激活素A对人皮肤微血管内皮细胞增殖的抑制作用及对SMADs信号转导通路影响的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
视网膜新生血管性疾病是指由于新生血管生长伴随出血、渗出、增生等病理性改变造成的致盲性玻璃体视网膜疾病,是世界范围内最严重的致盲性眼病之一,包括糖尿病性视网膜病变( diabeticretinopathy,DR)、早产儿视网膜病变(Rerinopathy of prematurity, ROP)等。视网膜新生血管形成过程中,血管内皮细胞发挥着重要作用。血管内皮细胞的分化、增殖、迁移、微血管形成等生命活动是整个过程的中心环节。抑制血管内皮细胞增殖和新生血管生长是治疗这类疾病的关键。本研究首先探讨了激活素A对人皮肤微血管内皮细胞的增殖活力、细胞周期和凋亡的影响,通过MTT,流式细胞术,DAPI及caspase-3活力检测法证实激活素A能够抑制人皮肤微血管内皮细胞的增殖并诱导细胞凋亡。然后通过western blot法检测Smad2和Smad3信号转导通路,发现Smad2和Smad3信号转导通路参与了激活素A对人皮肤微血管内皮细胞增殖的抑制及诱导细胞凋亡的作用。表明激活素A对抑制视网膜新生血管的形成具有重要意义。为视网膜新生血管性疾病的治疗提供了新思路和理论依据。
The diseases relate to retinal neovascularization include diabetic retinopathy , retinal periphlebitis, retinopathy of prem aturity ,etc.This kind of diseases may cause the damage to the blood-retinal barrier, blood microcirculation and vessel permeability. They lead to retinal anoxia and edema. Then retinal tissue has a series of compensatory response to the anoxia and neovascularization. Are the principal causes of blindness.Current treatments including laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy are of limited efficacy and cause significant adverse effects. but poor results in clinical trails of some of the antiangiogenic strategies.The key to treating these diseases is to inhibit the development of the neovascularization.
     ActivinβA, a member of the transforming growth factor(TGF-β) superfamily, Activin(ACT) are a kind of multifunctional factors,they have tissue specificity,and have critical regulatory contribution in the tissue formation、cell growth、cell differentiation、development and maturation. Espeeially in the dividing cell multiplieation,and apoptosis the functional concern. also are the important regulatory factor in organism during physiology and pathology. A recent study shows that heavy elements through regulation of VEGF expression in vaseular generation.
     Materials and Methods:
     1.The activinβA gene was amplified by PCR with the recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1/ activinβA as the template and the fragment was cloned into pMD18-T vector. gene was activinβA released from pMD18-T activinβA and then was inserted to plasmid pEGFP-Nl with double enzymatic digestion.
     2. Microvascular endothelial cells of human skin (HMEC) was cultured and then trasfected by liposomes mediated pEGFP-N1/ activinβA .The expression of EGFP was observed under fluorescence microscope.
     3.HMEC were cultured and then trasfected by liposomes mediated pEGFP-ActivinβA. The effect of cell proliferation was determined by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium(MTT) method. The effect on cell cycle was examined by flow cytometric analysis.
     4.Cell death was determined by DAPI staining,Hoechst33342 staining and action’s of Caspase-3.
     5. ACT’s action on Smads pathway was examined in HMEC by western blot analysis using primary antibody against the phosphorylated form of Smad2 and Smad3 signal molecules.
     Results:
     p1. The eukaryotic expression vector pEGFP-N1/activinβA was successfully constructed. DNA sequencing and blast showed that activinβA completely matched the DNA sequence listed in GenBank.
     2. ActivinβA protein was expressed in HMEC and secreted in the culture supernatant. With the time prolonging,they became stronger and stronger.
     3. MTT results showed with the time prolonging,the proliferation of HMEC was inhibited by pEGFP- activinβA transfection; flow cytometric analysis results showed with the ratio of the S phase decreased.
     4. Hoechst33342 staining showed that there was sifnificant difference in inducing apoptosis between control group and EGFP- activinβA trasfecting group.
     5. western Blot showed that it was sifnificant increasing in Smad2/ Smad 3 protein express between control group and pEGFP- activinβA trasfecting group. (P<0.01)
     Conclusion:
     1. The successful construction of the eukaryotic expression vector pEGFP-activinβA .
     2. The eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA-F-ARIPzip is conctructed and expresses in HEK293 cells successfully, which establish the foundation for future research on ARIPzip gene function.
     3. ActivinβA can be transferred to endothelial cells by cationic liposome mediating and inhibit the proliferation of endothelium cells.
     4. ActivinβA can be transferred to endothelial cells by cationic liposome mediating and induced apoptosis of HMEC in vitro.
     5. ActivinβA can be transferred to endothelial cells by cationic liposome mediating and showed a decrease in the phosphorylation of Smad2/Smad3 compared to control group.
     ActivinβA is a member of the family TGF-β,as in adenohypophysis FSH can stimulate the release function was separated out and surrounded by external naming.Recent research shows that activin,it in a variety of biological systems play an important role,especially in the dividing cell multiplication,and apoptosis the functional concern.Even activin from model and divided into three different types,namely,activinβA A ,B and enlivening activinβA. Beinging quality ,are widely distributed in human tissues.A recent study shows that heavy elements through regulation of VEGF expression in inhibiting of vascular. This results indicated that activinβA could inhibit the proliferation of HMEC by stimulating the synthesis of DNA and mitosis ,and the effet of proliferation on HMEC via Smad2/Smad3 signaling pathway.
     In summary, this study indicates that activinβA inhibit the proliferation of HMEC via Smad2/Smad3 signaling pathway.Thus may play a vital role in the prevention of neovascularization .This study should suggest that there may be some new options to need to be explored in the treatment of the diseases relate to retinal neovascularization.
引文
[1] Campochiaro PA.Retinal and choroidal neovascularization.J Cell physiol,2000, 184(3):301-310.
    [2] Distler JH,Hirth A,Kurowska-stolarska M,et al.Angiogenic and angiostatic factors in the molecular control of angiogengsis.Q J Nucl Med,2003, 47(3):149- 161.
    [3] Spranger J,Osterhoff M,Reimann M,et al.Loss of the antiangiogenic piment epithelium-derived factor in patients with angiogenic eye disease.Diabetes, 2001,50(12): 2641-2645
    [4] Boehm BO,lang G,Feldmann B,et al.Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is associated with a low level of the natural ocular antiangiogenic agent pigment epithelium-derived factor(PEDF) In aqueous humor, a pilot study.Horm Metab Res,2003,35(6):382-386
    [5] Myoken Yet al,Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1991;88:5819
    [6] Ling N, Ying SY, Ueno N, et al. A homodimer of the beta-subunits of inhibin A stimulates the secretion of pituitary follicle stimulating hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1986, 138(3): 1129-37. [ 7 ] Sugino H, Tsuchida K. Activin and follistatin. In Skeletal Growth Factors (E. Canalis Ed.) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia,2000, 251-263. [ 8 ] Feijen A, Goumans MJ. Expression of activin subunits, activin receptors and follistatin in postimplantation mouse embryos suggests specific developmental functions for different activins. Development, 1994, 120: 3621-3637.
    [9] Harrison CA, Gray PC, Vale WW and Robertson DM. Antagonists of activin signaling: mechanisms and potential biological applications. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2005, 16(2): 73-8.
    [10] Lau AL, Kumar TR, Nishimori K, etal. Activin beta C and beta E genes are not essential for mouse liver growth, differentiation, and regeneration [J]. Mol Cell Biol, 2000, 20 (18): 6127-6137.
    [11] Date M, Matsuzaki K, Matsushita M, et al. Differential regulation of activin A forhepatocyte growth and fibronectin synthesis in rat liver injury. [J]. J Hepatol, 2000, 32(2): 251-260.
    [12] Vejda S, Cranfield M, Peter B,et al. Expression and dimerization of the rat activin subunits bC and bE: evidence for the formation of novel activin dimers. J. Mol. Endocrinol, 2002, 28(1): 137–148.
    [13] Mellor SL, Cranfield M, Ries R, et al. Localization of activin ?A-, ?B- and ?C-subunits in human prostate and evidence for formation of new activin heterodimers of ?C-subunit. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Meta., 2000, 85:4851–4858.
    [14] Massague J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem ,1998, 67:753–791.
    [15] Massague J, Chen YG. Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev, 2000, 14:627–644.
    [16] Heldin CH, Miyazono K, Ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature, 1997, 390:465–471.
    [17] Shi Y, Wang YF, Jayaraman L, et al. Crystal structure of a Smad MH1 domain bound to DNA: Insights on DNA binding in TGF-beta signaling. Cell, 1998, 94:585–594.
    [18] Shi Y, Hata A, Lo RS, et al. A structural basis for mutational inactivation of the tumour suppressor Smad4. Nature, 1997, 388:87–93.
    [19] Massague J. How cells read TGF-beta signals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2000, 1:169–178.
    [20] Lagna G, Hata A, Hemmati-Brivanlou A and Massague J. Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-beta signalling pathways. Nature, 1996, 383:832–836.
    [21] Howell M, Itoh F, Pierreux CE, et al. Xenopus Smad4beta is the co-Smad component of developmentally regulated transcription factor complexes responsible for induction of early mesodermal genes. Dev Biol, 1999, 214:354–369.
    [22] Masuyama N, Hanafusa H, Kusakabe M, et al. Identification of two Smad4proteins in Xenopus: Their common and distinct properties. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274:12163–12170.
    [23] Liu F, Pouponnot C, Massague J. Dual role of the Smad4/DPC4 tumor suppressor in TGFbeta-inducible transcriptional complexes. Genes Dev, 1997, 11:3157–3167.
    [24] Yamashita H, ten Dijke P, Huylebroeck D, et al. Osteogenic protein-1 binds to activin type II receptors and induces certain activin-like effects. J Cell Biol, 1995, 130: 217-226.
    [25] Liu F, Ventura F, Doody J and MassaguéJ. Human type II receptor for bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs): extension of the two-kinase receptor model to the BMPs. Mol Cell Biol, 1995, 15:3479–3486.
    [26] Attisano L, Wrana JL, Montalvo E and MassaguéJ. Activation of signaling by the activin receptor complex. Mol Cell Biol, 1996, 16: 1066-1073.
    [27] Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, et al. Mechanism of activation of the TGFβreceptor. Nature, 1994, 370: 341-347.
    [28] Willis SA, Zimmerman CM, Li LI and Mathews LS. Formation and activation by phosphorylation of activin receptor complexes. Mol Endocrinol, 1996, 10: 367-379.
    [29] Lagna G, Hata A, Hemmati-Brivanlou A and MassaguéJ. Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGFβsignalling pathways. Nature, 1996, 383: 832-836.
    [30] Derynck R, Zhang Y, Feng X.H. Smads: transcriptional activators of TGFβresponses. Cell, 1998, 95: 737-740.
    [31] Massague J, D. Wotton D. Transcriptional control by the TGF-β/Smad signaling system. EMBO J, 2000, 19: 1745-1754.
    [32] Xu L, Chen YG, Massague J. The nuclear import function of Smad2 is masked by SARA and unmasked by TGFβ-dependent phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol, 2000, 2: 559-562.
    [33] Jonk LJ, Itoh S, Heldin CH, et al. Identification and functional characterization of Smad binding element (SBE) in the JunB promoter that acts as a transforminggrowth factorβ, activin, and bone morphogenetic protein-inducible enhancer. J Biol Chem, 1998, 273: 21145-21152.
    [34] Zhu H, Kavsak P, Abdollah S, et al. A SMAD ubiquitin ligase targets the BMPpathway and affects embryonic pattern formation. Nature, 1999, 400: 687-693.
    [35] Kavsak P, Rasmussen RK, Causing CG, et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf 2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGFβreceptor for degradation. Mol Cell, 2000, 6: 1365-1375.
    [36] Lin X, Liang M, Feng XH. Smurf2 is a ubiquitin E3 ligase mediating proteasome-dependent degradation of Smad 2 in transforming growth factor-βsignaling. J Biol Chem, 2000, 275: 36818-36822.
    [37] Zhang Y, Chang C, Gehling DJ, et al. Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf 2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 974-979.
    [38] Kretzschmar M, Doody J, Timokhina I and Massague J. A mechanism of repression of TGFβ/ Smad signaling by oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev, 1999, 13: 804-816.
    [39] Wicks SJ, Lui S, Abdel-Wahab N, et al. Inactivation
    [40] of smad-transforming growth factorβsignaling by Ca2+-
    [41] calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Mol Cell Biol, 2000, 20: 8103-8111.
    [42] Lebrun JJ, Takabe K, Chen Y and Vale W. Roles of pathway- specific and inhibitory Smads in activin receptor signaling. Mol Endocrinol, 1999, 13: 15-23.
    [43] Massague J, Chen YG. Controlling TGF-βsignaling. Genes Dev, 2000, 14: 627-644.
    [44] Feng XH, Derynck R. A kinase subdomain of transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β) type I receptor determines the TGF-βintracellular signaling activity. EMBO J, 1997, 16: 3912-3922.
    [45] Lo RS, Chen YG, Shi YG, et al. The L3 loop: a structural motif determining specific interactions between SMAD proteins and TGF-βreceptors. EMBO J, 1998,17: 996-1005.
    [46] Chen YG, Hata A, Lo RS, et al. Determinants of specificity in TGF-βsignal transduction. Genes Dev, 1998, 12: 2144-2152.
    [47] Armes NA, Neal KA, Smith JC. A short loop on the ALK-2 and
    [48] ALK-4 activin receptors regulate signaling specificity but cannot account for all their effects on early Xenopus development. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274: 7929-7935.
    [49] Chen Y, Bhushan A, Vale W. Smad8 mediates the signaling of the receptor serine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 12938-12943.
    [50] Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, et al. Greenfluorescent protein as a marker for gene expressionJ . Science ,1994:263(5148) :802 - 805.
    [51] Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G,et al.Science,1994,263(11): 802-805.
    [52] Ward W W, Bokman S H. Biochemistry, 1982,21:4535-4550.
    [53] Heim, R., D. C. Prasher, R. Y. Tsien. Proc.Nutl. Alced. Sci,1994, 91:12501-12504.
    [54] Dardalbon V, Noraz N, Pollok K,et al. Hum.Gene Ther, 1999,10:5-14.
    [55] Yun J, Shao L et al. Importance of FSH-releasing protein and inhibin in erythrodifferentiation. Nature, 1987,330(6150):765-7.
    [56] Ogawa Y, Schmidt DK et al. Bovine bone activin enhances bone morphogenetic protein-induced ectopic bone formation. J Bio Chem, 1992, 267(20): 14233-7.
    [57] Bao YL, Tsuchida K,Liu B, et al. Synergistic activity of activin A and basic fibroblast growth factor on tyrosine hydroxylase expression through Smad3 and ERK1/ERK2 MAPK signaling pathways. J Endocrino, 2005, 184(3), 493-504.
    [58] Mathews LS. Activin receptors and cellular signaling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocri Rev, 1994,15(3):310-25.
    [59] Itoh S, Itol F et al. Signaling of transforming growth factor-beta family members through Smad proteins. Eur J Biochem,2000, 267(24):6954-67.
    [60] Shoji H, Tsuchida K, et al. Identification and characterization of a PDZ protein that interacts with activin type II receptor. J Biol Chem, 2000,275: 5485-5492.
    [61] Matsuzaki T, Hanai S, et al, Regulation of endocytosis of activin type II receptorsby a novel PDZ protein through Ral/Ral-binding protein 1-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem,2002,277(21):19008-18.
    [62] Tsuchida K, Nakatani M, Matsuzaki T, et al. Novel Factor in Regulation of Activin Signaling. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 2004, 225(1-2):1-8.
    [63] Liu B, Bao Y, Wei Z, et al . Isolation and Characterization of proteins interacting with activin type II receptors. Chem. Res. Chinese U, 2006, 22(2): 217-220.
    [64] Chen YG, Wang Q, Lin SL, et al. Activin Signaling and Its Role in Regulation of Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Carcinogenesis Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2006, 231:534-544.
    [65] Liu ZH, Tsuchida K, Matsuzaki T, et al. Characterization of isoforms of activin receptor-interacting protein 2 that augment activin signaling. Journal of Endocrinology, 2006, 189:409-421.
    [66]赵利枝,杨日芳,汪海.内皮细胞与血管形成[ J ].中国药理学通报2002;18 (4)∶361–364.
    [67] Matsumura T, Wolff K, Petzelbuer A. Endothelial cell tub formation depends on cadhein 5 and CD31 interactionswith filamentous action[ J ]. JImmunol , 1997, 158 (7)∶3408-3416.
    [68] Mitsuthiro M R , Eguchi , Yam ashita H . Reguiation mechanisms of retinai pigment opithelial cell migration by the TGF-beta superfamily [J]. Acta ophthalmol Scand , 2003,81(6) : 630-638.
    [69] Poulaki V , Mitsades N , et al.Activin in the regulation of corneal neovascularization and vascular endothlial growth factor expression Am J pathol , 2004 , 164(4) : 1293-1298.
    [70] Lopez-saez J F, delaTorreC, Pincheire J, Gimenez-Martin G. Cell proliferation and cancer [ J ].Histol Histopathol.
    [71] Mathews LS. Activin receptors and cellular signaling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocri Rev. 1994,15(3):310-25.
    [72] Itoh S, Itol F et al. Signaling of transforming growth factor-beta family members through Smad proteins. Eur J Biochem. 2000, 267(24):6954-67.
    [73] Gamer A.Histopathology of diabetic retinopathy in man. E,1993,250.
    [74] Vinores SA,Campochiaro PA,May EE,Blaydes SH.Progressive untrastructural damage and thickening of the basement membrance of the retinal pigment epithelium in spontaneously diabetic BB rats.Exp Eye Res,1988,46:545.
    [75] Livo,Liux,Yanoff M et al.Cultured retinal capillary penicytes die by apoptosis an abrupt fluctuation from hyperglycemic to hypoglycemic levels:A comparative study with retinal capillary endothelial cell:Diabetologic,1996,39:537.
    [76] WooM,Hakem R,Soengas MS,Duncan GS,Shahinian A,kagiD.Essential contribution of caspase-3/cpp32 to apoptosis and its associated nuclear changes [J]. Genes Dev,1998,12(6):806-819.
    [77] Dilisa F,Canton M,Menaba R,Boengler K,Gres p.Mitochondia and reperfusion injury the role of permeability transition[J].Basic Res Cardiol. 2003,98 (4):235- 241.
    [78] Halestrap A,Kerr P,Javadov S,Woodfield KY.Elucidating the molecular mechanism of the permeability transition pore and its role in perfusion injury of the heart [J].Biochim Biophys Acta.1998,1366(1-2):79-94.
    [79] Dilsiz N,Sahaboglu A,Yildiz MZ,Rech enbach A.Protective effects of various antixidants during ischem ia reperfusion in the rat retina.[J].Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2006,244(5):627-633.
    [80] Schiffer M, von Gersdorff G, Bitzer M, et al. Smad proteins and transforming growth factor_beta signaling. Kidney Int Suppl, 2000,77:S45_S52.
    [81] Ten Dijke P, Hill CS. New insights into TGF_beta_Smad signalling.Trends Biochem Sci, 2004,29(5):265_273.
    [82] Hata A ,Lo RS,Wotton D,et al.Mutitions increasing suppressors Smad2 and Smad4 . Nature ,1997,388(6637):82-87.
    [83] Dennler S,Huet S,Gauthier JM.A short amino-acid sequence in MH1 domain is responsible for functional differences between Smad2 and Smad3. Oncogene, 1999,18(8):1643-1648.
    [84] Yagi k,Goto D,Hananoto T,et al.Alternatively spliced variant of Smad2 lackingexon3.J Biol Chem,1999,274(2):703-709.
    [85] Roberts AB,Russo A,Felici A,et al.Smad3:a key play in pathogenetic mechanisms dependent on TGF-beta.Ann N Y Acad Sci,2003,995:1-10.
    [86] Roberts AB,Russo A,Felici A,et al.Smad3:a key play in pathogenetic mechanisms dependent on TGF-beta.Ann N Y Acad Sci,2003,995:1-10.
    [87] Shi Y,Wang YF, Jayayaramanl,et al.Crystal structure of a Smad MH1 domain bound to DNA:insights on DNA binding in TGF-beta signaling. Cell,1998, 94(5):585-594.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700