百色盆地古近系高分辨率层序地层学
|
摘要
本文应用沉积学、构造地质学、盆地分析和高分辨率层序地层学理论,以大量的钻井、露头剖面、测井及地震资料为基础,对百色盆地古近系开展了系统深入的高分辨层序地层研究,取得了如下创新成果和认识:
(1) 以中、长期基准面旋回分析为基础,结合界面和部分层序的年龄资料,对百色盆地古近系的地层划分和对比进行了清理,在前人研究的基础上,提出更符合层序划分和沉积充填演化规律的地层划分方案,各组地层的时代归属依次为:六忸组为古新世,洞均组为早始新世,那读组为中—晚始新世,百岗组为渐新世,百岗组之上为伏平组和建都岭组。
(2) 首次以高分辨率层序地层学理论及其技术方法,以沉积相分析为基础,详细研究了古近系的层序地层学特征,主要进展为:①识别出超长期(SLSC旋回)、长期(LSC旋回)、中期(MSC旋回)和短期(SSC旋回)4个级次的基准面旋回层序,确定了中、长期和超长期旋回层序界面、湖泛面在盆地内的等时对比关系、意义和标志;②将百色盆地古近系划分为与地层组相当的4个超长期旋回层序,建立了超长期旋回层序与各期构造活动的关系,认为由构造应力场转换形成的区域性不整合界面,是控制超长期旋回层序发育的关键,因而超长期旋回层序界面可代表不同构造演化阶段的应力场转换面,层序是不同构造演化阶段的产物;③将六忸组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC1-LSC3),洞均组划分为1个长期旋回层序(LSC4),那读组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC5-LSC7),百岗组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC8-LSC10)。确定了长期旋回层序与较大规模湖进—湖退旋回的关系,认为长期旋回层序发育的因素,主要与同一构造应力场周期性构造沉降活动的强弱变化有关,因而长期旋回层序界面可代表同一构造演化阶段中周期性出现的构造变动面;④进一步在六忸组中划分出3个中期旋回层序(MSC1-MSC3),洞均组中划分出2个中期旋回层序(MSC4-MSC5),那读组中划分出12个中期旋回层序(MSC6-MSS17),百岗组中最多划分出7个中期旋回层序(MSC18-MSC24)。中期基准面旋回层序的发育与次一级的湖进—湖退作用和物源供给量、气候变化有关:⑤在收集众多年龄数据的基础上,结合不同级次的基准面旋回沉积演化特征,对超长期、长期、中期和短期旋回层序的时限进行了界定,认为超长期旋回层序的时限为10～13Ma。长期旋回层序的时限为3～5Ma。中期旋回层序的时限为0.8～2.5Ma。短期旋回层序相当于准层序或最小成因地层单元,时限为数万年级。上述不同级次的基准面旋回时限界定,为提高等时地层单元的时间对比精度和分辨率奠定了基础。
(3) 剖析了短期基准面旋回层序的结构类型,识别出向上“变深”的非对称型(A)、向上变浅的非对称型(B)和向上变深后复变浅的对称型(C)3种主要结构类型,以及分别发育于低可容纳空间和高可容纳空间中的7种亚类型:低可容纳空间向上“变深”的非
Sedimentolgy, tectonics, basin analyses and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy are applied in this paper. On basis of many data of drillings, outcrops, observation well and seism,we study paleogene sequence by the high- resolution sequence stratigraphy in the Bai Se basin. Some new opinions and results obtained as follow:(1) Basing on the mid-term and long-term datum level analysis and linking data of the interface and the age of some squences, Paleogene sequence delimiting and contrast is verified in the Bai Se basin. On basis of predecessor study, stratigraphic delimiting which accord with sequence division and evolution rule of sedimentary filling is put forward. Each formation age assignment in turn: Liu Niu formation belonging to Paleocene, Dong Jun formation belonging to early Eocene, Na Du formation belonging to mid-late Eocene, Bai Gang formation belonging to Oligocene, Fu Ping and Jian Dou Ling formation overlaying Bai Gang formation.(2) On basis of sedimentary facies analysis, Paleogene sequence stratigraphic feature is particularly studied by theories and methods of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy which is used firstly. Main evolvations: ①identified four grades datum level cycle sequence, such as super-long term (SLSC cycle), long term(LSC cycle), mid-term(MSC cycle) and short term (SSC cycle). Mid-term, long term and super-long term cycle sequence interface and isochronic correlation,significance and sign of flooding surface in the basin are made certain. ② Paleogene is divided 4 super-long term cycle sequences which correspond stratigraphic formations in the Bai Se basin. Establishing relation between super-long term cycle sequence and every phase tectonic activity, unconformable contactformed by tectonic stress field transition is key which control super-long term cycle sequence growth. So super-long term cycle interface denotes stress field transition of different tectonic evolution phase. Namely equence is result of different tectonic evolution phase;③Liu Niu formation is divided into 3 long term cycle sequences(LSCl-LSC3). Dong Jun formation dividing 1 long term cycle sequences(LSC4), Na Du formation dividing 3 long term cycle sequences(LSC5-LSC7), Bai Gang formation dividing 3 long term cycle sequences(LSC8-LSC10). Relation between long term cycle and lacustrine transgressive regressive cycle is confirmed. Factors of long term cycle growth is connected with variety of the periodical tectonic subsidence activity in the same stress field. Thus long term cycle interface denotes tectonic change surface of periodical tectonic surface in the same tectonic evolution phase; ④Liu Niu formation is farther divided into 3 mid-term cycle(MSCl), 2 mid-term cycle Dong Jun formation (MSC4-MSC5), 12 mid-term cycle in Na Du(MSC6-MSC17), 7 mid-term cycle in Na Du(MSC18-MSC24). Secondary lacustrine transgressive regressive action of mid-term datum level cycle bears on provenance supply and climate change; ⑤On basis of many age data and sedimentary evolution feature of different grade datum level cycle, the age of super-long term, mid-term and short term cycle are
confirmed. Super-long term age is 10-13Ma; long term cycle age is 3-5Ma; mid-term cycle age is 0.8-2.5Ma; short term cycle which correspond parasequence or least stratigraphic unit is tens thousand. Age confirmation of different grades datum level cycle is basis for age contrast precision and resolution of isochronic stratigraphic unit.(3) Analyzing structure type of short term datum level cycle, the authors identified three main types which are up-deeping asymmetry(A), up-shallowing asymmetry(B) and symmetry from up-deeping to up-shallowing(C). Further in the light of the high or low accommodation, seven subtypes of structure are distinguished and they are up-deeping asymmetry of low accommodation (Type Al) or high accommodation (Type A2), up-shallowing asymmetry of low accommodation (Type Bl) or high accommodation (Type B2), complete-nearly complete symmetry (Type Cl), incomplete symmetry with majority of uprising semi-cycle (Type C2) or subsiding semi-cycle (Type C3). It is mainly discussed that sedimentary kinetic feature during every type short term cycle stratigraphy and stacking patterns of mid-short term datum level cycle during mid-term cycle.(4) According to above research, in 2 secondary pull-apart basin, Nadu and Baigang formation of I and II grade tectonic units makes regional correlation by means of super-long term cycle as frame, long term cycle as grain and mid-term cycle as isochronic stratigraphyic unit. The author establish high-resolution sequence stratigraphy of the I grade tectonic unit and discuss datum level cycle structure type, stacking patterns, distribution rule of the different tectonic unit in stratigraphic frame.(5) Applying research achievement of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, basing on the choice sequence interface SB5,SB6,SB7,SB8 as isochronic contrast sign, the same sequence thickness and facies interpretation of hundreds drilling well as control point(facies type of control point decided by optimum method), LSC5 uprising semi-cycle, LSC6 uprising semi-cycle, LSC7 subsiding semi-cycle (Nayi up subsegment), LSC8 uprising semi-cycle (low Bai three segment) as mapping unit, we selectively make four sequence lithofacies-paleographic map which objectively reflect paleogene lithofacies-paleogeographic frame, development and evolution in the Baise basin.(6) On basis of the study of the sedimentary system, sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies-paleogeography, linking paleogene feature of tectonic stress field and tectonic type in the Baise basin, Baise basin is defined small strike-slip pull-apart basin which develops on the young craton folded basement in the Hercynian-Indosinian. Form, development and evolution history of Basin divide 3 periods and 7 phases: (Drelief basin period of the LSC1-LSC3 period(Liuniu sedimentary period); (2)LSC4(Dongjun formation period) early rift-subsidence phase, LSC5-LSC6(Nadu early-middle period—E2n3-E2n2) strong rift-subsidence phase, and LSC7(Nadu late period—E2n') stable rift-subsidence phase; (3)LSC8(Baigang early period— E3b3) early depression phase, LSC9(Baigang middle—E3b2) strong depression phase and
(1) 以中、长期基准面旋回分析为基础,结合界面和部分层序的年龄资料,对百色盆地古近系的地层划分和对比进行了清理,在前人研究的基础上,提出更符合层序划分和沉积充填演化规律的地层划分方案,各组地层的时代归属依次为:六忸组为古新世,洞均组为早始新世,那读组为中—晚始新世,百岗组为渐新世,百岗组之上为伏平组和建都岭组。
(2) 首次以高分辨率层序地层学理论及其技术方法,以沉积相分析为基础,详细研究了古近系的层序地层学特征,主要进展为:①识别出超长期(SLSC旋回)、长期(LSC旋回)、中期(MSC旋回)和短期(SSC旋回)4个级次的基准面旋回层序,确定了中、长期和超长期旋回层序界面、湖泛面在盆地内的等时对比关系、意义和标志;②将百色盆地古近系划分为与地层组相当的4个超长期旋回层序,建立了超长期旋回层序与各期构造活动的关系,认为由构造应力场转换形成的区域性不整合界面,是控制超长期旋回层序发育的关键,因而超长期旋回层序界面可代表不同构造演化阶段的应力场转换面,层序是不同构造演化阶段的产物;③将六忸组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC1-LSC3),洞均组划分为1个长期旋回层序(LSC4),那读组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC5-LSC7),百岗组划分为3个长期旋回层序(LSC8-LSC10)。确定了长期旋回层序与较大规模湖进—湖退旋回的关系,认为长期旋回层序发育的因素,主要与同一构造应力场周期性构造沉降活动的强弱变化有关,因而长期旋回层序界面可代表同一构造演化阶段中周期性出现的构造变动面;④进一步在六忸组中划分出3个中期旋回层序(MSC1-MSC3),洞均组中划分出2个中期旋回层序(MSC4-MSC5),那读组中划分出12个中期旋回层序(MSC6-MSS17),百岗组中最多划分出7个中期旋回层序(MSC18-MSC24)。中期基准面旋回层序的发育与次一级的湖进—湖退作用和物源供给量、气候变化有关:⑤在收集众多年龄数据的基础上,结合不同级次的基准面旋回沉积演化特征,对超长期、长期、中期和短期旋回层序的时限进行了界定,认为超长期旋回层序的时限为10～13Ma。长期旋回层序的时限为3～5Ma。中期旋回层序的时限为0.8～2.5Ma。短期旋回层序相当于准层序或最小成因地层单元,时限为数万年级。上述不同级次的基准面旋回时限界定,为提高等时地层单元的时间对比精度和分辨率奠定了基础。
(3) 剖析了短期基准面旋回层序的结构类型,识别出向上“变深”的非对称型(A)、向上变浅的非对称型(B)和向上变深后复变浅的对称型(C)3种主要结构类型,以及分别发育于低可容纳空间和高可容纳空间中的7种亚类型:低可容纳空间向上“变深”的非
Sedimentolgy, tectonics, basin analyses and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy are applied in this paper. On basis of many data of drillings, outcrops, observation well and seism,we study paleogene sequence by the high- resolution sequence stratigraphy in the Bai Se basin. Some new opinions and results obtained as follow:(1) Basing on the mid-term and long-term datum level analysis and linking data of the interface and the age of some squences, Paleogene sequence delimiting and contrast is verified in the Bai Se basin. On basis of predecessor study, stratigraphic delimiting which accord with sequence division and evolution rule of sedimentary filling is put forward. Each formation age assignment in turn: Liu Niu formation belonging to Paleocene, Dong Jun formation belonging to early Eocene, Na Du formation belonging to mid-late Eocene, Bai Gang formation belonging to Oligocene, Fu Ping and Jian Dou Ling formation overlaying Bai Gang formation.(2) On basis of sedimentary facies analysis, Paleogene sequence stratigraphic feature is particularly studied by theories and methods of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy which is used firstly. Main evolvations: ①identified four grades datum level cycle sequence, such as super-long term (SLSC cycle), long term(LSC cycle), mid-term(MSC cycle) and short term (SSC cycle). Mid-term, long term and super-long term cycle sequence interface and isochronic correlation,significance and sign of flooding surface in the basin are made certain. ② Paleogene is divided 4 super-long term cycle sequences which correspond stratigraphic formations in the Bai Se basin. Establishing relation between super-long term cycle sequence and every phase tectonic activity, unconformable contactformed by tectonic stress field transition is key which control super-long term cycle sequence growth. So super-long term cycle interface denotes stress field transition of different tectonic evolution phase. Namely equence is result of different tectonic evolution phase;③Liu Niu formation is divided into 3 long term cycle sequences(LSCl-LSC3). Dong Jun formation dividing 1 long term cycle sequences(LSC4), Na Du formation dividing 3 long term cycle sequences(LSC5-LSC7), Bai Gang formation dividing 3 long term cycle sequences(LSC8-LSC10). Relation between long term cycle and lacustrine transgressive regressive cycle is confirmed. Factors of long term cycle growth is connected with variety of the periodical tectonic subsidence activity in the same stress field. Thus long term cycle interface denotes tectonic change surface of periodical tectonic surface in the same tectonic evolution phase; ④Liu Niu formation is farther divided into 3 mid-term cycle(MSCl), 2 mid-term cycle Dong Jun formation (MSC4-MSC5), 12 mid-term cycle in Na Du(MSC6-MSC17), 7 mid-term cycle in Na Du(MSC18-MSC24). Secondary lacustrine transgressive regressive action of mid-term datum level cycle bears on provenance supply and climate change; ⑤On basis of many age data and sedimentary evolution feature of different grade datum level cycle, the age of super-long term, mid-term and short term cycle are
confirmed. Super-long term age is 10-13Ma; long term cycle age is 3-5Ma; mid-term cycle age is 0.8-2.5Ma; short term cycle which correspond parasequence or least stratigraphic unit is tens thousand. Age confirmation of different grades datum level cycle is basis for age contrast precision and resolution of isochronic stratigraphic unit.(3) Analyzing structure type of short term datum level cycle, the authors identified three main types which are up-deeping asymmetry(A), up-shallowing asymmetry(B) and symmetry from up-deeping to up-shallowing(C). Further in the light of the high or low accommodation, seven subtypes of structure are distinguished and they are up-deeping asymmetry of low accommodation (Type Al) or high accommodation (Type A2), up-shallowing asymmetry of low accommodation (Type Bl) or high accommodation (Type B2), complete-nearly complete symmetry (Type Cl), incomplete symmetry with majority of uprising semi-cycle (Type C2) or subsiding semi-cycle (Type C3). It is mainly discussed that sedimentary kinetic feature during every type short term cycle stratigraphy and stacking patterns of mid-short term datum level cycle during mid-term cycle.(4) According to above research, in 2 secondary pull-apart basin, Nadu and Baigang formation of I and II grade tectonic units makes regional correlation by means of super-long term cycle as frame, long term cycle as grain and mid-term cycle as isochronic stratigraphyic unit. The author establish high-resolution sequence stratigraphy of the I grade tectonic unit and discuss datum level cycle structure type, stacking patterns, distribution rule of the different tectonic unit in stratigraphic frame.(5) Applying research achievement of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, basing on the choice sequence interface SB5,SB6,SB7,SB8 as isochronic contrast sign, the same sequence thickness and facies interpretation of hundreds drilling well as control point(facies type of control point decided by optimum method), LSC5 uprising semi-cycle, LSC6 uprising semi-cycle, LSC7 subsiding semi-cycle (Nayi up subsegment), LSC8 uprising semi-cycle (low Bai three segment) as mapping unit, we selectively make four sequence lithofacies-paleographic map which objectively reflect paleogene lithofacies-paleogeographic frame, development and evolution in the Baise basin.(6) On basis of the study of the sedimentary system, sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies-paleogeography, linking paleogene feature of tectonic stress field and tectonic type in the Baise basin, Baise basin is defined small strike-slip pull-apart basin which develops on the young craton folded basement in the Hercynian-Indosinian. Form, development and evolution history of Basin divide 3 periods and 7 phases: (Drelief basin period of the LSC1-LSC3 period(Liuniu sedimentary period); (2)LSC4(Dongjun formation period) early rift-subsidence phase, LSC5-LSC6(Nadu early-middle period—E2n3-E2n2) strong rift-subsidence phase, and LSC7(Nadu late period—E2n') stable rift-subsidence phase; (3)LSC8(Baigang early period— E3b3) early depression phase, LSC9(Baigang middle—E3b2) strong depression phase and
引文
1.A.D.迈尔著(孙枢等译),1991,沉积盆地分析原理.北京:石油工业出版社:1-471
2.蔡勋育、梁贵生、张凤岭,1996,百色盆地西部地区区带及有利勘探目标分析,滇黔桂油气:Vol.9,No.2,P24-32.
3.蔡勋育等,1999—2000,百色盆地油气地质综合评价目标优选(内部资料)
4.操应长、姜在兴、李春华等,2002,山东惠民凹陷中央隆起带古近系沙三段层序地层及沉积演化。古地理学报,004(003).40-46
5.C.K.威尔格斯等编(徐怀大等译),1993,层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析).北京:石油工业出版社.1-525
6.陈洪德、钱弈中、刘文均,1994,层序地层学理论和研究方法。成都:四川科学技术出版社,1—228
7.陈洪德、覃建雄、田景春等,2000,右江盆地层序格架中的生储盖组合及勘探意义.沉积学报:18(2),215-220
8.陈焕疆、夏济瀛等,1991,广西百色盆地花状构造及其对油气富集的影响(内部报告)..
9.陈元壮,广西百色盆地第三系沉积类型及其油气分布特征,滇黔桂油气,Vol.10,No.3,P28-33.
10.陈元壮,广西百色盆地东部地区湖泊淡水碳酸盐岩特征研究,滇黔桂油气,Vol.10,No.2,P25-31.
11.戴家庆,1990,广西百色盆地浅层气藏简介.石油与天然气地质:011(003),345-348
12.邓宏文、钱凯,1987,关于间歇性涨缩湖盆沉积作用的几点认识(主要以柴达木盆地早第三纪沉积为例).沉积学报:5(2).91～101
13.滇黔桂石油勘探局勘探开发研究院,1990,百色盆地油气成藏基本特征—19991年勘探部署方案研究(内部资料)
14.滇黔桂石油勘探局勘探开发研究院,1992,百色盆地江泽气藏评价研究报告。(内部资料)
15.丁文江,1929,中国造山运动(英文).中国地质学会会志,8(2)
16.董清水、刘招君、方石等,2003,论陆相层序地层学四分方案的可行性。沉积学报.021(002).324-327
17.杜振川、刘洛夫、闫纯有等,2001,百色盆地早第三纪高分辨率层序地层特征及聚煤作用.煤炭学报.026(005).-463-467
18.方少仙 梁贵生,1993,百色盆地田东拗陷第三系砂岩成岩作用与孔隙演化研究.天然气工业.013(001),32-41
19.方少仙、侯方浩、张可怀等,1991,广西百色盆地东部地区第三系储层研究,成都:成都科技大学出版社.
20.高智,1995,百色断陷式盆地层序地层充填格架及油气控制因素,滇黔桂油气,Vol.8,No.3,P18-29.
21.高智,1991,百色盆地油藏特征及成藏规律的初步探讨,滇黔桂石油科技情报,Vol.4,No.2,P11-21.
22.顾家裕、邓宏文、朱筱敏,1997,层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的应用论文集.北京:石油 工业出版社
23.广西壮族自治区地质矿产局,1985,广西壮族自治区区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1-853
24.何登发,李德生,1995,沉积盆地动力学研究的新进展.地学前缘,2(3):53～58,88.
25.H.G.里丁,1985,沉积环境和相.科学出版社,651
26.侯明才、陈洪德、田景春,2001,层序地层学的研究进展.矿物岩石,21(3),128-134
27.胡斌、张利伟、齐永安,2004,济源下侏罗统鞍腰组沉积构造特征及环境解释。焦作工学院学报,023(001).18-22
28.胡朝元,1982,生油区控制油气田分布——中国东部陆相盆地进行勘探的有效理论[],石油学报,3(2):9-13
29.胡受权,2000,湖平面变化及物源供给对陆相层序影响机理的计算机模拟。断块油气田.007(006),1-4,11
30.胡炎坤等,1990,广西百色盆地第三系研究报告.滇黔桂石油勘探局南宁研究院
31.纪友亮,张世奇.1996.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社.
32.纪有亮、张世奇等编著,层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式,1998年2月北京,地质出版社
33.江兴歌 廖宗廷 陈跃昆,2004,百色盆地田东坳陷热演化研究.同济大学学报:自然科学版.032(003),332-336
34.李崇国,1979,广西卫片目视解释与石油地质构造特征,广西石油地质与勘探论文集..
35.L.E 布郎 W.L 费歇尔、曾洪流、张万选译,张厚福校,1988.地震地层学解释与石油勘探.北京:石油工业出版社
36.李光喧、徐志广等,1987,广西百色盆地高产油井的发现及东部地区石油资源综合评价(内部报告).
37.李思田,1995,沉积盆地动力学—盆地研究领域的主要趋向.地学前缘,1(3),1-8
38.李思田、林畅松、解习农等.1995.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究[J].地学前缘,2(3-4):133-136.
39.李载沃,1991,百色盆地的扭动断裂特征、构造演化及其对油气聚集的控制作用,滇黔桂石油科技情报,Vol.4,No.3,P1-7.
40.李载沃、张凤岭、蔡勋育等,1990,田东坳陷北部断阶带成油条件及富集高产规律研究报告(内部报告),
41.李载沃等,1987,广西百色盆地东部地区构造史研究报告(内部报告).
42.梁贵生等,1994,广西百色盆地西部地区区带描述与圈闭评价报告。(内部资料)
43.刘宝珺,1980:沉积岩石学,地质出版社
44.刘宝珺,曾允孚,1985:岩相古地理基础与工作方法,地质出版社
45.刘俊英 袁鹤然,2002,广西百色盆地那读组轮藻化石组合特征及时代.地质通报.021(010),646-647
46.刘立,王东坡.1996.陆相地层的层序地层学:层序的特征与模式[J].岩相古地理,16(5):47-53.
47.刘招君、程日辉、易海永,1994,层序地层学的概念、进展与争论[J].世界地质,13(3):56～68
48.刘招君、董清水、郭巍,1998,断陷湖盆层序地层特征及模式——以松辽盆地梨树断陷为例[J].长春科技大学学报,28(专辑):54～58
49.刘招君、郭巍、董清水,1997,湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式——以松辽盆地西部斜坡为例[J]. 长春地质学院学报,27(增刊):54～60
50.罗毅 朱扬明 薛秀丽,2003,百色盆地第三系浅层气成因类型与形成机制.广西科学.010(004).-286-291
51.麻建明等,1991,层序地层学在百色盆地的应用(内部报告).
52.南海东部石油公司,1989,百色盆地西部地区石油地质条件初步评价及勘探部署建议(内部资料)
53.盘昌林 郑荣才 彭军,2003,百色盆地百49块百岗组三段高分辨率层序地层学分析.成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,030(003).-263-269
54.盘昌林,1999,百色盆地子寅油田仑16块沉积微相的研究与应用,广西油气,Vol.2,No.1,P42-45.
55.盘昌林、郑荣才、彭军,2003,百色盆地百49块百岗组三段高分辨率层序地层学分析.成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,030(003).-263-269
56.佩罗东 A.1993,石油地质动力学[M].北京:石油工业出版社
57.彭军 郑荣才 陈果,2004,广西百色盆地东部古近系那读组湖相灰岩.古地理学报.006(002).-163-173
58.彭军 郑荣才等,2002,百色盆地那读组短期基准面旋回层序分析.沉积学报.020(002).-203-209
59.彭军、陈景山、郑荣才等,2002.百色盆地百岗组高分辨率层序分析及研究意义。地球学报.023(002).-153-158
60.彭军、郑荣才、陈景山,2002,百色盆地那读组层序分析与生储盖组合.沉积学报,020(001).-106-111
61.彭军、郑荣才、陈景山等,2002,百色盆地那读组短期基准面旋回层序分析。沉积学报.020(002).-203-209
62.沈源,1998,百色盆地地层层系辨析与勘探设想,广西油气,Vol.1、No1,P1-6.
63.沈源、胡炎坤等,广西百色盆地东部地区沉积发育史研究报告(内部报告),1987.8.
64.童国榜 郑绵平等,2001,广西百色盆地始新世孢粉组合与环境.地层学杂志.025(004),273-278
65.王东坡、刘立.1994.大陆裂谷盆地层序地层学的研究[J].岩相古地理,14(3):1-9
66.王鸿祯,1997,地球的节律与大陆动力学的思考.地学前缘,4(3),1-12
67.王鸿祯、李光芩编译,1990,国际地层时代对比表.北京:地质出版社
68.王鸿祯、史晓颖、王训练等,2000,中国层序地层研究.广州:广东科技出版社,1-455
69.韦永贤,1992,百色盆地那读组地层压实特征及油气运聚规律.石油勘探与开发.019(004),22-26
70.魏魁生,徐怀大,雷怀玉等.1996.非海相层序地层学——以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:地质出版社.
71.魏魁生、徐大怀.1993.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,18(2):139—149.
72.吴富强、刘家铎等,沉积盆地动力学与油气,成都理工学院学报 2000,v27(4):368-372
73.谢刚平、王玉静、余宏忠等,2003,百色盆地古近系层序地层模式与油气勘探.大地构造与成矿学.027(004).-378-383
74.徐怀大,1995,如何推动我国层序地层学迅速发展,地学前缘,3-4 p103-113
75.徐怀大,1997,陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题,石油与天然气地质,6 p83-89
76.许效松,1997,层序地层在油储勘察中的新思维.海相油气地质,2(2),16-21
77.薛良清.1991.层序地层学在湖相盆地中的应用探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,17(6):29—34.
78.尹燕义 方少仙,1997,百色盆地子寅油田碳酸盐及硅质胶结作用特征.中国海上油气(地质).011(005).-333-336
79.尹燕义 刘灵芝,1995,百色盆地田东凹陷子寅油田那读组砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化.大庆石油学院学报.019(003).-26-29
80.曾凡刚 周世新,1997,广西第三系煤系地层油砂的地球化学特征.沉积学报.015(003).-91-95
81.曾允孚、夏文杰,1986,沉积岩石学.北京:地质出版社,1-274
82.张风铃等,1995,广西百色盆地坳陷圈闭评价及目标优选。(内部资料)
83.张合鉴等,1992,百色盆地西部地区储层特征控制因素及储层分类与评价研究。(内部资料)
84.张厚福等,1989:石油地质学(第二版),石油工业出版社
85.赵金科、张文佑,1958,广西地质(地层).科学出版社
86.郑荣才 彭军 彭光明,2003,高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例.沉积学报.021(004).-654-662
87.郑荣才 彭军 彭光明等,2003,高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例。沉积学报,021(004).-654-662
88.郑荣才 尹世民 彭军,2000,基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析。沉积学报.18(003),369-375
89.郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容等,2001,陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义。沉积学报.019(002),249-255
90.郑荣才、彭军,2002,陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比。沉积学报..020(001),92-100
91.郑荣才、文华国、梁西文,2002,鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界高分辨率层序地层分析。矿物岩石.022(004),66-74
92.郑荣才等,2000,浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路,成都理工学院学报,Vol.27,No.3
93.郑小武、袁士义、穆龙新等,2001,三维可视化技术及其在层序地层分析中的应用.石油实验地质.023(001).-103-107
94.朱夏,1986.板块构造与中国石油地质.朱夏论中国含油气盆地构造.北京:石油工业出版杜,71-79
95.邹华耀等,20001,百色盆地西部坳陷成藏条件分析。(内部资料)
96. Beggs, J M, 1988, Vail's derivation of the eustatic sea-level curve; some stratigraphic implications for basin analysis in New Zealand. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 41a, 34
97. Corss T A, Lessenger M A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation[A].西北欧层序地层会议材料[C].1994.
98. Cross T. A, Stratigraphic Controls on Reservoir Attributes in Continental Strata,地学前缘,2000, 7(4): 322-350
99. Davies, Phillip R, 1983, The geological and geophysical characteristics of structural-stratigraphic plays in the offshore Gippsland Basin. Bulletin-Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 14(3-4), 103-112
100. Dickinson. Basin geodynamics. Basic Research, 1994, (5): 195- 196.
101. Dow W G. Application of oil correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin(abs) [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1972,56:615
102. Fisher J H, 1976, Structural history of the Michigan Basin; middle Ordovician through Silurian time. Geological Society of America, vol.8, no.4, North-Central Section 10th annual meeting, 8(4), 477
103. Fisher W L . 1967. Depositional systems in the Lvicox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrene of oil and gas. G ulf Coast Association of Geological Societies,Transactions. 17.213-248
104. Gale, Andrew S; Hardenbol, Jan; Hathway, Ben; 2002, Global correlation of Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) sequences; evidence for Milankovitch control on sea level. Geology (Boulder), 30(4), 291-294
105. Huessner, H; Roessler, J; Betzler, C; Petschick, R; Peinl, M, 2001, Testing 3D computer simulation of carbonate platform growth with REPRO; the Miocene Llucmajor carbonate platform (Mallorca), Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 175(1-4), 239-247
106. Ito-Makoto, 1994, Compositional variation in depositional sequences of the upper part of the Kazusa Group,a middle Pleistocene foearc basin fill in the Boso Peninsula,Japan.Sedimentary Geology,88,219-230
107. J.C.Ramon and TA.Cross 1997 Characterization and prediction of Reservoir Architecture and petrophysical properties in Fluvial Channel Sandstones,Middle Magdalena Basin,Colombia.CT&F.Ciencia,Tecnologiay Future Vol.1 Num.3
108. Klein, Andre C; Vail, Peter R, 2001, Lowstand sediment preservation and the role of syn -depositional normal faults, upper Paleogene, Alabama Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America, 33(2), 61
109. Louis S.Teng,Peter B.Yuan,Neng-TiYu,2000,Sequence stratigraphy of the Taipei Basin deposits:a preliminary study.Journal of the Geological Society of China,43(3),497-520
110. Magoon L B, Dow W G. The petroleum system :from source to trap .AAPG Memoir 60,1994
111. Miall A D.Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1990.668
112. Olson, Hilary C; Gary, Anthony, 1999,Integrated approaches to studying sea-level changes; examples from the Gulf of Mexico and the New Jersey margin using IPS software.Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts - American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1999, A102, Oschman.W., 1990, Environmental cycles in the late Jurassic northwest European epeiric basin: interaction with atmospheric and hydrospheric circulations:. Sedimentary Geology, 69, 313-332
113. Ramsbottom,W.H.C, 1977, Major cycles of transgression and regression(mesothems) of the Namurian:. Yorkshire Geological Society,pProceedings, 41, 261-291
114. Sahagian, Dork L; Holland, Steven M, 1991, Eustatic sea-level curve based on a stable frame of reference; preliminary results; with Suppl. Data 91-36. Geology (Boulder), 19(12), 1209-1212
115. Sarzalejo, S; Hague, P; Truskowski, I, 1998, Pulsed tectonic activity and its control on the sequence stratigraphy of Zulia Oriental, western Venezuela. AAPG Bulletin, 82(10), 1962
116. Schlager.W. 1991, Depositional bias and environmental change-important factors in sequence
2.蔡勋育、梁贵生、张凤岭,1996,百色盆地西部地区区带及有利勘探目标分析,滇黔桂油气:Vol.9,No.2,P24-32.
3.蔡勋育等,1999—2000,百色盆地油气地质综合评价目标优选(内部资料)
4.操应长、姜在兴、李春华等,2002,山东惠民凹陷中央隆起带古近系沙三段层序地层及沉积演化。古地理学报,004(003).40-46
5.C.K.威尔格斯等编(徐怀大等译),1993,层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析).北京:石油工业出版社.1-525
6.陈洪德、钱弈中、刘文均,1994,层序地层学理论和研究方法。成都:四川科学技术出版社,1—228
7.陈洪德、覃建雄、田景春等,2000,右江盆地层序格架中的生储盖组合及勘探意义.沉积学报:18(2),215-220
8.陈焕疆、夏济瀛等,1991,广西百色盆地花状构造及其对油气富集的影响(内部报告)..
9.陈元壮,广西百色盆地第三系沉积类型及其油气分布特征,滇黔桂油气,Vol.10,No.3,P28-33.
10.陈元壮,广西百色盆地东部地区湖泊淡水碳酸盐岩特征研究,滇黔桂油气,Vol.10,No.2,P25-31.
11.戴家庆,1990,广西百色盆地浅层气藏简介.石油与天然气地质:011(003),345-348
12.邓宏文、钱凯,1987,关于间歇性涨缩湖盆沉积作用的几点认识(主要以柴达木盆地早第三纪沉积为例).沉积学报:5(2).91～101
13.滇黔桂石油勘探局勘探开发研究院,1990,百色盆地油气成藏基本特征—19991年勘探部署方案研究(内部资料)
14.滇黔桂石油勘探局勘探开发研究院,1992,百色盆地江泽气藏评价研究报告。(内部资料)
15.丁文江,1929,中国造山运动(英文).中国地质学会会志,8(2)
16.董清水、刘招君、方石等,2003,论陆相层序地层学四分方案的可行性。沉积学报.021(002).324-327
17.杜振川、刘洛夫、闫纯有等,2001,百色盆地早第三纪高分辨率层序地层特征及聚煤作用.煤炭学报.026(005).-463-467
18.方少仙 梁贵生,1993,百色盆地田东拗陷第三系砂岩成岩作用与孔隙演化研究.天然气工业.013(001),32-41
19.方少仙、侯方浩、张可怀等,1991,广西百色盆地东部地区第三系储层研究,成都:成都科技大学出版社.
20.高智,1995,百色断陷式盆地层序地层充填格架及油气控制因素,滇黔桂油气,Vol.8,No.3,P18-29.
21.高智,1991,百色盆地油藏特征及成藏规律的初步探讨,滇黔桂石油科技情报,Vol.4,No.2,P11-21.
22.顾家裕、邓宏文、朱筱敏,1997,层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的应用论文集.北京:石油 工业出版社
23.广西壮族自治区地质矿产局,1985,广西壮族自治区区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1-853
24.何登发,李德生,1995,沉积盆地动力学研究的新进展.地学前缘,2(3):53～58,88.
25.H.G.里丁,1985,沉积环境和相.科学出版社,651
26.侯明才、陈洪德、田景春,2001,层序地层学的研究进展.矿物岩石,21(3),128-134
27.胡斌、张利伟、齐永安,2004,济源下侏罗统鞍腰组沉积构造特征及环境解释。焦作工学院学报,023(001).18-22
28.胡朝元,1982,生油区控制油气田分布——中国东部陆相盆地进行勘探的有效理论[],石油学报,3(2):9-13
29.胡受权,2000,湖平面变化及物源供给对陆相层序影响机理的计算机模拟。断块油气田.007(006),1-4,11
30.胡炎坤等,1990,广西百色盆地第三系研究报告.滇黔桂石油勘探局南宁研究院
31.纪友亮,张世奇.1996.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:石油工业出版社.
32.纪有亮、张世奇等编著,层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式,1998年2月北京,地质出版社
33.江兴歌 廖宗廷 陈跃昆,2004,百色盆地田东坳陷热演化研究.同济大学学报:自然科学版.032(003),332-336
34.李崇国,1979,广西卫片目视解释与石油地质构造特征,广西石油地质与勘探论文集..
35.L.E 布郎 W.L 费歇尔、曾洪流、张万选译,张厚福校,1988.地震地层学解释与石油勘探.北京:石油工业出版社
36.李光喧、徐志广等,1987,广西百色盆地高产油井的发现及东部地区石油资源综合评价(内部报告).
37.李思田,1995,沉积盆地动力学—盆地研究领域的主要趋向.地学前缘,1(3),1-8
38.李思田、林畅松、解习农等.1995.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究[J].地学前缘,2(3-4):133-136.
39.李载沃,1991,百色盆地的扭动断裂特征、构造演化及其对油气聚集的控制作用,滇黔桂石油科技情报,Vol.4,No.3,P1-7.
40.李载沃、张凤岭、蔡勋育等,1990,田东坳陷北部断阶带成油条件及富集高产规律研究报告(内部报告),
41.李载沃等,1987,广西百色盆地东部地区构造史研究报告(内部报告).
42.梁贵生等,1994,广西百色盆地西部地区区带描述与圈闭评价报告。(内部资料)
43.刘宝珺,1980:沉积岩石学,地质出版社
44.刘宝珺,曾允孚,1985:岩相古地理基础与工作方法,地质出版社
45.刘俊英 袁鹤然,2002,广西百色盆地那读组轮藻化石组合特征及时代.地质通报.021(010),646-647
46.刘立,王东坡.1996.陆相地层的层序地层学:层序的特征与模式[J].岩相古地理,16(5):47-53.
47.刘招君、程日辉、易海永,1994,层序地层学的概念、进展与争论[J].世界地质,13(3):56～68
48.刘招君、董清水、郭巍,1998,断陷湖盆层序地层特征及模式——以松辽盆地梨树断陷为例[J].长春科技大学学报,28(专辑):54～58
49.刘招君、郭巍、董清水,1997,湖盆层序地层学术语体系及模式——以松辽盆地西部斜坡为例[J]. 长春地质学院学报,27(增刊):54～60
50.罗毅 朱扬明 薛秀丽,2003,百色盆地第三系浅层气成因类型与形成机制.广西科学.010(004).-286-291
51.麻建明等,1991,层序地层学在百色盆地的应用(内部报告).
52.南海东部石油公司,1989,百色盆地西部地区石油地质条件初步评价及勘探部署建议(内部资料)
53.盘昌林 郑荣才 彭军,2003,百色盆地百49块百岗组三段高分辨率层序地层学分析.成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,030(003).-263-269
54.盘昌林,1999,百色盆地子寅油田仑16块沉积微相的研究与应用,广西油气,Vol.2,No.1,P42-45.
55.盘昌林、郑荣才、彭军,2003,百色盆地百49块百岗组三段高分辨率层序地层学分析.成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,030(003).-263-269
56.佩罗东 A.1993,石油地质动力学[M].北京:石油工业出版社
57.彭军 郑荣才 陈果,2004,广西百色盆地东部古近系那读组湖相灰岩.古地理学报.006(002).-163-173
58.彭军 郑荣才等,2002,百色盆地那读组短期基准面旋回层序分析.沉积学报.020(002).-203-209
59.彭军、陈景山、郑荣才等,2002.百色盆地百岗组高分辨率层序分析及研究意义。地球学报.023(002).-153-158
60.彭军、郑荣才、陈景山,2002,百色盆地那读组层序分析与生储盖组合.沉积学报,020(001).-106-111
61.彭军、郑荣才、陈景山等,2002,百色盆地那读组短期基准面旋回层序分析。沉积学报.020(002).-203-209
62.沈源,1998,百色盆地地层层系辨析与勘探设想,广西油气,Vol.1、No1,P1-6.
63.沈源、胡炎坤等,广西百色盆地东部地区沉积发育史研究报告(内部报告),1987.8.
64.童国榜 郑绵平等,2001,广西百色盆地始新世孢粉组合与环境.地层学杂志.025(004),273-278
65.王东坡、刘立.1994.大陆裂谷盆地层序地层学的研究[J].岩相古地理,14(3):1-9
66.王鸿祯,1997,地球的节律与大陆动力学的思考.地学前缘,4(3),1-12
67.王鸿祯、李光芩编译,1990,国际地层时代对比表.北京:地质出版社
68.王鸿祯、史晓颖、王训练等,2000,中国层序地层研究.广州:广东科技出版社,1-455
69.韦永贤,1992,百色盆地那读组地层压实特征及油气运聚规律.石油勘探与开发.019(004),22-26
70.魏魁生,徐怀大,雷怀玉等.1996.非海相层序地层学——以松辽盆地为例[M].北京:地质出版社.
71.魏魁生、徐大怀.1993.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋存关系[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,18(2):139—149.
72.吴富强、刘家铎等,沉积盆地动力学与油气,成都理工学院学报 2000,v27(4):368-372
73.谢刚平、王玉静、余宏忠等,2003,百色盆地古近系层序地层模式与油气勘探.大地构造与成矿学.027(004).-378-383
74.徐怀大,1995,如何推动我国层序地层学迅速发展,地学前缘,3-4 p103-113
75.徐怀大,1997,陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题,石油与天然气地质,6 p83-89
76.许效松,1997,层序地层在油储勘察中的新思维.海相油气地质,2(2),16-21
77.薛良清.1991.层序地层学在湖相盆地中的应用探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,17(6):29—34.
78.尹燕义 方少仙,1997,百色盆地子寅油田碳酸盐及硅质胶结作用特征.中国海上油气(地质).011(005).-333-336
79.尹燕义 刘灵芝,1995,百色盆地田东凹陷子寅油田那读组砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化.大庆石油学院学报.019(003).-26-29
80.曾凡刚 周世新,1997,广西第三系煤系地层油砂的地球化学特征.沉积学报.015(003).-91-95
81.曾允孚、夏文杰,1986,沉积岩石学.北京:地质出版社,1-274
82.张风铃等,1995,广西百色盆地坳陷圈闭评价及目标优选。(内部资料)
83.张合鉴等,1992,百色盆地西部地区储层特征控制因素及储层分类与评价研究。(内部资料)
84.张厚福等,1989:石油地质学(第二版),石油工业出版社
85.赵金科、张文佑,1958,广西地质(地层).科学出版社
86.郑荣才 彭军 彭光明,2003,高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例.沉积学报.021(004).-654-662
87.郑荣才 彭军 彭光明等,2003,高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例。沉积学报,021(004).-654-662
88.郑荣才 尹世民 彭军,2000,基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析。沉积学报.18(003),369-375
89.郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容等,2001,陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义。沉积学报.019(002),249-255
90.郑荣才、彭军,2002,陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比。沉积学报..020(001),92-100
91.郑荣才、文华国、梁西文,2002,鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界高分辨率层序地层分析。矿物岩石.022(004),66-74
92.郑荣才等,2000,浅谈陆相盆地高分辨率层序地层研究思路,成都理工学院学报,Vol.27,No.3
93.郑小武、袁士义、穆龙新等,2001,三维可视化技术及其在层序地层分析中的应用.石油实验地质.023(001).-103-107
94.朱夏,1986.板块构造与中国石油地质.朱夏论中国含油气盆地构造.北京:石油工业出版杜,71-79
95.邹华耀等,20001,百色盆地西部坳陷成藏条件分析。(内部资料)
96. Beggs, J M, 1988, Vail's derivation of the eustatic sea-level curve; some stratigraphic implications for basin analysis in New Zealand. Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication, 41a, 34
97. Corss T A, Lessenger M A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation[A].西北欧层序地层会议材料[C].1994.
98. Cross T. A, Stratigraphic Controls on Reservoir Attributes in Continental Strata,地学前缘,2000, 7(4): 322-350
99. Davies, Phillip R, 1983, The geological and geophysical characteristics of structural-stratigraphic plays in the offshore Gippsland Basin. Bulletin-Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 14(3-4), 103-112
100. Dickinson. Basin geodynamics. Basic Research, 1994, (5): 195- 196.
101. Dow W G. Application of oil correlation and source rock data to exploration in Williston basin(abs) [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1972,56:615
102. Fisher J H, 1976, Structural history of the Michigan Basin; middle Ordovician through Silurian time. Geological Society of America, vol.8, no.4, North-Central Section 10th annual meeting, 8(4), 477
103. Fisher W L . 1967. Depositional systems in the Lvicox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrene of oil and gas. G ulf Coast Association of Geological Societies,Transactions. 17.213-248
104. Gale, Andrew S; Hardenbol, Jan; Hathway, Ben; 2002, Global correlation of Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) sequences; evidence for Milankovitch control on sea level. Geology (Boulder), 30(4), 291-294
105. Huessner, H; Roessler, J; Betzler, C; Petschick, R; Peinl, M, 2001, Testing 3D computer simulation of carbonate platform growth with REPRO; the Miocene Llucmajor carbonate platform (Mallorca), Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 175(1-4), 239-247
106. Ito-Makoto, 1994, Compositional variation in depositional sequences of the upper part of the Kazusa Group,a middle Pleistocene foearc basin fill in the Boso Peninsula,Japan.Sedimentary Geology,88,219-230
107. J.C.Ramon and TA.Cross 1997 Characterization and prediction of Reservoir Architecture and petrophysical properties in Fluvial Channel Sandstones,Middle Magdalena Basin,Colombia.CT&F.Ciencia,Tecnologiay Future Vol.1 Num.3
108. Klein, Andre C; Vail, Peter R, 2001, Lowstand sediment preservation and the role of syn -depositional normal faults, upper Paleogene, Alabama Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America, 33(2), 61
109. Louis S.Teng,Peter B.Yuan,Neng-TiYu,2000,Sequence stratigraphy of the Taipei Basin deposits:a preliminary study.Journal of the Geological Society of China,43(3),497-520
110. Magoon L B, Dow W G. The petroleum system :from source to trap .AAPG Memoir 60,1994
111. Miall A D.Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1990.668
112. Olson, Hilary C; Gary, Anthony, 1999,Integrated approaches to studying sea-level changes; examples from the Gulf of Mexico and the New Jersey margin using IPS software.Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts - American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1999, A102, Oschman.W., 1990, Environmental cycles in the late Jurassic northwest European epeiric basin: interaction with atmospheric and hydrospheric circulations:. Sedimentary Geology, 69, 313-332
113. Ramsbottom,W.H.C, 1977, Major cycles of transgression and regression(mesothems) of the Namurian:. Yorkshire Geological Society,pProceedings, 41, 261-291
114. Sahagian, Dork L; Holland, Steven M, 1991, Eustatic sea-level curve based on a stable frame of reference; preliminary results; with Suppl. Data 91-36. Geology (Boulder), 19(12), 1209-1212
115. Sarzalejo, S; Hague, P; Truskowski, I, 1998, Pulsed tectonic activity and its control on the sequence stratigraphy of Zulia Oriental, western Venezuela. AAPG Bulletin, 82(10), 1962
116. Schlager.W. 1991, Depositional bias and environmental change-important factors in sequence