贝尔凹陷南屯组一段储层特征研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
贝尔凹陷是位于海拉尔盆地南部的一个次级负向构造单元。近年来在贝尔凹陷的南屯组一段中发现了较好的油气显示,并且在生产过程中也收到了可观的成果。由于贝尔凹陷的储层特征还不清楚,限制了该区的勘探、开发步伐。本文综合利用地震、测井、录井、岩芯、生产测试等地质信息,对贝尔凹陷南屯组一段储集特征进行研究。
     贝尔凹陷南屯组一段的储层主要包括火山碎屑岩储层和碎屑岩储层。碎屑岩储层以岩屑砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩为主,成熟度较低。次生孔隙是南屯组一段的主要储集空间,主要类型为粒内溶孔、填隙物溶孔、溶蚀粒间孔、火山碎屑粒内溶孔。南屯组一段的储层微观特征总体均较差。
     贝尔凹陷南屯组一段储层以低孔低渗和低孔特低渗为特征。纵向上南屯组一段处于异常高孔带上,次生孔隙是存在于该层位的主要储集空间。平面上苏德尔特潜山构造带和贝中次凹的物性特征为最优。贝尔凹陷南屯组一段的储层主要分布于辨状河三角洲平原、辨状河三角洲前缘、扇三角洲平原和扇三角洲前缘沉积亚相上。它的成岩作用类型包括机械压实作用、胶结作用、交代作用、溶蚀作用等,其中前两者使得储层储集空间降低,而交代作用与溶蚀作用则大大改善了储集空间。火山碎屑岩储层的主要岩性为凝灰岩、沉凝灰岩和凝灰质砂砾岩等。贝尔凹陷南屯组一段的储层主要位于中成岩阶段A2期,次为中成岩阶段B期。分布于该层位的主要成岩相有凝灰质溶蚀相、长石溶蚀相、方解石胶结相、泥质胶结相、泥岩压实相、压实胶结相。
     通过综合分析地震、录井、测井、扫描电镜、铸体薄片、生产测试、地化分析等多种资料得出:“烃灶”的分布、有利的沉积和成岩相带以及古不整合面的存在等是贝尔凹陷南屯组一段优质储层形成的主控因素。在对这四种主控因素进行综合分析的基础上,发现辨状河(扇)三角洲平原和辨状河(扇)三角洲前缘沉积亚相为最有利的沉积相带,凝灰质溶蚀成岩相和长石溶蚀成岩相是改善储集物性的有利成岩相带。在综合考虑‘烃灶’与古不整合面存在的前提下,结合有利的沉积和成岩相带对优质储层的分布进行平面预测。
Beier depression is a negative structure unit located in the southern of the central rift zone in Hailer Basin. In recent years, people find better oil and gas show in the first member of Nantun formation reservoir and the considerable results are obtained in the production process. Because of the indistinction of the reservoir characters in Beier depression, the step of exploration and development is limited. This paper applies comprehensively the seismic, logging, core and production testing to study the reservoir characteristics of the first member of Nantun formation in Beier Depression.
     The best types of reservoir of the first member of Nantun formation are pyroclastic rock and clastic rock in Beier Depression. The main types of clastic rock are lithic sandstone and feldspathic lithic sandstone, whose maturity is low. The secondary pore is the main reservoir space, which includes intragranular dissolved pore, interstitial material dissolved pore, corrosion intergranular pore, intragranular dissolved pore of pyroclastic. Generally, the microscopic characteristics of reservoirs are bad in the first member of Nantun formation.
     The reservoir's physical characteristics are low porosity and low permeability-low porosity and super-low permeability in the first member of Nantun formation in Beier depression. The secondary pore is the main reservoir space type, and this horizon is located in anomalously high porosity zone in vertical. In the plane, The Sudeerte buried hill tectonic belt and Beizhong sub-depression physical characteristics. The reservoirs are located in braided delta plain, front, fan delta plain and front subphase. The main diagenesis are compaction, cementation, metasomatism and dissolution. The compaction and cementation decrease the reservoir space, but metasomatism and dissolution enlarge the space. The main lithology of pyroclastic rock is tuff, sedimentary tuff and tuffaceous sandy conglomerate. The main diagenesis stage of reservoir of the first member of Nantun formation is A2, and diagenesis stage B is the second one. The main diagenism facies are tuffaceous corrosion diagenism facies, feldspar corrosion diagenism facies, calcite cementation diagenism facies, shale cementation diagenism facies, mud stone compaction diagenism facies and compaction and cementation diagenism facies.
     The paper shows that the main controlling factors are the distribution of hydrocarbon kitchen, the favorable sedimentary facies belt, favorable diagenism facies, and the existence of ancient unconformity by analyzing comprehensively seismic, well logging, logging, SEM, casting thin sections, production test, geochemical analysis data. Based on the comprehensive analysis of four main controlling factors, braided delta plain, front, fan delta plain and front subphase are the favorable sedimentary facies belts, and the favorable diagenesis facies belts are tuffaceous corrosion diagenism facies and feldspar corrosion diagenism facies. Considering the distribution of hydrocarbon kitchen and ancient unconformity, combine favorable sedimentary and diagenism facies belts to protect the high-quality reservoir.
引文
[1]Bloch S. Empirical prediction of porosity and permeability in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1991.75(7):1145-1160.
    [2]Anjos S M C, De Ros L F,De Souza R S,et al.Depositional and diagenetic control on there servoir quality of Lower Cretaceous Pendencia sandstones,Potiguar rift basin,Brazil[J].AAPG Bull.,2000,84(11):1719-1742.
    [3]Schmmugan G. Significance of secondary porosiy[J]. AAPG,Bullet in,1985,69(3):379-380.
    [4]Scherer M, Paralneters influencing porosity in sandstone:a model for sandstone porosity prediction[J].The AAPG Bulletin,1987,71(5):485-491.
    [5]Surdam R C,Crossey L J,Hagen E S.Organic-inorganic and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
    [6]Bloch S, Lander R H, Linda Bonnell. Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs Origin and predictability [J].AAPG Bull,2002, 86(2):301-328.
    [7]Kupecz J,Gluyas J,Bloch S.Reservoir quality prediction in sandstones and carbonates[J].AAPG Memoir,1997.69:1-307.
    [8]胡齐凯,关丽.利用灰色模型预测储层孔隙度.江汉石油学院学报[J],2003,25(4):39-40.
    [9]罗孝俊,杨卫东,李荣西,等.pH值对长石溶解度及次生孔隙发育的影响[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2001,20(2):103-107
    [10]李士祥,胡明毅,李霞等.鄂尔多斯盆地榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].海相油气地质,2005,10(2):31-32.
    [11]张金亮,司学强,梁杰,等.陕甘宁盆地庆阳地区长8油层砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响[J].沉积学报,2004,22(2):225-233.
    [12]赵澄林,朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001,124-125.
    [13]应凤祥,罗平,何东博,等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩作用数值模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004,120-127.
    [14]裘怿楠,薛叔浩,应凤祥.中国陆相油气储集层[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,147-217.
    [15]罗孝俊,杨卫东,李荣西,等.pH值对长石溶解度及次生孔隙发育的影响[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2001,20(2):103-107
    [16]张厚福等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,101-104
    [17]王家豪,王华,肖敦清,等.伸展构造体系中传递带的控砂作用—储层预测的新思路[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(1):19-25.
    [18]郑浚茂,游俊,何东博.渤海湾盆地与鄂尔多斯盆地陆相优质储层形成条件对比分析[J].现代地质,2007,21(2):376-386.
    [19]王多云,郑希民,李风杰,等.低孔渗油气富集区优质储层形成条件及相关问题[J].天然 气地球科学,2003,14(2):87-91.
    [20]杨晓萍,赵文智,邹才能,等.低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):57-61.
    [21]孟元林,李娜,黄文彪,等.辽河坳陷西部斜坡带南段新生界成岩相分析与优质储集层预测[J].古地理学报,2008,10(1):33-41.
    [22]康德江,张斌迟.潜山构造运动与油气的运聚成藏——以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(5):767-772,780.
    [23]金振奎,王春生,张响响.沁水盆地石炭-二叠系优质煤储层发育的沉积条件[J].科学通报,2005,50(增刊Ⅰ):32-37.
    [24]钟大康,朱筱敏,王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J].中国科学,2008,38(增刊Ⅰ):11-18.
    [25]付广,康德江.贝尔凹陷布达特群潜山油气成藏模式及有利区预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(2):165-169.
    [26]胡海燕,王国建.准噶尔盆地深层相对优质储层发育机理-淋滤与溶蚀作用[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(1):35-41.
    [27]霍秋立,汪振英,李敏,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油源及油气运移研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(3):377-383.
    [28]孙洪斌,张凤莲.断陷盆地优质储层的成因——以辽河坳陷古近系沙河街组储层为例[J].2009,21(1):51-54
    [29]Qiang Fu,and G.strobl.Role and importance of radius of gyration of chains in the melt in the crystalizatiion of poly (1·butene)[J]. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science,2002,20(2):143-154
    [30]李如一,林铁锋.松辽盆地北部古龙地区葡萄花油层储层特征研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(3):32-35.
    [31]宁松华,刘雷颂,回学峰.辽河西部CJ洼陷储层研究[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(2):62-65.
    [32]王兴志,张帆,蒋志斌,等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组储层研究[J].地学前缘,2008,15(1):117-122.
    [33]曾德铭,王兴志,张帆,等.四川盆地西北部中三叠统雷口坡组储层研究[J].古地理学报,2007,9(3):253-266.
    [34]马达德,寿建峰,胡勇,等.柴达木盆地柴西南区碎屑岩储层形成的主控因素分析[J].沉积学报,2005,23(4):589-594.
    [35]蒋凌志,牛嘉玉,张庆昌,等.渤海湾盆地深部有利储层发育的主控因素[J].地质论评,2009,55(1):73-78.
    [36]刘伟,朱筱敏.柴西南地区第三系碎屑岩储集层次生孔隙分布及成因[J].石油勘探与 开发,2006,33(3):315-318.
    [37]施振飞,张振城,叶绍东,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组储层次生孔隙成因机制探讨[J].沉积学报,2005,23(3):429-436.
    [38]BLOCHS, LANDERRH, BONNELLL. Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs:originand predictability [J].AAPG Bull.,2002,86(2):301-328.
    [39]黄文彪,卢双舫,孟元林,等.大庆长垣以西地区扶余油层次生孔隙预测[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3):419-426.
    [40]李晶,张云峰,王春香,等.松辽盆地南部十屋断陷营城组碎屑岩储层特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2008,32(2):8-11.
    [41]张福顺,朱允辉,王芙蓉.准噶尔盆地腹部深埋储层次生孔隙成因机理研究[J].沉积学报,2008,26(3):469-478.
    [42]周越,莫修文,孙凤贤,等.凝灰质砂岩骨架参数确定方法和效果对比[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2008,38:124-127.
    [43]施振飞,张振城,蔡晓明,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组储层次生孔隙成因机制探讨[J].沉积学报,2005,23(3):429-436.
    [44]Hubbort M K. Entrapment of petroleum under hydrodynamic conditions [J]. AAPG Bulletin,1953,37(8):1954-2026.
    [45]Dahberg E C. Applied Hydrodynamlics in Petroleum Exploration [J]. New York: Springer-Verlag,1982.
    [46]Luo X,Vasseur G. Contributions of compaction and aquathermal pressuring to geopressure and the influence of en-vironment conditions [J]. AAPG Bulletin,1992,76(10):1 550-1559.
    [47]杨秋莲,李爱琴,孙燕妮,等.超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J].2007,19(4):51-56.
    [48]王勇,鲍志东,刘虎.低孔低渗储层评价中数学方法的应用研究[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(5):8-13.
    [49]施冬,陈军,朱庆.基于GIS的油气储层综合评价方法研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(7):592-596.
    [50]彭仕宓,熊琦华,王才经,等.储层综合评价的主成分分析方法[J].石油学报,1994,15:187-194.
    [51]孟元林,高建军,刘德来,等.渤海湾盆地西部凹陷南段成岩相分析与优质储层预测[J].沉积学报,2006,24(2):469-478.
    [52]张琴,朱筱敏,陈祥,等.南华北盆地谭庄凹陷下白垩统成岩相分布及优质储层预测[J].是由于天然气地质,2010,31(4):472-480.
    [53]刘立等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷储层特征及分布研究项目[R].海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷储层特征及分布研究报告(第三章孔隙结构特征:61-65页)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700