基于双语言信息的多准则决策方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
语言多准则决策是现代多准则决策研究的一个重要方向,在诸多领域中有着广泛的的应用背景。尽管针对语言多准则决策的研究己取得了丰硕的成果,但无论理论还是应用方面,现有研究均还存在许多尚待解决的问题,尤其是在处理语言信息的不确定性特征时还很不成熟。为此,本文提出了双语言集的概念,并针对双语言环境下的不确定多准则决策问题加以系统研究,本文的主要工作包括:
     (1)提出了双语言集的概念。可以利用它同时表达对备选方案在准则下表现的评价和决策者对该评价的信心水平。这一工具与传统的语言变量相比,能够更好的包容决策过程中来自不同源头的不确定性。
     (2)定义了双语言集间的优势关系,并在此基础上建立了方案间的级别高关系。利用级别高关系,综合方案间两两比较的结果,可以得到方案间的不完全序。
     (3)在上述级别高关系的基础上,进一步扩展得到了一种双语言多准则分组评级决策方法。该方法利用一组标志性的虚拟参考方案,通过备选方案与这些虚拟参考方案相比较而将方案划分进合适的分组中。适用于备选方案较多、不便于方案间两两比较时对方案进行初步评价的决策环境。本文将其用以处理城市绿化树种选择问题,取得了较好的效果。
     (4)提出了语义占优技术,并证明了五种典型的语义结构下所对应的语义占优规则,研究了不同语义占优的性质。利用这一组规则,提出了基于语义占优的双语言多准则决策步骤,从而挑选出“非劣”方案的集合。
     (5)为了尽可能多获得的方案间偏好关系,并减少对语言变量的语义设定施加过多人为影响,通过建立语义规划模型对语言变量的语义加以设定,语言变量中包含的不完全偏好通过模型的限制条件表示,并提出了两种利用语义规划技术的双语言多准则决策方法。
     (6)针对权重信息不完全的双语言多准则决策问题进行了研究,提出了基于扩展语言运算的两种决策方法。其中一种方法将决策过程看作是决策者与自然间的博弈,利用矩阵博弈理论对准则权重加以设定;而另外一种方法则通过最大化模型离差来设定权重。
     (7)提出了直觉正态云模型来处理双语言多准则决策问题,决策者给出的决策信息被看作是方案的综合评价云中部分云滴的集合,通过这些云滴可估计出该评价云的相关参数,随后,利用所设计的云发生算法运用蒙特卡洛技术产生云滴并对云滴计分加以统计,进而对不同方案的综合评价云加以比较排序。
     (8)将所提出的双语言多准则决策技术应用于新能源公交车选型决策案例中,通过综合运用上述方法,可以揭示蕴含在双语言决策信息之内的决策者偏好,帮助决策者更好的理解问题和影响方案间偏好的具体因素,从而帮助其得到更加理性的决策结果,提高决策质量。
Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem is an important research topic in the nowadays MCDM theory. It has widely application background in many fields. Although the linguistic MCDM research has achieved fruitful results, the existing methods still have many unsolved problems in both theory and application aspects. Especially, they are very immature in handling the uncertainty in linguistic information. Thereby, the duplex linguistic (DL) sets are introduced in the thesis. Moreover, the uncertain MCDM problems under duplex linguistic environment are studied systematically. It includes:
     (1) Defined the DL set, which can be used to express the evaluation for an alternative with respect to a criterion and the confidence on such evaluation simultaneously. Comparing to the classical linguistic variable, the DL set can comprise the uncertainty from different sources.
     (2) Defined the dominance relation between DL sets, and established the outranking relation between alternatives based on such dominances. Integrating the outranking relations after pairwise comparing the alternatives, the partial order of alternatives is reached.
     (3) Based on the outranking relation above, a DL multi-criteria classifying and rating method is proposed. By comparing the alternatives to a group of virtual reference alternatives, the evaluated alternatives are classified into the proper groups. This method is suitable for solving the problem that involves too many alternatives to compare them pairwise. An urban tree species selection was conducted by using this method.
     (4) The semantic dominance (SD) technique is proposed. The SD rules about five typical semantics structures were proved, and the properties of SD were studied. The DL MCDM procedure based on SD was introduced to find all the "non-inferior" alternatives.
     (5) For obtaining the preferences about the alternatives as much as possible, and avoiding assigning the semantics to the linguistic variables artificially, a semantic programming model was introduced to set the semantics to the linguistic variables. The incomplete preference involving in the linguistic variables are expressed by the constraints of the model. Two DL MCDM methods based on semantic programming are introduced.
     (6) For handling the DL MCDM problems with incomplete weights, two methods based on the computing with expanded linguistic variables are proposed. One of them regards the decision as a game between decision makers and the nature, and set the weights with a matrix game. The other method sets the weights to maximize the deviation of the model.
     (7) The intuitionistic normal cloud model is proposed for solving the DL MCDM problems. The decision information is regarded as the drop sets of the clouds that evaluate the alternatives. Parameters of these clouds then can be estimated from such drops. Further, the drops of these clouds are generated by using the cloud-generating algorithm. The statistical results of the drop score can be used to rank the clouds.
     (8) The methods proposed are used to select the alternative fuel bus species. These methods reveal more detail of the preference that involves in the DL decision information. They help the decision maker to understand the problem and the factors that affect the preferences, thus make decision more reasonable.
引文
[1]Triantaphyllou E. Multi-criteria decision making methods:a comparative study[M]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000.
    [2]Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M. Multiple criteria decision analysis:state of the art surveys[M]. Springer Verlag,2005.
    [3]Doukas H. Modelling of linguistic variables in multicriteria energy policy support[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.
    [4]Roy B, Present M, Silhol D. A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1986,24 (2):318-352.
    [5]Dyer J S, Fishburn P C, Steuer R E, Wallenius J, Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory:the next ten years[J]. Management Science,1992,38 (5):645-654.
    [6]Stewart T J. A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice[J]. Omega,1992,20 (5-6):569-586.
    [7]Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and control,1965,8 (3):338-353.
    [8]Carlsson C, Fuller R. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making:Recent developments[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,78 (2):139-153.
    [9]Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making:theory and applications with recent developments[M]. Springer,2008.
    [10]王坚强.模糊多准则决策方法研究综述[J].控制与决策,2008,23(6):601-606,612.
    [11]Martinez L, Ruan D, Herrera F. Computing with words in decision support systems:An overview on models and applications[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2010,3 (4):382-395.
    [12]Zadeh L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I[J]. Information Sciences,1975,8 (3):199-249.
    [13]Dubois D. The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences:Old techniques and new directions[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2011,184 (1):3-28.
    [14]Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems,2000,8 (6):746-752.
    [15]Wang T-C, Chen Y-H. Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP[J]. Information Sciences,2008,178 (19): 3755-3765.
    [16]Wang W-P. Evaluating new product development performance by fuzzy linguistic computing[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36 (6):9759-9766.
    [17]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000,114(1):43-58.
    [18]Wang W-P. A fuzzy linguistic computing approach to supplier evaluation[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2010,34 (10):3130-3141.
    [19]Lin L-Z, Yeh H-R. Fuzzy linguistic decision to provide alternatives to market mechanism strategies[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37 (10):6986-6996.
    [20]Chen Y-H, Wang T-C, Wu C-Y. Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2011,35 (3): 1322-1330.
    [21]Parreiras R O, Ekel P Y, Martini J S C, Palhares R M. A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences,2010,180(7):1075-1089.
    [22]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis:steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115 (1):67-82.
    [23]Xu Z. A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2007,20 (8): 719-725.
    [24]Wei C F, Yuan R F. A decision making method based on linguistic aggregation operators for coal mine safety evaluation[C]. Hangzhou, China:Proc. of 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering,2010:7-20.
    [25]王坚强,李寒波.基于直觉语言集结算子的多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2010,25(10):1571-1574.
    [26]Zadeh L A. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,1973, (1): 28-44.
    [27]Xu Z. Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making[J]. Omega,2005,33 (3):249-254.
    [28]Xu Y, Wang H. Distance measure for linguistic decision making[J]. Systems Engineering Procedia,2011,1:450-456.
    [29]Xu Z. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences,2008,178 (2):452-467.
    [30]Xu Y, Merigo J M, Wang H. Linguistic power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2012,36 (11):5427-5444.
    [31]易平涛,李伟伟,郭亚军.二元语义密度算子及其在多属性决策中的应用[J].控制与决策,2012,27(5):757-760.
    [32]Martinez L, Herrera F. An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making:Extensions, applications and challenges[J]. Information Sciences,2012,207:1-18.
    [33]Wei G, Zhao X. Some dependent aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39 (5):5881-5886.
    [34]Xu Z. Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Information Sciences,2004,168 (1-4):171-184.
    [35]Niewiadomski A. Interval-valued linguistic variables. An application to linguistic summaries[J]. Issues in Intelligent Systems. Paradigms. EXIT Academic Press, Warsaw,2005:167-184.
    [36]王坚强,刘淘.基于综合云的不确定语言多准则群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(8):1185-1190.
    [37]Peng B, Ye C, Zeng S. Uncertain pure linguistic hybrid harmonic averaging operator and generalized interval aggregation operator based approach to group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2012,36:175-181
    [38]胡军华,陈晓红,刘咏梅.基于语言评价和前景理论的多准则决策方法.控制与决策,2009,24(10),1477-1482.
    [39]Rodriguez R M, Martinez L, Herrera F. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making[J]. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems,2012,20 (1):109-119.
    [40]Rodriguez R, Martinez L, Herrera F, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, in: Foundations of Intelligent Systems[M],2012, pp.287-295.
    [41]Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20 (1):87-96.
    [42]Yang W E, Wang J Q. Vague linguistic matrix game approach for multi-criteria decision making with uncertain weights[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems,2013,25 (2):315-324.
    [43]Wang X F, Wang J Q, Yang W E. Multi-criteria group decision making method based on intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems,2013, in Press.
    [44]王坚强,王佩.基于直觉模糊熵的直觉语言多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(11):1694-1698.
    [45]刘培德,张新.直觉不确定语言集成算子及在群决策中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,32(12):2704-2711.
    [46]Yang W-E, Wang J-Q, Wang X-F. An outranking method for multi-criteria decision making with duplex linguistic information[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2012, 198:20-33.
    [47]Yu X, Xu Z, Liu S, Chen Q. Multicriteria decision making with 2-dimension linguistic aggregation techniques[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2012, 27 (6):539-562.
    [48]朱卫东,周光中,杨善林.基于二维语言评价信息的群体决策方法[J].系统工程,2009,27(2):113-118.
    [49]Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making[J]. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B:Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,2001,31 (2):227-234.
    [50]Chang S L, Wang R C, Wang S Y. Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategy-oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,177 (2):1013-1025.
    [51]Chuu S J. Evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system using fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with multi-granularity linguistic information[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2007,32 (3): 409-421.
    [52]Huynh V N, Nakamori Y. A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments[J]. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,2005,35 (2):184-196.
    [53]Martinez L, Liu J, Yang J B, Herrera F. A multigranular hierarchical linguistic model for design evaluation based on safety and cost analysis[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2005,20(12):1161-1194.
    [54]Chen Z, Ben-Arieh D. On the fusion of multi-granularity linguistic label sets in group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2006,51 (3): 526-541.
    [55]乐琦,樊治平.具有多粒度不确定语言评价信息的多属性群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,25(7):1059-1062.
    [56]Jiang Y-P, Fan Z-P, Ma J. A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information[J]. Information Sciences,2008,178 (4):1098-1109.
    [57]Fan Z-P, Liu Y. A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37 (5):4000-4008.
    [58]Zhu J, Hipel K W. Multiple stages grey target decision making method with incomplete weight based on multi-granularity linguistic label[J]. Information Sciences, 2012,212 (0):15-32.
    [59]Zhang Z, Guo C. A method for multi-granularity uncertain linguistic group decision making with incomplete weight information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012,26(0):111-119.
    [60]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2008,16 (2):354-370.
    [61]鲍广宇,连向磊,何明,王玲玲.基于新型语言评估标度的二元语义改进模型[J].控制与决策,2010,25(5):780-784.
    [62]Torra V. Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,1996,11 (11):975-988.
    [63]Torra V. Aggregation of linguistic labels when semantics is based on antonyms[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2001,16 (4):513-524.
    [64]Trillas E, Guadarrama S. What about fuzzy logic's linguistic soundness?[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2005,156 (3):334-340.
    [65]Zadeh L A. Fuzzy logic= computing with words[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,1996,4 (2):103-111.
    [66]Zadeh L. From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words-from Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions[J]. Logic, Thought and Action,2005:507-544.
    [67]Herrera F, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E. Computing with words in decision making:foundations, trends and prospects[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2009,8 (4):337-364.
    [68]Mendel J M, Zadeh L A, R.R.Yager, Lawry J, Hagras H, Guadarrama S. What Computing with Words Means to Me[J]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2010,5(1):20-26.
    [69]Lawry J, Shanahan J, Ralescu A. Modelling with Words:Learning, fusion, and reasoning within a formal linguistic representation framework[M]. Springer,2004.
    [70]Zadeh L A. Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,90 (2): 111-127.
    [71]Pham T D. Computing with words in formal methods[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2000,15 (8):801-810.
    [72]Bargiela A, Pedrycz W. Granular mappings[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A:Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on,2005,35 (2):292-297.
    [73]Dick S, Schenker A, Pedrycz W, Kandel A. Regranulation:A granular algorithm enabling communication between granular worlds[J]. Information Sciences, 2007,177 (2):408-435.
    [74]Mendel J M. Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics[J]. Information Sciences,2007,177 (4):988-1006.
    [75]Trillas E. On the use of words and fuzzy sets[J]. Information Sciences,2006, 176 (11):1463-1487.
    [76]Tong R M, Bonissone P P. A linguistic approach to decisionmaking with fuzzy sets[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,1980,10 (11): 716-723.
    [77]Schmucker K J, Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets, natural language computations, and risk analysis[M]. Rockville:Computer Science Press,1984.
    [78]Yager R R. On the retranslation process in Zadeh's paradigm of computing with words[J]. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B:Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,2004,34 (2):1184-1195.
    [79]Martin O, Klir G J. On the problem of retranslation in computing with perceptions[J]. International Journal of General Systems,2006,35 (6):655-674.
    [80]Lawry J. An alternative approach to computing with words[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,2001,9 (suppOl): 3-16.
    [81]Lawry J. A methodology for computing with words[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2001,28 (2):51-89.
    [82]Lawry J. A framework for linguistic modelling[J]. Artificial Intelligence,2004, 155(1):1-39.
    [83]Rubin S H. Computing with words[J]. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on,1999,29 (4):518-524.
    [84]Cao Y, Ying M, Chen G. Retraction and generalized extension of computing with words[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2007,15 (6):1238-1250.
    [85]Ying M. A formal model of computing with words[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2002,10 (5):640-652.
    [86]Wang H, Qiu D. Computing with words via Turing machines:A formal approach[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2003,11 (6):742-753.
    [87]Tang Y, Zheng J. Linguistic modelling based on semantic similarity relation among linguistic labels[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157 (12):1662-1673.
    [88]Turksen I B. Meta-linguistic axioms as a foundation for computing with words[J]. Information Sciences,2007,177 (2):332-359.
    [89]Dubois D, Prade H. The three semantics of fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,90 (2):141-150.
    [90]Dubois D, Prade H, Harding E. Possibility theory:an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty[M]. New York:Plenum press 1988.
    [91]Klir G J, Folger T A. Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information[J].1988.
    [92]Yager R R. Some relationships between possibility, truth and certainty[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1983,11 (1):135-149.
    [93]Mendel J M. Advances in type-2 fuzzy sets and systems[J]. Information Sciences,2007,177 (1):84-110.
    [94]Wu D, Mendel J M. Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2007,15 (6): 1145-1161.
    [95]Liu F, Mendel J M. Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems,2008,16 (6):1503.
    [96]Mendel J M, Wu H. Type-2 fuzzistics for symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets: Part 1, forward problems[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2006,14 (6): 781-792.
    [97]Mendel J M, Wu H. Type-2 fuzzistics for symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets: Part 2, inverse problems[J]. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2007,15 (2): 301-308.
    [98]王坚强,韩知秋.基于二型三角诱导OWA算子的多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2013,发表中.
    [99]Xu Z. An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations[J]. Decision Support Systems,2006,41 (2):488-499.
    [100]Wang J, Chen X. Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2008,19 (5):934-938.
    [101]Liu P. Some geometric aggregation operators based on interval intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2013,37 (4):2430-2444.
    [102]Liu P. Some generalized dependent aggregation operators with intuitionistic linguistic numbers and their application to group decision making[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences,2013,79 (1):131-143.
    [103]Xu Z. Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making[J]. Information Fusion,2006,7 (2):231-238.
    [104]Xu Y, Wang H. Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment[J]. Applied Soft Computing,2011,11 (5):3988-3997.
    [105]Peng B, Ye C, Zeng S. Uncertain pure linguistic hybrid harmonic averaging operator and generalized interval aggregation operator based approach to group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2012,36:175-181.
    [106]Liu P, Jin F. Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making[J]. Information Sciences,2012, 205 (0):58-71.
    [107]Liu P D, Jin F. The trapezoid fuzzy linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Scientia Iranica,2012,19 (6): 1947-1959.
    [108]Wei G, Zhao X, Lin R, Wang H. Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2013,37 (7):5277-5285.
    [109]Wei G-W. Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2011,61 (1):32-38.
    [110]Zhou L, Chen H. A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2012,26:216-224.
    [111]Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1998,97 (1):33-48.
    [112]Delgado M, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making[J]. Information Sciences,1998, 107 (1):177-194.
    [113]Herrera F, Martinez L, Sanchez P. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005,166 (1): 115-132.
    [114]Meesad P, Yen G G. Combined numerical and linguistic knowledge representation and its application to medical diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A:Systems and Humans,2003,33 (2):206-222.
    [115]Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F, Ardakanian R. A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust multi-criteria decision making[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2008,7(1):1-15.
    [116]Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods[J]. Theory and Decision,1991,31 (1):49-73.
    [117]Roy B, Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (La methode Electre)[J]. Revue francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Operationnelle, 1968,8:57-75.
    [118]Brans J, Vincke P, Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects:The PROMETHEE method[J], European Journal of Operational Research,1986,24 (2): 228-238.
    [119]Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykalainen J. Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning[J]. Silva Fennica,2001,35 (2):215-227.
    [120]Jacquet-Lagreze E, Siskos J. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1982,10 (2):151-164.
    [121]Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York:McGraw Hill, 1980.
    [122]Saaty T L. Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP:Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2007,46 (7-8):860-891.
    [123]Saaty T L. Multicriteria Decision Making:The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation[M]. Pittsburgh:PWS Publications, 1990.
    [124]Forman E H, Selly M A. Decision by objectives:how to convince others that you are right[M]:World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated,2001.
    [125]Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications:a state-of-the-art survey[M]. Springer Verlag,1981.
    [126]Opricovic S, Tzeng G H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,156 (2):445-455.
    [127]华小义,谭景信.基于“垂面”距离的TOPSIS法-正交投影法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(1):114-119.
    [128]Chen M F, Tzeng G H. Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2004, 40 (13):1473-1490.
    [129]刘树林,邱菀华.多属性决策的TOPSIS夹角度量评价法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1996,16(7):12-16.
    [130]Ju Y, Wang A. Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2013, 37 (5):3112-3125.
    [131]Pedrycz W, Song M. A granulation of linguistic information in AHP decision-making problems[J]. Information Fusion,2011, in Press.
    [132]Yan H-B, Huynh V-N, Nakamori Y. A probabilistic model for linguistic multi-expert decision making involving semantic overlapping[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (7):8901-8912.
    [133]Dong Y, Xu Y, Yu S. Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2009,160 (5): 603-623.
    [134]Chen H, Zhou L, Han B. On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations and its application in the group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2011,24 (6):816-823.
    [135]Hsu S-C, Wang T-C. Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (9): 10882-10888.
    [136]Garcia-Lapresta J L, Meneses L C. An empirical analysis of transitivity with four scaled preferential judgment modalities[J]. Review of Economic Design,2003,8 (3):335-346.
    [137]Diaz S, Montes S, De Baets B. Transitivity bounds in additive fuzzy preference structures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2007,15 (2):275-286.
    [138]Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004,154(1):98-109.
    [139]Sahnoun Z, DiCesare F, Bonissone P P. Efficient methods for computing linguistic consistency[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1991,39 (1):15-26.
    [140]Dong Y, Xu Y, Li H. On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,189 (2):430-444.
    [141]Tapia Garci'a J M, del Moral M J, Martinez M A, Herrera-Viedma E. A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39 (11):10022-10030.
    [142]Kim S H, Ahn B S. Group decision making procedure considering preference strength under incomplete information[J]. Computers & Operations Research,1997,24 (12):1101-1112.
    [143]Li D F, Yang J B. Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments[J]. Information Sciences,2004,158: 263-275.
    [144]王坚强,陈晓红.信息不完全确定的多准则语言区间群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(002),190-195.
    [145]Alonso S, Cabrerizo F, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2009,24 (2):201-222.
    [146]Ma J, Ruan D, Xu Y, Zhang G. A fuzzy-set approach to treat determinacy and consistency of linguistic terms in multi-criteria decision making[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2007,44 (2):165-181.
    [147]Cabrerizo F J, Perez I J, Herrera-Viedma E. Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2010,23 (2):169-181.
    [148]Zhang Y, Fan Z. Method for multiple attribute decision making based on incomplete linguistic judgment matrix[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2008,19 (2):298-303.
    [149]Wu Z, Chen Y. The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2007,158(14):1608-1617.
    [150]Xu Y J, Da Q L. Standard and mean deviation methods for linguistic group decision making and their applications[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37 (8):5905-5912.
    [151]Xu Y, Da Q. A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information under uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2008,21 (8):837-841.
    [152]Wei G-W. Grey relational analysis method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (5):4824-4828.
    [153]Perez I J, Cabrerizo F J, Herrera-Viedma E. Group decision making problems in a linguistic and dynamic context[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (3): 1675-1688.
    [154]Pang J, Liang J. Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information[J]. Omega,2012,40 (3):294-301.
    [155]Meng D, Pei Z. On weighted unbalanced linguistic aggregation operators in group decision making[J]. Information Sciences,2013,223:31-41.
    [156]Wang J J, Jing Y Y, Zhang C F, Zhao J H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2009,13 (9):2263-2278.
    [157]Paneque Salgado P, Corral Quintana S, Guimaraes Pereira A, del Moral Ituarte L, Pedregal Mateos B. Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives. A case in the Costa del Sol (Malaga)[J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68 (4):990-1005.
    [158]Chou Y C, Sun C C, Yen H Y. Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach[J]. Applied Soft Computing,2011.
    [159]Sun Y H, Ma J, Fan Z P, Wang J. A group decision support approach to evaluate experts for R&D project selection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2008,55 (1):158-170.
    [160]Fan Z P, Feng B, Sun Y H, Ou W. Evaluating knowledge management capability of organizations:a fuzzy linguistic method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(2),3346-3354.
    [161]Rezaei J, Ortt R. Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2013, 225 (1):75-84.
    [162]Buyukozkan G. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2012,50 (11):2892-2909.
    [163]Tan C, Wu D D, Ma B. Group decision making with linguistic preference relations with application to supplier selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011,38(12):14382-14389.
    [164]Chou T Y, Hsu C L, Chen M C.A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management,2008,27 (2):293-301.
    [165]Awasthi A, Chauhan S S, Goyal S K. A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2011,53 (1):98-109.
    [166]Gharehgozli A, Rabbani M, Zaerpour N, Razmi J. A comprehensive decision-making structure for acceptance/rejection of incoming orders in make-to-order environments[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008,39 (9):1016-1032.
    [167]Biiyukozkan G, Ruan D. Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2008,77 (5):464-475.
    [168]Sanchez-Lopez R, Bana e Costa C A, De Baets B. The MACBETH approach for multi-criteria evaluation of development projects on cross-cutting issues[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2012:1-16.
    [169]Marle F, Gidel T. A multi-criteria decision-making process for project risk management method selection[J], International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making,2012,2 (2):189-223.
    [170]Shevchenko G, Ustinovichius L, Andruskevicius A. Multi-attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,2008,14 (3):428-443.
    [171]Chuu S-J. Interactive group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2011,213 (1):279-289.
    [172]Ngan S-C. Decision making with extended fuzzy linguistic computing, with applications to new product development and survey analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (11):14052-14059.
    [173]陈晓红,胡文华,曹裕,陈建二.基于梯形模糊数的分层多目标线性规划模型在多属性不确定决策问题中的应用.管理工程学报,2013,26(4),192-198.
    [174]Wang X-T, Xiong W. An integrated linguistic-based group decision-making approach for quality function deployment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011, 38 (12):14428-14438.
    [175]Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2002,138 (2): 229-246.
    [176]Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B, ELECTRE methods, in:Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis:State of the Art Surveys[M]. Springer,2005, pp.133-153.
    [177]Hobbs B F, Meier P. Energy decisions and the environment:a guide to the use of multicriteria methods[M]. Springer Netherlands,2000.
    [178]Papadopoulos A, Karagiannidis A. Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems[J]. Omega, 2008,36 (5):766-776.
    [179]Buchanan J, Vanderpooten D. Ranking projects for an electricity utility using ELECTRE III[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research,2007,14 (4): 309-323.
    [180]Augusto M, Figueira J, Lisboa J, Yasin M. An application of a multi-criteria approach to assessing the performance of Portugal's economic sectors:Methodology, analysis and implications[J]. European Business Review,2005,17 (2):113-132.
    [181]Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M. Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology[J]. Renewable Energy,2003,28 (13):2063-2087.
    [182]Shanian A, Milani A S, Carson C, Abeyaratne R C.A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos' procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2008,21 (7):709-720.
    [183]Hokkanen J, Salminen P. Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,98 (1):19-36.
    [184]Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,129 (1):1-47.
    [185]Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M. An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment[J]. Omega,2011,39 (4):373-386
    [186]Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. A model for linguistic partial information in decision making problem[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1994,9:365-378.
    [187]Rogers M, Bruen M. Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1998,107 (3):542-551.
    [188]Mousseau V, Pardalos P, Siskos Y, Zopounidis C, Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria, in:Advances in multicriteria analysis[M], Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995, pp.17-43.
    [189]Roy B, Mousseau V. A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria[J]. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,1996,5: 145-159.
    [190]Figueira J, Roy B. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos'procedure[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,139 (2):317-326.
    [191]Kelemenis A, Askounis D. A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37 (7):4999-5008.
    [192]Nilsson K, Randrup T B, Wandall B M, Trees in the urban environment, in: The Forests Handbook[M], Oxford:Blackwell Science,2000, pp.347-361.
    [193]Saeb(?) A, Benedikz T, Randrup T B. Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2003,2 (2):101-114.
    [194]Pauleit S, Urban street tree plantings:identifying the key requirements, in: the Institute of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineers,2003.
    [195]Sieghardt M, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Paoletti E, Couenberg E, Dimitrakopoulus A, Rego F, Hatzistathis A, Randrup T B, The abiotic urban environment:impact of urban growing conditions on urban vegetation, in, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Allemagne,2005, pp.281-323.
    [196]Saeb(?) A, Zelimir B, Ducatillion C, Hatzistathis A, Lagerstrom T, Supuka J, Garcia-Valdecantos J, Rego F, Slycken J. The selection of plant materials for street trees, park trees and urban woodland[J]. Urban Forests and Trees,2005:257-280.
    [197]Tello M L, Tomalak M, Siwecki R, Gaper J, Motta E, Mateo-Sagasta E. Biotic urban growing conditions-threats, pests and diseases[J]. Urban Forests and Trees. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York,2005:325-365.
    [198]Roloff A, Korn S, Gillner S. The Climate-Species-Matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2009,8 (4):295-308.
    [199]Raupp M J, Cumming A B, Raupp E C. Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers[J]. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry,2006,32 (6):297-304.
    [200]Bassuk N. Recommended urban trees:Site assessment and tree selection for stress tolerance[M]. Cornell University, Urban Horticulture Institute,2003.
    [201]Richards N. Diversity and stability in a street tree population[J]. Urban Ecology,1983,7 (2):159-171.
    [202]Pauleit S, Jones N, Garcia-Martin G, Garcia-Valdecantos J L, Vidal-Beaudet L, Bodson M, Randrup T B. Tree establishment practice in towns and cities-Results from a European survey[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2002,1 (2):83-96.
    [203]Sjoman H, Busse Nielsen A. Selecting trees for urban paved sites in Scandinavia-A review of information on stress tolerance and its relation to the requirements of tree planners[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2010,9 (4): 281-293.
    [204]Gershon M, Duckstein L. Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,1983,109:13.
    [205]Zanakis S H, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S. Multi-attribute decision making:A simulation comparison of select methods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1998,107(3):507-529.
    [206]Belton V. A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1986,26 (1):7-21.
    [207]Karni R, Sanchez P, Tummala V M R. A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies[J]. Theory and Decision,1990,29 (3):203-222.
    [208]Olson D L, Moshkovich H M, Schellenberger R, Mechitov A I. Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids:Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems[J]. Decision Sciences,1995,26 (6):723-747.
    [209]Deng H, Wibowo S. Intelligent decision support for evaluating and selecting information systems projects[J]. Engineering Letters,2008,16 (3):412-418.
    [210]Levy H. Stochastic Dominance and Expected Utility:Survey and Analysis[J]. Management Science,1992,38 (4):555-593.
    [211]Haven E. The financial relevance of fuzzy stochastic dominance:a brief note[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2005,152 (3):467-473.
    [212]Zhang Y, Fan Z-P, Liu Y. A method based on stochastic dominance degrees for stochastic multiple criteria decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010,58 (4):544-552.
    [213]Levy H, Wiener Z. Stochastic dominance and prospect dominance with subjective weighting functions[J]. Journal of Risk and uncertainty,1998,16 (2): 147-163.
    [214]Levy H. Stochastic dominance:investment decision making under uncertainty[M]. Springer Verlag,2006.
    [215]Bouyssou D, Pirlot M, Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM, in:J Figueira, S Greco, M Ehrgott (Eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis:State of the Art Surveys[M].2005, pp.73-112.
    [216]Fishburn P C. Utility theory for decision making[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1970.
    [217]Wang Y M. Using the method of maximizing deviations to make decision for multi-indices[J]. System Engineering and Electronics,1998, (7):24-26,31.
    [218]Wei G-W. Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2008,21 (8): 833-836.
    [219]Lo T-P, Guo S-J. Effective weighting model based on the maximum deviation with uncertain information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37: 8445-8449.
    [220]Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J. Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010, 37 (7):5491-5497.
    [221]Kim G, Park C S, Yoon K P. Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,1997,50 (1):23-33.
    [222]Shih H S, Shyur H J, Lee E S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2007,45 (7-8):801-813.
    [223]Wu J-Z, Zhang Q. Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entropy[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38 (1):916-922.
    [224]Li D-F, Chen G-H, Huang Z-G. Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets[J]. Information Sciences,2010,180 (9):1591-1609.
    [225]He Y, Wang Q, Zhou D. Extension of the expected value method for multiple attribute decision making with fuzzy data[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2009,22 (1): 63-66.
    [226]Li D-F. Linear programming method for MADM with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37 (8):5939-5945.
    [227]Xu Z S. On method of mulit-attribute group decision making under pure linguistic information[J]. Controal and Decision,2004,19 (7):778-781.
    [228]Davey B A, Priestley H A. Introduction to lattices and order[M]:Cambridge UnivPr,2002.
    [229]Dietrich B, Hoffman A. On greedy algorithms, partially ordered sets, and submodular functions[J]. IBM Journal of Research and Development,2003,47 (1): 25-30.
    [230]Choo E U, Wedley W C. A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2004, 31:896-908.
    [231]Xu Z. A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,156: 1101-1112.
    [232]Chen T Y, Li C H. Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures:A comparative analysis[J]. Information Sciences,2010,180 (21): 4207-4222.
    [233]Wang T C, Lee H D. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009, 36 (5):8980-8985.
    [234]Rao R, Patel B. A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection[J]. Materials & Design,2010,31 (10): 4738-4747.
    [235]于义彬,王本德,柳澎等,李卫.具有不确定信息的风险型多目标决策理论及应用[J].中国管理科学,2003,(6):9-13.
    [236]徐泽水.部分权重信息下对方案有偏好的多属性决策法[J].控制与决策,2004,(1):85-88.
    [237]Larbani M. Multiobjective problems with fozzy parameters and games against nature[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2010,161 (20):2642-2660.
    [238]Chen Y-W, Larbani M. Two-person zero-sum game approach for fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157 (1): 34-51.
    [239]Milnor J, Games against nature. Decision Processes, Eds. Thrall, Coombs and Davis, in, Wiley, London,1954.
    [240]Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game theory[M]:MIT Press,1991.
    [241]Parthasarathy T, Raghavan T E S. Some topics in two-person games[M]: American Elsevier Pub. Co.,1971.
    [242]Gilboa I. Questions in Decision Theory[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2010,2:1-19.
    [243]Liu B. Uncertainty Theory[M]. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2010.
    [244]Wong B K, Lai V S. A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management:1998-2009[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2011,129 (1):157-168.
    [245]Gau W L, Buehrer D J. Vague sets[J]. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics,1993,23 (2):610-614.
    [246]Bustince H, Buehrer D J. Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,79 (3):403-405.
    [247]Xu Z, Cai X. Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2010,9:359-368.
    [248]Ye J. Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2010,205 (1):202-204.
    [249]Vlachos I K, Sergiadis G D. Intuitionistic fuzzy information-Applications to pattern recognition[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters,2007,28 (2):197-206.
    [250]Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets:Theory and Applications[M]. Heidelberg:Physica-Verlag,1999.
    [251]刘琳,陈云翔,葛志浩.基于正态分布区间数的概率测度及多属性决策[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(4):652-654.
    [252]汪新凡,肖满生.基于正态分布区间数的信息不完全的群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2010,25(10):1494-1498,1506.
    [253]李德毅,刘常昱.论正态云模型的普适性[J].中国工程科学,2004,6(8):28-34.
    [254]王坚强,李康健.基于直觉正态模糊集结算子的多准则决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,发表中.
    [255]李德毅,孟海军,史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究和发展,1995,32(6):16-21.
    [256]刘常昱,李德毅,杜鹢,韩旭.正态云模型的统计分析[J].信息与控制,2005,34(2):236-239.
    [257]于少伟,史忠科.基于正态分布数区间的逆向云新算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(10):2021-2026.
    [258]刘常昱,冯芒,戴晓军.基于云X信息的逆向云新算法[J].系统仿真学报,2004,16(11):2417-2420.
    [259]张飞舟,范跃祖,沈程智.基于隶属云发生器的智能控制[J].航空学报,1999,20(1):89-92.
    [260]Wang S L, Li D R, Shi W Z, Li D Y, Wang X Z. Cloud mode-based spatial data mining[J]. Annals of GIS,2003,9 (1-2):60-70.
    [261]吕辉军,王晔,李德毅.逆向云在定性评价中的应用[J].计算机学报,2003,26(8):1009-1014.
    [262]Binder K, Monte-Carlo Methods, in:Mathematical Tools for Physicists[M]: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,2006, pp.249-280.
    [263]Bustince H, Burillo P. Structures on intuitionistic fuzzy relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,78 (3):293-303.
    [264]Morita K. Automotive power source in 21st century[J]. JSAE Review,2003, 24 (1):3-7.
    [265]Maggetto G, Van Mierlo J. Electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles:state of the art and perspectives[J]. Annales de Chimie Science des Materiaux,2001,26 (4):9-26.
    [266]Sperling D, Setiawan W, Hungerford D. The target market for methanol fuel[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,1995,29 (1):33-45.
    [267]Harding G G. Electric vehicles in the next millennium[J]. Journal of Power Sources,1999,78(1-2):193-198.
    [268]Tzeng G H, Lin C W, Opricovic S. Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33 (11):1373-1383.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700