大学生的认识论信念及其与自主学习能力的关系
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
认识论信念是近年来元认知研究领域的一个新主题,它涉及到人们对知识和学习的本质、形式、过程、条件以及合理性等问题的认识,是带有个人特色的哲学思考。它是由一套相互独立的信念系统组成。就学生学习活动的认识论信念而言,学生的知识观也即学生对知识本质和知识获得的信念是其核心内容。探讨认识论信念的内容、起作用的机制以及影响因素,不仅有助于来了解个体的内在认知特性,而且也为建立、完善及校正信念以及预测个体的行为、营造适宜的学习气氛、创设良好的学习环境和学习型社会提供依据。
     最近一个时期,自主学习也越来越引起教育研究领域的重视。我国学者庞维国主张应从横向和纵向两个角度来定义自主学习。从横向角度是指从学习的各个方面来综合界定自主学习,即如果学生本人对学习的各个方面都能自觉地作出选择和控制,其学习就是充分自主的。从纵向角度界定自主学习是指从学习的整个过程来阐释自主学习的实质,即学生在整个学习过程中能主导自己的学习。自主学习思想在我国教育界的提出,一方面反映了我国教育研究领域的新成果,另一方面又对我国的教育教学改革提出一系列新的带有根本性的问题。可见其重要性及在理论界的普遍认可,深化对它的研究,明确其内涵、影响因素及在教育过程中的地位和意义是非常有意义的。
     纵观对认识论信念已有的研究,大部分是西方国家研究者以西方学生作为研究对象的,我国学者的研究并不多见,已有的研究主要是针对具体学科,且主要以中小学生为研究对象。而对自主学习能力的研究国内外都比较多,但对学生认识论信念与其自主学习能力的关系的关注,学术期刊检索显示,国内外相当罕见。
     本文介绍了认识论信念及自主学习的界定、发展及研究现状,在此基础上,对大学生认识论信念及自主学习的影响因素及两者关系进行了系统研究。首先我们对针对中学生的《认识论信念量表》及中学生《自主学习能力量表》的相关语句作了修改,使之符合大学生的情境,然后从济南四所高校抽取大学生为被试进行预测,对量表进行修订,然后以修订后的问卷为工具,进行正式施测,对大学生的认识论信念及自主学习的影响因素及两者的关系作进一步的探讨。结果表明:
     1、我国大学生的整合-建构认识论信念在性别上存在边缘显著,而零散-接受的认识论信念在性别上不存在显著性差异,总体上大学生的认识论信念在性别上成边缘显著性差异,女生得分高于男生,自主学习能力不存在性别差异。
     2、大学生的认识论信念在专业上存在显著性差异,文科学生得分高于理科学生,自主学习能力在学习结果方面存在专业差距,文科学生得分高于理科学生。
     3、大学生的认识论信念在年级上存在显著差异,四年级得分最高,其次是二、一、三年级,大学生的自主学习能力在年级上也存在显著性差异,四年级得分最高,其次是一、二、三年级,且四年级得分显著高于三年级。
     4、大学生的认识论信念与自主学习之间存在显著的正相关,大学生的认识论信念越积极,其自主学习能力越强,认识论信念能很好的预测学生学习的自主性。
     本文进而得出以下教育启示:
     1、高校教师在教学中应重视并了解大学生的认识论信念
     2、在学生学习中,高校教师应重视培养机械认识论学生学习的自信心,及时与学生交流,提高学生自我效能感,促进其自主学习。
     3、教师应提高高校课堂教学的质量,改变教学模式,促进学生自主学习。
The belief of epistemology is a new subject studied in the metacognitive field. It involves people’s perception of the nature、form、process、condition of knowledge and its rationality, which is a peculiar individual philosophical thought. It is composed of a set of interdependent belief system, among which students’beliefs of knowledge is the core of the system. To explore the content、functioning system and influential factors of the belief of epistemology, is not only helpful to know of the individual internal perception characteristic, but also helpful to establish、improve、emend belief and predict individual behavior, and also helpful to provide basis for creating a desirable learning atmosphere.
     In recent period, autonomous learning gradually arouses the emphasis of the educational field. The researcher Pang Guowei proposes to define autonomous learning from the angle of landscape and lengthways. The angle of landscape refers to comprehensively define autonomous learning from all the aspects and dimensions. That is, if one student can consciously select and control all the aspects of his learning, we’ll conclude the student is fully autonomous. The angle of lengthways is to illustrate the nature of autonomous learning from the whole learning process, i.e. a student can direct his own learning. The proposal of autonomous learning in our country reflects the new achievements of domestic educational field. Autonomous learning has been listed into the“95”project as an important research content, from which we can realize the importance and significance of deeply exploring the subject of autonomous learning.
     By reviewing the study of beliefs of epistemology, most researches are done by western scholars against their students and few experts at home get involved in it,while there are many studies of autonomy home and abroad. Concerning the study of the relationship between beliefs of epistemology and autonomous learning, only one dissertation done by Wang Tingting can be found out.
     The thesis introduces the definition、development and present situation of beliefs of epistemology and autonomous learning, based on which, it systematically studies the influential factors and relationships of them. First, we revised some words and expressions in both Wang Tingting’s and Pang Guowei’s test tables under the help of psychological experts. The revised questionnaire is finished by four university’s sampled students. The investigation result shows as follows:
     1、Generally, the Chinese college students present obvious sexual differences in terms of beliefs of epistemology, that is, girls got higher marks than boys. However, there are not sexual differences on autonomy.
     2、As far as the students’major is concerned, arts students got higher marks than science ones on beliefs of epistemology, while on autonomy, there are also not major differences.
     3、From the angle of grades of the students, both of them present obvious differences. The order of the grades from the high to the low on the beliefs of epistemology is senior, sophomore, freshman and junior and the corresponding result of autonomy is senior, freshman, sophomore and junior.
     4、the relationship between beliefs of epistemology and autonomy is positive relevance, that is, the more positive the students’beliefs of epistemology is, the stronger of the students’autonomous learning ability. We may conclude that the students’beliefs of epistemology can properly predict their learning autonomy.
     The enlightenment that we can get from the thesis is as follows:
     1. College teachers should give more emphasis on knowing of the students’beliefs of epistemology.
     2. In the process of students’learning, college teachers should focus on fostering students’self-confidence and communicating with them immediately so as to improve students’self-efficacy and promote their autonomous learning.
     3. Teachers should try to improve the class teaching quality, change the teaching model and finally promote the students’autonomy.
引文
[1]Roger H.Bruning,Greogory J.Schraw & Royce R.Ronning.Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. Prentice-Hall,Inc., 1995
    [2] 庞维国. 论学生的自主学习. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2001,20(2)78-83.
    [3]Schommer, M.Effects of beliefs about the na2ture of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, 82 (3), 498-504.
    [4] Hofer, B.K.& Pintrich, P.R..The development of Epistemological theories:beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 1997, 67 (1), 88-140.
    [5]King P M,Kitchener K S.Reflective judgment:Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood.Educational Psychologist, 2002,39(3):5-18.
    [6]Schommer,M..An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning.In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander(Eds), Beliefs about text and instruction with text(113-116).NJ:Erlbaum,1994.
    [7] 张建伟、孙燕青.初中生的知识观与学习观的初步研究.心理发展与教育,1997,4(2):11-16.
    [8] 刘儒德、陈红艳:小学生数学学习观调查研究.心理科学,2002,25(2),194-199.
    [9] 刘儒德、邓利:小学生语文学习观调查研究.心理发展与教育,2002,4(1),54-58.
    [10] 孙燕青、张建伟.初二学生的科学观及其与科学发现学习的关系.心理发展与教育,2003, (2):47-52.
    [11]于婷婷.关于我国高中生认识论信念的初步研究.华东师范大学硕士论文,2004.
    [12] 吴红顺.中学生知识学习观研究.心理与行为研究,2005, 3(4):291-309.
    [13]李雪. 论自主学习的实质、结构及其指导.重庆工业高等专科学校学报,2003,(9):115-117.
    [14]程晓堂.论自主学习.学科能力培养研究.1999,(9):32-39.
    [15]韩清林.关于“自主学习”教育教学改革试验的若干基本问题.教育理论研究.2007(6):4-9.
    [16]陈水清.论自主学习. 心理发展与教育,2000, 3(2):41-45.
    [17]Zimmerman,B.J.,&Bandura,A. Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment.American Educationa Research Journal,1994,31,854-862.
    [18]Pintrich,P.R. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning.In M.Boekaerts,P.R.Pintrich & M.Zeidner(Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp.452-501).Academic Press,2000..
    [19] 庞维国. 自主学习-学与教的原理与策略.华东师范大学出版社,2003.
    [20]Schunk D.H.&Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulation of learning and performance.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1994, p.8.
    [21][22]转自肖永松.初中学生学习自主性及其发展的研究.西南师范大学硕士学位论文,2002.
    [23]董奇、周勇、陈红兵.自我监控与智力.浙江人民出版社,1996,第99-142页。
    [24]同[19]
    [25] Michael P.Ryan.Monitoring Text Comprehension:IndividualDifferences in Epistemological Standards,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984,76(2),pp257.
    [26]Marlene Schommer.Effects of Beliefs About the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehensing,Journal of Educational Psychology,1990, 42(2):pp152.
    [27] Gaoyin Qian and Donna Alvermann.Role of Epistemological beliefs and Learned Helplessness in Secondary School Students’Learning Science Concepts From Text,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995,87(2),pp290.
    [28]同上,p128
    [29]Gaoyin Qian and Donna Alvemann.Role of Epistemological beliefs and Learnen Helplessness in Secondary School Students’Learning Science Concepts From Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995,87(2), pp290.
    [30]Barara K.Hofer and Paul R.Pintrinch. The Development of Epistemological Theories:Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and their Relation to Learning,Review of Educational Research, 1997,67(1), pp128.
    [31] Simpson,M L & Nist,S L Perspectives on learning history: A case study.Journal of Literacy Research,1997,29:363-395.
    [32]同[11].
    [33][34]同[19]
    [35]Barara K.Hofer and Paul R.Pintrinch,The Development of Epistemological Theories:Belief About Knowledge and Knowing and their Relation to Learning ,Review of Educational Research, 1997,67(1),pp89.
    [36]同上.
    [37] 转引自张建伟、孙燕青:初中生的知识观与学习观的初步研究,心理发展与教育,1997, 4(2):11-16.
    [38]同上.
    [39]周炎根. 大学生自主学习能力的差异性分析.黑龙江高教研究,2007(1), 140-142.
    [40] 刘冰.中学生化学探究性学习的心理机制及其影响因素的研究.山东师范大学硕士论文.2005.
    [41] Hofer,B.K.,Yu,S.L.,&Pintrich,P.R. Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners.The Guilford Press,1998.
    [42]同[31]
    [43]同[8][9]
    [1]姬广敏、司继伟、毕华林.不同认识论学生的非智力因素对其化学探究学习的影响.化学教育,2007.第3期.
    [2]杨新荣、李忠如、王洪、宋乃庆.初中生数学学习关性别差异的调查研究.2006,31(2):178-181.
    [3]刘儒德,宗敏,刘治刚.论学生学习观的结构.华东师范大学学报,2005, 23(3):49-67.
    [4]周世勤.大学生知识观调查分析.中国健康心理学杂志,2007, 15(3):224-226.
    [5]周大根. 初中教师眼中学生认识论信念. 浙江师范大学硕士论文,2004.
    [6]吴红顺.中学生知识学习观研究.心理与行为研究,2005, 3(4):291-295.
    [7]孙燕青、张建伟.初二学生的科学观及其于科学发现学习的关系.心理发展与教育,2003, (2):47-52.
    [8] 庞维国. 90 年代以来国外自主学习研究的若干进展. 心理学动态, 2000,8(4):12-16.
    [9] 庞维国. 论学生的自主学习. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2001,20(2):78-83.
    [10] 李红美. 论自主学习的内部机制、模式及其实施.中国远程教育 , 2005,(01) :40-43.
    [11] 张建伟、孙燕青.初中生的知识关于学习观的初步研究.心理发展与教育,1997,. 4(2):11-16.
    [12]于婷婷.关于我国高中生认识论信念的初步研究.华东师范大学硕士论文,2004.
    [13]姚梅林、杜春丽.学习信念的心理学研究.信阳师范学院学报.2004, 24(2):11-14. [14 ]姚梅林,项丽娜.不同经验群体的学习观比较.心理发展与教育, 2004,. (1):43-47.
    [15]杨春. 国外语言学习信念对我国外语教学的影响.广西教育学院学报.2005增刊, (S1):171-179.
    [16]Schommer M. Explaining the Epistemological Belief System: Introducing the Coordinated Research Approach. Educational Psychologist, 2004, 39(1): 19–29.
    [17]喻平,唐剑岚.个体认识论的研究现状与展望.心理科学进展,2006,(4):10.
    [18]楼成礼,楼仁功.低年级大学生学习现状调查与思考. 高等农业教育, 2001,(01) :57-59.
    [19]刘儒德. 大学生的学习观.高等教育研究 , 2002,23(04):74-78.
    [20]刘儒德、邓利:小学生语文学习观调查研究.心理科学,2002,1,54-58.
    [21]刘儒德、陈红艳:小学生数学学习观调查研究. 心理科学,2002,2,194-199.
    [22]张耀华.高等学校学生评价课堂教学研究.上海师范大学硕士论文,2004.
    [23]朱玲.数学教学中学生自主学习能力的培养. 华中师范大学硕士论文, 2006
    [24] 刘梁华. 高中数学教学中培养学生自主学习能力的研究. 山东师范大学硕士论文, 2003
    [25] 左相国,祁小梅,乔香芬. 大学生自主学习现状的调查与分析.中国冶金教育 , 2003,(04) :19-22.
    [26] 孟威佳,李晓东. 自我调控学习———面向21世纪的学习理论.东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版) , 1999,(01) :84-90.
    [27] 庞维国. 自主学习理论的新进展.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) , 1999,(03) :68-74.
    [28] 曹筱萍.激发学生的内在动机 培养学生的自主学习能力.. 江西师范大学硕士论文,2006.
    [29]刘冰.中学生化学探究性学习的心理机制及其影响因素的研究.山东师范大学硕士论文,2005.
    [30]王重明.心理学研究方法.人民教育出版社,1990.
    [31]叶浩生主编.西方心理学研究新进展.人民教育出版社,2003.
    [32] 张俊峰 ,朱继洲. 新世纪大学生的自主学习观.理工高教研究 , 2002,21(01) :61-63.
    [33] 付桂芳. 自我调节学习结构模型的建构.吉林大学博士论文, 2004 .
    [34] 王静琼,张卫,朱祖德. 大学生自主学习能力及其培养.广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版) , 2007,29(01) :196-199.
    [35]袁红梅.大学生学习自主性量表修订及区域性常模的建立.湖南师范大学硕士论文,2005.
    [36]王焕景.网络环境下学生自主学习能力培养策略设计.河北大学硕士论文,2005.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700