调控根系—根际土壤微生态环境控制寄主主导性病害的初步研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
林木寄主主导性病害是21世纪我国林业发展所面临的严峻挑战。本试验拟研究调控根系-根际土壤微生态环境的优化因子及其复合方式对杨树扦插苗与裸根苗抗病性的作用效果,为控制杨树溃疡病这类寄主主导性病害提供理论及实践依据。本文共分两部分:
     第一部分研究调控根系-根际土壤微生态环境因子的优化:
     1)外生菌根菌培养条件的优化。结果表明,M001和M002最适培养基分别为灭菌10分的MMN与PDA培养基;适生温度和pH值范围为25~30℃和4~9;最适碳氮源为葡萄糖、淀粉和牛肉浸膏。发酵M001的最优条件为:葡萄糖30g/L,牛肉浸膏15g/L,接种量5%,通气量1.5L/L/m。
     二)杨树扦插苗抗病性对菌根化的响应。接种量设三水平(10、25与50g/株),以加等量灭菌基质为对照。结果每株接种25gM001可明显促进扦插苗生长、提高扦插成活率、树皮相对膨胀度并有效增强过氧化物酶等的活性。
     3)杨树扦插苗根系生长发育对施用植物生长调节剂的响应。N_1与I_1分设50、100、200与500ppm,并将二者按重量比1:1、3:2与4:3混合后再配成上述四个浓度,前三个浓度浸根1h,500ppm浸根5秒,以清水、G_1、A_1100ppm液为对照。结果表明,N_1100 ppm在提高扦插成活率、促进扦插苗苗高、地径与侧根的生长方面作用明显。
     4)植物生长调节剂对外生菌根菌生长的影响。设在菌剂基质中加入65%N_1100ppm为处理,以加入同比例的水分为对照。结果N_1100ppm对菌丝生长无影响。
     5)杨树扦插苗生物量对施用保水剂的响应。SA与SB采用蘸根与拌土法,设0.5%、1%和2%三水平;SC采用拌土法,设三个水平(分别占土体积7.5%、15%与30%),以不加保水剂为对照。结果使用占土体积15%的SC在提高杨树扦插成活率及生物量上效果最优。
     第二部分研究复合调控根系-根际土壤微生态环境因子对杨树扦插苗和1年生北京杨苗抗病性的影响。
     1)应用于扦插苗时,试验设五个处理:(1)将125gM001菌剂、10g保水剂SC制成的饱和凝胶及干土(饱和凝胶与干土体积比为15%)混匀,然后将蘸有植物生长调节剂G_1的插穗进行扦插;(2)将含G_1的SC凝胶、125gM001菌剂及干土混匀;(4)(5)分别与(1)和(2)方法同,但使用A_1100ppm液;(3)以加
    
     调控根系-根际土壤微生态环境控制寄主主导性病害的初步研究
     入等量菌剂基质、不加保水剂及清水蘸根为对照。结果复合因子4处理在促
     进扦插苗生长;提高生长势、叶绿素含量与树皮相对膨胀度;增强过氧化物
     酶、多酚氧化酶及苯丙氨酸解氨酶活性方面效果最佳。
     2)应用于田间北京杨苗时,采用正交试验设计,使用拌土(复合因子
     处理与土 1:1000混合)和蘸根法(同比例与土混合,加水至粘稠,蘸根),
     以无复合因子处理为对照。结果在拌土方式下,北京杨以复合因子8处理效
     果最佳。
Host leading diseases are severe challenges which will be faced by Chinese forestry development in the 21st century. This paper studied control factors and their compound treatment which could improve microecological environment in the root system and rhizosphere soil in order to prevent the occurance of poplar canker disease and supply theorial and practical basis for this kind of host leading diseases. This paper was composed by two parts:
    The first part studied the optimizing of the factors on controlling the microecological environment in the root system and rhizosphere soil:
    First, optimize the culture conditions of ECM fungi. The result suggested MOO land M002 was suitable to grow in the culture medium of MMN and PDA which were sterilized for ten minutes; the suitable temperature and pH scopes were 25~30癈 and 4-9; the suitable carbon and nitrogen sources were glucose, starch and beef extract. The ferment condition of M001 includes 30g/L glucose, 15 g/L beef extract, 5% the inoculation quantity and 1.5 L/L/m ventilation quantity.
    Second, the resistance to the poplar canker disease answered to inoculating ECM fungi. Each inoculum set up three levels (10,25,50g/plant), the control was 25g/plant medium. The result suggested the cutting stock per plant inoculated M001 25g could promote its growth, improve its survival rate, relative turgidity and strengthen the activity of peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase.
    Third, the poplar root system development answered to using the growth regulators. NI and I] set up four levels(50,100.200, SOOppm), according to weight proportion NI: I] set up 1:1, 3:2, 4:3.the mixture set up the same four levels. The cutting stock soaked in the first three levels solution for one hour, the fourth for 5 second, the control was water, GI and A) lOOppm. The result suggested NI lOOppm treatment could significantly promote the poplar cutting stock height .diameter at soil line and lateral root growth.
    Fourth, the effect of the growth regulator on the ECM fungi. In the first treatment added 65%(according to weight proportion) NI 100 ppm in the culture medium. The control added the same proportion water. The result suggested the growth regulator had no effect on the
    
    
    ECM fungi.
    Fifth, the biomass of poplar cutting stock answered to using superabsorbent. SA and SB used the method of mixing with the soil and soaking the root, set up 0.5%, 1% and 2% levels; SC used the method of mixing with the soil, set up 7.5%, 15% and 30%, the control had no superabsorbent. The result suggested SC15% treatment could improve the survival rate and biomass of poplar cutting stock.
    The second part studied the effects of the compound control factors on the resistance to poplar canker disease.
    When the compound factors were used in poplar cutting stock, the experiment set up five treats:
    (1)mixed 125g M001 inoculum, saturant made by 10g SC and soil (according to volume proportion, saturant : soil =15%)together. put the cutting stock which was soaked by G into the mixture; (2)mixed the saturant which had absorbed the GI, 125g M001 inoculum and soil together; (3)mixed the same quantity inoculum medium and soil, no superabsorbent, put the cutting stock soaked in the water into the mixture;(4) and (5) treatments used the same method with (1) and (2), but the growth regulator were A 100ppm. The result suggested that (4) treat could promote the growth, improve growth potential, increase the content of chlorophyll a, b and relative turgidity, strengthen the activity of peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase.
    When the compound factors used for Poplar X beijingensis W.Y. Hsu in field afforestation, the experiment adopted the orthogonal test, P. Xbeijingensis used the method of mixing with the soil (the compound : soil = 1:1000) and the method of soaking the root, the control had no the compound preparation. The result suggested that the 8th treat in the method of mixing with the soil took the best effect on the P. Xbeijingensis
引文
1. Adams, JC and Lockaby, BG. 1987. Commercially produced superabsorbent material increases water-holding capacity of soil medium. Tree-Planters'-Notes, 38: 1,24-25
    2. Bai-Baozhang;Yang-Yuchang, 1995. Effects of rare earth on the distribution of photosynthate in sugarbeet.Acta-Agriture-Nucleatae-Sinica,9(3) : 189-192
    3. Bier. J. E. 1959. The relation of moisture to the development of canker diseases caused by native facultive parasites. 1. Cryptodiapor the canker on willow. Canadian Journal of Bothant, 37: 229-239
    4. Brugess. A. and Nicholas, D. F. 1961. The use of soil sections in studying he amount of fungal hyphae in soil. Soil Sci.. 92: 25-29
    5. Chu-chou. M. et al. 1983. Characterization and identification of mycorrhizaes of radiata pine in New Zealand. Aust. Forest Res., 13(2) :121-132
    6. Chumak, N.F. 1981. Mycorrhizas produced by fungi of the genus Suillus on common pine. Mikol, Fitopat, 15(3) :202-207
    7. Davis, W. C..Wright. E. and Harley,C. 1942. Diseases of forest tree nurserystock. Fed. Sec. Agency. Div. Cons. Crop Forest. Publ., 9
    8. Dhliwayo, DKC. 1994. The effect of a superabsorbent on soil water retention of two soils and on the growth, development and yield of winter wheat. Zimbabwe-Journal-of-Agricultural-Research. 31:53-64
    9. Duran. PR., Rebordinos, L. and Collado, I.G.1997. Biologically active metabolites from Botrytis species. Recent-Research-Developments-in-Phytochemistry,1: 329-337
    10. Fontana, A. and Centrella, E. 1967. Ectomycorrhizae produced by hypogenous fungi. Allionia, 16:99-104
    11. Frank, A. B. Ueber die auf Wurzelsymbiose beruhende Ernahrunggewisser Baume durch Unterirdische pilze. Ber. Deut. Bot.Ges..3: 128-145(In "6th NACOM Proceedings," P. 18-25)
    12. Fu-MH;Ding-QF,1993. The effect of rare earth elements on the physiology of cotton. Journal of Shanghai Agricultural colleage,11(4) :313-319
    13. Gardner, J.L. and Smith S. E. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press
    14. Garret, S. D. 1960. Ecology of root-inhabiting fungi. Univ. Press. Cambridge. London and New York.
    
    
    15. Godbold, D.L, Jentschke, G, Wintr, S, et al. 1998. Ectomycorrhizaes and amelioration of metal stress in forest trees. Chemosphere, 36: 4-5,757-762
    16. Goss, R. 1960. Mycorrhizae of ponderosa Pine in Nebraska grassland soils. Webr. Agric. Exp-Stn. Res. Bull., 92:1-47
    17. Guo, Z. X. and Pan, D. M. 1998. The mechanism and the manipulation of plum fruit set: present research situation and prospects. 2: 154-158
    18. Gusta,LV., Reaney, MJT., Abrams, SR, et al. 1990. Abscisic acid analogs: biological activity and interactions with the plant growth regulator abscisic acid. Comments-on-Agricultural-and-Food-Chemistry, 2:2,143-169
    19. Hatch, A. B. 1936. The role of mycorrhizae in afforestation. J. Forest. 34: 22
    20. Hayman, D. S.. Johnson, A.M. and Duddlesdin, I. 1975. The influence of phosphate and crop species on endogone spores and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae under field conditions. PI. Soil, 43: 489-495
    21. Ho, I. and Zak, B. 1979. Acid phosphatase activity of six ectomycorrhizal douglas fir rootlets and some mycorrhizal fungi. PI. Soil., 54: 395-398
    22. Huang,W.D. 1994. Plant growth regulator control of flower bud induction in temperate fruit trees.Advances-in-Horticulture,1: 37-44
    23. Huttermann, A, Zommorodi, M and Reise, K. 1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil-and-Tillage-Research,50:3-4,295-304
    24. Jin, A.W., Hu, C Z., Pan, X. Z., et al. 1999. The biological characteristics of cutting plantlets of main branch with stump of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami. 18: 1,75-78
    25. Johnson, MS. and Leah, RT. 1'990. Effects of superabsorbent polyacrylamides on efficiency of water use by crop seedlings. J. Sci. Food. Agri., 52: 3,431-434
    26. Katznelson, H., Rouatte, J.W. and Peterson, E. A. 1962. The rhizosphere effect of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots of yellow birch seedlings. Car. J. Bot., 40:257
    27. Knypl, JS and Knypl, MA. 1993. Increased chilling stress tolerance in soybean seeds treated with poly(acrylic acid-ethyl acrylate-vinyl acetate), a superabsorbent Acta-Physiologiae-Plantarum, 15:1,3-9
    28. Kouol, J. and Conn, E. E. 1961. The metabolism of aromatic compound in higerplants. 4. Purification and properties of the phenylalanine deaminase of vulgare. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 236: 2692-2697
    29. Krupa, S. and Fries, N. 1971. Studies on ectomycorrhizae of pine, I. Production of
    
    voaltile organic compounds. Can.J. Bot., 49:1425
    30. Krywolap, G. 1971. Production of antibiotics by certain mycorrhizal fungi. In "Mycorrhizae"(Ed. Hacskaylo), PP210-222
    31. Kuang-YH;Liu-QY, 1992. Study on the effect of rare earth elements on nitrogen assimilation in sugarcane(Saccharum officinarum L.).Journal of South China Agriculture University, 13(1) :60-68
    32. Kuek, C. 1992. Hydrogel bead inocula for the production of ectomycorrhizal fungi on the growth of wunn crotalaria. 6th NACOM.Proceedingsm.P 141
    33. Lapeyrie, F, et al. 1987. New Phytol. 106: 139-146
    34. Lees, E. 1841. On the parasitic growth of Monotropa hypopitys. The Phytologist. 1: 97-101
    35. Liu. G. Q., Chang. Y. H.: Shao, M.C.. et al. 1998. Advance in research of plant growth substances on fruit trees. Advances-in-Horticulture, 2:12-17
    36. Liu-HongZhang et al., 1996. Effect of rare earth on physiological characters of black currant. Journal of Jiiin Agriculture University, 18(1) :1-6
    37. Lodge.D. J. 1989. The influence of soil moisture and flooding on formation of VA-endo-and-ectomycorrhazae in Popolus and Salix. Plant and Soil, 117: 243-258
    38. Lokhande, HT and Varadarajan. PV. 1992. A new Guargum-based superabsorbent polymer synthesised using gamma radiation as a soil additive. Bioresource-Technology. 42:2. 119-122
    39. Magnussen. S. 1986. Effects of root-coating with the polymer Waterlock on survival and growth of drought-stressed bare-root seedlings of white spruce and red pine. Tree-Planters'-Notes, 37: 1,15-19
    40. Malajczuk, N. et al. 1992. Ectomycorrhizaes. In: Microorganisms that Promote Plant Productivity. Klewer Press, Amsterdam
    41. Maronek, D.M., Hendrix, J.W. and Kiernan, J. 1981. Mycorrhizal fungi and their importance in horticultural crop production. Horticultural Reviews., 3:172-213
    42. Marx, D. H. et al. 1984. Commercial vegatative inoculum of Pt and inoculation technique for development of ectomycorrhizae on bare-root seedings. Forest Sci., Monograph 25
    43. Marx, D.H. 1975. Mycorrhizae and establishment of trees on stripmined land. Ohio J. Sci., 75:288-297
    44. Marx, D.H. and Bryan, W. C. 1971. Formation of ectomycorrhizae on half-sib progenies
    
    of slash pin in aseptic culture. Forest Sci.,17: 488-492
    45. Melin, E. and Nilsson, H. 1955. Transport of 14C-labelled photosynthate to the fungal associate of pine mycorrhiza. Svensk Bot. Tidskr., 51: 166-186
    46. Miller, A. N.1990. Changes in auxin concentration in developing fruits and seeds of non-endospermic seed species. 18:4,166-176
    47. Mitchell, J. W., Mandava, N. B., Worley, J. F. 1970. Brassins-a new family of plant hormones from rape pollen. Nature, 225: 1065
    48. Moorland, T. and Reves, F. B. 1979. The role of endomycorrhizae in revegetation practices in the semiarid region of west USA. 11. A bioassay to determine the effect of land disturbance on endomycorrhizal populations. Americal Journal of Botany. 66: 14-18
    49. Nyland, J. E. 1980. Symplastic continuity during Hartig net formation in Norway spruce ectomycorrhizae. New Phytol, 86(4) : 373-378
    50. Oh, JS and Lee, MB. 1989. Studies on packing methods of outplanting seedlings using superabsorbent. Research-Reports-of-the-Forestry-Research-Institute-Seoul, 38:1-7
    51. Qi-BZ,1990. The effect of rare earth elements on growth and mineral up take in maize seedlings. Acta-Agronomica-Sinica, 16(4) :305-310
    52. Ronsch, H., Adam, G., Matschke., J., et al. 1993. Influence of (22s-23s)-homobrassinolide on rooting capacity and survival of adult Norway spruce cutting.Tree Physiology, 12: 71
    53. Ryland, T. G. 1842. On the nature of the byssoid substance found invensting the roots of Monotropa hypopitys.The Phytologist, 1:341-348
    54. Sairam, R. K. 1994. Effect of epibrassinolide on gram (Cicer ariteinum)plants grown under water stress in juvenile stage. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 63(7) : 395
    55. Sanders, F.E. and Tinker,P.B. 1973. Phosphate flow into mycorrhizal roots. Pestic. Sci., 4:385-395
    56. Sasek,V. 1967. The protective effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the host plant. Proc. Int. Union Forest Res. Organ., 14th. Sect.24, P 182
    57. Sasse, J. M. 1991. Brassinosteroids-are they endogenous plant hormones? Plant-Growth-Regulator-Society-of-America-Quarterly. 19:1,1-18
    58. Schilling, G, Schiller, C, Otto, S. 1991. Influence of brassinosteroids on organ relations and enzyme activities of sugar-beet plants. In: Culter, H. G., Yokota, T, Adam, G. Brassinolid steroids, American Chemical Society, Washington D. C.
    
    
    59. Sieverding. E. and Toro. S. T. 1988. J. Agronomy and Crop Science, 161:322~332
    60. Stact, R. W. And Sinclair, W. A. 1975. Protection of douglas fir seedlings against Fusarium root rot by a mycorrhizal fungus in the absence of mycorrhiza formation. Phytopathology, 5: 519~523
    61. Theodorou, C. 1968. Inositol phosphates in needles of Pinus radiata D. Don. and the phytase activity of mycorrhizal fungi. Trans. Int. Congr. Soil Sci., 9th. 3:483
    62. Theodorou. C. 1971. The phytase activity of the mycorrhizal fungus rhizopogon roselus. Soil Biol. Biochem., 3:89~90
    63. Thompson, G. M. and Medue, R. J. 1984. Effects of aluminium and manganese on the growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Environm microbil, 48(3): 556~560
    64. Trappe, J. M. 1971. Mycorrhiza-forming Asocomycetes. In Mycorhrrizae. Hacskaylo E(ed)USDA For Ser. Misc Publ. 1189:19~37
    65. Trappe, J. M. 1977a. Selection of fungi for ectomycorrhizal inoculation in nurseries. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 15:203~222
    66. Trappe, J. M. and Fogel, R. D. 1977b. Ecosystenatic functions of mycorrhizae In "The below ground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant-associated processes." P. 205~214. Range Scl. Dept. Sci. Ser. No. 26, Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins.
    67. Unger, F. 1840. Beitrage Zur Kenntniss der parasitischen pflanzen. Anatomisch-phyciologische Theli. (Contribution to knowledge of parasitic plants, Anatomical-phyciological part.)Ann. Ien. Mus. Nalurgeschichte, 2:13~60
    68. Woodhouse. J.. Johnson. M. S. 1991. Effect of superabsorbent polymers on survival and growth of crop seedlings. Agricultural-Water-Management, 20: 1, 63~70
    69. Xu D. P. et al. 1994. Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculation on Growth and phosphorus uptake of four provenances of Eucalyptus urophylla. In Mycorrhizas for Plantation Forestry in Asia. P. 91~94. ACIAR Proceedings No. 62. Canberra, Australia
    70. Zhou, X. and Xu, Y. J. 1987. Recent progress in the study of plant growth regulator immunoassays(PGRIA). Journal-of-Naning-Agricultural-University, 2: 9~16
    71.毕国昌,郭秀珍,臧穆.1989.在纯培养条件下温度对外生菌根真菌生长的影响.林业科学研究,2 (3):247~253
    72.蔡典雄,王小彬,Keith,S.1999.土壤保水剂对土壤持水特性及作物出苗的影响.土壤肥料,1:13~16
    73.蔡典雄,赵兴宝.1999.什么是保水剂.(内部资料)
    74.常乃庆,孙嘉玉.1994.稀土在林业育苗上应用技术的研究.吉林林业科学,111 (4):19-22
    
    
    75.陈福明等.1984.混合液法测定叶绿素含量的研究.浙江林业科技通讯,4 (1):19~23
    76.陈连庆,裴致达.1995.马尾松容器苗菌根化对苗木生长及其基质的影响.林业科学研究,8(1):44~47
    77.陈连庆等.1992.马尾松菌根真菌的筛选及圃地接种效应.林业科学研究,7 (1):65~69
    78.陈守常.1997.我国林木病害研究进展与展望.森林病虫通讯,4:38~40
    79.陈守常.1994.论林木生态性病害及其生态治理.森林病虫通讯.2:28~32
    80.程大厚,郭正刚等.1993.新型生物钾肥在杨树育苗上的应用.河南林业科学.39 (1):10-11
    81.储钟稀.1991.稀土元素对向日葵生长和光合强度的影响.植物学集刊.265
    82.杜建玲,项蔚华.沈瑞祥.诱导杨树抗溃疡病机理的研究.林业科学研究,1995.8 (1):78~81
    83.冯建民,邹雪生.张春桃等.1998.吸水剂在银杏等树种扦插育苗中的应用.浙江林业科技.18 (1):46~48
    84.冯晓光,王继志,李永生等.1993.高效吸水生根增肥剂应用技术的研究.吉林林业科技.6:1~8
    85.洑香香,叶建国,尹增芳.1998.外源激素对杂种马褂木生根能力的影响.1:46~47
    86.弓明钦,王凤珍,陈羽.1992.桉树幼苗菌根接种及其生长效应研究.林业科学研究.5 (6):639~645
    87.弓明钦,王凤珍.陈羽.1994.桉树外生菌根研究及进展.土壤学报.31(增刊):127~133
    88.郭奇珍,1983.新型植物激素——油菜素内酯.植物生理学通讯.7(2):7
    89.郭秀珍.1981a.松树某些外生菌根真菌对防治油松苗猝倒病的作用.云南植物研究.3 (3):359~366
    90.郭秀珍.1981b.松树外生菌根真菌——牛肝菌(Boletus sp.)和厚环粘盖牛肝(Suillus grevillei)对立枯丝核菌(Rhizoctinia solani)的作用.林业病虫通讯.(2):1~6
    91.郭秀珍和赵志鹏.1989.林木菌根及应用技术.中国林业出版社,北京,1~305
    92.何景峰,唐德瑞,李根前等.1994.SA型高效保水剂对造林成活率及苗木生长的影响.陕西林业科技,3:76~78
    93.何平勋等.1992.落叶松早落病与森林生态因子关系研究初报.第四届全国林病学术讨论会论文摘要集
    94.花晓梅,周拯南,沈根度等.松树育苗P.t菌根化的研究,速生丰产林培育研究报告选编.北京:中国林业科学研究院世界银行贷款项目办公室,1994,(1):87~94
    95.花晓梅主编,1995.林木菌根研究,中国科学技术出版社.
    96.贾慧君,郑槐明,花晓梅等.1997,稳态营养对湿地松容器苗Pt外生菌根形成及生长效应研究.33 (1):51~58
    
    
    97.焦顺兴,杨春华,王沙生.1991.三十烷醇对杨树光合作用和生长的影响.河北林学院学报,6 (4):251~257
    98.雷增普,金均然,王昌温.1989.外生菌根菌对植物根部病原菌拮抗作用的研究.林业研究,25 (6):502~508
    99.雷增普,王昌温.1991.生物制剂在油松侧柏造林中的应用.北京林业大学学报.13 (增刊):80~89
    100.雷增普.1983.外生菌根对油松苗木猝倒病生物防治效应.北京林学院学报,11 (1):81~89
    101.雷增普.1994.外生菌根与树木抗旱的关系.土壤学报.31(增刊):156~161
    102.李凯荣,樊金栓.1998.新型植物激素——油菜素内酯类在农林上的应用研究进展.干旱地区农业研究,16 (4):103~108
    103.李晓储,徐修成,华自忠等.1991.生物吸水胶在育苗造林中的应用.
    104.李星洪等.1998.花生施用复合微生物肥的作用和增产效果初探.土壤肥料,(2):35-37
    105.李玉苹.1986.树木菌根真菌-美味红菇对几种病原菌活性的拮抗作用.真菌学报.1986.5(4):251~252
    106.李玉苹.1988.树木菌根真菌美味红菇内源激素的提取及鉴定.真菌学报.7 (4):239~244
    107.李元芳.1994.硅酸盐细菌肥料的特性和作用.土壤肥料,(2):48-49
    108.连学斌.李嘉珏,冯达等.1994.ABT生根粉在干旱半干旱地区林木育苗中的应用研究.甘肃林业科技.1:28~35
    109.林书蓉.廖观荣等.1995.稀土在杉木上的应用研究.热带亚热带土壤科学,4 (1):53-56
    110.刘春静,杨国涛,曾大鹏.应用化学药剂处理移栽苗木防治杨树溃疡病的研究.林业科技通讯,1993,(5):22~24
    111.刘庆城,许玉兰,张玉洁.1993.2,4-D对麦苗的刺激、抑制和致瘤效应的研究.26 (2):9~16
    112.刘效瑞,赵华生,刘荣清等.1993.土壤保水剂与作物抗旱剂配施效果.土壤肥料.6:30~32
    113.龙录祥,樊汝汶,曹航南等.1996.新植物生长调节剂——83008-1在马褂木育苗中的应用.1:20~22
    114.陆燕君,李桂林,张秉新.1990.山东杨树大斑溃疡病研究.山东农业大学学报,21 (3):23~30
    
    
    115.麻昌军,牛淑荣,于新权等.1995.高效吸水剂、菌根菌土在落叶松移植苗上的应用.
    116.毛静琴.1997.植物生长物质对木枣树根蘖苗成活率的影响.山西林业科技,3:13~16
    117.孟繁荣等.1991.外生菌根对高寒地区松苗猝倒病的防治效应.林业科技,5:27~31
    118.宁加贲.1989.稀土元素应用于黄菜花的效果.稀土,5:52
    119.彭安.1991.生物无机化学.北京大学出版社
    120.沈博礼,代新宾.1994,稀土对小麦叶绿体光化学反应的效应.稀土,15 (2):71
    121.沈应柏,1991,稀土对Ⅰ-69杨育苗木生长和光和作用的影响.北京林业大学学报,13 (4):47-52
    122.宋加木,刘锡彭,时鑫等.1996.苗木生根复合剂的研制与应用,山东林业科技,3:15~18
    123.宋廷茂,郝建华,赵权牢.1990.吸水剂在盆栽花卉上应用技术的研究.北京林业大学学报,12 (2):131~134
    124.宋相录,宋军,倪永春等,1995.高效保水剂对提高落叶松造林成活率及经济效益的研究.辽宁林业科技,6:7~10
    125.汤坚等.1988.外生菌根菌对松苗猝倒病的影响.森林病虫通讯,4:20~21
    126.唐明,陈辉,郭渊.1995.陕南山区主要经济林木外生菌根研究.林木菌根研究,94~99
    127.唐明,陈辉.1994.杨树菌根与溃疡病的关系.土壤学报,31(增刊):218~223
    128.田素忠,沈瑞祥.“5406”细胞分裂素防治杨树溃疡病的研究.北京林业大学学报,1991,3 (4):81~87
    129.汪安琳,高强.1994.多效唑提高广西种源马尾松苗抗寒性的效应.南京林业大学学报,18 (2):1~5
    130.王斌瑞,蔡典雄,赵兴宝.果树施用保水剂及发展前景.(内部资料)
    131.王昌温,罗晓芳,雷增普.1985.外生菌根对油松苗木生物产量的影响.林业科学,19(3):375~382
    132.王华芳,孟庆英,田砚亭.1987.人工合成植物生长调节剂促进插条生根的研究现状.北京林业大学学报,9 (4):426~432
    133.王佩卿,王丽倩,全金英.1999.新型植物生长调节剂(ASL)在农林上的应用.23 (4):1~6
    134.王守宗.1996.细菌肥料对杨树生长效应的研究.9(6):654-657
    135.王维敏.1994.中国北方旱地农业技术.自中国农业出版社.142~164
    136.魏辉等.生物有机无机复合肥的研制与效果研究.微生物学杂志,17:19-23
    137.魏孝文,1996.冀北山地施用稀土提高林果产量试验示范成果初报.河北林业科学,4:9-13
    
    
    138.魏益宁.1984.毛白杨受马格栅锈菌侵染后多酚氧化酶和过氧化物酶及同功酶变化趋势的研究.北京林业大学学报,(3):73~92
    139.闻鼎立,刘建灵,马兰生等.1998.ABT生根粉在林业生产中的应用.浙江林业科技,18 (5):39~43
    140.吴炳云等.1991,外生菌根对油松苗木抗旱性的影响.北京林业大学学报,13(增刊),2:281~289
    141.吴德瑜.1991.保水剂与农业.中国农业科技出版社.
    142.吴观以,李慧荃.1994.抗菌肥料的作用和应用.土壤肥料,3:45-47
    143.熊礼明,史瑞和.1994.蒸汽灭菌的土壤对植物的毒害作用及VA菌根的减毒效应.土壤学报,31(增刊):234~239
    144.薛智勇.汤江武等.1996.硅酸盐细菌在不同土壤中的解钾作用及对甘薯的增产效果.土壤肥料,2:23-26
    145.阳传和.1985.杨树溃疡病接种方法的比较.北京林学院学报,(2):76~81
    146.杨春华,胡炳福.1998.不同细菌制剂对核桃苗促生效果的试验.贵州林业科学.26(1):29-31
    147.杨新美.1988.中国食用菌栽培学.北京:农业出版社
    148.阳传和,杨旺.1990.环境生态因子与杨树溃疡病关系的初步研究.华北地区光肩星天牛、溃疡病为主的杨树病虫害防治技术研究(学术论文集):47~52
    149.叶德生.1998.ABT生根粉浸根造林应用研究报告.福建林业科技.25 (2):81~84
    150.叶国友.植物生长调节剂在华北落叶松扦插繁殖上的应用.林业科技,18~19
    151.张建国,马春花等.1994.稀土在林业生产中的应用研究.山东林业科学,91(2):41-44
    152.张林华,邹永谦,雷增谱.1994.外生菌根菌剂在长白落叶松、红松育苗造林中的作用.土壤学报,31 (增刊):164~171
    153.张若慧,刘洪,蔡建国等.1998.应用新型绿色植物生长调节剂ABT-11~15号生根粉促进树木扦插成活.浙江林学院学报,15 (1):22~26
    154.张献义,陈敏叶.1995,应用电子探针技术进行松树菌根与根际粘胶层关系的研究.南京林业大学学报,19 (3):1~5
    155.张星耀.森林生物灾害控制的新世纪策略及其实施基础.中国林业科学研究院编,面向21世纪的林业——可持续发展全球战略下的林业科学技术.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998:341~345
    156.张星耀.1999.森林病理学研究的生态数学方法.中国林业出版社,1~235
    157.赵志鹏,郭秀珍.1989.外生菌根真菌纯培养的生物学研究.林业科学研究,2 (2):136~140
    
    
    158.赵忠,刘西平,高崇巍.1994.毛白杨优良外生菌根的选择.林业科学研究,7(6):640~445
    159.赵忠,马刊欣,段安安.1993.毛白杨外生菌根类型及共生生态特性研究.林业科学,29(1):12~18
    160.郑均宝,裴保华,蒋湘宁.1988.NAA处理对杨树茎插穗生根的作用.河北林学院学报,3 (2):1~8
    161.郑先武,田砚亭.1995.金丝小枣插条中外源激素与内源激素的关系.北京林业大学学报,17 (4):44~49
    162.周玉芝,韩桂云,齐玉臣等.1994.落叶松外生菌根真菌优良菌株筛选及其在造林中的应用.7 (2):206~209
    163.左永忠,刘春兰,陆贵巧等.1994.保水剂蘸根对苗木保湿效果的影响.北京林业大学学报,16 (1):106~109

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700