摘要
随着社会经济的不断发展和工业化程度的逐步提高,人类对自然环境所带来的负面影响也日益突出,在此情形下,人们开始注意自然资源的合理利用和环境保护问题。而确立正确的自然旅游资源经济价值观,以及科学合理地计算自然旅游资源的经济价值,不仅有利于促进自然旅游资源的保护和合理开发,也有利于自然旅游资源收益的合理分配。目前,世界上已有许多专家学者开始投身于自然旅游资源价值及与其密切相关的生态环境经济价值核算领域的研究。
本文选择位于福建省南平市延平区郊区5公里的石佛山森林公园作为研究对象,在详细地阐释了与自然旅游资源价值密切相关的若干定义及研究的理论依据之后,通过对当前较为常用的多种评估核算方法进行比较分析,最终选择个人旅行成本法和条件价值法作为评估核算石佛山森林公园自然旅游资源经济价值的方法,并分别得出核算结果:其中运用旅行成本法核算得出的总价值为2551.74万元/年;而运用条件价值法核算得出的结果为3400.49万元/年。
全文共有七章。第一章为引言,主要介绍了论文的选题背景与意义、研究方法、研究特色及所追求的创新点等,并对国内外相关研究的历史与方法进行了综述;第二章介绍了自然旅游资源价值的定义以及常用的一些核算方法,并对其中的几种主要核算方法进行了比较分析;第三章介绍了研究对象石佛山森林公园的基本情况,并对研究中所采用的问卷调查法进行了分析,主要涉及问卷的前期准备工作和调查问卷的具体内容;第四章详细分析了旅行成本法,并具体运用个人旅行成本法评估核算石佛山森林公园自然旅游资源的经济价值;第五章在详细地介绍条件价值法的基础上,运用该方法对石佛山森林公园的自然旅游资源经济价值进行评估核算,并得出了相应的评估结果;第六章在比较分析石佛山森林公园旅游开发的现状与核算研究结果的基础上,提出了相应的进一步开发石佛山森林公园旅游资源的政策建议;第七章为本文的总结与讨论,通过比较分析旅行成本法与条件价值法的异同点,归纳出本研究的基本结论,并与前人的研究成果进行比较,最后指出了本研究的不足之处及今后进一步的努力方向。
The effect on the environment from mankind is increasingly remarkable with the sustaining development of social economy and industrialization. So mankind begin to pay attention to rational utilization of resources and environment protection at the same time of developing economy. The correct view of economic value and the scientific and reasonable evaluation of natural tourist resources are favorable for development and protection of natural tourist resources and the equitable distribution of income. Therefore, at the present time many economists set about study on the evaluation of economic value of natural resources and environment.
Shi-Fo Mountain Forest Park locates in the outskirts 5 kilometers way from Yan Ping District, Nan Ping City, Fujian Province. The paper chooses it as the object of study, and detailedly explains the relevant definitions and theories of natural tourist resource value. Through comparative analysis on several currently staple methods of evaluation and calculation, the paper uses individual travel cost method and contingent valuation method, and works out the economic value of natural tourist resources of Shi-Fo Mountain Forest Park. The former result is 2551.74 ten-thousand-yuan/year, and the latter one is 3400.49 ten-thousand-yuan/year.
The paper is divided into 7 parts. The first part is the introduction.It mainly introduces the background and mean of this paper, study means, characteristics and innovations. In addition, the intrduction summarizes the relevant studying course and means at home and abroad. The second part introduces the definitions of natural tourist resource value and several staple evaluating methods, and makes comparative analysis. The third part introduces the fundamental state of Shi-Fo-Shan Forest Park, and gives a reference to the preparation for questionnaire survey at the earlier studying stage. The fourth part introduces in detail traval cost method. And individual traval cost method is applied to evaluating the economic value of natural tourist resource of Shi-Fo Mountain Forest Park. The fifth part detailedly introduces contingent valuation method. And it’s also use to assessment. The sixth part compares the current situation of Shi-Fo Mountain Forest Park with the result, and puts forward some suggestions about developing the park. The seventh part includes the discussion and conclusion of the paper, analyzes the same and the difference between traval cost mean and contingent valuation method, makes the basic conclusions of this paper, compares the study with the previous research results, and finally comes up with deficiencies.
引文
[1]马传栋.资源生态经济学[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1995.
[2]李金昌.生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999.
[3]Krutilla J. Conservation Reconsidered[J]. American Economic Review, 1967,9:777-786.
[4]戴广翠,高岚,艾运盛.对森林游憩价值经济评估的研究[J].林业经济,1998,(2):65-74.
[5]陈海,康慕谊.森林旅游资源价值核算研究进展[J].资源科学,2003,25(3):104-111.
[6]Clawson M. Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation [M]. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.1959.
[7]Clawson M. and Knetsch J. Economics of Outdoor Recreation[M]. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.1966.
[8]Loomis J. B, Walsh R. G. Recreation economic decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs [M]. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.1986.
[9] Caulkins P. P. The travel cost model for lake recreation: a comparison of two method for incorporating site quality and substitution effect[J]. American Journal of Agriculture Economics.1986,68(02): 182-187.
[10]McConnell K. E. The Economics of outdoor Recreation [C]. In Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economic[D]. edited by Allen VKneese and James LSweeney. Vo12. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science,1985.677-722.
[11]Harris C. C. etal. Recreation User Fees I: An Economics Analysis[J]. Journal of Forestry,1987,85(5):31-35.
[12] Willis K. G, J. J. Benson. Recreational Value of Forests[J]. Forestry,1989, 62(2):93-110.
[13]庄大昌,董明辉.资源与环境经济学国内外研究综述[J].湖南文理学院学报(社科版),2005,30(1):52-55.
[14]王德利.试论旅游环境资源计价[J].价格月刊,1998,8:7-9.
[15]彭新育,吴甫成,傅尔林.评价旅游景点经济价值的数学模型[J].经济地理,2000,20(4): 109-113.
[16]彭斌,李世聪.环境资源价值的线性规划模型计量[J].现代会计,2002,4:1-3.
[17]刘坤,杨东.旅游资源的经济价值评价[J].曲阜师范大学学报,2001,27(3):103-107.
[18]李向明.旅游资源资产评估指标体系初探[J].中南林学院学报,2001,21(3):92-96.
[19]曹辉,陈平留.论森林景观资产评估[J].林业资源管理,2002,(1):41-44.
[20]阮君.森林游憩价值评价之CVM、TCM比较研究[J].辽宁林业科技,2006,1:17-18,20.
[21]曹建华,王红英,郭小鹏.CVM方法确定环境价值有效性的分析研究[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005,15(2):48-52.
[22]黎洁.我国自然保护区生态旅游资源价值实现方式研究[J].农村生态环境,2002,18(3): 61-64.
[23]魏民.试论风景名胜区资源的价值[J].中国园林,2003,3:25-28.
[24]张家来,章建斌,戴均华等.湖北森林生态资源价值的补偿标准[J].林业科学,2007,43(8):127-133.
[25]黄海玉,魏敏.厦门市生态旅游资源开发与价值补偿研究[J].生态经济,2006,10: 179-181,277.
[26]陆鼎煌.张家界森林公园效益的研究[J].中南林学院学报,1985,5(2):160-170.
[27]吴楚材.张家界森林公园游憩效益经济评价的研究[J].林业科学,1992,28(5):423-430.
[28]王连茂.香山公园游憩效益的经济评价[J].林业经济,1993,3:66-71.
[29]艾运盛.武夷山国家风景名胜区游憩效益的评价[J].北京林业大学学报,1996,18(3):89-97.
[30]程弘.兴隆山国家自然保护区森林资源游憩价值评估[J].甘肃林业科技,1997,22(4):40-43.
[31]欧阳勋志,廖为明,黄晓全.婺源县森林景观游憩价值的经济评价[J].地域研究与开发,2006,25(1):78-82.
[32]陈浮,张捷.旅游价值货币化核算研究—九寨沟案例分析[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(3):296-303.
[33]曹辉,兰思仁.福州国家森林公园森林景观游憩效益评价[J].林业经济问题,2001,21(5):296-298.
[34]陈浮,张捷.旅游价值货币化核算研究—九寨沟案例分析[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(3):296-303.
[35]韩哲英,王立海,陈.CVM法在森林生态旅游产品价值评估中的运用——以黑龙江省平山生态旅游区为例[J].林业科技,2007,32(3):65-68.
[36]王炳贵.厦门天竺山森林公园森林景观资产初步评估[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(6):84-88.
[37]孙龙,李俊涛,耿叙武等.崂山风景区森林生态系统服务功能及价值评估[J].防护林科技,2006,3:93-95.
[38]靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,饶良懿,牛建植,谢媛媛.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估问题[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(3):18-22,43.
[39]邓晓梅,秦岩,冉圣宏,王郑敏,孔艳.衡水湖国家级自然保护区的生态旅游价值研究[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(1):45-50.
[40]程宣境,杨培林,张成材.山西省森林生态旅游价值核算[J].山西林业科技,2007,2: 15-16,20.
[41]冷淑莲,冷崇总.自然资源价值补偿问题研究[J].价格月刊,2007,5:3-12.
[42]国家旅游局资源开发司.中国旅游资源普查规范[M].北京:中国旅游出版社,1992.
[43]蒋庭松,王健民.试论自然环境资源的价值与价格研究[A].资源、环境与农业发展,全国自然资源青年研讨会论文集[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:11-14.
[44]梁修存,丁登山.国外旅游资源评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2): 253-260.
[45]蔡银莺,张安录.城郊休闲农业景观地游憩价值估算[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(5):27-35.
[46]徐经泽,冯卓然,风笑天等.社会调查理论与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1993.
[47]谢贤政,马中.应用旅行费用法评估黄山风景区游憩价值[J].资源科学,2006,28(3):128-136.
[48]Brown W.G.,Nawas F.,Impact of Aggregation on the Estimation of Outdoor Recreation Demand Functions,American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1973,Vol 55:246-249.
[49]陈凯俐,林云雀.宜兰县游憩区之游憩效益评估[J].中华林学季刊,2004,37(3):293-302.
[50]Huang,Ju-Chin (2004),“Exact Welfare Measures for a Policy Ban Revisited,”Working Paper, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica.
[51]Alberini A,Zanatta V,Rosato P. Combining actual and contingent behavior to estimate the value of sports fishing in the lagoon of Venice.Ecological Economics,2007,61(3):530—541.
[52]崔丽娟.扎龙湿地价值货币化评价[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(4):451-456.
[53]刘亚萍,金建湘,潘晓芳.生态旅游区非使用价值的评估方法—CVM法[J].绿色中国:理论版,2005,07(m):39-42.
[54]刘亚萍,潘晓芳,钟秋平等.生态旅游区自然环境的游憩价值—运用条件价值评价法和旅行费用法对武陵源风景区进行实证分析[J].生态学报,2006,26(11):3765-3774.
[55]冯国云,马明呈,赵洪龙.大通老爷山景区及森林游憩价值初评[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2008,26(3):89-93.
[56] Michael D .Kaplowize.Identifying ecosystem services using multiple methods:Lessons from the mangrove wetlands of Yucatan,Mexico [J].Agriculture and Human Values,2000,17(2):16-179.
[57]Carson R T.Valuation of tropical rainforests:Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation[J].Ecological Economics,1998,24:15-29.
[58]曾贤刚.环境影响经济评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003.154-171,14-31.
[59]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003(3):454-463
[60]福建省统计局.福建省统计年鉴2008[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008.