枸杞在水盐联合胁迫条件下的生理生化响应
|
摘要
本论文以两年生枸杞(Lycium barbarum L.)为研究对象,采用大田试验的方式,研究在水盐联合胁迫下枸杞幼树生长性状、生理生化特性的变化,初步探讨了水盐联合胁迫下枸杞的生理生化反应及其交互作用,以及对生长的影响。通过盐分对枸杞的伤害程度,寻找适宜枸杞生长的土壤含盐量范围,以及在一定土壤含盐量条件下适宜生长的土壤含水量范围,为西部干旱半干旱的盐化地区枸杞的引种栽培提供可借鉴的理论依据。试验研究的主要结果如下:
1确定了在土壤含盐量为0.3%～0.6%条件下,枸杞新梢生长量较大的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～13.52%;枸杞叶片渗透调节物质含量较高的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～17.13%;保护酶活性相对较高的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～13.52%;光和能力较强的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～12.95%。
2提出了枸杞在土壤含盐量为0.3%～0.6%条件下能够正常生长,且所能忍耐的土壤含水量为9.87%;适宜含水量范围为22.37%～13.52%。
Two-year-old young trees of Lycium barbarum L. were used as material in this research.Through field test, the changings in growth trait and physiological and biochemical characteristics were studied, and the paper preliminarily discussed the response to water-salt stress and interaction and the effect on growth. The object of this research was to find the optimum soil salt content range and the optimum soil water content range based on the damage degree of Lycium barbarum L. by salt and managed to offer theoretical experiences to consul for the introduction and cultivation of Lycium barbarum L. in the west arid and half arid areas. Main results were as follows:
1 The research determined that under 0.3%～0.6% soil salt content conditions, the soil water content range was 22.37%～13.52% and on the conditions of which the young shoot growth of Lycium barbarum L. was larger; under 22.37%～17.13% conditions, the osmoreregulation matters were higher; under 22.37%～13.52% conditions, the protective enzymes activity was higher; under 22.37%～12.95% conditions, the photosynthetic capacity was stronger.
2 The research put forward that Lycium barbarum L. could grow nomally under 0.3%～0.6% soil salt content conditions and the tolerable soil water content was 9.87%; the optimum soil water content range was 22.37%～13.52%.
1确定了在土壤含盐量为0.3%～0.6%条件下,枸杞新梢生长量较大的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～13.52%;枸杞叶片渗透调节物质含量较高的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～17.13%;保护酶活性相对较高的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～13.52%;光和能力较强的土壤含水量范围在22.37%～12.95%。
2提出了枸杞在土壤含盐量为0.3%～0.6%条件下能够正常生长,且所能忍耐的土壤含水量为9.87%;适宜含水量范围为22.37%～13.52%。
Two-year-old young trees of Lycium barbarum L. were used as material in this research.Through field test, the changings in growth trait and physiological and biochemical characteristics were studied, and the paper preliminarily discussed the response to water-salt stress and interaction and the effect on growth. The object of this research was to find the optimum soil salt content range and the optimum soil water content range based on the damage degree of Lycium barbarum L. by salt and managed to offer theoretical experiences to consul for the introduction and cultivation of Lycium barbarum L. in the west arid and half arid areas. Main results were as follows:
1 The research determined that under 0.3%～0.6% soil salt content conditions, the soil water content range was 22.37%～13.52% and on the conditions of which the young shoot growth of Lycium barbarum L. was larger; under 22.37%～17.13% conditions, the osmoreregulation matters were higher; under 22.37%～13.52% conditions, the protective enzymes activity was higher; under 22.37%～12.95% conditions, the photosynthetic capacity was stronger.
2 The research put forward that Lycium barbarum L. could grow nomally under 0.3%～0.6% soil salt content conditions and the tolerable soil water content was 9.87%; the optimum soil water content range was 22.37%～13.52%.
引文
[1]赵可夫,范海.盐胁迫下真盐生植物与泌盐植物的渗透调节物质及其贡献的比较研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2000,6(2):99~1055
[2]王晓琴,袁继超,熊庆娥.玉米抗旱性研究的现状及展望[J].玉米科学,2002, 10(1):57~60
[3]安沙舟,刘晓媛.枸杞[M].北京:中国中医药出版社, 2001: 105~108
[4] Levitt, J. Response of Plant to Environmental Stresses. Academic Press, New York, 1972
[5]李吉跃.植物耐旱性及其机理[J].北京林业大学学报,1991,13(3):92~100
[6]戴建良.侧柏种源抗旱性测定和选择[D].北京林业大学硕士论文,1996
[7]彭祚登,李吉跃,沈熙环.林木抗旱性育种的现状与思考[J].北京林业大学学报,1998;20(4):98~103
[8]冯玉龙,王文章,敖红.长白落叶松和樟子松等五种树种抗旱性的比较[J].东北林业大学学报,1998,26(6):16~20
[9] Larcher W. Physiological Plant Ecology. 2nd ed. Berlin and New York: Springer-verlag.1980.303
[10]汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应(I)[J].植物生理学通讯,1983,(3):24~29
[11]李晓燕,李连国,刘志华.葡萄叶片组织结构与抗旱性关系的研究[J].内蒙古农牧学院学报,1994,9(3):30~2
[12]梅秀英,姜在民,高绍棠等.核桃和铁核桃品种(优系)叶形态构造与其抗旱性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1998,13(1):16~20
[13]梁宗锁,李敏,王俊峰.沙棘抗旱生理机制研究进展[J].沙棘,1998,11(3):8~13
[14] Rhizopoulou Set al. Influence of soil drying on root development, water relations and leaf growth of Ceratonia siliqua L. Oecolgia. 1991, 88(1): 41~47
[15]杨敏生,裴保华,赵敏英.优良白杨新品种BL193对水分胁迫的反应[J].河北林学院学报,1995,10(3):194~198
[16] Wang D. et al. Growth and water relations of seedings of two subspecies Eucalyptus globules[J]. Tree Physiol., 1988,4:129~138
[17] Seiler JR et al. Photosynthesis and transpiration of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by moisture-stress conditioning[J]. Forest Sci.,1985,31(3):742~749
[18] Seiler JR et al. Physiological and morphological responses of three half-sib families of loblolly pine to water-stress conditioning[J]. Forest Sci.,1988, 34(2):487~495
[19]姚允聪,张大鹏,王有年.水分胁迫下苹果属植物的光和活性与干物质积累的研究[A].中国园艺会编.北京;中国科学技术出版,1999:8
[20]李宏彬,黄建昌,叶希,等.水分胁迫对荔枝实生苗部分生理特性的影响[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,2002,15(3):39~43
[21]罗华健,刘星辉.水分胁迫对枇杷光和特性的影响[J].果树科学,1999,16(2):126~130
[22]程智慧,孟焕文,Stephen A Rolfe ,etc.水分胁迫对番茄叶片气孔传导及光和色素的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2002,30(6):93~96
[23]陈坤荣,王永义.加勒比松耐旱性生理特征研究[J].西南林学院学报,1997,17(4):9~14
[24]蒲光兰,周兰英,胡学华,等.土壤干旱胁迫对金太阳杏叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J],干旱地区农业研究,2003,23(3):44~48
[25]罗俊,林彦銓,吕建林,等.水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光和性能的影响[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(4):100~102
[26]叶燕萍,李杨瑞,黄减梅,等.下种方式和水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光和特性的影响[J].甘蔗,2003,10(3):1~4
[27]张秋英,李发东,刘孟雨,等.水分胁迫对小麦旗叶叶绿素a荧光参数和光和速率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,20(3):80~84
[28]牛洪斌,白润娥,张宪.水分胁迫对欧李光合速率日变化的影响[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2000,18(2):15~17
[29]林金科.水分胁迫对茶树光合作用的影响[J].福建林业大学学报,1998,27(4):423~427
[30]曹慧,兰彦萍,王孝威,等.水分胁迫对短枝型果树光和速率日变化的影响[J].山西农业科学.2000,28(3):53~56
[31]杨敏生,裴宝华,朱知悌.水分胁迫下白杨牌双交无性系主要生理过程研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):312~317
[32]周晓阳,张辉.不同耐旱性杨树气孔保卫细胞对水分胁迫的差异性反应[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(5):1~6
[33] Ni BR,Pallardy S G. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in seedlings of woody angiosperms[J].Plant physiol,1992,(99):1502~1508
[34]刘丹.干旱胁迫对植物的呼吸作用[J].云南大学学报,1990,5(3):177~182
[35] Dickmann DI et al. Photo synthesis, water relations and growth of two hybrid .Populus genotypes during a severs drought [J]Can.J.For.Res,1992,22(8):1092~1106
[36]张敦论,乔勇进,郗锦标,等.干旱胁迫下8个树种几项生理指标的分析[J].山东林业科技,2000,(3):5~9
[37]王克勤,王斌瑞.土壤水分对金矮苹果光和速率的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(2):206~214
[38]吴林,李亚东,刘洪章,等.果树干旱胁迫研究进展[J].吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(2):91~97
[39]陈立松,刘星辉.干旱胁迫对荔枝叶片呼吸代谢有关酶活性的影响[J].林业科学,2003,39(2):39~43
[40]陈慧兰,等.梭梭等树种体内水分状况及抗旱性的初步研究[J].甘肃林业科技,1986,(2):13~15
[41]黄建昌,肖燕,赵春香.香蕉对水分胁迫的生理反应[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,1999,12(4):40~42
[42]李岩,李德全,潘海春,等.土壤搞好胁迫下苹果叶片膨压维持对光和速率即上涨的影响[J].果树科学,1998,15(2)289~292
[43]童德中,高秀萍,杨家洪,等.梨树在水分亏缺下的生理反应[J].园艺学报,1997,24(4):313~318
[44]王建华,刘鸿先,徐同,等.超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理钟的作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,(1):1~7
[45]陈如凯,张水松,张木清,等.水分胁迫对木麻黄细胞膜稳定性和细胞保护酶影响的研究[J].福建林业科技,1999,26(增刊):6~8
[46] Dhindsa, R.S.etal.Droughttoerancein twomosses: Correlated with enzymatic defence against liquid peroxidation [J].J.Exp.Bot,1981,(32):79~91
[47]杨敏生,王进茂,梁海永,等.白杨杂种无性系苗期生长与水分交互[J].福建农业大学学报,2002,30(5):5~8
[48]王有年,杨爱珍,于同泉.干旱胁迫对爱岩梨渗透调节的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2003,18(1):17~20
[49]高秀萍,闫继耀,刘恩科,等.干旱胁迫下梨、枣和葡萄牙品种甜菜碱含量的变化[J].园艺学报,2002,29(3):268~270
[50]倪书邦,刘建福,李道高,等.澳洲坚果花期干旱胁迫效应的研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2002,24(1):34~37
[51]马双艳,姜远茂,彭福田,等.干旱胁迫对几种果树甜菜碱含量的影响[J].山西果树,2003,(5):3~4
[52] Kramer DJ著.植物的水分关系,许旭旦等译.北京:科学出版社,1989
[53] Van rensburg L,Kr.uger GHJ.Applicability of abscisic acid and (or) praline accumulation as selection criteria for drought tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum. Can J Bot 1994,72:1535~1540
[54] M.uller J,Boller T,Wiemken A. Pools of nonstructural carbodrates in soybean root nodules during water stress. Physiol. Plant 1996,98:723~730
[55]曹慧,韩振海,许雪峰,等.抗旱性不同的苹果属植物水分胁迫下核酸代谢及自由基变化[J].园艺学报,2002,29(6):505～509
[56]叶金山,王章荣.干旱胁迫对杂种马褂与双亲重要生理性状的影响[J] .林业科学,2002,38(3):20~26
[57] Nagaragah C.葡萄对干旱胁迫的生理生化反映[J].罗国光译.国外农学——果树,1990,(3):16~18
[58]潘根生,吴伯千,沈生荣,等.干旱胁迫过程中茶树新梢内源激素水平的消长及其与耐旱性的关系[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(5):9~15
[59] Xiloyannis C,Uriu K,Martin G C.Seasonal and joural Variations in abscisic acid,water potential and diflusive resistance in leaves from irrigated and non-irrigated peach trees [J].J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci.1980,105:412~415
[60]孙群,梁宗锁,杨建伟,等.干旱对萌芽期水分状况、ABA含量及萌芽特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):634~638
[61]王霞,侯平,尹林克.土壤缓慢干旱胁迫下柽柳植物内源激素的变化[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(4):41~43
[62]蒲光兰,胡学华,周兰英,等.水分胁迫下乌桕离体叶片生理生化特性.经济林研究,2004,22(2):20~23
[63]张道远,尹林克,潘伯荣,等.柽柳植物抗旱性能研究及其应用潜力评价[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(3):252~25
[64]王霞,侯平,尹林克,等.水分胁迫对柽柳植物可溶性物质的影响[J].干旱区研究,1999,16(2):6~11
[65]程瑞平,束怀瑞,顾曼如.水分胁迫对苹果树生长和叶中矿质元素含量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1992,228(1):32~34
[66]龚云池,徐季娥,张淑珍,等.鸭梨叶片和果实中钙素含量年周期变化的研究[J].园艺学报,1987,14(1):1~6
[67] Himelricle D G,Mcduffie R F.The calcium cycle:uptake and distribution apple trees[J].Hortscience,1983,18(2):145~151
[68] Munns R,Schachtman D P& Condon A G. The siginificance of the two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley(J). Plant Physiol.,1995,22:561~569
[69]刘遵春,刘用生.盐胁迫对果树生理生化的影响及耐盐性指标的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(14):3273~327
[70]刘兵,张世权,郭家保.植物抗逆研究概况[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):39
[71] Yeo AR, Lee KS,Izard P, etal short and long term effects of salinity on leaf groeth inrice(Oryza satival.) (J). Journal of Experimental Botany,1991,42:881~889
[72] Kulieva FB,Shanina ZB,Strogonov BP Effect of high sodium chloride concentrogonations on the in-vitrocell division of Crepis capillaries (J). Fiziol Rast, 1975,22:131~135
[73]马焕成,王沙生,蒋湘宁.盐胁迫下胡杨的光合和生长响应(J).西南林学院学报,1998,3,18(1):33~41
[74]杨敏生,李艳华,梁海永等.盐胁迫下白杨无性系苗木体内离子分配及比较(J).生态学报,2003,23(2):271~277
[75]陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害(J).植物生理学通讯,1991,27(2):84~90
[76]何承坤,郭素枝,李家慎.干旱胁迫对番茄活性氧代谢的影响(J).福建农业大学学报,1996,25(3):307~311
[77]赵可夫. NaCI抑制棉花幼苗生长的机理—盐离子效应(J).植物生理学报,1989,15 (2):173~178
[78] Munns R, Termaat A. Whole plant responses to salinity. (J) Plant physiol.,1986,13:143~160
[79]刘祖祺,张石诚.植物抗性生理学.中国农业出版社,1994
[80]赵可夫.植物抗盐生理.中国科学技术出版社.1993
[81]翟风林.植物耐盐性及其改良.北京农业出版社,1989
[82]翁森红,王承斌.植物的耐盐性(J).中国草地,1995(4): 70~72
[83]刘友良,汪良驹.植物对盐胁迫的反应和耐盐性[A].见:余叔文,汤章城主编.植物生理与分子生物学[C].北京:科学出版社,1998,752~769
[84] Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice(Oryzasateva L.) cultivar differing in salinity resistance[J].Ann Bot,1996,78:389-398
[85] Papageogious G C, M urata N. The unusually strong stabilizing effects of glycine betaine on thestructure and function of the oxygen evolving photosystemⅡcomp lex. Photosynth Res, 1995, 44:243~252.
[86]刘华,舒孝喜,赵银,王锁民.盐胁迫对碱茅生长及碳水化合物含量的影响[J].草业科学,1997,(141):18~20
[87]姜卫兵,马凯,朱建华等.盐离子的吸收和分布及其与无花果品种耐盐性的关系(J).江苏农业学报,1994,10(3):18~22
[88]马焕成,王沙生.盐胁迫下胡杨的离子响应(J).西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):42~47
[89]陈少良,王沙生,刘群录等.盐胁迫下胡杨和毛白杨悬浮细胞的离子区隔化(J).Forestry Studies in China ,2(2):8~16
[90]王艳青,蒋湘宁,李悦等.盐胁迫对刺愧不同组织及细胞离子吸收和分配的变化(J).北京林业大学学报,2001,23(1):18~23
[91]马焕成,王沙生.胡杨膜系统的盐稳定性及盐胁迫下的代谢调节(J).西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):15~23
[92]舒卫国,陈受宜.植物在渗透胁迫下基因表达及信号传递(J).生物工程进展,2000, 20 (3): 3~6
[93]孙谷畴.叶片水势降低对荔枝光合作用的影响[J].植物学报,1988,30(1):99～102
[94]裴保华,周宝顺.三种灌木耐旱性研究.林业科学研究,1993,6(6):597-601
[95] Morgan J M. Osmo regulation and water stress in highe plants [J]. Ann Rer PlantPhysiol, 1984(1): 299~319
[96] Subbzrao, G V, Chauhan Y S, Johanen C.Patterns of osmotic adjustment in pigeonpea importance as a mechanism of drought resistance [J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2000,12(3-4): 239~249
[97]曲东,王保莉,王沛洪,等.渗透胁迫下磷对玉米叶片有机渗调物质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,14(2):72~77
[98]沈黎明,王舰.水分胁迫、盐胁迫和热激对林生山黧豆体内游离氨基酸含量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,1996,1(1):23~26.
[99]王霞,候平,尹林克,等.水分胁迫对柽柳组织含水量和膜透性的影响[J].干旱区研究,1999,16(2):6~11
[100] Kemple A. R, Macpherson H.T. Liberation of amino acid in perennial rye grass during wilting [J]. Biochem J, 1954,58:46~49.
[101]王锁民等.渗透调节在碱茅属幼苗适应盐逆境中的作用初探[J].草业学报,1993,2(3): 40~46
[102]姜卫兵等.无花果耐盐性生理指标的探讨[J].江苏农业科学,1991, 7(3): 29~33
[103]汪贵斌,曹福亮.盐胁迫对落羽杉生理及生长的影响[J].南京林业大学学报, 2003,27(3):11~14
[104]魏良民.几种旱生植物碳水化合物和蛋白质变化的研究.干旱区研究,1991, 8(4):38~41
[105]杜青平,孟紫强,袁保红等.亚硫酸盐引起小麦幼苗细胞膜透性等改变的机制研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(6) :938~941
[106]柯玉琴,潘廷国,艾育芳.盐胁迫对发芽水稻种子质膜透性及物质转化的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2002,10(4):10~12
[107]蒋明义,郭绍川.水分亏缺诱导的氧化胁迫和植物的抗氧化作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1996,32(2):144~150
[108] Mishra N P, Mishra R K, Singhal G S. Changes in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperature in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors [J]. Plant Physiol, 1993,102:903~908
[109]聂先舟等.水稻旗叶脂过氧化作用与叶龄及Ni2+、Ag+的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,(2):32~34
[110]姚允聪,曲泽洲,李树仁.土壤干旱与柿树叶片膜质及脂质过氧化的关系[J].林业科学,1993;29(6): 485~491
[111]张莉,续九如.水分胁迫下刺槐不同无性系生理生化反应的研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(4):162~167
[112]沈惠娟,曾斌.干旱、低温胁迫对SOD、POD活性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16(4):54~57
[113]韩蕊莲,李丽霞,梁宗锁,等.干旱胁迫下沙棘膜脂过氧化保护体系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(4) :1~5
[114]刘家尧,衣艳君.CO2/盐冲击对小麦幼苗呼吸酶活性的影响[J] .植物学报,1996, 38(8): 641~646
[115]许详明,叶和春,李国凤.植物抗盐机理的研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2000,6(4):379~387
[116]廖祥儒,贺普超,朱新立.盐渍对葡萄光合色素含量的影响[J].园艺学报,1996,23(3):300~302
[117]林栖凤,李冠一.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].生物工程进展,2000,20(2):20~25
[118]孙彩霞,沈秀瑛,刘志刚.作物抗旱性生理生化机制的研究现状和进展[J].杂粮作物,2002,22(5):285~288
[2]王晓琴,袁继超,熊庆娥.玉米抗旱性研究的现状及展望[J].玉米科学,2002, 10(1):57~60
[3]安沙舟,刘晓媛.枸杞[M].北京:中国中医药出版社, 2001: 105~108
[4] Levitt, J. Response of Plant to Environmental Stresses. Academic Press, New York, 1972
[5]李吉跃.植物耐旱性及其机理[J].北京林业大学学报,1991,13(3):92~100
[6]戴建良.侧柏种源抗旱性测定和选择[D].北京林业大学硕士论文,1996
[7]彭祚登,李吉跃,沈熙环.林木抗旱性育种的现状与思考[J].北京林业大学学报,1998;20(4):98~103
[8]冯玉龙,王文章,敖红.长白落叶松和樟子松等五种树种抗旱性的比较[J].东北林业大学学报,1998,26(6):16~20
[9] Larcher W. Physiological Plant Ecology. 2nd ed. Berlin and New York: Springer-verlag.1980.303
[10]汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应(I)[J].植物生理学通讯,1983,(3):24~29
[11]李晓燕,李连国,刘志华.葡萄叶片组织结构与抗旱性关系的研究[J].内蒙古农牧学院学报,1994,9(3):30~2
[12]梅秀英,姜在民,高绍棠等.核桃和铁核桃品种(优系)叶形态构造与其抗旱性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1998,13(1):16~20
[13]梁宗锁,李敏,王俊峰.沙棘抗旱生理机制研究进展[J].沙棘,1998,11(3):8~13
[14] Rhizopoulou Set al. Influence of soil drying on root development, water relations and leaf growth of Ceratonia siliqua L. Oecolgia. 1991, 88(1): 41~47
[15]杨敏生,裴保华,赵敏英.优良白杨新品种BL193对水分胁迫的反应[J].河北林学院学报,1995,10(3):194~198
[16] Wang D. et al. Growth and water relations of seedings of two subspecies Eucalyptus globules[J]. Tree Physiol., 1988,4:129~138
[17] Seiler JR et al. Photosynthesis and transpiration of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by moisture-stress conditioning[J]. Forest Sci.,1985,31(3):742~749
[18] Seiler JR et al. Physiological and morphological responses of three half-sib families of loblolly pine to water-stress conditioning[J]. Forest Sci.,1988, 34(2):487~495
[19]姚允聪,张大鹏,王有年.水分胁迫下苹果属植物的光和活性与干物质积累的研究[A].中国园艺会编.北京;中国科学技术出版,1999:8
[20]李宏彬,黄建昌,叶希,等.水分胁迫对荔枝实生苗部分生理特性的影响[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,2002,15(3):39~43
[21]罗华健,刘星辉.水分胁迫对枇杷光和特性的影响[J].果树科学,1999,16(2):126~130
[22]程智慧,孟焕文,Stephen A Rolfe ,etc.水分胁迫对番茄叶片气孔传导及光和色素的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2002,30(6):93~96
[23]陈坤荣,王永义.加勒比松耐旱性生理特征研究[J].西南林学院学报,1997,17(4):9~14
[24]蒲光兰,周兰英,胡学华,等.土壤干旱胁迫对金太阳杏叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J],干旱地区农业研究,2003,23(3):44~48
[25]罗俊,林彦銓,吕建林,等.水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光和性能的影响[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(4):100~102
[26]叶燕萍,李杨瑞,黄减梅,等.下种方式和水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光和特性的影响[J].甘蔗,2003,10(3):1~4
[27]张秋英,李发东,刘孟雨,等.水分胁迫对小麦旗叶叶绿素a荧光参数和光和速率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,20(3):80~84
[28]牛洪斌,白润娥,张宪.水分胁迫对欧李光合速率日变化的影响[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2000,18(2):15~17
[29]林金科.水分胁迫对茶树光合作用的影响[J].福建林业大学学报,1998,27(4):423~427
[30]曹慧,兰彦萍,王孝威,等.水分胁迫对短枝型果树光和速率日变化的影响[J].山西农业科学.2000,28(3):53~56
[31]杨敏生,裴宝华,朱知悌.水分胁迫下白杨牌双交无性系主要生理过程研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):312~317
[32]周晓阳,张辉.不同耐旱性杨树气孔保卫细胞对水分胁迫的差异性反应[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(5):1~6
[33] Ni BR,Pallardy S G. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in seedlings of woody angiosperms[J].Plant physiol,1992,(99):1502~1508
[34]刘丹.干旱胁迫对植物的呼吸作用[J].云南大学学报,1990,5(3):177~182
[35] Dickmann DI et al. Photo synthesis, water relations and growth of two hybrid .Populus genotypes during a severs drought [J]Can.J.For.Res,1992,22(8):1092~1106
[36]张敦论,乔勇进,郗锦标,等.干旱胁迫下8个树种几项生理指标的分析[J].山东林业科技,2000,(3):5~9
[37]王克勤,王斌瑞.土壤水分对金矮苹果光和速率的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(2):206~214
[38]吴林,李亚东,刘洪章,等.果树干旱胁迫研究进展[J].吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(2):91~97
[39]陈立松,刘星辉.干旱胁迫对荔枝叶片呼吸代谢有关酶活性的影响[J].林业科学,2003,39(2):39~43
[40]陈慧兰,等.梭梭等树种体内水分状况及抗旱性的初步研究[J].甘肃林业科技,1986,(2):13~15
[41]黄建昌,肖燕,赵春香.香蕉对水分胁迫的生理反应[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,1999,12(4):40~42
[42]李岩,李德全,潘海春,等.土壤搞好胁迫下苹果叶片膨压维持对光和速率即上涨的影响[J].果树科学,1998,15(2)289~292
[43]童德中,高秀萍,杨家洪,等.梨树在水分亏缺下的生理反应[J].园艺学报,1997,24(4):313~318
[44]王建华,刘鸿先,徐同,等.超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理钟的作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,(1):1~7
[45]陈如凯,张水松,张木清,等.水分胁迫对木麻黄细胞膜稳定性和细胞保护酶影响的研究[J].福建林业科技,1999,26(增刊):6~8
[46] Dhindsa, R.S.etal.Droughttoerancein twomosses: Correlated with enzymatic defence against liquid peroxidation [J].J.Exp.Bot,1981,(32):79~91
[47]杨敏生,王进茂,梁海永,等.白杨杂种无性系苗期生长与水分交互[J].福建农业大学学报,2002,30(5):5~8
[48]王有年,杨爱珍,于同泉.干旱胁迫对爱岩梨渗透调节的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2003,18(1):17~20
[49]高秀萍,闫继耀,刘恩科,等.干旱胁迫下梨、枣和葡萄牙品种甜菜碱含量的变化[J].园艺学报,2002,29(3):268~270
[50]倪书邦,刘建福,李道高,等.澳洲坚果花期干旱胁迫效应的研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2002,24(1):34~37
[51]马双艳,姜远茂,彭福田,等.干旱胁迫对几种果树甜菜碱含量的影响[J].山西果树,2003,(5):3~4
[52] Kramer DJ著.植物的水分关系,许旭旦等译.北京:科学出版社,1989
[53] Van rensburg L,Kr.uger GHJ.Applicability of abscisic acid and (or) praline accumulation as selection criteria for drought tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum. Can J Bot 1994,72:1535~1540
[54] M.uller J,Boller T,Wiemken A. Pools of nonstructural carbodrates in soybean root nodules during water stress. Physiol. Plant 1996,98:723~730
[55]曹慧,韩振海,许雪峰,等.抗旱性不同的苹果属植物水分胁迫下核酸代谢及自由基变化[J].园艺学报,2002,29(6):505～509
[56]叶金山,王章荣.干旱胁迫对杂种马褂与双亲重要生理性状的影响[J] .林业科学,2002,38(3):20~26
[57] Nagaragah C.葡萄对干旱胁迫的生理生化反映[J].罗国光译.国外农学——果树,1990,(3):16~18
[58]潘根生,吴伯千,沈生荣,等.干旱胁迫过程中茶树新梢内源激素水平的消长及其与耐旱性的关系[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(5):9~15
[59] Xiloyannis C,Uriu K,Martin G C.Seasonal and joural Variations in abscisic acid,water potential and diflusive resistance in leaves from irrigated and non-irrigated peach trees [J].J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci.1980,105:412~415
[60]孙群,梁宗锁,杨建伟,等.干旱对萌芽期水分状况、ABA含量及萌芽特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):634~638
[61]王霞,侯平,尹林克.土壤缓慢干旱胁迫下柽柳植物内源激素的变化[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(4):41~43
[62]蒲光兰,胡学华,周兰英,等.水分胁迫下乌桕离体叶片生理生化特性.经济林研究,2004,22(2):20~23
[63]张道远,尹林克,潘伯荣,等.柽柳植物抗旱性能研究及其应用潜力评价[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(3):252~25
[64]王霞,侯平,尹林克,等.水分胁迫对柽柳植物可溶性物质的影响[J].干旱区研究,1999,16(2):6~11
[65]程瑞平,束怀瑞,顾曼如.水分胁迫对苹果树生长和叶中矿质元素含量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1992,228(1):32~34
[66]龚云池,徐季娥,张淑珍,等.鸭梨叶片和果实中钙素含量年周期变化的研究[J].园艺学报,1987,14(1):1~6
[67] Himelricle D G,Mcduffie R F.The calcium cycle:uptake and distribution apple trees[J].Hortscience,1983,18(2):145~151
[68] Munns R,Schachtman D P& Condon A G. The siginificance of the two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley(J). Plant Physiol.,1995,22:561~569
[69]刘遵春,刘用生.盐胁迫对果树生理生化的影响及耐盐性指标的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(14):3273~327
[70]刘兵,张世权,郭家保.植物抗逆研究概况[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):39
[71] Yeo AR, Lee KS,Izard P, etal short and long term effects of salinity on leaf groeth inrice(Oryza satival.) (J). Journal of Experimental Botany,1991,42:881~889
[72] Kulieva FB,Shanina ZB,Strogonov BP Effect of high sodium chloride concentrogonations on the in-vitrocell division of Crepis capillaries (J). Fiziol Rast, 1975,22:131~135
[73]马焕成,王沙生,蒋湘宁.盐胁迫下胡杨的光合和生长响应(J).西南林学院学报,1998,3,18(1):33~41
[74]杨敏生,李艳华,梁海永等.盐胁迫下白杨无性系苗木体内离子分配及比较(J).生态学报,2003,23(2):271~277
[75]陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害(J).植物生理学通讯,1991,27(2):84~90
[76]何承坤,郭素枝,李家慎.干旱胁迫对番茄活性氧代谢的影响(J).福建农业大学学报,1996,25(3):307~311
[77]赵可夫. NaCI抑制棉花幼苗生长的机理—盐离子效应(J).植物生理学报,1989,15 (2):173~178
[78] Munns R, Termaat A. Whole plant responses to salinity. (J) Plant physiol.,1986,13:143~160
[79]刘祖祺,张石诚.植物抗性生理学.中国农业出版社,1994
[80]赵可夫.植物抗盐生理.中国科学技术出版社.1993
[81]翟风林.植物耐盐性及其改良.北京农业出版社,1989
[82]翁森红,王承斌.植物的耐盐性(J).中国草地,1995(4): 70~72
[83]刘友良,汪良驹.植物对盐胁迫的反应和耐盐性[A].见:余叔文,汤章城主编.植物生理与分子生物学[C].北京:科学出版社,1998,752~769
[84] Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice(Oryzasateva L.) cultivar differing in salinity resistance[J].Ann Bot,1996,78:389-398
[85] Papageogious G C, M urata N. The unusually strong stabilizing effects of glycine betaine on thestructure and function of the oxygen evolving photosystemⅡcomp lex. Photosynth Res, 1995, 44:243~252.
[86]刘华,舒孝喜,赵银,王锁民.盐胁迫对碱茅生长及碳水化合物含量的影响[J].草业科学,1997,(141):18~20
[87]姜卫兵,马凯,朱建华等.盐离子的吸收和分布及其与无花果品种耐盐性的关系(J).江苏农业学报,1994,10(3):18~22
[88]马焕成,王沙生.盐胁迫下胡杨的离子响应(J).西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):42~47
[89]陈少良,王沙生,刘群录等.盐胁迫下胡杨和毛白杨悬浮细胞的离子区隔化(J).Forestry Studies in China ,2(2):8~16
[90]王艳青,蒋湘宁,李悦等.盐胁迫对刺愧不同组织及细胞离子吸收和分配的变化(J).北京林业大学学报,2001,23(1):18~23
[91]马焕成,王沙生.胡杨膜系统的盐稳定性及盐胁迫下的代谢调节(J).西南林学院学报,1998,18(1):15~23
[92]舒卫国,陈受宜.植物在渗透胁迫下基因表达及信号传递(J).生物工程进展,2000, 20 (3): 3~6
[93]孙谷畴.叶片水势降低对荔枝光合作用的影响[J].植物学报,1988,30(1):99～102
[94]裴保华,周宝顺.三种灌木耐旱性研究.林业科学研究,1993,6(6):597-601
[95] Morgan J M. Osmo regulation and water stress in highe plants [J]. Ann Rer PlantPhysiol, 1984(1): 299~319
[96] Subbzrao, G V, Chauhan Y S, Johanen C.Patterns of osmotic adjustment in pigeonpea importance as a mechanism of drought resistance [J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2000,12(3-4): 239~249
[97]曲东,王保莉,王沛洪,等.渗透胁迫下磷对玉米叶片有机渗调物质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,1996,14(2):72~77
[98]沈黎明,王舰.水分胁迫、盐胁迫和热激对林生山黧豆体内游离氨基酸含量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,1996,1(1):23~26.
[99]王霞,候平,尹林克,等.水分胁迫对柽柳组织含水量和膜透性的影响[J].干旱区研究,1999,16(2):6~11
[100] Kemple A. R, Macpherson H.T. Liberation of amino acid in perennial rye grass during wilting [J]. Biochem J, 1954,58:46~49.
[101]王锁民等.渗透调节在碱茅属幼苗适应盐逆境中的作用初探[J].草业学报,1993,2(3): 40~46
[102]姜卫兵等.无花果耐盐性生理指标的探讨[J].江苏农业科学,1991, 7(3): 29~33
[103]汪贵斌,曹福亮.盐胁迫对落羽杉生理及生长的影响[J].南京林业大学学报, 2003,27(3):11~14
[104]魏良民.几种旱生植物碳水化合物和蛋白质变化的研究.干旱区研究,1991, 8(4):38~41
[105]杜青平,孟紫强,袁保红等.亚硫酸盐引起小麦幼苗细胞膜透性等改变的机制研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(6) :938~941
[106]柯玉琴,潘廷国,艾育芳.盐胁迫对发芽水稻种子质膜透性及物质转化的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2002,10(4):10~12
[107]蒋明义,郭绍川.水分亏缺诱导的氧化胁迫和植物的抗氧化作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1996,32(2):144~150
[108] Mishra N P, Mishra R K, Singhal G S. Changes in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperature in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors [J]. Plant Physiol, 1993,102:903~908
[109]聂先舟等.水稻旗叶脂过氧化作用与叶龄及Ni2+、Ag+的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,(2):32~34
[110]姚允聪,曲泽洲,李树仁.土壤干旱与柿树叶片膜质及脂质过氧化的关系[J].林业科学,1993;29(6): 485~491
[111]张莉,续九如.水分胁迫下刺槐不同无性系生理生化反应的研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(4):162~167
[112]沈惠娟,曾斌.干旱、低温胁迫对SOD、POD活性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报,1992,16(4):54~57
[113]韩蕊莲,李丽霞,梁宗锁,等.干旱胁迫下沙棘膜脂过氧化保护体系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(4) :1~5
[114]刘家尧,衣艳君.CO2/盐冲击对小麦幼苗呼吸酶活性的影响[J] .植物学报,1996, 38(8): 641~646
[115]许详明,叶和春,李国凤.植物抗盐机理的研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2000,6(4):379~387
[116]廖祥儒,贺普超,朱新立.盐渍对葡萄光合色素含量的影响[J].园艺学报,1996,23(3):300~302
[117]林栖凤,李冠一.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].生物工程进展,2000,20(2):20~25
[118]孙彩霞,沈秀瑛,刘志刚.作物抗旱性生理生化机制的研究现状和进展[J].杂粮作物,2002,22(5):285~288