学科导航中网络信息资源建设策略研究
|
摘要
学科网络资源导航是以学科为主要分类体系,并对网络学术信息资源进行搜集整理以提高资源利用率的系统。随着网络信息资源的不断丰富,网络中可以用于学术研究和学习的资源内容越来越多,建设一个资源内容丰富、使用方便的学科导航显得越来越重要。在学科网络资源导航建设过程中最重要的,也是最困难的过程就是网络学术信息资源的搜集和整理,这也是我国及其它国家在学科导航建设过程中需要解决的一个重大问题。
本文首先对国内外学科导航的建设状况做了简要的介绍,并指出了国内现存学科导航信息资源建设中存在的问题。然后,针对存在的这些问题,结合国内外学科导航资源建设的实例,对以往的学科导航资源建设策略进行了总结,并提出了新的方法和策略。本文主要从网络学术信息资源搜集与选择,信息资源的分类和描述以及信息资源的管理和维护几个方面提出了相应的策略和方法。其中,还对网络学术信息资源的评价体系、分类体系和描述体系进行了描述,并对国内外的相关标准进行了简要的介绍。除此之外,还对网络学术信息资源建设每个步骤中应该注意到的问题进行了分析,并提出了相应的解决方法。最后,本文从思想意识、人力物力和新技术的开发与应用三个方面分析了制约学科导航信息资源建设的因素。
Subject navigation of network resources is a system which is used to collect and arrange network information resources in order to make them fully used by other people. The network information resources in it are classified by subjects. With the development of the internet, the network resources used in academic research and learning are increasingly rich. It is more and more important to establish subject navigation with abundant information resources and easy to use. The most important and difficult procedure is the collection and arrangement of network academic information resources.
This article first gives a brief introduction of the construction condition to the subject navigation at home and abroad. It also points out some problems existing in the construction in our country. To counter these problems, combined with construction examples at home and abroad, this article sums up the construction strategies in the past and puts forward new methods and strategies. It introduces corresponding strategies and methods in the following construction processes: the collection and selection, the classification and description and the management and maintenance of network academic resources. In this part, the article makes a description of the evaluation system, the classification system and the description system of network academic resources. It also gives a brief introduction of the relative standards at home and abroad. In addition, the article analyzes some questions we should pay attention to in each construction process and provides some solution methods. At last, the article analyzes some restrictive factors in the network information resources construction from three aspects: ideologies, human and material resources, the exploitation and application of new technologies.
本文首先对国内外学科导航的建设状况做了简要的介绍,并指出了国内现存学科导航信息资源建设中存在的问题。然后,针对存在的这些问题,结合国内外学科导航资源建设的实例,对以往的学科导航资源建设策略进行了总结,并提出了新的方法和策略。本文主要从网络学术信息资源搜集与选择,信息资源的分类和描述以及信息资源的管理和维护几个方面提出了相应的策略和方法。其中,还对网络学术信息资源的评价体系、分类体系和描述体系进行了描述,并对国内外的相关标准进行了简要的介绍。除此之外,还对网络学术信息资源建设每个步骤中应该注意到的问题进行了分析,并提出了相应的解决方法。最后,本文从思想意识、人力物力和新技术的开发与应用三个方面分析了制约学科导航信息资源建设的因素。
Subject navigation of network resources is a system which is used to collect and arrange network information resources in order to make them fully used by other people. The network information resources in it are classified by subjects. With the development of the internet, the network resources used in academic research and learning are increasingly rich. It is more and more important to establish subject navigation with abundant information resources and easy to use. The most important and difficult procedure is the collection and arrangement of network academic information resources.
This article first gives a brief introduction of the construction condition to the subject navigation at home and abroad. It also points out some problems existing in the construction in our country. To counter these problems, combined with construction examples at home and abroad, this article sums up the construction strategies in the past and puts forward new methods and strategies. It introduces corresponding strategies and methods in the following construction processes: the collection and selection, the classification and description and the management and maintenance of network academic resources. In this part, the article makes a description of the evaluation system, the classification system and the description system of network academic resources. It also gives a brief introduction of the relative standards at home and abroad. In addition, the article analyzes some questions we should pay attention to in each construction process and provides some solution methods. At last, the article analyzes some restrictive factors in the network information resources construction from three aspects: ideologies, human and material resources, the exploitation and application of new technologies.
引文
[1] http://www.desire.org/html/subjectgateways/subjectgateways.html(2008-02)
[2] http://navigation.calis.edu.cn/cm/inquiry.jsp(2008-02)
[3]叶春峰,张西亚,张惠君,等.国内外网络资源学科导航与信息门户研究分析[J].情报方法, 2004, (12): 58-61
[4]刘锦山.学科导航3.0建设纲要[EB/OL]. http://www.chinalibs.net/. (2008-02)
[5]王群,姜淇. CALIS“十五”“重点学科网络资源导航库”现状调查[J].图书馆杂志, 2007, (7):35-38
[6]邢美园,陈益君.学科信息门户建设中深层网页资源采集的方法与策略[J].情报资料工作, 2005, (6): 53-56
[7]康微,孙成艺. WEB2.0技术对学科导航库建设在学术资源上的贡献[J].新世纪图书馆, 2007, (2): 79-81
[8]王知津,闫永君.网络计量法与内容分析法比较研究[J].图书馆学研究, 2006, (6):2-5
[9]粟慧.网络资源评价:评价标准及元数据和CORC系统的应用[J].情报学报, 2002, 21(3): 295-300
[10]张惠君,张春红,萧德洪,等.“CALIS重点学科网络资源导航库”标准与规范评述[J].大学图书馆学报, 2006, (3):28-32
[11] Information Gateways Handbook [EB/OL].http://www.desire.org/handbook/print4.html. (2008-02)
[12]郑萍.学科网络资源导航库建设的知识产权问题分析[J].新世纪图书馆, 2007, (3): 59-61
[13]信息网络传播权保护条例[EB/OL]. http://www.cnr.cn/tfmb/bqmj/bjzl/200704/t20070425_504452060.html. (2008-02)
[14] Wonsook Lee, Shigeo Sugimoto, Mitsuharu Nagamori, etc. A Subject gateway in Multiple Languages: a Prototype Development and Lessons Learned [EB/OL]. http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/203_Paper76.pdf.(2008-02)
[15]郝亚铃. DC元数据与网络信息资源的描述[J].情报科学, 2002, 20(10): 1070-1074
[16]林佳,李京华.“CALIS重点学科网络资源导航系统资源选择与评估标准”的建立与思考[J].大学图书馆学报, 2005, (1):38～41
[17]张惠君,周敬恩,张西亚,等. CALIS“重点学科网络资源导航库”“十五”建设思考[J].大学图书馆学报, 2004, (2): 34～37
[18]徐佳宁. DC元数据在网络资源学科导航体系中的应用研究[J].图书馆建设, 2002,(1): 85-87
[19]吴钢.澳大利亚学科信息门户发展经验与启示[J].图书馆杂志, 2007, 26(5): 57-60
[20]刘巧英.传统文献分类法在网络中的优势、缺陷及其发展[J].图书馆学研究, 2004, (5): 51-53
[21]刘冬莲,苏贤聚,刘小香,等.高校图书馆学科导航系统维护的常见问题[J].农业网络信息, 2007, (10): 85-86
[22]苏开颜.高校图书馆学科资源导航系统分析[J].图书情报工作, 2002, (8): 84-87
[23]金科,孙金立.关于学科网络资源导航数据库软件功能的几点看法[J].实践研究, 2007, 30(2): 222-223
[24]左少凝,柳晓春.国际大型图书分类法在因特网上的引用[J].图书馆杂志, 2001, 20(12): 10-13
[25]韩丽.国内外学科信息门户简论[J].图书馆杂志, 2004, 23(7): 17-20
[26]张芮,张娴.国外学科信息门户发展现状分析[J].图书情报工作, 2006, 50(2): 139-142
[27]王琳琳,顾建新.基于Web2.0的学科信息门户分析[J].河南图书馆学刊, 2007, (10): 98-100
[28]王晓光,丁韧,胡超.基于web2.0的学科信息门户设计与实现[J].图书.情报.知识, 2007, (115): 83-86
[29]刘勇敏.升级版CALIS重点学科导航库的调查与评析[J].大学图书馆学报, 2007, (4): 56-59
[30]彭冬莲,彭备芳.试析传统分类法对网络信息的组织[J].图书馆学研究, 2005, (6): 51-53
[31]雷泽勇.图书馆学科信息导航服务新思路-wiki[J].图书情报工作, 2006,增刊: 157-159
[32]明均仁,张帆.网络学科导航系统的信息重组研究[J].现代情报, 2006, (8): 78-80
[33]史艳丽.网络学科资源导航库中的超链接研究[J].情报科学, 2004, 22(8): 964-966
[34]李驿,谭明华,康忠民.网络资源学科导航库的建设实践与发展[J].情报探索, 2006, (6): 41-42
[35]王贵玲.网络资源学科导航与DC元数据[J].现代情报, 2005, (8): 209-210
[36]金科,孙金立,井晓梅,等.学科网络资源导航数据库质量控制体系研究[J].情报杂志, 2007, (2):138-142
[37]王美琴,包平.学科信息门户的资源更新与维护机制研究[J].四川图书馆学报, 2007, (2): 27-30
[38]王楠,吴新年,祝忠明.学科信息门户评价指标体系探讨[J].情报杂志, 2004, (12): 36-40
[39]王燕.中英学科信息门户组织比较分析[J].情报杂志, 2007, (12): 139-141
[40]梅廷会.我国高校图书馆网络资源学科导航库建设现状分析[D].广州:中山大学, 2005
[41]韩丽.学科信息门户的信息组织研究[D].湖北:武汉大学, 2005
[42]冯玉.学科信息门户资源体系建设研究[D].北京:北京师范大学, 2006
[43] Debbie Campbell. Australian Subject Gateways-Metadata as Agent of Change [EB/OL].http://www.vala.org.au/vala2000/2000pdf/Campbell.PDF. (2008-02)
[44] Lorcan Dempsey. ROADS to Desire-Some UK and Other European Metadata and Resource Discovery Projects [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, July/August 1996. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/07dempsey.html. (2008-02)
[45] Makx Dekkers, Stuart Weibel. State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, April 2003 [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, 2003, 9(4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april03/weibel/04weibel.html. (2008-02)
[46] Ann M. Lally, Carolyn E. Dunford. Using Wikipedia to Extend Digital Collections [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, 2007, 13(5/6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/lally/05lally.html. (2008-02)
[2] http://navigation.calis.edu.cn/cm/inquiry.jsp(2008-02)
[3]叶春峰,张西亚,张惠君,等.国内外网络资源学科导航与信息门户研究分析[J].情报方法, 2004, (12): 58-61
[4]刘锦山.学科导航3.0建设纲要[EB/OL]. http://www.chinalibs.net/. (2008-02)
[5]王群,姜淇. CALIS“十五”“重点学科网络资源导航库”现状调查[J].图书馆杂志, 2007, (7):35-38
[6]邢美园,陈益君.学科信息门户建设中深层网页资源采集的方法与策略[J].情报资料工作, 2005, (6): 53-56
[7]康微,孙成艺. WEB2.0技术对学科导航库建设在学术资源上的贡献[J].新世纪图书馆, 2007, (2): 79-81
[8]王知津,闫永君.网络计量法与内容分析法比较研究[J].图书馆学研究, 2006, (6):2-5
[9]粟慧.网络资源评价:评价标准及元数据和CORC系统的应用[J].情报学报, 2002, 21(3): 295-300
[10]张惠君,张春红,萧德洪,等.“CALIS重点学科网络资源导航库”标准与规范评述[J].大学图书馆学报, 2006, (3):28-32
[11] Information Gateways Handbook [EB/OL].http://www.desire.org/handbook/print4.html. (2008-02)
[12]郑萍.学科网络资源导航库建设的知识产权问题分析[J].新世纪图书馆, 2007, (3): 59-61
[13]信息网络传播权保护条例[EB/OL]. http://www.cnr.cn/tfmb/bqmj/bjzl/200704/t20070425_504452060.html. (2008-02)
[14] Wonsook Lee, Shigeo Sugimoto, Mitsuharu Nagamori, etc. A Subject gateway in Multiple Languages: a Prototype Development and Lessons Learned [EB/OL]. http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/203_Paper76.pdf.(2008-02)
[15]郝亚铃. DC元数据与网络信息资源的描述[J].情报科学, 2002, 20(10): 1070-1074
[16]林佳,李京华.“CALIS重点学科网络资源导航系统资源选择与评估标准”的建立与思考[J].大学图书馆学报, 2005, (1):38～41
[17]张惠君,周敬恩,张西亚,等. CALIS“重点学科网络资源导航库”“十五”建设思考[J].大学图书馆学报, 2004, (2): 34～37
[18]徐佳宁. DC元数据在网络资源学科导航体系中的应用研究[J].图书馆建设, 2002,(1): 85-87
[19]吴钢.澳大利亚学科信息门户发展经验与启示[J].图书馆杂志, 2007, 26(5): 57-60
[20]刘巧英.传统文献分类法在网络中的优势、缺陷及其发展[J].图书馆学研究, 2004, (5): 51-53
[21]刘冬莲,苏贤聚,刘小香,等.高校图书馆学科导航系统维护的常见问题[J].农业网络信息, 2007, (10): 85-86
[22]苏开颜.高校图书馆学科资源导航系统分析[J].图书情报工作, 2002, (8): 84-87
[23]金科,孙金立.关于学科网络资源导航数据库软件功能的几点看法[J].实践研究, 2007, 30(2): 222-223
[24]左少凝,柳晓春.国际大型图书分类法在因特网上的引用[J].图书馆杂志, 2001, 20(12): 10-13
[25]韩丽.国内外学科信息门户简论[J].图书馆杂志, 2004, 23(7): 17-20
[26]张芮,张娴.国外学科信息门户发展现状分析[J].图书情报工作, 2006, 50(2): 139-142
[27]王琳琳,顾建新.基于Web2.0的学科信息门户分析[J].河南图书馆学刊, 2007, (10): 98-100
[28]王晓光,丁韧,胡超.基于web2.0的学科信息门户设计与实现[J].图书.情报.知识, 2007, (115): 83-86
[29]刘勇敏.升级版CALIS重点学科导航库的调查与评析[J].大学图书馆学报, 2007, (4): 56-59
[30]彭冬莲,彭备芳.试析传统分类法对网络信息的组织[J].图书馆学研究, 2005, (6): 51-53
[31]雷泽勇.图书馆学科信息导航服务新思路-wiki[J].图书情报工作, 2006,增刊: 157-159
[32]明均仁,张帆.网络学科导航系统的信息重组研究[J].现代情报, 2006, (8): 78-80
[33]史艳丽.网络学科资源导航库中的超链接研究[J].情报科学, 2004, 22(8): 964-966
[34]李驿,谭明华,康忠民.网络资源学科导航库的建设实践与发展[J].情报探索, 2006, (6): 41-42
[35]王贵玲.网络资源学科导航与DC元数据[J].现代情报, 2005, (8): 209-210
[36]金科,孙金立,井晓梅,等.学科网络资源导航数据库质量控制体系研究[J].情报杂志, 2007, (2):138-142
[37]王美琴,包平.学科信息门户的资源更新与维护机制研究[J].四川图书馆学报, 2007, (2): 27-30
[38]王楠,吴新年,祝忠明.学科信息门户评价指标体系探讨[J].情报杂志, 2004, (12): 36-40
[39]王燕.中英学科信息门户组织比较分析[J].情报杂志, 2007, (12): 139-141
[40]梅廷会.我国高校图书馆网络资源学科导航库建设现状分析[D].广州:中山大学, 2005
[41]韩丽.学科信息门户的信息组织研究[D].湖北:武汉大学, 2005
[42]冯玉.学科信息门户资源体系建设研究[D].北京:北京师范大学, 2006
[43] Debbie Campbell. Australian Subject Gateways-Metadata as Agent of Change [EB/OL].http://www.vala.org.au/vala2000/2000pdf/Campbell.PDF. (2008-02)
[44] Lorcan Dempsey. ROADS to Desire-Some UK and Other European Metadata and Resource Discovery Projects [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, July/August 1996. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/07dempsey.html. (2008-02)
[45] Makx Dekkers, Stuart Weibel. State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, April 2003 [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, 2003, 9(4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april03/weibel/04weibel.html. (2008-02)
[46] Ann M. Lally, Carolyn E. Dunford. Using Wikipedia to Extend Digital Collections [J/OL]. D-Lib Magazine, 2007, 13(5/6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/lally/05lally.html. (2008-02)