管外多磁化单元结构优化设计与实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
石油化工企业和储运站等存在着大量地面管道,这些管道不断的将油、气等介质输送到各自目的地。此类管道在运行过程中通常受到来自内外环境的联合影响,由于外部空气、输送介质、管内积液、压力波动等原因,极易发生管壁腐蚀而直接影响管道的使用寿命。因此如何了解管道的腐蚀状况,有目的地对管道进行维修,减少事故发生,延长管道的服役时间,就成了检测人员关心的主要问题。漏磁检测法因具有检测速度快、灵敏度高、不受管内介质影响等优点被广泛地应用于工业管道的检测,近些年来漏磁检测无论在其理论研究还是工程应用中都取得了很大的成就。
     本文针对石化工业地面管道特点,设计出一种检测结构,该结构能采用三个分离式磁化单元组合的形式,结构中各个磁化单元的衔铁、永久磁铁和极靴与待检测的管道形成闭合磁回路,通过采集及分析磁回路中产生的漏磁场信息,从而确定管道壁上存在的缺陷。该种检测结构简单、体积小,可以通过调整磁化结构间的相对角度满足不同直径管道的检测需要,扫描面积大、效率高。
     文中利用有限元方法建立三维静态漏磁检测模型,模型以单个磁化结构为基础,继而建立了多个磁化单元有限元分析模型。应用Ansys软件提供的优化设计方法,对本研究的三磁化单元检测结构进行优化设计,通过确定合理的优化设计变量、状态变量和目标函数,使得本设计的管道外多磁化单元检测结构,能够实现对直径为6mm,深度为管壁厚度的40%缺陷进行较好的检测;使得磁化结构下方的管道磁化强度分布更加合理、易于描述,同时满足对管道缺陷检测的要求和管道均匀磁化的要求。基于优化设计的结构尺寸,通过计算得到不同磁化单元个数、磁化结构间距漏磁场分布曲线,对比分析由于多个磁化结构的引入所引起的缺陷漏磁场叠加规律、各磁化单元间的相互影响。
     采用有限元计算得到优化尺寸,作为漏磁检测仪结构设计尺寸,对样机结构进行磁化结构、行进结构等设计,最终确定样机整体结构。在实验室条件下尺寸,完成样机的装配、调试,建立管道外多磁化单元检测系统。对磁化单元间的相互影响、不同位置及尺寸的腐蚀缺陷检测效果、及不同管径管道检测效果进行了实验研究,并将部分实验数据与数值模拟结果进行对比,验证有限元分析的正确性。
There are massive ground pipes in petrochemical enterprises and storage stations, these pipelines transported oil, gas, and other media to their destination constantly. Such pipeline usually suffer from both internal and external environment influence in operation process, because of outside air, transmission medium, tube effusion, pressure fluctuations and other reasons, pipeline corrosion easily happened. Therefore, how to understand pipeline corrosion situation, to maintenance with purpose, to reduce accidents, to prolong the pipeline duty time, became the main problem for examination person. Magnetic flux leakage testing have been widely used in industry pipeline detection because of its fast inspection speed, high sensitivity, do not suffer between medium influence etc, and the magnetic flux leakage testing have made great achievements whether in theory research or engineering applications in recent years.
     In this paper, a multi-magnetize structure for ground pipeline in petrochemical industry was designed, this structure comprise three units, armature, permanent magnet, pole piece, form a closed magnetic circuit along with pipeline. It can be detected whether defects exist in pipeline through acquiring and analyzing MFL information. There are characteristics of Small volume and Simple structure we designed structure, in addition, each unite can be adjusted relative angle to meet the requirement for detection of pipes with different size.
     3D static magnetic flux leakage testing model was established, using finite element model in this paper, based on single magnetized structure. Applied the optimization method Ansys software provides for this three magnetized unit testing structure, through the determination of reasonable optimization design variables, the state variables and the objective function, makes this multi-magnetized testing structure can achieve well defects detection of 6mm and depth of 40% for the thickness; make the field of magnetized pipeline distribute more reasonable and easy to describe, and satisfy the requirements of defect detection and magnetic field reasonableness simultaneously. Based on the size of optimization design, magnetic field leakage curves of different magnetization unit number, structure spacing were gained. Then contrast and analyze the law of magnetic leakage field and inter-influence of units.
     Take the optimized size as structure size of MFL device, magnetization structure and other structures were designed, complete the assemblage and debugging of device, finally established pipeline testing system under the condition of laboratory. The inter-influence of units, the effect of corrosion defection and different diameter pipeline, were gained through experiments, the experimental data validate the correctness of finite element analysis results.
引文
[1]Ali, A.Choumar, Adco, Abu Dhabi. Pipeline Integrity Management Through Intelligent survey Pigging[R].17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing,China,2008.
    [2]白港生,王瑞利,黄凯.Φ660气管道漏磁腐蚀检测器在陕京线的应用[J].管道技术与设备,2003,(3):26-27.
    [3]Dmitry Slesarev,Dmitry Sukhorukov.Practice of Inline Pipeline Inspection with MDSCAN Intelligent Pigs[R].17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing,China,2008.
    [4]范向红,王少华,那晶.我国管道漏磁检测技术及其成就[J].石油科技论坛,2007,(4):56-57.
    [5]张俊哲等著.无损检测技术及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1993:20-25
    [6]A.C.Bruno,R.Schifni,etal. New magnetic techniques for inspection and metal-loss assessment of oil pipelines[J].Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Material,2001,22(23):2061-2062 .
    [7]蒋奇.管道缺陷漏磁检测量化技术及其应用研究[D].博士学位论文,天津:天津大学,2003.
    [8]金虹.漏磁检测技术在我国管道腐蚀检测上的应用和发展[J].控制与测量,2003,(1:43-46.
    [9]戴光,李伟,张颖编著.过程设备安全管理与检测[M].北京:化学工业出版社.2005:231-238.
    [10]何辅云,石油管道的高速检测与缺陷识别[J],无损检测,2000,22(5):206-208.
    [11]J.Philip, C.B.Rao, T.Jayakumar, B.raj, A new OPTical technique for detection of defects in ferromagnetic materials and components[J],NDT International,2000,(33):237-239.
    [12]杨志军,储罐底板磁检测技术研究[D].硕士学位论文,大庆:大庆石油学院,2003.
    [13]Udpa L,Mandayam S,etal. Developments in gas pipeline inspection technology[J].Materials Evaluation,1996,54(4):467-472.
    [14]王亚东.管道漏磁检测技术研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2004.
    [15]傅玉华等.石油化工设备腐蚀与防治[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1997.18~89.
    [16]李明忠.管道漏磁检测技术发展现状与存在问题[J].中国锅炉压力容器安全,2002,19(1):54-56.
    [17]金虹.漏磁检测技术在我国管道腐蚀检测上的应用和发展[J].控制与测量,2003,(1):43-46
    [18]Kenzo Miya.Recent Advancement of Electromagnetic Nondestructive Inspection Technology in Japan [J]. IEEE transaction on magnetics,2002,38(2):312-326.
    [19]A.L. Souza, S.L.Cruz, J.F. Pereira.Leak Detection In Pipelines Though Spectral Analysis Of Pressure Signals [J].NDT International,2000,11(17):4-7.
    [20]Grid.New Technologies for Natural Gas Operations[J].Pipeline&Gas Journal,2000,226(10):40-45.
    [21]D.L Atherton.Finite element calculations and computer measurements of magnetic flux leakage patterns for pits[J].British Journal of NDT,1998.
    [22]何辅云,赖志荣漏磁NDT原理的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),1994,17(3):28~32.
    [22]C.N. Owston, B.Sc, Ph.D, M.Lnst. The Magnetic Flux Leakage Technique of Non-Destructive Testing[R].British Journal of NDT,1974, 11.
    [23]黄凤岗,宋克欧编著.模式识别[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,1998,3~4.
    [24]张红文.基于BP神经网络的模式分类[M].北京:交通出版社,1998,12.
    [25]张立明编著.人工神经网络的模型及应用[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1993,7.
    [26]W.Lord, J.H.Hwang. Defect Characterization from Magnetic Leakage Fields[J].British Journal of NDT,1977,(4:14.
    [27]Liu Songping.The investigation of broadband short pulse high frequency ultrasonic evaluation for titanium alloy sheets[R]. Proceedings of the 7th Asin-Pacific Conference on Nondestructive testing,1993,313~318.
    [28]D.L.Atherton. Finite element calculation of magnetic flux leakage detector signals[J].NDT International,1987,20( 4):235.
    [29]D.L.Atherton. Finite element calculations on the effects of permeability variation on magnetic flux leakage signals[J].NDT International,1987,August, 20( 4):239.
    [30]Sunho Yang. Finite element modeling of current perturbation method of nondestructive evaluation application [D]. phD Dissertation, Iowa ,Iowa state University Ames.
    [31]Mingye Yan, Satish Upda, Shreekanth Mandayam, Yushi Sun, Paul Sacks, and William Lord. Solution of Inverse Problems in Electromagnetic NDE Using Finite Element Methods[J].IEEE Transactions on Magnetics,1998,9(5):1123-1126.
    [32]Kyungtae, Hwang. 3-D defect profile reconstruction from magnetic flux leakage signatures using wavelet basis function neural networks[D]. PHD dissertation], Iowa ,Iowa State University,2000.
    [33]王太勇,蒋齐.管道缺陷定量识别技术的研究[J].天津大学学报,2003,(1:15-18.
    [34] Friedrich Forster. finding in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection[J].NDT International,1984,9(1):11-13.
    [35]G.Katragada, W.Lord, Y.S.Sun, S. Udpa .Alternative Magnetic Flux Leakage Modalities for Pipeline Inspection[J].IEEE Transaction on Magnetics,1996,32(3):1300-1304.
    [36]美国无损检测学会编.无损检测手册一超声卷[M].北京:世界图书出版社,1994.
    [37]J.C.Drury, A.Mari( A comparison of the Magnetic Flux Leakage and Ultrasonic methods in the detection and measurement of corrosion pitting in ferrous plate and pipe[J].NDT International,2006,24(7):18-23.
    [38]美国无损检测学会编.无损检测手册一涡流卷[M].北京世界图书出版社,1994.
    [39]J.H.Stalenhoef, J.A. Raad. MFL and PEC Tools for Plant Inspection[J].NDT International,1998,3(12):321-324. [40美国无损检测学会编.无损检测手册一渗透卷[M].北京:世界图书出版社,1994.
    [41]刘晴岩.液体渗透检测的可靠性[J].无损检测,2002,24(9):381-383.
    [42]美国无损检测学会编.无损检测手册一电磁卷[M].北京:世界图书出版社,1994.
    [43]魏茂安.油气管道MFL检测信号处理与管道缺陷评估技术研究[D].博士学位论文,天津:天津大学,2004.
    [44]A.Dhar, D.L.Atherton. Correlation between magnetic flux leakage and magnetic Barkhausen noise in steel pipeline [J].NDT International,2002,24(7):8-23.
    [45]R.Christen, A.Bergamini and M.Motavalli. Three-dimensional localization of defects in stay cables using magnetic flux leakage methods[J],Non Destructive Eval,2004,(3:93–101.
    [46]于敏,于轮元.磁粉探伤的理论和应注意的问题[J].无损检测,1995,17(8):232.
    [47]F.H, J.A.de Raad. Nondestructive testing:Necessary Evil or Benefit?[J].Materials Evaluation,2002,60(8):932-940.
    [48]U.Patel, D.Rodger.Calculation of magnetic field around far-side defects for nondestructive testing[J].IEEE Trans on Magnetics,1995,(31:2170.
    [49]Hartmut Goedecke. Ultrasonic or MFL Inspection:Which Technology is Better for you?[J]. Pipeline&Gas Journal,2003,230(10):34-47.
    [50]Forster F. New findings in the field of nondestructive magnetic leakage field inspection [J].NDT International,1986,19(2):3-14.
    [51]G.Dobman. New Set-up for Mathematical-Numerical Solution of Magnetic Leakage-Flux Testing with DC and AC-Mode in the FRG[R],10th WCNZT,1982,1175~1176.
    [52]K.F.Bainton. Characterizing Defect by Detecting Magnetic Leakage Field[J].NDT,1977,10(5):253.
    [53] F.A.Hyxnan. The Magnetostatic Defectoscope A Quantitative Characterization of Crack Depth and width[R].7th ICNDT,1973,2548~2549.
    [54]Ivanopa, Yeoh CH,etal. Magnetic flux leakage modeling for mechanical damage in transmission pipelines[J].IEEE Trans on Magnetics,1998,34(5):3020-3023.
    [55]徐江,武新军,康宜华.国外油管在线无损检测技术的研究与应用现状[J].石油机械,2006,34(5):81-84.
    [56]J.C.Drury, A.Mari( A comparison of the Magnetic Flux Leakage and Ultrasonic methods in the detection and measurement of corrosion pitting in ferrous plate and pipe[J].NDT International,2006,24(7):18-23.
    [57]Pradeep Ramuhalli. Neural network based iterative algorithms for solving electromagnetic NDT inverse problems [D]. PhD Dissertation , Iowa: Iowa State University,2002.
    [58]张勇.漏磁检测若干关键技术的研究[D].博士学位论文.合肥:中国科学技术大学,2007.
    [59]邢菲菲.储罐罐底腐蚀声发射信号模式识别研究[D],硕士学位论文.天津:天津大学,2008.
    [60]张济世.有限元法分析方钢表面裂纹的电磁场[D].硕士学位论文.北京:清华大学,1999.
    [61]张琪,于轮元.铁磁材料表面裂纹的漏磁场特性[J].西安交通大学学报,1985,19(4):23-31.
    [62]张琪.磁力无损探伤中铁磁材料裂纹的漏磁场特性[D].硕士学位论文.西安:西安交通大学,1984.
    [63]仲维畅.表面开口缺陷深度与漏磁场的关系[J].无损检测,2005,27(10):529-531.
    [64]仲维畅.20年来中国磁偶极子理论研究进展[J].无损检测,2000,22(12):551-554.
    [65]仲维畅.工件表面矩形沟槽引起的漏磁场分析[J].无损检测,2004,26(7):339-340.
    [66]何辅云,朱红,王铁山,杜津生.管道磁法高速探伤仪的研制[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),1998,21(1):90-94.
    [67]何辅云.管道高速检测系统[J].无损检测,1999,21(11):491-493.
    [68]胡浪涛,何辅云.管道漏磁检测磁化系统研究和设计[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2008,22(6):102-106.
    [69]CHEN Hougui, HE Liyong, KANG Yinhua, etal. Research on references standard for wire rope nondestructive testing instrurnent evaluation[J].A.M.S,2007,28(2):150-153.
    [70]陈厚桂,李晋,康宜华,武新军.钢丝绳中缺陷的描述方法[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(1):309-314.
    [71]何利勇,陈厚桂,康宜华.钢丝断口漏磁场磁荷模型定量描述的实验研究[J].无损检测,2005,29(4):22-24.
    [72]HUANG Songling, LI Luming, ZHANG Jiajun. Development of a magnetic flux leakage testing device for the pipelines in use [J].Nondestructive Testing,1999,21(8):344-369.
    [73]李路明,杨海青,黄松岭,汪来富.便携式管道漏磁检测系统[J].无损检测,2003,25[4]:181-183.
    [74]崔伟,黄松岭,赵伟.传感器提离值对管道漏磁检测的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(1):21-24.
    [75]Yang L J,Wang Y M,Feng H Y.Research on intelligent pipeline MFL equipment [J].NDT,2002,24(3):100-102
    [75]杨理践,张华良,高松巍,李松松.检测无损压缩在管道漏磁检测数据压缩中的应用[J].无损检测,2003,25(3):146-149
    [77]杨理践,马凤铭,高松巍.油气管道缺陷漏磁在线检测定量识别技术[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2009,41(1):245-247
    [78]白港生,黄凯,季峰,吴南勋.漏磁腐蚀检测器在输气管道中的运行速度分析[J].管道技术与设备,2003,5:13-14
    [79]王瑞利,李斌,高强.漏磁检测与超声波检测技术应用比较[J].管道技术与设备,2006,5:15-17
    [80]何辅云,石油管道的高速检测与缺陷识别[J],无损检测,2000,22(5):206~208,211
    [81]J.Maker, R.Desnoyes. Magnetic field techniques for the inspection of pipeline[J].NDT & E International, 2001,34:445~456.
    [82]王太勇,蒋齐.管道缺陷定量识别技术的研究[J].天津大学学报,2003,(1:15~16.
    [83]杨理践,陈晓春,魏兢.油气管道漏磁检测的信号处理技术[J],沈阳工业大学学报,1999,21(6):516~518.
    [84]K.Hwang, S.Mandayam. Application of wavelet basis function neural networks to NDE[J].Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 1997, (17:135~137.
    [85]盛剑霓.工程电磁场数值分析[D].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1991.
    [86]路杨,甘志华.计算机有限元仿真在缺陷漏磁定量检测中的应用[D].科学技术与工程[J].2007,7(13):3092-3096.
    [87]杨志军,储罐底板磁检测技术研究[D].硕士学位论文,大庆:大庆石油学院,2003.
    [88]金建铭著.电磁场有限元方法[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,1993,210~215.
    [89]陈建军,匙胜利.浅析影响管道漏磁腐蚀检测器定位精度的因素[J].管道技术与设备,2002,24(5):42~44.
    [90]胡仁喜,温正,王渊峰.ANSYS教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2007,87-90.
    [91]江洪,纪生,庞伟等.ANSYS基础教程[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007,70~79.
    [92]崔益铭,管道漏磁检测技术的研究[D],硕士学位论文,沈阳:沈阳工业大学,2009.
    [93]优化,余伟炜,高炳军.ANSYS在机械与化工装备中的应用[M],北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005,37~41.
    [94]周宁.ANSYS高级工程应用实例分析与二次开发[M],北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007,117~130.
    [95]丁忠平,康宜华.无损检测中的漏磁法原理与实践[J].电测与仪表,1995,32(6):15-18.
    [96]李路明,张家骏,李振星.提高霍尔器件检测灵敏度的一种方法[J].无损检测,1998,20(8):217~222.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700