农业科技园技术扩散的农户采用行为研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
农业科技园具有技术集成、研发与扩散功能,承担着带动区域农业发展的重任。农户是农业技术的最终采用者,是农业科技成果转化为农业生产力的执行者。对农业科技园技术扩散下农户技术采用行为的研究,不仅可以指导农户的技术认知、采用决策与生产要素安排,还能为科技园技术研发与扩散提供重要参考。因此,论文基于目前对农户技术采用特点及规律认识不足的现状,通过规范研究与实证研究,定性研究与定量研究相结合的方法,将农户纳入“科技园-辐射区”的系统框架下研究其技术采用过程与特点。以期能为科技园的技术扩散和农户的技术采用提供有益借鉴,并开拓经济地理学园区经济研究的新视角,丰富传播学理论在农业技术扩散中的运用。
     本文遵循“理论构建-实证分析-对策建议”的研究逻辑,以甘肃定西国家农业科技园及其辐射区为对象进行研究。首先借鉴人文-经济地理学、行为地理学、农业经济学及传播学等相关学科理论,对农户技术采用前、中、后三个阶段进行了相关概念界定和研究模型设定,构建实证研究的理论框架;继而采用GIS空间可视化表达、结构方程模型、Logit模型、DEA模型及SFA模型等方法,对辐射区马铃薯种植技术优势度,农户技术感知及其采用倾向影响,技术需求与决策影响因素,技术效率及农户生计效应等进行实证分析,总结出农户技术采用不同阶段的规律及特征;最后对以农户为中心的科技园技术扩散系统进行探讨并提出促进技术扩散的对策,主要研究内容和结论如下:
     (1)对农户的技术采用过程进行理论探讨。提出农户技术感知的概念并对其测量维度进行设计,对传统的农户技术采用影响变量进行修正,将技术效率和生计框架理论引入到农户的技术采用效应分析中,构建从技术采用前、中、后三个视角进行全过程研究的理论框架,并进行相关模型设定和检验方法选择。
     (2)对案例区技术扩散源、扩散区域和技术类型进行典型性分析。结果表明:定西国家农业科技园在科技研发和创新能力、种植技术、旱作农业技术和龙头企业带动区域农业发展方面都已取得显著成就;由全国和甘肃省两个尺度上的马铃薯种植格局演变分析可知,案例区为我国马铃薯主产区之一,区域优势度不断提升;定西国家农业科技园已经形成较为成熟的马铃薯种植成套技术。
     (3)对农户技术感知的相关维度进行测度,并运用结构方程模型验证技术感知对技术采用倾向的影响。结果表明:6个潜变量和21个测量变量得分均值存在显著差异,各潜变量得分排序为感知价值、采用意愿、技术风险、感知利益、感知成本和健康风险感知;影响农户技术感知价值和技术采用倾向大小的主要因素为技术收益,而技术成本、技术风险及使用过程中的健康风险对上述两者的影响极为有限;农户的性别、年龄、学历等个人属性特征,其所在区域的地形、园区辐射圈层以及是否参加合作社(龙头企业基地)等变量在通过验证的6条路径上也各有不同的显著性影响。
     (4)对农户的技术需求优先度和采用后担心因素,影响农户技术采用决策的技术与非技术因素进行分析。结果显示:农户在最需要的技术和使用后的担心因素方面具有较高的一致性;技术属性本身对农户技术采用有一定影响;决策者的年龄、学历、风险偏好等个体特质,家庭耕地面积、劳动力和收入状况等家庭农业生产禀赋条件,是否有补贴及所处地形条件等因素对偏中间性的脱毒薯种技术和偏商品性的地膜覆盖技术采用的影响存在较大差异。
     (5)采用数据包络和随机前沿生产函数两种方法对农户的技术采用效率进行测度,进而运用田野调查法分析技术采用的农户生计效应。结果表明:样本农户马铃薯种植的综合技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率都存在较大的优化空间;56.72%的农户处于规模报酬递增阶段,可通过增加种植规模实现技术效率的提升;各投入要素都存在一定的冗余现象;资本、劳动力和土地三项投入对技术效率均有正向贡献;种植规模和所处辐射圈层对技术效率有显著影响;技术效率损失受决策者学历水平、家庭劳动力数量、人均耕地面积、是否为龙头企业基地户和机会成本等多因素的影响;两种方法的效率均值差异表明,案例区农户技术效率存在一定的“低水平陷阱”现象;技术采用的农户生计效应分析表明,农户生计模式已形成较强的技术路径依赖效应。
     (6)本文的实证研究表明,农业技术扩散符合地理学的创新空间扩散与距离衰减规律理论。目前案例区地域空间内,已经形成由定西国家农业科技园及其次级园区为技术核心区,周边农业生产区为外围区的农业技术扩散“核心-外围”结构。不同辐射圈层农户的技术采用过程分析也表明,科技园的技术扩散具有较显著的距离衰减规律效应。
     (7)在前文研究的基础上,提出了促进定西国家农业科技园技术扩散及农户技术采用的举措。主要围绕扩散系统重构、农户技术感知教育与测度、技术市场监管、技术服务效率、农户人力资本投入、农业生产组织化和规模化、技术采用效应及农业技术服务节点空间布局等八个方面展开探讨。
Agricultural science and technology parks have the functions of technology integration, research, design and diffusion, undertaking the responsibility to lead the development of the region. Farmers are the final adopters of agricultural technologies and the exercisers of the transformation of agricultural technology into productivity. Therefore, research on the farmers' technical adoptions under the background of agricultural science and technology parks' technical diffusions is very important, it can guide farmers' technical perceptions, technical adoption and arrangements of productive essentials, and also can provide important references to the agricultural science and technology parks on agricultural technologies' researching and diffusing. Thus, based on the lack of realization about farmers' technical adoption's characteristics and laws, this dissertation takes farmers into the consideration of the systemic frame of'agricultural science and technology parks-radiation districts' to research the process and characteristics of farmers'adoption, through normative and demonstrative researches combining with quantities and qualities researches, aimed to provide references of technical adoption and diffusion to the parks, extend the perspective of park economic research in economic geography, and advance the application of communication theory in agricultural technology diffusion.
     This dissertation follows the logic of'theory construction-demonstration analyze-strategy', and take Dingxi agricultural science and technology park as object to carry out this research. First, this dissertation adopts human-economic geography, behavioural geography, agricultural geography and communication theory, design the models and the concepts in the pre-during-post phases of farmers' adoption, and constructs the theoretic frame of demonstration research. Then, adopts GIS visional show, structural equation model, Logit model, DEA model,SFA model and other methods, analyzes the peasants' technology perception and their trend influences, technological demands, technological-deciding factors, technological efficiency and farm-living effects, summarizes the laws and characteristics of different phases of adoptions. At last, it discusses the parks'technological diffusion system and provides the strategies to technological diffusion. The main contents and conclusions are as follows:
     (1) The discussion about the farmers'technological adoption. This dissertation puts forward the concept of farmers'technological perception and designs its'measuring dimension, modifies the traditional variables of farmers'technological adoption, introduces technological efficiency and living frame theory into analysis of farmers'technological adoption effects, constructs the whole-process research frame of pre-during-post views about technological adoption, and then sets relative models and chooses the testing methods.
     (2) Typical analysis of technological center, spread districts and technological types in case study area. It shows that Dingxi agricultural science and technology park has got a lot of achievement on the technology research and diffusion, such as technological research and innovation, farming technologies, dry farming technologies and leading enterprises driving the development of regional agriculture. It can be seen clearly from potato farming patterns' evolution in Gansu province and the whole nation, this case area is an important potato production district in our country, and its dominance has been higher and higher. Dingxi agricultural science and technology park has developed a series of relatively muturing potato farming technologies.
     (3) Measurement of variable dimensions about farmers'technological perception, and verification of technological perception's effects on technological adoption preferences based on structure equation model. It shows that the6potential variables and the21measuring variables have significant differences on score average. Those potential variables'rank is perceptional values, adoption intention, technological risks, perceptional interests, perceptional costs and health risk perception. The main factors which effect farmers' perceptional values and technological adoption intendance is technological profits. While technological cost, technological risks and health risks during using have very limited effects. Farmers'genders, ages, education level and other personal characteristics, the living area topography, the park's radiation zones and whether to participate in the cooperatives (the leading enterprises base) and other variables also have different significant effects on the6methods which past verification.
     (4) Analysis of farmers'technological demand preference and worry factors after adoption, and the technological and non-technological factors which effect farmers'technological adoption. It shows that there is high accordance on farmers between the most demanding technologies and the worry factors after adoption; technological properties itself has some effects on farmers' technological adoption; decision makers' ages, education level, risk preferences and other personalities, family farmland, quantity of labour force, income and family production and nature endowments, allowance and the landforms are all have different effects on the adoption of intermediate non-poison potato farming technology and more commercial film laminating technology.
     (5) The measurements of farmers' technological efficiency through DEA and SFA methods, and analyze farmers'living effects on technological adoption through field research method. It indicates that there is a large improving space of complex farming efficiency, pure technological efficiency and scale efficiency of sample farmers;56.72%farmers are in scale increasing return stage, and can improve efficiency by increasing farming scale; there is over-input of all factors; capital, labours and field have positive effects on technical efficiency; farming scale and radiation circle have significant effects on technical efficiency; decision makers'education level, family labours, family average farmland, whether is in leading enterprises base, choosing cost all have significant effects. The differences between average efficiency of the2methods suggests that there is low-level trap of farmers' technological efficiency in case district. Farmers'living effects of technological adoption indicates, farmers' living form has formed technological path-dependence effects.
     (6) The empirical study indicates that, technological diffusion of Dingxi agricultural science and technology park conform to theory about innovation spatial diffusion and distance attenuation rule in geography. Now in the spatial system which is composed of the park and it's radiation area, have already formed an primary'core-peripheral'structure, the park and it's secondary parks as the core elementary, and the surrounding agricultural production area as the peripheral area. The analysis about farmers'adoption of agricultural technology in different radiation circle also shows that, technological diffusion of the park has significant distance attenuation rule.
     (7) Based on the previous study, this dissertation puts forward the countermeasures to promote the technology diffusion of the park and doption of the farmers. The main contents as follows:reconstruction of diffusion system, education and measurement of farmers' technical conception, regulation of technology market, efficiency of technical service, investment to the farmers'human capital, organization and scale of agricultural production, effect of technology adoption, arrangement about the technology service node, etc.
引文
[1]蒋和平,张春敏.国家农业科技园区的发展现状与趋势[J].深圳特区科技,2005(10):50-54.
    [2]于正松,李同昇,李献波等.西北地区农业技术扩散环境的空间分异-以陕甘宁县域为例[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(4):618-626.
    [3]程绍铂,杨桂山,李大伟.长三角典型农业区农业现代化水平分区研究[J].地域研究与开发,2011,30(4):149-157.
    [4]孙政才.农业农村改革发展30年[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
    [5]满明俊.西北传统农区农户的技术采用行为研究[D].西安:西北大学,2010.
    [6]国家统计局国民经济综合统计司.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2011.
    [7]满明俊,李同昇.农户采用新技术的行为差异、决策依据、获取途径分析——基于陕西、甘肃、宁夏的调查[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(15):58-63.
    [8]李小建等.农户地理论[M].北京:科技出版社,2009.
    [9]蒋和平,孙炜琳.农业科技园区综合评价指标体系研究[J].农业技术经济,2002(6):21-25.
    [10]方田红,曾刚.上海创意产业园区空间分布特征及空间影响[J].社会科学家,2011(8):59-63.
    [11]许越先,陈建华,杨文志.中国农业科技园区建设与发展[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
    [12]杨敬华,许越先.农业科技园区集群创新平台建设的研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2007,05:20-23.
    [13]刘战平.农业科技园区技术推广机制与模式研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2007.
    [14]王芳.农业科技园区成长机理研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
    [15]蒋和平.高新技术改造传统农业论[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997.
    [16]查金祥,徐辉.论农业科技园区建设的理论基础[J].湖北农学院学报,2002(4):181-183.
    [17]张应良.WTO与中国农业和农村发展[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.
    [18]蒋和平.农业科技园的建设理论与模式探索[M].北京:气象出版社,2002.
    [19]Admirahmadi, H. and Staff, G. Science Park:a Critical Assessment [J]. Journal of Planning Literature,1993(8):107-123.
    [20]Doloreux, D. Technopoles Et TrajectoiresStratEgiques:Le Cas de la Ville de Laval[J]. Cahiers de Geographie du Quebec,1999(43):211-235.
    [21]Malecki, E. J. Technology and Economic Dvelopment[M]. Edinburgh:Longman, 1997.
    [22]Cooke, P. Regional Innovation System, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001a(10):945-974.
    [23]Komninos, N. After Technopoles[A]. In J. Simmie (ed) Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions? [C] London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers,1998.
    [24]Massey, D. Quintas, P. and Wield, D. High-Tech Fantasies[M]. London:Routledge, 1992.
    [25]杨其长.我国农业科技示范园的技术经济背景与发展对策[J].中国农村科技,2004,(8):39-41.
    [26]李瑞芳.社会主义新农村建设视角下的创意农业发展对策[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(28):11-12.
    [27]何伟.农业科技园区建设、评价与实践[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2011.
    [28]蒋和平,孙炜琳.农业科技园区综合评价指标体系研究[J].农业技术经济,2002(6):21-25.
    [29]蒋和平,宋莉莉.国家农业科技园区的运行模式分析[J].科技与经济,2006,(6):21-24.
    [30]王朝全.农业科技园区的发展模式探讨[J].科学管理研究,2004(1):32-36.
    [31]周小琴,查金祥.农业科技园区:功能定位、建园模式与运行机制[J].江苏工业学院学报(社会科学版),2005,03:36-39.
    [32]刘笑明,李同昇.农业技术创新扩散的国际经验及国内趋势[J].经济地理,2006,(6):931-935.
    [33]Westhead, P. Inputs and Qutputs of Technology-based Firms Located on and off Science Park[J]. R & D Management Journal,1997(27):45-62.
    [34]Vedovello, C. Science Park and University-Industry Interaction:Geo-graphical Proximity between the Agent as A Driving Force[J]. Technovation,1999(19):673-680.
    [35]Lofsten, H. and Lindelof, P. Science Parks in Sweden Industrial Renewal and Development[J]. R & D Management Journal,2001(31):309-322.
    [36]Chen K. F. and T. Lau. Assessing Technology Incubator Programs in the Science Park: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly[J]. Technovation,2005(25):1215-1228.
    [37]Fukugawa N. Science Parks in Japan and their Value-Added Contributions to New Technolog-Based Firms[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2006, 24(2):381-400.
    [38]何燕子.基于农业科技园区的区域创新系统研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2007.
    [39]杨敬华.农业科技园区科技创新能力建设研究[J].农村经济,2008,(8):107-110.
    [40]王旭,于妹,杨印生.农业科技园区集群效应与竞争力分析[J].农机化研究,2007,(12):203-206.
    [41]刘进梅.农业科技园区持续创新优势的集群分析[J].当代经济管理,2007,(4):64-66.
    [42]李树奎,李同昇.我国西北地区县域农业技术扩散环境的评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(1):179-185.
    [43]同海梅,侯军岐.以农业技术进步为主线的农业科技园区的制度创新[J].特区经济,2006,08:340-342.
    [44]李普峰,李同昇,满明俊等.农业技术扩散的时间过程及空间特征分析——以陕西省苹果种植技术为例[J].经济地理,2010,30(4):647-651.
    [45]张鸿,鲜小林,谭伟.科研单位支撑农业科技园区发展的成效及其人才队伍建设[J].天津农业科学,2010,(6):134-137.
    [46]张建忠,李同昇,李慧栋.我国农业科技园的发展现状及其动力机制[J].农村经济,2006,(12):56-59.
    [47]李秀彬.对于国家农业科技园区内空间布局过于分散问题的思考[J].中国农业科 技导报,2010,(1):56-59.
    [48]蒋和平,孙炜琳.国家农业科技园发展现状与政策建议[J].温室园艺,2004(4):19-23.
    [49]陈栋,甄双七,刘建峰等.我国农业科技园区建设现状与发展对策[J].广东农业科学,2006(12):116-120.
    [50]王欧,吴文良.中国农业科技园区评价指标体系研究[J].农业技术经济,2003(4):25-28.
    [51]陈阜.国家农业科技园区建设的现状与对策[J].中国农村科技,2007(11):41-45.
    [52]龙天炜,苏津津.提升国家农业科技园可持续发展能力的战略与对策[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(5):24-28.
    [53]聂闯.世界农业推广体系现状[J].世界农业,2000,249(1):50-51.
    [54]Chen C. J., WuH. L., LinB. W..Evaluating the Development of High-Tech Industries: Taiwan's Science Park[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2006, 37(4):452-465.
    [55]张新明,汤庆园.国家高新技术产业开发区发展评价研究[J].世界地理研究,2013,22(1):114-120.
    [56]何仙珠.农业科技园区的评价指标体系研究[J].中国农学通报,2005,(10):384-388.
    [57]高小红.我国农业科技园区评价指标体系研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2006.
    [58]李慧娟.现代农业科技园区综合评价指标体系研究[J].现代经济信息,2010,(5):21-22.
    [59]陈栋.广州国家农业科技园区能值评价的研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2007.
    [60]刘战平,陆远如,蒋和平.农业科技园区专家大院评价指标体系研究[J].中国集体经济,2008,(16):171-172.
    [61]李杰,魏秀芬.天津农业科技园区示范带动作用的绩效分析[J].天津农林科技,2012,(3):30-31.
    [62]何伟.基于DEA方法的农业科技园区投入产出综合效益评价[J].统计与决策,2007,(24):154-156.
    [63]张静.基于Malmquist指数法的中国农业科技园区生产效率实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2011,(17):129-133.
    [64]张敏.江苏农业科技园区与区域经济协调发展研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2011.
    [65]杨海蛟,刘源,赵黎明.产业集聚水平下农业科技园区的技术推广效率研究——以36个国家级农业科技园区为实证[J].农业科技管理,2012,(1):85-87.
    [66]赵静,肖洁,曹洪涛等.现代农业科技园区环境影响评价研究[J].农业环境与发展,2012,(5):54-58.
    [67]陈莉.合肥市农业科技示范园评价指标体系的构建与评价[J].现代农业科学,2009,(6):196-197.
    [68]杨敬华,蒋和平.农业科技园区集群创新的链式发展模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2005,(3):83-86.
    [69]潘启龙,刘合光.现代农业科技园区竞争力评价指标体系研究[J].地域研究与开发,2013,32(1):5-11.
    [70]刘战平,陆远如,蒋和平.农业科技园区专家大院评价指标体系研究[J].中国集体经济,2008,(16):171-172.
    [71]康凯.技术创新扩散理论与模型[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2004.
    [72]Rogers E M. Diffusion of innovation[M].3rd Ed. New York:New York Press,1983.
    [73]刘笑明.农业科技园区技术扩散研究.[D].西安:西北大学,2008.
    [74]常向阳,戴国海.技术创新扩散的机制及其本质探讨[J].技术经济与管理研究,2003,(5):101-102.
    [75]张建忠.农业科技园技术创新扩散理论与实证研究[D].西安:西北大学,2007.
    [76]秦文利,王慧军.农民素质对农业技术扩散的影响[J].河北农业科学,2004,8(1):54-57.
    [77]门杰,苏竣.信息技术在农业知识扩散中的应用[J].科研管理,2000,(2)49-55.
    [78]徐玖平.旱育秧技术扩散模型与实证分析[J].管理工程学报,2001,(1):21-27.
    [79]戴国海.良种技术扩散的理论与实证研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2004.
    [80]廖西元,王磊,王志刚.稻农采用节水技术影响因素的实证分析—自然因素和经济因素效应及其交互影响的估[J].中国农村经济,2006,(12):13-19.
    [81]赵绪福.农业技术扩散速度的模型分析[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),1996,14(2):59-61.
    [82]康凯,苏建旭,张会云.非均质空间各向同性的技术创新扩散模型研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2000,29(3):34-39.
    [83]余迎新,许立新,康凯.技术创新空间扩散机理研究[J].河北工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,(2):124-128.
    [84]宋德军,刘阳.中国农业技术扩散速度测定及发展策略研究[J].科技与经济,2008,21(6):35-38.
    [85]曹文志.系统认识农业技术创新的推广过程[J].科技管理研究,1997,(3):6-8.
    [86]张俊鹰.论农业技术推广模式的构建原理与运行机制[J].农业现代化研究,1999,18(3):91-93.
    [87]张力.以政府主导行为为主体的农业技术推广模式分析[J].农业科技管理,2005,24(4):28-29.
    [88]刘佛翔,张丽君.我国农业技术创新与扩散模式探讨[J].农业现代化研究,1999,20(5):294-297.
    [89]高启杰,陈良玉.优化农业推广模式发展农业推广事业[J].中国农业科技导报,2000,(2):76-80.
    [90]方维慰,李同异.农业技术空间扩散环境的分析与评价[J].科技进步与对策,2006(11):48-50.
    [91]Lindner Robert K. Farm Size and the Time Lag to Adoption of a Scale Neutral Innovation [M]. Mimeographed Adelaide:University of Adelaide,1980.
    [92]Janis M. Carey, David Zilberman. A Model of Investment Under Uncertainty:Modern Irrigation Technology and Emerging Markets in Water[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2002,84(1):171-183.
    [93]Eric C. Schuck, W. Marshall Frasier, Robert S. Webb, et al. Adoption of More Technically Efficient Irrigation Systems as a Drought Response[J]. Water Resources Development,2005,21(4):651-662.
    [94]Jack, B. K. Barriers to the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries[J]. Agricultural Technology,2009.
    [95]林毅夫.家庭责任制改革和中国杂交水稻的采用[J].发展经济学杂志,1991,36(7):353-372.
    [96]朱希刚,黄季焜.农业技术进步测定的理论方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1994.
    [97]汪三贵,刘晓展.信息不完备条件下贫困农民接受新技术行为分析[J].农业经济问题,1996,17(12):31-36.
    [98]廖西元,陈庆根,王磊等.农民对科技需求的优先序研究——水稻生产科技需求实证分析[J].中国青年农业科学学术年报,2004,8(6):470-481.
    [99]林毅夫.制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].上海:上海三联书店,2008.
    [100]刘宇,黄季焜,王金霞等.影响农业节水技术采用的决定因素——基于中国10个省的实证研究[J].节水灌溉,2009,34(10):1-5.
    [101]刘晓敏,王慧军,李运朝.太行山前平原区农户采用小麦玉米农艺节水技术意愿影响因素的实证分析者[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(5):1099-1105.
    [102]陆文聪,余安等.浙江省农户采用节水灌溉技术意愿及其影响因素[J].中国科技论坛,2011,27(11):136-142.
    [103]Paulson N. D.,Schnitkey G. D. Policy Concerns of Midwestern Grain Producers for the 2012 Farm Bill[J]. American journal of agricultural economics,2012, 94(2):515-521.
    [104]Atari, D.,Yiridoe, E.,Smale, S.,et al.What Motivates Farmers to Participate in the Nova Scotia Environmental Farm Plan Program? Evidence and Environmental Policy Implications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(2):1269-1279.
    [105]Ruto, E.,Garrod, G. Investigating Farmers'Preferences for the Design of Agri-environment Schemes:A Choice Experiment Approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2009,52(5):631-647.
    [106]AGRIDEA, FiBL.Swiss Association for the Development of Rural Areas and Research Institute for Organic Agriculture[M]. Switzerland:Deckungsbeitrage,2010.
    [107]Kaiser, T.,et al..Validation of Grassland Indicator Species Selected for Result-oriented Agri-environmentalSchemes[J]. Bio-diversity and Conservation,2010,19 (5):1297-1314.
    [108]MatzdorfB., LorenzJ..How Cost-effective are Result-oriented Agri-environmental Measures?AnEmpiricalAnalysis in Germany[J], Land Use Policy,2010,27 (2):535-544.
    [109]Techen, A. K.,Osterburg, B. Verifiability of Result-oriented Policy Measures to Reduce N Emissions From German Agriculture[C]. Edinburgh:Paper Presented at the Nitrogen & Global Change Science Conference,2011.
    [110]Rob J. F. Burton, G. Schwarz.Result-oriented Agri-environmental Schemes in Europe and Their Potential for Promoting BehaviouralChange[J]. Land Use Policy,2013, 30(1):628-641.
    [111]Claudia Sattler, Uwe Jens Nagelb.Factors affecting farmers acceptance of conservation measures:a case study from north-eastern Germany [J]. Land Use Policy,2010, 27(1):70-77.
    [112]Maria Espinosa-Goded, Jesus Barreiro-Hurle, Eric Ruto.What Do Farmers Want From Agri-environmental Scheme Design? A choice experiment approach.Agricultural Economics Society,2010,61(2):259-273.
    [113]Johan Ahnstrom, Jenny Hockert, Hanna L. Bergea, et al. Farmers and Nature Conservation null what is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation?. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,2009,24(1):38-47.
    [114]Teresa Serra, David Zilberman, Jose M. Gil.Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers:the case of Spanish arable crop farmers[J]. Agricultural Economics,2008,39(2):219-229.
    [115]Knowler D.,Bradshaw B. Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Agriculture:A review and synthesis of recent research[J]. Food Policy,2007,32(1):25-48.
    [116]Robert Finger, Nadja El Benni. Farmer'Adoption of Extensive Wheat Production-Determinants and Implications[J]. Land Use Policy,2013,30(1):206-213.
    [117]RangalalMohapatra.Farmers's Education and Profit Efficiency in Sugarcane Production:A Stochastic Frontier Profit Function Approach[J]. The IUP Journal of Agricultural Economics,2011,8(2):18-31.
    [118]Francisco Alcon, Maria Dolores de Miguel, Michael Burton.Duration Analysis of Adoption of Drip Irrigation Technology in Southeastern Spain [J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2011,78(6):991-1001.
    [119]Michael Burton, Dan Rigby, Trevor Young. Adoption and Abandonment of Organic Farming:An Empirical Investigation of the Irish Drystock Sector[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2010,61(3),697-714.
    [120]Jikun Huang, Cheng Xiang, XiangpingJia, Ruifa Hu.Impacts of Training on Farmers' Nitrogen Use inmaize Production in Shandong, China Impacts of Training on Farmers' Nitrogen Use in Maize Production in Shandong, China [J] Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,67(4):321-327.
    [121]朱明芬,王磊,李南田.农业劳动力兼业行为及发展趋势[J].调研世界,2000,8(6):18-21.
    [122]王志刚,王磊,廖西元等.农户采用水稻轻简栽培技术的行为分析[J].农业技术经济,2007,26(3):102-107.
    [123]刘红梅,王克强,黄智俊.影响中国农户采用节水灌溉技术行为的因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2008.24(4):44-54.
    [124]王秀东,王永春.基于良种补贴政策的农户小麦新品种选择行为分析—以山东、河北、河南三省八县调查为例[J].中国农村经济,2008,26(3):102-107.
    [125]喻永红,张巨勇.农户采用水稻IPM技术的意愿及其影响因素—基于湖北省的调查数据[J].中国农村经济,2009,25(11):77-86.
    [126]朱红根,周曙东.南方稻区农户适应气候变化行为实证分析—基于江西省36县(市)346份农户调查数据[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1119-1128.
    [127]朱丽娟,向会娟.粮食主产区农户节水灌溉采用意愿分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2011,32(5):17-21.
    [128]褚彩虹,冯淑怡,张蔚文.农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析—以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J].中国农村经济,2012,28(3):68-77.
    [129]杨念.区域经济中博弈论在节水灌溉中的应用研究[J].节水灌溉,2003,24(3):45-48.
    [130]韩青.农业节水灌溉技术应用的经济分析[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004:27-29.
    [131]李艳,陈晓宏.农业节水灌溉的博弈分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2005,24(3):19-22.
    [132]沈建芳,丰景春.水量调配博弈分析及应用研究[J].水利经济,2006,24(2):20-23.
    [133]柯水发.基于进化博弈理论视角的农户群体退耕行为分析[J].林业经济,2007,26(2):59-62.
    [134]江煜,王学峰.干旱区灌溉水价与农户采用节水灌溉技术之间的博弈分析[J].石河子大学学报,2008,26(3):362-365.
    [135]王艳芳,张红玲.水价与灌溉模式选择的博弈分析[J].水利经济,2009,27(2):32-33.
    [136]夏勇开,刘殿国.香蕉种植户技术需求行为及影响因素的实证分析—以广西香蕉种植户的调查为例[J].热带生物学报,2011,2(1):67-71.
    [137]李后建.农户对循环农业技术采纳意愿的影响因素实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2012,32(2):28-36.
    [138]黄玉祥,韩文霆,周龙等.农户节水灌溉技术认知及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(18):113-120.
    [139]Wossink G. A.A, Buck A. Niejenhuis J, J. H, et al. Farmer Perceptions of Weed Control Techniques in Sugarbeet[J]. Agricultural Systems,1997,55(3):409-423.
    [140]Mendesil E, Abdeta C, Tesfaye A, et al. Farmers'perceptions and management practices of insect pests on stored sorghum in southwestern Ethiopia[J]. Crop Protection,2007,26(12):1817-1825.
    [141]Khan Z, Amudavi D. M.,Charles, Midega A. O, et al. Farmers'perceptions of a 'push-ull' technology for control of cereal stemborers and Striga weed in western Kenya[J]. Crop Protection,2008, (27):976-987.
    [142]Greiner R, Patterson L, Miller O. Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers[J]. Agricultural Systems,2009,99(2):86-104.
    [143]Yaghoubi J. Assessment of agricultural extension and education graduate students'perceptions of e-learning in Iran[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2009,1(1):1914-1918.
    [144]Mojid M.A, Wyseure G. C. L, Biswas S. K.,etal. Farmers'perceptions and knowledge in using wastewater for irrigation at twelve peri-urban areas and two sugar mill areas in Bangladesh[J]. AgriculturalWater Management,2010,98(1):79-86.
    [145]D'Antoni J. M, Mishra A. K, Joo H. Farmers'perception of precision technology:The case of autosteer adoption by cotton farmers[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2012,87:121-128.
    [146]Gregory E. F, Hugo E. F, A. Nahuel P. Perceptions of silvopasture systems among adopters in northeast Argentina[J]. Agricultural Systems,2012,105(1):21-32.
    [147]Barraza D, Jansen K, Joode B. W. Pesticide use in banana and plantain production and risk perception among local actors in Talamanca, Costa Rica[J]. Environmental Research,2011,111(5):708-717.
    [148]Robinson K. G, Robinson C. H, Raup L.A, et al. Public attitudes and risk perception toward land application of biosolids within the south-eastern United States[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2012,98(15):29-36.
    [149]Reimer A. P, Weinkauf D. K, Prokopy L. S.The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics'.An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2012,28(1):118-128.
    [150]TanjuKiriscioglu, David M. Hassenzahl, Bulent Turan.Urban and rural perceptions of ecological risks to water environments in southern and eastern Nevada[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2013,33:86-95.
    [151]Melanie L. L, I, Jeffrey T. L, Sally A. M. Vegetable producers'perceptions of food safety hazards in the Midwestern USA[J]. Food Control,2012,26(2):453-465.
    [152]Carr G, Potter R. B, Nortcliff S. Water reuse for irrigation in Jordan:Perceptions of water quality among farmers[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2011, 98(5):847-854.
    [153]Jolly C. M.,Bayarda B, Awuah R T, et al. Examining the structure of awareness and perceptions of groundnut aflatoxin among Ghanaian health and agricultural professionals and its influence on their actions[J]. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009,38(2):280-287.
    [154]Aubert B A, Schroeder A, Grimaudo J. IT as enabler of sustainable farming:An empirical analysis of farmers'adoption decision of precision agriculture technology [J]. Decision Support Systems,2012,54(1):510-520.
    [155]赵建欣,张晓风.蔬菜种植农户对无公害农药的认知和购买意愿—基于河北省120家菜农的调查分析[J].农机化研究,2007,(11):70-73.
    [156]邢美华,张俊飚,黄光体.未参与循环农业农户的环保认知及其影响因素分析—基于晋、鄂两省的调查[J].中国农村经济,2009,(4):72-79.
    [157]徐家鹏,闫振宇.农民对转基因技术的认知及转基因主粮的潜在生产意愿分析—以湖北地区种粮农户为考察对象[J].中国科技论坛,2010,(11):142-148.
    [158]吴林海,侯博,高申荣.基于结构方程模型的分散农户农药残留认知与主要影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2011,(3):35-48.
    [159]王永强,朱玉春.启发式偏向、认知与农民不安全农药购买决策—以苹果种植户为例[J].农业技术经济,2012,(7):48-55.
    [160]黄季焜,齐亮,陈瑞剑.技术信息知识、风险偏好与农民施用农药[J].管理世界,2008,(5):71-76.
    [161]赵肖柯,周波.种稻大户对农业新技术认知的影响因素分析—基于江西省1077户农户的调查[J].中国农村观察,2012,(4):29-36.
    [162]邓正华,杨新容,张俊飚等.农户对高产农业技术扩散的生态环境影响感知实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):138-144.
    [163]石洪景,黄和亮.农户对农业技术采用行为的心理学分析[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(4):209-213.
    [164]徐欣,胡俞越,韩杨等.农户对市场风险与农产品期货的认知及其影响因素分析—基于5省(市)328份农户问卷调查[J].中国农村经济,2010,(7):47-55.
    [165]巩前文,穆向丽,田志宏.农户过量施肥风险认知及规避能力的影响因素分析—基于江汉平原284个农户的问卷调查[J].中国农村经济,2010,(10):66-76.
    [166]Klerkx L, Aarts N, Leeuwis C. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems:The interactions between innovation networks and their environment[J]. Agricultural Systems,2010,103(6):390-400.
    [167]Tim J. Coelli, D. S. PrasadaRao.Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture:A Malmquist Index Analysis of 93 Countries,1980-2000 [J]. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,2003,(2):1-32.
    [168]Ndlovu P. V, Mazvimavi K, An H, et al. Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe [J]. Agricultural Systems,2014, 12:21-32.
    [169]Pfeiffer L, Lin C.Does efficient irrigation technology lead to reduced groundwater extraction? Empirical evidence [J] Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.2014,67(2):189-208.
    [170]Ma S. Z, Feng H.Will the decline of efficiency in China's agriculture come to an end? An analysis based on opening and convergence [J]. China Economic Review,2013, 27:179-190.
    [171]Serra T, Chambers R. G, Lansink A. O. Measuring technical and environmental efficiency in a state-contingent technology [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2014,236(2):706-717.
    [172]Ray S. C, Ghose A. Production efficiency in Indian agriculture:An assessment of the post green revolution years [J]. Omega,2014,44:58-69.
    [173]黄少安,孙圣民,宫明波.中国土地产权制度对农业经济增长的影响—对1949-1978年中国大陆农业生产效率的实证分析[J].中国社会科,2005,(3):38-49.
    [174]李谷成,冯中朝,占绍文.家庭禀赋对农户家庭经营技术效率的影响冲击[J].统计研究,2008,25(1):35-42.
    [175]屈小博.不同规模农户生产技术效率差异及其影响因素分析—基于超越对数随机前沿生产函数与农户微观数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(3):27-36.
    [176]金福良,王璐,李谷成等.不同规模农户冬油菜生产技术效率及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2013,18(1):210-217.
    [177]史清华.农户经济增长与发展研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社.
    [178]D·J·沃姆斯利,G·J·刘易斯著;王兴中,郑国强,李贵才译.行为地理学导论[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1988.
    [179]李晓楠.感知风险、信任对网络购买意愿影响的实证研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2012.
    [180]郭霞.基于农户生产技术选择的农业技术推广体系研究-以江苏省小麦生产为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2008.
    [181]李斌.生态家园富民工程“三位一体”项目对宁夏盐池县农户生计影响的研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2005.
    [182]朱丽娟.基于认知的手机消费者购买决策过程影响因素研究[D].济南:山东大学,2011.
    [183]基于顾客价值构建竞争优势的理论与方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2003.
    [184]孔祥智,方松海,庞晓鹏等.西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004,(12):85-95.
    [185]何雪峰.基于农户尺度的半干旱区集雨生态农业技术体系的行为响应机理及影响因素分析[D].兰州:兰州大学,2007.
    [186]王磊.基于DEA和SFA方法的我国信托投资公司效率研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008.
    [187]中国统计局.中国农村统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1995-2012.
    [188]甘肃省统计局.甘肃统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997-2011.
    [189]孙俊,潘玉君,汤茂林等.地理学发展的战略方向探讨[J].地理学报,2013,68(2):268-283.
    [190]英国皇家学会著;唐英英译.公众理解科学[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2004.
    [191]西奥多·W·舒尔茨.改造传统农业[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700