融资约束、代理成本与股利政策治理效应
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
股利政策是公司财务研究领域一个经典而又不断推陈出新的研究课题。尽管有关股利政策的理论与实证研究成果丰硕,但是对于股利政策如何制定、什么是合理的股利政策等核心问题,国内外学术界始终没有得到一致的答案,这就为本文的研究提供了拓展的空间与改进的可能。
     在理论文献与现实背景的分析基础上,本文提出将股利政策治理效应作为判断股利政策合理与否的标准或主要依据的学术观点,并着重探讨以下两个问题:
     一是股利政策治理效应的存在性问题。本文分整体检验与局部检验两个步骤对存在性问题加以验证:(1)股利政策治理效应的整体检验。以一个综合性的公司治理指数作为公司治理机制整体完善程度的代理变量,在融资约束与代理成本的双重作用下,验证股利政策对公司治理机制的替代或增补效应;(2)股利政策治理效应的局部检验。以两种具体且重要的公司治理机制——管理层薪酬激励(激励机制)和股权制衡(约束机制)为例,验证股利政策与公司治理机制之间的替代或互补关系。
     二是股利政策治理效应的量化分析与评价问题。本文将股利政策分别视为其治理效应的内生与外生影响因素,并结合治理效应的效率观点展开量化研究:(1)基于经典的Lintner股利收益模型和Rozeff股利权衡模型,运用双边随机前沿分析方法(2tier-SFA)探讨在融资约束与代理成本权衡下股利政策的有效性以及造成有效性损失的具体原因;(2)股利政策治理效应最终应该体现在公司价值的变化上,此时股利政策可以被视为外生影响因素。在真实世界中,股利政策无法达到最优状态,其必然伴随着治理效率的损失。因此,本文借助随机前沿分析方法(SFA),通过对公司价值视角下股利政策治理效率的测度来评价和分析股利政策治理效应,并引出股利政策的具体作用特征。
     本文的主要研究结论如下:
     第一,在假设融资约束与代理成本均不存在的理想状态下,现金股利的支付与公司治理机制可以相互替代,这表明前者具有一定的公司治理效应;当仅考虑代理成本而忽略融资约束的作用时,较为完善的公司治理机制能够在代理问题严重时促使公司发放现金股利,即现金股利可以作为传统意义上的公司治理机制的一种补充;而在同时考虑代理成本与融资约束的情况下,治理机制较为完善的公司又会选择减少现金股利的发放,即融资约束与代理成本的共同作用使得股利政策与公司治理机制整体上呈现出替代性特征。
     第二,在代理成本与融资约束共同作用下,上市公司在管理层薪酬激励与股利政策之间具有明显的替代性倾向,即公司管理层并没有因为自身薪酬的增加而提高股利支付率以给予股东相对更多的回报;而股权制衡与股利政策是一种互补的而非替代的关系。
     第三,当前,中国资本市场的融资约束是导致上市公司股利水平发生偏离——即造成股利政策有效性损失的主导因素,而代理成本的影响则相对较小,二者的净效应使得上市公司的实际股利支付水平低于相对的最优水平。
     第四,现金股利支付率与公司价值之间存在正U型的二次非线性关系:即在上市公司现金股利支付率较低时,支付率的提高会降低公司价值;而当支付率达到一定水平时,股利政策才会起到提升公司价值的作用。
     本文的研究贡献在于:
     (1)明确提出将股利政策治理效应作为判定上市公司股利政策合理与否的标准或主要依据的理论观点,并构建了一个对股利政策治理效应进行整体与局部相结合的检验,以及从内生与外生双重视角对股利政策治理效应进行量化分析与评价的研究框架。该研究框架不仅克服了现有研究对股利政策治理效应单纯进行整体检验或者局部检验,以及仅仅关注股利政策相对于公司价值的外生性的不足,从而提高了本文研究结论的可靠性和可信度,而且对公司财务领域其他相关课题的研究也具有借鉴意义。
     (2)股利政策作为一种特殊的公司治理机制,其有效性首先取决于股利支付水平的高低。其次,股利政策的相对有效性具体表现为实际股利支付水平与最优股利支付水平之间的偏差,基于这一认识,股利政策的有效性可以理解为以股利政策为内生变量的公司治理效率。本文在借鉴吸收Lintner股利收益模型和Rozeff股利权衡模型的思想基础上,运用双边随机前沿分析方法构建了一个新的双边随机前沿股利模型,进而通过实证分析,测定了融资约束与代理成本权衡下的中国上市公司股利政策的有效性,并发现了造成有效性损失的若干具体原因。
     (3)股利政策治理效应最终应该体现在股利政策对公司价值的影响上。区别于以往大多数研究文献单纯使用会计指标、经济指标或市场指标,并通过公司价值对股利政策的回归分析来评价股利政策治理效应的方法,本文采用随机前沿分析模型,通过测定相对效率来评价股利政策治理效应,从而减少了信息不对称与主观性带来的偏误。
Dividend policy is a classical and constantly updated research topic in the financialresearch field. Despite of the variety of theoretical perspectives and a large number ofempirical studies emerging, there is no consistent answer to the problem of how to formulatethe dividend decision, which provides the space and possibility of theory improvement.On the basis of theoretical literature and the analysis of reality background, this paperproposes a standard to evaluate whether a dividend policy is reasonable from the perspectiveof governance effect of dividend policy. It focuses on two questions as following:
     The primary question is the existence of the governance effect of dividend policy. Carriedout in accordance with the overall inspection and partial inspection:(1) Take a corporategovernance index (CGI) as proxy variable of the overall degree of corporate governancemechanism, and verify the dividend policy’s substitution or supplement effects to thecorporate governance mechanism in the dual role of financing constraints and agency costs;(2) Verify the dividend policy’s relationship with two specific governancemechanisms-management compensation incentive(as incentive mechanism) and equitybalance(as restriction mechanism), in the partial inspection, to find out the substitution orcompensation effect.
     It followed by evaluating the governance effect of dividend policy. Take dividend policy asendogenous or exogenous factors of governance effects respectively:(1) to analyse the effectof the dividend policy in the financing constraints and agency costs via an empirical analysisbased on the two-tier stochastic frontier model(2-tier SFA), the classic Lintner dividend modeland Rozeff dividend balance model (2) The dividend policy can be regarded as exogenousfactors because the governance effects of dividend policy should eventually be reflected in thecorporate value. In the real world, dividend policy can’t be optimal, which cause the loss ofthe efficiency. With the stochastic frontier analysis, evaluation of the governance effects ofdividend policy will transfer to a measure of the governance efficiency of dividend policy inthe company perspective, and draw the specific characteristics of the role of dividend policy.The main conclusions are as follows:
     Firstly, impeccable corporate governance mechanism can play substitution role in dividendspayment without financing constraints and agency costs, which indicates that dividends paymenth as a certain corporate governance effect. When we consider the influence of agencycosts solely, well governed corporations will pay dividend to restrain agency costs,conventional governance mechanisms have supplement effects. After adding the affect of financing constraints, these corporations prefer to reduce dividend payment, which exerts asubstitution effects.Those results show dividend policy has corporate governance effectindeed.
     Secondly, under the dual role of agency costs and financing constraints, the executivecompensation incentives and dividend policy in listed companies show an obvioussubstitution tendency. The management layer don’t enhance dividend payout ratio to giveshareholders more in return due to an increase in the salaries. Equity balance to the dividendpolicy is a supplementrather than substitutes.
     Thirdly, in current Chinese capital market, financing constraints is the dominant factorcausing the deflected dividend level of listed companies, that is, the loss of the governanceeffect of dividend policy. Meanwhile the effect of agency costs is relatively small and their neteffect makes the actual payout ratio of Chinese listed companies lower than the relativelyoptimal levels.
     Fourthly, the relationship between the cash dividend payout ratio and the company value isa "U" shape of the quadratic nonlinear: when the level of the cash dividend payout ratio oflisted companies is not high, the increase of the payment rate will reduce the value of thecompany; and when the payment rate reach a certain level, the increase of the payment ratewill enhance the value of the company.
     The probable contribution of this paper is:
     (1)It proposes clearly one point that governance effect of dividend policy could be thecriterion of listed companies’ dividend policy decision, and build the framework for theinspection of governance effect of dividend policy including a whole and partial inspectionfrom the endogenous and exogenous perspective. This paper also provides a reference forresearches on other areas related to financing constraints and agency costs.Different from the previous literature which are only concerned with the exogenous ofdividend policy relative to the value of the company, this paper try to examine theeffectiveness of the dividend policy from two angles of endogenous and exogenous.
     (2) As a special corporate governance mechanism, the validity of dividend policy dependson their own level primarily. Then, the relative validity of dividend policy assumes as thedeviation between optimal dividend level and actual dividend payout. In the definition of sucha deviation, the validity of the dividend policy can be understood as a corporate governanceefficiency by using dividend policy for the endogenous variables. Based on stochastic frontiermethod, the idea of Lintner model and Rozeff dividend balance model, this paper builds atwo-tier stochastic frontier dividend model, and evaluate the effect of dividend policy via empirical analysis.It also finds out the governance effect of dividend policy in financingconstraints and agency costs and the reasons of loss of the effectiveness.
     (3) The ultimate goal of the governance effect of dividend policy is to achieve thepromotion of the corporate value. Different from most of the previous literature simply usingaccounting indicators, economic indicators, market indicators to regression analysis to test therelationship between the corporate value and the dividend policy, this paper try to measurethe governance effect of dividend policy in the view of relative efficiency by the stochasticfrontier model, which can reduce the bias causing by the information asymmetry andsubjectivity.
引文
[1] Lintner J. Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings,and taxes[J]. The American Economic Review.1956,46(2):97-113.
    [2] Miller M H, Modigliani F. Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares[J]. theJournal of Business.1961,34(4):411-433.
    [3] Da Silva L C, Goergen M, Renneboog L. Dividend policy and corporate governance[M].Oxford University Press, USA,2004.
    [4] Denis D J, Osobov I. Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on thedeterminants of dividend policy[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2008,89(1):62-82.
    [5] von Eije H, Megginson W L. Dividends and share repurchases in the EuropeanUnion[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2008,89(2):347-374.
    [6] Rozeff M. Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios[J].Journal of Financial Research, Vol.5, No.3, pp.249-259, Fall1982.1982.
    [7] Chae J, Kim S, Lee E J. How Corporate Governance Affects Payout Policy underAgency Problems and External Financing Constraints[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,Forthcoming.2009.
    [8] Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs andownership structure[J]. Journal of financial economics.1976,3(4):305-360.
    [9] La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Legal determinants of externalfinance[J]. Journal of finance.1997:1131-1150.
    [10] Franks J, Mayer C, Renneboog L. Who disciplines management in poorly performingcompanies?[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation.2001,10(3):209-248.
    [11] Myers S C. Capital structure puzzle[Z]. National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridge, Mass., USA,1984.
    [12] Myers S C, Majluf N S. Corporate financing and investment decisio ns when firms haveinformation that investors do not have*1[J]. Journal of financial Economics.1984,13(2):187-221.
    [13] Kaplan S N, Zingales L. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measuresof financing constraints?[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.1997,112(1):169-215.
    [14] Altinkilic O, Hansen R S. Are there economies of scale in underwriting fees? Evidenceof rising external financing costs[J]. Review of Financial Studies.2000,13(1):191-218.
    [15] Bhagat S, Marr M W, Thompson G R. The rule415experiment: equity markets[J].Journal of Finance.1985:1385-1401.
    [16] Blackwell D W, Marr M W, Spivey M F. Plant-closing decisions and the market valueof the firm[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1990,26(2):277-288.
    [17] Krishnaswami S, Subramaniam V. Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporatespin-off decision[J]. Journal of Financial economics.1999,53(1):73-112.
    [18] Fazzari S, Hubbard R G, Petersen B C. Financing constraints and corporateinvestment[Z]. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA,1988.
    [19] Gomes J F. Financing investment[J]. American Economic Review.2001:1263-1285.
    [20] Alti A. How sensitive is investment to cash flow when financing is frictionless?[J]. TheJournal of Finance.2003,58(2):707-722.
    [21] Jones C M, Lamont O A. Short-sale constraints and stock returns[J]. Journal ofFinancial Economics.2002,66(2-3):207-239.
    [22] Baker M, Stein J C, Wurgler J. When does the market matter? Stock prices and theinvestment of equity-dependent firms[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.2003,118(3):969-1005.
    [23]连玉君,彭方平,苏治.融资约束与流动性管理行为[J].金融研究.2010(10):158-171.
    [24] Easterbrook F H. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends[J]. The AmericanEconomic Review.1984:650-659.
    [25] Dempsey S J, Laber G. Effects of agency and transaction costs on dividend payoutratios: further evidence of the agency-transaction cost hypothesis[J]. Journal of FinancialResearch.1992,15(4):317-321.
    [26] Harford J. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions[J]. The Journal of Finance.1999,54(6):1969-1997.
    [27] Baker H K. Dividends and dividend policy[M]. Wiley,2009.
    [28] Grossman S J, Hart O D. One share-one vote and the market for corporate control[J].Journal of financial economics.1988,20:175-202.
    [29] Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Management ownership and market valuation:: Anempirical analysis[J]. Journal of financial economics.1988,20:293-315.
    [30] Schooley D K, Barney Jr L D. Using dividend policy and managerial ownership toreduce agency costs[J]. Journal of Financial Research.1994,17(3):363-373.
    [31] La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Investor protection and corporategovernance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2000,58(1-2):3-27.
    [32] Faccio M, Lang L H P, Young L. Dividends and expropriation[J]. American EconomicReview.2001:54-78.
    [33] Gul F A, Kealey B T. Chaebol, investment opportunity set and corporate debt anddividend policies of Korean companies[J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.1999,13(4):401-416.
    [34] Gul F A. Government share ownership, investment opportunity set and corporate policychoices in China[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.1999,7(2):157-172.
    [35] Gugler K. Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation betweendividends, R&D, and capital investment[J]. Journal of Banking&Finance.2003,27(7):1297-1321.
    [36] Shleifer A A V R. A survey of corporate governance[Z].1997:52,737.
    [37] Aghion P, Bolton P. An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting[J]. Thereview of economic Studies.1992,59(3):473-494.
    [38] Berkovitch E, Israel R, Zender J F. Optimal bankruptcy law and firm-specificinvestments[J]. European Economic Review.1997,41(3):487-497.
    [39] Kalay A. Stockholder-bondholder conflict and dividend constraints[J]. Journal ofFinancial Economics.1982,10(2):211-233.
    [40]魏刚,蒋义宏.中国上市公司股利分配问卷调查报告[J].经济科学.2001(4):79-87.
    [41]唐建新,蔡立辉.中国上市公司股利政策成因的实证研究[J].经济管理.2002(20):60-69.
    [42] Jensen M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers[J].American Economic Review.1986,76(2):323-329.
    [43] Faccio M, Lang L H P, Young L. Dividends and expropriation[J]. American EconomicReview.2001:54-78.
    [44] Marsh P. Dividend announcements and stock price performance[C].1992.
    [45] Fama E F, French K R. Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lowerpropensity to pay?[J]. Journal of Financial economics.2001,60(1):3-43.
    [46] Baker M, Wurgler J. Appearing and disappearing dividends: The link to cateringincentives[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2004,73(2):271-288.
    [47] Amihud Y, Li K. The declining information content of dividend announcements and theeffects of institutional holdings[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.2006,41(3):637.
    [48] Reddy Y S, Rath S. Disappearing Dividends in Emerging Markets?: Evidence fromIndia[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.2005,41(6):58-82.
    [49] Al-Malkawi H A N. Determinants of corporate dividend po licy in Jordan: anapplication of the Tobit model[J]. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.2007,23(2):44-70.
    [50] Ronapat M, Evans M. Disappearing Dividends in the Thai Capital Market: ChangingFirm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay[J]. Journal of Economic and Social Policy.2005,10(1):7.
    [51] Adaoglu C. Instability in the dividend policy of the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE)corporations: evidence from an emerging market[J]. Emerging Markets Review.2000,1(3):252-270.
    [52] Deangelo H, Deangelo L, Skinner D J. Are dividends disappearing? Dividendconcentration and the consolidation of earnings[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2004,72(3):425-456.
    [53] Skinner D J. The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stockrepurchases[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2008,87(3):582-609.
    [54] Julio B, Ikenberry D L. Reappearing dividends[J]. Journal of Applied CorporateFinance.2004,16(4):89-100.
    [55] Chen C R, Steiner T L. Managerial ownership and agency conflicts: A nonlinearsimultaneous equation analysis of managerial ownership, risk taking, debt policy, anddividend policy[J]. Financial Review.1999,34(1):119-136.
    [56] Crutchley C E, Jensen M R H, Jahera J S, et al. Agency problems and the simultaneityof financial decision making: The role of institutional ownership[J]. International Review ofFinancial Analysis.1999,8(2):177-197.
    [57] Short H, Zhang H, Keasey K. The link between dividend policy and institutionalownership[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance.2002,8(2):105-122.
    [58] Zeckhauser R J, Pound J. Are large shareholders effective monitors? An investigationof share ownership and corporate performance[Z]. University of Chicago Press,1990,1990.
    [59] Crutchley C E, Jensen M R H, Jahera J S, et al. Agency problems and the simultaneityof financial decision making: The role of institutional ownership[J]. International Review ofFinancial Analysis.1999,8(2):177-197.
    [60]陈信元,陈冬华,时旭.公司治理与现金股利:基于佛山照明的案例研究[J].管理世界.2003(8):118-126.
    [61]魏明海,柳建华.国企分红、治理因素与过度投资[J].管理世界.2007(4):88-95.
    [62]王毅辉,李常青.终极产权、控制权结构和股利政策[J].财贸研究.2010(2):120-129.
    [63] Denis D J, Osobov I. Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on thedeterminants of dividend policy[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2008,89(1):62-82.
    [64] Mitton T. Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets[J]. EmergingMarkets Review.2004,5(4):409-426.
    [65] Zwiebel J. Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment[J]. The AmericanEconomic Review.1996:1197-1215.
    [66] Aivazian V, Booth L, Cleary S. Do emerging market firms follow different dividendpolicies from US firms?[J]. Journal of Financial Research.2003,26(3):371-387.
    [67]吕长江,王克敏.上市公司资本结构、股利分配及管理股权比例相互作用机制研究[J].会计研究.2002(3):39-48.
    [68]刘淑莲,胡燕鸿.中国上市公司现金分红实证分析[J].会计研究.2003(4):29-35.
    [69]艾文国,孙洁,张剑英.我国上市公司股利政策研究[J].中国软科学.2004(4):65-68.
    [70]张纯,吕伟.信息环境、融资约束与现金股利[J].金融研究.2009(7):81-94.
    [71]王茜,张鸣.基于经济波动的控股股东与股利政策关系研究——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].财经研究.2009(12):50-60.
    [72] Cleary S. International corporate investment and the relationships between financialconstraint measures[J]. Journal of Banking&Finance.2006,30(5):1559-1580.
    [73]李维安,童道驰,谢永珍,等.中国上市公司治理指数与治理绩效的实证分析[J].管理世界.2004(002):63-74.
    [74]白重恩,刘俏,陆洲,等.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究.2005,2(0):0.
    [75] Krasker W S. Stock Price Movements in Response to Stock Issues under AsymmetricInformation[J]. The Journal of Finance.1986,41(1):93-105.
    [76] Bond S, Meghir C. Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy [J].The Review of Economic Studies.1994,61(2):197-222.
    [77] Bhagat S, Marr M W, Thompson G R. The Rule415Experiment: Equity Markets[J].The Journal of Finance.1985,40(5):1385-1401.
    [78] Krishnaswami S, Subramaniam V. Information asymmetry, valua tion, and the corporatespin-off decision[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1999,53(1):73-112.
    [79] Eberhart A C. Comparable firms and the precision of equity valuations[J]. Journal ofBanking&Finance.2001,25(7):1367-1400.
    [80] Wang H J. A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Financing Constraints on Investment[J].Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.2003,21(3):406-419.
    [81] Kumbhakar S C, Park B U, Simar L, et al. Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: a localmaximum likelihood approach[J]. Journal of Econometrics.2007,137(1):1-27.
    [82] Battese G E, Coelli T, Rao D S. An introduction to efficiency and productivityanalysis[Z]. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher,1998.
    [83] Marris R. The Economic Theory of" Managerial[J]. Capitalism (New York,1964).1964.
    [84] Murphy K J. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration:: An empiricalanalysis[J]. Journal of accounting and economics.1985,7(1-3):11-42.
    [85] Jensen M C, Murphy K J. Performance pay and top-management incentives[J]. Journalof political economy.1990:225-264.
    [86] Bebchuk L A. Myth of the Shareholder Franchise, The[J]. Va. L. Rev.2007,93:675.
    [87] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specificinvestments[J]. Journal of financial economics.1989,25(1):123-139.
    [88] Morris S, Shin H S. Social value of public information[J]. The American EconomicReview.2002,92(5):1521-1534.
    [89] Lang L H P, Litzenberger R H. Dividend announcements*1:: Cash flow signalling vs.free cash flow hypothesis?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1989,24(1):181-191.
    [90] Vogt S C. The cash flow/investment relationship: evidence from US manufacturingfirms[J]. Financial Management.1994:3-20.
    [91] Blanchard O L D S. What Do Firms Do with Cash Windfalls[J]. Journal of FinancialEconomics.1994,36(3):337-360.
    [92] Opler T, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, et al. Corporate cash holdings[J]. Journal of AppliedCorporate Finance.2001,14(1):55-67.
    [93]陈信元,陈冬华,万华林.国有企业中的薪酬管制与在职消费[J][J].经济研究.2005,2.
    [94]陈冬华,梁上坤,蒋德权.不同市场化进程下高管激励契约的成本与选择:货币薪酬与在职消费①[J].2010.
    [95] Bhattacharyya N, Mawani A, Morrill C. Dividend payout and executive compensation:theory and evidence[J]. Accounting&Finance.2008,48(4):521-541.
    [96] Hu A, Kumar P. Managerial entrenchment and payout policy[J]. Journal of Financialand Quantitative Analysis.2004,39(4):759-790.
    [97]罗宏,黄文华.国企分红、在职消费与公司业绩[J].管理世界.2008(9):139-148.
    [98]卢锐,魏明海,黎文靖.管理层权力,在职消费与产权效率——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].南开管理评论.2008(5):85-92.
    [99]辛清泉,林斌,王彦超.政府控制、经理薪酬与资本投资[J].经济研究.2007(08).
    [100]吴育辉,吴世农.高管薪酬:激励还是自利?——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].会计研究.2010(11).
    [101] Lee C W, Xiao X. Cash dividends and large shareholder expropriation in China[J].2003.
    [102]唐跃军,谢仍明.大股东制衡机制与现金股利的隧道效应——来自1999—2003年中国上市公司的证据[J].南开经济研究.2006(1):60-78.
    [103] Stulz R M. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market forcorporate control[J]. Journal of financial Economics.1988,20:25-54.
    [104] Mcconnell J J, Servaes H. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporatevalue[J]. Journal of financial Economics.1990,27(2):595-612.
    [105] Franks J, Mayer C, Renneboog L. Who disciplines management in poorly performingcompanies?[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation.2001,10(3):209-248.
    [106] Banerjee S, Leleux B, Vermaelen T. Large shareholdings and corporate control: ananalysis of stake purchases by French holding companies[J]. European Financial Management.1997,3(1):23-43.
    [107] Renneboog L. Ownership, managerial control and the governance of companies listedon the Brussels stock exchange[J]. Journal of Banking&Finance.2000,24(12):1959-1995.
    [108]刘芍佳,孙霈,刘乃全.终极产权论,股权结构及公司绩效[J].经济研究.2003(4):51-62.
    [109]孙永祥,黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究.1999,12(33.42).
    [110]赵玉芳,余志勇,夏新平,等.定向增发、现金分红与利益输送——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].金融研究.2011(1).
    [111] Miller M H, Rock K. Dividend policy under asymmetric information[J]. Journal offinance.1985:1031-1051.
    [112] Kalay A. Signaling, information content, and the reluctance to cut dividends[J]. Journalof.1980.
    [113] Ross S A. The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach[J].The Bell Journal of Economics.1977:23-40.
    [114] Ofer A R, Thakor A V. A theory of stock price responses to alternative corporate cashdisbursement methods: Stock repurchases and dividends[J]. Journal of Finance.1987:365-394.
    [115] Kumar P. Shareholder-manager conflict and the information content of dividends[J].Review of Financial Studies.1988,1(2):111-136.
    [116] Leland H E, Pyle D H. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financialintermediation[J]. The journal of Finance.1977,32(2):371-387.
    [117] Hansen R S, Kumar R, Shome D K. Dividend policy and corporate monitoring:Evidence from the regulated electric utility industry[J]. Financial Management.1994:16-22.
    [118] Schooley D K, Barney Jr L D. Using dividend policy and managerial ownership toreduce agency costs[J]. Journal of Financial Research.1994,17(3):363-373.
    [119] Prakash A J, Smyser M W, Hamid S S. LOG‐NORMALITY AND ARBITRAGEFREE BOUNDS ON THE DISTRIBUTION RANGE OF ZERO‐COUPON PUREDISCOUNT BOND RETURNS[J]. Journal of Business Finance&Accounting.1995,22(6):769-788.
    [120] Crutchley C E, Jensen M R H, Jahera J S, et al. Agency problems and the simultaneityof financial decision making: The role of institutional ownership[J]. International Review ofFinancial Analysis.1999,8(2):177-197.
    [121] Zwiebel J. Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control[J]. The Review ofEconomic Studies.1995,62(2):161-185.
    [122] Porta R L, Lopez-Desilanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Investor protection and corporatevaluation[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research,1999.
    [123] Gomes Armando R, Walter N. Sharing of Control as a Corporate GovernanceMechanism[R]. Los Angeles: Penn CARESS Working Papers from UCLA Department ofEconomics,2005.
    [124] Bloch F, Hege U, Group G R. Multiple shareholders and control contests[M].Universites d'Aix-Marseille II et III,2001.
    [125] Morck R, Yeung B. Dividend taxation and corporate governance[J]. The Journal ofEconomic Perspectives.2005,19(3):163-180.
    [126] Gugler K, Yurtoglu B B. Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy inGermany[J]. European Economic Review.2003,47(4):731-758.
    [127] Fama E F, Babiak H. Dividend policy: An empirical analysis[J]. Journal o f theAmerican Statistical Association.1968:1132-1161.
    [128] Benartzi S, Michaely R, Thaler R. Do changes in dividends signal the future or thepast?[J]. Journal of Finance.1997:1007-1034.
    [129] Koopmans T C. Analysis of production as an efficient comb ination of activities[J].Activity analysis of production and allocation.1951,13:33-37.
    [130] Farrell M J. The measurement of productive efficiency[J]. Journal of the RoyalStatistical Society. Series A (General).1957,120(3):253-290.
    [131] Leibenstein H. Allocative Efficiency vs." x-efficiency"[J]. The American EconomicReview.1966,56(3):392-415.
    [132] Aigner D, Lovell C A, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontierproduction function models[J]. Journal of econometrics.1977,6(1):21-37.
    [133] Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas productionfunctions with composed error[J]. International economic review.1977,18(2):435-444.
    [134] Wang H J. A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Financing Constraints on Investment[J].Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.2003,21(3):406-419.
    [135] Habib M A, Ljungqvist A. Firm Value and Managerial Incentives: A StochasticFrontier Approach*[J]. The Journal of Business.2005,78(6):2053-2094.
    [136] Kumbhakar S C, Christopher F P. The effects of bargaining on market outcomes:Evidence from buyer and seller specific estimates[R]. Working paper,2005.
    [137] Jondrow J, Knox Lovell C A, Materov I S, et al. On the estimation of technicalinefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model[J]. Journal of econometrics.1982,19(2-3):233-238.
    [138] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Large shareholders and corporate control[J]. The Journal ofPolitical Economy.1986:461-488.
    [139]刘芍佳,孙霈,刘乃全.终极产权论,股权结构及公司绩效[J].经济研究.2003(4):51-62.
    [140]唐跃军,谢仍明.大股东制衡机制与现金股利的隧道效应——来自1999-2003年中国上市公司的证据[J].南开经济研究.2006(001):60-78.
    [141] Modigliani F, Miller M H. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory ofinvestment[J]. The American economic review.1958,48(3):261-297.
    [142] Ruekert R W, Walker Jr O C, Roering K J. The organization of marketing activities: acontingency theory of structure and performance[J]. The Journal of Marketing.1985:13-25.
    [143] Hart O. Firms, contracts, and financial structure[M]. Oxford University Press, USA,1995.
    [144] O Connell B T. Enron. Con: He that filches from me my good name… makes me poorindeed [J]. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.2004,15(6-7):733-749.
    [145] Mcconnell J J, Servaes H. Additional evidence on equity owners hip and corporatevalue[J]. Journal of financial Economics.1990,27(2):595-612.
    [146] Agrawal A, Knoeber C R. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agencyproblems between managers and shareholders[J]. Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis.1996,31(3):377-397.
    [147] Barnhart S W, Rosenstein S. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and FirmPerformance: An Empirical Analysis[J]. The Financial Review.1998,33(4):1-16.
    [148] Cho M H. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empiricalanalysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1998,47(1):103-121.
    [149] B rsch Supan A, K ke J. An applied econometricians' view of empirical corporategovernance studies[J]. German Economic Review.2002,3(3):295-326.
    [150] Bauer R, Guenster N. Good Corporate Governance pays off![J]. Deminor Ratings.Nisan.2003.
    [151] Kirschenheiter M, Melumad N. Earnings Quality and Smoothing[C].2005.
    [152] Zhang A, Zhang Y, Zhao R. A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinesefirms[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics.2003,31(3):444-464.
    [153] Wang E C. R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis usingthe stochastic frontier approach[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling.2007,29(2):345-360.
    [154]岳书敬.中国区域研发效率差异及其影响因素——基于省级区域面板数据的经验研究[J].科研管理.2008,29(5):173-179.
    [155] Hunt-Mccool J, Koh S C, Francis B B. Testing for deliberate underpricing in the IPOpremarket: A stochastic frontier approach[J]. Review of Financial Studies.1996,9(4):1251-1269.
    [156]白仲光,张维.基于随机边界定价模型的新股短期收益研究[J].管理科学学报.2003,6(1):51-59.
    [157] Tobin J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory[J]. Journal of money,credit and banking.1969,1(1):15-29.
    [158] Lindenberg E B, Ross S A. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization[J]. Journal ofBusiness.1981:1-32.
    [159]娄伟.基金持股与上市公司业绩相关性的实证研究[J].上海经济研究.2002(6).
    [160]白仲林.经理人行为与公司业绩的弹性分析—兼论公司治理的顺序[J].甘肃社会科学.2002(004):128-130.
    [161]胡勤勤,沈艺峰.独立外部董事能否提高上市公司的经营业绩[J].世界经济.2002(007):55-62.
    [162]徐晓东,陈小悦.第一大股东对公司治理,企业业绩的影响分析[J].经济研究.2003(002):64-74.
    [163]施东晖.股权结构,公司治理与绩效表现[J].世界经济.2000,23(012):37-44.
    [164]李善民,曾昭灶.控制权转移的背景与控制权转移公司的特征研究[J].经济研究.2003(011):54-64.
    [165]曹廷求,杨秀丽,孙宇光.股权结构与公司绩效:度量方法和内生性[J].经济研究.2007,10:126-137.
    [166] Demsetz H, Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences[J].The Journal of Political Economy.1985,93(6):1155-1177.
    [167] Demsetz H, Villalonga B. Ownership structure and corporate performance[J]. Journal ofCorporate Finance.2001,7(3):209-233.
    [168] Loderer C, Martin K. Executive stock ownership and performance tracking fainttraces[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.1997,45(2):223-255.
    [169]张宗益,宋增基.上市公司股权结构与公司绩效实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究.2003(1):128-132.
    [170]曹廷求,杨秀丽,孙宇光.股权结构与公司绩效:度量方法和内生性[J].经济研究.2007,10:126-137.
    [171] Craswell A T, Taylor S L, Saywell R A. Ownership structure and corporateperformance: Australian evidence[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.1997,5(3):301-323.
    [172] Zheka V. Corporate Governance Determinants: The Firm-Level Evidence fromTransitional Country, Ukraine[J].2006.
    [173]孙永祥,黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究.1999,12(33.42).
    [174]冯根福,韩冰.中国上市公司股权集中度变动的实证分析[J].经济研究.2002(008):12-18.
    [175]胡洁,胡颖.上市公司股权结构与公司绩效关系的实证分析[J].管理世界.2006(003):142-143.
    [176]李双杰,王林,范超.统一分布假设的随机前沿分析模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究.2007,24(4):84-91.
    [177]杨汉明.现金股利与企业价值的实证研究——基于A股市场股权结构的分析[J].统计研究.2008,25(8):65-68.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700