双低菜粕、稻谷及小麦类型日粮中非淀粉多糖酶制剂的体外筛选与应用效果研究
|
摘要
本研究选择了6种非淀粉多糖酶制剂，以双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦原料以及以它们为基础的日粮为试验材料，采用体外(in vitro)酶解-透析技术，对不同非淀粉多糖酶制剂在双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦日粮中的作用效果从体外进行了评价和筛选，并通过饲养试验探讨了非淀粉多糖酶制剂在双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦日粮中的应用效果。结果如下：
1．体外评价了4种非淀粉多糖酶制剂对双低菜粕和稻谷原料的作用效果，并根据结果进行了筛选。评价指标包括干物质、蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维的消化率。结果表明，在双低菜粕中加入不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，对双低菜粕干物质和蛋白质消化率的改善效果不同，其中酶B极显著(P＜0.01)提高了双低菜粕蛋白质的消化率(68.50％ vs 64.78％)。对稻谷中干物质、蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维的消化率，加入4种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，作用效果也不相同。其中加入酶A和酶B后干物质的消化率相比不加酶组分别提高了54.9％和58.4％，差异极显著(P＜0.01)；加入酶A和酶B后还分别显著(P＜0.05)和极显著(P＜0.01)提高了中性洗涤纤维的消化率，相比不加酶组分别提高了55.9％和72.5％。酶C和酶D对双低菜粕和稻谷中干物质和蛋白质的消化率改善效果都不明显。表明针对双低菜粕和稻谷选择适宜的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可提高双低菜粕和稻谷营养物质的消化率。
2．体外评价了筛选出的2种非淀粉多糖酶制剂在双低菜粕和稻谷日粮中的作用效果，从而对酶制剂在动物日粮中的应用效果进行了预测。结果表明，在稻谷日粮中加入酶A和酶B，稻谷日粮中干物质和蛋白质的消化率相比不加酶组均有显著(P＜0.05)或极显著(P＜0.01)的提高；在双低菜粕日粮中加入酶B，极显著(P＜0.01)改善了双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率。表明在双低菜粕和稻谷日粮中加入非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可改善日粮营养物质的消化率，通过体外评价酶制剂对饲料原料营养物质消化率的改善效果，可反映该酶制剂在相应日粮中的作用效果。
3．用饲养试验探讨了非淀粉多糖酶制剂在稻谷和双低菜粕日粮中的应用效果。结果显示，在稻谷型日粮中加入2种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，生长肥育猪生产性能有明显改善，经济效益明显提高，其中加入酶制剂的两组后期平均日增重分别比不加酶组(615.4g／d，634.0g／d，vs 534.1g／d)高15.22％和18.70％，饲料利用率相比不加酶组(3.76，3.51 vs 4.40)分别显著(P＜0.05)和极显著(P＜0.01)改善；在双低菜粕型日粮中加入酶B，生长肥育猪的生产性能无明显改善，但前期饲料利用率相比不加酶组(2.48vs2.65)有改善趋势。结果表明，在稻谷和双低菜粕日粮中加入以木聚糖酶为主的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可提高日粮营养物质的消化率，改善生长肥育猪的生产性能，并可降低饲料成本，提高经济效益。
双低菜粕、稻谷及小麦类型日粮中非淀粉多糖酶制剂的体外筛选与应用效果研究
4.体外预测了4种不同酶制剂以及同种酶制剂4种不同水平对双低菜粕和小麦
日粮的作用效果。结果表明，不同的酶制剂对双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的改善
效果不同，其中加入酶F后双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率相比不加酶组分
别提高了7.97%和7.23%，改善趋势明显。在双低菜粕日粮中添加酶A，不同添加水
平下对干物质和蛋白质消化率的改善效果不同，其中以中间水平2509八和5009八
作用效果较好。在小麦日粮中加入2种酶制剂作用效果也不相同，其中加入酶E后
小麦日粮蛋白质的消化率比玉米一豆粕日粮高8.3%，差异显著(P<0.05)。表明在双
低菜粕和小麦日粮中加入非淀粉多糖酶制剂可提高日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率，
但酶制剂的种类、来源以及添加水平都会影响非淀粉多糖酶制剂的作用效果，在应
用于动物日粮时应综合考虑这些因素。
5.在前期研究的基础上，选择了4种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，其中酶A设4
个水平，用饲养试验探讨了不同酶制剂不同水平在生长肥育猪双低菜粕日粮和小麦
日粮中的应用效果。结果显示，在双低菜粕中加入4种不同的酶制剂对生长肥育猪
的生产性能改善效果不同。其中加入酶B后生长肥育猪前期平均日增重达到
58一09/d，相比不加酶组(528.69/d)显著提高(P(0.05)，全期平均日增重达到了
880.19/d，相比玉米一豆粕日粮(830.2岁d)显著(P<0.05)提高;加入酶E和酶F
后两组前期料肉比分别达到了2.36和2.39，相比不加酶组饲料利用率(2.50)分
别极显著(P<0.01)和显著(P<0.05)改善。在双低菜粕日粮中添加酶A，酶的添
加水平不同，酶A对生长肥育猪的生产性能改善效果不同，综合来看以中间水平
5009/d为最佳。在小麦日粮中加入酶E，小麦日粮前期饲料利用率(2.25vs2.46)
和平均日增重(9179/d vs 853.39/d)相比玉米一豆粕型日粮都有极显著(P(0. 01)
的改善。结果表明，在双低菜粕和小麦日粮中加入适宜水平的特定酶制剂，可改善
生长肥育猪的生产性能，而在小麦日粮中改善效果更明显。从生长肥育猪对酶制剂
的反应来看，酶制剂在动物幼龄阶段作用效果更明显。
研究表明，选择适宜的NSP酶制剂可改善双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦的营养物质消
化率。应用于生长肥育猪的双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦日粮?
Enzyme supplementation of cereal-based diets can significantly improve the nutritive value of diets and bring further improvement of animal performance. An in vitro incubation system was used to assess six enzyme preparations regarding activities toward the digestbility of dry matter and protein in double-low rapeseed meal, rice and wheat with the objective of identifying those preparations that possessed potential for improvement of the nutrive value of those feeds. Promising preparations were evaluated further in feeding trials utilizing growing-finishing pigs. The results are as follows:
The effects of four enzyme preparations for non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) on the double-low rapeseed meal(DLRM) and rice respectively were evaluated in vitro, and promising preparations were selected according to the results. The indicators included the digestibility of dry matter, protein, and neutral detergent fiber(NDF). The results show that the different promising preparations have the different effects on the digestibility of dry matter and protein. Moreover, enzyme B extremely significantly (P<0. 01) improved the protein digestibility (68. 50% VS 64. 78) of DLRMs. Four enzyme preparations have different effects on the digestibility of nutrients in the rice too. Enzyme A and B inclusions improved significantly (P<0.05) or extremely significantly (P<0.01) the digestibility of dry matter ,protein and NDF in rice. Compared the group without enzyme supplementation, the digestibility of dry matter were improved by 54. 9% and 58. 4% respectively and the digestibility of NDF were improved by 55. 9% and 72.
5% respectively. Enzyme C and D inclusions failed to improved the digestibility of dry matter, protein and neutral detergent
fiber in DLRM and rice. This indicated that the digestibility of nutrients in DLRM and rice might be improved by selecting appropriate enzyme preparations.
The effects of the two selected enzymes on DLRM and rice based diets were predicted by evaluating in vitro. The results indicate that: compared to the negative groups, the digestibility of dry matter and protein in the diets, which were added enzyme A and B respectively, was significantly (P<0.05) or extremely significantly (P<0.01) improved. Enzyme B supplematation significantly (P<0. 05) improved the digestibility of dry matter and protein in the DLRM based diets. This suggested that the digestibility of the nutrients in DLRM and rice diets might be improved by selecting appropriate enzymes. Moreover, the effects of the enzymes on the feed based diets may be predicted by evaluating their activities toward the digestibility of the nutrients in the feeds in vitro.
The practical effects of the enzymes on DLRM and rice based diets were discussed through feeding trial. The results show that the performance of the growing-finishing pigs were improved which were feed by the diets with two different enzyme supplementation. The economic benefit was improved too. Compared to the average daily gain of the negative groups (615. 4g/d, 634.0 g/d, VS 534.1 g/d), in the late period of this trial, the average daily gain of the positive groups, whose diets were added the two different enzymes, were improved by 15. 22%, 18. 70%; moreover, compared to the feed utilization rate of the negative groups (3.76, 3.51 VS 4.40), were significantly (P<0.05) and extremely significantly (P<0.01) improved; however, the performance of the growing pigs feed by the diets with enzyme B inclusion, was not improved notely, but compared to the feed utilization rate of the negative groups (2. 48 VS 2. 65), it showed a improving trend in early stage. This indicates that the performance of the growing-finishing pigs and economic benefit may be improved by adding enzymes for NSP to DLRM and rice based diets.
With four different enzymes and four different levels of the same enzyme supplementation in DLRM and rice based diets, the effects of enzymes on the digestibility of the diets were predicted. The results indicated that: the different enzymes have the different effect on
1．体外评价了4种非淀粉多糖酶制剂对双低菜粕和稻谷原料的作用效果，并根据结果进行了筛选。评价指标包括干物质、蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维的消化率。结果表明，在双低菜粕中加入不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，对双低菜粕干物质和蛋白质消化率的改善效果不同，其中酶B极显著(P＜0.01)提高了双低菜粕蛋白质的消化率(68.50％ vs 64.78％)。对稻谷中干物质、蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维的消化率，加入4种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，作用效果也不相同。其中加入酶A和酶B后干物质的消化率相比不加酶组分别提高了54.9％和58.4％，差异极显著(P＜0.01)；加入酶A和酶B后还分别显著(P＜0.05)和极显著(P＜0.01)提高了中性洗涤纤维的消化率，相比不加酶组分别提高了55.9％和72.5％。酶C和酶D对双低菜粕和稻谷中干物质和蛋白质的消化率改善效果都不明显。表明针对双低菜粕和稻谷选择适宜的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可提高双低菜粕和稻谷营养物质的消化率。
2．体外评价了筛选出的2种非淀粉多糖酶制剂在双低菜粕和稻谷日粮中的作用效果，从而对酶制剂在动物日粮中的应用效果进行了预测。结果表明，在稻谷日粮中加入酶A和酶B，稻谷日粮中干物质和蛋白质的消化率相比不加酶组均有显著(P＜0.05)或极显著(P＜0.01)的提高；在双低菜粕日粮中加入酶B，极显著(P＜0.01)改善了双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率。表明在双低菜粕和稻谷日粮中加入非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可改善日粮营养物质的消化率，通过体外评价酶制剂对饲料原料营养物质消化率的改善效果，可反映该酶制剂在相应日粮中的作用效果。
3．用饲养试验探讨了非淀粉多糖酶制剂在稻谷和双低菜粕日粮中的应用效果。结果显示，在稻谷型日粮中加入2种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，生长肥育猪生产性能有明显改善，经济效益明显提高，其中加入酶制剂的两组后期平均日增重分别比不加酶组(615.4g／d，634.0g／d，vs 534.1g／d)高15.22％和18.70％，饲料利用率相比不加酶组(3.76，3.51 vs 4.40)分别显著(P＜0.05)和极显著(P＜0.01)改善；在双低菜粕型日粮中加入酶B，生长肥育猪的生产性能无明显改善，但前期饲料利用率相比不加酶组(2.48vs2.65)有改善趋势。结果表明，在稻谷和双低菜粕日粮中加入以木聚糖酶为主的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，可提高日粮营养物质的消化率，改善生长肥育猪的生产性能，并可降低饲料成本，提高经济效益。
双低菜粕、稻谷及小麦类型日粮中非淀粉多糖酶制剂的体外筛选与应用效果研究
4.体外预测了4种不同酶制剂以及同种酶制剂4种不同水平对双低菜粕和小麦
日粮的作用效果。结果表明，不同的酶制剂对双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的改善
效果不同，其中加入酶F后双低菜粕日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率相比不加酶组分
别提高了7.97%和7.23%，改善趋势明显。在双低菜粕日粮中添加酶A，不同添加水
平下对干物质和蛋白质消化率的改善效果不同，其中以中间水平2509八和5009八
作用效果较好。在小麦日粮中加入2种酶制剂作用效果也不相同，其中加入酶E后
小麦日粮蛋白质的消化率比玉米一豆粕日粮高8.3%，差异显著(P<0.05)。表明在双
低菜粕和小麦日粮中加入非淀粉多糖酶制剂可提高日粮干物质和蛋白质的消化率，
但酶制剂的种类、来源以及添加水平都会影响非淀粉多糖酶制剂的作用效果，在应
用于动物日粮时应综合考虑这些因素。
5.在前期研究的基础上，选择了4种不同的非淀粉多糖酶制剂，其中酶A设4
个水平，用饲养试验探讨了不同酶制剂不同水平在生长肥育猪双低菜粕日粮和小麦
日粮中的应用效果。结果显示，在双低菜粕中加入4种不同的酶制剂对生长肥育猪
的生产性能改善效果不同。其中加入酶B后生长肥育猪前期平均日增重达到
58一09/d，相比不加酶组(528.69/d)显著提高(P(0.05)，全期平均日增重达到了
880.19/d，相比玉米一豆粕日粮(830.2岁d)显著(P<0.05)提高;加入酶E和酶F
后两组前期料肉比分别达到了2.36和2.39，相比不加酶组饲料利用率(2.50)分
别极显著(P<0.01)和显著(P<0.05)改善。在双低菜粕日粮中添加酶A，酶的添
加水平不同，酶A对生长肥育猪的生产性能改善效果不同，综合来看以中间水平
5009/d为最佳。在小麦日粮中加入酶E，小麦日粮前期饲料利用率(2.25vs2.46)
和平均日增重(9179/d vs 853.39/d)相比玉米一豆粕型日粮都有极显著(P(0. 01)
的改善。结果表明，在双低菜粕和小麦日粮中加入适宜水平的特定酶制剂，可改善
生长肥育猪的生产性能，而在小麦日粮中改善效果更明显。从生长肥育猪对酶制剂
的反应来看，酶制剂在动物幼龄阶段作用效果更明显。
研究表明，选择适宜的NSP酶制剂可改善双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦的营养物质消
化率。应用于生长肥育猪的双低菜粕、稻谷和小麦日粮?
Enzyme supplementation of cereal-based diets can significantly improve the nutritive value of diets and bring further improvement of animal performance. An in vitro incubation system was used to assess six enzyme preparations regarding activities toward the digestbility of dry matter and protein in double-low rapeseed meal, rice and wheat with the objective of identifying those preparations that possessed potential for improvement of the nutrive value of those feeds. Promising preparations were evaluated further in feeding trials utilizing growing-finishing pigs. The results are as follows:
The effects of four enzyme preparations for non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) on the double-low rapeseed meal(DLRM) and rice respectively were evaluated in vitro, and promising preparations were selected according to the results. The indicators included the digestibility of dry matter, protein, and neutral detergent fiber(NDF). The results show that the different promising preparations have the different effects on the digestibility of dry matter and protein. Moreover, enzyme B extremely significantly (P<0. 01) improved the protein digestibility (68. 50% VS 64. 78) of DLRMs. Four enzyme preparations have different effects on the digestibility of nutrients in the rice too. Enzyme A and B inclusions improved significantly (P<0.05) or extremely significantly (P<0.01) the digestibility of dry matter ,protein and NDF in rice. Compared the group without enzyme supplementation, the digestibility of dry matter were improved by 54. 9% and 58. 4% respectively and the digestibility of NDF were improved by 55. 9% and 72.
5% respectively. Enzyme C and D inclusions failed to improved the digestibility of dry matter, protein and neutral detergent
fiber in DLRM and rice. This indicated that the digestibility of nutrients in DLRM and rice might be improved by selecting appropriate enzyme preparations.
The effects of the two selected enzymes on DLRM and rice based diets were predicted by evaluating in vitro. The results indicate that: compared to the negative groups, the digestibility of dry matter and protein in the diets, which were added enzyme A and B respectively, was significantly (P<0.05) or extremely significantly (P<0.01) improved. Enzyme B supplematation significantly (P<0. 05) improved the digestibility of dry matter and protein in the DLRM based diets. This suggested that the digestibility of the nutrients in DLRM and rice diets might be improved by selecting appropriate enzymes. Moreover, the effects of the enzymes on the feed based diets may be predicted by evaluating their activities toward the digestibility of the nutrients in the feeds in vitro.
The practical effects of the enzymes on DLRM and rice based diets were discussed through feeding trial. The results show that the performance of the growing-finishing pigs were improved which were feed by the diets with two different enzyme supplementation. The economic benefit was improved too. Compared to the average daily gain of the negative groups (615. 4g/d, 634.0 g/d, VS 534.1 g/d), in the late period of this trial, the average daily gain of the positive groups, whose diets were added the two different enzymes, were improved by 15. 22%, 18. 70%; moreover, compared to the feed utilization rate of the negative groups (3.76, 3.51 VS 4.40), were significantly (P<0.05) and extremely significantly (P<0.01) improved; however, the performance of the growing pigs feed by the diets with enzyme B inclusion, was not improved notely, but compared to the feed utilization rate of the negative groups (2. 48 VS 2. 65), it showed a improving trend in early stage. This indicates that the performance of the growing-finishing pigs and economic benefit may be improved by adding enzymes for NSP to DLRM and rice based diets.
With four different enzymes and four different levels of the same enzyme supplementation in DLRM and rice based diets, the effects of enzymes on the digestibility of the diets were predicted. The results indicated that: the different enzymes have the different effect on
引文
1 王之祥．利用稻谷研制配合饲料取得新进展．中国饲料，1993，8：21
2 王进波，潘翔，刘建新．纤维对单胃动物消化生理功能的影响．中国饲料，2000，18：22-24
3 王在钧，张洁．低硫甙菜籽饼作为生长猪蛋白质饲料的研究．饲料工业，1999，2：20-23
4 王在钧，张洁，王春凤，罗启达．低硫甙菜籽饼在生长猪日粮中的应用．中国饲料．1999，1：9-11
5 王修启，李春喜，林东康，常绢，秦磊．小麦中的戊聚糖含量及添加木聚糖复酶对鸡表观代谢能值和养分消化率的影响．动物营养学报，2002，14：57-59
6 王冉摘译，Choct Mingan著．非淀粉多糖的化学结构和营养特性．国外畜牧科技，1998，25：9-14
7 冯定远，Shen Y R，Chavez E R．添加酶制剂及其它降低亚麻籽抗营养因子措施的应用效果．见：韩友文主编，中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会，哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，270-274
8 冯定远，刘玉兰．饲用酶制剂应用的影响因素及在猪日粮中应用的效果．饲料工业，1999．20：1-4
9 刘强，汪儆，雷祖玉，冯学勤，张子仪．小麦日粮粘滞性及小麦黏度的研究．动物营养学报，1999，11：44-50
10 齐广海，郑君杰．饲料原料及添加剂应用技术问答．北京：中国农业科技出版社．2000
11 许梓荣，李卫芬，孙建义．大麦型日粮中添加非淀粉多糖酶对仔猪生长和消化性能的影响．中国畜牧杂志，2001，37：23-24
12 孙哲，汪儆，雷祖玉，冯学勤，娄玉杰．小麦可溶性非淀粉多糖对肉仔鸡小肠粘膜二糖酶活性的影响．动物营养学报，2003，15：26-30
13 刘燕强，韩正康．大麦的营养特性及其抗营养因子—B-葡聚糖的研究进展．动物营养学报．1998，10：1-8
14 李德发．展望21世纪饲料工业发展趋势．中国饲料，1999，1：4-5
15 李建凡，高振川，姜云侠，张琪．中国菜籽饼的营养成分和抗营养因子．畜牧兽医学报，1995，26：193-199
16 张运涛．非淀粉多糖的抗营养作用．饲料研究，1999，3：20-22
17 张洁，王在钧．低硫甙菜籽饼对生长肥育猪生长表现效应试验．养猪，1999，4：23-24
18 张德福，李德发，朴香淑，刘慕钦．双低菜籽粕在生长猪日粮中的应用探讨．见：韩友文主编，中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会，哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，240-244
19 何瑞国，马立保，熊统安，王玉莲，林发光，张小元．早籼稻糙米代替玉米对60kg肥育
猪生长和肉品质影响的研究．养猪，2000，1：26-27
20 何瑞国，马立保，王玉莲，和希顺，郑桂菊，张顺喜．饲粮中糙米代替玉米对中猪增重效果的研究．养猪，1999，1：25-26
21 杨胜．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术．北京：北京农业大学出版社．1999．
22 汪儆，明根·朝格图．非淀粉多糖及其对家禽的抗营养作用．动物营养学报，1996．8：1-13
23 余伯良．发酵饲料生产与应用新技术．北京：中国农业出版社，1999
24 余东游，冯杰．早籼稻饲粮中添加非淀粉多糖酶对生长猪效应试验．2001，1：23-24
25 陈勇，张慧玲．饲用酶制剂的应用研究．粮食与饲料工业，1999，8：35-37
26 陈璐，吴子林．当前我国饲料工业中存在的主要问题．中国饲料，1999，21：7-9
27 陆伟，何余涌，谢国强，梁海平，王博，陈匡辉．全早稻型猪用浓缩料饲喂杜长大生长肉猪的研究．养猪，1999，2：16-17
28 郑国华，黄会萱，胡友战，韦启鹏，蒋云生．稻谷型饲粮养猪研究．见：韩友文主编。中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会。哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，256-259
29 郑学玲，李利民，朱永义，姚惠源．戊聚糖在小麦中的分布规律及其与灰分、白度相关性的研究．中国粮油学报，2002，17：19-22
30 贺建华，徐庆国．饲料用稻谷和糙米的营养特性．中国水稻科学，2000．14：229-232
31 侯炳炎．饲料工业用酶进展．动物科学与动物医学，2001，18：4-5
32 徐建雄，崔立，陈鲁勇．非淀粉多糖酶对仔猪早期生产性能和消化性能的影响．动物营养学报，2001，13：56-59
33 梁海平，陈匡辉，陆伟，谢国强，王博．何余涌．全早稻型猪用浓缩料饲喂生长肉猪中试报告．养猪，1999，2：18
34 彭健．中国双低油菜饼粕品质评价和品质改进研究．[博士学位论文] 武汉：华中农业大学图书馆，2000
35 彭健，Slominski B A，Guenter W，Campbell L D，熊远著．中国双低菜粕抗营养因子研究．中国粮油学报，2001，5：6-9
36 彭健，Compell L D．Slominski B A，Guenter W．猪对“双低”菜粕氨基酸消化率的研究．华中农业大学学报，1999，18：571—574。
37 彭健．日粮纤维定义、成分、分析方法及加工影响．猪与禽，1999，4：8—11
38 彭健，吴梅芳，熊远著，周法耜，刘澄清，邹祖文．“双低”菜籽饼等氮替代豆粕饲喂生长肥育猪试验．中国饲料，1995，24：13-16
39 蒋宗勇．饲用酶制剂的生产及在动物饲养中的应用．饲料工业，1992，13：7-9
40 澹台炳琰，张兆兰，赵国先，高瑞清．猪离体消化试验的不同处理方法对饲料干物质和蛋白质消化率的影响．河北农业大学学报，1992，15：62-65
41 Annison G. Relationship between the levels of soluble non-starch polysaccharides and the apparent metabolizable energy of wheats assayed in broiler chickens. J of Agri and Food Chemi, 1991, 39:1252-1256
42 Annison G, Choet M, Cheetham N W. Analyis of arabinoxylans from a large-sede isolation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1992, 19:151-159
43 Annison G. The Chemistry of Dietary Fiber. In: Samman S, Annison G eds., Dietary Fiber and Beyond-Australian Perspectives. Australia Nutrition Society of Australia Occasional Publications, 1993: 1-16
44 Babinszky L, Meer J M, Boer H, Hartog L A. An In-Vitro Method for Prediction of the Digestible Crude Protein Content in Pig Feeds. J Sci Food Agric 1990, 50: 173-178
45 Baidoo S K, Liu Y G. Hulless barley for swine: ileal and faecal digestibility of proximate nutrients, amino acids and non-starch polysaccharides.J of the Sci of Food and Agri,1998, 76:397-403
46 Baidoo S K, Liu Y G, Grandhi R R. Exogenous enzymes and hulless barley utilization by young pigs.Proceedings of the 1998 Feed Grain quality Conference. 1998a,Alberta, Canada
47 Baidoo S K, Liu YG, Yungblut D. Effect of microbial enzyme supplementation on energy, amino acid digestibility and performance of pigs fed hulless barley based diets. Can J Anim Sci, 1998b, 78:625-631
48 Boisen S, Eggum B O. Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simple-stomach animals. Nutr Res Rev, 1991, 4:141-162
49 Bedford M R. Mechanism of action and potential environmental benefits from the use of feed enzymes. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 1995, 53:145-155
50 Bedford M R, Schulz H. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutri Res Rev, 1998,1:91-114
51 Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and arabinoxylanase concentration is effected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueons phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion effectiency of broiler chicks. J of Nutri, 1992, 122:560-569
52 Bedford M R, Classen H L, Campbell G L. The effect of pelleting, salt, and pentosanase on the viscosity of intestinal contents and the performance of broilers fed rye. Poul Sci,1991, 70:1571-1577
53 Bell J M. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meals: A review. Can J Anim Sci,73:679-697
54 Bell J M, Keith M O, Hutcheson D S, Nutritional evaluation of very low glucosinolate canola meal, Can J Anim Sci, 71:497-506
55 Campbell G L, Rossnagel B F, Classen H L, Thacker P A. Genotypic and environmental differences in extract viscosity of barley and their relationship to its nutritive value for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1989, 26:221-230
56 Campbell L D, Liang D S, Slominski. Nutritive Value of Enzyme Pre-treated Canola Meal. Proceeding of the international rapeseed conference ,2001, Wuhan, China
57 Campbell L D, Bedford M R. Enzyme application for monogastric Feeds: a review. Can J Anim Sci,1992,72: 449-466.
58 Chesson A. Feed enzymes. Animal Feed Science and technology, 1993, 45:65-79
59 Choct M, Annison G. Anti-nutritive activity of Wheat pentosans in broiler diets. Bri Poul Sci, 1990, 31:811-822
60 Choct M, Annison G. The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. Bri J Nutri, 1992a, 67:123-132
61 Choct M, Annison G. Antinutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Bri Poul Sci, 1992b, 33: 821-834.
62 Choct M, Annison G, Trimble R P. Soluble wheat pentosans exhibit different anti-nutritive activities in intact and caecectomized broiler chickens. J of Nutri, 1992, 122:2457-2465
63 Choct M, Hughes R J, Trimble R P, Angkanaporn K, Annison G. Non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes increase the performance of broiler chickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. J of Nutri, 1995, 125:485-492
64 Choct M, Hughes R J, Wang J, Bedford M R, Morgan A J, Annison G. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. Brih Poul Sci, 1996, 37:609-621
65 Classen H L, Campbell G L, Grootwassink J W D. Improved feeding value of Saskatchewan-grown barley for chickens with dietary enzyme supplementation. Can J of Anim Sci,1988, 68:1253-1259
66 Cowan W D. Advances in feed enzyme technology. Anim Feed Sci and Techno 1992, 60: 311-319
67 Cowan, W D, Korsbak A, Hastrup T, Rasmussen P B. Influence of added microbial enzymes on energy and protein availability of selected feed ingredients. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1996, 60:311-319
68 Dierick N A, Decuypere J A. Enzymes and growth in pigs. In: Cole D J A, Wseman J, VarJey M eds.,Principals of Pig Science. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 1994. 169-195
69 Gill B P, Schulze H. Effect of diet processing and enzyme supplementation of Wheat-based diets on growing pig performance. Anim Sci, 1996, 62:662
70 Gdala Jolanta, Johansen H N. The digestibility of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the small and large intestine of piglets fed non-supplemented and enzyme supplemented diets, Anlm Feed Sci Techno, 1997, 65:15-33
71 Habberer B, Schulz E, Flachowsky G. Effects of β -glucanase and xylanase supplementation in pigs fed a diet rich in non-starch polysaccharides: disappearance and disappearance rate of nutrients including the non-starch polysaccharides in stomach and small intestine. J Anim Physi and Anim Nutri,1998,78:95-103
72 Hesselman K, Aman P. The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low or high viscosity. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1986, 15:83-103
73 Huang R L, Tan Z L, Xing T X, Pan, Li T J. An in vitro method for the estimation of ileal crude protein and amino acids digestibility using the dialysis tubing for pig feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 2000, 88:79-89
74 Inborr J, Schmitz M, Ahrens F. Effect of adding fiber and starch degrading enzymes to a barley/wheat based diet on performances of the small intestine of early weaned pigs, Anim Feed Sci Techno, 1993, 44:113-127
75 Inborr J. Practical application of feed enzymes. Hed Compounder, 1990,10:41-49
76 Inborr J, Ogle R B. Effect of enzyme treatment of piglet feeds on performance and post weaning diarrhea. Swed J Agri Res, 1988, 18:129-133
77 Low A G. Secretory response of the pig gut to non-starch polysaccharides. Anim Feed Sci and Techno,1989, 23:55-65
78 Marquardt R R, Brenes A, Zhang Z, Boros, Use of enzymes to improve nutrient availability in poultry feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci and Techno 1996, 60:321-330
79 Monro J A. A nutritionally valid procedure for measuring soluble dietary fiber. Food Chemistry, 1993, 47:187-193
80 Moran E T, Jrtall S P, Summers J D. The feeding value of rye for the growin chick: effect of enzyme supplements, antibiotics, autodaving and geographical area of production. Poul sci, 1968, 48:939-949
81 Moughan P J. In vitro techniques for the assessment of the nutritive value of feed grains for pigs: a review. Austr J Agri Res,1999, 50:871-879
82 Rotter B A, Marquardt R R, Guenter W, Biliaderis C, Newmall C W. In vitro viscosity measurements of barley extracts as predictors of growth responses in chicks fed barley-based diets supplemented with a fungal enzyme preparation. Can J Anim Sci,
1989, 69:431--439
83 Slominski B A, Campbell L D. Non-starch Polysaccharides of Canola Meal: Quantification, Digestibility in Poultry and Potential Benefit of Dietary Enzyme Supplementation. J Sci Food Agri, 1990, 53:175-184
84 Simbaya J, Slominski B A, Guenter W, Morgan A, Campbell L D. The effects of protease and carbohydrase supplementation on the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry :In vitro and in vivo studies. Anim Feed Sci Techno, 1996, 61:219-234
85 Simbaya J, Slominski B A. Quality Characteristics of Yellow-seeded Brassica Seed Meals:Protein, Carbohydrates, and Dietary Fiber Components, J of Agri and Food Chemi, 1995, 43
86 Schulze H, Partridge G G, Gill B P. The use of different xylanase sources and a protease in wheat-based diets for weaned pigs. Animal Production, 1996b, 62:663
87 Schulze H, Pearce A N, Rose S P. The effect of six different wheat cultivars of similar bushel weight on growth performance of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 1997, 75:197
88 Thacker P A, Baas T C. Effect of gastric pH on the activity of exogenous pentosanase and the effect of pentosanase supplementation of the diet on the performance of growthing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1996, 63:187-200
89 Thacker P A, Campbell G L, GrootWssink J. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye-based diets for swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1991, 71:489—496
90 Wiseman J, McNab J M. Numtins value of wheat varieties fed to non-raminants. HGCA Report NO. 3. Home Grown Cereals Authority, 1998, Nottingham, UK
91 Zhang Z ,Marquard R R, Wang G, Guenter W, Crow G H, Han Z K, Bedford M R. A simple model for predicting the response of chicks to dietary enzyme supplementation, J. Anim Sci, 1996, 74:394-402
2 王进波，潘翔，刘建新．纤维对单胃动物消化生理功能的影响．中国饲料，2000，18：22-24
3 王在钧，张洁．低硫甙菜籽饼作为生长猪蛋白质饲料的研究．饲料工业，1999，2：20-23
4 王在钧，张洁，王春凤，罗启达．低硫甙菜籽饼在生长猪日粮中的应用．中国饲料．1999，1：9-11
5 王修启，李春喜，林东康，常绢，秦磊．小麦中的戊聚糖含量及添加木聚糖复酶对鸡表观代谢能值和养分消化率的影响．动物营养学报，2002，14：57-59
6 王冉摘译，Choct Mingan著．非淀粉多糖的化学结构和营养特性．国外畜牧科技，1998，25：9-14
7 冯定远，Shen Y R，Chavez E R．添加酶制剂及其它降低亚麻籽抗营养因子措施的应用效果．见：韩友文主编，中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会，哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，270-274
8 冯定远，刘玉兰．饲用酶制剂应用的影响因素及在猪日粮中应用的效果．饲料工业，1999．20：1-4
9 刘强，汪儆，雷祖玉，冯学勤，张子仪．小麦日粮粘滞性及小麦黏度的研究．动物营养学报，1999，11：44-50
10 齐广海，郑君杰．饲料原料及添加剂应用技术问答．北京：中国农业科技出版社．2000
11 许梓荣，李卫芬，孙建义．大麦型日粮中添加非淀粉多糖酶对仔猪生长和消化性能的影响．中国畜牧杂志，2001，37：23-24
12 孙哲，汪儆，雷祖玉，冯学勤，娄玉杰．小麦可溶性非淀粉多糖对肉仔鸡小肠粘膜二糖酶活性的影响．动物营养学报，2003，15：26-30
13 刘燕强，韩正康．大麦的营养特性及其抗营养因子—B-葡聚糖的研究进展．动物营养学报．1998，10：1-8
14 李德发．展望21世纪饲料工业发展趋势．中国饲料，1999，1：4-5
15 李建凡，高振川，姜云侠，张琪．中国菜籽饼的营养成分和抗营养因子．畜牧兽医学报，1995，26：193-199
16 张运涛．非淀粉多糖的抗营养作用．饲料研究，1999，3：20-22
17 张洁，王在钧．低硫甙菜籽饼对生长肥育猪生长表现效应试验．养猪，1999，4：23-24
18 张德福，李德发，朴香淑，刘慕钦．双低菜籽粕在生长猪日粮中的应用探讨．见：韩友文主编，中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会，哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，240-244
19 何瑞国，马立保，熊统安，王玉莲，林发光，张小元．早籼稻糙米代替玉米对60kg肥育
猪生长和肉品质影响的研究．养猪，2000，1：26-27
20 何瑞国，马立保，王玉莲，和希顺，郑桂菊，张顺喜．饲粮中糙米代替玉米对中猪增重效果的研究．养猪，1999，1：25-26
21 杨胜．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术．北京：北京农业大学出版社．1999．
22 汪儆，明根·朝格图．非淀粉多糖及其对家禽的抗营养作用．动物营养学报，1996．8：1-13
23 余伯良．发酵饲料生产与应用新技术．北京：中国农业出版社，1999
24 余东游，冯杰．早籼稻饲粮中添加非淀粉多糖酶对生长猪效应试验．2001，1：23-24
25 陈勇，张慧玲．饲用酶制剂的应用研究．粮食与饲料工业，1999，8：35-37
26 陈璐，吴子林．当前我国饲料工业中存在的主要问题．中国饲料，1999，21：7-9
27 陆伟，何余涌，谢国强，梁海平，王博，陈匡辉．全早稻型猪用浓缩料饲喂杜长大生长肉猪的研究．养猪，1999，2：16-17
28 郑国华，黄会萱，胡友战，韦启鹏，蒋云生．稻谷型饲粮养猪研究．见：韩友文主编。中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会论文集(上册)．中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国会员代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会。哈尔滨，2000，哈尔滨：黑龙江人民出版社，2000，256-259
29 郑学玲，李利民，朱永义，姚惠源．戊聚糖在小麦中的分布规律及其与灰分、白度相关性的研究．中国粮油学报，2002，17：19-22
30 贺建华，徐庆国．饲料用稻谷和糙米的营养特性．中国水稻科学，2000．14：229-232
31 侯炳炎．饲料工业用酶进展．动物科学与动物医学，2001，18：4-5
32 徐建雄，崔立，陈鲁勇．非淀粉多糖酶对仔猪早期生产性能和消化性能的影响．动物营养学报，2001，13：56-59
33 梁海平，陈匡辉，陆伟，谢国强，王博．何余涌．全早稻型猪用浓缩料饲喂生长肉猪中试报告．养猪，1999，2：18
34 彭健．中国双低油菜饼粕品质评价和品质改进研究．[博士学位论文] 武汉：华中农业大学图书馆，2000
35 彭健，Slominski B A，Guenter W，Campbell L D，熊远著．中国双低菜粕抗营养因子研究．中国粮油学报，2001，5：6-9
36 彭健，Compell L D．Slominski B A，Guenter W．猪对“双低”菜粕氨基酸消化率的研究．华中农业大学学报，1999，18：571—574。
37 彭健．日粮纤维定义、成分、分析方法及加工影响．猪与禽，1999，4：8—11
38 彭健，吴梅芳，熊远著，周法耜，刘澄清，邹祖文．“双低”菜籽饼等氮替代豆粕饲喂生长肥育猪试验．中国饲料，1995，24：13-16
39 蒋宗勇．饲用酶制剂的生产及在动物饲养中的应用．饲料工业，1992，13：7-9
40 澹台炳琰，张兆兰，赵国先，高瑞清．猪离体消化试验的不同处理方法对饲料干物质和蛋白质消化率的影响．河北农业大学学报，1992，15：62-65
41 Annison G. Relationship between the levels of soluble non-starch polysaccharides and the apparent metabolizable energy of wheats assayed in broiler chickens. J of Agri and Food Chemi, 1991, 39:1252-1256
42 Annison G, Choet M, Cheetham N W. Analyis of arabinoxylans from a large-sede isolation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1992, 19:151-159
43 Annison G. The Chemistry of Dietary Fiber. In: Samman S, Annison G eds., Dietary Fiber and Beyond-Australian Perspectives. Australia Nutrition Society of Australia Occasional Publications, 1993: 1-16
44 Babinszky L, Meer J M, Boer H, Hartog L A. An In-Vitro Method for Prediction of the Digestible Crude Protein Content in Pig Feeds. J Sci Food Agric 1990, 50: 173-178
45 Baidoo S K, Liu Y G. Hulless barley for swine: ileal and faecal digestibility of proximate nutrients, amino acids and non-starch polysaccharides.J of the Sci of Food and Agri,1998, 76:397-403
46 Baidoo S K, Liu Y G, Grandhi R R. Exogenous enzymes and hulless barley utilization by young pigs.Proceedings of the 1998 Feed Grain quality Conference. 1998a,Alberta, Canada
47 Baidoo S K, Liu YG, Yungblut D. Effect of microbial enzyme supplementation on energy, amino acid digestibility and performance of pigs fed hulless barley based diets. Can J Anim Sci, 1998b, 78:625-631
48 Boisen S, Eggum B O. Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simple-stomach animals. Nutr Res Rev, 1991, 4:141-162
49 Bedford M R. Mechanism of action and potential environmental benefits from the use of feed enzymes. Anim Feed Sci and Tech, 1995, 53:145-155
50 Bedford M R, Schulz H. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutri Res Rev, 1998,1:91-114
51 Bedford M R, Classen H L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and arabinoxylanase concentration is effected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueons phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion effectiency of broiler chicks. J of Nutri, 1992, 122:560-569
52 Bedford M R, Classen H L, Campbell G L. The effect of pelleting, salt, and pentosanase on the viscosity of intestinal contents and the performance of broilers fed rye. Poul Sci,1991, 70:1571-1577
53 Bell J M. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meals: A review. Can J Anim Sci,73:679-697
54 Bell J M, Keith M O, Hutcheson D S, Nutritional evaluation of very low glucosinolate canola meal, Can J Anim Sci, 71:497-506
55 Campbell G L, Rossnagel B F, Classen H L, Thacker P A. Genotypic and environmental differences in extract viscosity of barley and their relationship to its nutritive value for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1989, 26:221-230
56 Campbell L D, Liang D S, Slominski. Nutritive Value of Enzyme Pre-treated Canola Meal. Proceeding of the international rapeseed conference ,2001, Wuhan, China
57 Campbell L D, Bedford M R. Enzyme application for monogastric Feeds: a review. Can J Anim Sci,1992,72: 449-466.
58 Chesson A. Feed enzymes. Animal Feed Science and technology, 1993, 45:65-79
59 Choct M, Annison G. Anti-nutritive activity of Wheat pentosans in broiler diets. Bri Poul Sci, 1990, 31:811-822
60 Choct M, Annison G. The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. Bri J Nutri, 1992a, 67:123-132
61 Choct M, Annison G. Antinutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Bri Poul Sci, 1992b, 33: 821-834.
62 Choct M, Annison G, Trimble R P. Soluble wheat pentosans exhibit different anti-nutritive activities in intact and caecectomized broiler chickens. J of Nutri, 1992, 122:2457-2465
63 Choct M, Hughes R J, Trimble R P, Angkanaporn K, Annison G. Non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes increase the performance of broiler chickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. J of Nutri, 1995, 125:485-492
64 Choct M, Hughes R J, Wang J, Bedford M R, Morgan A J, Annison G. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. Brih Poul Sci, 1996, 37:609-621
65 Classen H L, Campbell G L, Grootwassink J W D. Improved feeding value of Saskatchewan-grown barley for chickens with dietary enzyme supplementation. Can J of Anim Sci,1988, 68:1253-1259
66 Cowan W D. Advances in feed enzyme technology. Anim Feed Sci and Techno 1992, 60: 311-319
67 Cowan, W D, Korsbak A, Hastrup T, Rasmussen P B. Influence of added microbial enzymes on energy and protein availability of selected feed ingredients. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1996, 60:311-319
68 Dierick N A, Decuypere J A. Enzymes and growth in pigs. In: Cole D J A, Wseman J, VarJey M eds.,Principals of Pig Science. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 1994. 169-195
69 Gill B P, Schulze H. Effect of diet processing and enzyme supplementation of Wheat-based diets on growing pig performance. Anim Sci, 1996, 62:662
70 Gdala Jolanta, Johansen H N. The digestibility of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the small and large intestine of piglets fed non-supplemented and enzyme supplemented diets, Anlm Feed Sci Techno, 1997, 65:15-33
71 Habberer B, Schulz E, Flachowsky G. Effects of β -glucanase and xylanase supplementation in pigs fed a diet rich in non-starch polysaccharides: disappearance and disappearance rate of nutrients including the non-starch polysaccharides in stomach and small intestine. J Anim Physi and Anim Nutri,1998,78:95-103
72 Hesselman K, Aman P. The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low or high viscosity. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 1986, 15:83-103
73 Huang R L, Tan Z L, Xing T X, Pan, Li T J. An in vitro method for the estimation of ileal crude protein and amino acids digestibility using the dialysis tubing for pig feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci and Techno, 2000, 88:79-89
74 Inborr J, Schmitz M, Ahrens F. Effect of adding fiber and starch degrading enzymes to a barley/wheat based diet on performances of the small intestine of early weaned pigs, Anim Feed Sci Techno, 1993, 44:113-127
75 Inborr J. Practical application of feed enzymes. Hed Compounder, 1990,10:41-49
76 Inborr J, Ogle R B. Effect of enzyme treatment of piglet feeds on performance and post weaning diarrhea. Swed J Agri Res, 1988, 18:129-133
77 Low A G. Secretory response of the pig gut to non-starch polysaccharides. Anim Feed Sci and Techno,1989, 23:55-65
78 Marquardt R R, Brenes A, Zhang Z, Boros, Use of enzymes to improve nutrient availability in poultry feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci and Techno 1996, 60:321-330
79 Monro J A. A nutritionally valid procedure for measuring soluble dietary fiber. Food Chemistry, 1993, 47:187-193
80 Moran E T, Jrtall S P, Summers J D. The feeding value of rye for the growin chick: effect of enzyme supplements, antibiotics, autodaving and geographical area of production. Poul sci, 1968, 48:939-949
81 Moughan P J. In vitro techniques for the assessment of the nutritive value of feed grains for pigs: a review. Austr J Agri Res,1999, 50:871-879
82 Rotter B A, Marquardt R R, Guenter W, Biliaderis C, Newmall C W. In vitro viscosity measurements of barley extracts as predictors of growth responses in chicks fed barley-based diets supplemented with a fungal enzyme preparation. Can J Anim Sci,
1989, 69:431--439
83 Slominski B A, Campbell L D. Non-starch Polysaccharides of Canola Meal: Quantification, Digestibility in Poultry and Potential Benefit of Dietary Enzyme Supplementation. J Sci Food Agri, 1990, 53:175-184
84 Simbaya J, Slominski B A, Guenter W, Morgan A, Campbell L D. The effects of protease and carbohydrase supplementation on the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry :In vitro and in vivo studies. Anim Feed Sci Techno, 1996, 61:219-234
85 Simbaya J, Slominski B A. Quality Characteristics of Yellow-seeded Brassica Seed Meals:Protein, Carbohydrates, and Dietary Fiber Components, J of Agri and Food Chemi, 1995, 43
86 Schulze H, Partridge G G, Gill B P. The use of different xylanase sources and a protease in wheat-based diets for weaned pigs. Animal Production, 1996b, 62:663
87 Schulze H, Pearce A N, Rose S P. The effect of six different wheat cultivars of similar bushel weight on growth performance of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 1997, 75:197
88 Thacker P A, Baas T C. Effect of gastric pH on the activity of exogenous pentosanase and the effect of pentosanase supplementation of the diet on the performance of growthing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1996, 63:187-200
89 Thacker P A, Campbell G L, GrootWssink J. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye-based diets for swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1991, 71:489—496
90 Wiseman J, McNab J M. Numtins value of wheat varieties fed to non-raminants. HGCA Report NO. 3. Home Grown Cereals Authority, 1998, Nottingham, UK
91 Zhang Z ,Marquard R R, Wang G, Guenter W, Crow G H, Han Z K, Bedford M R. A simple model for predicting the response of chicks to dietary enzyme supplementation, J. Anim Sci, 1996, 74:394-402