降低日粮能量水平添加木聚糖酶对肉仔鸡的影响研究
|
摘要
本试验以肉仔鸡为研究对象,在玉米—豆粕日粮降低不同能量水平的基础上添加木聚糖酶制剂,研究其对AA肉仔鸡的生长性能、养分表观消化率、屠宰性能和免疫器官指数的影响。试验结果如下：
试验一：选择288只一日龄AA肉仔鸡,随机分为4个组,每个组6个重复,每个重复12只鸡。本试验分为4个处理组,分别为：对照组,饲喂玉米—豆粕型基础日粮；处理1：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.252 MJ/kg+木聚糖酶；处理2：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.42 MJ/kg+木聚糖酶；处理3：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.63MJ/kg+木聚糖酶,三个处理组中木聚糖酶添加量均为100g/t。本试验进行7周,研究其对肉仔鸡生产性能和免疫器官指数的影响。试验结果：试验开始时各组鸡体重均无显著差异(P>0.05)。对于42大末体重和平均日增重,处理2组与对照组相比均差异显著(P<0.05),而其他两个试验组与对照组差异不显著,但均有提高的趋势,42天末重分别提高了6.18%和0.5%；均日增重分别提高了6.132%和0.51%。日均采食量方面,处理1组和处理组2极显著高于对照组(P<0.01),分别比对照组提高了1.74%和2.54%；而处理组3却极显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。料重比方面各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。免疫器官指数方面：处理组1和2的胸腺指数显著高于对照组(P<0.05),分别提高了7.58%和7.94%；对于脾脏指数和法氏囊指数,各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05),除了处理组3比对照组略有下降外,处理组1和2均比对照组有提高的趋势,脾脏指数分别提高了13.42%和9.40%,法氏囊指数分别提高了7.27%和16.136%。试验结果表明：在肉仔鸡低能玉米—豆粕日粮中添加木聚糖酶,其生产性能能够达到甚至超过正常能量水平日粮的饲喂效果。同时,还能够提高免疫器官指数,说明提高了肉鸡的免疫力。
试验二：第42天饲养试验结束时,每个重复选1只鸡,体重接近,进行为期一周的代谢试验。研究肉鸡低能玉米—豆粕日粮中添加酶制剂对其养分表观消化率的影响。试验结果：各种营养成分的表观消化率均有不同程度的变化。粗蛋白表观消化率,处理组2和对照组、处理组1均有显著差异(P<0.05),处理组1和3与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但有所提高；粗脂肪消化率,处理组2与其余组相比都显著提高(P<0.05),而处理组1和3与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05)；粗灰分消化率,处理组2和3与对照组相比,都有显著提高(P<0.05),处理组1虽与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但消化率提高了7.15%；钙消化率,处理组1和2比对照组有极显著提高(P<0.01),处理组3比对照组有显著提高(P<0.05)；磷消化率,三个试验组均比对照组有极显著提高(P<0.01),但各个试验组之间没有显著差异。试验结果说明,低能日粮添加酶制剂可以有效的消除抗营养因子的干扰,改善日粮的营养价值,促进营养物质的消化和吸收,略好于正常日粮的饲养效果。
试验三：代谢试验结束当天,每个组每个重复选取1只鸡,屠宰取样,测定肉仔鸡的胸肌率、腿肌率等指标,进一步研究低能日粮中添加木聚糖酶对肉仔鸡屠宰性能的影响。试验结果：与对照组相比,各个试验组的屠宰率均有极显著提高(P<0.01)，且三个试验组之间,处理组2的屠宰率比处理组1有显著提高(P<0.05)；各组的半净膛率、胸肌率、腿肌率和相对肝重均差异不显著(P>0.05),但试验组都有提高的趋势；全净膛率方面,处理组3与对照组差异显著(P<0.05),而处理组1和2与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但均有所提高；肝重方面,处理组2与对照组差异显著(P<0.05),处理组1和3与对照组相比差异不显著(P>0.05)；腹脂率方面,各组差异不显著(P>0.05),但各试验组与对照组相比,均降低了腹脂率。
试验结果表明,低能日粮中添加木聚糖酶制剂可以在一定程度上改善肉仔鸡的胴体品质。
The broiler chickens is the research object in this study, add the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet, study the effects of xylanase on the growth performance, apparent digestibility of nutrients, carcass quality and immune organ index in broilers. The results are as follows:
Test 1:Two hundred eighty-eight one-day-old Avain broilers were randomly divided into four groups of six repeats, each repeat had twelve chickens. One acted as control group and fed Corn-soybean basal diet, another three treated groups were separately fed-0.252MJ/kg,-0.42MJ/kg and-0.63MJ/kg low ME basal diet and all supplemented 100g/t xylanase. The test has 7 weeks and study the effect of xylanase in low ME diet on growth performance and immune organ index in broilers. The test results showed that there were on difference for hatch weight between control and three treatment groups (P>0.05); There were significant difference for finish weight and ADG between treatment 2 and control group (P<0.05), the treatment 1 and 3 had not significant difference with control group (P>0.05), but its had the rising trend. The finish weight were respectively increased by 6.18% and 0.50% with control, the average daily gain were respectively increased by 6.32% and 0.51% with control; There were extremely significantly difference for ADFI between control and three treatments (P<0.01), the ADFI of the treatment 1 and 2 were increased by 1.74% and 2.54%, but the ADFI of treatment 3 were decreased with control. There were no difference for F/W between control and the three treatments (P>0.05). To immune organ index:Thymus index of treatment 1 and 2 was significantly increased than control group (P<0.05), its were increased by 7.58% and 7.94% respectively; There were no difference for spleen index and bursa index between control and the three treatments (P>0.05), the spleen index and bursa index of treatment 3 were decreased a little with control,but its of treatment 1 and 2 had rising trend, the spleen index of treatment 1 and 2 were respectively increased by 3.42% and 9.40%, the bursa index of treatment 1 and 2 were respectively increased by 7.27% and 16.36%. In a word, add the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet, the growth performance of the broilers in three treatments had the same even the better effect with the control group. The three treatments could increased the immune organ index, which explain increased the immunity of the broilers.
Test 2:Twenty 6-week-old Avain broilers which had the similar weight were randomly divided into four groups, each group of six chickens and feed 1 week to study the effects of adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet on the apparent digestibility of nutrients. The results were as follow:The apparent digestibility of each nutrient all had the changes in Varying degrees. The CP apparent digestibility of treatment 2 was significantly increased than control and treatment 1 (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05), but its all had the rising trend. The EE apparent digestibility of treatment 2 was significantly increased than the other groups (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05); The Ash apparent digestibility of treatment 2 and 3 was significantly increased than the control groups (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 (P>0.05), but the ash apparent digestibility of treatment 1 was increased by 7.15%; The Ca apparent digestibility of treatment 1 and 2 was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), the Ca apparent digestibility of treatment 3 was significantly increased than the control group (P<0.05); The P apparent digestibility of the three treatments was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), but there were no difference in the three treatments (P>0.05). The test results showed that adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet could eliminates the disturbance effectively of the anti-trophic factors, improve the nutritional value of diets and promot nutrient digestion and absorption.
Test 3:Twenty-four 7-week-old broilers were selected randomly and slaughtered to study the effects adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet on carcass quality. The results as follow:The dressing percentage of the three treatments was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), at the same time, the dressing percentage of treatment 2 was significantly increased than the treatment 3 (P<0.05); There were no difference for PHE, PBM, PTM and relative liver weight between control and the three treatments (P>0.05). The PE of the treatment 3 was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), there were no difference for PE between control and the treatment 1 and 2 (P>0.05), but its had the rising trend. The liver weight of the treatment 2 was significantly increased than the control group (P<0.05), but there were no significant difference for liver weight between control and the treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05).At the same time, there were no significant difference for PAF between control and the three treatments (P>0.05), but the PAF of three treatments were decreased. The results showed that adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet could improve the carcass quality of broilers.
试验一：选择288只一日龄AA肉仔鸡,随机分为4个组,每个组6个重复,每个重复12只鸡。本试验分为4个处理组,分别为：对照组,饲喂玉米—豆粕型基础日粮；处理1：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.252 MJ/kg+木聚糖酶；处理2：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.42 MJ/kg+木聚糖酶；处理3：玉米—豆粕型日粮能量降低0.63MJ/kg+木聚糖酶,三个处理组中木聚糖酶添加量均为100g/t。本试验进行7周,研究其对肉仔鸡生产性能和免疫器官指数的影响。试验结果：试验开始时各组鸡体重均无显著差异(P>0.05)。对于42大末体重和平均日增重,处理2组与对照组相比均差异显著(P<0.05),而其他两个试验组与对照组差异不显著,但均有提高的趋势,42天末重分别提高了6.18%和0.5%；均日增重分别提高了6.132%和0.51%。日均采食量方面,处理1组和处理组2极显著高于对照组(P<0.01),分别比对照组提高了1.74%和2.54%；而处理组3却极显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。料重比方面各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。免疫器官指数方面：处理组1和2的胸腺指数显著高于对照组(P<0.05),分别提高了7.58%和7.94%；对于脾脏指数和法氏囊指数,各组之间差异不显著(P>0.05),除了处理组3比对照组略有下降外,处理组1和2均比对照组有提高的趋势,脾脏指数分别提高了13.42%和9.40%,法氏囊指数分别提高了7.27%和16.136%。试验结果表明：在肉仔鸡低能玉米—豆粕日粮中添加木聚糖酶,其生产性能能够达到甚至超过正常能量水平日粮的饲喂效果。同时,还能够提高免疫器官指数,说明提高了肉鸡的免疫力。
试验二：第42天饲养试验结束时,每个重复选1只鸡,体重接近,进行为期一周的代谢试验。研究肉鸡低能玉米—豆粕日粮中添加酶制剂对其养分表观消化率的影响。试验结果：各种营养成分的表观消化率均有不同程度的变化。粗蛋白表观消化率,处理组2和对照组、处理组1均有显著差异(P<0.05),处理组1和3与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但有所提高；粗脂肪消化率,处理组2与其余组相比都显著提高(P<0.05),而处理组1和3与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05)；粗灰分消化率,处理组2和3与对照组相比,都有显著提高(P<0.05),处理组1虽与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但消化率提高了7.15%；钙消化率,处理组1和2比对照组有极显著提高(P<0.01),处理组3比对照组有显著提高(P<0.05)；磷消化率,三个试验组均比对照组有极显著提高(P<0.01),但各个试验组之间没有显著差异。试验结果说明,低能日粮添加酶制剂可以有效的消除抗营养因子的干扰,改善日粮的营养价值,促进营养物质的消化和吸收,略好于正常日粮的饲养效果。
试验三：代谢试验结束当天,每个组每个重复选取1只鸡,屠宰取样,测定肉仔鸡的胸肌率、腿肌率等指标,进一步研究低能日粮中添加木聚糖酶对肉仔鸡屠宰性能的影响。试验结果：与对照组相比,各个试验组的屠宰率均有极显著提高(P<0.01)，且三个试验组之间,处理组2的屠宰率比处理组1有显著提高(P<0.05)；各组的半净膛率、胸肌率、腿肌率和相对肝重均差异不显著(P>0.05),但试验组都有提高的趋势；全净膛率方面,处理组3与对照组差异显著(P<0.05),而处理组1和2与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),但均有所提高；肝重方面,处理组2与对照组差异显著(P<0.05),处理组1和3与对照组相比差异不显著(P>0.05)；腹脂率方面,各组差异不显著(P>0.05),但各试验组与对照组相比,均降低了腹脂率。
试验结果表明,低能日粮中添加木聚糖酶制剂可以在一定程度上改善肉仔鸡的胴体品质。
The broiler chickens is the research object in this study, add the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet, study the effects of xylanase on the growth performance, apparent digestibility of nutrients, carcass quality and immune organ index in broilers. The results are as follows:
Test 1:Two hundred eighty-eight one-day-old Avain broilers were randomly divided into four groups of six repeats, each repeat had twelve chickens. One acted as control group and fed Corn-soybean basal diet, another three treated groups were separately fed-0.252MJ/kg,-0.42MJ/kg and-0.63MJ/kg low ME basal diet and all supplemented 100g/t xylanase. The test has 7 weeks and study the effect of xylanase in low ME diet on growth performance and immune organ index in broilers. The test results showed that there were on difference for hatch weight between control and three treatment groups (P>0.05); There were significant difference for finish weight and ADG between treatment 2 and control group (P<0.05), the treatment 1 and 3 had not significant difference with control group (P>0.05), but its had the rising trend. The finish weight were respectively increased by 6.18% and 0.50% with control, the average daily gain were respectively increased by 6.32% and 0.51% with control; There were extremely significantly difference for ADFI between control and three treatments (P<0.01), the ADFI of the treatment 1 and 2 were increased by 1.74% and 2.54%, but the ADFI of treatment 3 were decreased with control. There were no difference for F/W between control and the three treatments (P>0.05). To immune organ index:Thymus index of treatment 1 and 2 was significantly increased than control group (P<0.05), its were increased by 7.58% and 7.94% respectively; There were no difference for spleen index and bursa index between control and the three treatments (P>0.05), the spleen index and bursa index of treatment 3 were decreased a little with control,but its of treatment 1 and 2 had rising trend, the spleen index of treatment 1 and 2 were respectively increased by 3.42% and 9.40%, the bursa index of treatment 1 and 2 were respectively increased by 7.27% and 16.36%. In a word, add the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet, the growth performance of the broilers in three treatments had the same even the better effect with the control group. The three treatments could increased the immune organ index, which explain increased the immunity of the broilers.
Test 2:Twenty 6-week-old Avain broilers which had the similar weight were randomly divided into four groups, each group of six chickens and feed 1 week to study the effects of adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet on the apparent digestibility of nutrients. The results were as follow:The apparent digestibility of each nutrient all had the changes in Varying degrees. The CP apparent digestibility of treatment 2 was significantly increased than control and treatment 1 (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05), but its all had the rising trend. The EE apparent digestibility of treatment 2 was significantly increased than the other groups (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05); The Ash apparent digestibility of treatment 2 and 3 was significantly increased than the control groups (P<0.05), there were no significant difference between control and treatment 1 (P>0.05), but the ash apparent digestibility of treatment 1 was increased by 7.15%; The Ca apparent digestibility of treatment 1 and 2 was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), the Ca apparent digestibility of treatment 3 was significantly increased than the control group (P<0.05); The P apparent digestibility of the three treatments was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), but there were no difference in the three treatments (P>0.05). The test results showed that adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet could eliminates the disturbance effectively of the anti-trophic factors, improve the nutritional value of diets and promot nutrient digestion and absorption.
Test 3:Twenty-four 7-week-old broilers were selected randomly and slaughtered to study the effects adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet on carcass quality. The results as follow:The dressing percentage of the three treatments was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), at the same time, the dressing percentage of treatment 2 was significantly increased than the treatment 3 (P<0.05); There were no difference for PHE, PBM, PTM and relative liver weight between control and the three treatments (P>0.05). The PE of the treatment 3 was extremely significantly increased than the control group (P<0.01), there were no difference for PE between control and the treatment 1 and 2 (P>0.05), but its had the rising trend. The liver weight of the treatment 2 was significantly increased than the control group (P<0.05), but there were no significant difference for liver weight between control and the treatment 1 and 3 (P>0.05).At the same time, there were no significant difference for PAF between control and the three treatments (P>0.05), but the PAF of three treatments were decreased. The results showed that adding the xylanase in the different levels low ME Corn-soybean meal diet could improve the carcass quality of broilers.
引文
[1]陈璐,吴子林.当前我国饲料工业中存在的主要问题[J].中国饲料,1999,21：7-9.
[2]李德发,展望21世纪饲料工业发展趋势[J].中国饲料,1999,1：4-5.
[3]许梓荣,卢建军.稻谷型日粮添加非淀粉多糖酶对生长猪消化道结构和功能的作用研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(2)：201-207.
[4]韩正康,Marquardt R R.家禽及猪营养中的酶制剂-饲料酶制剂国际学术研讨会论文[C].南京：南京农业大学,1996：43-49.
[5]彭玉麟,呙于明,袁建敏.小麦日粮中木聚糖酶和植酸酶对肉仔鸡生长和养分消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2003,18(013)：48-52.
[6]于旭华,冯定远.真菌性和细菌性木聚糖酶对黄羽肉鸡消化系统发育和消化酶活性的影响[A].中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会——第九届学术研讨会论文集[C],2004.
[7]王金全,蔡辉益.木聚糖酶与肉仔鸡小麦日粮代谢能之间当量关系的研究[J].中国饲料,2004,(9)：11-15.
[8]艾晓杰.韩正康,陈伟华.大麦日粮添加粗酶制剂对鹅生长及有关代谢激素水平的影响.《家禽及猪营养中的酶制剂.饲料酶制剂国际学术研讨会论文集,中国南京.1996,145-150.
[9]Marta S I, Costas G B. Effect of molecular size on physical, of wheat pentosan. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 1992, 40: 561-568.
[10]Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 1992, 122 : 560-569.
[11]Bedford M R, Morgan A J. The use of enzymes in poultry diets. World's Poultry Science Journal, 1996; 52: 61-68.
[12]Noy Y, Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick [J]. Poult Sci, 1995, 74 (2) : 366-373.
[13]Zanella I, Sakomura N K, Silversides F G, et al. Effect of enzyme supplementation of broiler diets based on corn and soybeans [J]. Poult Sci, 1999, 78 (4) : 561-568.
[14]王冉,周岩民,刘迎春.肉鸡玉米-豆粕型日粮中添加酶制剂的试验研究[J].饲料工业,1999,20(9)：40-42.
[15]Pack M, Bedford M. Feed enzymes for corn--soybean broiler diets [J]. World Poultry, 1997, 13 (9) : 87-93.
[16]Cowan, D. Advances in feed enzyme technology. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1992, 60:311-319.
[17]Bedford, M. R, and Morgan. A. J. The use of enzymes in Poultry diets. World' Poult. Sci. 1996.52:61—68.
[18]Graham, H. High gut viscosity can reduce Poultry Performance. Feedstuffs. 1993, Feb.1:14—15.
[19]Graham, H. Enzymes broaden scope of dietary ingredients. World poultry. 1996,12:24—25.
[20]岳增华,解志峰.复合酶制剂在不同能量水平肉鸡日粮中的应用效果[J].中国禽业导刊,2006,23(13)：34
[21]程时军,刘金银.复合酶及木聚糖酶在肉鸡低代谢能饲料中的应用[J].饲料广角,2006,21：9
[22]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦基础日粮添加酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能和血液某些指标的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,23(4)：71-75
[23]高峰,江芸,周光宏,韩正康.非淀粉多糖酶制剂对雏鸡生长、免疫功能和肠道微生物区系的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2004,24(5)：501-503.
[24]刘燕强,韩正康.大麦日粮添加粗酶制剂对雏鸡生长和血液代谢激素含量的影响.南京农业大学学报,1998,21(2)：77-81.
[25]Rivas A., Fabricant T. Indication of immune depression in chicken infected various strain of Marek's disease virus. J. Avian Diseases, 1985, 32: 1-8.
[26]张继东.不同类型日粮中添加a-半乳糖苷酶对肉仔鸡作用效果的研究[D].郑州：河南农业大学硕士论文,2007,6.
[27]杜思刚.木聚糖酶的体外酶解筛选及其在肉仔鸡小麦日粮中的应用研究[D].郑州：河南农业大学硕士论文,2009,6.
[28]王金全.小麦非淀粉多糖的抗营养机理及木聚糖酶在肉仔鸡小麦日粮的应用研究[D].中国农业科学院博士论文,2004：26-32.
[29]Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is affected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved rates and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 1992, 122:560-569.
[30]Almirall M, Francesch M, Pe'rez-Vendrell A M, Brufau J, Esteve-Garcia E. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 125: 947-955.
[31]Yu B, Hsu J C, Chiou P W S. Effects of β-glucanase supplementation of barley diets in growth performance of broilers. Animal of Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 70: 353-361.
[32]Danicke S, Vahjen W, Simon O, Jeroch H. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium, on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility. Poultry Science, 1999,78:1292-1299.
[33]宁开桂.实用饲料分析手册[M].中国农业科技出版社,1992.
[34]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M].中国农业大学出版社,2004.
[35]Noy Y, Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick [J]. Poult Sci, 1995, 74(2): 366-373.
[36]王玲.酶制剂在肉雏鸡饲料中的应用研究[J].饲料研究,2001,(2)：31-32.
[37]周晓容.肉鸡饲粮中木聚糖与木聚糖酶关系的研究.硕士学位论文.雅安：四川农业大学,2003：25-27.
[38]倪志勇,张克英,左绍群,陈代文.不同营养水平饲粮中添加饲用复合酶对肉鸡生产性能的影响研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2001,19(1)：80-85.
[39]万伶俐,王晓阳,邱玉朗,于振斌,于维.不同粗蛋白质水平饲粮中添加复合酶对蛋鸡生产性能的影响法[J].兽药与饲料添加剂,2004,9(6)：7-9.
[40]唐琼,汝应俊,张克英,丁雪梅,刘雅石.低能饲粮中添加不同酶制剂对肉鸭生长性能和养分回肠表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(5)：579-585.
[41]钱利纯等.可溶性非淀粉多糖对畜禽消化的影响[J].中国饲料,1998,8：23.
[42]Choct M, R J Hughes, R P Trimble, K Angkanaporn, G Annison. Non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzylnes increase the performance of broiler cllickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. J. Nutrition, 1995, 125: 485-492.
[43]Choct M, Hughes R J, Bedford M K. Effects of a xylanase on individual bird varation, starch digestion throughout the intestine. ileal and caecal volatile fatty acid production in chickens fed wheat. J. British Poultry Science 1999, 40: 419-422.
[44]孙德文,詹勇,许梓荣.非淀粉多糖的抗营养作用的研究[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001,(11):31-33.
[45]奚刚等.外源酶制剂对丝毛乌骨鸡蛋白质、氨基酸表观消化率及内源消化酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,1999,11(2)：64.
[46]张树政主编.酶制剂工业[M].北京：科学出版社,1984.
[47]朱忠珂,汪儆,雷祖玉,等.玉米—豆粕日粮中添加外源酶对肉仔鸡生长性能、养分代谢率及免疫功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2005,17(4)：41-45.
[48]汪儆,饲料酶制剂研究进展.饲料毒物与抗营养因子研究进展[M].西北大学出版社,1997,146.
[49]杨宁.现代养鸡生产[M].北京：北京农业大学出版社,1994.
[50]吴晋强主编.动物营养学[M].合肥,安徽科学技术出版社.1999,8.
[51]杨立彬,李德发,龚利敏.日粮不同能量和蛋白质水平对肉仔鸡生产性能和胭体品质的 影响[C].动物营养学会论文集(2000)2000,10：522—526.
[52]蒋桂韬,戴求仲,胡艳.能量和蛋白水平对湘黄鸡生长性能及胴体品质的影响[J].湖南畜牧兽医,2004,5：6—8.
[53]蔺淑琴,李金录,史兆国,魏时来,沈禹颐.日粮不同营养水平对黄羽肉鸡屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,135(8)：9—12.
[54]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦米糠口粮添加酶制剂和寡果糖对雏鸡生产性能、免疫和内分泌的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2002,33(1)：14-17.
[55]邹勇,张建军.日粮蛋白水平对肉用仔鸡腹脂率影响的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2003,3：10
[56]方立超,宋代军,阚宁等.饲粮能量和蛋白质水平对肉鸡肉质的影响.西南农业学报,2002,15(13)：98—104.
[57]Leske K L, Zhang B, Coon C N, The use of low alpha-galactoside protein products as a protein source in chicken diets. Animal Feed Science Technology, 1995, 54:275-286.
[58]Lin C Y. Relationship between increased body weight and fat deposition in broilers. world s Poultry Science Journal [J]. 1981, (37) :106—110.
[59]Melearl J. A. Nutritional factors influencing carcass fat in broilers review. World's Poultry science Journal[J]. 1982, 38(3):194—201.
[60]Donaldson, W. E. LiPogenesis and body fat in chick: effects of calorie—Protein ratio and dietary fat. poult, sci[J]. 1985, (64):1199—1204.
[61]王彦文,宋志琪.日粮能蛋水平对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响[J]甘肃畜牧兽医1996,1：1-4.
[62]陈金文 杨山 莫棣华等.日粮能量和蛋白水平对肉鸡腹脂和血脂的影响[J]动物营养学报1998,10(1)：20—29.
[63]候水生,李绍标,黄俊纯.日粮能量蛋白质水平对肉用仔鸡体重及腹脂率的影响[J]中国畜牧杂志,1991,27(5)：6—8.
[64]Li X, L P Yang, F Yan, Zuo Jin F. Factor regulating production of α -galactosidase from Bacillus sp. JF2. Letters in applied microbiology, 1997, 25: 1-4.
[65]Osei S A, and Oduro S, Effects of dietary enzyme on broiler chickens fed diets containing wheat bran. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2000, 9: 681-686.
[66]陈成功等.复合酶制剂对肉用仔鸡生产性能的影响.兽医大学学报,1992,1：90.
[67]崔朝霞,林东康,王若军,等.戊聚糖酶在肉鸡小麦豆粕日粮中的应用[J].饲料研究,2003,(8)：4-7.
[68]顾宪红,方路.酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能及主要营养素代谢率的影响[J].饲料研究,2000,(4)：39-40.
[69]胡少昶译.应用于肉鸡玉米-大豆日粮的饲用酶制剂[J].国外畜牧学-猪与禽,1998,1：17.
[2]李德发,展望21世纪饲料工业发展趋势[J].中国饲料,1999,1：4-5.
[3]许梓荣,卢建军.稻谷型日粮添加非淀粉多糖酶对生长猪消化道结构和功能的作用研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(2)：201-207.
[4]韩正康,Marquardt R R.家禽及猪营养中的酶制剂-饲料酶制剂国际学术研讨会论文[C].南京：南京农业大学,1996：43-49.
[5]彭玉麟,呙于明,袁建敏.小麦日粮中木聚糖酶和植酸酶对肉仔鸡生长和养分消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2003,18(013)：48-52.
[6]于旭华,冯定远.真菌性和细菌性木聚糖酶对黄羽肉鸡消化系统发育和消化酶活性的影响[A].中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会——第九届学术研讨会论文集[C],2004.
[7]王金全,蔡辉益.木聚糖酶与肉仔鸡小麦日粮代谢能之间当量关系的研究[J].中国饲料,2004,(9)：11-15.
[8]艾晓杰.韩正康,陈伟华.大麦日粮添加粗酶制剂对鹅生长及有关代谢激素水平的影响.《家禽及猪营养中的酶制剂.饲料酶制剂国际学术研讨会论文集,中国南京.1996,145-150.
[9]Marta S I, Costas G B. Effect of molecular size on physical, of wheat pentosan. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 1992, 40: 561-568.
[10]Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 1992, 122 : 560-569.
[11]Bedford M R, Morgan A J. The use of enzymes in poultry diets. World's Poultry Science Journal, 1996; 52: 61-68.
[12]Noy Y, Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick [J]. Poult Sci, 1995, 74 (2) : 366-373.
[13]Zanella I, Sakomura N K, Silversides F G, et al. Effect of enzyme supplementation of broiler diets based on corn and soybeans [J]. Poult Sci, 1999, 78 (4) : 561-568.
[14]王冉,周岩民,刘迎春.肉鸡玉米-豆粕型日粮中添加酶制剂的试验研究[J].饲料工业,1999,20(9)：40-42.
[15]Pack M, Bedford M. Feed enzymes for corn--soybean broiler diets [J]. World Poultry, 1997, 13 (9) : 87-93.
[16]Cowan, D. Advances in feed enzyme technology. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1992, 60:311-319.
[17]Bedford, M. R, and Morgan. A. J. The use of enzymes in Poultry diets. World' Poult. Sci. 1996.52:61—68.
[18]Graham, H. High gut viscosity can reduce Poultry Performance. Feedstuffs. 1993, Feb.1:14—15.
[19]Graham, H. Enzymes broaden scope of dietary ingredients. World poultry. 1996,12:24—25.
[20]岳增华,解志峰.复合酶制剂在不同能量水平肉鸡日粮中的应用效果[J].中国禽业导刊,2006,23(13)：34
[21]程时军,刘金银.复合酶及木聚糖酶在肉鸡低代谢能饲料中的应用[J].饲料广角,2006,21：9
[22]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦基础日粮添加酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能和血液某些指标的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,23(4)：71-75
[23]高峰,江芸,周光宏,韩正康.非淀粉多糖酶制剂对雏鸡生长、免疫功能和肠道微生物区系的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2004,24(5)：501-503.
[24]刘燕强,韩正康.大麦日粮添加粗酶制剂对雏鸡生长和血液代谢激素含量的影响.南京农业大学学报,1998,21(2)：77-81.
[25]Rivas A., Fabricant T. Indication of immune depression in chicken infected various strain of Marek's disease virus. J. Avian Diseases, 1985, 32: 1-8.
[26]张继东.不同类型日粮中添加a-半乳糖苷酶对肉仔鸡作用效果的研究[D].郑州：河南农业大学硕士论文,2007,6.
[27]杜思刚.木聚糖酶的体外酶解筛选及其在肉仔鸡小麦日粮中的应用研究[D].郑州：河南农业大学硕士论文,2009,6.
[28]王金全.小麦非淀粉多糖的抗营养机理及木聚糖酶在肉仔鸡小麦日粮的应用研究[D].中国农业科学院博士论文,2004：26-32.
[29]Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is affected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved rates and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 1992, 122:560-569.
[30]Almirall M, Francesch M, Pe'rez-Vendrell A M, Brufau J, Esteve-Garcia E. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 125: 947-955.
[31]Yu B, Hsu J C, Chiou P W S. Effects of β-glucanase supplementation of barley diets in growth performance of broilers. Animal of Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 70: 353-361.
[32]Danicke S, Vahjen W, Simon O, Jeroch H. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium, on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility. Poultry Science, 1999,78:1292-1299.
[33]宁开桂.实用饲料分析手册[M].中国农业科技出版社,1992.
[34]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M].中国农业大学出版社,2004.
[35]Noy Y, Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick [J]. Poult Sci, 1995, 74(2): 366-373.
[36]王玲.酶制剂在肉雏鸡饲料中的应用研究[J].饲料研究,2001,(2)：31-32.
[37]周晓容.肉鸡饲粮中木聚糖与木聚糖酶关系的研究.硕士学位论文.雅安：四川农业大学,2003：25-27.
[38]倪志勇,张克英,左绍群,陈代文.不同营养水平饲粮中添加饲用复合酶对肉鸡生产性能的影响研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2001,19(1)：80-85.
[39]万伶俐,王晓阳,邱玉朗,于振斌,于维.不同粗蛋白质水平饲粮中添加复合酶对蛋鸡生产性能的影响法[J].兽药与饲料添加剂,2004,9(6)：7-9.
[40]唐琼,汝应俊,张克英,丁雪梅,刘雅石.低能饲粮中添加不同酶制剂对肉鸭生长性能和养分回肠表观消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2008,20(5)：579-585.
[41]钱利纯等.可溶性非淀粉多糖对畜禽消化的影响[J].中国饲料,1998,8：23.
[42]Choct M, R J Hughes, R P Trimble, K Angkanaporn, G Annison. Non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzylnes increase the performance of broiler cllickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. J. Nutrition, 1995, 125: 485-492.
[43]Choct M, Hughes R J, Bedford M K. Effects of a xylanase on individual bird varation, starch digestion throughout the intestine. ileal and caecal volatile fatty acid production in chickens fed wheat. J. British Poultry Science 1999, 40: 419-422.
[44]孙德文,詹勇,许梓荣.非淀粉多糖的抗营养作用的研究[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001,(11):31-33.
[45]奚刚等.外源酶制剂对丝毛乌骨鸡蛋白质、氨基酸表观消化率及内源消化酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,1999,11(2)：64.
[46]张树政主编.酶制剂工业[M].北京：科学出版社,1984.
[47]朱忠珂,汪儆,雷祖玉,等.玉米—豆粕日粮中添加外源酶对肉仔鸡生长性能、养分代谢率及免疫功能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2005,17(4)：41-45.
[48]汪儆,饲料酶制剂研究进展.饲料毒物与抗营养因子研究进展[M].西北大学出版社,1997,146.
[49]杨宁.现代养鸡生产[M].北京：北京农业大学出版社,1994.
[50]吴晋强主编.动物营养学[M].合肥,安徽科学技术出版社.1999,8.
[51]杨立彬,李德发,龚利敏.日粮不同能量和蛋白质水平对肉仔鸡生产性能和胭体品质的 影响[C].动物营养学会论文集(2000)2000,10：522—526.
[52]蒋桂韬,戴求仲,胡艳.能量和蛋白水平对湘黄鸡生长性能及胴体品质的影响[J].湖南畜牧兽医,2004,5：6—8.
[53]蔺淑琴,李金录,史兆国,魏时来,沈禹颐.日粮不同营养水平对黄羽肉鸡屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2008,135(8)：9—12.
[54]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦米糠口粮添加酶制剂和寡果糖对雏鸡生产性能、免疫和内分泌的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2002,33(1)：14-17.
[55]邹勇,张建军.日粮蛋白水平对肉用仔鸡腹脂率影响的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2003,3：10
[56]方立超,宋代军,阚宁等.饲粮能量和蛋白质水平对肉鸡肉质的影响.西南农业学报,2002,15(13)：98—104.
[57]Leske K L, Zhang B, Coon C N, The use of low alpha-galactoside protein products as a protein source in chicken diets. Animal Feed Science Technology, 1995, 54:275-286.
[58]Lin C Y. Relationship between increased body weight and fat deposition in broilers. world s Poultry Science Journal [J]. 1981, (37) :106—110.
[59]Melearl J. A. Nutritional factors influencing carcass fat in broilers review. World's Poultry science Journal[J]. 1982, 38(3):194—201.
[60]Donaldson, W. E. LiPogenesis and body fat in chick: effects of calorie—Protein ratio and dietary fat. poult, sci[J]. 1985, (64):1199—1204.
[61]王彦文,宋志琪.日粮能蛋水平对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响[J]甘肃畜牧兽医1996,1：1-4.
[62]陈金文 杨山 莫棣华等.日粮能量和蛋白水平对肉鸡腹脂和血脂的影响[J]动物营养学报1998,10(1)：20—29.
[63]候水生,李绍标,黄俊纯.日粮能量蛋白质水平对肉用仔鸡体重及腹脂率的影响[J]中国畜牧杂志,1991,27(5)：6—8.
[64]Li X, L P Yang, F Yan, Zuo Jin F. Factor regulating production of α -galactosidase from Bacillus sp. JF2. Letters in applied microbiology, 1997, 25: 1-4.
[65]Osei S A, and Oduro S, Effects of dietary enzyme on broiler chickens fed diets containing wheat bran. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2000, 9: 681-686.
[66]陈成功等.复合酶制剂对肉用仔鸡生产性能的影响.兽医大学学报,1992,1：90.
[67]崔朝霞,林东康,王若军,等.戊聚糖酶在肉鸡小麦豆粕日粮中的应用[J].饲料研究,2003,(8)：4-7.
[68]顾宪红,方路.酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能及主要营养素代谢率的影响[J].饲料研究,2000,(4)：39-40.
[69]胡少昶译.应用于肉鸡玉米-大豆日粮的饲用酶制剂[J].国外畜牧学-猪与禽,1998,1：17.