摘要
从牛瘤胃中分离高产纤维素酶细菌,经纤维素刚果红平板初筛、摇瓶培养、固态发酵复筛、得到一株芽孢杆菌X4,该菌不仅可降解纤维素,且自身具固氮能力。最适生长PH为7左右,最适生长温度为37℃。在发酵过程中与其他菌株能很好共生。同时从牛瘤胃中分离、筛选得酵母Y2,实验证明该菌株与其他发酵菌株具良好配伍性,能利用混菌发酵产生的还原糖迅速生长,达到较高的生物量。
利用氨法和白腐真菌L:对玉米秸秆进行前期处理,依据多种微生物共生及代谢的特性,采用多菌种混合共发酵方式,将康宁木霉和选育出的高活性黑曲霉S",瘤胃细菌X4,酵母Y:,接种于前处理过的玉米秸秆上共发酵,利用正交试验,得出:在发酵温度30℃,PH5.0发酵9天后,粗蛋白含量达24.61%,纤维素降解率为48.37%。
对酵母Y:原生质体的制备、再生条件进行探索:采用对数生长前期(约24h)的菌体细胞,用1.5%蜗牛酶,0.1%p—巯基乙醇,处理60min,原生质体形成率可达95%,用0.6ml/l蔗糖做渗透稳定剂,原生质体再生效果最佳,再生率为6.32%。
采用He-Ne激光诱变酵母Y:原生质体,获得一株是出发菌株产生物量1.31倍的酵母Y:。经酯酶同工酶谱分析,其酶带条纹数,迁移率等均发生了明显变化,利用Y:和混菌共发酵实验结果表明,产物中粗蛋白可提高到28.10%,此时纤维素降解率为51.12%。
High-yield cellulase bacteria were isolated from rumen. After the primary screening test by cellulose-congo red agar medium, the second one by flask cultivation and then solid fermentation, A Bacillus X4 was obtained. This strain not only was capable of degrading cellulose, but also possessed the ability to fix Nitrogen. The optimum PH of it was at 7.0, The suitable temperature for the growth of )Q was about 37癈. The strain X4 was able to symbiosis well with other selected strains in the co-fermentation. The yeast called Y2 was separated from rumen too. The experiments showed that yeast Y2 matched better with mixed strains. And it grew quickly with reducing sugar which was produced by other selected strains in the co-fermentation resulting in higher biomass.
According to characteristics of the multi-microorganisms symbiosis and their metabolism, the corn straws were pretreated with the ammonia and white-rot fungi Lx, Trichoderma koningii Oud C413, high activity Aspergillus niger Sy, rumen bacterium X4 and rumen yeast Y2 were carefully selected and were inoculated on pretreated corn straws powder for multi-strains co-fermentation. The result of orthogonal experiment showed: with the fermentation temperature 30癈, PH 5.0, After 9 days, the contents of raw proteins reached 24.61% While the degradation ratio of cellulose was 48.37%.
The suitable condition of protoplast formation and regeneration of yeast Y2 were studied. The result of experiment showed that: the early exponential phase cells (about 24h) were easy to form protoplast, under the action of 1.5% snail enzyme and 0.1% (3 -mercaptoethanol, the ratio of protoplast formation was about 95% in 60 minutes. On the condition
that 0.6mol/l sucrose was used as osmotic stabilizer, the ratio of protoplast regeneration was the highest. The ratio of its regeneration was 6.32%.
A mutagenic strain called Y2' was achieved using irradiating protoplasts by He-Ne laser ( A =632.8nm). Its biomass yield increased as much as 1.31 times than that of starting strain. And it match excellently with other mixed strains. The esterase(EST) isoenzyme electropheresis bands of the mutagenic strain Y2' compared with that of starting strain changed dramatically. The result of co-fermentation utilizing 2' indicated the content of crude protein in production reached 28.10% while at the same time the degradation rate of cellulose came to 51.12%.
引文
[1] Parisi F. Advances in lignocellosics hydrolysis and in the utilization of the hydrolyzates. Advances in Biochemical Engineering Biotechnology, 1989, 38:54~55
[2] EI-Mastry H G. Utilization of egyptian rice straw in production of cellalases and microbial protein: effect of various pretreatments on yields of protein and enzyme activity. J Sci Agric, 1983, 34:725~732
[3] Han Y W, Yu P L, Smith S K. Alkali treatment and fermentation of straw for animal feed. Biotech Bioeng, 1978, 20:1015~1026
[4] Tassinari T, Macy C, Spano L. Energy requirements and process design considerations in compression milling pretreatment of cellulosic wastes for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotech Bioeng, 1980, 22:1689~1705
[5] Gould J M. Studies on the mechanism of alkaline peroxide deligni fication of agricaltural residues. Biotech Bioeng, 1985, 20(6): 46~52
[6] Saddler J N, Broanell H H, Clermont L P, et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulost and vairous pretreated wood fractions. Biotech Bioeng, 1982, 24: 1389~1402.
[7] 王仁振,秸秆类粗纤维饲料生化加工技术的研究,饲料工业,1999,20(3):8~12
[8] T. Kent Kirt. Enzymatic "Combustion": The Microbial Degradation of lignin. Ann Rev. Microbiol. 1987. 41:465~505
[9] 卢雪梅,刘紫鹃,高培基,木质素生物降解的化学反应机制,林产化学与工业,1996,16(2):75~82
[10] W. Charles. Erans. Anaerobic degradation of Aromatic compounds Ann. Rer. Microbiol 42:289~317
[11] 雷天富.秸秆饲料化加工技术,陕西省人民教育出版杜,1998:2~3
[12] 贾万福.农作物秸秆饲料的加工利用,中国畜牧杂志,1996,32(1):43~44
[13] 卢庆萍,王加启.秸秆处理技术研究进展,中国饲料 1999(2):7~9
[14] 王中键.提高秸秆营养价值研究进展 饲料工业,1998,19(5):12~14
[15] 中国农业百科全书畜牧卷编辑委员会,中国农业百科全书畜牧卷。北京农业出版社,1996:117~118
[16] 汝应俊等,O_3处理粗饲料研究进展,甘肃畜牧兽医,1991(4):27~29
[17] Tien M. kirk T.K. Lignin-degrading enzyme from phanero-chaete chrysos Porium: Purification Characterization and Catalytic Properities of a unigue H_2O_2 requiring Oxygenase Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984. 81: 2280~2284.
[18] Antai S.P., Crawford, D.L. 1981. Degradation of softwood, hardwood, and grass lingnocelluloses by two streptomyces strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42:378~380.
[19] Crawford, D.L., Barder, M.J., Pometto, A.L. Ⅲ Crawford R.L. 1982 Chemistry of softwood lignin degradation by Streptomyces viridosporus. Arch. Microbiol. 131: 140~145
[20] Raeder, V., Broda, P. 1984. Comparison of the lignin-degrading White-rot fungi Phanerochaete Chrysosporium and Sporotrichum pulverulentun at the DNA level. Curr. Genet 8: 499~506.
[21] 裘维蕃主编,菌物学大全,北京:科学技术出版社,1998:230
[22] Burdsall, H.H., Eslyn. W.E. 1974 A new Phanerochaete with a chrysosporium imperfect state. Mycotaxon 1:123~133
[23] 李慧蓉,白腐真菌及其技术的潜在工业应用,工业微生物,1996,26(2):35~39
[24] Kirk, T.K. Shimada, M. 1985. Lignin biodegradation: The microorganisms involved and the physiology and biochemistry of degradation by white-rot fungi:Recent Adrances in lignin biodegradation Research. Tokyo: Uni. PP 579~605.
[25] 郭爱莲编,细菌和放线菌分类基础,西北大学生物系 1985.
[26] 戴其华,徐宜锋,饲料工业,1992.13(6):35~36
[27] 刘东波 纤维素诺卡氏菌的一个新菌株,微生物学报 1990 30(1) 70~72
[28] 刘东波 纤维素诺卡氏菌降解玉米秸秆和玉米芯的研究,东北师大学报自然科学版.2001 33(1) 60~63
[29] A.H.Lachke等,李象洪摘译自Enzyme microb technol 1986,8(2):105~108,应用微生物,1985,13(5):51~53
[30] Mariko Uziir and Takashi sasaki Enzyme microb Technol 1987, Vol 9: 459~465.
[31] D.S. Chahal. 朱晓康节译自 Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1985. 49, Vol 205-210
[32] Bagga P.S et al Purification and Characterization of celluloytic enzymes produced by Aspergillus hidulans Process Biochemistry, 24(2): 41~45, 1989
[33] Sills A. M. et al Amylase activity in certain yeasts and a fungi species Dev. and Microbiol Vol. 24. 1989. 295~305
[34] A.Araujo, J.D Souza Enzymatic Sacharification of Pretreated Rice Straw and Biomass Production Biotech Bioeng, 1986(28): 1503-1509.
[35] 徐文玉,木质纤维素的混合菌发酵法,微生物学通报,1991,18(2):103~106
[36] Wiseman A et al: Topics in Enzyme and Fermentation Biotechnology, Vol, 7, P 156~195. 1983
[37] Becker D K et al: Developments in Industrial Microbiology Vol. 24, P. 123~129, 1983.
[38] 郭维烈,郭庆华著 新型发酵蛋白饲料 科学技术文献出版社 1996年北京
[39] 沈萍主编,微生物学 北京 高等教育出版社,2000年:428页
[40] M. Glancer. Process Biochemistry. 1986, 21(6): 169~173
[41] M Glancer. Process Biochemistry. 1989, 24(3): 109~113
[42] 陈庆森,刘剑虹等,利用多菌种共发酵技术转化玉米秸秆的研究 食品与发酵工业,1999 25(5):1~6
[43] 陈庆森,刘剑虹等,利用多菌种共发酵技术转化玉米秸秆的研究,生物技术,1999,9(4):15~20
[44] Moo Young, M, et al.: In"The Filamentous Fungi"。Fungal Technology., Smith, J.E. and Berry, D.R. Eds. (Amold, London, Vol:4, 1983)
[45] 张博润,刘玉方等,发酵饲料蛋白的培养条件及产物分析 微生物学报 1997,37(4):281~285
[46]李发生,谷庆宝等,双菌联合固态发酵生产酒精菌体蛋白饲料的实验研究,环境科学研究,1999,12(6):39~42
[47]徐坚平,刘均松,孔维等,利用秸秆类物质进行微生物共发酵生产单细胞蛋白.微生物学通报,1995,22(4) 222~225。
[48]吉海平,浅谈微生物在秸秆生物学转化中的应用 生物工程进展,1997 Vol.17 No.2
[49]陈翠微、刘长江,微生物发酵农作物秸秆生产蛋白饲料的研究与应用,微生物学通报,2000.27(4) 293页
[50]向阳编著,激光微生物学,长沙 湖南科学技术出版社,1995:31,224
[51]安玉君,激光对动物细胞的生物学效应,国外激光,1991 7,4
[52]陈远芳等主编,中国激光遗传育种与激光生物学,湖南师范大学出版社,1992:1
[53]杜珠还,张泉渡,紫外线和氯化锂对棒状杆菌原生质体的诱变作用,生物工程学报,1985,1(4):59~62
[54]郭爱莲、郭廷巍,He-Ne激光诱变黑曲霉Sx的原生质体 光子学报,1999 Vol.28,No.7
[55]李用芳,李学梅,面包酵母原生质体的制备、再生及紫外线诱变的初步研究,生物技术,2000 Vol.10,No.2
[56]胡能书等,同工酶技术及其应用,长沙 湖南科学技术出版社,1985.
[57]Fregreslev S (1969) A Comparative study of electrophoretic patterns of soluble Proteins from some Candida Species. Dansk Tidsskv Farm 43:69-74
[58]Yamazaki M, Komagata K (1981) Taxonomic significance of electrophoretic comparison of enzymes in the genera Rhodotorula and Rhodosporidium. Int J Syst Bacterial 31(3):361~381
[59]卢乡怀,李明霞,裂殖酵母属的酶及可溶性蛋白质聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳,真菌学报,1991,9;(1):50~55
[60]韦一能,张晓云,酵母两种形态菌体的MDH和DOD同工酶的电泳分析,广西师范大学学报自然科学版,1998 Vol 16,NO 6,80-84
[61]魏艳敏,周与良,红酵母属同工酶酶谱分析及其分类研究,菌物系统,1998 17(1) 63-67
[62]Mandels. M. Cellulase Production by a new mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei McG 77 [J] Biotech Bioeng Symp 1978(8): 89~101
[63]吉增福,景耀先,瘤胃纤维分解细菌促生长物质的探讨,中国畜牧杂志,1997 Vol.33 No.3 42~43
[64]叶姜瑜,一种纤维素分解菌鉴别培养基 微生物学通报,1997,24(4):251~252
[65]宋桂经、王冬、高培基,芽孢杆菌074碱性纤维素酶的研究Ⅰ菌种的分析、筛选及发酵条件,微生物学报35(1) 38~44 1995
[66]吴绍熙、曹正仁,六种假丝酵母在不同培养基中形成厚膜孢子的情况观察,微生物学通报,1979 Vol.6,No.1 22~24
[67]J.Szczodrak 筛选同时糖化和发酵纤维素的耐热酵母菌株,应用微生物,1989年2期,范宗理摘译自《Biotechnology and Bioengneering》1988,31 No.4,300~303
[68]谭蓓英、王花,毕氏酵母营养缺陷株P315株原生质体形成和再生的研究,真菌学报1983.Vol.2.No.3 192~196
[69]Nakasa T, Suzuki M Taxonomic studies on Debaromyces hansenii (ZDRF) Lodder et Kreger van Rij and related species Ⅰ. Chemotaxonomic investigations. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1985 31:49~69
[70]李多伟、尉亚辉、王义潮等,《生物技术实验与仪器操作指南》,西北大学出版社,1996.12~14
[71]王玉万、王云,培养温度和侧耳实体形成对胞外纤维素分解酶活性的影响,微生物学通报,1991,18(1):9~11
[72]中山大学生物系生化微生物学教研室编《生物化学技术导论》1979,61~63
[73]宁开桂编,实用饲料分析手册,中国农业出版社,北京1993 97页
[74]于淑娟、杨玉岭,快速定氮法的探讨,中国调味品1992(11):24~25
[75]北京大学生物系生物化学教研室,生物化学实验指导,北京:人民教育出版社,1982
[76]蔡金科、刘玉方、张博润 酵母菌杂交育种,微生物学报 25(2):124-128,1985
[77]Ronald M Teather and Peter J Wood. Use of Congo red Polysacaride interaction in emumeration and Characterization of Cellulilytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbio 1982, 38: 148-158.
[78]杨琳,西北大学硕士论文,玉米秸秆中木质素降解的研究,28页
[79]Anderson FB: Protoplast formation and yeast cell-wall structure. The action of enzyme of snail, helix pomatia. Biochem J. 1966, 99:682-687
[80]周东坡等,微生物原生质体融合,哈尔滨 黑龙江科技出版社 1990:79
[81]周德庆,《微生物学实验手册》,上海科技出版社,1986年1版416页