面向数字图书馆的信息网络传播权优化研究
|
摘要
版权一直都是数字图书馆面临的关键问题之一。《信息网络传播权保护条例》的出台,更是使数字图书馆的发展步履维艰了。面向数字图书馆优化信息网络传播权,是最务实的做法。文章在评述国内外研究现状的基础上,分析了信息网络传播权对数字图书馆发展的影响,同时指出了平衡信息网络传播权的必要性。以介绍国外关于图书馆的信息网络传播权限制与例外规定为基点,通过中外法条的对比分析并结合我国实际情况,从合理使用、法定许可、著作权集体管理等制度的角度优化了信息网络传播权,并考虑到某些特殊类型作品网络传播问题,设计了非物质文化遗产土著文化协议等以完善信息网络传播权制度。鉴于人的自主性和上述优化信息网络传播权方式的“非自我管理性”,文章提倡用创作共用协议的模式优化信息网络传播权,这只是一种理想境界。为了更清晰地展示这几种制度与协议之间的关联,文章最后分析了它们之间的关联关系,给出了一个清晰的定位。
Copyright is still among key issues digital library faces. The announcement of Ordinance on the Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information makes the development of digital library face great difficulties all the more. Optimizing the right to network dissemination of information towards digital library is the most pragmatic practice. Based on assessing and commentating domestic and foreign research status, the passage analyzes the impact of right to network dissemination of information on digital library, meanwhile pointing out necessity of balancing right to network dissemination of information. Based on introducing limitation and exception of right to network dissemination of information concerning library, through contrasting copyright laws between China and foreign countries and coupling with our country’s real conditions, we optimize and perfect the right to network dissemination of information from the perspectives of fair use, statutory license, copyright collective management, etc. Considering network dissemination issues of works of certain special types, we design indigene cultural protocol of intangible cultural heritage as to optimize right to network dissemination of information. It is merely a kind of ideal state. To clearly show the relations among these systems and protocols, the passage finally analyzes incidence relation among them and offers a clear orientation.
Copyright is still among key issues digital library faces. The announcement of Ordinance on the Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information makes the development of digital library face great difficulties all the more. Optimizing the right to network dissemination of information towards digital library is the most pragmatic practice. Based on assessing and commentating domestic and foreign research status, the passage analyzes the impact of right to network dissemination of information on digital library, meanwhile pointing out necessity of balancing right to network dissemination of information. Based on introducing limitation and exception of right to network dissemination of information concerning library, through contrasting copyright laws between China and foreign countries and coupling with our country’s real conditions, we optimize and perfect the right to network dissemination of information from the perspectives of fair use, statutory license, copyright collective management, etc. Considering network dissemination issues of works of certain special types, we design indigene cultural protocol of intangible cultural heritage as to optimize right to network dissemination of information. It is merely a kind of ideal state. To clearly show the relations among these systems and protocols, the passage finally analyzes incidence relation among them and offers a clear orientation.
引文
[1] Mary WS Wong. The exclusive rights of“distribution”,“communication to the public”&“making available”under the WIPO copyright treaty: Lessons for other jurisdictions from the Hong Kong bittorrent case[J/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118809, 2010-3-10
[2] Jane C. Ginsburg. The new(?)right of making available to the public[J/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=602623, 2010-3-10
[3] Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute. The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/InfoSoc_Study_2007.pdf, 2010-3-30
[4] Paul Edward Geller. Rethinking the Berne-Plus Framework: From Conflicts of Laws to Copyright Reform[J/OL]. European Review of Intellectual Property, 2009,31:1-10, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401052, 2010-3-10
[5]与图书馆和档案馆相关的著作权例外和限制原则的声明[EB/OL].http://www.ifla.org/files/clm/statements/statement-of-principles-sccr20-zh.pdf,2010-3-30
[6] Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper: Copyright in the Knowledge Economy[EB/OL]. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/greenpaper_en.pdf, 2010-4-10
[7] Laura N. Gasaway. Amending the copyright act for libraries and society: The section 108 study group[J]. Albany Law Review,2007,70:1331-1358
[8] Shamos Michael I. Machines as readers: A solution to the copyright problem[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2005 (11):1179-1187
[9] Emily Hudson, Andrew T Kenyon. Without Walls: Copyright Law and DigitalCollections in Australian Cultural Institutions[J]. SCRIPT-ed, 2007(2): 197-214
[10] Franki Committee. Recommendations of the Copyright Law Committee on Reprographic Reproduction 1976[EB/OL]. http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/4112/1/True-History-of-Copyright_appendix_4.pdf, 2010-3-10
[11] Saru Baiznertnan. Canadian Copyright Reform: Consulting with Copyright's Changing Public[J]. Intellectual Property Journal, 2006(4):271-296
[12] Peter K. Yu. Digital copyright reform and legal transplants in Hong Kong[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1538638, 2010-12-1
[13] David Gee. Should librarians and information professionals be content with current UK copyright law?[EB/OL]. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1129/1/2008%20Copyright%20article%20for%20BIALL%20LIM%20DG.pdf, 2010-12-6
[14]关于网络环境下著作权问题的声明[EB/OL].http://www.hudong.com/wiki/, 2010-4-15
[15]王清.著作权限制制度比较研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007.10
[16]冯晓青.知识产权法利益平衡理论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.8
[17]蒋永福.信息网络传播权保护与图书馆合理使用[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):14-18
[18]李国新.无传播就无权利—图书馆界围绕信息网络传播权立法的呼声与行动[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):6-10
[19]庄善洁.信息网络传播权与图书馆信息资源共享的利益平衡机制研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2008.6
[20]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[21]王宇红.信息网络传播权的限制与图书馆合理使用—兼论我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》的完善[J].情报杂志,2009(2):175-178
[22]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究——著作权集体管理的原因、问题与对策[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-74
[23]张若思.试论我国数字图书馆之版权许可[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2008-6
[24]庄善洁.信息网络传播权与图书馆信息资源共享的利益平衡机制研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2007-6-2
[25]李祖明.互联网上的版权保护与限制[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2003.6:45
[26]秦珂.信息网络传播权立法保护对图书馆的意义[J].图书馆理论与实践,2007(2):37-39
[27]秦珂.对《信息网络传播权保护条例》第七条中一项规定的认识[J].图书馆学研究.2007(9):70-72
[28]王钰.数字图书馆的合理使用问题探讨[J].黑龙江农垦师专学报,2003(2):124-126
[29]陈传夫.信息高速公路知识产权问题探讨[J].情报学报,1999(1):63-68
[30] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 96/9/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases[EB/OL].http://europaeu.int/ISPO/infosoc/legreg/docs/969ec.html, 2010-01-10
[31]梁志文.《数字著作权论》[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007:97-110
[32]杜晶.数字环境下的合理使用与数字图书馆建设中的著作权问题[D].北京:中国政法大学硕士学位论文,2005
[33] Liu Lijuan. The awful American Intellectual Property System does not Suit China– a Discussion on Protection and Share of Intellectual Property with Stiglitz, Nobel Prize Winner in Economics [J]. Business Watch Magazine, 2007(4)
[34]徐大同.西方政治思想史辞典[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2006:112
[35]陈焱光.罗尔斯代际正义思想及其思蕴[J].伦理学研究,2006(9):8-12
[36]蒋永福.信息网络传播权保护与图书馆合理使用[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):14-17
[37]国际图联关于在数字环境下版权问题的立场[EB/OL].http://www.csls.org.cn/edit/news.htm,2009-12-18
[38]沈木珠.论TRIPS协议与中国知识产权保护[J].江海学刊,2001(3):56-61
[39] Neil Weinstock Netanel. Copyright and a democratic civil society[J].The Yale Law Journal, 1996(11): 283
[40] Peter S. Menell. Knowledge Accessibility and Preservation Policy for the Digital Age[EB/OL]. http://www.law.uh.edu/ipil/symposium/prior/final/Menell.pdf, 2010-12-3
[41]张敏勤.信息网络传播权保护与数字图书馆信息资源建设[J].情报理论与实践,2007(2):172-175
[42] Peter S. Menell. Knowledge Accessibility and Preservation Policy for the Digital Age[EB/OL]. http://www.law.uh.edu/ipil/symposium/prior/final/Menell.pdf, 2010-12-3
[43] The digital millennium copyright act of 1998 U.S. Copyright Office Summary[EB/OL]. http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf, 2010-01-07
[44]肖燕.美国《数字千年著作权法》及其对图书馆的影响[J].大学图书馆学报,2001(1):24-30
[45] The Section 108 Study Group Report [EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html,2010-01-09
[46]梁志文.数字著作权论——以《信息网络传播权保护条例》为中心[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.8:217-218
[47]王清.著作权限制制度比较研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007:11
[48] Michael J. Madison. Rewriting fair use and the future of copyright reform[J]. Cardozo arts& Entertainment law journal, 2005,23(2):391-418
[49]刘青,黄晓.从Google数字图书馆计划看合理使用的新发展[J].图书情报工作,2007(6):85-89
[50] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL].http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[51] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-1-9
[52] Peter K. Yu. Digital copyright reform and legal transplants in Hong Kong[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1538638, 2010-12-5
[53] Study Group Issues Report Recommending Changes in Copyright Law to Reflect Digital Technologies[EB/OL].http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2008/08-063.html,2010-01-08
[54]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[55] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[56] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-1-9
[57] CONTU Guidelines on Photocopying under Interlibrary Loan Arrangements[EB/OL]. http://www.Cni.org/docs/infopols/CONTU.html, 2010-01-05
[58]杨海平.中外数字出版物复制权的立法比较研究[J/OL].http://www.hbcb.gov.cn/PORTAL/electric/ExchangeDetail.aspx?ExchangeID=72,2009-11-18
[59] Sun Haochen. China and the Internet: Toward a new paradigm for copyright protection in the digital age[D]. Pulau Bukom: National University of Singapore, 2005
[60] Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [EB/OL] .http://www.wipo.int/clea/en/text_html.jsp?lang=EN&id=1453,2009-11-10
[61]陈传夫,迈克尔,布勒坎雷.欧盟一体化版权保护十年:主要措施简介[J].电子知识产权,2001(1):51
[62] P. Bernt Hugenholtz. Caching and Copyright: The Right of Temporary Copying[J]. European Intellectual Property Review, 2000 (22) :482
[63]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[64]梁志文.《数字著作权论》[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.8:97-110
[65]尚清.欧盟信息社会版权指令6.4条之管窥[J].江汉论坛,2005(2):116-119
[66] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[67] Dara Lithwick. Bill C-32: An act to amend the copyright act (Publication No. 40-3-C32-E). Library of Parliament Legislative Summary. 2010-7-20
[68] Digital millennium copyright act[EB/OL].http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c105:6:./temp/~c105jhpeZA::,2009-12-20
[69]秦柯.公共传播权和数字图书馆[J].国家图书馆学刊,2000(4):30-34
[70]朱芒.公开型政府的法律理念和实践——日本信息公开法制度(上)[J].环球法律评论,2002(3):16-19
[71] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-01-09
[72] David Gee. Should librarians and information professionals be content with current UK copyright law?[EB/OL]. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1129/1/2008%20Copyright%20article%20for%20BIALL%20LIM%20DG.pdf, 2010-12-6
[73] Statement of principles on copyright exceptions and limitations for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.ifla.org/publications/statement-of-principles-on-copyright-exceptions-and-limitations-for-libraries-and-archives.htm, 2010-12-09
[74] EIFL Draft Law on Copyright [EB/OL]. http://www.eifl.net:8080/cps/sections/docs/ip_docs/draft-law/downloadFile/attachedFile_f0/modellaw_v16.pdf?nocache=1252488772.54, 2010-12-08
[75]李岩波.数字图书馆与法定许可——从几起知识产权专家诉讼案看数字图书馆走向[J].图书馆建设,2005(4):5-7
[76] Robert J. Morrison. Deriver’s licenses: an argument for establishing a statutory license for derivative works.Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=960927, 2010-1-10
[77] Anselm Kamperman Sanders. Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions[J]. Research Policy, 2006(35): 854–874
[78] Goldstein Paul. International Copyright, Principles, Law, and Practice[M]. England: Oxford University Press, 2001, p309
[79]张力.合理使用、法定许可抑或其他——论数字图书馆使用作品的行为模式选择[J].图书情报知识,2004(4):15-19
[80] Robert J. Morrison. Deriver’s licenses: an argument for establishing a statutory license for derivative works.Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=960927, 2010-1-10
[81] Amended Settlement Agreement, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 05-8136 (S.D.N.Y.Nov. 13, 2009)[EB/OL]. http://thepublicindex.org/docs/amended_settlement/amended_settlement.pdf, 2010-3-10
[82]陈婷.数字图书馆法定许可问题探讨[J].江苏警官学院学报,2007(2):81-84
[83] US Copyright Office– CARP[EB/OL]. http://www.copyright.gov/carp/, 2010-2-23
[84] Copyright and orphan works: A paper prepared for the gowers review by the British screen advisory council[EB/OL].http://www.bsac.uk.com/reports/orphanworkspaper.pdf, 2012-4-12
[85]金潞,刘青.推进孤儿作品公共获取的解决之道[J].图书情报工作,2010(9):14-17
[86]周艳敏,宋慧献.版权制度下的“孤儿作品”问题[J] .出版发行研究,2009(6):66-68
[87]马海群.数字图书馆信息资源开发利用需要更高效的著作权法律制度的支撑[J].图书馆建设,2006(5):30-33
[88] Jonathan Band, policybandwidth. A guide for the perplexed Libraries and the Google library project settlement[J/OL]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/publications.html, 2008-11-13
[89]赵春旻.并发用户数:一个评价和使用数据库的重要参量——兼对当前数据库评价研究的综述[J].图书馆论坛,2007(1):74-77
[90] Jeff Erwin. Copyright and the Digital library[J/OL]. http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/2/2, 2010-1-20
[91]郑国辉.数字图书馆中著作权“有限制”默示许可使用制度研究[J] .图书馆建设,2008(6):40-43
[92] Elisabeth Hanratty. Google library: beyond fair use?[J/OL]. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html,2010-3-20
[93] Jeff Erwin. Copyright and the Digital library[J/OL]. http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/2/2, 2010-1-20
[94] Dr. Lucie Guibault. The Nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general interest missions for the transmission of knowledge: prospects for their adaption to the digital environment[D]. University of Amsterdam, 2003-10: 9
[95] Daniel J. Gervais. Collective management of copyright and neighbouring rights in Canada: an International perspective[R]. http://cjlt.dal.ca/vol1_no2/pdfarticles/gervais.pdf, 2010-12-20
[96] Jeff Davis. Copyright Reform and Digital Libraries in Canada[D]. University of British Columbia, 2004-10-25
[97] Khartoum. WIPO National Seminar on Copyright, Related Rights, and CollectiveManagement-The importance of collective management of copyright [J/OL].http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/arab/en/wipo_cr_krt_05/wipo_cr_krt_05_4.pdf, 2010-6-9
[98] Daniel J. Gervais. Collective management of copyright and neighbouring rights in Canada: an International perspective[R]. http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~dgervais/publications/collective_management.pdf, 2010-6-9
[99]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究——著作权集体管理的原因、问题与对策[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-71
[100] The Nordic solution to complex copyright questions [EB/OL]. http://international.kopinor.no/opphavsrett/avtalelisens/extended_collective_license, 2010-6-11
[101] Dr. Lucie Guibault. The Nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general interest missions for the transmission of knowledge: prospects for their adaption to the digital environment[D]. University of Amsterdam, 2003-10: 9, available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001396/139671e.pdf
[102] Thomas Riisi, Jens Schovsbo. Extended Collective Licenses and the Nordic Experience–It’s a Hybrid but is it a VOLVO or a Lemon?[J]. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts,2010(4):1-26
[103] Gervais, Daniel J.. Application of An Extended Collective Licensing Regime in Canada: Principles and Issues Related to Implementation[J/OL]. http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~dgervais/publications/extended_licensing.pdf, 2010-6-4
[104]曹世华.著作权集体管理组织版权使用费标准争议解决机制探讨[J].电子知识产权,2009(1):55-57
[105] Jia Wang. Should Chian adpt an extended licensing system to facilitate collective copyright administration: Preliminary thoughts[C]. Asian Institute of law conference of 2009, Hong Kong:2009
[106]王晔.网络作品传播之立法模式研究——中国版权制度现状评析与思考[D].上海:上海大学,2008.6
[107]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-71
[108] Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, supra note 10, art.31(1)[EB/OL].http://iwgia.synkron.com/graphics/Synkron-Library/Documents/InternationalProcesses/DraftDeclaration/07-09-13ResolutiontextDeclaration.pdf, 2010-9-14
[109] Librarianship and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Nurturing Understanding and Respect[EB/OL], http://wo.ala.org/tce/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tce.pdf, 2010-12-07
[110] The protection of traditional cultural expressions/expressions of folklore: revised objectives and principles. Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore(Seventeenth Session) [C], Geneva:2010
[111] Martin Skrydstrup. WIPO, Towards Intellectual Property Guidelines and Best Practices for Recording and Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Survey o f Codes, Conduct and Challenges in North America [EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/culturalheritage/casestudies/skrydstrup_exec_summary.pdf, 2010-9-20
[112] Chunyan Wang. Creative commons licence: An alternative solution to copyright in the new media arena[J]. Copyright law, digital content and the Internet in the Asia-Pacific, 2008:305-320
[113] Stef van Gompel. Unlocking the potential of pre-existing content: How to address the issue of orphan works in Europe?[J]. IIC International Review of Intellectual property and Competition Law, 2007, 38( 6): 669-702
[114] Creative commons licences for cultural heritage institutions[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/creativecommons/CC_for_cultural_heritage_institutions.pdf, 2010-12-10
[115] Creative commons licences for cultural heritage institutions[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/creativecommons/CC_for_cultural_heritage_institutions.pdf, 2010-12-10
[116]刘志刚.数字时代版权授权方式比较研究与图书馆适用[J].图书情报工作, 2006(8):91-95,116
[117]秦珂,高利华.版权在图书馆中的限制与反限制[J].晋图学刊.2001(3):30-33
[2] Jane C. Ginsburg. The new(?)right of making available to the public[J/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=602623, 2010-3-10
[3] Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute. The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/InfoSoc_Study_2007.pdf, 2010-3-30
[4] Paul Edward Geller. Rethinking the Berne-Plus Framework: From Conflicts of Laws to Copyright Reform[J/OL]. European Review of Intellectual Property, 2009,31:1-10, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401052, 2010-3-10
[5]与图书馆和档案馆相关的著作权例外和限制原则的声明[EB/OL].http://www.ifla.org/files/clm/statements/statement-of-principles-sccr20-zh.pdf,2010-3-30
[6] Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper: Copyright in the Knowledge Economy[EB/OL]. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/greenpaper_en.pdf, 2010-4-10
[7] Laura N. Gasaway. Amending the copyright act for libraries and society: The section 108 study group[J]. Albany Law Review,2007,70:1331-1358
[8] Shamos Michael I. Machines as readers: A solution to the copyright problem[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2005 (11):1179-1187
[9] Emily Hudson, Andrew T Kenyon. Without Walls: Copyright Law and DigitalCollections in Australian Cultural Institutions[J]. SCRIPT-ed, 2007(2): 197-214
[10] Franki Committee. Recommendations of the Copyright Law Committee on Reprographic Reproduction 1976[EB/OL]. http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/4112/1/True-History-of-Copyright_appendix_4.pdf, 2010-3-10
[11] Saru Baiznertnan. Canadian Copyright Reform: Consulting with Copyright's Changing Public[J]. Intellectual Property Journal, 2006(4):271-296
[12] Peter K. Yu. Digital copyright reform and legal transplants in Hong Kong[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1538638, 2010-12-1
[13] David Gee. Should librarians and information professionals be content with current UK copyright law?[EB/OL]. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1129/1/2008%20Copyright%20article%20for%20BIALL%20LIM%20DG.pdf, 2010-12-6
[14]关于网络环境下著作权问题的声明[EB/OL].http://www.hudong.com/wiki/, 2010-4-15
[15]王清.著作权限制制度比较研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007.10
[16]冯晓青.知识产权法利益平衡理论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.8
[17]蒋永福.信息网络传播权保护与图书馆合理使用[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):14-18
[18]李国新.无传播就无权利—图书馆界围绕信息网络传播权立法的呼声与行动[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):6-10
[19]庄善洁.信息网络传播权与图书馆信息资源共享的利益平衡机制研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2008.6
[20]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[21]王宇红.信息网络传播权的限制与图书馆合理使用—兼论我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》的完善[J].情报杂志,2009(2):175-178
[22]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究——著作权集体管理的原因、问题与对策[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-74
[23]张若思.试论我国数字图书馆之版权许可[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2008-6
[24]庄善洁.信息网络传播权与图书馆信息资源共享的利益平衡机制研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2007-6-2
[25]李祖明.互联网上的版权保护与限制[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2003.6:45
[26]秦珂.信息网络传播权立法保护对图书馆的意义[J].图书馆理论与实践,2007(2):37-39
[27]秦珂.对《信息网络传播权保护条例》第七条中一项规定的认识[J].图书馆学研究.2007(9):70-72
[28]王钰.数字图书馆的合理使用问题探讨[J].黑龙江农垦师专学报,2003(2):124-126
[29]陈传夫.信息高速公路知识产权问题探讨[J].情报学报,1999(1):63-68
[30] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 96/9/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases[EB/OL].http://europaeu.int/ISPO/infosoc/legreg/docs/969ec.html, 2010-01-10
[31]梁志文.《数字著作权论》[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007:97-110
[32]杜晶.数字环境下的合理使用与数字图书馆建设中的著作权问题[D].北京:中国政法大学硕士学位论文,2005
[33] Liu Lijuan. The awful American Intellectual Property System does not Suit China– a Discussion on Protection and Share of Intellectual Property with Stiglitz, Nobel Prize Winner in Economics [J]. Business Watch Magazine, 2007(4)
[34]徐大同.西方政治思想史辞典[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2006:112
[35]陈焱光.罗尔斯代际正义思想及其思蕴[J].伦理学研究,2006(9):8-12
[36]蒋永福.信息网络传播权保护与图书馆合理使用[J].图书情报工作,2006(7):14-17
[37]国际图联关于在数字环境下版权问题的立场[EB/OL].http://www.csls.org.cn/edit/news.htm,2009-12-18
[38]沈木珠.论TRIPS协议与中国知识产权保护[J].江海学刊,2001(3):56-61
[39] Neil Weinstock Netanel. Copyright and a democratic civil society[J].The Yale Law Journal, 1996(11): 283
[40] Peter S. Menell. Knowledge Accessibility and Preservation Policy for the Digital Age[EB/OL]. http://www.law.uh.edu/ipil/symposium/prior/final/Menell.pdf, 2010-12-3
[41]张敏勤.信息网络传播权保护与数字图书馆信息资源建设[J].情报理论与实践,2007(2):172-175
[42] Peter S. Menell. Knowledge Accessibility and Preservation Policy for the Digital Age[EB/OL]. http://www.law.uh.edu/ipil/symposium/prior/final/Menell.pdf, 2010-12-3
[43] The digital millennium copyright act of 1998 U.S. Copyright Office Summary[EB/OL]. http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf, 2010-01-07
[44]肖燕.美国《数字千年著作权法》及其对图书馆的影响[J].大学图书馆学报,2001(1):24-30
[45] The Section 108 Study Group Report [EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html,2010-01-09
[46]梁志文.数字著作权论——以《信息网络传播权保护条例》为中心[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.8:217-218
[47]王清.著作权限制制度比较研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007:11
[48] Michael J. Madison. Rewriting fair use and the future of copyright reform[J]. Cardozo arts& Entertainment law journal, 2005,23(2):391-418
[49]刘青,黄晓.从Google数字图书馆计划看合理使用的新发展[J].图书情报工作,2007(6):85-89
[50] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL].http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[51] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-1-9
[52] Peter K. Yu. Digital copyright reform and legal transplants in Hong Kong[EB/OL]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1538638, 2010-12-5
[53] Study Group Issues Report Recommending Changes in Copyright Law to Reflect Digital Technologies[EB/OL].http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2008/08-063.html,2010-01-08
[54]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[55] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[56] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-1-9
[57] CONTU Guidelines on Photocopying under Interlibrary Loan Arrangements[EB/OL]. http://www.Cni.org/docs/infopols/CONTU.html, 2010-01-05
[58]杨海平.中外数字出版物复制权的立法比较研究[J/OL].http://www.hbcb.gov.cn/PORTAL/electric/ExchangeDetail.aspx?ExchangeID=72,2009-11-18
[59] Sun Haochen. China and the Internet: Toward a new paradigm for copyright protection in the digital age[D]. Pulau Bukom: National University of Singapore, 2005
[60] Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [EB/OL] .http://www.wipo.int/clea/en/text_html.jsp?lang=EN&id=1453,2009-11-10
[61]陈传夫,迈克尔,布勒坎雷.欧盟一体化版权保护十年:主要措施简介[J].电子知识产权,2001(1):51
[62] P. Bernt Hugenholtz. Caching and Copyright: The Right of Temporary Copying[J]. European Intellectual Property Review, 2000 (22) :482
[63]梅术文.信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J].法学,2008(6):103-112
[64]梁志文.《数字著作权论》[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.8:97-110
[65]尚清.欧盟信息社会版权指令6.4条之管窥[J].江汉论坛,2005(2):116-119
[66] Kenneth Crews. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf, 2010-12-07
[67] Dara Lithwick. Bill C-32: An act to amend the copyright act (Publication No. 40-3-C32-E). Library of Parliament Legislative Summary. 2010-7-20
[68] Digital millennium copyright act[EB/OL].http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c105:6:./temp/~c105jhpeZA::,2009-12-20
[69]秦柯.公共传播权和数字图书馆[J].国家图书馆学刊,2000(4):30-34
[70]朱芒.公开型政府的法律理念和实践——日本信息公开法制度(上)[J].环球法律评论,2002(3):16-19
[71] The Section 108 Study Group Report[EB/OL]. http://www.loc.gov/section108/index.html, 2010-01-09
[72] David Gee. Should librarians and information professionals be content with current UK copyright law?[EB/OL]. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1129/1/2008%20Copyright%20article%20for%20BIALL%20LIM%20DG.pdf, 2010-12-6
[73] Statement of principles on copyright exceptions and limitations for libraries and archives[EB/OL]. http://www.ifla.org/publications/statement-of-principles-on-copyright-exceptions-and-limitations-for-libraries-and-archives.htm, 2010-12-09
[74] EIFL Draft Law on Copyright [EB/OL]. http://www.eifl.net:8080/cps/sections/docs/ip_docs/draft-law/downloadFile/attachedFile_f0/modellaw_v16.pdf?nocache=1252488772.54, 2010-12-08
[75]李岩波.数字图书馆与法定许可——从几起知识产权专家诉讼案看数字图书馆走向[J].图书馆建设,2005(4):5-7
[76] Robert J. Morrison. Deriver’s licenses: an argument for establishing a statutory license for derivative works.Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=960927, 2010-1-10
[77] Anselm Kamperman Sanders. Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions[J]. Research Policy, 2006(35): 854–874
[78] Goldstein Paul. International Copyright, Principles, Law, and Practice[M]. England: Oxford University Press, 2001, p309
[79]张力.合理使用、法定许可抑或其他——论数字图书馆使用作品的行为模式选择[J].图书情报知识,2004(4):15-19
[80] Robert J. Morrison. Deriver’s licenses: an argument for establishing a statutory license for derivative works.Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property[EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=960927, 2010-1-10
[81] Amended Settlement Agreement, Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 05-8136 (S.D.N.Y.Nov. 13, 2009)[EB/OL]. http://thepublicindex.org/docs/amended_settlement/amended_settlement.pdf, 2010-3-10
[82]陈婷.数字图书馆法定许可问题探讨[J].江苏警官学院学报,2007(2):81-84
[83] US Copyright Office– CARP[EB/OL]. http://www.copyright.gov/carp/, 2010-2-23
[84] Copyright and orphan works: A paper prepared for the gowers review by the British screen advisory council[EB/OL].http://www.bsac.uk.com/reports/orphanworkspaper.pdf, 2012-4-12
[85]金潞,刘青.推进孤儿作品公共获取的解决之道[J].图书情报工作,2010(9):14-17
[86]周艳敏,宋慧献.版权制度下的“孤儿作品”问题[J] .出版发行研究,2009(6):66-68
[87]马海群.数字图书馆信息资源开发利用需要更高效的著作权法律制度的支撑[J].图书馆建设,2006(5):30-33
[88] Jonathan Band, policybandwidth. A guide for the perplexed Libraries and the Google library project settlement[J/OL]. http://www.policybandwidth.com/publications.html, 2008-11-13
[89]赵春旻.并发用户数:一个评价和使用数据库的重要参量——兼对当前数据库评价研究的综述[J].图书馆论坛,2007(1):74-77
[90] Jeff Erwin. Copyright and the Digital library[J/OL]. http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/2/2, 2010-1-20
[91]郑国辉.数字图书馆中著作权“有限制”默示许可使用制度研究[J] .图书馆建设,2008(6):40-43
[92] Elisabeth Hanratty. Google library: beyond fair use?[J/OL]. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html,2010-3-20
[93] Jeff Erwin. Copyright and the Digital library[J/OL]. http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/2/2, 2010-1-20
[94] Dr. Lucie Guibault. The Nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general interest missions for the transmission of knowledge: prospects for their adaption to the digital environment[D]. University of Amsterdam, 2003-10: 9
[95] Daniel J. Gervais. Collective management of copyright and neighbouring rights in Canada: an International perspective[R]. http://cjlt.dal.ca/vol1_no2/pdfarticles/gervais.pdf, 2010-12-20
[96] Jeff Davis. Copyright Reform and Digital Libraries in Canada[D]. University of British Columbia, 2004-10-25
[97] Khartoum. WIPO National Seminar on Copyright, Related Rights, and CollectiveManagement-The importance of collective management of copyright [J/OL].http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/arab/en/wipo_cr_krt_05/wipo_cr_krt_05_4.pdf, 2010-6-9
[98] Daniel J. Gervais. Collective management of copyright and neighbouring rights in Canada: an International perspective[R]. http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~dgervais/publications/collective_management.pdf, 2010-6-9
[99]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究——著作权集体管理的原因、问题与对策[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-71
[100] The Nordic solution to complex copyright questions [EB/OL]. http://international.kopinor.no/opphavsrett/avtalelisens/extended_collective_license, 2010-6-11
[101] Dr. Lucie Guibault. The Nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general interest missions for the transmission of knowledge: prospects for their adaption to the digital environment[D]. University of Amsterdam, 2003-10: 9, available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001396/139671e.pdf
[102] Thomas Riisi, Jens Schovsbo. Extended Collective Licenses and the Nordic Experience–It’s a Hybrid but is it a VOLVO or a Lemon?[J]. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts,2010(4):1-26
[103] Gervais, Daniel J.. Application of An Extended Collective Licensing Regime in Canada: Principles and Issues Related to Implementation[J/OL]. http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~dgervais/publications/extended_licensing.pdf, 2010-6-4
[104]曹世华.著作权集体管理组织版权使用费标准争议解决机制探讨[J].电子知识产权,2009(1):55-57
[105] Jia Wang. Should Chian adpt an extended licensing system to facilitate collective copyright administration: Preliminary thoughts[C]. Asian Institute of law conference of 2009, Hong Kong:2009
[106]王晔.网络作品传播之立法模式研究——中国版权制度现状评析与思考[D].上海:上海大学,2008.6
[107]赵媛,王远均.数字图书馆中的著作权保护模式研究[J].情报资料工作,2005(3):66-71
[108] Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, supra note 10, art.31(1)[EB/OL].http://iwgia.synkron.com/graphics/Synkron-Library/Documents/InternationalProcesses/DraftDeclaration/07-09-13ResolutiontextDeclaration.pdf, 2010-9-14
[109] Librarianship and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Nurturing Understanding and Respect[EB/OL], http://wo.ala.org/tce/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tce.pdf, 2010-12-07
[110] The protection of traditional cultural expressions/expressions of folklore: revised objectives and principles. Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore(Seventeenth Session) [C], Geneva:2010
[111] Martin Skrydstrup. WIPO, Towards Intellectual Property Guidelines and Best Practices for Recording and Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Survey o f Codes, Conduct and Challenges in North America [EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/culturalheritage/casestudies/skrydstrup_exec_summary.pdf, 2010-9-20
[112] Chunyan Wang. Creative commons licence: An alternative solution to copyright in the new media arena[J]. Copyright law, digital content and the Internet in the Asia-Pacific, 2008:305-320
[113] Stef van Gompel. Unlocking the potential of pre-existing content: How to address the issue of orphan works in Europe?[J]. IIC International Review of Intellectual property and Competition Law, 2007, 38( 6): 669-702
[114] Creative commons licences for cultural heritage institutions[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/creativecommons/CC_for_cultural_heritage_institutions.pdf, 2010-12-10
[115] Creative commons licences for cultural heritage institutions[EB/OL]. http://www.ivir.nl/creativecommons/CC_for_cultural_heritage_institutions.pdf, 2010-12-10
[116]刘志刚.数字时代版权授权方式比较研究与图书馆适用[J].图书情报工作, 2006(8):91-95,116
[117]秦珂,高利华.版权在图书馆中的限制与反限制[J].晋图学刊.2001(3):30-33