内蒙古中部白音希勒地区构造特征及其演化
|
摘要
研究区位于华北板块北部陆缘增生带槽台界线附近,构造复杂。区内出露主要地层原白乃庙群的时代归属问题一直争议较大,主要原因是未找到古生物化石和合适的年龄依据。因此,笔者选择白音希勒地区作为自己的论文研究区。对该区构造特征及其演化的研究有助于工作区地层构造格架的建立和白乃庙群时代归属的确定。
论文主要以野外工作为基础,分析了包尔汉图群的褶皱构造变形特征及区内其它构造特征,并结合区域资料建立研究区的构造演化史,最后探讨了白乃庙群的时代归属问题。并取得以下主要认识:
1.包尔汉图群的褶皱构造经历了多期叠加变形作用,大致可分为三期即早期层内无根勾状褶皱;主期北西西紧闭褶皱和同斜褶皱;晚期南北向宽缓叠加褶皱。
2.区内发育的徐尼乌苏断层,确认其断层面向南倾斜且是由南往北推覆的逆冲构造,推测其逆冲时间为晚侏罗世。
3.研究区中部发育的韧性剪切带,与徐尼乌苏逆冲断层可能是同一构造体系的根带,属于较深构造层次。该带上出露基性岩块,可能代表地槽与地台界线通过的位置,并得到地球物理资料的验证。
4.包尔汉图群一段发育软沉积变形,反映了包尔汉图群形成早期处于一种动荡的大陆边缘地壳抬升的拉张构造环境,可能受板块俯冲作用的的影响。
5.研究区的构造演化可划分为六个阶段:(1)奥陶纪及以前-----陆缘裂解增生阶段;(2)晚泥盆世-晚二叠世——早期褶皱构造变形和板块碰撞阶段;(3)早三叠世-中三叠世——岩浆侵入及韧性剪切带形成阶段;(4)晚三叠世-晚侏罗世——主期褶皱和自南向北逆冲阶段;(5)晚侏罗世末-早白垩世——晚期褶皱变形阶段;(6)中白垩世-新近系——南西-北东向挤压及火山岩喷发阶段。同时研究区在中生代可能发生了一次造山作用,使得地壳抬升超过3.5km。
6.原白乃庙群包括白乃庙组的含铜绿片岩(将底部的斜长角闪岩段删除)、徐尼乌苏组和西别河组,时代定于早寒武世-晚志留世;原白乃庙群三、四、五段置于白云鄂博群上部岩段,时代定于早奥陶世-早志留世。
The study area is nearby the boundary of Geosyncline and plateform, lies in the epicontinental aggradational belt in the northern margin of the North China Plate, the structure is complex. Divergent views still exist as to the chronocorrelation of the Pre- Bainaimiao Group ,the majaor stratum of this area, the main reason is that the evidence of the Palaeobiological fossil and the appropriate age were not been found. Therefore, the author takes the Baiyixile area as his own research area. It is helpful to establish the strata-tectonic framework of work area and solve the chronochorizone of Bainaimiao Group through studying the structure characteristics and its evolution in this area.
The research is mainly base on the field work, this paper analyzed the fold structure features of Baoerhantu Group and other structures in the area, and established the structure evolution history with the analysis of regional data, and also discussed the chronocorrelation of the Pre- Bainaimiao Group .The main comprehensions are as follow:
1. The Baoerhantu Group has been undergone by several tectonizations. Based on the structural features. There are three types of the fold structure of Baoerhantu Group can be recognized: the rootless folding; NWW-SEE-face or near EW-face folds ; near S-N-face folds.
2. Xuniwusu fault developed in area, whose fault tilting facing the south and is from pushing going against covering rushing structure, guessing its forming in late Jurassic.
3. In the middle of the research area, the ductile shear zone was developed; it was possibly the identical structural system root belt with Xuniwusu fault, which belonged to the deeper tectonic level. Basic clod appears on this belt possibly represents the boundary of geosyncline and platform; it obtains the confirmation where the geophysics material results in.
4. The Soft-sediment Deformational Structures exit in the first section of Baoerhantu Group, which had showed Baoerhantu Group formed in turbulent continental margin and the crustal uplifting and tesensional tectonic setting in the early time, possibly influenced by the seismic activity in the region.
5. On the basis of the tectonic features, the tectonic evolution of the Baiyinxile region has been distinguished as the follow six stages: (1) epicontinental rifting and aggradational in the Preordovician; (2) the early fold structure deformation and the collision between the North China plate and the Siberia plate during the late Devonian to the late Permian; (3) the magmatic intrusion and the ductile shear zone forming during the early triassic to the middle Triassic; (4) the mail fold deformation and thrusting from the south to the during the late Triassic to the late Jurassic; (5) the later fold deformation during the late Jurassic to the early Cretaceous ;(6) the compression from southwest to northeast and the volcanic rock eruption during the middle Cretaceous to Neogene. In the Baiyinxile region, there may be an orogeny in the Mesozoic era, caused the lithosphere uplifting over 3.5km.
6. The Pre-Bainaimiao Group consists of Bainaimiao Formation whose lithology is cupreous green-schists (amphibolite at the bottom is excluded), Xuniwusu Formation and Xibiehe Formation .The time is from early Cambrian to late Silurian. The third section to the fifth section of Pre-Bainaimiao Group should be setted on top of the Baiyunebo Group. The time of these three sections is from early Ordovician to early Silurian.
论文主要以野外工作为基础,分析了包尔汉图群的褶皱构造变形特征及区内其它构造特征,并结合区域资料建立研究区的构造演化史,最后探讨了白乃庙群的时代归属问题。并取得以下主要认识:
1.包尔汉图群的褶皱构造经历了多期叠加变形作用,大致可分为三期即早期层内无根勾状褶皱;主期北西西紧闭褶皱和同斜褶皱;晚期南北向宽缓叠加褶皱。
2.区内发育的徐尼乌苏断层,确认其断层面向南倾斜且是由南往北推覆的逆冲构造,推测其逆冲时间为晚侏罗世。
3.研究区中部发育的韧性剪切带,与徐尼乌苏逆冲断层可能是同一构造体系的根带,属于较深构造层次。该带上出露基性岩块,可能代表地槽与地台界线通过的位置,并得到地球物理资料的验证。
4.包尔汉图群一段发育软沉积变形,反映了包尔汉图群形成早期处于一种动荡的大陆边缘地壳抬升的拉张构造环境,可能受板块俯冲作用的的影响。
5.研究区的构造演化可划分为六个阶段:(1)奥陶纪及以前-----陆缘裂解增生阶段;(2)晚泥盆世-晚二叠世——早期褶皱构造变形和板块碰撞阶段;(3)早三叠世-中三叠世——岩浆侵入及韧性剪切带形成阶段;(4)晚三叠世-晚侏罗世——主期褶皱和自南向北逆冲阶段;(5)晚侏罗世末-早白垩世——晚期褶皱变形阶段;(6)中白垩世-新近系——南西-北东向挤压及火山岩喷发阶段。同时研究区在中生代可能发生了一次造山作用,使得地壳抬升超过3.5km。
6.原白乃庙群包括白乃庙组的含铜绿片岩(将底部的斜长角闪岩段删除)、徐尼乌苏组和西别河组,时代定于早寒武世-晚志留世;原白乃庙群三、四、五段置于白云鄂博群上部岩段,时代定于早奥陶世-早志留世。
The study area is nearby the boundary of Geosyncline and plateform, lies in the epicontinental aggradational belt in the northern margin of the North China Plate, the structure is complex. Divergent views still exist as to the chronocorrelation of the Pre- Bainaimiao Group ,the majaor stratum of this area, the main reason is that the evidence of the Palaeobiological fossil and the appropriate age were not been found. Therefore, the author takes the Baiyixile area as his own research area. It is helpful to establish the strata-tectonic framework of work area and solve the chronochorizone of Bainaimiao Group through studying the structure characteristics and its evolution in this area.
The research is mainly base on the field work, this paper analyzed the fold structure features of Baoerhantu Group and other structures in the area, and established the structure evolution history with the analysis of regional data, and also discussed the chronocorrelation of the Pre- Bainaimiao Group .The main comprehensions are as follow:
1. The Baoerhantu Group has been undergone by several tectonizations. Based on the structural features. There are three types of the fold structure of Baoerhantu Group can be recognized: the rootless folding; NWW-SEE-face or near EW-face folds ; near S-N-face folds.
2. Xuniwusu fault developed in area, whose fault tilting facing the south and is from pushing going against covering rushing structure, guessing its forming in late Jurassic.
3. In the middle of the research area, the ductile shear zone was developed; it was possibly the identical structural system root belt with Xuniwusu fault, which belonged to the deeper tectonic level. Basic clod appears on this belt possibly represents the boundary of geosyncline and platform; it obtains the confirmation where the geophysics material results in.
4. The Soft-sediment Deformational Structures exit in the first section of Baoerhantu Group, which had showed Baoerhantu Group formed in turbulent continental margin and the crustal uplifting and tesensional tectonic setting in the early time, possibly influenced by the seismic activity in the region.
5. On the basis of the tectonic features, the tectonic evolution of the Baiyinxile region has been distinguished as the follow six stages: (1) epicontinental rifting and aggradational in the Preordovician; (2) the early fold structure deformation and the collision between the North China plate and the Siberia plate during the late Devonian to the late Permian; (3) the magmatic intrusion and the ductile shear zone forming during the early triassic to the middle Triassic; (4) the mail fold deformation and thrusting from the south to the during the late Triassic to the late Jurassic; (5) the later fold deformation during the late Jurassic to the early Cretaceous ;(6) the compression from southwest to northeast and the volcanic rock eruption during the middle Cretaceous to Neogene. In the Baiyinxile region, there may be an orogeny in the Mesozoic era, caused the lithosphere uplifting over 3.5km.
6. The Pre-Bainaimiao Group consists of Bainaimiao Formation whose lithology is cupreous green-schists (amphibolite at the bottom is excluded), Xuniwusu Formation and Xibiehe Formation .The time is from early Cambrian to late Silurian. The third section to the fifth section of Pre-Bainaimiao Group should be setted on top of the Baiyunebo Group. The time of these three sections is from early Ordovician to early Silurian.
引文
[1] 曹从周,杨芳林,田昌烈,等.内蒙古贺兰山地区蛇绿及华北板块和西伯利亚板块之间的缝合带位置.见:中国北方板块构造论文集编委会编.中国北方板块构造论文集.北京:地质出版社.1986,64～86.
[2] 曹从周,田昌烈,杨芳林.内蒙古索伦山-贺根山蛇绿岩带中席状岩墙群及其地质意义. 中国北方板块构造论文集,北京:地质出版社, 1987,第 2 集, 125～135.
[3] 陈斌,赵国春. SimonWILDE. 内蒙古苏尼特左旗南两类花岗岩同位素年代学及其构造意义,地质论评,2001,47(4):361～367.
[4] 陈辉,邵济安.白云鄂博地区碳酸岩的形成方式及构造背景. 北京:地质出版社,中国北方板块构造论文集, 1987,第 2 集, 73～79.
[5] 陈琦,仇甘霖,杜玉申,等.白乃庙-温都尔庙区域构造及华北北缘古板块构造演化.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992,第 22 卷,119～130.
[6] 陈跃军,彭玉鲸,路孝平,等. 华北板块北缘活动带元古宙构造岩片. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002(2):134～139.
[7] 陈志勇.内蒙古中部色尔腾山推覆构造及找矿探讨[J].内蒙古地质科技,1993,(3～4):10～13.
[8] 陈志勇,温长顺,张维杰.内蒙古色尔腾山的推覆构造[J].地球科学,2000,25(3):237～242.
[9] 陈志勇,李玉玺,王新亮,等. 包头-呼和浩特北部地区逆冲推覆构造. 地质通报,2002,21(4～5):251～258.
[10]仇甘霖,杜玉申.对白乃庙群的再认识.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992, 第 22 卷,1～10.
[11]丁国瑜.古地震标志问题.中国活动断裂[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.276～281.
[12]杜菊民,张庆龙,杜松金,等. 内蒙古大青山地区构造新样式初探. 江苏地质,2004, 28(2):65～68.
[13]杜菊民,张庆龙,李洪喜,等. 内蒙古中部大青山地区推覆构造系统及与断层相关的 褶皱. 地质通报.2005(7),24(7):660～664.
[14]杜玉申,仇甘霖,陈琦.白乃庙-温都尔庙晚元古-早古生代陆缘增生带的构造序列及古构造应力场.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992, 第 22 卷,58～70.
[15]杜远生, 韩欣. 论震积作用和震积岩. 地球科学进展, 2000,15(4):389～394.
[16]郭进京. 早前寒武纪多期变质变形区主期韧性剪切带.中国区域地质,1994,1:90～ 96.
[17]郭孟习,孙炜,尹国义,彭玉鲸. 华北板块北缘东段拼贴带地质一地球物理特征. 吉林地质,1999(4):8～18.
[18]郭胜哲.中朝板块与西伯利亚板块拼合时限的确定及其生物地层学依据.沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,1986,14:127～136.
[19]郭颖,李智陵.构造地质学简明教程.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1995,1～213.
[20]韩杰.内蒙古自治区四子王旗白乃庙铜矿床地质特征及成矿规律研究.内蒙古 103 地质 队,1987,1～71.
[21]郝旭,徐备.内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩的原岩年代和变质年代.地质论评, 1997,43(1):101～105.
[22]河北省地质矿产勘查开发局.创新思维与找矿实践～用现代构造理论知道河北找矿.北京:地质出版社,2006,131～147.
[23]和政军,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等, 燕山-阴山地区晚侏罗纪强烈推覆-隆升事件及沉积响应[J]地质论评,1998,44(4):173～178.
[24]胡宝全,常忠耀,张文聪.阴山(包头段)大型推覆构造基本特征及其与金矿区域成矿的关系.内蒙古地质.1990(1):1～7.
[25]胡骁.华北板块北侧古构造应力场的演变.河北地质学院学报,1982,(1～2):149～165.
[26]胡骁,牛树银,张英涛.内蒙古白乃庙地区中晚志留世复理石.中国区域地质,北京:地质出版社,1987,4:333～340.
[27]胡骁,牛树银,张英涛.内蒙古白乃庙铜矿区褶皱构造序列.中国北方板块构造论文集, 北京:地质出版社, 1987,第 2 集, 113～124.
[28]胡骁,许传诗,牛树银著.华北地台北缘早古生代大陆边缘演化.北京:北京大学出版社,1990,1～215.
[29]黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等,中国大地构造及其演化.科学出版社,1980.
[30]李德伦,刘伟.华北板块北缘内蒙徐尼乌苏～谷那乌苏推覆构造特征及成因分析.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专题),1992,第 22 卷,79～86.
[31]李述靖,张维杰,耿明山,等著.蒙古弧地质构造特征及形成演化概论.北京:地质出版社,1998,119～131
[32]李双庆. 内蒙古中部早古生代地体的拼合与增置.内蒙古地质,1997,第 18 卷,18～23.
[33]李文国.内蒙古自治区岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996,1～344.
[34]梁定益,聂泽同,万晓樵,等.试论震积岩及震积不整合.现代地质,1991,5(2): 138～147.
[35]梁定益,聂泽同,宋志敏.再论震积岩及震积不整合[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 1994,19(6):845～851.
[36]梁定益,聂泽同,宋志敏,等.正在萌芽的震积地质学[J].高校地质学报,1997,3(4): 458～461.
[37]梁定益,宋志敏,赵崇贺,等. 河北省白石山中元古代地震遗迹的发现. 地质通报, 2002,21(10): 625～ 631.
[38]梁定益.青藏高原首批 1:25 万区域地质调查地层工作若干进展点评,地质通报,2004,23(1):24～26.
[39]刘家义.内蒙古贺根山地区蛇绿岩套研究及构造意义,中国北方板块构造文集,1983,(1):117～137.
[40]刘为付,孟祥化,葛铭,等.徐州-淮南地区新元古代臼齿碳酸盐岩成因探讨.地质论评, 2004,50(5): 454～463.
[41]刘正宏,徐仲元,扬振升,论内蒙古大青山地区逆冲推覆构造[J].中国区域地质,1999,18(4):13～19.
[42]刘正宏,刘雅琴,冯本智. 华北板块北缘中元古代造山带的确立及其构造演化.长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):100～114
[43]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升.大青山逆冲推覆体系含义及地质特征.世界地质,2001,20(3):224～230.
[44]刘正宏. 大青山中生代造山带构造变形与沉积盆地演化[博士后出站论文]吉林省:吉林大学,2002.
[45]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升. 阴山中生代地壳逆冲推覆与伸展变形作用[J]. 地质通报,2002,21(4～5):246～250.
[46]刘正宏,徐仲元. 阴山地区印支期地壳构造变形研究. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(1):1～6.
[47]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升.大青山逆冲推覆构造形成时代的“40Ar-39Ar”年龄证据[J].科学通报,2003,48(20):2193～2197.
[48]吕洪波, 章雨旭, 夏邦栋,等.南盘江盆地中三叠统复理石中的同沉积挤压构造. 地质论评, 2003,49(5): 449～456.
[49]吕洪波, 章雨旭, 肖国望, 等. 内蒙古白云鄂博南东黑脑包腮林忽洞群下部发现地震滑塌岩块. 地质论评, 2006,52(2): 163～169.
[50]马杏垣遗著.解析构造学.北京:地质出版社,2004,1～463.
[51]马文璞.区域构造解析――方法理论和中国板块构造,北京:地质出版社,1992,1～308.
[52]南凌,崔之久.地震混杂岩(震积岩)的沉积特点和识别. 地震地质译丛, 1996,18(6): 1～9.
[53]内蒙古自治区区域地质测量队.1:20 万白乃庙幅区域地质调查报告(地质部分),K-49-ⅩⅦ,1975,1～124
[54]内蒙古自治区区域地质测量队.1:20 万查干敖包幅区域地质调查报告(地质部分),K-49-ⅩⅥ,1976,1～51.
[55]内蒙古自治区地质矿产局.内蒙古自治区区域地质志,北京:地质出版社,1991,556～656.
[56]聂凤军,张洪涛,陈琦,等.内蒙古白乃庙群变质基性火山岩铀-铅年龄.科学通报,1991,35(13):1012～1015.
[57]聂凤军,裴荣富,吴良士. 内蒙古白乃庙地区铜(金)和金矿床钕、锶和铅同位素研究矿床地质,1994,13(4):331～344.
[58]聂凤军,裴荣富,吴良士. 内蒙古白乃庙地区绿片岩和花岗闪长斑岩的钕和锶同位素研究.地球学报-中国地质科学院院报,1995,1:36～44.
[59] 彭阳,杨天南,乔秀夫,等. 大连上震旦统地震灾变事件研究. 地质学报. 2001,75(2): 221～227.
[60]彭阳,胡贵昂,陆刚,等.桂西北晚古生代地层中的沉积灰岩墙研究进展. 地质论评, 2004,50(6)613～616.
[61]乔秀夫,宋天锐,高林志,等.碳酸盐岩振动液化地震序列.地质学报, 1994,68(1):16～32.
[62]乔秀夫.中国震积岩的研究与展望.地质论评,1996, 42(4):317～320.
[63]乔秀夫,宋天锐,李海兵,等.辽东半岛南部震旦系-下寒武统成因地层.北京:科学出版社. 1996,31～53.
[64]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.对内蒙古腮林忽洞群、白云鄂博群及白云鄂博铁矿赋矿白云岩的新认识.地质论评,1997,43(2):147.
[65]乔秀夫,李海兵,高林志.华北地台震旦纪-早古生代地震节律.地学前缘, 1997,4(3～4):155～160.
[66]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.内蒙古腮林忽洞群综合地层和白云鄂博矿床赋矿微晶丘.地质学报,1997,71(3):202～211.
[67]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.内蒙古腮林忽洞群综合地层和白云鄂博矿床赋矿微晶丘.地质学报,1997,71(1):202～211.
[68]乔秀夫,高林志.华北中新元古代及早古生代地震灾变事件及与 Rodinia 的关系.科学通报, 1999,44(16):1753～1758.
[69]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳.古郯庐带新元古界-灾变·层序·生物[M].北京:地质出版 社,2001,8～121.
[70]乔秀夫.中朝板块元古宙板内地震带与分地格局[J].地学前缘,2002,9(3):141～149.
[71]乔秀夫.中朝板块元古宙板内地震带与盆地格局.地学前缘, 2002,(3):141～149.
[72]乔秀夫,宋天锐,李海兵.是地震液化泄水成因,不是“渗流管”构造.科学通报, 2002a,47(14):1118～1120.
[73]乔秀夫,彭阳,高林志.桂西北二叠纪灰岩墙(脉)的地震成因解释.地质通报, 2002b,21(2):102～104.
[74]单文琅,宋鸿林,傅昭仁,等.构造变形分析的理论、方法和实践.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1～159
[75]戎嘉余,M.E.Johnson,B.G.Baarli,等. 中朝板块北缘志留纪海岛的发现,科学通报,2000,45(20):2227～2231.
[76]邵济安.内蒙古中部早古生代蛇绿岩及其在恢复地壳演化历史中的意义.见:中国北方板块构造文集(第一集).北京:地质出版社,1983.1:158～172.
[77]邵济安.华北板块北缘中段地壳演化.北京:北京大学出版社,1991,1～136.
[78]邵积东.内蒙古大地构造分区及其特征.内蒙古地质,1998,2:1～23.
[79]孙晓猛,梁定益,聂泽同.大陆边缘震积岩序列----以金沙江中段震积岩为例. 现代地质, 1995,9(3): 271～278.
[80]唐克东,张允平.内蒙古缝合带的构造演化.见:肖序常.汤耀庆主编古中亚夏合巨型缝合带南缘构造演化.北京:北京科学技术出版社.1991, 30～54.
[81]唐克东,等著.华北板块北侧褶皱带构造演化及成矿规律.北京:北京大学出版社,1992,237～243.
[82]肖序常,汤耀庆,冯益民,等.新疆北部及其邻区大地构造.北京:地质出版社,1992,104～122.
[83]徐备,陈斌,邵济安.内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩 Sm-Nd , Rb-Sr 同位素年代研究.科学通报,1996,41(2):153～155.
[84]徐备,陈斌. 内蒙古北部华北板块与西伯利亚板块之间中古生代造山带的结构及演化.中国科学(D 辑),1997,3:227～232.
[85]徐备.华北板块北缘元古代年代地层格架及其形成过程. 中国前寒武纪及早古生代地层讨论会论文摘要, 1999,第 2 期, 219～220.
[86]薛君治,陆正敏,张英,等.内蒙古白乃庙金矿物学找矿标志.北京:地质出版社,1990,2～5.
[87]王建平,杨玉东.大青山地区的冲断和推覆构造[J]. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊,1983,4:43～57.
[88]王建平,杨玉东.大青山及邻区冲断推覆构造形成机制的论讨[J]. 构造地质论丛,1986,6:1～16.
[89]王荃,刘亚雪.中国的蛇绿岩带与板块构造.长春地质学院学报,1981,第 1 期,72～81.
[90]王荃,内蒙古中部华北与西伯利亚板块间缝合线的确定,地质学报,1986,1:31～41.
[91]王荃,刘雪亚,李锦轶.中国华夏与安加拉古陆间的板块构造.北京:北京大学出版社,1991,1～151.
[92]王新亮,胡凤翔,李玉玺,等.华北地台北缘乌兰哈雅地区二叠纪末-三叠纪初推覆构造.中国地质,2005,29(2):135～138
[93]吴淦国.武汉地质学院北京研究生部研究生毕业论文,1982.
[94]吴泰然,刘树文,张臣.华北地台北缘中段中新元古代地块的 pTt 轨迹及构造演化研究. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1998,23(5):487～492.
[95]武振杰.滇中中元古代软沉积物变形构造及其地质意义,中国地质大学(北京)硕士论文,2006,12-35.
[96]徐冬葵.古火山岛弧岩系——包尔汉图群地层、岩石化学特征及其成因探讨. 中国北方板块构造论文集.北京:地质出版社,1987,第 2 集,101～112.
[97]徐仲元,刘正宏,杨振升. 内蒙古大青山地区中生代造山运动及构造演化[J]. 长春科技大学学报,2001,31(4):317～322.
[98]袁忠信,白鸽,吴澄宇,等.内蒙白云鄂博矿区 H9 中火山岩岩石特征及其意义.矿床地 质,1995,14(3):197～204.
[99]曾庆栋,李德伦.白乃庙-谷那乌苏韧性剪切带特征. 长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质 专题),1992, 第 22 卷,95～98.
[100]张鹏远,李双庆,王长尧,等.白云鄂博地区地质构造特征.中国地质科学院天津地质矿产研究所所刊,1993,28:1～86.
[101]张永清,孟二根,巩智镇,等. 内蒙古中部中-晚志留世西别河组的划分和时代. 地质通报,2004,23(4):352～359.
[102]张玉清.内蒙古达茂旗北白云鄂博群阿牙登组藻类化石的发现及其地质意义. 内蒙古地质,2002,3:10～14
[103]张宗清,唐索寒,王近辉,等.白云鄂博稀土矿床形成年龄的新数据.地球学报,1994,(1～2):95～101.
[104]张宗清,唐索寒,陈启桐,等.白云鄂博矿区 H9 变质岩的 Sm-Nd 年龄、成因及与成矿关系.地球学报,1997,18(3):267～274.
[105]赵卫卫,查明,杨剑萍. 中国震积岩研究综述. 地层学杂志,2006,30(2):171～176
[106]郑亚东, Davis G.,A.,王琮,等. 内蒙古大青山大型逆冲推覆构造. 中国科学(D辑),1998,28(4):289～295.
[107]郑亚东,Davis G. A.,王琮,等,内蒙古大青山大型逆冲推覆构造[J].中国科学 D 辑,1998, 28(4):289～297.
[108]周和平,聂风军,薛林福,等.白音都西群、白乃庙群和白音都西-白乃庙地体.长春地质学院学院(白乃庙专辑),1992,第 22 卷,17～28.
[109]周志广,梁定益,刘文灿,等.藏南晚白垩世宗卓组巨型混杂堆积的特征及其地裂-地震成因论证.地质论评,2006,52(3):314～321.
[110]朱志澄.逆冲推覆构造.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1～113.
[111]朱志澄.构造地质学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1999,1～362
[112]朱绅玉. 内蒙古色尔腾山-大青山地区推覆构造[J].内蒙古地质,1997,(1):41～47.
[113]朱绅玉,杨继贤.阴山带燕山运动特征.内蒙古地质,1998,85(1):41～47.
[114]Alfaro P, Moretti M, Soria J M. Soft-sediment deformation structures induced by earthquakes (seismites) in the Pliocene lacustrine deposits (Guadix-Baza Basin, CentralBetic Cordillera) [J]. Eclog. Geol. Helvet. 1997, 90: 531～540.
[115]Anketell J M, Cegla J, Dzulynski S. On the deformational structures in systems with reversed density gradients t[J]. Ann. Soc. Geol. 1970, 40:3～30.
[116]Darby,B.J.Structural evolution of the southwestern Daqing Shan,Yinshan belt,Inner Mongolia,China.MS Thesis University of Southern California,Los Angeles,61pp,1999.
[117]Davernport C A, Ringrose P S. Deformation of Scottish Quaternary sediment sequences by strong earthquake motions. In: Jones M S, Preston R M F , eds. Deformation of sediments and sedimentary rocks[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, Geol. Soc. Spect. Pub. l29, 1983:299～314.
[118]Davis,G.A.,Zheng, Y.,Wang,C.,Darby,B.J.,Hua, Y.Geologic introduction and fied guide to the Daqing Shan thrust,Daqing Shan, Nei Mengol,China.Yinshan-Yanshan Major Thrust and Nappe structures Field Conference,Hohhol China,23P,1998b.
[119]DavisG.H.,ReynoldsS.J.Structural Geology of Rocksand Regions.New York: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,1996, 1~776.
[120]Ettensohn F R, Rast N, Kulp M A. Locating possible epicentral areas for paleoearthquakes, Middle Ordovician Lexington Limestone, central Kentucky. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2000, 32: A215.
[121]Fairchild I.J., Einsel G, Song T. Possible seismic origin of molar tooth structures in N eoproterozoic ramp deposits, north China Sedmientology, 1997,44(4): 611～630.
[122]Goscombe B.D., Passchier C.W.. Asymmetric boudins as shear sense indicator——an assessment from field data.Journal of Structural Geology, 2003,25(3):575~589.
[123]Gosmombe B.D., Passchier C.W., Hand M..Boudinage classification: end-member boudin types and modified boudin structures. Journal of Structural Geology, 2004,26(4):739~763.
[124]Guiraud M, Plazia J.C. Seismites in the fluviatile Bima sandstones: identification of plaeoseisms and discussion of their magnitudes in a Cretaceous synsedimentary strike-slid basin(Upper Benue, Nigeria)[J]. Tectonophysics, 1993, 225: 493～522.
[125]Hempton M R, Dewey J S. Earthquake-induced deformational structures in young lacustring sediments, East Antolian Fault, southest Turkey[J]. Tectonophysics. 1983, 98: 12～17.
[126]Hsu K J, Wang Q C, Li L. Geological evolution of the Nei-monides; a working hypothesis, Eclogae. Geol. Helv., 1991,84:1～31.
[127]Jewell H E, Ettensohn F R. An ancient seismite response to Taconian far-field foces: theCane Run Bed, upper Ordovician(Trenton) Lexington limestone, central Kentucky[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2004, 37: 487～511.
[128]Lowe D R. Water escape structures in coarse-grained sediments[J]. Sedimnetology. 1975,22:157～204.
[129]Lowe D R. Subaqueous liquefied and fludized sediment flows their deposits[J]. Sedimentology,1976,23: 285～308.
[130]Marco S, Agnon A. Prehistoric earquake deformations near Masada, Dead Sea graben[J]. Geology,1995,23: 695～698.
[131]Mattauer,M.,Le desformation des materiaux de I ecorece terrestre.Ed. Herman,Paris,1980.
[132]McAlpin J P, Nelson A R. Introduction to paleoseismology. In: McAlpin J P, eds. Paleoseismology. San Diego:Academic Press,1996,1～32.
[133]Moretti M. Soft-sediment deformation structures interpreted as seismites in middle-latePleistocene Aeolian deposits (Apulian foreland, southern Italy)[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2000, 135: 167～179.
[134]Mutti E, Ricci F, seguretM , Zanzucchi G. Seismoturbidites: a new group of resedmi ented depostis. M arine geology, 1984, 55: 103～116.
[135]Obermeier S F, Jacobson R B, Smoot J P, et al. Earquake-induced liquefaction features in the coastal setting of South Carolina and in the fluvial setting of the New Madrid seismic zone. U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 1504, 1990,1～44.
[136]Obermeier S F. Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis-An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how their regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleo-earthquakeds[J]. Engineering Geology,1996,44: 1～74.
[137]Obermeier S F, Pond E C. Issues in using liquefaction feaqures for paleoseismic analysis: Seismological Research letters,1999,70: 34～58.
[138]Park R G.Foundations of Structureral Geology.Glasgow and Landon,1983,Blackie.
[139]Pettijohn F J, Potter P E. Atlas and Glossary of Primary Sedimentary Structures[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,1964. 1～370.
[140]Plaziat J C, Purser B H, Philobbos E. Seism ic deform ation structure (seism ites) in the syn-rift sedim ents of the NW red Sea(Egypt). Bul.l Geo.l France, 1990,8: 419～439.
[141]Pope M C, Read F, Bambach R, et al. Late Middle to Late Ordovician seismites of Kentucky, southwest Ohio and Virginia:Sedimentary recorders of earthquakes in the Appalachian basin[J]. GAS Bulletin,1997,109(4): 489～503.
[142]Potter P E, Pettijohn F J. Paleocurrents and basin analysis[M]. Berlin: Springer. 1963,1～296.
[143]Rast N, Moshier S O. Convoluted beds in the Lexington limestone seismites (talk and unpublished abstract). Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Sciences,1990,51～91.
[144]Rodriguez-Pascuaa M A, Calvob J P, Vicente G D, et al. Soft-sediment deformation structures interpreted as seismites in lacustrine sediments of the Prebetic Zone,SE Spain, and their potential use as indicators of earthquake magnitudes during the Late Miocene[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2000, 135: 117～135
[145]Roep T B, Everts A J. Pillow 2beds: a new type of seism ites:A n example from an O ligocene turbidite fan complex, A licante.Sedmi entology, 1992,39: 711～724.
[146]Rossetti D F, Goes A M. Deciphering the sedimentological imprint of paleoseismic event:an example from the aptian Code Formation, Northern Brazil[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2000,135:137～156.
[147]Schumacher G A. Lithostratigraphy, cyclic sedimentation, and event stratigraphy of the Maysville, Kentucky area[R]. In: Ettensohn F R, eds. Changing interpretations of Kentucky geology-layer-cake, facies, flexure, and eustasy. State of Ohio: Department of Natural Resources Miscellaneous Report 5,1992,165～172.
[148]Scott B, Price S. Earthquake-induced structures in young sediments[J]. Tectonophysics,1988,147: 165～170.
[149]Seilacher A. Fault～graded beds interpreted as seismites[J]. Sedimentology, 1969,13: 155～159.
[150]Seilacher A. Sedmi entary structures tentatively attributed to Seismic events. Marine Geology, 1984,55: 1～12.
[151]Sengor A. M.C., Natal' in B A, Rurtman V S. Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature. 1993,364: 299～307.
[152]Tang K D. Tectonic development of of the Paleozoic fold belts on the northern margin of the Sino-Korean craton. Tectonics, 1990,9: 249～260.
[153]Tuttle M P, Williams K D, Barstow N L. Paleoliquefaction study of the Clarendon-linden fault system, western New York State[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 353: 263～286.
[154]Urai J L , Spaeth G, andothers. Evolution of Mullion (Boudin) structures in the Variscan of the Ardennes and Eifel. In: Jessell M J .ed. General Contributions: 2001. Journal of the Virtua lExplorer, 2001, 3:1~16.
[155]Vanneste K, Meghraoui M, Camelbeeck T. Late Quaternary earquake-related soft-sediment deformation along the Belgian Portion of the Feldbiss Fault, Lower Rhine Craben system[J]. Tectonophysics, 1999, 309: 57～79.
[156]Zhang C H, Wu Z J, Gao L Z, et al. Earthquake-induced soft-sediment deformation structure in the Wumishan Formation and their geological implications [J]. Science in China: Series D,2007,50(3):350～358.
[2] 曹从周,田昌烈,杨芳林.内蒙古索伦山-贺根山蛇绿岩带中席状岩墙群及其地质意义. 中国北方板块构造论文集,北京:地质出版社, 1987,第 2 集, 125～135.
[3] 陈斌,赵国春. SimonWILDE. 内蒙古苏尼特左旗南两类花岗岩同位素年代学及其构造意义,地质论评,2001,47(4):361～367.
[4] 陈辉,邵济安.白云鄂博地区碳酸岩的形成方式及构造背景. 北京:地质出版社,中国北方板块构造论文集, 1987,第 2 集, 73～79.
[5] 陈琦,仇甘霖,杜玉申,等.白乃庙-温都尔庙区域构造及华北北缘古板块构造演化.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992,第 22 卷,119～130.
[6] 陈跃军,彭玉鲸,路孝平,等. 华北板块北缘活动带元古宙构造岩片. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002(2):134～139.
[7] 陈志勇.内蒙古中部色尔腾山推覆构造及找矿探讨[J].内蒙古地质科技,1993,(3～4):10～13.
[8] 陈志勇,温长顺,张维杰.内蒙古色尔腾山的推覆构造[J].地球科学,2000,25(3):237～242.
[9] 陈志勇,李玉玺,王新亮,等. 包头-呼和浩特北部地区逆冲推覆构造. 地质通报,2002,21(4～5):251～258.
[10]仇甘霖,杜玉申.对白乃庙群的再认识.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992, 第 22 卷,1～10.
[11]丁国瑜.古地震标志问题.中国活动断裂[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.276～281.
[12]杜菊民,张庆龙,杜松金,等. 内蒙古大青山地区构造新样式初探. 江苏地质,2004, 28(2):65～68.
[13]杜菊民,张庆龙,李洪喜,等. 内蒙古中部大青山地区推覆构造系统及与断层相关的 褶皱. 地质通报.2005(7),24(7):660～664.
[14]杜玉申,仇甘霖,陈琦.白乃庙-温都尔庙晚元古-早古生代陆缘增生带的构造序列及古构造应力场.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专辑),1992, 第 22 卷,58～70.
[15]杜远生, 韩欣. 论震积作用和震积岩. 地球科学进展, 2000,15(4):389～394.
[16]郭进京. 早前寒武纪多期变质变形区主期韧性剪切带.中国区域地质,1994,1:90～ 96.
[17]郭孟习,孙炜,尹国义,彭玉鲸. 华北板块北缘东段拼贴带地质一地球物理特征. 吉林地质,1999(4):8～18.
[18]郭胜哲.中朝板块与西伯利亚板块拼合时限的确定及其生物地层学依据.沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,1986,14:127～136.
[19]郭颖,李智陵.构造地质学简明教程.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1995,1～213.
[20]韩杰.内蒙古自治区四子王旗白乃庙铜矿床地质特征及成矿规律研究.内蒙古 103 地质 队,1987,1～71.
[21]郝旭,徐备.内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩的原岩年代和变质年代.地质论评, 1997,43(1):101～105.
[22]河北省地质矿产勘查开发局.创新思维与找矿实践～用现代构造理论知道河北找矿.北京:地质出版社,2006,131～147.
[23]和政军,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等, 燕山-阴山地区晚侏罗纪强烈推覆-隆升事件及沉积响应[J]地质论评,1998,44(4):173～178.
[24]胡宝全,常忠耀,张文聪.阴山(包头段)大型推覆构造基本特征及其与金矿区域成矿的关系.内蒙古地质.1990(1):1～7.
[25]胡骁.华北板块北侧古构造应力场的演变.河北地质学院学报,1982,(1～2):149～165.
[26]胡骁,牛树银,张英涛.内蒙古白乃庙地区中晚志留世复理石.中国区域地质,北京:地质出版社,1987,4:333～340.
[27]胡骁,牛树银,张英涛.内蒙古白乃庙铜矿区褶皱构造序列.中国北方板块构造论文集, 北京:地质出版社, 1987,第 2 集, 113～124.
[28]胡骁,许传诗,牛树银著.华北地台北缘早古生代大陆边缘演化.北京:北京大学出版社,1990,1～215.
[29]黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等,中国大地构造及其演化.科学出版社,1980.
[30]李德伦,刘伟.华北板块北缘内蒙徐尼乌苏～谷那乌苏推覆构造特征及成因分析.长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质专题),1992,第 22 卷,79～86.
[31]李述靖,张维杰,耿明山,等著.蒙古弧地质构造特征及形成演化概论.北京:地质出版社,1998,119～131
[32]李双庆. 内蒙古中部早古生代地体的拼合与增置.内蒙古地质,1997,第 18 卷,18～23.
[33]李文国.内蒙古自治区岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1996,1～344.
[34]梁定益,聂泽同,万晓樵,等.试论震积岩及震积不整合.现代地质,1991,5(2): 138～147.
[35]梁定益,聂泽同,宋志敏.再论震积岩及震积不整合[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 1994,19(6):845～851.
[36]梁定益,聂泽同,宋志敏,等.正在萌芽的震积地质学[J].高校地质学报,1997,3(4): 458～461.
[37]梁定益,宋志敏,赵崇贺,等. 河北省白石山中元古代地震遗迹的发现. 地质通报, 2002,21(10): 625～ 631.
[38]梁定益.青藏高原首批 1:25 万区域地质调查地层工作若干进展点评,地质通报,2004,23(1):24～26.
[39]刘家义.内蒙古贺根山地区蛇绿岩套研究及构造意义,中国北方板块构造文集,1983,(1):117～137.
[40]刘为付,孟祥化,葛铭,等.徐州-淮南地区新元古代臼齿碳酸盐岩成因探讨.地质论评, 2004,50(5): 454～463.
[41]刘正宏,徐仲元,扬振升,论内蒙古大青山地区逆冲推覆构造[J].中国区域地质,1999,18(4):13～19.
[42]刘正宏,刘雅琴,冯本智. 华北板块北缘中元古代造山带的确立及其构造演化.长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):100～114
[43]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升.大青山逆冲推覆体系含义及地质特征.世界地质,2001,20(3):224～230.
[44]刘正宏. 大青山中生代造山带构造变形与沉积盆地演化[博士后出站论文]吉林省:吉林大学,2002.
[45]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升. 阴山中生代地壳逆冲推覆与伸展变形作用[J]. 地质通报,2002,21(4～5):246～250.
[46]刘正宏,徐仲元. 阴山地区印支期地壳构造变形研究. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(1):1～6.
[47]刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升.大青山逆冲推覆构造形成时代的“40Ar-39Ar”年龄证据[J].科学通报,2003,48(20):2193～2197.
[48]吕洪波, 章雨旭, 夏邦栋,等.南盘江盆地中三叠统复理石中的同沉积挤压构造. 地质论评, 2003,49(5): 449～456.
[49]吕洪波, 章雨旭, 肖国望, 等. 内蒙古白云鄂博南东黑脑包腮林忽洞群下部发现地震滑塌岩块. 地质论评, 2006,52(2): 163～169.
[50]马杏垣遗著.解析构造学.北京:地质出版社,2004,1～463.
[51]马文璞.区域构造解析――方法理论和中国板块构造,北京:地质出版社,1992,1～308.
[52]南凌,崔之久.地震混杂岩(震积岩)的沉积特点和识别. 地震地质译丛, 1996,18(6): 1～9.
[53]内蒙古自治区区域地质测量队.1:20 万白乃庙幅区域地质调查报告(地质部分),K-49-ⅩⅦ,1975,1～124
[54]内蒙古自治区区域地质测量队.1:20 万查干敖包幅区域地质调查报告(地质部分),K-49-ⅩⅥ,1976,1～51.
[55]内蒙古自治区地质矿产局.内蒙古自治区区域地质志,北京:地质出版社,1991,556～656.
[56]聂凤军,张洪涛,陈琦,等.内蒙古白乃庙群变质基性火山岩铀-铅年龄.科学通报,1991,35(13):1012～1015.
[57]聂凤军,裴荣富,吴良士. 内蒙古白乃庙地区铜(金)和金矿床钕、锶和铅同位素研究矿床地质,1994,13(4):331～344.
[58]聂凤军,裴荣富,吴良士. 内蒙古白乃庙地区绿片岩和花岗闪长斑岩的钕和锶同位素研究.地球学报-中国地质科学院院报,1995,1:36～44.
[59] 彭阳,杨天南,乔秀夫,等. 大连上震旦统地震灾变事件研究. 地质学报. 2001,75(2): 221～227.
[60]彭阳,胡贵昂,陆刚,等.桂西北晚古生代地层中的沉积灰岩墙研究进展. 地质论评, 2004,50(6)613～616.
[61]乔秀夫,宋天锐,高林志,等.碳酸盐岩振动液化地震序列.地质学报, 1994,68(1):16～32.
[62]乔秀夫.中国震积岩的研究与展望.地质论评,1996, 42(4):317～320.
[63]乔秀夫,宋天锐,李海兵,等.辽东半岛南部震旦系-下寒武统成因地层.北京:科学出版社. 1996,31～53.
[64]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.对内蒙古腮林忽洞群、白云鄂博群及白云鄂博铁矿赋矿白云岩的新认识.地质论评,1997,43(2):147.
[65]乔秀夫,李海兵,高林志.华北地台震旦纪-早古生代地震节律.地学前缘, 1997,4(3～4):155～160.
[66]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.内蒙古腮林忽洞群综合地层和白云鄂博矿床赋矿微晶丘.地质学报,1997,71(3):202～211.
[67]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳,等.内蒙古腮林忽洞群综合地层和白云鄂博矿床赋矿微晶丘.地质学报,1997,71(1):202～211.
[68]乔秀夫,高林志.华北中新元古代及早古生代地震灾变事件及与 Rodinia 的关系.科学通报, 1999,44(16):1753～1758.
[69]乔秀夫,高林志,彭阳.古郯庐带新元古界-灾变·层序·生物[M].北京:地质出版 社,2001,8～121.
[70]乔秀夫.中朝板块元古宙板内地震带与分地格局[J].地学前缘,2002,9(3):141～149.
[71]乔秀夫.中朝板块元古宙板内地震带与盆地格局.地学前缘, 2002,(3):141～149.
[72]乔秀夫,宋天锐,李海兵.是地震液化泄水成因,不是“渗流管”构造.科学通报, 2002a,47(14):1118～1120.
[73]乔秀夫,彭阳,高林志.桂西北二叠纪灰岩墙(脉)的地震成因解释.地质通报, 2002b,21(2):102～104.
[74]单文琅,宋鸿林,傅昭仁,等.构造变形分析的理论、方法和实践.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1～159
[75]戎嘉余,M.E.Johnson,B.G.Baarli,等. 中朝板块北缘志留纪海岛的发现,科学通报,2000,45(20):2227～2231.
[76]邵济安.内蒙古中部早古生代蛇绿岩及其在恢复地壳演化历史中的意义.见:中国北方板块构造文集(第一集).北京:地质出版社,1983.1:158～172.
[77]邵济安.华北板块北缘中段地壳演化.北京:北京大学出版社,1991,1～136.
[78]邵积东.内蒙古大地构造分区及其特征.内蒙古地质,1998,2:1～23.
[79]孙晓猛,梁定益,聂泽同.大陆边缘震积岩序列----以金沙江中段震积岩为例. 现代地质, 1995,9(3): 271～278.
[80]唐克东,张允平.内蒙古缝合带的构造演化.见:肖序常.汤耀庆主编古中亚夏合巨型缝合带南缘构造演化.北京:北京科学技术出版社.1991, 30～54.
[81]唐克东,等著.华北板块北侧褶皱带构造演化及成矿规律.北京:北京大学出版社,1992,237～243.
[82]肖序常,汤耀庆,冯益民,等.新疆北部及其邻区大地构造.北京:地质出版社,1992,104～122.
[83]徐备,陈斌,邵济安.内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩 Sm-Nd , Rb-Sr 同位素年代研究.科学通报,1996,41(2):153～155.
[84]徐备,陈斌. 内蒙古北部华北板块与西伯利亚板块之间中古生代造山带的结构及演化.中国科学(D 辑),1997,3:227～232.
[85]徐备.华北板块北缘元古代年代地层格架及其形成过程. 中国前寒武纪及早古生代地层讨论会论文摘要, 1999,第 2 期, 219～220.
[86]薛君治,陆正敏,张英,等.内蒙古白乃庙金矿物学找矿标志.北京:地质出版社,1990,2～5.
[87]王建平,杨玉东.大青山地区的冲断和推覆构造[J]. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊,1983,4:43～57.
[88]王建平,杨玉东.大青山及邻区冲断推覆构造形成机制的论讨[J]. 构造地质论丛,1986,6:1～16.
[89]王荃,刘亚雪.中国的蛇绿岩带与板块构造.长春地质学院学报,1981,第 1 期,72～81.
[90]王荃,内蒙古中部华北与西伯利亚板块间缝合线的确定,地质学报,1986,1:31～41.
[91]王荃,刘雪亚,李锦轶.中国华夏与安加拉古陆间的板块构造.北京:北京大学出版社,1991,1～151.
[92]王新亮,胡凤翔,李玉玺,等.华北地台北缘乌兰哈雅地区二叠纪末-三叠纪初推覆构造.中国地质,2005,29(2):135～138
[93]吴淦国.武汉地质学院北京研究生部研究生毕业论文,1982.
[94]吴泰然,刘树文,张臣.华北地台北缘中段中新元古代地块的 pTt 轨迹及构造演化研究. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1998,23(5):487～492.
[95]武振杰.滇中中元古代软沉积物变形构造及其地质意义,中国地质大学(北京)硕士论文,2006,12-35.
[96]徐冬葵.古火山岛弧岩系——包尔汉图群地层、岩石化学特征及其成因探讨. 中国北方板块构造论文集.北京:地质出版社,1987,第 2 集,101～112.
[97]徐仲元,刘正宏,杨振升. 内蒙古大青山地区中生代造山运动及构造演化[J]. 长春科技大学学报,2001,31(4):317～322.
[98]袁忠信,白鸽,吴澄宇,等.内蒙白云鄂博矿区 H9 中火山岩岩石特征及其意义.矿床地 质,1995,14(3):197～204.
[99]曾庆栋,李德伦.白乃庙-谷那乌苏韧性剪切带特征. 长春地质学院学报(白乃庙地质 专题),1992, 第 22 卷,95～98.
[100]张鹏远,李双庆,王长尧,等.白云鄂博地区地质构造特征.中国地质科学院天津地质矿产研究所所刊,1993,28:1～86.
[101]张永清,孟二根,巩智镇,等. 内蒙古中部中-晚志留世西别河组的划分和时代. 地质通报,2004,23(4):352～359.
[102]张玉清.内蒙古达茂旗北白云鄂博群阿牙登组藻类化石的发现及其地质意义. 内蒙古地质,2002,3:10～14
[103]张宗清,唐索寒,王近辉,等.白云鄂博稀土矿床形成年龄的新数据.地球学报,1994,(1～2):95～101.
[104]张宗清,唐索寒,陈启桐,等.白云鄂博矿区 H9 变质岩的 Sm-Nd 年龄、成因及与成矿关系.地球学报,1997,18(3):267～274.
[105]赵卫卫,查明,杨剑萍. 中国震积岩研究综述. 地层学杂志,2006,30(2):171～176
[106]郑亚东, Davis G.,A.,王琮,等. 内蒙古大青山大型逆冲推覆构造. 中国科学(D辑),1998,28(4):289～295.
[107]郑亚东,Davis G. A.,王琮,等,内蒙古大青山大型逆冲推覆构造[J].中国科学 D 辑,1998, 28(4):289～297.
[108]周和平,聂风军,薛林福,等.白音都西群、白乃庙群和白音都西-白乃庙地体.长春地质学院学院(白乃庙专辑),1992,第 22 卷,17～28.
[109]周志广,梁定益,刘文灿,等.藏南晚白垩世宗卓组巨型混杂堆积的特征及其地裂-地震成因论证.地质论评,2006,52(3):314～321.
[110]朱志澄.逆冲推覆构造.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1～113.
[111]朱志澄.构造地质学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1999,1～362
[112]朱绅玉. 内蒙古色尔腾山-大青山地区推覆构造[J].内蒙古地质,1997,(1):41～47.
[113]朱绅玉,杨继贤.阴山带燕山运动特征.内蒙古地质,1998,85(1):41～47.
[114]Alfaro P, Moretti M, Soria J M. Soft-sediment deformation structures induced by earthquakes (seismites) in the Pliocene lacustrine deposits (Guadix-Baza Basin, CentralBetic Cordillera) [J]. Eclog. Geol. Helvet. 1997, 90: 531～540.
[115]Anketell J M, Cegla J, Dzulynski S. On the deformational structures in systems with reversed density gradients t[J]. Ann. Soc. Geol. 1970, 40:3～30.
[116]Darby,B.J.Structural evolution of the southwestern Daqing Shan,Yinshan belt,Inner Mongolia,China.MS Thesis University of Southern California,Los Angeles,61pp,1999.
[117]Davernport C A, Ringrose P S. Deformation of Scottish Quaternary sediment sequences by strong earthquake motions. In: Jones M S, Preston R M F , eds. Deformation of sediments and sedimentary rocks[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, Geol. Soc. Spect. Pub. l29, 1983:299～314.
[118]Davis,G.A.,Zheng, Y.,Wang,C.,Darby,B.J.,Hua, Y.Geologic introduction and fied guide to the Daqing Shan thrust,Daqing Shan, Nei Mengol,China.Yinshan-Yanshan Major Thrust and Nappe structures Field Conference,Hohhol China,23P,1998b.
[119]DavisG.H.,ReynoldsS.J.Structural Geology of Rocksand Regions.New York: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,1996, 1~776.
[120]Ettensohn F R, Rast N, Kulp M A. Locating possible epicentral areas for paleoearthquakes, Middle Ordovician Lexington Limestone, central Kentucky. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 2000, 32: A215.
[121]Fairchild I.J., Einsel G, Song T. Possible seismic origin of molar tooth structures in N eoproterozoic ramp deposits, north China Sedmientology, 1997,44(4): 611～630.
[122]Goscombe B.D., Passchier C.W.. Asymmetric boudins as shear sense indicator——an assessment from field data.Journal of Structural Geology, 2003,25(3):575~589.
[123]Gosmombe B.D., Passchier C.W., Hand M..Boudinage classification: end-member boudin types and modified boudin structures. Journal of Structural Geology, 2004,26(4):739~763.
[124]Guiraud M, Plazia J.C. Seismites in the fluviatile Bima sandstones: identification of plaeoseisms and discussion of their magnitudes in a Cretaceous synsedimentary strike-slid basin(Upper Benue, Nigeria)[J]. Tectonophysics, 1993, 225: 493～522.
[125]Hempton M R, Dewey J S. Earthquake-induced deformational structures in young lacustring sediments, East Antolian Fault, southest Turkey[J]. Tectonophysics. 1983, 98: 12～17.
[126]Hsu K J, Wang Q C, Li L. Geological evolution of the Nei-monides; a working hypothesis, Eclogae. Geol. Helv., 1991,84:1～31.
[127]Jewell H E, Ettensohn F R. An ancient seismite response to Taconian far-field foces: theCane Run Bed, upper Ordovician(Trenton) Lexington limestone, central Kentucky[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2004, 37: 487～511.
[128]Lowe D R. Water escape structures in coarse-grained sediments[J]. Sedimnetology. 1975,22:157～204.
[129]Lowe D R. Subaqueous liquefied and fludized sediment flows their deposits[J]. Sedimentology,1976,23: 285～308.
[130]Marco S, Agnon A. Prehistoric earquake deformations near Masada, Dead Sea graben[J]. Geology,1995,23: 695～698.
[131]Mattauer,M.,Le desformation des materiaux de I ecorece terrestre.Ed. Herman,Paris,1980.
[132]McAlpin J P, Nelson A R. Introduction to paleoseismology. In: McAlpin J P, eds. Paleoseismology. San Diego:Academic Press,1996,1～32.
[133]Moretti M. Soft-sediment deformation structures interpreted as seismites in middle-latePleistocene Aeolian deposits (Apulian foreland, southern Italy)[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2000, 135: 167～179.
[134]Mutti E, Ricci F, seguretM , Zanzucchi G. Seismoturbidites: a new group of resedmi ented depostis. M arine geology, 1984, 55: 103～116.
[135]Obermeier S F, Jacobson R B, Smoot J P, et al. Earquake-induced liquefaction features in the coastal setting of South Carolina and in the fluvial setting of the New Madrid seismic zone. U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 1504, 1990,1～44.
[136]Obermeier S F. Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis-An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how their regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleo-earthquakeds[J]. Engineering Geology,1996,44: 1～74.
[137]Obermeier S F, Pond E C. Issues in using liquefaction feaqures for paleoseismic analysis: Seismological Research letters,1999,70: 34～58.
[138]Park R G.Foundations of Structureral Geology.Glasgow and Landon,1983,Blackie.
[139]Pettijohn F J, Potter P E. Atlas and Glossary of Primary Sedimentary Structures[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,1964. 1～370.
[140]Plaziat J C, Purser B H, Philobbos E. Seism ic deform ation structure (seism ites) in the syn-rift sedim ents of the NW red Sea(Egypt). Bul.l Geo.l France, 1990,8: 419～439.
[141]Pope M C, Read F, Bambach R, et al. Late Middle to Late Ordovician seismites of Kentucky, southwest Ohio and Virginia:Sedimentary recorders of earthquakes in the Appalachian basin[J]. GAS Bulletin,1997,109(4): 489～503.
[142]Potter P E, Pettijohn F J. Paleocurrents and basin analysis[M]. Berlin: Springer. 1963,1～296.
[143]Rast N, Moshier S O. Convoluted beds in the Lexington limestone seismites (talk and unpublished abstract). Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Sciences,1990,51～91.
[144]Rodriguez-Pascuaa M A, Calvob J P, Vicente G D, et al. Soft-sediment deformation structures interpreted as seismites in lacustrine sediments of the Prebetic Zone,SE Spain, and their potential use as indicators of earthquake magnitudes during the Late Miocene[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2000, 135: 117～135
[145]Roep T B, Everts A J. Pillow 2beds: a new type of seism ites:A n example from an O ligocene turbidite fan complex, A licante.Sedmi entology, 1992,39: 711～724.
[146]Rossetti D F, Goes A M. Deciphering the sedimentological imprint of paleoseismic event:an example from the aptian Code Formation, Northern Brazil[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2000,135:137～156.
[147]Schumacher G A. Lithostratigraphy, cyclic sedimentation, and event stratigraphy of the Maysville, Kentucky area[R]. In: Ettensohn F R, eds. Changing interpretations of Kentucky geology-layer-cake, facies, flexure, and eustasy. State of Ohio: Department of Natural Resources Miscellaneous Report 5,1992,165～172.
[148]Scott B, Price S. Earthquake-induced structures in young sediments[J]. Tectonophysics,1988,147: 165～170.
[149]Seilacher A. Fault～graded beds interpreted as seismites[J]. Sedimentology, 1969,13: 155～159.
[150]Seilacher A. Sedmi entary structures tentatively attributed to Seismic events. Marine Geology, 1984,55: 1～12.
[151]Sengor A. M.C., Natal' in B A, Rurtman V S. Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature. 1993,364: 299～307.
[152]Tang K D. Tectonic development of of the Paleozoic fold belts on the northern margin of the Sino-Korean craton. Tectonics, 1990,9: 249～260.
[153]Tuttle M P, Williams K D, Barstow N L. Paleoliquefaction study of the Clarendon-linden fault system, western New York State[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 353: 263～286.
[154]Urai J L , Spaeth G, andothers. Evolution of Mullion (Boudin) structures in the Variscan of the Ardennes and Eifel. In: Jessell M J .ed. General Contributions: 2001. Journal of the Virtua lExplorer, 2001, 3:1~16.
[155]Vanneste K, Meghraoui M, Camelbeeck T. Late Quaternary earquake-related soft-sediment deformation along the Belgian Portion of the Feldbiss Fault, Lower Rhine Craben system[J]. Tectonophysics, 1999, 309: 57～79.
[156]Zhang C H, Wu Z J, Gao L Z, et al. Earthquake-induced soft-sediment deformation structure in the Wumishan Formation and their geological implications [J]. Science in China: Series D,2007,50(3):350～358.