中上扬子克拉通盆地沉积层序充填过程与演化模式
|
摘要
论文以现代沉积学、层序地层学、古生物学、石油地质学和构造地质学以及板块构造和活动论为指导,按照“构造控盆→盆控层序控相→层序与相控成藏要素”的整体思路,以反映盆地整体特性的构造-层序(二级层序)为基础,以反映盆地充填格架的层序地层(三级层序)为单元,以反映层序沉积充填过程的层序结构、体系域叠置方式(四级以上层序)和相带分布规律为剖析对象,采用钻井与露头剖面观察、地层与层序地层划分与对比、分析化验数据分析和地球物理资料解释等多种方法相结合,对中上扬子克拉通盆地沉积层序充填过程进行了分析、建立了沉积演化模式,并探讨了层序充填格架中成藏要素的发育特征、分布规律及其控制因素。取得主要新认识如下:
1.根据前人对克拉通盆地的分类成果,结合中上扬子克拉通盆地的个性特征,提出克拉通的三级分类方案:Ⅰ级分类按板块构造位置分、Ⅱ级分类结合盆地的动力学成因划分、Ⅲ级分类根据层序沉积建造类型细分。并将中上扬子震旦纪-中三叠世克拉通演化过程划分为四个阶段:震旦纪-早奥陶世早期(第Ⅰ阶段)、早奥陶世晚期-志留纪(第Ⅱ阶段)、泥盆纪-石炭纪(第Ⅲ阶段)、二叠纪-中三叠世(第Ⅳ阶段)。
2.以构造-层序岩相古地理为指导,采用“优势相”编图方法,补充新资料、新认识,在前期研究成果基础上,对构造-层序古地理进行修编,加强了研究区主要烃源岩、储集层、礁滩和膏盐岩等油气成藏物质分布特征的表现。分析认为,横向上,中上扬子沉积域包括两部分:中上扬子克拉通内盆地和克拉通边缘盆地。纵向上,加里东期的整体古地理面貌,在都匀运动前为西高东低的平缓台地为主的沉积体系,后期,因川中、黔中与雪峰等古隆起抬升,形成受古隆起分割、围限的陆棚为主的沉积体系;海西期中上扬子克拉通主体隆升、边缘裂陷沉积,即中部高边缘低,海水由边缘向克拉通内部渐进侵入,沉积体系受深大断裂、海平面变化与古地貌等因素控制,以陆棚-台地-盆地体系为主;三叠纪时期,以安县运动为分界,结束了海相克拉通盆地演化阶段,进入陆相前陆盆地与坳陷盆地演化阶段。
3.通过层序结构、叠加样式与沉积相分布规律等时空变化特征分析,揭示构造-层序充填演化过程及其控制因素。认为各种控制因素(包括基底构造特征、构造运动、深大断裂、古隆起、古地理背景、相对海平面变化、古气候和古纬度,以及区域构造特征等)通过对层序沉积充填的边界条件、古地理背景、沉积环境、物源性质、层序结构和叠加样式等方面的影响来控制层序发育,因此各因素的控制作用因时因地而异,从而导致构造-层序沉积充填的差异性。
4.对研究区不同演化阶段具有代表性的几种典型克拉通盆地(克拉通内裂陷碳酸盐岩型盆地、克拉通内坳陷碎屑岩型盆地、克拉通边缘裂陷碳酸盐岩型盆地与克拉通边缘裂陷-克拉通内裂陷-坳陷碳酸盐岩型盆地)的沉积充填过程与特征进行剖析,认为同时期不同类型的盆地,以及同类型盆地在不同时期,其层序充填、演化过程与控制因素存在明显差异。
5.基于盆地演化阶段、沉积格局、沉积充填特征与层序发育控制因素等方面考虑,将中上扬子震旦纪-中三叠世克拉通盆地的沉积演化阶段划分为两大旋回共7个阶段,建立了各沉积演化阶段的综合沉积模式,从模式特征、演化过程、控制因素以及油气地质意义等方面综合对比了中上扬子克拉通盆地沉积演化模式的差异性。
6.开展了中上扬子克拉通盆地层序格架中的主要油气成藏要素(生烃物质、储烃物质、封盖物质与礁滩地质体和膏盐岩地质体等)研究,对各成藏要素在层序格架中的发育特征、分布规律和控制因素进行分析和探讨。认为:
(1)中上扬子地区震旦纪-古生界层序格架中的成烃物质聚集分布规律主要受构造背景、盆地性质、古气候、古地理以及沉积环境等因素控制,与各种成因引起的海平面上升的关系密切,并且总是聚集分布于低能缺氧环境。纵向上,发育多套烃源岩,并选择性地集中发育于海侵体系域以及沉积旋回的中下部;横向上,层序格架内海相烃源岩在各地区差异保存,烃源岩Ⅰ级有利区主要分布川东-鄂西、桂北-黔南以及四川盆地的广大地区。
(2)层序格架中的高能沉积环境、岩溶区和有利的成岩环境,以及构造复合作用是形成优质储层的主控条件。储层的发育与全球二级海平面升降旋回中的高位期具有明显的一致性;同时,二级海平面旋回中的三级海侵旋回也为有利区域性储层发育的层位。海退旋回的晚期有利于古岩溶型的碳酸盐岩储层发育,而海侵旋回的初期-早期,有利于台地边缘或台内滨外滩的碳酸盐岩储层发育。
(3)礁滩类储层的控制因素分为礁滩形成发育方面的控制因素和储层物性方面的控制因素,它们分别控制储层的宏观分布特征与微观储集性能。早寒武世沧浪铺期滩体主要分布在扬子地区北缘保康地区,以及从云南永善,经贵州金沙、川东彭水至湖北宜昌一线的广大地区;川东北地区长兴组-嘉陵江组发育礁滩组合,主要呈带状分布于台地边缘,台内浅滩也比较发育。
(4)膏盐岩作为特殊地质体,其发育和分布受海平面变化、沉积环境、古气候、沉积速度和沉降速度,以及后期构造作用等因素控制。按封盖作用由强到弱的分布规律是:①中-下三叠统膏盐岩分布最广,在上扬子的四川盆地广泛分布,中扬子的当阳和沉湖地区也有分布;②中-下寒武统膏盐岩主要分布在四川盆地西南部-黔西北地区和川东南地区;③上震旦统灯影组封盖层主要分布在川西南-黔西北地区;④下石炭统蒸发岩零星分布,仅主要分布在湘中地区。
With the guidance of modern sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, paleontology, petroleum geology, structural geology and the theories of plate tectonics and activity , in accordance with the general idea of“tectonic-controlled basin→basin-controlled sequence and facies→sequence and facies -controlled reservoiring elements”, and based on the tectonic-sequence (second-order sequence) that indicates the overall characteristics of basin, the sequence stratigraphy (third-order sequence) that indicates the filling framework of basin is taken as the research unit. Meanwhile, the sequence configuration, superimposed modes (above fourth-order sequence) and the distribution pattern of facies belts are taken as the research objects, besides that some combined methods including drilling, exposure and profile observations, classification and correlation of stratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy, assay data analysis and geophysical data interpretation are used. Accordingly, the filling process of sedimentary sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze cratonic basins are analyzed, besides that the sedimentary and evolutionary modes are built, and the development characteristics, distribution pattern and controlling factors of accumulation factors of filling framework of sequence are discussed. The main new achievements are as follows:
1. According to the previous results and the personality traits of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins,the three-levels classification scheme of cratonic basin is proposed. It means that theⅠlevel basin classification is classified according to the plate tectonic position, theⅡlevel classification according to the dynamic origin of basin, and theⅢlevel detailed classification according to the building types of sequence deposition. And the evolution process of Middle-upper Yangtze cratonic during Sinian to middle Triassic period is divided into four stages that are the Sinian to the early Ordovician early(PhaseⅠ), the late early Ordovician to Silurian(PhaseⅡ),the Devonian to Carboniferous(PhaseⅢ) and the Permian to middle Triassic(PhaseⅣ).
2. With the guidance of tectonic stratigraphic paleogeographic, and according to the compiling method of advantaged sedimentary facies, also based on the previous research achievements, the tectonic sequence paleogeographic maps were revised with new materials and understanding, on which the distribution features of hydrocarbon accumulation material, such as the main source rocks, reservoir, reef-beach and anointed halite, etc. were strengthened. Analyzed that on transverse distribution the sedimentary domain of middle-upper Yangtze included two parts that were intercratonic basin and pericrationic basin. On Vertical distribution, taking DouYun movement as dividing line during Caledonian stage, prior to it the overall paleogeographic outlook were west high and east low with the main sedimentary system of gently platform,and after it the overall paleogeographic outlook were segmented and restircted shelf sedimentary system by tectonic uplifling of central Sichuan uplify,central Guizhou uplift and Xuefeng uplift and so on. During Hercynian stage, the overall paleogeographic outlook were central high and edge low as a result of most regions uplifted and rim crack trapped and accept deposits where seawater gradually invaded from the edge to the internal in middle-upper Yangze craton. And the main sedimentary environment were shelf- platform- basin system that was controlled by the factors of deep faults, sea-level changes and paleogeomorphology etc. To the Triassic period, this evolutionary stages of marine craton basin were over due to the Anxian movement, in the meanwhile entered into the new evolutionary stages of continental foreland basin and downwarped basin.
3.According to analyze the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the stratigraphic structure, systems tracts superposition style and sedimentary facies distribution, the filling evolution process of tectonic stratigraphic and its control factors are brought to light.The opinions are that various control factors including basal tectonic characteristics, tectonic movement and deep fault, ancient uplift, paleogeographic background, relative sea-level changes, ancient climate and ancient latitude, and regional tectonic characteristics, etc. controlled the stratigraphy development by the influence of the filling conditions of sequence,such as paleogeographic background, sedimentary environment, provenance properties, sequence configuration and superposition style and so on. So the controlling function of various factors change in different times or different areas which leads to the differences of the filling process of tectonic sequence
4. Based on the analysis of the process and characteristics of sedimentary filling about several typical craton basins in different evolutionary stages of the researched areas,which include the carbonate rock type of intracratonic rift basin, clastic rock type intracratonic sag basin, carbonate rock type cratonic margin rift basin and the intracratonic rift to sag basin. Conclusion is that the sequence filling, evolution and control factors of the different types of basins at the same period and the same type basin at different times are significantly different.
5. Based on various consideration about basin evolutionary stages, sedimentary structure, sedimentary filling characteristic and the stratigraphic development control factors, the sedimentary evolution of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins during Sinian to middle Triassic can be divided into two sedimentary cycles and a total of seven sedimentary stages.And its comprehensive depositional pattern about each sedimentary evolution stage are established. Furthermore, the differences of the sedimentary evolution model of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins were comprehensive compared on the aspects of characteristics, evolution process, control factors and petroleum geological significance, etc
6.After launched the researches of the major hydrocarbon accumulation elements,such as hydrocarbon generating material,storing material and sealing material, reef - beach geological body and gypsum rock,and the analysis of the development characteristic, distribution and control factors in the sequence stratigraphic framework of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins, views are as folloes.
(1)The aggregation and distribution of hydrocarbon substances in the sequence framework of middle-upper Yangtze during Sinian to Paleozonic were controled by tectonic setting, basin properties, paleoclimate, paleogeography and depositional environment and other factors,and have a close relationship with sea level rise caused by a variety of factors, and always accumulated and distributed in low-energy anoxic environment. On vertical distribution,multiple sets of source rocks developed and selectively concentrated developed in the transgressive systems tract and the middle-lower sedimentary cycle. On transverse distribution , marine hydrocarbon source rocks differently preserved in stratigraphic framework of various regions. The high quality source rocks mainly distributed from eastern Sichuan to western Hubei,northern Guangxi to southern Guizhou and the large areas of Sichuan basin.
(2)High-energy depositional environment, karst area,favorable diagenetic environment and the combined effects of Structure in the sequence framework were the master conditions of the forming of high quality reservoirs. Reservoir development has obvious consistency with high water system tract in the second cycles of global sea level; Meanwhile, the third cycles of transgression in the level 2 sea-level cycles were beneficial to the development of regional reservoir. And the late regression cycles were conducive to the development of ancient carbonate karst reservoir. While the initial to early transgressive cycles were conducive to the carbonate reservoirs of platform edge, or the offshore beach within platform.
(3)The controlling factors of reef-beach reservoir are divided into the developmental control factors of reef-beach formation and the reservoir physical properties that are respectively control the macro- reservoir distribution and the micro-reservoir properties. According to analysis found that the beach in Canglangpuan stage of early Cambrian are mainly distributed in BaoKang regions, northern Yangtze and distuibuted in a vast area from Yongshan, Yunnan to Jinsha,Guizhou,and Pengshui,Eastern Sichuan to Yichang,Hubei. In addition, the reef-beach combination from Changxing group to the jialing group in the northeast of sichuan are mainly as zonal distributed in the platform edge. And the inner platform shoals are also relatively development.
(4)The gypsum as a special geological rock that its development and distribution were influenced by many factors, such as sea-level changes, sedimentary environment, climate, deposition rate,settling velocity and post-tectonic, etc. According to the block function from strong to weak, the distribution rules are as follows:①The lower - middle Triassic gypsum rocks are most widely distributed in the vast areas of Sichuan basin,and from DangYang to ChenHu region,Hebei Province;②The lower - middle Cambrian gypsum rocks are mainly distributed in the southwestern sichuan basin to northwest guizhou and southeast sichuan as well;③Sealing layer in the Dengying group of the upper Sinian are mainly distributed in the southwest Sichuan to northwest guizhou;④The evaporation rocks of the lower Carboniferous are sporadically distributed,and only mainly in the central Hunan.
1.根据前人对克拉通盆地的分类成果,结合中上扬子克拉通盆地的个性特征,提出克拉通的三级分类方案:Ⅰ级分类按板块构造位置分、Ⅱ级分类结合盆地的动力学成因划分、Ⅲ级分类根据层序沉积建造类型细分。并将中上扬子震旦纪-中三叠世克拉通演化过程划分为四个阶段:震旦纪-早奥陶世早期(第Ⅰ阶段)、早奥陶世晚期-志留纪(第Ⅱ阶段)、泥盆纪-石炭纪(第Ⅲ阶段)、二叠纪-中三叠世(第Ⅳ阶段)。
2.以构造-层序岩相古地理为指导,采用“优势相”编图方法,补充新资料、新认识,在前期研究成果基础上,对构造-层序古地理进行修编,加强了研究区主要烃源岩、储集层、礁滩和膏盐岩等油气成藏物质分布特征的表现。分析认为,横向上,中上扬子沉积域包括两部分:中上扬子克拉通内盆地和克拉通边缘盆地。纵向上,加里东期的整体古地理面貌,在都匀运动前为西高东低的平缓台地为主的沉积体系,后期,因川中、黔中与雪峰等古隆起抬升,形成受古隆起分割、围限的陆棚为主的沉积体系;海西期中上扬子克拉通主体隆升、边缘裂陷沉积,即中部高边缘低,海水由边缘向克拉通内部渐进侵入,沉积体系受深大断裂、海平面变化与古地貌等因素控制,以陆棚-台地-盆地体系为主;三叠纪时期,以安县运动为分界,结束了海相克拉通盆地演化阶段,进入陆相前陆盆地与坳陷盆地演化阶段。
3.通过层序结构、叠加样式与沉积相分布规律等时空变化特征分析,揭示构造-层序充填演化过程及其控制因素。认为各种控制因素(包括基底构造特征、构造运动、深大断裂、古隆起、古地理背景、相对海平面变化、古气候和古纬度,以及区域构造特征等)通过对层序沉积充填的边界条件、古地理背景、沉积环境、物源性质、层序结构和叠加样式等方面的影响来控制层序发育,因此各因素的控制作用因时因地而异,从而导致构造-层序沉积充填的差异性。
4.对研究区不同演化阶段具有代表性的几种典型克拉通盆地(克拉通内裂陷碳酸盐岩型盆地、克拉通内坳陷碎屑岩型盆地、克拉通边缘裂陷碳酸盐岩型盆地与克拉通边缘裂陷-克拉通内裂陷-坳陷碳酸盐岩型盆地)的沉积充填过程与特征进行剖析,认为同时期不同类型的盆地,以及同类型盆地在不同时期,其层序充填、演化过程与控制因素存在明显差异。
5.基于盆地演化阶段、沉积格局、沉积充填特征与层序发育控制因素等方面考虑,将中上扬子震旦纪-中三叠世克拉通盆地的沉积演化阶段划分为两大旋回共7个阶段,建立了各沉积演化阶段的综合沉积模式,从模式特征、演化过程、控制因素以及油气地质意义等方面综合对比了中上扬子克拉通盆地沉积演化模式的差异性。
6.开展了中上扬子克拉通盆地层序格架中的主要油气成藏要素(生烃物质、储烃物质、封盖物质与礁滩地质体和膏盐岩地质体等)研究,对各成藏要素在层序格架中的发育特征、分布规律和控制因素进行分析和探讨。认为:
(1)中上扬子地区震旦纪-古生界层序格架中的成烃物质聚集分布规律主要受构造背景、盆地性质、古气候、古地理以及沉积环境等因素控制,与各种成因引起的海平面上升的关系密切,并且总是聚集分布于低能缺氧环境。纵向上,发育多套烃源岩,并选择性地集中发育于海侵体系域以及沉积旋回的中下部;横向上,层序格架内海相烃源岩在各地区差异保存,烃源岩Ⅰ级有利区主要分布川东-鄂西、桂北-黔南以及四川盆地的广大地区。
(2)层序格架中的高能沉积环境、岩溶区和有利的成岩环境,以及构造复合作用是形成优质储层的主控条件。储层的发育与全球二级海平面升降旋回中的高位期具有明显的一致性;同时,二级海平面旋回中的三级海侵旋回也为有利区域性储层发育的层位。海退旋回的晚期有利于古岩溶型的碳酸盐岩储层发育,而海侵旋回的初期-早期,有利于台地边缘或台内滨外滩的碳酸盐岩储层发育。
(3)礁滩类储层的控制因素分为礁滩形成发育方面的控制因素和储层物性方面的控制因素,它们分别控制储层的宏观分布特征与微观储集性能。早寒武世沧浪铺期滩体主要分布在扬子地区北缘保康地区,以及从云南永善,经贵州金沙、川东彭水至湖北宜昌一线的广大地区;川东北地区长兴组-嘉陵江组发育礁滩组合,主要呈带状分布于台地边缘,台内浅滩也比较发育。
(4)膏盐岩作为特殊地质体,其发育和分布受海平面变化、沉积环境、古气候、沉积速度和沉降速度,以及后期构造作用等因素控制。按封盖作用由强到弱的分布规律是:①中-下三叠统膏盐岩分布最广,在上扬子的四川盆地广泛分布,中扬子的当阳和沉湖地区也有分布;②中-下寒武统膏盐岩主要分布在四川盆地西南部-黔西北地区和川东南地区;③上震旦统灯影组封盖层主要分布在川西南-黔西北地区;④下石炭统蒸发岩零星分布,仅主要分布在湘中地区。
With the guidance of modern sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, paleontology, petroleum geology, structural geology and the theories of plate tectonics and activity , in accordance with the general idea of“tectonic-controlled basin→basin-controlled sequence and facies→sequence and facies -controlled reservoiring elements”, and based on the tectonic-sequence (second-order sequence) that indicates the overall characteristics of basin, the sequence stratigraphy (third-order sequence) that indicates the filling framework of basin is taken as the research unit. Meanwhile, the sequence configuration, superimposed modes (above fourth-order sequence) and the distribution pattern of facies belts are taken as the research objects, besides that some combined methods including drilling, exposure and profile observations, classification and correlation of stratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy, assay data analysis and geophysical data interpretation are used. Accordingly, the filling process of sedimentary sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze cratonic basins are analyzed, besides that the sedimentary and evolutionary modes are built, and the development characteristics, distribution pattern and controlling factors of accumulation factors of filling framework of sequence are discussed. The main new achievements are as follows:
1. According to the previous results and the personality traits of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins,the three-levels classification scheme of cratonic basin is proposed. It means that theⅠlevel basin classification is classified according to the plate tectonic position, theⅡlevel classification according to the dynamic origin of basin, and theⅢlevel detailed classification according to the building types of sequence deposition. And the evolution process of Middle-upper Yangtze cratonic during Sinian to middle Triassic period is divided into four stages that are the Sinian to the early Ordovician early(PhaseⅠ), the late early Ordovician to Silurian(PhaseⅡ),the Devonian to Carboniferous(PhaseⅢ) and the Permian to middle Triassic(PhaseⅣ).
2. With the guidance of tectonic stratigraphic paleogeographic, and according to the compiling method of advantaged sedimentary facies, also based on the previous research achievements, the tectonic sequence paleogeographic maps were revised with new materials and understanding, on which the distribution features of hydrocarbon accumulation material, such as the main source rocks, reservoir, reef-beach and anointed halite, etc. were strengthened. Analyzed that on transverse distribution the sedimentary domain of middle-upper Yangtze included two parts that were intercratonic basin and pericrationic basin. On Vertical distribution, taking DouYun movement as dividing line during Caledonian stage, prior to it the overall paleogeographic outlook were west high and east low with the main sedimentary system of gently platform,and after it the overall paleogeographic outlook were segmented and restircted shelf sedimentary system by tectonic uplifling of central Sichuan uplify,central Guizhou uplift and Xuefeng uplift and so on. During Hercynian stage, the overall paleogeographic outlook were central high and edge low as a result of most regions uplifted and rim crack trapped and accept deposits where seawater gradually invaded from the edge to the internal in middle-upper Yangze craton. And the main sedimentary environment were shelf- platform- basin system that was controlled by the factors of deep faults, sea-level changes and paleogeomorphology etc. To the Triassic period, this evolutionary stages of marine craton basin were over due to the Anxian movement, in the meanwhile entered into the new evolutionary stages of continental foreland basin and downwarped basin.
3.According to analyze the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the stratigraphic structure, systems tracts superposition style and sedimentary facies distribution, the filling evolution process of tectonic stratigraphic and its control factors are brought to light.The opinions are that various control factors including basal tectonic characteristics, tectonic movement and deep fault, ancient uplift, paleogeographic background, relative sea-level changes, ancient climate and ancient latitude, and regional tectonic characteristics, etc. controlled the stratigraphy development by the influence of the filling conditions of sequence,such as paleogeographic background, sedimentary environment, provenance properties, sequence configuration and superposition style and so on. So the controlling function of various factors change in different times or different areas which leads to the differences of the filling process of tectonic sequence
4. Based on the analysis of the process and characteristics of sedimentary filling about several typical craton basins in different evolutionary stages of the researched areas,which include the carbonate rock type of intracratonic rift basin, clastic rock type intracratonic sag basin, carbonate rock type cratonic margin rift basin and the intracratonic rift to sag basin. Conclusion is that the sequence filling, evolution and control factors of the different types of basins at the same period and the same type basin at different times are significantly different.
5. Based on various consideration about basin evolutionary stages, sedimentary structure, sedimentary filling characteristic and the stratigraphic development control factors, the sedimentary evolution of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins during Sinian to middle Triassic can be divided into two sedimentary cycles and a total of seven sedimentary stages.And its comprehensive depositional pattern about each sedimentary evolution stage are established. Furthermore, the differences of the sedimentary evolution model of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins were comprehensive compared on the aspects of characteristics, evolution process, control factors and petroleum geological significance, etc
6.After launched the researches of the major hydrocarbon accumulation elements,such as hydrocarbon generating material,storing material and sealing material, reef - beach geological body and gypsum rock,and the analysis of the development characteristic, distribution and control factors in the sequence stratigraphic framework of the middle-upper Yangtze cratonic basins, views are as folloes.
(1)The aggregation and distribution of hydrocarbon substances in the sequence framework of middle-upper Yangtze during Sinian to Paleozonic were controled by tectonic setting, basin properties, paleoclimate, paleogeography and depositional environment and other factors,and have a close relationship with sea level rise caused by a variety of factors, and always accumulated and distributed in low-energy anoxic environment. On vertical distribution,multiple sets of source rocks developed and selectively concentrated developed in the transgressive systems tract and the middle-lower sedimentary cycle. On transverse distribution , marine hydrocarbon source rocks differently preserved in stratigraphic framework of various regions. The high quality source rocks mainly distributed from eastern Sichuan to western Hubei,northern Guangxi to southern Guizhou and the large areas of Sichuan basin.
(2)High-energy depositional environment, karst area,favorable diagenetic environment and the combined effects of Structure in the sequence framework were the master conditions of the forming of high quality reservoirs. Reservoir development has obvious consistency with high water system tract in the second cycles of global sea level; Meanwhile, the third cycles of transgression in the level 2 sea-level cycles were beneficial to the development of regional reservoir. And the late regression cycles were conducive to the development of ancient carbonate karst reservoir. While the initial to early transgressive cycles were conducive to the carbonate reservoirs of platform edge, or the offshore beach within platform.
(3)The controlling factors of reef-beach reservoir are divided into the developmental control factors of reef-beach formation and the reservoir physical properties that are respectively control the macro- reservoir distribution and the micro-reservoir properties. According to analysis found that the beach in Canglangpuan stage of early Cambrian are mainly distributed in BaoKang regions, northern Yangtze and distuibuted in a vast area from Yongshan, Yunnan to Jinsha,Guizhou,and Pengshui,Eastern Sichuan to Yichang,Hubei. In addition, the reef-beach combination from Changxing group to the jialing group in the northeast of sichuan are mainly as zonal distributed in the platform edge. And the inner platform shoals are also relatively development.
(4)The gypsum as a special geological rock that its development and distribution were influenced by many factors, such as sea-level changes, sedimentary environment, climate, deposition rate,settling velocity and post-tectonic, etc. According to the block function from strong to weak, the distribution rules are as follows:①The lower - middle Triassic gypsum rocks are most widely distributed in the vast areas of Sichuan basin,and from DangYang to ChenHu region,Hebei Province;②The lower - middle Cambrian gypsum rocks are mainly distributed in the southwestern sichuan basin to northwest guizhou and southeast sichuan as well;③Sealing layer in the Dengying group of the upper Sinian are mainly distributed in the southwest Sichuan to northwest guizhou;④The evaporation rocks of the lower Carboniferous are sporadically distributed,and only mainly in the central Hunan.
引文
[1] Allen P A,Allen J R. Basin Analysis Principles and Applications[M].London:Blackwell Scientific,1990.451
[2] Allen PA,Homewood P. Foreland Basin[M]. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publication,1986
[3] Ball A W. Phanerozoic basins of North America. In: A.W.Bally,A.R.Palmer(ed) The Geology of North America-an overview:Geological Society of North America.1989.397-446
[4] Bally A W. Snelson S. Realms of subsidence[J].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 6,1980.9-94
[5] Beaumont C., Quinlan G., Hamilton J. Orogeny and stratigraphy: numerical models of thePalaeozoic in the eastern interior of North America[J].Tectonics, 1988,7(3):389-416
[6] Beaumont C., Tankand A J. Sedimentary basin-forming mechanism[J].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir,1987
[7] Cross T A. And Lessenger M A, Sediment Volume Partitioning: Rationale for Stratigraphic Model Evaluation and High~Resolution Stratigraphic Correlation[R]. Accepted for publication in Norwegian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume, 1996. 1-24.
[8] Cross T A. Controls on coal distribution in transgressive-regressive cycles, Upper Cretaceous, Western Interior, D.S.A. In:Wilgans c k, et al. Sea~level changes:Anintergrated approach[J]. SEPM Sepecial Publication, 42,1988, 371-380.
[9] Cross T A. Straigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata(地层因素对陆相沉积储层特征的控制)[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):322-350.
[10] Cross T.A.,Applications of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy in petroleum exploration and pnouetion short course Notes[J]. Canadian Society of Petroleum geologists,1993:290.
[11] Deming D. Cratastrophic release of heat and fluid flow in the continental crust[J]. Journal of Geology,1992,20:83-86
[12] Derito R F, Cozzarell F A, Hodge D S. Mechanism of subsidence in ancient cratonic rift basins[J]. Tectonophysic,1993,94:141-168
[13] Dickinson W R. Basin geodynamics[J].Basin Research.1993,5:195-196
[14] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonic evolution of sedimentary basin[J].AAPG Continuing Education Course Notes Series 1,1976, pp. 62
[15] Galloway W E.Genetic stratigraphic sequence in basin analysis(I):architecture and genetics of flooding surface bounded by depositional unites[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):125-142.
[16] Ingersol R V and Busby C J. Tectonics of sedimentary basins.In: Busby C J,Ingersol R V.eds.Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins[J].Cambridge:Blackwell,1995.1-51.
[17] Ingersoll R V. Tectonics of sedimentary basins[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,1988,100:1704-1709
[18] Johnson J G., Klapper G,Sandberg C A. Devonian eustatic fluctuation in Eurameria[J].Geological Socitery of America Bulletin, 1985, 96:567-87.
[19] Klein G D.Intracratonic basins.In:Busby C J. Ingersoll R.V. eds[J].Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins.Blackwell Science,1995.459-477
[20] Krapez B. Sequence stratigraphic concepts applied to the identification of basin-filling rhythems in Precambrian successions. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences,1996,43(3): 355-380.
[21] Leighton M A, Kolata D R. Selected interior cratonic basins and their place in the scheme ofglobal tectonics [M]//LeightonM W, Kolata D R, Oltz D F , et al Interior Cratonic Basins.American Association of Petroleum GeologyMemoir, 1990, 51:727-797.
[22] Leighton M W.Introduction to Interior cratonic basins.in:M.W.Leighton,D.R.Kolata et al(ed.) Interior Cratonic Basins. AAPG Memoir 1991,51:l-24
[23] Mckenzie D P.Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins[J].Earth and PlanetaryScience Letters,1978,40:25-30
[24] Miall A D. Sequence stratigraphy and their chronostratigraphical correlation. Jour sediment petrol,1991,61(4):497-505.
[25] Posamentier H W, et al. Variability of the sequence stratigraphic model effects of local basin factors[J]. Sedimentary Geology,1993,86:91-109
[26] Price L C. Basin richness and source rock disruption-a foundamental relationship?[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology,1994,17(1)
[27] Shanley, K. W.. Perspectives on the Sequence Stratigraphy of Continental Strata[J]. AAPG,1994,78:544-568.
[28] Sloss L L.Tectonic evolution of the craton in Phanerozoie time.In:Sloss L.L.(ed.) Sedimentary cover:North American Craton:Geological Society of America.The Geology of North America,1988,(2):25-51
[29] Vail P R and Hardenbol J R. Effect of sea level change on shelf-slope boundary. AAPG Bulletin 1981,65(5):1003.
[30] Vail P R,Mitchum R M. Global cycles of relative changes of sea level from seismic stratigraphy (in Geological and geophysical investigations of continental margins). Memoir -American Association of Petroleum Geologists,1979,(29):469-472.
[31] Vail P R. Seismic stratigraphy and the evaluation of depositional sequences and facies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society.1983,73(1):278.
[32] Vail P R. Sequence stratigraphy workbook,fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.AAPG Annual Conventio n Short Course:Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation of Seismic Well and Outcrop Data[J].AAPG, 1998:217-223.
[33] Watts A B. Lithospheric flexure due to prograding sediment loads-imphcations for the origin of offalp/onlap patterns in sedimenfary basins[J].Basin Research, 1989, 2:133-144
[34] Ziegler P A. Plate tectonics,plate moving mechanisms and rifting[J].Tectonophysics,1992,215:9-34
[35]蔡勋育,韦宝东,赵培荣.南方海相烃源岩特征分析[J].天然气工业.2005,25(3):20-24.
[36]陈安定.南方海相"有效烃源岩"定义及丰度下限[J].南方油气.2004,17(3):1-4.
[37]陈方鸿,谢庆宾,王贵文.碳酸盐岩成岩作用与层序地层学关系研究--以鄂尔多斯盆地寒武系为例[J].岩相古地理.1999,19(1):20-24.
[38]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2009,36(6):569-577
[39]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区碳酸盐岩储层发育分布规律及主控因素[J].矿物岩石.2009,29(4):7-15.
[40]陈洪德,庞林,倪新锋等.中上扬子地区海相油气勘探前景[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):13-18
[41]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165-171.
[42]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510-521.
[43]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质.2004,25(1):62-69.
[44]陈洪德,钟怡江,侯明才等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J].石油与天然气地质. 2009,30(5):539-547
[45]陈洪德等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[J].四川科学技术出版社,1994.
[46]陈洪德等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架.成都理工大学学报,2006,33(1):1-8
[47]陈洪德等.中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统构造-层序岩相古地理研究及编图[内部报告],2002.
[48]陈践发,张水昌,鲍志东,等.海相优质烃源岩发育的主要影响因素及沉积环境[J].海相油气地质.2006,11(3):49-54.
[49]陈义才,沈忠民,罗小平编著.石油与天然气有机地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[50]范嘉松,吴亚生.世界二叠纪生物礁的基本特征及其古地理分布[J].古地理学报, 2005,7(3): 287-304.
[51]范嘉松,张维.生物礁的基本概念、分类及识别特征[J].岩石学报,1985,1(3): 45-60.
[52]范嘉松.中国生物礁与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1996
[53]龚一鸣,杜远生,童金南,等.旋回地层学:地层学解读时间的第三里程碑[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2008,33(4):443-457
[54]巩恩普,张永利,关长庆,等.世界石炭纪生物礁发育基本特征[J].古地理学报,2010,12(2)
[55]巩恩普.中国石炭纪生物礁[M].辽宁沈阳:东北大学出版社, 1997:1-112.
[56]贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987:484-485.
[57]郭彤楼,田海芹.南方中古生界油气勘探的若干地质问题及对策[J].石油与天然气地质.2002,23(3):244-247.
[58]何登发,黄大众,曹守连,吕修祥.克拉通盆地分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[59]何登发.克拉通盆地的油气地质理论与实践[J].勘探家,1996,1(1):18-24
[60]何国琦,李茂松,周辉.论大陆岩石圈形成过程中的克拉通化阶段[J].地学前缘, 2002, 9(4): 217-224.
[61]何鲤,罗潇,刘莉萍,等.试论四川盆地晚二叠世沉积环境与礁滩分布[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):28-32
[62]洪海涛,王一刚,杨天泉,等.川北地区长兴组沉积相和生物礁气藏分布规律[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):38-41
[63]蒋志斌,王兴志,张帆,等.四川盆地北部长兴组—飞仙关组礁、滩分布及其控制因素[J].中国地质,2008,35(5):940-949
[64]金善燏,鞠天吟.中国南方震旦纪—三叠纪生物礁分布特征、成因及储集性能的研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1998,50-70.
[65]金之钧,龙胜祥,周雁,等.中国南方膏盐岩分布特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(5): 571-583.
[66]金之钧.中国海相碳酸盐岩层系油气勘探特殊性问题[J].地学前缘.2005,12(3):15-22.
[67]匡立春,王东坡.克拉通盆地的综合研究——成因与方法[J].世界地质,1995,14(4):20-28
[68]黎平,陈景山,王振宇.塔中地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层形成控制因素及储层类型研究[J].天然气勘探与开发.2003,26(1):37-42..
[69]李国蓉,王鑫,周心怀,等.碳酸盐岩层序地层储层预测--十万大山地区的应用[J].石油与天然气地质.2006,27(3):413-421.
[70]李书兵,张克银,张淑彬,等.《四川盆地中西部沉积演化与储层特征研究》.中石化西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院报告,2007
[71]李思田.沉积盆地的动力学分析[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):1-8
[72]李天义,何生,杨智.海相优质烃源岩形成环境及其控制因素分析[J].地质科技情报.2008,27(6):63-70.
[73]李晓清,汪泽成,张兴为,等.四川盆地古隆起特征及对天然气的控制作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,04期
[74]李忠,雷雪,晏礼.川东石炭系黄龙组层序地层划分及储层特征分析[J].石油物探,2005,44(1):39-43
[75]梁狄刚,郭彤楼,陈建平,等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一)--南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布[J].海相油气地质.2008,13(2):1-16.
[76]林良彪,陈洪德,朱利东.川东地区吴家坪组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].油气地质与采收率.2009,16(6):42-45.
[77]林小兵,李国忠,田景春,等.黔南石炭系层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2007,34(3):267-272.
[78]刘波,钱祥麟,王英华.克拉通盆地类型及成因机制综述[J].地质科技情报,1997,16(4):23-28
[79]刘春燕,林畅松,吴茂炳,等.中国生物礁时空分布特征及其地质意义[J].世界地质.2007,26(1):44-51.
[80]刘光祥.中上扬子北缘中古生界海相烃源岩特征[J].石油实验地质.2005,27(5):490-495.
[81]刘和甫,李景明,李晓清,等.中国克拉通盆地演化与碳酸盐岩——蒸发岩层序油气系统[J].现代地质, 2006, 20(1): 1-18.
[82]刘和甫.沉积盆地动力学分类及构造样式分析[J].地球科学,1993,18(6)
[83]刘殊,甘其刚.海相及湖相碳酸盐岩储层预测--层序地层学技术在储层预测中的应用[J].石油物探.2003,42(2):169-178.
[84]刘树根,罗志立.从华南板块构造演化探讨中国南方油气藏分布的规律性[J].石油学报.2001,22(4):24-30.
[85]刘树根,徐国盛,徐国强,等.四川盆地天然气成藏动力学初探[J].天然气地球科学,2004,04期
[86]柳祖汉,杨孟达,刘新华,等. 2000.湖南晚古生代生物礁[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社, 1-26.
[87]陆亚秋,龚一鸣.海相油气区生物礁研究现状、问题与展望[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2007,32(6):871-87
[88]陆亚秋,龚一鸣.海相油气区生物礁研究现状、问题与展望[J].地球科学--中国地质大学学报.2007,32(6):871-878.
[89]罗平,张静,刘伟,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩油气储层基本特征[J].地学前缘.2008,15(1):36-50.
[90]罗志立,刘树根,刘顺.四川盆地勘探天然气有利地区和新领域探讨(上)[J].天然气工业,2000,04期
[91]罗志立,刘树根,刘顺.四川盆地勘探天然气有利地区和新领域探讨(下)[J].天然气工业,2000,05期
[92]罗志立,刘树根.中国塔里木、鄂尔多斯、四川克拉通盆地下古生界成藏条件对比分析[A].见:罗志立,李景明,刘树根等编.中国板块构造和含油气盆地分析[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.454-546
[93]马力,陈焕疆,甘克文等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[94]马永生,蔡勋育.四川盆地川东北区二叠系—三叠系天然气勘探成果与前景展望[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(6):741-750
[95]马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[96]马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等.中国南方构造-层序岩相古地理图集:震旦纪-新近纪[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[97]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银等.关于开江—梁平海槽的认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):326-331
[98]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义[J].地质论评,2003(3):315.
[99]牟书令,金之钧,刘家铎,等.中国海相油气勘探理论技术与实践[M].北京:地质出版社.2009.
[100]南方分公司勘探开发研究院,《川东北地区油气勘探目标评价》,2003.
[101]南方分公司勘探开发研究院,《川东南Z-S碳酸盐岩油气成藏条件研究及目标优选》,2003.
[102]倪新锋,陈洪德,韦东晓.礁滩复合型气藏物质聚集分布及储层特征研究——以川东北地区普光气田长兴组-飞仙关组为例[J].中国地质2007,34(6):1045-1054
[103]潘桂棠,肖庆辉,陆松年等.中国大地构造单元划分[J].中国地质,2009,36(1):1-28.
[104]彭作林,郑建京,黄化芳等.中国主要沉积盆地分类[J].沉积学报,1995,13(2):150-159
[105]钱凯,李本亮,许惠中.从全球海相古生界油气田地质共性看四川盆地海相地层天然气勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2003,03期
[106]钱凯,李本亮,许惠中.中国古生界海相地层油气勘探[J].海相油气地质.2002,7(3):1-10.
[107]钱凯,魏国齐,吴世祥.古隆起对四川盆地大气田储层形成分布的控制作用[C].第八届古地理学与沉积学学术会议论文摘要集.
[108]任兴国,罗利,姚声贤,等.川东地区生物礁测井预测方法研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1):41-43.
[109]沈安江,陈子炓,寿建峰.相对海平面升降与中国南方二叠纪生物礁油气藏[J].沉积学报,1999,17(3):367-373.
[110]时志强,彭大钧,伊海生.羌塘盆地侏罗系高分辨率层序地层学及含油气远景[D].成都:成都理工大学,博士学位论文
[111]宋文海.乐山—龙女寺古隆起大中型气田成藏条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,S1期
[112]苏文博.上扬子地台东南缘奥陶纪层序地层及海平面变化研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),1997
[113]唐立章,王亮国,曹烈等,《四川探区油气资源评价》,2002
[114]田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序底界面的物质表现形式-以中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):675-682
[115]汪新伟,沃玉进,张荣强.扬子克拉通南华纪—早古生代的构造—沉积旋回[J].现代地质,2008,22(4):525-533
[116]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2002
[117]王成善,陈洪德,寿建峰等.中国南方二叠纪层序地层划分与对比[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):499-509
[118]王成善,李祥辉,陈洪德等.中国南方二叠纪海平面变化及升降事件[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):536-541
[119]王成善,李祥辉.沉积盆地分析原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003
[120]王鸿祯等.中国层序地层研究[M].广州:广东科技出版社,2000.
[121]王鸿祯等.中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[122]王启颖,李才良,王达俊,等.川东飞仙关组鲕滩气藏控制因素及其储集条件研究[J].海洋石油.2007,27(3):64-69.
[123]王兴志,张帆,马青,等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世—早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2002,20(2):249-253
[124]王一刚,洪海涛,夏茂龙.四川盆地二、三叠系环海槽礁、滩富气带勘探[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):22-27.
[125]王一刚,文应初,张帆,等.川东地区上二叠统长兴组生物礁分布规律[J].天然气工业,1998,18(6):10-15.
[126]卫平生,郭彦如,张景廉,等.古隆起与大气田的关系——中国西部克拉通盆地与中亚卡拉库姆盆地天然气地质比较研究之一[J].天然气地球科学,1998,05期
[127]吴根耀,梁兴,马力.扬子克拉通继承性构造与新生构造并存的时空发育特征及其对海相油气勘探的指导[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(1)
[128]吴根耀,马力.“盆”“山”耦合和脱耦:含油气盆地研究的新思路[A].见:中国石油学会石油地质专业委员会编.油气盆地研究新进展第一辑[C].北京:石油工业出版社, 2003.20-36
[129]吴亚生,范嘉松.生物礁的定义和分类.石油与天然气地质[J],1991,12(3):346-349.
[130]吴义布,龚一鸣,张立军,冯启.华南泥盆纪生物礁演化及其控制因素[J].古地理学报,2010,12(3)
[131]徐怀大译.层序地层学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[132]徐强,刘宝珺 ,何汉漪,等.四川晚二叠世生物礁层序地层岩相古地理编图[J].石油学报,2004,25(02):47-50.
[133]徐胜林,陈洪德,林良彪等川东南地区飞仙关组层序岩相古地理特征[J].中国地质. 2009,36 (5):1055-1064
[134]徐胜林,陈洪德,林良彪等川东南地区下三叠统飞仙关组层序地层与鲕滩展布特征研究[J].石油物探. 2009,48 (6): 578-583
[135]徐世琦.加里东古隆起震旦——寒武系成藏条件[J].天然气工业,1999,06期
[136]许效松,刘宝珺,牟传龙,等.中国中西部海相盆地分析与油气资源[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[137]杨逢清,殷鸿福,杨恒书,等.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史[J].地质学报, 1994, 68(3):208-218
[138]杨家静,王一刚,王兰生,等.四川盆地东部长兴组——飞仙关组气藏地球化学特征及气源探讨[J].沉积学报,2002,02期
[139]杨晓宁,沈安江,陈子炓,等.中国南方二叠纪生物礁油气系统成因类型[J].石油学报,2002,23(3):6-10.
[140]姚建军,陈孟晋,华爱刚,等.川中乐山——龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏条件分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,04期
[141]殷洪福,童金南,丁梅华等.扬子区晚二叠世—中三叠世海平面变化[J].地球科学,1994a,19(5):627-632
[142]殷鸿福等.中国古生物地理学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988.
[143]曾鼎乾,刘炳温,黄蕴明.中国各地质历史时期的生物礁[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988.
[144]张光亚,高世霞.克拉通内盆地研究中的几个重要问题[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1995,2(3-4):89-95
[145]张国伟,程顺有,郭安林,等.秦岭—大别中央造山系南缘勉略古缝合带的再认识—“兼论中国大陆主体的拼合”[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(9-10): 846-853.
[146]张锦泉.上扬子西南缘泥盆纪构造格局与岩相古地理[M].四川成都:成都科技大学出版社.1990.
[147]张景廉,王新民,赵应成,等.深大断裂与大气田的关系——中国西部克拉通盆地与中亚卡拉库姆盆地天然气地质比较研究之二[J].天然气地球科学,1998,05期
[148]张抗.中国克拉通盆地油气成藏特点和勘探思路[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(6):8-13
[149]张立平,王东坡.克拉通盆地形成机制及沉积特征[J].世界地质,1994,13(2):26-31
[150]张水昌,梁狄刚,朱光有,等.中国海相油气田形成的地质基础[J].科学通报.2007,52(增刊):19-31.
[151]张水昌,张宝民,边立曾,等.中国海相烃源岩发育控制因素[J].地学前缘.2005,12(3):39-48.
[152]张廷山,陈晓慧,边立曾,等.大地构造对上扬子区志留纪生物礁分布及发育的控制[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):84-93.
[153]张廷山,姜照勇,陈晓慧.四川盆地古生代生物礁滩特征及发育控制因素[J].中国地质,2008,35(5)
[154]张廷山,兰光志,高卫东,等.中国川西北地区志留纪生物礁[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994.
[155]张维,张孝林.中国南方二叠纪生物礁与古生态[M].地质出版社,1992
[156]张园园,王建坡,马俊业,等.礁滩分类以及在岩芯中的识别[J].古生物学报,2009,48(1):89-101
[157]赵文智,张光亚,何清海,等.中国海相石油地质与叠合含油气盆地[M].北京:地质出版社,2002
[158]赵宗举,范国章,吴兴宁,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩的储层类型、勘探领域及勘探战略[J].海相油气地质.2007,12(1):1-11.
[159]赵宗举,俞广,朱琰,等.中国南方大地构造演化及其对油气的控制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 30(2): 155-168.
[160]赵宗举,朱琰,徐云俊.中国南方古生界—中生界油气藏成藏规律及勘探方向[J].地质学报, 2004, 78 (5): 710-720
[161]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报, 2001,19(2): 249-255.
[162]郑荣才,文华国,李凤杰.高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社,2010
[163]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报, 2000,18(3):369-375.
[164]钟建华,温志峰,李勇,等.生物礁的研究现状与发展趋势[J].地质论评, 2005,51(3): 288-300.
[165]周小进,杨帆.中国南方新元古代—早古生代构造演化与盆地原型分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(5):446-451
[166]朱如凯,郭宏莉,高志勇,等.中国海相储层分布特征与形成主控因素[J].科学通报.2007,52(增刊):40-45.
[167]朱夏.论中国含油气盆地构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1986.
[168]朱忠德,胡明毅,刘秉理,等.中国早中奥陶丗生物礁研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2006
[2] Allen PA,Homewood P. Foreland Basin[M]. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publication,1986
[3] Ball A W. Phanerozoic basins of North America. In: A.W.Bally,A.R.Palmer(ed) The Geology of North America-an overview:Geological Society of North America.1989.397-446
[4] Bally A W. Snelson S. Realms of subsidence[J].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 6,1980.9-94
[5] Beaumont C., Quinlan G., Hamilton J. Orogeny and stratigraphy: numerical models of thePalaeozoic in the eastern interior of North America[J].Tectonics, 1988,7(3):389-416
[6] Beaumont C., Tankand A J. Sedimentary basin-forming mechanism[J].Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir,1987
[7] Cross T A. And Lessenger M A, Sediment Volume Partitioning: Rationale for Stratigraphic Model Evaluation and High~Resolution Stratigraphic Correlation[R]. Accepted for publication in Norwegian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume, 1996. 1-24.
[8] Cross T A. Controls on coal distribution in transgressive-regressive cycles, Upper Cretaceous, Western Interior, D.S.A. In:Wilgans c k, et al. Sea~level changes:Anintergrated approach[J]. SEPM Sepecial Publication, 42,1988, 371-380.
[9] Cross T A. Straigraphic controls on reservoir attributes in continental strata(地层因素对陆相沉积储层特征的控制)[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):322-350.
[10] Cross T.A.,Applications of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy in petroleum exploration and pnouetion short course Notes[J]. Canadian Society of Petroleum geologists,1993:290.
[11] Deming D. Cratastrophic release of heat and fluid flow in the continental crust[J]. Journal of Geology,1992,20:83-86
[12] Derito R F, Cozzarell F A, Hodge D S. Mechanism of subsidence in ancient cratonic rift basins[J]. Tectonophysic,1993,94:141-168
[13] Dickinson W R. Basin geodynamics[J].Basin Research.1993,5:195-196
[14] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonic evolution of sedimentary basin[J].AAPG Continuing Education Course Notes Series 1,1976, pp. 62
[15] Galloway W E.Genetic stratigraphic sequence in basin analysis(I):architecture and genetics of flooding surface bounded by depositional unites[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):125-142.
[16] Ingersol R V and Busby C J. Tectonics of sedimentary basins.In: Busby C J,Ingersol R V.eds.Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins[J].Cambridge:Blackwell,1995.1-51.
[17] Ingersoll R V. Tectonics of sedimentary basins[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,1988,100:1704-1709
[18] Johnson J G., Klapper G,Sandberg C A. Devonian eustatic fluctuation in Eurameria[J].Geological Socitery of America Bulletin, 1985, 96:567-87.
[19] Klein G D.Intracratonic basins.In:Busby C J. Ingersoll R.V. eds[J].Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins.Blackwell Science,1995.459-477
[20] Krapez B. Sequence stratigraphic concepts applied to the identification of basin-filling rhythems in Precambrian successions. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences,1996,43(3): 355-380.
[21] Leighton M A, Kolata D R. Selected interior cratonic basins and their place in the scheme ofglobal tectonics [M]//LeightonM W, Kolata D R, Oltz D F , et al Interior Cratonic Basins.American Association of Petroleum GeologyMemoir, 1990, 51:727-797.
[22] Leighton M W.Introduction to Interior cratonic basins.in:M.W.Leighton,D.R.Kolata et al(ed.) Interior Cratonic Basins. AAPG Memoir 1991,51:l-24
[23] Mckenzie D P.Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins[J].Earth and PlanetaryScience Letters,1978,40:25-30
[24] Miall A D. Sequence stratigraphy and their chronostratigraphical correlation. Jour sediment petrol,1991,61(4):497-505.
[25] Posamentier H W, et al. Variability of the sequence stratigraphic model effects of local basin factors[J]. Sedimentary Geology,1993,86:91-109
[26] Price L C. Basin richness and source rock disruption-a foundamental relationship?[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology,1994,17(1)
[27] Shanley, K. W.. Perspectives on the Sequence Stratigraphy of Continental Strata[J]. AAPG,1994,78:544-568.
[28] Sloss L L.Tectonic evolution of the craton in Phanerozoie time.In:Sloss L.L.(ed.) Sedimentary cover:North American Craton:Geological Society of America.The Geology of North America,1988,(2):25-51
[29] Vail P R and Hardenbol J R. Effect of sea level change on shelf-slope boundary. AAPG Bulletin 1981,65(5):1003.
[30] Vail P R,Mitchum R M. Global cycles of relative changes of sea level from seismic stratigraphy (in Geological and geophysical investigations of continental margins). Memoir -American Association of Petroleum Geologists,1979,(29):469-472.
[31] Vail P R. Seismic stratigraphy and the evaluation of depositional sequences and facies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society.1983,73(1):278.
[32] Vail P R. Sequence stratigraphy workbook,fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.AAPG Annual Conventio n Short Course:Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation of Seismic Well and Outcrop Data[J].AAPG, 1998:217-223.
[33] Watts A B. Lithospheric flexure due to prograding sediment loads-imphcations for the origin of offalp/onlap patterns in sedimenfary basins[J].Basin Research, 1989, 2:133-144
[34] Ziegler P A. Plate tectonics,plate moving mechanisms and rifting[J].Tectonophysics,1992,215:9-34
[35]蔡勋育,韦宝东,赵培荣.南方海相烃源岩特征分析[J].天然气工业.2005,25(3):20-24.
[36]陈安定.南方海相"有效烃源岩"定义及丰度下限[J].南方油气.2004,17(3):1-4.
[37]陈方鸿,谢庆宾,王贵文.碳酸盐岩成岩作用与层序地层学关系研究--以鄂尔多斯盆地寒武系为例[J].岩相古地理.1999,19(1):20-24.
[38]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2009,36(6):569-577
[39]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区碳酸盐岩储层发育分布规律及主控因素[J].矿物岩石.2009,29(4):7-15.
[40]陈洪德,庞林,倪新锋等.中上扬子地区海相油气勘探前景[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):13-18
[41]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165-171.
[42]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510-521.
[43]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质.2004,25(1):62-69.
[44]陈洪德,钟怡江,侯明才等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J].石油与天然气地质. 2009,30(5):539-547
[45]陈洪德等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[J].四川科学技术出版社,1994.
[46]陈洪德等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架.成都理工大学学报,2006,33(1):1-8
[47]陈洪德等.中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统构造-层序岩相古地理研究及编图[内部报告],2002.
[48]陈践发,张水昌,鲍志东,等.海相优质烃源岩发育的主要影响因素及沉积环境[J].海相油气地质.2006,11(3):49-54.
[49]陈义才,沈忠民,罗小平编著.石油与天然气有机地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[50]范嘉松,吴亚生.世界二叠纪生物礁的基本特征及其古地理分布[J].古地理学报, 2005,7(3): 287-304.
[51]范嘉松,张维.生物礁的基本概念、分类及识别特征[J].岩石学报,1985,1(3): 45-60.
[52]范嘉松.中国生物礁与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1996
[53]龚一鸣,杜远生,童金南,等.旋回地层学:地层学解读时间的第三里程碑[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2008,33(4):443-457
[54]巩恩普,张永利,关长庆,等.世界石炭纪生物礁发育基本特征[J].古地理学报,2010,12(2)
[55]巩恩普.中国石炭纪生物礁[M].辽宁沈阳:东北大学出版社, 1997:1-112.
[56]贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1987:484-485.
[57]郭彤楼,田海芹.南方中古生界油气勘探的若干地质问题及对策[J].石油与天然气地质.2002,23(3):244-247.
[58]何登发,黄大众,曹守连,吕修祥.克拉通盆地分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[59]何登发.克拉通盆地的油气地质理论与实践[J].勘探家,1996,1(1):18-24
[60]何国琦,李茂松,周辉.论大陆岩石圈形成过程中的克拉通化阶段[J].地学前缘, 2002, 9(4): 217-224.
[61]何鲤,罗潇,刘莉萍,等.试论四川盆地晚二叠世沉积环境与礁滩分布[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):28-32
[62]洪海涛,王一刚,杨天泉,等.川北地区长兴组沉积相和生物礁气藏分布规律[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):38-41
[63]蒋志斌,王兴志,张帆,等.四川盆地北部长兴组—飞仙关组礁、滩分布及其控制因素[J].中国地质,2008,35(5):940-949
[64]金善燏,鞠天吟.中国南方震旦纪—三叠纪生物礁分布特征、成因及储集性能的研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1998,50-70.
[65]金之钧,龙胜祥,周雁,等.中国南方膏盐岩分布特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(5): 571-583.
[66]金之钧.中国海相碳酸盐岩层系油气勘探特殊性问题[J].地学前缘.2005,12(3):15-22.
[67]匡立春,王东坡.克拉通盆地的综合研究——成因与方法[J].世界地质,1995,14(4):20-28
[68]黎平,陈景山,王振宇.塔中地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层形成控制因素及储层类型研究[J].天然气勘探与开发.2003,26(1):37-42..
[69]李国蓉,王鑫,周心怀,等.碳酸盐岩层序地层储层预测--十万大山地区的应用[J].石油与天然气地质.2006,27(3):413-421.
[70]李书兵,张克银,张淑彬,等.《四川盆地中西部沉积演化与储层特征研究》.中石化西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院报告,2007
[71]李思田.沉积盆地的动力学分析[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):1-8
[72]李天义,何生,杨智.海相优质烃源岩形成环境及其控制因素分析[J].地质科技情报.2008,27(6):63-70.
[73]李晓清,汪泽成,张兴为,等.四川盆地古隆起特征及对天然气的控制作用[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,04期
[74]李忠,雷雪,晏礼.川东石炭系黄龙组层序地层划分及储层特征分析[J].石油物探,2005,44(1):39-43
[75]梁狄刚,郭彤楼,陈建平,等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一)--南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布[J].海相油气地质.2008,13(2):1-16.
[76]林良彪,陈洪德,朱利东.川东地区吴家坪组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].油气地质与采收率.2009,16(6):42-45.
[77]林小兵,李国忠,田景春,等.黔南石炭系层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2007,34(3):267-272.
[78]刘波,钱祥麟,王英华.克拉通盆地类型及成因机制综述[J].地质科技情报,1997,16(4):23-28
[79]刘春燕,林畅松,吴茂炳,等.中国生物礁时空分布特征及其地质意义[J].世界地质.2007,26(1):44-51.
[80]刘光祥.中上扬子北缘中古生界海相烃源岩特征[J].石油实验地质.2005,27(5):490-495.
[81]刘和甫,李景明,李晓清,等.中国克拉通盆地演化与碳酸盐岩——蒸发岩层序油气系统[J].现代地质, 2006, 20(1): 1-18.
[82]刘和甫.沉积盆地动力学分类及构造样式分析[J].地球科学,1993,18(6)
[83]刘殊,甘其刚.海相及湖相碳酸盐岩储层预测--层序地层学技术在储层预测中的应用[J].石油物探.2003,42(2):169-178.
[84]刘树根,罗志立.从华南板块构造演化探讨中国南方油气藏分布的规律性[J].石油学报.2001,22(4):24-30.
[85]刘树根,徐国盛,徐国强,等.四川盆地天然气成藏动力学初探[J].天然气地球科学,2004,04期
[86]柳祖汉,杨孟达,刘新华,等. 2000.湖南晚古生代生物礁[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社, 1-26.
[87]陆亚秋,龚一鸣.海相油气区生物礁研究现状、问题与展望[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2007,32(6):871-87
[88]陆亚秋,龚一鸣.海相油气区生物礁研究现状、问题与展望[J].地球科学--中国地质大学学报.2007,32(6):871-878.
[89]罗平,张静,刘伟,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩油气储层基本特征[J].地学前缘.2008,15(1):36-50.
[90]罗志立,刘树根,刘顺.四川盆地勘探天然气有利地区和新领域探讨(上)[J].天然气工业,2000,04期
[91]罗志立,刘树根,刘顺.四川盆地勘探天然气有利地区和新领域探讨(下)[J].天然气工业,2000,05期
[92]罗志立,刘树根.中国塔里木、鄂尔多斯、四川克拉通盆地下古生界成藏条件对比分析[A].见:罗志立,李景明,刘树根等编.中国板块构造和含油气盆地分析[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2005.454-546
[93]马力,陈焕疆,甘克文等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[94]马永生,蔡勋育.四川盆地川东北区二叠系—三叠系天然气勘探成果与前景展望[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(6):741-750
[95]马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[96]马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等.中国南方构造-层序岩相古地理图集:震旦纪-新近纪[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[97]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银等.关于开江—梁平海槽的认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):326-331
[98]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义[J].地质论评,2003(3):315.
[99]牟书令,金之钧,刘家铎,等.中国海相油气勘探理论技术与实践[M].北京:地质出版社.2009.
[100]南方分公司勘探开发研究院,《川东北地区油气勘探目标评价》,2003.
[101]南方分公司勘探开发研究院,《川东南Z-S碳酸盐岩油气成藏条件研究及目标优选》,2003.
[102]倪新锋,陈洪德,韦东晓.礁滩复合型气藏物质聚集分布及储层特征研究——以川东北地区普光气田长兴组-飞仙关组为例[J].中国地质2007,34(6):1045-1054
[103]潘桂棠,肖庆辉,陆松年等.中国大地构造单元划分[J].中国地质,2009,36(1):1-28.
[104]彭作林,郑建京,黄化芳等.中国主要沉积盆地分类[J].沉积学报,1995,13(2):150-159
[105]钱凯,李本亮,许惠中.从全球海相古生界油气田地质共性看四川盆地海相地层天然气勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2003,03期
[106]钱凯,李本亮,许惠中.中国古生界海相地层油气勘探[J].海相油气地质.2002,7(3):1-10.
[107]钱凯,魏国齐,吴世祥.古隆起对四川盆地大气田储层形成分布的控制作用[C].第八届古地理学与沉积学学术会议论文摘要集.
[108]任兴国,罗利,姚声贤,等.川东地区生物礁测井预测方法研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1):41-43.
[109]沈安江,陈子炓,寿建峰.相对海平面升降与中国南方二叠纪生物礁油气藏[J].沉积学报,1999,17(3):367-373.
[110]时志强,彭大钧,伊海生.羌塘盆地侏罗系高分辨率层序地层学及含油气远景[D].成都:成都理工大学,博士学位论文
[111]宋文海.乐山—龙女寺古隆起大中型气田成藏条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,S1期
[112]苏文博.上扬子地台东南缘奥陶纪层序地层及海平面变化研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),1997
[113]唐立章,王亮国,曹烈等,《四川探区油气资源评价》,2002
[114]田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序底界面的物质表现形式-以中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):675-682
[115]汪新伟,沃玉进,张荣强.扬子克拉通南华纪—早古生代的构造—沉积旋回[J].现代地质,2008,22(4):525-533
[116]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2002
[117]王成善,陈洪德,寿建峰等.中国南方二叠纪层序地层划分与对比[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):499-509
[118]王成善,李祥辉,陈洪德等.中国南方二叠纪海平面变化及升降事件[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):536-541
[119]王成善,李祥辉.沉积盆地分析原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003
[120]王鸿祯等.中国层序地层研究[M].广州:广东科技出版社,2000.
[121]王鸿祯等.中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[122]王启颖,李才良,王达俊,等.川东飞仙关组鲕滩气藏控制因素及其储集条件研究[J].海洋石油.2007,27(3):64-69.
[123]王兴志,张帆,马青,等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世—早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2002,20(2):249-253
[124]王一刚,洪海涛,夏茂龙.四川盆地二、三叠系环海槽礁、滩富气带勘探[J].天然气工业,2008,28(1):22-27.
[125]王一刚,文应初,张帆,等.川东地区上二叠统长兴组生物礁分布规律[J].天然气工业,1998,18(6):10-15.
[126]卫平生,郭彦如,张景廉,等.古隆起与大气田的关系——中国西部克拉通盆地与中亚卡拉库姆盆地天然气地质比较研究之一[J].天然气地球科学,1998,05期
[127]吴根耀,梁兴,马力.扬子克拉通继承性构造与新生构造并存的时空发育特征及其对海相油气勘探的指导[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(1)
[128]吴根耀,马力.“盆”“山”耦合和脱耦:含油气盆地研究的新思路[A].见:中国石油学会石油地质专业委员会编.油气盆地研究新进展第一辑[C].北京:石油工业出版社, 2003.20-36
[129]吴亚生,范嘉松.生物礁的定义和分类.石油与天然气地质[J],1991,12(3):346-349.
[130]吴义布,龚一鸣,张立军,冯启.华南泥盆纪生物礁演化及其控制因素[J].古地理学报,2010,12(3)
[131]徐怀大译.层序地层学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[132]徐强,刘宝珺 ,何汉漪,等.四川晚二叠世生物礁层序地层岩相古地理编图[J].石油学报,2004,25(02):47-50.
[133]徐胜林,陈洪德,林良彪等川东南地区飞仙关组层序岩相古地理特征[J].中国地质. 2009,36 (5):1055-1064
[134]徐胜林,陈洪德,林良彪等川东南地区下三叠统飞仙关组层序地层与鲕滩展布特征研究[J].石油物探. 2009,48 (6): 578-583
[135]徐世琦.加里东古隆起震旦——寒武系成藏条件[J].天然气工业,1999,06期
[136]许效松,刘宝珺,牟传龙,等.中国中西部海相盆地分析与油气资源[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[137]杨逢清,殷鸿福,杨恒书,等.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史[J].地质学报, 1994, 68(3):208-218
[138]杨家静,王一刚,王兰生,等.四川盆地东部长兴组——飞仙关组气藏地球化学特征及气源探讨[J].沉积学报,2002,02期
[139]杨晓宁,沈安江,陈子炓,等.中国南方二叠纪生物礁油气系统成因类型[J].石油学报,2002,23(3):6-10.
[140]姚建军,陈孟晋,华爱刚,等.川中乐山——龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏条件分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,04期
[141]殷洪福,童金南,丁梅华等.扬子区晚二叠世—中三叠世海平面变化[J].地球科学,1994a,19(5):627-632
[142]殷鸿福等.中国古生物地理学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988.
[143]曾鼎乾,刘炳温,黄蕴明.中国各地质历史时期的生物礁[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988.
[144]张光亚,高世霞.克拉通内盆地研究中的几个重要问题[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1995,2(3-4):89-95
[145]张国伟,程顺有,郭安林,等.秦岭—大别中央造山系南缘勉略古缝合带的再认识—“兼论中国大陆主体的拼合”[J].地质通报, 2004, 23(9-10): 846-853.
[146]张锦泉.上扬子西南缘泥盆纪构造格局与岩相古地理[M].四川成都:成都科技大学出版社.1990.
[147]张景廉,王新民,赵应成,等.深大断裂与大气田的关系——中国西部克拉通盆地与中亚卡拉库姆盆地天然气地质比较研究之二[J].天然气地球科学,1998,05期
[148]张抗.中国克拉通盆地油气成藏特点和勘探思路[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(6):8-13
[149]张立平,王东坡.克拉通盆地形成机制及沉积特征[J].世界地质,1994,13(2):26-31
[150]张水昌,梁狄刚,朱光有,等.中国海相油气田形成的地质基础[J].科学通报.2007,52(增刊):19-31.
[151]张水昌,张宝民,边立曾,等.中国海相烃源岩发育控制因素[J].地学前缘.2005,12(3):39-48.
[152]张廷山,陈晓慧,边立曾,等.大地构造对上扬子区志留纪生物礁分布及发育的控制[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):84-93.
[153]张廷山,姜照勇,陈晓慧.四川盆地古生代生物礁滩特征及发育控制因素[J].中国地质,2008,35(5)
[154]张廷山,兰光志,高卫东,等.中国川西北地区志留纪生物礁[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994.
[155]张维,张孝林.中国南方二叠纪生物礁与古生态[M].地质出版社,1992
[156]张园园,王建坡,马俊业,等.礁滩分类以及在岩芯中的识别[J].古生物学报,2009,48(1):89-101
[157]赵文智,张光亚,何清海,等.中国海相石油地质与叠合含油气盆地[M].北京:地质出版社,2002
[158]赵宗举,范国章,吴兴宁,等.中国海相碳酸盐岩的储层类型、勘探领域及勘探战略[J].海相油气地质.2007,12(1):1-11.
[159]赵宗举,俞广,朱琰,等.中国南方大地构造演化及其对油气的控制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 30(2): 155-168.
[160]赵宗举,朱琰,徐云俊.中国南方古生界—中生界油气藏成藏规律及勘探方向[J].地质学报, 2004, 78 (5): 710-720
[161]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报, 2001,19(2): 249-255.
[162]郑荣才,文华国,李凤杰.高分辨率层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社,2010
[163]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报, 2000,18(3):369-375.
[164]钟建华,温志峰,李勇,等.生物礁的研究现状与发展趋势[J].地质论评, 2005,51(3): 288-300.
[165]周小进,杨帆.中国南方新元古代—早古生代构造演化与盆地原型分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(5):446-451
[166]朱如凯,郭宏莉,高志勇,等.中国海相储层分布特征与形成主控因素[J].科学通报.2007,52(增刊):40-45.
[167]朱夏.论中国含油气盆地构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1986.
[168]朱忠德,胡明毅,刘秉理,等.中国早中奥陶丗生物礁研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2006