干旱胁迫对瓜叶菊(Senecio×hybridus)几个无性系生长及生理反应的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
瓜叶菊(SenecioXhybridus)是世界范围内广泛栽培的观赏盆花之一。花形秀丽典雅,花姿雍容华贵,花期正值少花的冬春,花期长达2-3个月,又逢元旦和新春佳节,是冬春比较理想的温室盆花,有很高的市场占有率和经济效益。但是瓜叶菊抗旱性不强,从而增加日常管理强度,并使其大面积推广应用受到了影响。本试验以综合品质优良,市场表现较好,遗传性状稳定,生长一致的无性苗(其母株编号分别为Z、L、N、S)为材料,从外部形态、叶片结构、生理指标的变化来研究瓜叶菊在干旱胁迫下的生长及生理情况,旨在为瓜叶菊的耐旱鉴定提供简单实用的方法,为瓜叶菊的抗性育种选种打下一定的基础,也为瓜叶菊的进一步推广应用提供更科学的依据。
     本试验主要结论如下:
     1.对四个供试瓜叶菊材料的外部形态和叶片解剖结构观察表明:材料Z的叶小而厚、气孔密度最大,栅栏组织/海绵组织比值高;材料N的叶片大而薄,栅栏组织不发达。
     2.在PEG模拟干旱条件下,不同种质的瓜叶菊的旱害指数存在显著差异,其顺序为:Z     3.在不同的水分胁迫下,各品系的瓜叶菊叶片各项生理指标做出了不同程度的反应。材料N的质膜伤害最重,外渗最多,电导率的增加也最大。材料Z叶组织的脯氨酸明显高于其它三个供试材料,且随着干旱胁迫程度加强,其含量大幅度增加。Z有较高的SOD活性,N的活性最低,并与对照相比,总量有所下降,说明N的清除活性氧的能力较弱。
     4.用PEG作为抗旱突变体筛选剂时,15-20%的浓度是比较合适的选择压。另离体培养材料的丙二醛含量、脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖含量等可以作为抗旱突变体的筛选指标。
     5.利用因子分析法和隶属函数法对供试材料的8个生理指标分析后,得出瓜叶菊抗旱性综合评价值(D值)大小分别为:Z(0.803)、L(0.178)、N(0.061)、S(0.3315),四个供试材料中Z的值最大,抗旱能力最强,N的抗旱能力最差,L和S的抗性居中。
Cineraria (Senecio×hybridus) is among the most popular appreciative flowers in the world. Cineraria is a kind of fairly ideal green house flowers for the blossom season of it lasting over 2 to 3 months during winter and spring, which covers the New Year and the Chinese Rural New Year, as well as the shape of Cineraria is beautiful and elegant. Cineraria, therefore, takes a big share of the market and has a high economic return.
     With the aim of providing simple and applied methods for the identification of Cineraria 's drought resistance, and offering scientific basis for the application of cineraria in drought area, using the uniform clonal plantlet (their mother genotype were numbered Z、L、N、S respectively) as materials, and couple of indexes, such as the relations between the drought resistance and external form, leaf anatomic structures, physiological and biochemical changes under PEG-6000 stress were studied. The main results were shown as follows:
     1. Tissue parameters of leaves of 4 materials of Cineraria were observed and analyzed to study the relationship between the leaf tissue parameters and drought resistance of Cineraria. The results showed that: It had strong ability of drought resistance in leaves of Z there were high epidermis thickness and stoma density high ratio of stockade tissue thickness sponge tissue thickness;
     2. The drought index has significant differences in Cineraria under PEG-6000 stress, the order of: Z      3. In different water stress, the strain of Cineraria leaves to the indicators with varying degrees of reaction. The material N was the largest increase electric conductivity of all materials. The proline content in leaves of Z was significantly higher than others, and its content was substantial increase as under PEG-6000 stress strengthened. Z had high SOD activity, N had minimum and the total decrease compared with the comparison.
     4. The 15-20% of PEG is more appropriate choice of pressure in vitro selection of drought-resistant clonal line in cineraria. The MDA, proline content, soluble sugar content of vitro culture can be used as the selection indicators for drought-resistant Variants.
     5. Using factor analysis and subordinate function of the test materials for the eight physiological indicators analysis, that the drought resistance of Cineraria comprehensive evaluation value (D value) sizes are as follows: Z (0.803), L (0.178), N ( 0.061), S (0.3315), Z is most drought resistance the worst drought of N, L and S resistance center in four materials.
引文
[1]郑秀珍,瓜叶菊栽培技术及病虫害防治[J].湖北林业科技,2005,133(3):61-62
    [2]包满珠.花卉学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:181-18
    [3]郭长英.商品花卉的花期控制技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,2001(4):1-4
    [4]沈惠娟.麝香百合、仙客来和瓜叶菊花芽分化的调控[J].南京林业大学学报,2001,25(2):55-57
    [5]郑先国,杨先龙.盆栽瓜叶菊栽培技术[J].河南农业,2001(8):10
    [6]王志雄.冬季佳卉瓜叶菊的管理要点[J].农业科技与信息,2000(7):18
    [7]潘春屏,颜桂龙.瓜叶菊塑料大棚规模化商品栽培技术[J].中国花卉盆景,2001
    [8]李金荣.瓜叶菊叶斑病的防治[J].花卉,1998(6):12
    [9]范军科.瓜叶菊叶片卷缩病的防治[J].花卉,1998(6):1
    [10]E L.Sallami.l H.Growth,flowering and nutrient uptake of Senecio cruentus L.plants as influenced by phosphorus-zinc interaction[J].Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.2001,32(1):175-198;
    [11]Mostafa-M M.Effect of eycocel and.potassium on the growth and flowering of Senecio cruentus plant[J].Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research.2000,45(3):149-164
    [12]刘爱荣,张远兵等.几种不同营养液在瓜叶菊无土育苗的应用效应[J].安徽农业技术师范学院学报,2002,16(20):19-21
    [13]于凤鸣,刘玉艳,曹志刚.水分胁迫下腐殖酸钠对瓜叶菊抗旱能力的影响[A].中国园艺学会第六届表年学术讨论会文集,2004年
    [14]吕建洲,张琴.二烷氨基乙醇梭酸醋对瓜叶菊生长及生理活性的影响[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版)1999,22(2):153-157
    [15]张鸽香.瓜叶菊对低温胁迫的生理反应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(5):89-92
    [16]于晓英,卢向阳,李向婷,等.热锻炼对瓜叶菊幼苗高温胁迫下生理生化特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2006,22(2):186-188
    [17]于晓英,卢向阳,李达,等.瓜叶菊耐热无性系离体筛选初步研究[J].园艺学报,2007,34(2):513-516
    [18]于晓英,卢向阳,陈永华,等.瓜叶菊热胁迫下基因差异表达[J].农业生物技术学报,2007,15,(3):459-463
    [19]王旭明,王开峰,朱庆仁,匡品.淤泥中重金属铜的植物去除[J].淮北煤师院学报,2003,23(1):55-57
    [20]王旭明,高瑞如,瓜叶菊对铁离子净化能力的研究[J].淮北煤师院学报,2003,24(3):19-21
    [21]陈荣林,梁运波,刘亚.水稻早害及抗旱育种综述[J].中国农学通报,2005,6(21):220-222
    [22]李广敏,关军锋.作物抗旱生理节水技术研究[M].北京:气象出版社,2001.
    [23]Zhu J K.Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants.Annual Preview of Plant Biology,2002,53:245-273
    [24]张建国.树木耐早特性及其机理研究[M].中国林业出版社,2000
    [25]Tyree M T,Engelbrecht B M J,Vargas G,et al.Desiccation tolerance of five tropical seedlings in Panama.Relationship to a field assessment of drought performance.Plant Physiology,2003,132:1439-1447
    [26]章应峰,费世民,王鹏,等.干旱地区树木耐旱性研究现状评述[J].四川林业科学,2001,4(22):24-29
    [27]倪郁.作物抗旱机制及其指标的研究进展与现状[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2001,36(1):14-22
    [28]涂璟,王克勤.干旱地区造林树种的水分生理生态的研究进展[J].西北林学院学报2003,18(3):296-306
    [29]管伟,袁玉欣,王忠,等.侧柏和核桃苗木对水分胁迫的响应[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,3(27)41-45
    [30]温国胜,张国盛,吉川贤.干旱胁迫对臭柏水分特性的影响[J].林业科学,2004,5(40):84-87
    [31]王林和,刘美珍,张国盛.毛乌素沙地臭柏不定根发生特性的研究[J].林业科学,2002,38(5):156-159
    [32]温国胜,王林和,张明如,等.干旱胁迫条件下臭柏的气孔蒸腾与角质层蒸腾[J].浙江林学院学报,2003,20(3):268-272
    [33]Wen G S,Zushi M,Sakamoto K.Study on growth of Sabina vuigarisunder long termwater stress[J].Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology,2000,25(3):242-248
    [34]Ernst Steudle.Root function and adaptation to water take up by roots:effects of water eficit[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,51(350):1531 - 1542
    [35]Theodore C.Hsiao,Liu-Kang Xu.Whole plant integration and agriculture xploitation:Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,51(350):1595-1616
    [36]张承林,付子轼.水分胁迫对荔枝幼树根系与梢生长的影响[J报,2005,22(4):339-342
    [37]陈颖,谢寅峰,沈惠娟.银杏幼苗对水分胁迫的生理响应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(2):55-58
    [38]杨敏生,裴保华,朱之悌.白杨双交杂种无性系抗旱性鉴定指标分析[J].林业科学,2002,38(6):36-42
    [39]Hsiao T C,Xu I K.Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress:biophysical analysis and relation to water transport[J]Exp Bot,2000,51(350):1595-1616.
    [40]高建社,王军,周永学,等.5个杨树无性系抗旱性研究.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(2):112-116
    [41]杨凤云.土壤水分胁迫对梨树生理特性的影响{J}.安徽农业,2004,6:11-12
    [42]李彦慧,周怀军,杨敏生,等.廊坊杨苗期的抗早性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2004,9(1):27-31
    [43]张建国,李吉跃,沈国舫.树木耐早特性及其机理研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000
    [44]赵忠,李鹏.渭北黄土高原主要造林树种根系分布特征及抗旱性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):96-99.
    [45]陈立松,刘星辉.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片超微结构的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2001,30(2):171-174
    [46]Pastor A,Lopez M.Abscisic acid immunolocalization and ultra strueturalchanges in water-stressed lavender[J].Physiol Plant,1999,105:272-279
    [47]张莉,续九如.水分胁迫下刺槐不同无性系生理生化反应的研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(4):162-165
    [48]Hertling U M,Lubke R A Assessing the potential for biological invasion the case of Ammophila arenaria in South Africa.South African Journal of Science,2000,96:520-527
    [49]陈立松,刘星辉.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片超微结构的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2001,30(2):171-174
    [50]林艳,杜平,张全峰,等.国内林木抗寒抗旱性评定的主要指标及方法[J].河北林业科技,2000,(6):10-12.
    [51]M.J.Paul,T.K.Pellny.Carbon metabolite feedback regulation of leaf photosynthesis and development[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2003,54(382):539-547
    [52]邓艳,蒋忠诚,罗为群,等.不同岩溶干旱胁迫下青冈栎水分生理对比研究[J].农业现代化研究,2006,27(3):238-24
    [53]王怀玉,罗英.水分胁迫对茶树叶绿素a荧光动力学的影响[(J].绵阳师范学院学报,2003,22(2):61-63
    [54]李雪花,蒋德明,骆永明,等.不同施水量处理下樟子松幼苗叶片水分生理生态特性的研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(6):17-20
    [55]M.M.Chaves,J.S.Pereira,J.Maroco,et aI.How plants cope with water stress in the field?Photosynthesis and Growth[J].Annals of Botany,2002,89(7):907-916
    [56]黎祜琛,邱治军.树木抗旱性及抗旱造林技术研究综述[J].世界林业究,2003,16(4:)17-22.
    [57]孟庆杰,王光全,董绍锋,等.桃叶片组织结构与其抗旱性关系的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(1):65-67
    [58]刘淑明,陈海滨,孙长忠,等.黄土高原主要造林树种的抗早性研究[J].西北农林科学技术大学学报,2003,31(4):149-153.
    [59]蒲光兰,袁大刚,胡学华,等.杏树抗旱性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(3):40-43
    [60]任丽花,王义祥,翁伯琦,等.土壤水分胁迫对圆叶决明含水量和光合特性的影响[J].厦门大学学报(增刊),2005,44:28-31
    [61]陈之欢.水分胁迫对两种早生花卉生理生化的影响[J].中国农业简报,2002,4(18):20-23
    [62]黄建昌,肖艳,周厚.高渗透胁迫对番木瓜若干生理性状的影响[J].广西植物,2004,24(1):73-76
    [63]Liao J S,Liu S,Chen Q X,et,al.Study on the photosynthetic characters and its effect factors in longan[J].Acta Horticulure Sinica,2001,28(2):164-166
    [64]Karen P R,Xavier A,Isabel F Stomatal limitation to CO_2 assimilation and down-regulation ofphotosynthesis in Quercus ilex resprouts in responseto slowly imposed drought Tree Physiology,2004,24:823-822
    [65]苏培玺,严巧娣.C_4荒漠植物梭梭和沙拐枣在不同水分条件下的光合作用特征[J].生态学报,2006,26:(1)75-82
    [66]马饮彦,蔺琛,韩海荣,等.山西太岳山核桃楸光合特性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(1):14-18
    [67]朱教君,康宏樟,李智辉.不同水分胁迫方式对沙地樟子松幼苗光合特性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(2)57-63
    [68]刘任涛,任佳,不同土壤水分条件下翅果油树幼苗生理特性[J].南阳师范学院学报,2005,12(4):59-62
    [69]刘瑞香.不同土壤水分条件对中国沙棘和俄罗斯沙棘的光合和蒸腾作用的影响[J].水土保持通报,2006,2,26(2):1-5
    [70]骆建霞,史燕山,曹鸿斌,等.水分胁迫对蔓生紫薇和亮叶忍冬生长及生理特性的影响[J].园艺学报,2006,33(3):657-659
    [71]李吉跃,周平,招礼军.干旱胁迫对苗术蒸腾耗水的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1381-1386
    [72]李文华,刘广权,马松涛,等.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水和生长的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)2004,32(1):61-65
    [73]温国胜,王林和,张国盛.干旱胁迫条件下臭柏的气体交换与荧光特征[J].浙江林学院学报,2004,(21)4:361-365
    [74]Cao H,Xu X F,Han Z H,Wang X W,Guo T Q.Changes of physiological characteristic on photosynthesis in Malus seeding leaves during water stress.Acta Horticuhurae Sinica.2004,31(3):285-290
    [75]Chen L S.IJiu x H.Fruit stress physiology.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2003,140-143
    [76]Alves C A,Magaihaes Can,Barja P R.The phenomenon of photoinhibition of photosynthesis and its importance in reforestation.Botanical Review,2002,68:193-208
    [77]Otto L Lange.Photosynthetic productivity of the epilithic lichen Lecanora muralis:Dependence of photosyntbesis on water content,light,temperature,and CO_2concentration from laboratory[J].Flor,2002,197(4):233-249
    [78]Lamontagne,M.,Bigras,F.J.andMargolis,H.A.Chlorophyll fluorescence and CO_2 assimilation of black spruce seed lings following frost in diferent temperature and light conditions[J].Tree Physiol,2000,20:249-255
    [79]韩蕊莲,李丽霞等.干旱胁迫下沙棘叶片细胞膜透性与渗透调节物质研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(1):23-27
    [80]Deng X,Ye W H,Feng HL,Yang O H,Cao H L,Xu K Y,Zhang Y(2004)Gas exchange characteristics of the invasive species Mikania micrantha and its in digenous congener M.cordata(Asteraceae)in South China.Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica,45:213-220
    [81]Ruan Ch J,Li D Q.Study on seabuckthorn stomatal conductance and environmental factors in the Loess hilly region[J].Afta Botaica Boreali- cidentalia Sinica,2001,21(6):1078-1084(in Chinese)
    [82]孟繁静,刘道宏,苏业瑜.植物生理生化[M].中国农业出版社.
    [83]韦小丽,朱守谦,徐锡增.4个榆科树种水分参数随季节和年龄的变化规律[J].山地农业生物学报,2005,24(1):17-21
    [84]杨朝选,焦国利,郑先波,等.重水分胁迫下苹果树茎、叶水势的变化[J].果树学报,2002,19(2):71-74
    [85]Jiang Y,Huang B.Osmotic adjustment and root growth associated with drought preconditioning-enhanced heat tolerance in Kentuky bluegrass[J].Corp Sci,2001,41:1168-1179
    [86]姚允聪.水分亏缺条件下草莓幼苗儿个水分生理指标的变化[J].果树科学,1992,9(4):208-212
    [87]潘东明.水分胁迫与枇杷叶片SOD活性及脂质过氧化作用[J].福建农学院学报(自然科学版),1993,22(2):254-257
    [88]钱春,刘素君,尹克林.水分胁迫对草莓膜保护系统的影响[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版).2005,27(4)541-546
    [89]马双艳,姜远茂,彭福田,等.干旱胁迫对苹果叶片中甜菜碱和丙二醛及脯氨酸含量的影响.落叶苹果.2003,5:1-4
    [90]时连辉,牟志美,姚健.不同桑树品种在土壤水分胁迫下膜伤害和保护酶活性变化[J].蚕业科学,2005,31(1)13-17
    [91]陈洪国.桂花幼苗对不同程度水分胁迫的生理响应[J].华中农业大学学报,2006,25(4):190-193.
    [92]韦小丽,徐锡增,朱守谦.水分胁迫下榆科3种幼苗生理生化指标的变化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)2005,3:47-50
    [93]苏梦云.杉木幼苗在渗透胁迫下脯氦酸积累及Ca的调节作用研究[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(3):335-337
    [94]李岩.苹果植株根源水分胁迫信号及其对地上部抗旱生理机制的调控[J].山东农业大学,2000,12:16-19
    [95]徐迎春,张佳宝,蒋其鳌,等.水分胁迫对忍冬生长及金银花质量的影响[J].中药材,2006,29(5):420-422
    [96]赵黎芳,张金政,张启翔,等.水分胁迫下扶芳藤幼苗保护酶活性和渗透调节物质的变化[J].植物研究,2003,23(4):438-442
    [97]吴晓红,唐中华,祖元刚.水分胁迫对迷迭香中游离氨基酸的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(3):57-58
    [98]任永波,段拥军.植物体内超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)作用研究进展[J].西昌农业高等专科学校学报,2002,9:79-81
    [99]张巧仙,兰彦平.水分胁迫下植物体内的信号传递[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科版),2004,18(3):86-91
    [100]时忠杰,胡哲森,李荣生.水分胁迫与活性氧代谢[J].贵州大学学报(农业与生物科学版),2002,21(2):140-145
    [101]闫成仕.水分胁迫下植物叶片抗氧化系统的响应研究进展[J].烟台师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,18(3):220-225
    [102]王娟,李德全.逆境条件下植物体内渗透调节物质的积累与活性氧代谢[J].植物学通报,2001,18(4):459-465
    [103]吴志华,曾富华,马生健.水分胁迫下植物活性氧代谢研究进展[J].亚热带植物科学2004,33(3)77-80
    [104]蒲光兰,胡学华,周兰英.水分胁迫下乌桕离体叶片的生理生化特性经济林研究[J].经济林研究,2004,22(2):20-23
    [105]王霞,侯平,尹林克等.土壤水分胁迫对柽柳体内膜保护酶及膜脂过氧化的影响[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(3)17-20.
    [106]夏天翔,刘兆普,王景艳.盐分和水分胁迫对菊芋幼苗离子吸收及叶片酶活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(7):1241-1244
    [107]陈由强,叶冰莹,朱锦懋,等.水分胁迫对对木麻黄小枝活性氧伤害的定量分析[J].生命科学研究,2000,4(4):343-350
    [108]郭军战,彭少兵.水分胁迫对树莓、黑莓不同品种生长及膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2004,19(4):1 2-15
    [109]陈洪国.桂花幼苗对不同程度水分胁迫的生理响应[J].华中农业大学学报,2006,25(2):190-193
    [110]文建,张檀,胡景江,等三种杜仲无性系抗旱性比较[J].西北林学院学报,2000,15(3):12-15
    [111]文建雷,张檀,胡景江,等.三种杜仲无性系抗旱性比较[J].西北林学院学报,2000,15(3):12-15
    [112]卢少云,陈斯平,陈斯曼,等.三种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化[J].园艺学报,2003,30(3):303-306
    [113]刘宁,高玉葆,贾彩霞,等.渗透胁迫下多花黑麦草叶内过氧化物酶活性和脯氨酸含量以及脂膜相对透性的变化[J].植物生理学通讯,2000,36(1):11-14
    [114]毛培利,曹帮华,何明.干早胁迫下刺槐无性系保护酶活性著异的研究[J].林业科技,2004,29(4):10-12
    [115]Shi Zh J,Hu Zh S,Li R Sh.Water stress and active oxygen metabolism[J].Journal of Guizhou University.2002,21(2):140-145
    [116]谭大海,罗新义,沙伟.早胁迫下几种冰草属植物保护酶活性的变化研究[J].草原与饲料,2005.10:60-62
    [117]李丽霞,赵吉强,韩蕊莲,等.干旱胁迫对沙棘抗氧化酶的影响[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),2006,19(1)30-35
    [118]Sun C X,Liu Zh G,Jing Y D.Effect of water stress on activity and isozyme of the major defense in maize leaves[J].Journal of Maize Science,2003,11(1):63-66
    [119]黄建昌,肖艳,周厚高.渗透胁迫对番木瓜若干生理性状的影响[J].广西植物,2004,24(1):73-76
    [120]张明生,谈锋,谓波,等.甘薯膜脂过氧化作用和膜保护系统的变化与品种抗旱性的关系[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(11):1395-1398
    [121]闫成仕.水分胁迫下植物叶片抗氧化系统的响应研究进展[J].烟台师范学院学报,2002,18(3):220-225
    [122]杜秀敏等.植物体内活性氧的产生和清除机制[[J].生物工程学报.2001,17(2):121-126
    [123]陈洪.木麻黄抗早生理生化部分特性的研究[[J].福建农业学报,2000.15(1):48-54
    [124]李仲光等.在单一提取系统中同时测定五种植物抗氧化酶[J].云南师范大学学报,2002(6):44-47
    [125]王俊刚,陈国仓,张承烈.水分胁迫对2种生态型芦苇的可溶性蛋白含量、SOD、POD、活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(3):561-565
    [126]时连辉,牟志美,姚健.不同桑树品种在土壤水分胁迫下膜伤害和保护酶活性变化[J].蚕业科学,2005,31(1):13-16.
    [127]黄福平,陈荣冰.茶树抗早指标研究指标[J].福建茶叶,2000,3:2-5
    [128]Cheng Y F,Pu T L,Xue Y B,et al.Pc TGD,a highly expressed gene in stem is related to water stress in reed(Phragmites communis Trin[Jl.ChineseSci Bulletin,2001,46:850-854
    [129]俞嘉宁,山仑.LEA蛋白与植物的抗旱性[J].生物工程进展,2002,22(2):10-14
    [130]Shinozakik K,Yamagichi.Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperaLure:differences and cross talk between two stress signaling pathway[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biol,2000,3:217-223
    [131]Zhu X Y,Zhang Ch L.Photosynthetic electron transport and antioxidative system in two ecotypes ofreed[J].Act Phytophysiol,2000,26:476-480
    [132]Gherri C L M,Maffei M,Navari-izzo F.Antioxidantive enzymes in wheat subiected to increasing water deficit and rewatering[J].Plant Physiol,2000,157:273-279
    [133]颜华,贾良辉,王根轩.植物水分胁迫诱导蛋白的研究进展[J].2002,22(2):165-168
    [134]罗华建,刘星辉.水分胁迫条件下枇杷若干生理指标的变化[J].亚热带植物科学,2004,33(1):19-21
    [135]彭明俊,赵琳,温绍龙,等.4种禾本科牧草种子的抗旱性[J].西部林业科学,2006,2:2(35):74-77
    [136]许凯扬,叶万辉,段学武,等.PEG诱导水分胁迫下喜旱莲子草的生理适应性[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2004,30(3):271-277
    [137]Qing Song Zhou,Xue Hua Jiang,Jia Rui Yu.Synthesis and Characterization of PEG-scutellarin Conjugates,a Polential PEG Ester Prodrug for the Oral Delivery of Scutellar inChinese[J].Chemical Letters 2006,1(17):85-88
    [138]Liu Huai-pan,Ji Xiu'e,Yu Bingjun.Relationship between osmotic stress and polyamines conjugated to the deoxyribonucleic acid-protein in wheat seedling roots[J].Science in China:Series C Life Sciences 2006,1(49):12-17
    [139]姜义宝,崔国文,李红.干旱胁迫下外源钙对苜蓿抗旱相关生理指标的影响[J].草业学报,2005,5(14):32-36
    [140]Wang Qing-cheng,Su Zhi-hu,Zhanh Yan-dong adaptive responses of acer ginnala,Pyrus ussuriensis and Prunus davidiana seedlings to soil moisture stress[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2003,14(4):280-284
    [141]刘淑明,王得祥,孙长忠.干旱胁迫下雪松土壤水分及生理特性的研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(11):2057-2060
    [142]关军锋,李广敏.干旱条件下施肥效应及其作用机理[J].中国生态农业学报,2002,59-61
    [143]张国盛,张仁陟,黄高宝.水分胁迫条件下春小麦根系对施肥的响应[J].草业学报,2003,12(3):105-109
    [144]张士功,刘国栋,刘更另.植物营养与作物抗旱性[J].植物学通报,2001,18(1):64-9
    [145]呼天明,胡晓艳,李红星.氮磷对马蹄金抗早性的影响[J].草地学报,2005,4(3):167-174
    [146]朱再标,梁宗锁,王渭玲,等.氮磷营养对柴胡抗旱性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,2(23):95-99
    [147]魏永胜.干旱条件下不同施钾水平对烟草水分关系的影响[J].西北农业学报,2001,10(4):90-94
    [148]杨虹琦,周冀衡,罗泽民,等.干旱胁迫下供钾水平对烟草生长和钾素吸收及抗旱性的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,5(29):376-379
    [149]赵军营,李绍华,代占武,等.半根和全根干旱对嘎拉苹果组培苗渗透调节物质积累的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(12):2484-2489
    [150]孙世利,骆耀平.茶树抗旱性研究进展[J].浙江农业科学,2006,1:89-91
    [15l]郑仙照,余会康.柰园留草对奈园温湿度和柰果质量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2005,25,74-76
    [152]刘拉平.化学调控技术在农业抗旱中的应用[J].陕西农业科学,2000,7:33-34
    [153]杜太生,康绍忠,魏华.保水剂在节水农业中的应用研究现状与展望[J].农业现代化研究,2000,5,52-55
    [154]黄占斌,朱书全,张铃春,等.保水剂在农业改土节水中的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):57-60.
    [155]王斌瑞,贺康宁,史长青.保水剂在造林绿化中的应用[J].中国水土保持,2000,4:22-24
    [156]郑良永.保水剂在我国的研究应用现状与展望[J].广西热带农业,2005,6:26-27
    [157]祁桂林,张爱芬.保水剂对狼尾草幼苗耐旱效应[J].农业与技术,2005,6(25):45-47
    [158]党秀丽,张玉龙,黄毅.保水剂对土壤持水性能影响的模拟研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(4):191-192
    [159]芦海宁,韩烈保,苏德荣.保水剂在草坪中的应用研究进展[J].节水灌溉,2005,30:(1),14-17
    [160]黄占斌,朱书全,张铃春,等.保水剂在农业改土节水中的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):57-60
    [161]王志玉,刘作新.高吸水性树脂的性能及其在农业上的应用[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3):352-356
    [162]林文杰,马焕成,周蛟,等.干旱胁迫下保水剂对苗木生长及生理的影响[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(4):353-355
    [163]孙洪波,范海.新型抗旱剂对小麦增产原因的分析[J].山东师范大学学报,2000,1:25-28
    [164]罗杰,谢宜勤,陈峰.不同剂量抗旱剂对鸡冠花生长的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2005,11(3):68-72
    [165]陈立松,刘星辉.渗透胁迫下Ca~(2+)对龙眼叶片光合色素及膜质过氧化的影响[J].园艺学报,1998,25(1):87-88
    [166]洪法水,赵海泉.CaCl~2对月季切花衰老的影响[J].园艺学报,1999,26(1):62-64
    [167]薛波.珙桐幼苗对抗旱节水措施的生理生态响应.2006年四川农业大学硕士学位论文
    [168]张远兵,刘爱荣等.几种生长延缓剂对瓜叶菊生长发育的影响.中国林副特产.2001(1):17-18
    [169]张远兵,刘爱荣等.矿质元素与多效哇对瓜叶菊生长的影响[J].安徽农业技术师范学院学 报,2000,14(4):8-10
    [170]周凤珏,许鸿源,江翠平,等.多效唑对木薯若干抗旱性相关生理指标的影响[J].广西农业生物科学,2004,3(23):202-205
    [171]马新蕾,王玉军,谢胜利.根施甜菜碱对水分胁迫下烟草幼苗光合机构的保护[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006,32(4):465-472
    [172]刘瑞冬,王有年,于同泉,等.水分胁迫下外源甜菜碱对仁用杏叶片光合作用的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2004,19(1):10-13
    [173]杨淑英.外源甜菜碱对冬小麦抗旱性生理指标的影响研究[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(6):1041-1045
    [174]陈世苹.水分胁迫下内生真菌感染对黑麦草叶内游脱落酸含量的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):1965-1973
    [175]齐国辉.VA菌根对苹果组培苗水分吸收利利用的影响[J].河北林果研究,2000,15(2):135-138
    [176]吴强盛,夏仁学,胡正嘉.丛枝菌根对枳实生苗抗旱性的影响研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,3(16):459-463
    [177]刘藜,VA真菌对木豆、银合欢苗期生长及抗旱效应研究.2006年贵州大学硕士学位论文
    [178]曾小红,马焕成,伍建榕,等.根瘤菌的抗旱性研究进展[J].西南林学院学报,2005,3(25):80-82
    [179]毕银丽,李晓林,丁保健.水分胁迫接种菌根对玉米抗早性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003(6):7-12
    [180]张道远,尹林克,潘伯荣.柽柳属植物抗旱性能研究及其应用潜力评价[J].中国沙漠,2003,3(23):252-256
    [181]刘进平,郑成木.诱变结合植物培养在植物育种中的应用[J].上海农业学报,2004,20(1):19-22
    [182]洪亚辉,朱兆海,黄璜,等.菊花组织培养与辐射诱变的研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,29(6):457-461
    [183]张建华,陈火英,庄天明.番茄耐盐体细胞变异体的离体筛选[1].西北植物学报,2002,22(2):257-262
    [184]Li A X,Liu QC,WangYP,Zhai H.In vitro selection of drought and salt tolerant mutants in sweet potato[J].Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology,2002,10(1):15-19
    [185]李爱贤等.甘薯耐早耐盐突变体的离体筛选.农业生物技术学报,2001(1):15-19
    [186]Liu QC,Zhai H,Wang Y.Efficient plant regeneration from embryogenic suspension cultures of sweet potato[J].In Vitro Cellular Developmental Biology Plant,2001,37:564-567
    [187]吕德滋,李洪杰,李香菊,等.冬小麦对除草剂莠去津反应敏感性及其遗传控制[J].华北农学报,2000,15(3):55-60
    [188]陈双雅,张永祥,蔡向群.离体筛选中国水仙抗叶大褐斑病突变体初步研究[J].亚热带植物科学,2002:25-27
    [189]Das A,Gosal S S,Sidh J S,et al.lnduction of mutations for heat tolerance in potato by using in vitro culture and radiation[J].Euphytica,2000,114:205-209
    [190]王玉萍,刘庆昌,李爱贤,等.甘薯耐早突变体的离体筛选与鉴定[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(9):1000-1005
    [191]Sumayarti S.Characterization and regeneration of salt and water stressmutants from protoplast culture of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia.Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1992,83:613-619.
    [192]彭剑涛.硫酸二乙酯诱导烟草单倍体愈伤组织耐聚乙二醇的变异[J].贵州农业科学,2002,30(2):5-7
    [193]刘桂茹,葛淑俊,王静华,等.PEG对小麦花药出愈率的影响,河北农业大学学报,2001,24(4):25-27
    [194]Lisa M.Petty,et.al.Expression of the Arabidopsis gai gene under its own promoter causes a reduction in plant chrysanthemum by attenuation of the gibberellin response.Plant Science,2003,164:175-182
    [195]Shi W M,Muramoto Y,Ueda A,et al.Cloning of peroxiomal ascorbate thermotolerance by overexpressing in Arabidopsis thaliana[J].Gene,2001,273(1):23-27
    [196]TajiT.Important roles ofdrought-and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana[J].The Plant Journa,2002,29(4):41-426
    [197]Volker Haake.Transcription Factor CBF4 is a Regulator DroughtAd-aptation in Arabidopsis[J].PlantPhysiol,2002,(130):639-648
    [198]A.Pellegrineschil.Progress in the:genetic engineering of wheat forwater limited Conditions[J].Jircas Working Report,2002:55-60
    [199]CapellT.Overexpression of the oat arginine decarboxylase cDNA in transgenic rice(Oryza sativaL) affects normal developmentpatterns in vitro and results in putresine accumulation in transgenic plants[J].Theor Appl Genet,1998,97:246-254
    [200]Xu De-ping.Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene,HVAl,from Barley confers tolerance to water and salt stress in transgenic rice.Plant Physio,1998,117:913-923
    [201]尹春英,李春阳.杨树抗旱性研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2003,9(6):662-668
    [202]Teixeira da Silva.I A.Polyamines in the regulation of chrysanthemum and tobacco in vitro morphogenic path ways[J].Prop Orris.mental Plants,2002,2:9-15
    [203]Thakur M,Sharma D R,Sharma S K.Ia vitro selection and regeneration of carnation plants resistant to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp dianthi[J].Plant Cell Reports,2002,20(9):825-828
    [204]吴绮,胡莺雷,倪挺,等.转基因草坪草的研究概况与展望[J].草业科学,2004,24(1):29-35
    [205]Arie Nadler.Relations between soil and tree stem water content and bulk electrical conductivity under salinizing irrigation[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(3):779-783
    [206]L.S.Rhizopoulou,G.K.Psaras.Development and structure of drought-tolerant leaves of themediterranean shrub Capparis spinasa[J].Annals of Botany,2003,92(3)377-383
    [207]Bonos S A,Murphy J A.Growth response and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress[J].Crop science,1999,39:770-774.
    [208]孟庆杰,王光全,董绍锋,等.桃叶片组织结构与其抗旱性关系的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(1):65-67.
    [209]张锦春,汪杰,等,樟子松根系分布特征及其生长适应性研究[J].防护林科技,2000,(3):46-49
    [210]Kintzios S,Drossopoulos J B,Lymperopoulos C.Effect of vitamins and inorganic micronutrients on callus growth and somatic embryogenesis from young mature leaves of rose[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,2000,23(10):1407-1420
    [211]Li X Q,Krasnyanski F S,Korban S.Somatic embryogenesis,secondary somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis in Rosa[J].Journal of Plant Physiology.2002,59:313-319
    [212]Changgui Wan,Wenwei Xu Ronld E.Hydraulic lift in drought tolerance and susceptible maizehybrids[J].Plant and Soil,2000,(219):117-126.
    [213]Huang B.R,Honguen Gao.Root physiologyical characteristics associated with drought resistane in tall fesue cultiirars[J].Crop Science,2000,40:196-203
    [214]Michelle Dacosta,Zhaolong Wang,Bingru Huang.Physiological adaptation of Kentucky Bluegrass to localized soil drying[J]Crop Science,2004,44(4):1307-1314
    [215]孔照胜,武云帅,岳爱琴,等.不同大豆品种抗旱性生理指标综合分析[J].华北农学报,2001,16(3):40-45
    [216]马祎,王彩云.几种引进冷季型草坪草的生长及抗旱性生理指标[J].草业科学,2001,18(2):57-61.
    [217]Olsovska K,Brestic M.Function of hydraulic and chemical water stress signalization in evaluation of drought resistance of juvenile plants[J].Journal of Central European Agriculture,2001,2(3):157-164
    [218]Ramsay L,Galitz D S,Lee C J W.Basal medium and sucrose concentration influence ovary culture.Hort Science,2003,38(3):404-406
    [219]Neto V B D,Otoni W C.Carbon sources and their osmotic potential in plant tissue culture.Scientia Horticulturae,2003,97(3):193-202
    [220]M.Juan-Pablo,L.Stanley,et ai.ls osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,161(9):1041-1051
    [221]Fu J M,Huang B R.Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress.Environmental and Experimental Botany,2001,45(2):105-114
    [222]Jiang Y W,Huttng B.Drought and heat stress injury to two cool-Season turfgrasses in relation to antioxidant metabolism and lipid peroxidation.Crop Science.200141:436-442
    [223]Kim Y J,Shanmugasundaram S,Yun S J,et al.A simple method of seedling screening for drought tolerance in soybean.Korean Journal of Crop Science,2001,46(4):284-288.
    [224]龚吉蕊,张立新,赵爱芬,等.油蒿抗旱生理生化特 性研究初报[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(4):387-391.
    [225]Rajan K Mishra,Swati SEN-Mahdi.Genome analysis and isozyme studies for developing molecular markers associated with drought tolerance in tea plant[J].Production Proceedings,2001:66-69
    [226]张卫华,张方秋,张守攻,等.3种相思幼苗抗旱性研究[J].林业科学研究,2005,18(6):695-700
    [227]刘兰服,张松树,王延兵,等.甘薯细胞辐射诱变突变体的抗旱性鉴定[J].河北农业科学,2002,6(2):8-11.
    [228]苏国兴,洪法水.桑品种耐盐性的隶属函数法之评价[J].江苏农业学报,2002,18(1):42-47
    [229]揭雨成.苎麻抗旱性基冈型著异的农艺性状及形态解剖特征[J].中国麻作,2000,22(4):14-22.
    [230]王育红,姚宇卿,吕军杰.花生抗旱性与生理生态指标关系的研究[J],杂粮作物,2002,22(3):147-149
    [231]魏秀俭.玉米自交系耐早性的模糊隶属函数法分析[J],山东农业科学,2005,(2):25-27
    [232]柴守玺.小麦抗旱生态分类中适合性聚类方法的研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,11(6):833-838
    [233]于海秋,徐克章,陈学求,等.玉米主要抗旱性状的配合力及遗传参数分析[J].玉米科学,2003,11(2):9-15
    [234]刘飞虎,梁雪妮,张寿文.运用生理生化生化、形态解剖指标综合评价兰麻抗旱性[J].湖北农业科学,2001(3):16-19
    [235]马淼,陈蓓蕾,骆世洪.濒危植物新疆沙冬青叶解剖结构及其光合特性[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2005.23(4):446-448
    [236]李合生主编。植物生理生化实验原理与技术{M}.北京:高等教育出版社,2000
    [237]周广生,梅方竹,周竹青,等.小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(11):1378-1382
    [238]耶兴元,范宏伟,仝胜利等.热激锻炼诱导猕猴桃耐热性研究[J].果树学报,2005,22(6):630-633
    [239]潘瑞炽主编.植物生理学[M].高等教育出版社,2001
    [240]王霞,侯平.植物对干旱胁迫的适应机理[J].干旱区研究,2001,18(2):42-46
    [241]王俊刚.水分胁迫对2种生态型芦苇的可溶蛋白含量,SOD,POD,CAT活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(3):561-565
    [242]丁晓英,卢向阳,吴铁明,等.瓜叶菊的离体培养与快速繁殖.湖南农业大学学报,2004,30(5):429-433
    [243]于晓英,卢向阳,龙岳林,等.瓜叶菊花梗和花托愈伤组织的诱导与植株再生研究.湖南农业大学学报,2005:31(4):399-401

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700