用户名: 密码: 验证码:
丽格海棠抗茎腐病的生物学研究及EMS诱导的突变体筛选
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
丽格海棠,学名Begonia×hiemalis,英文名Rieger begonia,别名玫瑰海棠,属于秋海棠科秋海棠属植物,是球根海棠(B.Tuberons)和野生秋海棠的杂交种。丽格海棠及其亲本球根海棠是目前国际上非常流行的商业化盆花种类。目前,高品质的丽格海棠盆花仍以进口为主,但由于丽格海棠的独特的生理特性造成盆花不耐运输,而且极易造成病原菌从伤口感染,导致品质严重下降。同时丽格海棠抗病性弱,极易感染多种病害,栽培难度大,因此加强丽格海棠品种的遗传改良和抗病生物学研究,进一步深化繁殖和栽培技术研究势在必行。我国植物资源丰富,多种植物富含抗菌有效成分,进行生物农药的开发优势明显。如果能把农业有害杂草开发成生物农药,则是变害为利,将会大大的推动我国植物源农药的发展。
     本研究以丽格海棠为材料,通过茎腐病病原菌的分离和鉴定,明确了引起本地丽格海棠茎腐病的病原,在此基础上进行了EMS诱导的抗茎腐病突变体的筛选,壳聚糖生物肥料防治该病的初步研究,筛选了一部分具有高效抑制该种病原的植物种类,并对植物源农药防治丽格海棠茎腐病进行了一些初步研究,为丽格海棠植物的遗传改良和抗病生物学研究奠定了基础。研究结果如下:
     1、采用柯赫氏法则和常规组织分离法相结合,分离鉴定出引起丽格海棠茎腐病的病原菌,为丝核菌中的立枯丝核菌(R.solani Kuhn),为后期的抗病突变体的筛选和抗病植物提取液的筛选奠定了基础。
     2、对EMS诱导的突变体进行了抗立枯丝核菌引起的茎腐病筛选,经两轮筛选在接种量为3片/株选择压下最终得到3株突变株,发病级数为0级,无明显病害特征出现。并且也产生了一定的形态变异,叶片颜色加深,叶脉变浅、变细,花朵变大,花瓣雄蕊化,花期改变。
     3、研究了壳聚糖肥料在提高丽格海棠的园艺性状和抗病性方面的作用,实验结果表明:壳聚糖和NPK的比例为36.3∶13.8∶18.8∶10时,在花期、花朵直径和开花数,POD在40d时酶活,PAL40d时比活力与其他处理有显著差异或与最高值的处理无显著差异,CAT和SOD活性在3个测定时期与其他处理无显著差异,茎腐病和灰霉病的发病率最低,分别为7.14%和0。
     4、对15种植物进行了超声波提取,研究了提取液对立枯丝核菌的室内抑制效果,结果筛选到3种中草药具有强烈的抑菌效果,分别是丁香、牡丹皮、花椒。在0.375g干样/100 mL浓度下,三者的抑菌率分别为90.59%、71.76%、55.29%。特别是丁香在0.125 g干样/100 mL浓度下仍然有80.25%的抑菌率,同时其他植物的抑菌率大大下降,并且很多种类表现出了负抗性。
Rieger begonia, whose scientific name is Begonia×hiemalis and synonym rose begonia, belongs to Begoniaceae. It's a hybrid species crossed by B.Tuberons and wild begonia. Rieger begonia and its parent B.Tuberons. as business pot flowers are very popular in the world. High qualitative Rieger begonia is still imported recently, but for its distinct physiological nature, it's difficult to transport in long time. The quality gets worse for germs infecting the wound easily, while the disease resistance is poor. So it's necessary extremely to enhance genetic improvement, study the pathology and deepen the breed and culture technique. Our country is rich in plant resource and many kinds of them have effective component to resist disease, which is the superiority to develop. This development will advance the development of Biotanical biochemical pesticides if we turn agriculture harmful weed to Biological Pesticide.
     The study settle Rieger begonia as material, through isolating and identifying stem rotten pathogen, clear-cut the local pathogen of Rieger Begonia from the base of stem. We bolt the the mutants induced by EMS to resist stem rotten, prevent and cure the rotten by chitosan biofertilizer and bolt some plants with effective component to resist this disease, study preliminary biotanical biochemical pesticides. These studies establish the base of genctic improvement and pathology of Rieger begonia. The general results are following:
     1. Isolating and identifying stem rotten pathogen of Rieger Begonia, settle the base of later stage to bolt the mutant and plant extract of resisting stem rotten. We integrated the Koch's Postulates and common tissue separation, isolated the pathogen R. solani Kuhn.
     2. Screening the mutants induced by EMS to resist stem rotten of Rieger begonia, after two turns selection, three mutants were got which can resist the R. solani Kuhn. They are selected under the inoculum of three pills per pot with disease progression zero, which is no obvious disorder signature. Besides the mutants have some morphosis variation including these leaves turn greener, vein turns lighter and thinner, flower turns larger, petals turn to stamen and florescence changes.
     3. Studying the effects of chitosan biofertilizer increasing horticultural characters and the disease resistance, the results demonstrate: florescence, flower diameter and quantity, the activity of POD and PAL in 40d under chitosan and NPK at ratio 36.3:13.8:18.8:10 display significant deviation compared with others or display insignificant deviation compared with the highest treatment while CAT and SOD with indistinctive deviation in the three determination period. The treatment has the lowest incidence of stem rotten and gray mold, which is 7.14% and 0 respectively.
     4. Extracting 15 plants with ultrasonic wave, study if the extract inhibit the R. solani Kuhn ex vivo. As the results, we got three Chinese herbal medicine which have the intensive bacteriostasis effect, they are caryophyllus, Japan pepper and tree peony bark. Under the concentration 0.375 g/100mL ,their inhibition ratio is 90.59%、71.76% and 55.29% respectively. Especially caryophyllus still inhibit R. solani Kuhn strong under the concentration 0.125g/100mL with the inhibition ratio 80.25% while many others' ratio drop consumedly and display the negative resistance.
引文
1.陈尚平,刘晓青,李倩中.丽格海棠栽培技术研究.江苏农业科学[J].2005,6:96-97.
    2.陈娇,代光辉,顾振芳,缪一芳.58种植物提取液对葡萄霜霉病菌的抑菌活性筛选研究[J].2002,14(5):15-20.
    3.方中达.植病研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998:122-125.
    4.高必达.转几丁质酶基因防植物病害研究:进展、问题与展望.生物工程进展,1999,19(2):22-29.
    5.高新国,渠占奇.花生茎腐病的发病规律及防治技术[J].河南农业科学.2005,(4):87-88.
    6.高洪敏,宁家林,于兵.陈捷.玉米茎腐病菌毒素的致病机制(I)[J].辽宁农业科学.2000,(6):6-9.
    7.胡文玉,吴娇莲.壳聚糖的性质和用途及其在农业上的应用前景[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(4):294-296.
    8.黄勇,张秀省,郑红香.丽格海棠的叶片培养与快速繁殖[J].聊城大学学报.2003,16(3):52-53.
    9.黄江华,杨媚,周而勋,戚佩坤.丝核菌研究进展[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报.2002,15(1):61-67.
    10.黄江华,杨媚,周而勋,戚佩坤.丝核菌细胞核染色技术的研究[J].仲恺收业技术学院学报.2001,14(4):13-17.
    11.韩德元,许光善,任肇利.新型植物生长调节剂甲壳胺的生物学特性及其在农业上的应用[J].北京农业科学.2001,5:30-33.
    12.蒋甲福,陈发棣,管志勇,房伟民.小菊自交种子辐射生物学效应的研究[J].核农学.2004,18(6):431-434.
    13.蒋细良.农用抗生索的作用机理[J].生物防治通报.1994,10(2):76-8.
    14.蒋细良,朱昌雄等.扰生素除草剂M-22除草效果的初步评价[J].中国生物防治.2001,1:47-4.
    15.康卓.中国生物派农药产业化进展[J].农药.2001,40(3):4-8
    16.刘刚,陈锦忠.丽格海棠的盆花生产技术[J].甘肃林业科技,2005(30),58-70.
    17.刘伟华,李文雄,等.菜豆几丁质酶基因转化小麦的研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2001(32),111-116.
    18.刘伟华,李文雄,等.基因枪法向小麦导入几丁质酶基因的研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(1):54-59.
    19.刘和众,刘冬辉,刘丰佳等.甲壳素植物生长调节剂在玉米上的应用[J].天然产物研究与开发.1996,8(4):90-92.
    20.刘志俊,谢德明,刘志波.国外农药发展现状及未来展望[J].农药科学与管理.2000,1(2):33-37.
    21.刘长海,王延峰,陈国良,等.陕北枣树病虫害及其发生趋势[J].植物保护.2004,30(6):85-87.
    22.柳岸峰,蒋军喜,李庚花,罗有强.狗牙花叶枯病病原菌分离鉴定[J].江西植保.2004,27(4):153-154.
    23.卢翠华,李晶.几丁质酶基因转入马铃薯品种东农303的研究[J].中国马铃薯.2003,17(5):277-279.
    24.李琼娅,范文乾.空心莲子草化学成分和药理活性研究进展[J].时珍国医国药.2007,18(2):334-335.
    25.李维静.甲壳素、壳聚糖的性质、制备及其在食品中的应用[J].安徽农学通报.2007,13(10):58-6.
    26.李国英,丁胜利.新疆棉苗烂根病病原种群的鉴定[J].新疆农业大学学报.1997,20(4):46-50.
    27.李亚玲,龙书生,张宇宏,李强,王炜.玉米对镰刀菌茎腐病抗性的生化反应[J].中国农学通报.2005,21(10):299-302.
    28.李国利,于艳娟,李楠,王学臣.玉米细菌性茎腐病发生的原因及防治[J].天津农林科技.2006,(3):20-21.
    29.李洪连,汪守正,王金生.壳聚糖诱导抗病机制的研究[J].植物病理学报.1993,23(4):327-332.
    30.李华荣.丝核菌的菌丝融合群及其遗传多样性研究的新进展[J].菌物系统.1999,18(2):100-107.
    31.李华荣.丝核菌(Rhizoctonia)属真菌的分类学进展[J].国外农学,植物保护.1980,4:9-14.
    32.李海军,等.利用EMS化学诱变改造玉米自交系的研究[J].玉米科学.2002,10(3):36-37.
    33.李中岳,李郁柏.开展生物农药前景广阔[J].技术监督实用技术.1997,5:20.
    34.李春霞,苏俊,龚士琛,宋锡章,李国良,扈光辉,王明泉.玉米茎腐病接种方法的研究[J].玉米科学.2001,9(2):72-74.
    35.李少勇,李宝泉,郑彩云.丽格海棠的温室栽培管理技术[J].中国花卉园艺.2001,23:35-36.
    36.林闽法.两种甲壳素缓释肥料在茶树上应用的研究[J].茶叶科学技术.2006,(3):13-14.
    37.龙秀文,林杉,游捷,刘焕龙,高艳荣,杨帆.施氮量和CAU31系列控释肥对矮牵牛生长和观赏品质的影响[J].2004,27(5):22-26.
    38.刘海顺,叶青松,姚强,刘华.生物药肥防治魔芋软腐病和白绢病试验初报[J].湖北农业科学.2006,45(4):465-466.
    39.马鹏鹏.甲壳素及其衍生物在农业生产中的应用[J].植物生理学通讯,2001,37(5):475-478.
    40.穆鼎,杨孝汉,张燕.盆栽朱蕉和月季N、P、K施肥比例初探[J].园艺学报.1997,24(1):71-74.
    41.孟昭礼,罗兰,袁忠林,李健强,曲宝涵,姜学东,刘两莉.人工模拟的植物源杀菌剂银泰防治番茄3种病害效果研究[J].中国农业科学.2002,35(7):863-866.
    42.彭绍裘,曾昭瑞,张志光.水稻纹枯病及其防治[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1986,61.
    43.强继业,陈宗瑜,郭世昌.~(60)Co-r射线处理花卉后M2代生理特性变化[J].核农学 报.2004,18(2):107-109.
    44.荣廷昭,李晚忱.田间试验与统计分析[M].四川大学出版社,2001.
    45.史桂荣.化学诱变剂在玉米育种上的应用[J].黑龙江农业科学.1994,(6):44-46.
    46.舒庆笙.甲壳质及壳聚糖在园艺上的应用[J].西南园艺.2001,29(1):54-55.
    47.沈萍,范秀容,李广武.微生物学实验[M].高等教育出版社,1999.
    48.王瑾,刘桂茹,杨学举.EMS诱变小麦愈伤组织选择抗旱突变体的研究[J].中国农学通报.2005,21(12):190-193.
    49.王长泉,刘峰,李雅志.果树诱变育种的研究进展[J].核农学报.2000,14(1):61-64.
    50.王元东,等.诱变育种在创造玉米新种质中的应用[J].北京农业科学.1999,17(2):12-16.
    51.王洪凯,刘开启,吴洵耻.丝核菌分类研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报.1997,28(3):375-382.
    52.王政逸,李德葆.尖孢镰刀菌致病菌营养体亲和群研究[J].浙江农业学报.2001,13(1):72-77.
    53.王利琳,庞基良,胡江琴.丽格海棠的离体快繁[J].生物技术.2001,(10):46-48.
    54.王果萍,王景雪,等.几丁质酶基因导入西瓜植株及其抗病性鉴定研究[J].中国遗传资源学报.2003,4(2):104,109.
    55.王敏.废次烟草中有效成分的综合利用[J].中国资源综合利用.2003,2:16-18.
    56.魏玉昌,杜连恩,于秀普,吴鸣岐.甲基磺酸乙酯诱发大豆合子突变效果的研究[J].中国油料作物学报.1999,21(3):34-37.
    57.文锦芬等.丽格海棠离体培养植株再生影响因素的研究[J].北方同艺.2006(2):110-111.
    58.吴拒文.十字花科蔬菜害虫的综合治理[J].中国蔬菜.1997,(6):55-57.
    59.熊庆娥.植物生理学实验教程[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2003:72-76,85-86,91-93,124-126.
    60.熊大胜,朱金桃,张自亮,熊玉双.三叶木通理化诱变技术及其成熟期变异研究[J].常德示范学院学报.2001,13(4):79-80.
    61.薛淮,刘敏.植物空间诱变的生物效应及其育种研究进展[J].生物学通报.2002,37(11):7-9.
    62.徐作埏,李林,李长松,齐军山,贾曦.番茄茎腐病病原鉴定及防治研究[J].植物病理学报.2004,3(34):286-288.
    63.徐敬友,张华东,张红,童蕴慧,徐艳,陈夕军,纪兆林.立枯丝核菌毒素的产生及与致病力的关系[J].扬州大学学报.2004,25(2):61-64.
    64.徐美隆.丽格海棠遗传转化及离体诱变体系的研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2007:1-7,42-53.
    65.喻义东,胡琼波.白术根茎腐烂病病原分离鉴定与防治试验[J].湖南农业科学.2003,(1):47-48.
    66.杨再强,王立新.我国观赏植物辐射诱变育种研究进展[J].广西园艺.2006,17(2):44-47.
    67.于虹漫,陈宗瑜.花卉的辐射敏感性[J].内蒙古农业科技.2004(1):34,36.
    68.喻义东,胡琼波.白术根茎腐烂病病原分离鉴定与防治试验[J].湖南农业科学.2003,(1):47-48.
    69.曾永三,孙伟,梁关生,杨秀楷.吴优越节瓜枯萎病病原鉴定及生物学特性研究[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报.2003,16(1):23-27.
    70.张景萍,吴珍龄.EMS诱变玉米突变体苗期生理生化特性研究[J].激光生物学报.2004,13(1):41-43.
    71.张鑫,叶非.植物源农药中生物碱提取和纯化技术进展[J].农药科学与管理.2007,28(2):28-31.
    72.张忠义,冷怀琼,张志铭,曹若彬,张天宇.植物病原真菌学[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1988:73-348.
    73.章玉苹,陈霞,吴优利.壳聚糖----新型生防农药的应用研究进展[J].世界农药.2003,25(4):39-42.
    74.张克中,赵祥云.辐射百合雄性不育突变体的RAPD分析[J].林业科学研究.2003,16(3):372-375.
    75.张燕,方力,王宝.壳聚糖对烟草种子萌发及幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报.1998,20(3):28-30.
    76.赵永亮,等.玉米化学诱变研究进展[J].华北农学报.1996,11(4):24-28.
    77.赵思峰,李国英,李辉,王钦英.新疆甜菜根腐病病原种群鉴定[J].中国糖料.2002,(1):3-8.
    78.赵春燕,孙军德,刘志恒,张恩禄,何瀛,崔晓晶.甲壳素对土壤微生物区系组成的影响[J].辽宁农业科学.2000(5):7-8.
    79.赵杰,周超英,顾晓华.番茄茎叶提取液对黄瓜霜霉病的预防作用[J].上海农业科技.2006,2:89-90.
    80.郑雅楠,吕国忠,杨宇,庄敬华.玉米细菌性茎腐病鉴别与防治[J].安徽农业科学.2006,34(10):2128-2133.
    81.周而勋,杨媚.从植物病组织中分离立枯丝核菌的快速简便技术[J].华南农业大学学报.1998,19(1):125-126.
    82.祝丽英,等.甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)在创造玉米新种质中的应用[J].玉米科学.2000,8(1):19-20.
    83.朱天辉.园林植物病理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:22-32.
    84.朱向涛,刘庆华,尚现峰.丽格海棠的栽培管理[J].中国花卉园艺.2006,16:34-35.
    85.Anderson AN.Stetton HM & Flentjie N T.Genetics of Heterokargosis in Thanatep horus cucum eris[J].Phytopatholagy,1972,62:1057-1065.
    86.Anderson NA..The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani[J].Ann.Rev.Phytopatbol.1982,20:329-47.
    87. A.R.Chase. Rhizoctonia Diseases on Ornamentals[J]. Western Connection.1998,1(2): 1-4.
    
    88. Cheng Longfei, Fu Yulan. The Research on Photosynthetic Characteristics in Leaves of Rieger begonia[J].Cinaese agricultural science bulletin. 2008, 24(7):238-240.
    
    89. Debasis Chakrabarty ,A.K., & S.K.M. Data management of chimera through direct shoot regeneration from florets of Chrysanthemum morifolium [J].Journal of Horticultural Science &Biotechnology. 1999,74(3):293-296.
    
    90. D. Penman, G. Britton, K. Hardwick, H.A. Collin & S. Isaac. Chitin as a measure of biomass of Crinipellis perniciosa, causal agent of witches' broom disease of Theobroma cacao[J]. Mycological Research.2000,104(6): 671-675.
    
    91. F.A. Hakkaart, J.M.A. Versluijs. Control of leaf curl and Xanthomonas begoniae in begonia 'Elat ior' by meristem culture and an isolation test[J].Acta Hort. (ISHS). 1983, 131 :299- 301.
    
    92. G. Sandved. Flowering Begonia X Hiemalis Fotsch as affected by daylength and temperature [J]. Acta Hort. (ISHS). 1968,14:61-76.
    
    93. George C. Elliott, Paul V. Nelson. Acute boron toxicity in Begonia X hiemalis 'Schwabenla nd Red'[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis.1981, 12 (8):775 - 783.
    
    94. H.-J. Schroers, R.P. Baayen, J.P. Meffert, J. de Gruyter, M. Hooftman & K. O'Donnell. Fusarium foetens, a new species pathogenic to begonia elatior hybrids (Begonia x hiemalis) and the sister taxon of the Fusarium oxysporum species complex[J].Mycologia.2004,96(2): 393-406.
    
    95. Jana Morav(?)íková, Jana Libantova, Jan Heldak, Jan Salaj, Miroslav Bauer, Ildiko Matusikova, Zdenka Galova & Cudmila MLynarova. Stress-induced expression of cucumber chitinase and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia β -1,3-glucanase genes in transgenicpotato plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2007(29),133-141.
    
    96. J. Simmonds. Induction, growth and direct rooting of adventitious shoots of Begonia X hiemalis[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture.1984,3: 83-289.
    
    97. Locke James, Horst Leona, Krause Charles. Suppression of botryis gray mold in hiemalis begonia with potting mix amendments[J]. Resource. 2005,(1):6-7.
    
    98. L. E. Horst, J. Locke, C. R. Krause, R. W. McMahon, V. Madden, H. A. J. Hoitink. Suppression of Botrytis Blight of Begonia by Trichoderma hamatum 382 in Peat and Compost-Amended Potting Mixes[J]. Plant disease. 2005,89(11):1195-1200.
    
    99. Matsumoto-H. & Onozawa-Y. Development of non-chimaeric mutation lines through in vitro cult- ure of florets in chrysanthemum.Scientific-Reports of the Facultry of Agriculture[J].Ibaraki-University.1989,No.37,55-61.
    100.Majida EL Hassni,Abdelbasset EL Hadrami,Fouad Daayf,Essaid Ait Barka & Ismail EL Hadrami.Chitosan,antifungal product against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.albedinis and elicitor of defence reactions in date palm roots[J].Phytopathol.Mediterr.2004,(43),195-204.
    101.Nancy Kokalis-Burelle,Paul A.Backman,Rodrigo Rodriguez-Kabana & L.Daniel Ploper.Potential for biological control of early leafspot of peanut using Bacillus cereus and chitin as foliar amendments[J].Biological Control.1992,2(4):321-328.
    102.NehalS.El-Mougy,Nadia G.El-Gamal,Y.O.Fotouh & F.Abd-El-Kareem.Evaluation of Different Application Methodsof Chitin and Chitosan for Controlling Tomato Root Rot Disease under Gree nhouseand Field Conditions[J].Research Journal of Agricultureand Biological Sciences.2006,2(5):190-195.
    103.NY/T 222-2004,剑麻栽培技术规程[S].
    104.Ogo shi,A.Ecology and Pathogenicity of Anastomsis and Intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani K(u|¨)hn[J].Ann.Rev.Phytopathol.1987,25:125-143.
    105.Sak sena,H.K,V aartata,O.Taxonomy,morphology,and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia species from forest Nruseries[J].Can.J.Botany.1961,39:627-647.
    106.Sneh Burpee,LL.OgoshiA.Identification of Rhizoctonia spcies[J].St Paul,MN:A PS Press,1991,133pp.
    107.Sanae Kishimoto,Ryutaro Aida,Michio Shibata.Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transfor mation of Elatior Begonia(Begonia×hiemalis Fotsch)[J].Plant Science,2002,(162):697-703.
    108.S.Roest,M.A.E.Van Berkel,G.S.Bokelmann and C.Broertjes.The use of an in vitro adventi tious bud technique for mutation breeding of begoni×hiemalis[J].Euphytica.1981,(30):381-388.
    109.Shinsaku Takayama,Masanaru Misawa.Mass Propagation of Begonia x hiemalis Plantlets by Shake Culture[J].Plant and Cell Physiology.1981,22(3):461-467.
    110.The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.Begonia(Begonia)[EB/OL].http://www.ct.gov/caes/cwp/view.asp?a=2823&q=377514,2007-04-10.
    111.Vander P.varum K M.Domard A,et al.Comparison of the ability of parnally N-acetyl-ated chkos and chitoligosaccharides to elicit resistance reaction in wheat leaves[J].Plant Physiol.1998,118:1353-1359.
    112.W.T.Witte,T.J.Sheehan.Effects of media and fertility on growth and flowering of Rieger Begonia[J]. Florida State Horticultural Society. 1974,508-512.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700