免耕稻—鸭生态种养模式及综合效益研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究提出了一种新型的生态农业模式——免耕稻-鸭生态种养模式,并在湖南农业大学植物标本园和湖南宁乡迥龙铺两地同时对免耕的湿地稻-鸭复合生态系统土壤环境、植株性状、生态效益和社会经济效益进行了研究,旨在为全面系统地评价免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统提供理论依据,为免耕稻-鸭生态种养这一新型的生态农业模式的推广应用奠定坚实的理论基础。
     本试验研究包括四个方面的内容:(1)构建了免耕稻-鸭复合生态种养模式;(2)研究该体系对土壤环境的影响;(3)研究该体系对植株性状的影响;(4)研究该系统的生态效益、经济效益、社会效益。主要研究结果如下:
     1 免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统对土壤环境的影响
     免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统与常规翻耕相比,0~5cm土层土壤容重降低了2%,非毛管孔隙度增加了3.28%;5~15cm土层土壤容重变化不大,非毛管孔隙度增加了1.1%,说明免耕养鸭有利于改善土壤的物理性状。土壤养分库数量在0~5cm土层有不同程度的增加,有机质两地平均增加了8.8g/kg,全氮增加了0.53g/kg,碱解氮增加了77.0mg/kg,增加幅度分别达17.9%、23.76%、44.41%,说明免耕养鸭有利于这些养分的增加,对土壤中速效磷、速效钾的分析表明养鸭有利于土壤中速效磷、速效钾的增加,而免耕则对两者影响不大;5~15cm土壤的肥力变化缺乏明显的规律性,说明免耕养鸭能提高土壤表层肥力水平,而对中下层土壤肥力影响不明显。免耕养鸭与常规翻耕相比,氧化还原电位提高了18.4mV,还原物质总量减少83%,有利于土壤氧化还原状态的改善。以上结果说明免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统全面提高了土壤环境质量。
     2 免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统对水稻植株的影响
     免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统有利于提高水稻生长前中期的叶面积指数、干物重以及水稻根系的活力,后期由于免耕不动土,影响了根系下扎,根系有早衰现象,叶面积指数也受到影响,但后期这三项指标与常规翻耕比仍然处于优势。水稻植株茎叶氮、磷、钾含量在齐穗期以前也表现出免耕养鸭处理的优势,齐穗期后,则翻耕略高于免耕。穗粒性状考查表明,免耕稻-鸭复合系统水稻的有效穗数、每穗总粒数、结实率都得到了提高,理论产量每公顷增加了197kg,实际产量每公顷增加了141k8,增产幅度分别达2.5%、2.3%,产量增加显著。
     3 免耕稻-鸭复合系统的综合效益研究
     免耕稻-鸭复合生态系统具有强大的生态功能,产生了较好的生态效益:免耕的稻鸭复合生态系统利用鸭子除虫、除病、除草,不施农药和除草剂也能获得明显的防治病虫草害的效果,而且保护了天敌,防治效果稳定,大大减少了对农田生态环境的污染;而且免耕养鸭处理降低了晚稻甲烷排放高峰--分蘖盛期排放通量的40.4%,整个生育期排放总量降低了28.8%,这对于改善全球的温室气体效应具有
    
    重大意义;免耕稻一鸭复合生态系统在早稻生长后期不断水,不晒田,发挥了稻田
    生态系统集雨蓄水的作用,每公顷可节约灌溉用水1300 ms。经济效益方面,免耕
    养鸭增产显著,每公顷增加纯收入4390元,节约农药、除草剂以及机耕费用920
    元,产投比比对照增加了将近60地免耕抛秧养鸭极大地缓和了农忙时期机耕、畜
    力和劳力紧张强度,降低了农民的劳动强度,对提高农民种粮积极性有很大现实意
    义,同时生产了无公害农产品,满足了消费者对绿色食品的需求,产生了较好的社
    会效益。
     综合以上结果表明,免耕稻一鸭复合生态系统将兔耕与养鸭有机地结合起来,
    全面提高了土壤环境质量,改善了水稻植株性状,增加产量、提高稻田的产出和效
    率、降低成本,还为社会提供了优质的生态米、生态鸭、生态蛋,同时能降低农田
    污染、减少甲烷排放,节约灌溉用水,生态效益显著。实验证明兔耕稻一鸭复合生
    态系统是经济效益、生态效益、社会效益的最佳结合,将成为一种很有发展潜力的
    生态农业模式。
This research put forward a new ecological agriculture mode -Rice-Duck ecological management with no-tillage, and studied soil environment, plant characteristics, ecological benefits, social and economical benefits of Rice-Duck Complex Ecosystem with no-tillage in the Hunan Agriculture University and Huilongpu Town of NingXiang at the same time. It aimed at affording scientific basis for comprehensive assessment of this new ecological agriculture mode and establishing solid theoretical foundation for extending it.
    Study contents of this experiment included: (1) Constructing Rice-Duck Complex Ecosystem mode with no-tillage; (2) Study on impact of this system on soil environment; (3) Study on impact of this system on plant character; (4) Study on ecological benefits, social and economical benefits of this system. Main results for this study are as follows:
    1. The influence of Rice-Duck Complex Ecosystem with no-tillage upon soil environments
    Compared with tillage(CK), soil bulk density decreased by 2%, soil non-capillary increased 3.28% in 0~5cm soil layer, hi 5~15cm soil layer, soil bulk density have no change and soil non-capillary increased by 1.1%. It showed no-tillage duck-raising was beneficial to improving soil physical characteristics; The contents of soil nutrient increased in 0~5cm soil layer in various degree, compared with CK: organic matter, total N, available N increase 8.8 g/kg, 0.53 g/kg, 77.0 mg/kg, reaching 17.9%, 23.76%, 44.41%, it showed no-tillage duck-raising was beneficial to improving these nutrients; The analyzing of available P, available K showed, duck-raising was beneficial to increasing available P, available K, but no-tillage have no effects on them. The changes of soil nutrients in 5-15cm soil layer didn't show any regular changes, so no-tillage duck-raising can increase the soil fertility of surface layer, but have no effects on middle and lower layer. Eh increased 18.4mv, SRS decrease 83%, resulting in improving of Redox status. The results hereinbefore showed no-tillage duck-raising improved the soil environment obviously.
    2. The influence of Rice-Duck Complex Ecosystem with no-tillage upon plant characteristics
    The Rice-Duck Complex Ecosystem with no-tillage is beneficial to increasing the paddy's LAI, dry matter weight ,and the a-NA oxidation ability of rice root in the earlier
    
    
    
    term and midterm of growth period ,in the latter term, because no tillage resulted in premature senility of rice root, the LAI was affected, but this three were all not in inferior position compared with tillage. The nutrient content of rice plant body increased before heading stage, but decreased after heading stage because of premature senility of rice root, affecting absorption of N, P, K nutrient for paddy. The comparisons of yield characters showed, the effective panicles, total grains per panicle, seed-setting percentage increased, compared with tillage, theory yield, actual yield increased 2.5%, 2.3%, the increment of yield reaching significant level.
    3. The study on comprehensive benefits of rice-duck complex ecosystem with no-tillage
    Rice-duck complex ecosystem with no-tillage has strong ecological function, producing great ecological benefits: because of duck's eating and moving about at the field, it can control plant diseases and insect pests and weeds effectively by not using pesticide and herbicide, and because it protects the natural enemy, the effects are very stable, cutting down the pollution to the cropland ecosystem greatly. Furthermore, the fluxes of methane emission of late rice in full tillering stage of paddy decrease 22.5%, the total methane emission decreased 40.5% from full tillering stage to boot stage compared with tillage. It can reduce .the globe's greenhouse effects, producing great ecological significance. Also it can save water resources 1300 m3hm-2 through gathering rainwater and sluice of rice-duck complex ecosystem. As to economical effects, it increased the yield and the net income per ha. 4390 Yuan, decreased the consumption of pesticide, herbici
引文
[1]徐琪.湿地农田生态系统的特点及其调节[J].生态学杂志.1989,8(3):8~13
    [2]徐琪,杨林章,董元华等,中国稻田生态系统[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998:1~10
    [3]马世骏,李松华主编.中国的农业生态工程[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:56~60
    [4]苏芝仙.草莓—水稻“双千田”栽培模式初探[J].遵义科技.1999(2):8~12
    [5]王德林,费槐林,金千瑜等.稻田两种粮经型新复种方式[J].中国水稻科学,1992,6(4):173~178
    [6]卢升高等.稻田养鱼生态经济效益的初步分析[J].生态学杂志.1988(4):26~29
    [7]王华,黄璜.湿地稻田种养复合生态系统的生态经济效益研究[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(1):71~75,
    [8]陈万友,阮章波.稻香蟹肥鱼跃,优质高产高效[J].农村百事通,1999(10):12~13
    [9]李学军,乔志刚,聂国兴,稻—鱼-蛙立体农业生态效益的研究[J].生态学杂志,2001,20(2):37~40
    [10]冉茂林等.我国稻田养鸭的发展及研究现状[J].中国畜牧杂志,1993,29(5):58~60
    [11]吉野隆雄.稻田养鸭的实用技术[M].东京,农业渔村文化协会.1992,10~16,121~124
    [12]葛凤祥等.稻田放牧鸭群控制蚊幼孳生的实验研究[J].中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1991,2(2):77-79
    [13]中山大学昆虫学研究所.养鸭除虫.害虫生物防治的原理方法[M].科学出版社.1984,286~287
    [14]Masahara M, Hideomi U. Effects of Aigamo Ducks herding on weeding and pest control of duck free ranged in paddy fields. Jpn. Poult. Sci.,1993,30:365-370
    [15]黄璜.农业防灾抗灾救灾应用技术[M].湖南科学技术出版社.1998,70~80
    [16]黄璜,杨志辉,王华,稻鸭复合生态系统甲烷排放规律研究.生态学报,2003,23(5):104~110
    [17]郑永华等.稻鱼鸭复合生态经济效益的初步研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(4):431~434
    [18]杜道灯,陶站.稻田甲烷排放研究.世界农业,1993(9):43
    [19].陶战.稻田甲烷气排放与控制的研究 国外农业环境保护[J] 1992(34)4:1~4
    [20]陈宇良,姚亭,高金和.控制稻田甲烷排放的农业耕作条件的研究[J].农村生态环境,1993,,9(增):43~47
    [21]Isamu, Nouchi et al., 1990, Methanism of methane transport from the
    
    rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physical, [J] 94:59~66
    [22]黄勤,魏朝富,谢德体等.不同耕作制对稻田甲烷排放通量的影响[J].西南农业大学学报,1996,18(6):436~439
    [23]魏朝富,高明,黄勤等.耕种制度对西南地区冬水田甲烷徘放的影响[J].土壤学报,2000,37(2):157~165
    [24]李晶,王明星,陈德章.水稻田甲烷减排方法研究[J].中国农业气象,1997,18(6):9~14
    [25]陶战,杜道灯,周毅等.稻田施用沼渣对甲烷排放通量的影响[J].农村生态环境学报,1994,10(3):1~4
    [26]冉茂林.稻鸭共栖的水稻增产效应[J].宜宾科技,1991,(4):27~30
    [27]黄璜,王华,龙江松,等.稻田围栏养鸭[M].金盾出版社,2002:15~30
    [28]赵化春,王晓丽,任禾.少耕法与免耕法的起源和发展前景[J].吉林农业科学,1991,1:85~88
    [29]李新举,张志国,邓基先,等.免耕对土壤生态环境的影响[J].山东农业大学学报,1998,29(4):520~526.
    [30]周凌云.农田秸杆覆盖节水效应研究[J].生态农业研究.1996,4(3):49~52
    [31]彭祖厚.少耕免耕法研究的进展与展望[J].陕西农业科学,1998.(2):9~12
    [32]罗永藩.我国少耕与免耕技术推广应用情况与发展前景[J].耕作与栽培,1991 (2):1~7
    [33]Wills. W.O.,Tillage management principles soil temperature effects. Proc, National Conserv. Tillage conference. Des Moiness Ions, 1973:22~44
    [34]Baker J.L ,Johnson H.The effect of tillage systems on pesticides in runoff from small watersheds. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng, 1979(22):554-559
    [35]Dalal R. L. Long-term effects of no-tillage crop residue and nitrogen application on properties of averitisol, Soil-Sci-Am-J 1989,53(3):1511~1515
    [36]黄国勤,钟树福.少、免耕及其在中国的实践[J],农牧情报研究.1993(3):26~30
    [37]籍增顺.国外免耕农业研究[J].山西农业科学.1994,22(3):63~68
    [38]谢德体,魏朝富,杨剑虹.自然免耕下的稻田生态系统[J].应用生态学报,1994,5(4);415~421
    [39]魏家瑜.稻田畦作少耕法经济效益测试[J].福建农学院学报(自然科学版),1993,22(1):121~125
    [40]王昌全,魏成明,李廷强.不同免耕方式对作物产量和土壤理化性状的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2001,19(6):152~153
    [41]李华兴,卢维盛,刘远金.不同耕作方法对水稻生长和土壤生态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(4):553~556
    [42]Palma R. M., Arrigo N. M., Saubidet M. I.. Chemical and biochemical
    
    properties as potential indicators of disturbances .Biol Fertil Soils (2000) 32: 381-384
    [43]陈友荣,侯任昭,范仕容,等.水稻免耕法及其生理生态效应的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1993,14(2):10~17.
    [44] Wander M.M. , Bidart M.G..Tillage practice influences on the physical protection, bioavailability and composition of particulate organic matter. Biol Fertil Soils ,2000(32):360~367
    [45]黄庆,李康活,刘怀珍,等.广东水稻免耕抛秧高产栽培技术规程[J].广东农业科学,2000(6):12~14.
    [46]刘军,黄庆,刘怀珍.水稻免耕抛秧的特点及高产技术[J].作物杂志,2000(4):11~12
    [47]叶组堂.水稻免耕直播栽培技术探析.中国稻米.2001(3):24~25
    [48]施彩仙.免耕与翻耕直播对土壤特性及水稻生长的影响[J].土壤肥料,1999,(5):8~10
    [49]黄梅,黄璜,甘德欣.晚稻免耕抛秧养鸭技术研究试验初报[J].湖南农业大学学报,2003(3):211~214
    [50]谷义成等.稻鸭共栖[J],耕作与栽培,1989(2):46
    [51]华林等.稻田露宿养鸭的五大优点十项技术[J],农村科技开发1999(2):17
    [52]侯光炯,赖守悌,谢德体等.水田自然免耕技术综合研究报告[J].西南农业大学学报增刊,1998(4)
    [53]刘伟.北方稻田立体种养高效农田生态经济效益分析[J].农业技术经济,1999(1):63~64
    [54]邹冬生,余铁桥.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995:248~261
    [55]朱自均,郑钦玉,王光明,等.稻—鸭—鱼立体种养方式的条件作用及技术措施[M].西南农业学报,1996,9(1):81~85
    [56]童泽霞.稻田养鸭与稻田生物种群的关系初探.中国稻米,2002(1):33~34
    [57]郑永华,邓国彬.稻鱼鸭种养共生模式效益的研究及综合评价[J].生态农业研究,1998,6(1):48~51
    [58]刘怀珍,黄庆,李康活等:水稻连续免耕抛秧对土壤理化性状的影响初报[J],2000(5):8~11
    [59]王昌金,魏成明,李廷强等.不同免耕方式对作物产量和土壤理化性状的影响[J].2001,19(2):152~154
    [60]谢德体,曾觉廷.水田自然免耕土壤肥力特征的研究[J].中国农业科学,1990,23(1):37~44
    [61]谢德体,魏朝富,曾觉廷.水田自然免耕土壤有机质变化特性研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1991,13(4);434~437
    [62] McCarty G. W., Meisinger J. J.. Effects of N fertilizer treatments on biologically active N pools insoils umder plow and no tillage. Biol Fertil Soils(1997)24:406-412
    
    
    [63]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海科学技术出版社,1978:96~106
    [64]李阜棣、喻子牛、何绍江主编.农业微生物学实验技术[M].中国农业出版社,1996:82~83
    [65] Kabir Z., Halloran I.P.O' , P. widden, C. Hamel .Vertical distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under corn (Zea mays L.)in no-till and conventional tillage systems .Mycorrhiza ,1998(8):53~56
    [66]肖剑英,张磊,谢德体等.长期免耕稻田土壤微生物与肥力的关系研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2002,24(1):82~85
    [67]殷士学.土壤微生物生物量及其与养分循环关系的研究进展[J]。土壤学进展。1993,21(4):1~8
    [68]张磊,肖剑英,谢德体等.长期免耕水稻田土壤的生物特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(2):111~114
    [69]]许德海,禹盛苗.无公害高效益稻鸭共育新技术[J].中国稻米,2002(3):36~37
    [70]农作物田间试验方法[M].湖南人民出版社,1977:11~16
    [71]刘然金,杜金来.水稻少免耕增产机制的探讨.西南农业学报[J],1998,11(2);45~51
    [72]刘敬宗,等.杂交水稻免耕抛秧栽培技术研究初报.杂交水稻,1999,14(3):47~51
    [73]刘军,黄庆,付华等.水稻免耕抛秧高产稳产的生理基础研究[J].中国农业,2002,35(2):152~156
    [74]李康活,黄庆,陆秀明等.双季稻免耕抛秧栽培技术试验初报[J].广东农业科学,1997(3):2~5
    [75]张锐,常毅.气相色谱法测定沼气中甲烷含量[J].甘肃科学学报,1990,2(3):79~82
    [76]Dick W. A.,Daniel T. C .Soil chemical and biological properties ad affected ty conservation tillage:environmental implications. In: Logan T, Davidson J ,Baker j, (eds)Effects of conservation tillage on groundwater quality: nitrates and pesticides. Chelsea, Mich.:Lewis Publishers. PP 315-319
    [77]陈友云,侯任昭,范仕容等.水稻免耕法及其生理生态效应的研究.华南农业大学学报,1993 14(2);10~17
    [78]沈新平,黄丽芬,庄恒扬等.免耕水稻早发及产量形成特性研究[J],扬州大学学报(自然科学版),1998,1(4):41~44
    [79]黄璜.湖南境内隐形水库与水库韵集雨功能[J].湖南农业大学学报,1997,23(6):499~503
    [80]黄梅.农业生产与水资源的协调发展的现状与对策[J].湖南农业科学,2003(3):5~7
    [81]陈立云,李国泰,刘国华等.三系杂交水稻新组合新香优80的选育[J].湖南农业大学学报.1997,23(4):316~319 .

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700