F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management[J].Group and Organization Management,1995 (01):18-38.
    [207]Clegg C, Unswohrt K, EpitortPaki O et.al. Implicating Trust in the Innovation Process[J] Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2002 (04):409-422.
    [208]王于佳.创业团队成员信任对社会网络与企业创新能力关系的影响研究——基于吉林省中小企业实证研究[D].吉林大学学位论文,2011(04).
    [209]秦明青.科技型新创企业创业团队社会资本对新创企业成长的影响研究[D].江南大学学位论文,2010(12).
    [210]Shepherd D A, Zaeharakis A.The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship:Control trust and confidence in co-operative behavior[J].Venture Capital,2001 (02):129-150.
    [211]Tyler B. The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies:A resource-based Perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering and technology Management,2001(18):l-27.
    [212]De Clereq D, SapienzaH. The creation of relational rents in venture capitalist entrepreneur dyads [J].Venture Capital,2001 (02):107-128.
    [213]Granovetter M.S. Economic action and social structure:The Problem of embededness [J].American Journal of sociology,1985(91):481-510.
    [214]Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Joumal,1996(17):27-43.
    [215]Zaheer A., McEvily B, Perrone. Does trust mater? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on Performance[J].organization Science,1998(09):1-20.
    [216]朱亚明.社会资本对技术型中小企业中知识管理行为的影响研究[D].浙江大学学位论文,2005(10)
    [217]Cohen W, Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity:A new Perspective on learning and innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990(35):128-152.
    [218]Nonaka. The knowledge creating company[J].Harvard Business Review,1991(06):96-105.
    [219]王凤彬.供应链网络组织与竞争优势[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
    [220]Henderson R M, Clark K B. Architectural innovation:The reconfiguration of existing Product technologies and the failure of established firms [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990(35):9-30.
    [221]Mitchell T R, Silver W S. Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent:Effects on task strategies and Performance[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1990(75):185-193.
    [222]钟芳冰.团队内部社会资本、团队氛围与团队创造力的关系研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2011(03)
    [223]Wong A, Tjosvold D, Yu Z. Organizational Partnerships in China:Self-Interest, Goal Interdependence and Opportunism. Journal of Applied Psychology,2005 (04):782-791.
    [224]Amabile T M. Creativity in Context [M]. Boulder, CO:West view,1996.
    [225]Aquino K., Serva M.Using a dual role assignment to improve group dynamics and Performance: The effects of facilitating social capital in teams[J].Journal of Management Education,2005 (01):17-38.
    [226]袁晓婷.企业R&D团队内部社会网络与团队知识创造关系研究,华东理工大学博士学位论文,2010(06).
    [227]耿科化.社会资本、多团队学习与创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江工商大学学位论文,2011(01).
    [228]Jarvenpaa S L, Knoll K.& Leidner D E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams[J] Journal of Management Information Systems,1998 (04):29-64.
    [229]Farrell J B., Flood P C, Curtain S M. etal. CEO leadership, top team trust and the combination and exchange of information[J].Irish Journal of Management,2005 (01):22-40.
    [230]Lee D Y, Dawes P L. Guan xi, trust and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets[J] Journal of International Marketing,2005 (02):28-56.
    [231]Beugelsdijk S, Noorderhaven N G, etal. Organizational culture, alliance capabilities and social capital, Working Paper,2003.
    [232]韦影.企业社会资本的测量研究[J].科学学研究,2007(07):518-522.
    [233]Ancona D., Caldwell D F. Demography and design:Predictors of new Product team Performance. Organization Science,1992(03):321-341.
    [234]Barrick M R, Stewart G L, Mount M. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and Team effectiveness Journal of Applied Psychology,1998(83):377-391.
    [235]杨松青.高校科研团队协作相关因素对团队效能的影响研究-以共享心智模式为中介[D].浙江工业大学学位论文,2011(12)
    [236]Anderson N, West M A. Measuring climate for work group innovation:Development and validation of the team climate inventory[J] Journal of Organizational Behavior,1998 (03):235-255.
    [237]De Dreu C K W..When too little or too much hurts:Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams[J] Journal of Management,2006 (01):83-107.
    [238]Lovelace K, Shapiro D L, weingart L R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams, innovativeness and constraint adherence:A conflict communications Perspective[J].Academy of Management Journal,2001 (04):779-793.
    [239]Drach-Zahavy, A., Somech A. Understanding team innovation:The role of team Processes and structures[J],Group Dynamics:Theory, Research and Practice,2001 (02):111-123.
    [240]王贞怡.共享心智模式对团队效能的影响-基于IT研发团队的实证分析[D].西南财经大学学位论文,2008(11)
    [241]郭胜忠.组织支持感对于团队效能的影响研究-团队反思的中介作用[D].陕西师范大学学位论文,2009(06).
    [242]Bandura A A. socio-cognitive analysis of substance abuse:an agnatic perspective. Psychological Science,1999 (03) 214-225.
    [243]郑雁.组织公民行为对团队效能的影响研究-基于软件开发团队的实证分析[D].西南财经大学学位论文,2007(04)
    [244]Bourdieu, Pierre. The Forms of Social Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, (ed.) by John G. Richardson, Westport, CT.:Greenwood Press:1986,241-.252.
    [245]陈伟民.高管团队人口特征、社会资本和企业绩效[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报, 2007(02):82-84.
    [246]Shipilov, Danis. TMG Social Capital, Strategic Choice and Firm Performance [J]. European Management Journal,2006 (01):16-27.
    [247]John F.Hellwell, Reboert D. Putnam. Education and Social Capital. Eastern Economic Journal, 2007(33):1-19.
    [248]卢燕平.社会资本的来源及测量[J].求索,2007(05):5-8.
    [249]张进华.高管团队人口特征、社会资本和企业绩效[D].华中科技大学博士毕业论文,2010(10).
    [250]弗朗西斯·福山.信任—社会美德与创造经济繁荣[M].彭志华译.海口:海南出版社,2001.
    [251]陆铭,李爽.社会资本、非正式制度与经济发展[J].管理世界,2008(09):161-165,179.
    [252]顾慈阳.社会资本理论及其应用研究[D].天津大学博士学位论文,2004(11):24-30.
    [253]王海霞.团队互动过程对团队效能的影响研究[D].天津财经大学博士学位论文,2008(11)
    [254]Hare A P. Group size [J].American Behavioral Scientist,1981(24):695-708.
    [255]Shaw M E. Group dynamics:The Psychology of small group behavior (3rded.)[M]. New York: McGraw Hill,1981.
    [256]张树娟,刘政.研发团队知识创造的影响因素及绩效评估[J].情报杂志,2008(10):18-20.
    [257]雷纳托,塔吉尤利.选择行政人员的研究要求[D].哈佛大学商业管理研究生院,1961:45.
    [258]朱伟珏.社会学方法新规则—试论布尔迪厄对涂尔干社会学方法论的继承与超越[J].浙江社会科学,2006(05):105.
    [259]荣泰生Amos与研究方法[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
    [260]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].陕西:西安交通大学出版社,2004.
    [261]杨国枢,文崇一,吴聪贤等.社会及行为科学研究法(上)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2006.
    [262]刘怀伟.商务市场中顾客关系的持续机制研究—基于顾客的视角[D],浙江大学博士学位论文,2003(06).
    [263]卢纹岱Spss for Windows统计分析[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002.
    [264]黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005.
    [265]Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R. Blaek W. Multivariate data analysis[M](sthed.).PrentieeHall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ,1998.
    [266]梁莱歆,谢芳春,王文芝.结构方程在确定现金流风险指标权重问题中的应用[J].统计与决策,2007(09):134-135.
    [267]Amason, A., Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making:Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal, 1996(36):123-148.
    [268]吴明隆SPSS统计应用与实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [269]张镇鸿.R&D团队社会资本与创新绩效:团队心理安全与学习行为的作用研究[D].上海交通大学学位论文,2011(06)
    [270]赵延东.再就业中社会资本的使用——以武汉市下岗职工为例[J].学习与探索,2006(02):58-62.
    [271]符平.微观社会资本研究的反思[J].南京社会科学,2004(11):75-80.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700