天津滨海新区植物景观研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着我国城市化进程的逐步加快,滨海城市更是加速发展,同时对滨海城市园林景观的建设也越来越被重视。合理的营造滨海地区植物景观,能够建立城市的良好形象,也能为城市居民提供一个生态良好、环境优美、亲切宜人、富有地域文化特色的环境。因此,研究天津滨海新区植物景观,对于天津滨海新区植物景观的可持续发展和现代城市园林植物景观的营造具有重要意义。
     本研究主要以天津滨海新区为研究区域,对其中62个相对稳定的植物群落进行了调查。首先对植物群落的植物种类组成、盐生植物组成、观赏特性、生态结构等方面展开了调查分析。其次,应用层次分析法建立合理的评价体系,对调查群落中的14个典型植物群落,从植物景观生态价值、美学价值和社会效应三个方面进行综合评价,并在所评价的植物群落中选择3个典型群落进一步分析。再次,总结出天津滨海新区植物景观的优劣势并提出进一步的优化建议。最后,提出了营造天津滨海新区植物景观配置的构想,为进一步开展天津滨海新区植物景观建设提供基本思路。
     研究结果表明:
     1.本次调查的62个样地中共有木本植物49种,隶属于24科37属,其中裸子植物3科6属8种,被子植物21科31属41种。根据科的统计发现,以少种科和单种科相对集中,同时蔷薇科、豆科这两个世界性大科占有相对较大的比例。
     2.天津滨海新区植物种类较为丰富,但多数种类应用仍不广泛,无论乔木层还是灌木层,运用频率高的集中在少数几个物种上
     3.此次调查的天津滨海新区植物种类中,共有盐生植物45种,占植物总种数的67.16%。其中专性盐生植物共19种,兼性盐生植物共26种。
     4.天津滨海新区植物群落中以观花为主的植物共有31种,主要集中于灌木层;观果植物共有19种,主要集中于乔木和灌木层;观色叶植物应用种类达25种,以观秋色叶的植物为主。
     5.天津滨海新区植物群落垂直结构基本是由乔、灌、草相结合的复合群落。占总群落结构的54.84%。
     6.应用层次分析法建立了植物群落景观评价体系,确定了评价因子及其权重,从植物景观生态价值、美学价值和社会效应三个方而对天津滨海新区植物景观进行了评价。
     7.对天津滨海新区植物景观进行综合评价分析。结果表明,植物群落景观等级全部集中在Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级、Ⅴ级上,由此可见天津滨海新区在植物景观的构成及营造上还需进一步提升。
     8.总结天津滨海新区植物景观的优劣势,并提出优化道路绿地植物景观的途径:植物景观营造中需加强盐生植物的运用、模拟地带性植物群落、加强乡土植物开发以及丰富植物群落结构。
     9.分析影响天津滨海新区植物景观营造的各个因素,以及提出了营造天津滨海特色植物景观应该遵循的五大原则,最后对天津滨海新区特色植物景观配置进行构想,为进一步开展天津滨海新区植物景观建设提供基本思路。
With the rapid development of the urbanization process,coastal cities develop more quickly, and the the construction of landscape in coastal cities is paid more and more attention.Scientific and rational way to create a landscape of plants, can build a good image of the city, but also provide a sound ecological, beautiful, friendly and pleasant, the rich local cultural characteristics of the environment for the urban residents. Therefore, the study of Tianjin Binhai New Area plant landscape plays an important role on the sustainable development of Tianjin Binhai New Area plant landscape and plants landscape construction in modern urban.
     The object of research mainly concentrates on Tianjin Binhai New Area,and 62 relatively stable plant communities have been investigated and analyzed. Firstly, the paper surveys and analyzes plant composition, halophyte composition, ornamental characteristics, ecological structure of Tianjin Binhai New Area plant landscape. Secondly, To establish the reasonable evaluate system by AHP,and evaluate the palnt landscape of Tianjin Binhai New Area from three aspects:the the ecological value in plant landscape,the aesthetic value in plant landscape and the social effect in plant landscape.Thirdly,sum up the advantage and disadvantage to Tianjin Binhai New Area plant landscape,and than the suggestions to optimize the plant landscape are put forward.Finally, the paper create some ideas to the plant configuration of Tianjin Binhai New Area, in order to provide the basic ideas for the construction of Tianjin Binhai New Area plants landscape.
     The results show as follows:
     l.It totally have 67 species which belong to 24 families and 37 genera in 62 plots. The plants is concentrated on few and single families in sample plots. And Rosaceae, Leguminosae, which are world's big families occupy a relatively large proportion.
     2. The plant species are abundant in the communities of Tianjin Binhai New Area, but most types of applications is still not widely. Whether arbor or shrub layer, the use of high frequency mainly concentrates on a few species.
     3. There are 45 species halophyte in the 62 plots,and take 67.16 percent in all species,including the 19 obligate halophyte and 26 facultative halophyte.
     4. There are 31 mainly ornamental flower, which is focused on the shrub layer. There are 19 ornamental fruit plants, which is focused on the arbor layer and shrub layer. There are 25 kinds of colored foliage plants, and the most of colored foliage plants is autumn leaves plants.
     5. The structure of plant communities is multiple structure combined with arbor,shrub and herbaceous on the whole in communities,taking 54.84 percent in all types.
     6. To establish the reasonable evaluate system by AHP,and then confirm the evaluation factors and the weight ratio,in order to evaluate the palnt landscape of Tianjin Binhai New Area from three aspects:the the ecological value in plant landscape,the aesthetic value in plant landscape and the social effect in plant landscape.
     7.The result of comprehensive evaluation showed the communities is concentrated onⅢ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ-gradelandscape quality, therefore,Tianjin Binhai New Area in plant composition and the creation of the landscape need to be further improved.
     8.Sum up the advantage and disadvantage to Tianjin Binhai New Area plant landscape,and there are some suggestions to optimize the plant landscape including enriching the halophyte species;simulation of zonal communities;enriching the native plants and the plant community structure.
     9.To analysis the various factors and the principles of the design of Tianjin Binhai New Area Plant landscape.Finally, the paper create some ideas to the plant configuration of Tianjin Binhai New Area, in order to provide the basic ideas for the construction of Tianjin Binhai New Area plants landscape.
引文
[1]王遵亲.中国盐碱土[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
    [2]KOVDA V A.Loss of productivel and due to saliriazation [J].Ambio,1983, Ⅻ(2): 91-93.
    [3]徐恒刚.中国盐生植被及盐渍化生态治理[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004.
    [4]Waisel Y.Biology of halophytes[M].Academic Press.New York:1972.
    [5]Jennings.Ecology of halophytes[M].Reinhold RS.WH Queen.Academic Press. London:1976.
    [6]赵可夫.盐生植物[J].植物学通报1997,14(4):1-12.
    [7]林栖凤.耐盐植物研究[M].北京:科学出版社2004.
    [8]孙黎,徐海霞.盐生植物及其开发利用[J].生物学通报,2005,40(11):25.
    [9]王伯荪.植物群落学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1987.
    [10]尹吉光.图解园林植物造景[M].北京:机械出版社,2007.
    [11]中国大百科全书出版社编辑部.中国大百科全书:建筑·园林·城市规划[M].上海:中国大百科全书出版社,1988.
    [12]朱钧珍.中国园林植物景观艺术[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
    [13]苏雪痕.植物造景[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1994.
    [14]吴为廉.景观与景园建筑工程规划设计(下册)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
    [15]Suata—Curz Ana, AcostaMnauel, et al.Short——term salt tolerance mechanisms indieffrentialy salt tolerant tomato species,Plant Physiol[J].Biochem,1999,37(1)65-71.
    [16]牛东玲,王启基.盐碱地治理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2003,33(6):449-453.
    [17]Abe H,Yam aguchi-Shinozaki K,U rao T,Iwasaki T HosokawaD, Shinozaki K Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologise in drought-and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression.Plant Cell,1997,9:1859-1868.
    [18]D.L.N.Rao&H.S.Gili.Biomass and biofertilizer production by sesbania cannabina in alkaline soil[J].Field Crops Research,2002,74:81-91.
    [19]丁静,方亦雄等.苏北常见树种的耐盐力[J].植物生理学通报,1956,10:65-68.
    [20]闫永庆,刘慧民,范金萍等.怎样搞好黑龙江省盐碱地地区的园林绿化[J].北 方园艺,2005,1:35-36.
    [21]苑增武,张孝民,毛开来.大庆地区主要造林树种耐盐碱能力评价[]].防护林科技,2000(1):15-16.
    [22]徐国,万钦佩,谢民等.海滨锦葵的引种生态学研究[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),1996,(2):61-65
    [23]俞孔坚.论景观概念及其研究的进展[J].北京林业大学学报1987,9(4):433-439.
    [24]Litton,R.B.Jr.Forest landscape Description and Inventories,A Basis for land planning and Design[J].USDA F orest service Resenrch Paper,Psw_49 Pacific sourth_west Forest and Range Experiment Station,Pierkeley,Califernia,1968.
    [25]Litton,R.B.Jr and Tetlow,R.J.A landscape Inventory Fraework:Scenic Analyses of the Northern Great Plants[J].USD Forest service,Research Paper,1978.
    [26]Buhyoff,G.J. and Leaschner,W.A..Estimating psychological disutility from danged forest stand[J].Forest Sci.,1978,24:424-432.
    [27]Buhyoff,G.J.,wellman,J.D.and Daniel,T.C..Plodicting scenic beaucty for Mountain Pine Beetle and Western Spruce Budworm danaged forest vistas[J].Forest Sci.,1982,28:823-827.
    [28]Applenton,An informal model for the prediction of preference,In landscape Assessment,values,Perceptions,and Desources[J].Iube,E.H.Brush, R.O. And Fabos, J.G.Do wden,Hutchinson and ross stroudsourg.PA,92-102.
    [29]Lowental,D..Past time,presentplace,landscape and memory[J].Geogr,Dev.,1975, 65:1-36.
    [30]Lowental,D..The bicentennial landscape,a mirror held up to the past[J].Geogr, Rev. 1977,67:249-267.
    [31]俞孔坚.风景资源评价的主要学派和方法[M].北京:青年风景师(文集)城市设计情报资料,1988,4(3):31-41.
    [32]Thomas Kapper and Richard Chenoweth.Landscape Architecture and Societal Values[J].Evidence from the Literature,2002,21(2):149-157.
    [33]LienJ N.and Buhoff,GJ.Extension of visual quality methods for urban forests[J]. Journal of Environmential Management,1986,22:245-254.
    [34]Schroeder,H.W.Estimating park tree densities to maximize landscape esthetics[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1986,23:325-333.
    [35]Ali Ozbolen,Arzu Kalin.The semantic value of plants in the perception of space[J].Bulinding and Environment.2001,36:257-79.
    [36]陆兆苏等.紫金山风景林的动态及其经营对策[J].南京林学院学报.1985,(3):1-11.
    [37]俞孔坚.景观:文化、生态与感知[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
    [38]刘滨谊.风景景观工程体系化[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990.5-6.
    [39]王晓俊.风景资源管理和视觉影响评估方法初探[J].南京林业大学学报.1992,16(3):70-76.
    [40]李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2005,1(38):143-147.
    [41]唐东芹,杨学军,许东新.园林植物景观评价方法及其应用[J].浙江林学院学报,2001,18(4):394-397.
    [42]王竞红.园林植物景观评价指标体系研究初探[J].林业科技,2007,32(5):61-62.
    [43]郑岩.哈尔滨城市公园植物群落特征及其景观评价[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [44]周述明.成都市城市街道绿化景观评价及环境效益研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2003.
    [45]冯敏敏.园林植物景观美感评价研究[D].杭州:浙江大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [46]王彩霞,何平,王保忠等.株洲市道路植物景观的数量化分析[J].中南林学院学报,2004,24(2):100-105.
    [47]门媛媛.南宁市居住小区绿化植物及其景观分析与评价[D].南宁:广西大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [48]胡俊.南京市居住区植物景观[D].南京:南京林业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [49]翁殊斐,陈锡沐,黄少伟.用SBE法进行广州市公园植物配置研究[J].中国园林,2002,(5):83-86.
    [50]王竞红,魏殿文,张峥嵘.深圳市莲花山公园植物景观评价[J].国土与自然资源研究,2007(1):57-58.
    [51]石平,张广新等.SBE法评价沈阳市典型居住庭园的植物配置效果[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(4):471-474.
    [52]徐晓清.南京城市滨水绿地植物群落研究与综合评价分析[D].南京:南京农业大学硕士论文,2007.
    [53]马琳,赵兰勇,赵红霞,贾元义.济南植物园植物配置评价研究[J].山东林 业科技,2007(1):39-42.
    [54]王竞红.天津市水上公园植物景观评价研究初探[J].森林工程,2007,23(2):10-12.
    [55]York Francis.A Case Study Method For Landscape Architecture[J].Landscape Journal,2001,20(1):22-25.
    [56]宋云龙.哈尔滨市欧式建筑周围植物配置的评价[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [57]Marcin S J.Towards sustainable urban,environments:the potential for leasteost Planning approaches[J].Environ Plan Manag,1992,35(2):193-200.
    [58]Huang S L,Chen C S.A system model to analyse environmental carring capacity for manaming urban growth of the TaiPei Metroplitan Region[J].J of Envir Manag,1990, (31):46-60.
    [59]Meninger EA.Seaside Plants of the World[M].Hearthside press.New York:1964.
    [60]Report of a Panel of the Board on Science and Technology for International Development(BOSTID) office of International Affairs national research Council. 1990.Saline Agriculture-Salt-Tolerant Plants for Developing Countries [M].National Academy Press Washington,DC.
    [61]Bernatzky A[德],陈自新,许慈安译.树木生态与养护[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1987.
    [62]卞阿娜.华南滨海区耐盐园林绿化植物选择与配置[D].福建:厦门大学,2008.
    [63]耿美云.北方耐盐碱植物数据库及植物景观营造措施[D].黑龙江:东北林业大学,2005.
    [64]温静.天津滨海新区盐碱地景观生态化设计研究[D].河北:河北农业大学,2008.
    [65]胡妍妍.天津开发区生态环境建设与植物造景研究[D].天津:天津大学,2009.
    [66]段慧源.天津滨海新区功能植物生态应用及其主分量特征分析与评价[D].天津:天津师范大学,2010.
    [67]宋伯年.天津滨海新区海岸带景观的生态化建设[D].天津:天津大学。2007.
    [68]冀媛媛.天津滨海新区海岸带盐碱地生态化发展研究[D].天津:天津大学,2009.
    [69]吴静.天津市滨海新区生态承载能力综合评价[D].天津:天津师范大学,2003.
    [70]曹颖.天津市滨海新区土地可持续利用评价与区域发展对策研究[D].天津:天 津师范大学,2003.
    [71]王连弟.天津滨海新区的绿化与土壤盐碱化问题[J].生态经济,1995,(1):31-34.
    [72]李彩良.天津滨海新区经济与社会发展综合评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2004.
    [73]Stohlren T J, et,al.Comparison of range-land vegetation sampling techniques in Grasslands[J].Range,Manage.1998,51(2):164-172.
    [74]周琦,季旭华,车生泉.上海市外环线人工植物群落调查——以2000年段为例[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2005,23(4):416-423.
    [75]《运筹学》教材编写组编.运筹学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1990.
    [76]冷平生.园林生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.187-188.
    [77]马克平,黄建辉,于顺利等.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究H丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J].生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277
    [78]Alatalo R V.Problems in the measurement of evenness in eeology.Oikosl981, 37:199-204.
    [79]pielou E C.(卢泽愚译,1988).数学生态学(第2版)[M].北京:科学出版社1985:305-331.
    [80]Whittaker R H.Evolution and measurement of species diversity.Taxon,1972,21: 213-251.
    [81]李在辉.天津租界园林与保护[D].天津:天津大学硕士学位论文,2006.56-62.
    [82]马春,李洪远,王英,陈小奎.天津滨海地区的盐生植物与盐生植被景观[J].现代园林.2008,(11):2-5.
    [83]温静,张彦广,曹磊,刘行,常二梅.天津滨海野生观赏盐生植物资源调查与园林应用[J].河北林果研究.2008,23(3):328-330.
    [84]俞孔坚.后滩公园[J].风景园林,2010(2):30-31.
    [85]王信权,汪四旺.融合地域特色塑造宜人环境——天津桥园公园建设[J].天津建设科技,2009(2):41-42.
    [86]王玉珍,王明珍.盐碱地绿化中观赏草的应用[J].现代园林,2007,(5):66-67.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700