勃利盆地中生界地质特征及油气资源潜力分析
|
摘要
本文在广泛的搜集前人研究资料的基础上,结合野外实际工作,对黑龙江省东部松辽盆地外围盆地之一的勃利盆地进行了比较全面与深入的研究。包括黑龙江省东部区域地层划分与对比,沉积体系的演化,勃利盆地的盆地基底与沉积盖层的基本特征与时空分布特征、盆地主要断裂与褶皱构造特征、黑龙江省东部盆地群隆升幅度规律分析、盆地内烃源岩层、储层与盖层的时空分布规律及构造对保存条件的影响与盆地内的资源潜力分析等。重点研究了黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群与鸡西群的划分与对比、勃利盆地构造特征及演化、用镜质体反射率数据恢复区域隆升史,分析隆升幅度规律、用Matlab 编程实现蒙特卡罗法计算盆地内的油气资源量。
Based on the past records and field work in Boli basin, one of the basins that located at the eastern of Heilongjiang province, these contents were studied in this paper, including the basic features of basement and sedimentary cover, the structural feature of faults and folds, the analysis of uplift history, the space-time distribution regularity of source rock, oil-reservoir and cap rock, the tectonic effect on reserve condition and the calculation of oil-gas resource in the basin, etl. What are interpreted on detail include the Mesozoic regional strata in the eastern Heilongjiang Province (subdivision and correlation of the Longzhaogou Group and Jixi Group), the structural features and evolution of Boli basin, reconstruct the regional uplift history with vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data in this district and calculation the oil-gas resource with Monte-Carlo method under Matlab.
Concerning Boli basin is a Mesozoic-Cenozoic coal-bearing basin, and the exploratory degree is not very high, we must stick to study the basic geological data, beginning from the region data, distinguish contents which are the most important, analyze the data globally, so that we can hold the basin’s attribute in a wider field and a deeper degree. From the basic geological data such as structural of basement, the regional structural setting, sequence of strata, we can deepen the realization about the basin’s generating and evolution. From the strata sequence, we can analyze the structural unit. From the vitrinite reflectance data, we can reconstruct the uplift history of the basin group in eastern Heilongjiang province. Using the data above, the oil-gas geological condition was studied. At last, the oil-gas resource in the basin was
calculated with Monte-Carlo method and varied qualities at different possibilities were drawn. Through the study above, some conclusions were drawn: 1、Boli basin is a Mesozoic fault-depression relic basin. There are obvious geological development features among the western, middle and eastern in the basin. The inner structural framework is controlled by late Mesozoic synsedimentary tensional block and shear structural lately. 2、Longzhaogou and Jixi Groups in eastern Heilongjiang province are the early Cretaceous age, but not the“Jurassic”age or the“middle late Jurassic-early Cretaceous”age. Longzhaogou Group is divided into five Formations from lower to upper: Peide Formation, Qihulin Formation, Xiayunshan Formation, Shangyunshan Formation and Zhushan Formation. Jixi Group is divided into three Formations: Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muling Formation. Two Groups are generally in the same age, so they can be correlated each other. Correlatiom between Peide Formation in the Longzhaogou Group and the Didao Formation in Jixi Group,correlation between Qihulin Fomation and Yunshan Formation in the Longzhaogou Group and Chengzihe Formation in Jixi Group, correlation between Zhushan Formation in Longzhaogou Group and Muling Formation in Jixi Group. 3、Faults and folds are all well developed in the basin. Main tend strike of the faults in the basin is EW、SN、NW and NE. The faults in the Middle fault is the most complex. The strike EW fault is well developed in the southern Fault, the strike of NW and NE are well developed in middle and northern Fault. At the same time, the strike of NS is developed in middle Fault. Folds in the middle fault and eastern depression are developed better than those in the
western depression. The fold axes change with the basin axes. These folds and faults form an arc zone. These asymmetry folds often show flat in north wing but sharp in southern wing even become reverse fold. 4、Through the synthetical analysis of strata sequence, sedimentary sequence, structure features and evolution history, the basin evolution is divided into 2 periods and 5 development steps. One period is late Mesozoic synsedimentary fault-depression including rift, fault-depression and structural reverse, the other is Cenozoic reformed including reformed step in Palaeogene and reformed in Neogene. 5、The uplift regularity in late Cretaceous of basin groups in eastern Heilongjiang province was analyzed with vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data. The results show that the Mesozoic lower Cretaceous series has uplifted in most districts in Jiamusi block, but the amplitude is various. The uplift amplitude in some district reach 2000m, with the line of Jiayin-Hegang-Jiamusi-Mishan. In generally, it is a equal change, it is can be seen in the nearly parallel contour. There are relative doming especially in the north and depression, these are the basic condition of form the basins now. The relation of Ro and deep was established, the equation is Z=1879.7ln (Ro)-832.81,and the correlation coefficient is 0.9481. 6、After analyzing the condition of oil-generating strata, reservoir and cap rock, we find that the mother material type of source rock and the geochemistry condition decide the basin tend to gas and because the basin is scare of regional cap rock, add with the intense destroy of strata uplift, the condition of massing gas is not very good. 7、Oil-gas resource with Monte-Carlo method under Matlab were
Based on the past records and field work in Boli basin, one of the basins that located at the eastern of Heilongjiang province, these contents were studied in this paper, including the basic features of basement and sedimentary cover, the structural feature of faults and folds, the analysis of uplift history, the space-time distribution regularity of source rock, oil-reservoir and cap rock, the tectonic effect on reserve condition and the calculation of oil-gas resource in the basin, etl. What are interpreted on detail include the Mesozoic regional strata in the eastern Heilongjiang Province (subdivision and correlation of the Longzhaogou Group and Jixi Group), the structural features and evolution of Boli basin, reconstruct the regional uplift history with vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data in this district and calculation the oil-gas resource with Monte-Carlo method under Matlab.
Concerning Boli basin is a Mesozoic-Cenozoic coal-bearing basin, and the exploratory degree is not very high, we must stick to study the basic geological data, beginning from the region data, distinguish contents which are the most important, analyze the data globally, so that we can hold the basin’s attribute in a wider field and a deeper degree. From the basic geological data such as structural of basement, the regional structural setting, sequence of strata, we can deepen the realization about the basin’s generating and evolution. From the strata sequence, we can analyze the structural unit. From the vitrinite reflectance data, we can reconstruct the uplift history of the basin group in eastern Heilongjiang province. Using the data above, the oil-gas geological condition was studied. At last, the oil-gas resource in the basin was
calculated with Monte-Carlo method and varied qualities at different possibilities were drawn. Through the study above, some conclusions were drawn: 1、Boli basin is a Mesozoic fault-depression relic basin. There are obvious geological development features among the western, middle and eastern in the basin. The inner structural framework is controlled by late Mesozoic synsedimentary tensional block and shear structural lately. 2、Longzhaogou and Jixi Groups in eastern Heilongjiang province are the early Cretaceous age, but not the“Jurassic”age or the“middle late Jurassic-early Cretaceous”age. Longzhaogou Group is divided into five Formations from lower to upper: Peide Formation, Qihulin Formation, Xiayunshan Formation, Shangyunshan Formation and Zhushan Formation. Jixi Group is divided into three Formations: Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muling Formation. Two Groups are generally in the same age, so they can be correlated each other. Correlatiom between Peide Formation in the Longzhaogou Group and the Didao Formation in Jixi Group,correlation between Qihulin Fomation and Yunshan Formation in the Longzhaogou Group and Chengzihe Formation in Jixi Group, correlation between Zhushan Formation in Longzhaogou Group and Muling Formation in Jixi Group. 3、Faults and folds are all well developed in the basin. Main tend strike of the faults in the basin is EW、SN、NW and NE. The faults in the Middle fault is the most complex. The strike EW fault is well developed in the southern Fault, the strike of NW and NE are well developed in middle and northern Fault. At the same time, the strike of NS is developed in middle Fault. Folds in the middle fault and eastern depression are developed better than those in the
western depression. The fold axes change with the basin axes. These folds and faults form an arc zone. These asymmetry folds often show flat in north wing but sharp in southern wing even become reverse fold. 4、Through the synthetical analysis of strata sequence, sedimentary sequence, structure features and evolution history, the basin evolution is divided into 2 periods and 5 development steps. One period is late Mesozoic synsedimentary fault-depression including rift, fault-depression and structural reverse, the other is Cenozoic reformed including reformed step in Palaeogene and reformed in Neogene. 5、The uplift regularity in late Cretaceous of basin groups in eastern Heilongjiang province was analyzed with vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data. The results show that the Mesozoic lower Cretaceous series has uplifted in most districts in Jiamusi block, but the amplitude is various. The uplift amplitude in some district reach 2000m, with the line of Jiayin-Hegang-Jiamusi-Mishan. In generally, it is a equal change, it is can be seen in the nearly parallel contour. There are relative doming especially in the north and depression, these are the basic condition of form the basins now. The relation of Ro and deep was established, the equation is Z=1879.7ln (Ro)-832.81,and the correlation coefficient is 0.9481. 6、After analyzing the condition of oil-generating strata, reservoir and cap rock, we find that the mother material type of source rock and the geochemistry condition decide the basin tend to gas and because the basin is scare of regional cap rock, add with the intense destroy of strata uplift, the condition of massing gas is not very good. 7、Oil-gas resource with Monte-Carlo method under Matlab were
引文
[1]曹成润、郑庆道.黑龙江省东部残留盆地群构造演化特征及其油气勘探意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(12),167-171.
[2]刘池洋、孙海山.改造型盆地类型划分[J].新疆石油地质,1999,20(2):79-80.
[3]王新民、李相博、郭彦如.改造型盆地国内外研究现状与发展趋向[J].河南石油,2002,16(4):1-5.
[4]杨丙中、王东坡、李西建.松辽盆地东部地区推覆构造与油气勘探趋势[J].长春地质学院学报,1989,23(4),1-5.
[5]大庆石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志卷二[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,744.
[6]王世辉、王立民、唐金生.兴安岭盆地群成盆机制及含油气远景评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5):5-6.
[7]吴河勇、刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):20-22.
[8]候启军、冯志强、林铁锋.大庆探区油气勘探新进展[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):4-9.
[9]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:578-581.
[10]马家骏、方大赫.黑龙江省中生代火山岩初步研究.黑龙江地质[J],1991,2(2):1-16.
[11]成谷.黑龙江省东部中、新生代盆地群地球物理场特征及成盆规律研究.大庆石油学院硕士学位论文,2000:4-6.
[12]林强、葛文春、孙德有等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义,地质科学,1998,33(2):129-131.
[13]朱勤文、路凤香、谢意红. 大陆边缘扩张型活动带火山岩组合—松辽盆地周边中生代火山岩研究[J].岩石学报,1997,13(4):552.
[14]张帆、迟元林、王东坡等. 东北地区中新生代盆地及其动力学-地幔柱及其调整作用:盆地形成的原动力[J].世界地质,1999,12(4):13-19.
[15]姜贵周.中国东北中新生代盆地成因与演化[J].大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(1).
[16]牛雪、卢造勋、姜德录等.郯庐断裂北带地区主要构造单元壳幔结构特征与地震活动性[J].地震学报,2000,22(2):145-150.
[17]郭孟习、孙炜、尹国义. 郯庐断裂系的北延及地质地球物理特征[J].吉林地质,2000,19(3):35-44.
[18]于鸿禄.敦-密断裂带构造特征与控煤规律[J].东北煤炭技术,1996,3(3):36-37.
[19]李碧乐、孙丰月、姚凤良.中生代敦化一密山断裂大规模左旋平移及其对金矿床形成的控制作用[J].大地构造与成矿学,2002,26(4),390-395.
[20]章振铨、李志田、迟天峰.敦化—密山断裂带断裂活动性评价[J].吉林地质,1999,18(1):51-56.
[21]黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群及鸡西群专题组.黑龙江省东部地区龙爪沟群、鸡西群及其生物化石[M].中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊(第5 号),沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1982:1-41.
[22]黑龙江省区域地层表编写组.东北地区区域地层表(黑龙江省分册)[M].北京:地质出版社,1979:268.
[23]黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群的研究及其与鸡西群对比[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1986:9-12.
[24]具然弘,郑少林,于希汉等. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群的划分及其与鸡西群对比[J].地质评论,1981,27,(5):391-401.
[25]具然弘,郑少林,于希汉等.黑龙江省东部地区龙爪沟群及鸡西群[J].中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,1982,(5):1-29.
[26]李蔚荣、刘茂强、于庭相等.黑龙江省东部侏罗系龙爪沟群[M],北京:地质出版社,1986:14-16.
[27]王义刚.黑龙江省东部的几种Bathonian 菊石.黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与白垩统化石(上册).哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1983:100-104.
[28]梁仲发.黑龙江省东部中侏罗纪的一些菊石.中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊.1982,5:63-69.
[29] 顾知微、陈金华、沙金庚.黑龙江省东部侏罗纪和白垩纪双壳类的初步研究. 黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与白垩统化石(下册31).哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1984:49-220.
[30]孙革,郑少林. 中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):60-63.
[31]孙革,郑少林,姜剑红等. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
[32]Shajingeng,Fuersich F T, Bivalve launas of eastern Heilongjiang, Northeastern China, Beringeria,1994,12:3-92.
[33]何承全.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地早白垩世滴道组的沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2001,40(1):127-133.
[34]何承全、孙学坤.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2000,39(1):46-62.
[35]杨小菊、何承全、黎文本等.鸡西盆地早白垩世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义[J].科学通报,2003,48(14):1553-1557.
[36]沙金庚. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2002,9(3):95-101.
[37]姜宝玉、冯金宝.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨[J].地层学杂志,2000,25(3):217-220.
[38]沙金庚.一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”.古生物学报,1999,38(3).
[39]张世红、刘本培、杨晓强. 黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群层序地层格架[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1997,4(3-4):108.
[40]孙革、郑少林、姜剑红. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
[41]高瑞祺、萧德铭.松辽盆地及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:201-206.
[42]李子俊、姜剑虹. 三江—穆棱河中晚侏罗世沉积体系与聚煤模式[J]. 东北煤炭技术,1996,3:9-18.
[43]李思田等.断陷盆地分析与煤聚积规律[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
[44]中国石油天然气总公司.石油构造地质学(二)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998,52-54.
[45]CAO Cheng-run,SHAN Xuan-long,WANG Dong-po. The fault Block’s framework in Boli Basin and its control over the deposition[J]. Geosci NE Asia, 2001,4(1): 13-19.
[46]姜贵周、朱建华、陈秉麟等.黑龙江省东部中、新生代构造发展及与含油气性关系(科研报告),1990,大庆石油学院.
[47]大庆石油管理局勘探事业部.黑龙江省虎林、勃利盆地石油勘探早期地质综合研究(科研报告),1997,大庆石油学院.
[48]曹成润. 黑龙江省东部中新生代盆地群成盆动力学机制及盆地构造演化.吉林大学博士学位论文,2001,39.
[49]Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin, 1930,14,1-24.
[50]Falvey D A.,M. F. Middleton, Passice continental margins: evidence for a prebreakup deep crustal metamorphic subsidence mechanism: Oceanologica Acta SP, 1981,103-104.
[51]陈发景、汪新文、陈昭年.伸展断陷盆地分析[M],北京:地质出版社,2004,209.
[52]刘学锋、何幼斌、张或丹.利用回剥分析重建古构造格局[J].古地理学报,1999,1(2):53-61.
[53]张功成、蔡希源、周保章.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法-以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,235-240.
[54]庞雄奇、陈章明、陈发景.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模型研究与烃源岩定量评价[M],1993,北京:石油工业出版社.
[55]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法[M],1994, 北京:石油工业出版社.
[56]Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin analysis-Principles and applications[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Scinentific Publications, 1990:236-281.
[57]陈全茂、张学预、李大成等.盆地分析原理与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,239～257.
[58]荐军.吐鲁番-哈密盆地盆地分析.西北大学硕士学位论文.2001.
[59]曹新焰、严永新、林学庆等.应用磷灰石裂变径迹探讨巴彦浩特石炭系热演化史[J],河南石油,2001,15(6),9-10.
[60]吴堑虹.裂变径迹方法在大地构造学中的一些应用[J],地质地球化学,2001,29(1):83 -89.
[61]周中毅、潘长春等,沉积盆地古地温测定方法及其应用[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1992,1～114.
[62]陈安定、郭彤楼、万景林.裂变径迹、同位素年龄研究苏皖周边隆起构造抬升[J],大地构造与成矿学,2004,11(4):379-387.
[63]李善鹏、邱楠生.应用磷灰石裂变径迹分析(AFTA)方法研究沉积盆地古地温[J],新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(2):13-17.
[64]康铁笙、王世成. 地质历史研究的裂变径迹法[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1991:9-25.
[65]赵俊青、纪友亮、王金友等.应用磷灰石裂变径迹求取地层剥蚀量[J],疆石油地质,2003,24(3):579-581.
[66]周中毅、刘德汉、盛国英,新疆某地区古地温模式与生油期推断[J].沉积学报,1983,1(2):143～151.
[67] 李伟.恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(3),167~171.
[68]肖贤明、刘祖发、申家贵等.确定含油气盆地古地温梯度的一种新方法-镜质组反射率梯度法[J].科学通报,1998,43(21),2340~2343.
[69]Dow W G. Kerogern studies and geological interpretations[J]: Journal of Geochemical Exploration,1977,7(1):79~99.
[70]何生、王青玲.关于用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J],地质评论,1989,35(2):119-125
[71]陈增智、柳广弟、郝石生.修正的镜质体发射率剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].沉积学报,1999,17(1),141~143.
[72]胡圣标、汪集AA、张容燕.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4),42~45.
[73]陈刚、赵重远、李丕龙等.Ro 反演的盆地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4),333~334.
[74]张厚福、方朝亮、张枝焕等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,195.
[75]汤达祯.镜质组反射率与沉积盆地古地温分析[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4),181-187.
[76] 陈刚、赵重远、李丕龙等.Ro 反演的盆地地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J],石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):343-347.
[77] 赵孟为、H.J.Behr.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系镜质体反射率与地热史[J].石油学报,17(2),15-22.
[78]Teichmuller M.,Anwendung, Kohlenpetrographischer methoden bei erdol-underdgasprospektion. Erdol and Kohle 1971,24:69-76(in German)
[79]Cannan J.,Time-temperature relation in oil genesis[J]. Bull AAPG,1974,58:2516-2521.
[80]Hood D.,Gutiahr C.C.M.,Heacock R.L.,Organic metamorphism and the generatio
[2]刘池洋、孙海山.改造型盆地类型划分[J].新疆石油地质,1999,20(2):79-80.
[3]王新民、李相博、郭彦如.改造型盆地国内外研究现状与发展趋向[J].河南石油,2002,16(4):1-5.
[4]杨丙中、王东坡、李西建.松辽盆地东部地区推覆构造与油气勘探趋势[J].长春地质学院学报,1989,23(4),1-5.
[5]大庆石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志卷二[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993,744.
[6]王世辉、王立民、唐金生.兴安岭盆地群成盆机制及含油气远景评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5):5-6.
[7]吴河勇、刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):20-22.
[8]候启军、冯志强、林铁锋.大庆探区油气勘探新进展[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):4-9.
[9]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:578-581.
[10]马家骏、方大赫.黑龙江省中生代火山岩初步研究.黑龙江地质[J],1991,2(2):1-16.
[11]成谷.黑龙江省东部中、新生代盆地群地球物理场特征及成盆规律研究.大庆石油学院硕士学位论文,2000:4-6.
[12]林强、葛文春、孙德有等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义,地质科学,1998,33(2):129-131.
[13]朱勤文、路凤香、谢意红. 大陆边缘扩张型活动带火山岩组合—松辽盆地周边中生代火山岩研究[J].岩石学报,1997,13(4):552.
[14]张帆、迟元林、王东坡等. 东北地区中新生代盆地及其动力学-地幔柱及其调整作用:盆地形成的原动力[J].世界地质,1999,12(4):13-19.
[15]姜贵周.中国东北中新生代盆地成因与演化[J].大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(1).
[16]牛雪、卢造勋、姜德录等.郯庐断裂北带地区主要构造单元壳幔结构特征与地震活动性[J].地震学报,2000,22(2):145-150.
[17]郭孟习、孙炜、尹国义. 郯庐断裂系的北延及地质地球物理特征[J].吉林地质,2000,19(3):35-44.
[18]于鸿禄.敦-密断裂带构造特征与控煤规律[J].东北煤炭技术,1996,3(3):36-37.
[19]李碧乐、孙丰月、姚凤良.中生代敦化一密山断裂大规模左旋平移及其对金矿床形成的控制作用[J].大地构造与成矿学,2002,26(4),390-395.
[20]章振铨、李志田、迟天峰.敦化—密山断裂带断裂活动性评价[J].吉林地质,1999,18(1):51-56.
[21]黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群及鸡西群专题组.黑龙江省东部地区龙爪沟群、鸡西群及其生物化石[M].中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊(第5 号),沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1982:1-41.
[22]黑龙江省区域地层表编写组.东北地区区域地层表(黑龙江省分册)[M].北京:地质出版社,1979:268.
[23]黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群的研究及其与鸡西群对比[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1986:9-12.
[24]具然弘,郑少林,于希汉等. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群的划分及其与鸡西群对比[J].地质评论,1981,27,(5):391-401.
[25]具然弘,郑少林,于希汉等.黑龙江省东部地区龙爪沟群及鸡西群[J].中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,1982,(5):1-29.
[26]李蔚荣、刘茂强、于庭相等.黑龙江省东部侏罗系龙爪沟群[M],北京:地质出版社,1986:14-16.
[27]王义刚.黑龙江省东部的几种Bathonian 菊石.黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与白垩统化石(上册).哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1983:100-104.
[28]梁仲发.黑龙江省东部中侏罗纪的一些菊石.中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊.1982,5:63-69.
[29] 顾知微、陈金华、沙金庚.黑龙江省东部侏罗纪和白垩纪双壳类的初步研究. 黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与白垩统化石(下册31).哈尔滨:黑龙江科技出版社,1984:49-220.
[30]孙革,郑少林. 中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):60-63.
[31]孙革,郑少林,姜剑红等. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
[32]Shajingeng,Fuersich F T, Bivalve launas of eastern Heilongjiang, Northeastern China, Beringeria,1994,12:3-92.
[33]何承全.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地早白垩世滴道组的沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2001,40(1):127-133.
[34]何承全、孙学坤.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2000,39(1):46-62.
[35]杨小菊、何承全、黎文本等.鸡西盆地早白垩世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义[J].科学通报,2003,48(14):1553-1557.
[36]沙金庚. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2002,9(3):95-101.
[37]姜宝玉、冯金宝.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨[J].地层学杂志,2000,25(3):217-220.
[38]沙金庚.一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”.古生物学报,1999,38(3).
[39]张世红、刘本培、杨晓强. 黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群层序地层格架[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1997,4(3-4):108.
[40]孙革、郑少林、姜剑红. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
[41]高瑞祺、萧德铭.松辽盆地及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:201-206.
[42]李子俊、姜剑虹. 三江—穆棱河中晚侏罗世沉积体系与聚煤模式[J]. 东北煤炭技术,1996,3:9-18.
[43]李思田等.断陷盆地分析与煤聚积规律[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
[44]中国石油天然气总公司.石油构造地质学(二)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998,52-54.
[45]CAO Cheng-run,SHAN Xuan-long,WANG Dong-po. The fault Block’s framework in Boli Basin and its control over the deposition[J]. Geosci NE Asia, 2001,4(1): 13-19.
[46]姜贵周、朱建华、陈秉麟等.黑龙江省东部中、新生代构造发展及与含油气性关系(科研报告),1990,大庆石油学院.
[47]大庆石油管理局勘探事业部.黑龙江省虎林、勃利盆地石油勘探早期地质综合研究(科研报告),1997,大庆石油学院.
[48]曹成润. 黑龙江省东部中新生代盆地群成盆动力学机制及盆地构造演化.吉林大学博士学位论文,2001,39.
[49]Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin, 1930,14,1-24.
[50]Falvey D A.,M. F. Middleton, Passice continental margins: evidence for a prebreakup deep crustal metamorphic subsidence mechanism: Oceanologica Acta SP, 1981,103-104.
[51]陈发景、汪新文、陈昭年.伸展断陷盆地分析[M],北京:地质出版社,2004,209.
[52]刘学锋、何幼斌、张或丹.利用回剥分析重建古构造格局[J].古地理学报,1999,1(2):53-61.
[53]张功成、蔡希源、周保章.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法-以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,235-240.
[54]庞雄奇、陈章明、陈发景.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模型研究与烃源岩定量评价[M],1993,北京:石油工业出版社.
[55]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法[M],1994, 北京:石油工业出版社.
[56]Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin analysis-Principles and applications[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Scinentific Publications, 1990:236-281.
[57]陈全茂、张学预、李大成等.盆地分析原理与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,239～257.
[58]荐军.吐鲁番-哈密盆地盆地分析.西北大学硕士学位论文.2001.
[59]曹新焰、严永新、林学庆等.应用磷灰石裂变径迹探讨巴彦浩特石炭系热演化史[J],河南石油,2001,15(6),9-10.
[60]吴堑虹.裂变径迹方法在大地构造学中的一些应用[J],地质地球化学,2001,29(1):83 -89.
[61]周中毅、潘长春等,沉积盆地古地温测定方法及其应用[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1992,1～114.
[62]陈安定、郭彤楼、万景林.裂变径迹、同位素年龄研究苏皖周边隆起构造抬升[J],大地构造与成矿学,2004,11(4):379-387.
[63]李善鹏、邱楠生.应用磷灰石裂变径迹分析(AFTA)方法研究沉积盆地古地温[J],新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(2):13-17.
[64]康铁笙、王世成. 地质历史研究的裂变径迹法[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1991:9-25.
[65]赵俊青、纪友亮、王金友等.应用磷灰石裂变径迹求取地层剥蚀量[J],疆石油地质,2003,24(3):579-581.
[66]周中毅、刘德汉、盛国英,新疆某地区古地温模式与生油期推断[J].沉积学报,1983,1(2):143～151.
[67] 李伟.恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(3),167~171.
[68]肖贤明、刘祖发、申家贵等.确定含油气盆地古地温梯度的一种新方法-镜质组反射率梯度法[J].科学通报,1998,43(21),2340~2343.
[69]Dow W G. Kerogern studies and geological interpretations[J]: Journal of Geochemical Exploration,1977,7(1):79~99.
[70]何生、王青玲.关于用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J],地质评论,1989,35(2):119-125
[71]陈增智、柳广弟、郝石生.修正的镜质体发射率剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].沉积学报,1999,17(1),141~143.
[72]胡圣标、汪集AA、张容燕.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4),42~45.
[73]陈刚、赵重远、李丕龙等.Ro 反演的盆地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4),333~334.
[74]张厚福、方朝亮、张枝焕等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,195.
[75]汤达祯.镜质组反射率与沉积盆地古地温分析[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4),181-187.
[76] 陈刚、赵重远、李丕龙等.Ro 反演的盆地地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J],石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4):343-347.
[77] 赵孟为、H.J.Behr.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系镜质体反射率与地热史[J].石油学报,17(2),15-22.
[78]Teichmuller M.,Anwendung, Kohlenpetrographischer methoden bei erdol-underdgasprospektion. Erdol and Kohle 1971,24:69-76(in German)
[79]Cannan J.,Time-temperature relation in oil genesis[J]. Bull AAPG,1974,58:2516-2521.
[80]Hood D.,Gutiahr C.C.M.,Heacock R.L.,Organic metamorphism and the generatio