摘要
目前,我国杂交水稻年种植面积稳定在1500万hm~2左右,占全国水稻种植面积的50%以上。国内推广应用的杂交籼稻不育系除了红莲型细胞质外,野败型、冈型、印尼水田谷型、矮败型等都可用其它类型的保持系保持其不育性。这些细胞核不同的品种称为异型保持系或第二保持系。不育系与异型保持系杂交产生的杂种不育系通称为二元不育系。其中双亲之间没有明显亲缘关系的称为非同胞二元不育系,例如珍汕97A/协清早B;双亲为姊妹系的二元不育系称为全同胞型二元不育系,双亲之间只有一个共同亲本的二元不育系,称为半同胞型二元不育系;双亲之一为另一个亲本的衍生系的二元不育系,称为回交型二元不育系,这三类二元不育系统称为近亲型二元不育系。非同胞型二元不育系与恢复系杂交得到的杂种F_1称为水稻三交种,近亲型二元不育系与恢复系杂交所得到的杂种F_1称为改良单交种。据研究三交种和改良单交种由于聚合了三个亲本的优良基因,常常表现出较好的综合抗性,较强的群体缓冲性和对不良环境的广泛适应性,因此在玉米、油菜等许多作物中广泛应用。
我国水稻三交种的研究始于20世纪70年代末,到目前为止仅有少量报道,虽然达成了利用三交种可提高水稻制种产量的共识,并已经筛选出少量比单交种有一定增产潜力的三交组合,但一直没有大面积生产应用,其主要原因在于用来配制三交种的二元不育系双亲遗传差异较大,引起三交种F_1代生育期和株型分离较严重,群体整齐度较差,难以为群众所接受。类似的问题在玉米杂种优势利用过程中也遇到过,最终通过筛选特定的组合,特别是运用姊妹种配制改良单交种的方法,既提高了杂交种的制种产量,又解决了玉米三交种整齐度差的问题,但迄今为止未见关于水稻改良单交种的研究报道。
为了解决当前杂交水稻生产上品种适应性降低,稳产性差的问题,减少因高温冷害等异常气候条件对杂交稻生产所造成的损失,增强杂交稻对环境的适应能力,实现杂交稻生产的稳产高产,提高制种产量,本研究借鉴玉米育种的经验,选取了与纯合不育系有近亲关系的品系作为第二保持系,配制了三类近亲型二元不育系,再与不同的恢复系杂交配制了三种类型的改良单交种,对二元不育系本身的杂种优势、一般配合力表现、以及改良单交种的产量表现、群体整齐度和稻米的部分品质性状进行研究,一方面探讨杂交稻改良单交种生产应用的可行性,以解决水稻三交种因整齐度较差不能在大面积生产上应用的问题,为培育高产稳产且具有广泛适应性的杂交稻品种探索一条新的路子。另一方面筛选产量较高,整齐度较好,能为大面积生产所接受的改良单交种。
1、用10个具有不同亲缘关系的纯合不育系及其保持系配制了3个全同胞型二元不育系、11个回交型二元不育系和12个半同胞型二元不育系。鉴定了其育性、开花习性、异交特性及部分农艺性状的表现,分析了相应的保持系间杂交F_1代单株产量的杂种优势,结果表明:
(1)所有二元不育系的自交结实率均为零,表现完全不育,花粉组成与双亲不育系相比变化不大;
(2)多数二元不育系的开花习性和异交特性比相应的纯合不育系有明显改善,特别是柱头双外露率尤为明显;
(3)半同胞型二元不育系株高、剑叶长、剑叶宽、穗长及部分农艺性状的杂种优势较为明显;
(4)三类B×B组合F_1的平均单株产量随双亲的遗传差异的加大而增加,说明二元不育系随着双亲遗传差异增加杂种优势逐渐增强;26个保持系间杂交组合中有23个产量超过高亲,说明利用三类二元不育系的杂种优势都有可能提高制种产量。
2、利用3个全同胞型二元不育系、11个回交型二元不育系和10个半同胞型二元不育系及其10个亲本纯合不育系,分别与南恢04、明恢86、辐恢838、先恢207和密阳46等5个恢复系按照NCⅡ交配设计配制了50个单交种和120个改良单交种,按随机区组的随机模型分析方法,对二元不育系主要性状进行了配合力分析。结果表明:
(1)所有性状的一般配合力方差和特殊配合力方差均达到了极显著水平,说明所有性状均受加性效应和非加性效应的共同影响,其中千粒重、有效穗数、每穗总粒数、结实率、株高、播始历期等以基因的加性效应作用为主,单株产量却以非加性效应为主.在多数性状上,恢复系对F_1的影响大于不育系及互作效应,但在单株产量上不育系的影响超过了恢复系。
(2)三类二元不育系单株产量和有效穗数的一般配合力都比纯合不育系极显著增加,回交型二元不育系和半同胞型二元不育系结实率的一般配合力也极显著高于纯合不育系,其他性状上二元不育系和纯合不育系没有明显差异。
(3)在水稻改良单交种育种中,以双亲具有近亲关系的二元不育系作母本进行适当配组,有可能选育出有效穗数较多,结实率较好,比相应单交种产量更高的水稻改良单交种。
3、分析了三类二元不育系所配的改良单交种及其相应的B×B组合F_2的抽穗历期和始齐历期以及株高、有效穗数,主穗长、剑叶长、剑叶宽和播始历期等性状的变异系数,计算了两者之间各性状上的相关系数,结果表明:
(1)三类二元不育系所配的改良单交种除株高变异系数的平均值显著地高于纯合不育系的平均值外,其余株型性状上差异不显著;从纯合不育系到全同胞型二元不育系、回交型二元不育系、再到半同胞型二元不育系,播始历期变异系数、始齐历期(10%植株抽穗日期至80%植株抽穗日期)、抽穗历期(各小区第一株抽穗至最后一株抽稳的总天数)等三个性状的平均值都表现出了逐渐增大的趋势;部分全同胞型和回交型二元不育系配出改良单交种的平均群体整齐度与普通单交种接近。
(2)二元不育系所配的改良单交种与其相应的B×B组合F_2在抽穗历期、始齐历期、播始历期变异系数、株高的变异系数等性状上的相关系数分别为0.499、0.372、0.343和0.251,达到了极显著水平,在剑叶宽变异系数和主穗长变异系数上的相关系数分别为0.226和0.196,达到了显著水平;其它性状上相关不显著。说明随着二元不育系双亲遗传差异的增大,其所配改良单交种的生育期和株高、穗长等性状的整齐度可能会降低,在改良单交种的育种工作中,适当减少二元不育系双亲的遗传差异是完全有必要的。在普通单交种和各类改良单交种群内,单交种或改良单交种与其相应的保持系或B×B组合F_2在生育期有关的性状上相关均不显著,而大多数株型有关性状也都不显著。说明当把二元不育系双亲的遗传差异控制在一定的范围内时,改良单交种中在大多数性状上的整齐度与其母本不育系之间的相关不显著,在此范围内对二元不育系的选择主要根据其一般配合力的高低及其自身的杂种优势表现。
(3)通过综合分析B×B组合F_2以及二元不育系所配的改良单交种的整齐度,筛选得到了几个较好的二元不育系,主要包括Ⅱ协1A/Ⅱ协2B、金协黄A/金协紫B、金23A/金协紫B、金协黄A/金23B、Ⅱ-32A/Ⅱ协1B、Ⅱ-32A/Ⅱ协2B,和新协紫A/Ⅱ协2B。
4、研究比较了各改良单交组合与普通单交种单株产量的差异,以及株高、剑叶长、剑叶宽、主穗长、抽穗期等与群体整齐度关系较为密切的性状的变异情况。结果表明:
(1)三种类型的改良单交种平均单株产量均比普通单交种的平均产量增加;有74个组合比其两个对应单交种都增产,占所有改良单交种的61.67%,其中全同胞型改良单交种9个,回交型改良单交种37个,半同胞型改良单交种28个;
(2)三类改良单交种都有部分组合在株高、剑叶长、剑叶宽、主穗长、单株播始历期等性状的变异系数,以及始齐历期、抽穗历期上与普通单交种接近。
(3)通过综合考查各改良单交组合的产量优势及群体整齐度,筛选得到10个有可能在生产上应用的改良单交种,其产量比相应高产单交种增加10.43%-26.39%。
5、选取3个全同胞型二元不育系、3个回交型二元不育系、3个半同胞型二元不育系以及其对应的9个纯合不育系,分别与南恢04和密阳46两个恢复系所配制成的改良单交种和普通单交种,测定稻米的垩白米率(%)、垩白大小(%)、垩白度(%)、糙米率(%)、精米率(%)和整精米率(%),以及稻谷的千粒重(g)、粒长(mm)、粒宽(mm)、长宽比,计算了粒长、粒宽和长宽比的变异系数,利用方差分析的分群比较法比较了三类改良单交种和普通单交种各性状的整体差异;同时还比较了各改良单交种各性状与其相应的普通单交种的差异,分析了改良单交种籽粒整齐度的情况,结果表明:
(1)半同胞型改良单交种的千粒重极显著的高于普通单交种和回交型改良单交种;半同胞型改良单交种和全同胞型改良单交种的垩白米率均极显著地低于普通单交种,而回交型改良单交种也显著地低于普通单交种,三类改良单交种之间差异不显著;半同胞型改良单交种的垩白大小显著地低于普通单交种和其它两类改良单交种,垩白度极显著地低于普通单交种,显著地低于回交型改良单交种,与全同胞型改良单交种差异不显著;
(2)三类改良单交种和普通单交种之间在糙米率、精米率、整精米率以及粒长、粒宽和长宽比等性状均未表现出明显差异;说明利用二元不育系来配制改良单交种的育种方法,不会对F_1的外观品质和碾磨品质产生不良影响,反而在垩白性状上会有所改善。
(3)三类改良单交种粒长、粒宽和长/宽的变异系数平均值及变动范围均与普通单交种接近,部分改良单交种的变异系数小于普通单交种。新协黄A/新协紫B//密阳46和金23A/金协紫B//南恢04两个组合的粒长、粒宽和长/宽三个性状的变异系数均小于其两个对应单交种,另有部分组合变异系数的值也在普通单交种的变异范围之内,通过选择能够获得粒型整齐的改良单交种。
The planting areas of indica hybrid rice was about 1.5×10~7 hectares each year, occupied more than 50% of total areas of rice in China. The sterility of most indica rice CMS lines(A-lines) commercially used in China can be maintained by other maintainer lines(B-lines) except the Honglian type CMS-line. The male-sterile F_1 hybrids derived from the crosses between the A-lines and the other B-lines are named as binary CMS lines. In this paper, there are four types of binary CMS lines:(a) the binary CMS lines,in which two parents are distantly relationship are called non-sibling binary CMS lines,(b)and(c) the binary CMS lines which two parents are full sibling relationships or half sibling relationships are called full-sibling binary CMS lines and half-sibling binary CMS lines respectively,(d) if one of the two parents of the binary CMS lines was derived from the other one, these binary CMS lines are called backcross type binary CMS lines. The non-sibling binary CMS lines can be used as female parents to cross with rice restorer lines to produce three-way hybrids rice, and the other type binary CMS lines can be used to produce rice modified single-cross hybrids.
The researches on three-way hybrid rice initiated in china in the late 1970s, and a consensus reached on this issue is that the three-way hybrid rice can be used to increase the yield of hybrid rice seeds production. Up to now, several combinations have been selected, but they were not put into practical use commercially. The main reason is the poor population uniformity of the three-way hybrids F_1 generation that was caused by the difference between the two parents of the binary CMS lines. The similar problem had been solved by selecting specific combinations especially using modified single-cross hybrids(MSHs) in maize breeding. The modified single-cross hybrid(A/A*//B) is a hybrid which was made by using a sister-line(A/A*) as female parent to cross with a inbred line(B), and the sister-line was produced from a cross between two highly related inbred lines(A and A*). It had been practical utilized in maize producing; however, there have been no any reports on the use of modified single-cross hybrids in rice breeding as yet.
Just like in the maize breeding, in this study, three types' binary-CMS lines were made and three types rice MSHs were produced by using those binary-CMS lines to cross with the rice restorer lines; The male sterility, flowering habit, out crossing characters, heterosis and general combining ability(GCA) of all binary-CMS lines and the yields and the population uniformity of all MSHs were studied. The objectives of this study, for one thing, were to make an approach to the feasibility of the application of the MSHs in rice breeding, and for another, were to select high yield rice MSHs with good population uniformity to put into practical use commercially in rice producing.
1. Three full-sibling binary CMS lines, 11 backcross binary CMS lines, 12 half-sibling binary CMS lines were made from 10 rice CMS lines and their maintainer lines, which have different sib ship. The male sterility, flowering habit, out crossing characters and some agronomic characters of all binary CMS lines and CMS lines and the heterosis of the corresponding F_1(B×B) were studied. The results were as follows:
(1) All binary CMS lines were completely sterile and had no fertile seed. The percentage of stained pollen of binary CMS lines was similar to that of the corresponding parent CMS lines.
(2) Majority of binary CMS lines were superior to the CMS lines in flowering habit, out crossing characters, and especially in double stigma exsertion rate.
(3) There were distinct heterosis in plant height, flag-leaf length, flag-leaf width and panicle length in half-sibling binary CMS lines.
(4) The results indicated that the grain weight per plant of the three types of F_1 of B×B crosses promoted with the increase of genetic difference between the parents of the corresponding binary CMS lines. 23 of 26 F_1 among B-lines were of yield superiorities to the elite parents, suggesting that the above three binary CMS lines could be used in increasing yield in rice hybrid seed production.
2. Three full-sibling binary CMS lines, 11 back-cross binary CMS lines, 10 half-sibling binary CMS lines, 10 homozygous CMS lines and five restorer lines were chosen to make 50 single hybrids(SHs) and 120 modified single cross hybrids(MSHs) by the way of NCⅡdesign. The plots of F_1 were arranged in the field in a randomized complete block design with 2 replications and the combining ability of 7 characters were analyzed using random model. The results showed as follows:
(1) The variance of general combining ability(GCA) and specific combining ability(SCA) were significant at 1% level in all characters.
(2) The GCA of three types of MSHs and SHs were studied using analysis of variance of independent comparison of single degree of freedom in the grain weight per plant and the other yield traits. The result indicated that, three types of MSHs were higher than the SHs at 1% level in the grain weight per plant and the number of effective tillers per plant respectively, the back-cross binary CMS Lines and half-sibling binary CMS lines were higher than the SHs at 1% level in seed setting rate. There were no significant differences in other yield traits.
(3) It suggested that the above three types of close-sibling binary CMS lines could be used increasing grain weight per plant, number of effective tillers per plant and seed setting rate in modified single cross hybrid rice breeding.
3. The F_2 of B×B crosses and the three types of MSHs corresponding with the binary CMS lines were studied in the days from 10% to 80% plants heading in a plot(DPH), the days from the first plant heading to the latest plant heading in a plot(DFL), and the coefficient of variability of the plant height, flag-leaf length, flag-leaf width, number of effective tillers per plant, panicle length of main culms, days from sowing to initial heading(DIH). The correlation coefficients between the F_2 of B×B crosses and the three types of MSHs were investigated. The results showed that:
(1) The mean values of the coefficient of variability of plant height of three types of MSHs were significantly higher than that of the single cross hybrids; there were no significant differences in that of other characters. The DPH, DFL, and the coefficient of variability of DIH have a tendency to increase from single cross hybrids, to full-sibling MSHs, backcross MSHs, and half-sibling MSHs. The mean population uniformity of some crosses in the full-sibling MSHs and backcross MSHs were close to the single cross hybrids.
(2) There were highly significant positive correlations between the MSHs and the F_2 of the B×B crosses on the DFL, DPH, the coefficient of variability of DIH, plant height, and the correlation coefficients were 0.499、0.372、0.343 and 0.251 respectively. There were significant positive correlations on the coefficient of variability of flag-leaf width and panicle length of main culms, and the correlation coefficients were 0.226 and 0.196. The results indicated that the population uniformity of the three types of MSHs decreased with the increase of genetic difference between the parents of the corresponding binary CMS lines. It is necessary to reduce the genetic difference between the parents of the binary CMS lines in rice modified single cross hybrid breeding.
(3) According to the population uniformity of there corresponding MSHs and the F_2 of the B×B crosses, the attention should be paid to the full-sibling binary CMS lines and the backcross binary CMS lines, especiallyⅡxie1A/Ⅱxie2 B, JinxiehuangA/JinxieziB, Jin23A/JinxieziB, JinxiehuangA/Jin23B,Ⅱ-32A/Ⅱxie1B,Ⅱ-32A/Ⅱxie2B and XinxieziA/Ⅱxie2B.
4. Three full-sibling binary CMS lines, 11 back-cross binary CMS lines, 10 half-sibling binary CMS lines, 10 CMS lines and 5 restorer lines Nanhui 04, Minghui 86, Fuhui 838, Xianhui 207 and Milyang 46 were chosen to make 50 single cross hybrids(SHs) and 120 MSHs by the way of NCⅡdesign. The grain yields, DPH, DFL, and the coefficient of variability of DIH, plant height, flag-leaf length, flag-leaf width, number of effective tillers per plant and panicle length of main culms were studied respectively. The results showed that:
(1) The grain yields of three types of MSH rice were higher than single cross hybrids on average. Among all MSHs, 74 of which had superiority to the two corresponding single cross hybrids in grain yield, including 9 full-sibling type MSHs, 37 back-cross type MSHs and 28 half-sibling type MSHs.
(2) Some crosses of every types MSHs were similar to single hybrids in DBF, DFL, and the coefficient of variability of the plant height, flag-leaf length, flag-leaf width, number of effective tillers per plant, panicle length of main culms, days from sowing to initial heading.
(3) A total of 10 good modified single cross hybrids were selected according to the grain yield and the population uniformity, and its grain yield increased from 10.43% to 26.39% compared with the corresponding higher single cross hybrids.
5. 18 MSHs and 18 single cross hybrid, which were made from 9 binary CMS lines, 9 homozygous CMS lines and two restorer lines Nanhui 04, Milyang 46 were chosen. The characters investigated in this study include: chalky rice percentage(%), chalky area percentage(%), chalkiness degree(%), brown rice rate(%),milled rice rate(%),head rice rate(%), 1000-grain weight(g), grain length(mm), grain width(mm), length/width ratio, and the coefficient of variability of grain length, grain width, length/width ratio. The mean value of three types of MSHs and SHs were studied using analysis of variance of single degree of freedom in the appearance quality traits and milling quality traits.The results showed as follow:
(1) The mean value of 1000-grain weight of the half-sibling type MSH was significantly higher than that of single cross and the backcross MSH at 0.01 levels. The mean value of the half-sibling type MSH and the full-sibling type MSH were significantly lower than that of single cross hybrid on the chalky rice percentage at 0.01 level, and the backcross type MSH was significantly lower than that of single cross hybrid at 0.01 level. The mean value of the half-sibling type MSH were significantly lower than that of the single cross hybrid and the other two types of MSHs at 0.05 level on the chalky area percentage,and significantly lower than the single cross hybrid and the backcross type MSH at 0.01 level on the chalkiness degree.
(2)There were no significant difference between the three types of MSHs and single cross hybrids on the brown rice rate, milled rice rate, head rice rate, 1000-grain weight, grain length, grain width, length/width ratio. It suggested that there are no bad influence on the appearance quality and milling quality by using the modified single cross hybrid breeding method.
(3) The mean and the range of coefficient of variability of the three types of MSHs were close to that of the single cross hybrid on grain length, grain width and length/width ratio.
(4)The coefficient of variability of Xinxiehuang A/Xinxiezi B//Milyang 46 and Jin23A/JinxieziB//Nanhui04 were lower than there two corresponding single cross hybrids on the grain length, grain width and length/width ratio, and the coefficient of variability of another several MSHs were in the range of single cross hybrids on the three traits. The result indicated that the MSH with uniformity rice grain could be getting by selection.
引文
鲍文奎.机会与风险—40年育种研究的思考.植物杂志,1990,(4):4-5
曹立勇,占小登,庄杰云,等.水稻产量性状的QTL定位与上位性分析.中国农业科学,2003,36(11):1241-1247
曹树青,邓志瑞,翟虎渠,等.籼型杂交水稻根系活力及其衰退特性的配合力及杂种优势分析.中国水稻科学,2002,16(1):19-23
陈国基,郭国亮,吴枝根,等.玉米三交种种植试验.山西农业科学,1987,8:22-23
陈国平.美国玉米生产及考察后的反思.作物杂志,1992(2):1-4
陈建国,朱军.籼粳杂交稻米外观品质性状的遗传及基因型×环境互作效应研究.中国农业科学,1998,31(4):1-7
陈立云,李国泰,刘国华,等.两系杂交水稻新组合培两优288的选育.杂交水稻,2000,15(S2):16-17
陈立云.三交稻杂种优势利用的初步探讨.杂交水稻,1987,(4):11-13
陈亮,梅明华.鉴定与水稻光敏核不育基因pms3连锁的AFLP-RFLP标记.厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2000,39(4):421-425
陈澍棠,朱根娣,殷秀妹.青花菜自交不亲和系S基因型分析及三交种配制初报.上海农业学报1994,10(4):75-79
陈万义.化学杂交剂的进展.农药,1999,35(1):1-6
陈伟程,季良越,刘宗华,等.玉米不同自交世代产生的姊妹系组配改良单交种的研究.中国农业科学,1994,27(5):27-32
陈伟程.玉米改良单交和雄性不育研究.郑州:河南科技出版社,1993,5
陈伟程.玉米不同自交世代产生的姊妹系组配改良单交种的研究,中国农业科学,1994,27(5):27-32
陈新,陆作楣,陶瑾,等.籼稻半同胞全同胞二元不育系的研究.作物研究.2006,2:105-106
陈新军,戚存扣,张洁夫,等.化学杀雄剂2号在甘蓝型油菜上的应用.江苏农业科学,2002,(6):19-21
程本义,杨仕华,励立庆,等.中国长江流域新育成籼稻品种分析及育种应用.中国农学通报.2004,20(4):92-96
程朝阳,薛庆中.水稻不同胞质雄性不育恢复基因的探讨.作物学报,1998,24(3):361-367
程宁辉.水稻杂种一代与亲本基因表达差异的分析.植物学报,1997,39(4):379-382
程式华,曹立勇,陈深广,等.后期功能型超级杂交稻的概念及生物学意义.中国水稻科学,2005,19(3):280-284
杜世凯,刘必善,赵清华,等.高产优质多抗玉米新品种鄂玉17的选育及栽培技术.玉米科学,2004,12(S1):40,42
方继友.玉米杂交种种子生产技术的回顾和展望,玉米科学.2002,10(1):91-93
冯瑞光,孟令启,宁文书.粳型光敏核不育系主要农艺性状的配合力及杂种优势.华北农学报,1997,12(4):7-12
伏军.矮秆早籼叶片性状及其与产量关系的研究.湖南农学院学报,1990,16(1):2-7
傅廷栋,涂金星.油菜杂种优势利用的现状与展望.刘后利主编,作物育种学论丛.北京:中国农业出版社.2002:235-250
盖钧镒,翟虎渠,胡蕴珠,等.试验统计方法.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.241-245
官春云.油菜的自交不亲和性和杂种优势育种.湖南环境生物职业技术学院学报,2001,7(1):1-6
郭浦清,郭柏生,徐小红.对杂交水稻三交种应用前景的探讨.江西农业科技.1992(3):6-9
郭益全.米粒垩白之遗传.中华农业研究,1986,35(2):129-138
何春伟,葛洪根,刘建娜,张献荣.鲁棉研15号杂交二代在生产上的应用浅析.河南农业科学,2005,9:37-38
何予卿,戚华雄,王长义.两系杂交粳稻主要亲本配合力测定.华中农业大学学报,1995,14(3):220-224
何振才,等.新杀雄剂SX-1在油菜上的应用初报.陕西农业科学,2000,(3):12-14
洪植蕃,林菲,庄宝华,等.两系杂交稻栽培生理生态特性.Ⅰ.生育特性.福建农学院学报,1992,21(1):1-9
侯树敏,胡宝成,陈凤祥,等.甘蓝型油菜隐性核不育单交种与三交种的比较.安徽农业科学,1999,27(4):308-309,317
胡宝成,陈凤祥,李成,等.甘蓝型油菜细胞质雄性不育三交种和单交种的优势比较.中国油料,1996(3):4-6
华金平,张成,易先达,等.棉花远缘核质杂种的培育与育种应用.湖北农业科学,2003,4:25-28
黄河清,邹学英.稻米垩白的配合力分析,湖南农业科学,1991a,(1):18-20
黄河清,邹学英.稻米垩白的双列杂交分析,作物研究,1991b,5(2):1-3
黄青阳,何予卿,景润春,等.利用微卫星标记定位水稻红莲型细胞质雄性不育的恢复基因.科学通报,1999,44(14):1517-1519
黄耀祥.水稻生态育种科学体系的构建和新进展—两源并举“超优势稻”的选育.世界科技研究与发展,2003(4):1-8
黄宜祥等,玉米MO17、77姊妹种及改良单交技术的研究和应用,种子,1991(3):30
黄义德,曹流俭,武立权,等.2003年安徽省中稻花期高温热害的调查与分析.安徽农业大学学报,2004,31(4):385-388
黄英金,刘宜柏,饶治祥,等.几个名优水稻品种特异品种的配合力分析.江西农业大学学报,1995,17(2):361-367
霍建勇,朱彤,郭海风.番茄三交种的选育方法研究初报.辽宁农业职业技术学院学报.2002,4(4):1-4
吉立柱,陆作楣.粳稻二元不育系开花习性的研究.天津农业科学.2002(3):14-17
江立康,王维金,徐竹生,等.籼型水稻品种物质生产与演变规律的研究.华中农业大学学报,1995,14(6):549-554
江卫,毛正轩,等.四川省棉花杂种优势利用新进展.中国棉花,2000,27(8):23-24
姜凤英,栾绍武,张惠华,等.观赏植物杂种优势的研究进展.辽宁农业科学.2005(5):38-39
姜心禄.对2002年水稻生产的反思.四川农业科技.2002,11:10
蒋彭炎.高产水稻的若干生物学规律.中国稻米,1994,(2):43-45
蒋树德,林惠鸣,陈虎根,等.小型南瓜新品种迷你南瓜的选育.中国蔬菜.2003(4):26-27
金正勋、秋太权,孙艳丽等.粳稻杂种后代稻米垩白率的配合力分析,中国水稻科学,2000,14(4):199-202
靖深蓉,邢以华,占先合,邱竞.棉花三交组合杂种优势的利用.中国棉花.1987,14(5):12-13
阚画春,何团结,路曦结.棉花杂种优势利用的研究进展.江西棉花.2001,23(6):3-8
雷宏俶.论不同密植条件下稻麦主茎与分蘖的性状差异及蘖间整齐度问题.殷宏章主编.稻麦群体研究论文集.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1961,93-100
黎建文,严钦泉.杂交早稻整齐度与产量构成因素的关系.湖南农业科学,2005,(1):14-17
李成荃,程岩,袁勤等.杂交粳稻品质性状的遗传研究Ⅱ.主要品质性状的配合力分析,杂交水稻,1989,(1):35-39
李大雄,饶勇,肖华贵.甘蓝型油菜细胞质雄性不育三交种选育研究及配合力分析.种子.2000(4):37-40
李海林,徐庆国.小麦化学杀雄杂种优势利用研究与展望.作物研究.2003,17(4):208-212
李槐芬,陈秉相,钱有信.从区域试验看云南省杂交玉米育种进展.云南农业科技.1997,3:7-10
李继开,姚振广.光温敏基因雄性不育水稻遗传规律研究.垦殖与稻作,2002(4):3-7
李继明.水稻籼粳交后代生育期遗传的初步研究Ⅰ.籼粳交后代生育期的配合力分析.杂交水稻,1990,(5):32-34
李竟雄,周洪生.作物雄性不育杂种优势研究进展.北京:中国农业出版社,1996.84.
李木英,潘晓华,石庆华,等.两系杂交稻结实期茎鞘物质运转特性及其籽粒影响的初步研究.江西农业大学学报,1998,20(3):297-302
李荣改,孟祥祯,王玉珍,等.亚种间杂交稻干物质生产积累及转换与籽粒充实度的研究.河北农业大学学报,1999,22(1):29-32
李仕贵,黎汉云,周开达等.杂交水稻稻米外观品质性状遗传相关分析,西南农业大学学报,1995,(3):192-201
李晓方,何昆明,林红等.水稻抗病优质品种主要性状配合力分析,中国水稻科学,1998,12(1):55-58
李晓明,李晓红,冯辉.结球甘蓝的杂种优势利用进展.辽宁农业科学2004(5):31-34
李欣,汤述翥,印志同,等.粳型杂种稻米品质性状的表现及遗传控制.作物学报,2000,26(4):411-419
李秀秀,吕敬刚,薛毅柳.甜瓜几个主要性状在三交种中遗传表现的初步研究.园艺学报,2003,30(3):331-334
李云昌,龚仁才,胡琼.应用细胞质雄性不育系构建甘蓝型油菜三交杂种.中国油料.1996,18(1):8-10
李振宇,杂交粳稻二代利用的研究.遗传,1983,01:44
梁敬焜,陈宇杰.红莲质源水稻不育系杂种F2利用研究.广东农业科学,1992,06:10-12
廖伏明,周坤炉,盛孝邦,等.籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力研究.作物学报,1999,25(5):623-631
廖伏明,周坤炉,阳和华,等.籼型杂交水稻米质性状配合力及遗传力研究.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,26(5):233-238.
廖伏明,周坤炉.籼型三系杂交水稻米质现状研究.杂交水稻,1999,14(6):35-38
廖佩言.水稻主要性状配合力的分析.遗传,1980,2(5):22-24
廖亦龙,王丰,李传国,等.两用核不育水稻的选育与利用研究进展作物研究.2002,5:216-219
蔺万煌.早籼稻米垩白形成的生理机理及其化学调控研究.博士论文.湖南农业大学,2001
刘伯韬.玉米整齐度及其在生产中的意义.农业科技通讯,1984,(3):5-6
刘纪麟.玉米育种学.北京:中国农业出版社,2002
刘继华,刘英欣,杨洪博.棉花杂种优势利用与雄性不育研究进展.棉花学报,1997(4):169-175
刘建丰,唐文帮,肖应辉,等.两系杂交晚稻整齐度与产量及其构成因素关系研究.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,27(1):1-3
刘建华,李余良,王晓明,等.优质高产玉米单交种粤单1号的选育及利用.广东农业科学.2003,1:11-12
刘京宝,陈伟程,利用姊妹种改进玉米种子生产技术的初步研究,华北农学报,1994,9(1):48-51
刘丕庆,吕志仁.籼型杂交水稻糙米氨基酸含量的配合力及与农艺性状的相关分析.广西农业大学学报,1995,14(2):95-100
刘绚霞,等.新型油菜化学杀雄剂EN的杀雄效果与应用初报.西北农业学报,1999,8(4):60-62
刘学军,童继平,吴跃进,等.籼稻二元不育系9730A及三交种的初步研究.植物遗传资源学报,2005,6(3):304-309
刘宗华,黄西林,杨超英,等.玉米姊妹系间杂种优势及不育化杂交制种技术研究.河南农业大学学报,1997,03:207-211
龙太康,吴凡,王茂理,等.杂交水稻主要性状的配合力及遗传效应初步研究.绵阳农业学报,1995,12(2):1-9
卢庆善,等.农作物杂种优势.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002.240-269
卢兴桂.中国光、温敏雄性不育水稻育性生态.北京:科学出版社,2003.17-18,52-55
陆作楣,陶谨,赵霭林,等.方差分析的分群比较法.江苏农业科学,1983,(4)18-20
陆作楣,赵霭林,马崇云.杂交稻混杂退化问题研究.中国农业科学,1982(3):8-15
陆作楣.论杂交稻两系法育种.南京农业大学学报.1996,19(4):1-4
陆作楣.论杂交稻育种的配合力选择,中国水稻科学,1999,13(1):1-5
陆作楣.杂交水稻良种繁育体系研究.杂交水稻,1994(3/4):52-54
路曦结,何团结,阚画春,等,皖棉13号(皖杂40)的生物学特性和栽培技术.安徽农业科学,1999,27(6):578-579
吕川根,邹江石.两系法亚种间杂交稻两优培九的选育应用.杂交水稻,2000,15(2):4-5
吕晓丽.玉米三交育种在高纬寒地应用的初探.玉米科学.2006,14(1):79-80,83
罗福和,陈伟程,季良越,等.玉米改良单交种选育方法的研究.作物学报,1993,19(4):321-327
罗福和,法国玉米的生产和育种.世界农业,1982,06:22-26
罗福和,路凤银,季良越,胡彦民,黄西林,刘宗华,季洪强.玉米改良单交种选育方法的研究Ⅱ.姊妹系和姊妹种的配合力研究,作物学报.1995,21(5):556-560
罗闰良.水稻杂种优势利用的成就与展望.湖南农业科学(湖南省农业科学院百年院庆特刊):2002,11-14
罗孝和,邱趾忠,李任华,等.两系杂交水稻新组合培两优特青的选育.杂交水稻,1994,(5):7-9
马育华.植物育种的数量遗传学基础.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1982,158-198
毛昌祥,万宜珍,马国辉,等.中国杂交水稻发展现状分析.杂交水稻,2006,21(6):1-5
毛建昌,张世煌,李向拓.选育高产、高配合力玉米自交系的途径与方法.中国农业科学2006,39(5):872-878
孟祥祯,冯瑞光,王玉珍,关于杂交粳稻二代(F2)利用的探讨.华北农学报增刊,1989,S1:1-7
莫惠栋.谷类作物胚乳品质性状的遗传研究.中国农业科学,1995,28(2):1-7
莫惠栋.农业试验统计.上海:上海科技出版社,1984:166-170
彭俊华,李有春.水稻籼、粳两亚种产量构成特点的剖析.四川农业大学学报,1990,8(3):162-168
朴钟泽,韩龙植,高熙宗,等.稻干物质量和氮素利用效率性状的配合力分析.中国水稻科学,2005,19(6):527-532
祁正汉.水稻籼粳核质核杂种研究初探.杂交水稻,2004,19(6):1-15
祁祖白,李宝键,杨文广.水稻籽粒外观品质及脂肪的遗传研究.遗传学报,1983,10(6):452-458
齐绍武,盛孝邦.籼型两系杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力及遗传力分析.杂交水稻,2000,15(3):38-41
钱大顺,许乃银,狄佳春,等.杂种棉苏杂16的杂种优势及F2自交衰退.江苏农业科学,2001,17(1):7-12
钱大顺,朱烨,张香桂,等.陆地棉F2代杂交优势的研究和利用.江苏农业科学,1990,6(5):10-11
任洪,沈建华.贵州省玉米三交种的选育与利用.贵州农业科学.2005,33(5):100-102
任天举,李经勇,张晓春,等.水稻杂种FI再生力特性的配合力和遗传力分析.西南农业学报,2004,17(3):287-291
桑伟,韩新年,田笑明,等.小麦杂种优势的利用途径及研究进展.种子,2005,5:50-54
上海市生理研究所人工气候室.高温对早稻开花结实的影响及其防治.Ⅰ.高温对早稻灌浆.成熟期的影响.植物学报,1976a,18(3):250-256
上海市生理研究所人工气候室.高温对早稻开花结实的影响及其防治.Ⅲ.早稻开花结实对高温伤害的敏感期.植物学报,1977,19(2):126-131
上海植物生理研究所人工气候室.高温对早稻开花结实的影响及其防治.Ⅱ.早稻开花期高温对开花结实的影响.植物学报,1976b,18(4):323-329
邵景成,胡志峰,杨永岗.番茄新品种佳红1号的选育.中国蔬菜.2005,(10-11):39-40
申宗坦,徐云碧.水稻亚种间杂种不育性的的遗传分析.中国水稻科学,1992,6(3):105-112
沈明希,周火强,李颖,等.湘番茄1号的选育.中国蔬菜.1993,(4):27-29
盛孝邦.雄性不育细胞质对杂交水稻产量及农艺特性的影响.华中农学院学报,1982,1(3):1-13
石春海,何慈信,朱军.稻米碾磨品质性状遗传主效应及其与环境互作的遗传分析.遗传学报,1998,25(1):46-53
石春海,朱军.籼稻稻米外观品质与其它品质性状的相关性分析.浙江农业大学学报。1994,20(6):606-610
石明松.对光照长度敏感的隐性雄性不育水稻的发现及初步研究.中国农业科学,1985,2:44-48
史新海,刘存辉,赵尧先,等.山东省玉米生产和育种工作的进展及其展望.玉米科学.2001,9(3):86-88
四川省水稻育种攻关组.杂交水稻数量性状配合力、遗传力及其地点变异性分析.西南农业学报,1993,6(2):12-20
宋宇,邹小云,贺浩华,等.籼型三系杂交水稻产量及相关性状的配合力分析,江西农业大学学报,2004,26(5):719-725
苏孝道,杨仁崔,卢浩然.杂交水稻三交种的优势表现及配合力.福建农学院学报,1990(1):7-12
粟学俊,陈彩虹.几个杂交水稻亲本配合力的测定.广西农业科学,2001,(1):1-3
粟学俊,韦鹏霄,吕志仁.杂交水稻产量性状配合力研究.广西植物,2004,24(1):91-96
孙义伟,李继庆,刘宜柏.两系亚种问杂交水稻抽穗日数的杂种优势和配合力分析.中国水稻科学,1993,7(2):105-108
孙永霞,马平,尚新利.2003年气象因素对信阳水稻产量的影响分析.信阳农业高等专科学校学报.2004,14(4):12-13,35
孙宗修,程式华.杂交水稻育种.从三系、两系到一系.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1994.177-178
谭学林,师常俊.水稻不同胞质育性恢复基因分子定位及相互关系.杂交水稻,1999,24(3):37-39
唐惠益,曹兵,孟卫东,等.水稻辽优73杂交二代生产利用研究.新疆农业科学.1994,6:265-268
唐文武,吴秀兰,李桂花,等.菜心杂种优势利用的现状与展望.江西农业学报.2005,17(2):73-76
陶淑芝,由垦区玉米品种结构的变化看三交种的利用前景,北大荒农业,1985(5):9-10
田曾元,王姚波,王振华,等.利用RAPD进行玉米自交系种质类群划分的研究.华北农学报,2001,16(2):31-37
童继平,吴跃进,韩正妹,等.杂交水稻异质四系三交种应用价值初步研究.安徽农业科学,2001,29(3):284-285
万邦惠,唐一雄.水稻亚种间杂种优势利用研究.华南农业大学学报,1992,13(3):1-8
王斌,牟同敏,陈一华.水稻光、温敏核不育的遗传学和分子生物学研究.卢兴桂,顾铭洪,等编著.两系杂交水稻理论与技术.北京:科学出版社,2001.39-60
王才林,汤玉庚.我国杂交粳稻育种的现状与展望.中国农业科学,1989,22(5):8-13
王才林,汤玉庚.杂交粳稻若干米质性状的配合力.江苏农业学报,1989,5(1):11-17
王才林,汤玉庚.杂交粳稻主要经济性状的配合力与产量的互作效应,江苏农业学报,1989,5(2):1-6
王才林,仲维功.高温对水稻结实率的影响及其防御对策.江苏农业科学.2004,1:15-18
王楚桃,李贤勇,李顺武,何永歆.米质指标在不同杂交水稻品种间的变异度分析.西南农业学报,2003,16(1):22-24
王得元,王鸣.杂种优势过程性研究的基本模型.陕西农业科学,1995(2):30-32
王得元,殷秋秒.作物杂种优势机理研究:遗传振动合成学说.江西农业大学学报,1999,(21)3:314-319
王得元,殷秋妙,李颖,等.作物杂种优势的分子生物学研究进展.西北农业大学学报,1999,27(1):94-98
王恒明,王得元,李颖,等.辣椒核质互作雄性不育三系杂种优势利用研究进展.广东农业科学.2003,5:16-18
王红旗,李史侠,胡文信.甜菜O-型系与甜菜优势育种.中国甜菜,1990,(1):29-37
王军,张太平,魏忠芬,等.甘蓝型油菜隐性核不育系ZWAB临保三交种与单交种的比较.种子.2006,25(1):4-6
王武,张献龙,孙济中,等.转基因抗虫组合F2代群体农艺性状变异及其利用价值评估.棉花学报,2002,14(1):8-12
王永锐.作物高产群体生理.北京:科学技术出版社,1991,1,189-190
王章奎,倪中福,孟凡荣,等.小麦杂交种及其亲本拔节期根系基因差异表达与杂种优势关系的初步研究.中国农业科学,2003,36(5):473-479
魏耀林,张忠旭,赵迎春等.几个杂交粳稻亲本的配合力及配组优势分析,粳稻科技,1999,12-14
温振民等,玉米近交不育系配制单交种的研究,陕西农业科学,1990(3):5-6
吴若炎.杂种优势:双向基因重组方式下再选择的价值体现.农业现代化研究,1999,20(2):111-114
吴文革,李泽福,张四海,等.安徽江淮地区2006年中籼水稻结实不良情况调查.安徽农学通报,2006,12(13):85-88
吴晓华,张爱民,李元清,等.普通小麦-Aegilopscrassa核质杂种的同工酶研究.华北农学报.2003,18(4):5-8
#12
邢朝柱,郭立平,靖深蓉,等.棉花抗虫核不育系—中抗A组合优势及昆虫传粉研究.作物学报,2002,28(4):574-576
徐爱遐,田广文,金平安,等.甘蓝型油菜细胞质雄性不育三交种优势潜力分析.中国油料作物学报.2005,27(2):24-27
徐辰武,莫惠栋,张爱红,等.籼.粳杂种稻米品质性状的遗传控制.遗传学报,1995,22(3):192-198
徐辰武,张爱红,朱庆森.籼粳杂交稻米品质性状的遗传分析.作物学报,1996,22(5):530-534
徐寿昌,熊伟,徐华德,等.三交杂交水稻的育种研究.江西农业学报.2002,14(3):12-16
徐云碧,申宗坦.籼稻米粒垩白的遗传.浙江农业大学学报,1989,15(1):8-13
徐正进,黄瑞冬,李洪建.水稻群体整齐度品种间差异与相关的研究.沈阳农业大学学报,2006,37(2):137-140
徐正进,薛亚杰,车正昭.水稻超高产品种与产量分析.辽宁农业科学,1992(3):1-4
许吟隆,赵海燕,姚风梅,张勇,徐宾,胡亚南,袁静.长江中下游高温事件对中稻产量构成要素影响的统计分析.中国农业气象,2005,25(增刊):20-23
鄢章林;试论化学杀雄杂交水稻高产制种技术.杂交水稻.1993,1:15-20
闰淑琴.玉米姊妹交及改良单交种的性状表现及应用分析.黑龙江农业科学.1999,(5)12-14
严钦泉,阳菊华,伏军.两系杂稻亲本籼粳程度与配合力及杂种优势的关系,湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,27(3):163-166
杨春玲,郭瑞玲.我国小麦杂种优势利用现状及存在问题.河南农业科学,2002,(9):14-15
杨惠杰,杨仁崔,李义珍等.水稻超高产品种的产量潜力及产量构成因素分析.福建农业学报,2000,15(3):1-8
杨建昌,朱庆森,王志琴,等.亚种间杂交稻光合特性及物质积累与运转的研究.作物学报,1997,23(1):82-88
杨联松,白一松,许传万,等.水稻粒形与稻米品质问相关性研究进展.安徽农业科学,2001,29(3):312-316
杨仁崔,梁康迳,陈青华.稻米垩白直感遗传和杂交稻垩白米遗传分析.福建农学院学报,1986,15(1):51-54
杨仁崔,刘抗美,林培青,等.三交稻的试验观察.福建农业科技.1979,3:20-24,35
杨仁崔.对三交稻的一些初步认识.福建农业科技.1982(2):5
杨仕华,程本义,沈伟峰.中国水稻品种推广趋向分析,杂交水稻,2005,20(3):6-8
杨守仁,张龙步,陈温福,等.水稻超高产育种的理论和方法.作物学报,1996,220):295-304
杨秀青,化学杀雄杂交稻二代利用探讨.作物杂志.1990,4:14-15
杨振玉,陈秋柏,陈荣芳等.粳型杂交水稻“黎优57”的选育.中国农业科学,1982,1:38-42
杨振玉,陈秋柏,陈荣芳等.水稻粳型恢复系C57的选育.作物学报,1981,7(8):153-156
杨振玉.北方杂交粳稻的思考与展望.作物学报,1998,24(6):840-846
杨振玉.粳型杂交水稻育种的进展.杂交水稻,1994(Z1):46-49
殷宏章.关于农业生产中的群体概念.殷宏章主编.稻麦群体研究论文集.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1961.191-195
尹彦,方秀娟,韩旭,等.长果形两性花黄瓜的选育及利用初报.园艺学报,1990,17(2):133-138
游年顺,雷捷成,黄利兴,等.杂交水稻配合力分析及高产地优组合选配的探讨.福建稻麦科技,1994,12(4):11-17
余守武,刘宜柏,尹建华等,三交水稻的育种研究Ⅱ.三交中晚稻杂种优势的比较研究.作物学报,2005,31(4):476-480
余守武,杨平,尹建华,等.三交杂交水稻的育种研究.杂合不育系与纯合不育系的开花习性比较研究.江西农业大学学报,2004,26(1):96-101
余守武,尹建华,刘宜柏等,三交水稻的育种研究Ⅲ.三交中晚稻主要农艺性状的配合力和遗传力分析.作物学报,2005,31(6):784-789
余四斌,李建雄,徐才国,等.上位性效应是水稻杂种优势的重要遗传基础.中国科学(C辑),1998,333-342
余泽良.利用化学杂交种是实现小麦优质高产的有效途径.四川农业科技,1993,(6):14-15
余昭楹;屠曾平;林秀珍:蔡惟涓;优质杂种稻优杂1号研究和试种.中国水稻科学,1993,1:57
袁利群,杨隆维,向极钎,等.三交育种在三系杂交水稻抗瘟育种中的应用研究.杂交水稻,2003,18(6):7-9
袁隆平,陈洪新.杂交水稻育种栽培学.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998,200
袁隆平,唐传道.杂交水稻选育的回顾、现状与展望.中国稻米,1999(4):3-6
袁隆平.超级杂交水稻的现状和展望.粮食科技与经济,2003,(1):2-3
袁隆平.从育种角度展望我国水稻的增产潜力.杂交水稻,1996,4:1-2
袁隆平.杂交水稻超高产育种.杂交水稻,1997,12(6):1-6
袁隆平.杂交水稻学.北京,中国农业出版社,2002.
袁隆平.杂交水稻育种的战略设想.杂交水稻,1987,2(1):1-3
袁平荣,孙传清,杨从党等.云南籼稻每公顷15吨高产的产量及其结构分析.作物学报,2000,26(6):756-762
袁勤,倪林娟,曹黎明等.杂交粳稻的选育与应用(综述).上海农业学报,2002,18(1):25-28
詹先进,蓝家样,吴征彬,等.陆地棉品种间杂交种鄂杂棉3号正反交后代产量性状研究.湖 北农业科学,2003,5:38-40
张爱民编著.植物育种亲本选配的理论和方法.北京:农业出版社,1994:128-162
张长伟,郑家奎,蒋开锋,等.杂交水稻苗瘟抗性的配合力和遗传力分析.生物数学学报,2000,15(2):134-138
张长伟,郑家奎,蒋开锋等.杂交水稻叶瘟抗性杂种优势的遗传分析,植物病理学报,2002,30(1):9-12
张端品,邓顺安,余功新,等.农垦58S光敏感雄性不育基因的染色体定位.华中农业大学学报,1990,(4):407-419
张桂权,卢永根.水稻质核互作孢子体雄性不育性的基因分析.作物学报,1987,13(1):23-28
张杰,周国彬.籼型三系不育系选育研究现状及对策.中国种业.2006,(10):11-13
张俊国,李彻,张三元,等.不同粳稻品种群体整齐度的比较分析Ⅰ.整齐度的品种间差异及对产量的影响.吉林农业科学,1998,23(2):23-27
张俊国,李彻,张三元,等.不同粳稻品种群体整齐度的比较分析Ⅱ.超稀植栽培对品种性状及整齐度的影响.吉林农业科学,1999,24(1):18-22
张俊国,李彻,张三元,等.不同粳稻品种群体整齐度的比较分析Ⅲ.不同施氨水平对品种性状及整齐度的影响.吉林农业科学,2000,25(1):12-16
张俊国,李彻,张三元,等.不同粳稻品种群体整齐度的比较分析Ⅳ.不同插秧苗数对品种性状及整齐度的影响.吉林农业科学,2000,25(3):3-61
张利华,王建军,李旭晨,等.籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状的配合力分析.浙江农业学报,2003,15(1):1-7
张名位,彭仲明,杜应琼.特种稻米中微量元素铁、锌、锰的含量的配合力和稳定性分析.中国水稻科学,1996,10(4):201-206
张名位,彭仲明.色稻碾米品质性状的遗传效应分析.作物品种资源,1997,(4):1-4
张群宇,等.野败型水稻细胞质雄性不育恢复基因Pf_4的分子标记定位.遗传学报,2002,29(11):1001-1004
张述宽,陈天渊,李毓椿,等.玉米新品种桂三5号的选育.广西农业科学2002,2:62
张体德,张海洋,郑永战,等.芝麻杂种优势的表现及其制种技术研究的综述.作物杂志.2005,5:64-67
张天真,靖深蓉,金林.杂种棉选育的理论与实践.北京:科学出版社,1998
张天真,朱协飞.“南农98-4”杂交棉的选育.中国棉花,2002,29(9):30
张天真,朱协飞.南农6号的选育及栽培技术要点.中国棉花,2004,31(8):18-19
张相琼,岳福良,周宏俊,等.抗虫杂交棉川杂12号选育.中国棉花,2003,30(11):32-33
张相琼,周宏俊,王均明,等.优质丰产抗病高优势杂交棉川杂11号.中国棉花,2000, 27(7):28
张雪清,骆海波,梅时勇,邓耀华,胡侦华.冬春萝卜新品种鄂萝卜1号的选育.湖北农业科学.1998,(6):59-62
张志国等,利用姊妹种提高毕单系列玉米杂交种制种产量的研究,种子,1999,5,62-65
赵治海,许寅生,朱学海,等.谷子杂种优势利用的途径及前景.张家口农专学报.2000年,16(1):1-2
钟晓光,何元农.玉米生育中后期低温反应的研究.贵州农业科学,1985,3:14-17
周开达,黎汉云,李仁瑞,等.杂交水稻主要性状配合力、遗传力的初步研究.作物学报,1982,8(3):145-152
周开达,汪旭东,李仕贵,等.亚种间重穗型杂交稻研究.中国农业科学,1997,30(5):91-93
周开达等,杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力、遗传力的初步研究,作物学报,1982,8(3):145-152
朱立宏.关于我国水稻高产育种的我见.南京农业大学学报.2007,30(1):129-135
朱启升,洪敏,张国良.杂交水稻四系法选育初报,安徽农业科学,1993,21(3):216-218
朱雄涛,雷捷成,林伟峰.杂交稻主要农艺性状的配合力和遗传力分析,福建稻麦科技,1991,(4):19-25
朱英国.水稻雄性不育生物学.武汉:武汉大学出版社.2000.9-14,50-52,120-152,489-505
朱镇,赵凌,宗寿余,等.籼型两系杂交水稻主要农艺性状的配合力分析.江苏农业学报,2004,20(4):207-212
朱智伟,陈能,王丹英,章秀福,等.不同类型水稻品质性状变异特性及差异性分析,中国水稻科学,2004,18(4):315-320
邹应斌,余铁桥,等.光敏感核不育水稻的光温特性与育性诱导效应的关系.湖南农学院学报,1991,17(2):99-105
左波,熊远著,邓昌彦.杂种优势遗传学基础的研究进展切.中国畜牧兽医,2002,29(4):34-36
Anand G, Amirthadevarathinam A. Rogbell J E.Combining ability and heterosis for eold tolerance in rice, Oryza, 1999, 36(2): 114-117
Biradar D P, ALane Rayburn.Maize heterosis and nuclear DNA content.Heredity, 1993, 71(3):300-304
Brieger F G. The genetic basis of heterosis in maize. Genetics, 1950, 35:420-445
Carlone M R, Russell W A. Response to plant densities and nitrogen levels for four maize eultivars from different eras of breeding. Crop Science, 1987, 27:465-470
Cheverud J M, Routman E J .Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics, 1995, 139:1455-1461
Cheng S H, Cao L Y, Yang S H, et al. Forty Years' Development of Hybrid Rice: China's Experience. Rice Science, 2004,11 (5-6): 225-230
Christie B R, Shattuck V I. The diailel cross: design, analysis, and use for plant breeders. Plant Breeding Review, 1992, Vol. 9:9-32
Dedio W. Performance comparison of single and three way Crosses in sunflower. Can J of plant Sci 1992, (72): 431-434
Dudley J W, Sag, hal M A,Rufener G K. Molecular marker information and selection of parents in eom breeding programs. Crop Science, 1992, 32 (2): 301-304
Dudley J W, Saghal MaroofM.A, Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize in Indica and programs. Crop Science, 1991, 31. 718-723
Duvick D N, Cassman K G. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Science, 1999, 39:1622-1630
Duviek D N. What is yield? 1997, 332-335, In G.O.Edmeades, et aI. (ed.) Developing drought-and low N-tolerant maize. Proceedings of a Symposium. 25-29 March 1996. CIMMYT, Mexico, D. F
Duvick D N. Yield gains in U.S. hybrid maize.In: Fehr W R. Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants.CSSA Special Publ.7. ASA, Madison, WI, 1984:15-47
Dwivedi D K, Pandey M P, Pandey S K et al. Combining ability over environments in rice involving indica and tropical japonica lines, (Oryza), 1999, 36(2): 101-107
E A Lee, A Singh, M J Ash, B Good. Use of Sister-Lines and the Performance of Modified Single-Cross Maize Hybrids Crop Science. Madison: Jan/Feb 2006. Vol. 46, Iss. 1:312-321
G A.Ombakho.F.R.Miller高粱单交种、三交种和双交种的生产性能、稳产性及产量预测 Intemational Sorghum and Millets Newsletter《国际高粱和谷子通讯》1994,35卷,77页,周文宗译,国外农学:杂粮作物,1996(1):56
Godshalk E B, Lee M, Lamkey K R. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single cross hybrid performance of maize. Theorl Appl Genet, 1990, 80:273-280
Graham G L, WolffD W, Stuber C W. Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Science,1997, 37:1601-1610
Griffmg J B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems.Australian J Biol Sci, 1956, 9:463-493
Hallauer A R. Miranda J B.Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. (2nd ed.). Ames Iowa State University Press, 1988
Hallauer A R, Mirmb J H.Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Ames: Lowa State Univ. Press,1981, 124-126
Hallauer A R, Russell W A, Lain key K R. Corn breeding. 1988, 463-564. In GF. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Corn and corn improvement.3rd ed. Agron. Monogr. 18. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, W I
Houghton J T, Ding Y, Gdggs D J, Noguer M, Linden P J, Dai X,Maskell K, Johnson C A. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis.London: Cambridge University Press, 2001:26
Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, et al. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis in an elite rice hybrid. Genetics, 2003,100(5): 2574-2579
Jones D F. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis.Geneties, 1917, 2:466-479
Jones D F. Gene action in heterosis.Geneties, 1956, 3:93-104
Jones J W (1926) Hybrid vigor in flee. JAm Soc Agron 18:424-438
Kaul M L H, Male sterility in higher plants.Springer-Verlag.Berlin. 1988,3-13
Kinoshita T. Gene symbols and information on male sterility. RGN, 1997, (14): 13-22
Kumar B M D, Chandrappa H M.Combining ability studies for yield and its component in flee, Mysore Journal of gricultural Sciences, 1994, 28(3): 193-198
Lee M, Godshalk E B, Latnkey K R.Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Science, 1989, 29:1067-1071
Li Z K, Pinson S R M, Park W D, et al. Epitasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa.L).Genetics, 1997, 145:453-465
Liu X Q, Xu X, Tan Y P, et al. Inheritance and molecular mapping of two fertility-restoring loci for Honglian gametophytic cytoplasmic male sterility in flee (Oryza sativaL.) . Mol Gen Genet, 2004, 271:586-594
Mackill D J. Studies on the mechanism and genetics of high temperature tolerance in rice, Dissertation Abstracts International B, 1982, 42(8): 3049B
Majumder M K, Seshu D V, Shenoy V V. Genetics of cold tolerance in rice(Oryza sativa L.): A concept of multiple allelism. Indian J. Genet plant breed. 1990, 5(2) : 95-110
Mather I C, Jinks J L. Biometrical Genetics, Ed. 3. Chapman and Hall, London. 1982
Meghi M R, Dudley J M, Lambert R J, Sprague G F. Inbreeding depression, inbred and hybrid grain yields, and other traits of maize genotypes representing three eras. Crop Science,1984, 24:545-549
Meredith W R (Jr) .Yield and fiber-quality potential for second-generation cotton hybrids Crop Science, 1990(30): 1045-1048
Mishra B, Akbar M, Seshu D V, et al. Genetics of salinity tolerance and ionic uptake in rice, International Rice Research Notes,1996, 21(1): 38-39
Miura K, Lin S Y, Yano M, Nagamine T.Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed longevity in rice( Oryza sativa L.).Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104:981-986
Moon H P, Neil Rutger J.Combining ability analysis and selection effectiveness for tolerance to cold induced sterility in flee, Korean Journal of Crop Science ( Korea R), 1988, 33 (4):412-419
Ombakho, George Anthony .Performance, stability parameters, genetic effects, and prediction of performance in single, three-way, and double-cross hybrids of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench); Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1994, 175 pages; AAT 9432747
Omholt S W, Plahte E, Yehaug L, et al. Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis.Genetics, 2000, 155:969-980
Prasad G S V, Sastry M V S. Linextester analysis of combining ability and heterosis in brown planthopper resistant varieties, Indian Agriculturist, 1987, 31 (4): 257-265
Rai K N, Chandra S, RaoA S. Potential advantages of male-sterile F_1 hybrids for use as seed parents of three-way hybrids in pearl millet. Field Crops Research .2000, (68) :173-181
Ram N. K Moon H.P, Yae J. D, et al.Estimates of combining ability for cold tolerance at reproductive stage in rice, Korean Journal of Breading(Korea R.), 1989, 21 (3): 188-195
Ramalingam J, Vivekanandan P, Vanniarajan C. Combining ability analysis in lowland early rice, Crop Research Hisar, 1993, 6(2): 228 -233
Rhodes D, Ju G C, Yang W J. Plant metabolism and heterosis. Plant Breeding Reviews, 1992, Vol. 10: 53-89.
Romagnoli S, Maddaloni M, Livini C,Motto M.Relationship between gene expression and hybrid vigor in primary root tips of young maize(Zea mays L.) plantlets.Theor Appl Genet,1990,80: 769-775
SanSem Jampatong,Pom Rungchang.泰国玉米生产和遗传改良研究.遗传.2000,22(6):423-429
Satake T, Yoshida S. High temperature-induced sterility in Indica rice satflowering. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1978, 47(1): 6-17
Schnell F W. Trends and problems in breeding methods for hybrid com. In ⅩⅥ British Poultry Breeders Roundtable, 1974:86-98
Senadhira D. Genetic analysis of salinity tolerance in flce(Oryza sativa L.), Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993, 86:2-3,333-338
Sheng xiang Tang. Genetic studies on gel consistency of flce(Oryza saliva L.), College laguna (Philippines), Apr, 1989, 109
Shi C H ,Zhu J. Genetic analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects for milling quality traits in indiea dee. Seed Science and Technology, 1998,26 (2): 481-488
Shi C H, He C X, Zhu J, Chen J G. Analysis of genetic effects and genotype xenvironment interaction effects for apparent quality traits of indica dee. Chinese J Rice Sei, 1999, 13 (3):179-182
Shi C H, Zhu J, Wu J G, et al. Genetic and genotype xenvironment interaction effects from embryo, endosperm, cytoplasm and maternal plant for dee grain shape traits of indica dee. Field Crops Research, 2000, 68(3): 191-198
Singh N K, Shartna V K, .lha P B.Genetic analysis for earliness in riee,Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural university, 1993, 5(1): 23-26
Smith O S, Smith J S C, Bowen S L, et al. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F_1 grain yield heterosis and RFLPs. Tbeor Appl Genet, 1990, 80:833-840
Smith O S, Smith J C, Similarities among a group of elite inbreds as measured by pedigree F_1 grain yield, grain yield heterosis and RFLPs. Therl Appl Genet. 1990, 80:833-840
Sprague G F, Tatum L A. General vs specific combining ability in single crosses of com. J Am Soc Agron, 1942, 34:923-932
Sdvastava H K.Intergenomie interaction, heterosis, and improvement of crop yield. Advances in Agronomy, 1981, 34:117-195
Sun Q X, Ni Z F, Liu Z Y. Differential gene expression between wheat hybrids and their parental inbreds in seedling leaves.Euphytica,1999, 106: 117-123.
Suresh Acharya. Genetic parameters and their implication in breeding cold tolerant varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L), Crop Improvement,1987,14(1): 100-103
Tabien R E. Diallel analysis of resistance to bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas camnestris p.v.oryzae in rice. College, Laguna(philippines). 1989, 5:158
Taengsuwan S. Variability and genetics of tolerance for acid sulfate soil eonditions in rice (Oryzy saliva.), Central Luzon state univ. Munoz, Nueva Eeija (Philippines). 1998, 3:105
Tan Y F, Xing Y Z, Li J X, Yu S B, Xu C G, Zhang Q F. Genetic bases of appearance quality of rice grains in Shanyou 63, an elite rice hybrid. TheorAppl Genet, 2000, 101:823-829
Tsaftaris A S, Polidoros A N. Studying the expression of genes in maize parental inbreds and their heterotie and nonbeterotie hybrids.In Proe Eucarpia Maize and Sorghum Conference. Bergamo, Italy, 1993, 283-292
Veillet S, Filippi M.C, Gallais A. Combined genetic analysis of partial blast resistance in an updated rice population and recurrent selection for line and hybrid values, Tbeor appl genet, Berlin, Spinger Verlag, 1996, 92(6): 644-653
Vilichku F K. To the problem of breeding trilinear sun flower hybrids. Nnuchu Tr priklad Bot Gent,1987, 113:24-30
Vilichku F K. To the problem of breeding trilinear sunflower hybrids, sb Nauchu Tr. Priklad Bot Gent, 1987, (113): 24-30
Wright S. Evaluation and Genetics of populations.Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press, 1968.23-28
Wu P, Zhao B, Yan J, et al. Genetic control of seedling tolerance to aluminum toxicity in rice,
Euphytiea, 1997,97(3): 289-293
Xiao J H, Li J M, Yuan L P, et al. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics, 1995, 140:745-754
Xiaochuan Liu, Wu JiartLi, Tang Shaoqing,et al. Nuclear behavior and DNA content of hybrids and their parental lines related to heterosis in rice. Chinese J Rice Sci, 1996, 10(2): 91-94
Xiong L Z, Yang G P, Xu C G, et al. Relation of differential gene expression in leaves with heterosis and heterozygosity in a flee diallel cross. Molecular Breeding, 1998, 4:129-136
Zhang Q F, Zhou G P. Molecular marker heterzygosity and hybrid performance in Indiea and Japonica flee. Theorl Appl Genet, 1996, 93:1218-1224
Zhang Q F, Zhou Z Q, Yang G P. Molecular marker heterozygoeity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice.Theorl Appl Genet, 1996, 93(8): 1218-1224