京亚和克瑞森葡萄高效再生体系建立
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
转基因技术已发展成为植物育种和分子设计的一种重要手段,当前在葡萄育种中应用的限制因子是再生体系。虽然过去有较多葡萄组织培养的报道,但大多采用侧芽培养的方法,不适合转基因再生要求。本试验以鲜食葡萄品种京亚和克瑞森无核的成年态为试材,经消毒、继代扩繁后,进一步以无菌试管苗的叶片为外植体,建立了叶盘法再生的技术体系,并为转基因技术应用做了部分前期探索。得出以下结论:
     1.对单芽茎段采用0.1%升汞和2%NaClO进行消毒,设计了不同消毒时间的组合,实验表明用2%NaClO消毒20 min灭菌效果最好。取材在4月中旬至5月中旬污染最低。
     2.初代培养基:京亚采用MS+6-BA 1.0mg/L,克瑞森采用MS+6-BA 2.0mg/L都能有效的诱导腋芽的萌发。
     继代增殖培养基:采用MS+6-BA 1.5mg/L+IBA 0.1mg/L可以有效的诱导腋芽的增殖,增殖倍数在5倍以上。
     3.克服玻璃化:降低温度、增加琼脂含量都能够缓解组培苗的玻璃化,但都不能完全抑制玻璃化,随着温度的升高及继代次数的增加,玻璃化现象仍然严重。在继代增殖培养基中加入0.4mg/L的活性炭,虽然增殖倍数有所降低,但却可以完全抑制玻璃化,同时还可以为叶盘再生提供稳定而健壮的外植体材料。
     4.葡萄叶盘再生体系:克瑞森无核的叶盘再生最佳培养基为MS+6-BA5.0mg/L+IBA0.05mg/L,再生率为11.2%;京亚叶盘再生的最佳培养基为MS+6-BA3.0mg/L+IBA0.05mg/L,再生率为65.2%。前2片展开叶是最理想的外植体,只切断叶片主脉而不将叶片完全切断、将叶片背面接触培养基也可以提高再生率。
     5.叶片再生芽生根的适宜培养基为1/2MS+IBA 1.0mg/L+7g/L Agar+30g/LSuc,处理须根多,茎杆粗壮,生根效果最为理想。
     6.遗传转化摸索发现:卡那霉素不适合京亚叶片再生筛选,只适合于生根筛选,浓度为10mg/L;Cef抑菌浓度为300 mg/L。
Transgene technology has been developed a kind of most important instrument of plant breeding and molecular design.However,too low regeneration frequency restricted transgene project developing of grape now.Although there were many reports in grape tissue culture,they used axillary bud as explants,these is not fit to transgene regeneration. In this study,Jingya and Crimson Seedless were used as the materials,after sterilize、subculture and multiplication,leaves of plants in vitro were used as explants,established leaf disc regeneration system,a portion prophase research for transgene was done also, and get following conclusion:
     1.To sterilize single bud stem with 0.1%HgCl and 2%NaClO solution,and a variety of combinations with unequal sterilization time were designed.The test shows that the 2%NaClO sterilize 20 min has the best effect for eliminating bacterium.The lowest contamination was obtained at April and May.
     2.The first generation culture medium:MS + 6-BA 1.0 mg/L is the most suitable for Jingya;MS + 6-BA 2.0 mg/L is the most suitable for Crimson Seedless.
     The subculture medium:MS + 6-BA 1.5 mg/L + IBA 0.1 mg/L is the most suitable medium for both of them,and the Multiplication times are up to 5.
     3.Inhibit Vitrification:Reduce the temperature and increase agar content can delay the occurrence of vitrification,but it cann't stop the occurrence of vitrification as rising of the temperature and the times of the subculture.With 0.4 g/L active carbon in subculture medium cann't get more multiplication,but it can totally stop vitrification, and can provide stabilization and strong explants for leaf disc regeneration.
     4.Leaf regeneration system:The leaf best hormone match of Crimson Seedless was MS + 6-BA 6.0 mg/L + IBA 0.05 mg/L regeneration rate was 11.2%;Jingya was:MS + 6-BA 3.0 mg/L + IBA0.05 mg/L,regeneration rate was 65.2%.we also found that the top 2 leaves is the best explants,Leaf abaxial to medium and partially cut in the leaf vein can improve regeneration rate too.
     5.Best of the radication medium of adventitious bud was 1/2MS + IBA 0.5 mg/L+ sucrose 30 g/L + agar 7 g/L.The taproot distributes radially,with strong stem and developed lateral root.It is the ideal result for rhizogenesis.
     6.Kanamycin was used in the rooting select but not the leaf select because of the sensitivity,and the selecting concentrate was 10 mg/L,and the concentrate of Cef was 300 mg/L which can inhibit the Agrobacterium effectively.
引文
1.艾鹏飞,罗正荣.CPPU在柿试管繁殖中的应用.果树学报,2002,19(4):272-274.
    2.鲍雪珍,张克忠,沈利爽.葡萄胚性愈伤组织无性系的建立、保持及其植株再生的研究.山东大学学报(自然科学版),1995,30(1):105-111.
    3.卜学贤,陈维伦.活性碳对培养基中生长调节物质的吸附作用.植物生理学报,1988,14(4):401.
    4.曹孜义,刘国民.实用植物组织培养技术教程.甘肃科学技术出版社,1998.
    5.曹孜义,杨德龙,杨庆丰,于作文.内39号葡萄株系的离体快繁技术研究.果树学报,2002,19(6):427-429.
    6.曹孜义,郭彩月,齐与枢,敖良德,王明鑫,郝建军,秦玉凤.葡萄花药诱导植株成功.甘肃农业科技,1980,4:26-29.
    7.陈龙清,李春.日本早小菊的组织培养及玻璃苗防止.华中农业大学学报,1995,14(3):272-274.
    8.陈振光.果树组织培养.上海科学技术出版社,1987.
    9.程宗明,徐喜楼,盛炳成,徐惠英.葡萄组织培养的现状及展望.果树科学,1992,9(1):50-55.
    10.杜学梅,李登科.落叶果树生物技术育种研究进展.果树学报,2002,19(5):286-291.
    11.范子南,肖华.山葡萄(Vitis vinifera L)试管繁殖中芽增殖能力衰减的原因及其防治方法的研究.福建师范大学学报,1992,8(4):72-79.
    12.冯慧.葡萄转化受体系统的研究及抗卷叶病毒植株的培育.[北京林业大学硕士论文],2000.
    13.符近.三种不同类型种子休眠、萌发及马占思种子老化过程中的研究.[北京农业大学硕士研究论文],1996.
    14.干异星.荔枝细胞培养的初步研究.济南大学出版社.自然与医学报,1997,18(5):84-88.
    15.韩继成,陈宁,陈霜莹,章德明,蔡文启.葡萄叶片植株再生及GFLV-CP基因的转化.Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences.2006,9(3):6-9.
    16.韩美丽,陆荣生.葡萄侧芽形成丛生芽过程中影响因素研究.广西林业科学,1996,25(3):155-157.
    17.贺普超主编.葡萄学.中国农业出版社,1999.336-342.
    18.胡开林,杨瑞环.青花菜试管苗玻璃化发生及克服途径的初步研究.华南农业大学学报,1998,19(4):63-66.
    19.黄贞光,谭素英.葡萄组织培养繁殖及微茎尖培养研究.果树科学,1990,7(1):13-18.
    20.贾春兰,王纪芳,杨建荣,张丽云,连勇,蔡林.葡萄试管苗繁殖技术研究.中国果树,1992,(1):25-27.
    21.金万梅,董静,王忆,闫爱玲,陈梅香,韩振海.葡萄器官离体再生和遗传转化体系的建立.园艺学报,2008,35(1):27-32.
    22.李云,冯慧,田砚亭.葡萄再生系统研究进展.生物技术通报,2000,(2):28-311.
    23.李华,王华.欧亚种葡萄霜酶病与白粉病的抗病关系.园艺学进展,1994,(3):71-73.
    24.李华.我国葡萄、葡萄酒生产现状及存在问题.葡萄栽培与酿酒,1995,(3):1-3.
    25.李佩芬,卢炳芝,于向荣,郭飞跃,鲍雪珍.葡萄细胞悬浮培养及诱变研究初报.园艺学报,1993,20(3):301-302.
    26.李世诚.葡萄未成熟胚的胚状体诱导和再生植株.上海农业学报,1991,8(2):27-32.
    27.李杨汉主编.植物学.上海科学技术出版社出版,1984.
    28.李云,冯慧,田砚亭.葡萄遗传转化研究进展.生物工程进展,2000,20(3):49-52.
    29.李云,冯慧,田砚亭.“红地球”叶盘、叶柄不定芽再生系统的建立园艺学报,2002,29(1):60-62.
    30.李云,冯慧,田砚亭.葡萄再生系统研究进展.生物技术通报,2000,(2):28-31.
    31.李云,田砚亭,罗晓芳.珠美海棠试管苗玻璃化发生机理的初步研究.北京林业大学学报,1996,18(1):52-57.
    32.梁素颖,包慧芳,陈福双.葡萄生物技术研究进展及展望.中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2005,5.
    33.刘非燕,郭达初.试管苗玻璃化发生原因初探.杭州大学学报,1996,23(4):382-387.
    34.刘世强编著.细胞工程的理论与实践.辽宁大学出版社,1995.
    35.楼程富,周金妹,钟名其,胡美君,谈建中.CPPU对桑叶片培养不定芽分化的诱导效果.蚕业科学,1997,23(4):32-33.
    36.卢炳芝,于向荣,郭飞跃,李佩芬,鲍雪珍.葡萄花丝培养中的胚胎发生.果树科学,1995,(12):37-40.
    37.牛健哲,薛光荣,丛佩华,杨振英,史永忠.应用花药培养技术培育苹果新类型,果树科学,1994,11(1):1-4.
    38.潘春云,元桂梅,汤小宁,杨立英.葡萄三倍体育种初报.山东农业大学学报,1998,29(3):299-302.
    39.潘学军.无核抗病葡萄胚挽救育种的研究.[西北农林科技大学硕士论文],2002
    40.秦玲.苹果遗传转化体系的建立及ipt基因的导入.[西北农林科技大学硕士论文],2002.
    41.权冬玲,常永义.葡萄不同器官直接再生不定芽的研究.甘肃农业大学学报,2005,20(2):173-177.
    42.邵建柱,马宝馄.转基因苹果研究进展.果树学报,2003,20(1):49-53.
    43.孙仲序,陈受宜,王建设,李桂芬,管雪强.农杆菌介导BADH基因转化葡萄的研究.果树学报,2003,20(2):98-92.
    44.陶建敏,庄智敏,章镇,耿其芳,蔡斌华.美人指葡萄不定芽离体诱导再生植株的研究.果树学报,2005,22(5):551-553.
    45.王华,张继澍,卢江,马春花.葡萄基因工程研究进展.西北植物学报,2004,24(9):171-175.
    46.王发明.我国鲜食葡萄生产现状与发展趋势.西北园艺,2003,(8):7-8.
    47.王关林,方宏筠.果树基因工程研究进展及展望.中国果树,2002,(3):43-47.
    48.王关林,方宏筠,那杰.高活性细胞激动素TDZ在植物组织培养中的应用.植物学通报,1997,14(3):47-53.
    49.王关林,方宏筠.植物基因工程.科学出版社出版,1998.
    50.王华,卢江,马春花,张继澎.酿酒葡萄“梅尔诺”再生系统建立的研究西北植物学报,2005.25(5):551-553.
    51.王华,崔福君,张继澍,张予林.现代生物技术在葡萄种质资源、品种改良研究中的应用.中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2003(1):18-21.
    52.王清章,刘怀超.莲藕贮藏中褐变度及多酚氧化酶活性的初步研咒.中国蔬菜,1997(3):4-6.
    53.王蕴珠,葛扣麟,邹高治,杨金水,叶鸣明.葡萄体细胞愈伤组织的诱导与植株再生.植物学报,1985,6(15):21-23.
    54.王子成,邓秀新.柑橘转基因研究进展.华中农业大学学报,2002,21(5):494-499.
    55.吴伟民,陈晓强,陈秀兰,马鸿翔,戴子林,刘广勤,夏小宝,梁学辉,顾勤.CPPU 对草莓花药愈伤组织诱导和分化的影响.中国南方果树,1999,28(2):36-37.
    56.夏铭,吴细云,张丽梅.红豆杉组织培养中褐化问题的研究.生物技术,1996,6(3):18-20.
    57.徐彪振,傅作申,原亚萍.植物组织培养过程中的褐变现象.国外农学杂粮作物,1997,1:55-56.
    58.阎国华,周宇,张开春.核果类果树转基因研究进展,果树学报,2001,18(6):358-364.
    59.杨莉,徐昌杰,陈昆松.果树转基因研究进展与产业化展望.果树学报,2003(5):331-337.
    60.杨增海编著.园艺植物组织培养.农业出版社出版,1987.
    61.于清章,史国荣.几种防褐变剂对去皮切片马铃薯储藏的影响.长江蔬菜,1998,11:25-26.
    62.于向荣,李佩芬,卢炳芝,王敏,郑旭琴,刘延松.酿酒葡萄原生质体再生植株.果树科学,1999,16(2):115-118.
    63.张春晖,李华,方培绍.葡萄育种方法研究进展.葡萄栽培与酿酒,1995,(3):20-22.
    64.张翠玉,廖晴.月季试管苗玻璃化原因及控制方法研究.新疆农业科学,1991(2):76-78.
    65.张剑侠,王贺飞,徐炎,王跃进.中国野生葡萄组织培养研究.西北植物学报,2003,23(3):460-463.
    66.张克忠,鲍雪珍,白永延,颜望明,唐惕,曹湘玲,毛慧珠.苏云金杆菌内毒素蛋白基因转入葡萄胚性愈伤组织细胞及转基因植株再生的研究.试验生物学报,199,30(3):303-308.
    67.张利,孟新法.无核葡萄胚发育及早期离体培养的研究:培养方式对离体胚发育的影响.北京农业大学学报,1992,18(4):393-396.
    68.张潞生.无核葡萄有籽技术.葡萄栽培与酿酒,1993,6(3):35-38.
    69.张鸣,傅爱根,王爱国.AgNO_3在植物离体培养中的作用及可能机制.植物生 理学通讯,1997,33(5):376-379.
    70.张素勤.非洲菊离体快速繁殖体系的研究.[西北农林科技大学硕士论文],2002.
    71.张文娥,王飞,潘学军.葡萄属植物(Vitis L.)再生系统的研究进展.西北农林科技大学学报,2003,31(10):191-196.
    72.张玉满,田砚亭,罗晓芳.葡萄生物技术研究的进展.北京林业大学学报,1997,19(1):70-76.
    73.张云飞,赵志中.山葡萄组织培养.山西农业科学,1991(8):22-23.
    74.周菊华.控制瑞香试管苗玻璃化的研究.园艺学报,1990(8):229-232.
    75.周鹏,郭安平,王跃进,黎小瑛.2个葡萄品系外植体愈伤组织的诱导和植株再生.热带作物学报,2002,23(3):52-56.
    76.周鹏,王跃进,贺普超.人胰岛素样生长因I基因转化葡萄的研究.热带作物学报,2002,23(1):54-61.
    77.周瑞金,刘孟军.果树离体叶片培养再生研究进展.生物技术,2003,13(6):66-67.
    78.周思军.大豆遗传转化的主要障碍及研究进展.黑龙江农业科学,2001,(3):24-27.
    79.邹昌杰,李佩芬.葡萄花粉植株的诱导.植物学报,1991,23:79-81.
    80.Berres R,Otten L,Tinland B,Malgarini-Clog E,Walter B.Transformation of vitis tissue by different strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing the T-6b gene.Plant Cell Reports,1992(11):192-195.
    81.Colova-Tsolova VM,Bordallo PN,Phills BR,Bausher M.Synchronized somatic embryo development in embryogenic suspensions of grapevine Muscadinia rotundifolia(Michx.)Small.Vitis,2007,46:15-18.
    82.Franks T,He DG.,Thomas M.Regeneration of transgenic V.vinifera L.Sultana plants:genotypic and phenotypic analysis.Molecular Breeding,1998,4:321-333.
    83.Gall OL et al.Plant Science,1994,102:161-170.
    84.Goderis IJWM,Bolle MFC,Francois IEJA,Wouters PFJ,Broekaert WF,Cammue BPA.A set of modular plant transformation vectors allowing flexible insertion of up to six expression units.Plant Molecular Biology,2002,50:17-27.
    85.Gray DJ,Hanger LA.Effect of ovule maturity on recovery of zygotic embryos and embryogenic cultures from muscadine grapes.HortScience,1993,28:227.
    86.Gribaudo,Vallania R,Miaja ML.Genotype influence on soma tic embryogenesis in grapevine anther and leaf culture.Acta Horticulturae,2000,(1):407-410.
    87.Jean-Pierre P,Laurent T,Gilles B.Variability among Vitis vinifera cultivators in micropropagation,organogenesis and antibiotic sensitivity.Journal of Experimental Botany,1998,49(319):171-179.
    88.Li ZJ,Jayasankar S,Gray DJ.Expression of a bifunctional green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion marker under the control of three constitutive promoters and enhanced derivatives in transgenic grape(Vitis vinifera).Plant Science,2001,160:877-887.
    89.Martinelh L,Gribaudo I.Somatic Embryogenesis in Grapevine.Netherland:Kluwer Academic Publishers Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of Grapevine,2001,327-351.
    90.Mohsen K,Ebrahim H,Ibrahim A.Influence of medium soildification and pH value on in vitro propagation of marauta.leuconeura CV . Kerchoviana Science Horticulture 2000, 86: 12-21.
    
    91. Motoike SY, Skirrin RM, Norton MA. Somatic embryogenesis and long term maintenance of embryogenic lines from fox grapes. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2001, 66: 121-131.
    
    92. Perl A, Eshdat Y, Thombs MP. DNA transfer and gene expression in transgenic grapes. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 1998, 15: 365-386.
    
    93. Peros JP, Torregrosa, Berger G. Variability among Vitis vinifera cultivars in micropropagation, organogenesis and antibiotic sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1998, 49 (319): 171-179.
    
    94. Prapapan Teerawanichpan, Travis Hoffman, Paula Ashe. Investigations of combinations of mutations in the jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) that afford brighter fluorescence, and use of a version (VisGreen) in plant, bacterial, and animal cells. Biochimicaet BiophysicaActa, 1770, 2007, 1360-1368.
    
    95. Berres R, Otten L, Tinland B. Transformation of vitis tissue by different strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing the T-6b gene. Plant Cell Reports, 1992, (11): 192-195.
    
    96. Regner F , Roman H . Regeneration of grapevine by means of organogenesis. Mitteilungen Klostemeuburg, 1994, 4 (5): 168-174.
    
    97. Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Dutt M, Gray DJ. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cultures and plant regeneration in Vitis rotundifolia Michx (muscadine grape). Plant Cell Reports.
    
    98. ScorzaR, Cordts JM. Producing Transgenic "Thompson Seedless" Grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 1996, 121 (4): 616-619.
    
    99. Stamp JA, Colby SM, Meredith CP. Improve shoot organogenesis from leaves of grape. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 1990, 115: 1038-1042.
    
    100. Stamp JA, Colby SM. Direct shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of grapes (Vitis spp.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1990,22 (2): 127-133.
    
    101. Stewart CN. The utility of green fluorescent protein in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 2001, 20: 376-382.
    
    102.Tang FA, Mullins MG. Adventitious bud formation in leaf explants of some grapevine rootstocks and scion cultivars. Vitis, 1990, 29: 151-158.
    
    103. Torregrosa L, Bouquet A. Agrobacterium Rhizogenes and A1turn efaciens co2 transformation to obtain grapevine hair roots producing the coat protein of grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1997, 49: 53- 61.
    
    104. Yasuomi I, Kenji K. Automation of somatic embryo production. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 2001, 65: 179-191.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700