用户名: 密码: 验证码:
饲养模式对新引入美系杜洛克猪生长性能、胴体品质及肉质的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
美系杜洛克猪引入安徽后由于生态环境,管理方式和饲料营养水平等方面均发生了较大变化,有必要对其现有种质特性进行研究,进一步了解它的生长速度、生长发育水平、胴体组成和肉质性状,为指导杜洛克猪的推广工作提供参考依据。本实验从营养学的角度出发,对美系杜洛克生长性能、胴体品质及肉质做了一整套的测定,初步探讨了屠宰体重,季节,限制饲喂等不同饲养模式在安徽饲养条件下对新引入美系杜洛克生长性能、胴体品质及肉质参数的影响。
    试验一:新引入美系杜洛克猪在安徽省的性能表现。
    安徽省畜禽品种改良站2001年从美国引入100头原种杜洛克(85母15公),进行了一年半的扩繁后对原种和695头纯繁一代后裔进行了测定,目前测定的原种成绩为6月龄体长(♂)145±13cm,10月龄体长(♂)153±14cm,18月龄体长(♂)170±13cm,产仔数11.5±2.0头/窝(第二胎)。纯繁一代生长发育成绩为28日龄重8.3±2.1千克,70日龄重33.0±4.5千克,达100千克日龄148.0±13.2天,平均日增重为859克,饲料转化率达2.46:1。肉色L*值达51.70±2.44, 嫩度42.19±4.84N。该测定结果提示,新引进的杜洛克在生长速度、繁殖性能、肉质方面性能优秀,现代美系杜洛克的种质有较明显的改进。
    试验二:不同屠宰体重对美系杜洛克猪胴体肉质性能的影响。
    于2001年从美国引进杜洛克原种第二代种猪群中随机抽取28日龄48头杜洛克仔猪,并保育至70日龄,体重达33kg,在生长到肥育阶段饲喂含消化能l3.3~13.1MJ/Kg、粗蛋白质18.01%~16.03%的饲粮。分别在100kg、120kg、150kg体重级别从48头母猪中随机选择12头(4×3,每个体重级别4头)进行屠宰,检测体重和日龄对胴体和肉质的影响。结果表明:当体重从100kg增至150kg时,瘦肉率从66.8%显著降至62.4%,即使在150kg体重,瘦肉率也完全符合市场需求。然而,板油和花油的增加值得注意。此外,肌内脂肪,体重120kg、150kg(3.32%、3.69%)高于100kg(2.86%)。这个结果提示,随着体重增大肌内脂肪提高而改善肉质,但嫩度降低。
    试验三:季节对美系杜洛克猪胴体和肉质性能的影响。
    于秋冬季(季节1)与春夏季(季节2)分别在安徽省原种猪场第二代种猪群中选择日龄、体重相近的36头仔猪于28日龄断奶,并保育至70日龄,体重达33kg,在生长到肥育阶段饲喂含消化能l3.3~13.1MJ/Kg、粗蛋白质l8.01%~16.03%的饲粮,自由采食饲喂至100千克活重,再随机选取18头进行屠宰测定并进行肉质参数测定。结果表明:季节对本试验胴体品质无显著影响。在肉质参数中,秋冬季猪肉的红度(6.47±0.73)显著低于春夏季(8.78±0.85),贮存损失(3.26±0.88)也显著低于春夏季
    
    
    (5.63±0.64)。不同季节猪肉的常规生化指标尚能维持相对稳定,脂肪酸、氨基酸组份合理。
    试验四:限制饲喂对美系杜洛克猪生长肥育猪生长性能及经济效益的影响。
    于安徽省原种猪场第二代同胞测定群中选择日龄、体重相近的70日龄肥育猪50头,随机分为对照组与实验组,预试后,对照组按平时自由采食时消耗的饲料量饲喂,实验组饲喂对照组的80%,在相同饲养条件下饲喂至140日龄。试验开始和结束均空腹称重,记录饲料消耗量。实验结果表明:试验组日增重降低了66克,每增重1千克少耗料0.3千克,每头猪净增收入21.08元。
Since the importation of American Duroc in 1970’s, the following imported American Duroc of improved genetic background and feeding management have changed a lot , it’s very essential to measure its growth、carcass and meat quality performances for offering a technical reference for Duroc’s production. From the point of view of Animal nutrition, this experiment was focused on the three performance aspects: The effects of different live weights(1)、seasons(2)、and feeding patterns(3) on growth、carcass and meat quality performances of the New American Duroc on the feeding condition of Anhui.
    Experiment 1:A Report on Growth、Carcass and Meat Quality Performances of the New American Duroc in Ahhui Province.
    From U.S. Anhui Animal Improvement Station imported 100 American Duroc (15 male, 85 female) and reproduced them for 2 generations. The imported Duroc and the 659 offspring of first generation were tested. The performances of the imported were 145±13cm, 153±14cm, 170±13cm for the male body length at 6, 10, 18 month of age separately. The litter size was 11.5±2.0(the second embryo). The growing performances for the offspring were 8.3±2.1kg and 33.0±4.5kg of body weight at 28 days and 70 days of age separately. The growing days for 100kg body weight was 148.0±13.2 days. The average daily gain was 859g and the feed conversion rate was 2.46:1. As regard to meat quality they had 51.70±2.44 for L* and 42.19±4.84N for shearing force. The results imply that the new imported Duroc have very good capacity of growth, reproduction and meat quality. The genplasma of modern American Duroc has been improved to a certain extent.
    Experiment 2: Effects on Carcass and Meat Quality Performances of American Duroc at Different Live Weights.
     48 Durocs were randomly selected at 28 days of age from the second generation of American Duroc Breeding herd which was imported in 2001 from U.S. The 48 gilts were
    
    
    fed in nursery house till they were 70 days of age at about 33 kg body weight. For the growing-finishing phases the pigs were fed with diets at DE l3.3~13.1MJ/Kg and CP 18.01%~16.03%. Randomly 12 (4×3,4 individuals for each body weight phase) individuals from the 48 Durocs were selected and slaughtered at about 100 kg、120 kg and 150 kg live weight at different growing phases separately to examine the influence of body weight or age on the carcass ad meat quality. The results indicated that the lean percentage decreased significantly from 66.8% to 62.4% when live weight in creased from 100 kg to 150 kg. It means that Duroc gilts are lean enough to current market demands even they are finished as later as 180 days of age at 150 kg live weight. However the increased leaf fat and viscera fat need to be monitored. In addition, higher intramuscular fat percentages were for 120/150 kg live weight (3.32%/3.69%) than that for 100 kg (2.86%). The results imply better meat quality for higher live weight with higher intramuscular fat at the expense of a little worse tenderness.
    Experiment 3:The Influence of Season on the Carcass and Meat Performances in American Duroc.
    36 Duroc pigs of each group were randomly selected at 28 days of age from the second generation of American Duroc Breeding herd in season 1(autumn-winter) and season 2(spring-summer). The 36 Duroc pigs of each group were fed in nursery house till they were 70 days of age at about 33 kg body weight. For the growing-finishing phases the pigs were fed with diets at DE l3.3~13.1MJ/Kg and CP 18.01%~16.03% till they were 100 kg. Randomly 18 individuals from the each group were selected and slaughtered to examine the influence of different season on the carcass ad meat quality. The results indicated that season had no significant influence on the carcass parameters. As regard to meat parameters, lower a* value(6.47±0.73) and driploss(3.26±0.88) were for the season of autumn-winter than those(8.78±0.85, 5.63±0.64) for the season of spring-summer. Biochemistry parameters of different seasons were relative stabilization. The relative content of Fatty acid
引文
[1] 张伟力,殷宗俊.杜洛克的起源发展和利用.安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(2):165~170
    [2] Bundy C.K.et al..Swine production. Prentice-Hall, Inc.1984,N.J.U.S.A.
    [3] 熊远著.杜洛克猪新品系杂交配套初步研究.华中农业大学学报,1991,10(1):23~27
    [4] 潘晚平,柳方,申祥科,等.不同品系杜洛克杂交效果研究.2003,(10):25
    [5] 胡锦平,翁经强,王津,等.杜洛克猪(SI系)生产性能的选育改良与杂交效果.浙江农业大学学报,1999,25(2):201~204
    [6] 林小伟.杜洛克在四川省发展商品瘦肉猪中的地位和作用.四川畜牧兽医,第四期,8~9
    [7] 郭建凤,武英,孙继刚,等.丹麦杜洛克种猪适应性和生产性能测定.养猪,2002,(3)27~28
    [8] 郑春雷,赵永庆,赖登明,等.杜洛克猪部分肌肉和内脏器官解剖数据的测定.中国畜牧杂志,2000,36(2):30~32
    [9] 施启顺,陈斌,柳小春.杜洛克猪和大白猪作终端父本的杂交效果比较研究.中国畜牧杂志,1997,33(2):14~16
    [10] 范春国,钱辉耀,刘真.杜洛克猪新品系肉质特性的研究.中国畜牧杂志,1992,28(4):11~14
    [11] 郭万正,程妮,彭先文,等.高性能杜洛克专门化品系的选育方案及基础群组建.养殖与饲料,2003,(10):28~30
    [12] 许振英.中国地方猪种种质特性.杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1993,350~357
    [13] MoGloughin P,Pig News and Information,1980,1(1):5~8
    [14] 曾勇庆,樊新忠,王慧,等.杜洛克和汉普夏猪及其正反交Fl杂种猪肉质特性的研究.中国畜牧杂志,2001,37(1):20~21
    [15] Webb A,Pig News and Information,1980,2(1):17~23
    [16] Briggs,H.M.et al. Modern breeds of livestock. New York: Maemillan Publishing Co.Inc.1980,U.S.A.
    [17] 张仲葛.中国实用养猪学。郑州:河南科技出版社,1990,248~249
    [18] 张伟力,殷宗俊.杜洛克猪的起源,发展和利用.安徽农业大学学报,1996,(2):165~170
    [19] 吴晋强.动物营养学[M] .合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1999,148~153
    [20] Boccard, R. L.,Buchter, E. , Casteels, E. ,et al. ,Procedures for measuring meat
    
    
    quality characteristics in beef production experiments.Report of a working group in the commission of the European communities (CEC) beef production research programme. Livestock Production Science, 1981,(8)::385~397
    [21] Kauffman, R.G., G. Eikelenboom, P.G.Van der Wal, et al. ,The use of filter paper to estimate drip loss of porcine musculature, Meat Sci,1986,1(8):191~200
    [22] Honikel, K. O..How to measure the water holding capacity of meat.Evaluation and control of meat quality in pigs,The Netherlands:1987,127~142
    [23] Naveau, J. P. ,Pommeret ,P. Lechaux.Proposition d ’une méthode de mesure du rendement techenologique.Techni.Porc,1985,(8):7~13
    [24] Staun.H. .The nutritional and genetic influence on number and size of muscle fiber and their response to carcass quality in pigs.World Review of Animal Production,1972,VIII:18~26
    [25] 陈润生.国内外肌肉嫩度测定前处理方法的研究概述. 猪肉品质研究参考资料汇编,1990,(第三册)1~5
    [26] Boccard, R. L.,Buchter, E. , Casteels, E. ,et al. ,Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments.Report of a working group in the commission of the European communities (CEC) beef production research programme. Livestock Production Science, 1981,(8)::385~397
    [27] SAS institute , SAS/STAT users guide [M]. Version 8.0 Fourth Ed. Volume 1 and 2 (Cray, NC, SAS Institute Inc). 1989
    [28] Duncan A B. Multiple range and multiple F test [M]. Biometrics. 1955(11):41 ~42
    [29] 王林云.中国养猪业如何迎接WTO挑战.养猪学分会学术讨论会议文集,2001:20 ~25
    [30] 郭建凤.丹麦杜洛克种猪适应性和生产性能测定.养猪,2002(3):27 ~28
    [31] 熊远著.瘦肉猪育种的发展及展望.养猪学分会学术讨论会议文集,北京,2001:15 ~19
    [32] 刘建明,陈香波.改建圈舍、控制体重、适时出栏提高商品育肥猪经济效益.湖南畜牧兽医,2001,(2):11 ~12
    [33] 陈宏权,蒋模有.商品肉猪适宰体重的综合效益分析.中国畜牧杂志,1990,26(2):34 ~36
    [34] 蒋模有,肖向东,陈宏权,等.商品瘦肉猪适宰体重的研究.畜牧兽医学报,1990,21(2):144 ~149
    [35] 林亦孝.浅探商品猪的适宜上市体重.江西畜牧兽医杂志,2003,(6):16
    
    [36] 陈国顺,刘孟洲.不同屠宰体重的合作猪肉猪灰色关联度分析.甘肃畜牧兽医,2003,33(6):1 ~3
    [37] 林保忠,刘文.季节对种猪繁殖性能的影响及对策.四川畜牧兽医,2001,28(130):12 ~13
    [38] 解彦炯,郭宏,赵金亮.季节变化对军牧一号猪生产力及生长发育规律的影响.哲里木畜牧学院学报,1997,7(3):36 ~39
    [39] 卢成忠,王从刚.不同产仔季节对仔猪成活率的影响.贵州畜牧兽医,1996,20(4):17 ~18
    [40] 刘宇,黄群山,张小刚,等.不同繁殖季节对母猪产仔状况的影响.广东畜牧兽医科技,2003,28(2):20 ~21
    [41] Philip S.. Fetal growth[J]. . Br. J. Obstetr. Gyneco. ,1998,(105):1133-1135
    [42] Wollmann H.A.. Intrauterine growth restriction: Definition and Etiology[J]. Horm. Res. ,1998,49(Suppl. 2):1 ~ 6
    [43] Allen L.H. . Biological mechanisms that might underlie iron's effects on fetal growth and preterm birth [J].. J. Nutr.,2001,(131): S581 ~S589
    [44] Clarke I. J., Scott C J, Rao. A, et al..Seasonal changes in the expression of neuropeptide Y and pro-opiomelanocortin RNA in the arcuate nucleus of the ovariectomized ewe: relationship to the seasonal appetite and breeding cycles[J].. J.Neuroendocrino.,2000,12(11):1105 ~1111
    [45] 陈才勇,王恬,霍永久.仔猪初生重与产仔季节的相关性研究.家畜,2003,24(1):19 ~23
    [46] 殷宗俊,包文斌,陈宏权,等.胎次和分娩季节对皖南花猪产活仔数的影响.安徽农业科学,1999,27(1):82 ~84
    [47] 庄淑华,许开峰.不同季节对猪的饲养管理.动物科学与动物医学,2003,20(2):3
    [48] 冯立志.肥育猪炎热季节的饲粮营养水平研究.武汉食品工业学院学报,1994,(2):11 ~15
    [49] Graham R..A repid method for measuring pigment concentration in porcineand other low pigmented muscles. Australia.:Divesion of Food Processing, 1992,1198 ~1201
    [50] 孙玉民,罗明.畜禽肉品学.山东:山东科学技术出版社,1993,286
    [51] 王秉栋.动物性食品卫生理化检验.北京:中国农业出版社,1994,232 ~236
    [52] 王秉栋.动物性食品卫生理化检验.北京:中国农业出版社,1994,243 ~245
    [53] 孙玉民,罗明.畜禽肉品学.山东:山东科学技术出版社,1993,196 ~202
    
    [54] 张伟力,J. H. Huiskes..季节和屠宰日对商品猪胴体和肉质性状的影响.中国畜牧杂志,1995,31(6):12 ~14
    [55] Migdal, W. , Barteczko, J. , Brwiec. F. et al. The influence of dietary levels of essential fatty acid in full-dose mixtures on cholesterol level in blood and tissues in fatteners..Advances in Agriculture Science,2000,7(1):43 ~48
    [56] Horastein,J..Fatty acid composition of meat tissue lipids.Food Sci.,1961,(28):581 ~585
    [57] Kink, B. A..Fatty acid composition of bovise subcutaneous adipose tissue lipids during growth..Anim. Sci. ,1970,(30):722 ~725
    [58] Clemeas, E..Fatty acid sompssition of bull and steers as influenced by age and dietary energy level..Anim. Sci. ,1973,(37):1326 ~1331
    [59] 杨公社,路兴中,宋英,等.体重和营养对八眉猪脂肪组织脂肪酸组成的影响.畜牧兽医学报,1992,23(3):231 ~236
    [60] 孙玉民,罗明.畜禽肉品学.山东:山东科学技术出版社,1993,179 ~180
    [61] 周光宏,徐幸莲.肉品学.北京:中国农业出版社,1999,170 ~171
    [62] 陈国顺,班建荣,刘孟洲,等.屠宰体重对合作猪蛋白质品质的影响.动物科学与动物医学,2003,20(12):102 ~106
    [63] 崔岘,滚双宝.限制饲喂对不同阶段肥育猪肥育性能及胴体品质的影响.甘肃畜牧兽医,2001,(4):8 ~10
    [64] 任善茂,张牧.育肥猪“前敞后限”饲养法及其对肉品的影响.国外畜牧科技,2001,28(4):10 ~13
    [65] 邱德兴,郭金海,陈友银.限制饲喂与自由采食对肉猪生长的影响.福建畜牧兽医,1998,(1):34 ~35
    [66] 刘成,张志龙.瘦肉型肉猪后期限饲增效研究.湖南农业科学,2001,5:55 ~56
    [67] 彭国良,陈德强,杨景培,等.季节和高温对集约化饲养长白猪繁殖性状的影响.广东畜牧兽医科技,1994,19(2):10 ~12
    [68] 吴华东.外来母猪繁殖障碍和对策.江西畜牧兽医杂志,1994,(3):30 ~31
    [69] Christon R.J..Anim.Sci..1988,(66):3112 ~3123
    [70] 艾地云.常温与高温季节肥育猪主要营养素采食量研究.中国饲料,1996,(11):9 ~11
    [71] 艾地云,姚继承.高温季节生长育肥猪主要营养素采食量的研究.中国饲料,1995,(20):16 ~18
    [72] 杨前平.猪瘦肉生长性状的研究与进展.湖北畜牧兽医,1998,4:12 ~14
    [73] 张仕权,张大可.肉猪限饲瘦肉多.河南畜牧兽医,2001,22(10):35
    
    致 谢
    本论文是在导师张伟力教授的悉心指导下顺利完成的,无论从论文的选题、实验设计、准备到完成,还是在论文的撰写与修改,均凝聚着张老师巨大的心血和无微不至的关怀。三年来,张老师渊博的学术知识、严谨的治学风范、敏锐的创新思维和执着的进取精神深深地影响着学生,使我在各方面均取得了很大的进步,并让我终生受益,在此,谨向恩师表示衷心的感谢并致以崇高的敬意。
     试验过程中,饲养实验是在安徽省原种猪场进行的,在整个试验过程中,得到了王胜厂长,叶道武经理及其员工的大力协助;在生化指标、脂肪酸和氨基酸的测定过程中,得到了安徽农业大学生命科学院蒋立科教授、安徽农业大学生物化学中心陈玎玎副研究员、谭华荣副研究员、祁克宗教授和周秀红老师的支持和帮助;胴体测定和肉质测定过程中,得到了朱建和、石亚中、张槐春、蔡克周等同学的热情帮助;在此,向他们致以最诚挚的感谢。
    在论文完成过程中,得到了安徽农业大学王志耕教授、周明教授、程茂基副教授、王力生副教授、蔡海莹副教授、骆先虎副教授、耿照玉副教授、潘玲副教授、李吕木研究员的详尽指导和研究生王颖、梅林、吴宏忠、袁涛、朱启运、金仁桃、邢应寿和汪存利等同学的热情支持和帮助,对他们表示深深的谢意。另外,安徽农业大学研究生处、畜牧水产学院的各位领导和老师,为我提供了良好的学习环境,在此向他们表示诚挚的感谢。
    在我求学期间,家人及亲友们在物质和精神上给予了我极大的鼓励和支持,值此论文完成之际,谨向所有关心、指导和帮助我的领导、老师、同学和家人致以最诚挚的感谢和祝福,同时向参加论文评阅和答辩的专家、教授致以衷心的感谢和崇高的敬意。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700