规范与完善农村土地股份合作制流转模式研究
|
摘要
农村土地股份合作制是我国农村土地产权制度的改革与创新,是在实践中探索出的一种土地流转方式。它最早起源于1992年的广东南海、宝安等地。随着农业结构调整步伐加快和土地规模经营制度的不断改革,农村土地股份合作制在广东、福建等沿海发达地区不断扩展,中西部地区和边远地区农村也先后展开各种形式的农村土地股份合作制试点,并取得了一定的成效。农村土地股份合作制作为一种典型的诱致性制度变迁,能够克服现行的土地集体所有、家庭平均承包经营的弊病,表现出明显的社会效应,也成为理论界关注的热点问题。
作为一种新型制度探索,农村土地股份合作制在实施过程中存在诸多问题,如产权结构不明晰、农村土地承包经营权入股估价不科学、收益分配制度不规范、风险防范机制不健全、相关配套制度建设滞后等,这直接影响了农村土地股份合作制制度绩效的充分发挥。论文综合运用现代经济学、管理学理论及数理技术,对农村土地股份合作制的组织模式、农地使用权入股定价、产权制度安排、治理结构效率改进、利益分配与风险管理以及配套制度建设进行理论与实证研究,进
一步丰富和发展农村土地股份合作制理论。论文构建的农村土地股份合作制规范运作框架,以及提出的进一步推动农地股份合作制发展的相关措施和政策建议,将为农村土地股份合作制的具体实践和政府相关部门的政策制定提供参考依据。因此,论文研究对规范农村土地流转、优化农业产业结构、促进农民增收无疑具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
(1)论文首先对农村土地股份合作制的相关概念进行界定,分析了农村土地股份合作制的主要模式、法律依据及其适应性条件；利用新制度经济学理论对农村土地股份合作制流转的成因进行阐释；根据土地产出效益模型公式和劳动力效用综合评定模型公式,编制土地流转模式经济绩效综合评价指数、土地流转模式社会绩效综合评价指数,在此基础上,对各土地流转模式的经济社会综合绩效进行实证比较,分析农村土地股份合作制绩效的比较优势。农村土地股份合作制流转模式提供理论与实证依据。
(2)不同的农村土地股份合作制组织模式,制度实施的磨擦成本、组织成本和交易成本是不同的。论文对农村土地股份合作制的相关利益主体(农民、企业及地方政府)进行博弈分析,分析各利益主体的行为策略。按“牵头人”或“发起人”的类型的不同,创新农村土地股份合作制流转的组织模式,并对各种组织模式的适应性条件进行分析。最后,充分考虑我国农村经济发展的不平衡性,探讨非农产业较发达地区与非农产业欠发达地区农村土地股份合作制组织模式的最优选择。
(3)利用地租地价理论、产权价格理论以及土地收益理论,分析农村土地承包经营权入股价值评估的理论依据；从自然环境因素、经济社会因素、土地供需状况以及土地用途等角度,深入分析农村土地承包经营权入股价值的影响因素。在此基础上,采用模糊物元分析法和CBR技术,建立农村土地使用权入股价格评估模型,并进行实例分析。为农村土地使用权入股定价提供参考。
(4)从压缩内生交易费用来说,农村土地股份合作制的产权安排部分地是有效率的。但是这一产权安排存在着隐患,即在减少的同时,又内生出不同程度的交易费用。鉴于此,论文运用内生交易费用理论对农村土地股份合作制产权安排绩效进行评价。在此基础上,对农村土地股份合作制的产权进行界定,建立有效的股权配置机制,包括股权结构、持股比例等等。最后,研究建立农村土地股份合作制的股权流通机制,引导股权合理流动,解决企业股权不能流动所带来的问题。
(5)农村土地股份合作制的治理结构是一个复杂的制度安排,目的是为了解决企业内部分工和激励问题,防止道德风险的产生。论文对农村土地股份合作制中的委托——代理关系进行阐述,分析道德风险产生的根源,利用内生交易费用理论对其治理结构效率进行评价,在此基础上,研究建立农村土地股份合作制道德风险防范的激励——监督机制,提出改善农村土地股份合作制治理结构效率的措施。
(6)农村土地股份合作制的利益分配过程,同时也是各产权主体利益协商的过程。同时,发展土地股份合作必须建立风险保障机制,确保土地收益,这是实行股份合作制的基本出发点和归宿,也是衡量土地股份合作是否成功的主要标志。论文以股权设置为基础,利用合作博弈理论,建立利益分配的Nash协商模型和群体加权重心模型,合理协调各种股权利益分配的比例。然后,对农村股份合作制面临的可能风险进行识别,研究建立多角度、多层次的风险规避机制,减少股份制的运营风险,从而解决失地农民的保障问题。
(7)任何一项制度的出台和绩效发挥都必须有相关制度的配套支持。论文从地方政府角色的合理定位、农村土地流转市场机制的规范与完善、法律法规环境的优化、财政金融支持以及农村社会保障制度的建立与健全等角度构建农村土地股份合作制发展的支撑体系。
(8)在前期调研的基础上,进一步赴长沙市农村经济经营管理局和长沙县、浏阳市和望城县部分土地股份合作制流转典型个案现场进行实地调查,收集第一手资料数据,进行实证研究,验证论文所建立的理论模型,并提出针对性较强的对策建议。
Rural Land Shareholding Co-operative System is the reform and innovation of our country's rural land property and rights system, and is a mode of land transfer coming from the practice. It originated initially in the Nanhai of Guangzhou and Baoan and so on in the1992. With the accelerated pace of the agricultural adjustment and the continued reform of the land scale running system, stock cooperative system of rural land developed well in Guangdong, Fujian and other coastal areas, besides countries in central and western regions and remote areas have also launched into various forms of stock cooperative system of rural land pilot, and have made something. Stock cooperative system of rural land, as a typical induced institutional change, is able to overcome the shortcomings of the current collective land ownership and the average household contract management, besides it shows apparent social effects, and it has been a hot question attended by the theorists.
As a exploration of new system, stock cooperative system of rural land shows many questions during the period of its implement, such as ownership structure not clear, rural land contract and management rights shares valued unscientific, income distribution system not standardized, risk prevention not perfect, Supporting the construction of the system lagged behind and so on, which directly impact on the fully exertion of stock cooperative system of rural land. This paper, which comprehensively uses modern economics, management science and mathematical techniques, does theoretical and empirical research on the organizational model of stock cooperative system of rural land, pricing shares of agricultural land use rights, arrangements of property rights system, improvements of the efficiency of the governance structure, the distribution of benefits and risk management and supporting systems, and further enriches and develops the theory of stock cooperative system of rural land. The framework for the standard operation of stock cooperative system of rural land established in the paper and relevant measures and policy advises proposed further to promote the development of stock cooperative system of rural land, will provide reference for the specific practice of stock cooperative system of rural land and policy formulation of relevant government departments. So the paper study will undoubtedly have important theoretical and practical significances for regulating rural land, optimizing industrial structure of agriculture, increasing income for farmers.
(1) First,in this paper we define the related concepts of the shareholding cooperative system of rural lands,and analyse its main mode,legal basis and adaptable conditions.In the meanwhile, we explain the causes of the circulation of shareholding rural lands according to new institutional economics theories.Besides, according to the model formulas of Land productivity efficiency and the comprehensive assessment of labor efficiency, we work out the comprehensive evaluation indexes of the economic and social performance of the mode for the rural land circulation. On this basis,we make empirical comparison of the economic and social performance of various modes and analyse the comparative advantages of the shareholding cooperative system of rural lands to provide theoretical and empirical evidence.
(2) Different rural land shareholding cooperative organization models,the costs of friction, organization and transaction are diffrrent.In this paper, we make game analysis of the main stakeholders(farmers, enterprises and local governments) in rural land shareholding cooperative systerm and their behavioral strategies.According to the different types of "lead" or "sponsor",we create the organizational models of rural land shareholding cooperative system and analyse its adaptive conditions. At last, considering fully Chinese unbalanced economic development in rural areas,we discuss the optimal choice of the organizational model in more developed regions and underdeveloped regions of non-agricultural industries.
(3) Based on the Land rent and price theory, the price theory of property rights and land revenue theory,we analyse the theoretical basis of the rural land contract and management rights for assessing the value of shares and its factors in terms of natural environment, economy and society, land supply and demand, and the land uses.On this basis, with the use of fuzzy matter-element analysis and CBR technology,we establish a model to evaluate the share price of rural land-use right and make case analysis.
(4) From the compression of the endogenous transaction costs, the ownership arrangement of stock cooperative system of rural land is efficient in part. But there are risks in this ownership arrangement, such as during the time of reducing, it will produce different levels of transaction costs. In view of this, the paper uses the theory of endogenous transaction costs to evaluate the performance of property rights arrangements of stock cooperative system of rural land. On this basis, we define the property rights of stock cooperative system of rural land, and establish efficient equity allocation mechanism, including ownership structure, ownership percentage and so on. Finally, it studies and establishes the shares in circulation of stock cooperative system of rural land, and guides the rational flow of equity, besides, solve the problems arising from the inflow of equity.
(5) The governance structure of rural land shareholding cooperative system is a complex institutional arrangements,in order to solve the problem of internal division of work and incentives and prevent the generation of moral hazard. In this paper,we describe the principal-agent relationship, analyze the root causes of moral hazard and evaluate the efficiency of its governance structure with the use of endogenous transaction cost theory.Based on this, we study the establishment of incentive-monitoring mechanism to prevent moral hazard and put forward measurs to improve rural land shareholding cooperative governance structure efficiency.
(6) The process of the interests allocation of stock cooperative system of rural land, at the same time, it is the process of the interests consultation of all kinds of the property rights. What's more, to develop stock cooperative system of rural land must establish the risk protection mechanism to make sure the land revenue, which is the fundamental starting point and destination to implement the stock cooperative system of rural land, and also the main symbol to measure whether it is successful of stock cooperative system of rural land. The paper based on the equity setting, uses cooperative game theory, and sets up the Nash negotiation model for the distribution of interests and population-weighted center of gravity model in order to reasonably coordinate the proportion of interests distribution of all kinds of equities. Thus, it identifies the possible risks faced by the stock cooperative system of rural land, then it studies and establishes multi-angle and multi-level risk aversion mechanism to reduce the operational risk of the stock, in order to address the protecting issue of landless peasants.
(7) Any introduction and performing of a system must have the related systems to support. In this paper,we build the support system to develop the rural land shareholding cooperative system in terms of the reasonable position of local government, the improvement of market mechanisms, the optimization of the laws and regulations, fiscal and financial support, the establishment of sound rural social security system and so on.
作为一种新型制度探索,农村土地股份合作制在实施过程中存在诸多问题,如产权结构不明晰、农村土地承包经营权入股估价不科学、收益分配制度不规范、风险防范机制不健全、相关配套制度建设滞后等,这直接影响了农村土地股份合作制制度绩效的充分发挥。论文综合运用现代经济学、管理学理论及数理技术,对农村土地股份合作制的组织模式、农地使用权入股定价、产权制度安排、治理结构效率改进、利益分配与风险管理以及配套制度建设进行理论与实证研究,进
一步丰富和发展农村土地股份合作制理论。论文构建的农村土地股份合作制规范运作框架,以及提出的进一步推动农地股份合作制发展的相关措施和政策建议,将为农村土地股份合作制的具体实践和政府相关部门的政策制定提供参考依据。因此,论文研究对规范农村土地流转、优化农业产业结构、促进农民增收无疑具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
(1)论文首先对农村土地股份合作制的相关概念进行界定,分析了农村土地股份合作制的主要模式、法律依据及其适应性条件；利用新制度经济学理论对农村土地股份合作制流转的成因进行阐释；根据土地产出效益模型公式和劳动力效用综合评定模型公式,编制土地流转模式经济绩效综合评价指数、土地流转模式社会绩效综合评价指数,在此基础上,对各土地流转模式的经济社会综合绩效进行实证比较,分析农村土地股份合作制绩效的比较优势。农村土地股份合作制流转模式提供理论与实证依据。
(2)不同的农村土地股份合作制组织模式,制度实施的磨擦成本、组织成本和交易成本是不同的。论文对农村土地股份合作制的相关利益主体(农民、企业及地方政府)进行博弈分析,分析各利益主体的行为策略。按“牵头人”或“发起人”的类型的不同,创新农村土地股份合作制流转的组织模式,并对各种组织模式的适应性条件进行分析。最后,充分考虑我国农村经济发展的不平衡性,探讨非农产业较发达地区与非农产业欠发达地区农村土地股份合作制组织模式的最优选择。
(3)利用地租地价理论、产权价格理论以及土地收益理论,分析农村土地承包经营权入股价值评估的理论依据；从自然环境因素、经济社会因素、土地供需状况以及土地用途等角度,深入分析农村土地承包经营权入股价值的影响因素。在此基础上,采用模糊物元分析法和CBR技术,建立农村土地使用权入股价格评估模型,并进行实例分析。为农村土地使用权入股定价提供参考。
(4)从压缩内生交易费用来说,农村土地股份合作制的产权安排部分地是有效率的。但是这一产权安排存在着隐患,即在减少的同时,又内生出不同程度的交易费用。鉴于此,论文运用内生交易费用理论对农村土地股份合作制产权安排绩效进行评价。在此基础上,对农村土地股份合作制的产权进行界定,建立有效的股权配置机制,包括股权结构、持股比例等等。最后,研究建立农村土地股份合作制的股权流通机制,引导股权合理流动,解决企业股权不能流动所带来的问题。
(5)农村土地股份合作制的治理结构是一个复杂的制度安排,目的是为了解决企业内部分工和激励问题,防止道德风险的产生。论文对农村土地股份合作制中的委托——代理关系进行阐述,分析道德风险产生的根源,利用内生交易费用理论对其治理结构效率进行评价,在此基础上,研究建立农村土地股份合作制道德风险防范的激励——监督机制,提出改善农村土地股份合作制治理结构效率的措施。
(6)农村土地股份合作制的利益分配过程,同时也是各产权主体利益协商的过程。同时,发展土地股份合作必须建立风险保障机制,确保土地收益,这是实行股份合作制的基本出发点和归宿,也是衡量土地股份合作是否成功的主要标志。论文以股权设置为基础,利用合作博弈理论,建立利益分配的Nash协商模型和群体加权重心模型,合理协调各种股权利益分配的比例。然后,对农村股份合作制面临的可能风险进行识别,研究建立多角度、多层次的风险规避机制,减少股份制的运营风险,从而解决失地农民的保障问题。
(7)任何一项制度的出台和绩效发挥都必须有相关制度的配套支持。论文从地方政府角色的合理定位、农村土地流转市场机制的规范与完善、法律法规环境的优化、财政金融支持以及农村社会保障制度的建立与健全等角度构建农村土地股份合作制发展的支撑体系。
(8)在前期调研的基础上,进一步赴长沙市农村经济经营管理局和长沙县、浏阳市和望城县部分土地股份合作制流转典型个案现场进行实地调查,收集第一手资料数据,进行实证研究,验证论文所建立的理论模型,并提出针对性较强的对策建议。
Rural Land Shareholding Co-operative System is the reform and innovation of our country's rural land property and rights system, and is a mode of land transfer coming from the practice. It originated initially in the Nanhai of Guangzhou and Baoan and so on in the1992. With the accelerated pace of the agricultural adjustment and the continued reform of the land scale running system, stock cooperative system of rural land developed well in Guangdong, Fujian and other coastal areas, besides countries in central and western regions and remote areas have also launched into various forms of stock cooperative system of rural land pilot, and have made something. Stock cooperative system of rural land, as a typical induced institutional change, is able to overcome the shortcomings of the current collective land ownership and the average household contract management, besides it shows apparent social effects, and it has been a hot question attended by the theorists.
As a exploration of new system, stock cooperative system of rural land shows many questions during the period of its implement, such as ownership structure not clear, rural land contract and management rights shares valued unscientific, income distribution system not standardized, risk prevention not perfect, Supporting the construction of the system lagged behind and so on, which directly impact on the fully exertion of stock cooperative system of rural land. This paper, which comprehensively uses modern economics, management science and mathematical techniques, does theoretical and empirical research on the organizational model of stock cooperative system of rural land, pricing shares of agricultural land use rights, arrangements of property rights system, improvements of the efficiency of the governance structure, the distribution of benefits and risk management and supporting systems, and further enriches and develops the theory of stock cooperative system of rural land. The framework for the standard operation of stock cooperative system of rural land established in the paper and relevant measures and policy advises proposed further to promote the development of stock cooperative system of rural land, will provide reference for the specific practice of stock cooperative system of rural land and policy formulation of relevant government departments. So the paper study will undoubtedly have important theoretical and practical significances for regulating rural land, optimizing industrial structure of agriculture, increasing income for farmers.
(1) First,in this paper we define the related concepts of the shareholding cooperative system of rural lands,and analyse its main mode,legal basis and adaptable conditions.In the meanwhile, we explain the causes of the circulation of shareholding rural lands according to new institutional economics theories.Besides, according to the model formulas of Land productivity efficiency and the comprehensive assessment of labor efficiency, we work out the comprehensive evaluation indexes of the economic and social performance of the mode for the rural land circulation. On this basis,we make empirical comparison of the economic and social performance of various modes and analyse the comparative advantages of the shareholding cooperative system of rural lands to provide theoretical and empirical evidence.
(2) Different rural land shareholding cooperative organization models,the costs of friction, organization and transaction are diffrrent.In this paper, we make game analysis of the main stakeholders(farmers, enterprises and local governments) in rural land shareholding cooperative systerm and their behavioral strategies.According to the different types of "lead" or "sponsor",we create the organizational models of rural land shareholding cooperative system and analyse its adaptive conditions. At last, considering fully Chinese unbalanced economic development in rural areas,we discuss the optimal choice of the organizational model in more developed regions and underdeveloped regions of non-agricultural industries.
(3) Based on the Land rent and price theory, the price theory of property rights and land revenue theory,we analyse the theoretical basis of the rural land contract and management rights for assessing the value of shares and its factors in terms of natural environment, economy and society, land supply and demand, and the land uses.On this basis, with the use of fuzzy matter-element analysis and CBR technology,we establish a model to evaluate the share price of rural land-use right and make case analysis.
(4) From the compression of the endogenous transaction costs, the ownership arrangement of stock cooperative system of rural land is efficient in part. But there are risks in this ownership arrangement, such as during the time of reducing, it will produce different levels of transaction costs. In view of this, the paper uses the theory of endogenous transaction costs to evaluate the performance of property rights arrangements of stock cooperative system of rural land. On this basis, we define the property rights of stock cooperative system of rural land, and establish efficient equity allocation mechanism, including ownership structure, ownership percentage and so on. Finally, it studies and establishes the shares in circulation of stock cooperative system of rural land, and guides the rational flow of equity, besides, solve the problems arising from the inflow of equity.
(5) The governance structure of rural land shareholding cooperative system is a complex institutional arrangements,in order to solve the problem of internal division of work and incentives and prevent the generation of moral hazard. In this paper,we describe the principal-agent relationship, analyze the root causes of moral hazard and evaluate the efficiency of its governance structure with the use of endogenous transaction cost theory.Based on this, we study the establishment of incentive-monitoring mechanism to prevent moral hazard and put forward measurs to improve rural land shareholding cooperative governance structure efficiency.
(6) The process of the interests allocation of stock cooperative system of rural land, at the same time, it is the process of the interests consultation of all kinds of the property rights. What's more, to develop stock cooperative system of rural land must establish the risk protection mechanism to make sure the land revenue, which is the fundamental starting point and destination to implement the stock cooperative system of rural land, and also the main symbol to measure whether it is successful of stock cooperative system of rural land. The paper based on the equity setting, uses cooperative game theory, and sets up the Nash negotiation model for the distribution of interests and population-weighted center of gravity model in order to reasonably coordinate the proportion of interests distribution of all kinds of equities. Thus, it identifies the possible risks faced by the stock cooperative system of rural land, then it studies and establishes multi-angle and multi-level risk aversion mechanism to reduce the operational risk of the stock, in order to address the protecting issue of landless peasants.
(7) Any introduction and performing of a system must have the related systems to support. In this paper,we build the support system to develop the rural land shareholding cooperative system in terms of the reasonable position of local government, the improvement of market mechanisms, the optimization of the laws and regulations, fiscal and financial support, the establishment of sound rural social security system and so on.
引文
[1]Clegg,J.China's rural shareholding cooperatives as a form of multi-stakeholding cooperation.Journal of Rural Cooperation,1996,24:119-142
[2]Yair Levi.Beyond Traditional Models:Multi-Stakeholder Cooperatives and their Differential roles.Journal of Rural Cooperation,1998,26(1-2):49-64
[3]Jerker Nilsson.New Generation Farmer Cooperatives,ICA review,1997,90(1): 32-38
[4]Galen Rapp.Cooperative Information Report 10,WHAT ARE COOPERATIVES? Revised March 1995,RURAL BUSINESS AND COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE,USDE.
[5]Randall E. Torgerson,Bruce J.Reynoles,and Thomas W.Gray,EVOLUTION OF COOPERATIVE THOUGHT,THEORY AND PURPOSE, presentation: Conference on "cooperatives:Their Importance in the Future of the Food and Agricultural System",Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortinm,Las Vrgas,NV,January 16-17,1997
[6]Abrahamsen, M.Discussion.Government Regulations and Market Performance--Problems in Regulations and Future Roles for Agricultural Cooperatives.1966.1439-1443
[7]Albaek.S, C.Schultz.On the Relative Advantage of Cooperatives.Economic Letters,1998.397-401
[8]Alchian.A,Demsetz.Production information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review,1972.777-795
[9]Balbach, J.K.The effect of ownership on contract structure, costs, and quality: The case of the US beet sugar industry and the industrialization of agriculture.vertical coordination in the US food system,1998.155-184
[10]Barton Principles, D.Cobia.Cooperatives in agriculture Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall.1989:21-34
[11]Barton, D.Agricultural cooperatives:An American Economic and Management perspective, presented at International symposium on Institutional Arrangements and Legislative Issues of Farmer Cooperatives,Taizhou,zhejiang,PR china,2004
[12]Bateman.L, R.Edwards. Agricultural Cooperatives and the theory of the Firm. Oxford Agrarian Studies,1979.63-81
[13]Bekkum.van, Dijk.Van.Agricultural Cooperatives in the European Union.Assen: Van Gorcum,1997.4-19
[14]罗纳德.科斯.社会成本问题.载《财产权与度变迁》,上海：上海三联书店,1994,1-100
[15]哈德罗.德姆赛茨.所有权、控制与企业.北京：经济科学出版社,1999,23-56
[16]哈德罗.德姆赛茨.所有权、控制与企业.北京：经济科学出版社,1999,32-36
[17]波特.法律的经济分析.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997,69-98
[18]Hendrikse.G, J.Bijman."Ownership Structure in agrifood chains;the Marketing Cooperative".American Journal of Agriculture Economics,1984.104-119
[19]哈德罗.德姆塞茨.生产、信息费用与经济组织.上海：上海三联书店,1991,105-200
[20]Emelianoff,I.V. Economic Theory of Cooperation.Ann Arbor:Edward Brothers, 1942.
[21]Enke,S.Consumer Cooperatives and Economic Efficiency.American Economic Review1945,35(1):148-155.
[22]Phillips,R. Economic Nature of the Cooperative Association. Journal of Farm Economics,1953,(35):74-87.
[23]Helmberger,P.G and S.Hoos. Cooperative Enterprise and Organization Theory. Journal of Farm Economics,1962,(44):275-290.
[24]Sexton,R.J. The Formation of Cooperatives:A Game-theoretic Approach with Implications for Cooperative Finance,Decision Making and Stability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1986,(68):423-433.
[25]Staatz,J. Farmer Cooperative Theory:Recent Developments. ACS Research Report No.84.Washington.D.C.:USDA,1989.
[26]Alchian,A.A.and Demsetz,H. Production,information costs, and economic organization.American Economic Review,1972(62):777-795.
[27]Jensen,MC.and Meckling,W.H. Rights and Production Functions:An Application to Labor-managed Firms and Codetermination, Journal of Business,1979(52): 469-506.
[28]Fama,E.F.and Jensen,M.C. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics.1983(26):301-325.
[29]Porter,P.K.and Seully,G.W. Economic efficiency in cooperatives.The journal of law and economics,1987(30):489-512.
[30]Michae.L.Cook.The Future of U.S Agriculture Cooperatives:A Neo-Institutional Approach.American Journal of Agricultural Eeconomics,1995 (77[5]): 1153-1159.
[31]Fulton.The future of cooperatives in Canada:A Property rights approach. American Journalof agricultural economics,1995(77):1144-1152.
[32]Staatz, J. A Theoretical Perspective on the Behavior of Fanners' Cooperatives. Dissertation.Michigan State University,East Lansing,Ml,1984.
[33]Randall E.Torgerson,Bruce J. Reynoles,and Thomas W.Gray, Evolution of Cooperative Thought, Theory and Purpose, Presentation:Conference on"Cooperatives:Their Importance in the Future of the Food and Agricultural System", Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium, Las Vegas, NM January 16-17,1997.
[34]USDA. Farmer Cooperative Statistics,1998.
[35]Zusman,P. Constitutional Selection of Collective-Choice Rules in a Cooperative Enterprise. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization,1992(17): 353-362.
[36]Albaek,S. and C.Schults. on the Relative Advantage of Cooperatives. Economic Letters,1998(59):397-401.
[37]Hendrikse,G.W.J. Screening,Competition and the Choice of the Cooperative as Organizational Form. Journal of Agricultural Economies,1998(49[2]):202-217.
[38]Hendrikse,G.W.J. and C.P.Veerman. Marketing Cooperatives:An Incomplete Contracting Perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2001a(52[J]):53-64.
[39]冯开文.国外合作社经验纵横论—几个代表性合作社的最新举措及其对中国的启示.中国合作经济[J],2005(8).
[40]基思.布拉勒利,艾伦.盖布尔著职工股份所有制(中译本).四川省社科院出版社[M],1989
[41]望城农民组建“土地经营公司”[N].湖南日报,2009-05-22
[42]孟炜中.土地流转的模式选择.咨询研究择要,2004年第19期
[43]徐志全.中国工业化非均衡进程与农业政策选择[M].中国统计出版社,1998年7月版,第62-63页
[44]黄丽.农地股份合作制与土地社会保障功能的实现——以广东南海为例[J].乡镇经济,2008,(9)：51-54
[45]Andrew J. Plantinga, and Douglas J. Miller. Agricultural Land Values and the Value of Rights to Future Land Development [J]. Land Economics,2001, 77(1):56-67.
[46]Plantinga, Andrew J., Ruben N. Lubowski, and Robert N. Stavins. The Effects of Potential Land Development on Agricultural Land Prices [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2002,52, no.3:561-581.
[47]Feng Xu, Ron C. Mittelhammer,Paul W. Barkley. Measuring the Contributions of Site Characteristics to the Value of Agricultural Land[J]. Land Economics, November 1993,69(4):356-69.
[48]J.Stephen Clark, Murray Fulton, and John..T.Scott. The Inconsistency of Land Values, Land Rent and Capitalization Formulas[J]. American Agricultural Economics Association.1993,75:147-155.
[49]边学芳,吴群,曲福田.基于边际机会成本理论的农地价格矫正研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境.2006,16(6)：118-123.
[50]陈志刚,周建春,黄贤金.产权价值区域征收农地价格评估模型及应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(12)：191-195.
[51]张仕廉,陈玲燕.软集合理论在农村土地使用权估价中的应用[J].乡镇经济,2008,8：37-39.
[52]肖芳淳.模糊物元分析及其应用研究[J].强度与环境,1995,(2)：51-59.
[53]朱仁友.我国农地估价中运用收益还原法存在的问题与求解[J].中国农村观察,2000,5：25-29.
[54]刘萍,付梅臣.收益还原法评估农用地价格有关问题探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007,23(1)：78-81
[55]马克思.《资本论》第3卷,715页
[56]马克思.《资本论》第3卷,904页
[57]路燕.农用地价格体系.[D]北京：中国农业大学,2006
[58]刘书楷曲福田主编.土地经济学.北京：中国农业出版社,2004
[59]李松芹.重庆市农村土地使用权流转价格研究[D].重庆：重庆西南大学,2008
[60]全新奇.黑龙江省农地股份合作制发展研究[D].大庆：黑龙江八一农垦大学,2008
[61]张笑寒.农村土地股份合作制的制度解析与实证研究[D].南京：南京农业大学,2007
[62]傅夏仙.股份合作制：理论、实践及其适宜领域——基于浙江案例的新制度经济学视角分析[D].杭州：浙江大学,2003
[63]綦好东.论我国农地产权结构调整与演进的目标模式仁[J].经济体制改革,1998
[64]何杨.农地产权制度改革的最佳选择[J].中国改革,2001(3)
[65]钱忠好.农地股份合作制产权特征分析及政策启示[J],农业经济,1999(11)
[66]王琢.中国农村土地产权制度新论[J],中国农村经济,1994(5)
[67]刘胜天.发展农村股份合作制经济需要解决的几个问题[J].农村经济,2003(4).
[68]孔凡文.农地股份合作制的起因、运作及条件[J].农业经济,1994(9).
[69]曹凤歧.股份合作企业一新型的公有经济形式[J].经济科学,1990(5)
[70]顾存伟,陈维.关于股份合作企业的几点思考[J].中国农村经济,1991(9)
[71]金丽馥.新时期农村土地股份合作制探析[J].当代经济研究,2009(1)：31-35
[72]王小映.土地股份合作制的经济学分析[J].中国农村观察,2003,(6)：31-39
[73]国务院发展研究中心课题组.南海土地股份合作制在探索中完善[N].中国经济时报.2003-05-16
[74]蒋永穆,刘承礼.中国农地股份合作制制度绩效的内生交易费用理论分析[J].当代经济研究,2005(2)
[75]王松梅.农村股份合作制改革与完善研究[D].杭州：浙江大学,2004-04-20
[76]张艺萍.论股份合作与农业微观产权制度的改革[J].河南大学学报(社科版),1998,(3)
[77]卢学锋.新农村建设进程中农村土地股份合作制研究[D].南京：江苏大学,2007
[78]冀县卿,钱忠好.农地股份合作社农地产权结构创新——基于江苏渌洋湖土地股份合作社的案例研究[J].农业经济问题,2010,(5)
[79]赵曦岚.运用交易成本和产权理论分析股份制和独资制[J].北方经贸,2008,(5)
[80]闵珊.土地承包经营权股权化研究[D].重庆：西南政法大学,2008
[81]毛峰.深化农业微观产权制度改革——关于建立农村股份合作制的思考[J].农村发展论丛,1999,(1)
[82]何官燕.农地股份合作制的理论研究与实践探讨[J].经济师,2008,(5)
[83]照文那木拉.农地股份合作制股份设置与流转[J].经济体制改革,1997,(4)
[84]单宏洁.弱化土地保障视角下的农地产权制度改革[D].南京：河海大学,2007
[85]朱学义,李秀枝.关于在股份合作制企业设置劳动股的思考[J].上海会计,2000,(11)
[86]郭迟,吉宏伟,曾聪.土地股份合作中如何建立风险保障机制.合作经济与科技,2007/03/01
[87]修国义.虚拟企业组织模式及运行机制研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2006
[88]王玉双.我国农地股份合作制发展问题研究[D].沈阳：东北农业大学,2006
[89]金丽馥.新时期农村土地股份合作制探析[J].当代经济研究,2009/1/15
[90]刘秀娟,许月明.完善农地股份合作制的构想[J].中国土地,2008/09/30
[91]刘秀娟,许月明.完善农地股份合作制的构想[J].特区经济,2008/08/25
[92]刘秀娟,李彤.推进农地股份合作制发展的几点建议[J].乡镇经济,2008/06/25
[93]郭英杰.农村土地股份合作社法律问题探析[D].山西：山西财经大学,2010/03/29
[94]王小映.土地股份合作制的经济学分析[J].中国农村观察,2003/11/25
[95]徐朴,王启有.农村土地股份合作社的实践与探索[J].四川行政学院学报,2008/06/20
[96]薛保社.推进农村土地股份合作加快农村土地经营流转[J].北方经济,2009/12/11
[97]朱满德,刘超.土地股份合作制龙头企业发展的问题与对策[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011/04/25
[98]卢学锋.劳动力资本参与土地股份合作收益分配探析[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2008/3/30
[99]陈婷.土地流转中农民权利保障问题的探讨[D].长沙：湖南农业大学,2010-06-02
[100]湖南省长沙县土地流转经验[N],四川改革,2010-02-15
[101]骆东奇,朱莉芬,李颖慧.统筹城乡视角的农村土地入股型流转模式设计与风险防范[J],生产力研究,2009/04/30
[102]骆东奇,朱莉芬,李颖慧.农村土地入股型流转模式创新与政策设计——基于统筹城乡综合配套改革试验的探讨[J].第二届中国综合配套改革试验区论坛暨纪念建国六十周年高层经济论坛论文集,2009-11-14
[103]曾超群.农村土地流转问题研究[D].长沙：湖南农业大学,2010-04-15
[104]财政部关于印发《农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)》的通知[J],农村财务会计,2008/02/02
[105]财政部关于印发《农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)》的通知,中华人民共和国财政部文告,2008/03/20
[106]农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)[R].中国财经报,2008/01/11
[107]农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行).农村经营管理,2008/03/08
[108]村集体经济组织会计制度.财会月刊,2005/01/26
[109]村集体经济组织会计制度.中国财经报,2004/11/26
[110]村集体经济组织会计制度,农村财务会计,2004/12/02
[111]财政部关于印发《村集体经济组织会计制度》的通知,中华人民共和国财政部文告,2004/12/09
[112]李视友.农民专业合作社财务会计制度解读[J].财会月刊,2009-02-15
[113]胥晨慧.农民专业合作社内部控制的现状与对策研究[J].黑龙江科技信息, 2009-11-15
[114]浙江省农民专业合作社财务制度(试行),农村财务会计,2006-11-02
[115]农新,卓红,仁明,红玉.打造农产品生产到终端销售“直通车”[R].东方城乡报,2009/12/24
[116]浙江省农民专业合作社财务制度(试行),农村财务会计,2006/12/02
[117]虢正贵.发展农村合作组织与推动农村土地流转的思考,首届湖湘三农论坛论文集(上),2008/10/25
[118]陈学军.农民专业合作社内部会计控制制度的构建[J].农村财务会计,2007/04/02
[119]刘海玲.农民专业合作社财会制度今年实施[J].农业开发与装备,2008/02/28
[120]刘海玲.农民专业合作社财会制度出台[R].中国财经报,2008/01/11
[121]云帅.财经速递[J].商业会计,2008/02/20
[122]贾宗栋.收入管理及核算[J].农村财务会计,2010/08/06
[123]农业部关于印发《农民专业合作经济组织示范章程(试行)》的通知.中华人民共和国农业部公报,2006/02/20
[124]农民专业合作社示范章程,中华人民共和国国务院公报,2008/03/10
[125]刘宇翔.农业合作经济组织模式研究[D].西北：西北农林科技大学,2006/05/01
[126]张满林.我国农民专业合作社治理问题研究[D].北京：北京林业大学博士论文,2009/05/01
[127]股份合作制：理论、实践及其适宜领域——基于浙江案例的新制度经济学视角分析[D].杭州：浙江大学,2003
[2]Yair Levi.Beyond Traditional Models:Multi-Stakeholder Cooperatives and their Differential roles.Journal of Rural Cooperation,1998,26(1-2):49-64
[3]Jerker Nilsson.New Generation Farmer Cooperatives,ICA review,1997,90(1): 32-38
[4]Galen Rapp.Cooperative Information Report 10,WHAT ARE COOPERATIVES? Revised March 1995,RURAL BUSINESS AND COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE,USDE.
[5]Randall E. Torgerson,Bruce J.Reynoles,and Thomas W.Gray,EVOLUTION OF COOPERATIVE THOUGHT,THEORY AND PURPOSE, presentation: Conference on "cooperatives:Their Importance in the Future of the Food and Agricultural System",Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortinm,Las Vrgas,NV,January 16-17,1997
[6]Abrahamsen, M.Discussion.Government Regulations and Market Performance--Problems in Regulations and Future Roles for Agricultural Cooperatives.1966.1439-1443
[7]Albaek.S, C.Schultz.On the Relative Advantage of Cooperatives.Economic Letters,1998.397-401
[8]Alchian.A,Demsetz.Production information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review,1972.777-795
[9]Balbach, J.K.The effect of ownership on contract structure, costs, and quality: The case of the US beet sugar industry and the industrialization of agriculture.vertical coordination in the US food system,1998.155-184
[10]Barton Principles, D.Cobia.Cooperatives in agriculture Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall.1989:21-34
[11]Barton, D.Agricultural cooperatives:An American Economic and Management perspective, presented at International symposium on Institutional Arrangements and Legislative Issues of Farmer Cooperatives,Taizhou,zhejiang,PR china,2004
[12]Bateman.L, R.Edwards. Agricultural Cooperatives and the theory of the Firm. Oxford Agrarian Studies,1979.63-81
[13]Bekkum.van, Dijk.Van.Agricultural Cooperatives in the European Union.Assen: Van Gorcum,1997.4-19
[14]罗纳德.科斯.社会成本问题.载《财产权与度变迁》,上海：上海三联书店,1994,1-100
[15]哈德罗.德姆赛茨.所有权、控制与企业.北京：经济科学出版社,1999,23-56
[16]哈德罗.德姆赛茨.所有权、控制与企业.北京：经济科学出版社,1999,32-36
[17]波特.法律的经济分析.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997,69-98
[18]Hendrikse.G, J.Bijman."Ownership Structure in agrifood chains;the Marketing Cooperative".American Journal of Agriculture Economics,1984.104-119
[19]哈德罗.德姆塞茨.生产、信息费用与经济组织.上海：上海三联书店,1991,105-200
[20]Emelianoff,I.V. Economic Theory of Cooperation.Ann Arbor:Edward Brothers, 1942.
[21]Enke,S.Consumer Cooperatives and Economic Efficiency.American Economic Review1945,35(1):148-155.
[22]Phillips,R. Economic Nature of the Cooperative Association. Journal of Farm Economics,1953,(35):74-87.
[23]Helmberger,P.G and S.Hoos. Cooperative Enterprise and Organization Theory. Journal of Farm Economics,1962,(44):275-290.
[24]Sexton,R.J. The Formation of Cooperatives:A Game-theoretic Approach with Implications for Cooperative Finance,Decision Making and Stability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1986,(68):423-433.
[25]Staatz,J. Farmer Cooperative Theory:Recent Developments. ACS Research Report No.84.Washington.D.C.:USDA,1989.
[26]Alchian,A.A.and Demsetz,H. Production,information costs, and economic organization.American Economic Review,1972(62):777-795.
[27]Jensen,MC.and Meckling,W.H. Rights and Production Functions:An Application to Labor-managed Firms and Codetermination, Journal of Business,1979(52): 469-506.
[28]Fama,E.F.and Jensen,M.C. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics.1983(26):301-325.
[29]Porter,P.K.and Seully,G.W. Economic efficiency in cooperatives.The journal of law and economics,1987(30):489-512.
[30]Michae.L.Cook.The Future of U.S Agriculture Cooperatives:A Neo-Institutional Approach.American Journal of Agricultural Eeconomics,1995 (77[5]): 1153-1159.
[31]Fulton.The future of cooperatives in Canada:A Property rights approach. American Journalof agricultural economics,1995(77):1144-1152.
[32]Staatz, J. A Theoretical Perspective on the Behavior of Fanners' Cooperatives. Dissertation.Michigan State University,East Lansing,Ml,1984.
[33]Randall E.Torgerson,Bruce J. Reynoles,and Thomas W.Gray, Evolution of Cooperative Thought, Theory and Purpose, Presentation:Conference on"Cooperatives:Their Importance in the Future of the Food and Agricultural System", Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium, Las Vegas, NM January 16-17,1997.
[34]USDA. Farmer Cooperative Statistics,1998.
[35]Zusman,P. Constitutional Selection of Collective-Choice Rules in a Cooperative Enterprise. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization,1992(17): 353-362.
[36]Albaek,S. and C.Schults. on the Relative Advantage of Cooperatives. Economic Letters,1998(59):397-401.
[37]Hendrikse,G.W.J. Screening,Competition and the Choice of the Cooperative as Organizational Form. Journal of Agricultural Economies,1998(49[2]):202-217.
[38]Hendrikse,G.W.J. and C.P.Veerman. Marketing Cooperatives:An Incomplete Contracting Perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2001a(52[J]):53-64.
[39]冯开文.国外合作社经验纵横论—几个代表性合作社的最新举措及其对中国的启示.中国合作经济[J],2005(8).
[40]基思.布拉勒利,艾伦.盖布尔著职工股份所有制(中译本).四川省社科院出版社[M],1989
[41]望城农民组建“土地经营公司”[N].湖南日报,2009-05-22
[42]孟炜中.土地流转的模式选择.咨询研究择要,2004年第19期
[43]徐志全.中国工业化非均衡进程与农业政策选择[M].中国统计出版社,1998年7月版,第62-63页
[44]黄丽.农地股份合作制与土地社会保障功能的实现——以广东南海为例[J].乡镇经济,2008,(9)：51-54
[45]Andrew J. Plantinga, and Douglas J. Miller. Agricultural Land Values and the Value of Rights to Future Land Development [J]. Land Economics,2001, 77(1):56-67.
[46]Plantinga, Andrew J., Ruben N. Lubowski, and Robert N. Stavins. The Effects of Potential Land Development on Agricultural Land Prices [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2002,52, no.3:561-581.
[47]Feng Xu, Ron C. Mittelhammer,Paul W. Barkley. Measuring the Contributions of Site Characteristics to the Value of Agricultural Land[J]. Land Economics, November 1993,69(4):356-69.
[48]J.Stephen Clark, Murray Fulton, and John..T.Scott. The Inconsistency of Land Values, Land Rent and Capitalization Formulas[J]. American Agricultural Economics Association.1993,75:147-155.
[49]边学芳,吴群,曲福田.基于边际机会成本理论的农地价格矫正研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境.2006,16(6)：118-123.
[50]陈志刚,周建春,黄贤金.产权价值区域征收农地价格评估模型及应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(12)：191-195.
[51]张仕廉,陈玲燕.软集合理论在农村土地使用权估价中的应用[J].乡镇经济,2008,8：37-39.
[52]肖芳淳.模糊物元分析及其应用研究[J].强度与环境,1995,(2)：51-59.
[53]朱仁友.我国农地估价中运用收益还原法存在的问题与求解[J].中国农村观察,2000,5：25-29.
[54]刘萍,付梅臣.收益还原法评估农用地价格有关问题探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007,23(1)：78-81
[55]马克思.《资本论》第3卷,715页
[56]马克思.《资本论》第3卷,904页
[57]路燕.农用地价格体系.[D]北京：中国农业大学,2006
[58]刘书楷曲福田主编.土地经济学.北京：中国农业出版社,2004
[59]李松芹.重庆市农村土地使用权流转价格研究[D].重庆：重庆西南大学,2008
[60]全新奇.黑龙江省农地股份合作制发展研究[D].大庆：黑龙江八一农垦大学,2008
[61]张笑寒.农村土地股份合作制的制度解析与实证研究[D].南京：南京农业大学,2007
[62]傅夏仙.股份合作制：理论、实践及其适宜领域——基于浙江案例的新制度经济学视角分析[D].杭州：浙江大学,2003
[63]綦好东.论我国农地产权结构调整与演进的目标模式仁[J].经济体制改革,1998
[64]何杨.农地产权制度改革的最佳选择[J].中国改革,2001(3)
[65]钱忠好.农地股份合作制产权特征分析及政策启示[J],农业经济,1999(11)
[66]王琢.中国农村土地产权制度新论[J],中国农村经济,1994(5)
[67]刘胜天.发展农村股份合作制经济需要解决的几个问题[J].农村经济,2003(4).
[68]孔凡文.农地股份合作制的起因、运作及条件[J].农业经济,1994(9).
[69]曹凤歧.股份合作企业一新型的公有经济形式[J].经济科学,1990(5)
[70]顾存伟,陈维.关于股份合作企业的几点思考[J].中国农村经济,1991(9)
[71]金丽馥.新时期农村土地股份合作制探析[J].当代经济研究,2009(1)：31-35
[72]王小映.土地股份合作制的经济学分析[J].中国农村观察,2003,(6)：31-39
[73]国务院发展研究中心课题组.南海土地股份合作制在探索中完善[N].中国经济时报.2003-05-16
[74]蒋永穆,刘承礼.中国农地股份合作制制度绩效的内生交易费用理论分析[J].当代经济研究,2005(2)
[75]王松梅.农村股份合作制改革与完善研究[D].杭州：浙江大学,2004-04-20
[76]张艺萍.论股份合作与农业微观产权制度的改革[J].河南大学学报(社科版),1998,(3)
[77]卢学锋.新农村建设进程中农村土地股份合作制研究[D].南京：江苏大学,2007
[78]冀县卿,钱忠好.农地股份合作社农地产权结构创新——基于江苏渌洋湖土地股份合作社的案例研究[J].农业经济问题,2010,(5)
[79]赵曦岚.运用交易成本和产权理论分析股份制和独资制[J].北方经贸,2008,(5)
[80]闵珊.土地承包经营权股权化研究[D].重庆：西南政法大学,2008
[81]毛峰.深化农业微观产权制度改革——关于建立农村股份合作制的思考[J].农村发展论丛,1999,(1)
[82]何官燕.农地股份合作制的理论研究与实践探讨[J].经济师,2008,(5)
[83]照文那木拉.农地股份合作制股份设置与流转[J].经济体制改革,1997,(4)
[84]单宏洁.弱化土地保障视角下的农地产权制度改革[D].南京：河海大学,2007
[85]朱学义,李秀枝.关于在股份合作制企业设置劳动股的思考[J].上海会计,2000,(11)
[86]郭迟,吉宏伟,曾聪.土地股份合作中如何建立风险保障机制.合作经济与科技,2007/03/01
[87]修国义.虚拟企业组织模式及运行机制研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2006
[88]王玉双.我国农地股份合作制发展问题研究[D].沈阳：东北农业大学,2006
[89]金丽馥.新时期农村土地股份合作制探析[J].当代经济研究,2009/1/15
[90]刘秀娟,许月明.完善农地股份合作制的构想[J].中国土地,2008/09/30
[91]刘秀娟,许月明.完善农地股份合作制的构想[J].特区经济,2008/08/25
[92]刘秀娟,李彤.推进农地股份合作制发展的几点建议[J].乡镇经济,2008/06/25
[93]郭英杰.农村土地股份合作社法律问题探析[D].山西：山西财经大学,2010/03/29
[94]王小映.土地股份合作制的经济学分析[J].中国农村观察,2003/11/25
[95]徐朴,王启有.农村土地股份合作社的实践与探索[J].四川行政学院学报,2008/06/20
[96]薛保社.推进农村土地股份合作加快农村土地经营流转[J].北方经济,2009/12/11
[97]朱满德,刘超.土地股份合作制龙头企业发展的问题与对策[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011/04/25
[98]卢学锋.劳动力资本参与土地股份合作收益分配探析[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2008/3/30
[99]陈婷.土地流转中农民权利保障问题的探讨[D].长沙：湖南农业大学,2010-06-02
[100]湖南省长沙县土地流转经验[N],四川改革,2010-02-15
[101]骆东奇,朱莉芬,李颖慧.统筹城乡视角的农村土地入股型流转模式设计与风险防范[J],生产力研究,2009/04/30
[102]骆东奇,朱莉芬,李颖慧.农村土地入股型流转模式创新与政策设计——基于统筹城乡综合配套改革试验的探讨[J].第二届中国综合配套改革试验区论坛暨纪念建国六十周年高层经济论坛论文集,2009-11-14
[103]曾超群.农村土地流转问题研究[D].长沙：湖南农业大学,2010-04-15
[104]财政部关于印发《农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)》的通知[J],农村财务会计,2008/02/02
[105]财政部关于印发《农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)》的通知,中华人民共和国财政部文告,2008/03/20
[106]农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行)[R].中国财经报,2008/01/11
[107]农民专业合作社财务会计制度(试行).农村经营管理,2008/03/08
[108]村集体经济组织会计制度.财会月刊,2005/01/26
[109]村集体经济组织会计制度.中国财经报,2004/11/26
[110]村集体经济组织会计制度,农村财务会计,2004/12/02
[111]财政部关于印发《村集体经济组织会计制度》的通知,中华人民共和国财政部文告,2004/12/09
[112]李视友.农民专业合作社财务会计制度解读[J].财会月刊,2009-02-15
[113]胥晨慧.农民专业合作社内部控制的现状与对策研究[J].黑龙江科技信息, 2009-11-15
[114]浙江省农民专业合作社财务制度(试行),农村财务会计,2006-11-02
[115]农新,卓红,仁明,红玉.打造农产品生产到终端销售“直通车”[R].东方城乡报,2009/12/24
[116]浙江省农民专业合作社财务制度(试行),农村财务会计,2006/12/02
[117]虢正贵.发展农村合作组织与推动农村土地流转的思考,首届湖湘三农论坛论文集(上),2008/10/25
[118]陈学军.农民专业合作社内部会计控制制度的构建[J].农村财务会计,2007/04/02
[119]刘海玲.农民专业合作社财会制度今年实施[J].农业开发与装备,2008/02/28
[120]刘海玲.农民专业合作社财会制度出台[R].中国财经报,2008/01/11
[121]云帅.财经速递[J].商业会计,2008/02/20
[122]贾宗栋.收入管理及核算[J].农村财务会计,2010/08/06
[123]农业部关于印发《农民专业合作经济组织示范章程(试行)》的通知.中华人民共和国农业部公报,2006/02/20
[124]农民专业合作社示范章程,中华人民共和国国务院公报,2008/03/10
[125]刘宇翔.农业合作经济组织模式研究[D].西北：西北农林科技大学,2006/05/01
[126]张满林.我国农民专业合作社治理问题研究[D].北京：北京林业大学博士论文,2009/05/01
[127]股份合作制：理论、实践及其适宜领域——基于浙江案例的新制度经济学视角分析[D].杭州：浙江大学,2003