低张MRCP结合LAVA动态增强扫描在壶腹周围病变中的临床应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的
     利用3.0T MR低张胰胆管水成像(magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,MRCP)和肝脏快速容积采集(liver acquisition with volume acceleration,PropellerLAVA)技术对壶腹周围病变的影像征象进行研究,探讨二者结合在壶腹周围病变诊断及肿瘤术前可切除性评估中的价值及优势,为进一步提高壶腹周围病变的诊断率和治愈率提供可靠的影像学信息。
     方法
     对来我院就诊的43例疑为壶腹周围病变的患者行MR检查。所有患者均行常规MRI轴位T1WI、T2WI及T1WI、T2WI脂肪抑制扫描、冠状位FIESTA及2D、3D低张MRCP成像,对其中37例无法明确诊断者进一步行Propeller LAVA多期动态增强扫描,利用工作站中的Reformat、Functool功能对原始图像进行最大强度投影(maximum intensity projection,MIP)及多平面重组(multi-planarreformation,MPR)重建后处理,绘制动态强化曲线。根据病变的间接、直接征象及动态强化特点对其起源、性质、大小及范围做出术前诊断,将所得影像诊断结果与临床随访及病理组织学结果作对照研究,评估该方法诊断的灵敏度、特异度及准确度。将肿瘤病变的Propeller LAVA多期动态增强扫描结果分为3级,并与强化前常规MR平扫结果对比,利用非参数秩和检验法进行统计学处理,P<0.05时认为差异有统计学意义。
     结果
     1.低张MRCP结合Propeller LAVA动态增强诊断结石、炎症、肿瘤的灵敏度及特异度分别为100%及100%、60%及97.4%、96.7%及76.9%,三者诊断准确度分别为100%、93.0%、90.6%。
     2.30例肿瘤病变中壶腹部癌、胆总管远端癌及胰头癌组织起源诊断准确度分别为93.3%(28/30)、90.0%(27/30)、86.7%(26/30)。
     3.37例行Propeller LAVA动态增强扫描者中,病变直接征象显示率达89.2%(33/37),肿瘤浸润范围诊断准确度为83.3%(25/30)。其中胰腺癌术前可切除性评估准确度为76.9%(10/13),胆总管远端癌为85.7%(6/7),壶腹部癌为88.9%(8/9)。
     4.对于临床及病理证实的30例肿瘤性病变,观察直接征象并达到3级以上者,Propeller LAVA动态增强扫描显示25例,MR平扫显示2例,前者明显优于后者,二者比较组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
     5.动态强化曲线显示胆总管癌多于延迟40s—50s达到强化峰值,呈缓进缓出型;壶腹部癌达到强化峰值的时间不均一;胰腺癌强化程度较弱,峰值往往低于壶腹部癌及胆总管癌。
     结论
     低张MRCP结合Propeller LAVA动态增强扫描能够全面、直观显示壶腹周围病变的间接及直接征象,在明确肿瘤病变的起源、周围组织血管浸润及提高壶腹部较小或隐匿病变的检出方面均具有较高价值。
Objective
     To analyze the imaging features of the periampullary diseases by hypotonic-MRCP and Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced sequence of the 3.0T MR, then study the value and predominance of this technique in the diagnosis and preoperative resection evaluation of periampullary diseases, so as to supply reliable imaging information to further increase the diagnosis and healing rate of periampullary diseases.
     Materials and Methods
     43 patients suspected with periampullary diseases were reviewed. All patients underwent routine MRI which include axial T1WI/T2WI and FS-T1WI/T2WI、coronal FIESTA and 2D or 3D hypotonic-MRCP scanning, 37 patients of them underwent Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced scan further. Reformat the original images through MIP and MPR, then draw the time-signal curve. Observe the direct and indirect signs, diagnose the genesis、nature、size and circumscription of the diseases then compared with the clinical and histopathology results. Compare the Propeller LAVA dynamic enhanced scan results to the pre-contrast MRI, use nonparametric rank sum test statistics, while P<0.05 consider it has statistical significance.
     Results
     1. For calculus、inflammation and tumor, the sensitivity and specificity of hypotonic- MRCP combine with Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced scan were 100% and 100%、60% and 97.4%、96.7% and 76.9%, the preoperative qualitative accuracy was 100%、93.0% and 90.6%.
     2. Of all the 30 tumors, 8 carcinomas of ampulla、5 cholangiocarcinomas、12 carcinomas of head of pancreas were diagnosed clearly, the accuracy rating of the tissue origin was 93.3% (28/30 )、90.0% (27/30)、86.7% (26/30) .
     3. 37 cases underwent Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced scan, the direct sign display rate was 89.2% (33/37), tumor extension diagnose accordance rate was 83.3% (25/30) .The preoperative resection rate of pancreatic carcinoma、cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of ampulla were 76.9% (10/13)、85.7% (6/7) and 88.9% (8/9) .
     4. For the 30 tumor cases, 25 cases were demonstrated clearly by Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced sequence while 2 cases by pre-contrast MRI, there was significant difference of demonstration ability between Propeller LAVA sequence and pre-contrast MRI (P<0.05) .
     5. As the time-signal curves display cholangiocarcinomas usually achieve the peak value at 40 to50 second, it is not definite for the carcinoma of ampulla which can at the arterial phase or lag period, the enhancement of pancreatic carcinoma is inferior to and later than the two formers .
     Conclusion
     Hypotonic-MRCP combine with Propeller LAVA multi-phase dynamic enhanced scan can display the direct and indirect sign directly and fully, and have significance in identifying the circumscription of the tumor and its extension, they also have important diagnostic value in smaller periampullary diseases.
引文
1.杨立,杨州,赵绍宏等.肝门区胆管细胞癌的多层螺旋CT表现[J].中华放射学杂志.2005,39(11):1181-1184.
    2.Sugita R,Furuta A,Ito K,et al.Periampullary tumors:high spatial resolution MR imaging and histopathologic findings in ampullary region specimens [J].Radiology,2004,231(3):767-774.
    3.Ariyama.Detection and prognosis of small panereatic ductal adenocar-cinoma[J].Nippon Geke Gakkai Zasshi,1997,98(7):572-576.
    4.Balsells-Valls J;Olsina-Kissler JJ;Bilbao-Aguirre I et al;Surgical treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma in a specialized unit:a decade later.Gastroenterologia Y Hepatologia,2006 Feb;Vol.29(2),pp.66-70.
    5.Martin FM,Rossi RL,Dorrucci V,et al.Clinical and pathologic correlation in patients with periamnullary tumors.Arch Surg,1990,125:723.
    6.Filiz G;Yerci O;Adim SB et al;Periampullary carcinomas[J].Hepatogastroenterology,2007 Jun;Vol.54(76):1247-1249.
    7.Yamagiwa H.Clinicopathological study on the carcinoma of the papilla of Vater[J].Rinsho Byori.1988,36(2),217-220.
    8.黄志强.梗阻性黄疸临床诊断的进展[J].中国实用外科杂志.2001,21(8):449
    9.LEVY MJ,WIERSEM AMJ.Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer[J].Oncology,2002,16(1):29-38.
    10.Shoup M;Hodul P;Aranha GV et al;Defining a role for endoscopic ultrasound in staging periampullary tumors.American Journal Of Surgery.2000 Jun;Vol.179(6),453-456.
    11.Loyer M,David CL.Dubrow RA.et al.Vascular involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma:reassessment by thin-section CT.Abdom Imaging,1996,21:202-206.
    12.Hand BH.An anatomical study of the choledochoduodenal area.Br J Surg,1963,60:486
    13.Wang HP;Wu MS;Lin CC,et al;Pancreaticobiliary diseases associated with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1998 Aug;Vol.48(2):184-189
    14.Kimura K,Ohto M,Saisho H,et al.Assosciation of gallbladder carcinoma and anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union[J].Gastroenterology,1985,89(6):1258-1265.
    15.黎冬喧,田伏洲,李红,等.壶腹隔膜的形态及其生理意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,1999;17(3):252-253.
    16.Lim JH.Cholangiocarcinoma:morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings.AJR,2003,181:819-827.
    17.Sasake A,AramakiM,Kawano K,et a.l Intrahepatic periphe cholangiocarcinoma:mode of spread and choice of surgi treatment.Br J Surg,1998,85:1206-1209.
    18.戴建平.2004年RSNA磁共振新技术印象-HDMR开辟临床应用的新纪元.GE医疗杂志,2004(4).
    19.Hu HH,Madhuranthakam AJ,Kruger DG et al;Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography[J].
    20.Magnetic Resonance In Medicine,2006 Jan;Vol.55(1):16-22.
    21.Weiger M,Pruessmann KP,Boesiger P.2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI[J].MAGMA,2002,14:10-19.
    22.Pipe JG.Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI:applicationto head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging[J].Magn Re-son Med,1999,42(5):963-969.
    23.卢延,张雪哲主编.磁共振水成像[M].北京.科学出版社,2000,3-10.
    24.Munir K;Bari V;Yaqoob J etc.magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)in obstructive jaundice[J].The Journal Of The Pakistan Medical Association 2004.3,54(3):128-132.
    25.SARMLENTO JM,NAGORNEY DM,SARR MG,et al.Perrampullary cancers are there differences?[J].Sung C Lin North Am,2001,81:543-555.
    26.陈 翼,赵云辉,许乙凯等.Gd-DTPA增强在MRCP图像质量控制中的作用及临床应用[J].医学影像学杂志2007,17(6):585-589.
    1.卢延,张雪哲主编.磁共振水成像[M].北京.科学出版社,2000,3-10.
    2.Wallner BK,Schumacher KA,Weidenmaier W,et al.Dilated biliary tract:evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence[J].Radiology,1991,181(3),805-808.
    3.TskeharaY,IchijoK,TooyamaN,et al.Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spinecho sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis[J].Radiology 1994,192,73-78.
    4.夏黎明,陈荣萍,王承缘等.磁共振胆道成像.中华放射学杂志[J],1996,30:448-451
    5.PavoneP;LaghiA;Panebianco V,et al.MR cholangiopancreatography:technique,indications and clinical results[J].La Radiologia Medica 1997,94(6),632-641.
    6.CovaM,staculF,cesterG,et al.MR cholangiopancreatography:comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequence[J].Radiol Med,2003,106,178-190.
    7.IsomotoI,Koshiishi T,UetaniM,et al.Efficacy of respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo 3 dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography on middle magnetic field MR imaging[J].Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Crakkai Zasshi,1997,57(4),170-175.
    8.张晓明,李传福,冯德朝等.3.0T超高场磁共振正常人胆胰管成像及价值探讨[J].山东大学学报,2006,44,410-413.
    9.崔 凤 姜永乐 袁 杭等.MRCP结合敏感编码技术对梗阻性黄疸的诊断价值[J].浙江临床医学.2006,8:542.
    10.Asbach P,Dewey M,Klessen C et al.Respiratory-triggered MRCP applying parallel acquisition techniques.Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J].JMR,2006,24,1095-10100.
    11.石景森,王炳煌.外科黄疸疾病诊断治疗学[M].北京.人民军医出版社,59.
    12.Sperlongano P,Pisaniello D,Del Viscovo L,et al.Efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in detecting common bile duct lithiasis:our experience[J].Chirurgia Italiana,2005,57:635-640.
    13.Ito K,Fujita N,Noda Y,et al.Clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary tract diseases[J].Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi.2001,98:1167-1173.
    14.Brisbois D,Plomteux O.Value of MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis in symptomatic patients:one-year experience with a standardized high resolution breath-hold technique[J].JBR BTR.2001,84,258-261.
    15.HochwalkSN,DobryanskyMBA,Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis[J].Journal Of Gastrointestinal Surgery[J]1998,2:573-579.
    16.卢延,张雪哲,洪闻等.磁共振胆管造影评估胆结石[J].实用医学影像杂志.2003,4:61-63,167.
    17.卢延,张雪哲主编.胰胆CT与MRI[M].北京.人民卫生出版社,2002,151-167
    18.李明岳,余小舫,鲍世韵等.MRCP与ERCP在胆道梗阻病变中的诊治分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志2006,17:295-296.
    19.朱应礼,柏根基,徐益明等.MRI和MRCP在胰胆管恶性梗阻性病变中的定性研究[J].医学影像学杂志 2006,16:486-488.
    20.Ysh TS,Jan YY,TsengGH,et al.Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction:magnetic resonance chlangiopancreatograph findings.[J]AM JGastroenterol,2000,95,432-440.
    21.Andersson M,Kostic S,Johansson M et al.MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus helical CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected periampullary tumors:a prospective comparative study[J].Acta Radiol 2005,46,16-27.
    22.张为民,温 浩,李 涛等.139例壶腹周围癌诊治分析[J].新疆医科大学学报2006.,29:128-131.
    23.孙凯,孙权,刘志苏等.ERCP对壶腹周围癌的早期诊断价值[J].临床外科杂志.2003,11:297.
    24.张斌,吴力群,郭卫东等.磁共振胆胰管成像对壶腹部肿瘤诊断的价值[J].肝胆外科杂志 2002,10:175-177.
    25.李明山,王丽,耿进朝等.低张力MRI对十二指肠乳头区疾病的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志 2005,16:30-33.
    26.肖越勇,李杰,李国英等.低张力MRI与内窥镜对照评价十二指肠乳头区的研究[J].中华放射学杂志 1999,33:39-41.
    27.Irie H,Honda H,Shinozaki K et al.MR imaging of ampullary carcinomas.Comput Assist Tomogr.2002,26:711-717.
    28.GorelickAB,ScheimanJM,FendrickAM.Identificationofpatientswithresectablepan creaticcancer:atwhatstagearewe?[J].Am J Gastroenterol,1998,93:995-1996.
    29.支 龙,吕晓波,梁静等.MRCP对诊断良恶性胆道梗阻的临床应用[J].实用医学影像杂志 2001,2.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700