合募配穴对胃溃疡大鼠代谢物谱表达调节的研究
|
摘要
目的:通过研究合募配穴对胃溃疡大鼠的血清、尿液代谢物谱的影响,从代谢物谱表达角度分析合募配穴防治胃溃疡的生物学机制,为合募配穴的临床推广提供实验依据。
方法:72只Wistar大鼠随机分为6组:空白对照组(A)、捆绑对照组(B)、应激性胃溃疡模型组(C)、募穴组(D)、下合穴组(E)、合募配穴组(F)。各组大鼠依照分组,A组正常喂养,不予处理,B组只捆绑,不针刺,不造模;C组每日只捆绑不针刺;D、E、F组每日捆绑针刺;C、D、E、F组在连续针刺7天后,针刺后采用水浸-束缚应激的方法进行模型复制。观察胃黏膜损伤情况,并对各组大鼠血清和尿液利用LC-MS技术进行不同组间的差异代谢组分分析。
结果:
1肉眼观察各组大鼠胃黏膜的损伤情况,应激性胃溃疡模型组有数量不等、大小不一的溃疡灶出现。捆绑组与正常组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示捆绑也是一种应激性刺激;模型组与捆绑组比较有差异(P<0.05),提示造模成功;下合穴组、募穴组与模型组比较有差异(P<0.05),合募组穴组与模型组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示单纯针刺足三里穴或中脘穴对胃溃疡模型的治疗有一定防治作用,募穴组、下合穴组与合募配穴组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示合募配穴组防治胃溃疡效果优于募穴组、下合穴组。
2通过比较血清代谢物谱发现:捆绑组与空白组比较共有谱峰14个,有10个代谢产物的峰面积(1、5、6、7、8、9、11、12、15、17号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。模型组与捆绑组比较共有谱峰16个,有5个代谢产物的峰面积(4、5、12、13、14号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05);提示捆绑也是一种应激刺激。三个针刺组与模型组比较存在不同程度的差异:募穴组与与模型组比较共有峰16个,有4个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、6、8号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。下合穴组与模型组比较共有峰16个,有4个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、7、8号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)16号峰为特异性峰,有可能是新物质。合募配穴组与模型组比较共有峰16个,差异峰1个,有8个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、6、7、8、12、13号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),16号峰为特异性峰,有可能是新物质。三个针刺组之间代谢图谱比较:募穴组与下合穴组比较共有峰16个,有5个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、6、7、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。募穴组与合募配穴组比较有9个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、7、8、12、13、14、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。下合穴组与合募配穴组比较有9个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、7、8、12、13、14、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。提示模型复制后产生应激性损伤后,胃溃疡模型大鼠血清代谢产物与空白组相比有大量新的代谢产物产生,也有消失的代谢产物。针刺对胃溃疡大鼠血清代谢产物有影响,存在新产生的峰、消失的峰及峰面积有差异的代谢产物与针刺防治胃溃疡相关的血清标志性代谢产物。三个针刺组中,以合募配穴组的针刺相关代谢产物最多,提示合募配穴与针刺单穴相比特异性表达明显,有一定的协同效应。
3通过比较尿液代谢物谱发现:捆绑组与空白组比较共有谱峰31个,有17个代谢产物的峰面积(1、3、4、7、8、10、13、15、17、18、19、28、34、37、40、41、42号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。9、20号峰为新出现的峰,16、25、33、35、38号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是捆绑刺激产生的新物质。捆绑组与模型组比较共有谱峰30个,有16个代谢产物的峰面积(1、3、7、10、13、15、17、18、19、20、21、24、28、32、40、41号峰)有差异或显著性差异(P<0.05,P<0.01),其中12个代谢产物与空白组和模型组均有差异,提示捆绑也是一种应激刺激,这12个代谢产物可能是由于应激引起的改变。三个针刺组与模型组比较存在不同程度的差异。募穴组与与模型组比较共有峰共有峰34个,有12个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、6、7、10、13、15、17、20、22、23、24、29、30、32、36、37、39、40、41号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。5、31、33号峰为新出现的峰,28号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。下合穴组与模型组比较共有峰35个,有13个代谢产物的峰面积(1、7、8、15、18、20、22、25、32、36、37、41、42号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),5号峰为新出现的峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。合募配穴组与模型组比较共有峰31个,有10个代谢产物的峰面积(2、10、12、13、17、18、24、37、40、41号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),5、9、16、31、33、35、38号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。三个针刺组与模型组相比,都新出现了5号峰,考虑是针刺后产生的特异性代谢产物,与针刺防治应激性胃溃疡的效应机制相关。三个针刺组比较:募穴组与下合穴组比较共有峰34个,有16个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、10、12、13、17、18、21、22、23、24、25、29、30、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。28号峰为新出现的峰,31、33号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。募穴组与合募配穴组比较共有峰32个,有13个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、7、10、13、17、18、21、24、32、33、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。9、16、28号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25、35、38号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。下合穴组与合募配穴组比较共有峰31个,同时有11个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、7、10、13、17、18、21、32、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。9、16、31、33、35、38号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。提示针刺后对应激性胃溃疡大鼠的尿液代谢产物谱表达有调节作用。模型复制对大鼠尿液代谢物谱有影响,有新产生的峰,消失的峰。可能是应激导致的尿液代谢产物改变。考虑新出现的峰、消失的峰及峰面积有差异的代谢产物为与针刺防治胃溃疡相关的尿液标志性代谢产物。三个针刺组的比较,以合募配穴组的针刺相关代谢产物最多,合募配穴对尿液代谢物谱表达的调节最为显著,表明合募配穴与单穴相比具有一定的相对特异性,可能是合募配穴与单穴相比协同效应机制所在。
4通过比较发现在血清及尿液针刺相关代谢产物中有分别3个代谢物是三个针刺组共同拥有的,相应谱峰的主要成分也是一致的,但峰面积却有不同。而其他各代谢产物分布在不同的针刺组中,提示针刺不同腧穴可产生不同的标志性代谢物。
结论:
1针刺对胃黏膜损伤有修复作用。
2应激对大鼠血清和尿液代谢物谱的表达有影响。
3针刺对应激性胃溃疡大鼠血清代谢物谱有特异性表达,有新的谱峰出现,且针刺合募配穴的特异性表达优于针刺单穴。
4针刺对应激性胃溃疡大鼠尿液代谢物谱有特异性表达,有新的及新消失的谱峰,且针刺合募配穴的特异性表达优于针刺单穴。
5合募配穴对应激性胃溃疡大鼠的血清、尿液代谢物谱有一定的特异性协同作用。
Purpose: Analyze the theory from metabonomic side,by researching how He-Mu points effects on the serum and urine metabolic spectrums of the gastric ulcer mice.
Method: Divide 72 Wistar mice into 6 groups: the normal group,the bundled group,the model group,“He-sea points”group,“Mu points”group,He-Mu points group.Gastric ulcer mouse model uses the water- immersion and restraint stress method to copy the model.The normal group shoud be only fed without any treatment;the bundled group shoud be bind everyday without acupuncture and copy model; the model group shoud be bind everyday and copied the model without acupuncture; the Mu points group shoud be acupunctured on“zhong wan”everyday and copied the model; the He points group shoud be acupunctured on“zu san-li”everyday and copied the model; the He-Mu points group shoud be acupunctured on both“zhong wan”and“zu san-li”everyday and copied the model. After 7 continuous treatments, observing the injuries of the gastric mucosa, analyze the differences between each groups, which the serum and urine metabolic spectrums of the gastric ulcer mice by LC-MS.
Result:
1 Visual observation on gastric mucosa,there are varying amounts and sizes of ulcer lesions appeared in the model group.Bundled group compared with the normal group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed bundle is also a stress stimulus; the model group compared with the bundled group has difference (P<0.05), showed the model had been successfully copied; the He-sea points group or the Mu points group compared with the model group has difference (P<0.05), He-Mu points group compared with the model group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed that simple acupuncture Zusanli or Zhongwan Point on the treatment of gastric ulcer model has some role in prevention and treatment, Mu points group,He-Mu points group compared with He-Mu points group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed He-Mu points group effect to surpass the He-sea points group, Mu points group.
2 After the comparision of serum metabolic spectrum:There are 14 common peaks, 10 peak areas (No. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17) have prominent difference between the normal group and bundled group(P<0.01). There are 16 common peaks, 5 peck areas (No. 4, 5, 12, 13, 14) have significant difference between the model group and bundled group(P<0.01, P<0.05), point out binding is also a kind of stress stimulation. There are 16 common peaks, 4 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 6, 8) have significant difference between the Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01). There are 16 common peaks, 4 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 7, 8) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 16 peak is a specific peak, may be a new product. There are 16 common peaks, 8 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13) have significant difference between the He-Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 16 peak is a specific peak, may be a new product. Compared between the three treatment groups, there are 16 common peaks, 1 different peak, 5 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 6, 7, 15) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-sea group (P<0.01, P<0.05); there are 9 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05). There are 9 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05). Point out that acupuncture has effect on the serum metabolic products of gastric ulcer mice, the new peak and the peaks which have different peak areas may be the metabolic products are specific metabolic products of the prevention and treatment related to acupuncture the gastric ulcer mice serum. During three acupuncture groups , He-Mu points group has the most interrelated metabolic products. As a result, He-Mu points compared with single points has specific expression, there is a certain synergy.
3 After the comparision of urine metabolic spectrum:There are 31 common peaks, 17 peak areas (No. 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 28, 34, 37, 40, 41, 42) have significant difference between the normal group and bundled group (P<0.01). No. 9 and 20 are the new peaks, No. 16, 25, 33, 35, 38 peaks are the disappeared peaks, these special peaks may be the new products after the bundled stimulate. There are 30 common peaks, 16 peck areas (No. 1, 3, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 28, 32, 40, 41) have significant difference between the model group and bundled group(P<0.01,P<0.05),and there are 12 metabolic products have difference with normal group and model group, point out binding is also a kind of stress stimulation. There are 34 common peaks, 12 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30, 32, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41) have significant difference between the Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), No. 5, 31, 33 peaks are the new peaks, No. 28 peak is the disappeared peak, these metabolic products may be the new products. There are 35 common peaks, 13 peak areas (No. 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 24, 37, 40, 41) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 5 peak is a new peak, may be a new product. There are 31 common peaks, 10 peak areas (No. 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 24, 37, 40, 41 ) have significant difference between the He-Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 5, 9, 16, 31, 33, 5, 38 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 19, 22, 25 peaks are the disappeared peaks, these peaks are the specific peaks, may be are new products. Compared between the three treatment groups, there are 34 common peaks, 16 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23,24, 25, 29, 30, 37,40) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-sea group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 28 peak is the new peak, No. 31, 33 are the disappeared peaks. There are 32 common peaks, 13 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 24, 32, 33, 37, 40) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 9, 16, 28 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 19, 22, 25, 35, 38 peaks are the disappeared peaks. There are 31 common peaks, 11 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 32, 37, 40) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 9, 16, 31, 33, 35, 38 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 18 , 22, 25 peaks are the disappeared peaks. Point out that acupuncture has effect on the serum metabolic products of gastric ulcer mice. During three acupuncture groups, He-Mu points group has the most interrelated metabolic products. So as a result, He-Mu points compared with single points has specific expression, there is a certain synergy.
4 There are 3 same metabolic products during the three acupuncture groups separately in serum and urine of gastric ulcer mice, and the correspounding peaks have the same bases with different peak areas. Point out that acupunctured on different points could generate different symbolical metabolic products.
Conclusion:
1 Acupuncture can effect the gastric injury restoration.
2 Stress can influence the metabolite expression of mice's serum and urine.
3 Effects of acupuncture on stress ulcer serum metabolite profiling have specific expression, with new peaks appeared, and the specific expression of acupuncture on He-Mu point better than acuncture on a single point.
4 Effects of acupuncture on stress ulcer urine metabolite profiling have specific expression, with new peaks appeared and new peaks disappeared, and the specific expression of acupuncture on He-Mu point better than acuncture on a single point.
5 He-Mu points have some specific synergy on serum and urine metabolite profiling of the stress ulcer mice.
方法:72只Wistar大鼠随机分为6组:空白对照组(A)、捆绑对照组(B)、应激性胃溃疡模型组(C)、募穴组(D)、下合穴组(E)、合募配穴组(F)。各组大鼠依照分组,A组正常喂养,不予处理,B组只捆绑,不针刺,不造模;C组每日只捆绑不针刺;D、E、F组每日捆绑针刺;C、D、E、F组在连续针刺7天后,针刺后采用水浸-束缚应激的方法进行模型复制。观察胃黏膜损伤情况,并对各组大鼠血清和尿液利用LC-MS技术进行不同组间的差异代谢组分分析。
结果:
1肉眼观察各组大鼠胃黏膜的损伤情况,应激性胃溃疡模型组有数量不等、大小不一的溃疡灶出现。捆绑组与正常组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示捆绑也是一种应激性刺激;模型组与捆绑组比较有差异(P<0.05),提示造模成功;下合穴组、募穴组与模型组比较有差异(P<0.05),合募组穴组与模型组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示单纯针刺足三里穴或中脘穴对胃溃疡模型的治疗有一定防治作用,募穴组、下合穴组与合募配穴组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),提示合募配穴组防治胃溃疡效果优于募穴组、下合穴组。
2通过比较血清代谢物谱发现:捆绑组与空白组比较共有谱峰14个,有10个代谢产物的峰面积(1、5、6、7、8、9、11、12、15、17号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。模型组与捆绑组比较共有谱峰16个,有5个代谢产物的峰面积(4、5、12、13、14号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05);提示捆绑也是一种应激刺激。三个针刺组与模型组比较存在不同程度的差异:募穴组与与模型组比较共有峰16个,有4个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、6、8号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。下合穴组与模型组比较共有峰16个,有4个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、7、8号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)16号峰为特异性峰,有可能是新物质。合募配穴组与模型组比较共有峰16个,差异峰1个,有8个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、6、7、8、12、13号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),16号峰为特异性峰,有可能是新物质。三个针刺组之间代谢图谱比较:募穴组与下合穴组比较共有峰16个,有5个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、6、7、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。募穴组与合募配穴组比较有9个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、7、8、12、13、14、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。下合穴组与合募配穴组比较有9个代谢产物的峰面积(2、3、5、7、8、12、13、14、15号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。提示模型复制后产生应激性损伤后,胃溃疡模型大鼠血清代谢产物与空白组相比有大量新的代谢产物产生,也有消失的代谢产物。针刺对胃溃疡大鼠血清代谢产物有影响,存在新产生的峰、消失的峰及峰面积有差异的代谢产物与针刺防治胃溃疡相关的血清标志性代谢产物。三个针刺组中,以合募配穴组的针刺相关代谢产物最多,提示合募配穴与针刺单穴相比特异性表达明显,有一定的协同效应。
3通过比较尿液代谢物谱发现:捆绑组与空白组比较共有谱峰31个,有17个代谢产物的峰面积(1、3、4、7、8、10、13、15、17、18、19、28、34、37、40、41、42号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。9、20号峰为新出现的峰,16、25、33、35、38号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是捆绑刺激产生的新物质。捆绑组与模型组比较共有谱峰30个,有16个代谢产物的峰面积(1、3、7、10、13、15、17、18、19、20、21、24、28、32、40、41号峰)有差异或显著性差异(P<0.05,P<0.01),其中12个代谢产物与空白组和模型组均有差异,提示捆绑也是一种应激刺激,这12个代谢产物可能是由于应激引起的改变。三个针刺组与模型组比较存在不同程度的差异。募穴组与与模型组比较共有峰共有峰34个,有12个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、6、7、10、13、15、17、20、22、23、24、29、30、32、36、37、39、40、41号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01)。5、31、33号峰为新出现的峰,28号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。下合穴组与模型组比较共有峰35个,有13个代谢产物的峰面积(1、7、8、15、18、20、22、25、32、36、37、41、42号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),5号峰为新出现的峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。合募配穴组与模型组比较共有峰31个,有10个代谢产物的峰面积(2、10、12、13、17、18、24、37、40、41号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01),5、9、16、31、33、35、38号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。三个针刺组与模型组相比,都新出现了5号峰,考虑是针刺后产生的特异性代谢产物,与针刺防治应激性胃溃疡的效应机制相关。三个针刺组比较:募穴组与下合穴组比较共有峰34个,有16个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、10、12、13、17、18、21、22、23、24、25、29、30、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。28号峰为新出现的峰,31、33号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。募穴组与合募配穴组比较共有峰32个,有13个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、7、10、13、17、18、21、24、32、33、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。9、16、28号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25、35、38号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。下合穴组与合募配穴组比较共有峰31个,同时有11个代谢产物的峰面积(1、2、7、10、13、17、18、21、32、37、40号峰)有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。9、16、31、33、35、38号峰为新出现的峰,8、15、19、22、25号峰为消失的峰,这些特异性峰,有可能是新的代谢产物。提示针刺后对应激性胃溃疡大鼠的尿液代谢产物谱表达有调节作用。模型复制对大鼠尿液代谢物谱有影响,有新产生的峰,消失的峰。可能是应激导致的尿液代谢产物改变。考虑新出现的峰、消失的峰及峰面积有差异的代谢产物为与针刺防治胃溃疡相关的尿液标志性代谢产物。三个针刺组的比较,以合募配穴组的针刺相关代谢产物最多,合募配穴对尿液代谢物谱表达的调节最为显著,表明合募配穴与单穴相比具有一定的相对特异性,可能是合募配穴与单穴相比协同效应机制所在。
4通过比较发现在血清及尿液针刺相关代谢产物中有分别3个代谢物是三个针刺组共同拥有的,相应谱峰的主要成分也是一致的,但峰面积却有不同。而其他各代谢产物分布在不同的针刺组中,提示针刺不同腧穴可产生不同的标志性代谢物。
结论:
1针刺对胃黏膜损伤有修复作用。
2应激对大鼠血清和尿液代谢物谱的表达有影响。
3针刺对应激性胃溃疡大鼠血清代谢物谱有特异性表达,有新的谱峰出现,且针刺合募配穴的特异性表达优于针刺单穴。
4针刺对应激性胃溃疡大鼠尿液代谢物谱有特异性表达,有新的及新消失的谱峰,且针刺合募配穴的特异性表达优于针刺单穴。
5合募配穴对应激性胃溃疡大鼠的血清、尿液代谢物谱有一定的特异性协同作用。
Purpose: Analyze the theory from metabonomic side,by researching how He-Mu points effects on the serum and urine metabolic spectrums of the gastric ulcer mice.
Method: Divide 72 Wistar mice into 6 groups: the normal group,the bundled group,the model group,“He-sea points”group,“Mu points”group,He-Mu points group.Gastric ulcer mouse model uses the water- immersion and restraint stress method to copy the model.The normal group shoud be only fed without any treatment;the bundled group shoud be bind everyday without acupuncture and copy model; the model group shoud be bind everyday and copied the model without acupuncture; the Mu points group shoud be acupunctured on“zhong wan”everyday and copied the model; the He points group shoud be acupunctured on“zu san-li”everyday and copied the model; the He-Mu points group shoud be acupunctured on both“zhong wan”and“zu san-li”everyday and copied the model. After 7 continuous treatments, observing the injuries of the gastric mucosa, analyze the differences between each groups, which the serum and urine metabolic spectrums of the gastric ulcer mice by LC-MS.
Result:
1 Visual observation on gastric mucosa,there are varying amounts and sizes of ulcer lesions appeared in the model group.Bundled group compared with the normal group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed bundle is also a stress stimulus; the model group compared with the bundled group has difference (P<0.05), showed the model had been successfully copied; the He-sea points group or the Mu points group compared with the model group has difference (P<0.05), He-Mu points group compared with the model group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed that simple acupuncture Zusanli or Zhongwan Point on the treatment of gastric ulcer model has some role in prevention and treatment, Mu points group,He-Mu points group compared with He-Mu points group has significant difference (P<0.01), showed He-Mu points group effect to surpass the He-sea points group, Mu points group.
2 After the comparision of serum metabolic spectrum:There are 14 common peaks, 10 peak areas (No. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17) have prominent difference between the normal group and bundled group(P<0.01). There are 16 common peaks, 5 peck areas (No. 4, 5, 12, 13, 14) have significant difference between the model group and bundled group(P<0.01, P<0.05), point out binding is also a kind of stress stimulation. There are 16 common peaks, 4 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 6, 8) have significant difference between the Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01). There are 16 common peaks, 4 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 7, 8) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 16 peak is a specific peak, may be a new product. There are 16 common peaks, 8 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13) have significant difference between the He-Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 16 peak is a specific peak, may be a new product. Compared between the three treatment groups, there are 16 common peaks, 1 different peak, 5 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 6, 7, 15) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-sea group (P<0.01, P<0.05); there are 9 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05). There are 9 peak areas (No. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05). Point out that acupuncture has effect on the serum metabolic products of gastric ulcer mice, the new peak and the peaks which have different peak areas may be the metabolic products are specific metabolic products of the prevention and treatment related to acupuncture the gastric ulcer mice serum. During three acupuncture groups , He-Mu points group has the most interrelated metabolic products. As a result, He-Mu points compared with single points has specific expression, there is a certain synergy.
3 After the comparision of urine metabolic spectrum:There are 31 common peaks, 17 peak areas (No. 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 28, 34, 37, 40, 41, 42) have significant difference between the normal group and bundled group (P<0.01). No. 9 and 20 are the new peaks, No. 16, 25, 33, 35, 38 peaks are the disappeared peaks, these special peaks may be the new products after the bundled stimulate. There are 30 common peaks, 16 peck areas (No. 1, 3, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 28, 32, 40, 41) have significant difference between the model group and bundled group(P<0.01,P<0.05),and there are 12 metabolic products have difference with normal group and model group, point out binding is also a kind of stress stimulation. There are 34 common peaks, 12 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30, 32, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41) have significant difference between the Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), No. 5, 31, 33 peaks are the new peaks, No. 28 peak is the disappeared peak, these metabolic products may be the new products. There are 35 common peaks, 13 peak areas (No. 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 24, 37, 40, 41) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 5 peak is a new peak, may be a new product. There are 31 common peaks, 10 peak areas (No. 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 24, 37, 40, 41 ) have significant difference between the He-Mu points group and the model group (P<0.01), and No. 5, 9, 16, 31, 33, 5, 38 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 19, 22, 25 peaks are the disappeared peaks, these peaks are the specific peaks, may be are new products. Compared between the three treatment groups, there are 34 common peaks, 16 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23,24, 25, 29, 30, 37,40) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-sea group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 28 peak is the new peak, No. 31, 33 are the disappeared peaks. There are 32 common peaks, 13 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 24, 32, 33, 37, 40) have significant difference between the Mu points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 9, 16, 28 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 19, 22, 25, 35, 38 peaks are the disappeared peaks. There are 31 common peaks, 11 peak areas (No. 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 32, 37, 40) have significant difference between the He-sea points group and He-Mu points group (P<0.01, P<0.05), No. 9, 16, 31, 33, 35, 38 peaks are the new peaks, No. 8, 15, 18 , 22, 25 peaks are the disappeared peaks. Point out that acupuncture has effect on the serum metabolic products of gastric ulcer mice. During three acupuncture groups, He-Mu points group has the most interrelated metabolic products. So as a result, He-Mu points compared with single points has specific expression, there is a certain synergy.
4 There are 3 same metabolic products during the three acupuncture groups separately in serum and urine of gastric ulcer mice, and the correspounding peaks have the same bases with different peak areas. Point out that acupunctured on different points could generate different symbolical metabolic products.
Conclusion:
1 Acupuncture can effect the gastric injury restoration.
2 Stress can influence the metabolite expression of mice's serum and urine.
3 Effects of acupuncture on stress ulcer serum metabolite profiling have specific expression, with new peaks appeared, and the specific expression of acupuncture on He-Mu point better than acuncture on a single point.
4 Effects of acupuncture on stress ulcer urine metabolite profiling have specific expression, with new peaks appeared and new peaks disappeared, and the specific expression of acupuncture on He-Mu point better than acuncture on a single point.
5 He-Mu points have some specific synergy on serum and urine metabolite profiling of the stress ulcer mice.
引文
[1]唐旭东.消化性溃疡[M].科学技术出版社,北京,2002:276
[2]郑关毅,郑师碧,韦立新.针刺对消化性溃疡患者内源性多肽的影响[J].上海针灸,2002,21(2):10～11
[2]罗海鸥,唐勇,蒲艺,等.不同穴位配伍针刺对消化性溃疡患者血浆内皮素的影响[J].新中医,2003,35(5):51～52
[3]牛红月,杨铭,强宝全,等.针刺中脘治疗消化性溃疡:多中心随机对照研究[J].中国针灸,2007,27(2):89～92
[4]刘松江,江秀富,于世良,等.辨证施针治疗消化性溃疡60例[J].山东中医杂志,1998,11(6):263
[5]吴绪如,曾振秀,李家康.针灸治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡50例[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2000,9(3):175
[6]孟立强,秦媛媛.消化性溃疡的针灸治疗[J].河南中医,2000(3):30
[7]俞竹青,毛水泉.针灸治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡32例临床观察[J].光明中医,2005,20(2):31
[8]高群,曹曙波,蔺虹,等.针灸治疗肝气郁结型消化性溃疡131例疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(4):10~12
[9]杨微.杨楣良针灸论治经验举隅[J].中国针灸,2008,28(4)287~289
[10]孙静.针灸治疗消化性溃疡40例[J].陕西中医,1991,12(3):130~131
[11]徐莉.电针治疗胃痛35例临床观察[J].中华临床医药与护理,2007(10):92
[12]罗庆道,罗建明.电针背俞穴对急性胃脘痛的镶痛观察[J].针刺研究,1997 (12):138
[13]黄琴峰,齐丽珍.针灸治疗消化性溃疡[J].上海针灸杂志,2001,20(4):46
[14]李成坤.隔姜灸治疗消化道溃疡30例[J].中国针灸,1996,(10):24
[15]方向明,许能贵,余润明.艾灸对胃溃疡患者血浆cAMP的影响[J].辽宁中医杂志,1998,25(3):135
[16]邱林理.针灸治疗消化性溃疡45例临床观察[J].浙江中医杂志,2009,44(5):356
[17]任国平.针灸治疗消化性溃疡36例[J].甘肃中医学院学报,2007, 24 (4):44～45
[18]郑沛仪,阮经文.肠线穴位埋藏治疗胃十二指肠溃疡100例观察[J].1999,3(5):574
[19]秦品杰.穴位埋线治疗慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡疗效观察[J].中华适宜诊疗技术杂志,2004,22(2):19
[20]王志兴,鲁新华.穴位埋线法治疗消化性溃疡43例观察[J].中医药学刊,2001,19(5):457
[21]刘波.浅谈埋线治疗胃十二指肠溃疡[J].针灸临床杂志,1999,15(8):47
[22]王莹,崔敏.穴位埋线法治疗消化性溃疡1 2 8例分析[J].医用放射技术杂志,2005,(9):65
[23]刘开荣.平行针透穴药线植入法治疗消化性溃疡100例观察[J].中国社区医师,2008,24(343):39
[24]肖波.穴位埋线治疗胃及十二指肠溃疡218例[J].上海针灸,2002,21(2):14
[25]靳天兴,张辉.穴位埋线治疗慢性胃炎消化性溃疡43例疗效观察[J].中国社区医师,2003,5(2):50
[26]王学蕾,武大鹏,高文秀.穴位埋线合四七汤治疗溃疡病131例[J].中国民间疗法,2006,14(12):57
[27]龙千里,张文春.穴位埋线联合四联疗法治疗消化性溃疡50例[J].新中医,2002,33(6):347
[28]刘敏.羊肠线穴位埋藏治疗胃与十二指肠溃疡165例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1999,14(6):335
[29]郑兴,纪冬梅.维生素B l、B6、B12穴位注射治疗胃及十二指肠溃疡病人65例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,1997,13(1):33
[30]冯沙红.穴位注射治疗消化性溃疡15例疗效观察[J].医学理论与实践,1999,12(2):98
[31]韩晶.丹参穴位封闭治疗消化性溃疡的临床观察[J].中医药学报,2003,31(6):33
[32]张富山,孙国喜.自拟疡愈汤配合穴位注射治疗消化性溃疡临床观察[J].河南中医学院学报,2003,18(1):49
[33]于月华.溃疡膏穴位贴敷治疗消化性溃疡78例临床观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,1999,8(11):1822
[34]梁繁荣,鄢路洲,朱慧民,等.代针膏穴敷治疗消化性溃疡临床研究[J].中国针灸,2001,21(1):7～10
[35]梁庆临.针挑疗法[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1984,126~129
[36]宁晓军.针挑疗法治疗难治性和顽固性消化性溃疡的临床研究[J].中国航天工业医药,2001,3(4):31
[37]徐慧卿.针灸配合中药治疗消化性溃疡73例[J].上海针灸杂志,2009,28(10):593～594
[38]刘小芬.针药并用治疗巨型胃溃疡临床体会[J].现代中医药,2009,29(2):50
[39]宫凤兰,曲艳青.自拟胃溃宁煎剂及配合针灸治疗消化性溃疡53例临床观察[J].内蒙古中医药.2003,22(5):35
[40]窦逾常,李雪萍.中成药配合针灸治疗胃溃疡45例临床观察[J].吉林中医药,2006,26(11):55～56
[41]李咏梅,吴杞.针药合用治疗活动性消化性溃疡48例临床观察[J].湖南中医杂志,2008,24(3):21～22
[42]尤龙.针刺配合复方三白散治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔59例[J].中国使用乡村医生杂志,1008,15(9):20~21
[43]罗莎,刘江.针刺配合三联疗法治疗胃溃疡30例[J].山东中医杂志,2008,17(4):255～256
[44]王兴尧.中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡31例临床观察[J].中医药导报.2008,14(7):42~43
[45]孙爱英.中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡临床观察39例[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(11):123~125
[46]李敏.推拿配合针灸治疗消化性溃疡[J].中医外治杂志,2004,13(3):33
[47]鲁国强,高红梅.针刺加中药离子导入治疗溃疡病62例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2000,16(5):21
[48]李建忠,魏巍.针刺加TDP照射与中西药并用治疗消化性溃疡46例[J].Joumal of Extemal Therapy of TCM,2006,15(2):20
[49]闫晓雪,张双德.耳针配合中药治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡78例[J].天津中医,2000,17(6):26
[50]谭庆坤,王献勇.珍珠汤加穴位拔罐治疗难治性消化性溃疡96例[J].河北中医,2002,24(3):180
[51]林源,林瑜,林万庆.穴位埋线联合药物治疗消化性溃疡42例[J].福建中医药,2007,38(5):21
[52]李咏梅,吴杞.穴位埋线配合益气活血法治疗消化性溃疡36例临床观察[J].湖南中医药导报,2002,8(5)250～251
[53] Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data [J].Xenobiotica,1999,29(11): 1181～1189.
[54] Steinhauser D,KoPka J. Methods,aPPlications and concepts of metabolite profiling:primary metabolism[J].EXS,2007;97:171～194
[55] Lenz EM,Wilson ID.Analytical strategies in metabonomics[J].J Proteome Res,2007;6:443～458
[56] Lindon JC,Holmes E,Nieholson JK. Metabonomics techniques and applications to pharmaceutical research & development [J].Pharm Res,2006; 23:1075～1088
[57] Lauridsen M,Hansen SH,Jaroszewski JW,Cornett C.Human urine as test material in 1H NMR-based metabonomics : recommendations for sample preparation and storage[J].Anal Chem,2007;79:1181～1186
[58] Ott KH,Aranibar N. Nuelear magnetic resonance metabonomics : methods for drug discovery and development[J].Methods Mol Bio,2007; 358:247～271
[59] Serkova NJ,Niemann CU. Pattern recognition and biomarker validation using quantitative 1H-NMR-based metabolomics[J].Expert Rev Mol Diagn,2006;6:717～731
[60] Fiehn O.Metabolomics-the link between genotypes and phenotypes [J].Plant Mol Biol,2002,48 (1-2):155～171.
[61]洪静,陈金联.代谢组学分析技术及其在消化道肿瘤中的应用进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2008,16(1):68～75
[62]康媛.代谢组学及其再临床中的应用[J].国外医学妇产科学分册,2007,34(4):272～275
[63]林中营,严诗楷,戴卫星,等.代谢组学技术在临床诊断中的应用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(6):811～817.
[64] Guilhaus M,Mlynski V,Selby D. Perfect timing:time-of-flight mass spectrometry [J].Rapid Commum Mass Spectrom,1997,11(9):951～962.
[65] Yang J, Xu G, Zheng Y, et al. Diagnosis of liver cancer using HPLC-based metabonomics avoiding false-positive result from hepatitis and hepatocirrhosis diseases [J].J Chromatogr Analy Technol Biomed Life Sci,2004,813:59～65.
[66] Feng B,Wu S, Lv S,Liu F,Chen HS,Yan XZ,Li Y,Dong FT, Wei L. Metabolic profiling analysis of a galactosamine / lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse model of fulminant hepatic failure [J].J Proteome Res,2007,6(6):2161～2167.
[67] Marchesi JR, Holmes E, Khan F, et al. Rapid and nonin vasive metabonomic characterization of inflammatory bowel disease[J].Proteome Res,2007,6(2):546～551
[68] Yin P, Zhao X, Li Q, et al. Metabonomics study of intestrnal fistulas based on ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with Q-TOF mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF MS) [J].Proteome Res,2006,5(9):2135～3143.
[69] QiuY,SuM,LiuY,ChenM,GuJ,ZhangJ,JiaW.Application of ethyl chloroformate derivatization for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabonomic profiling. Anal Chim Acta,2007;583:277～283
[70] Nakayama Y,Matsumoto K,Inoue Y,et al.Correlation between the urinary dihydrouracil-uracil ratio and the 5-FU plasma coneentration in patients treated with oral 5-FUanalogs[J].Anticancer Res,2006,26:3983～3988
[71]王米渠,蔡玉泉.中医遗传学概论[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2001.65
[72]王米渠,冯韧,严石林,等.基因表达谱芯片与中医寒证的7类相关基因[J].中医杂志,2003,44(4):288
[73]杨丽萍,陆明,王米渠,等.免疫代谢类基因差异表达评价肾阳虚骨关节炎个案疗效[J].河南中医,2004,17(9):1
[74]王米渠.肾虚证的基因组与信息融合的研究前瞻——中医科研前言进取功能基因组[J].亚太生技,2004,2(1):43
[75] Chen M J, Zhao L P, Jia W.Metabonomic study on the biochemical profiles of a hydrocortisone induced animal model[J].J Proteome Res,2005,4,(6):2391
[76]王忆勤,李福凤,王文静,等.慢性胃炎中医湿证血清蛋白组学研究[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(5):514～516
[77]张丽.基于尿液代谢组学的脾气虚证本质研究[D].大连医科大学,硕士学位论文,2009
[78]童宁宁.慢性胃炎湿热蕴脾证唾液代谢组的初步研究[D].广州中医药大学硕士学位文论,2006
[79]郑丽红,黄穗平.脾气虚证唾液代谢组学的初步研究[D].广州中医药大学硕士学位论文,2007
[80]霍云华,罗仁.亚健康状态的流行病学调查及其脾气虚证唾液代谢组学研究[D].第一军医大学博士学位论文,2007
[81] Liu XY,Lu ZP,Zhang XF.Concept of proteome and application of proteome in study of modern traditional Chinese medicine[J].Zhong guo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi.2003,23(2):84～87.Chinese.
[82]林文注主编.实验针灸学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1994:287
[83]徐叔云,卞如濂,陈修.药理实验方法学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991:1158
[84]国家卫生服务研究,卫生部.国家卫生服务研究[M].北京:卫生部,1999:5～25
[85]涂易正,郑扶民.冷拘束大鼠应激性溃疡的发病机制和药物的预防作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,1998,5:107
[86]施新蝤,主编.现代医学实验动物学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2000(9):454～455
[87]王富春,景宽.特定穴在临床中的配伍应用[J].辽宁中医,1989(10)34～35
[88]赵艳鸿,王富春.下合穴与脏腑相关性探析[J].针灸临床杂志,2002,18(11):4～5.
[89]李铁,王富春,项柏东,等.不同针法针刺中脘、足三里对应激性胃溃疡模型大鼠胃电作用的研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(10):47～48
[90]陈琳,合募配穴对胃溃疡大鼠组织蛋白SDS-PAGE表达谱调节的研究[D].长春中医药大学硕士学位论文,2008
[91] Sherman KJ,Cherkin DC,Eisenberg DM,et al. The practice of acupuncture:who are the providers and what do they do? AnnFam Med,2005,3:151～158
[92]吴修玉,马正军,苏金鹏,等.合募配穴针灸治疗中风后尿失禁疗效观察[J].中国医药研究,2004,2(10):14
[93]张红石,王富春.合募配穴与俞原配穴在脏腑辨证中的应用[J].中国针灸,2006,26(5):378～380
[94] Fan XH, Bai JQ, Shen P. Diagnosis of brest cancer using HPLC metabonomics fingerprints couple with computational methods [C]// Proceedings of the 2005 IEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. Shanghai; 2005:6081～6084
[2]郑关毅,郑师碧,韦立新.针刺对消化性溃疡患者内源性多肽的影响[J].上海针灸,2002,21(2):10～11
[2]罗海鸥,唐勇,蒲艺,等.不同穴位配伍针刺对消化性溃疡患者血浆内皮素的影响[J].新中医,2003,35(5):51～52
[3]牛红月,杨铭,强宝全,等.针刺中脘治疗消化性溃疡:多中心随机对照研究[J].中国针灸,2007,27(2):89～92
[4]刘松江,江秀富,于世良,等.辨证施针治疗消化性溃疡60例[J].山东中医杂志,1998,11(6):263
[5]吴绪如,曾振秀,李家康.针灸治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡50例[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2000,9(3):175
[6]孟立强,秦媛媛.消化性溃疡的针灸治疗[J].河南中医,2000(3):30
[7]俞竹青,毛水泉.针灸治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡32例临床观察[J].光明中医,2005,20(2):31
[8]高群,曹曙波,蔺虹,等.针灸治疗肝气郁结型消化性溃疡131例疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(4):10~12
[9]杨微.杨楣良针灸论治经验举隅[J].中国针灸,2008,28(4)287~289
[10]孙静.针灸治疗消化性溃疡40例[J].陕西中医,1991,12(3):130~131
[11]徐莉.电针治疗胃痛35例临床观察[J].中华临床医药与护理,2007(10):92
[12]罗庆道,罗建明.电针背俞穴对急性胃脘痛的镶痛观察[J].针刺研究,1997 (12):138
[13]黄琴峰,齐丽珍.针灸治疗消化性溃疡[J].上海针灸杂志,2001,20(4):46
[14]李成坤.隔姜灸治疗消化道溃疡30例[J].中国针灸,1996,(10):24
[15]方向明,许能贵,余润明.艾灸对胃溃疡患者血浆cAMP的影响[J].辽宁中医杂志,1998,25(3):135
[16]邱林理.针灸治疗消化性溃疡45例临床观察[J].浙江中医杂志,2009,44(5):356
[17]任国平.针灸治疗消化性溃疡36例[J].甘肃中医学院学报,2007, 24 (4):44～45
[18]郑沛仪,阮经文.肠线穴位埋藏治疗胃十二指肠溃疡100例观察[J].1999,3(5):574
[19]秦品杰.穴位埋线治疗慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡疗效观察[J].中华适宜诊疗技术杂志,2004,22(2):19
[20]王志兴,鲁新华.穴位埋线法治疗消化性溃疡43例观察[J].中医药学刊,2001,19(5):457
[21]刘波.浅谈埋线治疗胃十二指肠溃疡[J].针灸临床杂志,1999,15(8):47
[22]王莹,崔敏.穴位埋线法治疗消化性溃疡1 2 8例分析[J].医用放射技术杂志,2005,(9):65
[23]刘开荣.平行针透穴药线植入法治疗消化性溃疡100例观察[J].中国社区医师,2008,24(343):39
[24]肖波.穴位埋线治疗胃及十二指肠溃疡218例[J].上海针灸,2002,21(2):14
[25]靳天兴,张辉.穴位埋线治疗慢性胃炎消化性溃疡43例疗效观察[J].中国社区医师,2003,5(2):50
[26]王学蕾,武大鹏,高文秀.穴位埋线合四七汤治疗溃疡病131例[J].中国民间疗法,2006,14(12):57
[27]龙千里,张文春.穴位埋线联合四联疗法治疗消化性溃疡50例[J].新中医,2002,33(6):347
[28]刘敏.羊肠线穴位埋藏治疗胃与十二指肠溃疡165例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1999,14(6):335
[29]郑兴,纪冬梅.维生素B l、B6、B12穴位注射治疗胃及十二指肠溃疡病人65例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,1997,13(1):33
[30]冯沙红.穴位注射治疗消化性溃疡15例疗效观察[J].医学理论与实践,1999,12(2):98
[31]韩晶.丹参穴位封闭治疗消化性溃疡的临床观察[J].中医药学报,2003,31(6):33
[32]张富山,孙国喜.自拟疡愈汤配合穴位注射治疗消化性溃疡临床观察[J].河南中医学院学报,2003,18(1):49
[33]于月华.溃疡膏穴位贴敷治疗消化性溃疡78例临床观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,1999,8(11):1822
[34]梁繁荣,鄢路洲,朱慧民,等.代针膏穴敷治疗消化性溃疡临床研究[J].中国针灸,2001,21(1):7～10
[35]梁庆临.针挑疗法[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1984,126~129
[36]宁晓军.针挑疗法治疗难治性和顽固性消化性溃疡的临床研究[J].中国航天工业医药,2001,3(4):31
[37]徐慧卿.针灸配合中药治疗消化性溃疡73例[J].上海针灸杂志,2009,28(10):593～594
[38]刘小芬.针药并用治疗巨型胃溃疡临床体会[J].现代中医药,2009,29(2):50
[39]宫凤兰,曲艳青.自拟胃溃宁煎剂及配合针灸治疗消化性溃疡53例临床观察[J].内蒙古中医药.2003,22(5):35
[40]窦逾常,李雪萍.中成药配合针灸治疗胃溃疡45例临床观察[J].吉林中医药,2006,26(11):55～56
[41]李咏梅,吴杞.针药合用治疗活动性消化性溃疡48例临床观察[J].湖南中医杂志,2008,24(3):21～22
[42]尤龙.针刺配合复方三白散治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔59例[J].中国使用乡村医生杂志,1008,15(9):20~21
[43]罗莎,刘江.针刺配合三联疗法治疗胃溃疡30例[J].山东中医杂志,2008,17(4):255～256
[44]王兴尧.中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡31例临床观察[J].中医药导报.2008,14(7):42~43
[45]孙爱英.中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡临床观察39例[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(11):123~125
[46]李敏.推拿配合针灸治疗消化性溃疡[J].中医外治杂志,2004,13(3):33
[47]鲁国强,高红梅.针刺加中药离子导入治疗溃疡病62例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2000,16(5):21
[48]李建忠,魏巍.针刺加TDP照射与中西药并用治疗消化性溃疡46例[J].Joumal of Extemal Therapy of TCM,2006,15(2):20
[49]闫晓雪,张双德.耳针配合中药治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡78例[J].天津中医,2000,17(6):26
[50]谭庆坤,王献勇.珍珠汤加穴位拔罐治疗难治性消化性溃疡96例[J].河北中医,2002,24(3):180
[51]林源,林瑜,林万庆.穴位埋线联合药物治疗消化性溃疡42例[J].福建中医药,2007,38(5):21
[52]李咏梅,吴杞.穴位埋线配合益气活血法治疗消化性溃疡36例临床观察[J].湖南中医药导报,2002,8(5)250～251
[53] Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data [J].Xenobiotica,1999,29(11): 1181～1189.
[54] Steinhauser D,KoPka J. Methods,aPPlications and concepts of metabolite profiling:primary metabolism[J].EXS,2007;97:171～194
[55] Lenz EM,Wilson ID.Analytical strategies in metabonomics[J].J Proteome Res,2007;6:443～458
[56] Lindon JC,Holmes E,Nieholson JK. Metabonomics techniques and applications to pharmaceutical research & development [J].Pharm Res,2006; 23:1075～1088
[57] Lauridsen M,Hansen SH,Jaroszewski JW,Cornett C.Human urine as test material in 1H NMR-based metabonomics : recommendations for sample preparation and storage[J].Anal Chem,2007;79:1181～1186
[58] Ott KH,Aranibar N. Nuelear magnetic resonance metabonomics : methods for drug discovery and development[J].Methods Mol Bio,2007; 358:247～271
[59] Serkova NJ,Niemann CU. Pattern recognition and biomarker validation using quantitative 1H-NMR-based metabolomics[J].Expert Rev Mol Diagn,2006;6:717～731
[60] Fiehn O.Metabolomics-the link between genotypes and phenotypes [J].Plant Mol Biol,2002,48 (1-2):155～171.
[61]洪静,陈金联.代谢组学分析技术及其在消化道肿瘤中的应用进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2008,16(1):68～75
[62]康媛.代谢组学及其再临床中的应用[J].国外医学妇产科学分册,2007,34(4):272～275
[63]林中营,严诗楷,戴卫星,等.代谢组学技术在临床诊断中的应用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(6):811～817.
[64] Guilhaus M,Mlynski V,Selby D. Perfect timing:time-of-flight mass spectrometry [J].Rapid Commum Mass Spectrom,1997,11(9):951～962.
[65] Yang J, Xu G, Zheng Y, et al. Diagnosis of liver cancer using HPLC-based metabonomics avoiding false-positive result from hepatitis and hepatocirrhosis diseases [J].J Chromatogr Analy Technol Biomed Life Sci,2004,813:59～65.
[66] Feng B,Wu S, Lv S,Liu F,Chen HS,Yan XZ,Li Y,Dong FT, Wei L. Metabolic profiling analysis of a galactosamine / lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse model of fulminant hepatic failure [J].J Proteome Res,2007,6(6):2161～2167.
[67] Marchesi JR, Holmes E, Khan F, et al. Rapid and nonin vasive metabonomic characterization of inflammatory bowel disease[J].Proteome Res,2007,6(2):546～551
[68] Yin P, Zhao X, Li Q, et al. Metabonomics study of intestrnal fistulas based on ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with Q-TOF mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF MS) [J].Proteome Res,2006,5(9):2135～3143.
[69] QiuY,SuM,LiuY,ChenM,GuJ,ZhangJ,JiaW.Application of ethyl chloroformate derivatization for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabonomic profiling. Anal Chim Acta,2007;583:277～283
[70] Nakayama Y,Matsumoto K,Inoue Y,et al.Correlation between the urinary dihydrouracil-uracil ratio and the 5-FU plasma coneentration in patients treated with oral 5-FUanalogs[J].Anticancer Res,2006,26:3983～3988
[71]王米渠,蔡玉泉.中医遗传学概论[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2001.65
[72]王米渠,冯韧,严石林,等.基因表达谱芯片与中医寒证的7类相关基因[J].中医杂志,2003,44(4):288
[73]杨丽萍,陆明,王米渠,等.免疫代谢类基因差异表达评价肾阳虚骨关节炎个案疗效[J].河南中医,2004,17(9):1
[74]王米渠.肾虚证的基因组与信息融合的研究前瞻——中医科研前言进取功能基因组[J].亚太生技,2004,2(1):43
[75] Chen M J, Zhao L P, Jia W.Metabonomic study on the biochemical profiles of a hydrocortisone induced animal model[J].J Proteome Res,2005,4,(6):2391
[76]王忆勤,李福凤,王文静,等.慢性胃炎中医湿证血清蛋白组学研究[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(5):514～516
[77]张丽.基于尿液代谢组学的脾气虚证本质研究[D].大连医科大学,硕士学位论文,2009
[78]童宁宁.慢性胃炎湿热蕴脾证唾液代谢组的初步研究[D].广州中医药大学硕士学位文论,2006
[79]郑丽红,黄穗平.脾气虚证唾液代谢组学的初步研究[D].广州中医药大学硕士学位论文,2007
[80]霍云华,罗仁.亚健康状态的流行病学调查及其脾气虚证唾液代谢组学研究[D].第一军医大学博士学位论文,2007
[81] Liu XY,Lu ZP,Zhang XF.Concept of proteome and application of proteome in study of modern traditional Chinese medicine[J].Zhong guo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi.2003,23(2):84～87.Chinese.
[82]林文注主编.实验针灸学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1994:287
[83]徐叔云,卞如濂,陈修.药理实验方法学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991:1158
[84]国家卫生服务研究,卫生部.国家卫生服务研究[M].北京:卫生部,1999:5～25
[85]涂易正,郑扶民.冷拘束大鼠应激性溃疡的发病机制和药物的预防作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,1998,5:107
[86]施新蝤,主编.现代医学实验动物学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2000(9):454～455
[87]王富春,景宽.特定穴在临床中的配伍应用[J].辽宁中医,1989(10)34～35
[88]赵艳鸿,王富春.下合穴与脏腑相关性探析[J].针灸临床杂志,2002,18(11):4～5.
[89]李铁,王富春,项柏东,等.不同针法针刺中脘、足三里对应激性胃溃疡模型大鼠胃电作用的研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(10):47～48
[90]陈琳,合募配穴对胃溃疡大鼠组织蛋白SDS-PAGE表达谱调节的研究[D].长春中医药大学硕士学位论文,2008
[91] Sherman KJ,Cherkin DC,Eisenberg DM,et al. The practice of acupuncture:who are the providers and what do they do? AnnFam Med,2005,3:151～158
[92]吴修玉,马正军,苏金鹏,等.合募配穴针灸治疗中风后尿失禁疗效观察[J].中国医药研究,2004,2(10):14
[93]张红石,王富春.合募配穴与俞原配穴在脏腑辨证中的应用[J].中国针灸,2006,26(5):378～380
[94] Fan XH, Bai JQ, Shen P. Diagnosis of brest cancer using HPLC metabonomics fingerprints couple with computational methods [C]// Proceedings of the 2005 IEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. Shanghai; 2005:6081～6084