两种芽孢杆菌微胶囊制剂的研制及其对中华绒螯蟹免疫功能的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文报道了枯草芽孢杆菌和蜡状芽孢杆菌海藻酸钠微胶囊的制备工艺及其对中华绒螯蟹免疫功能及抗病力影响的研究结果,该结果对水产动物饲用益生菌制剂剂型研究和中华绒螯蟹益生菌类免疫增强剂的研发具有重要的参考价值。试验包括两种芽孢杆菌微胶囊制备工艺研究(试验一)和芽孢杆菌微胶囊制剂对中华绒螯蟹免疫功能影响的研究(试验二)两部分。
     试验一:以生物相容性良好的海藻酸钠为壁材,以枯草芽孢杆菌和蜡状芽孢杆菌为芯材,应用乳化法制备芽孢杆菌微胶囊。通过单因素试验和正交试验,确定了两种芽孢杆菌微胶囊制备的较佳工艺:海藻酸钠浓度2%,乳化时间15 min,搅拌速度600 r/min,菌胶比例1:6。以该工艺制备的枯草芽孢杆菌和蜡状芽孢杆菌微胶囊的包封率分别为59.91%和58.33%,两种芽孢杆菌微胶囊均具有良好的耐酸性和肠溶性。
     试验二:在基础饲料中分别添加0(对照)、1、5 g/kg的枯草芽孢杆菌、蜡状芽孢杆菌微胶囊及两种芽孢杆菌1:1混合微胶囊制剂的冻干粉(活菌含量均约为2.2×1011 cfu/g),制成颗粒饲料后投喂中华绒螯蟹7 d,然后所有试验组均改投对照组饲料。在停喂含益生菌的试验组饲料后0、1、2、3周,分别采样测定中华绒螯蟹的血细胞总数(THC)、不同血细胞数量(DHC)、血细胞呼吸爆发活性、血细胞胞内受益生菌激活的酚氧化酶(POS)和总酚氧化酶(POT)活性以及血清酚氧化酶(PO)、过氧化物酶(POD)、溶菌酶(LSZ)、酸性磷酸酶(ACP)、碱性磷酸酶(AKP)活性,并在停喂试验组饲料后第2周,以1.2×107 cfu/kg体重的剂量,体腔注射致病性嗜水气单胞菌CL99920菌株,记录接种10 d后中华绒螯蟹的累积死亡率。结果显示:枯草芽孢杆菌、蜡状芽孢杆菌微胶囊制剂及两种芽孢杆菌1:1混合微胶囊制剂均能不同程度地增加中华绒螯蟹的THC和HC数量、血细胞的呼吸爆发活性、血细胞胞内POS与POT活性以及血清PO、POD、LSZ、ACP和AKP活性,在多数采样时间点,各实验组的上述免疫指标活性均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),并且以5 g/kg剂量的刺激效果为佳。同时,饲喂试验用芽孢杆菌微胶囊制剂能明显地提高中华绒螯蟹对嗜水气单胞菌的抗感染能力,其中饲喂5 g/kg饲料剂量的枯草芽孢杆菌微胶囊制剂对中华绒螯蟹的免疫保护率最高(71.43%)。试验表明,在饲料中添加一定量的枯草芽孢杆菌、蜡状芽孢杆菌微胶囊及两种芽孢杆菌1:1混合微胶囊制剂均能明显地增强中华绒螯蟹的免疫功能和抗病力。
The results of the preparation technology of alginate microcapsules of Bacillus subtilis and B. cereus and theirs effects on immunological function of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis are first reported in the paper. The results have important reference value to study on the preparation form of feed probiotics of aquatic animals and immunostimulants of E. sinensis. The experiment is composing of two parts as follows:
     Experiment one: The sodium alginate which has good biology consistent was used as shell-material and the B. subtilis or B. cereus was used as core-material, then preparing microcapsulation with emulsification method. The optimal technological conditions of making the microcapsule were determined through single factor test and orthogonal experiment of L9 (34). The results were as follows: the concentration of sodium alginate was 2%, the emulsification time was 15 min, the stirring speed was 600 r/min, the proportion of B. subtilis or B. cereus and sodium alginate was 1:6. This method can prepare microcapsules which have good enteric solubility and acid resistance, embedding rate was 59.91% and 58.33%, respectively.
     Experiment two: The purpose of this study is to determine the variance of immune function of E. sinensis after being fed with the diets added lyophilized powder of alginate microcapsules of living B. subtilis, B. cereus, B. subtilis and B. cereus (1:1) (about 2.2×1011 cfu/g powder) dosed at 0, 1 or 5 g/kg dry diet for 1 week, respectively. The total haemocyte count (THC), different haemocyte count (DHC), respiratory burst (release of superoxide anion) of haemocytes, the simulated PO activity by Bacillus (POS) and total phenoloxidase (POT) in haemocyte lysate supernatant (HLS), phenoloxidase (PO), peroxidase (POD), lysozyme (LSZ), acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities in serum were examined at 0,1,2,3 weeks after last administration with the diets of test groups. Crab were challenged at 1.2×107 colony forming units (cfu) /kg crab weight with a virulent strain of Aeromonas hydrophila (CL99920) of E. sinensis at 2 weeks after last administration with the diets of test groups, and mortalities were recorded over a 10-day period. The results indicated that experimental groups of feeding microcapsules of Bacillus showed all higher haemocyte count (THC), hyaline cells (HC), higher respiratory burst (release of superoxide anion) of haemocytes, while boosted up POS and POT activities in haemocyte lysate supernatant (HLS), phenoloxidase (PO), peroxidase (POD), lysozyme (LSZ), acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activities in serum. The activities of these immune parameters of test groups were significantly higher than control group at many sampling time points (P<0.05). The stimulate effects of the 5 g/kg group is more superiority than the 1 g/kg group at many sampling time points. Crab of test groups were the more resistant. It was concluded that E. sinensis that were fed with diets concluding microcapsules of Bacillus showed increased immune ability as well as resistance to A. hydrophila infection.
引文
[1] Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals, a review [J]. Appl Bacteriol, 1989, 66:365~ 378
    [2] Stutz M W, Lawton G S. Effect of diet and antimicrobial on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal Clostridium perfringens, and ileal weight of broiler chicks [J]. Poultry Sci, 1984, 63:2036~2042
    [3]潘康成,何明清,刘克琳.微生物添加剂对鲤鱼生长和消化酶活性的影响研究[J].饲料工业, 1997, 18(10):41~42
    [4] Douillet P A, Langdon C J. Use of a probiotic for the culture of larvae of the pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigasThunberg) [J]. Aquaculture, 1994, 119:25~40
    [5] Gilderg A, Mikkelsen H, Sandaker E, et al. Probiotic effect of lactic acid bacteria in the feed on growth and sruvival of fry of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) [J]. Hydrobiologia, 1997, 325:279~285
    [6] Smith P, Davey S. Evidence for the competitive exclusion of Aeromonas salmonicida from fish with stress-inducible furunculosis by a fluorescent Pseud omonad [J]. J Fish Dis, 1993, 16: 521~524
    [7] Olesson J C, Westerdahl A, Conway P L, et al. Intestinal colonization potential of turbot (Scophtalmus maximus)-and dab (Limanda limanada)-associated bacteria with inhibitory effects against Vibrio anguillarum [J]. Appl Environ Micro, 1992, 58 (2): 551~556
    [8] Sugita H, Hirose Y, Matsuo N, et al. Production of the antibacterial substance by Bacillus sp. Strain NM12, an intestinal bacterium of Japanese coastal fish [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 165:269~280
    [9] Ringe E, Gatesoupe F. Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a review [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 160:177~203
    [10] Gatesoupe F J, Lesel R. An environmental approach to intestinal microflora in fish [J]. Cahiera Agricultures, 1998, 7(1):29~35
    [11] Gram L, Melchiorsen J, Spanggaard B, et al. Inhibition of Vibrioanguillarum by Pseudononas fluorescens AH2. a possible probiotic treatment of fish [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(3):969~973
    [12] Stutz M W, Lawton G S. Effect of diet and antimicrobial on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal Clostridium perfringens, and ileal weight of broiler chicks [J]. Poultry Sci, 1984, 63:2036-2042
    [13]王有基,胡梦红,朱焕青,等.光合细菌对鲤鱼非特异性免疫功能的影响[J].水利渔业, 2005, 25(6):38~39
    [14]王雄,邓微,陈孝煊.微生态制剂对银鲫血清溶菌酶活性的影响[J].水利渔业, 2004, 24(3):15~16
    [15]李长玲,黄翔鹄,李瑞伟,等.硝化细菌对罗非鱼苗培育环境及抗病力的影响[J].广东海洋大学学报, 2008, 28(6):41~45
    [16]赵卫红,陈立侨,刘晓利,等.地衣芽孢杆菌和荚膜红假单胞菌对异育银鲫鱼种非特异性免疫机能的影响[J].上海水产大学学报, 2008, 17(6):757~760
    [17] Wang Y B, Tian Z Q, Yao J T, et al. Effect of probiotics, Enteroccus faecium, on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance and immune response [J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 277:203~207
    [18]张梁,张伟,任小丽.光合细菌对草鱼生长及免疫相关酶活性的影响[J].粮食与饲料工业, 2007(2): 37~38
    [19]张梁,沈建忠,敖茂权,等.蛭弧菌对草鱼免疫相关酶活性的影响[J].江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28(2):295~299
    [20]张梁,沈建忠.蛭弧菌对草鱼免疫功能的影响[J].淡水渔业, 2006, 36(3):41~43
    [21]郑清梅,温茹淑,刘兴隆,等.复合微生物制剂对草鱼的生长和免疫因子的影响[J].嘉应学院学报(自然科学), 2007, 25(3):68~71
    [22]桂远明,何幽峰,吴垠,等.生态制品(Jy10、Jy31复合制剂)饲料添加剂对提高鲤抗病力的研究[J].中国微生态学杂志, 1994, 6(6):27~33
    [23]刘克琳,何明清.益生菌对鲤鱼免疫功能影响的研究[J].饲料工业, 2000, 21(6): 24~25
    [24]周国勤,杜宣,吴伟.纳豆芽孢杆菌对鱼类非特异性免疫功能的影响[J].水利渔业, 2006, 26(1):101~103
    [25]殷海成,赵红月.苏云金芽孢杆菌对黄河鲤鱼血液免疫效果的研究[J].饲料广角, 2008, (22):33~36
    [26]许蓉.芽孢杆菌对鱼类免疫机能的影响[D].华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 2005
    [27]王高学,白冰. 9种细菌成分及其代谢产物对鲫鱼免疫功能的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(2):39~44
    [28]吴志新,陈孝煊,李丽鹃,等.微生态制剂对银鲫免疫机能的影响[J].水利渔业, 2004, 24(6):67~68
    [29]华雪铭,周洪琪,邱小琮,等.饲料中添加芽孢杆菌和硒酵母对异育银鲫的生长及抗病力的影响[J].水产学报, 2001, 25(5):448~453
    [30]张宇锋.益生菌在异育银鲫饲料的应用研究[D].上海水产大学硕士学位论文, 2005
    [31]伍莉,陈鹏飞.微生态制剂对大口鲇和鲫鱼生长及血液指标的影响[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 32(1):82~86
    [32] Nayak S K, Swain P, Mukherjee S C. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic and vitamin C on the immune response of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Ham.) [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2007, 23:892~896
    [33] Kumar R, Mukherjee S C, Ranjan R, et al. Enhanced innate immune parameters in Labeo rohita (Ham.) following oral administration of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2008, 24:168–172
    [34]袁科平.网网网网网网网网网网网性细菌性网病网网研究[D].华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 2008
    [35] Pirarat N, Kobayashi T, Katagiri T, et al. Protective effects and mechanisms of a probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus against experimental Edwardsiella tarda infection in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2006, 113:339~347
    [36] Aly S M, Ahmed Y A G, Ghareeb A A A, et al. Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of Tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2008, 25:128~136
    [37]温俊.合生素对罗非鱼非特异性免疫力的影响[J].饲料研究, 2008, (8):69~70
    [38]朱浩,蔡永祥,刘文斌,等.两种免疫增强剂对黄颡鱼生长、消化及免疫性能的影响[J].淡水渔业, 2008, 38(5):35~38
    [39]余德光,谢骏,王广军,等.嗜酸小球菌对日本鳗鲡生长和免疫的影响[J].湛江海洋大学学报, 2005, 25(4):14~17
    [40]林煜.二株鳗鲡益生菌对欧洲鳗鲡免疫应答的初步研究[J].福建水产, 2006, (4): 44~47
    [41] Nikoskelainen S, Ouwehand A, Salminen S, et al. Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from furunculosis by Lactobacillus rhamnosus [J]. Aquaculture, 2001, 198:229~236
    [42] Vendrell D, Balcázar J L, de Blas I, et al. Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from lactococcosis by probiotic bacteria [J]. Comp Immunol, Microbiol Infectious Dis, 2008, 31:337~345
    [43] Nikoskelainen S, Ouwehand A C, Bylund G, et al. Immune enhancement in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2003, 15:443~452
    [44] Panigrahi A, Kiron V, Kobayashi T, et al. Immune responses in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss induced by a potential probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136 [J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2004, 102:379~388
    [45] Panigrahi A, Kiron V, Puangkaew J, et al. The viability of probiotic bacteria as a factor influencing the immune response in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss [J]. Aquaculture, 2005, 243:241~ 254
    [46] Panigrahi A, Kiron V, Satoh S, et al. Immune modulation and expression of cytokine genes in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss upon probiotic feeding [J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2007, 31:372~382
    [47] Balcázar J L, Vendrell D, de Blas I, et al. Immune modulation by probiotic strains: Quantification of phagocytosis of Aeromonas salmonicida by leukocytes isolated from gut of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using a radiolabelling assay [J]. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 2006, 29:335~343
    [48]韩宇翔,邓璐,李圆圆,等.噬菌蛭弧菌对鲟鱼免疫相关酶活性的影响[J].饲料工业, 2008, 29(18):40~42
    [49] Salinas I, Cuesta A, Esteban Má, et al. Dietary administration of Lactobacillus delbrüeckii and Bacillus subtilis, single or combined, on gilthead seabream cellular innate immune responses [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2005, 19:67~77
    [50] Salinas I, Abelli L, Bertoni F, et al. Monospecies and multispecies probiotic formulations produce different systemic and local immunostimulatory effects in the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2008, 25:114~123
    [51] Díaz-Rosales P, Salinas I, Rodríguez A, et al. Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) innate immune response after dietary administration of heat-inactivated potential probiotics [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2006, 20:482~492
    [52] Villamil L, Tafalla C, Figueras A, et al. Evaluation of immunomodulatory effects of lactic acid bacteria in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) [J]. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 2002, 9(6):1318~1323
    [53] Taffala C, Novoa B. Requirements for nitric oxide production by turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) head kidney macrophages [J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2000, 24:236~631
    [54]郭文婷,李健,王群,等.微生态制剂对牙鲆非特异性免疫因子影响的研究[J].海洋科学进展, 2006, 24(1):51~58
    [55]温俊.复合益生菌与酵母培网物对牙鲆(Paralichthys olivaceus)生长、免疫及抗病力的影响[J].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2007
    [56]吴桂玲,梁萌青,周丽,等.复合微生态制剂对花鲈非特异性免疫力及抗病力的影响[J].海洋水产研究, 2007, 28(5):12~17
    [57]刘至网,蔡完其,季高华,等.几种免疫增强剂对中华鳖红细胞数量及免疫功能的影响[J].上海水产大学学报, 2006, 15(1):1~6
    [58] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. by Bacillus subtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon [J]. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2003, 36:83~87
    [59] Alavandi S V, Vijayan K K, Santiago T C, et al. Evaluation ofPseudomonas sp. PM 11 and Vibrio fluvialis PM 17 on immune indices of tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2004, 17:115~120
    [60]潘康成,杨金龙,王振华,等.枯草芽孢杆菌制剂在南美白对虾育苗上的应用[J].饲料研究, 2004, (12):33~34
    [61] Gullian M, Thompson F, Rodriguez J. Selection of probiotic bacteria and study of their immunostimulatory effect in Penaeus vannamei [J]. Aquaculture, 2004, 233:1~14
    [62]隋大鹏.微生态制剂对南美白对虾生长和非特异性免疫因子影响的研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2003
    [63] Li K, Zheng T L, Tian Y, et al. Beneficial effects of Bacillus licheniformis on the intestinal microflora and immunity of the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei [J]. Biotechnol Lett, 2007, 29:525~530
    [64]翟秀梅,毛连菊,王斌,等.微生态净水剂对凡纳滨对虾生理生化指标的影响[J].中国水产科学, 2007, 14(2):281~289
    [65]王永胜,钱鲁闽,陈昌生,等.抗生素和有益微生物对凡纳滨对虾非特异性免疫效应的研究[J].台湾海峡, 2008, 27(2):161~167
    [66]李继秋.对虾微生态制剂的研究和应用[J].中国海洋大学博士学位论文, 2004
    [67]徐琴,李健,刘淇,等.微生态制剂对中国对虾幼体生长和非特异性免疫的影响[J].饲料工业, 2006, 27(12):26~29
    [68]谢佳磊,肖丹,殷蝶,等.枯草芽孢杆菌对克氏原螯虾免疫机能的影响[J].淡水渔业, 2007, 37(6):24~27
    [69] Castex M, Chim L, Pham D, et al. Probiotic P. acidilactici application in shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris culture subject to vibriosis in New Caledonia [J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 275:182~193
    [70] Rengpipat S, Phianpak W, Piyatiratitivorakul S, et al. Effect of a probiotic bacterium on black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon survival and growth [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 167:301~313
    [71] Rengpipat S, Sombat Rukpratanporn S, Piyatiratitivorakul S, et al. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiontbacterium (Bacillus S11) [J]. Aquaculture, 2000, 191:271~288
    [72]於叶兵.芽孢杆菌对网节对虾消化和免疫的影响[D].上海水产大学硕士学位论文, 2007
    [73]孙舰军,丁美丽.改善虾池环境增强中国对虾抗病力的研究[J].海洋科学, 1999, 22(1):3~5
    [74]张玲.一株对虾肠道益生菌的筛选及其作用机理和应用效果的研究[D].中国海洋大学博士学位论文, 2007
    [75]徐琴,李健,刘淇,等.噬菌蛭弧菌和粘红酵母对中国对虾生长及非特异免疫因子的影响[J].海洋水产研究, 2007, 28(5):42~47
    [76] Balcázar J L, Rojas-Luna T, Cunningham D P. Effect of the addition of four potential probiotic strains on the survival of pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) following immersion challenge with Vibrio parahaemolyticus [J]. J Invert Pathol, 2007, 96:147~150
    [77] Balcázar J L, Rojas-Luna T. Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM 126 against Vibrio Species confers protection against Vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [J]. Curr Microbiol, 2007, 55:409~412
    [78]张新明,李健,刘淇,等.细菌J-10对凡纳滨对虾非特异性免疫指标的影响[J].海洋水产研究, 2004, 25(4):6~12
    [79]郭文婷.两种免疫增强剂对牙鲆和凡纳滨对虾免疫因子影响的研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2005
    [80]余德光,朱红友,王广军,等.嗜酸小球菌对凡纳滨对虾体液免疫因子的影响[J].海洋水产研究, 2006, 27(5):51~55
    [81] Chiu C H, Guu Y K, Liu C H, et al. Immune responses and gene expression in white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, induced by Lactobacillus plantarum [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2007, 23:364~377
    [82]朱学芝,郑石轩,潘庆军,等.芽孢杆菌对凡纳滨对虾免疫和生化指标的影响[J].饲料研究, 2007, (4):56~59
    [83]胡毅,谭北平,麦康森,等.饲料中益生菌对凡纳滨对虾生长、肠道菌群及部分免疫指标的影响[J].中国水产科学, 2008, 15(2):245~251
    [84] Tseng D Y, Ho P L, Huang S Y, et al. Enhancement of immunity anddisease resistance in the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, by the probiotic, Bacillus subtilis E20 [J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2009, 26:339~344
    [85] Nogami K, Maeda M. Bacterial as biocontrol agents for rearing larvae of the crab Portunus trituberculatus [J]. Can J Fish Aqua Sci, 1992, 11:2373~2376
    [86] Nogami K, Hamaskai K, Maeda M, et al. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus [J]. Hydrobiologia, 1997, 358:291~295
    [87] Maeda M, Nogami K, Kanematsu M, et al. The concept of biological control methods in aquaculture [J]. Hydrobiologia, 1997, 358:285~290
    [88]江河,汪留全,邓朝阳,等.益生菌制剂在河蟹网网中的应用研究[J].水利渔业, 2003, 23(5):46~48
    [89]王笃彩,闫斌伦,李士虎,等.复合微生物制剂对河蟹育苗生产影响的研究[J].水利渔业, 2007, 27(6):99~101
    [90]陈静,朱明,潘建梅,等.一株芽孢杆菌对河蟹蚤状一期幼体益生作用的初步研究[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版), 2008, 17(4):65~68
    [91]薛恒平.微生态制剂浅谈[J].饲料工业, 1996, 17(1):30~34
    [92]严正凛.微生态制剂对九孔鲍育苗效果的研究[J].水产学杂志, 2008, 21(1):21~25
    [93] Austin B, Stuckey L F, Robertson P A W, et al. A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalii [J]. J Fish Dis, 1995, 18(1): 93~96
    [94] Cheng T C. Release of lysozyme form hemolymph cells of Mercenaria during Phagocytosis [J]. J Invert Pathol, 1975, 27:243~245
    [95] Gibson L F, Woodworth J, George A M. Probiotic activity of Aeromonas media on the pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, when challenged with Vibrio tubiashii [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 169:111~120
    [96] Macey B M, Coyne V E. Improved growth rate and disease resistance in farmed Haliotis midae through probiotic treatment [J]. Aquaculture, 2005, 5245:249~261
    [97] Anal A K, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics forindustrial applications and targeted delivery [J]. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2007, 18: 240~251
    [98]郭本恒.益生菌[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2003
    [99]阳晖,蒋爱民,刘思聪,等.肠溶性益生菌微胶囊的研究[J].食品研究与开网, 2006, 27(1):76~79
    [100]许燕滨,杨汝德,陈惠音.双歧杆菌微胶囊特性研究[J].四川食品与网酵, 1998, (3):24~26
    [101]曹永梅,许时婴,张灏.肠溶性双歧杆菌微胶囊的制备[J].食品与网酵工业, 1999, 25 (2):71~74
    [102]刘丽英,张日俊.乳酸菌的微胶囊化包被研究[J].饲料工业, 2003, 24(6):16~18
    [103]蒋爱民,阳晖,曹稳.肠溶性嗜酸乳杆菌微胶囊工艺研究[J].中国食品学报, 2006, 6(1):253~257
    [104]阳晖,蒋爱民.内源乳化法制备肠溶性嗜酸乳杆菌微胶囊的研究[J].食品研究与开网, 2008, 29(6):57~61
    [105]许本网,李宏建,柴金贞.酸奶和乳酸菌饮料加工[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社, l994
    [106]赵明军,谌南辉.动物微生态制剂研究进展[J].山东家禽, 2002, 6:42~44
    [107] Cavzzoni V A, Adami, Castrvilli C. Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic [J]. British Poultry sci, 1998, 39:526~529
    [108] RingФE, Gatesoupe F. Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a review [J]. Aquaculture, 1998, 160:177~203
    [109] Hong H A, Duc L H, Cutting S M. The use of bacterial spore former as probiotics [J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2005, 29:813~835
    [110] Vine N G, Leukes W D, Kaiser H. Probiotics in marine larviculture [J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2006, 30:404~427
    [111] Wang Y B, Xu Z R. Effect of probiotics for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities [J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2006, 127:283~292
    [112]蔡武城,李碧羽,李玉民.生物化学实验技术教程[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 1983, 47
    [113] Song Y L, Hsieh Y T. Immunostimulation of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) hemocytes for generation of microbicidal substances: analysis of reactive oxygens pecies [J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 1994, 18(3):201~209
    [114] Ashida M. Purification and characterization of prophenoloxidase from hemolymph of the silkworm Bombyx Mori [J]. Archs Biochem Biophys, 1971, 144:749~762
    [115] Sung H H, Chang H J, Her C H, et al. Phenoloxidase activity of hemocytes derived from Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii [J]. Invertebr Pathol, 1998, 71:26~33
    [116]史成银,黄网,宋晓玲.对虾皮下及造血组织坏死杆状病毒单克隆抗体的ELISA快速检测[J].中国水产科学, 1999, 6(3):116~118
    [117] Hultmark D, Seiner H. Insect immunity:Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophera cecropia [J]. Eur J Biochem, 1980, 106:7~16
    [118] Horan T D, Denis E, Thomas A, et al. Association of neutrophil chemiluminescence with microbicidal activity [J]. Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 1982, 22(2):259~269
    [119] Bell K L, Smith V J. In vitro superoxide production by hyaline cells of the crab Careinus maenas (L.) [J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 1993, 17:211~219
    [120] Mu?oz M, Cede?o R, Rodríguez J, et al. Measurement of reactive oxygen intermediate production in haemocytes of the penaeid shrimp, Penaeus vannamei [J]. Aquaculture, 2000, 191(3):89~107
    [121]王宝杰,王雷.中国对虾血细胞吞噬活动中超氧阴离子(O2-)的产生[J].中国水产科学, 2003, 10(1):14~18
    [122]孟凡伦,张玉臻,孔健,等.甲壳动物中的酚氧化酶原激活系统研究评价[J].海洋与湖沼, 1999, 30(1):110~116
    [123] Ashida M, S?derh?ll K. The prophenoloxidase activating system in crayfish [J]. Comp Biochem Physiol B, 1984, 77:21~26
    [124] Hashimoto T, Ohno N, Yadomae T. Subgrouping immunomodulatingβ-glucans by monitoring IFN-γand NO syntheses [J]. Drg Develop Res, 1997, 42(1): 35~40
    [125] Cheng T C. The role of lysosomal hydrolases in molluscan cellular response to immunologic challenge [J]. Comp Pathobiol, 1978, (4): 59~71
    [126]谭夕东.海藻酸钠和壳聚糖对中华绒螯蟹免疫功能的影响[D].苏州大学硕士学位论文, 2008

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700