摘要
湘江流域的发展对于湖南省具有举足轻重的作用。但是,湘江流域的水污染问题制约着湘江流域的经济发展。实现湘江流域经济和环境协调发展是我们的一个重要任务。排污权交易制度作为一项新的环境管理经济政策在全球范围内引起高度重视,并在美国、欧盟一些发达国家取得显著成效。而在我国对于排污权交易制度的研究还处在起步阶段,尤其是涉及水污染方面。因此在湘江流域进行排污权交易制度的理论和应用研究很有必要。
本文以系统论和博弈论为研究工具,通过借鉴国内外成功交易模式,同时结合湘江流域现状,对湘江流域排污权交易体系的构建及排污权交易定价问题进行研究。具体内容包括:
一、回顾排污权交易制度的理论依据及理论产生和发展情况,总结排污权交易制度的国内外研究现状与实践情况。
二、总结国内外排污权交易的成功模式,为湘江流域构建排污权交易制度提供经验。然后分析湘江流域构建排污权交易制度的必要性和可行性,提出建立排污权交易制度应遵守的原则和应注意的问题,构建排污权交易制度的体系框架及运行程序。
三、对排污权初始定价和排污权交易定价的文献进行梳理,讨论排污权交易定价研究中取得的成果和存在的不足,用影子价格法、恢复成本法探讨排污权初始定价方法,用博弈论中的讨价还价博弈模型来研究排污权交易定价。
四、以湘江流域长株潭段为例,对湘江流域排污权交易制度的实施进行研究,并对湘江流域排污权交易制度的有效性进行评价,为进一步扩排污权交易制度实施范围提供参考。
本研究的目的是为湘江流域建立排污权交易制度提供政策依据和技术支撑,将对相关部门进行决策提供重要参考价值。
The development of the Xiangjiang River has a vital role in Hunan province. However, Water pollution restricts the regional economic development of Xiangjiang River. It is an important task to achieve economy and environment balanced. As a new environmental management and economy means, emissions trading gets highly emphasis in the whole world and gains remarkable achievement in USA and EU. But emissions trading system is in infancy stage in our country, especially in water pollution.Therefore, it is necessary to research emissions trading in Xiangjiang River.
This paper researches pricing issues and emissions trading system in Xiangjiang River, Systematology and game theory as tools, combined with successful emissions trading practice home and worldwide.
First, review the theory and development of emissions trading, summerize the research status and practice of emissions trading system.
Second, the successes of emissions trading models are summarized, then from the analysis of the feasibility and necessity of building emissions trading system, proposals framework and operational procedure of emissions trading system.
Third, the documents on initial pricing and pricing emissions trading are introduced firstly, then the achievements of pricing emissions trading are summarized, the difficulties are pointed out,and pricing methods are discussed. The initial pricing of emission uses shadow price method and recovery cost method.Bargaining model is used to study emission price.
Finally, study the implematation of emissions trading system and evaluate the effectiveness for expanding the scope of system.
The purpose of this study is to provide policy and technical support for establishing emissions trading system in Xiangjiang River and to provide an important reference for decision-making.
引文
[1]夏光.环境政策创新[M .中国环境科学出版社,2001.P19
[2]R.H.Coase.The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3 (1):1-44
[3]J.H.Dales."Pollution,Property and Prices."Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1968
[4]J.H.Dales.Land, Water and Ownership.Canadian Journal of Economics.1968,1(4):791-804
[5]T.D.Crocker."The Structuring of Atmospheric Pollution Control System," The Economics of Air Pollution,61-86,H.Wolozin,New York,W.W. Norton&Co,1996
[6]W.J.Baumol,W.E. Oates.The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment Swedish journal of economics.1971,73(1):42-54
[7]W.D.Montgomery."Markets in licenses and Efficient Pollution control Programs."Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.5,No,1972(3):395-418
[8]T.H.Tietenberg.Emissions trading:an exercise in reforming pollution policy.Washington,D.C.:Resources for the Future,1985
[9]R.W.Hahn.Market power and transferable property right[J].Quarterly Journal of Economies,1984(3):753-765
[10]T.H.Tietenberg.Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1991(6):125-178
[11]W.S.Misiolek and H.W.Elder.Exclusionary Manipulation of Markets for Pollution Rights[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1989(16): 156-166
[12]T.N.Cason, L.Gangadharan and C.Duke.Market power in tradable emission markets:a laboratory testbed for emission trading in Port Phillip Bay[J]. Victoria.Ecological Economics,2003(46):469-491
[13]R.N.Stavins.Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1995,29:133-148
[14]P.Cramton and S.Kerr.Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions:How and Why to Auction not Grandfather[J].Energy Policy,2002,30:333-345.
[15]K.Athanasios.Selecting permit allocation rules for agricultural pollution control:A bargaining solution[J].Ecological Economics,2003,47:135-147
[16]C.Boemare.Quirion P.Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe[J].
lessons from economic literature and international experiences.Ecological Economics,2002(43):213-230
[17]A.Rose and B.Stevens.The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO2 emission[J].Resource and Energy Economics,1993,15(1):117-146
[18]泰坦伯格著,崔卫国,范红延译,马中主编.排污权交易:污染控制政策的改革[M].北京:三联书店,1992
[19]马中、杜丹德.总量控制与排污权交易[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999
[20]王金南等.二氧化硫排放交易——中国的可行性[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
[21]王金南等.二氧化硫排放交易——美国的经验与中国的前景[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000
[22]肖江文,赵勇,罗云峰,岳超源.寡头垄断条件下的排污权交易博弈模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(04):27-31
[23]陈德湖,李寿德,蒋馥.寡头垄断和排污权初始分配[J].系统工程,2004,22(10):51-53
[24]李彩莲,胡德朝,王辉.排污权交易中的寡占企业博弈分析[J].科技与管理,2007(06):76-78
[25]鞠占杰.我国排污权制度的建立和实施[J].政策与管理,2007(6):572-578
[26]尹萌.排污权交易制度在我国实践中存在的问题[J].中国商界,2007(6):140-143
[27]蒋芳红.完善我国排污权交易制度的若干对策研究[J].法制视野,2009(3):121
[28]吕连宏,罗宏,罗柳红.排污权交易制度在中国的推行建议[J].环境科技,2009(8):70-73.
[29]JP.Barde.Environmental Policy and Policy Instruments[A].In:FolmerH. Principals of Environmental and Resource Economics[C]. Edward Elgar, Aldershot,1995:201-227
[30]T.Heller.The Path to EU Climate Change Policy[A].In:Golub J.Global Competition and EU Environmental Policy [C]. London:Rutledge,1998:108-141
[31]E.Woerdman.Implementing the kyoto Protocol:Why JI and CDM show more Promise than international Emissions Trading[J].Energy Policy,2000,28(1)
[32]Haln Robert,Roger Noll.Designing a Market for Transferable Permits[M]. Cambridge, MA:Ballinger,1982:78-83
[33]E.Cramton and S.Kerr.Tradeable carbon permit auctions:How and why to auction not grandfather[J].Energy Policy,2002(30):333-345
[34]R.Andrew Muller,Stuart Mestelman, John Spraggon,Rob Godby.Can Double Auctions Control Monopoly and Monopsony Power in Emissions Trading Markets? [J] Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2002(44):70-92
[35]Knut Einar Rosendahl. Incentives and prices in an emissions trading scheme with updating[J] Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008(56):69-82
[36]肖江文,罗云峰,赵勇等.初始排污权拍卖的博弈分析[J].华中科技大学学报,2001(9):37-39
[37]施圣炜.期权理论在排污权初始分配中的应用[J].中国人口、资源与环境,2005(1):52-55
[38]王晓敏,刘万才.排污权的初始配置方式及其价格问题研究[J].生态经济,2006(10):116-119
[39]毕军,周国梅.排污权有偿使用的初始分配价格研究[J].经济政策,2007(7):51-54
[40]胡民.排污权定价的影子价格模型分析[J].价格月刊,2007(2):19-22
[41]夏德建,孙睿,任玉珑.政府与企业在排污权定价中的演化稳定策略研究[J].技术经济,2010(3):23-27
[42]Peter Russ. Dynamic Carbon Emission Permit Prices and Emission Trade. ECOMOD 2001, Brussels
[43]Carolyn Fischer.Emissions pricing,spillovers and public investment in environmentally friendly technologies[J]. Energy Economics,2008(30):487-502
[44]Urs Springer,Matthew Varilek. Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008-12[J]. Energy Policy,2004(32):611-621
[45]Chao-ning Liao,Hayri Onal, Ming-Hsiang Chen. Average shadow price and equilibrium price: A case study of tradable pollution permit markets[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2009(196):1207-1213
[46]R.P.O'Neill,P.M.Sotkiewicz,B.F.Hobbs,M.H.Rothkopf,W.R.StewartJr.Effi cient market-clearing prices in market with nonconvexities[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2005(164):269-285
[47]George Daskalakis,Dimitris Psychoyios,Raphael N.Markellos.Modeling CO2 emission allowance prices and derivatives:Evidence from the European trading scheme[J]. Journal of Banking&Finance,2009(33):1230-1241
[48]Marc S.Paolella,Luca Taschini.An econometric analysis of emission allowance prices[J]. Journal of Banking&Finance,2008(32):2022-2032
[49]Jan Seifert,Marliese Uhrig-Homburg,Michael Wagner. Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2008(56):180-194
[50]E.Benz,S.Truck.Modeling the price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances [J]. Energy Economics 2009(31),4-15
[51]Ren Carmona,Juri Hinz. Risk-Neutral Modeling of Emission Allowance Prices and Option Valuation. Technical report, Princeton University,2009
[52]M.Fehr,J.Hinz.A Quantitative Approach to Carbon Price Risk Modeling,2006,Working Paper,Institute for Operations Research,ETH Zentrum,Zurich.
[53]李寿德.排污权交易思想及其初始分配与定价问题探析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(1):69-71
[54]黄桐城、武邦涛.基于治理成本和排污收益的排污权定价模型分析[J].上海管理科学,2004(6):34-36
[55]徐自力.排污权定价策略分析[J].武汉理工大学学报,2003(5):126-128
[56]李赤林,陈优金.城市水污染处理的排污权交易策略及定价机理研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(6):88-89
[57]林云华.排污权交易定价机制研究[J].武汉工程大学学报,2009(2):33-36
[58]唐浩阳.行业排污定价机理研究[J].生态经济,2005(12):73-75
[59]饶从军,王成,段鹏.基于贝叶斯博弈的排污权交易模型[J].决策参考,2008(15):48-49
[60]宁素琴,梁善涛,陈欣华.广西二氧化硫(SO2)排污权初始分配模式及价格形成机制研究[J].市场论坛,2010(2):86-87
[61]颜蕾,巫腾飞.基于影子价格的排污权初始分配和交易模型[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2010(2):53-55
[62]林云华.排污权影子价格模型的分析及启示[J].环境科学与管理,2009(2):16-19
[63]Song Haili,Liu Chen-Ching,Lawarree.Nash equilibrium bidding strategies in a bilateral electricity market[J]. IEEE Transaction of Power Systems,2002,17(1):73-79
[64]David AK,Wen FS.Bilateral transaction bargaining between independent utilities under incomplete information[J]. IEEE Proceedings-Generation Transmission Distribution,2001,148(5):448-454
[65]迈尔森.博弈论——矛盾冲突分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2001:314-327
[66]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2002:286-290
[67]U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Draft Framework for Watershed-Based Trading[J].Office of Water,EPA 800-R-96-001,1996.
[68]薛瑛.排污权交易制度实施的国际经验及启示[J].资源与环境,2008(9):94-95
[69]何春晖.排污权交易制度在我国实施的思考[J].甘肃科技,2009(1):13-15
[70]王晓冬.排污权交易制度的国际比较与借鉴[J].经济纵横,2009(2):52-56
[71]殷小丽.排污权交易在水污染治理中的应用研究[D].南京林业大学,2008
[72]杨展里.水污染物排污权交易技术方法研究[D].南京:河海大学水环学院,2001
[73]张淑丽.水污染物排污权交易的规则与方式[D].北京:北京化工大学,2008
[74]王俊英.二氧化硫排污权交易市场体系研究——以青岛市为例[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2007
[75]徐周.关于太湖流域建立排污权交易体系的研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2008
[76]李晓筠.潭江流域排污权交易市场初探[J].科技资讯,2009(5):168-169
[77]罗佩宁.水污染物排污权交易体系研究[D].成都:四川大学,2006
[78]陈德湖.排污权交易理论及其研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2004(5)
[79]高鸿业,冯金华等.西方经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[80]安丽,赵国杰.排污权交易评价指标体系的构建及评价方法研究[J].中国人口、资源与环境,2008(1):89-92
[81]张颖,舒相军.排污权交易政策的评价标准研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006(4):35-37