常州市经济开发区土地利用规划后评估研究
|
摘要
土地是社会经济发展不可或缺的基础性要素,科学制定并严格实施土地利用总体规划,优化土地资源配置,关系国家和人民的长远利益,必须坚持节约资源和保护环境的基本国策,坚持保护耕地和节约用地用地的根本方针,统筹土地利用与经济社会发展,不断提高土地资源对经济社会全面、协调、可持续发展的保障能力。随着我国社会主义市场经济的建立和不断完善,进一步加强土地利用规划管理,建立科学的土地利用规划后评估制度,对于保障土地资源的有效配置,促进经济社会持续健康发展,具有十分重要的意义。
本文基于系统工程的思想,采用理论分析和专家咨询相结合的方法,建立了土地利用规划后评估指标体系,并在此基础上建立了一种更为科学、系统的土地利用规划后评估方法。在本论文中,针对常州市经济开发区土地利用规划实施过程,提出了土地利用规划后评估的内容框架和评估内容,构建了土地利用规划后评估的指标体系,按照层次分析法和模糊综合评判的方法,对常州市经济开发区土地利用规划后评估方法进行实证研究。通过实证分析,论证了该方法的适用性和评估结果的可信性。
本文具体成果体现在以下几个方面:(1)论证了不完全竞争下最优的土地配置方式是规划配置而不是市场配置。由于土地利用具有明显的外部性,因此土地资源的最优化配置方式,就存在着两种不同的选择。无论是正的外部效应还是负的外部效应,市场配置资源的效率均达不到帕累托最优,市场配置下的土地总收益低于规划配置下的土地总收益,最优的土地配置方式不再是市场的自由配置,而变成了土地的规划配置。当然,土地资源的市场配置与规划调控之间并不是矛盾对立的关系。根据当前我国的实际情况,在土地资源配置中,应将市场配置与规划调控相结合,才能充分提高土地资源的配置效率,实现土地资源的优化配置。(2)确定了土地利用规划后评估的多目标取向。建立土地利用规划后评估,就是对土地利用规划执行后的效果进行分析判断,以确定土地利用规划的价值。传统经济学意义上的资源配置目标,就是以“经济增长”为核心,使资源配置实现最优化。这种资源配置的目标,必然是只注重经济效益,而忽略社会及环境影响等其他方面,最终将危及经济社会的可持续发展和人类生存环境。土地利用规划发展到今天,可持续、多元化、异质性已成为土地利用规划多元目标的重要内涵。土地资源优化配置要体现多元的价值,其基本目标应包括区域的经济发展规划、社会发展规划、物质建设规划以及城市政策的和制度设计等。(3)建立了土地利用规划后评估指标体系。本文根据土地利用规划后评估的内容,按照理论分析和专家咨询相结合的方法,建立了包括效果指标(社会影响度、经济效益、社会效益、生态效益)和执行指标(完成性指标、限制性指标、违反事件指标)在内的土地利用规划后评估指标体系,采用层次分析法和模糊综合评估法进行土地利用规划后评估。根据评估综合得分情况,科学评价土地利用规划实施情况。
Optimizing land resources allocation, making the general land-use planning scientifically and enforcing it strictly are of vital importance to the long-term interest of the people and the nation, because of the fundamental effects of land on socioeconomic development. We must adhere to the basic state policies of environmental and resources protection and the basic strategy of protecting and conserving arable land, coordinating the use of land resources and the development of economy and society, and constantly promote the supportive influence the land resource has on an overall coordinated and sustainable socioeconomic development. Along with the establishment and constant improvement of the socialist market economic system in our country, further strengthening the land-use plan and establishing a scientific post planning review mechanism for land utilization are of big importance to the optimal allocation of land resources and the continuous and healthy development of the economy and society.
Based on the idea of System Engineering, this article established a system of post planning review of land utilization through both theoretical analysis and consulting experts. Furthermore, this article established a more scientific and systematic evaluation method. By studying the enforcement of the planning of land utilization in the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou, this article also put forward a Content Frame including post planning review evaluation and evaluation items, constructed the indicators of the evaluation, and, by stratum analysis and fuzzy comprehensive method, analyzed some concrete examples in the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou. The applicability and the credibility of the method are demonstrated by analysis of the cases.
Specific conclusions are reflected in the following aspects: (1)Demonstrated that under imperfect competition, the optimal allocation of land is the planning allocation rather than the market allocation. Because land utilization has obvious externalities, we have two options to optimize land resources allocation. Whether the externality is positive or negative, the efficiency of market allocation of resources will fail to reach Pareto Optimality, and the total land revenue under planning control is larger than it is under market allocation. Therefore, the optimal allocation of land is not a free market allocation but becomes planning allocation. Of course, market allocation and planning control are not contradictory. Based on the current situation in our country, we should have the market allocation and the planning control combined in the allocation of urban land, so as to improve the allocation efficiency, and achieve the optimal allocation.(2)Identified the multi-objective approach in post planning evaluation. The post planning evaluation is to analyze the effects of the planning in order to be sure of the value of the plan. In traditional economics, the aim of resource allocation is optimization, which focuses on economic growth. Inevitably, the social and environmental effects are overlooked in this way of allocation, and the environment for human livelihood and the sustainable socioeconomic development will be jeopardized. Today, sustainability, diversification and heterogeneity are important to the multi-objective land planning. The value of diversity should be reflected in optimal allocation of land resources, and the allocation should be targeted at the plan for regional economic development, social development, substantial construction as well as urban policies and systems. (3) Established a system of post planning review of land utilization. Based on the contents of post planning review of land utilization and through both theoretical analysis and consulting experts, this article established a system that covers effect indicators (the influence on society, economic results, social effects and ecological effects) and implemental indicators ( accomplishment indicator, restrictive indicator and violation incidents indicator). Through the general evaluation by a systemic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the implementation and effect of land utilization can be scientifically evaluated.
本文基于系统工程的思想,采用理论分析和专家咨询相结合的方法,建立了土地利用规划后评估指标体系,并在此基础上建立了一种更为科学、系统的土地利用规划后评估方法。在本论文中,针对常州市经济开发区土地利用规划实施过程,提出了土地利用规划后评估的内容框架和评估内容,构建了土地利用规划后评估的指标体系,按照层次分析法和模糊综合评判的方法,对常州市经济开发区土地利用规划后评估方法进行实证研究。通过实证分析,论证了该方法的适用性和评估结果的可信性。
本文具体成果体现在以下几个方面:(1)论证了不完全竞争下最优的土地配置方式是规划配置而不是市场配置。由于土地利用具有明显的外部性,因此土地资源的最优化配置方式,就存在着两种不同的选择。无论是正的外部效应还是负的外部效应,市场配置资源的效率均达不到帕累托最优,市场配置下的土地总收益低于规划配置下的土地总收益,最优的土地配置方式不再是市场的自由配置,而变成了土地的规划配置。当然,土地资源的市场配置与规划调控之间并不是矛盾对立的关系。根据当前我国的实际情况,在土地资源配置中,应将市场配置与规划调控相结合,才能充分提高土地资源的配置效率,实现土地资源的优化配置。(2)确定了土地利用规划后评估的多目标取向。建立土地利用规划后评估,就是对土地利用规划执行后的效果进行分析判断,以确定土地利用规划的价值。传统经济学意义上的资源配置目标,就是以“经济增长”为核心,使资源配置实现最优化。这种资源配置的目标,必然是只注重经济效益,而忽略社会及环境影响等其他方面,最终将危及经济社会的可持续发展和人类生存环境。土地利用规划发展到今天,可持续、多元化、异质性已成为土地利用规划多元目标的重要内涵。土地资源优化配置要体现多元的价值,其基本目标应包括区域的经济发展规划、社会发展规划、物质建设规划以及城市政策的和制度设计等。(3)建立了土地利用规划后评估指标体系。本文根据土地利用规划后评估的内容,按照理论分析和专家咨询相结合的方法,建立了包括效果指标(社会影响度、经济效益、社会效益、生态效益)和执行指标(完成性指标、限制性指标、违反事件指标)在内的土地利用规划后评估指标体系,采用层次分析法和模糊综合评估法进行土地利用规划后评估。根据评估综合得分情况,科学评价土地利用规划实施情况。
Optimizing land resources allocation, making the general land-use planning scientifically and enforcing it strictly are of vital importance to the long-term interest of the people and the nation, because of the fundamental effects of land on socioeconomic development. We must adhere to the basic state policies of environmental and resources protection and the basic strategy of protecting and conserving arable land, coordinating the use of land resources and the development of economy and society, and constantly promote the supportive influence the land resource has on an overall coordinated and sustainable socioeconomic development. Along with the establishment and constant improvement of the socialist market economic system in our country, further strengthening the land-use plan and establishing a scientific post planning review mechanism for land utilization are of big importance to the optimal allocation of land resources and the continuous and healthy development of the economy and society.
Based on the idea of System Engineering, this article established a system of post planning review of land utilization through both theoretical analysis and consulting experts. Furthermore, this article established a more scientific and systematic evaluation method. By studying the enforcement of the planning of land utilization in the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou, this article also put forward a Content Frame including post planning review evaluation and evaluation items, constructed the indicators of the evaluation, and, by stratum analysis and fuzzy comprehensive method, analyzed some concrete examples in the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou. The applicability and the credibility of the method are demonstrated by analysis of the cases.
Specific conclusions are reflected in the following aspects: (1)Demonstrated that under imperfect competition, the optimal allocation of land is the planning allocation rather than the market allocation. Because land utilization has obvious externalities, we have two options to optimize land resources allocation. Whether the externality is positive or negative, the efficiency of market allocation of resources will fail to reach Pareto Optimality, and the total land revenue under planning control is larger than it is under market allocation. Therefore, the optimal allocation of land is not a free market allocation but becomes planning allocation. Of course, market allocation and planning control are not contradictory. Based on the current situation in our country, we should have the market allocation and the planning control combined in the allocation of urban land, so as to improve the allocation efficiency, and achieve the optimal allocation.(2)Identified the multi-objective approach in post planning evaluation. The post planning evaluation is to analyze the effects of the planning in order to be sure of the value of the plan. In traditional economics, the aim of resource allocation is optimization, which focuses on economic growth. Inevitably, the social and environmental effects are overlooked in this way of allocation, and the environment for human livelihood and the sustainable socioeconomic development will be jeopardized. Today, sustainability, diversification and heterogeneity are important to the multi-objective land planning. The value of diversity should be reflected in optimal allocation of land resources, and the allocation should be targeted at the plan for regional economic development, social development, substantial construction as well as urban policies and systems. (3) Established a system of post planning review of land utilization. Based on the contents of post planning review of land utilization and through both theoretical analysis and consulting experts, this article established a system that covers effect indicators (the influence on society, economic results, social effects and ecological effects) and implemental indicators ( accomplishment indicator, restrictive indicator and violation incidents indicator). Through the general evaluation by a systemic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the implementation and effect of land utilization can be scientifically evaluated.
引文
[1]巴洛维.谷树忠译.土地资源经济学—不动产经济学[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1989.
[2]毕宝德,土地经济学[M].4版,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[3]曹清华,关于新一轮土地利用规划修编的若干认识[J],中国国土资源经济,2004(8)
[4]陈勇,土地利用变化机制研究现状与展望[J],湖北农业科学,2003(2)
[5]陈银蓉等,城市土地集约利用的研究[J],资源调查与评价,2006,(5):7-12
[6]陈子雄,城市土地资源配置效率的经济学分析[J],市场经济,2004,(3):38-40
[7]戴雪芬,城市土地集约利用的现状分析与建议[J],地矿测绘,2006,22(2):42-44
[8]邓红蒂,董祚继,建立土地利用规划实施管理保障体系[J],中国土地科学,2002(12)
[9]邓红蒂,俞冠玉,张佳等,土地利用规划中公众参与的实践与分析[J],中国土地科学,2005(6)
[10]丁峰.,合理利用城市土地,促进城镇建设[J],国土资源, 2003(21)
[11]冯凌、石培华,基于广义资本概念的土地利用变化再分析[J],经济地理,2009,1
[12]冯长春,城市土地资源经济的理论与应用分析[J],水土保持研究,2004,11(1),163-167
[13]高鸿业,《西方经济学》[M],中国人民大学出版社,2007.3
[14]高希瑞,张永福,董煜,马丽娟,新疆阿克苏市土地利用总体规划实施评价[J],安徽农学通报,2008,14(13)
[15]郭贯成,吴群,土地政策对土地市场配置效率影响的经济学分析—理论研究与实践检验[J],地域研究与开发,2009.2
[16]郝晋琅.土地利用规划北京IM].中国农业大学出版杜,2007:149-156
[17].何金书,李秀彬.黄河三角洲土地持续利用优化分析IJ] ,地理科学进展,2001.20(4):313-322.
[18]胡业翠,方玉东.土地利用优化调控[J].国土资源科技管理,2002(3),23-26.
[19]黄德春,许长新,投资项目可持续发展后评价研究[J],软科学,2004,(4)
[20]黄大全,海外城市化与耕地保护对中国的启示〔J〕,中国土地科学,2005,(6):38-43
[21]侯玉亭,城市化进程中的土地集约利用〔J〕,江西农业大学学报,2004,3(4):67-69
[22]季晓峰,城市土地集约利用研究[J],合作经济与科技,2006,(9):36-37
[23]康静萍等,我国土地资源滥用的经济学分析〔J〕,江西财经大学学报,2004,(6):14-17
[24]况大伟,土地用途、外部性与土地税[J],理论探讨,2005.10
[25]《昆山市土地集约利用与可持续发展研究》课题组,区域发展与土地利用研究[J」,中国国土资源报,2005,8,22.
[26]李羽中,现代西方经济学原理(第四版)[M].中山大学出版社,,2003.
[27]李明月等,土地要素对经济增长贡献的实证分析,软科学,2005,19(6):21-23
[28]李庆福等,集约利用土地保障经济发展[J],山东国土资源,2006,(4):7-8
[29]李炜,尚晓萍.修宪后土地供应方式的改革——兼谈《土地管理法的修改》[ J],中国土地, 2004(7): 20-23.
[30]梁积汉,利用地价杠杆调控土地市场[J],南方国土资源,2004,(9):6
[31]林培如,李满春等.区域土地利用战略研究[M].北京:科学出版社.2005.
[32]林英彦.土地经济学通论(第五版)[M].台湾:文笙书局股份有限公司,1999.
[33]刘力等,城市土地集约利用评价[J],西南师范大学学报,2004,29(5):887
[34]刘书楷.土地经济学原理.江苏科学技出版社,1988,(2)
[35]刘书楷,曲福田.土地经济学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2004: 30-39.
[36]刘伟锋等,我国城市土地利用效率分析[J],黑龙江对外经贸,2005,(7):65-67
[37]刘卫东,中国城镇居民点用地开发及其供给问题研究[J],城市规划,2002.26(11)
[38]刘彦随.区域土地利用优化配置[M].北京:学苑出版社,1999,78-82
[39]刘彦随,卢艳霞,中国沿海地区城乡发展态势与土地利用优化研究[J],重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(3)-890.
[40]刘艳芳,明冬萍等.基于生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化[J],武汉大学学报,2002,(7):22-23.
[41]刘勇,城乡结合部土地可持续利用规划政策研究[J],中国可持续发展,2003(4)
[42]隆宗佐等,城市土地利用问题与对策[J],求索,2004,(8):30-31
[43]陆菊春,韩国文,郑君君,城市基础设施项目社会评价指标体系的构建[J],科技进步与对策,2002,(2)
[44]陆效平,孙伟与,区域土地利用的效率与公平及其政府职能[J],国土资源科技管理,2007.5
[45]卢新海,城市化进程中的土地需求与供给「J」,土地使用制度改革,2004,(l):30-32
[46]卢新海,城市化进程中的土地需求与供给「J」,土地使用制度改革,2004,(1):30-32
[47]罗鸿铭,城市土地资源集约化配置模式与利用策略选择[J],现代财经,2004,24(7):22-25
[48]马歇尔.经济学原理(上卷)[M].商务印书馆,2005,166一168
[49]马歇尔.经济学原理(下卷)〔M].商务印书馆,2005,93-95
[50]曼昆.经济学原理[M].梁小民,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2003: 4-5
[51]毛蒋兴等,20世纪90年代以来我国城市土地集约利用研究述评[J],地理与地理信息科学,2005,(3):48~53
[52]倪绍样,刘彦随.区域土地资源优化配置及其可持续利用[J],农村生态环境,1999,15(2):8-12
[53]潘祥伟,产业聚集和村镇居民点聚集与土地集约利用[J],国土资源科技管理,2005.6
[54]平新乔,微观经济学十八讲[M].北京大学出版社,,2002.
[55]仇保兴,市场失效、市场界限与城市规划调控[J],城市规划,2004.05
[56]曲福田等.经济发展与土地可持续利用[M].人民出版社,2001.
[57]渠丽萍等,城市土地集约利用的系统分析[J],土地市场,2004,(10):64-66
[58]萨伊著.陈福生,陈振骅译.政治经济学概论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[59]邵晓梅,土地集约利用的研究进展及展望仁J],地理科学进展,2006,(3):85-95
[60]宋永发,宫蕾,开发区土地集约利用分区评价—以大连经济技术开发区为例[J],价值工程,2009,3
[61]苏为华,多指标综合评价理论与方法研究[M].中国物价出版社,2001年.
[62]王万茂,土地利用规划学[M].科学出版社,2009年。
[63]王克强,王洪卫,刘红梅,土地经济学[M],上海财经大学,
[64]王建主编.区域与发展[M].浙江人民出版社,1998
[65]王万茂,市场经济条件下土地资源配置的目标、原则和评价标准[J].资源科学,1996,1
[66]汪水永,田永贤,城市规划:西方国家的经验与我国的路径选择[J].现代城市研究,2006,9
[67]王万茂,张颖,市场经济与土地利用规划[J].中国土地科学,2003,17(1)
[68]王晓川,运用规划手段不断提高城市土地利用效率[J],中国土地科学,2003,17(4)
[69]王华春等,中国城市土地资源利用及对策[J〕,北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)2004(2):124-131
[70]王仲君,马歇尔的“报酬递减律”与新经济「J],经济问题,2004,(11):11-13
[71]王伟华,基于主成分分析法的城市土地利用集约度研究[J〕,内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(4):448一450
[72]王慎刚等,中外土地集约利用理论与实践[J],山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(3):90~93
[73]王爱民等,深圳市土地供给与经济增长关系研究[J],2005,(3):19-23
[74]魏国锐.土地节约集约利用面临的问题及对策[J].山东国土资源, 2006, 22(2): 57-62.
[75]温朝霞,可持续发展思想与城市规划理念的转变[J],广东农工商职业技术学院学报,2004,20(2):28-32
[76]吴旭芬,孙军,开发区土地集约利用的问题探讨[J],中国土地科学,2000,14
[77]肖屹等,对土地征用中外部性的经济学思考[J],国土资源科技管理,2005,(4):29-33
[78]谢敏,城市土地集约利用内涵及其评价指标体系研究[J],中国农业大学学报,2006,n(5):117-120
[79]杨渝红等,地价理论对城市土地集约利用的应用分析[J],西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(6):93-97
[80]尧德明,陈玉福,张富刚,刘彦随,黄朝明,层次分析法在土地利用总体规划用地分解中的应用—以海南省为例[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35
[81]尹奇,罗育新,宴志谦,城市土地资源配置效率的经济学分析———以住宅用地和非住宅用地为例[J].四川农业大学学报,2007,6
[82]于春艳,城市土地集约利用探讨[J〕,安徽农业科学,2005,33(7):1333一1334
[83]袁丽丽,城市土地资源配置的经济学分析[J],经济师,2006,(9):7-8
[84]张海鹏,实现我国土地资源优化配置中的两难问题[J],南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008.4
[85]张丽君,城市土地集约利用研究[J],国土资源情报,2005,(9):16一21
[86]张颖.区域土地资源配置与社会经济发展[J].地域研究与开发, 2004, 23(6): 93-97.
[87]张文新,城市土地储备对我国城市土地供求与地价的影响分析「J],资源科学,2005,(11):58-64
[88]赵小敏,郭熙,土地利用总体规划实施评价[J].中国土地科学,2003,17(5)2)
[89]绍绘春、厉伟、诸培新,可持续发展观下的土地资源配置理论分析,产业观察[J]
[90]周颂红,城市化过程中的城市土地集约利用[J],国土资源导刊,2006,(4):12一14
[91]周巍,浅谈城镇化过程中耕地保护[J],国土资源导刊,2007.3.1
[92]朱红章等,经济增长的因素分析[J],技术经济,2006,25(5):42-46
[93]朱介鸣,市场经济下中国城市规划理论发展的逻辑[J],城市规划学刊,2005.01
[94]庄悦群,美国城市增长管理实践及其对广州城市建设的启示探求[J〕,2005,155(92):62
[95]Alcamo, J, E.Kerileman, and R.Leemans. Integrated scenarios of global change. Global Environmental Change [M]. Program Press: London.1996.
[96]Bradshaw TK, Muller B. Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: application of new regional land use policy models and geographical information systems [J]. Rural Social, 63:1-25.
[97]Callies, David L. On the making of land use decisions through citizen initiative and referendum [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1990, 56(2):222-223.
[98]Cheng Jianquan, Masser Ian. Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 62(4):199-217.
[99]Daniels, Tom, and Deborah Bowers. Holding Our Ground: Protecting Americas Farms and Farmland. Island Press, Washington, D.C, 1997.
[100]Darin, Drabkin.Land Policy and Urban Growth. Pergamon Press.1997.
[101]Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Technical Manual for Coastal Land Use Planning.2002-07.
[102]Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Optimal urban land use and zoning[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2004, (7): 69-106.
[103]Extensive & Intensive Rural Land Uses. Spatial Planning Unit, Department of the Environment & Local Government, 2001.7.
[104]Fischer Kowalski, M. Haberl, H. Tons. Joules and Money: Modes of Production and Their Sustainability Problems [J]. Society and Natural Resources, 1997, 10(1):61-85.
[105]George C, S. Lin, Samuel P, S. Ho. China’s land resources and land-use change insights from the 1996 land survey [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, (20):87-107.
[106]Gord Miller. The Protection of Ontario’s Groundwater and Intensive Farming. Special Report to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 2000, July 27.
[107]Intensive Agricultural Land Use by River Subbasin in Europe and the Middle East. http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/ECN/maps/262.htm. 2004-04.
[108]Intensive Land Use in France. http://www.co.johnston.nc.us/,2004-04.
[109]Kline JD, Alig RJ. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm land?[J]. Growth Change, 30:3-22.
[110]Lagendijk,A.Multifunctional Land Use as a Planning Challenge. The Economics of Multifunctional Land Use,2003:83-90.
[111]Leemans R, Zuidema G. Evaluation change in land cover and their importance for global change [J]. TREE, 1995, (10):76-81.
[112]Loo Lee Sim, Lai Choo Malone-Lee, Kein Hoong Lawrence Chin. Integrating land use and transport planning to reduce work-related travel a case study of Tampines Regional Centre in Singapore. Habitat INTL, 2001:399-414.
[113]Margaret A Moote, Mitchel P, Mcclaran, Donna K Chickering. Theory in Practice: Applying Participatory Democracy [J]. Environmental Management, 1997, 21(6):877-889.
[114]Paul Thorsnes. Internalizing neighborhood externalities: the ef-fect of subdivision size and zoning on residential lot prices[J].Journal of Urban Economics, 2000, 48, 397-418.
[2]毕宝德,土地经济学[M].4版,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[3]曹清华,关于新一轮土地利用规划修编的若干认识[J],中国国土资源经济,2004(8)
[4]陈勇,土地利用变化机制研究现状与展望[J],湖北农业科学,2003(2)
[5]陈银蓉等,城市土地集约利用的研究[J],资源调查与评价,2006,(5):7-12
[6]陈子雄,城市土地资源配置效率的经济学分析[J],市场经济,2004,(3):38-40
[7]戴雪芬,城市土地集约利用的现状分析与建议[J],地矿测绘,2006,22(2):42-44
[8]邓红蒂,董祚继,建立土地利用规划实施管理保障体系[J],中国土地科学,2002(12)
[9]邓红蒂,俞冠玉,张佳等,土地利用规划中公众参与的实践与分析[J],中国土地科学,2005(6)
[10]丁峰.,合理利用城市土地,促进城镇建设[J],国土资源, 2003(21)
[11]冯凌、石培华,基于广义资本概念的土地利用变化再分析[J],经济地理,2009,1
[12]冯长春,城市土地资源经济的理论与应用分析[J],水土保持研究,2004,11(1),163-167
[13]高鸿业,《西方经济学》[M],中国人民大学出版社,2007.3
[14]高希瑞,张永福,董煜,马丽娟,新疆阿克苏市土地利用总体规划实施评价[J],安徽农学通报,2008,14(13)
[15]郭贯成,吴群,土地政策对土地市场配置效率影响的经济学分析—理论研究与实践检验[J],地域研究与开发,2009.2
[16]郝晋琅.土地利用规划北京IM].中国农业大学出版杜,2007:149-156
[17].何金书,李秀彬.黄河三角洲土地持续利用优化分析IJ] ,地理科学进展,2001.20(4):313-322.
[18]胡业翠,方玉东.土地利用优化调控[J].国土资源科技管理,2002(3),23-26.
[19]黄德春,许长新,投资项目可持续发展后评价研究[J],软科学,2004,(4)
[20]黄大全,海外城市化与耕地保护对中国的启示〔J〕,中国土地科学,2005,(6):38-43
[21]侯玉亭,城市化进程中的土地集约利用〔J〕,江西农业大学学报,2004,3(4):67-69
[22]季晓峰,城市土地集约利用研究[J],合作经济与科技,2006,(9):36-37
[23]康静萍等,我国土地资源滥用的经济学分析〔J〕,江西财经大学学报,2004,(6):14-17
[24]况大伟,土地用途、外部性与土地税[J],理论探讨,2005.10
[25]《昆山市土地集约利用与可持续发展研究》课题组,区域发展与土地利用研究[J」,中国国土资源报,2005,8,22.
[26]李羽中,现代西方经济学原理(第四版)[M].中山大学出版社,,2003.
[27]李明月等,土地要素对经济增长贡献的实证分析,软科学,2005,19(6):21-23
[28]李庆福等,集约利用土地保障经济发展[J],山东国土资源,2006,(4):7-8
[29]李炜,尚晓萍.修宪后土地供应方式的改革——兼谈《土地管理法的修改》[ J],中国土地, 2004(7): 20-23.
[30]梁积汉,利用地价杠杆调控土地市场[J],南方国土资源,2004,(9):6
[31]林培如,李满春等.区域土地利用战略研究[M].北京:科学出版社.2005.
[32]林英彦.土地经济学通论(第五版)[M].台湾:文笙书局股份有限公司,1999.
[33]刘力等,城市土地集约利用评价[J],西南师范大学学报,2004,29(5):887
[34]刘书楷.土地经济学原理.江苏科学技出版社,1988,(2)
[35]刘书楷,曲福田.土地经济学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2004: 30-39.
[36]刘伟锋等,我国城市土地利用效率分析[J],黑龙江对外经贸,2005,(7):65-67
[37]刘卫东,中国城镇居民点用地开发及其供给问题研究[J],城市规划,2002.26(11)
[38]刘彦随.区域土地利用优化配置[M].北京:学苑出版社,1999,78-82
[39]刘彦随,卢艳霞,中国沿海地区城乡发展态势与土地利用优化研究[J],重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(3)-890.
[40]刘艳芳,明冬萍等.基于生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化[J],武汉大学学报,2002,(7):22-23.
[41]刘勇,城乡结合部土地可持续利用规划政策研究[J],中国可持续发展,2003(4)
[42]隆宗佐等,城市土地利用问题与对策[J],求索,2004,(8):30-31
[43]陆菊春,韩国文,郑君君,城市基础设施项目社会评价指标体系的构建[J],科技进步与对策,2002,(2)
[44]陆效平,孙伟与,区域土地利用的效率与公平及其政府职能[J],国土资源科技管理,2007.5
[45]卢新海,城市化进程中的土地需求与供给「J」,土地使用制度改革,2004,(l):30-32
[46]卢新海,城市化进程中的土地需求与供给「J」,土地使用制度改革,2004,(1):30-32
[47]罗鸿铭,城市土地资源集约化配置模式与利用策略选择[J],现代财经,2004,24(7):22-25
[48]马歇尔.经济学原理(上卷)[M].商务印书馆,2005,166一168
[49]马歇尔.经济学原理(下卷)〔M].商务印书馆,2005,93-95
[50]曼昆.经济学原理[M].梁小民,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2003: 4-5
[51]毛蒋兴等,20世纪90年代以来我国城市土地集约利用研究述评[J],地理与地理信息科学,2005,(3):48~53
[52]倪绍样,刘彦随.区域土地资源优化配置及其可持续利用[J],农村生态环境,1999,15(2):8-12
[53]潘祥伟,产业聚集和村镇居民点聚集与土地集约利用[J],国土资源科技管理,2005.6
[54]平新乔,微观经济学十八讲[M].北京大学出版社,,2002.
[55]仇保兴,市场失效、市场界限与城市规划调控[J],城市规划,2004.05
[56]曲福田等.经济发展与土地可持续利用[M].人民出版社,2001.
[57]渠丽萍等,城市土地集约利用的系统分析[J],土地市场,2004,(10):64-66
[58]萨伊著.陈福生,陈振骅译.政治经济学概论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[59]邵晓梅,土地集约利用的研究进展及展望仁J],地理科学进展,2006,(3):85-95
[60]宋永发,宫蕾,开发区土地集约利用分区评价—以大连经济技术开发区为例[J],价值工程,2009,3
[61]苏为华,多指标综合评价理论与方法研究[M].中国物价出版社,2001年.
[62]王万茂,土地利用规划学[M].科学出版社,2009年。
[63]王克强,王洪卫,刘红梅,土地经济学[M],上海财经大学,
[64]王建主编.区域与发展[M].浙江人民出版社,1998
[65]王万茂,市场经济条件下土地资源配置的目标、原则和评价标准[J].资源科学,1996,1
[66]汪水永,田永贤,城市规划:西方国家的经验与我国的路径选择[J].现代城市研究,2006,9
[67]王万茂,张颖,市场经济与土地利用规划[J].中国土地科学,2003,17(1)
[68]王晓川,运用规划手段不断提高城市土地利用效率[J],中国土地科学,2003,17(4)
[69]王华春等,中国城市土地资源利用及对策[J〕,北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)2004(2):124-131
[70]王仲君,马歇尔的“报酬递减律”与新经济「J],经济问题,2004,(11):11-13
[71]王伟华,基于主成分分析法的城市土地利用集约度研究[J〕,内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(4):448一450
[72]王慎刚等,中外土地集约利用理论与实践[J],山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(3):90~93
[73]王爱民等,深圳市土地供给与经济增长关系研究[J],2005,(3):19-23
[74]魏国锐.土地节约集约利用面临的问题及对策[J].山东国土资源, 2006, 22(2): 57-62.
[75]温朝霞,可持续发展思想与城市规划理念的转变[J],广东农工商职业技术学院学报,2004,20(2):28-32
[76]吴旭芬,孙军,开发区土地集约利用的问题探讨[J],中国土地科学,2000,14
[77]肖屹等,对土地征用中外部性的经济学思考[J],国土资源科技管理,2005,(4):29-33
[78]谢敏,城市土地集约利用内涵及其评价指标体系研究[J],中国农业大学学报,2006,n(5):117-120
[79]杨渝红等,地价理论对城市土地集约利用的应用分析[J],西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(6):93-97
[80]尧德明,陈玉福,张富刚,刘彦随,黄朝明,层次分析法在土地利用总体规划用地分解中的应用—以海南省为例[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35
[81]尹奇,罗育新,宴志谦,城市土地资源配置效率的经济学分析———以住宅用地和非住宅用地为例[J].四川农业大学学报,2007,6
[82]于春艳,城市土地集约利用探讨[J〕,安徽农业科学,2005,33(7):1333一1334
[83]袁丽丽,城市土地资源配置的经济学分析[J],经济师,2006,(9):7-8
[84]张海鹏,实现我国土地资源优化配置中的两难问题[J],南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008.4
[85]张丽君,城市土地集约利用研究[J],国土资源情报,2005,(9):16一21
[86]张颖.区域土地资源配置与社会经济发展[J].地域研究与开发, 2004, 23(6): 93-97.
[87]张文新,城市土地储备对我国城市土地供求与地价的影响分析「J],资源科学,2005,(11):58-64
[88]赵小敏,郭熙,土地利用总体规划实施评价[J].中国土地科学,2003,17(5)2)
[89]绍绘春、厉伟、诸培新,可持续发展观下的土地资源配置理论分析,产业观察[J]
[90]周颂红,城市化过程中的城市土地集约利用[J],国土资源导刊,2006,(4):12一14
[91]周巍,浅谈城镇化过程中耕地保护[J],国土资源导刊,2007.3.1
[92]朱红章等,经济增长的因素分析[J],技术经济,2006,25(5):42-46
[93]朱介鸣,市场经济下中国城市规划理论发展的逻辑[J],城市规划学刊,2005.01
[94]庄悦群,美国城市增长管理实践及其对广州城市建设的启示探求[J〕,2005,155(92):62
[95]Alcamo, J, E.Kerileman, and R.Leemans. Integrated scenarios of global change. Global Environmental Change [M]. Program Press: London.1996.
[96]Bradshaw TK, Muller B. Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: application of new regional land use policy models and geographical information systems [J]. Rural Social, 63:1-25.
[97]Callies, David L. On the making of land use decisions through citizen initiative and referendum [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1990, 56(2):222-223.
[98]Cheng Jianquan, Masser Ian. Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 62(4):199-217.
[99]Daniels, Tom, and Deborah Bowers. Holding Our Ground: Protecting Americas Farms and Farmland. Island Press, Washington, D.C, 1997.
[100]Darin, Drabkin.Land Policy and Urban Growth. Pergamon Press.1997.
[101]Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Technical Manual for Coastal Land Use Planning.2002-07.
[102]Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Optimal urban land use and zoning[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2004, (7): 69-106.
[103]Extensive & Intensive Rural Land Uses. Spatial Planning Unit, Department of the Environment & Local Government, 2001.7.
[104]Fischer Kowalski, M. Haberl, H. Tons. Joules and Money: Modes of Production and Their Sustainability Problems [J]. Society and Natural Resources, 1997, 10(1):61-85.
[105]George C, S. Lin, Samuel P, S. Ho. China’s land resources and land-use change insights from the 1996 land survey [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, (20):87-107.
[106]Gord Miller. The Protection of Ontario’s Groundwater and Intensive Farming. Special Report to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 2000, July 27.
[107]Intensive Agricultural Land Use by River Subbasin in Europe and the Middle East. http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/ECN/maps/262.htm. 2004-04.
[108]Intensive Land Use in France. http://www.co.johnston.nc.us/,2004-04.
[109]Kline JD, Alig RJ. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm land?[J]. Growth Change, 30:3-22.
[110]Lagendijk,A.Multifunctional Land Use as a Planning Challenge. The Economics of Multifunctional Land Use,2003:83-90.
[111]Leemans R, Zuidema G. Evaluation change in land cover and their importance for global change [J]. TREE, 1995, (10):76-81.
[112]Loo Lee Sim, Lai Choo Malone-Lee, Kein Hoong Lawrence Chin. Integrating land use and transport planning to reduce work-related travel a case study of Tampines Regional Centre in Singapore. Habitat INTL, 2001:399-414.
[113]Margaret A Moote, Mitchel P, Mcclaran, Donna K Chickering. Theory in Practice: Applying Participatory Democracy [J]. Environmental Management, 1997, 21(6):877-889.
[114]Paul Thorsnes. Internalizing neighborhood externalities: the ef-fect of subdivision size and zoning on residential lot prices[J].Journal of Urban Economics, 2000, 48, 397-418.