企业人员诚信人格结构及影响因素研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
诚信是中华民族的传统美德,但随着我国正处于市场经济体制转型发展时期,诚信缺失已成为一个严重的社会问题。其中,企业的诚信问题尤为受人关注。企业的诚信问题,追根溯源还是要追究到企业人的诚信问题。
     本研究从人格心理学角度出发,综合运用文献分析、问卷调查、自由分类、多维尺度分析和个体访谈等方法,对企业人员这一群体的诚信人格结构及影响因素进行全面探索和分析,力图揭示诚信发生发展的本质及规律。
     通过对多维尺度分析发现,企业人员诚信人格结构正负向分别为4个维度,正向为:善良淳朴、诚实信用、守法敬业、乐观无私;负向为:自私乱纪、浮躁散漫、虚夸不实、阴险狡诈。与中国人“大七”人格结构及其他诚信结构研究相比较,发现有较好的契合性。同时,也表明了多维尺度分析法也是一种探索人格结构的有效方法。
     对于诚信的影响因素,借助QSR Nvivo7.0对文本内容进行分析研究,结果得出:主要受个体特质与状态、文化与环境和人际互动三大类因素的影响。其中个体特质与状态因素又分为自我指向的个人特质与状态和他人指向的他人特质与状态2类;文化与环境因素又分为社会环境与文化、家庭生活与教育、道德与法律监督机制、任务与工作、危机与困境5类;人际互动因素又分为情感性交往与互动、工具性交往与互动、角色性交往与互动3类。研究发现,工具性的交往互动对诚信的影响最大。说明诚信的外延有所扩展,它不仅是一种道德规范,同时也是获取利益的一种策略和手段。
     本研究立足于本土文化视角,对企业人员的诚信心理结构及影响因素进行了深入探析,揭示出诚信发生发展的本质及规律,有助于深化人们对诚信的认识,为当前的诚信建设提供一定的理论参考。
Integrity is the traditional virtue of China, but with the development and transformation of China's market economy, lack of integrity has become a serious social problem, one of which is especially of concern in enterprise’s integrity. Enterprise’s integrity still has to trace back to the entrepreneur’s integrity.
     From the perspective of personality psychology, this research uses literature analysis, questionnaires, free classification, multi-dimensional scaling analysis and individual interviews etc to explore and analyze the personality structure and influencing factors of entrepreneur’s integrity. We attempt to reveal the nature and the laws of integrity’s development.
     Through multi-dimensional scaling(MDS) method,the research find that positive and negative personality structure of entrepreneur’s integrity all contain four dimensions. Positive facets are goodness, credit, devotion, optimism and selflessness; negative facets are selfishness, sloth, insincerity, cunning. Compared to the Chinese "big seven" personality structure and the other structure of integrity, there is a better fit among them. It also shows that the MDS is an effective method to explore the personality structure.
     For the influencing factors of the integrity, with the help of QSR Nvivo7.0, the results indicate integrity is mainly influenced by individual characteristics and state (ICS), social interaction (SI), cultural and environmental (CE) factors. In addition, ICS is divided into personal characteristics and status as well as other characteristics and status; SI is divided into the emotional, tool and character aspects’contents; CE is divided into social environment and culture, family life and education and so on. What’s more, the tool interaction is one of the most important factors. It shows that integrity is not only a kind of moral norms but also a strategy and method of gaining benefit.
     This study, based on the local culture, researches about enterprise staff’s integrity psychological structure and factors, and reveals the essence of development of integrity, and helps to deepen the understanding of the current credit construction, in an attempt to provide certain theoretical reference.
引文
1 http://www.sina.net 2008年04月25日13:36产经网-中国企业报
    珀文,L.A. (2002).人格科学.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
    陈向明. (2000).质的研究方法与社会科学研究.北京:教育科学出版社.
    格里格·津巴多.王垒,王甦译. (2006).心理学与生活.北京:人民邮电出版社.
    Jerry M.Burger著.陈会昌等译.(2004).人格心理学.北京:中国轻工业出版社.
    刘电芝. (2002).教育与心理研究方法.重庆:西南师范大学出版社.
    施忠连. (2002).四书五经名篇诵读.上海:上海辞书出版社.
    谭中明. (2005).社会信用管理体系:理论、模式、体制与机制.合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社.
    吴继霞. (2009).诚信品格的养成.合肥:安徽教育出版社.
    吴继霞,黄辛隐. (2007).大学生心理健康学.上海:学林出版社.
    徐喜堂译注. (2001).易经上经·乾卦.广州:广州出版社.
    徐秀瑛,麦晓颖译注. (2001).论语.广州:广州出版社.
    约翰·纳什. (2000).纳什博弈论论文集.北京:北京经济出版社.
    叶奕乾等主编. (2004).普通心理学.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
    邹建平. (2005).诚信论.天津:天津人民出版社.
    左丘明. (2001).左传·成公十七年.长沙:岳麓书社.
    陈富国. (1990).多维标度法的理论与方法.心理科学通讯, 4,36 - 40.
    陈劲. (2007).中国人诚信心理结构及其特征.博士学位论文,西南大学.
    蔡海江,章可敦,杨华琴. (2005).当代大学生诚信水平与诚信观的调查.中国临床康复,9(24),85 - 87.
    高淑青,廖昭铭. (2004).父母亲职经验之现象诠释:以家有青春期子女为例之初探.应用心理研究, 24,117 - 145.
    管文娟,吴继霞. (2005).大学生诚信缺失行为的社会学习理论阐释.江苏大学学报(高教研究版),27(4),55-57.
    桂亚莉. (2004).大学生诚信心理初步研究.硕士学位论文,西南师范大学.
    黄金凤. (2008).中学生诚信态度及其影响因素研究.硕士学位论文,西南大学.
    韩励,张积家. (2003).汉语亲属词概念结构的研究.广州大学学报(社会科学版),2(9), 55 - 56.
    黄元男. ( 2007).中小企业发展诚信问题研究.硕士学位论文,哈尔滨工程大学.
    姜晶花. (2002).大学生诚信状况调查.调查与思考, 11,90 - 92.
    吉云. (2008).民营企业家诚信水平的影响因素研究—基于经理人感知角度的分析.云南社会科学, 2,105 - 108.
    刘阳. (2004).大学生诚信度调查分析及提高对策.山西高等学校社会科学学报,16(3),89 - 91.
    刘敏,李小平. ( 2007).中学生诚信研究.中国健康心理学杂志, 15(6),549 - 551.
    刘?  . (2008).同性恋者性身份认同的影响因素研究.硕士学位论文,华东师范大学.
    李祚山. (2005).大学生健全人格特征的内隐观研究.心理科学, 28(6),406 - 1409.
    李海青. (2008).“家”的结构分析:当代青年人“家”的内隐观研究.心理科学,31 (4) ,1014 - 1017.
    李世众. (2003).“公”与“私”的悖论—中国人“自私”行为的历史溯源.学海, 31,162 -165.
    李亦园. (2002).新世纪的人文关怀.广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 24(1),44 - 51.
    李伟民,梁玉成. (2002).特殊信任与普遍信任:中国人信任的结构与特征.社会学研究, 3,11 - 22.
    马尽举. (2002).诚信系列概念研究.高校理论战线, 4,17 - 23.
    聂丽萍,吴继霞. (2008).当代大学生诚信品德养成的他律机制探讨.河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版), 6,80 - 81.
    邱均平,邹菲. (2003).国外内容分析法的研究概况及进展.图书情报知识, 6, 6 - 8.
    秦延红. (2002).论马基雅维利国家政体学说的人性论.基础当代法学, 2,110 - 111.
    沈淼. (2004).组织管理诚信及其现代价值初探.硕士学位论文,苏州大学.
    宋美娴. (2009).影响高中生诚信问题的因素研究.黑龙江教育学院学报, 28(7),33 - 37.
    王爱红. (2003).诚信—企业文化的核心.濮阳教育学院学报, 16(2),64 - 65.
    王登峰,方林,左衍涛. (1995).中国人人格的词汇研究.心理学报, 27(4),400 - 406.
    韦克平.(2001).人格特质结构模型研究述评.广西民族学院学报(自然科学版),7(3),206 - 209.
    吴凡明. (2008).理学诚信思想与现代儒商人格的塑造.南通大学学报(社会科学版),24(2),15 - 18.
    徐国栋. (2004).中世纪法学家对诚信问题的研究.法学, 6,4-10.
    奚春华. (2005).中国城市居民信任的特征与影响因素.硕士学位论文,华中师范大学.
    夏春. (2005).组织管理诚信的结构验证及模型建构研究.硕士学位论文,苏州大学.
    许思安. (2006).汉族、壮族、蒙族、纳西族人格结构的比较研究.博士学位论文,华南师范大学.
    杨方. (2007).诚信内在结构解析.伦理学研究, 4,18 - 20.
    杨宜音. (2002).社会变迁与人的变迁:杨国枢等人关于“个人现代性”研究述评, 19 - 39.
    余茉莉. (2006).高中生诚信行为及其影响因素的研究.硕士学位论文,华东师范大学.
    杨国枢,瞿海源. (1974d).中国人的现代化有关个人现代性的研究.中央研究院民族研究所集刊,37,1 - 38.
    周萌. (2007).内容分析法及其在社会学中的应用评述.重庆科技学院学报,3,52 - 53.
    张倩. (2005).大学生诚信状况调查与诚信体制建构.硕士学位论文,山东大学.
    张积家,陆爱桃. (2007).汉语心理动词的组织和分类研究研究.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2(1),117 - 123.
    张积家,陈俊. (2004).汉族亲属词概念结构再探.语言科学,3(1),77 - 86.
    张积家,和秀梅. (2004).纳西族亲属词的概念结构.心理学报, 36(6),663 - 670.
    张景焕,金盛华. (2007).具有创造成就的科学家关于创造的概念结构.心理学报, 39(1),135 - 145.
    赵子真,吴继霞等. (2009).诚信人格特质初探.心理科学, 32 (3) ,626 - 629.
    Allport,G.W.(1937).Personality-A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.
    Andreski,S. Social sciences as sorcery.London:Deutsch,1972:83.
    Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., deVries, R.E., DiBlas, etal... (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycho lexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,356–366.
    Borg, I., and Groenen, P. (2005)."Modern Multidimensional Scaling: theory and applications" (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag New York.
    Bourdage Joshua S., Lee Kibeom, Ashton Michael C, Perry Alissa...(2007).Big Five and HEXACO Model Personality Correlates of Sexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43,1506-1516.
    Cullen M J, Sackett P R. (2004).Integrity testing in the workplace. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, 4,149-165.
    Cloninger S. (1996). Personality: Description, dynamics, and development. New York: Freeman.
    Cervone D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56,423-452.
    佚名. (2008).Corporate Personality: What are you like? [EB /OL].www. dectech. Org.
    Forgas,J.P.,Heck,V.G.L. (1992).The psychology of Situations. In: Gian-Vittorrian Caprara, Guus L Heck(eds).Modern Personality Psychology. New York: Wheatssheaf, 7-8.
    Hardin R. (1991).Trusting persons, trusting institutions, Strategy in Choice.MA MIT, 487.
    Jone.wJones. (1991).:preemployment Honesty Testing: current reseach and future directions.New York. Quorum Book, 1 - 15.
    Kruskal, J. B., and Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences, 07-011. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications,100.
    Lee K, Ashton M C, de Vries R E. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18(2), 179-197.
    Lee Kibeom, Ashton Michael C...(2006).Further Assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory Two New Facet Scales and an Observer Report Form. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 182-191.
    MacRae Jr., Duncan. (1954). The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 149(1), 14-18.
    Marcus B, Lee K, Ashton M C. (2007).Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 1-34.
    Michael C. Ashton, Kibeom Lee. (2005). Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five Factors Model. Journal of Personality, 10, 1321-1353.
    Ones,D.S.,Viswesvaran,C.,& Schrnidt, F. (1993a).Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78(4),679-703.
    Patton MQ. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nded. Newbury Park,CA: Sage Publications, 160.
    Philipp E. Otto, Nick Chater, Henry Stott. (2006). How People Perceive Companies: Personality Dimensions as Fundamentals. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
    Sackett,P.R.,& Harris,M.M.(1984).Honesty testing for personnel selection : A review and critique. Personnel Psychology, 37,221-245.
    Sackett,P.R.,Burris,I..R., & Callahan,C. (1989).Integrity testing for personal selection: an update. Personnel Psychology, 42,491-529.
    Wanek J E, Sackett P R, Ones D S. (2003).Towards an understanding of integrity test similarities and differences: an item level analysis of seven tests. Personnel Psychology, 56, 873-894.
    Yui-Tim Wong, Hang-Yue Ngo,Chi-Sum Wong. (2003).Antecedents and outcomes of employees` trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (Singapore), 20(4), 481-504.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700