伽达默尔诗思研究
摘要
“诗”在伽达默尔那里是一个有很大跨度的概念,它既是一种具体到诗人和诗篇的文学体裁,又是艺术性的最高代表,也是一种理想的、原初的生存状态。诗思很早便出现在伽达默尔的学术思想之中,几乎涉及到哲学诠释学所有重要的理论问题,比如“艺术真理存在方式”、“效果历史意识”、“视域融合”、“审美无区分”、“偏见”的合法性、理解的“语言性”等关键理论。对于诗思的分析能帮助我们从新的角度重新看待这些问题,从总体上达到各理论间的融汇贯通。伽达默尔在《真理与方法》中所做的全部努力就是建立一个以艺术、历史和语言为坐标的新真理观,在伽达默尔随后多年的补充和完善过程中,“诗”逐渐凸显成为集艺术、历史和语言之大成的理念。在伽达默尔看来,诗成为了人文科学对抗自然科学最后的希望,人惟有在诗的世界逗留,才能若即若离地接近存在本真,切实体验到“归家”的感觉,所以其思想越近晚年越表现出一种强烈的诗化倾向。在这种情况之下,伽达默尔的诗思确实成为把握伽达默尔思想精髓和发展方向的关键所在。本论文的基本观点是,“哲学诠释学”并不能涵盖伽达默尔思想的全部,伽达默尔的学术思想是一种囊括了哲学诠释学思想在内的“诗性的存在之思”,即“诗思”。跟随“诗”这一条贯穿伽达默尔思想发展始终的重要线索,本论文从不同以往的新视角对伽达默尔思想的源起、建构、实践以及在当代的意义进行了重新解读。
The theme of the dissertation is the“poetic thinking”of Gadamer. The standpoint of the dissertation is:“poesy”is the main line throughout the lifelong thinking of Gadamer, and it is an integrated core harmonizing Gadamer’s concepts of arts, language and history; the“poetic thinking”is a“poetic thinking of Being”, which is the supreme summary of the whole academic thinking of Gadamer, and Gadamer’s“poetic thinking”is not only of poetry as literature, but also of the art and language theories based on poetic language, and rather of a primitive realm combining inner spiritual conditions with outer living patterns. The dissertation is composed of the parts of the preface, the body and the epilogue. The body is formed of four chapters, namely, Chapter 1“Source Tracing of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking”, Chapter 2“‘Body’of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Theoretical Analyses of the Poetic Thinking”, Chapter 3“‘Function’of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Poetic Thinking in Poetry Criticisms”, and Chapter 4“Enlightenments of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking”. They provide multi-dimension and all-round analyses for Gadamer’s poetic thinking from angles of conceptual sources, theoretical structures, critical practices and enlightenments.
Preface
The life experience of Gadamer is the starting point of the preface, leading to a finding of the personal, temporal and circumstantial factors including the impacts of wars and technology, the encounter with Heidegger, the study of classical philology, and the literature and art accomplishments. These factors are closely related to the emergence and development of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. On this basis, the dissertation briefly describes the fundamental natures and characteristics of Gadamer’s“poetic thinking”, and puts forward that poetic thinking is a kind of“poetic thought based on Being”, which is an overall generalization of quintessence of Gadamer’s lifelong academic thinking. For Gadamer,“poesy”has four-layer meanings: poetry in narrow sense, arts, language ontology, and the real and essential realm of Being.“Poesy”is not only the dimension of arts in the theoretical frame of Philosophical Hermeneutics, nor just a practical domain of hermeneutical principles; the realm of poesy extends from arts through human spirit to the whole universe. It is an alive organic integrity where human beings ever lived, and it is the supreme living realm in dual theoretical and practical senses pursued by Gadamer. Accordingly, Gadamer’s poetic thinking manifests a structural feature of“Body-Function”dual dimensions. The“body”dimension is composed of art theory, language theory and existential theory, and the“function”dimension is contained in Gadamer’s concrete poetry criticisms. The two dimensions are unified as one, and echo each other, producing a solid poetic thinking system. Then the study background of the dissertation is analyzed, and it is pointed out that current Gadamer researches mainly focus on Philosophical Hermeneutics. Although some researchers noticed Gadamer’s poetic thinking recently, relevant studies lag behind with no treatise books on the topic yet. Given the study vacancy, the dissertation obeys the principle of text-orientation, getting close to the original texts. The line of thought is: taking poetic thinking as the thread, concentrating on the main points, drawing up overall features of the issue, to find out the relations between different layers of Gadamer’s academic thought and its general developing orientation through the analyses of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. In the clarification of the natures and characteristics of the poetic thinking, the dissertation provides a genuine integrated reflection and reconsideration of Gadamer’s aesthetic and philosophical thinking.
Chapter 1 Source Tracing of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics
This chapter traces the sources and background of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Firstly, the dissertation goes backward into the ancient Greek thinking, and finds out the influences of mythological consciousness, Plato’s idea of the beauty, and ancient Greek metaphysical language existential thought, and thus shows the deep theoretical relations between Gadamer’s poetic thinking and ancient Greek thinking. Secondly, the dissertation analyzes the German romantic remains in Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Arts as the basic thinking position, blending poesy with life, trying to go back to Greek poetic world in worry of human’s alienation—all these typical characteristics of German romantic tradition are contained in Gadamer’s poetic thinking, deep into his soul. Next, the dissertation studies the great impacts of Husserl and Heidegger upon Gadamer’s poetic thinking, and proposes that the ontology of Gadamer’s poetic thinking is set up on the base of Heidegger’s linguistic existentialism, while the methodology and epistemology mainly come from Husserl’s phenomenology. So the tutors exactly laid the foundation for Gadamer’s poetic thinking system. Finally, the dissertation places Gadamer’s poetic thinking in the flow of the poesy-thinking relation in the western history, and considers that Gadamer’s poetic thinking highlights the tendency that through arts and poetry the western thought has been transcending the metaphysical opposition between subjectivity and objectivity in face of modern crisis since the end of the 19th’century.
Chapter 2“Body”of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Theoretical Analyses of the Poetic Thinking
This chapter concretely analyzes the theoretical structure of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Gadamer’s poetic thinking is woven with three aspects, say, art theory, language theory, and existential theory. In the aspect of art theory, Gadamer reveals the existential truth in art experiences from angles of theory of art truth and theory of art understanding, that is, from angles of art ontology and epistemology. Gadamer thinks that art work is an independent Being with ontological meanings, which displays itself to the spectators. And the work, spectators and circumstances together compose an independent, complete and open world, where the art work eventually expresses the truth of Being through constant expressions of itself. Toward such an art work, Gadamer’s understanding theory is totally different from the western traditional“object-oriented”examination, but actually an“experiencing”participation in the sense of Being. In the aspect of language theory, poetic language is established by Gadamer the base of his academic thinking as the“primitive language”. The poetic language has the purest characteristic of self-expression, and in self-expression it directs an open realm of Being. In this sense, poetic language is closest to the clarifying of truth, and it becomes the utmost core of Gadamer’s poetic thinking as the coagulation of“language”,“art”and“Being”. In the aspect of existentialism, the root of Gadamer’s poetic thinking is explicit: from art to language,“Being”is the starting and ending point of Gadamer’s thinking. In his later years, Gadamer considered Being with poesy as the main idea, and so his thinking of Being gradually matured.“Poesy”surpasses the general meaning of literary poems; besides the“poetic flavor”in the aesthetic sense,“poesy”has the meaning of“natural and original Being”in a higher level, which is the free status and supreme realm of Being. In all, by theoretical construction on the three layers of art, language and Being, Gadamer tries to reunite the long divided subjective and objective Beings, to integrate tradition and reality, and so to return into a Being-rooted poetic thinking with object-subject fusion and ancient-modern breakthrough.
Chapter 3“Function”of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Poetic Thinking in Poetry Criticisms
This chapter analyzes the“function”dimension of Gadamer’s poetic criticisms. Gadamer’s criticisms have distinct pertinence, with the focus on the German domestic poets and poems, especially Goethe, H?lderlin and German neo-Romantic poets Rilke, Georg, Celan and their poems. From his poetic critical practices, it can be seen that Gadamer is rooted in the relationship between poetry and Being, and so those poems expressing significant theme of Being through musical words always drew Gadamer’s extra attention. Generally, there are two main features of Gadamer’s poetic criticisms: the focus of criticisms is on the poetic language itself; Being is the eternal theme in Gadamer’s poetic criticisms. In other words, Gadamer’s poetic criticisms still manifest obvious philosophical purport, and his poetic criticisms are essentially the dialogue between a philosopher and poems. However, from the extra attention to the theme of Being in poetry, to the sensitivity to the expression of truth through poetic words, Gadamer’s poetic criticisms closely coordinate with his poetic theories in all respects. Gadamer’s critical practice and poetic theory correspond with each other soundly: criticism gains sufficient theoretical supports, and poetic theory is well examined and flexibly applied in criticism, and thus the two aspects are combined into a lively, complete while open system of poetic thinking.
Chapter 4 Enlightenments of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking
This chapter explains the enlightenments of Gadamer’s poetic thinking from the angles of reality, aesthetics and the communicability with Chinese“Xiang Thinking”. Gadamer reveals that poesy and thinking have the same origin and so they are an union in nature, and meanwhile he finds that this original united status is just that of the open-up and clarifying of Being. Therefore, Gadamer is on a way of return, instead of a way of innovation. His poetic thinking continues to carve out a way of poetic philosophy with“poesy and thinking fusion”since Nietzsche, Dilthey, and Heidegger. Gadamer shows a rarely seen manner of balancing. it can be said that, Gadamer’s poetic thinking significantly enlightens future studies of the origin and movement of western thinking, and that of the changes of the relationship between Chinese and western thinking.
Epilogue
At last, the dissertation summarizes the essential temperament and characteristics as well as the theoretical and practical meanings of Gadamer’s poetic thinking, and looks forward to the prospects of this issue.
The theme of the dissertation is the“poetic thinking”of Gadamer. The standpoint of the dissertation is:“poesy”is the main line throughout the lifelong thinking of Gadamer, and it is an integrated core harmonizing Gadamer’s concepts of arts, language and history; the“poetic thinking”is a“poetic thinking of Being”, which is the supreme summary of the whole academic thinking of Gadamer, and Gadamer’s“poetic thinking”is not only of poetry as literature, but also of the art and language theories based on poetic language, and rather of a primitive realm combining inner spiritual conditions with outer living patterns. The dissertation is composed of the parts of the preface, the body and the epilogue. The body is formed of four chapters, namely, Chapter 1“Source Tracing of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking”, Chapter 2“‘Body’of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Theoretical Analyses of the Poetic Thinking”, Chapter 3“‘Function’of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Poetic Thinking in Poetry Criticisms”, and Chapter 4“Enlightenments of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking”. They provide multi-dimension and all-round analyses for Gadamer’s poetic thinking from angles of conceptual sources, theoretical structures, critical practices and enlightenments.
Preface
The life experience of Gadamer is the starting point of the preface, leading to a finding of the personal, temporal and circumstantial factors including the impacts of wars and technology, the encounter with Heidegger, the study of classical philology, and the literature and art accomplishments. These factors are closely related to the emergence and development of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. On this basis, the dissertation briefly describes the fundamental natures and characteristics of Gadamer’s“poetic thinking”, and puts forward that poetic thinking is a kind of“poetic thought based on Being”, which is an overall generalization of quintessence of Gadamer’s lifelong academic thinking. For Gadamer,“poesy”has four-layer meanings: poetry in narrow sense, arts, language ontology, and the real and essential realm of Being.“Poesy”is not only the dimension of arts in the theoretical frame of Philosophical Hermeneutics, nor just a practical domain of hermeneutical principles; the realm of poesy extends from arts through human spirit to the whole universe. It is an alive organic integrity where human beings ever lived, and it is the supreme living realm in dual theoretical and practical senses pursued by Gadamer. Accordingly, Gadamer’s poetic thinking manifests a structural feature of“Body-Function”dual dimensions. The“body”dimension is composed of art theory, language theory and existential theory, and the“function”dimension is contained in Gadamer’s concrete poetry criticisms. The two dimensions are unified as one, and echo each other, producing a solid poetic thinking system. Then the study background of the dissertation is analyzed, and it is pointed out that current Gadamer researches mainly focus on Philosophical Hermeneutics. Although some researchers noticed Gadamer’s poetic thinking recently, relevant studies lag behind with no treatise books on the topic yet. Given the study vacancy, the dissertation obeys the principle of text-orientation, getting close to the original texts. The line of thought is: taking poetic thinking as the thread, concentrating on the main points, drawing up overall features of the issue, to find out the relations between different layers of Gadamer’s academic thought and its general developing orientation through the analyses of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. In the clarification of the natures and characteristics of the poetic thinking, the dissertation provides a genuine integrated reflection and reconsideration of Gadamer’s aesthetic and philosophical thinking.
Chapter 1 Source Tracing of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics
This chapter traces the sources and background of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Firstly, the dissertation goes backward into the ancient Greek thinking, and finds out the influences of mythological consciousness, Plato’s idea of the beauty, and ancient Greek metaphysical language existential thought, and thus shows the deep theoretical relations between Gadamer’s poetic thinking and ancient Greek thinking. Secondly, the dissertation analyzes the German romantic remains in Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Arts as the basic thinking position, blending poesy with life, trying to go back to Greek poetic world in worry of human’s alienation—all these typical characteristics of German romantic tradition are contained in Gadamer’s poetic thinking, deep into his soul. Next, the dissertation studies the great impacts of Husserl and Heidegger upon Gadamer’s poetic thinking, and proposes that the ontology of Gadamer’s poetic thinking is set up on the base of Heidegger’s linguistic existentialism, while the methodology and epistemology mainly come from Husserl’s phenomenology. So the tutors exactly laid the foundation for Gadamer’s poetic thinking system. Finally, the dissertation places Gadamer’s poetic thinking in the flow of the poesy-thinking relation in the western history, and considers that Gadamer’s poetic thinking highlights the tendency that through arts and poetry the western thought has been transcending the metaphysical opposition between subjectivity and objectivity in face of modern crisis since the end of the 19th’century.
Chapter 2“Body”of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Theoretical Analyses of the Poetic Thinking
This chapter concretely analyzes the theoretical structure of Gadamer’s poetic thinking. Gadamer’s poetic thinking is woven with three aspects, say, art theory, language theory, and existential theory. In the aspect of art theory, Gadamer reveals the existential truth in art experiences from angles of theory of art truth and theory of art understanding, that is, from angles of art ontology and epistemology. Gadamer thinks that art work is an independent Being with ontological meanings, which displays itself to the spectators. And the work, spectators and circumstances together compose an independent, complete and open world, where the art work eventually expresses the truth of Being through constant expressions of itself. Toward such an art work, Gadamer’s understanding theory is totally different from the western traditional“object-oriented”examination, but actually an“experiencing”participation in the sense of Being. In the aspect of language theory, poetic language is established by Gadamer the base of his academic thinking as the“primitive language”. The poetic language has the purest characteristic of self-expression, and in self-expression it directs an open realm of Being. In this sense, poetic language is closest to the clarifying of truth, and it becomes the utmost core of Gadamer’s poetic thinking as the coagulation of“language”,“art”and“Being”. In the aspect of existentialism, the root of Gadamer’s poetic thinking is explicit: from art to language,“Being”is the starting and ending point of Gadamer’s thinking. In his later years, Gadamer considered Being with poesy as the main idea, and so his thinking of Being gradually matured.“Poesy”surpasses the general meaning of literary poems; besides the“poetic flavor”in the aesthetic sense,“poesy”has the meaning of“natural and original Being”in a higher level, which is the free status and supreme realm of Being. In all, by theoretical construction on the three layers of art, language and Being, Gadamer tries to reunite the long divided subjective and objective Beings, to integrate tradition and reality, and so to return into a Being-rooted poetic thinking with object-subject fusion and ancient-modern breakthrough.
Chapter 3“Function”of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking—Poetic Thinking in Poetry Criticisms
This chapter analyzes the“function”dimension of Gadamer’s poetic criticisms. Gadamer’s criticisms have distinct pertinence, with the focus on the German domestic poets and poems, especially Goethe, H?lderlin and German neo-Romantic poets Rilke, Georg, Celan and their poems. From his poetic critical practices, it can be seen that Gadamer is rooted in the relationship between poetry and Being, and so those poems expressing significant theme of Being through musical words always drew Gadamer’s extra attention. Generally, there are two main features of Gadamer’s poetic criticisms: the focus of criticisms is on the poetic language itself; Being is the eternal theme in Gadamer’s poetic criticisms. In other words, Gadamer’s poetic criticisms still manifest obvious philosophical purport, and his poetic criticisms are essentially the dialogue between a philosopher and poems. However, from the extra attention to the theme of Being in poetry, to the sensitivity to the expression of truth through poetic words, Gadamer’s poetic criticisms closely coordinate with his poetic theories in all respects. Gadamer’s critical practice and poetic theory correspond with each other soundly: criticism gains sufficient theoretical supports, and poetic theory is well examined and flexibly applied in criticism, and thus the two aspects are combined into a lively, complete while open system of poetic thinking.
Chapter 4 Enlightenments of Gadamer’s Poetic Thinking
This chapter explains the enlightenments of Gadamer’s poetic thinking from the angles of reality, aesthetics and the communicability with Chinese“Xiang Thinking”. Gadamer reveals that poesy and thinking have the same origin and so they are an union in nature, and meanwhile he finds that this original united status is just that of the open-up and clarifying of Being. Therefore, Gadamer is on a way of return, instead of a way of innovation. His poetic thinking continues to carve out a way of poetic philosophy with“poesy and thinking fusion”since Nietzsche, Dilthey, and Heidegger. Gadamer shows a rarely seen manner of balancing. it can be said that, Gadamer’s poetic thinking significantly enlightens future studies of the origin and movement of western thinking, and that of the changes of the relationship between Chinese and western thinking.
Epilogue
At last, the dissertation summarizes the essential temperament and characteristics as well as the theoretical and practical meanings of Gadamer’s poetic thinking, and looks forward to the prospects of this issue.
引文
[1] Celan, Paul. Selected Poems and Prose of Paul Celan[M]. Translated and introduced by John Felstiner. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.
[2] Dostal, Robert J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[3] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato[M]. Translated and edited by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.
[4] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflection and Commentary[M]. Translated by Richard E. Palmer. New York: Yale University Press, 2001.
[5] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays[M].Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
[6] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics[M]. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
[7] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies[M]. Translated by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.
[8] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Heidegger’s Ways[M]. Translated by John W. Stanley. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
[9] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
[10] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory[M]. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
[11] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Apprenticeships[M]. Translated by Robert R. Sullivan. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.
[12] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Edited and translated by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
[13] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays[M]. Translated by David E. Linge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
[14] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Reason in the Age of Science[M]. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.
[15] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings[M]. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007.
[16] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy[M]. Translated by Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
[17] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays[M]. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[18] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004.
[19] Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Derrida, J., and etc. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter[M]. Edited and translated by Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.
[20] Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
[21] Grondin, Jean. Sources of Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
[22] Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer[M]. Translated by Kathryn Plan. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003.
[23] Heidegger, Martin. On the Way to Language[M]. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982.
[24] Heidegger, Martin. On Time and Being[M]. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1972.
[25] Hoy, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1978.
[26] Malpas, Jeff; Arnswald, Ulrich; & Kertscher, Jens(eds.). Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer[C]. Cambridge: the MIT press, 2002.
[27] Palmer, Richard. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Tory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer[M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
[28] Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
[29] Valéry, Paul. The Art of Poetry[M]. Translated by Denise Folliot. New York: Vintage Books, 1961.
[30] Weinsheimer, J. C. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of“Truth and Method”[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
[31] Weinsheimer, J. C. Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.二.期刊论文
[1] Devereaux, Mary. Can Art Save Us? A Meditation on Gadamer[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 1991, 15 (1): 59-73.
[2] Fortin, E. L. Gadamer on Strauss: An Interview[J]. Interpretation, 1984, 12 (1): 1-13.
[3] Lawn, Christopher. Gadamer on Poetic and Everyday Language[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 2001, 25 (1): 113-126.
[4] Pizer, John. Aesthetic Consciousness and Aesthetic Non-Differentiation: Gadamer, Schiller, and Lukács[J]. Philosophy Today, 1989, 33 (1): 63-72.
[5] Pizer, John. Gadamer’s Reading of Goethe[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 1991, 15 (2): 268-277.
[6] Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1994, 38 (4): 369-379.
[7] Schuchman, Paul. Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1979, 23 (1): 41-50.
[8] Shapiro, Gary. Gadamer, Habermas and the Death of Art[J]. British Journal of Aesthetics, 1986, 26 (1): 39-47.
[1] Barthold, Lauren Swayne. The Truth of Hermeneutics: The Self and Other in Dialogue in the Thought of Hans-Georg Gadamer[D]. New York: Department of Political and Social Science, New School for Social Research, Ph.D. dissertation, 2001.
[2] Ford, Martin. Gadamer’s Transformation of Hermeneutics: From Dilthey to Heidegger [D]. St. Catharines, Ontario: Department of Philosophy, Brock University, M.A. thesis, 2006.
[3] Rizo-Patron, Eileen. Through the Eye of A Needle: Hermeneutics as Poetic Transformation [D]. New York: Department of Comparative and Literature, State University of New York, Ph.D. dissertation, 2005.
[4] Young, Michael R. The Past and Future in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [D]. Dallas: Institute of Philosophic Studies, University of Dallas, Ph.D. dissertation, 2004.
[1] [奥]茨威格.与魔鬼作斗争:荷尔德林、克莱斯特、尼采[M].徐畅,译.北京:西苑出版社,1998.
[2] [德]狄尔泰.历史中的意义[M].艾彦,逸飞,译.北京:中国城市出版社,2001.
[3] [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
[4] [德]歌德.歌德谈话录[M].爱克曼,辑录.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1978.
[5] [德]歌德.歌德文集(4、5卷)[M].绿原,等,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999.
[6] [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982.
[7] [德]格罗塞.艺术的起源[M].蔡慕晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
[8] [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999.
[9] [德]海德格尔.海德格尔选集[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海三联书店,1996.
[10] [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林诗的阐释[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[11] [德]海德格尔.林中路[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008.
[12] [德]海德格尔.路标[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[13] [德]海德格尔.面向思的事情[M].陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[14] [德]海德格尔.诗·语言·思[M].彭富春,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,1991.
[15] [德]海德格尔.在通向语言的途中(修订译本)[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[16] [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994.
[17] [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林文集[M].戴晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[18] [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001.
[19] [德]黑格尔.精神现象学[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[20] [德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录(第1卷)[M].贺麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1978.
[21] [德]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988.
[22] [德]胡塞尔.现象学的观念[M].倪梁康,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[23] [德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔集[M].严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003.
[24] [德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔论柏拉图[M].余纪元,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1992.
[25] [德]伽达默尔.科学时代的理性[M].薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988.
[26] [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M].张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991.
[27] [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I、II:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
[28] [德]伽达默尔.哲学解释学[M].夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994.
[29] [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[30] [德]卡西尔.卢梭·康德·歌德[M].刘东,译.北京:三联书店,2002.
[31] [德]卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1985.
[32] [德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2002.
[33] [德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997.
[34] [德]尼采.悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选[M].周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986.
[35] [德]尼采.尼采散文[M].杨恒达,等,译.杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2001.
[36] [德]尼采.权力意志:重估一切价值的尝试——尼采后期思想文集[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000.
[37] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第一卷)[M].王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002.
[38] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第二卷)[M].王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2003.
[39] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图文艺对话集[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1980.
[40] [古希腊]亚里士多德.亚里士多德全集(第四卷)[M].苗力田,主编.颜一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
[41] [古希腊]亚里士多德.亚里士多德全集(第八卷)[M].苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
[42] [荷]约翰·赫伊津哈.游戏的人——关于文化的游戏成分的研究[M].多人,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,1996.
[43] [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[44] [美]吉尔伯特,[德]库恩.美学史[M].夏乾丰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
[45] [日]丸山高司.伽达默尔:视野融合[M].刘文柱,等,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001.
[46] [意]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1986.
[47] [英]以赛亚·伯林.浪漫主义的根源[M].亨利·哈代,编.吕梁,等,译.南京:译林出版社,2008.
[48]北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室,编译.西方哲学原著选读(上卷)[C].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[49]陈嘉映.海德格尔哲学概论[M].北京:三联书店,1995.
[50]古典文艺理论译丛编辑委员会,编.古典文艺理论译丛(二)[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.
[51]何卫平.解释学之维——问题与研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[52]何卫平.通向解释学辩证法之途:伽达默尔哲学思想研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[53]郭绍虞,编选.清诗话续编[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
[54]洪汉鼎.理解的真理:解读伽达默尔《真理与方法》[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2001.
[55]洪汉鼎.诠释学:它的历史和当代发展[M].北京:人民出版社,2001.
[56]洪汉鼎,主编.理解与解释——诠释学经典文选[C].北京:东方出版社,2001.
[57]洪汉鼎,主编.中国诠释学·第1辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2003.
[58]洪汉鼎,主编.中国诠释学·第2辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2004.
[59]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第3辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2006.
[60]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第4辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2007.
[61]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第5辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[62]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第6辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2009.
[63]金元浦.文学解释学[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1997.
[64]赖贤宗.意境美学与诠释学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
[65]李建盛.理解事件与文本意义:文学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
[66]李咏吟.诗学解释学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[67]刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986.
[68]刘小枫.拯救与逍遥[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[69]刘小枫,选编.德语诗学文选(上卷)[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006.
[70]马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[71]倪梁康.现象学及其效应:胡塞尔与当代德国哲学[M].北京,三联书店,1994.
[72]彭启福.理解之思——诠释学初论[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005.
[73]孙周兴.说不可说之神秘:海德格尔后期思想研究[M].北京:三联书店,1991.
[74]王建元.现象诠释学与中西雄浑观[M].台北:东大图书股份有限公司,1988.
[75]伍蠡甫,胡经之,编.西方文艺理论名著选编[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
[76]谢榛,王夫之.四溟诗话·薑斋诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.
[77]严复.严复集(第三册)[M].王栻，主编．北京：中华书局，1986.
[78]严平.走向解释学的真理:伽达默尔哲学述评[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.
[79]杨武能.走进歌德[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999.
[80]叶维廉.比较诗学[M].台北:东大图书股份有限公司,1988.
[81]殷鼎.理解的命运:解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988.
[82]张隆溪.道与逻各斯[M].冯川,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
[83]张能为.理解的实践:伽达默尔实践哲学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[84]章启群.伽达默尔传[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1998.
[85]章启群.意义的本体论:哲学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
[86]张汝伦.意义的探究:当代西方释义学[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
[87]张祥龙.海德格尔思想与中国天道:终极视域的开启与交融[M].北京:三联书店,1996.
[88]中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二)[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981.
[89]朱光潜.西方美学史(上下卷)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1964.
[90]宗白华.美学散步[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
[1] [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗歌[J].王家新,译.诗选刊,2007(7):82—83.
[2] [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗选[J].王家新,芮虎,译.诗林,2009(4):81—83.
[3] [德]K.伏拉施.简直是在倾听他人——为哲学家伽达默尔逝世而作[J].邓安庆,译.世界哲学,2002(3):53—55.
[4] [德]哈贝马斯.评伽达默尔的《真理与方法》一书[J].郭官义,译.世界哲学,1986(3):71—74.
[5] [德]伽达默尔.解释学的挑战[J].渊明,译.世界哲学,1987(2):53—56.
[6] [美]R.E.帕尔默.海德格尔的本体论和伽达默尔的哲学诠释学[J].彭启福,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(3):265—272.
[7] [美]R.E.帕尔默.伽达默尔哲学的七个关键术语[J].江涛,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(5):502—508.
[8] [美]贤·霍希曼.庄子与伽达默尔:忘己与体道[J].刘梁剑,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(5):514—519.
[9] [日]今道有信.传统、阐释与创造[J].程麻,译.世界哲学,1987(2):50—53.
[10]陈治国.2006:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2):1—7.
[11]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2003:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1):1—9.
[12]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2004:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(1):1—9.
[13]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2005:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1):10—20.
[14]洪汉鼎.百岁西哲寄望东方——伽达默尔访问记[N].中华读书报,2001-—7—25(5).
[15]洪汉鼎.伽达默尔的前理解学说(上)[J].河北学刊,2008(1):53—62.
[16]洪汉鼎.伽达默尔的前理解学说(下)[J].河北学刊,2008(2):43—52.
[17]洪汉鼎.诠释学与中国[J].文史哲,2003(1):8—12.
[18]洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(1):53—62.
[19]洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(下)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(2):43—52.
[20]李建盛.哲学诠释学的“反美学”与人文科学的审美真理立场[J].人文杂志,2003(1):65—72.
[21]李鲁宁.加达默尔的美论思想及其他[J].理论学刊,2003(6):36—38.
[22]李鲁宁.哲学解释学视野中的美与真[J].文史哲,2001(6):45—50.
[23]刘毅青.解释学的逻各斯与道的解释学[J].学术探索,2007(5):13—18.
[24]莫光华.词语破碎之处:格奥尔格引论[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6):13—25.
[25]那薇.道家的“藏天下于天下”和海德格尔的“在世界之中”[J].哲学研究,2003(9):68—73.
[26]那薇.道家的反朴归真和海德格尔的本真存在[J].中国哲学史,2003(2):114—121.
[27]那薇.海德格尔的恩惠之树和庄子的吾有大树[J].中州学刊,2006(1):163—166.
[28]那薇.海德格尔与庄子的渊源:诗意道说与无心吟咏[J].人文杂志,2007(3):36—40.
[29]那薇.庄子的意之所随不可言传与海德格尔的语言之根[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1):81—86.
[30]彭启福.走向生存论意义的方法论——关于伽达默尔哲学诠释学的方法论沉思[J].天津社会科学,2008(1):36—40.
[31]王确.呼唤真理返回家园——从《真理与方法》看伽达默尔的艺术观[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(1):80—87.
[32]王业伟.伽达默尔对艺术作品存在方式的分析——兼论何以伽达默尔反对“接受美学”[J].外国文学,2008(2):83—94.
[33]余虹.海德格尔的艺术沉思[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),1996(1):86—93,99.
[34]章启群.理解与审美——伽达默尔解释学及其美学意义[J].解放军外语学院学报,1994(5):98—107.
[35]张德兴.时间距离与视界融合——伽达默尔的解释学美学管窥[J].文艺理论研究,1990(2):20—26.
[36]张汝伦.伽达默尔和哲学[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(9):509—513.
[37]张汝伦.艺术:审美经验,还是存在经验?——伽达默尔视域中的艺术经验[J].河北学刊,2004(5):71—76.
[38]郑湧．M·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):1—11.
[39]郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):630—642.三.学位论文
[1]彭兴伟.伽达默尔对诗与哲学关系的阐释[D].上海:复旦大学哲学学院硕士学位论文,2004.
[2]孙丽君.哲学诠释学视野中的艺术经验[D].济南:山东大学文学与新闻传播学院博士学位论文,2005.
[3]王业伟.论伽达默尔美学对审美现代性的批判[D].北京:北京师范大学文学院博士学位论文,2005.
[4]张震.理解的真理及其限度——西方现代诠释学的艺术哲学向度的考察与批判[D].上海:华东师范大学中国语言文学系博士学位论文,2006.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:11.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory (Translator’s Introduction)[M]. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: ix-x.
2 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾·译后记[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:236.
3 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:17.
4同上:23.
5在伽达默尔晚年自传《哲学生涯——我的回顾》(商务印书馆2003版第31页)以及丸山高司的《伽达默尔——视野融合》(河北教育出版社2001版序章)中都有提及。
1在日本学者卷田悦郎的德文主页http://www.ms.kuki.tus.ac.jp/KMSLab/makita/gdmhp/gdmhp_d.html上可查到伽达默尔《全集》的完整目录,该主页也是迄今最完备的伽达默尔参考文献目录。
2 [德]伽达默尔.论哲学解释学的起源[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:11.
1 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:178.
2 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:25.
3同上:36.
4郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):630.
1可参阅Dostal, Robert J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.与Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.导论部分。北京师范大学王业伟的博士论文中也表达了同样的观点。详见:王业伟.论伽达默尔美学对审美现代性的批判[D].北京:北京师范大学文学院博士学位论文,2005.
2 [德]格罗塞.艺术的起源[M].蔡慕晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984:205.
1 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,译.上海:上海三联书店,1996:300.
2同上:306-307.
3同上:306.
1 [意]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1986:6-7.
2同上:29.
3同上:164.
1谢榛.四溟诗话(卷二)[M]//四溟诗话·薑斋诗话.北京:人民文学出版社,1961:41.
2吴乔.围炉诗话(卷一)[C]//清诗话续编(上).郭绍虞,编选.上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:486.
1 Hoy, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
2 Weinsheimer, J. C. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of“Truth and Method”[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
3张汝伦.意义的探究:当代西方释义学[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
4殷鼎.理解的命运:解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988.
5章启群.伽达默尔传[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1998.
1 Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
2 Grondin, Jean. Sources of Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
3 Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer [M]. Translated by Kathryn Plan. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003.
4 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
5严平.走向解释学的真理:伽达默尔哲学述评[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.
6何卫平.通向解释学辩证法之途:伽达默尔哲学思想研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
7章启群.意义的本体论:哲学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
8温施梅尔(J. C. Weinsheimer)所著《哲学诠释学与文学理论》是西方文学诠释学研究的代表性作品。此外国内可见的文学诠释学研究成果也非常丰富,张隆溪、金元浦、李建盛、李咏吟等学者从中西文学诠释思想的接洽、文学作品的诠释学结构、作品接受的诠释学视域等诠释学向度对此进行了深入探讨。这表现出伽达默尔的诠释学思想与诗学之间的天然亲近,二者有着相互映证、相互渗透的可观空间。详见: Weinsheimer, J. C. Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.张隆溪.道与逻各斯[M].冯川,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.金元浦.文学解释学[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1997.李建盛.理解事件与文本意义:文学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.李咏吟.诗学解释学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
9具体可参阅:Schuchman, Paul. Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1979, 23 (1): 41-50.以及:张能为.理解的实践:伽达默尔实践哲学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
1 Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics [J]. Philosophy Today, 1994, 38 (4): 369-379.
2 Lawn, Christopher. Gadamer on Poetic and Everyday Language [J]. Philosophy and Literature, 2001, 25 (1) :113-126.
3彭兴伟.伽达默尔对诗与哲学关系的阐释[D].上海:复旦大学哲学学院硕士学位论文,2004.
4 Baker, J. M. Lyric as Paradigm: Hegel and the Speculative Instance of Poetry in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[C]//The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Edited by Robert J. Dostal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 143-166.
5郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):636.
1洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(1):17-23. 洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(下)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(2):24-29.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:38.
2 [德]伽达默尔.逻辑学抑或修辞学——再论解释学的早期历史[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:223.
1 [德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录(第1卷)[M].贺麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1978:157.
2 hermēneia的基本含义为“思想的表述”,柏拉图的《政治篇》和亚里士多德的《解释篇》对此都有讨论。hermēneuein为其动词形式。
3 Palmer, Richard. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Tory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer [M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969: 12-32.
4同上: 13.
5 Grondin, Jean. Source of Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995: 21.
1让·格朗丹认为Hermēneuein的“解释”和“翻译”两层涵义实际上可被“解释”所囊括,因为翻译即是将不熟悉的发音组合转换为熟悉的语言,这在一定意义上也是解释的一种。参见:Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994: 20-21.
2 [德]伽达默尔.逻辑学抑或修辞学——再论解释学的早期历史[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:216.
3同上:218.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:83.
2柏拉图.斐多篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第一卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002:110.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:649-650.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 478.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学Ⅰ:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:651.笔者认为此句中文版译文的意义不够清楚明了,而英文版相较之下更为明晰,故采用英文版译义。
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:651.
4同上:652.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:645.
2同上.
3 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:28.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
1参见:柏拉图.斐多篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第一卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002:71-72.以及:亚里士多德.动物志·第三卷[M]//亚里士多德全集(第四卷).苗力田,主编.颜一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 455.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:619.
3 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: SUNY press, 1997: 110.
4参见:Bruns, Gerald. The Hermeneutical Anarchist[C]//Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Edited by Jeff Malpas and etc. Cambridge: the MIT press,2002: 48.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy[M]. Translated by Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986: 35-39.
2亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:35.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 443.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:601-602.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
1 Fortin, E. L. Gadamer on Strauss: An Interview [J]. Interpretation, 1984(12):10.
2 [德]伽达默尔.存在、精神、上帝[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:445.
1朱光潜.西方美学史(下卷)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1964:349.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:9.
3恩格斯在评述德国哲学发展过程时,把1790-1840年,即从康德到费尔巴哈这一时期称为“德国古典哲学”时期。见:《马克思恩格斯全集》(第2卷),北京:人民出版社,1965:301.
4当代一些学者将一战后德国出现的这批极富哲理沉思的诗人称为“新浪漫派”诗群。另一部分学者认为“新浪漫派”用语不甚确切,因为实际上并无新浪漫派,只有象征主义、表现主义等流派。这算是一家之言。但实际上“新浪漫派”一词在现代德国文学史、哲学史研究中被广泛采用。在鲍尔森编《现代德国文学中浪漫派的余生》中有对此问题的探讨。以上主要参考了刘小枫《诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统》中关于新浪漫派的看法。见:刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:185.
5 [德]伽达默尔.第3版后记[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:545.
1 [德]伽达默尔.文本和解释[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:402.
2 [英]以赛亚·伯林.浪漫主义的根源[M].亨利·哈代,编.吕梁,等,译.南京:译林出版社,2008:3.
1 [德]奥·史雷格尔.关于美文学和艺术讲座[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:361.
2 [德]诺瓦利斯.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:393.
3 [德]席勒.论素朴的诗与感伤的诗[C]//西方文艺理论名著选编(上卷).伍蠡甫,胡经之,编.北京:北京大学出版社,1985:473.
4 [德]弗·史雷格尔.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:384.
5 [德]诺瓦利斯.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:393.
1 [德]伽达默尔.汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔自述[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:585.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:131.
1 [德]尼采.作为艺术的强力意志[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:366.
2 [德]尼采.权力意志:重估一切价值的尝试——尼采后期思想文集[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000:7.
3 [德]尼采.作为艺术的强力意志[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:348.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:97.
5 [德]尼采.人性,太人性的[M]//尼采散文.杨恒达,等,译.杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2001:29.
6 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:32-33.
1 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:37.
2同上:34.
3 [德]狄尔泰.历史中的意义[M].艾彦,逸飞,译.北京:中国城市出版社,2001:245.
4同上:243.
5同上:248.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:102-103.
2 [德]卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1985:198.
1 [德]尼采.悲剧的诞生[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:108.
2同上:18.
3同上:73.
1 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:41-42.
1国内当代著名的黑格尔研究专家贺麟先生在翻译《精神现象学》过程中,对朗贝尔特到黑格尔的这段“现象学”前史进行了梳理。参见:[德]黑格尔.精神现象学(上卷)[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979:译者导言7-11.
2 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:313.
1 [德]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988:5-6.
2 [德]胡塞尔.现象学的观念[M].倪梁康,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986:24.
3倪梁康.现象学及其效应:胡塞尔与当代德国哲学[M].北京,三联书店,1994:35.
4同上:36.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:541.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:363-364.
3 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:313.
4 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:541.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007: 364.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:23.
2同上:26-27.
3 [德]海德格尔.《形而上学是什么?》导言[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:446.
4此处引文为伽达默尔对郑湧论文的批注?ィ甅·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):2.
1 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:4-6.
2同上:14.
3同上:21.
4同上:22.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:208.
2 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:292.
3参见:陈嘉映.海德格尔哲学概论[M].北京:三联书店,1995:285.
4 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林诗的阐释[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:2.
5同上:1.
6 [德]海德格尔.哲学的终结和思的任务[M]//面向思的事情.陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996:60.
1 [德]海德格尔.哲学的终结和思的任务[M]//面向思的事情.陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996:62.
2同上:67.
3同上:68.
4同上:70.
5同上:71.
1 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:316.
2 Heidegger, M. Words[M]//On the Way to Language. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982: 155.
3 [德]海德格尔.从思的经验而来[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:1162.
1 [德]海德格尔.诗人何为?[M]//林中路.孙周兴,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008:245.
2同上:246.
3 [德]海德格尔.论真理的本质[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:233.
4 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:422.
5在《存在与时间》书中,海德格尔已从词源学上指明“在之中”(In-Sein)的“之中”(in-)源自于“居住”(innan-)、“逗留”(habitare)。参见:[德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:63.
1 [德]海德格尔.“……人诗意地栖居……”[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:478.
2同上:478.
3同上:478.
4同上:463.
5刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:241.
6 [德]海德格尔.“……人诗意地栖居……”[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:465.
1 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:366.
2同上:426.
3同上:426.
4 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林和诗的本质[M]//荷尔德林诗的阐释.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:38.
5同上:40.
6 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:425.
1 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林和诗的本质[M]//荷尔德林诗的阐释.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:40.
2同上:40.
3同上:47.
4 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:25.
5 [德]伽达默尔.在现象学和辩证法之间——一种自我批判的尝试[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:12.
1 [德]伽达默尔.在现象学和辩证法之间——一种自我批判的尝试[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:11-15.
2同上:13.
3章启群.理解与审美——伽达默尔解释学及其美学意义[J].解放军外语学院学报,1994(5):99.
1 [美]吉尔伯特,[德]库恩.美学史[M].夏乾丰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989:10.
2 [德]伽达默尔.柏拉图与诗人[M]//伽达默尔论柏拉图.余纪元,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1992:43.
3同上:51.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:172.
1洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006 (1):17.
1严复.严复集(第三册)[M].王栻，主编．北京：中华书局，1986:558-559.
2 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:17.
3 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
4 [德]伽达默尔.《艺术作品的本源》导言[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:96.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:142.
1新约.约翰福音:18.38.
2 [德]伽达默尔.什么是真理?[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:52.
3同上:53.
1 [德]伽达默尔.什么是真理?[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:56.
2同上:56.
3 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
1参见:柏拉图.理想国[M]//柏拉图文艺对话集.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1980:68-79.
2 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:2.
1 [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:6.
2同上:19.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:19.
2同上:140.
3同上:143.
1 [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:33.
2同上:34.
3可参阅拙文:论近代西方艺术游戏观的发端[J].湖北社会科学,2008(7):127-130.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:143.
2同上:144.
3同上:144.
4同上:145.
5同上:146.
1参见:[荷]约翰·赫伊津哈.游戏的人——关于文化的游戏成分的研究[M].多人,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,1996.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:148.
3同上:150.
4同上:156.
5同上:158.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:157.
2同上:157.
3同上:157.
4同上:159.
5同上:165.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:188.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:69.
2同上:67.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:174.
4同上:177.
5 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:65.
6同上:65.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:71.
2同上:71.
3同上:71.
4亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:35.
5 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:179.
6 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:77.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:76.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:533.
2此处引文为伽达默尔对郑湧论文的批注．见郑湧．M·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):2.
1彭启福.理解之思——诠释学初论[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005:108.
2彭启福.走向生存论意义的方法论——关于伽达默尔哲学诠释学的方法论沉思[J].天津社会科学,2008(1):36.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:5.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:121.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:121.
2同上:165.
3同上:165.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:201.
2 Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991: 113.
3殷鼎.理解的命运——解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988:266.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:407.
5同上:408.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:463.
2同上:409.
3同上:405.
4参见:亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:21-22.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:405-406.
2同上:407.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:8.
1 [德]阿斯特.诠释学[C]//理解与解释——诠释学经典文选.洪汉鼎,主编.北京:东方出版社,2001:7.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:258.
3同上:266.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:266.
2同上:266.
3 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:178.
4同上:176.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论理解的循环[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:71.
1 [德]伽达默尔.事物的本质和事物的语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:72.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Mimesis [M]// The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 106.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:639.
3同上:659.
4马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005:1.
1 [德]伽达默尔.人和语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:63.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:655.
3柏拉图.克拉底鲁篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第二卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2003:130-133.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:549.
5同上:556.
6同上:557.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:563.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:578-579.
2同上:594.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:598.
2同上:597-598.
3同上:599-600.
4同上:607.
5 [德]伽达默尔.语言在多大程度上规范思想[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:180.
6 [德]伽达默尔.解释学问题的普遍性[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:3.
1马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005:摘要1.
1 Valéry, Paul. The Art of Poetry [M]. Translated by Denise Folliot. New York: Vintage Books, 1961: 170-171. 2参见:[德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔集[M].严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:496,555-556.
1 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:496.
2 [德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2002:85.
3 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:502.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Are the Poets Falling Silent?[ M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 73.
2 [德]伽达默尔.海德格尔和形而上学语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:229.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
2同上:532.
1 [德]伽达默尔.事物的本质和事物的语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:72.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:612-613.
3 [德]伽达默尔.精神科学中的真理[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:47.
4 [德]伽达默尔.直观与生动[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:513.
5同上:513.
1 [德]伽达默尔.文本和解释[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:401.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:633.
2 [德]伽达默尔.第3版后记[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:575.
3 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:557.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:535.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:628.
3同上:632.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:634.
1 [德]伽达默尔.解释学的挑战[J].渊明,译.世界哲学,1982(2):54.
2 [德]伽达默尔.存在、精神、上帝[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:452-453.
1 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:97.
2 Joan Stambaugh是纽约城市大学的哲学教授。她是目前比较活跃的海德格尔研究和翻译专家之一,其主要译作有:英译本《存在与时间》(1996),《同一与差异》(2002),《时间与存在》(2002),以及《哲学的终结》(2003)。
3 Heidegger, Martin. On Time and Being [M]. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1972: ix.
4 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:20.
1 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:162.
2 [德]海德格尔.时间与存在[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:673.
3 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:674.
4 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:170.
1 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:172.
2 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:164-165.
3 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:109.
4 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:164.
5 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:173.
1同上:173.
2 [德]伽达默尔.作为问题的死[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:145.
3同上:146.
4 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:108.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:89-90.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:91.
3同上:96.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:470.
2同上:483.
3同上:479.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Divine in Early Greek Thought [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 37.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Kant and the Question of God [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 3.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Reflection on the Relation of Religion and Science [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 126.
4参见:巴门尼德.巴门尼德著作残篇[C]//西方哲学原著选读(上卷).北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室,编译.北京:商务印书馆,1981:30-34.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:621.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Divine in Early Greek Thought [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 37.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Myth in the Age of Science [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 91-102.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 114.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 114.
1 Ibid.: 113.
2 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:541.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 115.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 466.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:634.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]// The Gadamer
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 112-115.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole[M]//Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 91.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Relevance of the Beautiful—Art as Play, Symbol, and Festival [M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 45.
2 Ibid.: 45.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]//The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007: 212.
4 Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1992, 38 (4): 369-379.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:113.
1席勒.论素朴的诗和感伤的诗[C]//古典文艺理论译丛(二).古典文艺理论译丛编辑委员会,编.北京:人民文学出版社,1961:48.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Mimesis[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 120.
1刘小枫.拯救与逍遥[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001:修订本前言9.
1杨武能.走进歌德[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999:230.
2 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:534.
3 [德]歌德.歌德谈话录[M].爱克曼,辑录.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1978:147.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Goethe and Philosophy [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary. Theory Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 1.
2 Ibid.: 17.
3 Ibid.: 15.
4 [德]歌德.歌德文集第5卷:诗与真(下)[M].刘思慕,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999:684.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 32.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 32.
2 Ibid.: 33.
3参见:[德]歌德.歌德文集第5卷:诗与真(下)[M].刘思慕,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999:683-686.
1 [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:27-28.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 35-36.
1参见:何卫平.伽达默尔为何批评接受美学?[J].文史哲,2008(4):130-139.
1参见:Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994 : 38.
2 [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:27.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994 : 38-39.
2 Ibid.: 40.
3参见:Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 40-41.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 41.
2 Ibid.: 41.
3 Ibid.: 41.
4 [德]卡西尔.卢梭·康德·歌德[M].刘东,译.北京:三联书店,2002:185.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 42.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 65.
2 Ibid.: 42.
3 Ibid.: 57.
4 Ibid.: 54.
1 [奥]茨威格.与魔鬼作斗争:荷尔德林、克莱斯特、尼采[M].徐畅,译.北京:西苑出版社,1998:7-8.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 67.
3 Ibid.: 67.
4 Ibid.: 67.
5 Ibid.: 68.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 69.
2 Ibid.: 70.
3 Ibid.: 70.
4 Ibid.: 72.
5 [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001:170.
6同上:193.
1 [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982:163-164.
2密涅尔娃(Minerva)即雅典娜,她的子民即指雅典人。
1乌拉尼亚是九位缪斯女神之一,是爱与美的女神。
2提洛斯为爱琴海中的小岛,阿波罗的圣地。
3 [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982:165-167.
4 [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001:211.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 73.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 73.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:100.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 67.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press,1994: 89.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 90.
2 Ibid.: 90.
3 Ibid.: 91.
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:139-140.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 92.
3 Ibid.: 92.
4 Ibid.: 93.
5指酒神。
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:143-147.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 94.
3 Ibid.: 91.
4 Ibid.:106.
5 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林文集[M].戴晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999:253.
6 [德]荷尔德林.致诺伊斐尔[C]//德语诗学文选(上卷).刘小枫,选编.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006:247.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 101.
2 Ibid.: 90.
3 Ibid.: 102
4 Ibid.: 102.
5 Ibid.:102.
6 Ibid.:107.
7 Ibid.:107.
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:44.
2同上:3.
1参见:[德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003:1.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 154.
3 [德]伽达默尔.语言在多大程度上规范思想[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:180.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 157.
5 Ibid.: 157.
6《杜伊诺哀歌》第一首,2-3行.参见:[德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997:5.
1《杜伊诺哀歌》第二首,18行.参见:[德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997:9.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
3 Ibid.: 158.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Rainer Maria Rilke’s Interpretations of Existence: On the Book by Romano Guardini [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 142.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
6 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Punctuation [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 132.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
2 Ibid.: 159.
3 Ibid.: 170.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 159-160.
2关于格奥尔格的生平与创作,可参阅:莫光华.词语破碎之处:格奥尔格引论[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6):13-25.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 83.
4 Ibid.: 87.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 89.
2 Ibid.: 86.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 89.
2 Ibid.: 91.
3 Ibid.: 91.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 88.
2 Ibid.: 91.
3参见英文版《保罗·策兰诗文选》前言:Celan, Paul. Selected Poems and Prose of Paul Celan [M]. Translated and introduced by John Felstiner. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001: 4 (preface).
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism[M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 111-112.
2 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 2.
1 [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗歌[J].王家新,译.诗选刊,2007(7):83.
1 [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗选[J].王家新,芮虎,译.诗林,2009(4):82.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 117.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Who Am I and Who Are You? [M]// Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays. Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 69.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Who Am I and Who Are You? [M]// Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays. Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 67.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism[M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 123.
3 Ibid.: 123.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]//The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007: 212.
1张汝伦.伽达默尔和哲学[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(9):510.
1 [德]伽达默尔.科学时代的理性·作者自序[M].薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988:1.
1 [日]丸山高司.伽达默尔:视野融合[M].刘文柱,等,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001:155.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:71.
1张祥龙.海德格尔思想与中国天道:终极视域的开启与交融[M].北京:三联书店,1996:187.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:416.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:416.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:366.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:232.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论人类对哲学的自然倾向[M]//科学时代的理性.薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988:126.
[2] Dostal, Robert J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[3] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato[M]. Translated and edited by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.
[4] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflection and Commentary[M]. Translated by Richard E. Palmer. New York: Yale University Press, 2001.
[5] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays[M].Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
[6] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics[M]. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
[7] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies[M]. Translated by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.
[8] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Heidegger’s Ways[M]. Translated by John W. Stanley. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
[9] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
[10] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory[M]. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
[11] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Apprenticeships[M]. Translated by Robert R. Sullivan. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.
[12] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Edited and translated by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
[13] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays[M]. Translated by David E. Linge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
[14] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Reason in the Age of Science[M]. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.
[15] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings[M]. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007.
[16] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy[M]. Translated by Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
[17] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays[M]. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[18] Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004.
[19] Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Derrida, J., and etc. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter[M]. Edited and translated by Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.
[20] Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
[21] Grondin, Jean. Sources of Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
[22] Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer[M]. Translated by Kathryn Plan. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003.
[23] Heidegger, Martin. On the Way to Language[M]. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982.
[24] Heidegger, Martin. On Time and Being[M]. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1972.
[25] Hoy, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1978.
[26] Malpas, Jeff; Arnswald, Ulrich; & Kertscher, Jens(eds.). Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer[C]. Cambridge: the MIT press, 2002.
[27] Palmer, Richard. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Tory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer[M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
[28] Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
[29] Valéry, Paul. The Art of Poetry[M]. Translated by Denise Folliot. New York: Vintage Books, 1961.
[30] Weinsheimer, J. C. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of“Truth and Method”[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
[31] Weinsheimer, J. C. Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.二.期刊论文
[1] Devereaux, Mary. Can Art Save Us? A Meditation on Gadamer[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 1991, 15 (1): 59-73.
[2] Fortin, E. L. Gadamer on Strauss: An Interview[J]. Interpretation, 1984, 12 (1): 1-13.
[3] Lawn, Christopher. Gadamer on Poetic and Everyday Language[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 2001, 25 (1): 113-126.
[4] Pizer, John. Aesthetic Consciousness and Aesthetic Non-Differentiation: Gadamer, Schiller, and Lukács[J]. Philosophy Today, 1989, 33 (1): 63-72.
[5] Pizer, John. Gadamer’s Reading of Goethe[J]. Philosophy and Literature, 1991, 15 (2): 268-277.
[6] Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1994, 38 (4): 369-379.
[7] Schuchman, Paul. Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1979, 23 (1): 41-50.
[8] Shapiro, Gary. Gadamer, Habermas and the Death of Art[J]. British Journal of Aesthetics, 1986, 26 (1): 39-47.
[1] Barthold, Lauren Swayne. The Truth of Hermeneutics: The Self and Other in Dialogue in the Thought of Hans-Georg Gadamer[D]. New York: Department of Political and Social Science, New School for Social Research, Ph.D. dissertation, 2001.
[2] Ford, Martin. Gadamer’s Transformation of Hermeneutics: From Dilthey to Heidegger [D]. St. Catharines, Ontario: Department of Philosophy, Brock University, M.A. thesis, 2006.
[3] Rizo-Patron, Eileen. Through the Eye of A Needle: Hermeneutics as Poetic Transformation [D]. New York: Department of Comparative and Literature, State University of New York, Ph.D. dissertation, 2005.
[4] Young, Michael R. The Past and Future in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [D]. Dallas: Institute of Philosophic Studies, University of Dallas, Ph.D. dissertation, 2004.
[1] [奥]茨威格.与魔鬼作斗争:荷尔德林、克莱斯特、尼采[M].徐畅,译.北京:西苑出版社,1998.
[2] [德]狄尔泰.历史中的意义[M].艾彦,逸飞,译.北京:中国城市出版社,2001.
[3] [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
[4] [德]歌德.歌德谈话录[M].爱克曼,辑录.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1978.
[5] [德]歌德.歌德文集(4、5卷)[M].绿原,等,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999.
[6] [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982.
[7] [德]格罗塞.艺术的起源[M].蔡慕晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
[8] [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999.
[9] [德]海德格尔.海德格尔选集[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海三联书店,1996.
[10] [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林诗的阐释[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[11] [德]海德格尔.林中路[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008.
[12] [德]海德格尔.路标[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
[13] [德]海德格尔.面向思的事情[M].陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[14] [德]海德格尔.诗·语言·思[M].彭富春,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,1991.
[15] [德]海德格尔.在通向语言的途中(修订译本)[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[16] [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994.
[17] [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林文集[M].戴晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[18] [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001.
[19] [德]黑格尔.精神现象学[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[20] [德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录(第1卷)[M].贺麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1978.
[21] [德]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988.
[22] [德]胡塞尔.现象学的观念[M].倪梁康,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[23] [德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔集[M].严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003.
[24] [德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔论柏拉图[M].余纪元,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1992.
[25] [德]伽达默尔.科学时代的理性[M].薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988.
[26] [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M].张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991.
[27] [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I、II:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
[28] [德]伽达默尔.哲学解释学[M].夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994.
[29] [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[30] [德]卡西尔.卢梭·康德·歌德[M].刘东,译.北京:三联书店,2002.
[31] [德]卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1985.
[32] [德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2002.
[33] [德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997.
[34] [德]尼采.悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选[M].周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986.
[35] [德]尼采.尼采散文[M].杨恒达,等,译.杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2001.
[36] [德]尼采.权力意志:重估一切价值的尝试——尼采后期思想文集[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000.
[37] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第一卷)[M].王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002.
[38] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第二卷)[M].王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2003.
[39] [古希腊]柏拉图.柏拉图文艺对话集[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1980.
[40] [古希腊]亚里士多德.亚里士多德全集(第四卷)[M].苗力田,主编.颜一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
[41] [古希腊]亚里士多德.亚里士多德全集(第八卷)[M].苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
[42] [荷]约翰·赫伊津哈.游戏的人——关于文化的游戏成分的研究[M].多人,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,1996.
[43] [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[44] [美]吉尔伯特,[德]库恩.美学史[M].夏乾丰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
[45] [日]丸山高司.伽达默尔:视野融合[M].刘文柱,等,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001.
[46] [意]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1986.
[47] [英]以赛亚·伯林.浪漫主义的根源[M].亨利·哈代,编.吕梁,等,译.南京:译林出版社,2008.
[48]北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室,编译.西方哲学原著选读(上卷)[C].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[49]陈嘉映.海德格尔哲学概论[M].北京:三联书店,1995.
[50]古典文艺理论译丛编辑委员会,编.古典文艺理论译丛(二)[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.
[51]何卫平.解释学之维——问题与研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[52]何卫平.通向解释学辩证法之途:伽达默尔哲学思想研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[53]郭绍虞,编选.清诗话续编[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
[54]洪汉鼎.理解的真理:解读伽达默尔《真理与方法》[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2001.
[55]洪汉鼎.诠释学:它的历史和当代发展[M].北京:人民出版社,2001.
[56]洪汉鼎,主编.理解与解释——诠释学经典文选[C].北京:东方出版社,2001.
[57]洪汉鼎,主编.中国诠释学·第1辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2003.
[58]洪汉鼎,主编.中国诠释学·第2辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2004.
[59]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第3辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2006.
[60]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第4辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2007.
[61]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第5辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[62]洪汉鼎,傅永军,主编.中国诠释学·第6辑[C].济南:山东人民出版社,2009.
[63]金元浦.文学解释学[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1997.
[64]赖贤宗.意境美学与诠释学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
[65]李建盛.理解事件与文本意义:文学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
[66]李咏吟.诗学解释学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[67]刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986.
[68]刘小枫.拯救与逍遥[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[69]刘小枫,选编.德语诗学文选(上卷)[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006.
[70]马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[71]倪梁康.现象学及其效应:胡塞尔与当代德国哲学[M].北京,三联书店,1994.
[72]彭启福.理解之思——诠释学初论[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005.
[73]孙周兴.说不可说之神秘:海德格尔后期思想研究[M].北京:三联书店,1991.
[74]王建元.现象诠释学与中西雄浑观[M].台北:东大图书股份有限公司,1988.
[75]伍蠡甫,胡经之,编.西方文艺理论名著选编[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
[76]谢榛,王夫之.四溟诗话·薑斋诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.
[77]严复.严复集(第三册)[M].王栻，主编．北京：中华书局，1986.
[78]严平.走向解释学的真理:伽达默尔哲学述评[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.
[79]杨武能.走进歌德[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999.
[80]叶维廉.比较诗学[M].台北:东大图书股份有限公司,1988.
[81]殷鼎.理解的命运:解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988.
[82]张隆溪.道与逻各斯[M].冯川,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
[83]张能为.理解的实践:伽达默尔实践哲学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[84]章启群.伽达默尔传[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1998.
[85]章启群.意义的本体论:哲学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
[86]张汝伦.意义的探究:当代西方释义学[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
[87]张祥龙.海德格尔思想与中国天道:终极视域的开启与交融[M].北京:三联书店,1996.
[88]中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二)[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981.
[89]朱光潜.西方美学史(上下卷)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1964.
[90]宗白华.美学散步[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
[1] [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗歌[J].王家新,译.诗选刊,2007(7):82—83.
[2] [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗选[J].王家新,芮虎,译.诗林,2009(4):81—83.
[3] [德]K.伏拉施.简直是在倾听他人——为哲学家伽达默尔逝世而作[J].邓安庆,译.世界哲学,2002(3):53—55.
[4] [德]哈贝马斯.评伽达默尔的《真理与方法》一书[J].郭官义,译.世界哲学,1986(3):71—74.
[5] [德]伽达默尔.解释学的挑战[J].渊明,译.世界哲学,1987(2):53—56.
[6] [美]R.E.帕尔默.海德格尔的本体论和伽达默尔的哲学诠释学[J].彭启福,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(3):265—272.
[7] [美]R.E.帕尔默.伽达默尔哲学的七个关键术语[J].江涛,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(5):502—508.
[8] [美]贤·霍希曼.庄子与伽达默尔:忘己与体道[J].刘梁剑,译.安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(5):514—519.
[9] [日]今道有信.传统、阐释与创造[J].程麻,译.世界哲学,1987(2):50—53.
[10]陈治国.2006:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2):1—7.
[11]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2003:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1):1—9.
[12]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2004:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(1):1—9.
[13]陈治国,洪汉鼎.2005:诠释学与中国[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1):10—20.
[14]洪汉鼎.百岁西哲寄望东方——伽达默尔访问记[N].中华读书报,2001-—7—25(5).
[15]洪汉鼎.伽达默尔的前理解学说(上)[J].河北学刊,2008(1):53—62.
[16]洪汉鼎.伽达默尔的前理解学说(下)[J].河北学刊,2008(2):43—52.
[17]洪汉鼎.诠释学与中国[J].文史哲,2003(1):8—12.
[18]洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(1):53—62.
[19]洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(下)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(2):43—52.
[20]李建盛.哲学诠释学的“反美学”与人文科学的审美真理立场[J].人文杂志,2003(1):65—72.
[21]李鲁宁.加达默尔的美论思想及其他[J].理论学刊,2003(6):36—38.
[22]李鲁宁.哲学解释学视野中的美与真[J].文史哲,2001(6):45—50.
[23]刘毅青.解释学的逻各斯与道的解释学[J].学术探索,2007(5):13—18.
[24]莫光华.词语破碎之处:格奥尔格引论[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6):13—25.
[25]那薇.道家的“藏天下于天下”和海德格尔的“在世界之中”[J].哲学研究,2003(9):68—73.
[26]那薇.道家的反朴归真和海德格尔的本真存在[J].中国哲学史,2003(2):114—121.
[27]那薇.海德格尔的恩惠之树和庄子的吾有大树[J].中州学刊,2006(1):163—166.
[28]那薇.海德格尔与庄子的渊源:诗意道说与无心吟咏[J].人文杂志,2007(3):36—40.
[29]那薇.庄子的意之所随不可言传与海德格尔的语言之根[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1):81—86.
[30]彭启福.走向生存论意义的方法论——关于伽达默尔哲学诠释学的方法论沉思[J].天津社会科学,2008(1):36—40.
[31]王确.呼唤真理返回家园——从《真理与方法》看伽达默尔的艺术观[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(1):80—87.
[32]王业伟.伽达默尔对艺术作品存在方式的分析——兼论何以伽达默尔反对“接受美学”[J].外国文学,2008(2):83—94.
[33]余虹.海德格尔的艺术沉思[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),1996(1):86—93,99.
[34]章启群.理解与审美——伽达默尔解释学及其美学意义[J].解放军外语学院学报,1994(5):98—107.
[35]张德兴.时间距离与视界融合——伽达默尔的解释学美学管窥[J].文艺理论研究,1990(2):20—26.
[36]张汝伦.伽达默尔和哲学[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(9):509—513.
[37]张汝伦.艺术:审美经验,还是存在经验?——伽达默尔视域中的艺术经验[J].河北学刊,2004(5):71—76.
[38]郑湧．M·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):1—11.
[39]郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):630—642.三.学位论文
[1]彭兴伟.伽达默尔对诗与哲学关系的阐释[D].上海:复旦大学哲学学院硕士学位论文,2004.
[2]孙丽君.哲学诠释学视野中的艺术经验[D].济南:山东大学文学与新闻传播学院博士学位论文,2005.
[3]王业伟.论伽达默尔美学对审美现代性的批判[D].北京:北京师范大学文学院博士学位论文,2005.
[4]张震.理解的真理及其限度——西方现代诠释学的艺术哲学向度的考察与批判[D].上海:华东师范大学中国语言文学系博士学位论文,2006.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:11.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory (Translator’s Introduction)[M]. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: ix-x.
2 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾·译后记[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:236.
3 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:17.
4同上:23.
5在伽达默尔晚年自传《哲学生涯——我的回顾》(商务印书馆2003版第31页)以及丸山高司的《伽达默尔——视野融合》(河北教育出版社2001版序章)中都有提及。
1在日本学者卷田悦郎的德文主页http://www.ms.kuki.tus.ac.jp/KMSLab/makita/gdmhp/gdmhp_d.html上可查到伽达默尔《全集》的完整目录,该主页也是迄今最完备的伽达默尔参考文献目录。
2 [德]伽达默尔.论哲学解释学的起源[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:11.
1 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:178.
2 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:25.
3同上:36.
4郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):630.
1可参阅Dostal, Robert J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.与Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.导论部分。北京师范大学王业伟的博士论文中也表达了同样的观点。详见:王业伟.论伽达默尔美学对审美现代性的批判[D].北京:北京师范大学文学院博士学位论文,2005.
2 [德]格罗塞.艺术的起源[M].蔡慕晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984:205.
1 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,译.上海:上海三联书店,1996:300.
2同上:306-307.
3同上:306.
1 [意]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1986:6-7.
2同上:29.
3同上:164.
1谢榛.四溟诗话(卷二)[M]//四溟诗话·薑斋诗话.北京:人民文学出版社,1961:41.
2吴乔.围炉诗话(卷一)[C]//清诗话续编(上).郭绍虞,编选.上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:486.
1 Hoy, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
2 Weinsheimer, J. C. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of“Truth and Method”[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
3张汝伦.意义的探究:当代西方释义学[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1986.
4殷鼎.理解的命运:解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988.
5章启群.伽达默尔传[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1998.
1 Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.
2 Grondin, Jean. Sources of Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
3 Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer [M]. Translated by Kathryn Plan. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003.
4 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
5严平.走向解释学的真理:伽达默尔哲学述评[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.
6何卫平.通向解释学辩证法之途:伽达默尔哲学思想研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
7章启群.意义的本体论:哲学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.
8温施梅尔(J. C. Weinsheimer)所著《哲学诠释学与文学理论》是西方文学诠释学研究的代表性作品。此外国内可见的文学诠释学研究成果也非常丰富,张隆溪、金元浦、李建盛、李咏吟等学者从中西文学诠释思想的接洽、文学作品的诠释学结构、作品接受的诠释学视域等诠释学向度对此进行了深入探讨。这表现出伽达默尔的诠释学思想与诗学之间的天然亲近,二者有着相互映证、相互渗透的可观空间。详见: Weinsheimer, J. C. Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.张隆溪.道与逻各斯[M].冯川,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.金元浦.文学解释学[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1997.李建盛.理解事件与文本意义:文学诠释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.李咏吟.诗学解释学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
9具体可参阅:Schuchman, Paul. Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1979, 23 (1): 41-50.以及:张能为.理解的实践:伽达默尔实践哲学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
1 Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics [J]. Philosophy Today, 1994, 38 (4): 369-379.
2 Lawn, Christopher. Gadamer on Poetic and Everyday Language [J]. Philosophy and Literature, 2001, 25 (1) :113-126.
3彭兴伟.伽达默尔对诗与哲学关系的阐释[D].上海:复旦大学哲学学院硕士学位论文,2004.
4 Baker, J. M. Lyric as Paradigm: Hegel and the Speculative Instance of Poetry in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[C]//The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Edited by Robert J. Dostal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 143-166.
5郑湧．伽达默尔哲学解释学的基本思想[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(6):636.
1洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(1):17-23. 洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(下)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006(2):24-29.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:38.
2 [德]伽达默尔.逻辑学抑或修辞学——再论解释学的早期历史[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:223.
1 [德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录(第1卷)[M].贺麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1978:157.
2 hermēneia的基本含义为“思想的表述”,柏拉图的《政治篇》和亚里士多德的《解释篇》对此都有讨论。hermēneuein为其动词形式。
3 Palmer, Richard. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Tory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer [M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969: 12-32.
4同上: 13.
5 Grondin, Jean. Source of Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995: 21.
1让·格朗丹认为Hermēneuein的“解释”和“翻译”两层涵义实际上可被“解释”所囊括,因为翻译即是将不熟悉的发音组合转换为熟悉的语言,这在一定意义上也是解释的一种。参见:Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994: 20-21.
2 [德]伽达默尔.逻辑学抑或修辞学——再论解释学的早期历史[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:216.
3同上:218.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:83.
2柏拉图.斐多篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第一卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002:110.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:649-650.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 478.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学Ⅰ:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:651.笔者认为此句中文版译文的意义不够清楚明了,而英文版相较之下更为明晰,故采用英文版译义。
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:651.
4同上:652.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:645.
2同上.
3 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:28.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
1参见:柏拉图.斐多篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第一卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2002:71-72.以及:亚里士多德.动物志·第三卷[M]//亚里士多德全集(第四卷).苗力田,主编.颜一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 455.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:619.
3 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: SUNY press, 1997: 110.
4参见:Bruns, Gerald. The Hermeneutical Anarchist[C]//Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Edited by Jeff Malpas and etc. Cambridge: the MIT press,2002: 48.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy[M]. Translated by Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986: 35-39.
2亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:35.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 443.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:601-602.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method[M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 453.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:616.
1 Fortin, E. L. Gadamer on Strauss: An Interview [J]. Interpretation, 1984(12):10.
2 [德]伽达默尔.存在、精神、上帝[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:445.
1朱光潜.西方美学史(下卷)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1964:349.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:9.
3恩格斯在评述德国哲学发展过程时,把1790-1840年,即从康德到费尔巴哈这一时期称为“德国古典哲学”时期。见:《马克思恩格斯全集》(第2卷),北京:人民出版社,1965:301.
4当代一些学者将一战后德国出现的这批极富哲理沉思的诗人称为“新浪漫派”诗群。另一部分学者认为“新浪漫派”用语不甚确切,因为实际上并无新浪漫派,只有象征主义、表现主义等流派。这算是一家之言。但实际上“新浪漫派”一词在现代德国文学史、哲学史研究中被广泛采用。在鲍尔森编《现代德国文学中浪漫派的余生》中有对此问题的探讨。以上主要参考了刘小枫《诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统》中关于新浪漫派的看法。见:刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:185.
5 [德]伽达默尔.第3版后记[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:545.
1 [德]伽达默尔.文本和解释[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:402.
2 [英]以赛亚·伯林.浪漫主义的根源[M].亨利·哈代,编.吕梁,等,译.南京:译林出版社,2008:3.
1 [德]奥·史雷格尔.关于美文学和艺术讲座[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:361.
2 [德]诺瓦利斯.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:393.
3 [德]席勒.论素朴的诗与感伤的诗[C]//西方文艺理论名著选编(上卷).伍蠡甫,胡经之,编.北京:北京大学出版社,1985:473.
4 [德]弗·史雷格尔.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:384.
5 [德]诺瓦利斯.断片[C]//欧美古典作家论现实主义和浪漫主义(二).中国社会科学院外国文学研究所外国文学研究资料丛刊编辑委员会,编.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981:393.
1 [德]伽达默尔.汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔自述[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:585.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:131.
1 [德]尼采.作为艺术的强力意志[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:366.
2 [德]尼采.权力意志:重估一切价值的尝试——尼采后期思想文集[M].张念东,凌素心,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000:7.
3 [德]尼采.作为艺术的强力意志[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:348.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:97.
5 [德]尼采.人性,太人性的[M]//尼采散文.杨恒达,等,译.杭州:浙江文艺出版社,2001:29.
6 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:32-33.
1 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:37.
2同上:34.
3 [德]狄尔泰.历史中的意义[M].艾彦,逸飞,译.北京:中国城市出版社,2001:245.
4同上:243.
5同上:248.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:102-103.
2 [德]卡西尔.人论[M].甘阳,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1985:198.
1 [德]尼采.悲剧的诞生[M]//悲剧的诞生——尼采美学文选.周国平,译.北京:三联书店,1986:108.
2同上:18.
3同上:73.
1 [德]伽达默尔.当今德国哲学中的历史问题[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:41-42.
1国内当代著名的黑格尔研究专家贺麟先生在翻译《精神现象学》过程中,对朗贝尔特到黑格尔的这段“现象学”前史进行了梳理。参见:[德]黑格尔.精神现象学(上卷)[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979:译者导言7-11.
2 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:313.
1 [德]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988:5-6.
2 [德]胡塞尔.现象学的观念[M].倪梁康,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986:24.
3倪梁康.现象学及其效应:胡塞尔与当代德国哲学[M].北京,三联书店,1994:35.
4同上:36.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:541.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:363-364.
3 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:313.
4 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:541.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007: 364.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:23.
2同上:26-27.
3 [德]海德格尔.《形而上学是什么?》导言[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:446.
4此处引文为伽达默尔对郑湧论文的批注?ィ甅·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):2.
1 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:4-6.
2同上:14.
3同上:21.
4同上:22.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:208.
2 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:292.
3参见:陈嘉映.海德格尔哲学概论[M].北京:三联书店,1995:285.
4 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林诗的阐释[M].孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:2.
5同上:1.
6 [德]海德格尔.哲学的终结和思的任务[M]//面向思的事情.陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996:60.
1 [德]海德格尔.哲学的终结和思的任务[M]//面向思的事情.陈小文,孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996:62.
2同上:67.
3同上:68.
4同上:70.
5同上:71.
1 [德]伽达默尔.康德与解释学转向[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:316.
2 Heidegger, M. Words[M]//On the Way to Language. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982: 155.
3 [德]海德格尔.从思的经验而来[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:1162.
1 [德]海德格尔.诗人何为?[M]//林中路.孙周兴,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008:245.
2同上:246.
3 [德]海德格尔.论真理的本质[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:233.
4 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:422.
5在《存在与时间》书中,海德格尔已从词源学上指明“在之中”(In-Sein)的“之中”(in-)源自于“居住”(innan-)、“逗留”(habitare)。参见:[德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:63.
1 [德]海德格尔.“……人诗意地栖居……”[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:478.
2同上:478.
3同上:478.
4同上:463.
5刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:241.
6 [德]海德格尔.“……人诗意地栖居……”[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:465.
1 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:366.
2同上:426.
3同上:426.
4 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林和诗的本质[M]//荷尔德林诗的阐释.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:38.
5同上:40.
6 [德]海德格尔.关于人道主义的书信[M]//路标.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:425.
1 [德]海德格尔.荷尔德林和诗的本质[M]//荷尔德林诗的阐释.孙周兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:40.
2同上:40.
3同上:47.
4 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:25.
5 [德]伽达默尔.在现象学和辩证法之间——一种自我批判的尝试[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:12.
1 [德]伽达默尔.在现象学和辩证法之间——一种自我批判的尝试[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:11-15.
2同上:13.
3章启群.理解与审美——伽达默尔解释学及其美学意义[J].解放军外语学院学报,1994(5):99.
1 [美]吉尔伯特,[德]库恩.美学史[M].夏乾丰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989:10.
2 [德]伽达默尔.柏拉图与诗人[M]//伽达默尔论柏拉图.余纪元,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1992:43.
3同上:51.
1 [德]伽达默尔.哲学生涯——我的回顾[M].陈春文,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:172.
1洪汉鼎.作为想象艺术的诠释学(上)——伽达默尔思想晚年定论[J].河北学刊,2006 (1):17.
1严复.严复集(第三册)[M].王栻，主编．北京：中华书局，1986:558-559.
2 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:17.
3 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
4 [德]伽达默尔.《艺术作品的本源》导言[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:96.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:142.
1新约.约翰福音:18.38.
2 [德]伽达默尔.什么是真理?[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:52.
3同上:53.
1 [德]伽达默尔.什么是真理?[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:56.
2同上:56.
3 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
1参见:柏拉图.理想国[M]//柏拉图文艺对话集.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1980:68-79.
2 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:2.
1 [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:6.
2同上:19.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:19.
2同上:140.
3同上:143.
1 [美]艾布拉姆斯.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,童庆生,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:33.
2同上:34.
3可参阅拙文:论近代西方艺术游戏观的发端[J].湖北社会科学,2008(7):127-130.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:143.
2同上:144.
3同上:144.
4同上:145.
5同上:146.
1参见:[荷]约翰·赫伊津哈.游戏的人——关于文化的游戏成分的研究[M].多人,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,1996.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:148.
3同上:150.
4同上:156.
5同上:158.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:157.
2同上:157.
3同上:157.
4同上:159.
5同上:165.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:188.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:69.
2同上:67.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:174.
4同上:177.
5 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:65.
6同上:65.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:71.
2同上:71.
3同上:71.
4亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:35.
5 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:179.
6 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:77.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:76.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:533.
2此处引文为伽达默尔对郑湧论文的批注．见郑湧．M·海德格尔对解释学的哲学贡献[J].人文杂志,2008(6):2.
1彭启福.理解之思——诠释学初论[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2005:108.
2彭启福.走向生存论意义的方法论——关于伽达默尔哲学诠释学的方法论沉思[J].天津社会科学,2008(1):36.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:5.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:121.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:121.
2同上:165.
3同上:165.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:201.
2 Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991: 113.
3殷鼎.理解的命运——解释学初论[M].北京:三联书店,1988:266.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:407.
5同上:408.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:463.
2同上:409.
3同上:405.
4参见:亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M]//亚里士多德全集(第八卷).苗力田,编译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:21-22.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:405-406.
2同上:407.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:8.
1 [德]阿斯特.诠释学[C]//理解与解释——诠释学经典文选.洪汉鼎,主编.北京:东方出版社,2001:7.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:258.
3同上:266.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:266.
2同上:266.
3 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:178.
4同上:176.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论理解的循环[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法.洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:71.
1 [德]伽达默尔.事物的本质和事物的语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:72.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Mimesis [M]// The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 106.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:639.
3同上:659.
4马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005:1.
1 [德]伽达默尔.人和语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:63.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:655.
3柏拉图.克拉底鲁篇[M]//柏拉图全集(第二卷).王晓朝,译.北京:人民出版社,2003:130-133.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:549.
5同上:556.
6同上:557.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:563.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:578-579.
2同上:594.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:598.
2同上:597-598.
3同上:599-600.
4同上:607.
5 [德]伽达默尔.语言在多大程度上规范思想[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:180.
6 [德]伽达默尔.解释学问题的普遍性[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:3.
1马大康.诗性语言研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005:摘要1.
1 Valéry, Paul. The Art of Poetry [M]. Translated by Denise Folliot. New York: Vintage Books, 1961: 170-171. 2参见:[德]伽达默尔.伽达默尔集[M].严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:496,555-556.
1 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:496.
2 [德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2002:85.
3 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:502.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Are the Poets Falling Silent?[ M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 73.
2 [德]伽达默尔.海德格尔和形而上学语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏镇平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:229.
1 [德]伽达默尔.第2版序言[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:532.
2同上:532.
1 [德]伽达默尔.事物的本质和事物的语言[M]//哲学解释学.夏振平,宋建平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1994:72.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:612-613.
3 [德]伽达默尔.精神科学中的真理[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:47.
4 [德]伽达默尔.直观与生动[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:513.
5同上:513.
1 [德]伽达默尔.文本和解释[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:401.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:633.
2 [德]伽达默尔.第3版后记[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:575.
3 [德]伽达默尔.创作与解释[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:557.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:535.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:628.
3同上:632.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:634.
1 [德]伽达默尔.解释学的挑战[J].渊明,译.世界哲学,1982(2):54.
2 [德]伽达默尔.存在、精神、上帝[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:452-453.
1 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:97.
2 Joan Stambaugh是纽约城市大学的哲学教授。她是目前比较活跃的海德格尔研究和翻译专家之一,其主要译作有:英译本《存在与时间》(1996),《同一与差异》(2002),《时间与存在》(2002),以及《哲学的终结》(2003)。
3 Heidegger, Martin. On Time and Being [M]. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1972: ix.
4 [德]海德格尔.存在与时间(修订译本)[M].陈嘉映,王庆节,译.北京:三联书店,1999:20.
1 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:162.
2 [德]海德格尔.时间与存在[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:673.
3 [德]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源[M]//海德格尔选集.孙周兴,选编.上海:上海三联书店,1996:674.
4 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:170.
1 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:172.
2 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:164-165.
3 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:109.
4 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:164.
5 [德]伽达默尔.历史的连续性和存在的瞬间[M]//诠释学II:真理与方法(修订译本).洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:173.
1同上:173.
2 [德]伽达默尔.作为问题的死[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:145.
3同上:146.
4 [德]伽达默尔.西方的时间观[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:108.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:89-90.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:91.
3同上:96.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:470.
2同上:483.
3同上:479.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Divine in Early Greek Thought [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 37.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Kant and the Question of God [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 3.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Reflection on the Relation of Religion and Science [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 126.
4参见:巴门尼德.巴门尼德著作残篇[C]//西方哲学原著选读(上卷).北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室,编译.北京:商务印书馆,1981:30-34.
1 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:621.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Divine in Early Greek Thought [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 37.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Myth in the Age of Science [M]//Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999: 91-102.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 114.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 114.
1 Ibid.: 113.
2 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:541.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 115.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method [M]. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004: 466.同时参见:[德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:634.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]// The Gadamer
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 112-115.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole[M]//Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 91.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Relevance of the Beautiful—Art as Play, Symbol, and Festival [M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 45.
2 Ibid.: 45.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]//The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007: 212.
4 Risser, James. Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics[J]. Philosophy Today, 1992, 38 (4): 369-379.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:113.
1席勒.论素朴的诗和感伤的诗[C]//古典文艺理论译丛(二).古典文艺理论译丛编辑委员会,编.北京:人民文学出版社,1961:48.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Mimesis[M]//The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by Robert Bernasconi, translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 120.
1刘小枫.拯救与逍遥[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001:修订本前言9.
1杨武能.走进歌德[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999:230.
2 [德]伽达默尔.论诗歌对探索真理的贡献[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:534.
3 [德]歌德.歌德谈话录[M].爱克曼,辑录.朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1978:147.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Goethe and Philosophy [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary. Theory Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 1.
2 Ibid.: 17.
3 Ibid.: 15.
4 [德]歌德.歌德文集第5卷:诗与真(下)[M].刘思慕,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999:684.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 32.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 32.
2 Ibid.: 33.
3参见:[德]歌德.歌德文集第5卷:诗与真(下)[M].刘思慕,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1999:683-686.
1 [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:27-28.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 35-36.
1参见:何卫平.伽达默尔为何批评接受美学?[J].文史哲,2008(4):130-139.
1参见:Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994 : 38.
2 [德]歌德.歌德抒情诗选[M].钱春绮,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:27.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994 : 38-39.
2 Ibid.: 40.
3参见:Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 40-41.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 41.
2 Ibid.: 41.
3 Ibid.: 41.
4 [德]卡西尔.卢梭·康德·歌德[M].刘东,译.北京:三联书店,2002:185.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 42.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. On the Course of Human Spiritual Development: Studies of Goethe’s Unfinished Writings [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 65.
2 Ibid.: 42.
3 Ibid.: 57.
4 Ibid.: 54.
1 [奥]茨威格.与魔鬼作斗争:荷尔德林、克莱斯特、尼采[M].徐畅,译.北京:西苑出版社,1998:7-8.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 67.
3 Ibid.: 67.
4 Ibid.: 67.
5 Ibid.: 68.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 69.
2 Ibid.: 70.
3 Ibid.: 70.
4 Ibid.: 72.
5 [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001:170.
6同上:193.
1 [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982:163-164.
2密涅尔娃(Minerva)即雅典娜,她的子民即指雅典人。
1乌拉尼亚是九位缪斯女神之一,是爱与美的女神。
2提洛斯为爱琴海中的小岛,阿波罗的圣地。
3 [德]歌德,等.德国诗选[M].钱春绮,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1982:165-167.
4 [德]荷尔德林.烟雨故园路:荷尔德林书信选[M].张红艳,译.北京:经济日报出版社,2001:211.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 73.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 73.
2刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:100.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and Antiquity [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 67.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press,1994: 89.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 90.
2 Ibid.: 90.
3 Ibid.: 91.
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:139-140.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 92.
3 Ibid.: 92.
4 Ibid.: 93.
5指酒神。
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:143-147.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 94.
3 Ibid.: 91.
4 Ibid.:106.
5 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林文集[M].戴晖,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999:253.
6 [德]荷尔德林.致诺伊斐尔[C]//德语诗学文选(上卷).刘小枫,选编.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006:247.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. H?lderlin and the Future [M]//Literature and Philosophy in Dialogue: Essays in German Literary Theory. Translated by Robert H. Paslick. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994: 101.
2 Ibid.: 90.
3 Ibid.: 102
4 Ibid.: 102.
5 Ibid.:102.
6 Ibid.:107.
7 Ibid.:107.
1 [德]荷尔德林.荷尔德林诗选[M].顾正祥,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1994:44.
2同上:3.
1参见:[德]里尔克.里尔克诗选[M].黄灿然,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003:1.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 154.
3 [德]伽达默尔.语言在多大程度上规范思想[M]//伽达默尔集.严平,编选.邓安庆,等,译.上海:上海远东出版社,2003:180.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 157.
5 Ibid.: 157.
6《杜伊诺哀歌》第一首,2-3行.参见:[德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997:5.
1《杜伊诺哀歌》第二首,18行.参见:[德]里尔克,勒塞,等.《杜伊诺哀歌》与现代基督教思想[M].林克,译.上海:上海三联书店,1997:9.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
3 Ibid.: 158.
4 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Rainer Maria Rilke’s Interpretations of Existence: On the Book by Romano Guardini [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 142.
5 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
6 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Poetry and Punctuation [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 132.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 158.
2 Ibid.: 159.
3 Ibid.: 170.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Mythopoietic Reversal in Rilke’s Duino Elegies [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 159-160.
2关于格奥尔格的生平与创作,可参阅:莫光华.词语破碎之处:格奥尔格引论[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6):13-25.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 83.
4 Ibid.: 87.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 89.
2 Ibid.: 86.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 89.
2 Ibid.: 91.
3 Ibid.: 91.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Verse and the Whole [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 88.
2 Ibid.: 91.
3参见英文版《保罗·策兰诗文选》前言:Celan, Paul. Selected Poems and Prose of Paul Celan [M]. Translated and introduced by John Felstiner. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001: 4 (preface).
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism[M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 111-112.
2 Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 2.
1 [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗歌[J].王家新,译.诗选刊,2007(7):83.
1 [奥]策兰.保罗·策兰诗选[J].王家新,芮虎,译.诗林,2009(4):82.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism [M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 117.
3 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Who Am I and Who Are You? [M]// Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays. Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 69.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Who Am I and Who Are You? [M]// Gadamer on Celan:“Who Am I and Who Are You?”and Other Essays. Translated and edited by Richard Heinemann and Bruce Krajewski. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997: 67.
2 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Under the Shadow of Nihilism[M]// Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Grame Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992: 123.
3 Ibid.: 123.
1 Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Artwork in Word and Image:“So True, So Full of Being!”[M]//The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007: 212.
1张汝伦.伽达默尔和哲学[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(9):510.
1 [德]伽达默尔.科学时代的理性·作者自序[M].薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988:1.
1 [日]丸山高司.伽达默尔:视野融合[M].刘文柱,等,译.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001:155.
1 [德]伽达默尔.美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术[M]//美的现实性——作为游戏、象征、节日的艺术.张志扬,等,译.北京:三联书店,1991:71.
1张祥龙.海德格尔思想与中国天道:终极视域的开启与交融[M].北京:三联书店,1996:187.
2 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:416.
3 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:416.
4 [德]伽达默尔.诠释学I:真理与方法(修订译本)[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:366.
1刘小枫.诗化哲学——德国浪漫美学传统[M].济南:山东文艺出版社,1986:232.
1 [德]伽达默尔.论人类对哲学的自然倾向[M]//科学时代的理性.薛华,等,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988:126.