期权博弈下可转换债券定价与统计套利理论分析和实证研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
历次金融危机,特别是2008年全球的次贷危机都清晰的表明,金融市场的完善已迫在眉睫。妥善推进金融市场产品的发展,不仅可以有效促进金融市场的繁荣和成熟,而且能够大力增强实体经济的抗风险能力。可转换债券作为一种国内新兴的金融产品,近三年的融资规模已突破千亿,申购金额远超出发行规模,受到金融市场各方参与者的追捧和青睐。可转换债券市场规模的扩大,对于解决我国金融市场中股权融资比例高、投资品种单一等问题具有重要意义。但是,可转换债券所具有的债性、股性和可转换性与其纷繁复杂的附带条款相互作用与耦合,使得可转换债券本身及其市场结构、可转换债券参与者之间的博弈和可转换债券交易市场的运行规律等问题都异常复杂。因此,可转换债券相关研究是学术界的重点和难点。
     本文围绕可转换债券的定价、可转换债券发行公告效应和可转换债券市场的交易策略等问题依次进行了探讨和研究。
     首先,本文基于无套利定价原理,用巴黎期权刻画赎回条款的性质,将巴黎期权融入可转换债券定价方程,考虑可转换债券发行方和持有者之间的零和博弈,运用逆向归纳法讨论子博弈纳什均衡,分析理性参与者之间的行为决策,给出相应的定价方程。以国内可转换债券为例,借助数值算法和相关数据,计算出可转换债券价值,结合参与者的最优策略,揭示赎回条款的巴黎期权特性和赎回公告对可转换债券价值的影响。结果表明,巴黎期权的引入可以降低可转换债券的价值,公告期时间越长可转换债券的价值越大,这体现出可转换债券发行公司设计赎回条款的目的。
     其次,本文基于随机占优方法的理论,结合近年来迅速发展的排列检验方法,构建出一个区分小样本优劣的统计检验方法,并将该统计检验方法实际应用于可转换债券市场上普遍关注的“发行公告效应”问题。为描述在信息不完全条件下数据比较问题,该方法使用二阶随机占优的定义作为检验统计量,给出针对小样本问题的检验假设和相应的判定准则。结果显示,可转换债券发行公告后,公司股票普遍出现负面的表现,这一结果与国内外大多数研究结果相符。
     最后,本文基于计量经济学中的单位根检验和协整检验,利用国内市场的样本,挖掘可转换债券市场上的统计套利机会,提出可供操作的统计套利策略。计算结果表明,若找到满足条件的交易对象,可转换债券市场也可以佐证经典的配对交易方法的可行性。
     综上所述,本文试图通过可转换债券定价模型解释可转换债券的赎回条款对其价值的影响机理,并结合可转换债券发行公告效应和市场套利机会的研究,充分揭示可转换债券的性质,为认识和推进我国的可转换债券市场提供理论依据。
Diversification of financial products plays an essential role in financial market inChina. The promotion in the development of financial market products not only boosts thefinancial market, but also enhances the capacity of withstanding risk. With the peculiarcharacteristics, convertible bond wins the favor from financial market participants. Theexpansion of the scale in convertible bond market will surely carry weight to the financialmarket. Due to the complex characteristics and the relevant terms, the convertible bondpricing, the behaviors among participants and the market features are difficult tounderstand. Therefore, it is important to devote to the corresponding research ofconvertible bond.
     Firstly, convertible bond’s call policy embeds the Parisian option feature, which hassome effect on the value of convertible bond. Based on non-arbitrage principle, necessarypartial equations are put forward to capture the characteristic in Parisian option, andsimultaneously tackle the interaction between firm and bondholders. In addition,numerical illustrations are displayed not only to clarify some properties, but also presentsome explanations to the value of convertible bond related to Parisian option and callnotice period. The results indicate the fact the Parisian option decreases the value of theconvertible bond, at the same time, the longer is the call notice period, the higher is thevalue. That’s to say, these findings are in a line with the purpose of the convertible bond.
     Secondly, in order to analyze the announcement effect of convertible bond, a newpermutation test of a small sample for second-stochastic dominance is proposed. By usingoriginal permutation test procedure and combining the stochastic dominance theory, astandard statistical test to distinguish between good and bad from the small sample data isconstructed. Furthermore, the new test is applied to evaluation of announcement effect asthe issuance of convertible bond. The results of analysis focus on the changes of relevantstock prices, and demonstrate that most stock prices have a negative effect after theissuance. Such outcomes can partially reflect the response of investors to the financingdecision.
     Finally, the analysis of pairs trading strategy was introduced to the convertible bond market in order to seek the arbitrage opportunities. Specifically, the unit root test andcointegration test are applied to select the objective samples during observed period, andthen statistical arbitrage strategy is constructed accordingly. The feasibility of the strategywas supported by results from verifiable period.
     In general, the results proposed in this dissertation will provide some insight into thecharacteristics of convertible bonds and promote the development of convertible bondmarket in China.
引文
[1] Agarwal V, Fung W H, Loon Y C, et al. Risk and return in convertible arbitrage:Evidence from the convertible bond market. Journal of Empirical Finance,2011,18(2):175-194
    [2] Altintig Z A, Butler A W. Are they still called late? The effect of notice period oncalls of convertible bonds. Journal of Corporate Finance,2005,11(1-2):337-350
    [3] Ammann M, Kind A, Seiz R. What drives the performance of convertible-bondfunds? Journal of Banking&Finance,2010,34(11):2600-2613
    [4] Ammann M, Kind A, Wilde C. Simulation-based pricing of convertible bonds.Journal of Empirical Finance,2008,15(2):310-331
    [5] Anderson G. Nonparametric tests of SD in income distributions. Econometrica,1996,64(5):1183-1193
    [6] Arshanapalli B, Fabozzi F, Switzer L, et al. New evidence on the market impact ofconvertible bond issues in the US. Finance Letters,2005,3:1-6
    [7] Asquith P, Mullins D. Convertible Debt: Corporate Call Policy and VoluntaryConversion. Journal of Finance,1991,46(4):1273-1289
    [8] Asquith P. Convertible bonds are not called late. The Journal of Finance,1995,50(4):1275-1289
    [9] Babenko I, Lemmon M, Tserlukevich Y. Employee stock options and investment.The Journal of Finance,2011,66(3):981-1009
    [10] Baker M, Wurgler J. Market timing and capital structure. The Journal of Finance,2002,57(1):1-32
    [11] Barone-Adesi G, Bermudez A, Hatgioannides J. Two-factor convertible bondsvaluation using the method of characteristics/finite elements. Journal of EconomicDynamics and Control,2003,27(10):1801-1831
    [12] Barrett G F, Donald S G. Consistent test for SD. Econometrica,2003,71(1):71-104
    [13] Baumol W J, Malkiel B G, Quandt R E. The valuation of convertible securities.Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(1):48-59
    [14] Baurdoux E J, Kyprianou A E, Pardo J C. The Gapeev–Kuhn stochastic game drivenby a spectrally positive Levy process. Stochastic Processes and their Applications,2011,121(6):1266-1289
    [15] Bawa V S, Lindenberg E B, Rafsky L C. An efficient algorithm to determinestochastic dominance admissible sets. Management Science,1979,25(7):609-622
    [16] Beveridge C, Joshi M. Monte Carlo bounds for game options including convertiblebonds. Management Science,2011,57(5):960-974
    [17] Bielecki T R, Crepey S, Jeanblanc M, et al. Arbitrage pricing of defaultable gameoptions with applications to convertible bonds. Quantitative Finance,2008,8(8):795-810
    [18] Bielecki T R, Crepey S, Jeanblanc M, et al. Defaultable options in a markovianintensity model of credit risk. Mathematical Finance,2008,18(4):493-518
    [19] Billingsley R S, Smith D M. Why do firms issue convertible debt. FinancialManagement,1996,25(2):93-99
    [20] Boyle P. Option valuation using a three-jump process. International Options Journal,1986,3:7-12
    [21] Brennan M J, Kraus A. Efficient financing under asymmetric information. TheJournal of Finance,1987,42(5):1225-1243
    [22] Brennan M J, Schwartz E S. The case for convertibles. Journal of Applied CorporateFinance,1988,1(2):55-64
    [23] Brennan M, Schwartz E S. Finite difference method and jump processes arising inthe pricing of contingent claims. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1978,13(3):461-474
    [24] Brennan M, Schwartz E S. The valuation of American put options. The Journal ofFinance,1977,32(2):449-462
    [25] Bühler W, Koziol C. Valuation of Convertible Bonds with Sequential Conversion.Schmalenbach Business Review,2002,54(4):302-334
    [26] Butler A W. Revisiting optimal call policy for convertibles. Financial AnalystsJournal,2002,58(1):50-55
    [27] Byrd A K, Mann S V, Moore W T, et al. Rational timing of calls of convertiblepreferred stocks. Journal of Financial Research,1998,21(3):293-313
    [28] Carlson M, Fisher A, Giammarino R. Corporate investment and asset pricedynamics: implications for the cross-section of returns. The Journal of Finance,2004,59(6):2577-2603
    [29] Carlson M, Fisher A, Giammarino R. Corporate investment and asset pricedynamics: implications for SEO event studies and long-run performance. TheJournal of Finance,2006,61(3):1009-1034
    [30] Chakraborty A, Yilmaz B. Adverse selection and convertible bonds. Review ofEconomic Studies,2011,78(1):148-175
    [31] Chemmanur T J, Simonyan K. What drives the issuance of putable convertibles:risk-shifting, asymmetric information, or taxes. Financial Management,2010,39(3):1027-1067
    [32] Chesney M, Geman H, Jeanblanc-Picque M, et al. Brownian excursion and Parisianbarrier options. Advances in Applied Probability,1997,29(1):165-184
    [33] Chesney M, Geman H, Jeanblanc-Picque M, et al. Mathematics of derivativesecurities. Cambridge University Press,1997
    [34] Choi D, Getmansky M, Henderson B, et al. Convertible bond arbitrageurs assuppliers of capital. Review of Financial Studies,2010,23(6):2492-2522
    [35] Choi D, Getmansky M, Tookes H. Convertible bond arbitrage, liquidity externalities,and stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics,2009,91(2):227-251
    [36] Constantinides G M, Grundy B D. Optimal investment with stock repurchase andfinancing as signals. Review of Financial Studies,1989,2(4):445-465
    [37] Cox J C, Ross S A, Rubinstein M. Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal ofFinancial Economics,1979,7(3):229-263
    [38] Daniels K, Ejara D D, Vijayakumar J. An empirical analysis of the determinants andpricing of corporate bond clawbacks. Journal of Corporate Finance,2009,15(4):431-446
    [39] Dann L Y, Mikkelson W H. Convertible debt issuance, capital structure change andfinancing-ralated information: some new evidence. Journal of Financial Economics,1984,13(2):157-186
    [40] Davidson III W N, Glascock J L, Schwartz T V. Signalling with convertible debt.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1995,30(3):425-440
    [41] Davidson R, Duclos J Y. Statistical inference for SD and for a measurement ofpoverty and inequality. Econometrica,2000,68(6):1435-1464
    [42] De Roon F, Veld C. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans andwarrant-bond loans: an empirical analysis of the Dutch market. Journal of Banking&Finance,1998,22(12):1481-1506
    [43] Downing C, Underwood S, Xing Y H. The relative informational efficiency ofstocks and bonds: an intraday analysis. Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis,2009,44(5):1081-1102
    [44] Duca E, Dutordoir M, Veld C, et al. Why are convertible bond announcementsassociated with increasingly negative issuer stock returns? an arbitarage-basedexplanation. Journal of Banking&Finance,2012,36(11):2884-2899
    [45] Dutordoir M, Gucht L V D. Why do western European firms issue convertiblesinstead of straight debt or equity. European Financial Management,2009,15(3):563-583
    [46] Dutta P K. Strategies and games. The MIT Press Cambridge,1999
    [47] Eckbo B E. Valuation effects of corporate debt offerings. Journal of FinancialEconomics,1986,15(1-2):119-151
    [48] Ederington L H, Caton G L, Campbell C J. To call or not to call convertible debt.Financial Management,1997,26(1):22-31
    [49] Elliott R, Van Der Hoek J, Malcolm. Pairs trading. Quantitative Finance,2005,5(3):271-276
    [50] Engle R F, Granger C W J. Co-integration and error-correction: representation,estimation and testing. Econometrica,1987,55(2):251-276
    [51] Essig S M. Convertible securities and capital structure determinants. Ph. D.dissertation (Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, US),1992
    [52] Foufas G, Larson M G. Valuing Asian options using the finite element method andduality techniques. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2008,222(1):144-158
    [53] Gatev E G, Goetzmann W, Rouwenhorst K. Pairs trading: performance of arelative-value arbitrage rule. Review of Financial Studies,2006,19(3):797-827
    [54] Giancristofaro R A, Bonnini S, Pesarin F. A permutation approach for testingheterogeneity in two-sample categorical variables. Statistic and Computing,2009,19(2):209-216
    [55] Gong P, He Z W, Zhu S P. Pricing convertible bonds on a multi-stagecompound-option model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its applications,2006,336(1):449-462
    [56] Gong P, He Z W. Pricing Convertible Bonds Based on Compound Option Model.Journal of Systems&Management,2006,15(1):32-38
    [57] Gosh C, Varma R, Woolridge. An analysis of exchangeable debt offers. Journal ofFinancial Economics,1990,28(1-2):251-263
    [58] Green R. Investment incentives, debt and warrants. Journal of Financial Economics,1984,13(1):115-136
    [59] Haber R J, Schonbucher P J, Wilmott P. Pricing Parisian options. The Journal ofDerivatives,1999,6(3):71-79
    [60] Hanoch G, Levy H. The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. The Review ofEconomic Studies,1969,36(3):335-346
    [61] Hardar J, Russell W. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American EconomicReview.1969,59(1):25-34
    [62] Hardy G H, Littlewood J E, Polya G. Inequalities. Cambridge, MA: CambridgeUniversity Press
    [63] Harris M, Raviv A. A sequential signalling model of convertible debt call policy.The Journal of Finance,1985,40(5):1263-1281
    [64] Heinkel R, Zechner J. The role of debt and preferred stock as a solution to adverseinvestment incentives. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1990,25(1):1-24
    [65] Hennessy C A, Tserlukevich Y. Taxation, Agency conflicts, and the choice betweencallable and convertible debt. Journal of Economic Theory,2008,143(1):374-404
    [66] Hugonnier J. The Feynman-Kac formula and pricing occupation times derivatives.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance,1999,2(2):153-178
    [67] Hull J, White A. Valuing derivative securities using the explicit finite differencemethod. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1990,25(1):87-100
    [68] Hutchinson M C, Gallagher L A. Convertible bond arbitrage: risk and return.Journal of Business Finance&Accounting,2010,37(1)&(2):206-241
    [69] Ingersoll J. A contingent-claims valuation of convertible securities. Journal ofFinancial Economics,1977,4(3):289-322
    [70] Isagawa N. Callable convertible debt under managerial entrenchment. Journal ofCorporate Finance,2002,8(3):255-270
    [71] Isagawa N. Convertible Debt: An effective financial instrument to controlmanagerial opportunism. Review of Financial Economics,2000,9(1):15-26
    [72] Jaffee D, Shleifer A. Costs of Financial Distress, Delayed Calls of ConvertibleBonds, and the Role of Investment Banks. The Journal of Business,1990,63(1):107-123
    [73] Jalan P, Barone-Adesi G. Equity financing and corporate convertible bond policy.Journal of Banking and Finance,1995,19(2):187-206
    [74] Jennings E. An estimate of convertible bond premiums. Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis,1974,9(1):33-56
    [75] Jensen M, Meckling W. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs andownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(4):305-360
    [76] Jong A D, Dutordoir M, Verwijmeren P. Why do convertible issuers simultaneouslyrepurchase stock? An arbitrage-based explanation. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,100(1):113-129
    [77] Jung K, Kim Y C, Stulz R M. Timing, investment opportunities, managerialdiscretion, and the security issue decision. Journal of Financial Economics,1996,42(2):159-186
    [78] Jung M, Michael J S. The signaling effects associated with convertible debt design.Journal of Business Research,2009,62(12):1358-1363
    [79] Jung M. Long-term equity and operating performances following straight andconvertible debt issuance in the U. S. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies,2009,38(3):337-374
    [80] Ka W L, Yue K K. Anatomy of option features in convertible bonds. The Journal ofFutures Markets,2004,24(6):513-532
    [81] Kang J K, Stulz R M. How different is Japanese corporate finance? An investigationof the information content of new security issues. Review of Financial Studies,1996,9(1):109-139
    [82] Kaur A, Rao B P, Singh H. Testing for second-order SD of two distributions.Econometric Theory,1994,10(5):849-866
    [83] Kifer Y. Game options. Finance and Stochastics,2000,4(4):443-463
    [84] Kim Y O. Informative conversion ratios: a signaling approach. Journal of Financialand Quantitative Analysis,1990,25(2):229-243
    [85] Kimura T, Shinohara T. Monte Carlo analysis of convertible bonds with resetclauses. European journal of operational research,2006,168(2):301-310
    [86] Krishnaswami S, Yaman D. The role of convertible bonds in alleviating contractingcosts. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2008,48(4):792-816
    [87] Kuhn C, Schaik K V. Perpetual convertible bonds with credit risk. Stochastics,2008,80(6):585-610
    [88] Kwok Y K. Mathematical models of financial derivatives. Second edition, Springer,2008
    [89] Lau K W, Kwok Y K. Anatomy of option features in convertible bonds. Journal ofFutures Markets,2004,24(6):513-532
    [90] Lbanez A, Paraskevopoulos I. The sensitivity of American options to suboptimalexercise strategies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2010,45(6):1563-1590
    [91] Lee C F, Lee K W, Yeo G H H. Investor protection and convertible debt design.Journal of Banking&Finance,2009,33(6):985-995
    [92] Lee H W, Figlewicz R E. Characteristics of firms that issue convertible debt versusconvertible preferred stock. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,1999,39(4):547-563
    [93] Levy H. Stochastic dominance: investment decision making under uncertainty.Second Edition. Springer,2006
    [94] Lewis C M, Rogalski R J, Seward J K. The long-run performance of firms that issueconvertible debt: An empirical analysis of operating characteristics and analystforecasts. Journal of Corporate Finance,2001,7(4):447-474
    [95] Li J L, Clemonts C B, Young G W, et al. Solutions of two-factor models withvariable interest rates. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2008,222(1):30-41
    [96] Liao S L, Huang H H. Valuation and optimal strategies of convertible bonds. Journalof Futures Markets,2006,26(9):895-922
    [97] Luncarski I, Horst J T, Veld C. Why do companies issue convertible bond loans? AnEmpirical Analysis for the Canadian Market. Canadian Journal of AdministrativeSciences,2008,25(3):214-236
    [98] Lyuu Y D, Wang C J. On the construction and complexity of the bivariate latticewith stochastic interest rate models. Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2011,61(4),1107-1121
    [99] Magennis D, Watts E, Wright S. Convertible notes: the debt versus equityclassification problem. Journal of Multinational Financial Management,1998,8(2):303-315
    [100] Marco A, Wu L X. Pricing Parisian-style options with a lattice method. Journal ofTheoretical and Applied Finance,1999,2(1):1-16
    [101] Mauer D C. Optimal bond call policies under transactions costs. Journal ofFinancial Research,2004,16(1):23-37
    [102] Mayers D. Why firms issue convertible bonds: the matching of financial and realinvestment options. Journal of Financial Economics,1998,47(1):83-102
    [103] McConnell J, Schwartz E S. Lyon taming. The Journal of Finance,1986,41(3):561-576
    [104] McFadden D. Testing for stochastic dominance. Studies in economics ofuncertainties, New York: Springer,1989
    [105] Mikkelson W H, Partch M M. Valuation effects of security offerings and theissuance process. Journal of Financial Economics,1986,15(1-2):31-60
    [106] Modigliani F, Miller M H. Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital. AmericanEconomic Review,1963,53(3):433-443
    [107] Modigliani F, Miller M H. Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares.Journal of Business,1961,34(4):411-433
    [108] Modigliani F, Miller M H. The cost of capital, corporative finance, and the theory ofinvestment. American Economic Review,1958,48(3):261-297
    [109] Myers S C, Majluf N S. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firmshave information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics,1984,13(2):187-221
    [110] Myers S C. The capital structure puzzle. The journal of Finance,1984,39(3):575-592
    [111] Nath P. High frequency pairs trading with us treasury securities: risks and rewardsfor hedge funds. Available at SSRN565441,2003
    [112] Pesarin F, Salmaso L. Finite-sample consistency of combination-based permutationtests with application to repeated measures designs. Journal of NonparametricStatistics,2010,22(5):669-684
    [113] Poensgen O. The valuation of convertible bonds, part1. Industrial ManagementReview,1965,7(1):77-92
    [114] Poensgen O. The valuation of convertible bonds, part2. Industrial ManagementReview,1966,7(2):83-98
    [115] Quirk J P, Saposnik R. Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Review ofEconomic Studies,1962,29(2):140-146
    [116] Rendleman R, Bartter B. The pricing of options on debt securities. Journal ofFinancial and Quantitative Analysis,1980,15(1):11-24
    [117] Rothschild M, Stiglitz J E. Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of EconomicTheory,1970,2(3):225-243
    [118] Schroder M. Brownian excursions and Parisian barrier optionsa note. Journal ofApplied Probability,2003,40(4):855-864
    [119] Scott T W, Wiedman C I, Wier H A. Transaction structuring and Canadianconvertible debt. Contemporary Accounting Research,2011,28(3):1046-1071
    [120] Sirbu M, Shreve S E. A two-person game for pricing convertible bonds. SIAMJournal on Control and Optimization,2006,45(4):1508-1539
    [121] Smith C W. Investment banking and the capital acquisition process. Journal ofFinancial Economics,1986,15(1-2):3-29
    [122] Stein J C. Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing. Journal of FinancialEconomics,1992,32(1):3-22
    [123] Stiglitz J E. A re-examination of the Modigliani-Miller theorem. AmericanEconomic Review,1969,59(5):784-793
    [124] Stiglitz J E. On the irrelevance of corporate financial policy. American EconomicReview,1974,64(6):851-866
    [125] Szymanowska M, Horst J T, Veld C. Reverse convertible bonds analyzed. TheJournal of Futures Markets,2009,29(10):895-919
    [126] Tesfatsion L. Stochastic dominance and the maximization of expected utility.Review of Economic Studies,1976,43(2):301-315
    [127] Tolley H D, Pope R D. Testing for stochastic dominance. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics,1988,70(3):693-700
    [128] Vetzal K R, Forsyth P A. Discrete Parisian and delayed barrier options: a generalnumerical approach. Advances in Futures and Options Research,1999,10:1-15
    [129] Vidyamurthy G. Paris trading. Quantitative Methods and Analysis, John Wiley&Sons, Canada,2004
    [130] Walter J E, Que A V. The valuation of convertible bonds. Journal of Finance,1973,28(3):713-732
    [131] Wang S S. Convertibles in sequential financing. Review of Finance,2009,13(4):727-760
    [132] Weil R L, Segall J E, Green D. Premiums on convertible bonds. Journal of Finance,1968,23(3):445-463
    [133] Yagi K, Sawaki K. The pricing and optimal strategies of callable warrants. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research,2010,206(1):123-130
    [134] Yan H, Yi F. A free boundary problem arising from pricing convertible bond.Applicable Analysis,2010,89(3):307-323
    [135] Yang J Y, Choi Y, Li S H, et al. A note on―Monte Carlo analysis of convertiblebonds with reset clause‖. European Journal of Operational Research,2010,200(3):924-925
    [136] Yang Z, Yi F H. A free boundary problem arising from pricing convertible bond.Applicable Analysis,2010,89(3):307-323
    [137] Yi F H, Zhou Y. Free boundary problem concerning pricing convertible bond.Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences,2011,34(9):1036-1049
    [138] Zacks S. The theory of statistical inference. New York: John Wiley&Sons,1971
    [139]方昊.统计套利的理论模式及应用分析—基于中国封闭式基金市场的检验.统计与决策,2005(12),14-16
    [140]龚朴,陈睿.投资者异质信念下可转换债券赎回策略.系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(3):656-663
    [141]龚朴,蒙坚玲,何志伟.具有巴黎期权特性的可转债有限元定价和策略分析.系统工程,2007,25(12):63-69
    [142]龚朴,蒙坚玲.基于期权博弈的可转换债券最优策略分析.管理工程学报,2009,23(1):70-75
    [143]韩广哲,陈守东.统计套利模型研究—基于上证50指数成分股的检验.数理统计与管理,2007,26(5):908-916
    [144]韩立岩,牟晖,王颖.基于偏最小二乘回归的可转债定价模型及其实证研究.中国管理科学,2006,14(4):81-87
    [145]何志伟,龚朴.可转换债券的巴黎期权特征.管理学报,2005,2(2):229-234
    [146]李小军,王平心.代理成本视角下的可转换债券融资市场反应研究.管理评论,2009,21(3):3-9
    [147]刘娥平.中国上市公司可转换债券发行公告财富效应的实证研究.金融研究,2005,7:45-56
    [148]刘亮.可转换债券市场异常现象的理论研究-基于委托代理问题的资产定价模型.中国管理科学,2008,16(2):14-19
    [149]仇中群,程希骏.基于协整的股指期货跨期套利策略模型.系统工程,2008,26(12):26-29
    [150]宋殿宇,金华,刘善存.双指数跳扩散过程下带违约风险的可转债定价.系统工程,2011,29(6):60-64
    [151]吴振翔,魏先华,陈敏.基于统计套利的开放式基金评级.管理评论,2009,21(6):3-9
    [152]荀鹏程,赵杨,易洪刚. Permutation Test在假设检验中的应用.数理统计与管理,2006,25(5):616-621
    [153]张才琴.公司的可转换债券发行决策模型.系统工程,2011,29(5):43-48
    [154]张高擎,廉鹏.可转债融资与机构投资者侵占行为—基于华菱管线可转债案例研究.管理世界,2009,1(S):110-120
    [155]张卫国,史庆盛,肖炜麟.考虑支付红利的可转债模糊定价模型及其算法.管理科学学报,2010,13(11):86-93
    [156]张卫国,史庆盛,许文坤.基于全最小二乘拟蒙特卡罗方法的可转债定价研究.管理科学,2011,24(1):82-89
    [157]张学新.随机排列方法检验方差变点.数理统计与管理,2013,32:1-9
    [158]周其源,吴冲锋,刘海龙.可赎回可转换贴现债券完全拆解定价法.管理科学学报,2009,12(4):135-144

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700