保护地番茄甲基溴替代技术研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
2002-2003年在北京对保护地番茄进行了甲基溴土壤消毒替代技术研究。这些替代技术旨在防治保护地番茄土传病害。研究的替代技术包括使用熏蒸剂威百亩17.5g/m~2-52.5g/m~2、硫酰氟12.5g/m~2-50g/m~2、太阳能消毒结合生物防治剂和使用人工基质栽培技术。试验在滴灌及覆盖塑料薄膜的条件下进行。
     通过跟踪调查,处理土壤中的镰孢菌数量显著低于对照区,处理后立即分离显示甲基溴、威百亩和硫酰氟熏蒸处理对镰孢菌都有良好的效果。考查二种熏蒸剂处理后的镰孢菌减退率表明:威百亩处理的为91.8%-99.0%、硫酰氟处理的为44.4%-98.3%,高浓度处理的较甲基溴处理的(100%)无显著性差异,但太阳能消毒效果较差,其镰孢菌减退率仅为18.8%。从第2次分析开始,镰孢菌开始上升。有益菌木霉的数量虽然在在处理后迅速下降,但4个月后大部分处理有不同程度的恢复。
     防治线虫方面,威百亩35g/m~2-52.5g/m~2和硫酰氟25g/m~2-50g/m~2有良好效果,太阳能消毒和硫酰氟12.5g/m~2效果较差。线虫总数和根结线虫数在处理后显著下降,但线虫总数很快上升。根结指数在各个处理间有明显的差异。
     与对照相比,其它处理促进了番茄的长势。株高和茎粗都有提高。生长增进反应最大的几个处理分别为威百亩35g/m~2、硫酰氟25g/m~2和威百亩52.5g/m~2,最小的为基质、太阳能消毒结合生物防治剂以及硫酰氟12.5g/m~2。
     应用甲基溴土壤消毒及其替代技术使番茄增产7.46%-34.05%。产量最高的两个处理为威百亩35g/m~2和硫酰氟50g/m~2,最低的两个处理为太阳能消毒结合生物防治剂和硫酰氟12.5g/m~2。非商品果产量则对照最高。各个处理的单株果数、单株果重和单果重也有差异,应用替代技术的处理中这几项指标高于对照。
     经济效益方面,甲基溴处理纯效益为12657元/公顷;威百亩为3279元-17841元/公顷;硫酰氟为6440元-9516元/公顷;太阳能消毒结合生防剂处理为912元/公顷;基质由于一次性投入较高,从一茬作物的产量看未见明显的经济效益,但基质可反复使用多次,并有良好的环境生态效益,这项技术在经济发达地区具有很好的应用前景。
     替代技术在后茬作物上仍表现良好效果。黄瓜长势受到明显影响。株高在各个处理间差异很大,对照最低,仅为55.4cm,威百亩35g/m~2处理的最高,达85.2cm。这一结果与前茬作物是一致的。
     土壤消毒剂显著影响土壤的化学性质,铵态氮、硝态氮的含量及土壤pH值发生了变化。甲基溴处理和威百亩52.5g/m~2使土壤中铵态氮的含量增高;太阳能消毒、硫酰氟25g/m~2-50g/m~2硝态氮较高,各个处理pH值均较对照低;有机质、有效氮、
    
    有效磷和有效钾的含量不受影响。
     通过试验表明,威百亩和硫酸氟是有效的甲基澳替代品,太阳能消毒结合生物
    防治剂和基质栽培则效果较差。
     硫酸氟土壤熏蒸防治土传病害效果好,增产显著,是一种很有潜力的甲基泥土
    壤消毒替代品,建议用量259/m2:威百亩也是一种良好的替代品,建议用量35g/m\
    太阳能消毒结合生物防治剂效果不够好,需要继续研究改进其应用技术:基质栽培
    防治土传病害效果好,但需要研究合适的配方,改进使用技术。
Study on methyl bromide alternatives of greenhouse tomato was carried out in 2002-2003 to control soil-borne diseases.The alternative techniques and methods include using soil fumigants metham sodium and sulfuryl fluoride,solarization combinated with bio-control agent (BCA) and planting with substrate.The field trials were conducted together with using drip irrigation system and polyethylene film.Results indicated that metham sodium and sulfuryl fluoride were effective replacements for methyl bromide and solarization combined with BCA and substrate were noneffective.
    Fusarium spp. populations in treated plots were significantly lower than untreated plots during 4 months' survey.Results indicated that methyl bromide,metham sodium and sulfuryl flulride fumigation had good efficacy and soil solarization combined with BCA were not very effective in the first analysis after treating.Reduction rate of Fusarium spp.of methyl bromide,metham sodium,sulfuryl fluoride and solarization were 100%,91.8%-99.0%,44.4%-98.3% and 18.8%,respectively. Fusarium spp. populations began to increase since the second analysis. Beneficial fungi Trichoderma spp.populations also decreased rapidly after treating but recovered partially in most of the treatments after 4 months.
    Metham sodium 35g/m2-52.5g/m2 and sulfuryl fluoride 25g/m2-50g/m2 had good efficacy on controlling root-knot nematodes whereas soil solarization combined with BCA and sulfuryl flulride 12.5g/m2 were noneffective.Total nematodes and root-knot nematodes populations decreased markedly after treating but total nematode populations soon increased. Root-knot index among different treatments were significantly different..
    Vigour of tomato such as plant height and stem diameter were accelerated in different degree.The most effective treatments were metham sodium 35g/m2,sulfuryl fluoride25g/m2 and metham sodium 35g/m2 whereas substrate,soil solarization combined with BCA and sulfuryl fluoride 12.5 g/m2 were not so effective.
    Methyl bromide fumigation and its alternatives improved tomato yield with the range of 7.46%-34.05%.The treatments with the highest yield were metham sodium 35g/m and sulfuryl flulride 50g/m2 and the lowest is soil solarization combined with BCA and sulfuryl fluoride 12.5 g/m2.Untreated plots produced more unmarketable fruits than the other treatments. Fruit number, fruit weight of single plant and single fruit weight in treated plots were lower than untreated plots.
    Analysis on economic results of different treatments indicated that every treatments
    
    
    
    made profit except substrate treatment.The profit of methyl bromide, metham sodium, sulfuryl fluoride and solarization combined with BCA were 12657yuan, 3279yuan -17841yuan, 6440yuan-9516yuan and 912yuan per hectare,respectively. Substrate treatment had no significant profit in one crop season because it need very high one-off investment. Substrate can be used repeatedly and has benefit on environment so it has very good foreground for applying.
    Investigation in 2003 indicated that methyl bromide alternatives still had good efficacy on the succedent crop. Vigor of cucumber were markedly advanced.Plant height was significant different in various treatments.Average plant height of untreated plots was the shortest with 55.4cm and that of metham sodium 35g/m2 treatment was the highest with 85.2cm.This results were similar to the former crop tomato.
    Soil fumigation affected soil chemical characteristics such as the content of NH4+-N ,NO3-N and pH of soil.Organic matter, Available phosphorus, Available Kalium and Organic carbon were not affectd.
    The study indicated that fumigating with sulfuryl fluoride could effectively control soil-borne pathogens,remarkably improve crop yield ,thereby having great potentialities to replace methyl bromide as soil fumigant.Fumigating with metham sodium also acquired good results. Applied dosage of sulfuryl fluoride and metham sodium should be 25g/m2 and 35g/m2,respectively.Soil solarization combined with BCA was not very effective so it is needed to continue to r
引文
1. 马淑健,张新乾,程占胜.梳角窃蠹的初步研究.河南省农业大学学报 1990,24(4):479~483.
    2. 方中达编著.植病研究方法.北京:中国农业出版社,1998
    3. 乐海洋,李冠雄,喻国泉.硫酰氟熏杀双钩异翅长蠹等害虫试验初报.植物检疫,1997a
    4. 乐海洋,朱绍智,李冠雄.二氧化碳对硫酰氟毒杀谷斑皮蠹的增效作用.植物检疫1997b,12(5):257~259.
    5. 卢家川,利用硫酰氟熏杀双钩异翅长蠹初报. 海南林业科技,1991,(2):16~20.
    6. 史绍德,黄弋峰.熏蒸防治观赏树蛀干害虫.江西林业科技,1986,(1):33~34.
    7. 叶炳元。栗克森.溴甲烷硫酰氟二硫化碳熏蒸苗木杀虫试验简报.植物检疫,1997
    8. 刘维志主编.植物病原线虫学.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.373.
    9. 林郁编.农药应用大全.北京.农业出版社.1989
    10.郑文华.硫酰氟对集装箱害虫熏杀效果研究.西南农业大学学报.1994,16(1):41-44
    11.胡善敏,杨维宁,闫学民.日本松干蚧疫材熏蒸处理试验初报.森林病虫通讯 1993,(3):39.
    12.唐祖庭,王保章.病木采伐与薰蒸灭虫防治松材线虫病的研究.松材线虫防治技术研究鉴定会,1989b.南林大情报室(7)1799:13
    13.唐祖庭,游国亮.松材线虫萎蔫病的防治.松材线虫防治技术研究鉴定会,1989a. 南林大情报室(7)1799:3
    14.徐国淦.熏蒸剂硫酰氟及熏蒸处理设备在我国的开发研究.植物检疫 1990,12(1):38-46
    15.曹坳程主编.中国甲基溴土壤消毒替代技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2000
    16. Ashley, M.G.,Leigh, B.L.,and Lioyd,L.S.The action of metham-sodium in soil:Factors affecting the removol of methyl isothiocyanate residues.J.Sci.Food Agric. 1963,14:153-161.
    17. Baker, K..F.,and Cook,J.R. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens.The American Phytopathological Society, St.Paul,MN. 1982.
    18. Baker, K.F.,and Cook,J.R. Biological control of plant pathogens.1974.W.H.Freeman and Co.,San Francisco.
    19. Becker, J.O.,Ohr, H.D.,Grech,N.M.,McGiffen,M.E.Jr.,and Sims,J.J..Evaluation of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant container and small field plot studies.Pesticide Science. 1998,52:58-62.
    20. Benson,D.M. Thermal inactivation of Phytophthora cinnamomi for control of Fraser Pit root rot.P hytopathology. 1978,68:1373-1376.
    21. Ben-Yephet,Y. Penetration of metham and mylone into soil columns as measured by their effect on viability of microsclerotia of Verticillium dahliae. Plant Soil. 1979,53:341-349.
    22. Ben-Yephet,Y.,and Frank,Z.R.Effect of soil structure on penetration by metham-sodium and of temperature on concentrations required to kill soilboren pathogens. Phytopathology. 1985,75:403-406.
    23. Ben-Yephet,Y.,Biton,S.,Mor, N.,Keren,Y.,and Greenberger, A. Control of Sclerotinia scierotilrum by soil disinfestations with metham-sodium and by aerial application of Benomyl. Phytopathology. 1983,11:207.
    24. Ben-Yephet,Y.,Melero-Vera,J.M.,and DeVay, J.E. Interaction of soil solarization and metam-sodium in the destruction of Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum
    
    f.sp.vasinfectum. Crop Prof. 1988a,7:327-331.
    25. Ben-Yephet,Y.,Siti,E.,and Frank,Z.R.Control of Verticillium dahliae by metham-sodium in loessial soil and effect on potato tuber yields. Plant Dis. 1983,67:1223-1225.
    26. Ben-Yephet, Y.,Stapleton,,J.J.,Wakeman,R.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Comparativr effects of solarization with single and double layers of polyethylene film on survival of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum. Phytoparasitica. . 1988b, 15:181-185.
    27. Bihan,B.L.,Soulas,M.L.,Comporota, P.,Salerno, M.I.,and Perrin,R. Evaluation of soil solar heating for control of damping-off fungi in two forest nursetees in France.Biol. Fertil.Soils. 1997,25:189-195.
    28. Cascone,Ct,D'Emilio,A.,Polizzi,G. et al. Effectiveness of greenhouse soil solarization with different plastic mulches in controlling corky root and root-knot on tomato. Acta Horticulture, Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on chemical and non-chemical soil and substrate disinfestation, 2000, 532: 29-32.
    29. Chambers,D.M., Millard,C.E.. Assessing the global use potential ofsulfuryl fluoride. 1995 annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. S.1. (USA). s.n. 1995. p. 83/1-83/2.
    30. Chellemi,D.O.,Olson,S.M.,and Mitchell,D.J.Efficts of soil solarization and fumigation on survival of soilborne pathogens of tomato in northern Florida.Plant Dis. 1994,78:1167-1172.
    31. Chellemi,D.O.,Olson,S.M.,Mitchell,D.J.,Secker, I.,and McSorley, R. Adaptation of soil solarization to the integrated management of soliborne pests of tomato under humid conditions.Phytopathology. 1997,87:250-258.
    32. Coelho,L.,MitchilI,D.J.,and Chellemi,D.O.Thermal inactivation of phytophthora nicotianae.Phytopathology 2000,90:1089-1097.
    33. Conn,K.L.and Lazarovits,G.Impact of animal manures on verticillium wilt,potato scab,and soil microbial populations.Can.J.Plant Pathol. 1999,21:81-92.
    34. Csinos,A.S.,Sumner, D.R.,Johnson,W.C.,Johnson,A.W.,McPherson,R.M.,and Dowler, C.C.Methyl bromide alternatives in tobacco,tomato,and pepper transplant production.Crop Protection. 2000,19:39-49.
    35. Davis,J.R.,Huisman,O,C.,westermann,D,T.,Hafez, S.L.,Evorson,L.H. and Schneider, A.T. Effects of green manures on Vertillium wilt of potato. Phytopathology. 1996,86:444-453.
    36. DeVay, J.E. Historical review and principles of soil solarization.ln: DeVay, J.E.,Stapleton,J.J.,and Elmore,C.L.Soii solarization.FAO Plant Pro.Bull. 1991.1-15.
    37. Eayre, C.G.,sims, J.J. Ohr, H.D.,and Mackey, B.Evaluation of methyl iodide for control of peach replant disorder.Plant Disease. 2000,84:1177-1179.
    38. Eayre, C.G.and Sims, J.J. Effect of methyl iodide and chloropicrin on strawberry yield in california.Phytopathology.2000, 90:S21.
    39. Elad Y, Chat I,and Henis Y.Phytoparasitica.1981,9:59-67.
    40. Eshel,D.,Gamliel,A.,Grinstein,A.,Primo,P.D.,andKatan,J. Combined soil treatments and sequence of application in improving the control of soilborne pathogens.Phytopathology.2000,90:751-757.
    41. Freeman,S.,and Katan,J.Weskening Effect on propagules on Fusarium by sublethal heating.Phytopathology. 1988,78:1656-1661.
    42. Freeman,S.,Sztejnberg,A.,Shabi,E.,and Katan,J. Long-term effect of soil solarization for the control of Rosellinia necatrix in apple. Crop Prot. 1990,9:312-316.
    43. Gamliel,A and Stapleton,J.J. Characterization of antifungal volatile compounds evolved from
    
    solarized soil amended with cabbage residues. Phytopathology1993b, 83:899-905.
    44. Gamliel,A.,and Katan,J. Suppression of major and minor pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads in solarized an nonsolarized soil. Phytopathology. 1993,83:68-75.
    45. Gamliel,A.,and Katan,J.Suppression of major and minor pathogens by Fluorescent Pseudomonads in solarized and nonsolarized soils.Phytopathology.1993,83:68-75.
    46. Gamliel,A.,and Stapleton J.J.Effect of soil amendment with chicken compost or ammonium phosphate and solarization on pathogen control,rhizophere microorganisms and lettuce growth.Plant Dis. 1993a,77:886-891.
    47. Gamliel,A.,Grinstein,A.,Peretz, Y.,Klein,L.,and Katan,J.Reduced dosage og methyl bromide for controlling Verticillium wilt of potato in experimental and commercial plots.Plant Dis. 1997,81:469-474.
    48. Gamliel, A.,Hadar, E.,and Katan,J.Improvement of Growth and yield of Gypsophila paniculata by solarization or fumigation of soil or container medium in continuous cropping systems. Plant Disease. 1993,77:933-938.
    49. Gan, J.,Yates,S.R.,Ohr, H.D.,and Sams,J.J..volatilization and distribution of methyl iodide and methyl bromide after subsoil application.Journal of Environmental Quality1997,26:1107-1115.
    50. G tee nberger, A.,Yogev, A.,and Katan,J. Induced suppressiveness in solarized soils. Phytopathology. 1987,77:1663-1667.
    51. Halbrent,J.M. Allelopathy in the management of plant-parasitic nematoes.J.Nematol. 1996,28:8-14.
    52. Harman,G.E.Myths and dogma of biocontrol:Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harizianum T-2.Plant Dis.2000,84:377-393.
    53. Hartz,T.K.,DeVay, J.E.,And Elmore,C.L. Solarization is an effective soil disinfestations technique for strawberry production.Hortscience. 1993,28:104-106.
    54. Hine,R.B.,Alaban,C.,and Klemmer, H. Influence of soil temperature on root and heart root of pineapple caused by Phytophora cinnamomi and Phytophthora parasitica. Phytopathology. 1964,54:467-470.
    55. Hutchihson,C,M.,McGiffen,M.E.Jr.,Ohr, H.D.,Sims,J.J.,and Becker, J.O..Evalution of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant for root-knot nematode control in carrot production.Plant Disease. 1999,83:33-36.
    56. Hutchihson,C.M.,McGiffen,M.E.Jr.,Ohr, H.D.,Sims,J.J.and Becker,J.O..Efficacy of methyl iodide and synergy with chloropicrin for control of fungi.Pest Management Science.2000,56:413-418.
    57. Hutchinson,C.M.,McGiffen,M.E.. Ohr, H.D., Sims, J.J.,and Becker, J.O. Efficacy of methyl iodide soil fumigation for control of Meloidogyne incognita, Tylenchulus semipenetrans and Heterodera schachtii.nematology. 1999, 1:407-414.
    58. Hutchinson,C.M.,McGiffen,M.E.Jr.,Becker,J.O.,Ohr, H.D.,and Sims,J.J.Efficacy of methyl iodide soil fumigation against fungi. Phytopathology. 1999,88:S42.
    59. Juarez-Palacios,C.,Felix-Gastelum,R.,Wakeman,R.J.,Paplomatas,E.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Thermal sensitivity of three species of Phytophthora and the effect of soil solarization on their survival. Plant Dis. 1991,75:1160-1164.
    60. Katan, J., Greenberger, A.,Alon, H.et al. Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for the control of disease caused by soil-borne pathogens. Phytopathology, 1976,66:683-688.
    61. Katan,J.,Fishler, G.,and Grinstein,A. Short-and long-term effects of soil solarization and crop sequence on Fusarium wilt and yield of cotton in Israel. Phytopathology. 1983,73:1215-1219.
    
    
    62. Katan,J.Solar heating(solarization) of the soil for control of soilborne pests.Annu.Rev.Phytopathol. 1981, 19:211-236.
    63. Katan,J.Solar pasteurization of soils for diseases control:Staus and prospects. Plant Dis. 1980,64:450-454.
    64. Komada H.Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil.Review of Plant Protection Research. 1975,8: 114-125.
    65. Lazarovits,G,Hawke,M.A.,Tomlin,A.D.,Olthof, Th.H.A.,and Squire,S. Soil solarization to control Verticillium dahliae and Pratylenchus penetrans on pstatoes in central Ontario.Can.J. Plant Pathol.1991,13:116-123.
    66. Leistra, M.,Smelt,J.H.,and Nollen,H.M.Concentration relations for methyl isothiocyanate in soil after injection of metham-sodium.Pestic.Sci. 1974,5:409-417.
    67. Lewis,V.R., Haverty, M.I.. Evaluation of six techniques for control of the western drywood termite (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae)in structures.Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1996,89(4): 922-934..
    68. Majewski,M.S.,McChesney, M.M.,Woodrow, J.E.,Prueger, J.H.,and Seiber, J.N.Aerodynamic measurements of methyl bromide volatilization from tarped and nontarped fields. J. Environ. Qual. 1995,24:742-752.
    69. Marois,J.L.,Dunn,M.T.,and Papavizas,G.C. Reinvasion of fumigated soil by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonis. Phytopathology. 1983,73:680-684.
    70. Mayton,H.S.,Olivier, C.,Vaughn,S.F.,and Loria,R.Correlation of fungicidal activity of Brassica species with allyl isothiocyanate production macerated leaf tissue.Phytopathology. 1996,86:267-271.
    71. Mizobuti,M., Matsuoka, I.,Soma,Y., et al. Susceptibility of forest insect pests to sulfuryl fluoride, 2: Ambrosia beetles.Research-Bulletin-of-the-Plant-Protection-Service (Japan). 1996(32):77-82.
    72. Mojtahedi,H.,Santo,G.S,and Ingham,R.E. Suppression of Melodogyne chitwoodil with sudangrass cultivars as green manures. J.Nematol. 1993,25:303-311.
    73. Muehlchen,A.M.,Rand R.E.and Parke,J.L.Evaluation of crucifer green manures for controlling Apahnomyces root rot of peas.Plant Dis. 1990,74:651-654.
    74. Muehlchen,A.M.,Rand,R.E.,and Parke,J.L. Evaluation of crucifer green manure for controlling Aphanomycetes root rot of peas.Plant Dis. 1990,74:651-654.
    75. Munnecke,D.E.,and Martin,J.R Release of methyl isothiocyanate from soils treated with mylone. Phytopathology. 1964,54:941-945.
    76. Munnecke,D.E.,Domsch,K.H.,and Eckert,J.W. Fungicidal activity of air passed through columns of soil treated with fungicides. Phytopathology. 1962,52:1298-1306.
    77. Ohr, H.D.,Sims,J.J.,.Grech,N.M.,Becker, J.O.,andMcGiffen,M.E..Me-thyl iodide,an ozone-safe alternative to methyl bromide as a soil fumigant.Plant Disease. 1996,80:731-735.
    78. Osbrink, W.L.A., Scheffrahn,R.H., et al. Laboratory comparisons of sulfuryl fluoride toxicity and mean time of mortality among ten termite species (Isoptera: Hodotermitidae, Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae).Journal of economic entomology. 1987,80:1044-1047.
    79. Pinkas,Y.,Kariv, A.,and Katan,J.Soil solarization for the control of Phytophthora cinnamomi:Thermal and biological effects. Phytopathology. 1984,74:796
    80. Pinkerton, J.N. Ivors, K.L., Miller, M.L.,and Moore, L.W..Effect of soil solarization and cover crops on populations of selected soilborne plant pathogens in western oregon. Plant Diseas.2000,84:952-960.
    81. Pinkerton,J.N., Ivors,K.L. Miller, M.L.and Moore,L.W..Effect of soil solarization and cover crops
    
    on populations of selected soilborne plant pathogens in western oregon. Plant Disease.2000,84:952-960.
    82. Pinkerton,J.N.,Ivors, K.L.,Reeser, P.W.,Bristow, P.R.,and Windom,G.E..The use of soil solarization for the management of soilborne plant pathogens in strawberry and red paspberry production. Plant Disease. 2002,84:645-651.
    83. Pullman,G.S.,DeVay, J.E.,Garber, R.H.,and Weinhold,A.R. Soil solarization:Effects of Verticillium wilt of cotton and soilborne populations of Verticillium dahliae,Pythium spp.,Rhizoctonia solani,and Thielaviosis basicola. Phytopathology. 1981,71:954-959.
    84. Pullman,G.S.DeVey, J.E.,and Garber, R.H. Soil solarization and thermal death:Alofarithmic relationship between time and temperature for four soilborne plant pathogens. Phytopathology. 1981,71:959-964.
    85. R.J.McGovern, R.McSorley, R.R.Urs..Reduction of Phytophthora blight of madagascar periwinkle in Florida by soil solarization in autumn. Plant Disease.2000, 84: 185-191.
    86. Raio,A.,Zoina,A.,and Moore,L.W. The effect of solar heating of soil on natural and inoculated agrobacteria.Plant Pathol. 1997,46:320-328.
    87. Ramirez-Villapudua, R.J.,and Munnecke,D.E. Effects of solar heating and soil amendments of cruciferous residues on Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.conglutinans and other organisms. Phytopathology. 1988,78:289-295.
    88. Reuveni,R.,Krikun,J.,and Shani,U. The role of Monnsporascus eutypoides in a collapse of milon plants in an arid area of Israel. Phytoprotection. 1983,73:1223-1226.
    89. Ristaine,J.B.,Perry, K.B.,and Lumsden,R.D.Effect of solarization and Gliocladium virens on sclerotia of Sclerothum rolfsii,soil microbiota, and the incidence of southern blight of tomoto. Phytopathology 1991, 81:1117-1124.
    90. Saeed,I.A.M.D., Rouse,I.,Harkin,J.M., Smith, K.P.Effects of soil water content and soil temperature on efficacy of metham-sodium against Verticillium dahliae. Plant Disease 1997,81:773-776.
    91. Sang,J.P.,Minchinton,I.R.,Johnstone,P.K.,and Trustcott R.J.W. Glucosinolate profile in the seed,root and leaf tissue of cabbage,mustard,and rapeseed.Can.j.Plant Sci. 1984,64:77-93.
    92. Scheffrahn, R.H., Su,N.Y., Busey, P. Laboratory and field evaluations of selected chemical treatments for control of drywood termites (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae).Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1997,90(2):492-502..
    93. Scheffrahn, R.H., Osbrink, W.L.A., Hsu,R.C., et al. Desorption of residual sulfuryl fluoride from structural and household commodities by headspace analysis using gas chromatography.Bulletin-of-environmental-contamination-and-toxicology, 1987, 39: 769-775.
    94. Scheffrahn, R.H., Su,N.Y., Osbrink, W.L.A. Precise dosage delivery method for sulfuryl fluoride in small-chamber fumigations. Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1987, 80(3): 705-707.
    95. Scheffrahn, R.H.,Wheeler, G.S.,Su,N.Y. Synergism of methyl bromide and sulfuryl fluoride toxicity against termites (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae) by admixture with carbon dioxide.Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1995,88 (3):649-653.
    96. Schmidt, E.L., Woodward,R.P., Christopherson,E.R.. Fumigants to kill fungi and parenchyma in red oak log sections.1995 annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. S.I. (USA). s.n. 1995. p. 94/1-94/2.
    97. Soma, Y., Yabuta,S., Mizobuti,M. et al. Susceptibility of forest insect pests to sulfuryl fluoride, 1: Wood borers and bark beetles. Research-Bulletin-of-the-Plant-Protection-Service (Japan). 1996,
    
    (32):69-76..
    98. Stepleton,J.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Effect of soil solarization on populations of selected soilborne microorganisms and growth of deciduous fruit tree seedlings. Phytopathology. 1982,72:323-326.
    99. Stepleton,J.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Response of phytoparasitic and free-living nematodes to soil solarization and 1,3-dichloropropene in California. Phytopathology. 1983,73:1429-1436.
    100. Stepleton,J.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Soil solarization:A non-chemical approach for management of plant pathogens and pests. Crop Prot. 1986,5:190-198.
    101. Stepleton,J.J.,and DeVay, J.E. Thermal components of soil solarization as related to exchange in soil and root microflora and increased plant growth response. Phytopathology. 1984,74:255-259.
    102. Su,N.Y., Osbrink, W.L.A., Scheffrahn,R.H. Concentration-time relationship for fumigant efficacy of sulfuryl fluoride against the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1989,82(1): 156-158.
    103. Su,N.Y., Scheffrahn,R.H. Efficacy of sulfuryl fluoride against four beetle pests of museums( Coleoptera:Dermestidae,Anobiidae).Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1990, 83(3):879-882.
    104. Su,N.Y., Scheffrahn,R.H. Field comparison of sulfuryl fluoride susceptibility among three termite species (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae) during structural fumigation. Journal-of-economic-entomology. 1986,79(4):903-908.
    105. Subbarao,K.V.,and Hubbard,J.C. Inreractive effects of broccoli residues and temperature on Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia in soil and on wilt of cauliflower. Phytopathology. 1996:1303-1310.
    106. Tjamos,E.C.,and Favel,D.R.Detrimental effects of sublethal heating and Talaromyces flavus on microscterotia of Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology. 1995,85:388-392.
    107. Toussiant,V.,Valios,D.,Dodier, M.,Faucher, E.,Dery, C.Brzezinski,R.Ruest, L.,and Beaulieu,C. Characterization of actinomycets antagonistic to Phytophthora fragariae var.rubi, the causal agent of rasphberry root rot.Phytoprotection. 1997,78:43-51.
    108. Toyata, K.,Ritz, K.,Kuninaga,S.,and Kimura, M. Impact of fumigation with metam sodium upon soil microbial community structure in two Japanese soils.Soil Sci.Plant Nutr. 1999,45:207-223.
    109. Turner, N.J.,and Corden,M.E.Decomposition of methyldithicarbamate in soil. Phytopathology. 1963,53:1388-1394.
    110. UNEE Methyl Bromide:its Atmospheric Science,Technology and Economics.Synthesis Report.Methyl Bromide Interim Scientific and Technology and Economic Assessment.United Nations Environment Programme. 1992.Nairobi.
    111. UNEP.MBTOC. Assessment of Alternatives to Methyl Bromide.United Nations Enviroment Programme. 1998.Nairobi.
    112. United nations environment programme (UNEP) industry and environment. Protecing the ozone layer. 1998,Vol 6: Methyl bromide.p35.
    113. Vanachter, A.,and Van Assche. The influence of soil temperature and moisture content on the effect of soil fumigants.Neth.J.Plant Pathol. 1970,76:240-248.
    114. Waggoner.M, Ohr, H.D.,Adams, C., Sims, J.J.,and Gonzalez, D..Methyl iodide:an alternative to methyl bromide for insectary fumigation.Journal of Applied Entomology. 2000,124:113-117.
    115. Wang,D.,Yates,S.R., and Gan,J. Temperature effect on methyl bromide volatilization in soil fumigation.. J. Environ. Qual.. 1997c,26:1072-1079.
    116. Wang,D.,Yates,S.R., Gan,J.,and Jury, W.A. Temperature effect on methyl bromide permeability of
    
    plastic cover films.J.Environ.Qual..1998,27:821-827.
    117. Wang,D.,Yates,S.R.,Ernst, EF, Gan,J.,and Jury, W.A. Reducing methyl bromide emission with a high barrier plastic film and reduced dasage.Environ.Sci. Technol. 1997a,31:3686-3691.
    118. Wang,D.,Yates,S.R.,Ernst, F.F, Gan,J.,Gao,f.,and Becker, J.O. Methyl bromide emission with field management practices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997b,31:3017-3022.
    119. Westphal, A. andBecker, J.O..Biological suppression and natural population decline of heterodera schachtii in a California field.Phytopathology. 1999, 89:434-440.
    120. Williams,L.H., Sprenkel,R.J. Ovicidal activity of sulfuryl fluoride to anobiid and lyctid beetle eggs of various ages.Journal-of-entomological-science. 1990,25(3):366-375.
    121. WMO. Scientific Assessment of ozone depletion. World Meteorolofical Organisation Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, report no.25.WMO, 1991.Geneva.
    122. Woodward,R.P., Schmidt,E.L. Fungitoxicity of sulfuryl fluoride to Ceratocystis fagacearum in vitro and in wilted red oak log sections.Plant-disease. 1995, 79(12):1237-1239.
    123. Yagi,K.J.,Williams,N.Y.,Wang,and Cicerone,R.J. Agricultural soil fumigation as a source of atmospheric methyl bromide.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. 1993,90:8420-8423.
    124. Yates,S.R., Gan,J., Ernst,F.F.,and Wang, D. Methyl bromide emissions from a covered field: Ⅲ.Crroecting chamber flux for temperature. J.Environ. Qual. 1996c,25:892-898.
    125. Yates,S.R., Gan,J., Ernst,F,F.,and Yates,M.V. Methyl bromide emissions from a covered field: Ⅱ.Volatilization.J. Environ. Qual. 1996a,25:192-202.
    126. Yates,S.R., Gan,J., Ernst,F.F.,Mutziger, A.and Yates,M.V. Methyl bromide emissions from a covered field: Ⅰ.Experimental conditions and degradation in soil. J.Environ. Qual. 1996b,25:184-192.
    127. Yates,S.R., Wang,D., Ernst, F.F., and Gan,J.,Methyl bromide emissions from agricultural fields:Bare-soil deep injection.Environ.Sci. Technol. 1997,31: 1136-1143.
    128. Zhang, W.M.,McGiffen,M.E.Jr, Becker, J.O.,Ohr, H.D.,Sims,J.J.,and Campbell,S.D. Effect of soil physical factors on methyl iodide and methyl bromide.Pesticide Science 1998,53:71-79.
    129. Zhang, W.M.,McGiffen,M.E.jr, Becker, J.O.Ohr, H.D.,Sims,J.J.,and Kallenbach,R.L..Dose response of weeds to methyl iodide and methyl bromide. Weed Research. 1997,37:181-189.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700