降雨环境下交通因素辨析与驾驶可靠性评价建模
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
汽车与交通运输产业的发展,在推动社会经济进步的同时,伴之而来的交通事故对社会公共安全构成严重威胁。鉴于严峻的交通安全形势,分析研究交通事故特点,抑制交通事故高发,降低道路交通事故危害程度是一项重要而紧迫的研究工作。影响交通安全的因素是多方面的,如人、车、路、环境及交通管理水平等。目前,国内外对交通事故的研究多注重人、车、路中的某一种或某几种因素,而对环境协调性因素研究甚少,甚至忽视环境因素在交通安全中的重要作用。例如,道路因素为安全行车提供保证,就本身的特征而言是相对静态的,但由于受气候条件等外部环境因素的影响,使其在不断变化的交通运行环境中成为动态因素,增加了研究的复杂性。
     影响道路交通安全的灾害性气候主要有风、雨、雾、冰雪和高、低温等,随着路网的逐步完善和不良气候条件的逐渐增多,发生在不良气候条件下的交通事故正在不断增加。统计数据显示,我国公路交通事故中有50%是发生在不良气候条件下,而71%的重特大交通事故和65%的直接经济损失也是发生在不良气候环境下,加强不良气候条件下交通安全事故预防研究已刻不容缓。
     随着交通安全研究领域的拓宽,需要深入开展不良气候条件下交通事故致因机理关键技术的研究工作。在诸多不良气候条件中,降雨因其具有常见性、突发性、局部性,极易导致驾驶员对车辆周围多目标观察产生错觉,对车辆性能、道路性能亦具有重要影响。因此,本文对降雨环境下交通因素进行辨析,着重研究驾驶可靠性建模技术,并提出交通事故预防体系与具体措施。上述研究工作对有效降低降雨这一不良气候条件下道路交通事故的发生具有深刻的现实意义,对相关研究工作可起到抛砖引玉的作用。
     首先,对道路交通系统的组成、系统安全性分析方法、事故分析指标等进行了阐述与比较;通过事故案例分析,对降雨环境下交通事故进行了分类研究;在此基础上,对交通系统各主要因素在降雨环境下所发生的变化及安全机理进行深入分析,并运用灰色系统理论对各因素在不良气候条件下(降雨)对驾驶可靠性产生的影响及贡献程度进行定量分析,得出相关结论。
     然后,详细阐述了主成分分析方法的计算、样本处理及主成分选择,并用于辨析降雨环境下驾驶可靠性影响因素。确定视觉、知觉反应能力、环境感知能力、注意力集中程度、焦躁情绪等5个参数作为驾驶员可靠性因素的技术指标;车辆速度、车辆制动强度、转向盘转角、加速度等4个参数作为车辆可靠性因素的技术指标;摩擦系数、平整度、道路排水性、水膜厚度、道路线形等5个参数作为道路可靠性因素技术指标。在分析降雨环境下各项技术指标特征的基础上,通过实验量化部分重点技术指标。按照驾驶员可靠性因素,车辆可靠性因素和道路可靠性因素分别通过调查获得原始数据,利用统计处理得到样本数据,采用主成分分析方法对其进行计算,将多个线性相关的指标转化为少数线性无关的综合指标变量,确定出对降雨环境下驾驶可靠性贡献率大且累积贡献率符合研究要求的7个指标,作为降雨环境下驾驶可靠性评价模型研究的基础。
     在驾驶可靠性评价建模过程中,以降雨环境下交通系统的驾驶可靠性作为研究对象,在论述系统可靠性基本概念、研究内容、可靠性指标、典型可靠性模型等相关系统可靠性理论的基础上,从系统内在关系出发,通过研究传统可靠性分析方法与复杂道路交通条件下系统可靠性研究前提、方法、内容的不同,有针对性地提出了降雨环境下驾驶可靠性评价模型,并详细阐述了该模型的建立过程与计算步骤。为进一步探索该方法的应用价值,典型道路被选择进行实例研究(含对比试验),应用相关测量设备对主要研究指标进行数据采集、分析,运用多种方法对现实交通系统进行可靠性评价,为建立基于可靠性评价的不良气候条件下交通运输系统安全预警理论体系提供了一套切实可行的研究方案。
     最后,运用故障树分析理论构建降雨环境下交通安全事故预防体系。在详细阐述故障树分析相关理论的基础上,确定“降雨环境下车辆运行过程中发生事故”为顶事件,逐层展开,利用推理法找出发生交通事故的原因及影响,直至基本事件,建立了降雨环境下交通安全系统故障树。在借鉴相关学科理论基础上,构建了降雨环境下道路交通事故预防层次结构模型,为科学、系统地研究不良气候条件下交通安全预防措施指明了方向。针对降雨这一特定气候条件,从驾驶员行为策略、车辆运行模式、道路设计与设施规划完备等几个方面分析了具体的安全改善措施。
     通过对降雨环境下道路交通事故致因因素的剖析,在继承国内外学者的研究成果的基础上结合实际案例的具体情况,选择了一个合适的研究工作切入点,在一定程度上为本领域的科研工作提供了新的研究思路和研究手段。在通过大量深入细致的实地调研、运用先进的仪器设备获取翔实第一手研究资料的基础上,制定灵活实用的研究方案,融合或者组合运用多种理论知识对研究对象进行深入分析研究。力求全面探索不良气候条件下(降雨)道路交通系统的内在规律,丰富道路交通安全理论研究与实践的途径,为道路交通运输系统持续健康发展提供切实可行的安全保障。
     研究成果如下:
     运用灰关联技术定量研究了驾驶员因素、车辆因素、道路因素间的相对重要程度,对确定三者间的权重具有重要意义;
     通过大量文献资料、实地调研、观察试验等手段获取多项对降雨环境下驾驶可靠性具有显著影响的因素,提出了相应的评价指标,为研究工作奠定了基础;
     应用主成分分析理论辨析降雨环境下多种驾驶可靠性影响因素,将多个线性相关的指标转化为少数线性无关的综合指标变量,确定出对降雨环境下驾驶可靠性贡献率大且累积贡献率符合研究要求的指标;
     建立降雨环境下驾驶可靠性评价模型,将定性分析转变为定量评估,为该领域的研究工作提出了一条切实可行的途径;
     基于故障树分析技术,建立降雨环境下道路交通事故预防层次结构模型,对全面研究降雨环境下的道路交通安全措施具有重要的现实意义。
     通过系统性、理论性、实践性相结合的方式,进行降雨环境下道路交通安全领域中交通因素辨析、驾驶可靠性建模和事故预防的理论、方法与实施技术手段等方面的研究,为不良气候条件下道路交通安全研究体系形成及开展深入研究提供了一种新思路和新方法。
Development of industry of the automobile and transportation, propels the social economy forward, meanwhile, causes traffic accidents to occur which seriously imperils social public security. Because of the serious traffic safety situation, it is important and urgent researches to analyze characteristics of the traffic accidents, control the frequency of the traffic accidents, and decrease the damage of the road traffic accidents. Factors that affect the traffic safety are various, for example, human, vehicle, road, environment and traffic management level and so on. Up to now, domestic and foreign researches on traffic accidents pay more attention to merely one or several factors, while less attention to the environmental harmony, even neglect the important role that the environmental factors play in. For instance, road factors provide guarantee for safe driving and its feature is relatively static, but because of the influence of the climate and exterior environment factors, makes it turn into a dynamic factor in the constant traffic environment. As a result, increase the complexity of the traffic research.
     Disastrous weather that affects the road traffic safety primarily has the wind, rain, fog, snow and high or low temperature and so on. Because that the road network has improved step by step and the bad weather conditions grow gradually, the traffic accidents caused by bad weather are increasing. Statistics show that there are fifty percent of the road traffic accidents, seventy one percent of the sever accidents and sixty five percent of the direct economical loses have been caused owing to the bad weather. So researches about the traffic accidents prevention in bad weather conditions are urgently needed.
     With the diversification of research field on the traffic safety, research about key technology of traffic accidents causation mechanism in bad weather conditions need to be deeply develop, The raining in many bad weathers conditions not only easily causes optical illusion of drivers about objects around the vehicles because that it has some characteristics of common, unexpected and localized, but also has important influence on vehicle and road performance, so the dissertation analyses traffic factors in raining environment, puts emphasis on modeling technology of driving reliability and presents prevention system and concrete improved measures. The researches will have high application value for effective decreasing traffic accidents occurred in bad weather and can play an important role in other relevant researches.
     Firstly, the dissertation elaborates and compares on the composition of the traffic system, approaches of system security analysis and analysis indicators of accidents, makes a classification about the traffic accidents in rainy days by the accident case studies. On this basis, it deeply analyzes the changes of the main factors of traffic system in raining environment and safety mechanism, and uses grey system theory to do a quantitative analysis about how factors in bad weather can influence the driving reliability and its contribution to the effect, and finally draws an appropriate conclusion.
     Then it elaborates the Principal Component Analysis method about calculating, sample processing and selection method of principal ingredients of sample in the details, and uses the method to analyze the factors that affect the driving reliability. The dissertation makes sure that five parameters that are the vision, consciousness, the ability of responding to the environment, concentration level and impatient as the driver reliability indicators, four parameters that are speed of the vehicle, the vehicle's braking intensity, the steering wheel's corner and acceleration as the vehicle reliability indicators, five parameters that are friction coefficient, flatness, drainage, water film thickness and the road alignment as the road reliability indicators. On the base of analyzing the characteristic of the various technology indicators in the rainfall environment, part of the key technology indicators are quantified by experiments. According to reliability factors of the driver, the vehicle and the road, the original data are obtained by investigation, then the sample data are gotten by the statistical analysis; and Principal Component Analysis method is adopted to calculate the data, which transforms many linear dependence indicators into few integrated indicators with linear independent, consequently finds the seven indicators with high contribution rate to driving reliability in raining environment and accumulated contribution rate of meeting requirement,.which is basis of driving reliability evaluation model.
     In the process of the diving reliability modeling, the dissertation adopts driving reliability of traffic system in the rainfall environment as research objective, on the basis of basic reliability concept, content of the researches, reliability indicators, the typical model of reliability, presents driving reliability evaluation model and elaborates modeling and calculation process in detail by analyzing intrinsic relationship, and researching reliability analysis methods and difference on research precondition, methods, content of system reliability in complex road condition. In order to explore applied value of the methods, typical roads are chosen to carry out the research (containing comparison experiments) measurement devices are used to collect data and analyze aiming to main indicator, multifarious methods are adopted to evaluate reliability of real transportation system, which provides practical scheme for establishing the early warning theoretical system of transportation system safety in bad weather based on reliability evaluation.
     Finally, Failure Tree Analysis Theory is adopted to establish the prevention system of traffic accidents in rainfall environment. On the basis of elaborating the relevant theory of Failure Tree analysis, the accidents occurred in running process of rainfall environment are ensured as the top event, by utilizing the inference method to find out the reasons and effects of the accidents occurrence, till the basic events, consequently failure tree of traffic safety system in rainfall environment is established. By referring to related disciplines theories, hierarchy structure model of road traffic accidents prevention in rainfall environment is established, which point out the way forward for scientifically systematically researching traffic safety measure in bad weather condition. Aiming to rainfall, specific safety measure are analyzed from several facets that is the driver's behavior tactics, the vehicle' running behavior pattern, the road deign and the plan completion respectively.
     The dissertation through a deeply understanding and analyzing on the road traffic causing factors in rainfall environment inheriting the domestic and foreign advance study, on this base combines the specific circumstance of the practical cases, and chooses a suitable job breakthrough and in certain extent provides a new idea and method for the research work in the scientific field. On the base of deeply and careful study work, and the use of advanced equipment to get the first hand information of research, it formulates a research scheme of flexibility or combing with a variety of theoretical knowledge to make a detailed study on the subject. It intends to do a all-round exploration about the interior regular of the road traffic system in bad weather conditions, enriches the ways of the road traffic safety theory and practice, provides a practical security guarantee for a continues healthy development of the road transportation system.
     The innovative research results are as followings:
     (1) Using grey relative technology to analyze the importance degree between driver, vehicle and road factors, it is of great significance to establish the weight between them.
     (2) Through a large amount of literature, field study, and survey means to obtain the factors which have a remarkable influence on the driver reliability in the rainfall environment, propose appropriate evaluation indicators and establish basis for the research work.
     (3) Applying the principal component analysis method to argue about the drive reliability in rainfall conditions, transforms many linear dependence indicators into few representational linearly independent indicator, find the indicators with high contribution rate to driving reliability in raining environment and accumulated contribution rate of meeting requirement.
     (4) Putting forward to a practical way for the study in this area by proposing the evaluation model for drive reliability in the rainfall environment and turning qualitative analysis to quantitative study.
     (5) On the base of the failure tree analysis, it proposes the hierarchical structure model of road traffic accidents prevention in the rainfall conditions, which is a great significant for the comprehensive study about the traffic safety measures in rainfall environment.
     In conclusion, a new idea and method is provided for the formation of the road traffic safety theory and further study by the way that integrates systematization, theoretical definition and practice, and carrying out the study about the analysis of traffic factors in the field of road traffic safety, driving reliability modeling, and theory, method, and practical technology of accident prevention.
引文
[1]郭忠印,方守恩.道路安全工程[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003:6-11.
    [2]段里仁.道路交通事故概论[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1997:3-67.
    [3]路明.中国交通安全形势及其对策[J].交通企业管理,2006,18(12):7-8.
    [4]中华人民共和国交通部.道路交通事故2010年度统计年报.公安部交通管理局,2011.
    [5]陈勇.不良气候条件下道路交通安全事故预防系统研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2007.
    [6]Berhanu,G..Effects of road and traffic factors on road safety in Ethiopia[D].Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Trondheim,Norway.2000.
    [7]Liou,R.,M.R.,Multiple target detection using modified high order correlations[J].IEEE Trans.AES,1998,34(2):553-567.
    [8]Caefer,C.E.,Silverman,J.and Mooney,J.M.,Optimization of point target tracking[J]. IEEE Trans.AES,2000,36(1):15-25.
    [9]http://www.transdata.cn.2006年恶劣气候条件下道路交通事故统计.中华人民共和国交通运输部科学数据网,2008.
    [10]陈新,刘英舜,曹从咏.美国高速公路雾天通行管理[J].中外公路,2003,23(3):10-12.
    [11]曾红莲.美国智能交通系统的研究[J].交通科技与经济,2001,(1):39-41.
    [12]倪秉书.欧洲智能交通系统成功案例[J].中国交通通信产业,2004,(5):88-89.
    [13]许先锋.不良天气条件下高速公路安全控制研究[D].青岛:山东科技大学.2007.
    [14]陈旭梅.智能运输系统[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2007.
    [15]袁成松,卞光辉.高速公路上低能见度的监测与预报[J].气象,2003,29(11):36-40.
    [16]安明伟,陈启美,郭宗良.基于路况视频的气象能见度检测方法与系统设计[J].仪器仪表学报,2010,31(5):1148-1153.
    [17]黄朝迎,张清.暴雨洪水灾害对公路交通的影响[J].气象,2000,26(9):12-15.
    [18]周石研,成田英器,小林俊一.黑龙江省公路雪冰基本特征与灾害防治对策[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(3):114-118.
    [19]李长城,汤筠筠.不利天气条件下高速公路安全管理系统的构建[J].交通科技,2009,(234):84-87.
    [20]支晓伶,李长城,汤筠筠等.高速公路雾天可变信息标志信息联动发布策略研究[J].公路,2010,(11):123-128.
    [21]李长城,张高强,汤筠筠.高速公路交通气象灾害预警管理系统研究[J].道路交通与安全,2008,8(3):16-19.
    [22]李长城,汤筠筠.不利天气条件下的公路交通管理[J].中文公路,2008,28(2):235-239.
    [23]黄新民,王小光,胡功宏.灾害天气下高速公路运营管理系统结构研究[J].公路交通技术,2008,(4):132-134.
    [24]杨中良,林瑜,高霄.恶劣天气条件下城市快速路通行能力研究[J].交通信息与安全,2010,28(1):75-78.
    [25]李洪强,程国柱,夏正浩.高速公路不良天气条件下最高车速限制合理取值[J].石家庄铁道学院学报(自然科学版),2009,22(3):78-82.
    [26]艾力·斯木吐拉,巴寅亮,将松强.新疆高等级公路沿线灾害性天气及其分布[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(4):59-61.
    [27]陈爽,姚令侃.西攀和攀田高速公路汛期行车安全雨量警戒制研究[J].公路,2009,(3):82-86.
    [28]隽海民,裴玉龙,朱从坤.冰雪覆盖条件下城市道路通行能力分析[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1998,31(2):104-108.
    [29]蒋贤才,裴玉龙.寒冷地区道路交通安全特征及其管理措施分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(4):82-89.
    [30]蒋贤才,裴玉龙.冰雪道路交通安全管理措施及其成效分析[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(4):127-132.
    [31]许秀红,闫敏慧,于震宇等.道路交通事故气象条件分析及安全等级标准[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(4):53-58.
    [32]闫敏慧,许秀红,矫玲玲.黑龙江省道路交通事故与气象条件分析[J].黑龙江气象,2008,25(4):36-38.
    [33]冯民学.高速公路交通气象智能化监测预警系统[D].南京:南京信息工程大学.2004.
    [34]Opara, Ethelbert O. A comprehensive method to improve highway traffic safety[D]. Ph.D. Dissertation of Texas A&M University, USA,1998.
    [35]Navin, F.. A model for road safety planning:the theory[C]. Proceedings of the Canadian Multi-Disciplinary Road Safety Conference,1997.
    [36]Peter C. Compes. Perspectives of accident research by safety science[J]. Journal of Occupational Accidents,1982,4(2-4),105-119.
    [37]李生权,罗庆,陈松灵等.交通事故与高等级公路线形相关性研究[J].公路交通科技,2000,164-166.
    [38]陈斌,袁伟.交通安全的道路因素分析[J],广西交通科技,2002,4(3):25-28.
    [39]沈斐敏.道路交通安全[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.
    [40]De Leur, Paul. Improved approaches to manage road safety infrastructure[D]. University of British Columbia, Canada,2001.
    [41]郡勇飞,朱顺应,王红等.高速公路交通事故灰色Verhulst预测模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2009,39(7):92-96.
    [42]叶新娜,袁洪川.基于因果分析图和AHP法的交通事故成因分析[J].公路与汽运,2008,(3):64-67.
    [43]梁英慧.基于事故树的平面交叉口机非冲突模糊神经网络预测模型的研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2009.
    [44]孙平,宋瑞.道路交通参与者安全可靠性研究[J].安全与环境工程,2006,13(3):98-101.
    [45]马爱霞,白建平,赵一姝.事故树分析在交通事故原因分析中的应用[J].重庆科技学院学报,2009,(8):101-103.
    [46]任强.河南省高速公路交通安全评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2006.
    [47]田皓.相对指标指数体系及其因素分析[J].统计与决策,2005,(10):29-31.
    [48]高兴华.怎样避免统计基本概念与方法的误用[J].北京统计,2003,(2):108-109.
    [49]郑伶俐.交通影响程度评价指标及方法研究[D].上海:同济大学,2008.
    [50]李正平,张金钟,李晏喜.系统动态安全评价与预测的灰色方法[J].沈阳航空工业学院学报,1997,14(3):53-59.
    [51]方芳.交通运输项目评价中动态评价指标计算中的误区[J].交通科技,2001,(4):75-76.
    [52]胡江碧,曹新涛.道路交通事故肇事驾驶员特征分析[J].中国公路学报,2009,22(6):106-110.
    [53]马艳丽.驾驶员驾驶特性与道路交通安全对策研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2007.
    [54]徐进,彭其渊,邵毅明.直线路段积水路面车辆事故产生机理分析[J].中国公路学报,2009,22(1):97-103.
    [55]范洪波.雨天条件下高速公路交通事故成因与对策[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2009,21(2):38-41.
    [56]林洋.汽车事故鉴定学[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2001.
    [57]姜立标,张黎骅.汽车运用工程基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
    [58]许洪国.汽车事故工程[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
    [59]高延龄,许洪国.汽车运用工程[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
    [60]文斌,曹东伟.高速公路路面抗滑力与交通事故的统计分析[J].公路交通科技,2006,23(8):72-75.
    [61]和松,夏礼秀.高速公路路面摩擦系数的测试与评价[J].公路交通科技,2002,19(1):8-12.
    [62]马璐.道路因素对道路交通安全的影响分析[D],西安:长安大学,2005.
    [63]李伟,王炜,邓卫等.城市客运换乘枢纽多目标灰关联综合评价研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2004,2(4):5-10.
    [64]王晓原,杨新月,王凤群.基于灰关联熵理论的驾驶决策影响因子研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2007,17(5):126-132.
    [65]杨玉中,吴立云,张强等.煤矿运输安全性的灰熵综合评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(9):83-87.
    [66]侯立峰,何学秋.基于灰关联度的事故聚类分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(1):51-54.
    [67]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M],武汉:华中理工大学出版社,2002.
    [68]吕锋.灰色系统关联度的比较研究[J],武汉工业大学学报,2000,(2):41-44.
    [69]吴祈宗.系统工程[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2006.
    [70]Xin-yue YANG, Xiao-hui WANG, Lei WU, and Xiao-yuan WANG. Study on the integrated cognitive topological structure of driver in themulti-resource information fusion[J]. GESTS InternationalTransactions on Computer Science and Engineering,2006,32(1):23-30.
    [71]顾政华,李旭宏.基于改进主成分分析法的城市交通管理规划方案评价[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2004,4(2):51-55.
    [72]汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
    [73]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:11-28.
    [74]范红静.驾驶员动态视觉特性及对交叉口通行能力的影响研究[D].南京:东南大学,2008.
    [75]范红静,黄庆泓,陆建.人的视觉-眼动系统在交通方面的应用研究[J].道路交通与安全,2007,7(4):4144.
    [76]马荣国,李铁强,肖代全.灰关联决策在公路建设项目方案比选中的应用[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2004,24(6):67-70.
    [77]丁靖艳.基于社会心理学的侵犯驾驶行为研究[D].南京:浙江大学,2005.
    [78]任有.交通环境下驾驶行为模拟与应急驾驶可靠性建模[D].长春:吉林大学,2007.
    [79]马艳丽,裴玉龙.基于实验心理学的驾驶员驾驶特性及其综合评价[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2008,40(12):9-12.
    [80]STUTTS J C, Stewart J R, MARTELL C. Congnitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population[J]. AccidentAnalysis and Prevention,1998,30(3):337-346.
    [81]隽志才,曹鹏,吴文静.基于认知心理学的驾驶员交通标志视认性理论分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(8):8-12.
    [82]Hashim Al-Madani,Abdul-Rahman,Al-Janahi.Assessment of Drivers'Comprehension of Traffic Signs Based on Their Traffic, Personal and Social Characteristics[J]. Transportation Research,2002,F(5):361-374.
    [83]毛恩荣,周一鸣.汽车驾驶员注意品质与行车安全性关系的研究[J].人类工效学,1997,(01):20-22.
    [84]张晓琴,孙桂华,任梦.道路交通事故与驾驶员心理素质的研究[J].职业与健康,1999,(12):2-4.
    [85]葛旭海,何存道,邓岚,等.卡车驾驶员视觉选择性注意研究[J].心理科学,1996,(06):326-330.
    [86]罗婷,焦书兰.注意分配与注意选择能力的年龄差异比较[J].心理科学,2004,(06):1307-1309.
    [87]李振东.青年驾驶员易发生交通肇事的心理原因及对策[J].社会科学论坛,1994,(06):61-63.
    [88]张述祖,沈德立.基础心理学[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1987.
    [89]Richard A.Retting,Helen B.Weinsteinb,Mark G.Solomon.Analysis of motor-vehicle crashes at stop signs in four U.S.citiesJournal of Safety Research.2003.34:485-489.
    [90]Gerald McGwin,David B Brown.Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers.Accident Analysis and Prevention.1999:181-198.
    [91]B·Φ·巴布可夫著,景天然译.道路条件与交通安全[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1990.
    [92]秦利燕,邵春福.济青高速公路交通事故成因分析[J].山东交通学院学报,2003,(9):23-26.
    [93]杨少伟,许金良,杨宏志.考虑平、纵、横三方面关系的横向加速度变化率[J].中国公路学报,1999,10(4):12-16.
    [94]杨少伟,许金良,杨宏志等.横向加速度变化率在公路设计中的控制和评价[J].西安公路交通大学学报,2001,(1):46-48.
    [95]Baykal O.Concept of Lateral Change of Acceleration[J] Journal of Surveying Engineering.ASCE,1996,122(3).
    [96]安旗林,吴玉淘,张剑飞.车辆运行速度和成本模型的建立[J].公路,1995,(1):40-47.
    [97]温学钧,杨屹东,方靖.高速公路运行速度研究[J].公路交通科技,2002,(1):80-82.
    [98]贺玉龙,卢仲贤,马国雄等.高速公路直线段车辆稳定运行速度模型[J].公路,2002,(10):99-103.
    [99]许洪国等.道路交通事故分析与再现[M].北京:警官教育出版社,1996.
    [100]崔洪军,魏连雨,朱敏清等.公路平面设计中有关问题的探讨[J].中国公路学报,2002,15(1):22-25.
    [101]杨少伟,许金良,李伟等.路线设计中车辆行驶速度预测模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2003,(3):51-55.
    [102]程文,郭忠印,孔令旗.路线线形与道路安全关系的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,(5):703-706.
    [103]马勇.基于眼动分析的汽车驾驶员视觉搜索模式研究[D].西安:长安大学,2006.
    [104]黄迎秋.山区与城市道路交通环境下驾驶员视觉搜索过程分析[D].西安:长安大学,2008.
    [105]袁伟.城市道路环境中汽车驾驶员动态视觉特性试验研究[D].西安:长安大学,2008.
    [106]彭建,周尚意.公众环境感知与建立环境意识[J].人文地理,2001,16(3):21-25.
    [107]魏玉桂,刘援朝.机动车驾驶员注意力的调查研究[J].山东交通学院学报,2007,15(3):11-14.
    [108]李百川.汽车驾驶员注意特性与交通事故关系研究[J].人类工效学,1996,6(2):38-41.
    [109]柳忠起,袁修干,刘伟,等.飞行员注意力分配的定量测量方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2006,32(5):519-539.
    [110]TIMOTHY J A, DAVID M C. Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments[J]. Vision Research,1999, (39):2947-2953.
    [111]RAYNER K. Eyemovements in reading and information processing:20 years of research[J]. PsychologicalBulletin,1998,124(3):372-422.
    [112]罗婷,焦书兰.注意分配与注意选择能力的年龄差异比较[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1330-1334.
    [113]刘援朝.机动车驾驶员注意及相关因素的调查研究[J].社会心理科学,2007,22(2):90-95.
    [114]郭孜政,陈崇双,陈亚青.高负荷驾驶任务下驾驶员注意力状态概率模型[J].西南交通大学学报,2009,44(4):541-546.
    [115]张殿业.驾驶员适应性及可靠性[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1996:197-212.
    [116]毛恩荣,周一鸣.汽车驾驶员注意品质与行车安全性关系的研究[J].人类工效学,1997,3(3):18-20.
    [117]AVOLIO B J. Individual differences in information processing ability as a predictor ofmotor vehicle accident[J]. Human Factors,2005,27(5):577-587.
    [118]NANCY E. LAURIE. An evaluation of alternative DoNotEnter signs:failures of attention[J]. Transportation Research,2004,7(3):151-166.
    [119]Federal Highway Administration. Speed prediction for two-lane Rural highways[R]. Washington:Federal Highway Administration, August 2000, Publication No.99-171.
    [120]Dr. Joao Cardoso(LNEC), Anastasia Flouda(NTUA), Ioannis Dimitropoulos(NTUA), Dr. George Kanellaidis(NTUA). Design consistency of horizontal alignment in rural roads (Safey Standards for Road Design and Redesign, TASK 5.1)[R].1997,4.1-85.
    [121]Lamm, R., Choueiri, E.M.. Recommendations for Evaluating Horizontal Design Consistency Based on Investigations in the State of New York. Transportation Research Record 1122, Transportation Research Board, Washingtong, D.C.,1987,68-78.
    [122]Lamm, R., Choueiri, E.M., Hayward, J.C., and Paluri, A.. Possible design procedure to promote design consistency in highway geometric design on two-lane rural roads[R]. Transportation Research Record 1195, TRB, National Research Council, Washington,D.C.,1988,111-122.
    [123]靳灿章,杨春风,魏连雨等.车速作为线形评价参数的敏感性分析[J].河北工业大学学报,2004,33(1):36-40.
    [124]B. N. Fildes, "The Perception of Geometric Road Curves," Ph.D. Dissertation, Monash University, Australia,1986.
    [125]姚祖康.路面管理系统[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1993.
    [126]杨春风.道路工程[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,2000.
    [127]王洪德,马云东.系统可靠性理论与应用研究.北京:煤炭工业出版社,2004.
    [128]刘湘平,罗一忠,谢学斌.矿山采场人的可靠性模糊数学分析[J].人类工效学,2008,14(2):19-21.
    [129]徐志胜,韩可琦,张先尘等.高产高效综采放顶煤工作面人-机-环境系统可靠性[J].中国矿业大学学报,1995,24(2):12~18.
    [130]崔玉玲,李廷杰.清晰事件模糊概率型(CF型)模糊可靠性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1991,(12):37~41.
    [131]乔健.基于可靠性的铁路运输安全预警理论研究[D].大连:大连交通大学,2009.
    [132]刘兆惠.高等级公路交通安全综合评价及多元事故预测模型研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2007.
    [133]Transportation Research Board of The National Academies. Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices[R].National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 504, Washington, D.C.2003.
    [134]杨纶标,高英议.模糊数学原理及应用(第4版)[M].广州:华南理工大学,2006.
    [135]王霄锋.汽车可靠性工程基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
    [136]Y.Dutuit,A.Rauzy.Approximate estimation of system reliability via fault trees [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2005,(87):163~172.
    [137]李海泉,李刚.系统可靠性分析与设计[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [138]卢明银,徐人平.系统可靠性[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2010.
    [139]郑裕国,张康达.故障树定性和定量分析的算法[J].浙江工业大学学报,1995,23(1):42~47.
    [140]韩明.FTA法和重要度分析在某系统可靠性中的应用[J].运筹与管理,2000,(1):58~63.
    [141]金星,洪延姬.基于故障树的智能型故障诊断系统[J].宇航学报,2001,22(3):111~113.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700