城市污水处理厂综合评价模型的研究
|
摘要
城市污水处理厂的建造及运行涉及因素众多,其效能影响重大而且深远。为了保证方案选择的合理性和总体决策的正确性,为最终方案的确定提供可靠的依据,就必须对拟选的所有方案进行全面的综合评价。
城市污水处理厂综合评价是一项复杂的系统工程,涉及到社会、经济和环境等各个方面。以往的污水处理厂评价多从经济效益出发,忽略了其他方面的影响因素,存在一定的片面性。
本研究从社会、经济、环境、技术等4个方面选择了具有代表性的19项综合评价指标,并给出了大多数指标的量化公式和标准化方法。之后,根据层次分析法确定各项指标的权重,再采用模糊综合评价法建立了城市污水处理厂的综合评价模型,相对于单一的经济评价模型更加合理和全面。
首先,在综述国内城市污水处理厂综合评价的研究现状基础上,分析评述了目前评价体系已经取得的成果以及还存在的不足,指出了城市污水处理厂综合评价的发展趋势。
其次,介绍了现有的系统综合评价的方法,在明确城市污水处理目标的前提下,根据系统分析的思想,选择了模糊综合评价理论作为总的指导思想,并结合城市污水处理厂的具体实际,构建了由社会、经济、环境、技术等4个方面指标组成的污水处理厂评价系统总体框架。
第三,以熟知指标体系建立原则和指标体系的建立方法为前提,在评价系统总体框架的指导下,从上述4个不同方面着手建立了城市污水处理厂综合评价指标体系。并对指标体系中的定量和定性指标做了分析研究。在广泛查阅资料的基础上,对其中可量化的指标进行了较为科学的量化,并给出了评价指标标准化的方法。
第四,根据系统评价的原则以及污水处理厂的具体情况,选择以层次分析法作为计算评价指标权重系数的方法。通过问卷调研,得出各项指标相应的三标度尺度表,经过分析计算,得出4个方面19项指标的权重系数。在权重系数确定之后,根据模糊综合评价的基本原理,建立了城市污水处理厂的综合评价系统。
第五,对昆明市的水资源情况和水污染情况做了简介,并将昆明市现有的6个污水处理厂的有关数据带入综合评价模型。通过隶属函数法以及主观赋值法将昆明市6个污水处理厂的基本参数标准化,带入综合评价模型进行了4个方面7个指标的综合评价,由此得出三厂相对最优,四厂相对最低。该研究成果为今后新建和改造污水处理厂提供了指标上的参考。
最后,总结了研究成果,同时指出了本论文需要进一步研究和完善的内容。
用层次分析法加模糊综合评价法建立城市污水处理厂的综合评价模型,与现行的城市污水处理厂可行性分析中以经济数据为主的方案选择方法相比,更能客观的反映系统要素对整体的影响,使评价结果更为全面、科学、合理,为优化新建污水处理厂的设计方案和现有污水处理厂的改扩建方案提供了较好的科学依据。
The construction and operation of municipal sewage treatment plant involved many factors, and the impact of the performance are important and far-reaching. In order to ensure the reasonableness of the choice program and the accuracy of the overall decision-making, to provide a reliable basis for the final determining, made all-around comprehensive evaluation on all the project is necessary.
Making evaluation on urban sewage treatment plant is a complex and systematic project which is involved the social, economic and environmental aspects. Previous evaluations of the urban sewage treatment plant were preceded more from the economic benefits; there are one-sidedness that the other influence factors were neglected.
This study selected 19 comprehensive evaluation indexes from 4 aspects of the social, economic, environmental, technical, and the quantization formula and standardized method of the most indexes. The weights of the various indexes are confirmed by AHP, and the comprehensive evaluation model of urban sewage treatment plant is established by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, it is more reasonable and comprehensive than the single economic evaluation model.
Firstly, on the base of summarized the comprehensive evaluation domestic of urban sewage treatment plant, the study analyzed the achievements and deficiencies of the current evaluation system, and it point out the development trend of the urban sewage treatment plant evaluation.
Secondly, the study introduced the existing system evaluation method, in the precondition of nail down the aim of urban sewage treatment, according to the ideology of system analysis, the theory of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is chose to be as the guiding ideology, combine with the actual conditions of municipal sewage treatment plant, it constructed an overall framework of urban sewage treatment plant which is composed by the social, economic, environmental, technical aspects.
Thirdly, in the premise of familiar with the principles and methods of the index system, on the guidelines of the overall frame of evaluation system, the evaluation index system of the urban sewage treatment plant was established from the above 4 different aspects. The study also gives the analysis of the quantitative and qualitative indexes form the index System. On the basis of a wide range of data access, the study gives the scientific quantification of the quantifiable indexes, and gives a standardized method of evaluation indexes.
Fourthly, on the foundation of the principle of systematic evaluation and the fact circumstances of urban sewage treatment plants, the study used AHP evaluation method to calculate the weight coefficient. Through the questionnaire, it educes the corresponding scaling list to three tables of the indexes. After analyzed, it educes the indexes weight coefficients form 4 aspects of 19 indexes. After the weight coefficient has been determined, according to fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the urban sewage treatment plant comprehensive evaluation system was established.
Fifthly, the circumstances of the water resources and water pollution in Kunming were brief introduced in this study, and the relevant data of existing 6 sewage treatment plants was put into the comprehensive evaluation model. The basic parameters of the Kunming six sewage treatment plants were standardized through the subjection function and subjective assignment, and the numerical value were put into the comprehensive evaluation model which contains 4 aspects 7 indexes, the result indicates that though the calculation of this evaluation model, the 3rd sewage treatment plant is the optimal, the 4th sewage treatment plant is the minimum. The research results can be a reference for the newly-built sewage treatment plant in the future.
Finally, it summarizes the research results in conclusions part, and it also pointed out the content which is need for further research.
Comparing with the present programs selection which is briefly according to the economic data used in urban sewage treatment plant feasibility analysis, the comprehensive evaluation model of urban sewage treatment plant established by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation technique can reflect the influence of each system factor to the whole body more objectively, and makes the evaluating results more scientifically and reasonably, provides preferable scientific accordance for the optimization and selection of source pollution control programs.
城市污水处理厂综合评价是一项复杂的系统工程,涉及到社会、经济和环境等各个方面。以往的污水处理厂评价多从经济效益出发,忽略了其他方面的影响因素,存在一定的片面性。
本研究从社会、经济、环境、技术等4个方面选择了具有代表性的19项综合评价指标,并给出了大多数指标的量化公式和标准化方法。之后,根据层次分析法确定各项指标的权重,再采用模糊综合评价法建立了城市污水处理厂的综合评价模型,相对于单一的经济评价模型更加合理和全面。
首先,在综述国内城市污水处理厂综合评价的研究现状基础上,分析评述了目前评价体系已经取得的成果以及还存在的不足,指出了城市污水处理厂综合评价的发展趋势。
其次,介绍了现有的系统综合评价的方法,在明确城市污水处理目标的前提下,根据系统分析的思想,选择了模糊综合评价理论作为总的指导思想,并结合城市污水处理厂的具体实际,构建了由社会、经济、环境、技术等4个方面指标组成的污水处理厂评价系统总体框架。
第三,以熟知指标体系建立原则和指标体系的建立方法为前提,在评价系统总体框架的指导下,从上述4个不同方面着手建立了城市污水处理厂综合评价指标体系。并对指标体系中的定量和定性指标做了分析研究。在广泛查阅资料的基础上,对其中可量化的指标进行了较为科学的量化,并给出了评价指标标准化的方法。
第四,根据系统评价的原则以及污水处理厂的具体情况,选择以层次分析法作为计算评价指标权重系数的方法。通过问卷调研,得出各项指标相应的三标度尺度表,经过分析计算,得出4个方面19项指标的权重系数。在权重系数确定之后,根据模糊综合评价的基本原理,建立了城市污水处理厂的综合评价系统。
第五,对昆明市的水资源情况和水污染情况做了简介,并将昆明市现有的6个污水处理厂的有关数据带入综合评价模型。通过隶属函数法以及主观赋值法将昆明市6个污水处理厂的基本参数标准化,带入综合评价模型进行了4个方面7个指标的综合评价,由此得出三厂相对最优,四厂相对最低。该研究成果为今后新建和改造污水处理厂提供了指标上的参考。
最后,总结了研究成果,同时指出了本论文需要进一步研究和完善的内容。
用层次分析法加模糊综合评价法建立城市污水处理厂的综合评价模型,与现行的城市污水处理厂可行性分析中以经济数据为主的方案选择方法相比,更能客观的反映系统要素对整体的影响,使评价结果更为全面、科学、合理,为优化新建污水处理厂的设计方案和现有污水处理厂的改扩建方案提供了较好的科学依据。
The construction and operation of municipal sewage treatment plant involved many factors, and the impact of the performance are important and far-reaching. In order to ensure the reasonableness of the choice program and the accuracy of the overall decision-making, to provide a reliable basis for the final determining, made all-around comprehensive evaluation on all the project is necessary.
Making evaluation on urban sewage treatment plant is a complex and systematic project which is involved the social, economic and environmental aspects. Previous evaluations of the urban sewage treatment plant were preceded more from the economic benefits; there are one-sidedness that the other influence factors were neglected.
This study selected 19 comprehensive evaluation indexes from 4 aspects of the social, economic, environmental, technical, and the quantization formula and standardized method of the most indexes. The weights of the various indexes are confirmed by AHP, and the comprehensive evaluation model of urban sewage treatment plant is established by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, it is more reasonable and comprehensive than the single economic evaluation model.
Firstly, on the base of summarized the comprehensive evaluation domestic of urban sewage treatment plant, the study analyzed the achievements and deficiencies of the current evaluation system, and it point out the development trend of the urban sewage treatment plant evaluation.
Secondly, the study introduced the existing system evaluation method, in the precondition of nail down the aim of urban sewage treatment, according to the ideology of system analysis, the theory of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is chose to be as the guiding ideology, combine with the actual conditions of municipal sewage treatment plant, it constructed an overall framework of urban sewage treatment plant which is composed by the social, economic, environmental, technical aspects.
Thirdly, in the premise of familiar with the principles and methods of the index system, on the guidelines of the overall frame of evaluation system, the evaluation index system of the urban sewage treatment plant was established from the above 4 different aspects. The study also gives the analysis of the quantitative and qualitative indexes form the index System. On the basis of a wide range of data access, the study gives the scientific quantification of the quantifiable indexes, and gives a standardized method of evaluation indexes.
Fourthly, on the foundation of the principle of systematic evaluation and the fact circumstances of urban sewage treatment plants, the study used AHP evaluation method to calculate the weight coefficient. Through the questionnaire, it educes the corresponding scaling list to three tables of the indexes. After analyzed, it educes the indexes weight coefficients form 4 aspects of 19 indexes. After the weight coefficient has been determined, according to fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the urban sewage treatment plant comprehensive evaluation system was established.
Fifthly, the circumstances of the water resources and water pollution in Kunming were brief introduced in this study, and the relevant data of existing 6 sewage treatment plants was put into the comprehensive evaluation model. The basic parameters of the Kunming six sewage treatment plants were standardized through the subjection function and subjective assignment, and the numerical value were put into the comprehensive evaluation model which contains 4 aspects 7 indexes, the result indicates that though the calculation of this evaluation model, the 3rd sewage treatment plant is the optimal, the 4th sewage treatment plant is the minimum. The research results can be a reference for the newly-built sewage treatment plant in the future.
Finally, it summarizes the research results in conclusions part, and it also pointed out the content which is need for further research.
Comparing with the present programs selection which is briefly according to the economic data used in urban sewage treatment plant feasibility analysis, the comprehensive evaluation model of urban sewage treatment plant established by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation technique can reflect the influence of each system factor to the whole body more objectively, and makes the evaluating results more scientifically and reasonably, provides preferable scientific accordance for the optimization and selection of source pollution control programs.
引文
[1]张东,蔡迎春,吕岩林.污水回用的重要性及方法[J].现代日用科学,2001(1):10-10
[2]胡佐斌.试论我国古代的生态和环境保护[J].中国西部科技,2003(6):94-95
[3]刘军伟,赵秀改.污水处理和再利用是节水的重要途径[J].山西水利,2005,27(4):39-41
[4]何旭.我国污水处理事业现状的问题分析及发展对策[J].中国科技信息,2007(1):22-23
[5]张松滨,李万海,王红.污水处理设施性能评价中的赋权相关分析[J].环境工程,1999,17(5):55-58
[6]朱羽中,范先雄.九江炼油污水处理运行模式评价[J].石油化工环境保护,1999(1):31-34
[7]刘开第,李思敏,庞彦军.污水处理厂运行管理效果评价模型[J].中国给水排水,2000,16(8):45-47
[8]李如忠.多层次模糊综合评判模型在城市污水处理中的应用[J].淮南工业学院学报,2000,20(4):1-4
[9]范祖悦,邹蔚.污水处理扩建工程的模糊决策[J].工业工程与管理,2002(2):61-63
[10]王国平,王洪光.集对分析用于污水处理厂的综合评价[J].江苏环境科技,2002,15(1):16-19
[11]陈郁,郑洪波,杨凤林,张树深.城市污水处理厂生命周期评价方法初探及应用案例[J].大连理工大学学报,2003,43(3):292-297
[12]狄军贞,刘书贤.污水处理厂治理设施的模糊综合评价及优选[J].工程设计与建设,2004,36(1):40-42
[13]李凡修,梅平,陈武.多元集对模型在污水处理厂改造决策中应用[J].环境科学与技术,2004,27(6):92-94
[14]郭劲松,杨渊,方芳.西部小城镇污水处理技术评价指标体系研究[J].重庆大学学报,2005,11(2):14-17
[15]龚宏伟.污水处理厂运行效果的模糊综合评价[J].河北建筑工程学院学报,2005,23(4):10-13
[16]何雪梅,吴义锋.统计模型在污水处理厂试运行评价中的应用[J].工程与建设,2006,20(5):521-523
[17]王佰伟,曹升乐.工业废水治理效果多目标评价方法研究[J].山东大学学报,2007,37(3):89-92
[18]水利部.“十一五”及2020年水利发展规划思路目标[J].中国水利,2005(7):5-6
[19]贺北方,吴泽宁,杨建水.复杂系统的灰度综合评估研究[J].郑州工业大学学报,2000,20(1):46-49
[20]冯尚友.多目标决策理论方法与应用[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1990.
[21]钱学森等.论系统工程[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
[22]张鸿茂等.系统工程在水利水电工程中的应用[M].石家庄:河北深水利学会,1986.3
[23]傅先武.城市防洪工程必须与环境整治紧密结合[J].中国水利,2001(5):35
[24]刘武,娄成武.定量分析方法[M].武汉:武汉出版社,2003.1
[25]沈时兴.城市给水厂综合评价模型及应用[D]:[硕士学位论文].合肥:合肥工业大学,2005
[26]胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.1
[27]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.1
[28]秦寿康等.综合评价原理与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2003.5
[29]苏为华.多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].厦门:厦门大学,2000
[30]Saaty T L.Multi-criteria Decision Making.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,1996.
[31]Saaty T L.Inner and outer Dependence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process:The Super matrix and Super hierarchy.Pittsburgh:Proceeding of the 2~(nd)ISAHP,1991.
[32]Saaty T L.Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,1996
[33]李洪兴,汪培庄.模糊数学[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1994.2
[34]汪培庄,李洪兴.模糊系统理论和模糊计算机[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
[35]陈守煌.系统模糊决策理论与应用[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,1994.
[36]K.Kim,K.S.Park.Ranking numbers with index of optimism.Fuzzy sets and System.1990,143-150
[37]张跃等.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1996.
[38]王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998.
[39]Sparks R.E."Ecosystem effects:positive and negative outcomes,"in the Great flood of 1993.Boulder,OO:WestviewPress.1996
[40]冯宝平.区域水资源可持续利用理论与应用研究[D]:[博士学位论文].南京:河海大学,2004
[41]唐克旺.水资源可持续利用指标体系探讨[J].水问题论坛,1999(3):48-53
[42]于丽英,冯之浚.城市循环经济评价指标体系的设计[J].中国软科学,2005(12):44-53
[43]杨义群.多元统计分析:兼论有关新方法、新观点[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996.3
[44]Richard A.Johnson,Dean W.Wichem,陆漩译.实用多元统计分析(第四版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.4
[45]何晓群.回归分析与经济数据建模[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.5
[46]袁志发,周静芋.多元统计分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[47]王顺久,杨志峰.区域农业生态环境质量综合评价投影寻踪模型研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(1):173-175.
[48]傅湘,纪昌明.区域水资源承载能力综合评价-主成分分析法的应用[J].1999,8(2):168-173.
[49]饶琳.谷城县城市污水处理厂工艺方案与技术经济评价[D]:[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中科技大学,2005
[50]Mc NVRLIN & Sprague.Information Systems Management in Practice.Prentice Hall.1998:107-109
[51]徐国祥.管理统计学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1995:101-104
[52]Yang Qing,Wang LiYan.On Two criteria of Investment Decision Making.Proceedings of 18th International Conference on computers & Industrial Engineering,ShangHai,China Machine Press.1995:101-105
[53]Lewis,Bernard T,周佳平等译.工厂工程师管理指南[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1992:71-72
[54]梅明蕾,曹阳.国际经济惯例实用指南[M].武汉:湖北辞书出版社,1993:50-51
[55]王丰效.定性指标体系综合评价研究[J].固原师专学报(自然科学版),2002,23(6):6-8
[56]冯德益,楼世博等.模糊数学方法与应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1983:73
[57]Mizumoto,Masaharu.Trends and Perspectives of Fuzzy Engineering,Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics Vol.7,No.1,1993
[58]范中洲.散装船舶安全评判数学模型的研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].大连:大连海事大学,2002.
[59]张凯.变电构架可靠性模糊综合评判研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].郑州:郑州大学,2003.
[60]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:85
[61]Victor B.Kreng and Chao-Yi Wu.Evaluation or knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach:The case of Taiwanese stone industry[J].European Journal of Operational Rearch,Inpress,Corrected Proof,Available online 25 January 2006.
[62]陈玉明.孤东滩海油田原油外输方案模糊综合评判研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2002.
[2]胡佐斌.试论我国古代的生态和环境保护[J].中国西部科技,2003(6):94-95
[3]刘军伟,赵秀改.污水处理和再利用是节水的重要途径[J].山西水利,2005,27(4):39-41
[4]何旭.我国污水处理事业现状的问题分析及发展对策[J].中国科技信息,2007(1):22-23
[5]张松滨,李万海,王红.污水处理设施性能评价中的赋权相关分析[J].环境工程,1999,17(5):55-58
[6]朱羽中,范先雄.九江炼油污水处理运行模式评价[J].石油化工环境保护,1999(1):31-34
[7]刘开第,李思敏,庞彦军.污水处理厂运行管理效果评价模型[J].中国给水排水,2000,16(8):45-47
[8]李如忠.多层次模糊综合评判模型在城市污水处理中的应用[J].淮南工业学院学报,2000,20(4):1-4
[9]范祖悦,邹蔚.污水处理扩建工程的模糊决策[J].工业工程与管理,2002(2):61-63
[10]王国平,王洪光.集对分析用于污水处理厂的综合评价[J].江苏环境科技,2002,15(1):16-19
[11]陈郁,郑洪波,杨凤林,张树深.城市污水处理厂生命周期评价方法初探及应用案例[J].大连理工大学学报,2003,43(3):292-297
[12]狄军贞,刘书贤.污水处理厂治理设施的模糊综合评价及优选[J].工程设计与建设,2004,36(1):40-42
[13]李凡修,梅平,陈武.多元集对模型在污水处理厂改造决策中应用[J].环境科学与技术,2004,27(6):92-94
[14]郭劲松,杨渊,方芳.西部小城镇污水处理技术评价指标体系研究[J].重庆大学学报,2005,11(2):14-17
[15]龚宏伟.污水处理厂运行效果的模糊综合评价[J].河北建筑工程学院学报,2005,23(4):10-13
[16]何雪梅,吴义锋.统计模型在污水处理厂试运行评价中的应用[J].工程与建设,2006,20(5):521-523
[17]王佰伟,曹升乐.工业废水治理效果多目标评价方法研究[J].山东大学学报,2007,37(3):89-92
[18]水利部.“十一五”及2020年水利发展规划思路目标[J].中国水利,2005(7):5-6
[19]贺北方,吴泽宁,杨建水.复杂系统的灰度综合评估研究[J].郑州工业大学学报,2000,20(1):46-49
[20]冯尚友.多目标决策理论方法与应用[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1990.
[21]钱学森等.论系统工程[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
[22]张鸿茂等.系统工程在水利水电工程中的应用[M].石家庄:河北深水利学会,1986.3
[23]傅先武.城市防洪工程必须与环境整治紧密结合[J].中国水利,2001(5):35
[24]刘武,娄成武.定量分析方法[M].武汉:武汉出版社,2003.1
[25]沈时兴.城市给水厂综合评价模型及应用[D]:[硕士学位论文].合肥:合肥工业大学,2005
[26]胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.1
[27]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.1
[28]秦寿康等.综合评价原理与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2003.5
[29]苏为华.多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].厦门:厦门大学,2000
[30]Saaty T L.Multi-criteria Decision Making.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,1996.
[31]Saaty T L.Inner and outer Dependence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process:The Super matrix and Super hierarchy.Pittsburgh:Proceeding of the 2~(nd)ISAHP,1991.
[32]Saaty T L.Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,1996
[33]李洪兴,汪培庄.模糊数学[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1994.2
[34]汪培庄,李洪兴.模糊系统理论和模糊计算机[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
[35]陈守煌.系统模糊决策理论与应用[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,1994.
[36]K.Kim,K.S.Park.Ranking numbers with index of optimism.Fuzzy sets and System.1990,143-150
[37]张跃等.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1996.
[38]王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998.
[39]Sparks R.E."Ecosystem effects:positive and negative outcomes,"in the Great flood of 1993.Boulder,OO:WestviewPress.1996
[40]冯宝平.区域水资源可持续利用理论与应用研究[D]:[博士学位论文].南京:河海大学,2004
[41]唐克旺.水资源可持续利用指标体系探讨[J].水问题论坛,1999(3):48-53
[42]于丽英,冯之浚.城市循环经济评价指标体系的设计[J].中国软科学,2005(12):44-53
[43]杨义群.多元统计分析:兼论有关新方法、新观点[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996.3
[44]Richard A.Johnson,Dean W.Wichem,陆漩译.实用多元统计分析(第四版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.4
[45]何晓群.回归分析与经济数据建模[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.5
[46]袁志发,周静芋.多元统计分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[47]王顺久,杨志峰.区域农业生态环境质量综合评价投影寻踪模型研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(1):173-175.
[48]傅湘,纪昌明.区域水资源承载能力综合评价-主成分分析法的应用[J].1999,8(2):168-173.
[49]饶琳.谷城县城市污水处理厂工艺方案与技术经济评价[D]:[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中科技大学,2005
[50]Mc NVRLIN & Sprague.Information Systems Management in Practice.Prentice Hall.1998:107-109
[51]徐国祥.管理统计学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1995:101-104
[52]Yang Qing,Wang LiYan.On Two criteria of Investment Decision Making.Proceedings of 18th International Conference on computers & Industrial Engineering,ShangHai,China Machine Press.1995:101-105
[53]Lewis,Bernard T,周佳平等译.工厂工程师管理指南[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1992:71-72
[54]梅明蕾,曹阳.国际经济惯例实用指南[M].武汉:湖北辞书出版社,1993:50-51
[55]王丰效.定性指标体系综合评价研究[J].固原师专学报(自然科学版),2002,23(6):6-8
[56]冯德益,楼世博等.模糊数学方法与应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1983:73
[57]Mizumoto,Masaharu.Trends and Perspectives of Fuzzy Engineering,Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics Vol.7,No.1,1993
[58]范中洲.散装船舶安全评判数学模型的研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].大连:大连海事大学,2002.
[59]张凯.变电构架可靠性模糊综合评判研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].郑州:郑州大学,2003.
[60]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:85
[61]Victor B.Kreng and Chao-Yi Wu.Evaluation or knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach:The case of Taiwanese stone industry[J].European Journal of Operational Rearch,Inpress,Corrected Proof,Available online 25 January 2006.
[62]陈玉明.孤东滩海油田原油外输方案模糊综合评判研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2002.