城市空间形态演变的多尺度研究
|
摘要
城市形态是城市化空间过程的重要表现,不同尺度水平上的城市空间扩展、功能空间演替、群组空间融合必然导致城市空间形态的剧烈演变,对快速城市化背景下城市空间形态演变进行研究,具有重要的现实意义。本文以江苏省淮安市为例,基于GIS空间分析技术,从多尺度的视角,选择大中小三个空间尺度和不同的时间尺度,集成多种定量分析方法,分析城市空间形态演变的格局、过程与机制,提出城市空间形态优化发展的对策建议。
论文共分八章。第一章为绪论。说明论文的选题背景、研究意义、研究目的、研究内容、思路框架、研究方法、研究区域与资料来源、论文的可能创新与特色,对城市空间、城市形态以及城市空间形态等相关概念进行辨析界定。第二章为国内外相关研究进展与理论基础。回顾国内外相关研究进展并进行评述与展望,在此基础上梳理相关理论,构筑城市空间形态演变研究的理论基础。第三章为城市空间形态演变的尺度特征与分析方法。在分析城市空间形态尺度问题的源起、城市空间形态演变的尺度特征以及尺度关联的基础上,构建城市空间形态演变多尺度研究框架,确定城市空间形态演变多尺度研究的分析方法。第四章为城市空间扩展与外部形态演变。通过分析城市空间扩展时空差异,计算紧凑度指数、分形维数、形态指数等,分析城市外部形态的变化特征,总结城市空间扩展模式,揭示城市空间扩展与外部形态演变的机制。第五章为城市用地变化与功能空间演替。分析城市功能用地的结构变化与相互转换,分析工业、居住与公共设施等主要功能空间演替的格局特征,提炼空间结构演变的模型,探讨城市功能空间演替的土地市场机制。第六章为城市组合发展与群组空间演变。在定性分析淮安城市组合发展与演变特征的基础上,基于可达性技术,分析群组空间主要功能用地可达性时间分布规律,探讨行政区划调整、城市道路交通和城市新产业空间成长对群组空间形态演变的作用机理。第七章为城市空间形态演变的特征综合与优化调控。在综合集成大中小三个尺度水平上城市空间形态演变特征的基础上,梳理城市空间形态的演变轨迹,比较不同尺度空间形态演变的相互关系,提炼城市空间形态演变的特征图谱。探讨理想城市空间形态的目标和原则,结合淮安城市空间发展的实际,分析城市空间形态演变趋势和优化重点,提出空间形态优化的策略建议。第八章为结论与展望。在总结论文研究结论的基础上,指出论文可能的创新点及存在问题,展望今后进一步研究的努力方向。
通过研究,本文得到的结论为：(1)在中尺度水平上,城市空间扩展的时间变化与空间分异特征明显,城市空间扩展与外部形态演变有较强关联性,圈层式扩展与扇翼式扩展的交替作用导致城市外部轮廓由星状向块状形态演变,城市空间扩展受到诸多因素的综合作用,并与道路建设、房地产开发、GDP、人均GDP以及中等以上教育发展水平线性相关；(2)在小尺度水平上,城市功能用地结构变化剧烈,并导致城市功能空间的演替,城市核心区居住和商业金融服务业功能突出,城市边缘区工业用地与大型公共设施用地相对集中,中间地带用地相对均衡,土地市场机制对功能用地变化与空间演替具有驱动作用；(3)在大尺度水平上,城市组合发展导致城市群组空间趋于融合,两个城区轴向粘连发展,群组空间功能用地可达性时间分布特征明显,行政区划、道路交通与新产业空间驱动群组空间演变；(4)不同尺度水平上的城市空间扩展、功能空间演替与群组空间融合,通过城市土地利用变化发生关联,相互联系、相互影响、相互作用,深刻地影响着城市空间形态的演变；(5)不同尺度的城市空间形态演变的主导机制差异明显,小尺度的功能空间演替主要受到市场力量的作用,大尺度的群组空间演变更多地受到来自政府力量以及一些大的结构性因素的作用,中尺度城市空间扩展则受到多种因素的综合作用；(6)“三淮一体”发展是淮安城市空间形态演变的基础,城市空间形态演变经历了城镇分散发展、主城区形成与群组型城市形成三个阶段。城市空间形态优化调控要基于理想城市形态理念,突出城市空间的历史传承与协同整合,发挥经济推动、规划协调、交通引导、土地调控、生态约束和制度保障的综合作用。
论文可能的创新点主要为以下方面：基于对城市地域结构尺度层次性和城市空间形态演变尺度依赖性的理解,尝试从尺度视角构建了城市空间形态演变研究的分析框架,拓宽了城市空间演变研究的视角；进一步集成了基于GIS平台的城市空间形态演变研究的方法与技术,尝试将HP滤波法、可达性技术、缓冲区分析等引入到城市空间形态演变的分析过程并验证了方法的有效性。
Urban morphology is an important performance in the spatial process of urbanization. The urban spatial process of different scales including urban expansion, functional space succession and group spatial integration, will lead to the dramatic evolution of urban spatial morphology inevitably. Therefore, it is of important practical significance to study the evolution of urban spatial morphology in the context of rapid urbanization. Based on GIS spatial analysis techniques and a variety of quantitative analysis method, the dissertation takes Huai'an City of Jiangsu Province as an example, analyzes the pattern of urban spatial morphology evolution, the process and mechanism by selecting three different spatial scales and different time scales, and put forward the countermeasures of optimizing the development of urban spatial morphology.
The dissertation is composed of eight chapters. ChapterⅠis about the introduction, including the background, research significance, purpose, content, frameworks, research methods, study area & data sources, innovation, and it also discriminates and defines the concept of urban space, urban morphology and urban spatial morphology. ChapterⅡis about literature review and theoretical analysis. Based on the literature review home and abroad, the dissertation reviews and prospects the evolution of urban spatial morphology. On the basis of the theoretical analysis, the theoretical foundation has been constracted for the study of evolution of urban spatial morphology. ChapterⅢis about the scale features and research methods of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. Based on the analysis of the origin of urban spatial morphology and scale features of urban spatial evolution, multi-scale framework of the evolution of urban spatial morphology are constructed, and multi-scale analysis method of urban spatial evolution are employed. ChapterⅣis about urban expansion and morphological evolution. On the basis of the analysis of the spatial and temporal differences in urban expansion, by calculating the compact, fractal dimension and morphology index, the dissertation analyzes the characteristics of urban spatial morphology, summarizes the mode of urban expansion and elaborates the mechanism of urban spatial expansion and external morphology evolution. ChapterⅤis about the change of urban land use and the succession of functional space. Based on the analysis of structural change in land use, the dissertation analyzes the features of succession of functional space such as the industrial, residential and public facilities, summarizes the model of spatial structure evolution, discusses land market mechanism of urban spatial function succession. ChapterⅥis about the combinative development and group spatial evolution. Based on qualitative analysis of the combinative development and evolution characteristics of Huai'an city, the dissertation analyzes time distribution discipline of the accessibility of main function land use, and studies the mechanism effect of the adjustment of administrative divisions, road traffic and new industrial space growth on of urban morphological evolution according to the real status of Huai'an city. ChapterⅦis about the characteristics and optimized control of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. Based on the evolution characteristics of urban spatial morphology from three perspectives of large, medium and small scale, analyzes the evolution of urban spatial morphology, the dissertation summarizes the characteristic spectrum of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. And it also discusses the objectives and principles of ideal spatial morphology, analyzes the evolution trends of urban spatial morphology and optimization focus. According to the development of Huai'an city, policy recommendations are proposed. ChapterⅧis the conclusion and outlook. Based on the conclusions of the research, the dissertation points out the main innovation and problems, prospects the future direction for further research.
According to the research mentioned above, it comes to the conclusion that:(ⅰ) In terms of medium scale, the characteristics of the time change and spatial differentiation of urban expansion is very clear. There is a strong correlation between urban spatial expansion and external morphological evolution. It is the alternation between Circle-type expansion and fan-wing extension that lead to the external outline evolutes from the star shape to the block shape. Urban expansion had been influenced by a variety of factors, and it has a linear correlation with road construction, real estate development, GDP, GDP per capita and the high education level; (ⅱ) In terms of small scale, land use structure of urban functions changes dramatically, which lead to the succession of the city function space. The function of urban core residence and commercial & financial services is highlighted. Industrial land in urban fringe and the land use of large-scale public facilities are in relative concentration, and there is a relatively balanced land use in middle zone. Land market mechanisms have driven the land use change and spatial succession; (ⅲ) In terms of large scale, combination development of urban space lead to urban group tends to be merged, and there is adhesion development in two urban axes. The characteristics of time distribution of accessibility of function land use is distinctive, and it is the administrative divisions, road traffic and the new industrial space that drive spatial evolution of city group; (ⅳ) There are strong interacting and interrelation, through urban land use change, between the evolution process of different scales of urban space, including urban expansion, functional space succession and group spatial integration. The mutual contact and mutual influence, interaction, lead to a profound impact on the evolution of urban spatial morphology; (ⅴ)There are significant differences between the dominant mechanism of different scales of urban spatial morphology evolution. Evolution of small-scale function space is driven mainly by market forces, large-scale spatial evolution of the urban group are mainly forced by the government and some big role in structural factors, and the scale of urban expansion is limited by the combined effect of many factors; (ⅵ) The development of trinity of Huai'an is the basis for the evolution of Huai'an urban space, and the evolution of urban spatial morphology experiences such three different stages as urban decentralization, the downtown formation and city group formation. Optimal control of urban spatial morphology is based on the concept of ideal urban morphology, highlighting the historical heritage of urban space and spatial integration, playing the integrated role of economic promotion, planning and coordination, traffic guidance, land control, protection of ecological constraints and system security.
The innovation of the dissertation is in the following:Firstly, based on the understanding of hierarchical structure of urban spatial scale and the dependence of evolution characteristics of urban spatial morphology, analysis framework of the evolution of urban spatial morphology is constructed from the perspective of the scale. Secondly, based on GIS platform that integrated spatial analysis techniques and methods of morphological evolution, such as HP filter, buffer analysis and accessibility techniques, are employed to analyze the evolution of urban spatial morphology.
论文共分八章。第一章为绪论。说明论文的选题背景、研究意义、研究目的、研究内容、思路框架、研究方法、研究区域与资料来源、论文的可能创新与特色,对城市空间、城市形态以及城市空间形态等相关概念进行辨析界定。第二章为国内外相关研究进展与理论基础。回顾国内外相关研究进展并进行评述与展望,在此基础上梳理相关理论,构筑城市空间形态演变研究的理论基础。第三章为城市空间形态演变的尺度特征与分析方法。在分析城市空间形态尺度问题的源起、城市空间形态演变的尺度特征以及尺度关联的基础上,构建城市空间形态演变多尺度研究框架,确定城市空间形态演变多尺度研究的分析方法。第四章为城市空间扩展与外部形态演变。通过分析城市空间扩展时空差异,计算紧凑度指数、分形维数、形态指数等,分析城市外部形态的变化特征,总结城市空间扩展模式,揭示城市空间扩展与外部形态演变的机制。第五章为城市用地变化与功能空间演替。分析城市功能用地的结构变化与相互转换,分析工业、居住与公共设施等主要功能空间演替的格局特征,提炼空间结构演变的模型,探讨城市功能空间演替的土地市场机制。第六章为城市组合发展与群组空间演变。在定性分析淮安城市组合发展与演变特征的基础上,基于可达性技术,分析群组空间主要功能用地可达性时间分布规律,探讨行政区划调整、城市道路交通和城市新产业空间成长对群组空间形态演变的作用机理。第七章为城市空间形态演变的特征综合与优化调控。在综合集成大中小三个尺度水平上城市空间形态演变特征的基础上,梳理城市空间形态的演变轨迹,比较不同尺度空间形态演变的相互关系,提炼城市空间形态演变的特征图谱。探讨理想城市空间形态的目标和原则,结合淮安城市空间发展的实际,分析城市空间形态演变趋势和优化重点,提出空间形态优化的策略建议。第八章为结论与展望。在总结论文研究结论的基础上,指出论文可能的创新点及存在问题,展望今后进一步研究的努力方向。
通过研究,本文得到的结论为：(1)在中尺度水平上,城市空间扩展的时间变化与空间分异特征明显,城市空间扩展与外部形态演变有较强关联性,圈层式扩展与扇翼式扩展的交替作用导致城市外部轮廓由星状向块状形态演变,城市空间扩展受到诸多因素的综合作用,并与道路建设、房地产开发、GDP、人均GDP以及中等以上教育发展水平线性相关；(2)在小尺度水平上,城市功能用地结构变化剧烈,并导致城市功能空间的演替,城市核心区居住和商业金融服务业功能突出,城市边缘区工业用地与大型公共设施用地相对集中,中间地带用地相对均衡,土地市场机制对功能用地变化与空间演替具有驱动作用；(3)在大尺度水平上,城市组合发展导致城市群组空间趋于融合,两个城区轴向粘连发展,群组空间功能用地可达性时间分布特征明显,行政区划、道路交通与新产业空间驱动群组空间演变；(4)不同尺度水平上的城市空间扩展、功能空间演替与群组空间融合,通过城市土地利用变化发生关联,相互联系、相互影响、相互作用,深刻地影响着城市空间形态的演变；(5)不同尺度的城市空间形态演变的主导机制差异明显,小尺度的功能空间演替主要受到市场力量的作用,大尺度的群组空间演变更多地受到来自政府力量以及一些大的结构性因素的作用,中尺度城市空间扩展则受到多种因素的综合作用；(6)“三淮一体”发展是淮安城市空间形态演变的基础,城市空间形态演变经历了城镇分散发展、主城区形成与群组型城市形成三个阶段。城市空间形态优化调控要基于理想城市形态理念,突出城市空间的历史传承与协同整合,发挥经济推动、规划协调、交通引导、土地调控、生态约束和制度保障的综合作用。
论文可能的创新点主要为以下方面：基于对城市地域结构尺度层次性和城市空间形态演变尺度依赖性的理解,尝试从尺度视角构建了城市空间形态演变研究的分析框架,拓宽了城市空间演变研究的视角；进一步集成了基于GIS平台的城市空间形态演变研究的方法与技术,尝试将HP滤波法、可达性技术、缓冲区分析等引入到城市空间形态演变的分析过程并验证了方法的有效性。
Urban morphology is an important performance in the spatial process of urbanization. The urban spatial process of different scales including urban expansion, functional space succession and group spatial integration, will lead to the dramatic evolution of urban spatial morphology inevitably. Therefore, it is of important practical significance to study the evolution of urban spatial morphology in the context of rapid urbanization. Based on GIS spatial analysis techniques and a variety of quantitative analysis method, the dissertation takes Huai'an City of Jiangsu Province as an example, analyzes the pattern of urban spatial morphology evolution, the process and mechanism by selecting three different spatial scales and different time scales, and put forward the countermeasures of optimizing the development of urban spatial morphology.
The dissertation is composed of eight chapters. ChapterⅠis about the introduction, including the background, research significance, purpose, content, frameworks, research methods, study area & data sources, innovation, and it also discriminates and defines the concept of urban space, urban morphology and urban spatial morphology. ChapterⅡis about literature review and theoretical analysis. Based on the literature review home and abroad, the dissertation reviews and prospects the evolution of urban spatial morphology. On the basis of the theoretical analysis, the theoretical foundation has been constracted for the study of evolution of urban spatial morphology. ChapterⅢis about the scale features and research methods of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. Based on the analysis of the origin of urban spatial morphology and scale features of urban spatial evolution, multi-scale framework of the evolution of urban spatial morphology are constructed, and multi-scale analysis method of urban spatial evolution are employed. ChapterⅣis about urban expansion and morphological evolution. On the basis of the analysis of the spatial and temporal differences in urban expansion, by calculating the compact, fractal dimension and morphology index, the dissertation analyzes the characteristics of urban spatial morphology, summarizes the mode of urban expansion and elaborates the mechanism of urban spatial expansion and external morphology evolution. ChapterⅤis about the change of urban land use and the succession of functional space. Based on the analysis of structural change in land use, the dissertation analyzes the features of succession of functional space such as the industrial, residential and public facilities, summarizes the model of spatial structure evolution, discusses land market mechanism of urban spatial function succession. ChapterⅥis about the combinative development and group spatial evolution. Based on qualitative analysis of the combinative development and evolution characteristics of Huai'an city, the dissertation analyzes time distribution discipline of the accessibility of main function land use, and studies the mechanism effect of the adjustment of administrative divisions, road traffic and new industrial space growth on of urban morphological evolution according to the real status of Huai'an city. ChapterⅦis about the characteristics and optimized control of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. Based on the evolution characteristics of urban spatial morphology from three perspectives of large, medium and small scale, analyzes the evolution of urban spatial morphology, the dissertation summarizes the characteristic spectrum of the evolution of urban spatial morphology. And it also discusses the objectives and principles of ideal spatial morphology, analyzes the evolution trends of urban spatial morphology and optimization focus. According to the development of Huai'an city, policy recommendations are proposed. ChapterⅧis the conclusion and outlook. Based on the conclusions of the research, the dissertation points out the main innovation and problems, prospects the future direction for further research.
According to the research mentioned above, it comes to the conclusion that:(ⅰ) In terms of medium scale, the characteristics of the time change and spatial differentiation of urban expansion is very clear. There is a strong correlation between urban spatial expansion and external morphological evolution. It is the alternation between Circle-type expansion and fan-wing extension that lead to the external outline evolutes from the star shape to the block shape. Urban expansion had been influenced by a variety of factors, and it has a linear correlation with road construction, real estate development, GDP, GDP per capita and the high education level; (ⅱ) In terms of small scale, land use structure of urban functions changes dramatically, which lead to the succession of the city function space. The function of urban core residence and commercial & financial services is highlighted. Industrial land in urban fringe and the land use of large-scale public facilities are in relative concentration, and there is a relatively balanced land use in middle zone. Land market mechanisms have driven the land use change and spatial succession; (ⅲ) In terms of large scale, combination development of urban space lead to urban group tends to be merged, and there is adhesion development in two urban axes. The characteristics of time distribution of accessibility of function land use is distinctive, and it is the administrative divisions, road traffic and the new industrial space that drive spatial evolution of city group; (ⅳ) There are strong interacting and interrelation, through urban land use change, between the evolution process of different scales of urban space, including urban expansion, functional space succession and group spatial integration. The mutual contact and mutual influence, interaction, lead to a profound impact on the evolution of urban spatial morphology; (ⅴ)There are significant differences between the dominant mechanism of different scales of urban spatial morphology evolution. Evolution of small-scale function space is driven mainly by market forces, large-scale spatial evolution of the urban group are mainly forced by the government and some big role in structural factors, and the scale of urban expansion is limited by the combined effect of many factors; (ⅵ) The development of trinity of Huai'an is the basis for the evolution of Huai'an urban space, and the evolution of urban spatial morphology experiences such three different stages as urban decentralization, the downtown formation and city group formation. Optimal control of urban spatial morphology is based on the concept of ideal urban morphology, highlighting the historical heritage of urban space and spatial integration, playing the integrated role of economic promotion, planning and coordination, traffic guidance, land control, protection of ecological constraints and system security.
The innovation of the dissertation is in the following:Firstly, based on the understanding of hierarchical structure of urban spatial scale and the dependence of evolution characteristics of urban spatial morphology, analysis framework of the evolution of urban spatial morphology is constructed from the perspective of the scale. Secondly, based on GIS platform that integrated spatial analysis techniques and methods of morphological evolution, such as HP filter, buffer analysis and accessibility techniques, are employed to analyze the evolution of urban spatial morphology.
引文
[1]Almo Farina, Principles and methods in landscape ecology[M]. Chapman & Hall, 1998.35-49.
[2]Alonso, William. Location and land use[M].Cambridge:Harvard University press, 1965.
[3]Batty M Longley P A. fractal cities:Geometry of form and function[M].London: Academic Press,1994.
[4]Batty M, Longley P A. Fractal-based description of urban form[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1987,14:123-134.
[5]Batty M, Longley P A. The fractal cimulation of urban structure[J].Environment and Planning A,1986,9.
[6]Batty M, Longley P A. The morphology of urban land use[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1988,15:461-488.
[7]Batty M. The fractal nature of geography[J].Geographical Journal,1992,5.
[8]Beinat E, Nukamp P. Land use sustainable development in Serie Research Memorandum[M]. Amsterdam:Vrije Universiteit,1997.135-140.
[9]Berry J L. Internal structure of the city. In:Larry S Bourne, eds. Internal structure of the city[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1971.
[10]Bertaud Alain, Stephen Malpezzi. The spatial distribution of population in 35 world cities:The role of markets, planning and topography[J].Center for Urban Land Economics Research,1999.
[11]BLOCHL G, SIVAPALAN M. Scale issues in hydrological modeling:A review[J].Hydrol process,1995,9:251-290.
[12]Bourne L S. Internal structure of the city:Reading on urban form, growth and policy[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1982.
[13]Bowen J. Airline hubs in Southeast Asia national economic development and modal accessibility[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2000,8:25-41.
[14]Boyce R R, Clark W A V. The concept of shape in geography[J]. The Geographical Review,1964,54:561-572.
[15]Burgess, E.W. Bogue, D.J. Urban Sociology[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1965.
[16]Buyantuyev A, Wu J. Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern Analysis[J]. Landscape Ecology,2007,22 (1):7-13.
[17]CAI Bofeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Bin.Spatial-temporal changes of Tianjin urban spatial morphology from 1978 to 2004[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2007(4):500-503.
[18]Camagni R, Gibelli M C, Rigamonti P. Urban mobility and urban form:the social and environment costs of different patterns of urban expansion[J]. Ecological Ecolomics, 2002,40:199-216.
[19]Castells M. The urban question[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press,1977.
[20]Charles Dietzel, Keith C Clarke. Toward optional calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model[J]. Transactions in GIS,2007, 11(1):29-45.
[21]Clarke K C, Gaydos LJ, Hoppen S. A self modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in SanFransico Bay Area[J]. Environment and Planning,1997, 24:247-261.
[22]Corry R C, Lafortezza R. Sensitivity of landscape measurements to changing grain size for fine scale design and managemen[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2007,3(1):47-53.
[23]David Harvey. Social justice and the city[M]. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1973.
[24]David Peterson and V. Thomas Parker, Ecological scale:Theory and application[M]. Columbia University Press,1998.5-34.
[25]Deal, B, C Farello, etal. A dynamic model of the spatial spread of an infectious disease:The case of fox rabiesin illinois[J]. Environment Modeling and Assessment, 2005,5:47-62.
[26]Del court HR, Del court PA. Quaternary landscape ecology:relevant scales in space and time[J]. Landscape Ecol,1998,(2):23-44.
[27]Dupuy Gabriel, Stransky Vaclav. Cites and highway net work in Europe[M]. Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (2):107-121.
[28]Edward N Lorenz. The essence of chaos[M]. The University of Washington Pr,1996.
[29]Evans P. Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainabiliry[M]. California:Univesity of California Press Ltd,2002.
[30]Finco A, Nijkamp P. Sustainable land use:methodology and application[A].Stilwell J, Scholten H, Kluwer S. Future land use in Europe Dordrecht[C].2000.
[31]Foley D L. An approach to metropolitan spatial structure. Explorations into the sustainable urban structure[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsy Press,1998.
[32]Forman R T T.Land Mosaics:The ecology of landscape and regions[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,1995.
[33]Frank Houser P. Aspects fractals des structures urbaines[J]. L'Espace Geographique, 1990.
[34]Frank Houser P. La Fractilite des structures urbaines[M]. Paris:Economica,1994.
[35]Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M R et al. Wrestling sprawl to the ground:Defining and measuring an elusive concep[J]. Housing Policy Debate,2001,12(4):681-717.
[36]Geurs K, Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies review and research directions[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2004,12 (2):127-140.
[37]Gutierrez Javier, Gomez Gabriel. The impact of orbital motorway on intra-metropolitan accessibility:the case of Madrid's M-40[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1999,7(1):1-15.
[38]Gutierrez Javier, Gonzalez Rafael, Gomez Gabriel. The European high-speed train net work:Predicted effects on accessibility patterns[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996,4 (4):227-238.
[39]Gutierrez Javier,Urbano Paloma.Accessibility in the European Union:the impact of the transeuropean road net work[J] Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (1): 15-25.
[40]Gutierrez Javier. Location economic potential and daily accessibility:An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Bard el ona-French border[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001,9(4):229-242.
[41]H.Haken. An Introduction:Non-equilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology[J]. Spring-Verlag, Ⅲ,1983:191.
[42]Hall, T. How urban morphology can improve development plans[J].Urban Morphology,2000,4(1).
[43]Hanson J, Hiller B.The shape and role of the city of London[A]. In London:A vision for the city symposium[C].1992.
[44]Harris C, Ullman E. The nature of city[J]. Annals of The American Academy of Political Science,1945,242:7-17.
[45]Harvey D. Explanation in geography[M]. London:Edward Arnold Ltd,1969: 481-486.
[46]Harvey, David. The urban process under capitalism[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1978,2:101-131.
[47]Hec, Weiy, Xiex. Globalization, institutional change and industrial location: Economic transition and industrial concentration in China[J]. Regional Studies,2008, 42 (7):923-945.
[48]Herod A. Scale:the local and global. In Holloway S L, Rice S P, Valentin G, eds. Key Concepts in Geography[M].London:Sage Publications Ltd,2003.209-228.
[49]Herod, A. What is scale and how do we think about it[A]. In:Scale[C]. Routledge. 2010.
[50]Hiller B, Hnason J.The social logic of space[M].Cambridge, Press,1984.
[51]Hiller B, The hidden geometry of deformed grids:or why space syntax wokrs, when it looked as though it shouldn't[J].Environment and planning B:planning& Design, 1999,26(2):169-191.
[52]Hoyt, H. The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities[M]. Washington, DC:Federal Housing Administration,1939.
[53]Kersey G.. Teaching urban geography:The burgess model[J]. New Zealand Journal of Geography,1983,12:10-13.
[54]Kevin Lynch. Good City Form[M]. MA:M.I.T Press, Cambridge,1981.
[55]Kevin Lyneh.The Image of the City[M]. MA:M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,1960.
[56]Knox P, Pinch S. Urban social geography:An introduction(Fourth edition) [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall,2000.
[57]Lam N, Quattrochi D A. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in mapping sciences[J]. Prof. Geogr.,1992,44:88-987.
[58]Lam NS, De Cola. Fractals in geography[M]. New Jersey:PTR Prentice- Hall, Inc, 1993.
[59]Larkham, PeterJ.Urban morphology and typology in the united kingdom. In:In typological proeess and design theory. attilio petruccioli (eds) [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts:Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture,1998.159-177.
[60]Leorey O M, Nariida C S. A framework for linking urban form and air quality[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,1999,14(6):541-548.
[61]LI Jiang, DUAN Jie. Multi-scale representation of urban spatial morphology based on GIS and spatial syntax[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Nat. Sci.), 2004,38(3):383-387.
[62]Li Siming, Shum Yiman. Impacts of the national truck highway system on accessibility in China[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001,9(1):39-48.
[63]Lindeberg tony. Scale-space theory:A basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales[J]. Journal of applied statistics,1994,21:223-270.
[64]Linneker B, Spence N. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development:The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (2):77-92.
[65]Lo C P. Changes of the shapes of Chinese cities[J].Professional Geographer,1980, 32(2):173-183.
[66]M.Eigen, P.Schuster. The hypercycle:A principle of natural Self-organization[M]. springer verlag. Berlin,1979:89.
[67]Maclaren D. Urban sustainabiliry reporting[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1996,62 (2):185-202.
[68]Marston, S. A. The social construction of scale[J]. Progress in Human Geography 24(2)219-242.
[69]McGarigal, K., SA Cushman, MC Neel, and E Ene.2002. FRAGSTATS:Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. computer software program produced by the authors at the university of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site:http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
[70]McMaster, R.B. Sheppard, E. Introduction:scale and geographic inquiry[A]. In Sheppard, E. S., and R. B. McMaster (Eds). Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society, and Method[C]. Blackwell,2004,1-22.
[71]Michael Batty & Paul Longley. Fractal cities:Geometry of form and function[M].Academic Press, San Diego, CA and London,1994.
[72]Nguyen Xuan Thinh, Gunter Arlt, Bernd Heber etal. Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view to sustainable development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2002,22:475-492.
[73]Nicolis G. Prigogine I. Self-organization in Nonequilibrium Systems[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1997.131-135.
[74]Pacione M.Model of urban land use structure in cities of the development world[J]. Geography,2001,86:97-119.
[75]Pacione M.The internal structure of cities in The Third World[J]. Geography,2001, 86:189-209.
[76]Paul Knox, Steven Pinch. Urban social geography:An introduction[M]. Pearson Education Limited,2000.
[77]Portugeli J. Self-organization and the city[M]. Berlin:Springer.Uerlag,2000.
[78]Rex, J.& Moore. Race, Community and conflict[J]. Oxford University Press,1967.
[79]Roland Schulze. Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agro hydrological responses. Agriculture[J]. Ecosystems and Environment,2001,82:185-212.
[80]Salzano E. Seven aims for the livable city. In:Lennard S H, Ungern-Sternberg Svon, Lennard H L. Making cities livable. International making cities livable conferences[M]. carmel:Gondolier Press,1997.
[81]Saunders, Peter. Space, the city and urban sociology[A]. in D.Gregory and J.Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structures[C]. New York:St. Martin's Press,1985.
[82]Sayre, N. F. Ecological and geographical scale:parallels and potential for integration[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2005,29 (3):276-290.
[83]Scott, A. Metropolis:From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley[M]. CA: University of California Press,1998.
[84]Sheppard E.S. McMaster, R.B. Scale and geographic inquiry:contrasts, intersections, and boundaries [A]. In Sheppard, E. S., and R. B. McMaster (Eds). Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society, and Method[C]. Blackwell,2004,256-267.
[85]Simmons J W. Descriptive models for urban land use[A]. In Larry Sbourne, eds. Internal structure of the city[C]. New York:Oxford University Press,1971.
[86]Spiro Kostof. The City Assembled:The elements form through history[M]. Thames & Hudson, London.1992.
[87]Sullivan A O.Urban economics[M]. NY:McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc,2000.
[88]Sun Sheng Han. Shanghai between state and market in urban transformation[J]. Urban Studies,2000,37(11):2091-2112.
[89]Torrens P M. Simulating Sprawl[J]. Annals of the association of American Geographers,2006,96(2):248-275.
[90]Torrens, P M.Sprawl Sim:Modeling sprawling urban growth using automata-based models[A]. In agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change[C]. Dparker, T Berger, S Manson (EdS.). Belgium, LUCC International Projcet Office,2003.
[91]Tsai, Y. H.. Quantifying Urban Form:Compactness versus 'sprawl'[J]. Urban Studies. 2005,42(1):141-161.
[92]Ulam, S. Numbers and Universes[M]. Cambridge:IT Press,1974.
[93]Von Neumann, J. Theory of self-reproducing automataed[M]. Urbana:University of Illinois Press,1966.
[94]Waddell P. Urbansim:Modeling urban development for land use, Transportation and environmental planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2002,68(3): 297-314.
[95]Webber M M. The urban place and the Nonplare Urban realm[A]. In:Webber M M. Explorations into sustainable urban[C]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,1998.
[96]Wei YH. Decentralization, mercerization, and globalization:the triple processes under lying regional development in China[J]. Asian Geographer,2001,20(1-2):7-23.
[97]Wei YH. Regional development in China:States, globalization, an dine quality[M]. London:Rutledge,2000.
[98]White R W. Cellular automata and fractal urban form:A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns[J]. Environment and Planning,1993, 25:1175-1189.
[99]White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling[J]. Environment and Planning,1997,24:235-246.
[100]Wilkins H. The need for subjectivity in EIA:discourse as a tool for sustainable development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003,401-414.
[101]William Alonso:Location and land use toward a general theory of land rent[M]. East-West Certer Press Honolulu,1966:120-126.
[102]Wolfgang Widgeon. Catastrophe, Theoretic, Semantics:An elaboration and application of rene Thom's theory[M]. Benjamins Pub Co,1982:4.
[103]Wu F, Webster C J.Simulation of land use development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation[J]. Environment and Planning,1998.
[104]Wu F. An experiment on the generie polyeen trieity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city[J]. Environment and Planning,1998,25:731-752.
[105]Wu F. Simland:a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-driven transition rules[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information science,1998,12(1):63-52.
[106]Wu, F. and Yeh, A.GO. Urban spatial structure in atransitional economy:The case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1999, (65): 377-393.
[107]Zhu, J. Loeal Growth coalition:the context and implications of China's gradualist urban land reforms[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1999 (23):534-548.
[108]白永平,尚正永,牛定炜.兰州市区土地利用变化及其驱动力研究[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2008,17(4)：81-84.
[109]白永平.区域工业化与城市化的水资源保障研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[110]蔡博峰.景观生态学中的尺度分析方法[J].遥感技术与应用,2002,17(1)：22-26.
[111]蔡运龙.贵州喀斯特高原土地系统变化空间尺度综合的一个研究方案[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(12)：1301-1307.
[112]蔡运龙.土地利用/土地覆被变化研究：寻求新的综合途径[J].地理研究,2001,20(6)：645-652.
[113]蔡运龙.自然地理学的创新视角[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2000,26(4)：576-582.
[114]曹小曙,阎小培.经济发达地区交通网络演化对通达性空间格局的影响：以广东东莞市为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(3)：305-312.
[115]柴彦威.中日城市结构比较研究[M].北京：北京大学出版社.1999.
[116]陈超萃.由层次网络方法解读城市形态[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(6)：72-75.
[117]陈龙乾,郭达志,胡召玲,等.城市扩展空间分异的多时相TM遥感研究[J]煤炭学报,2004,29(3)：308-312.
[118]陈爽,王进,詹志勇.生态景观与城市形态整合研究[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(5)：67-77.
[119]陈素蜜.遥感与地理信息系统相结合的城市空间扩展研究[J].地理空间信息,2005,3(1)：33-36.
[120]陈涛,李后强.城镇空间体系的科赫(Koch)模式——对中心地学说的一种可能的修正[J].经济地理,1994,14(3)：10-14.
[121]陈彦光,黄昆.城市形态的分形维数：理论探讨与实践教益[J].信阳师范学院学报,2002,15(1)：62-67.
[122]陈彦光,刘继生.城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述：从信息熵到分数维[J]地理研究,2001,20(2)：146-152.
[123]陈彦光,刘明华.城市土地利用结构熵值定律[J].人文地理,2001,16(4)：20-24.
[124]程连生,赵红英.北京城市边缘带探讨[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1)：128-133.
[125]储金龙.城市空间形态定量分析研究[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[126]崔功豪,武进.中国城市边缘区空间结构特征及其发展——以南京等城市为例[J].地理学报,1990,45(4)：399-411.
[127]丁成日,宋彦,Gerrit knap,等.城市规划与空间结构——城市可持续发展战略[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005a.
[128]丁成日,宋彦,黄艳.市场经济体系下城市总体规划的理论基础——规模和空间形态[J].城市规划,2004(11)：71-77.
[129]丁成日.土地政策改革时期的城市空间发展：北京的实证分析[A].中国杭州,2005b.中国城市理性增长与土地政策国际研讨会论文集[C].Part Ⅳ：1-25.
[130]段杰,李江.基于空间分析的城市交通网络结构特征研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2002,41(6)：105-108.
[131]段进.城市空间发展论[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1999.
[132]段进.城市形态研究与空间战略规划[J].城市规划,2003,27(2)：45-48.
[133]樊杰.优化中国经济地理格局的科学基础——对未来10年经济地理学学科建设问题的讨论[J].经济地理,2011,31(1)：1-6.
[134]冯健,周一星.北京都市区社会空间结构及其演化(1982-2000)[J].地理研究,2003,22(4)：465-483.
[135]冯健.杭州城市工业的空间扩散与郊区化研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002a(2)：42-47.
[136]冯健.杭州城市形态与土地利用结构的时空演化[J].地理学报,2003,58(3)：343-353.
[137]冯健.杭州市人口密度空间分布及其演化的模型研究[J].地理研究,2002b,21(5)：635-646.
[138]冯健.转型期中国城市内部空间重构[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[139]谷凯.城市形态的理论与方法：探索全面与理性的研究框架[J].城市规划,2001,25(2)：36-41.
[140]顾朝林,C.克斯特罗德.北京社会空间极化与空间分异研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(5)：385-393.
[141]顾朝林,陈耀光.中国大都市空间增长形态[J].城市规划,1994(6)45-50.
[142]顾朝林,于涛方,李玉鸣,等.中国城市化格局·过程·机制[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[143]顾朝林,甄峰,张京祥.集聚与扩散——城市空间结构新论[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2000.
[144]顾朝林.北京土地利用/覆盖变化机制研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4)：307-311.
[145]顾朝林.中国大城市边缘区研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1995.
[146]郭广东.市场力作用下城市空间形态演变的特征和机制研究——基于苏南地区的快速城市化进程[D].上海：同济大学,2007.
[147]郭鸿懋等.城市空间经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2002.
[148]何春阳,陈晋,史培军.大都市区城市扩展模型——以北京城市扩展模拟为例[J].地理学报,2003,58(2)：294-304.
[149]何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.北京地区城市化过程与机制研究[J].地理学报,2002,57(3)：363-371.
[150]何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.基于系统动力学模型和元胞自动机模型的土地利用情景模拟研究[J].中国科学,2005,135(5)：464-473.
[151]何流,崔功豪.南京城市空间扩展的特征与机制[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,(6)：56-60.
[152]胡俊.中国城市：模式与演进[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1995.
[153]金凤君,王娇娥.20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：293-302.
[154]金凤君.我国航空客流网络发展及其地域系统研究[J].地理研究,2001,20(1)：31-39.
[155]靳诚,陆玉麒,范黎丽.基于公路网络的长江三角洲旅游景点可达性格局研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2)：258-269.
[156]柯长青,欧阳晓莹.基于元胞自动机模型的城市空间变化模拟研究进展[J].南京大学学报,2006,42(1)：103-110.
[157]郐艳丽.东北地区城市空间形态研究[D].长春：东北师范大学,2004.
[158]黎夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的单元自动机CA及真实和优化的城市模拟[J].地理学报,2002,57(2)：159-166.
[159]黎夏,叶嘉安.约束性单元自动演化以模型及可持续城市发展形态的模拟[J]地理学报,1999,54(4)：259-298.
[160]李传武.转型期我国中部特大城市社会空间结构演化研究——以合肥为例[D]南京：南京师范大学,2010.
[161]李德华,城市规划原理(第三版)[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[162]李江,郭庆胜.基于GIS的城市交通网络复杂性定量描述[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,36(4)：534-537.
[163]李江,郭庆胜.基于句法分析的城市空间形态定量研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(2)：69-73.
[164]李江,郭庆胜.基于空间拓扑关系的城市交通网络层次结构推理[J].测绘信息与工程,2003,28(3)：29-30.
[165]李江.组团式城市外部空间形态分形特征研究[J].经济地理,2004,24(1)：62-66.
[166]李金林.中国大连近代(1898-1945)城市形态与建筑[J].城建档案,2004.
[167]李开宇.番禺行政区划调整与城市空间扩展研究[D].广州：中山大学,2007.
[168]李双成,蔡运龙.地理尺度转换若干问题的初步探讨[J].地理研究,2005,24(1)：11-17.
[169]李玮,徐建春.基于UGB的杭州城市空间结构研究[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(4)：106-111.
[170]李宪坡,白淑军.国外城市景观结构及其动态变化研究进展[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,26(2)：164-150.
[171]李小建.经济地理学研究中的尺度问题[J].经济地理,2005,25(4)：433-436.
[172]李星墨,段广德.基于GIS的呼和浩特城市扩展轴上的绿地景观格局梯度分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2010,31(2)：89-94.
[173]廖邦固,徐建刚,宣国富,等.1947-2000年上海中心城区居住空间结构演变[J].地理学报,2008,63(2)：195-206.
[174]林炳耀.城市空间形态的计量方法及其评价[J].城市规划汇刊,1998,(3)：42-45.
[175]刘纪远,王新生,庄大方,等.凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别[J]地理学报,2003,58(6)：885-892.
[176]刘妙龙,陈鹏.城市空间扩散增长模型与模拟[J].人文地理,2004,19(2)：6-11.
[177]刘妙龙,陈鹏.基于细胞自动机与多主体系统理论的城市模拟原型模型[J].地理科学,2006,26(3)：292-298.
[178]刘明华,陈彦光.城市土地利用形态及其空间结构的分维描述方法[J].信阳师范学院学报,2001,14(2)：209-213.
[179]刘青昊.城市形态的生态机制[J].城市规划,1995,19(2)：20-22.
[180]刘盛和,吴传钧,等.基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式[J].地理学报,2000,55(4)：407-416.
[181]刘曙华,沈玉芳.上海城市扩展模式及其动力机制[J].经济地理,2006,26(3)：487-491.
[182]刘小平,黎夏,艾彬等.基于多智能体的土地利用模拟与规划模型[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1101-1112.
[183]刘耀林,刘艳芳,明冬萍.基于灰色局势决策规则的元胞自动机城市扩展模型[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(1)：7-13.
[184]鲁学军,周成虎,张洪岩,等.地理空间的尺度——结构分析模式探讨[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(2)：107-114.
[185]陆大道,姚士谋等.中国区域发展报告——城镇化进程及空间扩张[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007.1-2.
[186]陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[187]陆玉麒,董平,王颖.双核结构模式与淮安区域发展[J].人文地理,2004,19(1)：32-36.
[188]陆玉麒.区域发展中的空间结构研究[M].南京：南京师范大学出版社,1998.83.
[189]吕传廷,曹小曙,徐旭.城市边缘区生态隔离机制探讨[J].人文地理,2004, 19(6)：36-38.
[190]吕卫国,陈雯.制造业企业区位选择与南京城市空间重构[J].地理学报,2009,64(2)：142-152.
[191]吕卫国.转型期南京市制造业郊区化及区位选择[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(2)：120-126.
[192]吕一河,傅伯杰.生态学中的尺度及尺度转换方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(12)：2096-2105.
[193]罗平,杜清运,雷元新,等.地理特征元胞自动机及城市土地利用演化研究[J]武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(6)：504-507.
[194]马晓东.基于ESDA的城市化空间格局与过程比较研究[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[195]毛蒋兴,闫小培,李志刚,等.深圳城市规划对土地利用的调控效能[J].地理学报,2008,63(8)：311-320.
[196]齐康.城市的形态(研究提纲初稿)[J].城市规划,1982,6(6)：16-25.
[197]尚正永,白永平.淮安市域经济空间结构优化的构想[J].生产力研究,2004,5：112-114.
[198]尚正永,张永凯.淮安市域城镇体系结构研究[J].淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版),2005,4(1)：70-75.
[199]施源,陈贞.关于行政区经济格局下地方政府规划行为的思考[J].城市规划学刊,2005(2)：45-49.
[200]石崧.城市空间结构演变的动力机制分析[J].城市规划汇刊,2004(1)：50-52.
[201]史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(2)：151-160.
[202]苏建中,魏清泉,郭恒亮.广州市的蔓延机理与调控[J].地理学报,2005,60(4)：626-636.
[203]苏毓德.台北市道路系统发展对城市外部形状演变的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),1997(3)：46.
[204]宛素春.城市空间形态解析[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[205]王琤琤,刘进.构想未来淮安城市空间结构布局[J].现代城市研究,2001,2.
[206]王春峰.用遥感和单元自动演化方法研究城市扩展问题[M].北京：测绘出版社,2001.
[207]王富臣.城市形态的维度：空间和时间[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002(2)：28-33.
[208]王桂新,陈萍.城市未来发展持续性评价决策支持系统构建和设计[J].中国人口 ·资源与环境,2006,16(5)：42-46.
[209]王建国.常熟城市形态历史特征及演变研究[J].东南大学学报,1994,24(6)：1-5.
[210]王建国.城市空间形态的分析方法[J].新建筑,1994(1)：29-34.
[211]王静文,毛其智,党安荣.北京城市的演变模型——基于句法的城市空间与功能模式演进的探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2008(3)：82-88.
[212]王娜,李雪红.元明清运河演变与城市发展互动关系研究——以江苏省淮安市为例[J].淮阴工学院学报,2009,18(4)：17-21.
[213]王新生,刘纪远,庄大方,等.中国特大城市空间形态变化的时间特征[J].地理学报,2005,60(3)：392-400.
[214]王新生,刘纪远.中国城市形状的时空变化[J].资源科学,2005,27(5)：20-25.
[215]王兴平.中国城市新产业空间——发展机制与空间组织[M].北京：科学出版社,2005.
[216]王兴中等著,中国城市社会空间结构研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[217]王铮,吴健平,邓悦,等.城市土地利用演变信息的数据挖掘——以上海市为例[J].地理研究,2002,21(6)：675-681.
[218]危良华.基于适变哲学思想的淮安城市变迁研究[D].苏州：苏州科技学院,2009.
[219]魏立华,丛艳国.城际快速列车对大都市区通达性空间格局的影响机制分析：以京津塘大都市区为例[J].经济地理,2004,(6)：834-837.
[220]吴启焰.大城市居住空间分异研究的理论与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2001,
[221]吴威,曹有挥,曹卫东,等.长江三角洲公路网络的可达性空间格局及其演化[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1065-1074.
[222]武进.中国城市形态：结构、特征及其演变[J].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1990.
[223]肖笃宁,布仁仓,等.生态空间理论与景观异质性[J].生态学报,1997,17(5)：453-461.
[224]熊国平.90年代以来中国城市形态演变研究[D].南京：南京大学,2005.
[225]徐旳,汪珠,朱喜钢,等.南京城市社会区空间结构——基于第五次人口普查数据的因子生态分析[J].地理研究,2009,28(2)：484-498.
[226]徐建刚,陈昌勇,沈青.基于GIS-CA模型的城镇空间发展分析[A].规划50年——2006年中国城市规划年会论文集[C],中国建筑工业出版社,2006,553-560.
[227]徐建华,单宝艳.兰州市城市扩展的空间格局分析[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),1996,24(4)：62-68.
[228]徐建华,梅安新,吴健平.20世纪下半叶上海城市景观镶嵌结构演变的数量特征与分形结构模型研究[J].生态科学,2002,21(2)：131-137.
[229]徐丽华,岳文泽,曹宇.上海市城市土地利用景观的空间尺度效应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2)：2827-2834.
[230]许学强,胡华颖,叶嘉安.广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395.
[231]许学强,刘琦.珠江三角洲的发展和城市化[M].广州：中山大学出版社,1988.
[232]许彦曦,陈凤,濮励杰.城市空间扩展与城市土地利用扩展的研究进展[J].经济地理,2007,27(2)：296-301.
[233]宣国富,徐建刚,赵静.上海市中心城社会区分析[J].地理研究,2006,25(3)：526-538.
[234]薛领,杨开忠.城市演化的多主体(Multi-Agent)模型研究[J].系统二程理论与实践,2003,12.
[235]杨青生,黎夏,刘小平.基于Agent和CA的城市土地利用变化模拟[J].地球信息科学,2005,7(2)：78-51.
[236]杨荣南,张雪莲.城市空间扩展的动力机制与模式研究[J].地域研究与开发,1997,16(2)：1-4.
[237]杨山,查勇.太湖流域城镇形态的遥感信息提取模型研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002a,11(1)：27-31.
[238]杨山,陈升.基于遥感分析的无锡市城乡过渡地域嬗变研究[J].地理学报,2009,64(10)：1221-1230.
[239]杨山,任瑞芳,洪灿辉.无锡市城乡耦合地域范围的演变[J].城市问题,2010(5)：78-83.
[240]杨山,吴勇.无锡市形态扩展的空间差异研究[J].人文地理,2001,16(3)：84-88.
[241]杨山.发达地区的乡村集镇空间扩展差异与模型研究——以锡山市为例[J].人文地理,2002b,17(1)：89-92.
[242]杨山.南京城镇空间形态的度量和分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(1)：7—11.
[243]杨永春,孟彩红,郭士梅.基于GIS的兰州城市用地变化分析[J].山地学报,2005,23(2)：174-184.
[244]杨永春,曾尊固.兰州市地域结构分析[J].地理科学,2002,22(4)：468-475.
[245]叶亮.城市空间结构与交通结构相互关系探析——以淮安市为例[J].现代城市研究,2007(2)：60-65.
[246]奕峰.改革开放以来快速城市空间形态演变的成因机制研究——深圳和厦门案例[D].上海：同济大学,2004.
[247]殷洁,张京祥,罗小龙.基于制度转型的中国城市空间结构研究初探[J].人文地理,2005(3)：59-62.
[248]尹长林.长沙市城市空间形态演变及动态模拟研究[D].长沙：中南大学,2008.
[249]于英.城市空间形态维度的复杂循环研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2009.
[250]俞孔坚,李迪华,韩西丽.论“反规划”[J].城市规划,2005,29(9)：64-69.
[251]虞蔚.城市社会空间的研究与规划[J].城市规划,1986,10(6)：25-28.
[252]岳文泽,徐建华,谈文琦,等.城市景观多样性的空间尺度分析——以上海市外环线以内区域为例[J].生态学报,2005,25(1)：122-128.
[253]曾辉,唐江,郭庆华.珠江三角洲东部地区常平镇景观组分转移模式及动态变化研究[J].地理学报,1999,19(1)：73-77.
[254]张华,张勃.国际土地利用/土地覆被变化模型研究综述[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(3)：422-4311
[255]张京祥,崔功豪.城市空间结构增长原理[J].人文地理,2000,15(2)：15-18.
[256]张京祥,罗震东,何建颐.体制转型与中国城市空间重构[M].南京：东南出版社,2007.
[257]张莉,陆玉麒.基于陆路交通网的区域可达性评价——以长江三角洲为例[J]地理学报,2006,61(12)：1235-1246.
[258]张莉.连云港：城市形态演变与空间发展战略[J].城市开发,2001(10)：19-21.
[259]张尚武,王雅娟.大城市地区的新城发展战略及其空间形态[J].城市规划汇刊,2000(6)：39-42.
[260]张庭伟.1990年代中国城市空间结构的变化及其动力机制[J].城市规划,2001,25(7)：7-14.
[261]张显峰,崔伟宏.基于GIS和CA模型的时空建模方法研究[J].中国图象图形学报,2000,5(12)：1012-1018.
[262]张显峰,崔伟宏.集成GIS和细胞自动机模型进行地理时空过程模拟与预测的新方法[J].测绘学报,2001,30(2)：148-155.
[263]张小林.试论乡村城市化[J].人文地理,1992,7(2)：37-40.
[264]张小林.乡村空间系统及其演变研究[M].南京：南京师范大学出版社,1999.
[265]张晓鸣.形态·结构·空间结构：由《集聚与扩散》引发的思考[J].规划师,2003(5)55-58.
[266]张新焕,杨德刚,陈曦.乌鲁木齐近50年城市用地动态扩展及其机制分析[J]干旱区地理,2005,2.
[267]张勇强.城市空间发展自组织研究——深圳为例[D].南京：东南大学,2003.
[268]张宇星.城市生态空间理论[D].南京：东南大学,1995.
[269]张宇星.城镇生态空间理论初探[J].城市规划,1995(2)：17-19.
[270]张振龙,马国强.基于景观生态学的城市空间格局变化研究——以南京都市区为例[J].生态经济,2010(6)：35-38.
[271]赵辉,王东明,谭许伟.沈阳城市形态与空间结构的分形特征研究[J].规划师,2007,23(2)：81-83.
[272]赵晶,徐建华,梅安新,等.上海市土地利用结构和形态演变的信息嫡与分维分析[J].地理研究,2004,23(2)：137-146.
[273]赵生和.城市规划与城市发展[M].南京：东南大学出版社,1999.
[274]赵文武,傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观指数的尺度变化效应[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3)：326-332.
[275]赵燕菁.高速发展与空间演进——深圳城市结构的选择及其评价[J].城市规划,2004,28(6)：32-42.
[276]郑莘,林琳.1990年以来国内城市形态研究评述[J].城市规划,2002(7)：59-63.
[277]郑新奇.基于GIS的城镇上地优化配置与集约利用评价研究[D].郑州：解放军信息工程大学,2004.
[278]钟业喜,陆玉麒.基于可达性角度的区域发展机会公平性评价[J].地理科学,2009,29(6)：809-816.
[279]周成虎,孙战利,谢一春.地理元胞自动机研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1999.
[280]周春山,刘洋.转型时期广州市社会区分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1046-1056.
[281]周文佐,潘剑君,刘高焕.南京市城市绿地现状遥感分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(5)：2279-2286.
[282]周听.昆明城市空间形态演变趋势研究[M].昆明：云南大学出版社,2009.
[283]朱锡金.城市结构的活性[J].城市规划汇刊,1987(5)7-13.
[284]朱喜钢.城市空间集中与分散论[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[285]朱晓华,李加林,杨秀春,等.土地空间分形结构的尺度转换特征[J].地理科学,2007,27(1)：58-62.
[286]宗跃光,周尚意,张振世,等.北京城郊化空间特征与发展对策[J].地理学报,2002,57(2)：135-142.
[287]宗跃光.城市景观生态规划中的廊道效应研究——以北京市区为例[J].生态学报,1999,19(2)：145-150.
[288]宗跃光.大都市空间扩展的廊道效应与景观结构优化——以北京市区为例[J]地理研究,1998,17(2)：119-124.
[289]邹怡,马清亮.江南小城镇形态特征及其演化机制[M].天津：天津科学技术出版社,1993.
[2]Alonso, William. Location and land use[M].Cambridge:Harvard University press, 1965.
[3]Batty M Longley P A. fractal cities:Geometry of form and function[M].London: Academic Press,1994.
[4]Batty M, Longley P A. Fractal-based description of urban form[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1987,14:123-134.
[5]Batty M, Longley P A. The fractal cimulation of urban structure[J].Environment and Planning A,1986,9.
[6]Batty M, Longley P A. The morphology of urban land use[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1988,15:461-488.
[7]Batty M. The fractal nature of geography[J].Geographical Journal,1992,5.
[8]Beinat E, Nukamp P. Land use sustainable development in Serie Research Memorandum[M]. Amsterdam:Vrije Universiteit,1997.135-140.
[9]Berry J L. Internal structure of the city. In:Larry S Bourne, eds. Internal structure of the city[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1971.
[10]Bertaud Alain, Stephen Malpezzi. The spatial distribution of population in 35 world cities:The role of markets, planning and topography[J].Center for Urban Land Economics Research,1999.
[11]BLOCHL G, SIVAPALAN M. Scale issues in hydrological modeling:A review[J].Hydrol process,1995,9:251-290.
[12]Bourne L S. Internal structure of the city:Reading on urban form, growth and policy[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1982.
[13]Bowen J. Airline hubs in Southeast Asia national economic development and modal accessibility[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2000,8:25-41.
[14]Boyce R R, Clark W A V. The concept of shape in geography[J]. The Geographical Review,1964,54:561-572.
[15]Burgess, E.W. Bogue, D.J. Urban Sociology[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1965.
[16]Buyantuyev A, Wu J. Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern Analysis[J]. Landscape Ecology,2007,22 (1):7-13.
[17]CAI Bofeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Bin.Spatial-temporal changes of Tianjin urban spatial morphology from 1978 to 2004[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2007(4):500-503.
[18]Camagni R, Gibelli M C, Rigamonti P. Urban mobility and urban form:the social and environment costs of different patterns of urban expansion[J]. Ecological Ecolomics, 2002,40:199-216.
[19]Castells M. The urban question[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press,1977.
[20]Charles Dietzel, Keith C Clarke. Toward optional calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model[J]. Transactions in GIS,2007, 11(1):29-45.
[21]Clarke K C, Gaydos LJ, Hoppen S. A self modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in SanFransico Bay Area[J]. Environment and Planning,1997, 24:247-261.
[22]Corry R C, Lafortezza R. Sensitivity of landscape measurements to changing grain size for fine scale design and managemen[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2007,3(1):47-53.
[23]David Harvey. Social justice and the city[M]. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1973.
[24]David Peterson and V. Thomas Parker, Ecological scale:Theory and application[M]. Columbia University Press,1998.5-34.
[25]Deal, B, C Farello, etal. A dynamic model of the spatial spread of an infectious disease:The case of fox rabiesin illinois[J]. Environment Modeling and Assessment, 2005,5:47-62.
[26]Del court HR, Del court PA. Quaternary landscape ecology:relevant scales in space and time[J]. Landscape Ecol,1998,(2):23-44.
[27]Dupuy Gabriel, Stransky Vaclav. Cites and highway net work in Europe[M]. Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (2):107-121.
[28]Edward N Lorenz. The essence of chaos[M]. The University of Washington Pr,1996.
[29]Evans P. Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainabiliry[M]. California:Univesity of California Press Ltd,2002.
[30]Finco A, Nijkamp P. Sustainable land use:methodology and application[A].Stilwell J, Scholten H, Kluwer S. Future land use in Europe Dordrecht[C].2000.
[31]Foley D L. An approach to metropolitan spatial structure. Explorations into the sustainable urban structure[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsy Press,1998.
[32]Forman R T T.Land Mosaics:The ecology of landscape and regions[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,1995.
[33]Frank Houser P. Aspects fractals des structures urbaines[J]. L'Espace Geographique, 1990.
[34]Frank Houser P. La Fractilite des structures urbaines[M]. Paris:Economica,1994.
[35]Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M R et al. Wrestling sprawl to the ground:Defining and measuring an elusive concep[J]. Housing Policy Debate,2001,12(4):681-717.
[36]Geurs K, Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies review and research directions[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2004,12 (2):127-140.
[37]Gutierrez Javier, Gomez Gabriel. The impact of orbital motorway on intra-metropolitan accessibility:the case of Madrid's M-40[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1999,7(1):1-15.
[38]Gutierrez Javier, Gonzalez Rafael, Gomez Gabriel. The European high-speed train net work:Predicted effects on accessibility patterns[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996,4 (4):227-238.
[39]Gutierrez Javier,Urbano Paloma.Accessibility in the European Union:the impact of the transeuropean road net work[J] Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (1): 15-25.
[40]Gutierrez Javier. Location economic potential and daily accessibility:An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Bard el ona-French border[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001,9(4):229-242.
[41]H.Haken. An Introduction:Non-equilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology[J]. Spring-Verlag, Ⅲ,1983:191.
[42]Hall, T. How urban morphology can improve development plans[J].Urban Morphology,2000,4(1).
[43]Hanson J, Hiller B.The shape and role of the city of London[A]. In London:A vision for the city symposium[C].1992.
[44]Harris C, Ullman E. The nature of city[J]. Annals of The American Academy of Political Science,1945,242:7-17.
[45]Harvey D. Explanation in geography[M]. London:Edward Arnold Ltd,1969: 481-486.
[46]Harvey, David. The urban process under capitalism[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1978,2:101-131.
[47]Hec, Weiy, Xiex. Globalization, institutional change and industrial location: Economic transition and industrial concentration in China[J]. Regional Studies,2008, 42 (7):923-945.
[48]Herod A. Scale:the local and global. In Holloway S L, Rice S P, Valentin G, eds. Key Concepts in Geography[M].London:Sage Publications Ltd,2003.209-228.
[49]Herod, A. What is scale and how do we think about it[A]. In:Scale[C]. Routledge. 2010.
[50]Hiller B, Hnason J.The social logic of space[M].Cambridge, Press,1984.
[51]Hiller B, The hidden geometry of deformed grids:or why space syntax wokrs, when it looked as though it shouldn't[J].Environment and planning B:planning& Design, 1999,26(2):169-191.
[52]Hoyt, H. The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities[M]. Washington, DC:Federal Housing Administration,1939.
[53]Kersey G.. Teaching urban geography:The burgess model[J]. New Zealand Journal of Geography,1983,12:10-13.
[54]Kevin Lynch. Good City Form[M]. MA:M.I.T Press, Cambridge,1981.
[55]Kevin Lyneh.The Image of the City[M]. MA:M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,1960.
[56]Knox P, Pinch S. Urban social geography:An introduction(Fourth edition) [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall,2000.
[57]Lam N, Quattrochi D A. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in mapping sciences[J]. Prof. Geogr.,1992,44:88-987.
[58]Lam NS, De Cola. Fractals in geography[M]. New Jersey:PTR Prentice- Hall, Inc, 1993.
[59]Larkham, PeterJ.Urban morphology and typology in the united kingdom. In:In typological proeess and design theory. attilio petruccioli (eds) [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts:Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture,1998.159-177.
[60]Leorey O M, Nariida C S. A framework for linking urban form and air quality[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,1999,14(6):541-548.
[61]LI Jiang, DUAN Jie. Multi-scale representation of urban spatial morphology based on GIS and spatial syntax[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Nat. Sci.), 2004,38(3):383-387.
[62]Li Siming, Shum Yiman. Impacts of the national truck highway system on accessibility in China[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001,9(1):39-48.
[63]Lindeberg tony. Scale-space theory:A basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales[J]. Journal of applied statistics,1994,21:223-270.
[64]Linneker B, Spence N. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development:The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4 (2):77-92.
[65]Lo C P. Changes of the shapes of Chinese cities[J].Professional Geographer,1980, 32(2):173-183.
[66]M.Eigen, P.Schuster. The hypercycle:A principle of natural Self-organization[M]. springer verlag. Berlin,1979:89.
[67]Maclaren D. Urban sustainabiliry reporting[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1996,62 (2):185-202.
[68]Marston, S. A. The social construction of scale[J]. Progress in Human Geography 24(2)219-242.
[69]McGarigal, K., SA Cushman, MC Neel, and E Ene.2002. FRAGSTATS:Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. computer software program produced by the authors at the university of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site:http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
[70]McMaster, R.B. Sheppard, E. Introduction:scale and geographic inquiry[A]. In Sheppard, E. S., and R. B. McMaster (Eds). Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society, and Method[C]. Blackwell,2004,1-22.
[71]Michael Batty & Paul Longley. Fractal cities:Geometry of form and function[M].Academic Press, San Diego, CA and London,1994.
[72]Nguyen Xuan Thinh, Gunter Arlt, Bernd Heber etal. Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view to sustainable development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2002,22:475-492.
[73]Nicolis G. Prigogine I. Self-organization in Nonequilibrium Systems[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1997.131-135.
[74]Pacione M.Model of urban land use structure in cities of the development world[J]. Geography,2001,86:97-119.
[75]Pacione M.The internal structure of cities in The Third World[J]. Geography,2001, 86:189-209.
[76]Paul Knox, Steven Pinch. Urban social geography:An introduction[M]. Pearson Education Limited,2000.
[77]Portugeli J. Self-organization and the city[M]. Berlin:Springer.Uerlag,2000.
[78]Rex, J.& Moore. Race, Community and conflict[J]. Oxford University Press,1967.
[79]Roland Schulze. Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agro hydrological responses. Agriculture[J]. Ecosystems and Environment,2001,82:185-212.
[80]Salzano E. Seven aims for the livable city. In:Lennard S H, Ungern-Sternberg Svon, Lennard H L. Making cities livable. International making cities livable conferences[M]. carmel:Gondolier Press,1997.
[81]Saunders, Peter. Space, the city and urban sociology[A]. in D.Gregory and J.Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structures[C]. New York:St. Martin's Press,1985.
[82]Sayre, N. F. Ecological and geographical scale:parallels and potential for integration[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2005,29 (3):276-290.
[83]Scott, A. Metropolis:From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley[M]. CA: University of California Press,1998.
[84]Sheppard E.S. McMaster, R.B. Scale and geographic inquiry:contrasts, intersections, and boundaries [A]. In Sheppard, E. S., and R. B. McMaster (Eds). Scale and Geographic Inquiry:Nature, Society, and Method[C]. Blackwell,2004,256-267.
[85]Simmons J W. Descriptive models for urban land use[A]. In Larry Sbourne, eds. Internal structure of the city[C]. New York:Oxford University Press,1971.
[86]Spiro Kostof. The City Assembled:The elements form through history[M]. Thames & Hudson, London.1992.
[87]Sullivan A O.Urban economics[M]. NY:McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc,2000.
[88]Sun Sheng Han. Shanghai between state and market in urban transformation[J]. Urban Studies,2000,37(11):2091-2112.
[89]Torrens P M. Simulating Sprawl[J]. Annals of the association of American Geographers,2006,96(2):248-275.
[90]Torrens, P M.Sprawl Sim:Modeling sprawling urban growth using automata-based models[A]. In agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change[C]. Dparker, T Berger, S Manson (EdS.). Belgium, LUCC International Projcet Office,2003.
[91]Tsai, Y. H.. Quantifying Urban Form:Compactness versus 'sprawl'[J]. Urban Studies. 2005,42(1):141-161.
[92]Ulam, S. Numbers and Universes[M]. Cambridge:IT Press,1974.
[93]Von Neumann, J. Theory of self-reproducing automataed[M]. Urbana:University of Illinois Press,1966.
[94]Waddell P. Urbansim:Modeling urban development for land use, Transportation and environmental planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2002,68(3): 297-314.
[95]Webber M M. The urban place and the Nonplare Urban realm[A]. In:Webber M M. Explorations into sustainable urban[C]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,1998.
[96]Wei YH. Decentralization, mercerization, and globalization:the triple processes under lying regional development in China[J]. Asian Geographer,2001,20(1-2):7-23.
[97]Wei YH. Regional development in China:States, globalization, an dine quality[M]. London:Rutledge,2000.
[98]White R W. Cellular automata and fractal urban form:A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns[J]. Environment and Planning,1993, 25:1175-1189.
[99]White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling[J]. Environment and Planning,1997,24:235-246.
[100]Wilkins H. The need for subjectivity in EIA:discourse as a tool for sustainable development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003,401-414.
[101]William Alonso:Location and land use toward a general theory of land rent[M]. East-West Certer Press Honolulu,1966:120-126.
[102]Wolfgang Widgeon. Catastrophe, Theoretic, Semantics:An elaboration and application of rene Thom's theory[M]. Benjamins Pub Co,1982:4.
[103]Wu F, Webster C J.Simulation of land use development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation[J]. Environment and Planning,1998.
[104]Wu F. An experiment on the generie polyeen trieity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city[J]. Environment and Planning,1998,25:731-752.
[105]Wu F. Simland:a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-driven transition rules[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information science,1998,12(1):63-52.
[106]Wu, F. and Yeh, A.GO. Urban spatial structure in atransitional economy:The case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1999, (65): 377-393.
[107]Zhu, J. Loeal Growth coalition:the context and implications of China's gradualist urban land reforms[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1999 (23):534-548.
[108]白永平,尚正永,牛定炜.兰州市区土地利用变化及其驱动力研究[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2008,17(4)：81-84.
[109]白永平.区域工业化与城市化的水资源保障研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[110]蔡博峰.景观生态学中的尺度分析方法[J].遥感技术与应用,2002,17(1)：22-26.
[111]蔡运龙.贵州喀斯特高原土地系统变化空间尺度综合的一个研究方案[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(12)：1301-1307.
[112]蔡运龙.土地利用/土地覆被变化研究：寻求新的综合途径[J].地理研究,2001,20(6)：645-652.
[113]蔡运龙.自然地理学的创新视角[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2000,26(4)：576-582.
[114]曹小曙,阎小培.经济发达地区交通网络演化对通达性空间格局的影响：以广东东莞市为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(3)：305-312.
[115]柴彦威.中日城市结构比较研究[M].北京：北京大学出版社.1999.
[116]陈超萃.由层次网络方法解读城市形态[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(6)：72-75.
[117]陈龙乾,郭达志,胡召玲,等.城市扩展空间分异的多时相TM遥感研究[J]煤炭学报,2004,29(3)：308-312.
[118]陈爽,王进,詹志勇.生态景观与城市形态整合研究[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(5)：67-77.
[119]陈素蜜.遥感与地理信息系统相结合的城市空间扩展研究[J].地理空间信息,2005,3(1)：33-36.
[120]陈涛,李后强.城镇空间体系的科赫(Koch)模式——对中心地学说的一种可能的修正[J].经济地理,1994,14(3)：10-14.
[121]陈彦光,黄昆.城市形态的分形维数：理论探讨与实践教益[J].信阳师范学院学报,2002,15(1)：62-67.
[122]陈彦光,刘继生.城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述：从信息熵到分数维[J]地理研究,2001,20(2)：146-152.
[123]陈彦光,刘明华.城市土地利用结构熵值定律[J].人文地理,2001,16(4)：20-24.
[124]程连生,赵红英.北京城市边缘带探讨[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1)：128-133.
[125]储金龙.城市空间形态定量分析研究[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[126]崔功豪,武进.中国城市边缘区空间结构特征及其发展——以南京等城市为例[J].地理学报,1990,45(4)：399-411.
[127]丁成日,宋彦,Gerrit knap,等.城市规划与空间结构——城市可持续发展战略[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005a.
[128]丁成日,宋彦,黄艳.市场经济体系下城市总体规划的理论基础——规模和空间形态[J].城市规划,2004(11)：71-77.
[129]丁成日.土地政策改革时期的城市空间发展：北京的实证分析[A].中国杭州,2005b.中国城市理性增长与土地政策国际研讨会论文集[C].Part Ⅳ：1-25.
[130]段杰,李江.基于空间分析的城市交通网络结构特征研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2002,41(6)：105-108.
[131]段进.城市空间发展论[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1999.
[132]段进.城市形态研究与空间战略规划[J].城市规划,2003,27(2)：45-48.
[133]樊杰.优化中国经济地理格局的科学基础——对未来10年经济地理学学科建设问题的讨论[J].经济地理,2011,31(1)：1-6.
[134]冯健,周一星.北京都市区社会空间结构及其演化(1982-2000)[J].地理研究,2003,22(4)：465-483.
[135]冯健.杭州城市工业的空间扩散与郊区化研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002a(2)：42-47.
[136]冯健.杭州城市形态与土地利用结构的时空演化[J].地理学报,2003,58(3)：343-353.
[137]冯健.杭州市人口密度空间分布及其演化的模型研究[J].地理研究,2002b,21(5)：635-646.
[138]冯健.转型期中国城市内部空间重构[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
[139]谷凯.城市形态的理论与方法：探索全面与理性的研究框架[J].城市规划,2001,25(2)：36-41.
[140]顾朝林,C.克斯特罗德.北京社会空间极化与空间分异研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(5)：385-393.
[141]顾朝林,陈耀光.中国大都市空间增长形态[J].城市规划,1994(6)45-50.
[142]顾朝林,于涛方,李玉鸣,等.中国城市化格局·过程·机制[M].北京：科学出版社,2008.
[143]顾朝林,甄峰,张京祥.集聚与扩散——城市空间结构新论[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2000.
[144]顾朝林.北京土地利用/覆盖变化机制研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4)：307-311.
[145]顾朝林.中国大城市边缘区研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1995.
[146]郭广东.市场力作用下城市空间形态演变的特征和机制研究——基于苏南地区的快速城市化进程[D].上海：同济大学,2007.
[147]郭鸿懋等.城市空间经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2002.
[148]何春阳,陈晋,史培军.大都市区城市扩展模型——以北京城市扩展模拟为例[J].地理学报,2003,58(2)：294-304.
[149]何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.北京地区城市化过程与机制研究[J].地理学报,2002,57(3)：363-371.
[150]何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.基于系统动力学模型和元胞自动机模型的土地利用情景模拟研究[J].中国科学,2005,135(5)：464-473.
[151]何流,崔功豪.南京城市空间扩展的特征与机制[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,(6)：56-60.
[152]胡俊.中国城市：模式与演进[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1995.
[153]金凤君,王娇娥.20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：293-302.
[154]金凤君.我国航空客流网络发展及其地域系统研究[J].地理研究,2001,20(1)：31-39.
[155]靳诚,陆玉麒,范黎丽.基于公路网络的长江三角洲旅游景点可达性格局研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(2)：258-269.
[156]柯长青,欧阳晓莹.基于元胞自动机模型的城市空间变化模拟研究进展[J].南京大学学报,2006,42(1)：103-110.
[157]郐艳丽.东北地区城市空间形态研究[D].长春：东北师范大学,2004.
[158]黎夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的单元自动机CA及真实和优化的城市模拟[J].地理学报,2002,57(2)：159-166.
[159]黎夏,叶嘉安.约束性单元自动演化以模型及可持续城市发展形态的模拟[J]地理学报,1999,54(4)：259-298.
[160]李传武.转型期我国中部特大城市社会空间结构演化研究——以合肥为例[D]南京：南京师范大学,2010.
[161]李德华,城市规划原理(第三版)[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[162]李江,郭庆胜.基于GIS的城市交通网络复杂性定量描述[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,36(4)：534-537.
[163]李江,郭庆胜.基于句法分析的城市空间形态定量研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(2)：69-73.
[164]李江,郭庆胜.基于空间拓扑关系的城市交通网络层次结构推理[J].测绘信息与工程,2003,28(3)：29-30.
[165]李江.组团式城市外部空间形态分形特征研究[J].经济地理,2004,24(1)：62-66.
[166]李金林.中国大连近代(1898-1945)城市形态与建筑[J].城建档案,2004.
[167]李开宇.番禺行政区划调整与城市空间扩展研究[D].广州：中山大学,2007.
[168]李双成,蔡运龙.地理尺度转换若干问题的初步探讨[J].地理研究,2005,24(1)：11-17.
[169]李玮,徐建春.基于UGB的杭州城市空间结构研究[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(4)：106-111.
[170]李宪坡,白淑军.国外城市景观结构及其动态变化研究进展[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,26(2)：164-150.
[171]李小建.经济地理学研究中的尺度问题[J].经济地理,2005,25(4)：433-436.
[172]李星墨,段广德.基于GIS的呼和浩特城市扩展轴上的绿地景观格局梯度分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2010,31(2)：89-94.
[173]廖邦固,徐建刚,宣国富,等.1947-2000年上海中心城区居住空间结构演变[J].地理学报,2008,63(2)：195-206.
[174]林炳耀.城市空间形态的计量方法及其评价[J].城市规划汇刊,1998,(3)：42-45.
[175]刘纪远,王新生,庄大方,等.凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别[J]地理学报,2003,58(6)：885-892.
[176]刘妙龙,陈鹏.城市空间扩散增长模型与模拟[J].人文地理,2004,19(2)：6-11.
[177]刘妙龙,陈鹏.基于细胞自动机与多主体系统理论的城市模拟原型模型[J].地理科学,2006,26(3)：292-298.
[178]刘明华,陈彦光.城市土地利用形态及其空间结构的分维描述方法[J].信阳师范学院学报,2001,14(2)：209-213.
[179]刘青昊.城市形态的生态机制[J].城市规划,1995,19(2)：20-22.
[180]刘盛和,吴传钧,等.基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式[J].地理学报,2000,55(4)：407-416.
[181]刘曙华,沈玉芳.上海城市扩展模式及其动力机制[J].经济地理,2006,26(3)：487-491.
[182]刘小平,黎夏,艾彬等.基于多智能体的土地利用模拟与规划模型[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1101-1112.
[183]刘耀林,刘艳芳,明冬萍.基于灰色局势决策规则的元胞自动机城市扩展模型[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(1)：7-13.
[184]鲁学军,周成虎,张洪岩,等.地理空间的尺度——结构分析模式探讨[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(2)：107-114.
[185]陆大道,姚士谋等.中国区域发展报告——城镇化进程及空间扩张[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007.1-2.
[186]陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[187]陆玉麒,董平,王颖.双核结构模式与淮安区域发展[J].人文地理,2004,19(1)：32-36.
[188]陆玉麒.区域发展中的空间结构研究[M].南京：南京师范大学出版社,1998.83.
[189]吕传廷,曹小曙,徐旭.城市边缘区生态隔离机制探讨[J].人文地理,2004, 19(6)：36-38.
[190]吕卫国,陈雯.制造业企业区位选择与南京城市空间重构[J].地理学报,2009,64(2)：142-152.
[191]吕卫国.转型期南京市制造业郊区化及区位选择[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(2)：120-126.
[192]吕一河,傅伯杰.生态学中的尺度及尺度转换方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(12)：2096-2105.
[193]罗平,杜清运,雷元新,等.地理特征元胞自动机及城市土地利用演化研究[J]武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(6)：504-507.
[194]马晓东.基于ESDA的城市化空间格局与过程比较研究[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[195]毛蒋兴,闫小培,李志刚,等.深圳城市规划对土地利用的调控效能[J].地理学报,2008,63(8)：311-320.
[196]齐康.城市的形态(研究提纲初稿)[J].城市规划,1982,6(6)：16-25.
[197]尚正永,白永平.淮安市域经济空间结构优化的构想[J].生产力研究,2004,5：112-114.
[198]尚正永,张永凯.淮安市域城镇体系结构研究[J].淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版),2005,4(1)：70-75.
[199]施源,陈贞.关于行政区经济格局下地方政府规划行为的思考[J].城市规划学刊,2005(2)：45-49.
[200]石崧.城市空间结构演变的动力机制分析[J].城市规划汇刊,2004(1)：50-52.
[201]史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(2)：151-160.
[202]苏建中,魏清泉,郭恒亮.广州市的蔓延机理与调控[J].地理学报,2005,60(4)：626-636.
[203]苏毓德.台北市道路系统发展对城市外部形状演变的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),1997(3)：46.
[204]宛素春.城市空间形态解析[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[205]王琤琤,刘进.构想未来淮安城市空间结构布局[J].现代城市研究,2001,2.
[206]王春峰.用遥感和单元自动演化方法研究城市扩展问题[M].北京：测绘出版社,2001.
[207]王富臣.城市形态的维度：空间和时间[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002(2)：28-33.
[208]王桂新,陈萍.城市未来发展持续性评价决策支持系统构建和设计[J].中国人口 ·资源与环境,2006,16(5)：42-46.
[209]王建国.常熟城市形态历史特征及演变研究[J].东南大学学报,1994,24(6)：1-5.
[210]王建国.城市空间形态的分析方法[J].新建筑,1994(1)：29-34.
[211]王静文,毛其智,党安荣.北京城市的演变模型——基于句法的城市空间与功能模式演进的探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2008(3)：82-88.
[212]王娜,李雪红.元明清运河演变与城市发展互动关系研究——以江苏省淮安市为例[J].淮阴工学院学报,2009,18(4)：17-21.
[213]王新生,刘纪远,庄大方,等.中国特大城市空间形态变化的时间特征[J].地理学报,2005,60(3)：392-400.
[214]王新生,刘纪远.中国城市形状的时空变化[J].资源科学,2005,27(5)：20-25.
[215]王兴平.中国城市新产业空间——发展机制与空间组织[M].北京：科学出版社,2005.
[216]王兴中等著,中国城市社会空间结构研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[217]王铮,吴健平,邓悦,等.城市土地利用演变信息的数据挖掘——以上海市为例[J].地理研究,2002,21(6)：675-681.
[218]危良华.基于适变哲学思想的淮安城市变迁研究[D].苏州：苏州科技学院,2009.
[219]魏立华,丛艳国.城际快速列车对大都市区通达性空间格局的影响机制分析：以京津塘大都市区为例[J].经济地理,2004,(6)：834-837.
[220]吴启焰.大城市居住空间分异研究的理论与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2001,
[221]吴威,曹有挥,曹卫东,等.长江三角洲公路网络的可达性空间格局及其演化[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1065-1074.
[222]武进.中国城市形态：结构、特征及其演变[J].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1990.
[223]肖笃宁,布仁仓,等.生态空间理论与景观异质性[J].生态学报,1997,17(5)：453-461.
[224]熊国平.90年代以来中国城市形态演变研究[D].南京：南京大学,2005.
[225]徐旳,汪珠,朱喜钢,等.南京城市社会区空间结构——基于第五次人口普查数据的因子生态分析[J].地理研究,2009,28(2)：484-498.
[226]徐建刚,陈昌勇,沈青.基于GIS-CA模型的城镇空间发展分析[A].规划50年——2006年中国城市规划年会论文集[C],中国建筑工业出版社,2006,553-560.
[227]徐建华,单宝艳.兰州市城市扩展的空间格局分析[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),1996,24(4)：62-68.
[228]徐建华,梅安新,吴健平.20世纪下半叶上海城市景观镶嵌结构演变的数量特征与分形结构模型研究[J].生态科学,2002,21(2)：131-137.
[229]徐丽华,岳文泽,曹宇.上海市城市土地利用景观的空间尺度效应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2)：2827-2834.
[230]许学强,胡华颖,叶嘉安.广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395.
[231]许学强,刘琦.珠江三角洲的发展和城市化[M].广州：中山大学出版社,1988.
[232]许彦曦,陈凤,濮励杰.城市空间扩展与城市土地利用扩展的研究进展[J].经济地理,2007,27(2)：296-301.
[233]宣国富,徐建刚,赵静.上海市中心城社会区分析[J].地理研究,2006,25(3)：526-538.
[234]薛领,杨开忠.城市演化的多主体(Multi-Agent)模型研究[J].系统二程理论与实践,2003,12.
[235]杨青生,黎夏,刘小平.基于Agent和CA的城市土地利用变化模拟[J].地球信息科学,2005,7(2)：78-51.
[236]杨荣南,张雪莲.城市空间扩展的动力机制与模式研究[J].地域研究与开发,1997,16(2)：1-4.
[237]杨山,查勇.太湖流域城镇形态的遥感信息提取模型研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002a,11(1)：27-31.
[238]杨山,陈升.基于遥感分析的无锡市城乡过渡地域嬗变研究[J].地理学报,2009,64(10)：1221-1230.
[239]杨山,任瑞芳,洪灿辉.无锡市城乡耦合地域范围的演变[J].城市问题,2010(5)：78-83.
[240]杨山,吴勇.无锡市形态扩展的空间差异研究[J].人文地理,2001,16(3)：84-88.
[241]杨山.发达地区的乡村集镇空间扩展差异与模型研究——以锡山市为例[J].人文地理,2002b,17(1)：89-92.
[242]杨山.南京城镇空间形态的度量和分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(1)：7—11.
[243]杨永春,孟彩红,郭士梅.基于GIS的兰州城市用地变化分析[J].山地学报,2005,23(2)：174-184.
[244]杨永春,曾尊固.兰州市地域结构分析[J].地理科学,2002,22(4)：468-475.
[245]叶亮.城市空间结构与交通结构相互关系探析——以淮安市为例[J].现代城市研究,2007(2)：60-65.
[246]奕峰.改革开放以来快速城市空间形态演变的成因机制研究——深圳和厦门案例[D].上海：同济大学,2004.
[247]殷洁,张京祥,罗小龙.基于制度转型的中国城市空间结构研究初探[J].人文地理,2005(3)：59-62.
[248]尹长林.长沙市城市空间形态演变及动态模拟研究[D].长沙：中南大学,2008.
[249]于英.城市空间形态维度的复杂循环研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2009.
[250]俞孔坚,李迪华,韩西丽.论“反规划”[J].城市规划,2005,29(9)：64-69.
[251]虞蔚.城市社会空间的研究与规划[J].城市规划,1986,10(6)：25-28.
[252]岳文泽,徐建华,谈文琦,等.城市景观多样性的空间尺度分析——以上海市外环线以内区域为例[J].生态学报,2005,25(1)：122-128.
[253]曾辉,唐江,郭庆华.珠江三角洲东部地区常平镇景观组分转移模式及动态变化研究[J].地理学报,1999,19(1)：73-77.
[254]张华,张勃.国际土地利用/土地覆被变化模型研究综述[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(3)：422-4311
[255]张京祥,崔功豪.城市空间结构增长原理[J].人文地理,2000,15(2)：15-18.
[256]张京祥,罗震东,何建颐.体制转型与中国城市空间重构[M].南京：东南出版社,2007.
[257]张莉,陆玉麒.基于陆路交通网的区域可达性评价——以长江三角洲为例[J]地理学报,2006,61(12)：1235-1246.
[258]张莉.连云港：城市形态演变与空间发展战略[J].城市开发,2001(10)：19-21.
[259]张尚武,王雅娟.大城市地区的新城发展战略及其空间形态[J].城市规划汇刊,2000(6)：39-42.
[260]张庭伟.1990年代中国城市空间结构的变化及其动力机制[J].城市规划,2001,25(7)：7-14.
[261]张显峰,崔伟宏.基于GIS和CA模型的时空建模方法研究[J].中国图象图形学报,2000,5(12)：1012-1018.
[262]张显峰,崔伟宏.集成GIS和细胞自动机模型进行地理时空过程模拟与预测的新方法[J].测绘学报,2001,30(2)：148-155.
[263]张小林.试论乡村城市化[J].人文地理,1992,7(2)：37-40.
[264]张小林.乡村空间系统及其演变研究[M].南京：南京师范大学出版社,1999.
[265]张晓鸣.形态·结构·空间结构：由《集聚与扩散》引发的思考[J].规划师,2003(5)55-58.
[266]张新焕,杨德刚,陈曦.乌鲁木齐近50年城市用地动态扩展及其机制分析[J]干旱区地理,2005,2.
[267]张勇强.城市空间发展自组织研究——深圳为例[D].南京：东南大学,2003.
[268]张宇星.城市生态空间理论[D].南京：东南大学,1995.
[269]张宇星.城镇生态空间理论初探[J].城市规划,1995(2)：17-19.
[270]张振龙,马国强.基于景观生态学的城市空间格局变化研究——以南京都市区为例[J].生态经济,2010(6)：35-38.
[271]赵辉,王东明,谭许伟.沈阳城市形态与空间结构的分形特征研究[J].规划师,2007,23(2)：81-83.
[272]赵晶,徐建华,梅安新,等.上海市土地利用结构和形态演变的信息嫡与分维分析[J].地理研究,2004,23(2)：137-146.
[273]赵生和.城市规划与城市发展[M].南京：东南大学出版社,1999.
[274]赵文武,傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观指数的尺度变化效应[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3)：326-332.
[275]赵燕菁.高速发展与空间演进——深圳城市结构的选择及其评价[J].城市规划,2004,28(6)：32-42.
[276]郑莘,林琳.1990年以来国内城市形态研究评述[J].城市规划,2002(7)：59-63.
[277]郑新奇.基于GIS的城镇上地优化配置与集约利用评价研究[D].郑州：解放军信息工程大学,2004.
[278]钟业喜,陆玉麒.基于可达性角度的区域发展机会公平性评价[J].地理科学,2009,29(6)：809-816.
[279]周成虎,孙战利,谢一春.地理元胞自动机研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1999.
[280]周春山,刘洋.转型时期广州市社会区分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1046-1056.
[281]周文佐,潘剑君,刘高焕.南京市城市绿地现状遥感分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(5)：2279-2286.
[282]周听.昆明城市空间形态演变趋势研究[M].昆明：云南大学出版社,2009.
[283]朱锡金.城市结构的活性[J].城市规划汇刊,1987(5)7-13.
[284]朱喜钢.城市空间集中与分散论[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[285]朱晓华,李加林,杨秀春,等.土地空间分形结构的尺度转换特征[J].地理科学,2007,27(1)：58-62.
[286]宗跃光,周尚意,张振世,等.北京城郊化空间特征与发展对策[J].地理学报,2002,57(2)：135-142.
[287]宗跃光.城市景观生态规划中的廊道效应研究——以北京市区为例[J].生态学报,1999,19(2)：145-150.
[288]宗跃光.大都市空间扩展的廊道效应与景观结构优化——以北京市区为例[J]地理研究,1998,17(2)：119-124.
[289]邹怡,马清亮.江南小城镇形态特征及其演化机制[M].天津：天津科学技术出版社,1993.