论劳动收入份额的决定机制
|
摘要
本文从事劳资分配的基础理论和应用研究。文章完成了三项理论任务：其一,详细地梳理、比较、评判新古典主义、马克思主义和后凯恩斯主义的劳资分配思想,重点是全面批判新古典主义的劳资分配理论,分析马克思和后凯恩斯主义的互补性和内在联系；其二,在综合马克思主义与后凯恩斯主义相关理论的基础上,分析建立劳动收入份额的决定机制,亦即劳资分配比例的系统化决定因素,以及因素间的内在联系和作用方式,其间提出若干理论命题与推论；其三,对我国劳动收入份额的变动趋势及相关现象展开实证研究,验证理论分析部分提出的命题与推论,得到若干启示与政策建议。
在理论回顾与批评部分,笔者沿着经济思想史的发展脉络,依次回顾、评判了现代三大经济学理论体系——新古典主义、马克思主义和后凯恩斯主义的劳资分配理论。文章指出,新古典主义的劳资分配理论(乃至整个新古典主义理论体系)在立论基础、理论建构和方法论方面都存在不容回避的缺陷,“边际生产力分配论”不足以解释现实中的劳资分配问题,更不能用来指导收入分配实践。相比之下,马克思主义和后凯恩斯主义从古典经济学继承了共同的学术传统,二者在本质上兼容,在侧重点上互补。通过对二者不同“支流”的比较研究,笔者归纳出了两条理论脉络：“马克思(高登)-斯拉法-卡莱斯基”(MSK)体系和“马克思(古德温)-卡尔多-罗宾逊”(MKR)体系。MSK体系研究先于价格体系存在的社会经济因素对劳资分配的决定作用,它对应劳动收入份额的潜在均衡水平；MKR体系研究社会经济因素既定,劳动收入份额在利润预期和有效需求的作用下围绕潜在均衡水平的周期性波动。劳资分配是经济学的理论本体及其潜在意识形态和阶级属性的核心。选择什么样的劳资分配理论指导实践,关乎政治立场和经济方针。当前我国的收入分配乃至经济体制改革要摆正方向,就必须改变新古典主义一统天下的局面,重塑基于马克思和后凯恩斯主义相结合的主流意识形态。
在理论综合和应用部分,笔者分别基于MSK和MKR理论体系,分析建立劳动收入份额的静态决定机制和动态决定机制。静态决定机制不考虑预期和有效需求的影响。文章指出,宏观劳资分配服从剩余价值规律,工资份额与剩余价值率成反比。剩余价值率取决于特定“积累的社会结构”(SSA)下的劳资力量对比,其中SSA以微观生产方式为核心特征,它是决定劳资关系进而剩余价值率的本质因素,其他制度因素——包括技术进步、市场结构、工会力量和政府干预等,通过作用于生产方式,或者直接影响劳资关系,影响剩余价值率。各行业的价格加成率、技术构成和工资率决定了剩余价值总额在行业间的再分配,进而决定了行业工资份额。特定行业的价格加成率、技术构成和工资率对各自平均水平的偏离,决定了行业工资份额对平均工资份额的偏离。通过上下游行业的价格传导效应,低工资份额的行业实际上得到了高工资份额行业的剩余价值让渡或补贴。动态决定机制假设社会经济因素既定,考察劳动收入份额在预期和有效需求的作用下,沿“历史时间”的变动趋势。文章表明,短期内劳动收入份额与投资率成反比。在预期利润率、投资支出、有效需求、就业率、产能利用率、工资率和价格水平等一系列宏观经济变量的连锁反应下,劳动收入份额呈反周期波动。长期内,劳资分配影响经济增长。根据投资支出对利润份额和产能利用率的相对反应敏感程度,经济增长表现出“工资拉动”(wage-led)和“利润拉动”(profit-led)两种模式。在工资拉动模式下,劳动收入份额提高会导致经济增长率提高,公平与效率的目标相容；在利润拉动模式下,劳动收入份额提高会导致经济增长率降低,公平与效率需要权衡。
在实证研究和启示部分,笔者通过数据分析,验证了理论综合与应用部分提出的命题与推论,同时解释了我国劳动收入份额的变动趋势和相关问题,主要结论包括：(1)近年来我国劳动收入份额下降的根本原因,是资本化经济部门的扩大以及资本化经济部门内剩余价值率的提高。(2)改革开放以来,薪金份额相比工资份额持续提高,薪金收入与工资收入差距不断扩大。(3)行业劳动收入份额的差距分解为价格加成率、技术构成和工资率的差距,其中价格加成率与国有垄断势力、产业集中度和人均固定资本存量正相关,与技术构成负相关；工资率与国有企业的就业比重和技术构成正相关。国有垄断行业的高加成率和高工资率造成对下游行业的工资份额和利润率的双重挤压。(4)劳资分配失衡和产能过剩问题密切相关,投资主导的经济增长模式会导致劳动收入份额下降和产能过剩的恶性循环。(5)当前我国经济已处于工资拉动增长的阶段,提高劳动收入份额会促进经济增长,因而劳资双方的利益共赢,公平与效率的目标相容。
基于实证研究结果,我们得到如下启示：(1)无论从实证的角度还是规范的角度,都有必要提高劳动收入份额。市场原教旨主义的思想不可取。(2)需要辩证看待公有制经济的主体地位。应该鼓励一般国有企业扩大就业覆盖率,让按劳分配受惠更多人群；但对于垄断性的中央企业,应逐步引入竞争,同时提高利润上缴比例。(3)不是产业结构决定收入分配,而是收入分配决定产业结构。产业结构没有先进落后之分,只有是否适合既有的分配与需求结构之别。应走出“产业结构升级”的误区。当前我国收入分配改善的结果,将是消费品制造业和普通消费服务业的比重扩大。(4)当前我国最需要的是一大批稳定、富足、团结的产业工人队伍,而不是更多的白领精英。为此需要消除就业身份歧视,推进农民工市民化；加强工会的代表性和独立性；改变地方政府的激励机制,改革税制,营造优先就业、民生和劳动权益的制度环境。
The dissertation is about theory of capital-labor distribution and its applications. It finishes three major tasks:first, review, compare and evaluate the capital-labor theories of Neo-Claasical, Marxian and Post-Keynesian economics, by which the author criticizes the Neo-Classical distribution theory, while disentangling the relations and complementarity between Marxian and Neo-keynesian distribution theories. Second, by combining Marxian and Post-Keynesian theories, analyze the determination of labor share, which means the systematic determinants of labor share and the imapcts and reactions of the determinants, and then put forward some propositions and inferences. Third, make empirical researches into the labor share and relevant problems of China, so as to prove the propositions and inferences, and then put forward some implications and policy suggestions.
In theories review and criticism, the author reviews and criticizes the capital-labor distribution theories of the three major schools of modern economics, namely, Neo-Classicism, Marxism and Post-Keynesianism. It asserts that the Neo-Classical distribution theory has inevitable shortfalls in its philosophy foundation and knowledge construction. The theory is unable to explain the capital-labor distribution in the real world, neither able to guide the distribution practices.In contrast, Marxism and Post-Keynesianism inherit common precious traditions from the Classical economics, which make them compatible in nature, and complementary in their focuses. By comparative analysis of their branches, including Classical Marxism, Neo-Marxism, and Neo-Ricardian, Kaleckian and Neo-Cambridge schools, the author figures out two theory strands about capital-labor distribution, namely,'Marx (Gordon)-Sraffa-Kalecki'(MSK) strand and'Marx (Goodwin)-Kaldor-Robinson'(MKR) strand. The former focuses on the socioeconomic determination of capital-labor distribution, or the potential equilibrium of labor share, which is determined independent of the price system, while the latter focuses on the cyclical fluctuations of labor share around the potential equilibrium level, driven by expectations and effective demand, with socioeconomic background given. Capital-labor distribution is right the core of economic thoughts and their backup ideaology. Choice of the capital-labor distribution theory directly relates to the political position and economic policy. To realign the orientation of our reform of income distribution or even the whole economic system, we have to overturn the domination of Neo-Classicism, and reshape the mainstream ideaology based on the synthesis of Marxism and Post-Keynesianism.
In the theory synthesis and application, the author analyzes the static and dynamic determination of labor share, based on MSK strand and MKR strand, respectively. The static part omits the influences of expectations and effective demand. It asserts that, capital-labor distribution on the macro level is dominated by the rule of surplus value; macro labor share is in reverse relation with the ratio of surplus value. The ratio is overdetermined by a complex of institutional arrangements, named SSA (social structure of accumulation), with specific mode of production as its core and many supportive factors including market structure, powerof labor union, technology system and government participation. Markup, technology composition and wage rate of every industry determines the redistribution of aggregate surplus value among the industries. For each industry, deviation of its markup, technology composition and wage rate from the average levels determines deviation of its labor share from the aggregate level, or whether it get (or render) surplus value as subsidy from (to) other industries. The dynamic dtermination investigates the labor share dynamics in the historical time under the impacts of uncertain expectations and effective demand. It asserts that labor share is in reverse relation with investment rate. Along with the chain reactions of profit expectation, investment expenditure, employment rate, capacity utilization, wage rate and price level, the labor share tends to fluctuate anti-cylicaly. In the long run, labor share influences growth. In accordance with the relative sensitivities of the investment expenditure to profit share and capacity utilization, respectively, growth can be wage-led or profit-led. For the wage-led growth, rising labor share can improve growth rate, which means equality and efficiency are compatible; while for the profit-led growth, rising labor share can lower growth rate, which means equality and efficiency need trade-off.
In empirical research and implications, the author gets empirical evidences for the theory propositions and inferences based on data analysis, and explains the labor share trend and relevant issues of China along the way. Main findings include:(1) Declining labor share in the recent years in China is attribute to the expansion of capitalist sectors (i.e. sectors with capitalist mode of production) and the rising ratio of surplus value.(2) The ratio of salary share to wage share keeps increasing, because of rising proportion of salary labor and widening gap between salary level and wage level.(3) decompose the differences of industry-level labor into differences of markup, technology composition and wage rate; the markup relates positively to the output share of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), industry concentration and fixed assets per head, while negatively to the technology composition; the wage rate relates positively to the employment share of SOEs and technology composition. High markup and high wage rate of some monopoly SOEs squeeze the labor share and profit rate of downstream industries.(4) Declining labor closely relates to the problem of excess capacity; over dependence on investment to stimulate growth may leads to vicious cycle of declining labor share and excess capacity.(5) Now China has entered the pahse of wage-led growth; rising labor share can stimulate growth, which means that capital-labor relation is cooperative other than antagonistic, efficiency and equality are compatible other than contradictory.
Form the empirical outcomes, we can get the following implications:(1) Both from the positive side and normative side, it's necessary to increase the labor share; free market fundamentalism can't be the right guide.(2) The domination position of SOEs should be treated dialectically. We should expand the employment coverage of normal SOEs, while for the minority monopoly SOEs, competition should be introduced and profit delivering proportion should be increased.(3) Income distribution determines the industry structure, other than the opposite. We must break up the myth of so-called upgrading of industry structure, since industry structure has nothing to do with the grade, rather matters whether fitting the given distribution and demand structure. At present in China, consumption goods manufacture and consumption service industries will expand at most following distribution improvement.(4) At present in China, a bigger mass of stable, affluent and united industrial workers are in most need, instead of more white-collar elites. To reach the goal, we should eliminate the employment discrimination, promote the rural immigrants become fairly treated urban workers; strengthen the power and independence of labor union; reform the incentives of local government and taxation system, to establish the institutional environment prioritize employment, livelihood and labor rights.
在理论回顾与批评部分,笔者沿着经济思想史的发展脉络,依次回顾、评判了现代三大经济学理论体系——新古典主义、马克思主义和后凯恩斯主义的劳资分配理论。文章指出,新古典主义的劳资分配理论(乃至整个新古典主义理论体系)在立论基础、理论建构和方法论方面都存在不容回避的缺陷,“边际生产力分配论”不足以解释现实中的劳资分配问题,更不能用来指导收入分配实践。相比之下,马克思主义和后凯恩斯主义从古典经济学继承了共同的学术传统,二者在本质上兼容,在侧重点上互补。通过对二者不同“支流”的比较研究,笔者归纳出了两条理论脉络：“马克思(高登)-斯拉法-卡莱斯基”(MSK)体系和“马克思(古德温)-卡尔多-罗宾逊”(MKR)体系。MSK体系研究先于价格体系存在的社会经济因素对劳资分配的决定作用,它对应劳动收入份额的潜在均衡水平；MKR体系研究社会经济因素既定,劳动收入份额在利润预期和有效需求的作用下围绕潜在均衡水平的周期性波动。劳资分配是经济学的理论本体及其潜在意识形态和阶级属性的核心。选择什么样的劳资分配理论指导实践,关乎政治立场和经济方针。当前我国的收入分配乃至经济体制改革要摆正方向,就必须改变新古典主义一统天下的局面,重塑基于马克思和后凯恩斯主义相结合的主流意识形态。
在理论综合和应用部分,笔者分别基于MSK和MKR理论体系,分析建立劳动收入份额的静态决定机制和动态决定机制。静态决定机制不考虑预期和有效需求的影响。文章指出,宏观劳资分配服从剩余价值规律,工资份额与剩余价值率成反比。剩余价值率取决于特定“积累的社会结构”(SSA)下的劳资力量对比,其中SSA以微观生产方式为核心特征,它是决定劳资关系进而剩余价值率的本质因素,其他制度因素——包括技术进步、市场结构、工会力量和政府干预等,通过作用于生产方式,或者直接影响劳资关系,影响剩余价值率。各行业的价格加成率、技术构成和工资率决定了剩余价值总额在行业间的再分配,进而决定了行业工资份额。特定行业的价格加成率、技术构成和工资率对各自平均水平的偏离,决定了行业工资份额对平均工资份额的偏离。通过上下游行业的价格传导效应,低工资份额的行业实际上得到了高工资份额行业的剩余价值让渡或补贴。动态决定机制假设社会经济因素既定,考察劳动收入份额在预期和有效需求的作用下,沿“历史时间”的变动趋势。文章表明,短期内劳动收入份额与投资率成反比。在预期利润率、投资支出、有效需求、就业率、产能利用率、工资率和价格水平等一系列宏观经济变量的连锁反应下,劳动收入份额呈反周期波动。长期内,劳资分配影响经济增长。根据投资支出对利润份额和产能利用率的相对反应敏感程度,经济增长表现出“工资拉动”(wage-led)和“利润拉动”(profit-led)两种模式。在工资拉动模式下,劳动收入份额提高会导致经济增长率提高,公平与效率的目标相容；在利润拉动模式下,劳动收入份额提高会导致经济增长率降低,公平与效率需要权衡。
在实证研究和启示部分,笔者通过数据分析,验证了理论综合与应用部分提出的命题与推论,同时解释了我国劳动收入份额的变动趋势和相关问题,主要结论包括：(1)近年来我国劳动收入份额下降的根本原因,是资本化经济部门的扩大以及资本化经济部门内剩余价值率的提高。(2)改革开放以来,薪金份额相比工资份额持续提高,薪金收入与工资收入差距不断扩大。(3)行业劳动收入份额的差距分解为价格加成率、技术构成和工资率的差距,其中价格加成率与国有垄断势力、产业集中度和人均固定资本存量正相关,与技术构成负相关；工资率与国有企业的就业比重和技术构成正相关。国有垄断行业的高加成率和高工资率造成对下游行业的工资份额和利润率的双重挤压。(4)劳资分配失衡和产能过剩问题密切相关,投资主导的经济增长模式会导致劳动收入份额下降和产能过剩的恶性循环。(5)当前我国经济已处于工资拉动增长的阶段,提高劳动收入份额会促进经济增长,因而劳资双方的利益共赢,公平与效率的目标相容。
基于实证研究结果,我们得到如下启示：(1)无论从实证的角度还是规范的角度,都有必要提高劳动收入份额。市场原教旨主义的思想不可取。(2)需要辩证看待公有制经济的主体地位。应该鼓励一般国有企业扩大就业覆盖率,让按劳分配受惠更多人群；但对于垄断性的中央企业,应逐步引入竞争,同时提高利润上缴比例。(3)不是产业结构决定收入分配,而是收入分配决定产业结构。产业结构没有先进落后之分,只有是否适合既有的分配与需求结构之别。应走出“产业结构升级”的误区。当前我国收入分配改善的结果,将是消费品制造业和普通消费服务业的比重扩大。(4)当前我国最需要的是一大批稳定、富足、团结的产业工人队伍,而不是更多的白领精英。为此需要消除就业身份歧视,推进农民工市民化；加强工会的代表性和独立性；改变地方政府的激励机制,改革税制,营造优先就业、民生和劳动权益的制度环境。
The dissertation is about theory of capital-labor distribution and its applications. It finishes three major tasks:first, review, compare and evaluate the capital-labor theories of Neo-Claasical, Marxian and Post-Keynesian economics, by which the author criticizes the Neo-Classical distribution theory, while disentangling the relations and complementarity between Marxian and Neo-keynesian distribution theories. Second, by combining Marxian and Post-Keynesian theories, analyze the determination of labor share, which means the systematic determinants of labor share and the imapcts and reactions of the determinants, and then put forward some propositions and inferences. Third, make empirical researches into the labor share and relevant problems of China, so as to prove the propositions and inferences, and then put forward some implications and policy suggestions.
In theories review and criticism, the author reviews and criticizes the capital-labor distribution theories of the three major schools of modern economics, namely, Neo-Classicism, Marxism and Post-Keynesianism. It asserts that the Neo-Classical distribution theory has inevitable shortfalls in its philosophy foundation and knowledge construction. The theory is unable to explain the capital-labor distribution in the real world, neither able to guide the distribution practices.In contrast, Marxism and Post-Keynesianism inherit common precious traditions from the Classical economics, which make them compatible in nature, and complementary in their focuses. By comparative analysis of their branches, including Classical Marxism, Neo-Marxism, and Neo-Ricardian, Kaleckian and Neo-Cambridge schools, the author figures out two theory strands about capital-labor distribution, namely,'Marx (Gordon)-Sraffa-Kalecki'(MSK) strand and'Marx (Goodwin)-Kaldor-Robinson'(MKR) strand. The former focuses on the socioeconomic determination of capital-labor distribution, or the potential equilibrium of labor share, which is determined independent of the price system, while the latter focuses on the cyclical fluctuations of labor share around the potential equilibrium level, driven by expectations and effective demand, with socioeconomic background given. Capital-labor distribution is right the core of economic thoughts and their backup ideaology. Choice of the capital-labor distribution theory directly relates to the political position and economic policy. To realign the orientation of our reform of income distribution or even the whole economic system, we have to overturn the domination of Neo-Classicism, and reshape the mainstream ideaology based on the synthesis of Marxism and Post-Keynesianism.
In the theory synthesis and application, the author analyzes the static and dynamic determination of labor share, based on MSK strand and MKR strand, respectively. The static part omits the influences of expectations and effective demand. It asserts that, capital-labor distribution on the macro level is dominated by the rule of surplus value; macro labor share is in reverse relation with the ratio of surplus value. The ratio is overdetermined by a complex of institutional arrangements, named SSA (social structure of accumulation), with specific mode of production as its core and many supportive factors including market structure, powerof labor union, technology system and government participation. Markup, technology composition and wage rate of every industry determines the redistribution of aggregate surplus value among the industries. For each industry, deviation of its markup, technology composition and wage rate from the average levels determines deviation of its labor share from the aggregate level, or whether it get (or render) surplus value as subsidy from (to) other industries. The dynamic dtermination investigates the labor share dynamics in the historical time under the impacts of uncertain expectations and effective demand. It asserts that labor share is in reverse relation with investment rate. Along with the chain reactions of profit expectation, investment expenditure, employment rate, capacity utilization, wage rate and price level, the labor share tends to fluctuate anti-cylicaly. In the long run, labor share influences growth. In accordance with the relative sensitivities of the investment expenditure to profit share and capacity utilization, respectively, growth can be wage-led or profit-led. For the wage-led growth, rising labor share can improve growth rate, which means equality and efficiency are compatible; while for the profit-led growth, rising labor share can lower growth rate, which means equality and efficiency need trade-off.
In empirical research and implications, the author gets empirical evidences for the theory propositions and inferences based on data analysis, and explains the labor share trend and relevant issues of China along the way. Main findings include:(1) Declining labor share in the recent years in China is attribute to the expansion of capitalist sectors (i.e. sectors with capitalist mode of production) and the rising ratio of surplus value.(2) The ratio of salary share to wage share keeps increasing, because of rising proportion of salary labor and widening gap between salary level and wage level.(3) decompose the differences of industry-level labor into differences of markup, technology composition and wage rate; the markup relates positively to the output share of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), industry concentration and fixed assets per head, while negatively to the technology composition; the wage rate relates positively to the employment share of SOEs and technology composition. High markup and high wage rate of some monopoly SOEs squeeze the labor share and profit rate of downstream industries.(4) Declining labor closely relates to the problem of excess capacity; over dependence on investment to stimulate growth may leads to vicious cycle of declining labor share and excess capacity.(5) Now China has entered the pahse of wage-led growth; rising labor share can stimulate growth, which means that capital-labor relation is cooperative other than antagonistic, efficiency and equality are compatible other than contradictory.
Form the empirical outcomes, we can get the following implications:(1) Both from the positive side and normative side, it's necessary to increase the labor share; free market fundamentalism can't be the right guide.(2) The domination position of SOEs should be treated dialectically. We should expand the employment coverage of normal SOEs, while for the minority monopoly SOEs, competition should be introduced and profit delivering proportion should be increased.(3) Income distribution determines the industry structure, other than the opposite. We must break up the myth of so-called upgrading of industry structure, since industry structure has nothing to do with the grade, rather matters whether fitting the given distribution and demand structure. At present in China, consumption goods manufacture and consumption service industries will expand at most following distribution improvement.(4) At present in China, a bigger mass of stable, affluent and united industrial workers are in most need, instead of more white-collar elites. To reach the goal, we should eliminate the employment discrimination, promote the rural immigrants become fairly treated urban workers; strengthen the power and independence of labor union; reform the incentives of local government and taxation system, to establish the institutional environment prioritize employment, livelihood and labor rights.
引文
[1]Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H.,1972, Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, The American Economic Review, Vol.62, No.5, pp.777-795
[2]Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S. and Solow, R.M.,1961, Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Effeciency, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.XLIII, No.3, pp.225-250
[3]Asimakopulos, A.,1973, Keynes, Patinkin, Historical Time and Equilibrium Analysis, Canadian Journal of Economics,6, May, pp.179-188
[4]Asimakopulos, A.,1988, Investment, Employment and Income Distribution, Cambridge, UK:Polity Press
[5]Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T. and Saez, E.,2011, Top Incomes in the Long Run of History, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.49, No.l, pp.3-71
[6]Bental, B., and Demougin, D.,2010, Declining labor shares and bargaining power:An institutional explanation, Journal of Macroeconomics,32, pp.443-456
[7]Bentolina, S. and Saint-Paul, G.,2003, Explaining Movements in Labor Share, Contributions in Macroeconomics, Vol.3, Issue.1, Paper 9
[8]Berberoglu, B.,2009, Class and Class Conflict in the Age of Globalization, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
[9]Bhaduri, A.,1969, On the Significance of Recent Controvercies on Capital Theory:A Marxist View, The Economic Journal, Vol.79, No.315, pp.532-539
[10]Bhaduri, A.,1985, Capitalistic Accumulation in Logical and Historical Time, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.20, No.45/47, pp.1903-1907
[11]Bhaduri, A.1986. Macroeconomics:The Dynamics of Commodity Production. London: Macmillan
[12]Bhaduri, A.2007. Growth, Distribution and Innovations:Understanding their Interrelations. New York:Routledge
[13]Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S.A.,1990, Unemployment and the Real Wage:The Economic Basis of Contesting Political Ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.14, No.4, pp.375-393
[14]Bhaduri, A. and Robinson, J.,1980, Accumulation and Exploitation:an analysis in the tradition of Marx, Sraffa and Kalecki, Cambridge Journal of Economics,4, pp.103-115
[15]Blanchard, O.E.,1998, Revisiting European Unemployment, Capital Accumulation and Factor Prices, Written for the conference in honor of Michael Bruno, Jerusalem, Nov.1997
[16]Blecker, R.,2002, Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models, in M. Setterfield (ed.), The Economics of Demand-led Growth:Challenging the Supply-side Vision in the Long Run, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA:Edward Elgar, pp.129-152
[17]Bliss, C.J.,1975, Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income, Amsterdam: North-Holland
[18]Bortis, H.,1997, Institutions, Behavior and Economic Theory:A contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[19]Bortis, H.,2003, Marshall, the Keynesian Revolution and Sraffa's Significance, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.30, No.1, pp.77-97
[20]Bortkiewicz, L.V.,1907, Value and Price in Marxian System, Translated from German by J. Kahane, International Economic Papers, No.2,1952
[21]Bowles, S.,1985, The Production Process in a Competitive Economy:Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian and Marxian Models, The American Economic Review, Vol.75, No.l, pp.16-36
[22]Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.,1982, The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism:The Case of the United States, Politics and Society, Vol.11, No.1, pp.51-93
[23]Bronfenbrenner, M.,1939, The Cobb-Douglas Function and Trade Union Policy, American Economic Review, Vol.29, No.4, pp.793-796
[24]Bronfenbrenner, M.,1960, A Note on Relative Shares and Elasticity of Substitution, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.68, No.3, pp.284-287
[25]Brunner, E.,1975, Competitive prices, normal costs and industrial stability, in P.W.S.Andrews and E. Brunner, Studies in Pricing, London:MacMillian, pp.18-34
[26]Buroway, M.,1978, Toward a Marxist Theory of Labor Process Theory:Braverman and Beyond, Politics and Society, Vol.47, No.4, pp.247-312
[27]Buroway,M. and Wright, E.O.,1994, Coercion and Consent in Contested Exchange, in Wright, E.O., Interrogating Inequality, London and New York:Verso
[28]Canterbery, E.R.,1984, Galbraith, Sraffa, Kalecki and Super-Surplus Capitalism, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.7, No.l, pp.77-90
[29]Cobb, C.W. and Douglas, P.H.,1928, A Theory of Production, American Economic Review, Supplement, March, pp.139-165
[30]Conyon, M.J.,1994, Labour's Share, Market Structure and Trade Unionism, International Journal of Industrial Organization,12, pp.117-131
[31]Coutts, K., Godley, W. and Nordhaus, W.,1978, Industrial Pricing in the United Kingdom, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[32]Cowling, K.1982. Monoply Capitalism. London:Macmillian
[33]Cowling, K. and Molho, I.,1982, Wage Share, Concentration and Unionism, Manchester School, Vol.50, Issue.2, pp.99-115
[34]Dalton, H.,1920, Some Aspects of the Inequality of Incomes in Modern Communities, London:George Routledge & Sons
[35]Debreu, G.,1959, Theory of Value:An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New Haven and London:Yale University Press
[36]Decreuse, B. and Maarek, P.,2008, FDI and the Labor Share in Developing Countries:A Theory and Some Evidence, MPRA Paper No.11224
[37]Desai, M.,1973, Growth cycles and inflation in a model of the class struggle, Journal of Economic Theory,6, pp.527-545
[38]Diwan, I.,2000, Labor Shares and Globalization, World Bank Working Paper, November, Washington
[39]Domar, E.D.,1946, Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment, Econometrica,14, pp.137-147
[40]Douglas, P.H.,1948, Are there laws of production? American Economic Review, Vol.38, No.1,pp.1-41
[41]Droucoponlos, V. and T. P. Lianos,1992, Labor's Share and Market Power:Evidence from the Greek Manufacturing Industries, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics,15, pp.263-280
[42]Dutt, A.K.,1984, Stagnation, Income Distribution and Monopoly Power, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.8, No.1, pp.25-40
[43]Dutt, A.K.,1990, Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[44]Dutt, A.K.,2012, Distributional dynamics in Post Keynesian growth models, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.34, No.3, pp.431-451
[45]Edwards, R.,1979, Contested Terrain:The transformation of the workplace of twentieth century, Basic Books
[46]Eichner, A.S.,1973, A Theory of the Determination of Mark Up under Oligopoly, The Economic Journal, Vol.83, No.332, pp.1184-1200
[47]Eichner, A.S.,1976, The Megacorp and Oligopoly:Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics, Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press
[48]Ferri, P.,1983, The Consumption-Wage Gap, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.4, pp.579-589
[49]Ferguson, C.E.,1958, Neoclassical Theory of Technical Progress and Relative Factor Shares, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.4, pp.490-504
[50]Ferguson, C.E. and Moroney, J.R.,1969, The Sources of Changes in Labor's Relative Share:A Neoclassical Analysis, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.35, No.4, pp.308-322
[51]Foster, J.B., McChesney, R.W. and Jonna, R.J.,2011, The Internationalization of Monopoly Capital, Monthly Review, Vol.63, Issue.2
[52]Foster, J.B., McChesney, R.W. and Jonna, R.J.,2011,2011, The Global Reserve Army of Labor and the New Imperialism, Monthly Review, Vol.63, Issue.6
[53]Galbraith, J. K.1958. The Affluent Society.2nd. Ed. Rev. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[54]Galbraith, J. K.1967. The New Industrial State. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[55]Galbraith, J. K.1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[56]Garegnani, P.,1976, On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution, in M. Brown, K. Sato and P. Zarembka (eds), Essays in Modern Capital Theory, Amsterdam:North-Holland, pp.25-45
[57]Garegnani, P.,1979, Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand, Ⅱ., Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.3 (1), pp.63-82
[58]Garegnani, P.,1983, The Classical Theory of Wage and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices, The American Economic Review, Vol.73, No.2, pp.309-313
[59]Garegnani, P.,1984, Value and Distribution in the Classical Economics and Marx, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.36, No.2, pp.291-325
[60]Glyn, A.,2006, Will Marx Be Proved Right? Oxonomics, Vol.1, Issue.1, pp.13-16
[61]Godley, W. and Nordhause, W.,1972, Pricing in the Trade Cycle, Economic Journal, Vol.82, Issue.327, pp.853-882
[62]Goldstein, J.P.,1985, The Cylical Profit Squeeze:A Marxian Microfoundation, Review of Radical Political Economics,17, pp.103-128
[63]Goodwin, R.M.,1982, Essays in Economic Dynamics, London:MacMillan
[64]Goodwin, R.M.,1983, A Note on Wages, Profits and Fluctuation Growth Rates, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.7, pp.305-310
[65]Gordon, D., Edwards, R. and Reich, M.,1982, Segmanted Work, Divided Workers, New York:Cambridge University Press
[66]Gordon, D., Weisskopf, T.E., and Bowles, S.,1983, Long Swings and the Nonreproductive Cycle, The American Economic Review, Vol.73, No.2, pp.152-157
[67]Gram, H. and Walsh, V.,1983, Joan Robinson's in Retrospect, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.21, No.2, pp.518-550
[68]Guscina, A.,2006, Effects of Globalization on Labor's Share in National Income, IMF Working Paper, No.294
[69]Hall, R. and Hitch, C.,1939, Price Theory and Business Behaviour, Oxford Economic Papers,2, pp.12-45
[70]Harcourt, G.C.,1969, Some Cambridge Controvercies in the Theory of Capital, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.7, No.2, pp.369-405
[71]Harris, D.J.,1978, Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
[72]Harrison, A.E.,2002, Has Globalization Eroded Labor Share? Some Cross-Country Evidence, UC Berkeley and NBER Working Paper, No.39649
[73]Harrod, R.F.,1939, An Essay in Dynamic Theory, Economic Journal,49, pp.14-33
[74]Hawtrey, R.G.,1954, Keynes and Supply Functions, Economic Journal,64, Dec., pp.834-839
[75]Heidensohn, K.,1969, Labour's share in national income:a constant? Manchester School, Vol.37, Issue 4, pp.295-321
[76]Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J. and Yeaple, S.R.,2004, Export and FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, American Economic Review, Vol.94, No.l, pp.300-316
[77]Henley, A.,1987, Trade Unions, Market Concentration and Income Distribution in United States Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of Industrial Organization,5, pp.193-210
[78]Hodgson, J.M.,2001, How Economics Forgot History:The Problem of Historical Speciaficity in Social Science, London and New York:Routledge
[79]Iaumotte, F. and Tytell, I.,2007, How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected the Labor Income Share in Advanced Countries? IMF Working Paper, No.298
[80]Jarsulic, M.,1988, Effective Demand and Income Distribution:Issues in Alternative Economic Theory, Cambridge, UK:Polity Press
[81]Johnson, D. G.,1954, The Functional Distribution of Income in the United States,1850-1952, Review of Economics and Statistics,35(2),9, pp.175-82
[82]Kaldor, N.,1955-1956, Alternative Theories of Distribution, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.23, No.2, pp.83-100
[83]Kaldor, N.,1960, Characteristics of economic development, in Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, London:Duckworth
[84]Kalecki, M.,1937, A Theory of the Business Cycle, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.4, No.2, pp.77-97
[85]Kalecki, M.,1937, A Theory of Commodity, Income and Capital Taxation, The Economic Journal, Vol.47, No.187, pp.444-450
[86]Kalecki, M.,1938, The Determinants of Distribution of the National Income, Econometrica, Vol.6, No.2, pp.97-112
[87]Kalecki, M.,1939, Money and Real Wages, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1991, pp.21-50
[88]Kalecki, M.,1941a, The Theory of Long Run Distribution of the Product of Industry, Oxford Economic Papers, No.5, pp.31-41
[89]Kalecki, M.,1941b, A Theorem on Technical Progress, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford: Clarendon Press,1991, pp.107-116
[90]Kalecki, M.,1942, A Theory of Profits, The Economic Journal, Vol.52, No.206/207, pp.258-267
[91]Kalecki, M.1957. Degree of Monopoly and Distribution of Income. in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.209-238
[92]Kalecki, M.,1968a, The Marxian Equations of Reproduction and Modern Economics, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.459-466
[93]Kalecki, M.,1968b, Trend and Business Cycle, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.435-450
[94]Kalecki, M.,1971a, Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalistic Economy, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[95]Kalecki, M.,1971b, Class Struggle and the Distribution of National Income, Kyklos, Vol.24, Issue.1,pp.1-9
[96]Kalleberg, A., M. Wallace and L. Raffalovich,1984, Accounting for Labor's Share:Class and Income Distribution in the Printing Industry, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, pp.386-402
[97]Keynes, J.M.,1933, Essays in Biography, New York:Harcourt, Brace and Company
[98]Klein, L.R.,1967, the Keynesian Revolution,2nd eds., London:Macmillian
[99]Kravis, I.B., Relative Income Shares in Fact and Theory, American Economic Review, Vol.49, No.5, pp.917-949
[100]Krueger, A.B.,1999, Measuring Labor's Share. The American Economic Review, Vol. 89,No.2,pp.45-51
[101]Kujis, L.,2006, How Will China's Saving-investment Balance Evolve? World Bank China Office Research Working Paper, No.5, May 5
[102]Lanzillotti, R.F.,1958, Pricing objectives in large companies, American Economic Review, Vol.48, No.5, pp.921-940
[103]Lee, F.,1998, Post-Keynesian Price Theory, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[104]Levine, D.P.,1986, A Note on Wage Determination and Capital Accumulation, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.8, No.3, pp.463-477
[105]Manwaring, T. and Wood, S.,1985, The Ghost in the Labor Process, in D. Knights, H. Willmott, D. Collinson, eds., Job Redesign:Critical Perspectives on the Labor Process, Gower Publishing Company
[106]Marglin, S. A.1974. What Do Bosses Do? The Origin and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production. Review of Radical Political Economics, July,6, pp.60-112
[107]Marglin, S. A.1984. Growth, Distribution and Prices. Cambridge:Harvard University Press
[108]Marris, R.,1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, New York:Basic Books
[109]Marschak, J. and Andrews, W.H., Jr.,1944, Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production, Econometrica, Vol.12, No.3/4, pp.143-205
[110]Means, G.,1936, Notes on inflexible prices, American Economic Review, Vol.26, No.l,pp.23-35
[111]Meek, R.L.,1973, Studies in the Labor Theory of Value,2nd ed., London:Lawrence & Wishart
[112]Mendershausen, H.,1938, On the Significance of Douglas's production function, American Economic Review, Vol.6, No.2, pp.143-153
[113]Meng, X.,2003, Unemployment, Consumption Smoothing, and Precautionary Savings in Urban China, Journal of Competitive Economics, Vol.32, No.3, pp.465-485
[114]Milgate, M.,1982, Capital and Employment:A Study of Keynes's Economics, London:Academic Press
[115]Mitra, A.,1980, The Share of Wages in National Income, Calcutta:Oxford University Press
[116]Morishima, M.,1974, Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory, Econometrica, Vol.42, No.4, pp.611-632
[117]Morishima, M., Catephores, G.,1978, Value, Exploitation and Growth, London: McGraw-Hill
[118]Neild, R.,1963, Pricing and Employment in the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press
[119]Nell, E.J.,1982, Growth, Distribution and Inflation, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.1, pp.104-113
[120]Onaran, O. and Galanis, G.,2012, Is Aggregate Demand Wage-led or Profit-led? Conditions of Work and Employment Series, No.40, International Labor Office, Geneva
[121]Palley, T.I.,1998, Macroeconomics with Conflict and Income Distribution, Review of Political Economy, Vol.10, Issue.3, pp.329-342
[122]Pasinetti, L.L.,1962, Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in relation to the Rate of Economic Growth, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.ⅩⅪⅩ, No.4, pp.267-279
[123]Pasinetti, L.L.,1974, From Classical to Keynesian Economic Dynamics, in Growth and Income Distribution:Essays in Economic Theory, London, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press
[124]Pasinetti, L.L.,1993, Structural Economic Dynamics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[125]Patinkin, D.,1982, Anticipation of the General Theory? And Other Essays on Keynes, Chicago:University of Chicago Press
[126]Phillips, J.,1960, Labor's Share and Wage Parity', Review of Economics and Statistics,42(2), pp.164-74
[127]Robinson, J.,1953-1954, The Production Function and the Theory of Capital, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XXI (2), No.55, pp.81-106
[128]Robinson, J.,1956, The Accumulation of Capital, London:Macmillian
[129]Robinson, J.,1962, Essays in the theory of economic growth, London:Macmillian
[130]Robinson, J.,1971, Economic Heresies:Some Old-Fashioned Questions in Economic Theory, New York:Basic Books
[131]Robinson, J.,1972, The Second Crisis of Economic Theory, The American Economic Review, Vol.62, No.1/2, pp.1-10
[132]Rosenberg S. and Weisskopf, T.E.,1977, A Conflict Theory Approach to Inflation in the Postwar U.S. Economy, The American Economic Review, Vol.71, No.2, pp.42-47
[133]Rotheim, R.J.,1998, Keynes and the Marginalist Theory of Distribution, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.20, No.3, pp.355-388
[134]Rothschild, K.W.,1969, Alternative dimensions in the theory of wages, in Employment, Wages and Income Distribution:Critical essays in economics, London and New York:Routledge, pp.77-100
[135]Rothschild, K.W.,1985, Some Notes on Weintraub's Eclectic Theory of Income Shares, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.7, No.4, pp.575-593
[136]Rothschild, K.W.1993, Some recent contributions to a macroeconomic theory of income distribution, in Employment, Wages and Income Distribution:Critical essays in economics, London and New York:Routledge, pp.236-260
[137]Rowthorn, B.,1973, Neo-Classical Economics and its Critics:A Marxist View, Social Scientist, Vol.2, No.3, pp.3-29
[138]Rowthorn, B.,1980, Capitalism, Conflict and Inflation, London:Lawrence & Wishart
[139]Rowthorn, R. E.,1977, Conflict, inflation and money, Cambridge Journal of Economics,1, pp.215-239
[140]Rowthorn, R.E.,1982, Demand, Real Wages and Growth, Studi Economici,18, pp.3-54
[141]Sawyer, M.C.,1983, Business Pricing and Inflation, London:MacMillian
[142]Sawyer, M.C.,1985, The Economics of Michal Kalecki, London:MacMillian
[143]Schumpeter, J.A.,1954, History of Economic Analysis, New York:Oxford University Press
[144]Shaikh, A., Ahmet, E.,1996, Measuring the Wealth of Nations:The Political Economy of National Accounts, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[145]Simarro, R. M., Functional Distribution of Income and Economic Growth in the Chinese Economy:1978-2007, Working Papers, No.168, Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
[146]Solow, R.M.,1958, A Skeptical Note on the Constancy of Income Shares, The American Economic Review, Vol.48, No.4, pp.618-631
[147]Spence, M.1977. Entry, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.8, No.2, pp.534-544
[148]Sraffa, P.,1926, The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions, The Economic Journal, Vol.36, No.144, pp.535-550
[149]Steedman, I.,1985, Marx After Sraffa, London:Routledge
[150]Steindl, J.1952. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press
[151]Stockhammer, E. and Onaran, O.,2004, Accumulation, Distribution and Employment: A Structral VAR Approach to a Kaleckian Macro-model, Structral Change and Economic Dynamics,15, pp.421-447
[152]Stockhammer, E., Onaran, O. and Ederner, S.,2007, Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro-area, Vienna University of Economics and B.A., Department of Economics Working paper series, No.102
[153]Sylos Labini, P.,1971, The Theory of Prices in Oligopoly and the theory of growth, in P. Sylos Labini, The Forces of Economic Growth and Decline, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, pp.123-145
[154]Taylor, L.,1990, Income Distribution, Inflation, and Growth:Lectures on Structrulist Macroeconomic Theory, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press
[155]Vellupillai, K.,1983, A neo-Cambridge model of income distribution and unemployment, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.3, pp.454-473
[156]Wallce, M. and Brady, D.,2010, Globalization or Spatialization? The Worldwide Spatial Restructuring of the Labor Process, in McDonough, T., Reich M. and David M. Kortz, eds., Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crisis:Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press
[157]Weintraub, S.,1979, Generalizing Kalecki and Simplifying Macroeconomics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.1, No.3, pp.101-106
[158]Weintraub, S.,1981, An Eclectic Theory of Income Shares, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.4, No.l, pp.10-24
[159]Weisskopf, T.E.,1979, Marxian crisis theoy and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics,3, pp.341-378
[160]Wicksteed, P.H.,1932, An Essay on the Co-Ordination of the Laws of Distribution, London:L.S.E.
[161]Young, A.T.,2010, One of the Things We Know that Ain't So:Is U.S. Labor's Share Relatively Stable? Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol.32, Issue.l, pp.90-102
[162]阿瑟·刘易斯,1991,施炜等译,二元经济论,北京：北京经济学院出版社
[163]白重恩,钱震杰,2009,国民收入的要素分配：统计数据背后的故事,经济研究,第3期,27-41
[164]保罗·巴兰,保罗·斯威齐,1977,垄断资本——论美国的经济和社会秩序,南开大学政治经济学系译,北京：商务印书馆
[165]保罗·斯威齐,1997,陈观烈、秦亚男译,资本主义发展论——马克思主义政治经济学原理,北京：商务印书馆
[166]彼得·德鲁克,1981,走向下一种经济学,载于丹尼尔·贝尔、欧文·克里斯托尔编,经济理论的危机,中译本,1987年版,上海：上海译文出版社
[167]彼罗·斯拉法(主编),1962,李嘉图著作和通信集,第1-9卷,郭大力、王亚南译,北京：商务印书馆
[168]蔡防,都阳,王美艳,2010,中国如何应对金融危机：经济、就业与社会保护的视角,载于蔡防主编,中国人口与劳动问题报告No.11：后金融危机时期的劳动力市场挑战,北京；社会科学文献出版社
[169]蔡防,2010,成长的烦恼：中国在刘易斯转折期间面临的就业难题,载于蔡防主编,中国人口与劳动问题报告No.11：后金融危机时期的劳动力市场挑战,北京：社会科学文献出版社
[170]陈享光,2008,论我国微观收入分配中的公平,经济学动态,第8期,28-32
[171]程言君,2008,按劳分配制度体系走向完善的30年——从效率优先到公平正义的权衡与抉择,现代经济探讨,第8期,10-14
[172]大卫·李嘉图,2005,政治经济学及赋税原理,周洁译,北京：华夏出版社
[173]丁守海,2011,劳动剩余条件下的供给不足与工资上涨——基于家庭分工的视角,中国社会科学,第5期,4-37
[174]董事会,2012,上市公司高管薪酬调查,第8期
[175]凡勃伦,1964,蔡受百译,有闲阶级论,北京：商务印书馆
[176]樊纲.1994.现代三大经济理论体系的比较与综合.上海：三联书店
[177]樊纲,张曙光等,1990,公有制宏观经济理论大纲,上海：三联书店
[178]方福前,2009,中国居民消费需求不足原因研究——基于中国城乡分省数据,中国社会科学,第2期
[179]冯志轩,2012,国民收入中劳动报酬占比测算理论基础和方法的讨论——基于马克思主义经济学的方法,经济学家,第3期,5-13
[180]弗·冯·维赛尔,1982,自然价值,陈国庆译,北京：商务印书馆
[181]甘霞,2010,地方政府“招商引资”竞争策略与要素收入分配,经济论坛,第4期,32-34
[182]龚刚,杨光,2010,论工资性收入占国民收入比例的演变,劳动经济与劳动关系,第5期,5-18
[183]光明日报,2011,劳有所得,干有所值——怎么解决分配不公,8月16日,P.7
[184]郭庆旺,吕冰洋,2011,论税收对要素收入分配的影响,经济研究,第6期,16-30
[185]韩国高等.2011.中国制造业产能过剩的测度、波动及成因研究.经济研究,第12期.pp.18-31
[186]贺国强,2010,深化交流合作,实现互利双赢——在中意中小企业合作论坛上的主旨演讲,2010-6-7
[187]黄乾,魏下海,2010,中国劳动收入比重下降的宏观经济效应——基于省级面 板数据的实证分析,财贸经济,第4期,121-129
[188]加尔布雷思,1988,权力的分析,陶远华、苏世军译,石家庄：河北人民出版社
[189]贾根良,2011,美国学派：推进美国经济崛起的国民经济学,中国社会科学,第4期,111-125
[190]姜辉,2011,论当代资本主义的阶级问题,中国社会科学,第4期,39-54
[191]凯恩斯,1986,货币论,何瑞英译,北京：商务印书馆
[192]克拉克,1981,财富的分配,陈福生、陈振骅译,北京：商务印书馆
[193]莱昂·瓦尔拉斯,1989,纯粹经济学要义,蔡受百译,北京：商务印书馆
[194]兰斯·泰勒,1990,结构主义宏观经济学,颜泽龙译,北京：经济科学出版社
[195]郎咸平,2010,我们的日子为什么这么难,北京：东方出版社
[196]李稻葵,刘霖林,王红领,2009,GDP中劳动份额演变的U型规律,经济研究,第1期,70-82
[197]李楠,张振华,2011,制度视角下的中国现阶段劳动报酬率演变研究,劳动经济与劳动关系,第1期,26-32
[198]李实,2007,专家建言：中国要在增长和分享之间寻求平衡,中国财经报,2007-8-28
[199]李晓宁,马启民,2012,中国劳资收入分配差距与关系失衡研究,马克思主义研究,第6期,48-58
[200]李扬,殷剑峰,2005,劳动力转移过程中的高储蓄、高投资和中国经济增长,经济研究,第2期，4-25
[201]李扬,殷剑峰,2007,中国高储蓄率问题探究：1992-2003年中国资金流量表的分析,经济研究,第6期,14-26
[202]梁东黎,2008,初次分配格局的形成和变化的基本规律,经济学家,第6期,56-63
[203]梁东黎,2011,资金流量表的二重结构与我国初次分配格局的产业结构分析,南开经济研究,第1期,38-53
[204]刘国光,2008,对十七大报告论述中一些经济问题的理解,经济学动态,第1期,31-38
[205]刘钧,2011,我国农业剩余劳动力供给的“刘易斯拐点”争议综述,经济学动态,第7期,94-98
[206]刘瑞明,石磊.2011.上游垄断、非对称竞争与社会福利——兼论大中型国有企业利润的性质.经济研究,第12期,pp.86-96
[207]刘树成,2010,中国经济增长与经济周期,北京：中国经济出版社
[208]刘伟,蔡志洲,2010,国内总需求结构矛盾与国民收入分配失衡,经济学动态,第7期,19-27
[209]卢卡奇,1996,历史与阶级意识——关于马克思主义辩证法的研究,杜章智等译,北京：商务印书馆
[210]陆铭,2008,劳动收入占比下降：为什么?怎么办?上海证券报,2008-9-9
[211]陆正飞,王雄元,张鹏,2012,国有企业支付了更高的职工工资吗?经济研究,第3期,28-38
[212]马克·拉沃,2009,后凯恩斯主义经济学,王鹏译,济南：山东大学出版社
[213]马克思,1958,哲学的贫困,马克思恩格斯全集第4卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[214]马克思,1972a,政治经济学批判,马克思恩格斯全集第13卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[215]马克思,1972b,工资、价格和利润,马克思恩格斯全集第25卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[216]马克思,1995,哥达纲领批判,出自马克思恩格斯选集第3卷上,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[217]马克思,2004a,资本论,1-3卷,中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译,北京：人民出版社
[218]马克思,2004b,剩余价值理论,1—3卷,中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译,北京：人民出版社
[219]马歇尔,1964,经济学原理,朱志泰译,北京：商务印书馆
[220]迈克尔·布若威,2008,制造同意——垄断资本主义劳动过程的变迁,李荣荣译,北京：商务印书馆
[221]迈克尔·华莱士,大卫·布拉迪,2012,全球化还是空间化?——世界范围内劳动过程的空间重构,中译版,马克思主义研究,第3期,128-135
[222]孟捷,2011,劳动与资本在价值创造中的正和关系研究,经济研究,第4期,15-25
[223]乔安·罗宾逊,1965,于树生译,资本积累论,北京：商务印书馆
[224]乔安·罗宾逊,约翰·伊特韦尔,1982,陈彪如译,现代经济学导论,北京：商务印书馆
[225]罗长远,张军,2009a,劳动收入占比下降的经济学解释——基于中国省级面板数据的分析,劳动经济与劳动关系,第5期,29-41
[226]罗长远,张军,2009b,经济发展中的劳动收入占比——基于产业数据的实证研究,中国社会科学,第4期,65-79
[227]庞巴维克,1983,资本实证论,陈端译,北京：商务印书馆
[228]钱颖一,1999,激励与约束,经济社会体制比较,第5期,7-12
[229]乔榛,2011,我国初次分配结构变迁的探讨,经济学动态,第9期,62-66
[230]萨伊,1997,政治经济学概论,陈福生、陈振骅译,北京：商务印书馆
[231]邵敏,黄玖立,2010,外资与我国劳动收入份额,经济学(季刊),第9卷第4期,1190-1209
[232]斯拉法,1991,巫宝三译,用商品生产商品——经济理论批判绪论,北京：商务印书馆
[233]斯坦利·杰文斯,1984,政治经济学理论,郭大力译,北京：商务印书馆
[234]宋晓梧,2011,农民工收入——经济社会面临的突出问题,收录于中国(海南)改革发展研究院主编,消费主导,民富优先：收入分配改革的破题之路,北京：中国经济出版社
[235]孙慧文,2011,我国劳动收入份额持续下降的制度解释,经济问题探索,第3期,40-44
[236]孙文杰,2012,中国劳动报酬份额的演变趋势及其原因——基于最终需求和技术效率的视角,经济研究,第5期,120-131
[237]佟家栋,周燕.2011.二元经济刘易斯拐点和中国对外贸易发展战略.经济理论 与经济管理,第1期,pp.18-26
[238]涂圣伟,何安华,2011,中国农村剩余劳动力存量及变动趋势预测,经济与管理研究,第3期,111-117
[239]汪同三,2007,改革收入分配体系,解决投资消费失调,中国证券报,引自中证网
[240]王琦,梅建军,2009,初次分配公平原则的理论基础,经济问题,第2期,13·15
[241]魏克赛尔,1982,利息与价格,蔡受百译,北京：商务印书馆
[242]魏众,2010,中国当前的收入分配状况及对策分析,经济学动态,第8期,55-62
[243]翁杰,周礼,2010,中国工业部门劳动收入份额的变动研究：1997～2008年,中国人口科学,第4期,32-45
[244]伍山林,2011,劳动收入份额决定机制：一个微观模型,经济研究,第9期,55-68
[245]伍艳艳,2011,我国劳动报酬份额变动的经济后果及其对策研究,中国人民大学博士论文
[246]肖文,周明海,2010,劳动收入份额变动的结构因素——收入法GDP和资金流量表的比较分析,当代经济科学,第23卷第3期,69-76
[247]肖文,周明海,2011,贸易模式转变与劳动收入份额下降——基于中国工业分行业的实证研究,劳动经济与劳动关系,第1期,33-42
[248]信卫平,2007,关于提高劳动收入的宏观思考,宏观经济管理,第2期,43-45
[249]徐滇庆,李昕,2011,读懂中国贫富差距,北京：机械工业出版社
[250]许开国,2009,地区性行政垄断的宏观成本效率损失研究,经济评论,第5期,27-34
[251]亚当·斯密,1972,国民财富的性质和原因的研究,郭大力,王亚南译,北京：商务印书馆
[252]杨承训,2008,深化收入分配制度改革的经济学解析,经济学动态,第1期,64-69
[253]杨继东,2010,高管薪酬影响因素研究：理论与证据,中国人民大学博士学位论文
[254]杨天宇,2012,国民收入分配格局对居民消费需求的扩张效应,学习与探索,第2期
[255]约翰·肯尼斯·加尔布雷思,2008,美国资本主义：抗衡力量的概念,王肖竹译,华夏出版社
[256]约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯,2011,就业、利息和货币通论(重译本),高鸿业译,北京：商务印书馆
[257]约瑟夫·熊彼特,1991,何畏,易家祥等译,经济发展理论——对利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的考察,北京：商务印书馆
[258]约瑟夫·熊彼特,1999,资本主义、社会主义与民主,吴良健译,北京：商务印书馆
[259]于良春,张伟.2010.中国行业性行政垄断的强度与效率损失研究.经济研究,第3期,pp.16-27
[260]喻美辞,熊启泉,2012,中间产品进口、技术溢出与中国制造业的工资不平等,经济学动态,第3期,55-62
[261]袁江,张思成,2009,强制性技术变迁、不平衡增长与中国经济周期模型,经 济研究,第12期,17-29
[262]张伯伦.1958.郭家麟译.垄断竞争理论.北京：三联书店
[263]张超,陈璋,2011,“中国式技术进步”视角下的收入分配失衡,现代经济探讨,第9期,14-17
[264]张涛,乐文平,2009,资本深化、劳动收入份额与消费需求,毛泽东邓小平理论研究,第12期,9-13
[265]中谷岩,2010,资本主义为什么会自我崩溃?新自由主义者的忏悔,郑萍译,北京：社会科学文献出版社
[266]周杨波,2008,私有制企业劳资利益关系因素理论与实证分析,现代经济探讨,第8期,76-80
[267]周杨波,2010,利益分配失衡框架下我国劳动收入份额变动的影响因素分析,经济经纬,第6期,102-107
[268]朱国林,范建勇,严燕,2002,中国的消费不振与收入分配：理论和数据,经济研究,第5期,72-95
[269]朱嘉明,1988,论非均衡增长,上海：三联书店
[270]邹红,喻开志,2011,劳动收入份额、城乡收入差距与中国居民消费,经济理论与经济管理,第3期,45-55
[271]宗寒,2012,两只眼看中国资产层,北京：红旗出版社
[2]Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S. and Solow, R.M.,1961, Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Effeciency, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.XLIII, No.3, pp.225-250
[3]Asimakopulos, A.,1973, Keynes, Patinkin, Historical Time and Equilibrium Analysis, Canadian Journal of Economics,6, May, pp.179-188
[4]Asimakopulos, A.,1988, Investment, Employment and Income Distribution, Cambridge, UK:Polity Press
[5]Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T. and Saez, E.,2011, Top Incomes in the Long Run of History, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.49, No.l, pp.3-71
[6]Bental, B., and Demougin, D.,2010, Declining labor shares and bargaining power:An institutional explanation, Journal of Macroeconomics,32, pp.443-456
[7]Bentolina, S. and Saint-Paul, G.,2003, Explaining Movements in Labor Share, Contributions in Macroeconomics, Vol.3, Issue.1, Paper 9
[8]Berberoglu, B.,2009, Class and Class Conflict in the Age of Globalization, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
[9]Bhaduri, A.,1969, On the Significance of Recent Controvercies on Capital Theory:A Marxist View, The Economic Journal, Vol.79, No.315, pp.532-539
[10]Bhaduri, A.,1985, Capitalistic Accumulation in Logical and Historical Time, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.20, No.45/47, pp.1903-1907
[11]Bhaduri, A.1986. Macroeconomics:The Dynamics of Commodity Production. London: Macmillan
[12]Bhaduri, A.2007. Growth, Distribution and Innovations:Understanding their Interrelations. New York:Routledge
[13]Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S.A.,1990, Unemployment and the Real Wage:The Economic Basis of Contesting Political Ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.14, No.4, pp.375-393
[14]Bhaduri, A. and Robinson, J.,1980, Accumulation and Exploitation:an analysis in the tradition of Marx, Sraffa and Kalecki, Cambridge Journal of Economics,4, pp.103-115
[15]Blanchard, O.E.,1998, Revisiting European Unemployment, Capital Accumulation and Factor Prices, Written for the conference in honor of Michael Bruno, Jerusalem, Nov.1997
[16]Blecker, R.,2002, Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models, in M. Setterfield (ed.), The Economics of Demand-led Growth:Challenging the Supply-side Vision in the Long Run, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA:Edward Elgar, pp.129-152
[17]Bliss, C.J.,1975, Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income, Amsterdam: North-Holland
[18]Bortis, H.,1997, Institutions, Behavior and Economic Theory:A contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[19]Bortis, H.,2003, Marshall, the Keynesian Revolution and Sraffa's Significance, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.30, No.1, pp.77-97
[20]Bortkiewicz, L.V.,1907, Value and Price in Marxian System, Translated from German by J. Kahane, International Economic Papers, No.2,1952
[21]Bowles, S.,1985, The Production Process in a Competitive Economy:Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian and Marxian Models, The American Economic Review, Vol.75, No.l, pp.16-36
[22]Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.,1982, The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism:The Case of the United States, Politics and Society, Vol.11, No.1, pp.51-93
[23]Bronfenbrenner, M.,1939, The Cobb-Douglas Function and Trade Union Policy, American Economic Review, Vol.29, No.4, pp.793-796
[24]Bronfenbrenner, M.,1960, A Note on Relative Shares and Elasticity of Substitution, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.68, No.3, pp.284-287
[25]Brunner, E.,1975, Competitive prices, normal costs and industrial stability, in P.W.S.Andrews and E. Brunner, Studies in Pricing, London:MacMillian, pp.18-34
[26]Buroway, M.,1978, Toward a Marxist Theory of Labor Process Theory:Braverman and Beyond, Politics and Society, Vol.47, No.4, pp.247-312
[27]Buroway,M. and Wright, E.O.,1994, Coercion and Consent in Contested Exchange, in Wright, E.O., Interrogating Inequality, London and New York:Verso
[28]Canterbery, E.R.,1984, Galbraith, Sraffa, Kalecki and Super-Surplus Capitalism, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.7, No.l, pp.77-90
[29]Cobb, C.W. and Douglas, P.H.,1928, A Theory of Production, American Economic Review, Supplement, March, pp.139-165
[30]Conyon, M.J.,1994, Labour's Share, Market Structure and Trade Unionism, International Journal of Industrial Organization,12, pp.117-131
[31]Coutts, K., Godley, W. and Nordhaus, W.,1978, Industrial Pricing in the United Kingdom, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[32]Cowling, K.1982. Monoply Capitalism. London:Macmillian
[33]Cowling, K. and Molho, I.,1982, Wage Share, Concentration and Unionism, Manchester School, Vol.50, Issue.2, pp.99-115
[34]Dalton, H.,1920, Some Aspects of the Inequality of Incomes in Modern Communities, London:George Routledge & Sons
[35]Debreu, G.,1959, Theory of Value:An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New Haven and London:Yale University Press
[36]Decreuse, B. and Maarek, P.,2008, FDI and the Labor Share in Developing Countries:A Theory and Some Evidence, MPRA Paper No.11224
[37]Desai, M.,1973, Growth cycles and inflation in a model of the class struggle, Journal of Economic Theory,6, pp.527-545
[38]Diwan, I.,2000, Labor Shares and Globalization, World Bank Working Paper, November, Washington
[39]Domar, E.D.,1946, Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment, Econometrica,14, pp.137-147
[40]Douglas, P.H.,1948, Are there laws of production? American Economic Review, Vol.38, No.1,pp.1-41
[41]Droucoponlos, V. and T. P. Lianos,1992, Labor's Share and Market Power:Evidence from the Greek Manufacturing Industries, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics,15, pp.263-280
[42]Dutt, A.K.,1984, Stagnation, Income Distribution and Monopoly Power, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.8, No.1, pp.25-40
[43]Dutt, A.K.,1990, Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[44]Dutt, A.K.,2012, Distributional dynamics in Post Keynesian growth models, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.34, No.3, pp.431-451
[45]Edwards, R.,1979, Contested Terrain:The transformation of the workplace of twentieth century, Basic Books
[46]Eichner, A.S.,1973, A Theory of the Determination of Mark Up under Oligopoly, The Economic Journal, Vol.83, No.332, pp.1184-1200
[47]Eichner, A.S.,1976, The Megacorp and Oligopoly:Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics, Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press
[48]Ferri, P.,1983, The Consumption-Wage Gap, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.4, pp.579-589
[49]Ferguson, C.E.,1958, Neoclassical Theory of Technical Progress and Relative Factor Shares, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.4, pp.490-504
[50]Ferguson, C.E. and Moroney, J.R.,1969, The Sources of Changes in Labor's Relative Share:A Neoclassical Analysis, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.35, No.4, pp.308-322
[51]Foster, J.B., McChesney, R.W. and Jonna, R.J.,2011, The Internationalization of Monopoly Capital, Monthly Review, Vol.63, Issue.2
[52]Foster, J.B., McChesney, R.W. and Jonna, R.J.,2011,2011, The Global Reserve Army of Labor and the New Imperialism, Monthly Review, Vol.63, Issue.6
[53]Galbraith, J. K.1958. The Affluent Society.2nd. Ed. Rev. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[54]Galbraith, J. K.1967. The New Industrial State. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[55]Galbraith, J. K.1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston:Houghton Mifflin
[56]Garegnani, P.,1976, On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution, in M. Brown, K. Sato and P. Zarembka (eds), Essays in Modern Capital Theory, Amsterdam:North-Holland, pp.25-45
[57]Garegnani, P.,1979, Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand, Ⅱ., Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.3 (1), pp.63-82
[58]Garegnani, P.,1983, The Classical Theory of Wage and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices, The American Economic Review, Vol.73, No.2, pp.309-313
[59]Garegnani, P.,1984, Value and Distribution in the Classical Economics and Marx, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.36, No.2, pp.291-325
[60]Glyn, A.,2006, Will Marx Be Proved Right? Oxonomics, Vol.1, Issue.1, pp.13-16
[61]Godley, W. and Nordhause, W.,1972, Pricing in the Trade Cycle, Economic Journal, Vol.82, Issue.327, pp.853-882
[62]Goldstein, J.P.,1985, The Cylical Profit Squeeze:A Marxian Microfoundation, Review of Radical Political Economics,17, pp.103-128
[63]Goodwin, R.M.,1982, Essays in Economic Dynamics, London:MacMillan
[64]Goodwin, R.M.,1983, A Note on Wages, Profits and Fluctuation Growth Rates, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.7, pp.305-310
[65]Gordon, D., Edwards, R. and Reich, M.,1982, Segmanted Work, Divided Workers, New York:Cambridge University Press
[66]Gordon, D., Weisskopf, T.E., and Bowles, S.,1983, Long Swings and the Nonreproductive Cycle, The American Economic Review, Vol.73, No.2, pp.152-157
[67]Gram, H. and Walsh, V.,1983, Joan Robinson's in Retrospect, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.21, No.2, pp.518-550
[68]Guscina, A.,2006, Effects of Globalization on Labor's Share in National Income, IMF Working Paper, No.294
[69]Hall, R. and Hitch, C.,1939, Price Theory and Business Behaviour, Oxford Economic Papers,2, pp.12-45
[70]Harcourt, G.C.,1969, Some Cambridge Controvercies in the Theory of Capital, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.7, No.2, pp.369-405
[71]Harris, D.J.,1978, Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
[72]Harrison, A.E.,2002, Has Globalization Eroded Labor Share? Some Cross-Country Evidence, UC Berkeley and NBER Working Paper, No.39649
[73]Harrod, R.F.,1939, An Essay in Dynamic Theory, Economic Journal,49, pp.14-33
[74]Hawtrey, R.G.,1954, Keynes and Supply Functions, Economic Journal,64, Dec., pp.834-839
[75]Heidensohn, K.,1969, Labour's share in national income:a constant? Manchester School, Vol.37, Issue 4, pp.295-321
[76]Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J. and Yeaple, S.R.,2004, Export and FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, American Economic Review, Vol.94, No.l, pp.300-316
[77]Henley, A.,1987, Trade Unions, Market Concentration and Income Distribution in United States Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of Industrial Organization,5, pp.193-210
[78]Hodgson, J.M.,2001, How Economics Forgot History:The Problem of Historical Speciaficity in Social Science, London and New York:Routledge
[79]Iaumotte, F. and Tytell, I.,2007, How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected the Labor Income Share in Advanced Countries? IMF Working Paper, No.298
[80]Jarsulic, M.,1988, Effective Demand and Income Distribution:Issues in Alternative Economic Theory, Cambridge, UK:Polity Press
[81]Johnson, D. G.,1954, The Functional Distribution of Income in the United States,1850-1952, Review of Economics and Statistics,35(2),9, pp.175-82
[82]Kaldor, N.,1955-1956, Alternative Theories of Distribution, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.23, No.2, pp.83-100
[83]Kaldor, N.,1960, Characteristics of economic development, in Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, London:Duckworth
[84]Kalecki, M.,1937, A Theory of the Business Cycle, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.4, No.2, pp.77-97
[85]Kalecki, M.,1937, A Theory of Commodity, Income and Capital Taxation, The Economic Journal, Vol.47, No.187, pp.444-450
[86]Kalecki, M.,1938, The Determinants of Distribution of the National Income, Econometrica, Vol.6, No.2, pp.97-112
[87]Kalecki, M.,1939, Money and Real Wages, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1991, pp.21-50
[88]Kalecki, M.,1941a, The Theory of Long Run Distribution of the Product of Industry, Oxford Economic Papers, No.5, pp.31-41
[89]Kalecki, M.,1941b, A Theorem on Technical Progress, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford: Clarendon Press,1991, pp.107-116
[90]Kalecki, M.,1942, A Theory of Profits, The Economic Journal, Vol.52, No.206/207, pp.258-267
[91]Kalecki, M.1957. Degree of Monopoly and Distribution of Income. in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.209-238
[92]Kalecki, M.,1968a, The Marxian Equations of Reproduction and Modern Economics, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.459-466
[93]Kalecki, M.,1968b, Trend and Business Cycle, in Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, Vol.2, Capitalism:Economic Dynamics, edited by Jerzy Osiatynski, Oxford:Clarendon Press,1991, pp.435-450
[94]Kalecki, M.,1971a, Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalistic Economy, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[95]Kalecki, M.,1971b, Class Struggle and the Distribution of National Income, Kyklos, Vol.24, Issue.1,pp.1-9
[96]Kalleberg, A., M. Wallace and L. Raffalovich,1984, Accounting for Labor's Share:Class and Income Distribution in the Printing Industry, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, pp.386-402
[97]Keynes, J.M.,1933, Essays in Biography, New York:Harcourt, Brace and Company
[98]Klein, L.R.,1967, the Keynesian Revolution,2nd eds., London:Macmillian
[99]Kravis, I.B., Relative Income Shares in Fact and Theory, American Economic Review, Vol.49, No.5, pp.917-949
[100]Krueger, A.B.,1999, Measuring Labor's Share. The American Economic Review, Vol. 89,No.2,pp.45-51
[101]Kujis, L.,2006, How Will China's Saving-investment Balance Evolve? World Bank China Office Research Working Paper, No.5, May 5
[102]Lanzillotti, R.F.,1958, Pricing objectives in large companies, American Economic Review, Vol.48, No.5, pp.921-940
[103]Lee, F.,1998, Post-Keynesian Price Theory, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[104]Levine, D.P.,1986, A Note on Wage Determination and Capital Accumulation, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.8, No.3, pp.463-477
[105]Manwaring, T. and Wood, S.,1985, The Ghost in the Labor Process, in D. Knights, H. Willmott, D. Collinson, eds., Job Redesign:Critical Perspectives on the Labor Process, Gower Publishing Company
[106]Marglin, S. A.1974. What Do Bosses Do? The Origin and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production. Review of Radical Political Economics, July,6, pp.60-112
[107]Marglin, S. A.1984. Growth, Distribution and Prices. Cambridge:Harvard University Press
[108]Marris, R.,1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, New York:Basic Books
[109]Marschak, J. and Andrews, W.H., Jr.,1944, Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production, Econometrica, Vol.12, No.3/4, pp.143-205
[110]Means, G.,1936, Notes on inflexible prices, American Economic Review, Vol.26, No.l,pp.23-35
[111]Meek, R.L.,1973, Studies in the Labor Theory of Value,2nd ed., London:Lawrence & Wishart
[112]Mendershausen, H.,1938, On the Significance of Douglas's production function, American Economic Review, Vol.6, No.2, pp.143-153
[113]Meng, X.,2003, Unemployment, Consumption Smoothing, and Precautionary Savings in Urban China, Journal of Competitive Economics, Vol.32, No.3, pp.465-485
[114]Milgate, M.,1982, Capital and Employment:A Study of Keynes's Economics, London:Academic Press
[115]Mitra, A.,1980, The Share of Wages in National Income, Calcutta:Oxford University Press
[116]Morishima, M.,1974, Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory, Econometrica, Vol.42, No.4, pp.611-632
[117]Morishima, M., Catephores, G.,1978, Value, Exploitation and Growth, London: McGraw-Hill
[118]Neild, R.,1963, Pricing and Employment in the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press
[119]Nell, E.J.,1982, Growth, Distribution and Inflation, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.1, pp.104-113
[120]Onaran, O. and Galanis, G.,2012, Is Aggregate Demand Wage-led or Profit-led? Conditions of Work and Employment Series, No.40, International Labor Office, Geneva
[121]Palley, T.I.,1998, Macroeconomics with Conflict and Income Distribution, Review of Political Economy, Vol.10, Issue.3, pp.329-342
[122]Pasinetti, L.L.,1962, Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in relation to the Rate of Economic Growth, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.ⅩⅪⅩ, No.4, pp.267-279
[123]Pasinetti, L.L.,1974, From Classical to Keynesian Economic Dynamics, in Growth and Income Distribution:Essays in Economic Theory, London, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press
[124]Pasinetti, L.L.,1993, Structural Economic Dynamics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[125]Patinkin, D.,1982, Anticipation of the General Theory? And Other Essays on Keynes, Chicago:University of Chicago Press
[126]Phillips, J.,1960, Labor's Share and Wage Parity', Review of Economics and Statistics,42(2), pp.164-74
[127]Robinson, J.,1953-1954, The Production Function and the Theory of Capital, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XXI (2), No.55, pp.81-106
[128]Robinson, J.,1956, The Accumulation of Capital, London:Macmillian
[129]Robinson, J.,1962, Essays in the theory of economic growth, London:Macmillian
[130]Robinson, J.,1971, Economic Heresies:Some Old-Fashioned Questions in Economic Theory, New York:Basic Books
[131]Robinson, J.,1972, The Second Crisis of Economic Theory, The American Economic Review, Vol.62, No.1/2, pp.1-10
[132]Rosenberg S. and Weisskopf, T.E.,1977, A Conflict Theory Approach to Inflation in the Postwar U.S. Economy, The American Economic Review, Vol.71, No.2, pp.42-47
[133]Rotheim, R.J.,1998, Keynes and the Marginalist Theory of Distribution, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.20, No.3, pp.355-388
[134]Rothschild, K.W.,1969, Alternative dimensions in the theory of wages, in Employment, Wages and Income Distribution:Critical essays in economics, London and New York:Routledge, pp.77-100
[135]Rothschild, K.W.,1985, Some Notes on Weintraub's Eclectic Theory of Income Shares, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.7, No.4, pp.575-593
[136]Rothschild, K.W.1993, Some recent contributions to a macroeconomic theory of income distribution, in Employment, Wages and Income Distribution:Critical essays in economics, London and New York:Routledge, pp.236-260
[137]Rowthorn, B.,1973, Neo-Classical Economics and its Critics:A Marxist View, Social Scientist, Vol.2, No.3, pp.3-29
[138]Rowthorn, B.,1980, Capitalism, Conflict and Inflation, London:Lawrence & Wishart
[139]Rowthorn, R. E.,1977, Conflict, inflation and money, Cambridge Journal of Economics,1, pp.215-239
[140]Rowthorn, R.E.,1982, Demand, Real Wages and Growth, Studi Economici,18, pp.3-54
[141]Sawyer, M.C.,1983, Business Pricing and Inflation, London:MacMillian
[142]Sawyer, M.C.,1985, The Economics of Michal Kalecki, London:MacMillian
[143]Schumpeter, J.A.,1954, History of Economic Analysis, New York:Oxford University Press
[144]Shaikh, A., Ahmet, E.,1996, Measuring the Wealth of Nations:The Political Economy of National Accounts, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
[145]Simarro, R. M., Functional Distribution of Income and Economic Growth in the Chinese Economy:1978-2007, Working Papers, No.168, Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
[146]Solow, R.M.,1958, A Skeptical Note on the Constancy of Income Shares, The American Economic Review, Vol.48, No.4, pp.618-631
[147]Spence, M.1977. Entry, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.8, No.2, pp.534-544
[148]Sraffa, P.,1926, The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions, The Economic Journal, Vol.36, No.144, pp.535-550
[149]Steedman, I.,1985, Marx After Sraffa, London:Routledge
[150]Steindl, J.1952. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press
[151]Stockhammer, E. and Onaran, O.,2004, Accumulation, Distribution and Employment: A Structral VAR Approach to a Kaleckian Macro-model, Structral Change and Economic Dynamics,15, pp.421-447
[152]Stockhammer, E., Onaran, O. and Ederner, S.,2007, Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro-area, Vienna University of Economics and B.A., Department of Economics Working paper series, No.102
[153]Sylos Labini, P.,1971, The Theory of Prices in Oligopoly and the theory of growth, in P. Sylos Labini, The Forces of Economic Growth and Decline, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, pp.123-145
[154]Taylor, L.,1990, Income Distribution, Inflation, and Growth:Lectures on Structrulist Macroeconomic Theory, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press
[155]Vellupillai, K.,1983, A neo-Cambridge model of income distribution and unemployment, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol.5, No.3, pp.454-473
[156]Wallce, M. and Brady, D.,2010, Globalization or Spatialization? The Worldwide Spatial Restructuring of the Labor Process, in McDonough, T., Reich M. and David M. Kortz, eds., Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crisis:Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press
[157]Weintraub, S.,1979, Generalizing Kalecki and Simplifying Macroeconomics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.1, No.3, pp.101-106
[158]Weintraub, S.,1981, An Eclectic Theory of Income Shares, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol.4, No.l, pp.10-24
[159]Weisskopf, T.E.,1979, Marxian crisis theoy and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics,3, pp.341-378
[160]Wicksteed, P.H.,1932, An Essay on the Co-Ordination of the Laws of Distribution, London:L.S.E.
[161]Young, A.T.,2010, One of the Things We Know that Ain't So:Is U.S. Labor's Share Relatively Stable? Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol.32, Issue.l, pp.90-102
[162]阿瑟·刘易斯,1991,施炜等译,二元经济论,北京：北京经济学院出版社
[163]白重恩,钱震杰,2009,国民收入的要素分配：统计数据背后的故事,经济研究,第3期,27-41
[164]保罗·巴兰,保罗·斯威齐,1977,垄断资本——论美国的经济和社会秩序,南开大学政治经济学系译,北京：商务印书馆
[165]保罗·斯威齐,1997,陈观烈、秦亚男译,资本主义发展论——马克思主义政治经济学原理,北京：商务印书馆
[166]彼得·德鲁克,1981,走向下一种经济学,载于丹尼尔·贝尔、欧文·克里斯托尔编,经济理论的危机,中译本,1987年版,上海：上海译文出版社
[167]彼罗·斯拉法(主编),1962,李嘉图著作和通信集,第1-9卷,郭大力、王亚南译,北京：商务印书馆
[168]蔡防,都阳,王美艳,2010,中国如何应对金融危机：经济、就业与社会保护的视角,载于蔡防主编,中国人口与劳动问题报告No.11：后金融危机时期的劳动力市场挑战,北京；社会科学文献出版社
[169]蔡防,2010,成长的烦恼：中国在刘易斯转折期间面临的就业难题,载于蔡防主编,中国人口与劳动问题报告No.11：后金融危机时期的劳动力市场挑战,北京：社会科学文献出版社
[170]陈享光,2008,论我国微观收入分配中的公平,经济学动态,第8期,28-32
[171]程言君,2008,按劳分配制度体系走向完善的30年——从效率优先到公平正义的权衡与抉择,现代经济探讨,第8期,10-14
[172]大卫·李嘉图,2005,政治经济学及赋税原理,周洁译,北京：华夏出版社
[173]丁守海,2011,劳动剩余条件下的供给不足与工资上涨——基于家庭分工的视角,中国社会科学,第5期,4-37
[174]董事会,2012,上市公司高管薪酬调查,第8期
[175]凡勃伦,1964,蔡受百译,有闲阶级论,北京：商务印书馆
[176]樊纲.1994.现代三大经济理论体系的比较与综合.上海：三联书店
[177]樊纲,张曙光等,1990,公有制宏观经济理论大纲,上海：三联书店
[178]方福前,2009,中国居民消费需求不足原因研究——基于中国城乡分省数据,中国社会科学,第2期
[179]冯志轩,2012,国民收入中劳动报酬占比测算理论基础和方法的讨论——基于马克思主义经济学的方法,经济学家,第3期,5-13
[180]弗·冯·维赛尔,1982,自然价值,陈国庆译,北京：商务印书馆
[181]甘霞,2010,地方政府“招商引资”竞争策略与要素收入分配,经济论坛,第4期,32-34
[182]龚刚,杨光,2010,论工资性收入占国民收入比例的演变,劳动经济与劳动关系,第5期,5-18
[183]光明日报,2011,劳有所得,干有所值——怎么解决分配不公,8月16日,P.7
[184]郭庆旺,吕冰洋,2011,论税收对要素收入分配的影响,经济研究,第6期,16-30
[185]韩国高等.2011.中国制造业产能过剩的测度、波动及成因研究.经济研究,第12期.pp.18-31
[186]贺国强,2010,深化交流合作,实现互利双赢——在中意中小企业合作论坛上的主旨演讲,2010-6-7
[187]黄乾,魏下海,2010,中国劳动收入比重下降的宏观经济效应——基于省级面 板数据的实证分析,财贸经济,第4期,121-129
[188]加尔布雷思,1988,权力的分析,陶远华、苏世军译,石家庄：河北人民出版社
[189]贾根良,2011,美国学派：推进美国经济崛起的国民经济学,中国社会科学,第4期,111-125
[190]姜辉,2011,论当代资本主义的阶级问题,中国社会科学,第4期,39-54
[191]凯恩斯,1986,货币论,何瑞英译,北京：商务印书馆
[192]克拉克,1981,财富的分配,陈福生、陈振骅译,北京：商务印书馆
[193]莱昂·瓦尔拉斯,1989,纯粹经济学要义,蔡受百译,北京：商务印书馆
[194]兰斯·泰勒,1990,结构主义宏观经济学,颜泽龙译,北京：经济科学出版社
[195]郎咸平,2010,我们的日子为什么这么难,北京：东方出版社
[196]李稻葵,刘霖林,王红领,2009,GDP中劳动份额演变的U型规律,经济研究,第1期,70-82
[197]李楠,张振华,2011,制度视角下的中国现阶段劳动报酬率演变研究,劳动经济与劳动关系,第1期,26-32
[198]李实,2007,专家建言：中国要在增长和分享之间寻求平衡,中国财经报,2007-8-28
[199]李晓宁,马启民,2012,中国劳资收入分配差距与关系失衡研究,马克思主义研究,第6期,48-58
[200]李扬,殷剑峰,2005,劳动力转移过程中的高储蓄、高投资和中国经济增长,经济研究,第2期，4-25
[201]李扬,殷剑峰,2007,中国高储蓄率问题探究：1992-2003年中国资金流量表的分析,经济研究,第6期,14-26
[202]梁东黎,2008,初次分配格局的形成和变化的基本规律,经济学家,第6期,56-63
[203]梁东黎,2011,资金流量表的二重结构与我国初次分配格局的产业结构分析,南开经济研究,第1期,38-53
[204]刘国光,2008,对十七大报告论述中一些经济问题的理解,经济学动态,第1期,31-38
[205]刘钧,2011,我国农业剩余劳动力供给的“刘易斯拐点”争议综述,经济学动态,第7期,94-98
[206]刘瑞明,石磊.2011.上游垄断、非对称竞争与社会福利——兼论大中型国有企业利润的性质.经济研究,第12期,pp.86-96
[207]刘树成,2010,中国经济增长与经济周期,北京：中国经济出版社
[208]刘伟,蔡志洲,2010,国内总需求结构矛盾与国民收入分配失衡,经济学动态,第7期,19-27
[209]卢卡奇,1996,历史与阶级意识——关于马克思主义辩证法的研究,杜章智等译,北京：商务印书馆
[210]陆铭,2008,劳动收入占比下降：为什么?怎么办?上海证券报,2008-9-9
[211]陆正飞,王雄元,张鹏,2012,国有企业支付了更高的职工工资吗?经济研究,第3期,28-38
[212]马克·拉沃,2009,后凯恩斯主义经济学,王鹏译,济南：山东大学出版社
[213]马克思,1958,哲学的贫困,马克思恩格斯全集第4卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[214]马克思,1972a,政治经济学批判,马克思恩格斯全集第13卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[215]马克思,1972b,工资、价格和利润,马克思恩格斯全集第25卷,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[216]马克思,1995,哥达纲领批判,出自马克思恩格斯选集第3卷上,中译本,北京：人民出版社
[217]马克思,2004a,资本论,1-3卷,中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译,北京：人民出版社
[218]马克思,2004b,剩余价值理论,1—3卷,中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译,北京：人民出版社
[219]马歇尔,1964,经济学原理,朱志泰译,北京：商务印书馆
[220]迈克尔·布若威,2008,制造同意——垄断资本主义劳动过程的变迁,李荣荣译,北京：商务印书馆
[221]迈克尔·华莱士,大卫·布拉迪,2012,全球化还是空间化?——世界范围内劳动过程的空间重构,中译版,马克思主义研究,第3期,128-135
[222]孟捷,2011,劳动与资本在价值创造中的正和关系研究,经济研究,第4期,15-25
[223]乔安·罗宾逊,1965,于树生译,资本积累论,北京：商务印书馆
[224]乔安·罗宾逊,约翰·伊特韦尔,1982,陈彪如译,现代经济学导论,北京：商务印书馆
[225]罗长远,张军,2009a,劳动收入占比下降的经济学解释——基于中国省级面板数据的分析,劳动经济与劳动关系,第5期,29-41
[226]罗长远,张军,2009b,经济发展中的劳动收入占比——基于产业数据的实证研究,中国社会科学,第4期,65-79
[227]庞巴维克,1983,资本实证论,陈端译,北京：商务印书馆
[228]钱颖一,1999,激励与约束,经济社会体制比较,第5期,7-12
[229]乔榛,2011,我国初次分配结构变迁的探讨,经济学动态,第9期,62-66
[230]萨伊,1997,政治经济学概论,陈福生、陈振骅译,北京：商务印书馆
[231]邵敏,黄玖立,2010,外资与我国劳动收入份额,经济学(季刊),第9卷第4期,1190-1209
[232]斯拉法,1991,巫宝三译,用商品生产商品——经济理论批判绪论,北京：商务印书馆
[233]斯坦利·杰文斯,1984,政治经济学理论,郭大力译,北京：商务印书馆
[234]宋晓梧,2011,农民工收入——经济社会面临的突出问题,收录于中国(海南)改革发展研究院主编,消费主导,民富优先：收入分配改革的破题之路,北京：中国经济出版社
[235]孙慧文,2011,我国劳动收入份额持续下降的制度解释,经济问题探索,第3期,40-44
[236]孙文杰,2012,中国劳动报酬份额的演变趋势及其原因——基于最终需求和技术效率的视角,经济研究,第5期,120-131
[237]佟家栋,周燕.2011.二元经济刘易斯拐点和中国对外贸易发展战略.经济理论 与经济管理,第1期,pp.18-26
[238]涂圣伟,何安华,2011,中国农村剩余劳动力存量及变动趋势预测,经济与管理研究,第3期,111-117
[239]汪同三,2007,改革收入分配体系,解决投资消费失调,中国证券报,引自中证网
[240]王琦,梅建军,2009,初次分配公平原则的理论基础,经济问题,第2期,13·15
[241]魏克赛尔,1982,利息与价格,蔡受百译,北京：商务印书馆
[242]魏众,2010,中国当前的收入分配状况及对策分析,经济学动态,第8期,55-62
[243]翁杰,周礼,2010,中国工业部门劳动收入份额的变动研究：1997～2008年,中国人口科学,第4期,32-45
[244]伍山林,2011,劳动收入份额决定机制：一个微观模型,经济研究,第9期,55-68
[245]伍艳艳,2011,我国劳动报酬份额变动的经济后果及其对策研究,中国人民大学博士论文
[246]肖文,周明海,2010,劳动收入份额变动的结构因素——收入法GDP和资金流量表的比较分析,当代经济科学,第23卷第3期,69-76
[247]肖文,周明海,2011,贸易模式转变与劳动收入份额下降——基于中国工业分行业的实证研究,劳动经济与劳动关系,第1期,33-42
[248]信卫平,2007,关于提高劳动收入的宏观思考,宏观经济管理,第2期,43-45
[249]徐滇庆,李昕,2011,读懂中国贫富差距,北京：机械工业出版社
[250]许开国,2009,地区性行政垄断的宏观成本效率损失研究,经济评论,第5期,27-34
[251]亚当·斯密,1972,国民财富的性质和原因的研究,郭大力,王亚南译,北京：商务印书馆
[252]杨承训,2008,深化收入分配制度改革的经济学解析,经济学动态,第1期,64-69
[253]杨继东,2010,高管薪酬影响因素研究：理论与证据,中国人民大学博士学位论文
[254]杨天宇,2012,国民收入分配格局对居民消费需求的扩张效应,学习与探索,第2期
[255]约翰·肯尼斯·加尔布雷思,2008,美国资本主义：抗衡力量的概念,王肖竹译,华夏出版社
[256]约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯,2011,就业、利息和货币通论(重译本),高鸿业译,北京：商务印书馆
[257]约瑟夫·熊彼特,1991,何畏,易家祥等译,经济发展理论——对利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的考察,北京：商务印书馆
[258]约瑟夫·熊彼特,1999,资本主义、社会主义与民主,吴良健译,北京：商务印书馆
[259]于良春,张伟.2010.中国行业性行政垄断的强度与效率损失研究.经济研究,第3期,pp.16-27
[260]喻美辞,熊启泉,2012,中间产品进口、技术溢出与中国制造业的工资不平等,经济学动态,第3期,55-62
[261]袁江,张思成,2009,强制性技术变迁、不平衡增长与中国经济周期模型,经 济研究,第12期,17-29
[262]张伯伦.1958.郭家麟译.垄断竞争理论.北京：三联书店
[263]张超,陈璋,2011,“中国式技术进步”视角下的收入分配失衡,现代经济探讨,第9期,14-17
[264]张涛,乐文平,2009,资本深化、劳动收入份额与消费需求,毛泽东邓小平理论研究,第12期,9-13
[265]中谷岩,2010,资本主义为什么会自我崩溃?新自由主义者的忏悔,郑萍译,北京：社会科学文献出版社
[266]周杨波,2008,私有制企业劳资利益关系因素理论与实证分析,现代经济探讨,第8期,76-80
[267]周杨波,2010,利益分配失衡框架下我国劳动收入份额变动的影响因素分析,经济经纬,第6期,102-107
[268]朱国林,范建勇,严燕,2002,中国的消费不振与收入分配：理论和数据,经济研究,第5期,72-95
[269]朱嘉明,1988,论非均衡增长,上海：三联书店
[270]邹红,喻开志,2011,劳动收入份额、城乡收入差距与中国居民消费,经济理论与经济管理,第3期,45-55
[271]宗寒,2012,两只眼看中国资产层,北京：红旗出版社