信念视域分隔与知识命运选择
|
摘要
本论文由绪论、六个专题性论述和结束语所组成。
绪论对本论文的选题、主旨、提纲以及写作意义做出详细说明,简单介绍了各章的主要内容,澄清了论文的主要概念、观点,特别是提供了论文中所没有涉及到的背景知识和写作思路等。本论文的主要目的就是要试图总结和廓清所有有关社会认识的思维,并且试图构建一个合理的研究体系。在这一体系中我们能够将散乱复杂的不同研究内容有机地纳入一个成体系的研究平台中,一方面可以在这一体系中深入分析和比较各类研究的内容和特征,另一方面在系统的归纳和比较的基础上,进而引入个人的研究内容和理论创新,以期在社会认识论研究这一新颖的研究领域内给出自己的求解和探索。
第一章分为三节来论述,分别是:第一节现代认识论的发展、第二节认识论的社会化方向和第三节社会认识论的研究意义。在第一节中论文主要阐述了认识论的现代发展的新特征,即认识论的自然化方向以及认识论的社会化方向,论文在指出自然化认识论的重要理论特征以及它所具有的意义的同时,指出了自然化认识论的缺陷与不足之处,特别是由于辩护问题与循环问题的存在使得自然化认识论遇到了无法回避的难题和缺陷。而与此同时一种新的认识论研究方向悄然生成,并迅速地在学术界扩大自己的影响力,从而为认识论的研究开启了新的研究思路,这就是社会认识论。论文具体指出了社会认识论的两个研究进路,即其一个体与社会相区分的研究进路,其二陈词问题的研究进路,同时论文指出了一种广义的社会认识论,从而扩大了社会认识论的研究领域。在第二节中论文重点阐述了社会认识论的两个生成方向,即个体化向社会化的转向以及自然化向社会化的转向,系统地指出了两种转向的生成原因,从而指明社会认识论的产生有其历史和理论的必然性,因而需要以新的思维来看待和关注这一研究内容。在第三节中论文重点阐述了社会认识论的研究意义,从五个不同的角度指出社会认识论的发展有助于促进“社会”概念的界定和深化,有助于明确认识论研究的发展方向,有助于哲学方法论丰富和多元化,有助于补充和深化马克思主义认识论,有助于促进社会科学哲学的学科建制化。综合来看,本章系统论述了认识论的现代发展,指出了当代哲学研究特别是认识论研究表征出明显的社会化趋势,并试图分析认识论的社会化趋势具有特定的哲学思维拓展的背景。文章具体指明社会认识论的两个不同的生成方向,在此基础上深入地分析了当代社会认识论的研究意义和价值。
第二章分为两节来论述,分别是第一节社会认识论的涵义和第二节社会认识论的划界。在第一节中论文主要阐述了社会认识论的历史渊源,分别从古希腊时期、17、18世纪、19世纪以及20世纪四个不同的阶段探讨了社会认识论的思想脉络,尽管其中的思想更多的是一种思维的火花,但是对于社会认识论的系统研究来说,却是一种必要的追溯和考察。除此以外,在这一节中论文还对社会认识论的内涵做出了具体的界定,从知识政策研究、知识社会组织、知识社会属性进行了探讨,特别是从知识社会属性入手,界定了八种不同的内涵定义,从而从多个不同角度分别对社会认识论研究的理论特征做出了丰富的考察和全面的归纳。在第二节中论文对社会认识论的划界问题进行了系统的研究,分别从社会认识论与传统认识论、社会认识论与知识社会学两个角度入手,指出社会认识论与传统认识论的区别就在于,认识标准是个体的还是集体的,认识标准是理性的还是社会的。知识社会学和社会认识论都是对知识社会性的研究,除去二者的定义不同之外,它们对科学传统和社会结构之于知识社会性的看法也不一致,知识社会学认为科学传统和社会结构构成了知识的社会性,而社会认识论否认这一点,认为知识的社会性来源于社会互动。综合来看,本章致力于三个基本工作,首先,从历史发展的角度,追溯了社会认识论的发展线索和思想脉络演变;其次,对社会认识论的内在涵义做出了基本界定,展示出其研究风格和多元理解;最后,进一步明确了其与传统认识论、知识社会学的划界。
第三章分为三节来论述,分别是第一节社会认识论的理论定位、第二节社会认识论的研究路径和第三节社会认识论的基本域面。第一节分析了社会认识论的三种不同理论定位,以对社会认识论和传统认识论的关系作为分析的基础从而将众多纷繁散乱的研究内容归纳在三个理论定位之上,具体来看表现为延续性定位、替代性定位和平行性定位。第二节分析了社会认识论的两类研究路径,以知识就是信念、知识就是制度化的信念为核心阐述了社会学式的研究路径,以知识就是真信念、知识就是获得辩护的真信念为核心阐述了哲学式的研究路径,从而从研究方法上进行了归纳和区分。第三节分析了社会认识论的基本域面,以社会因素在个体中的作用、认知劳动的分配、集体性知识的本质这三个问题为核心,详细地分析了社会认识论研究的主要探讨问题,重点突出了陈词问题以及专家意见选择问题。综合来看,本章分析了社会认识论的本质,是本论文的基础研究部分的核心内容。文章具体分析了社会认识论的三种不同的理论定位,指出了哲学式和社会学式的两类研究路径,在此基础上将社会认识论的研究内容大致归纳为三个不同的域面,并相应地将其中所包含的具体研究内容做出了详尽的论述和分析,从而构建了一条把握社会认识论的核心思维主线。
第四章分为五节来论述,分别是第一节求真社会认识论、第二节最小化社会认识论、第三节规范社会认识论、第四节建构社会认识论和第五节女性主义社会认识论。第一节重点论述了艾尔文.戈德曼的求真社会认识论,阐述了他的求真维度思想以及对真理的六种批判和辩护,指出了他的社会认识论的评价目标、评价基础和评价标准,最后详细地阐述了求真值分析特别是使用贝叶斯定理进行的求真计算。第二节论述了菲利浦.凯彻尔的最小化社会认识论,指出他对科学变化、个体实践与共识实践、认知劳动分配的解释和认识,论文指出他的理论是一种最小化的社会认识论。第三节论述了史蒂夫.富勒尔的规范社会认识论,分别探讨了规范认识论、规范性研究、科学管理与看不见的手、知识生产的修辞学研究这四个方面,进而勾画出富勒尔的规范社会认识论研究内容。第四节论述了建构主义社会认识论思想,指出知识的社会建构的三种认识、建构论对科学知识的解释、建构论之于认识论的意义,从而合理地从外部将建构论纳入社会认识论的研究范畴之内。第五节论述了女性主义社会认识论思想,分别从女性主义认识论的定位、女性主义认识论的历史与发展、女性主义认识论的论题三个方面阐述了女性主义社会认识论的研究内容。综合来看,本章完善了社会认识论的研究内容,充实了社会认识论的研究主线,更详尽的展现了当代社会认识论的研究特征。具体来看,文章介绍了五个不同的理论和思想,指出了这些理论的内容、特征和哲学意义,指出无论当代社会认识论研究表现为什么样的实际特征,采用什么样的研究视域和研究范式,它们都是人类知识探索过程中深入到社会实践时的诉求,是人类认识深化的实现机制。
第五章分为四节进行论述,分别为第一节科学知识的合法化、第二节社会认识论视野中的认知偏见、社会认识论视域中的信息与知识、社会认识论与研究伦理学。第一节重点论述了科学知识的合法化问题、三种社会认识论的解决策略、以及规范认识论的新解释,指出了社会认识论对于科学知识合法化问题的全新回答。第二节重点论述了认知偏见的形成原因、本质特征以及社会认识论的解决策略,特别是求真认识论的解决方法,从而对于认知偏见这个复杂问题给出了自己的求解。第三节重点论述了信息与知识的社会认识论思维与认识方式,论文从社会认识论的目标域、社会认识论的方法域、社会认识论的价值域入手,指明社会认识论之于信息科学的意义和启示。第四节重点论述了社会认识论与研究伦理学的关系和定位,分别从研究伦理学的意义和价值、社会认识论的解读方式、研究伦理学的解释域入手,指明社会认识论完善了伦理学解释机制,丰富了伦理学的道德解释功能。综合来看,本章作为社会认识论的实践研究,从具体问题上来透视知识的社会性、知识的社会维度思想在求解哲学难题上的意义和方式,详尽地分析了社会认识论之于科学知识合法化、认知偏见、信息与知识、研究伦理学问题上的启迪和朝向认识社会化的发展,揭示了认识论的社会化思想给哲学研究带来的新的思维和观念。
第六章分为两个研究组成,分别为第一节语境经验论的内容和意义以及第二节精致的语境经验论。第一节重点介绍了海伦.朗基诺的语境经验论内容,展现了朗基诺的语境经验论的研究内容、理论特征和语境解释的思想观念,指出语境解释了假说和证据之间的鸿沟。第二节创新性地提出我个人的精致的语境经验论,指出了我个人对朗基诺研究的不同意见和看法,并从三个方向批判和修改了朗基诺的观点,分别提出了自己的看法和认识,构建了一个精致的语境经验论,进一步分析论证了语境解释的具体过程和解释作用。综合来看,本章认为社会认识论显示出的思维方式和认识观念的变革和方法论的更新,必将为认识论研究带来深刻启迪和认识价值。
结束语部分总结了本论文在写作上的创新和不足之处,同时揭示了社会认识论研究这一学科发展的趋势,即走向实践哲学。同时提出一个重要的观念“自由的思想交流市场”,进一步说明本论文的意义,指出这一观念的价值就在于推动我们进一步地理解为什么社会认识论会出现在社会学和哲学两个完全不同的研究域内并形成“认识论的社会化”潮流,指出开放与实践的社会认识论就是当代社会认识论的研究趋势所在。
The dissertation includes the introduction, six special topics and the conclusion.
The introduction explains the selection of the topic, motif, outline and significance of writing in details, simply introduces main contents of the special topic and clarifies the main conceptions and opinions in this thesis, especially provides the Knowledge background and writing train of thought, which the main bodies do not involve. The main purpose of the dissertation is to summarize and clarify all the ideas about social epistemology and to construct a rational research system。We can put all different research contents into the systemic research platform, analyze and compare these contents and character on one hand, on the other hand import my research contents and theory innovation on the basic of systemic induction and compare. I want to contribute some my solutions and explorations in this novel research field.
Chapter One can divide into three sections, they are section one the development of modern epistemology, section two the socialization directions of epistemology and section three the research significance of Social Epistemology. The dissertation expounds the new development characters of modern epistemology, that is the naturalized epistemology and the socialized epistemology. The dissertation points out the important theory characters and the meaning of naturalized epistemology, at the same time it points out the shortcoming of naturalized epistemology, especially the justification problem and the circulation problem, points out the two problems are the unaccountable problems and puzzles of naturalized epistemology. But a new direction of epistemology is forming stealthily and enlarging the influence at the same time, it is opening a new research idea. It is Social Epistemology. The dissertation points out two research routes of Social Epistemology concretely, that is the differentiation route between individual and group and the testimony research route. The dissertation points out a larger and looser Social Epistemology and enlarges the research scope. Section two expounds two formation directions of Social Epistemology, that is the turn from Naturalized to Socialized and the turn form Individual to Socialized, points out the formation reason of the two turns, expounds its historical and theoretical inevitability. Section three expounds five research significances of the Social Epistemology. It concludes that the research of Social Epistemology is of great epistemological importance in defining and deepening the concept "society", in clarifying the direction of the epistemological research, and diversifying philosophical methodologies. In particular, Social Epistemology has theoretical and practical significance in enriching and complementing Marxian epistemology and promoting the development of Philosophy of Social Science in the context of China. Synthetically, Chapter one expound the modern development of Epistemology, point out that the philosophy research especially the Epistemology research represent obvious socialization trend, analyze that this socialization trend has its particular philosophy idea development background. The article designate the two formation directions of Social Epistemology, analyze the research meaning and value of modern Social Epistemology deeply .
Chapter two can divide into two sections, they are section one the meaning of Social Epistemology and section two the demarcation of Social Epistemology. The dissertation expounds the historical trace in the section one, discusses the idea of Social Epistemology from the time of Ancient Greece, 17-18century,19century and 20century. Although these ideas are only thinking sparks, it is a necessary review to the systemic research. The dissertation clarifies the meaning of Social Epistemology from the study of knowledge policy, the organization of knowledge society and the social attribution of knowledge , it gives eight different definitions from the social attribution of knowledge, it gives abundant review and general induction from many viewpoint. The dissertation gives systemic research to the demarcation of Social Epistemology from the traditional epistemology, Social Epistemology and Knowledge Sociology, it points out the differentiation between Social Epistemology and traditional Epistemology is whether the epistemology standard is individual or collective, is whether the epistemology standard is rational or social. Both Social Epistemology and Knowledge Sociology are the social study of knowledge, their definitions are different. Their opinions to science tradition and social structure are different, too. Knowledge Sociology maintains that the social attribute of knowledge is from the two factors, but Social Epistemology denies it and maintains that it comes from the social interactions of knowledge. Synthetically, Chapter two takes up with three essential works. Firstly, the article carries up the development clue and idea venation evolvement of Social Epistemology from the point of view of history development. Secondly, the article makes the essential confirmation to the meaning of Social Epistemology, reveals its research style and multiple understanding. Finally, the article nails down the boundary of Social Epistemology, traditional epistemology and knowledge sociology.
Chapter three can divide into three sections, they are section one the theory orientation of Social Epistemology, section two the research route of Social Epistemology and section three the fundamental domains of Social Epistemology. Section one analyzes three theory orientation of Social Epistemology. The part takes all kinds of theories into the orientation on the basis of it. Specifically, the orientation can divide into the continued orientation, the substituted orientation and the Parallel orientation. Section two analyzes two kind research routes, "the knowledge is belief and "the knowledge is institutional belief are the core of the sociology research methods, "the knowledge is true belief" and "the knowledge is justified true belief are the core of philosophy research methods. Section three analyzes the fundamental domains of Social Epistemology. The social factors of individual knowledge , the distribution of cognitive labor and the nature of collective knowledge are the core of this section . The dissertation analyzes the main questions of Social Epistemology, stresses the testimony problem and the expert opinions choice problem. Synthetically, Chapter three analyzes the essence of Social Epistemology and it is the core contents of basic research. The article analyzes three different theory orientations of Social Epistemology, points out philosophy and sociology routes, divides three different domains, analyzes and expounds its idiographic contents, constructs one main line to understand Social Epistemology.
Chapter four can divide into five sections, they are section one veritistic Social Epistemology, section two minimal Social Epistemology, Section three normative Social Epistemology, section four constructive Social Epistemology and section five feminist Social Epistemology. Section one expounds Alvin Goldman' veritistic Social Epistemology, expounds his veritistic dimension idea and six criticism and justify to truth, points out his evaluation aim, base and criterion, analyzes his veritistic calculate and the Bayesian theorem. Section two expounds Philips Kitcher' minimal Social Epistemology, points out his interpretation of scientific change, the individual practice and consensus practice, the research of cognitive labor distribution. The dissertation points out that his theory is a minimal Social Epistemology. Section three expounds Steve Fuller' normative Social Epistemology, discusses normative epistemology, norm, the governance of science and the invisible hand and the rhetoric research of knowledge production. Section four expounds constructive Social Epistemology, points out three opinions of the theory of social constructivism, the constructive interpretation of scientific knowledge and the meaning of constructive interpretation to epistemology, takes constructivism into Social Epistemology from the external view. Section five expounds feminist Social Epistemology, expounds the study contents from the orientation of feminist epistemology, the history and development of feminist epistemology and the thesis of feminist epistemology. Synthetically, Chapter four consummates the contents of Social Epistemology, enriches its main line, exhibits the character of modern Social Epistemology. Specifically, the article introduce five different theories and ideas, points out the contents, characters and meanings of these theories, designates that they are considerations of human knowledge explorations which goes deep into social practice, that they are realization mechanisms of human cognitive deepen, whether modern Social Epistemology represents whatever actual characters and adopts whatever research visual thresholds.
Chapter five can divide four sections, they are section one the legitimization of scientific knowledge, section two cognitive bias from perspective of Social Epistemology, section three information and knowledge of Social Epistemology, section four Social Epistemology and Research Ethnics. Section one expounds the legitimization of scientific knowledge, three solutions of Social Epistemology and The new interpretation of normative epistemology, gives a new answer to this problem. Section two expounds the formation reason of cognitive bias, the essential character of cognitive bias and the solution of Social Epistemology, gives a new solution to this complicated question. Section three expounds the information and knowledge from the perspective of Social Epistemology, points out the meaning of Social Epistemology from the aim domain of Social Epistemology, the method domain of Social Epistemology and the value domain of Social Epistemology. Section four expounds the relationship between Social Epistemology and research ethnics, points out the meaning and value of research ethnics, the interpretation of Social Epistemology and the interpretation domain of research ethnics. Synthetically, Chapter five is the practical research of Social Epistemology, it surveys the sociality and the social dimensions of knowledge from the specific questions, analyzes the enlightenments of Social Epistemology towards scientific knowledge legitimization, cognitive bias, information, and research ethics, analyzes the development of epistemology socialization, reveal that the socialization idea can bring new intentions and thoughts.
Chapter six can divide two parts, they are section one the content and meaning of contextual empiricism and section two the exquisite contextual empiricism. In section one it exhibits the contents, characters and contextual explanations of longino's contextual empiricism, points out that context can explain the gap between hypotheses and evidence. In section two it offers my own opinions and attitudes, criticizes and amends longino's theory from three directions, provides my own opinions, constructs an exquisite contextual empiricism, analyzes and explains the specific process and explanation function of the context explanation. The article considers that the thinking manner, thinking revolution and methodology innovation of Social Epistemology can bring profound enlightenment and cognitive value for epistemology.
Conclusion section summarizes the innovation and inadequacies in the dissertation, reveals that the trend of the subject is practical Philosophy ,and at the same time reveals an important idea, which is The Free Marketplace of Ideas, points out the meaning of the dissertation, namely, it can promote us to understand why Social Epistemology had appeared in the different domains of philosophy and sociology why Social Epistemology had formed the trend of socialization epistemology. The part points out that openness and practice are the research trend of Social Epistemology.
绪论对本论文的选题、主旨、提纲以及写作意义做出详细说明,简单介绍了各章的主要内容,澄清了论文的主要概念、观点,特别是提供了论文中所没有涉及到的背景知识和写作思路等。本论文的主要目的就是要试图总结和廓清所有有关社会认识的思维,并且试图构建一个合理的研究体系。在这一体系中我们能够将散乱复杂的不同研究内容有机地纳入一个成体系的研究平台中,一方面可以在这一体系中深入分析和比较各类研究的内容和特征,另一方面在系统的归纳和比较的基础上,进而引入个人的研究内容和理论创新,以期在社会认识论研究这一新颖的研究领域内给出自己的求解和探索。
第一章分为三节来论述,分别是:第一节现代认识论的发展、第二节认识论的社会化方向和第三节社会认识论的研究意义。在第一节中论文主要阐述了认识论的现代发展的新特征,即认识论的自然化方向以及认识论的社会化方向,论文在指出自然化认识论的重要理论特征以及它所具有的意义的同时,指出了自然化认识论的缺陷与不足之处,特别是由于辩护问题与循环问题的存在使得自然化认识论遇到了无法回避的难题和缺陷。而与此同时一种新的认识论研究方向悄然生成,并迅速地在学术界扩大自己的影响力,从而为认识论的研究开启了新的研究思路,这就是社会认识论。论文具体指出了社会认识论的两个研究进路,即其一个体与社会相区分的研究进路,其二陈词问题的研究进路,同时论文指出了一种广义的社会认识论,从而扩大了社会认识论的研究领域。在第二节中论文重点阐述了社会认识论的两个生成方向,即个体化向社会化的转向以及自然化向社会化的转向,系统地指出了两种转向的生成原因,从而指明社会认识论的产生有其历史和理论的必然性,因而需要以新的思维来看待和关注这一研究内容。在第三节中论文重点阐述了社会认识论的研究意义,从五个不同的角度指出社会认识论的发展有助于促进“社会”概念的界定和深化,有助于明确认识论研究的发展方向,有助于哲学方法论丰富和多元化,有助于补充和深化马克思主义认识论,有助于促进社会科学哲学的学科建制化。综合来看,本章系统论述了认识论的现代发展,指出了当代哲学研究特别是认识论研究表征出明显的社会化趋势,并试图分析认识论的社会化趋势具有特定的哲学思维拓展的背景。文章具体指明社会认识论的两个不同的生成方向,在此基础上深入地分析了当代社会认识论的研究意义和价值。
第二章分为两节来论述,分别是第一节社会认识论的涵义和第二节社会认识论的划界。在第一节中论文主要阐述了社会认识论的历史渊源,分别从古希腊时期、17、18世纪、19世纪以及20世纪四个不同的阶段探讨了社会认识论的思想脉络,尽管其中的思想更多的是一种思维的火花,但是对于社会认识论的系统研究来说,却是一种必要的追溯和考察。除此以外,在这一节中论文还对社会认识论的内涵做出了具体的界定,从知识政策研究、知识社会组织、知识社会属性进行了探讨,特别是从知识社会属性入手,界定了八种不同的内涵定义,从而从多个不同角度分别对社会认识论研究的理论特征做出了丰富的考察和全面的归纳。在第二节中论文对社会认识论的划界问题进行了系统的研究,分别从社会认识论与传统认识论、社会认识论与知识社会学两个角度入手,指出社会认识论与传统认识论的区别就在于,认识标准是个体的还是集体的,认识标准是理性的还是社会的。知识社会学和社会认识论都是对知识社会性的研究,除去二者的定义不同之外,它们对科学传统和社会结构之于知识社会性的看法也不一致,知识社会学认为科学传统和社会结构构成了知识的社会性,而社会认识论否认这一点,认为知识的社会性来源于社会互动。综合来看,本章致力于三个基本工作,首先,从历史发展的角度,追溯了社会认识论的发展线索和思想脉络演变;其次,对社会认识论的内在涵义做出了基本界定,展示出其研究风格和多元理解;最后,进一步明确了其与传统认识论、知识社会学的划界。
第三章分为三节来论述,分别是第一节社会认识论的理论定位、第二节社会认识论的研究路径和第三节社会认识论的基本域面。第一节分析了社会认识论的三种不同理论定位,以对社会认识论和传统认识论的关系作为分析的基础从而将众多纷繁散乱的研究内容归纳在三个理论定位之上,具体来看表现为延续性定位、替代性定位和平行性定位。第二节分析了社会认识论的两类研究路径,以知识就是信念、知识就是制度化的信念为核心阐述了社会学式的研究路径,以知识就是真信念、知识就是获得辩护的真信念为核心阐述了哲学式的研究路径,从而从研究方法上进行了归纳和区分。第三节分析了社会认识论的基本域面,以社会因素在个体中的作用、认知劳动的分配、集体性知识的本质这三个问题为核心,详细地分析了社会认识论研究的主要探讨问题,重点突出了陈词问题以及专家意见选择问题。综合来看,本章分析了社会认识论的本质,是本论文的基础研究部分的核心内容。文章具体分析了社会认识论的三种不同的理论定位,指出了哲学式和社会学式的两类研究路径,在此基础上将社会认识论的研究内容大致归纳为三个不同的域面,并相应地将其中所包含的具体研究内容做出了详尽的论述和分析,从而构建了一条把握社会认识论的核心思维主线。
第四章分为五节来论述,分别是第一节求真社会认识论、第二节最小化社会认识论、第三节规范社会认识论、第四节建构社会认识论和第五节女性主义社会认识论。第一节重点论述了艾尔文.戈德曼的求真社会认识论,阐述了他的求真维度思想以及对真理的六种批判和辩护,指出了他的社会认识论的评价目标、评价基础和评价标准,最后详细地阐述了求真值分析特别是使用贝叶斯定理进行的求真计算。第二节论述了菲利浦.凯彻尔的最小化社会认识论,指出他对科学变化、个体实践与共识实践、认知劳动分配的解释和认识,论文指出他的理论是一种最小化的社会认识论。第三节论述了史蒂夫.富勒尔的规范社会认识论,分别探讨了规范认识论、规范性研究、科学管理与看不见的手、知识生产的修辞学研究这四个方面,进而勾画出富勒尔的规范社会认识论研究内容。第四节论述了建构主义社会认识论思想,指出知识的社会建构的三种认识、建构论对科学知识的解释、建构论之于认识论的意义,从而合理地从外部将建构论纳入社会认识论的研究范畴之内。第五节论述了女性主义社会认识论思想,分别从女性主义认识论的定位、女性主义认识论的历史与发展、女性主义认识论的论题三个方面阐述了女性主义社会认识论的研究内容。综合来看,本章完善了社会认识论的研究内容,充实了社会认识论的研究主线,更详尽的展现了当代社会认识论的研究特征。具体来看,文章介绍了五个不同的理论和思想,指出了这些理论的内容、特征和哲学意义,指出无论当代社会认识论研究表现为什么样的实际特征,采用什么样的研究视域和研究范式,它们都是人类知识探索过程中深入到社会实践时的诉求,是人类认识深化的实现机制。
第五章分为四节进行论述,分别为第一节科学知识的合法化、第二节社会认识论视野中的认知偏见、社会认识论视域中的信息与知识、社会认识论与研究伦理学。第一节重点论述了科学知识的合法化问题、三种社会认识论的解决策略、以及规范认识论的新解释,指出了社会认识论对于科学知识合法化问题的全新回答。第二节重点论述了认知偏见的形成原因、本质特征以及社会认识论的解决策略,特别是求真认识论的解决方法,从而对于认知偏见这个复杂问题给出了自己的求解。第三节重点论述了信息与知识的社会认识论思维与认识方式,论文从社会认识论的目标域、社会认识论的方法域、社会认识论的价值域入手,指明社会认识论之于信息科学的意义和启示。第四节重点论述了社会认识论与研究伦理学的关系和定位,分别从研究伦理学的意义和价值、社会认识论的解读方式、研究伦理学的解释域入手,指明社会认识论完善了伦理学解释机制,丰富了伦理学的道德解释功能。综合来看,本章作为社会认识论的实践研究,从具体问题上来透视知识的社会性、知识的社会维度思想在求解哲学难题上的意义和方式,详尽地分析了社会认识论之于科学知识合法化、认知偏见、信息与知识、研究伦理学问题上的启迪和朝向认识社会化的发展,揭示了认识论的社会化思想给哲学研究带来的新的思维和观念。
第六章分为两个研究组成,分别为第一节语境经验论的内容和意义以及第二节精致的语境经验论。第一节重点介绍了海伦.朗基诺的语境经验论内容,展现了朗基诺的语境经验论的研究内容、理论特征和语境解释的思想观念,指出语境解释了假说和证据之间的鸿沟。第二节创新性地提出我个人的精致的语境经验论,指出了我个人对朗基诺研究的不同意见和看法,并从三个方向批判和修改了朗基诺的观点,分别提出了自己的看法和认识,构建了一个精致的语境经验论,进一步分析论证了语境解释的具体过程和解释作用。综合来看,本章认为社会认识论显示出的思维方式和认识观念的变革和方法论的更新,必将为认识论研究带来深刻启迪和认识价值。
结束语部分总结了本论文在写作上的创新和不足之处,同时揭示了社会认识论研究这一学科发展的趋势,即走向实践哲学。同时提出一个重要的观念“自由的思想交流市场”,进一步说明本论文的意义,指出这一观念的价值就在于推动我们进一步地理解为什么社会认识论会出现在社会学和哲学两个完全不同的研究域内并形成“认识论的社会化”潮流,指出开放与实践的社会认识论就是当代社会认识论的研究趋势所在。
The dissertation includes the introduction, six special topics and the conclusion.
The introduction explains the selection of the topic, motif, outline and significance of writing in details, simply introduces main contents of the special topic and clarifies the main conceptions and opinions in this thesis, especially provides the Knowledge background and writing train of thought, which the main bodies do not involve. The main purpose of the dissertation is to summarize and clarify all the ideas about social epistemology and to construct a rational research system。We can put all different research contents into the systemic research platform, analyze and compare these contents and character on one hand, on the other hand import my research contents and theory innovation on the basic of systemic induction and compare. I want to contribute some my solutions and explorations in this novel research field.
Chapter One can divide into three sections, they are section one the development of modern epistemology, section two the socialization directions of epistemology and section three the research significance of Social Epistemology. The dissertation expounds the new development characters of modern epistemology, that is the naturalized epistemology and the socialized epistemology. The dissertation points out the important theory characters and the meaning of naturalized epistemology, at the same time it points out the shortcoming of naturalized epistemology, especially the justification problem and the circulation problem, points out the two problems are the unaccountable problems and puzzles of naturalized epistemology. But a new direction of epistemology is forming stealthily and enlarging the influence at the same time, it is opening a new research idea. It is Social Epistemology. The dissertation points out two research routes of Social Epistemology concretely, that is the differentiation route between individual and group and the testimony research route. The dissertation points out a larger and looser Social Epistemology and enlarges the research scope. Section two expounds two formation directions of Social Epistemology, that is the turn from Naturalized to Socialized and the turn form Individual to Socialized, points out the formation reason of the two turns, expounds its historical and theoretical inevitability. Section three expounds five research significances of the Social Epistemology. It concludes that the research of Social Epistemology is of great epistemological importance in defining and deepening the concept "society", in clarifying the direction of the epistemological research, and diversifying philosophical methodologies. In particular, Social Epistemology has theoretical and practical significance in enriching and complementing Marxian epistemology and promoting the development of Philosophy of Social Science in the context of China. Synthetically, Chapter one expound the modern development of Epistemology, point out that the philosophy research especially the Epistemology research represent obvious socialization trend, analyze that this socialization trend has its particular philosophy idea development background. The article designate the two formation directions of Social Epistemology, analyze the research meaning and value of modern Social Epistemology deeply .
Chapter two can divide into two sections, they are section one the meaning of Social Epistemology and section two the demarcation of Social Epistemology. The dissertation expounds the historical trace in the section one, discusses the idea of Social Epistemology from the time of Ancient Greece, 17-18century,19century and 20century. Although these ideas are only thinking sparks, it is a necessary review to the systemic research. The dissertation clarifies the meaning of Social Epistemology from the study of knowledge policy, the organization of knowledge society and the social attribution of knowledge , it gives eight different definitions from the social attribution of knowledge, it gives abundant review and general induction from many viewpoint. The dissertation gives systemic research to the demarcation of Social Epistemology from the traditional epistemology, Social Epistemology and Knowledge Sociology, it points out the differentiation between Social Epistemology and traditional Epistemology is whether the epistemology standard is individual or collective, is whether the epistemology standard is rational or social. Both Social Epistemology and Knowledge Sociology are the social study of knowledge, their definitions are different. Their opinions to science tradition and social structure are different, too. Knowledge Sociology maintains that the social attribute of knowledge is from the two factors, but Social Epistemology denies it and maintains that it comes from the social interactions of knowledge. Synthetically, Chapter two takes up with three essential works. Firstly, the article carries up the development clue and idea venation evolvement of Social Epistemology from the point of view of history development. Secondly, the article makes the essential confirmation to the meaning of Social Epistemology, reveals its research style and multiple understanding. Finally, the article nails down the boundary of Social Epistemology, traditional epistemology and knowledge sociology.
Chapter three can divide into three sections, they are section one the theory orientation of Social Epistemology, section two the research route of Social Epistemology and section three the fundamental domains of Social Epistemology. Section one analyzes three theory orientation of Social Epistemology. The part takes all kinds of theories into the orientation on the basis of it. Specifically, the orientation can divide into the continued orientation, the substituted orientation and the Parallel orientation. Section two analyzes two kind research routes, "the knowledge is belief and "the knowledge is institutional belief are the core of the sociology research methods, "the knowledge is true belief" and "the knowledge is justified true belief are the core of philosophy research methods. Section three analyzes the fundamental domains of Social Epistemology. The social factors of individual knowledge , the distribution of cognitive labor and the nature of collective knowledge are the core of this section . The dissertation analyzes the main questions of Social Epistemology, stresses the testimony problem and the expert opinions choice problem. Synthetically, Chapter three analyzes the essence of Social Epistemology and it is the core contents of basic research. The article analyzes three different theory orientations of Social Epistemology, points out philosophy and sociology routes, divides three different domains, analyzes and expounds its idiographic contents, constructs one main line to understand Social Epistemology.
Chapter four can divide into five sections, they are section one veritistic Social Epistemology, section two minimal Social Epistemology, Section three normative Social Epistemology, section four constructive Social Epistemology and section five feminist Social Epistemology. Section one expounds Alvin Goldman' veritistic Social Epistemology, expounds his veritistic dimension idea and six criticism and justify to truth, points out his evaluation aim, base and criterion, analyzes his veritistic calculate and the Bayesian theorem. Section two expounds Philips Kitcher' minimal Social Epistemology, points out his interpretation of scientific change, the individual practice and consensus practice, the research of cognitive labor distribution. The dissertation points out that his theory is a minimal Social Epistemology. Section three expounds Steve Fuller' normative Social Epistemology, discusses normative epistemology, norm, the governance of science and the invisible hand and the rhetoric research of knowledge production. Section four expounds constructive Social Epistemology, points out three opinions of the theory of social constructivism, the constructive interpretation of scientific knowledge and the meaning of constructive interpretation to epistemology, takes constructivism into Social Epistemology from the external view. Section five expounds feminist Social Epistemology, expounds the study contents from the orientation of feminist epistemology, the history and development of feminist epistemology and the thesis of feminist epistemology. Synthetically, Chapter four consummates the contents of Social Epistemology, enriches its main line, exhibits the character of modern Social Epistemology. Specifically, the article introduce five different theories and ideas, points out the contents, characters and meanings of these theories, designates that they are considerations of human knowledge explorations which goes deep into social practice, that they are realization mechanisms of human cognitive deepen, whether modern Social Epistemology represents whatever actual characters and adopts whatever research visual thresholds.
Chapter five can divide four sections, they are section one the legitimization of scientific knowledge, section two cognitive bias from perspective of Social Epistemology, section three information and knowledge of Social Epistemology, section four Social Epistemology and Research Ethnics. Section one expounds the legitimization of scientific knowledge, three solutions of Social Epistemology and The new interpretation of normative epistemology, gives a new answer to this problem. Section two expounds the formation reason of cognitive bias, the essential character of cognitive bias and the solution of Social Epistemology, gives a new solution to this complicated question. Section three expounds the information and knowledge from the perspective of Social Epistemology, points out the meaning of Social Epistemology from the aim domain of Social Epistemology, the method domain of Social Epistemology and the value domain of Social Epistemology. Section four expounds the relationship between Social Epistemology and research ethnics, points out the meaning and value of research ethnics, the interpretation of Social Epistemology and the interpretation domain of research ethnics. Synthetically, Chapter five is the practical research of Social Epistemology, it surveys the sociality and the social dimensions of knowledge from the specific questions, analyzes the enlightenments of Social Epistemology towards scientific knowledge legitimization, cognitive bias, information, and research ethics, analyzes the development of epistemology socialization, reveal that the socialization idea can bring new intentions and thoughts.
Chapter six can divide two parts, they are section one the content and meaning of contextual empiricism and section two the exquisite contextual empiricism. In section one it exhibits the contents, characters and contextual explanations of longino's contextual empiricism, points out that context can explain the gap between hypotheses and evidence. In section two it offers my own opinions and attitudes, criticizes and amends longino's theory from three directions, provides my own opinions, constructs an exquisite contextual empiricism, analyzes and explains the specific process and explanation function of the context explanation. The article considers that the thinking manner, thinking revolution and methodology innovation of Social Epistemology can bring profound enlightenment and cognitive value for epistemology.
Conclusion section summarizes the innovation and inadequacies in the dissertation, reveals that the trend of the subject is practical Philosophy ,and at the same time reveals an important idea, which is The Free Marketplace of Ideas, points out the meaning of the dissertation, namely, it can promote us to understand why Social Epistemology had appeared in the different domains of philosophy and sociology why Social Epistemology had formed the trend of socialization epistemology. The part points out that openness and practice are the research trend of Social Epistemology.
引文
[1]尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,西方哲学英汉对照辞典,北京:人民出版社,2001,第314-315页
[2]陈嘉明先生在他的《知识与确证:当代认识论引论》(上海人民出版社.2003.第1页)中将英文Epistemology (认识论)翻译为Theory of Knowledge(知识论)。同时,尼古拉斯.布宁在他的《西方哲学英汉对照辞典中》也写道:epistemology来源于希腊文episteme和logos,在字面上是指知识论。“epistemic”(认识的)是它的形容词,即对知识的获得。“gnoseology”(认知学)有时也用于认识论的同义词,或用于指探究知识的科学方法。
[1]尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,西方哲学英汉对照辞典,北京:人民出版社,2001,第537-538页
[1]尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,西方哲学英汉对照辞典,北京:人民出版社,2001,第532页
[2]E.Gettier,"Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? ",Analysis 23,1963,p.121-123
[3]R.Nozick,Philosophical Explanation,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1981,p.240
[1]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第199页
[2]Matthias Steup.Epistemology.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/notes.html#33,2005
[1]罗伯特.威尔逊,MIT认知科学百科全书,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年,第426页
[2]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第204页
[3]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第204-207页
[1]罗伯特.威尔逊,MIT认知科学百科全书,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年,第426页
[2]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第209页
[3]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第211页
[1]W.V.Quine,贾可春(译),自然化的认识,世界哲学,2004,第五期,83.
[2]奎因在《自然化的认识论》中指明:我认为在这一点上,相反这样说可能是更有益处的,认识论依然将继续存在下去,尽管它是在一种新的背景下并以一种被澄清了的身份出线。认识论,或者某种与之类似的东西,简单地落入了作为心理学的一章,因而也是作为自然科学的一章的地位。它研究一种自然现象,即一种物理的人类主体。而推动我们研究它的理由,和总是推动认识论的理由,在某种程度上是同一种理由,这就是:为了弄清楚证据是如何与理论相关联的,并且人们的自然理论是以何种方式超越现成证据的。
[2]理查德.罗蒂,哲学和自然之镜,李幼蒸译,北京:商务印书馆,2003,210
[1]Ted Benton,Iran Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,p.60
[1]奎因,从逻辑的观点看,江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987,第19页
[2]陈波,奎因哲学研究,北京:三联书店,1998,第18-19页
[3]W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York:Columbia University Press,1969,p.126-127
[4]A.Shimony,D.Nails,Naturalistic Epistemology,Reidel Publishing Company,Boston,1987,p.260
[5]W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York,Columbia University Press,1969,p.82
[1]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第2页
[2]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第3页
[3]奎因,从逻辑的观点看,江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987,第40页
[4]郑祥福 洪伟,认识论的自然化之后,上海三联书店,2005,第95-96页
[5]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第3页
[1]W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Harvard University Press,Cambridge Massachusetts,1981,p.102
[2]W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Harvard University Press,Cambridge Massachusetts,1981,p.175
[3]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第2-3页
[4]此处详细论文可参见李侠,简评自然化认识论的替代命题的理论旨趣与存在的问题,科学技术与辩证法,2006年,第一期;何静 丛航青,自然主义认识论的不同形式,自然辩证法通讯,2006年,第三期。
[5]Ted Benton,Ian Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,P.60
[1]J.巴德(美),杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003年第1期,第105页
[2]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,Asia Publishing House,1970,p.86
[1]吴畏,社会知识论还是社会认识论,自然辩证法研究,2004年第11期,第38页
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1994,p.4
[3]Kusch Martin,Testimony in Communication Epistemology,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,part 23 A,2002,33(2),p.336.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Group Knowledge VS Group Rationality:Two Approaches to Social Epistemology,Episteme:A Journal of Social Epistemology,2004,1,p.11-22
[2]此处可详细参考Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,,Oxford University Press,2002,,p182-204;Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p1-29
[1]Rom Harre,Varieties of Realism:a Rationale for the Natural Sciences,Oxford:Blackwell.1986,p.21
[2]殷杰,哲学对话的新平台—科学语用学的元理论研究,山西科学技术出版社,2003,第37页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Epistemology and Cognitive,Harvard University Press,1986,p.43
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,MIT Press,1992,p.179
[3]S.Downes,Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science,Philosophy of Science,Vol:60,p.452
[1]Michael Roess,The Social Dimension of Epistemology,Florida Philosophy Review,2005,Vol:V,p.25.
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathway to Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.26.
[3]M.Bradie,Evolutionary Epistemology as Naturalized Epistemology,In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology,K.Hahlueg&,C.Hooker(eds),State University of New York Press,1989,p.396.
[4]Robert Almeder,Harmless Naturalism;the limits of science and the nature of philosophy,Carus Publishing Company,1998,p.36.
[1]M.Gibson,Quine'Behaviorism,In the Philosophy of Psychology,W.Donohue&R.Kitchner(eds).Sage Publications,1996,p.96.
[2]Alvin Goldman,What Is Justified Belief,In Naturalizing Epistemology,H.Kornblith(eds),MITPress,1985,p.91.
[3]Hilary Kornblith,A Conservative Approach to Social Epistemology,Frederick Schmitt(eds),Social Epistemology:the Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&publishers,Inc,1994,p.93.
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,p.570-571.
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29.
[1]殷杰,当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义,中国社会科学,2006年第三期,第26-27页
[2]刘军,当代科学哲学中的自然主义流派论析,自然辩证法通讯,1997年第六期,第96页
[3]Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996,p.93.
[1]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Dover,1959,p.23.
[2]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Raleigh,N.C.Alex Catalogue,1690,p.60-61
[3]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Raleigh,N.C.Alex Catalogue,1690,p.298
[4]Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.2-3
[1]David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press,1975,p.111.
[2]David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press,1975,p.111.
[3]Thomas Reid,Essays on the Intellectual Power of Man,Macmillan and Co.,Limited,1941,p.48
[4]Thomas Reid,An Inquiry into Human Mind,Timothy Duggan(eds),University of Chicago Press,1970,p.240-241
[1]Alvin Goldman,Social Epistemology:Theory and Applications,Royal Institute of Philosophy,p.2,http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Social Epistemology:Theory and Applications.pdf
[2]Ted Benton,Ian Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,p.60.
[1]Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar,Laboratory Life:The Construction of Scientific Facts,Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1986,p128-129
[2]冯俊,后现代主义哲学演讲录,北京:商务印书馆,2003,第430-431页
[3]福柯,词与物,上海:三联书店,2001,第10页
[1]福柯,权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录,上海:上海人民出版社,1997,第37页
[2]W.Newton-Smith,A Companion to the Philosophy of Science,Blackwell Publishing,2000,p.451
[3]彼得.温奇,张庆熊(译),社会科学的观念及其与哲学的关系,上海人民出版社,2004年,第41页
[4]Tarcisio Zandonade,Social Epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller,Library Trends,2004,vol52,iss4,p.818
[1]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,New York,Asia Publishing House,1970,86
[2]J.M巴德,杰西.谢拉,社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003,第一期,第107页
[3]这七篇论文分别为:Frederick.Schmitt,"Justification,Sociality and Automony";Stewart Cohen,"Knowledge,Context,and Social Standards";Hilary Kornblith,"Some Social Features of Cognition ";Keith Lehrer,"Personal and Social Knowledge";Alvin Goldman,"Foundations of Social Epistemics";Steve Fuller,"On Regulating What is Known:A Way to Social Epistemology ";Margaret Gilbert,"Modeling Collective Belief"
[1]Simon Evnine,Epistemic Unities,Erkenninis,vol 59,2003,365
[2]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[1]A.Bullock & S.Trombley.Norton dictionary of modem thought,New York:Norton,1999.P.801-802
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002.P.3
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,p.1
[3]Goldman,A.(1999).Social epistemology.In E.Zalta(Ed.),Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Stanford,CA:Stanford University.Available online at http://plato.stanforcl.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology_social.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Clarendon Press,1999,p5
[2]J.巴德(美),杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003(1).
[3]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,p 180
[4]Alvin Goldman.Social Epistemics and Social Psychology[J].Social Epistemology.1991(5).p.121
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Clarendon Press,1999,p.4
[1]Kay Mathiesen,Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol.21,No.3,2007,p.209-216
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,P.1
[3]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[4]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[1]Karl Popper,Conjectures and Refutations,London,Harper and Row,1963,p.6
[1]Laudan,L,Progress and Its Problems,Berkeley,The University of California Press,1977,P.202
[1]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemics,Synthese 73,1987,p.111
[2]Steve Fuller,Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents,Boulder,Westview Press,1989,p.27
[1]林默彪,认识论问题域的现代转向,哲学研究,2005年,第8期,第69页
[2]林默彪,认识论问题域的现代转向,哲学研究,2005年,第8期,第69页
[3]大卫.休谟,人性论(上),商务印书馆,1997年,第239页
[1]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2004年,第251页
[1]Durkheim,M,Rules of Sociological Method,New York,The Free Press,1974,p.2
[2]Durkheinm,M,On Morality and Society,Chicago,University of Chicago Press,1973,p.16
[1]Richard Rorty,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1979,p.155-165,p.295-306
[2]富勒,社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年第22卷第1期,第13页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.183
[1]Peter Winch,Understanding a Primitive Society,American Phil Quart.,vol 1,1964,p.307-324;Evans Pritchard,Witchcraft,Oracles and Magic among the Azande,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1937,p.1-25
[2]David Bloor,Knowledge and Social Imagery,University of Chicago Press,1976,p.53
[1]David Bloor,Knowledge and Social Imagery,University of Chicago Press.1976,p.169
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways To Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.188
[2]富勒,社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年第22卷第1期,第13页
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publisher,1994,p6-10
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publisher,1994,p11-14
[1]C.A.J.Coady,Testimony:A Philosophy study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p,25
[2]Audi,Robert,The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy,(eds),Cambridge University Press,2001,p.909
[3]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemilogy of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.396-397
[4]Audi Robert,The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification,American Philosophy Quarterly,34,1997,p.406
[5]Sosa Ernest,Knowledge in Perspective:Selected Essays in Epistemology,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991,p.219
[1]Flicker,E,Against Fallibility,B.K.Matilal&A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,Kluwer,1994,p.137
[2]Kusch,M.Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,vol 33,issue 2,2002,p.335
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.3
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.160
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.161
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.161-162
[4]C.A.J.Coady,Testimony:A Philosophical Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.82
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.162
[1]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.404
[2]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.394-395
[3]Fricker,E,Against Fallibiligy,B.K.Matilal&A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,Kluwer,1994,p.129
[4]Fricker,E,Trusting Others in the Science:A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Part A,vol,33,Issue2,2002,p.382
[5]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.164
[2]Jennifer Lackey.The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.164-165
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.165-166
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.166
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.166
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.185
[2]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.458
[3]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.481
[4]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.480
[1]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.468
[2]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.54
[1]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[2]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[3]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[4]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.56-57
[1]Davidson.D,The Social Aspect of Language,in B.McGuinness and Olivieri(eds),The Philosophy of Michael Dummett,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.2
[2]Davidson.D,A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs,in R.E.Grandy and R.Warner(eds),Philosophical Grounds of Rationality.Oxford University Press,1986,p.174
[3]殷杰,郭贵春,哲学对话的新平台,山西科学技术出版社,2003,第57页
[1]Coady.C.AJ.Testimony:A Philosophy Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.169-173
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.167
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.167
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.168
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[3]Webb,Mark Owen,Why I Know About As Much As You:A Reply to Hardwig,Journal of Philosophy,90,p263
[4]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.57-58
[5]P.F.Strawson,Knowing From Words,in Matilal and Chakrabarti,1994,p.25
[6]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.172
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.172-174
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.178-179
[1]Jonathan Adler,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/
[2]Graham.P.J,Transferring Knowledge,NOUS,34,issue 1,2000,p.131
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.6
[2]Audi.R,The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification,American Philosophical Quarterly,34,1997,p.410
[3]Dummett,M,Testimony and Memory,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,1994,p.264
[4]详见 Lackey,J,Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission,The Philosophcial Quarterly,vol49,,no197,1999,p473以及Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.7
[1]详见 Fred Dretske,Cognitive Cul-de-Sac,Mind,vol 91,No 361,1982,p.109-110
[2]Welbourne,M,Testimony,Knowledge and Belief,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing from words,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.306
[3]Welbourne,M,Testimony,Knowledge and Belief,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing from words,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.302
[1]Hume,D,A Treatise of Human Nature,L.A.Selby-Bigge(ed),Oxford:Clarendon Press,1967,P.145(bk,I,part iii,s.13)
[2]Coady.C.A.J,Tesitmony:A Philosophical Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.211-216
[3]Burge Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.486
[4]Audi.R,Epistemology:A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge,London:Routledge,1998,p.138
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:An Introduction through Two Sample Issues.In F.Schmitt(Ed.),Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.3
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.139-140
[1]John Hardwig,Epistemology Dependence,Journal of Philosophy,82,1985,p.335-349
[2]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.467-469
[3]Foley Richard,Egoism in Epistemology,in F.Schmitt(Ed.),Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.55
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.142
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.142
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[2]Kitcher Philip,The Advancement of Science,New York:Oxford University Press,1993,p.314-322
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[4]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.146
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.145-146
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.146
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.147
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.147-148
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.149
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.156
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.156-157
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.159
[2]Alvin Goldman.Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.159
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.160
[4]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.18-19
[5]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.213
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.208
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.209
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.210
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.216
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.220-222
[1]Quinton Anthony,Social Objects,Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society,76,1976,p.17
[2]Quinton Anthony,Social Objects,Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society,76,1976,p.78
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduction to Special Issues of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol.21,No.3,2007,p.211
[1]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.232
[2]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.233
[1]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.233
[2]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.235
[3]Gilbert Margaret,On Social Facts,London,Routledge,1989,p.257-260
[4]Pettit Philip,Groups with Minds of Theirs Own,In Socializing Metaphysics,Frederick Schmitt(ed),Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield,2003,p.167
[1]Gilbert Margaret,On Social Facts,London,Routledge,1989,p.289
[2]Tuomela Raimo,The Importance of us,Stanford:Stanford University Press,1995,p.314-316
[3]Tollefsen Deboran,Organizations as True Believers,Journal of Social Philosophy33,(3),2002,p.395-410
[4]Gilbert Margaret,Sociality and Responsibility:New Essays in Plural Subject theory,Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,2000,p.37-39
[1]M Bratman,Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context,Mind,102(1),1992,p.6-12
[1]L Cohen,An Essay on Belief and Acceptance,Oxford University Press,1992,p.367-369
[2]P Engel,Believing,Holding Truth,Accepting,Philosophy Exploration,1998(1),p.143-147
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduntion to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.211
[4]Raul Hakli,On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.252
[1]M Gilbert,Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups,Protosociology,2002,16(1),p.56
[2]Raul Hakli,On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.254
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduntion to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.212
[1]Meijers Anthonie,Why Accept Collective Belief? Reply to Gilbert,Protosociology 18-19,2003,p.379
[2]Don Fallis,Collective Epistemic Goals,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.274
[3]James William,The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1979,p.24
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,New York:Oxford University Press,1999,p.96
[2]Don Fallis,Collective Epistemic Goals,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.277
[1]殷杰,当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义,中国社会科学,2006第3期,第36页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.10
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.10
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.12
[3]Peirce Charles,Collected Papers,Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss(eds),Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1931-35,p.407
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.17-18
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.19
[3]Nelson Goodman,Of Mind and Other Matters,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1984,p.36
[1]John Searle,The Construction of Social Reality,New York:Free Press,1995,p.166
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.22
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.28
[2]Ludwig Wittgenstein,On Centainty,trans GE.M.Anscombe and GH.von Wright,New York:Harper,1969,p.559
[3]Gordon Baker and Peter Haker,Wittgenstein,Rules,Grammar,and Necessity,Oxford:Blackwell,1985,p.22
[4]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.29
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.29
[2]Tomas Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,University of Chicago Press,1962,p.94
[3]Michel Foucault,Discipline and Punish,trans A.Sheridan,New York:Vintage Books,1979,p.305
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.34-37
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.37
[3]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.37-40
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p183-184
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.185
[2]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,P.116-117
[1]Ziman,J,Reliable Knowledge,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1978,p.6
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.186
[3]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,p.118-120
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.188
[2]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,P.121-124
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.195-196.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.89-90
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.92-93
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.93-94.
[1]维基百科全书,http://Zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.111-115
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.115
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.115-116
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.59-60.
[2]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993.p.60-61
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.74.
[2]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.87.
[3]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.88
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Division of Cognitive Labor,The Journal of Philosophy,1990,p.7.
[1]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第43页
[2]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.113
[1]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.114
[2]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.114
[1]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.117
[2]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第43-44页
[1]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第44页
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.3
[2]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.3
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.275
[2]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.53
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.76
[1]Eduard Craig,Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy,vol 6,London:Routledge.p.725
[1]F.Remedios.Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books.2003.p.64
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2),p.87
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books.2003.p.68
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]Ronald Giere.Essay Review:Interpreting The Philosophy of Science,Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science.1991(22).521
[1]Hull David,Science as a Process,University of Chicago Press,1988.p.31-32
[1]Steve Fuller,The Governance of Science,Buckingham U.K:Open University Press,2000,p.135-151
[2]Steve Fuller,The Governance of Science:Ideology and The Future of The Open Society,Buckingham U.K:Open University Press.2000,p.135-151
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29.
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.112
[2]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.112-113
[3]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.113
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.114-115
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.116
[2]R.Cohen,The Context of Explanation,Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993,p.1-4
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.115
[2]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.117
[3]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.117
[4]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.20-26
[2]约瑟夫.劳斯,知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学,北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第106页
[1]约瑟夫.劳斯,知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学,北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第225页
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第68-71页
[2]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第68-71页
[3]David Bloor,Wittgenstein and Mannheim On The Sociology of Mathematics,Study In History and Philosophy of Science(4).1973.no.3,p.173-191
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第117-118页
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第150页
[2]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第152页
[1]拉卡托斯,证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑,上海译文出版社,1987,第163-166页
[2]拉卡托斯,证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑,上海译文出版社,1987,第163-166页
[1]详见巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2004,第22-48页
[1]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2000,第40页
[2]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2000,第42页
[1]拉里.劳丹,进步及其问题,华夏出版社,1999,第230页
[1]Andre Kukla,Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science,London:Routledge,2000,p.21
[2]Andre Kukla,Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science,London:Routledge,2000,p.28
[1]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology 2002 vol 16,No 3,p.185
[2]海伦.朗基诺于2008年在山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心做学术汇报期间,她在自我介绍中就将自己定位为社会认识论者和女性主义认识论者,同时她认为二者相当程度上是统一的。
[3]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology 2002 vol 16,No 3,p.186
[1]Elizabeth Anderson,Feminist Epistemology:An Interpretation and a Defense,Hypatia:A Journal of Feminist Philosophy,vol 10,issue3,1995,p.54
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/.2006
[2]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,No 3,p.186
[3]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,No 3,p.187
[1]Helen Longino,Feminist Epistemology,in J.Greco and E.Sosa(eds),A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology,Cambridge,Ma:Blackwell,1999,p.330
[2]Helen Longino,Feminist Epistemology,in J.Greco and E.Sosa(eds),A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology,Cambridge,Ma:Blackwell,1999,p.330
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[2]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Alcoff.L,and Potter.E,Feminist Epistemologies,New York:Routledge,1993,p.4
[2]Alcoff.L,and Potter.E,Feminist Epistemologies,New York:Routledge,1993,p.3-4
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[2]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002 vol 16,No 3,p.194
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.11-12
[1]J..M.巴德,杰西.谢拉,社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003,第1期,第105页
[2]Michael Williams,Unnatural Doubts:Epistemology Realism and The Basic of Scepticism,Oxford University Press,1991,p.108-109
[3]Joseph Rouse,Engaging Science:How to Understand Its Practice Philosophically,Cornell University Press,1996,p.8
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.3
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.76
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.68
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]Ronald Giere.Essay Review:Interpreting The Philosophy of Science,Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science.1991(22) p.521
[1]蔡浩,社会认知偏见及其对策研究,新疆师范大学学报,2001年第2期,第90页
[2]Francis Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.64
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.230
[2]William Donohne,Richard Kitcher,Philosophy of Psychology,London Sage,1996,p.22-23
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.231
[2]卡尔·波普尔著,舒炜光译,客观知识——一个进化论的研究,上海译文出版社,1987年,第357页
[3]卡尔·波普尔著,李本正等译,走向知识的进化论,中国美术学院出版社,2001年,第66页
[1]朱新秤,社会认知心理学研究的新进展,心理学动态,2000年第2期,第75页
[1]Taylor S E.The Social Being in Social Psychology.D.Gilbert,S.Fiske,GLindzey(eds.).Handbook of social psychology.McGraw-Hill,1998,p.58-98
[2]Steve Fuller.Epistemology Radically Natured:Recovery the Normative the Experimental and the Social.R.N.Giere(ed.)Cognitive Models of Science,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1992,444
[3]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology and the Recovery of the Normative in the Post-Epistemic Era.The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2),p.87
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p234
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,MIT Press,1992,p.174
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.232
[3]Thomas Gilovich,,How We Know What Isn't So,Free Press,1991,p.81
[1]Miriam Solomon,Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning,Philosophy of Science,1992(59),p.439-455
[1]Association of College and Research Libraries.Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction:A Model Statement for Academic Librarians[OL],[2004-1-22]http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm
[2]Edward Montgomery,The Foundations of Access to Knowledge,Syracuse University Press,1968,p.35
[1]J.巴德,杰西·谢拉.社会认识论和实践.国外社会科学,2003(1),p.105
[2]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,New York,Asia Publishing House,1970,P.86
[3]J.巴德,杰西·谢拉.社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003(1)p.107
[4]Edward Montgomery,The Foundations of Access to Knowledge,Syracuse University Press,1968,p.8
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002.p.3
[2]A.Bullock & S.Trombley,Norton dictionary of modem thought,New York:Norton,1999,p.801-802
[1]Alvin Goldman.Foundation of Social Epistemics,Synthesis,vol.73,1987(1),p.114
[1]Jesse Shera,Libraries and the organization of Knowledge.Connecticut:Archon Books,1965.p.5
[2]Don Fallis,Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol 14,2000(4).p307
[3]Don Fallis,Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol 14,2000(4).p307-309
[1]D.V.Lindley,Making Decisions,London:Wiley,1971,p.134
[1]E.Lee.Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity.North Carolina:McFarland & Company,1998.p.24
[2]Alvin Goldman.Knowledge In a Social World.New York:Oxford University Press,1999.P.212
[3]E.Lee.Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity.North Carolina:McFarland & Company,1998.p.25
[4]Don Fallis.Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol.14,2000(4),p.314
[1]Martin Heideggar,The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays,New York:Harper & Row,1977,p.4-7
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,No.4,1996,p.573
[1]Alvin Goldman,Social Epistemics and Social Psychology.Social Epistemology.1991(5) p.121
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,No.4,1996,p.575-576
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.48
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.27
[2]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.58
[4]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[5]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.57
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.81
[2]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.58-59
[4]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66-67
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.67
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66-67
[2]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.69-70
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.72
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.131
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.44
[1]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.41
[1]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.42-43
[2]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.43
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.46-47
[2]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66
[1]灵长类进化模型祥见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.107
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.109
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.77
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p78
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p78
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p80
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.80-81
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.83
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.83-84
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.84
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.84
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.89
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91-92
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.92
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.92
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.95-96
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.72
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.131
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.129-131
[1]维基百科全书,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity_(philosophy)
[1]汉斯.伽达默尔,卡斯腾.杜特,金慧敏译,什么是实践哲学——伽达默尔访谈录,西北师大学报,2005年,第1期,第7页
[2]关于社会认识论的实践研究领域可详见Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1999,p221-400
[1]Frederick Schauer,Free Speech:A Philosophical Enquiry,New York:Cambridge University Press,1982,p.16
[1]Seyla Benhabib,Models of Public Space:Hannah Arendt,the Liberal Tradion,and Jǖrgen Habermas,in C.Calhoun(ed.),Habermas and the Public Sphere,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1992,p.89
[2]Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996,p.93.
1.Ted Benton,Iran Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001.
2.W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York:Columbia University Press,1969
3.A.Shimony,D.Nails,Naturalistic Epistemology,Boston:Reidel Publishing Company,1987
4.W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1981
5.Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,New York:Clarendon Press,1999
6.Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994
7.Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002
8.Rom Harre,Varieties of Realism:a Rationale for the Natural Sciences,Oxford:Blackwell,1986
9.Alvin Goldman,Epistemology and Cognitive,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1986
10.Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT Press,1992
11.K.Hahlueg,C.Hooker,Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology,New York Press,1989
12.Robert Almeder,Harmless Naturalism:the limits of science and the nature of philosophy,Carus Publishing Company,1998
13.W.Donohue,R.Kitchner,The Philosophy of Psychology,Sage Publications,1996
14.H.Kornblith,Naturalizing Epistemology,Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT Press,1985
15.Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Bloomington:Indiana University Press,2002
16.Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996
17.John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Dover,1959
18.David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press, 1975
19. Thomas Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Power of Man, Macmillan and Co. Limited, 1941
20. Thomas Reid, An Inquiry into Human Mind, Timothy Duggan(eds), University of Chicago Press, 1970
21. Bruno Latour, Steve Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986
22. W. Newton-Smith, A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell Publishing, 2000
23. Jesse Shera, Sociological Foundations of Librarianship, New York: Asia Publishing House, 1970
24. A. Bullock , S. Trombley, Norton dictionary of modem thought, New York: Norton, 1999
25. Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations,, London: Harper and Row, 1963
26. Laudan. L, Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1977
27. Steve Fuller, Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, Boulder: Westview Press, 1989
28. Durkheinm. M, Rules of Sociological Method, New York: The Free Press, 1974
29. Durkheinm. M, On Morality and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973
30. David Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976
31. C. A. J. Coady, Testimony: A Philosophy study, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
32. Audi Robert, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 2001
33. Sosa Ernest, Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
34. B. K. Matilal, A. Chakrabarti, Knowing From Words, Kluwer, 1994
35. Jennifer Lackey, The Epistemology of Testimony, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006
36. B. McGuinness, The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994
37. R. E. Grandy, R. Warner, Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press, 1986
38. Hume. D, A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge(ed), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967
39. Audi. R, Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, London: Routledge, 1998
40. Kitcher Philip, The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993
41. William James, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1979
42. Gilbert Margaret, On Social Facts, London: Routledge, 1989
43. Frederick Schmitt , Socializing Metaphysics, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield, 2003
44. Tuomela Raimo, The Importance of Us, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995
45. Gilbert Margaret, Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject theory, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, 2000
46. L. Cohen, An Essay on Belief and Acceptance, Oxford University Press, 1992
47. James William, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979
48. Peirce Charles, Collected Papers, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss(eds), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1931-35
49. Nelson Goodman, Of Mind and Other Matters, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984
50. John Searle, The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press, 1995
51. Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Centainty, trans G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, New York: Harper, 1969
52. Gordon Baker, Peter Haker, Wittgenstein, Rules, Grammar, and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell, 1985
53. Tomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1962
54. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books, 1979
55. Ziman. J, Reliable Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978
56. F. Remedios, Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge, Lexington Books, 2003
57. Hull David, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, 1988
58. Steve Fuller, The Governance of Science: Ideology and The Future of The Open Society, Buckingham U. K: Open University Press, 2000
59. R. Cohen, The Context of Explanation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993
60. Andre Kukla, Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge, 2000
61. J. Greco, E. Sosa, A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Cambridge Ma: Blackwell, 1999
62. Alcoff. L, Potter. E, Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge, 1993
63. Michael Williams, Unnatural Doubts: Epistemology Realism and The Basic of Scepticism, Oxford University Press, 1991
64. Joseph Rouse, Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practice Philosophically, Cornell University Press, 1996
65. William Donohne, Richard Kitcher, Philosophy of Psychology, London Sage, 1996
66. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey, Handbook of social psychology, McGraw-Hill, 1998
67. Thomas Gilovich, How We Know What Isn't So, Free Press, 1991
68. Edward Montgomery, The Foundations of Access to Knowledge, Syracuse University Press, 1968
69. A. Bullock, S. Trombley, Norton dictionary of modem thought, New York: Norton, 1999
70. Jesse Shera, Libraries and the organization of Knowledge, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1965
71. D. V. Lindley, Making Decisions, London: Wiley, 1971
72. E. Lee, Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 1998
73. Martin Heideggar, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Harper & Row, 1977
74. Helen Longino, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990
75. Helen Longino, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002
76. R. Nozick. Philosophical Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1981
1. E. Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?", Analysis 23, 1963
2. Kusch Martin, Testimony in Communication Epistemology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, part 23 A, 2002, 33 (2)
3. Alvin Goldman, Group Knowledge VS Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology, Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 2004, 1
4. S. Downes, Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science, Vol: 60
5. Michael Roess, The Social Dimension of Epistemology, Florida Philosophy Review, 2005, Vol: 5
6. David Resnik, Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol: 27
7. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications, Royal Institute of Philosophy, p. 2, http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications.pdf
8. Tarcisio Zandonade, Social Epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller, Library Trends, 2004, vol 52, iss4
9. Simon Evnine, Epistemic Unities, Erkenninis, vol 59, 2003
10. Martin Kusch , HPS Research Methods Guide : Social pistemology, http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
11. Goldman, A. (1999). Social epistemology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanforcl.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology social
12. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemics and Social Psychology, Social Epistemology. 1991 (5)
13. Kay Mathiesen, Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers", Social Epistemology, vol. 21, No. 3, 2007
14. Alvin Goldman, Foundations of Social Epistemics, Synthese 73, 1987
15. Flicker Elizabeth, Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemilogy of Testimony, Mind 104, 1995
16. Audi Robert, The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophy Quarterly, 34, 1997
17. M. Kusch, Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 33, issue 2, 2002
18. Flicker. E, Trusting Others in the Science: A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, vol. 33, Issue2, 2002
19. Bergen Tailor, Content Preservation, Philosophical Review 102, 1993
20. Webb, Mark Owen, Why I Know About As Much As You: A Reply to Hardwig, Journal of Philosophy, 90
21. Jonathan Adler, Epistemology Problems of Testimony, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/
22. Graham. P. J, Transferring Knowledge, NOUS, 34, issue 1, 2000
23. Audi.R, The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophical Quarterly,34, 1997,
24. Lackey. J, Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission, The Philosophcial Quarterly, vol49, no197, 1999
25. Fred Dretske, Cognitive Cul-de-Sac, Mind, vol 91, No 361, 1982
26. John Hardwig, Epistemology Dependence, Journal of Philosophy, 82, 1985
27. Quinton Anthony,. Social Objects, Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society, 76, 1976
28. Anglo Corlett, Analyzing Social Knowledge, Social Epistemology, vol21, no3, 2007
29. Tollefsen Deboran, Organizations as True Believers, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, (3), 2002
30. M. Bratman, Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context, Mind, 102(1), 1992
31. P. Engel, Believing, Holding Truth, Accepting, Philosophy Exploration, 1998(1)
32. Raul Hakli, On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief, Social Epistemology, vol21, No3, 2007
33. M Gilbert, Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups, Protosociology, 2002, 16(1)
34. MeijersAnthonie, Why Accept Collective Belief? Reply to Gilbert, Protosociology 18-19, 2003
35. Don Fallis, Collective Epistemic Goals, Social Epistemology, vol21, No3, 2007
36. Alvin Goldman, Foundations of Social Epistemology, Synthese, 73, 1987
37. Philips Kitcher, The Division of Cognitive Labor, The Journal of Philosophy, 1990
38. Steve Fuller, Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era, The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1997 (2)
39. Ronald Giere, Essay Review: Interpreting The Philosophy of Science, Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science, 1991 (22)
40. John Lyne, Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry, Argumentation 8, 1994
41. David Bloor, Wittgenstein and Mannheim On The Sociology of Mathematics, Study In History and Philosophy of Science (4), 1973
42. Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb, Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology, Social Epistemology, 2002, vol 16, No 3
43. Elizabeth Anderson, Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense, . Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, vol 10, issue3, 1995
44. Heidi Grasswick, Feminist Social Epistemology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/, 2006
45. Miriam Solomon, Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning, Philosophy of Science, 1992 (59)
46. Association of College and Research Libraries, Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction : A Model Statement for Academic Librarians [OL] , http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm, 2004
47. Don Fallis, Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science, Social Epistemology, vol 14, 2000 (4)
48. M. Bradie, Evolutionary Epistemology as Naturalized Epistemology, In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, K. Hahlueg&, C. Hooker( eds), State University of New York Press, 1989,
49. Alvin Goldman, What Is Justified Belief, In Naturalizing Epistemology, H. Kornblith
(eds), MIT Press, 1985
50. Flicker. E, Against Fallibility,B. K;.Matilal, A.Chakrabarti(eds), Knowing From Words, Kluwer, 1994
51. Davidson. D, The Social Aspect of Language, in B.McGuinness and Olivieri(eds), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994
52. Davidson. D, A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs, in R. E. Grandy and R. Warner(eds), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press, 1986
53. Pettit Philip, Groups with Minds of Theirs Own, In Socializing Metaphysics,, Frederick Schmitt(ed), Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield, 2003
54. Helen Longino, Feminist Epistemology, in J. Greco and E.Sosa (eds). A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Cambridge Ma: Blackwell, 1999
55. Taylor SE, The Social Being in Social Psychology, D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, McGraw-Hill, 1998
56. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemology, Critica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, 1999, no. 93
57. Steve Fuller, Social Epistemology: A Philosophy for Sociology or a Sociology of Philosophy? Sociology, 2000, vol 34, no 3
58. Kusch. M, A General Theory of Societal Knowledge? Aspirations and Shortcomings of Alvin Goldman's Social Epistemology, Studies of History and Philosophy of Science, 2001, vol.32, No 1
59. Roess. M, The Social Dimension of Epistemology, Florida Philosophical Review, 2005, vol 5, issuel
60. Solomon. M, Norms of Epistemic Diversity, Episteme, 2006
61. Viale. R, Truth, Science, and Politics: an Analysis of Social Epistemology, Scipolicy: the Journal of Sciences and Health Policy, 2001, vol 2
62. Steve Fuller, On Regulating What Is Known: A Way To Social Epistemology, Synthese, 1987, vol 73
63. Ashmore. M, Social Epistemology and Reflexivity: Two Versions of How to be Really Useful, Argumentation, 1994, vol 8
64. Baigrie. B, Social Epistemology, Scientific Practice and the Elusive Social, Argumentation, 1994, vol 8
65. Steven Fuller, The Social Epistemologist in Search of a Position from Which to Argue,Argumentation,1994,vol 8
66.Anglo Corlett,Goldman and the Foundations of Social Epistemology,Argumentation,1994,vol 8
67.Remedios.F,Preview to Special Issue on Knowledge in a Social World,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
68.Pelletier.F.J,A Problem for Goldman on the Rationality,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
69.Maffie.J,Alternative epistemologies and the value of truth,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
70.Schmitt.F,Veritistic value,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
71.Rehg.M.,Goldman's veritistic rhetoric and the tasks of argumentation theory,Social Epistemology,,2000,vol 14,issue 4
72.Alvin Goldman,Replies to reviews of Knowledge in a Social World,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
73.Grasswick.H,The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,issue 2
74.Smith.C,Social epistemology,contextualism and the division of labour,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,issue 1
75.May.T,Power,knowledge and organizational transformation:administration as depoliticization,Social Epistemology,2001,vol 15,issue 3
1.尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,《西方哲学英汉对照辞典》,北京:人民出版社,2001
2.陈嘉明,《知识与确证:当代认识论引论》,上海:上海人民出版社,2003
3.欧阳康,《当代英美哲学地图》,北京:人民出版社,2005年
4.罗伯特.威尔逊,《MIT认知科学百科全书》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年
5.理查德.罗蒂,《哲学和自然之镜》李幼蒸译,北京:商务印书馆,2003
6.奎因,《从逻辑的观点看》江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987
7.陈波,《奎因哲学研究》,北京:三联书店,1998
8.郑祥福,洪伟,《认识论的自然化之后》,上海:上海三联书店,2005
9.殷杰,《哲学对话的新平台—科学语用学的元理论研究》,太原:山西科学技术出版社,2003
10.冯俊,《后现代主义哲学演讲录》,北京:商务印书馆,2003
11.福柯,《词与物》,上海:三联书店,2001
12.福柯,《权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录》,上海:上海人民出版社,1997
13.彼得.温奇,《社会科学的观念及其与哲学的关系》张庆熊译,上海人民出版社,2004年
14.大卫.休谟,《人性论》(上),北京:商务印书馆,1997年
15.巴里.巴恩斯,大卫.布鲁尔,《科学知识:一种社会学的分析》,南京;南京大学出版社,2004年
16.殷杰,郭贵春,《哲学对话的新平台》,太原:山西科学技术出版社,2003
17.约瑟夫.劳斯,《知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004
18.赵万里,《科学的社会建构》,天津:天津人民出版社,2002
19.拉卡托斯,《证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑》,上海:上海译文出版社,1987
20.巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,《科学知识:一种社会学的分析》,南京:南京大学出版社,2004
21.拉里.劳丹,《进步及其问题》,北京:华夏出版社,1999
22.卡尔·波普尔,《客观知识——一个进化论的研究》舒炜光译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987年
23.卡尔·波普尔,《走向知识的进化论》李本正等译,杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2001年
24.汉斯·伽达默尔,《真理与方法》洪汉鼎译,上海:上海译文出版社,1999年
25.丛航青,《陈词证据研究》,北京:人民出版社,2005
1.W.V.Quine.《自然化的认识论》贾可春译,世界哲学,2004,第5期
2.郭贵春,《奎因的自然主义与科学实在论》,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期
3.李侠,《简评自然化认识论的替代命题的理论旨趣与存在的问题》,科学技术与辩证法,2006年,第1期
4.何静 丛航青,《自然主义认识论的不同形式》,自然辩证法通讯,2006年,第3期
5.J.巴德(美),《杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践》,国外社会科学,2003年,第1期
6.吴畏,《社会知识论还是社会认识论?》,《自然辩证法研究》,2004年,第11期
7.殷杰,《当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义》,中国社会科学,2006年,第3期,
8.刘军,《当代科学哲学中的自然主义流派论析》,自然辩证法通讯,1997年,第6期
9.林默彪,《认识论问题域的现代转向》,哲学研究,2005年,第8期
10.富勒,《社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践》(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年,第1期
11.富勒,《社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践》(下),华中科技大学学报,2008年,第2期
12.黄翔,《混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论》,自然辩证法通讯,2008,第1期,
13.蔡浩,《社会认知偏见及其对策研究》,新疆师范大学学报,2001年,第2期
14.朱新秤,《社会认知心理学研究的新进展》,心理学动态,2000年,第2期
15.丛航青,《陈词与知识》,科学学研究,2005年,第1期
16.顾林正,《从个体知识论到社会知识论——当代认识论的另一个转向》,科学技术与辩证法,2007年,第6期
17.郑祥福,《当代西方“认识论的社会化”趋向评述》,国外社会科学,2006年,第4期
18.郑祥福,《当代西方科学哲学的“认知转向”》,福建论坛,2005年,第8期
19.潘斌,《当代西方社会认识论研究的拓展与深化》,华中科技大学学报,2008年,第1期
20.欧阳康,《当代哲学视野中的社会认识论》,天津社会科学,2001年,第5期
21.王娜,《海伦.朗基诺语境经验论思想评述》,自然辩证法研究,2007年,第9期
22.张建华,《近年来西方社会认识论研究概况》,哲学动态,2001年,第4期
23.吴畏,《科学理性的命运》,自然辨证法研究,2003年,第1期
24.丛航青,《科学社会研究的两种进路》,自然辩证法通讯,2004年,第2期
25.丁五启,《科学与技术研究和修辞学》,兰州学刊,2006年,第1期
26.田小飞,《科学哲学中的自然主义理论研究述评》,哲学动态,2007年,第2期
27.刘晓力,《科学知识社会学的集体认识论和社会认识论》,哲学研究,2004年,第11期
28.徐献军,丛航青,《论知识传递》,科学学研究,2005年,第3期
29.殷杰,《社会科学哲学的论域》,科学技术与辨证法,2006年,第3期
30.丛航青,《什么是科学的社会研究》,科学学研究,2003年,第3期
31.叶初升,《自然化认识论:在描述与规范之间》,哲学动态,1997年,第7期
32.殷杰,尤洋,《科学知识合法化的新解释》,自然辩证法研究,2006年,第4期
33.殷杰,尤洋,《社会认识论视野中的认知偏见》,自然辩证法通讯,2007年,第4期
34.殷杰,尤洋,《当代社会认识论研究及其意义》(上),科学技术与辩证法,2008年,第4期
35.殷杰,尤洋,《当代社会认识论研究及其意义》(下),科学技术与辩证法,2008年,第5期
36.殷杰,尤洋,《社会认识论视域中的信息与知识》,山西大学学报,2009年,第2期
37.郭桂春,《语境论的科学哲学纲领研究》,哲学动态,2008年,第5期
38.成素梅,郭贵春,《语境论的真理观》,哲学研究,2007年,第5期
39.郭贵春,《论语境》,哲学研究,1999年,第4期
40.郭贵春,《语境分析的方法论意义》,山西大学学报,2000年,第3期
41.成素梅,郭贵春,《论科学解释语境与语境方法》,自然辨证法通讯,2002年,第2期
42.郭贵春,《语境研究纲领与科学哲学的发展》,中国社会科学,2006年,第5期
43.郭贵春,《语境研究的意义》,科学技术与辨证法,2005年,第4期
44.殷杰,《语境主义世界观的特征》,哲学研究,2006年,第5期
[2]陈嘉明先生在他的《知识与确证:当代认识论引论》(上海人民出版社.2003.第1页)中将英文Epistemology (认识论)翻译为Theory of Knowledge(知识论)。同时,尼古拉斯.布宁在他的《西方哲学英汉对照辞典中》也写道:epistemology来源于希腊文episteme和logos,在字面上是指知识论。“epistemic”(认识的)是它的形容词,即对知识的获得。“gnoseology”(认知学)有时也用于认识论的同义词,或用于指探究知识的科学方法。
[1]尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,西方哲学英汉对照辞典,北京:人民出版社,2001,第537-538页
[1]尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,西方哲学英汉对照辞典,北京:人民出版社,2001,第532页
[2]E.Gettier,"Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? ",Analysis 23,1963,p.121-123
[3]R.Nozick,Philosophical Explanation,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1981,p.240
[1]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第199页
[2]Matthias Steup.Epistemology.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/notes.html#33,2005
[1]罗伯特.威尔逊,MIT认知科学百科全书,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年,第426页
[2]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第204页
[3]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第204-207页
[1]罗伯特.威尔逊,MIT认知科学百科全书,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年,第426页
[2]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第209页
[3]欧阳康,当代英美哲学地图,人民出版社,2005年,第211页
[1]W.V.Quine,贾可春(译),自然化的认识,世界哲学,2004,第五期,83.
[2]奎因在《自然化的认识论》中指明:我认为在这一点上,相反这样说可能是更有益处的,认识论依然将继续存在下去,尽管它是在一种新的背景下并以一种被澄清了的身份出线。认识论,或者某种与之类似的东西,简单地落入了作为心理学的一章,因而也是作为自然科学的一章的地位。它研究一种自然现象,即一种物理的人类主体。而推动我们研究它的理由,和总是推动认识论的理由,在某种程度上是同一种理由,这就是:为了弄清楚证据是如何与理论相关联的,并且人们的自然理论是以何种方式超越现成证据的。
[2]理查德.罗蒂,哲学和自然之镜,李幼蒸译,北京:商务印书馆,2003,210
[1]Ted Benton,Iran Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,p.60
[1]奎因,从逻辑的观点看,江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987,第19页
[2]陈波,奎因哲学研究,北京:三联书店,1998,第18-19页
[3]W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York:Columbia University Press,1969,p.126-127
[4]A.Shimony,D.Nails,Naturalistic Epistemology,Reidel Publishing Company,Boston,1987,p.260
[5]W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York,Columbia University Press,1969,p.82
[1]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第2页
[2]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第3页
[3]奎因,从逻辑的观点看,江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987,第40页
[4]郑祥福 洪伟,认识论的自然化之后,上海三联书店,2005,第95-96页
[5]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第3页
[1]W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Harvard University Press,Cambridge Massachusetts,1981,p.102
[2]W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Harvard University Press,Cambridge Massachusetts,1981,p.175
[3]郭贵春,奎因的自然主义与科学实在论,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期,第2-3页
[4]此处详细论文可参见李侠,简评自然化认识论的替代命题的理论旨趣与存在的问题,科学技术与辩证法,2006年,第一期;何静 丛航青,自然主义认识论的不同形式,自然辩证法通讯,2006年,第三期。
[5]Ted Benton,Ian Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,P.60
[1]J.巴德(美),杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003年第1期,第105页
[2]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,Asia Publishing House,1970,p.86
[1]吴畏,社会知识论还是社会认识论,自然辩证法研究,2004年第11期,第38页
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1994,p.4
[3]Kusch Martin,Testimony in Communication Epistemology,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,part 23 A,2002,33(2),p.336.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Group Knowledge VS Group Rationality:Two Approaches to Social Epistemology,Episteme:A Journal of Social Epistemology,2004,1,p.11-22
[2]此处可详细参考Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,,Oxford University Press,2002,,p182-204;Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p1-29
[1]Rom Harre,Varieties of Realism:a Rationale for the Natural Sciences,Oxford:Blackwell.1986,p.21
[2]殷杰,哲学对话的新平台—科学语用学的元理论研究,山西科学技术出版社,2003,第37页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Epistemology and Cognitive,Harvard University Press,1986,p.43
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,MIT Press,1992,p.179
[3]S.Downes,Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science,Philosophy of Science,Vol:60,p.452
[1]Michael Roess,The Social Dimension of Epistemology,Florida Philosophy Review,2005,Vol:V,p.25.
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathway to Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.26.
[3]M.Bradie,Evolutionary Epistemology as Naturalized Epistemology,In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology,K.Hahlueg&,C.Hooker(eds),State University of New York Press,1989,p.396.
[4]Robert Almeder,Harmless Naturalism;the limits of science and the nature of philosophy,Carus Publishing Company,1998,p.36.
[1]M.Gibson,Quine'Behaviorism,In the Philosophy of Psychology,W.Donohue&R.Kitchner(eds).Sage Publications,1996,p.96.
[2]Alvin Goldman,What Is Justified Belief,In Naturalizing Epistemology,H.Kornblith(eds),MITPress,1985,p.91.
[3]Hilary Kornblith,A Conservative Approach to Social Epistemology,Frederick Schmitt(eds),Social Epistemology:the Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&publishers,Inc,1994,p.93.
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,p.570-571.
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29.
[1]殷杰,当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义,中国社会科学,2006年第三期,第26-27页
[2]刘军,当代科学哲学中的自然主义流派论析,自然辩证法通讯,1997年第六期,第96页
[3]Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996,p.93.
[1]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Dover,1959,p.23.
[2]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Raleigh,N.C.Alex Catalogue,1690,p.60-61
[3]John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Raleigh,N.C.Alex Catalogue,1690,p.298
[4]Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.2-3
[1]David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press,1975,p.111.
[2]David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press,1975,p.111.
[3]Thomas Reid,Essays on the Intellectual Power of Man,Macmillan and Co.,Limited,1941,p.48
[4]Thomas Reid,An Inquiry into Human Mind,Timothy Duggan(eds),University of Chicago Press,1970,p.240-241
[1]Alvin Goldman,Social Epistemology:Theory and Applications,Royal Institute of Philosophy,p.2,http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Social Epistemology:Theory and Applications.pdf
[2]Ted Benton,Ian Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001,p.60.
[1]Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar,Laboratory Life:The Construction of Scientific Facts,Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1986,p128-129
[2]冯俊,后现代主义哲学演讲录,北京:商务印书馆,2003,第430-431页
[3]福柯,词与物,上海:三联书店,2001,第10页
[1]福柯,权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录,上海:上海人民出版社,1997,第37页
[2]W.Newton-Smith,A Companion to the Philosophy of Science,Blackwell Publishing,2000,p.451
[3]彼得.温奇,张庆熊(译),社会科学的观念及其与哲学的关系,上海人民出版社,2004年,第41页
[4]Tarcisio Zandonade,Social Epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller,Library Trends,2004,vol52,iss4,p.818
[1]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,New York,Asia Publishing House,1970,86
[2]J.M巴德,杰西.谢拉,社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003,第一期,第107页
[3]这七篇论文分别为:Frederick.Schmitt,"Justification,Sociality and Automony";Stewart Cohen,"Knowledge,Context,and Social Standards";Hilary Kornblith,"Some Social Features of Cognition ";Keith Lehrer,"Personal and Social Knowledge";Alvin Goldman,"Foundations of Social Epistemics";Steve Fuller,"On Regulating What is Known:A Way to Social Epistemology ";Margaret Gilbert,"Modeling Collective Belief"
[1]Simon Evnine,Epistemic Unities,Erkenninis,vol 59,2003,365
[2]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[1]A.Bullock & S.Trombley.Norton dictionary of modem thought,New York:Norton,1999.P.801-802
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002.P.3
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,p.1
[3]Goldman,A.(1999).Social epistemology.In E.Zalta(Ed.),Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.Stanford,CA:Stanford University.Available online at http://plato.stanforcl.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology_social.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Clarendon Press,1999,p5
[2]J.巴德(美),杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003(1).
[3]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,p 180
[4]Alvin Goldman.Social Epistemics and Social Psychology[J].Social Epistemology.1991(5).p.121
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Clarendon Press,1999,p.4
[1]Kay Mathiesen,Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol.21,No.3,2007,p.209-216
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman&Littlefield Publisher,1994,P.1
[3]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[4]Martin Kusch,HPS Research Methods Guide:Social pistemology,http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
[1]Karl Popper,Conjectures and Refutations,London,Harper and Row,1963,p.6
[1]Laudan,L,Progress and Its Problems,Berkeley,The University of California Press,1977,P.202
[1]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemics,Synthese 73,1987,p.111
[2]Steve Fuller,Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents,Boulder,Westview Press,1989,p.27
[1]林默彪,认识论问题域的现代转向,哲学研究,2005年,第8期,第69页
[2]林默彪,认识论问题域的现代转向,哲学研究,2005年,第8期,第69页
[3]大卫.休谟,人性论(上),商务印书馆,1997年,第239页
[1]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2004年,第251页
[1]Durkheim,M,Rules of Sociological Method,New York,The Free Press,1974,p.2
[2]Durkheinm,M,On Morality and Society,Chicago,University of Chicago Press,1973,p.16
[1]Richard Rorty,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1979,p.155-165,p.295-306
[2]富勒,社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年第22卷第1期,第13页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.183
[1]Peter Winch,Understanding a Primitive Society,American Phil Quart.,vol 1,1964,p.307-324;Evans Pritchard,Witchcraft,Oracles and Magic among the Azande,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1937,p.1-25
[2]David Bloor,Knowledge and Social Imagery,University of Chicago Press,1976,p.53
[1]David Bloor,Knowledge and Social Imagery,University of Chicago Press.1976,p.169
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways To Knowledge,Oxford University Press,2002,p.188
[2]富勒,社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年第22卷第1期,第13页
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publisher,1994,p6-10
[2]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Rowman & Littlefield Publisher,1994,p11-14
[1]C.A.J.Coady,Testimony:A Philosophy study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p,25
[2]Audi,Robert,The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy,(eds),Cambridge University Press,2001,p.909
[3]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemilogy of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.396-397
[4]Audi Robert,The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification,American Philosophy Quarterly,34,1997,p.406
[5]Sosa Ernest,Knowledge in Perspective:Selected Essays in Epistemology,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991,p.219
[1]Flicker,E,Against Fallibility,B.K.Matilal&A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,Kluwer,1994,p.137
[2]Kusch,M.Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,vol 33,issue 2,2002,p.335
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.3
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.160
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.161
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.161-162
[4]C.A.J.Coady,Testimony:A Philosophical Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.82
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.162
[1]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.404
[2]Fricker Elizabeth,Telling and Trusting:Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony,Mind 104,1995,p.394-395
[3]Fricker,E,Against Fallibiligy,B.K.Matilal&A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,Kluwer,1994,p.129
[4]Fricker,E,Trusting Others in the Science:A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Part A,vol,33,Issue2,2002,p.382
[5]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.163
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.164
[2]Jennifer Lackey.The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.164-165
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.165-166
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.166
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.166
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.185
[2]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.458
[3]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.481
[4]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.480
[1]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.468
[2]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.54
[1]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[2]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[3]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.55
[4]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.56-57
[1]Davidson.D,The Social Aspect of Language,in B.McGuinness and Olivieri(eds),The Philosophy of Michael Dummett,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.2
[2]Davidson.D,A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs,in R.E.Grandy and R.Warner(eds),Philosophical Grounds of Rationality.Oxford University Press,1986,p.174
[3]殷杰,郭贵春,哲学对话的新平台,山西科学技术出版社,2003,第57页
[1]Coady.C.AJ.Testimony:A Philosophy Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.169-173
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.167
[3]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.167
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.168
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.170
[3]Webb,Mark Owen,Why I Know About As Much As You:A Reply to Hardwig,Journal of Philosophy,90,p263
[4]Richard Foley,Egoism inEpistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,F.Schimtt(eds),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.57-58
[5]P.F.Strawson,Knowing From Words,in Matilal and Chakrabarti,1994,p.25
[6]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.172
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.172-174
[2]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.178-179
[1]Jonathan Adler,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/
[2]Graham.P.J,Transferring Knowledge,NOUS,34,issue 1,2000,p.131
[1]Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.6
[2]Audi.R,The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification,American Philosophical Quarterly,34,1997,p.410
[3]Dummett,M,Testimony and Memory,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing From Words,1994,p.264
[4]详见 Lackey,J,Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission,The Philosophcial Quarterly,vol49,,no197,1999,p473以及Jennifer Lackey,The Epistemology of Testimony,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2006,p.7
[1]详见 Fred Dretske,Cognitive Cul-de-Sac,Mind,vol 91,No 361,1982,p.109-110
[2]Welbourne,M,Testimony,Knowledge and Belief,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing from words,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.306
[3]Welbourne,M,Testimony,Knowledge and Belief,in B.Matilal and A.Chakrabarti(eds),Knowing from words,Dordrecht:Kluwer,1994,p.302
[1]Hume,D,A Treatise of Human Nature,L.A.Selby-Bigge(ed),Oxford:Clarendon Press,1967,P.145(bk,I,part iii,s.13)
[2]Coady.C.A.J,Tesitmony:A Philosophical Study,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992,p.211-216
[3]Burge Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.486
[4]Audi.R,Epistemology:A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge,London:Routledge,1998,p.138
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:An Introduction through Two Sample Issues.In F.Schmitt(Ed.),Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.3
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.139-140
[1]John Hardwig,Epistemology Dependence,Journal of Philosophy,82,1985,p.335-349
[2]Bergen Tailor,Content Preservation,Philosophical Review102,1993,p.467-469
[3]Foley Richard,Egoism in Epistemology,in F.Schmitt(Ed.),Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.55
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.142
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.142
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[2]Kitcher Philip,The Advancement of Science,New York:Oxford University Press,1993,p.314-322
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[4]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.143
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.146
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.145-146
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.146
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.147
[2]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.147-148
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.149
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.156
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.156-157
[1]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.159
[2]Alvin Goldman.Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.159
[3]Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002,p.160
[4]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.18-19
[5]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.213
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.208
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.209
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.210
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.216
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,The MIT Press,1992,p.220-222
[1]Quinton Anthony,Social Objects,Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society,76,1976,p.17
[2]Quinton Anthony,Social Objects,Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society,76,1976,p.78
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduction to Special Issues of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol.21,No.3,2007,p.211
[1]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.232
[2]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.233
[1]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.233
[2]Anglo Corlett,Analyzing Social Knowledge,Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.235
[3]Gilbert Margaret,On Social Facts,London,Routledge,1989,p.257-260
[4]Pettit Philip,Groups with Minds of Theirs Own,In Socializing Metaphysics,Frederick Schmitt(ed),Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield,2003,p.167
[1]Gilbert Margaret,On Social Facts,London,Routledge,1989,p.289
[2]Tuomela Raimo,The Importance of us,Stanford:Stanford University Press,1995,p.314-316
[3]Tollefsen Deboran,Organizations as True Believers,Journal of Social Philosophy33,(3),2002,p.395-410
[4]Gilbert Margaret,Sociality and Responsibility:New Essays in Plural Subject theory,Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,2000,p.37-39
[1]M Bratman,Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context,Mind,102(1),1992,p.6-12
[1]L Cohen,An Essay on Belief and Acceptance,Oxford University Press,1992,p.367-369
[2]P Engel,Believing,Holding Truth,Accepting,Philosophy Exploration,1998(1),p.143-147
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduntion to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.211
[4]Raul Hakli,On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.252
[1]M Gilbert,Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups,Protosociology,2002,16(1),p.56
[2]Raul Hakli,On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.254
[3]Kay Mathiesen,Introduntion to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers",Social Epistemology,vol21,no3,2007,p.212
[1]Meijers Anthonie,Why Accept Collective Belief? Reply to Gilbert,Protosociology 18-19,2003,p.379
[2]Don Fallis,Collective Epistemic Goals,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.274
[3]James William,The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1979,p.24
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,New York:Oxford University Press,1999,p.96
[2]Don Fallis,Collective Epistemic Goals,Social Epistemology,vol21,No3,2007,p.277
[1]殷杰,当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义,中国社会科学,2006第3期,第36页
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.10
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.10
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.12
[3]Peirce Charles,Collected Papers,Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss(eds),Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1931-35,p.407
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.17-18
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.19
[3]Nelson Goodman,Of Mind and Other Matters,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1984,p.36
[1]John Searle,The Construction of Social Reality,New York:Free Press,1995,p.166
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.22
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.28
[2]Ludwig Wittgenstein,On Centainty,trans GE.M.Anscombe and GH.von Wright,New York:Harper,1969,p.559
[3]Gordon Baker and Peter Haker,Wittgenstein,Rules,Grammar,and Necessity,Oxford:Blackwell,1985,p.22
[4]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.29
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.29
[2]Tomas Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,University of Chicago Press,1962,p.94
[3]Michel Foucault,Discipline and Punish,trans A.Sheridan,New York:Vintage Books,1979,p.305
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.34-37
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.37
[3]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.37-40
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p183-184
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.185
[2]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,P.116-117
[1]Ziman,J,Reliable Knowledge,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1978,p.6
[2]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.186
[3]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,p.118-120
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.188
[2]Alvin Goldman,Foundations of Social Epistemology,Synthese,73,1987,P.121-124
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,The MIT Press,1992,p.195-196.
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.89-90
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.92-93
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.93-94.
[1]维基百科全书,http://Zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.111-115
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.115
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.115-116
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.59-60.
[2]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993.p.60-61
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.74.
[2]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.87.
[3]Philips Kitcher,The Advancement of Science,Oxford University Press,1993,p.88
[1]Philips Kitcher,The Division of Cognitive Labor,The Journal of Philosophy,1990,p.7.
[1]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第43页
[2]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.113
[1]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.114
[2]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.114
[1]Philip Kitcher,Constrasting conceptions of Social Epistemology,in Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge,Frederick,Schmitt(ed),Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994,p.117
[2]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第43-44页
[1]黄翔,混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论,自然辩证法通讯,第1期,2008,第44页
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.3
[2]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.3
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.275
[2]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.53
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.76
[1]Eduard Craig,Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy,vol 6,London:Routledge.p.725
[1]F.Remedios.Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books.2003.p.64
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2),p.87
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books.2003.p.68
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]Ronald Giere.Essay Review:Interpreting The Philosophy of Science,Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science.1991(22).521
[1]Hull David,Science as a Process,University of Chicago Press,1988.p.31-32
[1]Steve Fuller,The Governance of Science,Buckingham U.K:Open University Press,2000,p.135-151
[2]Steve Fuller,The Governance of Science:Ideology and The Future of The Open Society,Buckingham U.K:Open University Press.2000,p.135-151
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29.
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.112
[2]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.112-113
[3]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.113
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.114-115
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.116
[2]R.Cohen,The Context of Explanation,Kluwer Academic Publishers,1993,p.1-4
[1]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.115
[2]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.117
[3]John Lyne,Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry,Argumentation 8,1994,P.117
[4]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002,p.29
[1]Schmitt F,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimension of Knowledge.Rowman&Littlefield,1994,p.20-26
[2]约瑟夫.劳斯,知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学,北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第106页
[1]约瑟夫.劳斯,知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学,北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第225页
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第68-71页
[2]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第68-71页
[3]David Bloor,Wittgenstein and Mannheim On The Sociology of Mathematics,Study In History and Philosophy of Science(4).1973.no.3,p.173-191
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第117-118页
[1]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第150页
[2]赵万里,科学的社会建构,天津人民出版社,2002,第152页
[1]拉卡托斯,证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑,上海译文出版社,1987,第163-166页
[2]拉卡托斯,证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑,上海译文出版社,1987,第163-166页
[1]详见巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2004,第22-48页
[1]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2000,第40页
[2]巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,科学知识:一种社会学的分析,南京大学出版社,2000,第42页
[1]拉里.劳丹,进步及其问题,华夏出版社,1999,第230页
[1]Andre Kukla,Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science,London:Routledge,2000,p.21
[2]Andre Kukla,Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science,London:Routledge,2000,p.28
[1]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology 2002 vol 16,No 3,p.185
[2]海伦.朗基诺于2008年在山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心做学术汇报期间,她在自我介绍中就将自己定位为社会认识论者和女性主义认识论者,同时她认为二者相当程度上是统一的。
[3]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology 2002 vol 16,No 3,p.186
[1]Elizabeth Anderson,Feminist Epistemology:An Interpretation and a Defense,Hypatia:A Journal of Feminist Philosophy,vol 10,issue3,1995,p.54
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/.2006
[2]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,No 3,p.186
[3]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,No 3,p.187
[1]Helen Longino,Feminist Epistemology,in J.Greco and E.Sosa(eds),A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology,Cambridge,Ma:Blackwell,1999,p.330
[2]Helen Longino,Feminist Epistemology,in J.Greco and E.Sosa(eds),A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology,Cambridge,Ma:Blackwell,1999,p.330
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[2]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Alcoff.L,and Potter.E,Feminist Epistemologies,New York:Routledge,1993,p.4
[2]Alcoff.L,and Potter.E,Feminist Epistemologies,New York:Routledge,1993,p.3-4
[1]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[2]Heidi Grasswick,Feminist Social Epistemology,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/,2006
[1]Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb,Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002 vol 16,No 3,p.194
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.11-12
[1]J..M.巴德,杰西.谢拉,社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003,第1期,第105页
[2]Michael Williams,Unnatural Doubts:Epistemology Realism and The Basic of Scepticism,Oxford University Press,1991,p.108-109
[3]Joseph Rouse,Engaging Science:How to Understand Its Practice Philosophically,Cornell University Press,1996,p.8
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.3
[1]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.76
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]F.Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexinton Books,2003,p.68
[1]Steve Fuller.Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era,The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2) p.87
[2]Ronald Giere.Essay Review:Interpreting The Philosophy of Science,Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science.1991(22) p.521
[1]蔡浩,社会认知偏见及其对策研究,新疆师范大学学报,2001年第2期,第90页
[2]Francis Remedios,Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge,Lexington Books,2003,p.64
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.230
[2]William Donohne,Richard Kitcher,Philosophy of Psychology,London Sage,1996,p.22-23
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.231
[2]卡尔·波普尔著,舒炜光译,客观知识——一个进化论的研究,上海译文出版社,1987年,第357页
[3]卡尔·波普尔著,李本正等译,走向知识的进化论,中国美术学院出版社,2001年,第66页
[1]朱新秤,社会认知心理学研究的新进展,心理学动态,2000年第2期,第75页
[1]Taylor S E.The Social Being in Social Psychology.D.Gilbert,S.Fiske,GLindzey(eds.).Handbook of social psychology.McGraw-Hill,1998,p.58-98
[2]Steve Fuller.Epistemology Radically Natured:Recovery the Normative the Experimental and the Social.R.N.Giere(ed.)Cognitive Models of Science,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1992,444
[3]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology and the Recovery of the Normative in the Post-Epistemic Era.The Journal of Mind and Behavior.1997(2),p.87
[1]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p234
[1]Alvin Goldman,Liaisons:Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences,MIT Press,1992,p.174
[2]Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford University Press,1999,p.232
[3]Thomas Gilovich,,How We Know What Isn't So,Free Press,1991,p.81
[1]Miriam Solomon,Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning,Philosophy of Science,1992(59),p.439-455
[1]Association of College and Research Libraries.Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction:A Model Statement for Academic Librarians[OL],[2004-1-22]http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm
[2]Edward Montgomery,The Foundations of Access to Knowledge,Syracuse University Press,1968,p.35
[1]J.巴德,杰西·谢拉.社会认识论和实践.国外社会科学,2003(1),p.105
[2]Jesse Shera,Sociological Foundations of Librarianship,New York,Asia Publishing House,1970,P.86
[3]J.巴德,杰西·谢拉.社会认识论和实践,国外社会科学,2003(1)p.107
[4]Edward Montgomery,The Foundations of Access to Knowledge,Syracuse University Press,1968,p.8
[1]Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Indiana University Press,2002.p.3
[2]A.Bullock & S.Trombley,Norton dictionary of modem thought,New York:Norton,1999,p.801-802
[1]Alvin Goldman.Foundation of Social Epistemics,Synthesis,vol.73,1987(1),p.114
[1]Jesse Shera,Libraries and the organization of Knowledge.Connecticut:Archon Books,1965.p.5
[2]Don Fallis,Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol 14,2000(4).p307
[3]Don Fallis,Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol 14,2000(4).p307-309
[1]D.V.Lindley,Making Decisions,London:Wiley,1971,p.134
[1]E.Lee.Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity.North Carolina:McFarland & Company,1998.p.24
[2]Alvin Goldman.Knowledge In a Social World.New York:Oxford University Press,1999.P.212
[3]E.Lee.Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity.North Carolina:McFarland & Company,1998.p.25
[4]Don Fallis.Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science.Social Epistemology,vol.14,2000(4),p.314
[1]Martin Heideggar,The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays,New York:Harper & Row,1977,p.4-7
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,No.4,1996,p.573
[1]Alvin Goldman,Social Epistemics and Social Psychology.Social Epistemology.1991(5) p.121
[1]David Resnik,Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,Vol:27,No.4,1996,p.575-576
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.48
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.27
[2]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.58
[4]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[5]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.57
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.81
[2]K.Brad Wray,Defending Longino' Social Epistemology,http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/TKno/TKnoWray.htm
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.58-59
[4]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66-67
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.67
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66-67
[2]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.69-70
[3]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.72
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.131
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.44
[1]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.41
[1]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.42-43
[2]详见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.43
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.46-47
[2]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.66
[1]灵长类进化模型祥见 Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.107
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.109
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.77
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p78
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p78
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p80
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.80-81
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.83
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.83-84
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.84
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.84
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.89
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91-92
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.92
[3]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.92
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.91
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.95-96
[1]Helen Longino,Science as Social Knowledge,Princeton University Press,1990,p.72
[2]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.131
[1]Helen Longino,The Fate of Knowledge,Princeton University Press,2002,p.129-131
[1]维基百科全书,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity_(philosophy)
[1]汉斯.伽达默尔,卡斯腾.杜特,金慧敏译,什么是实践哲学——伽达默尔访谈录,西北师大学报,2005年,第1期,第7页
[2]关于社会认识论的实践研究领域可详见Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1999,p221-400
[1]Frederick Schauer,Free Speech:A Philosophical Enquiry,New York:Cambridge University Press,1982,p.16
[1]Seyla Benhabib,Models of Public Space:Hannah Arendt,the Liberal Tradion,and Jǖrgen Habermas,in C.Calhoun(ed.),Habermas and the Public Sphere,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1992,p.89
[2]Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996,p.93.
1.Ted Benton,Iran Craib,Philosophy of Social Science,Palgrave,2001.
2.W.V.Quine,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays,New York:Columbia University Press,1969
3.A.Shimony,D.Nails,Naturalistic Epistemology,Boston:Reidel Publishing Company,1987
4.W.V.Quine,Theories and Things,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1981
5.Alvin Goldman,Knowledge in a Social World,New York:Clarendon Press,1999
6.Frederick Schmitt,Socializing Epistemology:The Social Dimensions of Knowledge,Lanham:Rowman&Littlefield Publishers,1994
7.Alvin Goldman,Pathways to Knowledge,New York:Oxford University Press,2002
8.Rom Harre,Varieties of Realism:a Rationale for the Natural Sciences,Oxford:Blackwell,1986
9.Alvin Goldman,Epistemology and Cognitive,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1986
10.Alvin Goldman,Liansons:philosophy meets the cognitive and social science,Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT Press,1992
11.K.Hahlueg,C.Hooker,Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology,New York Press,1989
12.Robert Almeder,Harmless Naturalism:the limits of science and the nature of philosophy,Carus Publishing Company,1998
13.W.Donohue,R.Kitchner,The Philosophy of Psychology,Sage Publications,1996
14.H.Kornblith,Naturalizing Epistemology,Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT Press,1985
15.Steve Fuller,Social Epistemology,Bloomington:Indiana University Press,2002
16.Gulbenkian Commission,Open the Social Science,Stanford University Press,1996
17.John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,Dover,1959
18.David Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,Oxford University Press, 1975
19. Thomas Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Power of Man, Macmillan and Co. Limited, 1941
20. Thomas Reid, An Inquiry into Human Mind, Timothy Duggan(eds), University of Chicago Press, 1970
21. Bruno Latour, Steve Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986
22. W. Newton-Smith, A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell Publishing, 2000
23. Jesse Shera, Sociological Foundations of Librarianship, New York: Asia Publishing House, 1970
24. A. Bullock , S. Trombley, Norton dictionary of modem thought, New York: Norton, 1999
25. Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations,, London: Harper and Row, 1963
26. Laudan. L, Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1977
27. Steve Fuller, Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, Boulder: Westview Press, 1989
28. Durkheinm. M, Rules of Sociological Method, New York: The Free Press, 1974
29. Durkheinm. M, On Morality and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973
30. David Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976
31. C. A. J. Coady, Testimony: A Philosophy study, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
32. Audi Robert, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 2001
33. Sosa Ernest, Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
34. B. K. Matilal, A. Chakrabarti, Knowing From Words, Kluwer, 1994
35. Jennifer Lackey, The Epistemology of Testimony, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006
36. B. McGuinness, The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994
37. R. E. Grandy, R. Warner, Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press, 1986
38. Hume. D, A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge(ed), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967
39. Audi. R, Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, London: Routledge, 1998
40. Kitcher Philip, The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993
41. William James, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1979
42. Gilbert Margaret, On Social Facts, London: Routledge, 1989
43. Frederick Schmitt , Socializing Metaphysics, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield, 2003
44. Tuomela Raimo, The Importance of Us, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995
45. Gilbert Margaret, Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject theory, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, 2000
46. L. Cohen, An Essay on Belief and Acceptance, Oxford University Press, 1992
47. James William, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979
48. Peirce Charles, Collected Papers, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss(eds), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1931-35
49. Nelson Goodman, Of Mind and Other Matters, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984
50. John Searle, The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press, 1995
51. Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Centainty, trans G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, New York: Harper, 1969
52. Gordon Baker, Peter Haker, Wittgenstein, Rules, Grammar, and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell, 1985
53. Tomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1962
54. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books, 1979
55. Ziman. J, Reliable Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978
56. F. Remedios, Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge, Lexington Books, 2003
57. Hull David, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, 1988
58. Steve Fuller, The Governance of Science: Ideology and The Future of The Open Society, Buckingham U. K: Open University Press, 2000
59. R. Cohen, The Context of Explanation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993
60. Andre Kukla, Social Construction and the Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge, 2000
61. J. Greco, E. Sosa, A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Cambridge Ma: Blackwell, 1999
62. Alcoff. L, Potter. E, Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge, 1993
63. Michael Williams, Unnatural Doubts: Epistemology Realism and The Basic of Scepticism, Oxford University Press, 1991
64. Joseph Rouse, Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practice Philosophically, Cornell University Press, 1996
65. William Donohne, Richard Kitcher, Philosophy of Psychology, London Sage, 1996
66. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey, Handbook of social psychology, McGraw-Hill, 1998
67. Thomas Gilovich, How We Know What Isn't So, Free Press, 1991
68. Edward Montgomery, The Foundations of Access to Knowledge, Syracuse University Press, 1968
69. A. Bullock, S. Trombley, Norton dictionary of modem thought, New York: Norton, 1999
70. Jesse Shera, Libraries and the organization of Knowledge, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1965
71. D. V. Lindley, Making Decisions, London: Wiley, 1971
72. E. Lee, Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 1998
73. Martin Heideggar, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Harper & Row, 1977
74. Helen Longino, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990
75. Helen Longino, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002
76. R. Nozick. Philosophical Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1981
1. E. Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?", Analysis 23, 1963
2. Kusch Martin, Testimony in Communication Epistemology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, part 23 A, 2002, 33 (2)
3. Alvin Goldman, Group Knowledge VS Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology, Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 2004, 1
4. S. Downes, Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science, Vol: 60
5. Michael Roess, The Social Dimension of Epistemology, Florida Philosophy Review, 2005, Vol: 5
6. David Resnik, Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol: 27
7. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications, Royal Institute of Philosophy, p. 2, http://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman/Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications.pdf
8. Tarcisio Zandonade, Social Epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller, Library Trends, 2004, vol 52, iss4
9. Simon Evnine, Epistemic Unities, Erkenninis, vol 59, 2003
10. Martin Kusch , HPS Research Methods Guide : Social pistemology, http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/research/se.html
11. Goldman, A. (1999). Social epistemology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanforcl.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology social
12. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemics and Social Psychology, Social Epistemology. 1991 (5)
13. Kay Mathiesen, Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers", Social Epistemology, vol. 21, No. 3, 2007
14. Alvin Goldman, Foundations of Social Epistemics, Synthese 73, 1987
15. Flicker Elizabeth, Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemilogy of Testimony, Mind 104, 1995
16. Audi Robert, The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophy Quarterly, 34, 1997
17. M. Kusch, Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 33, issue 2, 2002
18. Flicker. E, Trusting Others in the Science: A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, vol. 33, Issue2, 2002
19. Bergen Tailor, Content Preservation, Philosophical Review 102, 1993
20. Webb, Mark Owen, Why I Know About As Much As You: A Reply to Hardwig, Journal of Philosophy, 90
21. Jonathan Adler, Epistemology Problems of Testimony, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/
22. Graham. P. J, Transferring Knowledge, NOUS, 34, issue 1, 2000
23. Audi.R, The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophical Quarterly,34, 1997,
24. Lackey. J, Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission, The Philosophcial Quarterly, vol49, no197, 1999
25. Fred Dretske, Cognitive Cul-de-Sac, Mind, vol 91, No 361, 1982
26. John Hardwig, Epistemology Dependence, Journal of Philosophy, 82, 1985
27. Quinton Anthony,. Social Objects, Proceedings of the Aristolelian Society, 76, 1976
28. Anglo Corlett, Analyzing Social Knowledge, Social Epistemology, vol21, no3, 2007
29. Tollefsen Deboran, Organizations as True Believers, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, (3), 2002
30. M. Bratman, Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context, Mind, 102(1), 1992
31. P. Engel, Believing, Holding Truth, Accepting, Philosophy Exploration, 1998(1)
32. Raul Hakli, On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief, Social Epistemology, vol21, No3, 2007
33. M Gilbert, Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups, Protosociology, 2002, 16(1)
34. MeijersAnthonie, Why Accept Collective Belief? Reply to Gilbert, Protosociology 18-19, 2003
35. Don Fallis, Collective Epistemic Goals, Social Epistemology, vol21, No3, 2007
36. Alvin Goldman, Foundations of Social Epistemology, Synthese, 73, 1987
37. Philips Kitcher, The Division of Cognitive Labor, The Journal of Philosophy, 1990
38. Steve Fuller, Social Epistemology and The Recovery of The Normative In The Post-Epistemic Era, The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1997 (2)
39. Ronald Giere, Essay Review: Interpreting The Philosophy of Science, Studies In The History and Philosophy of Science, 1991 (22)
40. John Lyne, Social Epistemology as a Rhetoric Inquiry, Argumentation 8, 1994
41. David Bloor, Wittgenstein and Mannheim On The Sociology of Mathematics, Study In History and Philosophy of Science (4), 1973
42. Heidie Grasswick and Mark Webb, Feminist Epistemology as Social Epistemology, Social Epistemology, 2002, vol 16, No 3
43. Elizabeth Anderson, Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense, . Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, vol 10, issue3, 1995
44. Heidi Grasswick, Feminist Social Epistemology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/, 2006
45. Miriam Solomon, Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning, Philosophy of Science, 1992 (59)
46. Association of College and Research Libraries, Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction : A Model Statement for Academic Librarians [OL] , http//www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm, 2004
47. Don Fallis, Veritistic Social Epistemology and information Science, Social Epistemology, vol 14, 2000 (4)
48. M. Bradie, Evolutionary Epistemology as Naturalized Epistemology, In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, K. Hahlueg&, C. Hooker( eds), State University of New York Press, 1989,
49. Alvin Goldman, What Is Justified Belief, In Naturalizing Epistemology, H. Kornblith
(eds), MIT Press, 1985
50. Flicker. E, Against Fallibility,B. K;.Matilal, A.Chakrabarti(eds), Knowing From Words, Kluwer, 1994
51. Davidson. D, The Social Aspect of Language, in B.McGuinness and Olivieri(eds), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994
52. Davidson. D, A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs, in R. E. Grandy and R. Warner(eds), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press, 1986
53. Pettit Philip, Groups with Minds of Theirs Own, In Socializing Metaphysics,, Frederick Schmitt(ed), Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield, 2003
54. Helen Longino, Feminist Epistemology, in J. Greco and E.Sosa (eds). A Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Cambridge Ma: Blackwell, 1999
55. Taylor SE, The Social Being in Social Psychology, D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, McGraw-Hill, 1998
56. Alvin Goldman, Social Epistemology, Critica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, 1999, no. 93
57. Steve Fuller, Social Epistemology: A Philosophy for Sociology or a Sociology of Philosophy? Sociology, 2000, vol 34, no 3
58. Kusch. M, A General Theory of Societal Knowledge? Aspirations and Shortcomings of Alvin Goldman's Social Epistemology, Studies of History and Philosophy of Science, 2001, vol.32, No 1
59. Roess. M, The Social Dimension of Epistemology, Florida Philosophical Review, 2005, vol 5, issuel
60. Solomon. M, Norms of Epistemic Diversity, Episteme, 2006
61. Viale. R, Truth, Science, and Politics: an Analysis of Social Epistemology, Scipolicy: the Journal of Sciences and Health Policy, 2001, vol 2
62. Steve Fuller, On Regulating What Is Known: A Way To Social Epistemology, Synthese, 1987, vol 73
63. Ashmore. M, Social Epistemology and Reflexivity: Two Versions of How to be Really Useful, Argumentation, 1994, vol 8
64. Baigrie. B, Social Epistemology, Scientific Practice and the Elusive Social, Argumentation, 1994, vol 8
65. Steven Fuller, The Social Epistemologist in Search of a Position from Which to Argue,Argumentation,1994,vol 8
66.Anglo Corlett,Goldman and the Foundations of Social Epistemology,Argumentation,1994,vol 8
67.Remedios.F,Preview to Special Issue on Knowledge in a Social World,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
68.Pelletier.F.J,A Problem for Goldman on the Rationality,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
69.Maffie.J,Alternative epistemologies and the value of truth,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
70.Schmitt.F,Veritistic value,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
71.Rehg.M.,Goldman's veritistic rhetoric and the tasks of argumentation theory,Social Epistemology,,2000,vol 14,issue 4
72.Alvin Goldman,Replies to reviews of Knowledge in a Social World,Social Epistemology,2000,vol 14,issue 4
73.Grasswick.H,The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,issue 2
74.Smith.C,Social epistemology,contextualism and the division of labour,Social Epistemology,2002,vol 16,issue 1
75.May.T,Power,knowledge and organizational transformation:administration as depoliticization,Social Epistemology,2001,vol 15,issue 3
1.尼古拉斯.布宁,余纪元,《西方哲学英汉对照辞典》,北京:人民出版社,2001
2.陈嘉明,《知识与确证:当代认识论引论》,上海:上海人民出版社,2003
3.欧阳康,《当代英美哲学地图》,北京:人民出版社,2005年
4.罗伯特.威尔逊,《MIT认知科学百科全书》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年
5.理查德.罗蒂,《哲学和自然之镜》李幼蒸译,北京:商务印书馆,2003
6.奎因,《从逻辑的观点看》江天骥等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987
7.陈波,《奎因哲学研究》,北京:三联书店,1998
8.郑祥福,洪伟,《认识论的自然化之后》,上海:上海三联书店,2005
9.殷杰,《哲学对话的新平台—科学语用学的元理论研究》,太原:山西科学技术出版社,2003
10.冯俊,《后现代主义哲学演讲录》,北京:商务印书馆,2003
11.福柯,《词与物》,上海:三联书店,2001
12.福柯,《权力的眼睛——福柯访谈录》,上海:上海人民出版社,1997
13.彼得.温奇,《社会科学的观念及其与哲学的关系》张庆熊译,上海人民出版社,2004年
14.大卫.休谟,《人性论》(上),北京:商务印书馆,1997年
15.巴里.巴恩斯,大卫.布鲁尔,《科学知识:一种社会学的分析》,南京;南京大学出版社,2004年
16.殷杰,郭贵春,《哲学对话的新平台》,太原:山西科学技术出版社,2003
17.约瑟夫.劳斯,《知识与权力——走向科学的政治哲学》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004
18.赵万里,《科学的社会建构》,天津:天津人民出版社,2002
19.拉卡托斯,《证明与反驳——数学发现的逻辑》,上海:上海译文出版社,1987
20.巴里.巴恩斯、大卫.布鲁尔、约翰.亨利,《科学知识:一种社会学的分析》,南京:南京大学出版社,2004
21.拉里.劳丹,《进步及其问题》,北京:华夏出版社,1999
22.卡尔·波普尔,《客观知识——一个进化论的研究》舒炜光译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987年
23.卡尔·波普尔,《走向知识的进化论》李本正等译,杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2001年
24.汉斯·伽达默尔,《真理与方法》洪汉鼎译,上海:上海译文出版社,1999年
25.丛航青,《陈词证据研究》,北京:人民出版社,2005
1.W.V.Quine.《自然化的认识论》贾可春译,世界哲学,2004,第5期
2.郭贵春,《奎因的自然主义与科学实在论》,自然辩证法通讯,第十九卷,1997,第4期
3.李侠,《简评自然化认识论的替代命题的理论旨趣与存在的问题》,科学技术与辩证法,2006年,第1期
4.何静 丛航青,《自然主义认识论的不同形式》,自然辩证法通讯,2006年,第3期
5.J.巴德(美),《杰西·谢拉:社会认识论和实践》,国外社会科学,2003年,第1期
6.吴畏,《社会知识论还是社会认识论?》,《自然辩证法研究》,2004年,第11期
7.殷杰,《当代西方的社会科学哲学研究现状、趋势和意义》,中国社会科学,2006年,第3期,
8.刘军,《当代科学哲学中的自然主义流派论析》,自然辩证法通讯,1997年,第6期
9.林默彪,《认识论问题域的现代转向》,哲学研究,2005年,第8期
10.富勒,《社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践》(上),华中科技大学学报,2008年,第1期
11.富勒,《社会认识论:知识政策的理论与实践》(下),华中科技大学学报,2008年,第2期
12.黄翔,《混合型认识论中的个人主义方法论》,自然辩证法通讯,2008,第1期,
13.蔡浩,《社会认知偏见及其对策研究》,新疆师范大学学报,2001年,第2期
14.朱新秤,《社会认知心理学研究的新进展》,心理学动态,2000年,第2期
15.丛航青,《陈词与知识》,科学学研究,2005年,第1期
16.顾林正,《从个体知识论到社会知识论——当代认识论的另一个转向》,科学技术与辩证法,2007年,第6期
17.郑祥福,《当代西方“认识论的社会化”趋向评述》,国外社会科学,2006年,第4期
18.郑祥福,《当代西方科学哲学的“认知转向”》,福建论坛,2005年,第8期
19.潘斌,《当代西方社会认识论研究的拓展与深化》,华中科技大学学报,2008年,第1期
20.欧阳康,《当代哲学视野中的社会认识论》,天津社会科学,2001年,第5期
21.王娜,《海伦.朗基诺语境经验论思想评述》,自然辩证法研究,2007年,第9期
22.张建华,《近年来西方社会认识论研究概况》,哲学动态,2001年,第4期
23.吴畏,《科学理性的命运》,自然辨证法研究,2003年,第1期
24.丛航青,《科学社会研究的两种进路》,自然辩证法通讯,2004年,第2期
25.丁五启,《科学与技术研究和修辞学》,兰州学刊,2006年,第1期
26.田小飞,《科学哲学中的自然主义理论研究述评》,哲学动态,2007年,第2期
27.刘晓力,《科学知识社会学的集体认识论和社会认识论》,哲学研究,2004年,第11期
28.徐献军,丛航青,《论知识传递》,科学学研究,2005年,第3期
29.殷杰,《社会科学哲学的论域》,科学技术与辨证法,2006年,第3期
30.丛航青,《什么是科学的社会研究》,科学学研究,2003年,第3期
31.叶初升,《自然化认识论:在描述与规范之间》,哲学动态,1997年,第7期
32.殷杰,尤洋,《科学知识合法化的新解释》,自然辩证法研究,2006年,第4期
33.殷杰,尤洋,《社会认识论视野中的认知偏见》,自然辩证法通讯,2007年,第4期
34.殷杰,尤洋,《当代社会认识论研究及其意义》(上),科学技术与辩证法,2008年,第4期
35.殷杰,尤洋,《当代社会认识论研究及其意义》(下),科学技术与辩证法,2008年,第5期
36.殷杰,尤洋,《社会认识论视域中的信息与知识》,山西大学学报,2009年,第2期
37.郭桂春,《语境论的科学哲学纲领研究》,哲学动态,2008年,第5期
38.成素梅,郭贵春,《语境论的真理观》,哲学研究,2007年,第5期
39.郭贵春,《论语境》,哲学研究,1999年,第4期
40.郭贵春,《语境分析的方法论意义》,山西大学学报,2000年,第3期
41.成素梅,郭贵春,《论科学解释语境与语境方法》,自然辨证法通讯,2002年,第2期
42.郭贵春,《语境研究纲领与科学哲学的发展》,中国社会科学,2006年,第5期
43.郭贵春,《语境研究的意义》,科学技术与辨证法,2005年,第4期
44.殷杰,《语境主义世界观的特征》,哲学研究,2006年,第5期