创造性思维水平高、低大学生类比推理能力与工作记忆关系的实验
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究在综合国内外研究的基础上,采用测验法和实验法对大学生创造性思维、类比推理和工作记忆三者的关系进行研究。研究结果表明:(1)类比推理的反应时在创造性思维水平、推理类型和组别上均存在显著的主效应,并且在创造性思维和推理类型之间存在显著的交互作用;而类比推理的正确率在推理类型和组别上存在显著的主效应。(2)高创造性思维水平的被试无论进行言语类比推理还是图形类比推理,所需的时间都明显少于低创造性思维水平的被试;而创造性思维水平高、低被试在类比推理的正确率方面没有显著差异。(3)高创造性思维被试无论是言语类比还是图形类比反应时,组别之间的差异均非常显著;低创造性思维被试在图形类比推理上存在显著的组别差异。高创造性思维被试在进行言语类比推理时有视空间模板中的空间成分和视觉成分、语音回路中的发音成分及中央执行器四种工作记忆子成分参与;在进行图形类比推理时有视空间模板中的视觉成分、语音回路中的语言储存成分及中央执行器三种工作记忆子成分的参与。而对于低创造性思维被试而言,无论是言语类比推理还是图形类比推理,都只有中央执行器一种工作记忆子成分参与了类比推理过程。高创造性思维被试在言语类比推理正确率上存在显著的组别差异;低创造性思维被试无论是言语类比还是图形类比,组别之间的差异均不显著。
Based on the global researches, the study conducts the research combined with the methods of the analogical reasoning test and experiments on the relations among the creative thoughts, analogy reasoning and working memory among the college students. The results indicate that (1) the significant main effect lies in the reaction time of analogy reasoning on the level of creative thoughts, reasoning types and groups. And the significant interactive effects were seen between the creative thoughts and reasoning types. Whereas, the significant main effect lies in the corrections of analogy reasoning of reasoning types and groups. (2) Whatever linguistic reasoning or picture reasoning are performed, subjects from the high level of creative thoughts took less time rather than the low level of its counterparts. However, no differences were found in the correction rates between two groups. (3) In terms of reaction time, significant differences are obvious between the groups. So far as the picture analogy reasoning is concerned, the low creative thoughts are obviously different. While, being conducted in the test of linguistic analogy reasoning, there are spatial and visual parts, as well as the linguistic circuit and
引文
[1] Usha Goswami. Analogical reasoning in children. Hove: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992: 1-3, 17-23, 49-57.
    [2] (德)韦特海默著、林宗基译,创造性思维[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1987年第一版。
    [3] (日)高桥浩编著、未申等译,怎样进行创造性思维[M].北京:科学普及出版社,1987年第一版。
    [4] (台)陈龙安,创造性思维与教学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999年第一版.
    [5] 张德秀,创造性思维的发展与教学[M].湖南:湖南师范大学出版社,1990年2月第一版。
    [6] 王纬虹、段继扬,小学生智力、创造性思维、创造性倾向与其学业成绩的相关研究[J],信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,19(1):70-72。
    [7] 陈国鹏等,我国中小学生创造力与智力和人格相关研究,心理科学,1996,19:154-157。
    [8] 朱晓红,儿童学习动机类型与创造力倾向关系的研究,南京师大学报(社科版),2001,6:90-95。
    [9] 庄寿强,试论特点、属性的区别与联系及其在科学研究中的意义[J].自然辩证法研 究,1997,(11):114-117。
    [10] 顾明远,教育大辞典(增订合编本)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1998年第一版,91。
    [11] 朱作仁,教育辞典[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,1987年第一版,271。
    [12] 周明星,创造教育与挫折教育[M].北京:中国人事出版社,1999年第一版,101。
    [13] 朱作仁,创造教育手册[M].南宁:广西教育出版社,1991年第一版,29。
    [14] (美)吉尔福特,创造性才能[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1991年第一版,133-135。
    [15] 董奇,托兰斯的创造力研究工作[J].心理发展与教育,1985,2(1):21。
    [16] Sternberg R J. Handbook of Creativity[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 78-79.
    [17] (美)奥斯本,我是最懂创造力的人物[M].厦门:鹭江出版社,1989年版,119。
    [18] 柳斌主编,创新教育全书[M].500、551。
    [19] 杨叔子,中国高教育,2000,7。
    [20] 殷坤,虚拟与现实,光明日报,2000年3月28日。
    [21] 郑慎德,思维、创造性思维及其理论[J].武汉金融高等专科学校学报,2000,55(4):3-7。
    [22] 郑日昌,肖蓓玲,创造思维测验手册[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1993。
    [23] Torrance E P. Educational achievement of the highly intelligent and the highly creative: Eight partial replications of the Getzels-Jackson study [R]. (Research Memorandum BER-60-18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Bureau of Education Research, 1960.
    [24] Getzels J W, Jackson P W. Creativity and intelligence[M]. NY: Wiley, 1962. 223.
    [25] Rampaul W E. The relationship between academic achievement, self-concept, Creativity and teacher expectations among native children in a northern Manitoba school[J]. Alberta Jour, 1984, 30 (3): 213-225.
    [26] Runco M A. Creativity, extra curricular activity and divergent thinking as predictors of mathematics and science performance by talented adolescents[R]. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED279523, 1987.
    [27] Hudson L. Contrary imaginations [M]. London: Methuen, 1966.
    [28] Edwards M P, Tyler L E. Intelligence, Creativity and achievement in a nonselective public junior high school[J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56: 52-62.
    [29] Pal S K. Personality study of engineering, law, medical and teacher training students [M]. Allahabad, India: United Publishers, 1969.
    [30] Sanchez K, Betkouski M. A study of factors affecting student performance in community college general chemistry courses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching[R]. San Francisco: 1986.
    [31] Lent R W. Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence [J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984, 31(3): 356-362.
    [32] Torrance, E P. The Minnesota studies of creative behaviors: national and international extensions[J]. Journal of creative behavior, 1967, 1: 28-34
    [33] HUS Sain, Shamshed. Creativity: concept and findings[M]. Delhi: Banarsidass, 1988.
    [34] 董奇,西方关于儿童创造力发展的研究综述[J].外国心理学,1985(3)。
    [35] Ortony A. Why metaphors are necessary and not justice. Educational Theory, 1985, 25, 43-53.
    [36] Goldman S R, Pellegrino J W, Parseghian P, et al. Development and individual differences in verbal analogical reasoning. Child Development, 1982, 53: 550-559.
    [37] SUBH M, Oberauer K, Wittmann W W, et al. Working-memory capacity explains reason ability and a little bit more. Intelligence, 2002, 30: 261-288.
    [38] Wharton C M, Grafman J, Flitman S S, et al. Toward neuroanatomical models of analogy: A positron emission topography study of analogical reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 40: 173-197.
    [39] Holyoak K J. The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In: GH Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: A-cademicPress. 1985.
    [40] Kintsch W, vanDijk T A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 363-394.
    [41] Piaget J, Montangero J, Billeter J. Les Correlats. In J. Piaget (Ed.), L' Abstraction Reflechissante. Pairs: Presses Universitaires de Franc, 1977.
    [42] Sternberg J, Nigro G. Developmental patterns in the solution of verb-analogies. Child Development, 1980, 51: 27-38.
    [43] Gentner D, The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & Ortony (Eds.): Similarity and analogical reasoning, pp. 199-241. Cambridge: A. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    [44] Brown A L, Kane M J, Long C, Analogical transfer in young children: Analogical as tools for communication and exposition, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1989, 3: 275-293.
    [45] Keil FC, Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
    [46] Kolodner J L, Narayanan H, Hmelo C. Problem-based learning meets cased-reasoning. In E. Domesshek & D. Eddeelman (Eds.). Proceedings of the 1996 international Conference of the learning Sciences (PP. 188-195). YA: American Association for Computers in Education, 1996.
    [47] Ross B, Distinguishing types of super-facial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989, 15: 456-468.
    [48] 沃建中,心理加工速度发展的研究进展[J],心理学动态,2001,9(4):311-318。
    [49] Salthouse T A, Aging and measures of processing speed. Biological Psychology, 200, 54: 35-54.
    [50] Brigman S, Cherry K E,. Age, speed of information processing, recall, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 1995, 20: 229-248.
    [51] Salthouse T A. The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 1996, 103 (3): 403-428.
    [52] Wilhelm O, Schulze R. The relation of speeded and unspeeded reasoning with mental speed. Intelligence, 2002, 30: 537-554.
    [53] Klix (1980)
    [54] Halpern D F, Hanson C & Riefer D. Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, 82 (2): 298-305.
    [55] Kubose T T, Holyoak K J, Hummel J E. The role of textual coherence in incremental analogical mapping. Journal of Memory & Language, 2002, 47 (3): 407-435
    [56] Keane M T. What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1997, 23 (4): 946-967
    [57] Gentner D, Markman A B. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 1997, 52: 45-56.
    [58] Wharton C M, Holyoak K J, Lange T E. Remote analogical reminding. Memory & Cognition, 1996, 24: 629-643.
    [59] Yanowitz K L. The effects of similarity of theme and instantiation in analogical reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 2001, 114 (4): 547-567.
    [60] Chen Z. Children's Analogical Problem Solving: The Effects Superficial, Structural, and Procedual similarity. Journal of Experimental child Psychology, 1996, 62: 410-431.
    [61] Brown A L. Analogical Learning and Transfer: What Developing? In: S Vosnidou & A. Ortony. Similiarity and Analogical Ressoning. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 369-412.
    [62] Yanowitz K L. Transfer of structure-related and arbitrary information in analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 2001, 51: 357-379.
    [63] Badely AD. Is working memory still working[J]? American Psychologist, 2001, (11): 851-864].
    [64] 陈彩琦,华南师范大学学报(社科版)[J],2004(6):114-120。
    [65] 刘昌,人类工作记忆的某些神经影像研究[J],心理学报,2002,34(6):634-642.
    [66] Baddeley AD. Hitchi GJ. Working memory [A]. In: Bower GA. In: Bower GA. The Psychology of learning and Motivation[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1974: 47-89.
    [67] Baddeley AD. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4: 417-423.
    [68] 杨治良等,记忆心理学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999:98-109。
    [69] Norman DA. Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson RJ. Schwarts GE. Shapiro D. Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory (Vo].4). New York: Plenum Press, 1986. 1-18.
    [70] Baddeley AD. Hitch GJ. Development of working memory: Should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000, 77(2): 128.
    [71] Engle RW. Working memory capacity as executive attention[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11(1): 19-23.
    [72] Miyake A. Friedman NP. Emerson MJ., etal. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2001, (41): 49-100.
    [73] Miyake A. Working memory: The past, the present, and the future[A]. In: Osaka N. The brain and working memory[M]. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press, 2000: 311-329.
    [74] Connell KE. Buy back programs in commercial fisheries: Efficiency versus transfers Quinn Weninger [J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 2000, 33(2): 394.
    [75] 阿瑞提,创造的秘密[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987,351、439、482-483.
    [76] 张光鉴,相似论[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1992,4、36、526.
    [77] Barnett H G. Innovation: the Basis of Cultural change. McGrow-Hill Book Company, Inc. Princeton, etc, 1963.
    [78] 曲衍立、张梅玲,类比迁移研究综述[J],心理学动态,2000.2。
    [79] 吴文丽,初中生创造性思维加工策略及其测试研究[J],湖南师范大学硕士论文,2003.4。
    [80] Logie RH. Working memory. Psychologist, 1999, 12: 174-178.]
    [81] A. D. Baddeley, H. A. Baddeley, R. S. Bucks, G. K. Wilcock. Attentional control in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. Oxford: Aug 2001. Vol. 124, Iss. 8; p. 1492.
    [82] Mehmet Bahar, Mike H Hansell. The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology. Dorchester-on-Thames: Sep 2000. Vol. 20, Iss. 3; p. 349 (16 pages).
    [83] Vandierendonck A. Vooght GD. Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1997, 50(4): 803-820.
    [84] 白学军等,工作记忆、表达方式和同质性对线性三段论推理影响的眼动研究[J], 心理与行为研究,2004,2(3):519-523。
    [85] 申继亮等,工作记忆容量和加工速度在归纳推理能力老化中的作用[J],心理学报,2004,27(3):536-539。
    [86] 王习胜,创造性思维机制的认知解读[J].科学技术与辩证法,2004,21(3):56-59。
    [87] 冯廷勇、李红,类比推理发展理论述评[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,28(4):44-47。
    [88] Badely AD. Is working memory still working[J]? American Psychologist, 2001, (11): 851-864.
    [89] 李俊,成人的学习研究——成人的智商、创造性思维能力及学业成绩之间的相关性研究分析报告[J].北京联合大学学报.2001,15(2):89-93。
    [90] 张布和,轮创造性思维及其研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版)2002,15(6):45-48。
    [91] 颜峰、罗尧成,创造力研究的新进展及其对人才培养的启示[J].湖南商学院学报(双月刊),2001,8(6):94-95。
    [92] Kris E. Psychoanalytic exportations in art [M]. New York: International Universities Press, 1952.
    [93] 北京语言学院语言教学研究所,现代汉语词频词典[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社,1986年第一版。
    [94] Vandierendonck A. Vooght G D. Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1997, 50(4): 803-820.
    [95] Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Maher, M. A., Costanza, D. P., & Supinski, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: Ⅳ. Category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 59-71.
    [96] Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: Ⅱ. Information encoding. Creativity ResearchJournal, 9, 77-88.
    [97] Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., &Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 63-76.
    [98] Vera John-Steiner. Creative combinations: Random or Purposive? The American Journal of Psychology. Urbana: Winter 2005. Vol. 118, Iss. 4; p. 649 (7 pages).
    [99] Arthur B Markman, Oedre Gentner. Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto: 2001. Vol. 52: p. 223 (25 pages).
    [100] A. D. Baddeley, H. A. Baddeley, R. S. Bucks, G. K. Wilcock. Attentional control in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. Oxford: Aug 2001. Vol. 124, Iss. 8; p. 1492.
    [101] Mehmet Bahar, Mike H Hansell. The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology. Dorchester-on-Thames: Sep 2000. Vol. 20, Iss. 3; p. 349 (16 pages).
    [102] Chihiro Yokoyama, Hideo Tsukada, Yasuyoshi Watanabe, Hirotaka Onoe. A Dynamic Shift of Neural Network Activity before and after Learning-set Formation. Cerebral Cortex. New York: Jun 2005. Vol. 15, Iss. 6; p. 796.
    [103] Dan Chiappe, Kevin MacDonald. The Evolution of Domain-General Mechanisms in Intelligence and Learning. The Journal of General Psychology. Provincetown: Jan 2005. Vol. 132, Iss. 1; p. 5 (36 pages).
    [104] Franck Carpentier, Paul M Smeets, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Ian Stewart. Matching derived functionally-same stimulus relations: equivalence-equivalence and classical analogies The Psychological Record. Gambier: Spring 2004. Vol. 54, Iss. 2; p. 255 (19 pages).
    [105] John R Cusack. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. The American Journal of Psychiatry. Washington: May 1994. Vol. 151, Iss. 5: p. 777 (1 page).
    [106] Arne Dietrich. The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Austin: Dec2004. Vol. 11, Iss. 6; pg. 1011.
    [107] 周泓、张庆林,创造性的生理研究新进展[J],心理学探新,2002(22),3:9-12。
    [108] 卢又燃,耿道颖.工作记忆的功能磁共振研究进展[J],国外医学,临床放射学分册,2005,(4).48。
    [109] Masato Inoue, Akichika Mikami, Ichiro Ando, Hideo Tsukada. Functional Brain Mapping of the Macaque Related to Spatial Working Memory as Revealed by PET. Cerebral Cortex. New York: Jan 2004. Vol. 14, Iss. 1; p. 106.
    [110] John E. Fisk. Age and probabilistic reasoning: Biases in conjunctive, disjunctive and Bayesian judgments in early and late adulthood. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Chichester: Jan 2005. Vol. 18, Iss. 1; p. 55 (28 pages).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700