三种术式治疗单节段下腰椎退行性疾病的疗效观察
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:观察比较腰椎后外侧融合术(PLF)、腰椎后路椎体间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗单节段下腰椎退行性疾病的疗效。
     方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年8月我院收治资料完整且获得随访的73例单节段下腰椎退行性疾病患者。按其手术方式不同分为A组(PLF,21例);B组(PLIF,27例);C组(TLIF,25例)。比较三种植骨融合术的Oswestry功能障碍指数(汉化版ODI),腰腿痛VAS评分,融合率,断钉,腰椎前凸角,相对椎间隙高度等情况。
     结果:术后随访18月~62月,平均27个月。3组ODI功能障碍指数、腰腿痛VAS评分均较术前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CT二维重建观察到A、B及C组融合率分别为85.7%、100%、100%,3组间有显著性差异(P<0.05);进一步比较B、C组融合率明显高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B、C两组间,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组间断钉及腰椎前凸角无显著性差异(P>0.05)。B、C组相对椎间隙高度显著优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B、C两组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     结论:三种融合术式治疗单节段下腰椎退行性疾病效果良好,临床疗效观察无显著性差异。TLIF、PLIF在融合率、恢复和维持椎间隙高度明显优于PLF,建议作为治疗单节段下腰椎退行性疾病的优先选择术式。
Objective: To observe and compare the efficacy of lumbar posterolateral fusion(PLF),posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion (TLIF) in the treatment of single-level low lumbar degenerative disease.
     Methods: Between January2008and August2011,the follow-up complete data of73patients who underwent fusion surgery because of single-leve low lumbar degenerativedisease were retrospectively analysed.The patients were divided into3groups:group A(PLF, n=21);group B (PLIF, n=21);group C (TLIF, n=25).A visual analog scale(VAS)and the Chinese Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) were used to measure low back pain, legpain, and disability.For X-ray evaluation, instrumented breakage、lumbar lordosis、maintenance of disc height were analyzed.Bone fusion was examined by two-dimensionalreconstruction of CT.
     Results: All patients were followed up for average of27months(range,18months~62months).All methods indicated significant improvement in clinical assessments,using Oswestry、VAS for low back pain and leg pain(P<0.05);no statistical differenceswere found among the3groups (P>0.05).On radiologic assessment, the fusion ratesrespectively were85.7%,100%and100%with significant differences (P<0.05).Furthercomparing the fusion rates of B,C with A, significant differences existed (P<0.05); nosignificant difference existed comparing B and C(P>0.05).The incidence of broken nailsand lumbar lordosis in the3fusion methods had no statistically significantdifferences(P>0.05).Statistical differences were found Between B、C and the A groups inthe relative disc height (P <0.05), indicating that A group having the highest loss in discheight,there was no significant difference between B and the C groups.
     Conclusion: No significant differences in clinical results were found among the3 fusion methods in our observation,all are equally suitable for treating single-level lowlumbar degenerative disease.However,the fusion rates of TLIF and PLIF are better thanPLF.TLIF and PLIF have significant advantages in the correction and maintenance of discheight.TLIFand PLIF should be given priority to in the treatment of in single-level lowlumbar degenerative disease.
引文
[1] Robinson Y,MichaelssonK,SandenB.Instrumentation in lumbar fusion improvesback pain but not quality of life2years after surgery [J].Acta Orthopaedica,2013,84(1):7-11.
    [2] Cloward RB.The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral bodyfusion[J].J Neurosurg,1953,10(2):154-168.
    [3] Kim KT,Lee SH,Lee YH,et al.Clinical outcomes of3fusion methods through theposterior approach in the lumbar spine[J].Spine,2006,31(12):1351-1357.
    [4] Zhou ZJ,Zhao FD, Fang XQ,et al. Meta-analysis of instrumented posteriorinterbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine Areview [J].Journal of neurosur-gery-Spine,2011,15(3):295-310.
    [5] Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior Lumbar InterbodyFusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis [J].Spine,2007,32(20):2178-2183.
    [6] Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stage procedure in operative treatment of ospondylolisthesis:dorsal traciton-reposition and anterior fusion[J].ZOrthop,1983,l20:343-347.
    [7] Xu H,Tang H,Guan XM,et al.Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior LumbarInterbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite ElementAnalysis[J].Neurosur Gery,2013,72,:21-26.
    [1] Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The oswestry disability index [J].Spine,200.25:2940-2953.
    [2] Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pediclescrew fixation and posterolateral fusion afte decompression inspondylolyticspondylolisthesis[J].Spine,1997,22(2):210-229.
    [3] SelbyMD,ClarkSR,Hall DJ,etal.Radiologic Assessment of Spinal Fusion[J].Journalof orthopaedic surgeons,2012,20(11):694-703.
    [4] Fogel GR,Toohey JS,Neidre A,et al.Fusion assessment of posterior lumbarinterbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computedtomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion[J].The SpineJournal,2008,8(4):570-577.
    [5] Herzog RJ,Marcotte PJ.Assessment of spinal fusion-Critical evaluation of imagingtechniques[J].Spine,1996,21(9):1114-1118.
    [6] Oda I,Abumi K,Yu BS,et al.Types of spinal instability that require interbodysupport in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation [J]Spine,2003,28:1573–1580.
    [7] Suda K,Ito M,Abumi K,et al.Radiological Risk Factors of Pseudoarthrosis and/orInstrument Breakage After PLF With the Pedicle Screw System in IsthmicSpondylolisthesis[J].Journal of Spinal Disorders&Techniques,2006,19(8):541-546.
    [8] Dantas FLR, Prandini MN, Ferreira MAT,et al. Comparison between posteriorlumbar fusion with pedicle screws and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pediclescrews in adult spondylolisthesis[J].Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.2007,65(38):764-770.
    [9] Dehoux E,Fourati E,Madi K,et al.Posterolateral versus interbody fusion in isthmicspondylolisthesis: functional results in52cases with a minimum follow-up of6years[J].Acta orthopaedica Belgica,2004,70(6):578-582.
    [10] Wu YG,Tang H,Li ZH,et al.Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versusposterolateral fusion in lumbar degenerative disease[J]. Jourrnal of clinical ofneuroscience,2011,18(6):780-783.
    [11] Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior Lumbar InterbodyFusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis [J].Spine,2007,32(20):2178-2183.
    [12] Audat Z,Moutasem O, Yousef K, et al.Comparison of clinical and radiologicalresults of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminallumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbarspine[J].Singapore Med J,2012,53(3):183-187.
    [13]谢松林,顾开宏,秦树连.三种植骨融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2012,1(3):221-224.
    [14] Wilco CH,Jacobs WCH, Vreeling A, et al.Fusion for low-grade adult isthmicspondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature[J].European Spine Journal,2006,15(4):391-402.
    [15] Ma X,Qin YC,Huo JZ,et al.The application of three lumbar fusion methods in thetreatment of spondylolisthesis[J].Chinese Journal of Surgery2010,48(22):1718-1721.
    [16] Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR, Grauer JN, et al. Indications, techniques, and outcomes ofposterior surgery for chronic low back pain[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2003,34(2):297-308.
    [17] Xia XP,Chen HL, Cheng HB,et al.Prevalence of Adjacent Segment DegenerationAfter Spine Surgery:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Spine,2013,38(7):597-608.
    [18] Sun HL, Li CD, Liu XY, et al. Clinical characteristics and reoperation ofsymptomatic adjacent segment degeneration postoperation of lumbar fusion[J]. Journal ofPeking University. Health Sciences,2012,44(6):855-859.
    [19] Jacobs WCH, Van der Gaag NA, Kruyt MC, et al.Total disc replacement forchronic discogenic low back pain: a cochrane review[J].Spine,2013,38(1):24-36.
    [20] Shuang F, Hou S, Zhongguo xiu, et al. Present clinical research situationof adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion[J].Zhongguo Xiu FuChong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi,2013,27(1):110-115.
    [21] Ha KY, Na KH, Shin JH,et al. Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion With andWithout Additional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative LumbarSpondylolisthesis [J].Journal of Spinal Disorders,2008,21(4):229-234.
    [22] Maciejczak A, Radek A.Lumbar interbody fusion. Biomechanical significance forthe spine[J].Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska,1998,32(5):1247-1259.
    [23] Kim KT,Lee SH,Lee YH,et al.Clinical outcomes of3fusion methods through theposterior approach in the lumbar spine[J].Spine,2006,31(12):1351-1357.
    [1] Hibbs RA.An operation for progressive spinal deformities:a preliminary report ofthree cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital [J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2007,(460):17-20.
    [2] Albee FH.Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease:apreliminary report.JAMA,1911,57(9):885-886.
    [3]赵栋,邱贵兴,仉建国.腰椎融合技术及其临床研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(4):298-300.
    [4] ChristieSD,Song JK,Fessler RG.Dynamic interspinous process technology[J].Spine,2005,16(30):73-78.
    [5] Rajaee SS,Bae HW,Kanim LEA,et al.Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysisof Trends From1998to2008[J].Spine,2012,37(01):67-76.
    [6]周盛源,陈雄生,贾连顺,等.棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex预防腰椎融合术后相邻节段退变的短期随访疗效观察[J].中华外科杂志,2012,50(9):772-775.
    [7] LeeCK,Langrana NA.Lumbosacral spinal fusion:a biomechanical study[J].Spine,1984,9(6):574-580.
    [8] Kim SM, LimTJ, Paterno J, et al. Biomechanical comparison: stability oflateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared withanterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lowerlumbar spine[J].Neurosurg Spine,2005,2(1):62-88.
    [9]张烽,陈兵乾,居建文,等.三种单纯腰椎椎间融合术加用双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定后生物力学比较的实验研究[J].医用生物力学,2007,22(3):302-305.
    [10] Lee CK.Accelerated degeneration of segment adjacent a lumbar fusion[J].Spine,1988,13(8):952-953.
    [11] Battié MG,Videman T,Parent E.Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology andgenetic Influences[J].Spine,2004,29(23):2679-2690.
    [12]王洪立,姜建元.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的相关因素研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(6):590-593.
    [13] Bagby G.Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression methods using a stainless steelimplant[J].Orthopedics,1988,11(6):93l-934.
    [14] Kulish SD,Ulstrom CL,Griffith SL,et al.The Bagby and kuslich method of lumbarinterbody fusion:history,techniques,and2year follow up results of a united statesprospective, multicenter Trial[J].Spine,,1998,23(11):1267-1278.
    [15] Brantigan JW,Steffee AD,Geiger JM.A carbon fiber implant to aid interbodyLumbar fusion mechanical testing[J].Spine,1991,16(6):277-282.
    [16] Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion withcages[J].Surgical Neurology,2004(5),62:378-386.
    [17] David HK, Louis J,Scott CB,et al.Bone graft alternatives in spinal fusionsurgery[J].Current Opinion in Orthopedics,2003,14(13):127-137.
    [18] Boden SD.Overview of biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selectingabone graft substitute[J].SPine,2002,27(16):26-31.
    [19] Mussano F,Ciccone G,Ceccareli M,et al.Bone morphogenetic proteins and bonedefects:a systematic review[J].Spine,2007,32(7):824-830.
    [20] Watkins MB.Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbesacralspine[J].J BoneJoint Surg Am,1953,35-A(4):1014-1018.
    [21] Videbaek TS,Christensen FB,Soegaard R et al.Circumferential fusion improvesoutcome incomparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion:long—term results ofa randomized chnical trial[J].Spine,2006,3l:2875-2880.
    [22] Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior Lumbar InterbodyFusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis [J].Spine,2007,32(20):2178-2183.
    [23] Cloward RB.The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral bodyfusion[J].J Neurosurg,1953,10(2):154-168.
    [24] Kimura H, Shikata J, Odate S,et al.Risk Factors for Cage Retropulsion AfterPosterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Analysis of1070Cases[J].Spine,2012,37(13):1164-1169.
    [25] Krishna M,Pollock RD,Bhatia C.Incidence,etiology,classiftation and managenmentof neuralgia after postelior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in226patients[J].Spine,2008,8(2):374-379.
    [26] O'Brien JP.The role of fusion for chonic low back pain[J].Orthop Clin North Am,1983,14(3):639-47.
    [27] Lindley EM, McBeth ZL, Henry SE,et al.Retrograde Ejaculation After AnteriorLumbar Spine Surgery[J].Spine,2012,37(20):1785-1789.
    [28] Beutler WJ,Peppelman WC,DiMarco LA.The da Vinci Robotic Surgical AssistedAnterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technical Development and Case Report[J].Spine,2013,38(4):356-363.
    [29] Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stage procedure in operative treatment of ospondylolisthesis:dorsal traciton-reposition and anterior fusion[J].ZOrthop,1983,l20:343-347.
    [30] Audat Z,Moutasem O, Yousef K, et al.Comparison of clinical and radiologicalresults of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminallumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbarspine[J].Singapore Med J,2012,53(3):183-187.
    [31] Lowe TG,Tahernia AD,O’Brien MF,et al.Unilateral transforaminal posteriorlumbar interbody fusion (TLIF):indicatoins,technique,and2-year results[J].J SpinalDisord,2002,15(3):31-38.
    [32] Han XX, Zhu Y,Cui C,et al.A Meta-Analysis of Circumferential Fusion VersusInstrumented Posterolateral Fusion in the Lumbar Spine[J].Spine,2009,34(17):618-625.
    [33] Kim KT,Lee SH,Lee YH,et al.Clinical outcomes of3fusion methods through theposterior approach in the lumbar spine[J].Spine,2006,31(12):1351-1357.
    [34] Ozgur BM, Yoo K, Rodriguez G, et al. Minimally-invasive technique fortransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2005,14(9):887-894.
    [35] Wu RH,Fraser JF,Hartl RM.Minimal Access Versus Open Transforaminal LumbarInterbody Fusion Meta-Analysis of Fusion Rates[J].Spine,2010,35(26):2273-2281.
    [36] Karikari IO, Isaacs RE.Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar InterbodyFusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes [J].Spine,2010,35(26):S297-S301.
    [37] Youssef JA, McAfeePC, PattyCA,et al.Minimally Invasive Surgery: LateralApproach Interbody Fusion Results and Review [J].Spine,2010,35(26):S302-S311.
    [38] Cragg A,Carl A,Casteneda F,et al.New percutaneous access method for minimallyinvasive anterior lumbosacral surgery[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2004,17(1):21-28.
    [39] Mukund I,Gundanna, MD,Larry E,et al.Complications with axial presacral lumbarinterbody fusion: A5-year postmarketing surveillance experience[J].SAS Journal,2011,5(3):90-94.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700