基于人工智能方法的金审工程研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着信息技术的迅猛发展,全球性信息化迅速到来,经济领域高科技成果的层出不穷,给审计信息化进程带来一定的压力和动力。本项研究以人工智能理论与技术、审计理论技术为研究共同基础,采用了理论分析和实证检验相结合的研究方法,重点研究了基于人工智能方法的金审工程问题,较为完备的研究了智能化审计总体系统、智能化内部控制评价系统、内部控制评价中的定性仿真以及神经网络在审计智能中的应用。主要研究内容和创新成果如下:
     (1)首次把智能理论技术与审计理论技术进行了融合。计算机审计是在信息化环境下的一门新的审计学科,是一种崭新的审计方式。构建了计算机审计的基本理论框架,提出了计算机审计的一般模型,主要包括计算机环境下的审计对象、审计作业模式、审计基本方式、审计技术方法等。提出了智能化审计系统的总体结构,包括现场审计实施系统、联网审计实施系统、审计办公系统和信息资源库四个部分。分析了数据采集与转换,包括数据采集与分析的基本特征,数据采集智能化,并构建了审计数据采集与转换系统。
     (2)提出并设计了内部控制智能评价系统。从知识角度总结了国外、国内内部控制制度和体系。分析内部控制需要解决的问题,设计了内部控制智能评价系统,包括系统的整体结构、系统的知识库、数据库、推理机制等。将内部控制与定性仿真方法相结合,研究了QSIM算法,设计了基于定性推理的内部控制评价系统结构,以及系统处理流程和系统功能结构等概念模型。把内部控制的业务循环进行了简化与抽象,并对业务循环的各系统模块进行了分解,建立定性的成因推理模型。
     (3)研究了人工神经网络在审计智能中的应用,以神经网络为工具进行审计中问题线索的发现。分析了数据挖掘、神经网络与审计的关系,借鉴了国外神经网络在审计方面的应用,建立了神经网络方法在审计分析性复核过程应用模式。选定BP神经网络为工具,构建了人工神经网络与财务危机发现模型,进行了数据实验,表明了方法的有效性。建立了基于自组织特征映射的纳税情况审计模型,税种选择为增值税,进行模型实验,结果表明了模型的有效性。
With the rapid development of information technology, the global informationalization is imminent. High-tech achievements in the economic field are emerging one after another. It brings pressure and driving force to audit Information system. On the basis of artificial intelligence and audit, the thesis employs empirical study and academic analysis to study the Golden-Audit program, and designs the General System of Intelligence Audit, Intelligent Evaluating System of Internal Control, Qualitative Simulation in internal control. The major research work and achievements are as follows.
     The computing auditing and artificial intelligence methods are combined to deal with audit problems. Computing auditing is a new subject and audit technology in the information age. The framework for computing auditing is initially established, including auditee, audit operation model, audit basic fashion, audit new technology and so on in computing environment. It gives priorities to the transformation from computing auditing to intelligent audit system. The general structure of intelligent audit system is built, including conduct system on field work, on net, audit office system and information resource data. The investigation is made on the gathering and transformation of data, including intelligent gathering and transformation of data, and the system of the gathering and transformation of data is designed.
     The thesis proposes an artificial intelligent evaluation system for internal control. Firstly, the research gives a review of foreign and domestic internal control system. Secondly, we design a artificial intelligent evaluation system for internal control to analyze audit internal control problems. The analyses are focused on the design of system integral structure, knowledge base, database and reasoning mechanism which integrates internal control and qualitative simulation. By using the QSIM,the structure of intelligent evaluating system of internal control is designed based on the qualitative simulation. Meanwhile, the process and the functionalities of system are built with concept models. The transaction cycle of internal control is simplified and abstracted. The system module is decomposed and the qualitative reasoning modeled.
     The artificial neural network is applied to support auditing as an analytic tool to find the clue of problems. Firstly, we analyze the relationship between data mining, neural net and auditing. By referring to the applications of neural network, we find that the neural network is suitable for the analytical review process of audit. Secondly, we select BP as a tool to construct models of artificial neural network for identifying financial crises based on empirical data. We conduct an empirical study on the financial risk model of BP neural network and the rate paying audit model of SOM. The value-added tax is selected for experiments, which verifies the proposed model and its validity.
引文
[1]刘汝焯,计算机审计质量控制模型,北京:清华大学出版社,2005.6-9
    [2]刘汝焯,关于当前计算机审计发展的几个个问题,天津:计算机审计理论与实践研讨会论文集,2005:1-4
    [3]杨善林,智能决策方法与智能决策支持系统,北京:科学出版社,2005:30-45
    [4]廉师友,人工智能技术导论,西安:西安电子科技大学出版社. 2002,
    [5]李道亮、傅泽田、田东智能系统:基础、方法及其在农业中的应用清华大学出版社2004,8-12
    [6]张鹏翥,智能决策支技系统理论技术及应用.西安:陕西人民出版社,1998:144-159
    [7]耿骞,袁名敦,肖明,信息系统分析与设计,北京:高等教育出版社,2001:12-14
    [8]张海藩,软件工程导论,北京:清华大学出版社,1998.46-56
    [9]Shen Q Leitch R. Fuzzy Qualitative Simulation [J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(4): 1038-1061.
    [11]白方周,鲍忠贵,涂永忠等,可信度增强的模糊定性仿真[J].自动化学报, 1998, 24(1): 147-151.
    [11] Klir G J. The general system as a methodological tool [J]. General System Yearbook, 1965, 10: 29-42.
    [12] Klir G J. An approach to general systems theory [M]. New York Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1969.
    [13] Klir G J, Cavallo R E. A conceptual foundation for systems problem
    [14] Uyttenhove H J. Computer-aided systems modelling: Anassemblage of methodological tools for systems problem solving [D]. School of Advanced Technology, SUNY-Binghamton, 1978.
    [15] Uyttenhove H J. SAPS (Systems Approach Problem Solver): An introduction and guide [Z]. Computing and Systems Consultants, Binghamton, New York, 1981.
    [16] Uyttenhove H J. SAPS─A software system for inductive modeling [A]. In: Simulation and model-based methodologies: An integrative view [C]. Edited by Oren T I, Zeigle B P and Elzas M S. Springer-Verlag, Series F: Computer & Systems Science, 1984, 10: 427-449.
    [17] Klir G J. Architecture of system problem solving [M]. New York :Plenum Press, 1985.
    [18] Cellier F E. Qualitative simulation of technical systems using the general system problem solving framework [J]. Int J Gen Sys, 1987,13(4): 333-344.
    [19] Cellier F E, Yandell D W. SAPS- : A new implementation of the systems approach problem solver [J]. Int J Gen Syst, 1987,13(4): 307-322.
    [20] Vesantera P J, Cellier F E. Building intelligence into an autopilot --Usingqualitative simulation to support global decision making [J]. Simulation, 1989,52(3): 111-121.
    [21] Cellier F E. General system problem solving paradigm for qualitative modeling [A]. In: Advances in simulation, Vol : Qualitative simulation modeling and analysis [C], edited by Fishwick P A and Luker P A. NewYork : Springer-Verlag, 1991.
    [22] MQ&D. Qualitative Reasoning: A Survey of Techniques and Applications [J]. AICOM, 1995, 8(3-4): 119-192.
    [23] de Kleer J, Brown J S. A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluence [J]. Artifficial Intellegence . 1983, 59: 7-15.
    [24] Forbus K D. Qualitative Process Theory [J]. Artilficial Intellegence, 1984, 24:85-168.
    [25] Kuipers B J. Qualitative Simulation [J]. Artilf Intel, 1986, 29: 289-338.
    [26] Hungos K M, Csáki Zs, Varga E I. Use of Qualitative Models for the Choice of Design Parameters of MBPC [A]. Advances in Model-based Predictive Control (edited by Clarke D W) [C]. Oxford University Press, 1994, 344-351.
    [27] Foulloy L, Zavidovique B. Towards symbolic process control [J]. Automatica, 1994, 30(3): 379-390.
    [28] Gerzon M, Csáki Zs, Hungos K M. Qualitative model based verification of operating procedures by high level Petri nets [J] .Computers Chem Engng, 1994, 18(Suppl.): 565-569 .
    [29] Palmer C, Chung P W H. Eliminating ambiguities in qualitative causal feedback [J]. Computers Chem Engng, 1998, 22 (Suppl.): 843-846.
    [30] Kokar M M. An example of a consistent quantitative/qualitative representation of a dynamic system [A]. Proc IEEE Int Symp Intelligent Control [C]. Glasgow, UK, 1992, 323-328.
    [31] Wong Y K, Leitch R R, Wyatt G J, Wong H. Causual reasoning in systems modelling [J]. Int J of Syst Sci, 1998, 29(11): 1325-1337.
    [32] Lunze J. Qualitative modelling of linear systems with quantised state measurements [J]. Automatica, 1994, 30(3): 417-432.
    [33] Lunze J. Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems by Qualitative Feedback Controllers [J]. Int J Control. 1995, 62(1): 109-128.
    [34] Hungos K M, Csáki Zs, Jorgensen S Bay. Qualitative model-based intelligent control of a distillation column [J]. Engng Appl Artif Intell 1992, 5(5): 431-440.
    [35] Delchamps D F. Stabilizing a linear system with quantized state feedback [J]. IEEE Trans Auto Contr, 1990, 35(8): 916-924.
    [36] Lichtenberg G, Lunze J. Observation of qualitative states by means of a qualitative model [J]. Int J Control, 1997, 66(6): 885-903.
    [37] Urbancic T, Bratko I. Constructing control rules for a dynamic system: probabilistic qualitative models, lookahead and exaggeration [J]. Int J SystemsSci, 1993, 24(6): 1155-1164.
    [38] Gazi E, Seider W D, Ungar L H. Control of nonlinear processes using qualitative reasoning [J]. Computers Chem Engng, 1994, 18(Suppl.):189-193.
    [39] Nagib G, Gharieb W, Binder Z. Quality multi-model control using a[39] Nagib G, Gharieb W, Binder Z. Quality multi-model control using a learning approach [J]. Int J Systems Sci 1992, 23(6): 855-869.
    [40] Hurme M, Dohnal M, Jārvelāinen M. Qualitative decision support system for cold box operation [J]. Computers Chem Engng, 1994, 18(Suppl.): 541-545.
    [41] Raisch J. Qualitative control with quantitative models [A]. Conf Intelligent Syst Engng Hamburg [C], 1994, 229-234.
    [42] Leitch R, Freitag H, Struss P, Tornielle G. ARTIST: A Methodological Approach to Specifying Model Based Diagnostic Systems[Z]. Intellegent Automation Laboratory, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh & Advanced Reasoning Methods. Siemens AG, Munich, Germany & Artificial Intelligence Section, CISE Spa, Segrat, Milano, Italy (Milan Applications Conference, October, 1991).
    [43] Dague Ph, Raiman O, Deves Ph. Trouble-shooting: When Modeling is the Trouble [Z]. IBM Scientific Center, Paris, France & Electronique Serge Dassault, France, 1987.
    [44] Bratko I, Mozetic I, Lavrac N. KARDIO: A Study in Deep and Qualitative Knowledge for Expert Systems [M]. MIT Press, 1989.
    [45] Kuiper B J. Qualitative Reasoning -- Modeling & Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge [M]. MIT Press, 1994.
    [46] Daniels H A M, Feelders A J. Model-Based Diagnosis of Business Peformance [Z]. Tilburg University, Institute for Language Technology and AI, Netherlands, 1990.
    [47] Farley A, Lin K P. Qualitative Reasoning in Microeconomics: An Example [Z]. Computer Science Dept, University of Oregon, USA &Economics Department, Protland State University, Oregon, USA, 1991.
    [48] Bailey A, Kiang Y, Kuipers B, Whinston A. Analytical Procedures and Qualitative Reasoning in Auditing: Applications in Management Science [Z]. 1990.
    [49] Downing K. Model-Based Diagnosis of Qualitative Physiological Models [D]. DA, Linkoping University, Sweden, 1991.
    [50] James, William. The Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt, 1890. Jameson
    [51] Hebb, D. O. The Organization of Behavior: a Neuropsychological Theory. New York, 1949
    [52] Minsky M L, Papert S A.Percceptrons.[M] Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1969
    [53]高隽,人工神经网络原理及仿真实例,北京:机械工业出版社,2002:40-43
    [54]朱大奇,史慧,人工神经网络原理及应用,北京:科学出版社2006:144-149
    [55]刘汝焯,计算机审计概念、框架与规则,北京:清华大学出版社,2007.1-4
    [56]刘汝焯,计算机审计技术和方法,北京:清华大学出版社,2004.8-9
    [57]计算机审理论演讨会文集,天津:审计署京津冀特派员办事处,2004.180
    [58]刘汝焯,审计数据的多维分析技术,北京:清华大学出版社,2006.8-9
    [59]吴璇,基于信息系统的审计理论、模型及应用,天津大学硕士论文,2004. 16-18
    [60]董化礼,刘汝焯,计算机审计案例选北京:清华大学出版社,2003年,139-140
    [61]董化礼,刘汝焯,数据采集与转换技术设计,计算机审计数据采集与处理技术研究报告,北京:清华大学出版社,2006. 27-29
    [62]董化礼,刘汝焯,数据存储与处理技术设计,计算机审计数据采集与处理技术研究报告,北京:清华大学出版社,2006. 37-40
    [63]孙中和,审计应用示范软件技术设计,计算机审计数据采集与处理技术研究报告,北京:清华大学出版社,2006. 61-66
    [64] Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977
    [65]朱荣恩应唯,袁敏企业内部控制制度设计——理论与实践,上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005:60-67
    [66]美国注册会计师协会AICPA审计准则公告第78号( SAS No.78 ) 1995
    [67] Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Tread-way Commission,COSO,Internal Control――Integrated Framework,1994
    [68]美国审计总署(GAO),联邦政府内部控制准则,(Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government),1999
    [69]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,银行外汇头寸的监管,1980
    [70]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,银行表外风险管理,1986
    [71]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,巴塞尔协议,1998
    [72]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,衍生产品风险管理原则,1994
    [73]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,利率风险管理原则,2001
    [74]巴塞尔银行监管委员会,有效银行监管的核心原则,1997
    [75]Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Framework For Internal Control systems in Banking organization,FICSBO),1998
    [76]财政部,独立审计具体准则第9号——内部控制和审计风险,1996
    [77]财政部,内部会计控制规范——基本规范(试行)-―货币资金(试行)2001
    [78]财政部,内部会计控制规范――销售与收款(试行)-―采购与付款(试行)2002.
    [79]财政部,内部会计控制规范-―工程项目(试行),2003.
    [80]中国人民银行,加强金融机构内部控制的指导原则,1997.
    [81]中国人民银行,商业银行内部控制指引,2000.
    [82]中国人民银行,关于上市公司做好各项资产减值准备等有关事项的通知,2003.
    [83]中国证券监督管理委员会,关于加强期货经纪公司内部控制的指导原则,1999.
    [84]证监会,公开发行证券公司信息披露编报规则第l号、第3号、第5号,2000.
    [85]中国证券监督管理委员会,公证券公司内部控制指引,2001.
    [86]保监会,保险公司内部控制制度建设指导原则,1999.
    [87]中国注册会计师协会,内部控制审核指导意见,1999.
    [88]李凤鸣,内部控制学,北京北京大学出版社,2002.212-214
    [89]朱荣恩,内部控制评价,北京:中国时代经济出版社,2002.43-46
    [90]虞文钧,企业内部控制制度的构建,上海:上海财经大学出版社.2003 65-89
    [91]朱荣恩,徐建新,现代企业内部控制制度,北京:中国审计出版社,1996
    [92]内部控制测评技术与方法课题组(刘家义等),内部控制测评的技术与方法,北京:中国时代经济出版社.2001.212-213
    [93]何红,上市公司舞弊性财务报告产生的因素分析,复旦大学博士学位论文, 2002.
    [94]张安明,从美国财务危机看COSO报告,会计研究,2000,(8):23-25
    [95]财政部注册会计师考试委员会办公室,审计,北京:经济科学出版社,2002
    [96]萨班斯一奥克斯利法案
    [97]胡春元,风险基础审计,辽宁:东北财经大学出版社,2001. 78-87
    [98]朱国泓,财务报告舞弊的二元治理,复旦大学博士学位论文,2001.55-57
    [99]朱荣恩,建立和完善内部控制的思考,会计研究,2001(1) 36-37
    [100]张文焕,刘光霞,苏连义.控制论,信息论·系统论与现代管理,北京:北京出版杜,2002.32-35
    [101]姜丽红,智能化预测支持系统(IFSS)的理论及方法的研究,天津大学博士论文,1996. 34-35
    [102]吴联生,会计信息失真的“三分法”:理论框架与证据,会计研究,2003,(1):13-16
    [103]杨有红,企业内部控制框架构建与运行,浙江:浙江人民出版社,2001 22-24
    [104]刘英雁,财务报表审计中关注舞弊的研究,上海财经大学博士学位论文,2003. 42-44
    [105]蒋义宏,会计信息失真的现状、成因与对策研究一一上市公司利润操纵实证研究,北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002
    [106] Kuipers B. J.Qualitative Simulation, Artificial Intelligence, 1986, 29p 289-338.
    [107]方瑾,白方周,邵晨曦.定性建模、仿真和控制.系统仿真学报[J].2000.11,Vol.12,No.6:584-589.
    [108]钱学森,再谈开放的复杂巨系统,模式识别与人工智能1991,4(1)1-4
    [109]钱学森,于景元,戴汝为.一个科学新领域.开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论,自然杂志,1990,13(1):3-10
    [110]黄梯云,梁昌勇,杨善林.集成定性推理的DSS结构模型研究,管理科学学报,2000,3卷4期,84-88
    [111]Yoonon Integrating artificial neural networks with rule-base expert system. Decision Support Systems,1994,11:497-507.
    [112]高洪深.决策支持系统理论·方法·案例[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1996. 45-48
    [113]顾晓安基于业务循环的审计风险评估专家系统研究,会计研究,2006年, 4期,23-29
    [114]龚晓光,黎志成,胡斌.员工行为激励定性模拟方法与原理系统研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版) , 2004, 26 (2) : 195-200.
    [115]黎志成,胡斌,傅晓华,等.管理系统定性模拟的理论与应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005.87-99
    [116] Bailey, A. D., Jr., Y. l-l. Kiang , B. J. Kuipers & A. B. Whinston,“Analytical Procedures and Qualitative Reasoning in Auditing”Application in Management Science, JAI Press,forthcoming.
    [117] Bell, M. Z.,“Why Expert Systems Fail”Journal of the Operational Research Society, (36)1985, pp.61 3-619.
    [118] Yihwa kiang Tsing-Hwa Chi, Long term and short term strategic planning in business environment a qualitative Reasoning approach Department of Management Science and Information Systems Graduate School Of Business University of Texas at Austin,1-19
    [119]陈颖,税务稽查选案技术方法研究天津:天津大学硕士论文.
    [120]]Eija Koskivaara, Artificial Neural Networks for Analytical Review in Auditing, Publication of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, 2004,39-45
    [121]Coakley JR, Brown CE Neural Networks Applied to Ratio Analysis in the Analytical Review Procedures Expert Systems with Applications 1991a.9(4) 513-528
    [122] Coakley JR, Brown CE Artificial Neural Networks Applied to Ratio Analysis in the Analytical Review Process Intelligent Systems in Accounting. Finance and Management 2 19-39.
    [123]Coakley JR, Using Pattern Analysis Methods to Supplement Attention-Directing Analytical Procedures. Expert with Applications 1995,9(4):513-528
    [124]Coakley JR, Brown CE 1991b Neural Networks for Financial Ratio Analysis In J Liebowitz(ED) The world Congress on Expert Systems,Vol,1:132-139. Pergamon press Orlando, Florida
    [125]Wu RC-F 1994 Integrating Neurocomputing and Auditing Expertise Managerial Auditing Journal 9(3), 20-26
    [126]Busta B, Weinberg R 1998. Using Benford’s law and neural networks as a review procedure Managerial Auditing Journal 13(6),356-366
    [127]Green BP, Choi JH 1997, Assessing the Risk of Management Fraud Trough Neural Network Technology. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theoy:14-28
    [128]Fanning KM, Cogger KO. 1998. Neural Network Detection of Management Fraud Using Published Financial Data. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management 7(1):21-41
    [129]Hansen JV, McDonald JB, Stice JD. 1992. Artificial Intelligence and Generalized Qualitative-Response Models: An Empirical Test on Two Audit Decision-Making Domains. Decision Science 23(3):708-723
    [130] Fanning KM, Cogger KO. 1994. A comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks Using Financial Distress Prediction. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 3:241-252
    [131] Lenard MJ, Alam P, Madey GT. 1995. The Application of Neural Networks and a Qualitative Response Model to the Auditor's Gong Concern Uncertainty Decision. Decision Science 26(2):209-227
    [132] Anadarajan M, Anadarajan A. 1999. A comparison of machine learning techniques with a qualitative response model for auditor's going concern reporting. Expert Systems with Applications 16:385-392
    [133]Koh HC, Tan SS. 1999. A neural network approach to the prediction of going concern status. Accounting and Business Research 29(3):211-216
    [134]Davis JT, Massey AP, Lovell RERI. 1997. Supporting a complex audit judgement task: An expert network approach. European Journal of Operational Research 103(2):350-372
    [135]Ramamoorti S, Bailey ADJ, Traver RO. 1999. Risk Assessment in Internal Auditing: A neural Network Approach. International Jouranal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 8(3)159-180
    [136]杨保安,朱明,基于人工智能的银行信贷风险管理决策研究,2004,33-39
    [137]刘德红,胡文萍,石晶,企业财务分析技术,北京:中国经济出版社. 2003:34-55
    [138]王树岭,武震,税务稽查计算机选案指标体系的分析与设计,中央财经大学学报,1997,7:57-59
    [139]陈颖吴璇,税务稽查选案存在的问题及指标体系选择,税务研究,2005(8)48-50
    [140]Forbus K D.Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence,1984,24:86-168

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700